A RIDICULOUSLY AWESOME INTEGRAL WITH A BEAUTIFUL RESULT!!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @jkid1134
    @jkid1134 Рік тому +26

    Euler's wonderful *buuuurp* wonderful formula, Morty

  • @yoav613
    @yoav613 Рік тому +2

    Very nice! The one who came up with this integral is so creative!💯

  • @emanuellandeholm5657
    @emanuellandeholm5657 Рік тому +2

    Loved your previous result with the old Euler-Mascheroni and what not. This looks like another spicy boi!

  • @kappasphere
    @kappasphere Рік тому +5

    Why is it so hard for me to imagine Rick doing actual maths

  • @nhatnam7168
    @nhatnam7168 Рік тому +1

    omg beautiful solution

  • @MrWael1970
    @MrWael1970 Рік тому

    Very Smart Solution. Good job.

  • @SuperSilver316
    @SuperSilver316 Рік тому +1

    Yeah I think when you got to step that has e^(e^(2*i*x)), I substituted the definition of sine function in terms of complex exponentials. From there you can make a sub that z = e^(i*x), and then use residue theory on the resulting function. We can treat this result as if we integrated around a closed contour, maybe a circle with r > 1, this should give you 2*pi*e*i, then just find a quarter of this result and take the imaginary part? I think there might need to be more arguments for those last steps, but I think it’s a simple as your argument near the end, you get double the result if you integrate from [-pi/2, pi/2], but because the integrand is also periodic, this interval is the same thing as saying [0, pi], so from [0, 2pi], is just the other half of that result.
    Cool problem!

    • @SuperSilver316
      @SuperSilver316 Рік тому

      Oh yeah I figured it out, the function is also periodic so you use that to make the simplification.

  • @Kritic_lyr
    @Kritic_lyr Рік тому

    Solving along the vid and finally getting the answer pulls out a *WOAHHHHHHH* that'll put 7 year olds to shame lol. Awesome vid thanks !

  • @JirivandenAssem
    @JirivandenAssem Рік тому +1

    Dear sir, I am a highschooler and I have much trouble with understanding When you can and can not switch order of operations in integrals & summations. I have checked wikipedia but the kind of math notation is a bit above my understandings, could you help me out? Or do you know a good site to learn this? Love ur vids, I try to understand everything but this is just getting in the way now :)))

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  Рік тому +1

      It all depends on convergence. There are lots of ways to check convergence like I did in this video. For integrals its much easier cuz you can always look at a graph in wolfram alpha. For double sums it's a bit more difficult as you have to check for absolute convergence of the iterated sum. Check out math stackexchange, you'll find lots of comprehensive explanations.

    • @JirivandenAssem
      @JirivandenAssem Рік тому +1

      ​@@maths_505thx i now understand it well, also the example in this video is clear now !!

  • @Sai404wastaken
    @Sai404wastaken Рік тому +1

    Hey math505, (unrelated question) which books from springer do u recommend a student who is going to university.... the first topic is infinite sequence and series....

    • @Sai404wastaken
      @Sai404wastaken Рік тому +2

      Also, I've completed the following chapters: functions ,limits ,continuity and differentiability, differentiation and its application, indefinite and definite integration and area under curve....which topic should i start next?

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  Рік тому +2

      Real analysis by Rudin (also know as baby rudin) is an absolute classic

    • @Sai404wastaken
      @Sai404wastaken Рік тому

      @@maths_505 Thankyou ❤

  • @insouciantFox
    @insouciantFox Рік тому

    What's wrong with extending the imaginary part argument to csc(x)?

  • @morchel332
    @morchel332 Рік тому

    *I LIKE WHAT YOU GOT!*

  • @petterituovinem8412
    @petterituovinem8412 Рік тому +1

    now try to find an integral which result is e times pi times gamma

  • @ali97x52
    @ali97x52 Рік тому

    nice🙂

  • @jonathanhanon9372
    @jonathanhanon9372 Рік тому

    When I saw Im [e^(e^(2ix)) e^(ix)] / sin(x), I thought of rewriting it as Im [2 i e^(e^(2ix)) e^(ix)] / [e^(ix) - e^(-ix)] dx = 2 Im [i e^(e^(2ix))] / [1 - e^(-2ix)] dx
    As is mentioned in the video, because the original function is even * odd(odd) / odd, the resulting function is an even function.
    I then thought to make a substitution of z = e^(2ix), making dz = 2i z dx, or dx = dz / (2i z)
    This makes this 2 Im[i (e^z / (1-1/z)) / 2iz]
    Applying that this is an even function, we get Im(e^z / (1-z) dz)/2.
    This gives us that we can use residue theory to get the at the residue of z = 1 of simply e/2, and therefore, the integral is simply pi*e.

  • @Maths_3.1415
    @Maths_3.1415 Рік тому

    Noise

  • @sagnikbiswas3268
    @sagnikbiswas3268 Рік тому

    You love Taylor series, don’t you? Haha just messing with you, nice video!

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  Рік тому

      Ofcourse I love em!
      They're incredibly useful
      Infinite series in general are super handy

  • @ericthegreat7805
    @ericthegreat7805 Рік тому +1

    So the answer is 9/2 😅

  • @r2k314
    @r2k314 Рік тому

    That was awesome artistry as usual. (BTW I was wondering, if you had time to tell me if this is this a legitimate use of the gamma function: ua-cam.com/video/7_iWDyMPoJs/v-deo.html