7. The rule of 4+2 with Kara Scott - PartyPoker.com

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 75

  • @MattSouthJersey
    @MattSouthJersey 11 років тому +23

    Forget the outs. Kara Scott is so friggin' cute.

  • @SQUi5HiiFiSH
    @SQUi5HiiFiSH 12 років тому +32

    it's really 5 and 1. so there are 6 units. 1/6 is 16.666

  • @CAM3RoN11
    @CAM3RoN11 14 років тому +22

    Actually, in the last hand you should have counted the other two 9's towards the outs seeing as you would have no idea that your opponent was holding the two 9's in a real game.

  • @MrYahboo
    @MrYahboo 2 роки тому +6

    20% is 4-to-1, not 5-to-1.

  • @danielmoctezuma3799
    @danielmoctezuma3799 8 років тому +8

    To improve accuracy, substract 1, anytime the number of outs exceed 8. For example, on the flop against a flush draw, it would be 35%. 9X4=36-1=35. Assuming you have 10 outs, you subtract 2, and you keep subtracting an additional 1 % for every out exceeding 8.

    • @JESUSandPoker
      @JESUSandPoker 8 років тому

      nice lol

    • @andybowmanful
      @andybowmanful 4 роки тому

      Just curious, why is this the case? why do you subtract one?

  • @Jsoldier22
    @Jsoldier22 13 років тому +1

    on the flop you are actually a slight favorite. there are 15 outs to get a heart or a king or queen which would make the hand better than 9s.

  • @sneakkyz3696
    @sneakkyz3696 6 років тому +6

    This is actually wrong. You don't know your opponent has 99 so you would obviously count all the 9s as outs. It would be all the hearts which is 9 of them plus the remaining 3 aces plus the 6 queens and kings left and also the 3 remaining 9s which would be 21 outs for roughly 44% maybe even 45%. Always add 2 or 3% to make it closer to the actual %.

  • @davidhess4737
    @davidhess4737 8 років тому +5

    Kara you are underrated. Don't listen to the haters below. The math is designed to be a quick reference guide. And none of the fractions matter, it's the odds that count. Pot odds vs out odds. If the scenario were to play out above, there's no guarantee any of it would come out the way it's played in the video. But she says there's other factors so shut the hell up. Finally, she is gorgeous. Then end.

    • @steven-el3sw
      @steven-el3sw 2 роки тому

      > "And none of the fractions matter, it's the odds that count."
      Tell us you don't understand mathematics without telling us you don't understand mathematics.

  • @_Gundy_
    @_Gundy_ 2 роки тому

    I'm here for the odds of that button popping off by the end of this video...

  • @TheGr0eg
    @TheGr0eg 11 років тому +2

    The Jack brings out a straight draw, making for 15 outs, 15/46~33%.

  • @MrBluemanworld
    @MrBluemanworld 4 роки тому +2

    Wow, I didn't think I could fall in love over the internet, but Kara Scott did it.

  • @cugir321
    @cugir321 Рік тому

    That seems like a slam dunk lawsuit. 5 times over.

  • @JESUSandPoker
    @JESUSandPoker 8 років тому +2

    So how many outs do I have with her? And what is that as a percentage?

    • @TonyEnglandUK
      @TonyEnglandUK 5 років тому

      You have 0 outs, so multiply your outs by 4 on the flop and by 2 on the river.
      You basically have the same outs as Phil Hellmuth with her.

  • @thijs25111996
    @thijs25111996 13 років тому

    that's why she says it's not 100% accurate

  • @barney151
    @barney151 12 років тому +3

    so should pot odds formula be 5 / 30 = .16666 instead of 5 / 25 = .2??

    • @danielmoctezuma3799
      @danielmoctezuma3799 8 років тому

      pot formula is always Total Pot size/bet size. Assume there is 20 on the pot. Your opponent bets 5. Total pot size is 25. you need 5 to 1 to call or 1/5= 20 %. This just means that your need to have at least 5 clean outs on the flop to call. Of course, implied odds play also a big role when making this calculations which is not mentioned in the video.

    • @jackel5785
      @jackel5785 6 років тому +3

      This is incorrect, you'd need 1/6 = 16.66% chance to make the call not 20% as 5:1 is a total of 6 units.

    • @steven-el3sw
      @steven-el3sw 3 роки тому

      @@danielmoctezuma3799 5:1 = 1/6 mate.

  • @skullduggery3377
    @skullduggery3377 12 років тому

    true that. this stuff is all calculated on the fly by feel and past scenarios, anyway, not multiplication of odds and outs. anyone who has played for a while has seen every scenario come across. you just kind of KNOW how much of a chance your hand has of improving. you just don't wanna be calling raises that are too high compared to your present equity in the hand. that's why i prefer to be the aggressor if i'm going to be chasing down a big draw like that. if you don't hit, you could still win.

  • @Cleisthenes2
    @Cleisthenes2 3 роки тому +1

    Why is the multiplier 4 then 2?

    • @steven-el3sw
      @steven-el3sw 3 роки тому

      On the flop you have two opportunities to hit your hand: the turn AND the river. On the turn you only have one more chance to hit your hand: the river. So, on the turn you effectively have half the chance of hitting your hand. As 2 is half of 4 multiplying by 2 gives the roughly half the odds you had on the flop.

  • @BrokTheLoneWolf
    @BrokTheLoneWolf 5 років тому

    I like this girl.

  • @cookinthekitchen
    @cookinthekitchen Рік тому

    Wow, that is good to know

  • @fruitfuljames15
    @fruitfuljames15 12 років тому

    i dont understand how you got that can you please explain it to me ?

  • @upplsuckimcool16
    @upplsuckimcool16 8 років тому

    in this scenario you got 15 normal outs. however if a jack AND an ace came on the turn and river (a million dolalr shot in hell but it's still an out) would you could you and shouldyou calculate that into the odds? And how would you do that?
    so are the outs here like 15.5 or something ?

    • @jeremybrown6201
      @jeremybrown6201 8 років тому +1

      i think the probability of getting two card's that you need back to back is like .3% so it wouldnt be worth calculating imo

  • @thegonz9
    @thegonz9 8 років тому +2

    I'd like to put her into practice

  • @SanjayPatel-no3sg
    @SanjayPatel-no3sg 3 роки тому

    Kara i am Indian good friends

  • @imremucsi6418
    @imremucsi6418 3 роки тому

    Kara nice girl❤️❤️💋

  • @barney151
    @barney151 12 років тому +1

    should of read your comment about the error first cheers

  • @cgff1
    @cgff1 18 днів тому

    Literally did not catch a single word

  • @benjieguilas15
    @benjieguilas15 12 років тому

    its 20 my frend.

  • @1821aftershock
    @1821aftershock 12 років тому +1

    3 of clubs. shit happens.

  • @steven-el3sw
    @steven-el3sw 3 роки тому

    The level of mathematical ignorance in the comments is depressing.
    5:1 = 1/6 = 16.67% not 20% as stated in the video.
    And if you don't believe me, ask Google or Siri what 5:1 expressed as a percentage is.

  • @Carbunkal
    @Carbunkal 13 років тому

    I love simple maths :)

  • @OrdinaryHandsome
    @OrdinaryHandsome 5 років тому +1

    7:40 Youre so cute that I remember just you, sorry haha

  • @norael758
    @norael758 4 роки тому

    3:40

  • @gabyapy
    @gabyapy 13 років тому

    @onta1988 why?! 1 by 5 is 0.20 so.. why 16.666?!

    • @jackel5785
      @jackel5785 6 років тому

      5:1 is a total of 6 units, so 1/6 is your pot odds, which is 16.66%. To convert a ratio to percentage you do: right side divided by the total units on both sides, so 1/5+1 = 1/6 * 100 = 16.66%
      You may think that when you need to call t2500 into a total pot t7500, that you would need a 33.3% chance of winning the pot to be able to make the call. This a common misconception, when you call the t2500 to win the t7500, you actually recieve t7500 + t2500 (your bet back). Thus you would only need a 25% chance of winning the pot to call this to effectively break even; This is because if you had a 25% chance of winning then you win 1/4 times.. So let's say the first 3 times you call you lose, thus you lose t7500 in total, however on the fourth time you win, when you win you get t10000, you know t2500 of the t10000 were your calling chips in an attempt to win the pot, therefore only t7500 of the chips are the profit. This shows that on average you will gain/lose no chips in the long run statistically.

  • @Francois-C
    @Francois-C 12 років тому

    Wow this girl's a 20.. I'm sure 100%!!

  • @chuy020
    @chuy020 12 років тому

    I got 20%

  • @AutPen38
    @AutPen38 12 років тому +9

    It's pretty abysmal to see a video that is supposed to make things simple for beginners contains schoolboy errors when it comes to simple maths. If the pot contains 25 and it costs 5 to call, the odds are 25:5 or 5:1, but as a fraction it's 1/6 and as a percentage it's 16.67%, not 20%.

    • @ebojfmdboojoh4023
      @ebojfmdboojoh4023 7 років тому

      why is it 1/6

    • @ebojfmdboojoh4023
      @ebojfmdboojoh4023 7 років тому +2

      your putting in 5 to win an additional 25, so that's 20% which is 1/5

    • @tmmedia1000
      @tmmedia1000 7 років тому

      correct

    • @jackel5785
      @jackel5785 6 років тому +2

      5:1 is a total of 6 units, so 1/6 is your pot odds, which is 16.66%.
      You may think that when you need to call t2500 into a total pot t7500, that you would need a 33.3% chance of winning the pot to be able to make the call. This a common misconception, when you call the t2500 to win the t7500, you actually recieve t7500 + t2500 (your bet back). Thus you would only need a 25% chance of winning the pot to call this to effectively break even; This is because if you had a 25% chance of winning then you win 1/4 times.. So let's say the first 3 times you call you lose, thus you lose t7500 in total, however on the fourth time you win, when you win you get t10000, you know t2500 of the t10000 were your calling chips in an attempt to win the pot, therefore only t7500 of the chips are the profit. This shows that on average you will gain/lose no chips in the long run statistically.

    • @TonyEnglandUK
      @TonyEnglandUK 5 років тому

      There's a simple error here, but it isn't Kara's.

  • @benjieguilas15
    @benjieguilas15 12 років тому

    i hope she can counts how many baby were gonna have...

  • @janvdplaat3067
    @janvdplaat3067 Рік тому +1

    Kara, in the first example there are 15 outs, not 9. It's hard to see, but 3Q's and 3K's + 9 hearts = 15 outs.
    The number of outs after the turn becomes 18, because an ace would make a straight.
    So your conclusion of 18% should - according to your rule of 2 - be 36%. Look it up Kara, in reality this chance is > 43%.
    I'm sure there are lots of other fields where you can comment on, but better not on poker.

    • @Batwal99onUtube
      @Batwal99onUtube Рік тому

      Literally covered all that if you bothered to keep watching instead of racing to the comments to be a know-it-all

  • @agentcero4364
    @agentcero4364 4 роки тому

    None of this shit is true though bc if some of those players folded hearts (which I'm sure they did) then the actual chance of hitting a flush is lowered quite a bit and causing a false sense of a possible winning percentage.

    • @steven-el3sw
      @steven-el3sw 3 роки тому

      Doesn't matter overall. Any card is just as likely to be in play or in the muck as any other card, so the calculations work out in the long-term.

  • @akitoyeptho8775
    @akitoyeptho8775 3 роки тому

    U are not taking in the folded cards or cards the opponent might have?? .I think this is BS

  • @robertbonter1190
    @robertbonter1190 10 років тому

    Kara lost me when she said you have 9 "outs," and 47 total unknown cards = 36 per cent chance of hitting your flush. Hey, nine out of 47 = just under 20 per cent, not 36 per cent. Or am I missing something, here? When nine divided by 47 = 36 per cent, the planet is in trouble.

    • @aldenlewis573
      @aldenlewis573 10 років тому +1

      Yeah you're actually missing that after the flop you have to account for 2 future cards, the turn and the river.
      After the flop, with 9 outs, the % to hit one is: (9/47)+(9/46) = almost 38%
      So yea, the rule of the 4+2 gets the result almost exactly. it's a close estimate

    • @robertbonter1190
      @robertbonter1190 10 років тому

      Thanks, and these things you helpfully explained, should have been part of the original explanation.

    • @robertbonter1190
      @robertbonter1190 10 років тому

      But I do like her, even though I know she can beat me up. lol

    • @BennieVredestein
      @BennieVredestein 9 років тому

      Alden Lewis Thank you for this explanation indeed

    • @upplsuckimcool16
      @upplsuckimcool16 8 років тому

      yes all these videos are horrible with explanation. Thye give NO reason thyeare using 2 and 4 multipliers.... she just said,.... do it..