Equal Protection for All: The 14th Amendment at 150
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
- Commemorate the 150th Anniversary of the 14th Amendment’s ratification with three daytime panels featuring noted scholars.
This event is presented in partnership with the Thurgood Marshall Institute at the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund.
1:00-2:00 p.m.: The Story of the 14th Amendment and America’s Second Founding
Leading legal scholars and historians, including Allen Guelzo, Martha Jones, and Kurt Lash, discuss the story of Reconstruction, with a particular focus on the intellectual origins, drafting, ratification, and original understanding of the 14th Amendment; the “forgotten Founders” who fought for its ratification and sought to make its promise a reality; and why this key period can be thought of as America’s “Second Founding.” Sherrilyn Ifill, President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., moderates.
2:00 -2:05 p.m.: Brief Break
2:05-3:05 p.m.: Reconstruction, America’s Second Founding, and Public Memory
Eric Foner, Kate Masur, and Thavolia Glymph discuss the struggle over Reconstruction in American public memory, including the battle over how best to memorialize our nation’s past through landmarks, monuments, and historic sites. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates.
3:05-3:15 p.m.: Break
3:15-4:15 p.m.: 150 and Beyond: Debating the 14th Amendment
Leading scholars, including Randy Barnett, Steve Calabresi, and Kimberly West-Faulcon debate what the 14th Amendment means today (and may mean tomorrow), covering some of the most important topics in constitutional law today.
The market's direction can swiftly change, with indexes frequently transitioning from a bear market to a bull market precisely when the news is most negative and investor sentiment reaches its lowest point. I came across an article highlighting individuals who achieved profits of up to $150,000 during challenging market periods. Considering this, I am curious about the best stocks to purchase now or add to a watchlist.
Thank you for providing this helpful pointer.
SCAM ALERT!
Fair and equal treatment under the law is not happening in our country.
When Trump is jailed, and free speech is over. The denied will not bother talking. No barking just biting now. They will serve justice away from Cameras. Private one on one.
You're right. If you are a Christian, Conservative and/or Republican the judicial system has been weaponized against you.
it has become an anty - w h y t e sheeeeithole
In what context? The rich not being held accountable?
😅😊😅😊😅😊😊😊😊 🎉😊😊😅😊😊😊😊😊😊😅😅😊😊😂😊
Positive discrimination is discriminating.
There is a hell of a lot of ignorance regarding slavery.
I need to be heard by the supreme Court inorder to stake my claim in Nathan Gibson v. The federal government
I didn't want to watch this any of the FIVE TIMES UA-cam stuck this into my suggestions this week.
imma be honest , i fell asleep watching youtube and ended up here , im not even from us 😂
Same thing with me! I closed my laptop when it woke me up. So now this morning I open my laptop and find this. Now I'm reading through the comments to see if my subconscious was being indoctrinated by You-Tube... I am from the U.S.
@@dayinthelifeofmycat this happened to me me just now.
Same here ...
That's Fine. What you missed was that YOU can become President of the US - there's a "precedent." BUT if you are born in the US as a result of a botched abortion, then no, you can't even claim the Right to Life. It's an American thang, you wouldn't understand.
same with me except i'm in the usa
Under the Jurisdiction thereof. Finish the thought.
USA!!!
I didn't hear one person define the definition of UNITED STATES and the fundamental difference between State Citizenship and Federal citizenship.
Nice to hear an intelligent conversation!
See if our Country was truly ran correctly for every one, this meeting or these meetings would not be taking place.
What we need is for the Federal Government play a role in stopping the infringements on our rights by corporations. If we did, there could be an end to homelessness, unemployment, untreated illness, polluted land ND air and water, and higher education being sold to the highest bidders.
Absolutely. Corporations should not have the same rights as people.
Some people want to be homeless
@@adamburns2452 Possibly. Some people want to live in a pumpkin, possibly. Would society have to accept people living in random locations other than shelters and buildings if there were enough of them available. NO.
It is very hard on the environment to have people living in certain environments which do not have adequate sanitation, have vulnerable flora and fauna and/or where it poses a threat to others such as taking up sidewalk space.
Having people camping out in unapproved camping is correctly prohibitted.
@@vernonfrance2974
Let the liberals take care of the problem they create with drug use the whole country is going to the gutter with your thoughts lol
Our government are imbedded with millionaires there is a video of Klaus Schwab saying we have penetrated world cabinets
Question is why Biden, Democrats and RINO's attending & supporting Schwab's' NGO World Economic Forum (wef)?
Equal protection for all vs: No Duty to protect? Must protect feelings, economic, social vs: No duty to protect Safety, security, life.
It's an Amendment for a reason not just something you take away when it is convenient, for good or bad the amendment was ignored for covid. Wonder what else they will use to justify nullifying precious amendments.
Holy Fu@% you republiCONS are whiny.
The 4th 6th and 8th are regularly ignored and barely no one raises and eyebrow
Yeah, it is. The reason is so they may control you whenever and however they see fit, for now being your Parens Patriae, they can convince you to take to embrace it thru happy rhetoric paying attention to only the parts that sound the sweetest like a kid not knowing candy also rots your teeth out.
This is just white intellectuals virtue signaling intellectually with black intellectuals. They are sooo happy talking together in their academic echo chamber.
💗💗💗I truly love the positive energy emitting from every pore on the MC-- wow it creates an intense interest in the 14th Amendment and the brilliants he is introducing!
I found myself here again, and it is the ONLY place on the web like it. Bookmark, oh no! shortcut on my top bar!!🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
why did this come on when i was sleeping'
i woke up to this douche speaking....
My uncle Ruben Jasper Dailey (24 January 1910, Asheville - 8 January 1981, Asheville was the first African American attorney to practice in Buncombe County, North Carolina, which includes Asheville. Dailey worked to press the issue of school integration not only in Buncombe County, but also across Western North Carolina in order to level the educational playing field and ensure that the mandate of Brown v. Board of Education was observed. He handled a multitude of county cases; "[i]n county after county, attorney Ruben J. Dailey confronted school boards who were trying to find ways to ignore the law and to overlook students with black skin." In addition to being Buncombe County's first black lawyer, in 1969, Ruben Dailey became the first black Asheville City Council member. He was reelected in 1971 and at some time subsequent to that reelection, he retired from politics due to health issues.
@@larryc5688 and @NickiDee-tm1qs As a guy who saw 1969 and 1971 and thought "only yesterday", I'm guessing Nicki Dee's uncle would say, "It shows we all still have work to do." Today's temporary insanity comes from a generation that never got decent history or civic education in schools (or, sadly, from their own families). Still, it's useful to bring attention to newer generations of the ongoing obligation of all of us to keep on working to build a multi-cultural democratic America that works for everyone. I'm an 80 year old Anglo from a 'blended family' (Daddy's side Southern, Mother's side Yankees [no, actually Quakers; it makes a difference!]). I live in and love a diverse lower income suburb of Los Angeles that is about 8 percent white and feels (to me) wonderfully normal. People without an international perspective often fail to realize how unique our 250 year old national experiment is among the world's nations. I think it's the best. I like to remember Winston Churchill's comment about America (about entering the Second World War), "The Americans will always do the right thing … after they have exhausted all the alternatives."
Has your group formed similar panels and held similar forums on the 16th & 17th Amendments?
Seems like the Constitution Center should emphasize that the Constitution's purpose is to define powers and purpose of the U.S. Government. Citizens of the U.S. have all rights that don't interfere with that purpose. The Bill of Rights is a highlight and clarification of some of those rights that were thought to surely be in jeopardy from growth of government; a sort of impediment to government overreach.
What rights did black Americans have under before the 13th, 14, and 15th amendments? Blacks then were property and were not citizens.
People do not understand that the constitution does not have anything to do with PRIVATE Citizens of the Republic. The constitution forms government and restrains government much like a Trust does with Trustees. it does not confer RIGHTS because RIGHTS existed BEFORE the advent of the constitution. You do not have constitutional rights, You have constitutionally PROTECTED RIGHTS.
Actually, no. The U.S constitution's purpose is to limit what our government can do. To restrict government, if you will. Note the wording of the Bill of rights. "Shall not be infringed" "Congress shall make no law" "No soldier shall" "Shall not be violated" etc. Unlike other constitutions which spell out the rights of the people, ours deals more with STOPPING the government from infringing on our already inalienable rights.
If you have followed the Constitution Center's programs, you would know that they cover all aspects of the Constitution. They don't have to "emphasize" any particular aspect .
@@EBR1 Have you read the U.S. Constitution? Seriously, it only takes about 20 minutes. Its original purpose was to establish a form of government and define the role of each branch of government. The Bill of Rights was added 2 years later and it created limits on the government's power over private citizens. "Inalienable rights" was a phrase from the Dec. of Ind. which was written 23 years before the Bill of Rights. It is not mentioned in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights - if it was it would have needed to be defined - what is an inalienable right? Infringing means violating or negating, not impinging, which it is frequently confused with.
LIKED IT
Thomas Sowell should be invited to comment on this
these academic hacks would not want thomas to speak
When will these intellectual elites stop talking about the racism of the past and concentrate on preaching individual accountability and social responsibility? A person's failures can't be rectified without those attributes. Millions, of all colors have succeeded by following these simple guidelines. It's all about family and culture.
Seriously, I was thinking the same thing. By them praising the 14th amendment they underline it with racism.
James Wilson, a distant relative, realized that slaves were being counted representation in congress. I would have said that any voting age person to include women. He made the Three-Fifths Compromise. This might have accelerated voting right.
Wonderful Discussion!
the 14th did not apply to indigenous who were removed, the chinese who were excluded, annexed countries, occupied countries (iraq, afgha, viet, phil) pacific islands until now.
Fakes from KGB FSB propaganda ...
Ta Nahasi Coates would have been a great fit in these panels.
Equal protection for all. Great knowledge
14th Amendment is Corporate Citizenship.
@@josephinetracy1485 The 14th Amendment is a Reconstruction Amendment drafted as the 2nd Amendment exclusively for the Descendants of American Slavery. The world has just squatted on these people's Constitution.
Even people with mullets?
participitory democracy? We are a Constitutional Republic
Which part triggers you more, the participation part or the democracy part?
God forbid the people actually choose, long live the electoral college!
The US isn’t a democracy & what the founders called participatory democracy had no link to the corrupt democracy of the ancient world & Europe, but what Washington called the decision making parts of the 7 Iroquois nations, ie voting. The US is a constitutional republic, meathead
America Spring will be the Third founding of the Constition.
we all have rights in this world
We have rights in our home countries, only citizens have civil rights in their countries. There is no right to invade other countries
I will watch this entire event just to see if anyone at all brings up the fact that the original 14th Amendment once prevented Lawyers from holding Public Office and why we now are led by Lawyers Nationwide
What section did that? Also wait why would the US decide to ban people who know laws from making laws?
I mean when you read section 3 of the single page amendment it bans people who who "civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." but that's not banning lawyers, it's mostly banning people from the CSA from holding office
_"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."_
So you are saying that a constitutional amendment meant to prevent people from becoming slaves in the US was actually in part designed to ensured that a lawyer like Abraham Lincoln could never again hold public office. What a strange intent to impart on Reconstructionists in 1868. Wonder where you got this notion.
@@CarolinaDragonEye01 The reason you didn't know it is because it isn't true.
@@arbiters487 and now we see why jan6 is universally described as an insurrection, insurrection, insurrection by all state media...
We don't even have the 1st on this very internet.
What are 3/5 persons?
We have to talk about SECTION 3 OF THE 14th AMENDMENT OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION with regards to January 6 and DONALD J TRUMP.
SECTION 3 OF THE 14th AMENDMENT DISQUALIFIES TRUMP NOT EVER HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE AGAIN!
Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Which united states are you referring to? the one in the District of Columbia or the united states of America located in the 50 states of the union.
Watch what and how you talk about the constitution!
To have equal protection i`m so glad we do.
d0nt be naive we do not have equal protection
@@adamgriffith6750 correct. The male-only military draft registration is an obvious example of the absence oif equal protection.
the secret lies between not outside in this case
equal? since when are people equal.
Most challenges to the 14th amendment are brought by corporations and not individual citizens. Since the government treats corporations as individual persons (that is to say that they can own property, sue others, enter into contracts, etc,, ) they have rights that need to protected. Of course the amendment was originally designed to guarantee the rights of former slaves...and we know how that turned out. In fact, amendment 13, 14 and 15 were crafted with the intention of doing one thing: protecting the rights of newly emancipated Americans, but somehow each amendment failed to do that for many people. Amendment 13 for example didn't eliminate slavery but merely redefined the parameters of who could be held as a slave and who couldn't be. This opened the door for convict leasing of mostly African Americans. The 15th amendment granted the right to vote to African Americans who did vote for a very short time in the 19th century until they were effectively shut out of the their right to vote and still in many ways are disenfranchised in this regard.
HOW DID I AUTOPLAY TO THIS????????
Excellent commentary.
Finally, an intelligent response.
Merrick Garland should watch this. He should have seen this before he took his current job. Maybe then he would realize that he only does this country a disservice by worrying about what REPUBLICAN TRAITOR PARTY will say when you prosecute the RADICALIZED DOMESTIC TERRORISTS that answered the call of their cult leader & how you must show strength to handle going after the terrorist leader Trump.
Poor communities can't survive in the cesspit-cities created by no health-code enforcement for those who cook our food, clean our hospitals, stock our shelves... we stay sick with no funds to miss work for the prescribed drugs required to have energy in all of this sewage.
Those poor communities need to stop voting in democrats who erode health and safety laws and standards. The constitution doesn’t list any right to a free ride so voting for democrats who promise freebies is a bad decision.Doing so is voting to be deprived of your rights and freedoms
The 14th Amendment was never properly & fully ratified
No one talk about July 7, 1868 or watch on from 3:50
Horrifying. The USA is right in lock step with all of this.
Child Services DHS of Oklahoma needs to be investigated cause they don't follow the 14th Ammendment!!. Whitnee Mileys, Is violating parental rights and childrens rights!!. Midwest City, Oklahoma walfare sucks!!.
They do follow the 14th amendment. You are slaves according to the 14th. The state owns us and our children. Do your research.
These "academics"are flag waving united states citizen idiots that file and pay income taxes that are 100% voluntary. How are "citizens" volunteering is the REAL question! Anyone out there KNOW what CITIZENS are doing to themselves when they walk in to the DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES office at the CHILDISH age of 16 and "APPLY" (beg) for a STATE issued ID/Driver License "LIAR'S CLUB" card? Remember, everyone THINKS that they ARE that "legal name" entity....and that they MUST sign that legal document UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY! Hint: DATE OF BIRTH
And once you figure HAT one out. READ SECTION 3. OF THE 14TH aMENDMENT and tell mme what thge very last sentence REALLY means...and remember this is 1868 and NO ONE was watching or paying attention to what CONGRESS WAS DOING (and VOTING for or against!). A 2/3 majority vote REMOVED THE DISABILITY OF CONGRESS BEING ABLE TO COMMIT ALL THE CRIMES OF A TRAITOR "legally" and with impunity. Is it any wonder WHY CONGRE$$ E$$ENTIALLY $HIT$ ALL OVER SECOND CLASS CITIZENS!!!! Citizens are SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITYED STATES...UNITED STATES NATIONALS THAST ARE NOT UNITED STATES CITIZENS ARE "NOT" SUBJECT TO THAT JURISDICTION!!!!!
Hint: VOLUME 8 FOREIGN AFFAIRS MANUAL (8 FAM) SECTION 505.2 ENDORSEMENTS (scroll down to #8 and #9)
This is what you find there:
08 (ALL) THE BEARER IS ALSO KNOWN AS (K-A GIVEN NAMES) (K-A SURNAME).
Bearer uses an assumed name in addition to their legal name.
09 (ALL) "THE BEARER IS A UNITED STATES NATIONAL AND NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN."
Placed in a passport book issued to a U.S. national who is not a citizen. “U.S. National” will be printed instead of “USA” on the front of the passport card.
Prior to the creation of this endorsement in 1992, the bearer's status as a non-citizen U.S. national was indicated by circling the word "National" or crossing out the word "Citizen" in the Secretary's message on the signature page of the U.S. passport.
fam.state.gov/fam/08fam/08fam050502.html
We need more discussions like these, more often and regularly. The white American population (in America, UK, Australia, NZ and European nations) must be willing to engage in the TRUTH of her past history, without being offended or feeling that they, personally were involved in their forefather's atrocities around the world. However, they must accept that the POLITICAL SYSTEMS, INSTITUTIONS, ETC of today have continued disenfranchising people of colour but which has taken on a different hue since slavery and empire days. Little are the new white generation actually aware of, or if they are, prefer to turn a blind eye to "their automatic privileges", by virtue of their skin colour. These privileges are so systematically imbibed in ALL PRIVATE CORPORATIONS AND GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS, PRESENTED WITH A SUBTLE AND NUANCED LOOK that at first glance, you're likely to be fooled by its "benevolence"..
Spare us, the every shade from lightest to dark have engaged in invasion, slavery etc.. so no. Whites who have been enslaved by brown & black do not need to do any such thing. Hispanics & Sephardic Jews started & controlled the trans Atlantic slave trade
sadly my sister ...monotony
Has anyone on this "panel" ever held a job ?
hahahaaa academic hacks that think they know it all doubt they have
they still dont understand they are enemy s of the state
Over compensate, so much self hate for his ancestors
Qho is John Galt?
the mitch & joe song
The higher law is the Torah
If you read Maimonides, he discusses the problems of the Torah and how the people lived homogenized and not following the laws of Moses.
Yes, Virginia - there IS a Sanity Clause
14:20 In his thorough explanation of the various clauses of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment ("All persons born or naturalized in the United States... are citizens. That's the Citizenship Clause." and so forth), Geoffrey Rosen omitted what many believe to be the most important Clause of all, originally introduced by Julius H Marx, which states that any citizen seeking to participate in the 14th Amendment debate must be of sound mind. That's the Sanity Clause.
well that would entirely rule out the dem and rep politicians and all of the lefty freakazoids.
WE CAN ARGUE SOUND MIND. INSANITY IS PRETTY EASY TO DETECT.
The 14th Amendment was supposed to be for Black Americans and not to be mis appropriated for illegal aliens.
At the time this decision was being drafted, what constituted the term "any citizen" is ambiguous, many people, challenged who is a citizen. The 3/5 persons were jailed because they did not work or own property, thus any citizen has a narrow meaning to the Federal government, US Supreme courts, and state courts laws, the idea of who is a citizen, and enforcing this new ideal is still being debated in the states.
In London in 1848, having spent a pleasant night at the opera, Carl (Julius's celebrated brother) was overheard remarking to Oscar Wilde that this addendum was the inspiration for Marxism at its finest.
Engineers have to sign a contract with corporations that anything they invent is own by the corporation. This is a slavery clause. Only if the corporation paid for the development of the invention would they have a case that they own the invention.
We got a whole bunch of "patriots" hating on the US constitution both on the dislikes and in the comments
The 13th Amendment abolished involuntary servitude while simultaneously legalizing VOLUNTARY SERVITUDE!
😮😅😮😅
😮😮
😮😅😅 is the one 😮😅😅😅
The equal protections is to restraint all government institution that operating under the color of law.
Goverment having 0 part in our life is not how we get equality. It’s how you get the govenrment to do nothing while other people (the rich) exploit you
People fail to realize that many laws are written to restrain government... Now they look at them all as how they can utilize them
Somehow this ended up in my autoplay. I am Canadian. So I am assuming the equal protections no longer exists? Could you elaborate further?
@@JohnFreedman0 Contract to Protect Plaintiffs’ Rights under the Oath of Office and under Article 6 Paragraph 2
For the state of _________ and all states in harmony
Pertaining to Oath of Office, Delegated Authority, and
The Iron Clad Contract, ATTORNEYS LAWYERS JUDGES POLICE OFFICERS AND ALL INSTITUIONS. IF REFUSED AFTER SERVING IT OR PUTTING ON THE RECORD, UTILIZE FOR APPEAL.
Plaintiff
U.C.C. 1-207 1-308
CLAIMED DESIGNATED BENEFICIARY
SIGNITURE, ______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
6/17/2023 3:44:34 PM
*****
To Whom It May Concern:
LISTED DEFENDANTS FOR APPEAL,
AND NOT LISTED YET, INVESTIGATIONS.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This contract protects the Plaintiff’s ____________________________ Constitutional rights by the agreement between the parties, the appointed attorneys, and anyone who is operating under the color of law or their oath of office or any contract between the People of all sister states in harmony.
Either sign the contract, agreeing to protect and to defend all the Plaintiff’s rights, as provided in the Constitutional amendments, articles, and declarations of rights at the state and federal level; or if you refuse to sign in agreement, then you have violated the actual law at the state and federal level.
According to the 6th and 7th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, all due process clauses and the Bill of Rights are in harmony with all sister states under the compact agreement to govern by Constitutions, as the agreement between the People grants the delegated powers under the 10th Amendment.
The named iron clad contract, supreme law in harmony with case law Marbury v Madison 1803 states that a repugnant, unconstitutional law under the color of law must not be in conflict and that any clause or part at all in conflict shall be void null.
Under your oath of office and the protections of Article 6 paragraph 2, the supremacy clause, to preserve and to protect rights under the Constitution at the state and federal level are in perfect harmony with the compact agreement between the sisters’ states in harmony.
By your signature, you agree to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets by the iron clad Constitutional Warranty. Therefore, all statutes codes regulations police policies and any repugnant laws are void AND null and must be construed to the Constitutions of the sister states according to the real law and article 6 paragraph 2. Of the supremacy clause/ second p. 2 of the last sentence shall not be in conflict and if in conflict void and not bound to any office or any institutions of the United States of America.
No secondary law is not withstanding ion law. Now claiming all statutes codes listed, ________________, ____________________, ___________________, _________________, _________________________________________.now claimed void. {Full report if requested in writing} {CONFLICT OF INTREST}
In God We Trust.
11brv 1/Signature of Claimed Beneficiary, _________________________________
Printed Claimed Beneficiary Name:
Civilian, Common Law, Private American, UCC1-207 1-308 without Prejudice
11brv 2/ Signature of Presiding Judge, ___________________________
If presiding judge refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of judge who refuses under the color of law:
__________________________________________________
11brv 3/ Signature of clerk of record, ___________________________
If the clerk recorder refuses documents motions and redress of grievances or any papers and effects, check box [ ]
Name of clerk recorder or who refuses under the color of law:
_________________________________________
11brv 4/ Signature of Presiding Magistrate, ___________________________
If presiding magistrate refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of magistrate who refuses under the color of law:
__________________________________________________
11brv 5/ Signature of Defendant Attorney, ___________________________ If Defendant attorney refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of Defendant’s attorney who refuses under the color of law: __________________________________________________
11brv 6/ Signature of Police Officer or Sheriff, ___________________________ If police officer refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of police officer who refuses under the color of law:
__________________________________________________
Equal protection obviously doesn't apply to Trump,,, exceptions are made for him. ie: setting aside "statute of limitation" impeding lawsuit.
Not sure I'm a fan of the idea of originalism vs traditionalism, cause I'm just not a fan of the idea that we need a verses. My approach is very simple. Scientifically speaking, we are all the same species... men, women, black, white etc, and no law can be in harmony with reality that doesn't respect reality, so our law should reflect reality, which is that there is no fundamental difference.
I'm not arguing against your constitutional point except that there are fundamental differences namely in digestion of food and alcohol, leading to vastly different personality motivations and aggressive behaviors in all the races. Asians experience worse metabolic health outcomes than everyone.
Blacks, have digestion that operates in putrification whereas whites operate in fermentation. Specialized digestion cells are controlled by a system of endocrine cells and neurons. Aka: the brain. Furthermore, gut biomes are varying greatly depending on location of study. This explains why certain diseases like stomach cancer are more common in specific populations (i.e.: EA's)
I couldn't find the resource, but I expect the great popularity of Kimchi and other fermented foods by Asians suggest they are seeking digestion aids their whole lives. Putrification extracts more nutrients from food, but fermentation makes food nutrition last longer in the blood. Last but not least, ethnic identity isn't going anywhere.
@@lightsout176 It's all a certain cult that likes to use race to divide and conquer. When you look into how coined racist, antisemite, homosexual and transexual, you'll find a pattern around the history and social settings with which those idioms were created. It's more about the who and the why and in the next couple of years, I feel everyone is going to see it all plain as day.
Dang'
But Biden has declared that none of the amendments are absolute.
The 14th Amendment was never fully ratified
The 14th amendment was ratified in July of 1868.
Ratified July 1868 AND the 14th Amendment is a Reconstruction Amendment, the 2nd Constitution that belongs (along with the 13th and the 15th Amendments) was drafted EXCLUSIVELY for the Descendants of American Slavery....
Who knew 150 years later we need this for white Christian patriots.
Who knew that 80 years later that Nazis would still be rearing their ugly heads?
how'd i end up here? agree with you anyway
Why isn't there any (black people) involved in this panel discussion?
depends who it is would diamond and silk count
It's the Supreme Court's fault??!!! Dang
yes equal rights male female black white Chinese all held accounbtable for their actions same punishment why is that so hard????
As a nurse, it was necessary to invoke Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in order to avoid the tyrannical Clot-Shot of 2021 enforcement. Despite these two layers of human rights protections, many lost their jobs, depriving them of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and all based on artificial, anti-scientific information. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution address similar issues of equal protection and anti-discrimination, but they differ in several key ways:
Legislative vs. Constitutional Basis:
Title VII: Title VII is a federal statute passed by Congress as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It is a specific piece of legislation aimed at prohibiting employment discrimination based on specified characteristics (race, color, religion, sex, and national origin) in the workplace.
14th Amendment: The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land. The 14th Amendment is broader in scope and provides constitutional protection against state action that deprives individuals of equal protection under the law.
Scope of Application:
Title VII: Title VII specifically applies to employment discrimination and is enforced through administrative agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). It primarily addresses discrimination in the workplace.
14th Amendment: The 14th Amendment applies more broadly to government actions and extends its protections to all areas of life, not just employment. It is a foundational constitutional provision for ensuring equal protection and due process under the law for all citizens.
Protected Characteristics:
Title VII: Title VII focuses on specific characteristics, namely race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It prohibits discrimination on these specific grounds in employment.
14th Amendment: The 14th Amendment is not limited to any specific characteristics and provides protection against discrimination on various grounds, including race, religion, gender, and other classifications. It applies to all government actions, not just employment.
Enforcement:
Title VII: Title VII is enforced through the EEOC and the federal court system. Individuals who believe they have been subjected to employment discrimination can file complaints with the EEOC and, if necessary, take their cases to court.
14th Amendment: The 14th Amendment can be enforced through lawsuits against government entities that engage in discriminatory practices. It can also serve as a basis for challenging discriminatory laws or policies at the state and local levels.
Title VII: Title VII is enforced through the EEOC and the federal court system. Individuals who believe they have been subjected to employment discrimination can file complaints with the EEOC and, if necessary, take their cases to court.
14th Amendment: The 14th Amendment can be enforced through lawsuits against government entities that engage in discriminatory practices. It can also serve as a basis for challenging discriminatory laws or policies at the state and local levels.
In summary, while both Title VII and the 14th Amendment share the goal of preventing discrimination, they differ in their scope, application, and enforcement mechanisms. Title VII is a specific federal law targeting employment discrimination, while the 14th Amendment is a constitutional provision that applies more broadly to all government actions and areas of life.
In general, I was kinda wondering if the *_14th Amendment_* also applied to Entities with Government contracts or Entities that accept Government money, funds, &/or grants ???
...Then you said "government actions" which makes me think that one could make that argument... That money is equivalent to action ?
More specifically, I had trouble with several places that refused entry to me because I could not wear a mask (breathing problems): Maybe ADA applies here ?
For most places, they were perfectly fine if I wore the mask over my mouth only so that I could breathe thru my nose: For some people, that wasn't enough tho.
the 14th Amendment is a Reconstruction Amendment, the 2nd Constitution that belongs (along with the 13th and the 15th Amendments) was drafted EXCLUSIVELY for the Descendants of American Slavery....
I just wished they had a black man on that panel.
Um....SC judges winding back all the um...laws that protect poc?
Jesus loves you and has a plan for your life
These people continue to say WHICH States that committed these crimes, like “separate but equal. NOT IN THE NORTH!
The 14th Amendment was entirely ignored during COVID.
A Governor issuing an order which designates any person as nonessential and says that person may not use public transit is absolutely, 100% a blatant violation of the 14th Amendment.
Every Governor who did such a thing (e.g. literally every Governor in the nation) as well as all other State actors who enforced such a thing (from State police to State Judges to State legislators) should be put in prison for violating the 14th Amendment. They should receive one felony for each person affected. That means Governor Polis of Colorado is eligible for 5.8 million felonies, and thereby is eligible to serve the remainder of his life in Federal prison, without any potential of parole.
More like all Trump cult Republicans who continue to show him support after 1-6-21 and who have taken the oath should be sent home permanently..
US Constitution - Article 14, Section 3
Disqualification from Holding Office:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability
Heard some stories from New York city during COVID. Not only the rents went up, people had to suffer the "body trucks".
don't say things like that. Youre making me hard.... : - S
@@Hamokk Lots of conspiracy theories during Covid but one fact is red states suffered more Covid deaths during Covid than blue states.
public transport was restricted to everyone not just nonessential
1:33:00 Well said
Trump/Gabbard 2024!
July 9 , 1868 , contains, among other things, articles guaranteeing legal certainty and equal treatment, anno 2023 it still is just another Amerikkkan dream.
Was mit Yahoo?
Jus Sanguinis has nothing to do with the 14th amendment, it has to do with the office of the President and Vice President, its not about being a citizen its about being a NATURAL BORN CITIZENS. See how they do, they always avoid the Natural Born Citizen and a Citizen, Jus Saguinis-right of blood and Jus Soli-right of soil are 2 entirely different things.
we are living on stolen land.....guess that's why there's an apparent history scrub last century and this
@Violet Mountain Prior to the 14th Amendment blacks, freed or not, were not considered citizens with full rights despite being born here.
@@vernonfrance2974 Many of the blacks fought on the side of the British against the people in the colonies, they were known as the Ethiopian Regiment. And the naturalization act of 1790 limited many people from naturalization including white people that were not of good character, there were reasons for this, in order to understand one must go back to Scotland and Ireland and at least 700 years of history, they had been massacred by kings pretty much every where they went. They were eventually sold into slavery by the British into the colonies, they sold what the British called undesirable and riff raff, people under religions and political persecution, street children, one of the main reasons is they always believed we are in endowed with certain unalienable rights from our creator and not from a king or any man, this never went over well with kings. So as much as people would like to blame every single white person, those white people died for blacks and blacks died for whites, as many blacks and whites fought side by side in the revolution and ran off as slaves together before the revolution. Government violates peoples rights it was not the people in the revolution doing that, they also violated women's right to vote, women always had the right to vote, people will say government gave women the right to vote, since when does the government give us rights in the country, again we are endowed with unalienable rights from our creator. Government derives their just power from the consent of the governed, women and blacks were also the governed, they were violating their rights, as they still violate our rights today. Something we will always be fighting for. A person that recognizes we are endowed with unalienable rights from our creator could not possibly believe in owning another person as those that fought in the revolution did not want to be owned, one of the reasons they went against the British.
@vernonfrance2974 and one more thing Vernon, go read the original draft of the declaration of independence there was a 28th grievance against the king regarding slavery, as those white people were also slaves, some believe the reason it was left out as it was to big of an issue at the time to deal with as they needed all colonies on board for the new country and they would deal with it later, which they did.
@@vernonfrance2974 the 14th Amendment is a Reconstruction Amendment, the 2nd Constitution that belongs (along with the 13th and the 15th Amendments) was drafted EXCLUSIVELY for the Descendants of American Slavery....
is there any old black Scholars that they could have had on their men
Light and throw some fire crackers
Arm ist kein begriff mehr dafür
section 3 No trump and many others
Well...there went that.
These "academics"are flag waving united states citizen idiots that file and pay income taxes that are 100% voluntary. How are "citizens" volunteering is the REAL question! Anyone out there KNOW what CITIZENS are doing to themselves when they walk in to the DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES office at the CHILDISH age of 16 and "APPLY" (beg) for a STATE issued ID/Driver License "LIAR'S CLUB" card? Remember, everyone THINKS that they ARE that "legal name" entity....and that they MUST sign that legal document UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY! Hint: DATE OF BIRTH
And once you figure HAT one out. READ SECTION 3. OF THE 14TH aMENDMENT and tell mme what thge very last sentence REALLY means...and remember this is 1868 and NO ONE was watching or paying attention to what CONGRESS WAS DOING (and VOTING for or against!). A 2/3 majority vote REMOVED THE DISABILITY OF CONGRESS BEING ABLE TO COMMIT ALL THE CRIMES OF A TRAITOR "legally" and with impunity. Is it any wonder WHY CONGRE$$ E$$ENTIALLY $HIT$ ALL OVER SECOND CLASS CITIZENS!!!! Citizens are SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITYED STATES...UNITED STATES NATIONALS THAST ARE NOT UNITED STATES CITIZENS ARE "NOT" SUBJECT TO THAT JURISDICTION!!!!!
Hint: VOLUME 8 FOREIGN AFFAIRS MANUAL (8 FAM) SECTION 505.2 ENDORSEMENTS (scroll down to #8 and #9)
This is what you find there:
08 (ALL) THE BEARER IS ALSO KNOWN AS (K-A GIVEN NAMES) (K-A SURNAME).
Bearer uses an assumed name in addition to their legal name.
09 (ALL) "THE BEARER IS A UNITED STATES NATIONAL AND NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN."
Placed in a passport book issued to a U.S. national who is not a citizen. “U.S. National” will be printed instead of “USA” on the front of the passport card.
Prior to the creation of this endorsement in 1992, the bearer's status as a non-citizen U.S. national was indicated by circling the word "National" or crossing out the word "Citizen" in the Secretary's message on the signature page of the U.S. passport.
fam.state.gov/fam/08fam/08fam050502.html
1:16 "....in bringing you today's programming....".
I'm not saying it's incorrect, just interesting that a lawyer, a person known to be most particular with their words, should choose to use 'programming' over 'programs'.
in UK but isn't 14A the swamp's next attempt to go against Trump 47?
Its a gang now they are inserting communists and half our population is falling for it the most childish propaganda imaginable.
I'd take a swamp over a cesspool any day.
You are a United States citizen says it all.
Take a look on youtube at the cops.
Understand what you see on UA-cam is a microscpopic slice of what occurs each day in America. With a population of 333,000,000 there are likely, at least a billion and a half, person on person interactions, some of which include police. Justice Department statistics show at least 62 million law enforcement contacts per day. That data does not include those person 16 years and younger.....see where I am going with this?
Persons are not people
Corie Bush....Ayanna Presley...I don't know, compensated deportation doesn't sound too bad. Lincoln had a good idea..2020 convinced me of that//
Very easy simple concept basic logic if life is not free why the hell would death be any cheaper it's not. So the question one may wonder is the spiritual cost to one's own soul and spirit for having lived and died only using the smallest percentage of A fraction of the true potential they were first born with equally as reckless neglectful at the same time to the lowest standards of quality for so many years now global pollution has diminished the quality of life to the point where today's people are living, dying and yielding the worst spiritual kickback that has ever been manifested since the beginning of life only getting worse. The polar opposite extreme to that is today's people should be living and dying to the highest standards of quality which would make each and every moment physically, mentally, financially and spiritually beneficial rewarding constantly consistently S.R.F.
14th amendment was written to give DC it's own citizens after the civil war, meaning, freed slaves now belong to the federal government citizens of DC to be exact. 14th does not apply to state citizens. Bill of rights does not apply to US citizens. State citizens were given the option to join us citizens on form SS5 line 5. When you get your SSN, you can chose state citizen or us citizen. Us citizenship means you lose the bill of rights. You now pay income tax to IRS, you become a resident of your state. You lose state citizenship. You lose all your rights. 14th amendment created privileges not rights
IN SPITE OF THE B.S. ABOUT SAFETY IN N.Y. , KATHY HOCHULL IS MUCH SAFER AS AN INCUMBENT & LESS WASTEFUL TRYING TO TRANSFORM A STATE FROM A SYSTEM GOVERNMENT THAT THE STATE IS NOT USED TO .
I MEAN AT FIRST A NEW PERSON SOUNDS BETTER , BUT OVER TIME IT WILL BE REVEALED HOW MUCH WORSE THINGS WOULD GET .
If you are going to issue an incoherent mess of a statement, why not put it in all caps so people KNOW you're deranged, rather than merely suspect it?
Could you politely at least give us some dressing to pour on your word salad. What the hell did you even say?
It'a called divide and conquer.
hay
why most of the discussion there is no native american included. are they so low in education or are they not an historian. is the american afraid the native american historian might reveal something ?will the native american also get equal right and protection including attending a discussions like this?i hope there is more discussions include the NATIVES OF AMERICA.
You are a confused dullard. That is all.
Firstly, the tribal peoples, or Indians lived (& most still do) under their own form of government. If they choose to live away from tribal lands they are subject to US laws. There are no “native Americans”, their ancestors migrated across the Bering Strait from what is now called Siberia
The 14th Amendment did not associate any other peoples as citizens, the question was about the 3/5 persons claiming rights in the newly conceded colonies. Andrew Jackson decided that natives were to move to reservations or die using the trails of tears idea, for the homestead act to be enforced after the Louisana Purchase from Napolean. The immigrant Europeans decided this land was theirs for the taking, so the natives who lived here for thousands of years would not be included in a 14th Amendment discussion based on expansion at that time.
@@mmoretti So therefore there is no native of anywhere, is that your argument? we all moved from somewhere at some point, right? No native Britons as they migrated from the continent, right?
@@mmoretti This is the excuse Europeans use for invading the continent of North America. I find it hard to believe that there were no people in North and South America until the unproven so-called migration along the Bering Strait. Native Americans from Alaska to Chile have no history of this migration. They say they were ALWAYS there.
BUNCH OF BOLONIES TELL THAT TO NATIVE AMERICANS THE REAL OWNERS!!!
American Indians aren’t native to the Americas but to what is called Siberia. Nor did they believe in their owning where they lived.
Equal protection for all. Unless you're a PoC or LGBTQLM#4. Then you get EXTRA protection.
In what way?
@@devinnie7572 Crimes committed against any of the protected classes by the unprotected class(singular(white people)) are automatically upgraded to "Hate Crimes". They are more vigorously investigated and prosecuted, and the penalties are far greater.
Stop drinking the Kool-Aid. We are not equal under the law. Just try to get our judicial system to enforce the law, and you'll be surprised that your plea falls on deaf ears.
This is not happening in the USA.....
Do the research.. us citizens are us property…us property folks..the true definition of the word citizen, public servant, public servant… goes back to Rome…..
Under the constitution US citizens aren’t property but the owners of the government, the term public servants refer to elected officials who are supposed to serve the public, unlike the slaves to communist and socialist governments or subjects of monarchies
For everyone except men.
Your beginning premise is severely flawed. Everything after this is an argument against the very "hypothesis " you propose.
Also, the statement of what atheism is, is incorrect.
Please stop trying to use pseudo science.
Love the molecular transmogrify take.