Adam A500 Walkaround

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
  • Adam A500, an American six-seat twin-engine civil utility aircraft that was produced by Adam Aircraft Industries. The aircraft has a distinctive, unusual centerline thrust configuration where its two Continental Motors TSIO-550-E piston engines are mounted in push-pull configuration: one at the front and one at the back of its fuselage pod. It also features a high wing and a twin-boom tail with twin vertical stabilizers, which gives it a very unique and recognizable profile. Unfortunately, despite its innovative design, the Adam A500 faced various challenges and production was ceased following the bankruptcy of Adam Aircraft Industries.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 111

  • @sstearns2
    @sstearns2 11 місяців тому +35

    I was an engineer on the prototype at Scaled. If you look at the booms half way back there is a section that is a constant cross section. I think they pulled molds off of our original prototype, because when we first tried to fly it would not rotate on takeoff until it reached a speed that was much too high.
    We came in the next day and Burt had ordered the shop to build a support structure under the tail, cut the booms vertically, roll the fuselage forward three feet, and graft in a three foot plug with foam and fiberglass to glass it all back together. A little body work and paint and go fly. It was the last of the wild f’ing west days
    I think you can still see it in the shape of the booms.

    • @arcanondrum6543
      @arcanondrum6543 11 місяців тому +1

      Where did you go next?

    • @EllipsisAircraft
      @EllipsisAircraft 10 місяців тому

      😂
      I've heard several stories about early RAF aircraft also. Lopping off tails and extending wingtips to make it stable, etc.

  • @bretproud3336
    @bretproud3336 11 місяців тому +24

    The flight controls are aluminum because we couldn't get the composite ones to balance. Most of the engineers that designed things on that aircraft were not aircraft engineers. To save money they hired anybody with an engineering degree, so that's why a lot of things are not aviation normal on that aircraft. That's why there are no gear doors. That's why the induction heating systems on the front and rear engines are ridiculous. I actually flew on 509 many many years ago and I also flew on 504 which is the fuselage you have behind you. Good to see that there are some out there still

    • @arcanondrum6543
      @arcanondrum6543 11 місяців тому +1

      More people need to read your comment. I'll never be a Rutan fan and I first learned about him when it was trade rags only. The Internet was unknown to most.

    • @bretproud3336
      @bretproud3336 11 місяців тому +4

      Rutan didn't have anything to do with the design of the A500. It was just based on the M309 that he designed and built as a proof of concept. In fact when Rutan visited Adam Aircraft he was not impressed. He actually left halfway through the tour.

    • @arcanondrum6543
      @arcanondrum6543 11 місяців тому +1

      @@bretproud3336 Well, I've never heard Rutan take responsibility for anything that didn't turn out well.
      There will be plenty more fans to argue in your and Rutan's favor. Count me out of that herd.

    • @bretproud3336
      @bretproud3336 11 місяців тому

      Don't get me wrong. Rutan is a pompous ass in person. We were told not to look at him, don't talk to him, or anything. He is a brilliant designer. But he's arrogant.

    • @ericjohnstone5771
      @ericjohnstone5771 11 місяців тому

      Hey Brett! Thought of you when I saw this video.

  • @N807DS
    @N807DS 2 місяці тому +1

    Buying this airplane was a bold move and I admire and respect your mission. I own an Extra 400 and when you talked about your "parts bin" it put a big smile on my face. I consider myself luckier than you from the "inherited engineering" perspective. My path to satisfaction SHOULD be shorter. Good luck and safe flying

  • @MartyBecker
    @MartyBecker 11 місяців тому +15

    Great walk around! What an amazing aircraft.

  • @101jtag
    @101jtag 11 місяців тому +8

    We like to think of pilots as being on the rational side of the human spectrum, but owning and caring for an exotic gem like this is just plain crazy. Lunacy or love dunno but its just awesome. Thank you sir !

  • @air-headedaviator1805
    @air-headedaviator1805 11 місяців тому +9

    The other day at work me and the fellow line guys stumbled upon seeing y’alls flight of the Adam on Flight tracker. I didn’t expect such a unique aircraft to be a stones throw away!

  • @tomsamuelson767
    @tomsamuelson767 11 місяців тому +3

    When I was getting my private at KAPA I used to go over the the Adam facility and you could watch them assemble the aircraft. That was a tremendously thorough walk-through of a unique, beautiful airplane. Thanks for posting.

  • @EUC-lid
    @EUC-lid 11 місяців тому +5

    Glad to see you got a top notch CFI to ride in the back to check everyone out on the Adam A500.

    • @ErikJohnston
      @ErikJohnston  11 місяців тому +2

      Haha, yeah it was fun having Bryan there.

  • @ryankrueger3446
    @ryankrueger3446 11 місяців тому +5

    such a cool airplane! Nice cameo by Mr. Turner.:). Also love the Fieros in the background

    • @JustPlaneSilly
      @JustPlaneSilly 11 місяців тому +2

      Erik makes me sit in the back

  • @Growthat
    @Growthat 11 місяців тому +6

    Im usually not big on the look of Push/Pulls but this thing is freaking slick, I love it !

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 11 місяців тому +1

      The Bronco style twin boom with up-and-over h/v-stab design is perfect for push&pull planes imo.

    • @Growthat
      @Growthat 11 місяців тому +1

      @@davecrupel2817 I agree

  • @markriley141
    @markriley141 11 місяців тому +11

    Awesome video about this plane. There isn't much detailed information about it. Looking forward to in-flight video.

  • @facebook2k7
    @facebook2k7 11 місяців тому +1

    Wow if Dan is not famous by now he will be. Did not know that there are any flying examples. Gorgeous!

  • @greghorne8949
    @greghorne8949 11 місяців тому +3

    Thanks for sharing. Ran into an example of this aircraft after a flight to Georgetown SC a few years ago. Looked it up and did a little research on it. Always interesting to get insight into a Burt Rutan design.

  • @WARHAMMER-j5c
    @WARHAMMER-j5c 11 місяців тому +1

    Having a 1 of 3 is so amazing CONGRATULATIONS reason being why I have not seen any of these luxury planes in the sky thank you thank you so much for taking time out of your day for showing us such an incredible beauty of a plane. God Speed, Safe Travels, Fair Winds Good Sir.

  • @PlaneFunRC
    @PlaneFunRC 11 місяців тому +5

    Thank you so much for putting up this video. I thoroughly enjoyed it. This was one of Burt Rutan‘s finest designs. I have a giant scale, RC version of this plane. I love it.

  • @machpodfan
    @machpodfan 11 місяців тому +4

    Fascinating aircraft! Thank you for sharing it with us.

  • @noonehere1793
    @noonehere1793 11 місяців тому +7

    Beautiful machine and it looks like there is plenty of room for a couple of PT 6’s😉🙂🙂👍👍

    • @jetfixer3207
      @jetfixer3207 11 місяців тому +3

      There were 2 models, the A500 piston and the A700 twinjet. Rumor had it if there were to be a A600 it would have used the 700 nose, the 500 fuselage, and a single PT6 pusher. The way it was explained to me (true or false) a single PT6 was more expensive than the twin Williams FJ33's we were the launch customers for on for the A700, so the A600 never got much past the discussion phase.

    • @noonehere1793
      @noonehere1793 11 місяців тому

      @@jetfixer3207 thanks for the additional info!👍👍

  • @carlos76c
    @carlos76c 11 місяців тому +1

    Amazing walk around and beautiful aircraft !

  • @keepitsimpleengineer
    @keepitsimpleengineer 11 місяців тому +9

    Absolutely the finest walk-around I have ever seen.... ... .. .

    • @ErikJohnston
      @ErikJohnston  11 місяців тому

      Thanks a lot! Glad you liked it

  • @jetfixer3207
    @jetfixer3207 11 місяців тому +14

    I've worked on your airplane. Me and a close friend worked aircraft maintenance in Adam's flight test department. In fact, the empty fuselage in the background looks like Rick Adams personal bird, N504AX. N501AX which was seen in Miami Vice, being an uncertified experimental, was later scrapped. I have the overwing exit hatch. Those cowl fasteners are called "Ketema" fasteners, and I HATED them.

    • @scavenom2008
      @scavenom2008 11 місяців тому +2

      Ketema fasteners......about time I found the name. Thanks

    • @Bubbalass
      @Bubbalass 11 місяців тому

      @jetfixer3207 and @scavenom2008 What about the VG like mechanism(s) on the wing leading edge?

  • @michaelbrown2470
    @michaelbrown2470 11 місяців тому +4

    Leading Edge Triangles are what those leading-edge devices are called. One of the flight test engineers was Paul Robertson (Aeronautical Testing Service). He's still around here at the Arlington Airport in Washington (KAWO). Fly the airplane up here and I'm sure he'll tell you more about the development process than you can ingest.

  • @mnice59
    @mnice59 11 місяців тому +8

    A very humble pilot that loves and knows his girls. Most don't but this pilot makes me proud to be one.

  • @brettgerber795
    @brettgerber795 11 місяців тому +2

    I saw the thumbnail and wondered if this was Dan’s plane! See pics on his FB but great to see a video.

  • @davidleg
    @davidleg 11 місяців тому +4

    Great vid of a rear bird. I think the windshield heat aside from anti ice capabilities. It gives it flexibility for bird strikes

  • @jimhayes2786
    @jimhayes2786 11 місяців тому +6

    As a 337 owner I absolutely love the concept of this plane and remember going to see their tent at Airventure. I remember thinking the landing gear was carrier qualified. Too bad the economics didn't work.

    • @sstearns2
      @sstearns2 11 місяців тому +6

      I worked on the prototype at Scaled. Rick Adam owned a 337 and wanted the “next gen” push pull twin. Burt wanted him to do a boomerang configuration. I wanted to do a “next gen” Aerostar, but the guy with the gold makes the rules. The problem was not economics as much as weight. The useful load is very low. It’s very hard to beat the airplanes from the 60s-70s.

    • @jimhayes2786
      @jimhayes2786 11 місяців тому +1

      @@sstearns2 That’s amazing, I knew that he owned a 337 but I guess I missed that he was involved with the inception. As for economics, I was referring to its lack of load carrying capability making it generally undesirable as more than a 2 place aircraft….hard to sell.

    • @sstearns2
      @sstearns2 11 місяців тому +1

      @@jimhayes2786 Rick Adam paid for the prototype with his own money as I recall. He was the inception.

    • @jimhayes2786
      @jimhayes2786 11 місяців тому +1

      @@sstearns2 Yep read it too quickly and saw Rick Rutan, not Adam. Regardless cool group to work with.

  • @Czechbound
    @Czechbound 11 місяців тому +4

    That was great ! Greetings from prague CZ

  • @serverninjas
    @serverninjas 11 місяців тому +4

    Amazing video. Thank you for sharing. Learned allot about a very unique aircraft.

  • @arcanondrum6543
    @arcanondrum6543 11 місяців тому +2

    @Erik Johnston; I'm always grateful to you and the owners for your walkaround videos, thank you. Did Dan not want us to see the cabin area?

  • @LouisLupz
    @LouisLupz 10 місяців тому +1

    What a beauty!! Tks for sharing!!

  • @thecode3fc
    @thecode3fc 11 місяців тому +3

    Dang Ole Bryan with a “y”. 😊
    Cameo appearance on the back row. 🙃

  • @Democrazyandfreespeechfirst
    @Democrazyandfreespeechfirst 11 місяців тому +1

    Nice aircraft. Love it❤. Sad you didn’t go flying with it. They where awesome products. Also sad, they couldn’t make it successful. 😊

  • @ryanottis9468
    @ryanottis9468 11 місяців тому +1

    Nice video! Well done

  • @txkflier
    @txkflier 11 місяців тому +2

    Pretty neat. Nice walkaround.. 😎

  • @mikesatchell8317
    @mikesatchell8317 11 місяців тому +12

    "We're here to help" = extra useless weight. Sounds like what happened with the Starship! Thanks for the video!

    • @electricaviationchannelvid7863
      @electricaviationchannelvid7863 11 місяців тому

      I think other companies were using the FAA to undermine Burts designs…

    • @arcanondrum6543
      @arcanondrum6543 11 місяців тому +1

      It's just SO WEIRD: Everyone has the same set of rules, the same laws of physics but Hurt Rutan isn't a "one (canards) note" narcissist, he's a 2x+ victim.

  • @greggsimmons5136
    @greggsimmons5136 11 місяців тому +2

    Great informative video

  • @hughmarloweverest1684
    @hughmarloweverest1684 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @gafrers
    @gafrers 11 місяців тому +2

    Interesting for sure

  • @mpojr
    @mpojr 11 місяців тому +1

    enjoyed video

  • @MikeKobb
    @MikeKobb 11 місяців тому +1

    Did you shoot any footage of the cabin interior? That would be nice to see. Enjoyed the walk around!

  • @djtolias1
    @djtolias1 11 місяців тому +1

    Amazing plane. I have it in rc 1/6 scale!

  • @weirdscenepastelbunny
    @weirdscenepastelbunny 11 місяців тому +2

    that is beautiful

  • @WARHAMMER-j5c
    @WARHAMMER-j5c 11 місяців тому +1

    Careful when they replace certain parts they may keep them so to reconstruct the props or any other piece on your ADAM, for their particular needs.

  • @seinfeld11123
    @seinfeld11123 11 місяців тому +1

    such a rare aircraft. the only time i have ever seen one was on Miami Vice the movie (the florida one)

  • @Lazengogh
    @Lazengogh 11 місяців тому +2

    Cool plane, that rear wing looks like a giant Ferrari F50 wing or something

  • @P-J-W-777
    @P-J-W-777 11 місяців тому +2

    Those panels on the boom that go nowhere; I’m kind of wondering if they were originally meant to be cargo bays until they figured out the they didn’t have much room left for weight or if they are just inspection panels used to check the carbon fiber boom spars? Either way cool looking airplane. Would have been nice to have seen the designed refined and the useful load improved.

    • @davidrawley4461
      @davidrawley4461 11 місяців тому

      Those panels allowed for an aerodynamic fairing, the strength needed in the wing to tail section of the boom(which also housed the main gear) needed a structural box (44 plies per side of 12K toray 2510 fabric) to take the loads and torsion. Fun to see in structural testing what loads it could take.

    • @P-J-W-777
      @P-J-W-777 11 місяців тому

      @@davidrawley4461 appreciate you taking the time answer my question. I’m assuming you helped work on/build the airplane? I bet the tests were very exciting to watch and probably a little nerve wracking at the same time. I’m curious if they could have added cargo/luggage bays in the boom had they gotten the useful payload much higher. I’m thinking they could have if they had used higher horsepower turboprop engines.

  • @SIRTEDD
    @SIRTEDD 11 місяців тому +2

    You're at Redbird

  • @richardpark3054
    @richardpark3054 11 місяців тому +4

    Looks like a Cessna Skymaster had unholy relations with a Piper Malibu!

    • @ErikJohnston
      @ErikJohnston  11 місяців тому +1

      Haha, that’s the best description I’ve heard so far.

  • @rv7ator
    @rv7ator 11 місяців тому +2

    Dan didn’t say anything about the engine out performance, and I think I know why unfortunately. At 7,000 pounds and with 350 hp engines, the single engine power to weight ratio is about the same as a Piper Aztec, and Aztecs can’t climb on one engine. It deserves 800 ft/min single engine climb performance, but to get that the gross weight would have to be at least 1,800 pounds less.

  • @rebelyell22
    @rebelyell22 11 місяців тому +1

    I'm shocked you got Bryan to sit and stay quiet for that long

  • @mrsaskriders
    @mrsaskriders 11 місяців тому +1

    Could that panel be an access for inspections?

  • @mikercflyer7383
    @mikercflyer7383 11 місяців тому +1

    Will we get to see it flying?

  • @libertine5606
    @libertine5606 11 місяців тому +1

    You should make a flight sim out of the extra fuselage.

  • @fishfoolishness4222
    @fishfoolishness4222 11 місяців тому +1

    I don't think anyone with OCD ever said "it is what it is".

  • @mytube001
    @mytube001 11 місяців тому +2

    There's five seconds from around 20:36 where the sound is missing. Intentional?

  • @Mongo63a
    @Mongo63a 11 місяців тому +3

    Think I've seen that guy lurking around in the back before.

    • @ErikJohnston
      @ErikJohnston  11 місяців тому

      Haha, Bryan Turner is a great friend of mine

  • @oliverlebot
    @oliverlebot 11 місяців тому +3

    is it just me or is it not odd to have the 28V panel screwed shut instead of a latch?

    • @ErikJohnston
      @ErikJohnston  11 місяців тому

      It’s not too uncommon to have it screwed like this. But it’s is easier when it’s a latch.

  • @davecrupel2817
    @davecrupel2817 10 місяців тому +1

    The F.A.A. made those poor souls sawzoll these beauties.....
    Un-fvcking-believable...

  • @br4nd0nh347
    @br4nd0nh347 11 місяців тому +1

    While beautiful, I fear it will have the same issue as the Skymaster; noise. The cabin is in between the engines, so I'm wondering about how it sounds.

  • @fastanchor
    @fastanchor 11 місяців тому +1

    Longingly followed the development of this aircraft. I imagine that the airplane must smell like sex. Thanks for making this super informative video, Erik.

  • @zekigokkanat6926
    @zekigokkanat6926 11 місяців тому +1

    👍👍👍

  • @snower13
    @snower13 11 місяців тому +2

    That's what some people call a suck-n-blow.

  • @Andre.D550
    @Andre.D550 11 місяців тому +1

    😎

  • @Alekzinho82
    @Alekzinho82 11 місяців тому +2

    Coloquem legendas em Português, Please !

  • @AvGasAlien
    @AvGasAlien 11 місяців тому +2

    A cessna 337 and a piper mailubu had a baby

  • @reynbalb4945
    @reynbalb4945 11 місяців тому +1

    Cessna 337 Skymaster

  • @kasm10
    @kasm10 11 місяців тому +3

    Rutan is a genius

    • @bravocharlie639
      @bravocharlie639 11 місяців тому

      Not if you measure him by results. Check the specs of Starship versus King Air. It's no wonder Beechcraft took a major loss and cut up the hulls.
      I'd be surprised if the flight where Erik and the (cameraman?) switch seats wasn't interrupted by the Adam 500 taking on more fuel (and only a LITTLE more fuel).
      "genius" Burt has other "designs" that went nowhere but I and others I know don't like his Canards nor his eagerness to blame everyone but the lead designer; Burt Rutan.
      He is the most well known aircraft designer and, in my mind, the least deserving of praise.

    • @EllipsisAircraft
      @EllipsisAircraft 10 місяців тому +1

      Except for solving the F-4 phantom spin recovery problem. Fixing the BD-5 stability and control. Designing stall-proof airplanes that thousands of people have built in their garage. Doubling the world un refueled distance record by circumnavigating the planet. Sending the first NGO private astronauts into space. Yeah, doesn't deserve to be famous. And You are?

  • @FlyingNDriving
    @FlyingNDriving 11 місяців тому +2

    Hey take this down, Br(y)an called first dibs on video rights!!!

    • @ErikJohnston
      @ErikJohnston  11 місяців тому +1

      Haha. We sure had fun making this one!