EXPOSING The Myths Of The Vedic Era | Dostcast 177 w/

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
  • Jay Vardhan Singh is a Ph.D scholar in Indian History at JNU. He also runs a UA-cam channel where he posts about the lesser known facts and nuances of Indian history.
    In this podcast,
    ▸ Vinamre and Jay talk about the history of ancient India
    ▸ How literature and architecture helps in writing history of a place
    ▸ How wars were fought in the ancient times
    You can follow Jay on:
    UA-cam: / @jayvardhansingh
    Twitter: Jayvtweets?t=cwXm...
    Timestamps:
    0:00 Intro
    0:54 Was the Vedic Era real or fiction?
    5:48 Do you consider religion as history or fiction?
    12:05 The history of the Mauryan Empire
    16:18 Why is ancient Indian history mostly oral?
    22:36 Modern war vs ancient war
    33:44 What makes Ashoka great?
    38:12 Did Ashoka really change after the Kalinga War?
    39:35 Why Arthashastra is not a reliable source of history?
    46:16 Xerxes invaded India?
    49:34 Persian and Greek invasion in India
    56:10 History of empires you've never heard of
    1:01:59 The future of historians
    1:03:32 Must-read books on Indian history
    1:06:50 Conclusion
    Listen to the audio version of the full podcasts at -
    Spotify - open.spotify.com/show/70vrbHe...
    Google Podcast - podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
    Apple Podcast - podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast...
    ==
    This is the official channel for Dostcast, a podcast by Vinamre Kasanaa.
    Connect with me
    Instagram: / vinamrekasanaa
    Twitter: / vinamrekasanaa
    Dostcast on Instagram: / dostcast
    Dostcast on Facebook: / dostcast
    Dostcast on Snapchat: / dostcast
    ==
    Contact Us
    For business inquiries: dostcast@egiplay.com
    ==
    #Dostcast
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 404

  • @4z4d
    @4z4d 19 днів тому +1

    Shlokas were passed on orally for tones preservation.
    But written texts were also there but were burnt when 30+ universities and 100+ temple schools library were burnt down

  • @beluga9596
    @beluga9596 Рік тому +71

    Bro I love this guy and his work !!!
    His coverage is really good and very under rated !!!

    • @phantom.2912
      @phantom.2912 Рік тому

      Good boy.

    • @angryshirts
      @angryshirts Рік тому +2

      Sakshaat Beluga, ap aur yahan..😱

    • @uncle_1037
      @uncle_1037 Рік тому

      @@angryshirts Sasta vala beluga hai vo

    • @AbleLawrence
      @AbleLawrence 2 місяці тому

      He pays attention to detail and it’s clear he loves doing this

  • @theharshpuniya
    @theharshpuniya Рік тому +28

    It was an interesting watch,keep making such amazing stuff 😊👍

  • @omkar7372
    @omkar7372 Рік тому +34

    Ashoka accept Buddhism many years before Kalinga war ...

    • @placeboeffect7031
      @placeboeffect7031 Рік тому +4

      Asoka was a lay buddhist,did take up buddhism as in pravajja post kalinga war.

    • @omkar7372
      @omkar7372 Рік тому +3

      @@placeboeffect7031 bro read again don't argue

    • @placeboeffect7031
      @placeboeffect7031 Рік тому +2

      @@omkar7372 he was a born Buddhist I said.

    • @omkar7372
      @omkar7372 Рік тому

      @@placeboeffect7031 yes he accept Buddhism before Kalinga war even before he kills his brothers

    • @placeboeffect7031
      @placeboeffect7031 Рік тому +1

      @@omkar7372 he did not kill his brothers 😂😂

  • @friendlyvimana
    @friendlyvimana Рік тому +3

    It was super dope of Vinamre to put the youtube channel link in the title itself.

  • @friendlyvimana
    @friendlyvimana Рік тому +17

    1:02:00 the future of 'history of india
    Was my one of my fav segments from the whole podcast.
    Jay said "geneticists" would help alot in verifying the migrations and also telling new stories of migrations.
    I jyst want to make an addition (and also want to know if what I'm saying is right), that:
    With the decipherment of the millions of untranslated sanskrit (and probably even in many more languages) texts, we would inevitably stumble upon new avenues of our written history.
    And that may disrupt the whole present of indian history.

    • @tvrulz46
      @tvrulz46 Рік тому +3

      Yes but are people actively translating these texts?? Im afraid they may be rotting away without people ever knowing

    • @Rishabhgoyal14002
      @Rishabhgoyal14002 Рік тому

      @@tvrulz46 super negative take

    • @tvrulz46
      @tvrulz46 Рік тому +1

      @@Rishabhgoyal14002 But its a serious question. Who and how many people are employed in sitting down and translating this all day?

    • @Rishabhgoyal14002
      @Rishabhgoyal14002 Рік тому +1

      @@tvrulz46 i understand that you are actually concerned about this, but you did come off as a toxic comment there

  • @thrustydraculla15
    @thrustydraculla15 Рік тому +11

    Nice podcast we need this man back to back

  • @rishikeshwagh
    @rishikeshwagh 2 місяці тому +9

    Jay Vardhan is doing great service to Indian history

  • @SANCHIT18OCT
    @SANCHIT18OCT Рік тому +12

    Brilliant video
    Kudos to Jay Vardhan

  • @joydeeproy1580
    @joydeeproy1580 Рік тому +14

    In my opinionm Jay Vardhan Singh is India's best historian past and present. Not only his knowledge is amazing but he does not twist the facts. Always so interesting listening to him.
    I would urge him to go into DNA analysis of India

    • @A.K.M.333
      @A.K.M.333 4 місяці тому

      That point some people tell history as story but Mr Jay tells history with fact that what I like more about him

  • @eliotanderson6554
    @eliotanderson6554 Рік тому +34

    With this podcast I think he is going to be a big youtuber

  • @rishx
    @rishx Рік тому +7

    I want as much clarity as him in my life to say NO to everything I disagree with.

  • @Noname-oq9mk
    @Noname-oq9mk Рік тому +11

    Very knowledgeable 🕉️🇮🇳

  • @ashutoshshringari9
    @ashutoshshringari9 Рік тому +1

    Hi. where can i find your newletter?

  • @dp_1512
    @dp_1512 Рік тому +17

    Bahut badiya video hai, bring this history enthusiast back please 😇😃🙏🏻

  • @WhistleMaster
    @WhistleMaster Рік тому +19

    22:00 The reason the ancient Indians invented Sanskrit and cultivated a scholars or Brahmins whose mandate was to preserve the knowledge through an oral tradition!
    This is precisely why the Xian and Islamic invaders killed Brahmins and Pandits whenever they could. And they are still doing it - from Kashmir to Tamil Nadu(Dravidian parties).

  • @dharmeshparikh7837
    @dharmeshparikh7837 5 місяців тому

    Interesting discussion.

  • @witchilich
    @witchilich 11 місяців тому

    1:00:06 What about Satrubhanja and the Nagas of Vindyatabi that ruled from Keonjhar. In his Asanpat inscription he talked about a war where all the Naga tribes united to defeat the last Kushanas(and there royal family jumped to Ganga and commited suicide). If you read the story of Kaundinya(Kalinga merchant who became a Cambodian king) and the Funan , the Nagas were a tribe in ancient Cambodia.

  • @sauravroychow
    @sauravroychow Рік тому +205

    East West North South, Sir Abhijit Chawda is the best historian. He was present in all historic events, and saw with his own eyes.

    • @kishandubey7882
      @kishandubey7882 Рік тому +2

      He is a cheap nautankibaaz

    • @randomturd1415
      @randomturd1415 Рік тому +55

      Zoroaster hindu tha😱
      Nepal me caste system nhi Varna Jati follow krte hai😭 caste to British ne bnaya
      Sab log hindu the 🤡 Europe me invade and massacre/rape krne wale indians the😘
      He should've stuck to being an astrophysicist lmao

    • @existentialbaby
      @existentialbaby Рік тому +24

      aur aur ye kaun bolega
      " raja ram mohan roy 'UTILITARIAN' Christian tha..ab mere se iska matlab na poochhna"

    • @gampa_10_31
      @gampa_10_31 Рік тому +35

      While debunking Aryan dravidian theories, I really wanted to know his stance on the difference of language families, But he refused to even talk about that, and just said all these language families are Western propaganda 🤡🤡🤡, He doesn't even know that to divide language families, there are some proper criterias, Really hard to believe he is an scientist

    • @sauravroychow
      @sauravroychow Рік тому +15

      @@gampa_10_31 I agree. My comment was encased in sarcasm, as he suddenly became a history torchbearer among the yuppies.

  • @b6-45sameerkhola9
    @b6-45sameerkhola9 Рік тому

    Which spotify geeta recording vinamre is talking about?

  • @omsingh8625
    @omsingh8625 3 місяці тому +1

    Jai Vardhan is the best in analysing facts on the।basi of historical accounts and physical evidence s,so he is a historian in real sense,he is not a story teller, this is the basic। difference with others

  • @prashantchauhan4368
    @prashantchauhan4368 Рік тому

    What is the name of Gita Podcast on Spotify

  • @thakur_sahab1991
    @thakur_sahab1991 8 місяців тому +5

    Well planned cities of IVC then nomadic life of vedic period ? It is hard to believe.

  • @APJ89MYS
    @APJ89MYS Рік тому +11

    What's the difference b/w this headline and the headline of third-rate news channels?

  • @rishx
    @rishx Рік тому +1

    whats the name of that rajasthan migration book?

  • @AbcDef-gw4dg
    @AbcDef-gw4dg Рік тому +1

    Great podcast

  • @shantanulasurkar1345
    @shantanulasurkar1345 10 місяців тому

    Great podcast 👍👍

  • @aa_572
    @aa_572 Рік тому +10

    Finally real historian on podcast.

  • @friendlyvimana
    @friendlyvimana Рік тому +12

    Hi Jay Vardhan bhai, this was amazing to listen to, Vaad wali conversation se bhi zada achha laga, asaan shabdon mein (hindi) mein tha, aur ek birdseye view mil gaya reasoning ke sath.
    But i have just one question
    Here @53:50 you say that nothing was industrialised..
    I am not against it, but from what I've heard is that we used to produce textile, steel, and spices at a somewhat industrial level then.
    Morover, the unstichhed silk garments greeks wore, alot of them came from the then indian merchants.
    (Probably)Thereby, telling the greeks that we are territory worth looting.
    So, my question is that, can we say that what i know is true, or is it true for a later time period, and how conclusive is the evidence which suggests that.
    I ask the conclusiveness of the evidence, because i want to know if a future discovery can change our view.
    Thanks bhai itta read karna pada, pr bhai literally you are the best historian in india right now.
    Please keep doing what you are doing 🙂.

  • @amodhsaxena6103
    @amodhsaxena6103 Місяць тому

    I have said this, and I’ll say it again, this is the only podcast worth listening to!

  • @sridharbhatk3510
    @sridharbhatk3510 Рік тому +7

    I appreciate both of u.
    Being a rtd.teacher,I could learn better perspective of understanding history.
    As some one histriogr had said "History is an enquiry of past."
    We can never say "......this is real history".
    I appreciate u for trying to go out from any kind of narrow mindedness & prejudices.
    If any scholars from any walks of life try to understand anything as a human being,such society will be good to live in.

  • @thelogicless9040
    @thelogicless9040 8 місяців тому

    Zabardast

  • @riya_beautifulchaos
    @riya_beautifulchaos 3 місяці тому +1

    Aise rare gems kaise dhundh ke laate ho Vinamre ji! Knowledgeable conversation! No show sha. Simple and valid questions. I have often come to know about new influencers from your channel.

  • @66sbjaygoti80
    @66sbjaygoti80 Рік тому

    Amazing podcast

  • @R3DBLAZE
    @R3DBLAZE Рік тому +10

    The average dostcast fan’s urge to call this podcast The vinamre kasana experience 😭..

  • @nykhilist
    @nykhilist Рік тому

    Okay right of the bat. I fking miss the outre theme song. Vinamre bhai please bring that back.

  • @Noname-oq9mk
    @Noname-oq9mk Рік тому +8

    Love from Siliguri 🕉️🚩

  • @Jha.Pranav
    @Jha.Pranav Рік тому +25

    Didn't know that Piyush Bnasal is also a historian! 😶😂
    Jokes apart i heard him on Vaad earlier and i really found him insightful!

  • @saurabh6453
    @saurabh6453 Рік тому +21

    Mahabharat was originally called jaya samhita ( 10 k shalokas) later become mahabhart ( 100k shalokas) so 900% of it was added later.
    During the period of bhoj raja it had 25k shalokas

    • @naveedemaar
      @naveedemaar Рік тому +14

      Correct I totally agree with you but 99% people still says all the 100k sholkas are authentic and they forget that there are many many versions of itihasa.

    • @arnavgupta9459
      @arnavgupta9459 9 місяців тому +3

      Deos was the ancient Greece author (before 2000 bce) who in his work mentioned about 1 lakh verses epic. Read Ramesh Chandru - mahabharat myth or history

    • @mukundayadav108
      @mukundayadav108 8 місяців тому +3

      No.. They were not added later,
      There is a popular theory about three of the Mahābhārata. jaya being the original as narrated by ved vyas 8,800 shlokas, folloed by Bhārata, 24,000 shlokas and the one known as Mahābhārata, narrated by ugrashravā consisting o 100,000 shlokas. Hoever, till date there have been no separate manuscript of Bhārata Or jaya found to support the above theory.
      Then again in the sixty-second chapter of the Ādi Parva, before reciting to narrate the story to Janamjayeya, vaishampayna explaining to the Importance of the Mahābhārata, says, ‘These 100,000 shlokas have been comosed by ved vyas..

    • @mukundayadav108
      @mukundayadav108 8 місяців тому +1

      @meteor541 the sixty-second chapter o the Ādi Parva, before starting to narrate the story to janamejaya, vaishampāyana, while exlaining to him the importance of the Mahābhārata, says, ‘These 100,000 shlokas have been composed by ved vyas , the son of Satyavati. This great story o the birth and lives o the rogeny of Bharata is called the Mahābhārata.’ In the same chapter Ādi Parva 62, vaishampāyana tells janamejaya
      ‘This itihāsa by the should be heard by all who desire or victory.’ It seems to suggest that jaya is another name or this history o Bhāratas-the Mahābhārata. The above the context-setting shlokas added by Ugrashravā and Vaishampāyana are in addition to the 100,000 shlokas of Vyāsa. It is very unlikely that additions, modifications and deletions have happened to the shlokas over years. But the theory of the evolution of Jaya into Bhārata intoMahābhārata seems unlikely based on what the text tells us.
      

    • @NobleDorito8698
      @NobleDorito8698 6 місяців тому

      No such evidence has been found so cope

  • @friendlyvimana
    @friendlyvimana Рік тому +2

    1:06:30 happened with me when i found him via vaad

  • @kushalkarmodiya
    @kushalkarmodiya 2 місяці тому

    30:20 Master and Commander

  • @raosaheb5637
    @raosaheb5637 Місяць тому

    mahabharat itself advises that the book jaya was the original text and everything else was added by later generations per their memory. thats why some things are repeated in mahabharat

  • @shyamalkumarsowmondal7704
    @shyamalkumarsowmondal7704 11 місяців тому +1

    Hare krishna

  • @jashseta7927
    @jashseta7927 Рік тому +2

    How does one know that certain paragraphs are added later on and was not part of the core text?

    • @RnR1001
      @RnR1001 Рік тому +4

      Because the things that are in the text may not be suited for that time period. Example has been given in this discussion that there is the mention of Greeks and huns. Indians would have known about Greeks only after 500 BCE, same thing with Huns, they would have only have known about Huns after 500 CE.

    • @jashseta7927
      @jashseta7927 Рік тому +1

      Isn't there a possibility that we might be knowing about Greeks and Huns at the time when the original text was written?
      Similarly, the mentioned about a paragraph from Mahabharat where Bhishma is explaining to Yudhishthir, they mention that it describes reality of Mauryan Empire so it must have been added at that time... What if this dialogue in Mahabharat is present from the beginning and if at all it describes reality of Mauryan Empire, the Mauryans must have taken inspiration from this text and set up their kingdom inspired by this dialogue.
      Please correct if I am thinking in wrong direction

    • @booksanimeenthusiast3802
      @booksanimeenthusiast3802 6 місяців тому

      ​@@jashseta7927Do you think these books were available so freely in market that , ministers of maurya empire read it and then thought of doing exactly like that.
      Or is it easier for a person to make fictional character discuss out the details of management, governance while he is living under empire and observing it.

  • @vikasmudigonda188
    @vikasmudigonda188 2 місяці тому +1

    There is no Mahabharath without Bhagvath geetha.

  • @friendlyvimana
    @friendlyvimana Рік тому +10

    Poora comment section itna gusse mein kyun hai yahaan?
    Bhai ne Mahabharata/Ramayana ke baare mein ek shabd nhi bola, atleast bura to nhi bola.

    • @akashsingh4005
      @akashsingh4005 Рік тому

      Abhijit chavda ke chode aaye hai yha, unko vhi sunna hai jo vo chahte hai.

  • @ashwani6527
    @ashwani6527 Рік тому +13

    Is doesnt matter if its a myth or reality . What it says matter most .

    • @nameless7060
      @nameless7060 Рік тому +4

      Underrated comment ✨

    • @kishandubey7882
      @kishandubey7882 Рік тому +7

      Yeah .......but they can't be stated as historical events....!

    • @existentialbaby
      @existentialbaby Рік тому

      dharti pe aa gaya baawa

    • @vedicarya7
      @vedicarya7 Рік тому +1

      ​@@nameless7060 they are , he didn't even discuss dwarka

    • @vedicarya7
      @vedicarya7 Рік тому +1

      As per this logic , even Buddha didn't exist because not a single evidence is there which is of 5th or 4th centurybce , oldest stupa dates back to only 3rd or 2nd century bce.

  • @DocSingh369
    @DocSingh369 Рік тому +10

    JVS is just brilliant!

    • @sagnik3556
      @sagnik3556 Рік тому

      yvs?

    • @DocSingh369
      @DocSingh369 Рік тому

      @@sagnik3556 now edited*

    • @akashsingh4005
      @akashsingh4005 Рік тому +1

      Truly well read guy. Not like abhijit chavda rayta wing conspiracy theorist.

  • @thakur_sahab1991
    @thakur_sahab1991 8 місяців тому +1

    Arthshastra to devnagari lipi me sanskrit bhasha me hai kya koi manuscript uplabdh hai arthshastra ka

  • @VELTROS
    @VELTROS Рік тому +6

    He is defaming rajputs 🤡 and his afgani ancestors claim ancestory from rajputs wtf 🤣

  • @RoseSharma-nk4ui
    @RoseSharma-nk4ui 4 місяці тому +1

    Means malechh were outside these 4 categories means today's scheduled castes and tribe people

  • @Odyvers
    @Odyvers Рік тому +5

    Ramayan and Mahabharat are history 💯many proofs their no one denied.. Know real history of #BHARAT (not believed in foreign corrupt historian)

    • @milindpanho
      @milindpanho 9 місяців тому +3

      अनपढ़ गैंग 😂

    • @Odyvers
      @Odyvers 9 місяців тому +2

      @@milindpanho may be your parents not managed to teach you well.

  • @rahuls8764
    @rahuls8764 Рік тому

    Master and commander.. russell crowe movie

  • @Sam.Ray1974
    @Sam.Ray1974 Рік тому +1

    Didn't liked logo what does it mean

  • @Ivvanir
    @Ivvanir 5 днів тому

    The Vedic Aryan culture,appears with the forced implementation of endogamy, Varna, jati system in 100AD first century AD.
    The Vedas, Sanskrit, Manusmriti, Endogamy, Varna, Jati all appear in the first century AD and not 1500bc because the male biased Steppe ancestry had merged with the AASI to create the ANI population prevalent until 100AD.

  • @PoonamMohite-db8bj
    @PoonamMohite-db8bj 9 місяців тому +1

    THIS VIDEO GOOD, INFORMATIVE.
    ACTUALLY TO SAY RAMAYAN, MAHABHARAT IS A TV SERIAL 😂.
    ANCIENT INDIAN HISTORY IS ALL ABOUT BUDDHISM, LORD BUDDHA AND FAMOUS BUDDHIST EMPERORS OF HARYANKA, SISHUNAG DYNASTY. EMPEROR ASHOK, EMPEROR MENANDER, EMPEROR KANISHK, EMPEROR HARSHAVARDHAN. REST EVERYTHING BOGUS, FICTITIOUS.

    • @abhishekgurav6584
      @abhishekgurav6584 8 місяців тому

      We can expect this shit talk from Buddhists . Don't forget shunga empire btw 😂💯

    • @Parmeshwari-nb7tx
      @Parmeshwari-nb7tx 3 місяці тому

      Nav boddh joker😂😂

  • @SamTheOwl
    @SamTheOwl Місяць тому

    something on Dr Ruchika Sharma?

  • @c.augustedupin8860
    @c.augustedupin8860 Рік тому +4

    the angry reply on comment section reveals the level illiteracy in india.

    • @user-db7nr2zz5w
      @user-db7nr2zz5w 26 днів тому

      तुमने ही तय कर दिया की बिरोध करने वालो का ज्ञान 😂😂? ये बतला रहा है तुम कितने ज्ञानी हो 👍

    • @c.augustedupin8860
      @c.augustedupin8860 26 днів тому

      @@user-db7nr2zz5w ??? i don't understand Hindi.

  • @mukulrjain
    @mukulrjain Рік тому +4

    Dear host, please don't talk like your personal conversation, it is for the audience. And 2nd as you are visible on podcast, just want to tell you, get some brand as sponsor and have a shave.
    Rest all is best.

  • @manan4614
    @manan4614 19 днів тому

    Finally 😭😭😭😭🙏i can trust this guy

  • @everythingido9503
    @everythingido9503 Рік тому +1

    Piyush bansal doing podcast !!

  • @sushantbhalbar5507
    @sushantbhalbar5507 8 місяців тому +1

    are apne title kya diya hai . mahabharat - myth or real?
    uske upar to kuch baat hi nahi kiya

  • @shubhanginisinghshekhawat9404
    @shubhanginisinghshekhawat9404 Рік тому +1

    Isn’t the governance mechanism of mauryan empire covered in megasthenes book indica

  • @y1.5
    @y1.5 Рік тому +21

    Next do Harry Potter is myth or reality

  • @ckastic
    @ckastic 10 місяців тому

    he should do podcast in Hindi now

  • @SMASH_REVIEWS
    @SMASH_REVIEWS Рік тому

    Nagade in Kesari movie

  • @ved3346
    @ved3346 2 місяці тому +1

    Chanakya/ kautilya is mythical character

  • @adityatalekar88
    @adityatalekar88 Рік тому

    59:00

  • @naman6368
    @naman6368 Рік тому

    War drums i think nagada

  • @vinto1586
    @vinto1586 4 місяці тому

    but then how is then the original author credited?.. if ved vyasa wrote mahabharat , how can someone add something to it? and i am sure ved vyasa wasnt alive to keep writing 10th or 11th editions of the mahabharat..... was it crowd sourced? was ved vyasa like a group of authors whose pen name was ved vyasa.. was it like a position.... that the successors could edit the religious text?
    for example : i cant add 3 chapters to game of thrones ... and call it layered novel/text , its not my text to edit...
    Plus i dont think Indian ancient history can be carbon dated to the exact age .....especially the satya yug , treta and dwapar because the indian knowledge system followed oral tradition.... transference was oral in nature by way of recitation, so even if our historical texts are carbon dated.... it would only give us a recent date because only later on it was brought to print.... so if you apply western standards to our history it wont fit , because its not one size fits all

  • @drawingkids6067
    @drawingkids6067 Рік тому

    Dna study and internet is different thing but digging and exavation it so low and slow government doesn't provide budget to Asi archeologist don't get paid and large part of history is still hidden under ground.

  • @NativeVsColonial
    @NativeVsColonial 11 місяців тому

    41:47 The opposite of Swachha (Clean) is Mlechha (Dirty). It has nothing to do with the Us Vs Them thinking you are imposing.
    Dharma says this:
    Source: Maha Upanishad 6.71-75
    Sanskrit transcript:
    अयं निजः परो वेति गणना लघुचेतसाम्।
    उदारचरितानां तु वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम्॥
    Sanskrit Transliteration:
    ayaṃ nijaḥ paro veti gaṇanā laghucetasām।
    udāracaritānāṃ tu vasudhaiva kuṭumbakam॥
    Hindi translation:
    यह मेरा है, वह पराया है, ऐसे छोटें विचार के व्यक्ति करते हैं।
    उच्च चरित्र वाले लोग समस्त संसार को ही परिवार मानते हैं॥
    English translation:
    ❝ This is mine, that is his, say the small-minded,

    • @abhijithcheneri7827
      @abhijithcheneri7827 11 місяців тому +3

      Mleccha originally meant "foreign " in Vedic texts and later on became dirty .

    • @NativeVsColonial
      @NativeVsColonial 11 місяців тому

      @@abhijithcheneri7827 Give me the verse.

    • @darkprince2-xs3lf
      @darkprince2-xs3lf 3 місяці тому

      @@abhijithcheneri7827 the vedic texts were not directives of conquest, you colonized pathetic. they were aids to Enlightenment and repositories of tradition. You are projecting abrahamist intolerance onto these texts.

    • @EntropyInfo
      @EntropyInfo 2 місяці тому

      Kavi Bhushan poem on Chtrapathi Shivaji Maharaj​@@NativeVsColonial

  • @prashantkumarsingh285
    @prashantkumarsingh285 5 місяців тому

    What about Gita.

  • @ritashaarora3269
    @ritashaarora3269 9 місяців тому

    The things they describe like elevation etc cant exist a few thousand years ago. We do not even get any archaeology to that as we are getting 8000 years sites for now.

  • @adityatalekar88
    @adityatalekar88 Рік тому

    39:00

  • @anshumantiwari7525
    @anshumantiwari7525 Рік тому +1

    he could have asked much more better questions

  • @satyawanshekhawat3841
    @satyawanshekhawat3841 8 місяців тому +4

    Historically accurate. Loved it. These present day pseudo historians tilting to the right, like chawda, are manipulative and not accurate. I loved Singhs reliance on facts.

  • @drsanjaykumar3448
    @drsanjaykumar3448 4 місяці тому

    Contradictory use of terminology . Descriptive means which describes the prevelant scenerio and prescriptive means what should be the ideal scenario

    • @prateeksingh5333
      @prateeksingh5333 3 місяці тому

      Apni shanka hai ek baar me boldo kitni jagah answer dunga tumhara 😂

  • @satellitecommunication4430
    @satellitecommunication4430 Рік тому

    Yes…the Greeks assimilated in the Indian culture.

  • @naman6368
    @naman6368 Рік тому +5

    Mekro yaar project dena tha tu pehle nikal deta yeh wala ep

  • @SANSKAAR07
    @SANSKAAR07 Рік тому +6

    Still finding some Mahabharat discussion in this podcast😑

  • @abhishektyagi4172
    @abhishektyagi4172 Рік тому +2

    He said nothing wrong about ramayana and mahabharata

  • @adityatalekar88
    @adityatalekar88 Рік тому

    19:30

  • @Zorawarsingh001
    @Zorawarsingh001 Рік тому +3

    Rajputs are the same ancient and original kshtriyas.

  • @Indrauta
    @Indrauta Рік тому +2

    Why the people are so filled with ignorance and hatred?

  • @Ayushsharma-qc7qx
    @Ayushsharma-qc7qx Рік тому

    ❤️❤️❤️

  • @therajputanaempire4105
    @therajputanaempire4105 Рік тому +6

    Ye Jo host he Vinamara Gujjar kasana sale iska ek hi motive he Rajputon ko apna papa banana, Lekin Jay ne gayab jawab diya bolti band ho gyi Saale ki,🤣🤣😆

  • @salmanshaik1298
    @salmanshaik1298 16 днів тому

    Do you guys want me to sleep on on the pathway?

  • @hardiksharma9498
    @hardiksharma9498 Рік тому +4

    Written texts majority Sara jla diya invaders na .

    • @RnR1001
      @RnR1001 Рік тому +3

      It would not be possible. You are just saying that just to preserve your belief.

    • @hardiksharma9498
      @hardiksharma9498 Рік тому +1

      @@RnR1001 manu things are still there brother.

  • @akashsingh-oe2xt
    @akashsingh-oe2xt Рік тому +1

    Do a podcast with science journey

  • @akashsingh-oe2xt
    @akashsingh-oe2xt Рік тому +2

    Jai bhim namo buddhay jai manavta jai gujjar samrat kaniska ki

    • @Parmeshwari-nb7tx
      @Parmeshwari-nb7tx 3 місяці тому

      Kanishka toh videshi tha aur khud ko arya bolta tha toh ye jai bhim ke sath use kyu jod diya😂😂

    • @Parmeshwari-nb7tx
      @Parmeshwari-nb7tx 3 місяці тому

      Ye jai bhim wale bhi joker hote hai😂

  • @vikramadityasinghpawar7265
    @vikramadityasinghpawar7265 7 місяців тому

    Kautilya historic figure nahi tha megasthanese aur contemporary jain aur Buddhist sources mei bhi chanakya ya kautilya ke baare mei kuch nahi kaha gaya

    • @chitragatha-anshudeepdhusi5752
      @chitragatha-anshudeepdhusi5752 2 місяці тому

      है

    • @manojkumar-jj2rm
      @manojkumar-jj2rm 2 місяці тому +1

      Indica mein budh ka koi jikar nahi hain budh bhi farzi hain

    • @Shubhamkumar-fr9hl
      @Shubhamkumar-fr9hl 2 місяці тому

      abe ghochu chanakya ka mention buddhist jain grantho me bhi h,btw ek baat bta megasthenes ne buddha ka bhi zikr nhi kiya mtlb buddha bhi fake h😂😂😂

  • @omkar7372
    @omkar7372 Рік тому +4

    Why don't you says leftist history

  • @litmus2450
    @litmus2450 Рік тому +2

    Podcast 😅😅

  • @devanshsingh4646
    @devanshsingh4646 11 місяців тому +1

    No surprise he is from jnu ...

  • @bhaveshdk
    @bhaveshdk Рік тому

    Ï

  • @AyushSharma-cc4cc
    @AyushSharma-cc4cc Рік тому +1

    Bhai aap vahi ho Kya happedent ke Aad wale?

  • @nav9005
    @nav9005 Рік тому +1

    1:11:43 he is biased on this point

    • @darkprince2490
      @darkprince2490 Місяць тому

      he is biased about everything - he is a JNU product

  • @amitrana045
    @amitrana045 Рік тому

    Nagada is known as dundhubhi

  • @unni.m1959
    @unni.m1959 24 дні тому

    JAWAHALWA NERU UNIVERSITY.
    thats all you need to know. Im not swallowing everything right leaning people say( im right ). Same goes for these people.