TioÅrigaSmåbarnIrreterarMig OchAllaAndra hunter gets insane start or you get bad start and soon you are so low you die to something like hero power kill command and quick shot...
***** There is actually no solid and consistent counter for Face-Decks, like Face-Hunter or Combo-Decks like Pattron-Warrior. Either you have Loatheb, a taunt or you are screwed. And even with Loatheb or a Taunt there are plenty possible ways for your opponent to either play around these cards or counter them by themself. So most of the time it doesnt really matter a lot what you draw, cause it most likely depends on what they draw.
RuLeZ1988 I disagree, I got a Priest deck that destroys every rush deck on ladder right now. I got a 100% winrate over 20 games against aggro. The problem with the deck tho is that it only focus on aggro decks, so whenever I face Control I need to Concede....
Joseph Ford Kripp's oppenent was unlucky several times. Kripp also topdecked a Auchenai at 10:15. If that was just a normal card with no battlecry his opponent would have had lethal next turn. He also topdecked a Stormwind Champion at 12:13 that he would have lost without.
Egg&Bacon Nah Joseph is right. Remember it's a 30 card. It's more luck to get an amazing start even more so in arena usually. Typically you can't build a consistent rush deck in arena. The fact that the guy just went face 24/7 was playing against the odds of giving Krip board control. That's exactly what happened. Sometimes it pays off to go face. Against a Priest or Warrior especially it's a very dangerous thing because if they regain board control even slightly you'll often lose.
Egg&Bacon Watched some streams of kripp and I have to say that this guy have problems with losing. Always blaming rng but when he get a top deck card then hes quiet. Besides that hes sometimes really bad manner with his behaviour against opponent.
Josh Lyman Totally, Hunter is getting a 2 mana cards that gives them a random Hunter class card everytime they cast a spell. They can now SMOrc you without running out of steam.
Josh Lyman Yea! I mean Im rank 15, which you probably dont consider really high but aggro decks are not common here at all. There are some, of course, but really nice variety ^_^
Itama Anyone can name himself Kripp. There can be unlimited Kripp's. They just have different Battletags, for example Kripp#2345 or something like that. The Kripp who went offline is somebody who plays against Kripp sometimes, there's even videos of Kripp vs Kripp :D
Magnus Bekkengen no kidding. i think i might be done watching kripp its just not fun anymore... are there any other good content creators besides trump? :P
Jared Sanford There is tump. and amaz.for me amaz high pitched voice is sometimes anoying but he sure do put on a good show. trump is very mellow and some of his reactions are priceless. but other then those 2 you could browse the twitch stream. depending on the time zone ou live in you might find a gem.
Kripp is like a living bobblehead, with his head always moving and wide jaw bone! Who would buy a Kripp bobblehead if it was available? I sure would have, hahah :D Keep up your good work, Kripp!
Its still so funny to me that Kripp is the only Hearthstone player I've ever heard say that paladin is a tough match up for priests. Never have I heard that spoken anywhere else, nor have I seen it; I'm a paladin main in Hearthstone, that's the only class I have that's level 60, with my second highest being mage at level 43. And I personally feel that paladins have a tough time against priests at least 5 out of 10 times. Not sure if its just the way Kripp plays priest, or how the EU players play or what...but it just seems like the weirdest conclusion to come to.
Dude, you are better than this. Most of your videos are either entertaining or even insightful, but this one... it was just a salt fest. Imho, and that's the reason I watched this, I thought it would end up being a humorous video. Almost replying saying the face epic smorc card was a bad choice, since it should be common instead. Maybe making an argument on how face hunters are a cancerous deck, but since they are so effective and cheap, and even "top" players use them to ladder (heck, pretty sure thats all Firebat uses nowadays), they will always be played until a huge meta swing that renders them useless.But no. You chose the sodium route. Bear in mind you focused only one game. That I'm sure you wouldn't post if the end result happened to be different. An arena game, mind you, not constructed, so the dynamics of plays and cards are a whole different beast. You could posted games where you break the dynamics of facerolling by placing a few taunts and the oponent insta-concedes. I made it happen so many times before. But no. You focused on your opponent misplays, and totally disregard your own. And there were quite a lot. Take the time to rewatch the game with a different mindset and you will easily spot them. You are a good enough player to see them. You focused on bad mouthing his options, and knowing you were wrong in the process. Like the consecrate. That was a waste of a turn... but... was really scary regardless. Your words, not mine. I considered an obvious attempt at a board clear, pretty common on turns 4-6 to a pally, but leaving him with a weak board to respond to your turn. So he got rid of your Senjin and your Ironfur at the cost of a 1-2 deathraddle minion (that left him 2x1-1) and a 2-3, and by floating 1 mana crystal. Yeh. Such a waste of a turn. He should just let the Senjin alive so you could always use him the next turn. Right. The paladin play at a whole isn't a part of "the face race", so even there, its a bad choice of a video. He traded, he cleared the board, and he took some risks in the meanwhile. And when he chose to race you for face, he had a good assortment of survivable cards that could make it happen against what you had the board, plus his hero power. But you out rng'd him, drewing almost perfect in the end game. That player, knowing he lost the race, even conceded (so i'm pretty sure he knew his last few cards wouldnt help him). But, it true krip salt fashion, you went on about saying how "bad he was". But since you said you werent trying to be offensive, it makes it alright, doesnt it? Bear in mind. You made a video out of this. Makes only you look bad. /rant over
HuehuehueEsBest Hum... just check the video after 11:30 or so. Big bodies when they were very very needed (in order to do favorable trades), and 2 out of 11 SwD. Even before the auch for spot removal, and serving as a soaker for the brute, the rng was in krips favor. I'm not saying the pally played perfectly, cause he didnt. But he wasnt protecting a 1\1 divine shield. He was flooding the board as most as he could with divine shield creatures tho.
dbramm01 I'm not it. You know, it is possible for a person to see a video, disagree, and voice their opinion, without being the subject of it. Food for thought.
AlphaPT You know those games where you can over-trade into a loss? This game was through and through the opposite of that. Kripp's focus on this video isn't the part where the paladin had an iffy consecration. I agree with you that that portion of the video was a rather salty. However, I believe that his main focus for this video was the end where the paladin was trying to push damage through onto a priest while allowing the priest to gain board control. I haven't watched the video again since my first comment, so this is going to be by recall. I believe the creatures the paladin had stick for the longest time were the argent squire and the shielded mini bot. He was playing his creatures and then going face with whatever was able to stay on the board the previous turn. He had Kripp in the unfavorable situation of having to choose between healing his face in order to survive or healing his creatures in order to maintain board to eventually push for the win. Kripp was choosing the survival route which put him in the situation where the paladin could have used his divine shield creatures to protect his big creatures and then have 1 turn to push through for lethal. He chose not to, went face, and was punished severely for it. He gave kripp the extra turns to draw what was needed to essentially push 1 damage per turn since he had 3 dmg going through and kripp could heal 2. That is just dumb.
Gregory Gibson It's a 50/50 if it goes for another target, meaning the original target is no longer an option. the 1 other minion+Face is two. Which means that it's another 50/50 if it will hit the other minion (in this case Blackwing Technician) or face. 25% chance overall.
I don't understand why he held the circle of healing for so long. It's so situational in arena and if he's afraid of falling behind it's not particularly helpful later.
Freddie Simmons I thought the same thing, and the only explanation I could come up with is that he might have an Auchenai Soulpriest in his Arena deck, which would make Circle of Healing a two-sided Flamestrike. Turns out, he did later draw a Soulpriest.
Penta Gram Nope. There was a 50% chance the ogre attacks the wrong target. If that happens, there is a 50 percent chance that the ogre hits the 3/4 rather than face, meaning there was a 25% or 1 in 4 chance it would hit the 3/4
I think the Paladin's decision to go all out face was correct. His mistake was choosing to hold the Spellbreaker for something like 3-4 turns. If he just played it immediately, he would have won. I can understand wanting to hold it so you can hit a Sunwalker/Sludge Belcher or something, but when you go all in smorc, you are banking on your opponent having no answers at all, as if he has something good, you lose anyway. So why choose to hedge around Sunwalker, but not around Holy Nova? Just play your 4/3 as soon as you can so you have more damage on the board.
Going all out face was absolutely not the right choice. He passed up so many favorable trades to save a divine shield on a 1/1 or push an extra 2 damage to face. He would have won if he was trading instead of SMOrcing
lkjkhfggd I think he missed out on several really important trades by just going 100% face. Yes most of the time he made the correct decision, but quite a few were terrible. 1. Cult Master play - pretty much cost him the game right there. Ironically, this is the one time he didn't go face. 2. When priest is at 25 life, you give up 4 face damage to protect a 1/1, since the game is not ending in 4 turns, and the 1/1 can help secure your board. 3. He values the divine shield on his 1/1 and 3 damage (1 - (-2)) to face over his scarlet crusader.... 4. He goes face correctly on the MCtech turn, but he floats 5 mana with Spellbreaker in hand. 5. He doesn't trade the divine shield(s) to protect his 6/3. He also makes a dude over playing the Spellbreaker.
Yes, you are right in that he made more mistakes besides just holding spellbreaker. I didn't bother going back to find them all since that's a waste of my time. My point was the overall choice to smorc was correct, and while he made other mistakes as well, the biggest one in my opinion was not playing the spellbreaker asap.
I like how some people are yelling at him for not doing a video about the announcement even though: 1.He already did one last week. 2.He said he made these videos prior so he has something to upload while absent. 3.He is AT THE ANNOUNCEMENT Are you people that dense?
It's an orc from Warhammer, so I assume the SM stands for Space Marine, which is both a faction in the universe and the name of a warhammer game, where the face is probably from.
He is right in all his points but he forgot to mention the deck the SMOrc me go face joke is attributed to, face hunter, is probably the only deck where this play style works very well. Extremely irritating, but you cannot deny its efficiency unless it goes up against a taunt heavy deck.
![[Hearthstone] Chugga Chugga](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tufN7hkxHC8/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] Chugga Chugga](/img/tr.png)
![[Hearthstone] The Grand Tournament Expansion!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hpMTwLUk36I/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] Dragon Hunter Actually Works?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7R_XonrhlqE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
7:47 Kripp's vibrator went on for a second there.
Uther the Lightbringer Rania turn it off (つ°ヮ°)つ
Uther the Lightbringer Why sex is funny? kids?
Zeode X.
Fuck you bitch.
Zeode X. "Lean English please."
Maybe start with yourself before you tell others
Zeode X. Person with very little understanding of the English language VS person with very little understanding of the English language. Fight!
Looks like a face hunter decided to play arena and got stuck with paladin.
turn 9. turn 11.
Kripp did 9/11 confirmed
THIS is gold
Paddy Meehan On turn 11, kripp dealt 4 damage to a minion, took 3 damage on a minion, and put a 2 attack minion on the board. 3+4+2 = 9
9/11
GG kripp
Paddy Meehan steel beams can't melt kripperino
Current tavern brawl:
Step 1. Go first
Step 2. Win
gg
Ted Wallace pick warlock pick twisting nether profit
Ted Wallace I disagree.If you're priest, going second will win you the game 10/10.
Ll you must be really bad then. Not trying to offend you... you just suck
Ted Wallace Naturalize, freezing trap, vaporize, sap, vanish can easily turn the game into your favor if you use it very early.
Ted Wallace I play a Priest, so no.
2:05 "The face is the place! Smorc-y, smorc-y!" was my favorite part of this video.
TLDW: Go Face when it will help you win. 2:55 for Skipperino the Kripperino
How can we counter fast decks you ask?!
Why that's easy! Build faster decks!
-SMOrc
***** Handlock counter fast decks, you dreaming or rank 20ish?
TioÅrigaSmåbarnIrreterarMig OchAllaAndra hunter gets insane start or you get bad start and soon you are so low you die to something like hero power kill command and quick shot...
***** huntard actually is one of the worst matchups for the most handlock decks
***** There is actually no solid and consistent counter for Face-Decks, like Face-Hunter or Combo-Decks like Pattron-Warrior. Either you have Loatheb, a taunt or you are screwed. And even with Loatheb or a Taunt there are plenty possible ways for your opponent to either play around these cards or counter them by themself. So most of the time it doesnt really matter a lot what you draw, cause it most likely depends on what they draw.
RuLeZ1988 I disagree, I got a Priest deck that destroys every rush deck on ladder right now. I got a 100% winrate over 20 games against aggro.
The problem with the deck tho is that it only focus on aggro decks, so whenever I face Control I need to Concede....
For some reason i misunderstood the title.
CHE6yp Yeah, I thought it was going to be like 2 face hunters race for the win, look who can go face "best"
Jan Ham I thought that too :D
Aliskuss Same
Dan R Kripp fix title or RIOT! :D
2:55 Skipperino the Kripperino
2:52 "enjoy the kripp" Kappa
"One of THE most AMAZING games (insert time frame here)" - Kripperino every video
8:26
-This guy is so fucking lucky
12:52
-Topdecks a card he would lost without
Egg&Bacon he admits that he was lucky 14:06
Egg&Bacon I would say the luck evened out. The game wouldn't have been nearly that close if he didn't get that undertaker.
Joseph Ford Kripp's oppenent was unlucky several times. Kripp also topdecked a Auchenai at 10:15. If that was just a normal card with no battlecry his opponent would have had lethal next turn. He also topdecked a Stormwind Champion at 12:13 that he would have lost without.
Egg&Bacon Nah Joseph is right. Remember it's a 30 card. It's more luck to get an amazing start even more so in arena usually. Typically you can't build a consistent rush deck in arena. The fact that the guy just went face 24/7 was playing against the odds of giving Krip board control. That's exactly what happened. Sometimes it pays off to go face. Against a Priest or Warrior especially it's a very dangerous thing because if they regain board control even slightly you'll often lose.
Egg&Bacon Watched some streams of kripp and I have to say that this guy have problems with losing. Always blaming rng but when he get a top deck card then hes quiet. Besides that hes sometimes really bad manner with his behaviour against opponent.
I WANNA SMORC THE KRIPP
You already got your video
So you're saying that they're not allowed to comment anymore?
yeah beat it
Imran Taheel exactly.
Whissp I'm still waiting for How Good Is Magma Rager...
Well your smorc card is now a tavern brawl.
hi (sorry for my bad english)
hola (lo siento malo espaniol)
Been on a break from Hs for a month because i had enough of aggro
Should i come back?
Josh Lyman yea there's a new cancer paladin you should check out
Josh Lyman Probably, control and combo is making a comeback
Josh Lyman Totally, Hunter is getting a 2 mana cards that gives them a random Hunter class card everytime they cast a spell.
They can now SMOrc you without running out of steam.
Josh Lyman Come back before new expansion your only chance!! ^^
Josh Lyman Yea! I mean Im rank 15, which you probably dont consider really high but aggro decks are not common here at all. There are some, of course, but really nice variety ^_^
2:56 to skipperino kripperino
Thanks bro, you LITERALLY saved my life!
3doo3 TehEpikDhuk tanks, MISERABLY shaved my wife
I wasn't even hearing what Kripp was saying first minute - being hypnotized by the taunted enemy hero. =)
SMOrc do me trade?? SMOrc
Really Unskilled Nope
Really Unskilled Me go face??
Really Unskilled yup
Nope
Jimmy Burrell me am smart ???
"Don't be too experimental when it comes to the face" - Kripp 2015
You are the Hero this game needs
5:33 Kripp has gone offline..........what?
Itama Krippi
Itama Anyone can name himself Kripp. There can be unlimited Kripp's. They just have different Battletags, for example Kripp#2345 or something like that. The Kripp who went offline is somebody who plays against Kripp sometimes, there's even videos of Kripp vs Kripp :D
Troll Face Krippception
Troll Face You just quoted my battletag D:
***** WutFace
Welcome to the FaceJam.
this Paladin makes Dennis look like a seasoned professional
i have played too many games where they ignored everything and went face and they still won
"420 no-scoped there"
That's the kind of no-scoping I'm about.
Waiting for your video on The Grand Tournament expansion announcement.
Why are you getting so salty about every setback in a game?. just small ones you curse out and being o whell his rng is better then mine.
Cause a small setback can make you lose the game on future turns such as keeping bgh after hitting dr boom
We are average player so little setbacks are whatever. But kripp play professionally so every little thing is something to think about.
That might be true but there is alot of others streamers and proffesionally players who take setback far better and some laugh about it.
Magnus Bekkengen no kidding. i think i might be done watching kripp its just not fun anymore... are there any other good content creators besides trump? :P
Jared Sanford There is tump. and amaz.for me amaz high pitched voice is sometimes anoying but he sure do put on a good show. trump is very mellow and some of his reactions are priceless. but other then those 2 you could browse the twitch stream. depending on the time zone ou live in you might find a gem.
Hey Kripp, whats the name of the background music at the end of your videos ? Thanks !
heyguyshowsitgoingkripparrianhere
Kripp is like a living bobblehead, with his head always moving and wide jaw bone! Who would buy a Kripp bobblehead if it was available? I sure would have, hahah :D Keep up your good work, Kripp!
I thought this was going to be about this week's tavern brawl.
I can't help it. Whenever Kripp gets salty, all I see is an angry talking potato.
"How do I win? Guess I don't."
Hearthstone professional level player.
If the face plays taunt, me still go face.
If the face plays ice block, me still go face.
If the face face race, me still go face.
Oi! Hunter know this ancient tactics already!
I lol'd at "420 no-scope".
How good are twitch plebs?
Where is the paladin image from? =) the thumbnail that is ^^
#Kripparrian How Good Is Doomguard? (little old card but anyway if you have some time)
How do you do the whole time stamps in comments. I need to know so I can help skipp the kripp.
Kripp, we got the uuh...grand tournament!
What does SMOrc stand for? What does it mean? Captain pls.
wtf did that guy just hold on to that silence guy for so many turns when he was going for lethal? damn bruh nice play
so in the skipthekripp part the says going face is for people who know how to play and in the game going face he says the guy is a noob, i dont get it
Can you do a video about how good is lord jaraxxus or how to use it?
Video on card placement? Suggestion
Skipperino the Kripperino when he roasts the SMorcerino, because he's pissed at the ladderino ruining his gamerino. 2:56
Is there a new update on hs becuse i wasnt able to go in to the shop in a half day
Thats COMEback!
"Face is the place! SMOrcy SMOrcy!" lmfao
How good is Headcrack?
People complain about this not beong about the announcement- but its not in another two hours. Chill people
Its still so funny to me that Kripp is the only Hearthstone player I've ever heard say that paladin is a tough match up for priests. Never have I heard that spoken anywhere else, nor have I seen it; I'm a paladin main in Hearthstone, that's the only class I have that's level 60, with my second highest being mage at level 43. And I personally feel that paladins have a tough time against priests at least 5 out of 10 times.
Not sure if its just the way Kripp plays priest, or how the EU players play or what...but it just seems like the weirdest conclusion to come to.
It wasn't because you topdecked death the turn after he topdecked a 7/7 Frostwolf after not drawing a 5+ attack minion for several turns prior either
Dude, you are better than this.
Most of your videos are either entertaining or even insightful, but this one... it was just a salt fest. Imho, and that's the reason I watched this, I thought it would end up being a humorous video. Almost replying saying the face epic smorc card was a bad choice, since it should be common instead. Maybe making an argument on how face hunters are a cancerous deck, but since they are so effective and cheap, and even "top" players use them to ladder (heck, pretty sure thats all Firebat uses nowadays), they will always be played until a huge meta swing that renders them useless.But no. You chose the sodium route.
Bear in mind you focused only one game. That I'm sure you wouldn't post if the end result happened to be different. An arena game, mind you, not constructed, so the dynamics of plays and cards are a whole different beast. You could posted games where you break the dynamics of facerolling by placing a few taunts and the oponent insta-concedes. I made it happen so many times before. But no. You focused on your opponent misplays, and totally disregard your own. And there were quite a lot. Take the time to rewatch the game with a different mindset and you will easily spot them. You are a good enough player to see them. You focused on bad mouthing his options, and knowing you were wrong in the process. Like the consecrate. That was a waste of a turn... but... was really scary regardless. Your words, not mine. I considered an obvious attempt at a board clear, pretty common on turns 4-6 to a pally, but leaving him with a weak board to respond to your turn. So he got rid of your Senjin and your Ironfur at the cost of a 1-2 deathraddle minion (that left him 2x1-1) and a 2-3, and by floating 1 mana crystal. Yeh. Such a waste of a turn. He should just let the Senjin alive so you could always use him the next turn. Right.
The paladin play at a whole isn't a part of "the face race", so even there, its a bad choice of a video. He traded, he cleared the board, and he took some risks in the meanwhile. And when he chose to race you for face, he had a good assortment of survivable cards that could make it happen against what you had the board, plus his hero power. But you out rng'd him, drewing almost perfect in the end game. That player, knowing he lost the race, even conceded (so i'm pretty sure he knew his last few cards wouldnt help him). But, it true krip salt fashion, you went on about saying how "bad he was". But since you said you werent trying to be offensive, it makes it alright, doesnt it?
Bear in mind. You made a video out of this. Makes only you look bad.
/rant over
AlphaPT We found the paladin player
HuehuehueEsBest Hum... just check the video after 11:30 or so. Big bodies when they were very very needed (in order to do favorable trades), and 2 out of 11 SwD. Even before the auch for spot removal, and serving as a soaker for the brute, the rng was in krips favor. I'm not saying the pally played perfectly, cause he didnt. But he wasnt protecting a 1\1 divine shield. He was flooding the board as most as he could with divine shield creatures tho.
dbramm01 I'm not it. You know, it is possible for a person to see a video, disagree, and voice their opinion, without being the subject of it. Food for thought.
AlphaPT You know those games where you can over-trade into a loss? This game was through and through the opposite of that. Kripp's focus on this video isn't the part where the paladin had an iffy consecration. I agree with you that that portion of the video was a rather salty.
However, I believe that his main focus for this video was the end where the paladin was trying to push damage through onto a priest while allowing the priest to gain board control.
I haven't watched the video again since my first comment, so this is going to be by recall. I believe the creatures the paladin had stick for the longest time were the argent squire and the shielded mini bot. He was playing his creatures and then going face with whatever was able to stay on the board the previous turn. He had Kripp in the unfavorable situation of having to choose between healing his face in order to survive or healing his creatures in order to maintain board to eventually push for the win.
Kripp was choosing the survival route which put him in the situation where the paladin could have used his divine shield creatures to protect his big creatures and then have 1 turn to push through for lethal. He chose not to, went face, and was punished severely for it. He gave kripp the extra turns to draw what was needed to essentially push 1 damage per turn since he had 3 dmg going through and kripp could heal 2. That is just dumb.
AlphaPT
Good one! +1
New taunt card PogChamp
I think he was trying to keep you in range for a number of finishers he would have drawn.
*3 targets available*
Kripp: That's like.. a 1 in 4!
me: =__=
No it's 1/4 cuz 50% chance to miss, then two other characters on board 1/2 x 1/2
Gregory Gibson It's a 50/50 if it goes for another target, meaning the original target is no longer an option. the 1 other minion+Face is two. Which means that it's another 50/50 if it will hit the other minion (in this case Blackwing Technician) or face. 25% chance overall.
fyrestorme123 You're dumb.
GG Blizzard broke the game with the new expansion
Patrick Dave De Manuel again you mean, well wouldn't be again if it wasn't always broken.
More hero powers! MORE HERO POWERS!!
Title of this video should be: Why you never give up a game 3
The next tavern brawl should be SMOrc The Orc vs Mogor The Ogre.
'I got 420 no-scoped there'
LOL
I don't understand why he held the circle of healing for so long. It's so situational in arena and if he's afraid of falling behind it's not particularly helpful later.
Freddie Simmons I thought the same thing, and the only explanation I could come up with is that he might have an Auchenai Soulpriest in his Arena deck, which would make Circle of Healing a two-sided Flamestrike. Turns out, he did later draw a Soulpriest.
What do you guys think about the new brawl? Not that fun for new players IMO.
If the face plays taunt... Me still go face...
12:48 "we have 2 deaths left, right" ...turn up, turn down.
Drogaddos for what
5:33 Kripp has gone offline??
Kripp: going face here is sooo bad!
Me: SMOrc GOOD CHOICE SMOrc
SMOrc
Jesus Some players. The beer must of sunk in QUICK !
Why SMOrc means face?
2:10 BULLSHIT. ALWAYS GO FACE IS SMART PLAY. SMOrc
Notice me senpai
?
I love you.
Krip in peace
GRAND TOURNAMENT TRAILER
Isn't 4:20 a 1 in 3? There's only 3 possibilities:
Ogre hits
Ogre misses and hits 3/4
Ogre misses and hits face
Penta Gram you just discovered this guy has no clue... better late than never
Penta Gram Nope. There was a 50% chance the ogre attacks the wrong target. If that happens, there is a 50 percent chance that the ogre hits the 3/4 rather than face, meaning there was a 25% or 1 in 4 chance it would hit the 3/4
0:07 New Card PogChamp
What does SMOrc mean
0 mana??? It should be 8 minimum since you can't silence Heroes...
Either you're missing a kappa or your stupid
The Gaming N00Bz There should be a "Kappa" card, and your comment in description...
Lights champion on Jaraxxus Kappa
2:06 was beautiful.
Don't you get it Kripp? He needed to go to bathroom.
Kripp did get lucky with the second PW:Death though.
Naxx Out? PogChamp
Everybody knows that the face is the place.
Who is this Guys Said "RIP in Peace"?
Sériously?
I'm very very bad in English but i know that >.
Either I'm really baked or i just heard him say 420 no scope
It was definitely 1 and 1/6th spins for some reason.
I think the Paladin's decision to go all out face was correct. His mistake was choosing to hold the Spellbreaker for something like 3-4 turns. If he just played it immediately, he would have won. I can understand wanting to hold it so you can hit a Sunwalker/Sludge Belcher or something, but when you go all in smorc, you are banking on your opponent having no answers at all, as if he has something good, you lose anyway. So why choose to hedge around Sunwalker, but not around Holy Nova? Just play your 4/3 as soon as you can so you have more damage on the board.
Going all out face was absolutely not the right choice. He passed up so many favorable trades to save a divine shield on a 1/1 or push an extra 2 damage to face. He would have won if he was trading instead of SMOrcing
lkjkhfggd I think he missed out on several really important trades by just going 100% face. Yes most of the time he made the correct decision, but quite a few were terrible.
1. Cult Master play - pretty much cost him the game right there. Ironically, this is the one time he didn't go face.
2. When priest is at 25 life, you give up 4 face damage to protect a 1/1, since the game is not ending in 4 turns, and the 1/1 can help secure your board.
3. He values the divine shield on his 1/1 and 3 damage (1 - (-2)) to face over his scarlet crusader....
4. He goes face correctly on the MCtech turn, but he floats 5 mana with Spellbreaker in hand.
5. He doesn't trade the divine shield(s) to protect his 6/3. He also makes a dude over playing the Spellbreaker.
Yes, you are right in that he made more mistakes besides just holding spellbreaker. I didn't bother going back to find them all since that's a waste of my time. My point was the overall choice to smorc was correct, and while he made other mistakes as well, the biggest one in my opinion was not playing the spellbreaker asap.
Guys halp can't skip the kripp, save me
Everybody knows, that the face is the place
I like how some people are yelling at him for not doing a video about the announcement even though:
1.He already did one last week.
2.He said he made these videos prior so he has something to upload while absent.
3.He is AT THE ANNOUNCEMENT
Are you people that dense?
Has anyone else here never seen Cobalt Guardian ever.
I got insane value out of it in arena, so yeah!
You should have made the SMorc card a common...
kripperino skipperino yesserino reallerino ıerino realyerino 14.44 erino skipperino kripperino plserino
so why is smorc called smorc?
On Twitch there is an emote called SMOrc that shows up as an ogre head. The ogre head is associated with stupidity (going for face).
fangtimes I think he's asking where the SM comes from in SMOrc
It's an orc from Warhammer, so I assume the SM stands for Space Marine, which is both a faction in the universe and the name of a warhammer game, where the face is probably from.
Barboy is here
Repeatedly hit 4. You're welcome.
rip in peace --> rest in peace in peace :) gz
He is right in all his points but he forgot to mention the deck the SMOrc me go face joke is attributed to, face hunter, is probably the only deck where this play style works very well. Extremely irritating, but you cannot deny its efficiency unless it goes up against a taunt heavy deck.
Fuck I hate face so much. They need to double hero health to nerf face into the ground.
Everyone knows that the face is the place.