Climate Catastrophe Cancelled - PART 4/5
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 січ 2007
- Climate Catastrophe Cancelled: What You're Not Being Told About the Science of Climate Change
At a news conference held in Ottawa, some of North America's foremost climate experts provided evidence demonstrating that the science underlying the Kyoto Protocol is seriously flawed.
Contrary to claims that the science of climate change has been settled, the causes of the past century's modest warming is highly contested in the climate science community.
features climatologist Dr. Tim Ball and paleoclimatologist Prof. Tim Patterson (Carleton U), among other specialists (including IPCC reviewers)
Original: www.friendsofscience.org/index... - Навчання та стиль
Thank you for your scientific precision!
Thank You for posting this video. I highly recomend the book, "Politically Incorrect Guide To Global Warming" It covers this issue in more depth.
An unappreciated aspect of all this global warming alarmism is that we are teaching ourselves to see modern human activity as a blight upon the planet. We have come to hate ourselves as we see our existence as destroying the planet. I have come to appreciate this sad fact more as my 10 year old recites his school lessons about how humans do nothing but pollute the earth and are leading it to destruction. Long term this attitude will lead to resignation and relief as catastrophes strike humans.
i mean sure, maybe CO2 doesn't contribute to global warming, but we can still try to decrease the amount CO2 we produce and release. I still don't find a problem with the decrease of CO2 by governments
Are you sure about this? I have read this in regard to certain fertilizer use. But not about the effect of this with regard to Co2.
Cool people! They use eMacs and iMacs! :-)
yes CO2 is "plant food," but so is water, and what is water vapor, water. So, yes it is plant food, but that doesn't mean that it will be beneficial because you need water as well with the plants to make them grow: 6CO2+6H2O=C6H12O6 (glucose) + 6O2. So, you need water, as rain, river, or ocean to effect the roots as well as CO2
No, the graph presented here(the Vostov Ice Cores) is very clear.....Did you look at it carefully? Just look at the peaks & the plummets on that graph. CO2 consistently lags the temperature increases...that falsifies the idea of "positive feedback loop" in this instance.