What is Freedom of Expression and what is hate speech?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 48

  • @bengee27
    @bengee27 3 роки тому +12

    I'm guessing South Africa doesn't have free speech from what i'm hearing

    • @Rj-cl1zw
      @Rj-cl1zw 2 роки тому

      Words are expression…

    • @RL-ue4dz
      @RL-ue4dz Рік тому

      Compared to America it's less free. But really good for an African and 3rd world country.

  • @TheHollandHS
    @TheHollandHS 2 роки тому +4

    People are so incredibly ignorant about Freedom of speech. is NOT about RIGHT OR WRONG . It’s about giving equal platform to all humankind to speak and prevent power imbalance by not letting authority block or influence speech. Because no can censor the opinions of an authority anyway.

    • @Moodboard39
      @Moodboard39 4 місяці тому

      Should be allow

    • @harhar4844
      @harhar4844 Місяць тому

      People don't take the time to read histroy lessons in full. Or to read their constitution at voting age. Freedom of Speech is a wind that can only cause harm if he who hears it has a trauma they haven't conquered. Meaning the only pain inflicted by sounds is from those who fear. Those without fear can listen to any word and respond with another. And only those who act violently towards those who don't lift a hand are guilty. Words are not violence.

  • @TheHollandHS
    @TheHollandHS 3 роки тому +3

    It just doesn't feel symmetrical.

  • @PhilipCoetsee
    @PhilipCoetsee 6 місяців тому

    As a young white South African I can confirm that only the use of the "K-word" (Likened to the N-word in the US) is considered to be "Hate Speech" and will be heavily scrutinised and excessively punished. However, any death threats or verbal attacks or songs about killing whites are not hate speech and is very well protected under free speech law and arrogant claims of cultural entitlement. Also, note that any retaliation by the minority whites will be seen as blatant racism and is again heavily scrutinised and excessively punished by the law.

  • @ayaan9646
    @ayaan9646 11 місяців тому +1

    I don't believe hurting religious sentiments is hate speech at all, no matter how aggressive you are.
    After all, the renaissance could only happen due to so many free thinkers over dark age christendom fanatics.

    • @ayaan9646
      @ayaan9646 8 місяців тому

      @@riikerman the USA is free. However, with such a large number of immigrants from poorer, religious countries, it’s already become unsafe to criticise religion, and I won’t mention which one, we all know.

  • @PeskySpyCrab
    @PeskySpyCrab 3 роки тому

    The problem is that there is no way to mesure hate speech, dispite the video saying that these laws need to be narrow. Someone who takes offence can state that the your argument has no ground and that you are mearly seeking to hate and sue you. An example of this is abortion. Being anti abortion means you are looking out for the rights of the child, however this could also be interperated as disregarding the rights of the women (gender hate crime). The reciever of these arguments choose to only hear the bad parts and concider the remarks as blind hate with no baking, which is enough ground to take you to court

  • @Moodboard39
    @Moodboard39 4 місяці тому

    Hate speech is protected. Threats, harssaement, violence isn't.

  • @givemethemusicd
    @givemethemusicd Рік тому +2

    There is no such thing as hate speech in a free society. It is just speech.

    • @ayaan9646
      @ayaan9646 11 місяців тому

      absolute truth

    • @urbnctrl
      @urbnctrl 9 місяців тому

      Thats why you have the second amendment no?😂

  • @artifacthunter1472
    @artifacthunter1472 Місяць тому +1

    Hate speech is a political label and does not exist. You have the freedom to say whatever you want as long as you don’t threaten anyone’s safety.

    • @davidpar2
      @davidpar2 Місяць тому

      @riikerman1wrong. Threaten others’ safety = threaten others’ safety.

    • @harhar4844
      @harhar4844 Місяць тому

      Even threats are a freedom of speech. My founding fathers believed in free speech in its absolute. For there is no greater trail to the truth than the freedom to express your thoughts. Lies will allways be revealed where as truth will allways stay strong. Freedom of speech is absolute and any negation of that is a power of tyranny trying to take authority over people and opress the opressible

  • @northwind2050
    @northwind2050 3 роки тому +4

    Simply put if your liberal say do whatever you want.
    If you are Conservative you are to keep quiet because anything you say is hate speech. Including saying Amen at the end of a prayer.

    • @soggychip3784
      @soggychip3784 3 роки тому +1

      this is very true

    • @TinNguyen-rl2xr
      @TinNguyen-rl2xr 3 роки тому

      And if you're a white straight pure male who is a Christian from the country of birth your just dead

  • @MAGH1O1
    @MAGH1O1 2 місяці тому +1

    Hate speech: "Stop the Genocide"
    Freedom of expression: "burn the Qur'an"
    The definitions depend on the race, religion, and wealth of the offender/victim.
    Pure hypocricy!🤢😡
    All definitions can be wrong when fitting

    • @harhar4844
      @harhar4844 Місяць тому

      Words are not violence. Physical assault is violence.

  • @TheHollandHS
    @TheHollandHS 3 роки тому

    Some people feel things easily hurt than others. That s how humans are.

  • @Moodboard39
    @Moodboard39 4 місяці тому +1

    Social media silence Cuz u have a opinion. Lol

  • @shawnburnham1
    @shawnburnham1 Рік тому

    2:00

  • @kevincooke1405
    @kevincooke1405 4 роки тому +3

    bs

  • @davidpar2
    @davidpar2 2 місяці тому

    “Hate speech” ABSOLUTELY IS protected by the constitution. “Hate speech” is a narrative, not an actual thing. Slander, libel, defamation, and overt threats are objective grievances; “challenging the dignity of others” is not.

    • @harhar4844
      @harhar4844 Місяць тому

      None of that is protected by the U.S. First amendment. Only by the authoritarian powers that bent its definition in the late 20th century