I am a mallayali and i am indian i dont care i have big small problems in my life to take care of . I Love India 🇮🇳. I love all 22 official languages and all unofficial languages .
Let me tell you a small statement from DMK (political party Abhijit sir mentioned) "We need to Erad!cate Sanatan Dharm(Hinduism), Sanatan Dharm is a V!rus" It is said by the DMK leader in front of hoards of people!
@ReldrikGeo the whole party is notorious for making such statements, not just him or his son. They do this to get the votes of non-hindu people Let's say there are 30% non-hindus and 70% hindus, first they will unite the non-hindus by making such statements and will try to divide the hindus based their castes...when the Hindu are divided in smaller fragments of 10% or 15% each then they will get the votings and they will win the elections as those 30% of them voted to them while those 70% who are now in fragments give votes based on Castes...30% > 10% and thats how they win elections...when this bubble of fake reality burst they will lose the whole of Southern India...but sadly there time in that!
@@ReldrikGeo the whole party is notorious for making such statements, not just him or his son. They do this to get the votes of non-h!ndu people Let's say there are 30% non-h!ndus and 70% h!ndus, first they will unite the non-h!ndus by making such statements and will try to divide the h!ndus based their c@stes...when the H!ndu are divided in smaller fragments of 10% or 15% each then they will get the votings and they will win the elections as those 30% of them voted to them while those 70% who are now in fragments give votes based on C@stes...30% > 10% and thats how they win elections...when this bubble of f@ke reality burst they will lose the whole of Southern India...but sadly there time in that!
Irony the Tamil guy who is talking about Pandiyas accusing of Abhijit having half knowledge, little did he know The Pandiyas also just like Cholas used Sanskrit as civilizational language, performed Vedic rituals like ashwameda, the word Sangam itself is a Sanskrit word, I mean he believes that continent of Lemuria of was a real thing so how much of intelligence we can attribute to him, more irony the people like him believe that Tamils once lived in a separate island or continent (Kumarikandam or Lemuria) and migrated into Indian sub-continent and started from southern tip-of India in same breath they say Tamils also original inhabitant India and owners of Indus valley civilization.
Lemuria is the debunked theory to try to figure out why animals in India were so similar to animals in Africa. This theory was made before the Continental drift was discovered and proven to be accurate. So no lemuria isn't real and neither is the continent of MU. These landmasses are just can't be possible with the way the earths crust is. That said there is large swaths of land that are now underwater and a lot of human history lost because of it but these are previous coastal lands
@@ReldrikGeo Yes I agree, Lemuria was debunked theory, but some of my state can't accept it as debunked, they still claim that once Tamils had great empire greater than any in the world but submerged so they moved to nearest land, its a dubius claim based on few literary mentions, in the oldest of Tamil text there is mention of place called "Kumari Kandam", its very similar story to Atlantis, so it might be a island somewhere in Indian ocean probably near modern day Maldives, but again they are all just claims no proof.
The guy claims to be a 'scientist', but found he can profit from peddling half-truths. He says some truths to 'wow' the audience, then mixes up half-truths & propaganda for views, like saying certain cultures are 'brainwashed'
Hinduism is the main religion of Tamil Nadu in my area 90% are hindus but he was talking about a specific place called Kanyakumari where non hindus(christians and muslims) are slightly higher than hindus
@seyonekusalavan7970 What is Hinduism? +++++++++++++++ I have long pondered on what constitutes this so called religion that sweepingly generalises the 'Indian' people and sitting on their head (as cultural hegemony) and have come up with some conclusions .... A group of priest from the Zoroastrian religion (known as Aryans same as Iran) came to northern 'India' with their Avestan language and fire rituals and later created some slogans to form the Oral Vedas (old Sanskrit) which was never in written form (modern Sanskrit in Brahmi script) until after the 5th century AD. These priest learnt the principles of the Samana tradition( the mother of Jainism and Buddhism) that originated in the Indus Valley Civilization (admixture of Sumerian agriculturist and hunter gatherers) and thrived all over the sub continent with Tamizh especially in Southern 3 Kingdoms ( tiri- three Vi-Kings Idam-place Dravidam) and started incorporating(stealing)it into their already existent vaiteegam (senseless fire ritual) and produced the Upanishad (later the 3 levels of the Bhagavad-Gita and War Epics were hijacked) and became vegetarians. For a solid philosophical footing which they needed in a highly philosophized Tamizh (Samana Palli language just as Prakrit is Jain and Pali is Buddhist) infused land (Sanatan Dharma meaning just People's Religiosity) about the 8th century scribes like Adi Sankara came up with Advaita logic that distorted the original Buddhist(Sunya-Void) thoughts and produced a dichotomical nonsense which did not last the test of time. Later they took up the Tantric Samana Tamizh tradition (where Yoga and the Martial Arts came from) about the 10th century and put forth the bakti methodology (blind surrender). This was inspired by the Christian tradition also. Bakti was based on subtle erotism and appealed to the masses(like cinemas). The high Samana Tantra philosophical (Aaseevagam) basis was ruined for the newly conjectured Saiva and Vainava cult of the wretched puranic tales (porn stories). This is the history of the Priestly class(Brahmins) that still retain their priesthood in the agamic temples (lifeless stone worship) that held sway through the bakti movement from the 12th century onwards. The consecutive non-Tamizh rulers (Brahmin admixtured race such as Vaduga Telugus) firmly rooted the new found 'Hindu' religion with its caste (karmic birth) institution (twisted from the Samana four occupational make-up of society aka Farmers, Merchants, Rulers, Philosophers) with the insidious brahmin malicious agenda of Non-Dharmic segregation (untouchability) which the colonial British gave the general name by which sealing the new found religion hence the Brahmanic hegemony as Hindooism....
bro i am from north india, and i want to ask you why people of south india do not consider DNA testing? this whole argument can be avoided if we knew the genetic makeup of every indian. As far as i know, south indians are 40% aryans and north indians are 60% aryans.
@JodioJoestar-by8sn people South don't actually care about it, its the politicians and anti-india and anti Hindu gang that makes you think that south Indians hate north
@@JodioJoestar-by8sn Sangi Sir, ua-cam.com/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/v-deo.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English. English people and Tamil people have different colours. But how Tamil is mother of English. DNA test will not show languages..
Try reading the Indus Valley Script decipherment by Yajnadevam. He deciphered the script as classical Sanskrit. He deciphered the 37% of the corpus and it's going on well.
There shouldn't be denial that Sanskrit is the one language which binds the whole of South Asia. Fun fact : More than 85% of Tamil Hindus have Sanskrit names.
It's just British started this division and later politicians to divide and rule ... Sanskrit and Tamil both were used in tamilnadu widely but Sanskrit is used for spiritual like in temple n scriptures and Tamil is used as common language for all in tamilnadu... I forgot the name but there was many kings of Tamil Nadu hav written many text ,,copper plates were used specifically for Sanskrit text as it was abt spiritual and for general public Tamil is used in non copper plates and leafs
Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. It got writting 1700 years ago only. How refined Prakrithm be older than original Prakrithm and ancient and mother of languages. Is it not funny to call this unspoken Sanskrit as ancient.. Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English. ua-cam.com/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/v-deo.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR Every word of Sanskrit is traced back to Tamil. Tamil alone has root words. By conspiracy Sanskrit words are inserted into Tamil with the aim of destroying. Tamil was made into Malayalam language by inserting Sanskrit words and change the script. Hindi and urudu are same but different scripts. Thus the nomads use divide and rule policy.
Cholas didn't only use Sanskrit..They have written in their inscriptions that they trace their ancestry to Lord Rama and that they're of Solar dynasty.
Your lord Ram from kazar region of Ukraine was killed by Tamil Indiran. Kazar... code in Kerala Kazar singa nayanar. He was not born in ancient India and never ruled ayothiya. It is a lie propaganda..
Bs. Cholas never build any temple for ram . Ram only become popular after the bakthi moment. Cholas only claim their descendants of vishnu not particularly ram as an god or leader
The word ‘Dravid’ itself actually comes from Sanskrit ‘Tr+vid’ = where the three coasts meet & ‘ary’ means noble. Both ‘aryan & Dravid’ terms were used to ‘divide & rule’ by ‘the British’
@@ReldrikGeo The term Dravida is first mentioned in a buddist text which features the word "Dravida " as one of the languages in the Indian Subcontinent...
39:25 The first humans migrated out of Africa around 60,000-70,000 years ago. They first reached the Middle East temporarily and settled there for a period of time and eventually reached the Indian subcontinent and settled there. Later spread out in different directions.
Son of current chief minister of Tamil Nadu ( and most probably the next chief minister of Tamil Nadu) openly said “Just like dengue, mosquitoes, malaria, or coronavirus need to be eradicated, we have to eradicate Sanatana"( sanatan =Hinduism) and people there have no problem with this 🤷🏻♂️
@@ReldrikGeoyes they are whole india was erupted at that time there were 3 elections in north india which congress part was alliance with dmk due to backlash against dmk congress got worst defeat in all those three states congress got wiped out due alliance with dmk party and from every state in india lots of fir filed in supreme court against dmk leader who spoke that even I'm telugu and there are 2 telugu states who protested for this at high scale coz dmk Dravidian shit is next to our telugu state Andhra pradesh and we and rest of south india don't give a shit to Dravidian ideology and one more thing because of telugu and kannada people Tamilnadu dmk party Dravidian separatist shit didn't got any proper ground all of these years
Abhijit Chavda is a fo-ol who is unable to accept the truth as his fragile ego that everything started from India got hurt. If not for migration can he explain why his or any average Indian DNA has Aryan/Iranian origins as well along with other origins while the Harappan civilization did not have Aryan genes.
2:45 no those who believe in aryan invasion theory are the people that say vedic religion now hinduism was never native to india they brought vedas with themselves and pushed dravidians and natives from the north to south.
It's true though. The horse is not native to india but it is frequently mentioned in vedas. The Aryan invasion didn't happen but Aryan migration did happen. Aryan people have little knowledge about infrastructure but Harappans had a better knowledge about infrastructure and they were trading with other civilizations which Aryan people were not doing. Moreover, statue worshipping is not found in early Vedic religion but it is believed that Harappans are statue worshipping people. This mix in culture gives birth to modern hinduism.
@@SussyBaka-uq6nfthese are all very superficial claims. You say the Vedas extensively speak of the use of horses, which are not native to India,nd hence the people who composed India cannot have been Indian. And yet, you ignore all the geographical knowledge embedded in the Vedas, which give high importance to rivers like the now dry Saraswati. How can they have had contact with it, if they had actually migrated from another land. While the Vedas do speak of wars and disputes like the Dasharajna,there is no mention of an inward migration and confrontations with new ethnic groups within the subcontinent. Then how can you make such claims without even considering the accounts in these ancient texts, which are fundamental to understanding the heritage of India?
@@ReldrikGeo yes there are a lot of diff between india and west majority reasons hindus don't like christianity because christianity in india is not like christianity in west, western christianity is progressive you can say christianity in india in 2024 is like christianity in west in 1924
These are the words of a prominent archaeologist/historian of Archeological survey of India : "If proof were needed to show that Kannada was the spoken language of the region during the early period, one needs only to study the large number of Kannada personal names and place names in the early Prakrit inscriptions on stone and copper in Upper South India [...] Kannada was spoken by relatively large and well- settled populations, living in well- organised states ruled by able dynasties like the Satavahanas, with a high degree of civilisation [...] There is, therefore, no reason to believe that these languages had less rich or less expressive oral traditions than Tamil had towards the end of its pre-literate period." And to add more.....The Ashoka rock edict found at Brahmagiri (dated to 250 BC) has been suggested to contain words (Isila, meaning to throw, viz. an arrow, etc.) in identifiable Kannada.
All I can say with surity is that people in ancient India were very highy intelligent and competent people. And the current generation in comparision is kinda defective. (Some would say damaged goods) Because of all the invasions and colonisations the whole region had to suffer. It screwed up people's minds too. I have no idea how many generations it will take to heal people's minds from this mess...
I don't think modern Indian people are any less intelligent than the past. Look at the world and see how many scientists and ceos are Indian. I think colonialism definitely had a lot of negative affects but it's nothing that can hold people back
@@ReldrikGeo just compile more of his shorter videos i.e "AskAbhijit"...there are some videos about Indian gods and Greek gods, there are some on the term Danav, and many more. Feel free to compile.
Aryan or Dravidian or Mongoloid it doesn't matter We are alll Indians first then we are hindus Buddhists Christian muslim sikh Jain then anything else .
Both the Aryans and Dravidians originated from Iranian Neolithic farmers. The Aryans have about one-third Iranian Neolithic ancestry and migrated to the steppe and Russia around 9,000 years ago from Iran, forming the Indo-European culture. In contrast, the Indus Valley people had about 75% Iranian Neolithic ancestry, contributing to the formation of the Dravidian culture in present-day South India. Proto-Tamil and Sanskrit originated from Iran and Balochistan. Most modern Indians have between 40-60% Iranian Neolithic ancestry
bro reldrik, there is a strong opposition from tamil nadu against sanskrit is because of the things people do in this country. they say hindi is the national language and everyone should speak that and also they are spreading hindutva, while being a hindu from TN, I dont think there is a need to change india from a secular to a hindu nationalist country. and also , to the people saying that old tamils worshipped hinduism, i wanna say that in the sangam period, there were murugan, ceyyon, cenon, kadalon, kotravai, these were the 5 gods that tamils worshipped. murugan is not karthikeya , murugan is in no way related to shiva and parvati. murugan was an ancient tamil king. alright? there is no doubt on it that tamizhakam or tamil country was a seperate country before india , only in 7th century did tamils got introduced to shaivism and vaishnavism, before sangam, or before 300bce, tamils worshipped those 5 gods, 3-7th century, tamils worshipped samanam and boudham(jainism and buddhism) , only after 7th century did hinduism as a force emerged in south india and thats why imperial cholas have sanskrit names and they were sanskritized. u wouldnt see a pinch of sanskrit in early or sangam cholas
Tamil is not oldest language its it's Sanskrit,, people misunderstood..tamil is oldest living language which means its widely used but Sanskrit is considered dead so in this living language category tamil is oldest but if u take language script than Sanskrit is oldest written language.. and bith were not like oposite its similar and there is jo history of struggle in tamilnadu over language before Britishers...its manipulated Sanskrit is still language ised for spiritual means its not meant for common public its hard to learn and tamil was used in tamilnadu as common language..some kings of tamilnadu have written text both in tamil and Sanskrit where his giving rules for public he used tamil where its written abt god and spiritual Sanskrit is used ..
Sanskrit comes from indo Iranian language family which in itself comes under indo European language family from proto indo European whereas tamil comes from proto Dravidian languages family which doesn't have any other root .it developed independently without much influence
7:18 NOPE! 80 percent people of tamilnadu state are hindus (on certificate atleast). Well anti hindu and anti national sentiments exist there but only kept alive by politicians for past 75 years but still majority hindus kept their heritage alive in tamil nadu. Yes conversions are rampant there but not at all like wiped out hinduism in tamilnadu. Thousands of years old civilization and faced one thousand years of oppression from invaders various, we're still standing.
Aboriginals of Australia have some similarities genetically with Indians (Trivia: The Dingo of Australia is closely related to Indian Pariya dogs) but no they did not speak anything related to Tamil
Language will obv change over 40K years. Native South Indians still have some Astraloid features common with Australia-natives. Only South-India & Australia have high retro-flex consonants in language.
It's very illlogical to claim any language to be oldest/oldest living language Let’s take two languages X and Y at time t0. Then at a later date through times t1-t5, we will have Xt1, Xt2, Xt3, Xt4 and Xt5 similarly, Yt1, Yt2, Yt3, Yt4 and Yt5. Now, which of these is oldest? Most would answer Xt0 and Yt0. But, in fact none exists other than Xt5 and Yt5. Since, languages are primarily spoken they don't exist beyond the point of utterance. Assume now, we have written records left for each of these, viz., Xt3, Xt4 and Xt5 but Yt4, and Yt5. Which of these is oldest? People would quip with Xt3. In fact, Xt3 wouldn't have come into existence without Xt0, Xt1, Xt2. Hence we should say Xt3 and Yt4 were the earliest recorded stages of X and Y but not the oldest representations of X and Y. Logically, Xt5 and Yt5 are the continuities of Xt0 and Yt0 through ages. Neither of X and Y is older than the other. Ofcourse! It's lot more complex than this. The closeness between X0 and X3 could be higher than the closeness between Y0 and Y1. It gets even more complex. X0 not only creates X1 in T1, but also X1-1,X1-2 and so on,in the same T.X1-2 then to X2-2--1,X2-2--2etc.... Then X2-2--2 to X2-2--2---1,X2-2--2---2 etc.... So does Y0. You can call them different languages or different dialects. It's subjective. Things don't end here. X3-3--3---4 might influence X3-3--1---2 to create a new language (X3-3--3---4)(X3-3--1---2). But whether this newly created language be given an independent language status is subjective. It depends on the magnitude of influence. Just like there's magnitude of influence, there's magnitude of mutation too, to pave the way for more vagueness.(Plot twist: The language X0 was P5-6--9---2----7-----12 and Y0 was P5-2--4---2----7-----1). Now I'd like to know which one is the oldest living language. ((X3-3--3---4)(Y3-3--1---2)3-3) ((X2-1--3)(X2-3--1)3-1--3). (OR) ((Y3-1--2---1)(Y3-3--1---2)3-2) ((X2-1--2)(X2-1--1)3-2--3)?????
ஹிந்து மதம் என்ற வகைப்பாட்டில் ஹிந்து மதம் என்ற வாசகம் இங்கிலாந்து கிழக்கிந்திய கம்பெனியின் வகைப்படுத்தப்பட்ட வாசகம் தான் ஹிந்து மதம் தமிழர்கள் ஒரு போதும் தங்களை ஹிந்து மதம் என்று கூறுவதில்லை காரணம் தமிழர்கள் வரையறுத்த மதங்கள் இரண்டு 1 . சைவம் அதாவது சிவனை வழிபாடு செய்யும் மக்கள் சைவர்கள் 2. வைணவம் விஷ்ணு பகவானை வழிபாடு செய்பவர்கள் வைணவர்கள் அவ்வளவு தான் இதைதான் சேரன் மன்னர்கள் பல்லவர் மன்னர்கள் சோழன் மன்னர்கள் பாண்டியன் நெடுஞ்செழியன் காலத்தில் இருந்து சங்கம் வைத்து தமிழ் வளர்த்த மன்னர்கள் அருளிய மிகப்பெரிய கொடை
Reldrik Project Shivoham has dedicated video on this topic, if you want to learn more about this Dravidian-Sanskrit divide the origin, the implication you should watch it
@ReldrikGeo there are multiple "theories" like that...there are some Anthropologist who believe everything started from Egypt, some say it's Europe, some say it's Middle East...but when read about them you find out about their biases! (Ik this cus I'm an Anthropology student myself)
Please react to graphic india's 18 days, its basically a sci fi version of the mahabharata and most of its episodes are less than 1 minute long it would be awesome if you reacted to a couple of these episodes also the animation is a bit meh but once you get used to it its good
to know about ancient tamil people spoke tamil or sanskrit there is yt channel "shivoham" recent video "the uncomfortable truth about sanskrit and tamil"
This is a topic of much debate, with various theories and hypotheses. Over time, many academics have reached a consensus on several points: -Languages of Europe and Northern India belong to the Indo-European language family. -This implies that there was likely a common origin, often referred to as the "Aryan" homeland. -Cultural and religious similarities between ancient Europe and India support this idea. -Evidence suggests that these people migrated into Europe around 2500 BCE. -Some languages spread through migration, such as Greek and other Southern European languages. -The Iranian branch, known from the Avesta texts, separated later from the Indian branch. -Historical records show that Iranians migrated into modern-day Persia. -This leaves Central Asia and India as possible origins. -The consensus is that these people originated in Central Asia and migrated into India. -However, there is no conclusive archaeological or literary evidence of an "Aryan" migration or invasion into India. -Tamil belongs to the Dravidian language family. -There is no evidence to suggest that Tamil-speaking people lived near Northern India in the last 10,000+ years. -The script of the Saraswathi-Sindhu (Indus) Valley civilization remains undeciphered. -Modern research often relies on genetics to support migration theories, but genetics alone cannot determine the languages spoken by ancient peoples. -The decipherment of the Harappan script could provide new insights, but this remains speculative without new evidence. -Figuring out the Harappan script could give us new insights, but that’s still just a hopeful guess without fresh evidence. These points are broadly accepted among academics, although many details and interpretations remain subject to ongoing research and debate.
The Dravidian movement is basically the communist modus operandi of the oppressed-oppressor dynamic. The south of India is basically a communist utopia (or hellhole for normal people), and the best way of retaining power is through divide-and-rule politics that the communists are so adept at. These problems never existed historically in any significant way, that is before the communists (or the Periyarists) came into power.
Yes, definitely a heated debate, this is why there lots of theories, claims and hypothesis on this topic for centuries with no real answers, also lots of vested interest groups invested heavily in this since the colonial times. But most academics agree on few facts, so let me put few of those, 1. Most of Languages of Europe and Nothern India belong to single groups of language family Indo-European. 2. So, its logical to assume that this group of people lived at one single location at some point, the so called "Aryan" homeland. 3. Cultural and religious similarities between old European and Indian also cemented this hypothesis. 4. There is copious amount of evidence to prove that these people do not belong to Europe, and actually invaded into Europe around 2500BCE (see Yamnaya invasion of Europe) 5. We also know some languages spread by migration (maybe invasion) like Greek and other southern European "Aryan" languages. 6. We know that the last group to separate form Indian branch is Iranian (Avesta or proto-Persian) (Trivia: Iran is Persian word of Aryan) 7. And we know that Iranian also invaded into current Persia from somewhere else. 8. That left us with India and central Asia 9. General consensus is they originated in Central Asia and came into India just like Yamnaya and Iranians 10. But There is not a single archeological or literary evidence to prove that the "Aryans" either invaded or migrated into India, unlike Yamnaya, Iranian or other cases. 11. Tamil does not belong to that group, but part of a sperate language family called "Dravidian" 12. But there is also no proof to say Tamil/"Dravidians" lived anywhere near northern India in last 10000+ years. 13. The Saraswathi-Sindu (Indus) valley script is not yet deciphered conclusively, no matter what anyone claims. 14. So, the modern western academics primarily relay on genetics to prove AIT/AMT/ATT, but the problem is no amount genetic data can reveal what languages people spoke, so it cannot be used as hard evidence. 15. Hard evidence like decipherment of Harapan script could shine a new light, but that's unlikely unless we have some new evidence like Rosetta stone or something. Everything beyond that is just speculations, claims, hypothesis or outright propaganda right now. I myself have bunch of data points (based on various research) to claim that the homeland of the so called "Aryans" is modern day Haryana/Punjab region but again that is not accepted by everyone and just a hypothesis like AIT/AMT/ATT.
In some 3rd-1st century BC Tamil inscriptions, words of Kannada influence such as Naliyura, kavuDi and posil were found. In a 3rd-century AD Tamil inscription there is usage of oppanappa vIran. Here the honorific appa to a person's name is an influence from Kannada. Another word of Kannada origin is taayviru and is found in a 4th-century AD Tamil inscription. Scholars studied the sittanavAsal inscription of first century AD as also the inscriptions at tirupparamkunram, adakala and neDanUpatti. Scholars and historians assert that the words erumi, kavuDi, poshil and tAyiyar have their origin in Kannada because Tamil cognates are not available. And they add the words nADu and iLayar to this list. They propose that some grammatical categories found in these inscriptions are also unique to Kannada rather than Tamil.Scholars attribute these influences to the movements and spread of Jainas in these regions. These inscriptions belong to the period between the first century BC and fourth century AD. These are some examples that are proof of the early usage of a few Kannada origin words in early Tamil inscriptions before the common era and in the early centuries of the common era.
Church backed separatist have made people believe they are different from north india. This is a 100 year phenomenon. Before, there was no such division. All royal families of South india had sanskrit as their court language just like north india. They claim descent from either Ram or Krishna ( Suryavanshi or Chandravanshi)
Sanskrith and Malayalam bit of same. Sanskrith was used by high cast and political parties used Thamil speaking ( lower cast and working class)to rebel aganist the high class.
Middle East is dessert and all kinds of mountain terraians and not much habitable for larger human civilizations. but India was always fertile for billions of Humans to co-exist surrounded with mountains, see for people to live without fear of invasions and invents advance maths, astronomy, science, advanced technologies like Vimanas, binary algorithms, calculus, large Ships and so on. and India is the mother of all civilizations. civilizations started when Hindu Vedic maths, luni-solar calander and Param Yantras (pyramids) started spreading across the world from India on all 7 continents. I suggest you to watch Nilesh Oak with BeerBiceps podcast where he shares evidence of 5561 BCE Mahabharat, 12,209BCE Ramayana and 21,000 BCE Rig Vedic civilization evidences from multiple fields of subjects
The Vedas, Upnishads, Puranas are written in SANSKRIT. Vaishnavites or Shaivites all mantra are in SANSKRIT. They are chanting in Sanskrit to praise the lord.
we have 4000 divya prabhandham to chant to god in vaishnavite traditions. tamil vaishnavites use more tamil than sanskrit. even sanskrit during the bhakti movement, recognize that. there is a saying that goes Sanskrit is following god for knowledge while God follows Tamil to find bhakti/devotion
Not fan of Chavda but in Covid times I used to watch him he literally changed my perspective about history in every stream he says research yourself you should react him more
Its clear that the life after originating from africa . First settled in india . Idk what do u mean by Europe there because it was all covered in ice . Middle east land wasnt as rich and fertile as india . Thats why they kept migrating till they reach india . This happened 70,000 years ago . The oldest written historical evidence is the ramayana which dates back to 14,000 thousand years ago . Clearly no debate with anything as it as proved using astronomical evidence . Also the oldest language ever was chandos again a more pure language of Sanskrit itself originated in india .
in that 2 hr long podcast he presented all the facts in the detailed....so saying brainwashed justifys why he say so...because he had done all the research..
I plan on watching it. It's why I talked about it in the video. I feel like making sure the full context is presented in my reaction/commentary videos is highly important
You are seriously mistaken possibly because of outdated massaman video and articles based on outdated info All the current genetics papers are showing that Indus valley "like" ancestry is the predominant ancestry across Indian subcontinent actually North Indians have more Indus valley ancestry than South Indians on average If you want a detailed explanation you can leave your insta id then we can talk over there
U need to update yourself. The Indus script is meticulously deciphered and all evidences are pointing to Indus valley was speaking and writing in some form of Ancient Sanskrit.
idk how many can accept this but the way tamil is being seperated on the aryan theory is straightup bs. tamilians n the rest of the country never had this problem of being adressed seperately to begin with, before british time, during the colonial rule some linguist (forgot the name) tried spilting india into north n south.... he started with telugu, failed then considering the first failure he narrated the origin of tamil to be from dravidian family n what not..... this was succesfull this is the only reson of the divide today infact tamil went through "purification" after that particular linguist's article published. tamil was very much a hindu language if not a child lang of sanskrit it was atlest a sibling but today both parties antogonise each other exactly because of the that particular british linguist's work n the current political parties who use that to divide ppl even more. tamil was so integrated in the whole hindu culture that only rival philosophy to the kashmir shaivism would be tamil shaivism n now most of tamil nadu is hindu phobic. This is simply a tragedy not a debate or rivialry.
Oldest living language is Greek (See Mycenaean civilisation) not Tamil Don't believe random articles Classical Sanskrit is atleast as old as if not older than Tamil It is still a living language spoken as primary language in small villages in so it cannot be a dead language but dravidian parties don't mention this Vedic Sanskrit is much much older atleast as old as or older than Mycenaean Greek so atleast millennium older than Tamil Our Tamil is great but as a Tamil I don't like random bigots making bombastic claims without any proof
Hinduism has not been “wiped” off from Tamil Nadu, I challenge anyone to prove me otherwise, on the other hand you can look up for yourself which state in india has the most Hindu temples old and new, spoiler alert, it’s Tamil Nadu.
Just want to check if Nilesh Oak is in your watch list. BeerBiceps podcast with him on the dating of the Mahabharata and Sugriva's Atlas (from Ramayana) should be interesting. They are pretty long so I can understand if you do not want to react to them. But I only wish you can get time to watch them at your own convenience..
Becoz of this aryan theory, poor little adolf moustache german thoughts they were superior, and this battle (theory) still going on, even in US Canada 😅, exactly what happens between pharaohs jews zorastrian sumerian and many earlier civilization
Brooo😂 we don't know what language Indus valley people spoke Even proto dravidian is dated to 3rd millennium Tamil which is a late derivative of that hypothesized language can't be 5000 years old Oldest evidence of Tamil comes from around late 1st millennium BCE So around 400-300 BCE By the way nobody alive today understands that form of Tamil Internet is full of articles saying that 5000 years old nonsense no scholar says that Conspiracy theorists says that
@mallarghosh6915 educate yourself I read it multiple times and listened to his videos I am in personal contact with Yajnadevam through social media Infact I have read so many paper on that topic When I said nobody knows I mean it What I said was the consensus No authoritative scholar has accepted any of the claims Let Yajnadevam publish his paper vua journal then we can proceed
Sadly southern India during the period of freedom movement was captured by marxist ideologies whose core agenda is to get rid of the primary religion (in our case hinduism or Sanatan Dharam) from the region and then establish communism. Being hinduism which is a "NON-PROPHET" Religion and no one book to target they are struggling for decades. The northern parts were invaded by islam and their core strategy was brut force, The europeans (inventors of marxism) who were active in southern India went hand in hand with the missionaries studied the failed tactics of Islam and started to target the very ideology of one culture based on just the language difference (as is the case in Europe). So the temples and native culture remained intact just the idea of south is not same as north and completely different civilisation all together was formed. Marxism was hiding behind christian missionaries & remained dormant until dawn of 20th century and then grew rapidly during freedom struggle was at peak and political environment was not ready for a civil war between north and south. the political parties then took advantage of this divide and here we are today.😅 I do not worry for our civilisation as we have defended our religion and civilisation from such invaders for a millennia.🔥🔥🔱🔱🚩🚩🚩
@@ReldrikGeo ya, and the current CM of Tamil Nadu is Stalin, his father named him Stalin Bcoz he was born just few days after Stalin died and his father was fan of Stalin.
Fun fact Tamil & Telugu both languages has more percentage of Sanskrit Sounding or Sanskrit originated words than Hindi or Marathi other Devnagari languages of India. So Sanskrit had wide range of influence on all Indian Languages. Current spoken Hindi was corrupted and more Arebic and persian words as Arebian Persian brutal Invasion happened in Northern India. Mughals tried to forced Persianised Arebic in Northen India hence pure hindi got corrupted. Pure hindi languages has entire Sanskrit based words and not corrupted by Arebic or Persian words. In Schools Hindi Subject taught as a pure Hindi but Spoken Hindi has more persian arebian words. If you wanna learn hindi then learn pure hindi not Persianised Arebianisrd hindi.
Actually failed dna - yamnaya DNA higher among people who actually low caste and isolated non Varna people Even if their was dominated let's say Invasion the Iranian related people successful defended against them and they made them servent in Hindu monarchy Jats ,ror ( sudra ) , gujjar , pastuns ( isolated, avagana) kalash/ dards ( isolated ) , actually have dominating steppe dna
@@ReldrikGeo Rigveda texts... Rigveda texts has proper astronomical descriptions which dates back to 40000- 50000 yrs... You can react to Nilesh oaks videos with ranveer allahbadia.... There he tells about all these astronomical descriptions...
@@ggezs24 Idiot go & see Nilesh oaks video with ranveer allahbadia on channel beerbiceps.. There r 2-3 videos on tht channel about Indian civilization.. He has proved timelines with proofs.. See those videos & thnk me later
My take on this is even if you disagree with someone they should still be listened to. I didn't 100% agree with a lot of the things he said or believes but it's still good to listen and give commentary on the subject, rebuttal and what not lol
@@ReldrikGeo but his points are not academically progressive... He just wanna blame Europeans for mistranslations.... Misinformations when such a character doesn't even think of what his $tupidity gonna do he's just spreading info's without even caring how it gonna affect common man from thinking....
He says that every non African moved out of India, which is rubbish. India like rest of the world made of different immigrants who came into India in last 100000 years and Aryans are one of them. They most probably came from Andro ovan culture in central Asia .
@@ABIRPAUL-e7e even after seeing this video and lots of evidence, you still believe in the migration theory, so all I'll say keep living in your delusional world
As an Indian, it feels disheartening that we haven't learned from our history. Our past demonstrates that whenever we have been divided-whether by race, language, region, religion, or caste-others have taken advantage of our divisions. We must focus on unity to safeguard ourselves from such narratives. There is no benefit in dwelling on history; instead, we should learn from it, acknowledge our mistakes, and move forward by forgiving and forgetting the past. Today, our identity as Indians is what matters the most to us.
What do you mean Indian.. Meaning.. Hindi Hindu Hindustan.. India is union of Nations from 1947. You have no right to change this into one nation as Hindia.
I am a mallayali and i am indian i dont care i have big small problems in my life to take care of . I Love India 🇮🇳. I love all 22 official languages and all unofficial languages .
🤣🖐
malayali here bro 👊
Let me tell you a small statement from DMK (political party Abhijit sir mentioned)
"We need to Erad!cate Sanatan Dharm(Hinduism), Sanatan Dharm is a V!rus"
It is said by the DMK leader in front of hoards of people!
Another commenter said that it was his son that said this? I'll have to look it up
@ReldrikGeo the whole party is notorious for making such statements, not just him or his son. They do this to get the votes of non-hindu people
Let's say there are 30% non-hindus and 70% hindus, first they will unite the non-hindus by making such statements and will try to divide the hindus based their castes...when the Hindu are divided in smaller fragments of 10% or 15% each then they will get the votings and they will win the elections as those 30% of them voted to them while those 70% who are now in fragments give votes based on Castes...30% > 10% and thats how they win elections...when this bubble of fake reality burst they will lose the whole of Southern India...but sadly there time in that!
@@ReldrikGeo the whole party is notorious for making such statements, not just him or his son. They do this to get the votes of non-h!ndu people
Let's say there are 30% non-h!ndus and 70% h!ndus, first they will unite the non-h!ndus by making such statements and will try to divide the h!ndus based their c@stes...when the H!ndu are divided in smaller fragments of 10% or 15% each then they will get the votings and they will win the elections as those 30% of them voted to them while those 70% who are now in fragments give votes based on C@stes...30% > 10% and thats how they win elections...when this bubble of f@ke reality burst they will lose the whole of Southern India...but sadly there time in that!
@@ReldrikGeo yes it was his son, he is christian btw
@@JodioJoestar-by8sn he said these too, the whole party is rigged
Irony the Tamil guy who is talking about Pandiyas accusing of Abhijit having half knowledge, little did he know The Pandiyas also just like Cholas used Sanskrit as civilizational language, performed Vedic rituals like ashwameda, the word Sangam itself is a Sanskrit word, I mean he believes that continent of Lemuria of was a real thing so how much of intelligence we can attribute to him, more irony the people like him believe that Tamils once lived in a separate island or continent (Kumarikandam or Lemuria) and migrated into Indian sub-continent and started from southern tip-of India in same breath they say Tamils also original inhabitant India and owners of Indus valley civilization.
Abhijit is not half baked but rather a funded propagandist
Lemuria is the debunked theory to try to figure out why animals in India were so similar to animals in Africa. This theory was made before the Continental drift was discovered and proven to be accurate.
So no lemuria isn't real and neither is the continent of MU. These landmasses are just can't be possible with the way the earths crust is.
That said there is large swaths of land that are now underwater and a lot of human history lost because of it but these are previous coastal lands
@@ReldrikGeo Yes I agree, Lemuria was debunked theory, but some of my state can't accept it as debunked, they still claim that once Tamils had great empire greater than any in the world but submerged so they moved to nearest land, its a dubius claim based on few literary mentions, in the oldest of Tamil text there is mention of place called "Kumari Kandam", its very similar story to Atlantis, so it might be a island somewhere in Indian ocean probably near modern day Maldives, but again they are all just claims no proof.
The guy claims to be a 'scientist', but found he can profit from peddling half-truths. He says some truths to 'wow' the audience, then mixes up half-truths & propaganda for views, like saying certain cultures are 'brainwashed'
@@ripsanskrit3609you are product of Dmk + khangress coitus
Hinduism is the main religion of Tamil Nadu in my area 90% are hindus but he was talking about a specific place called Kanyakumari where non hindus(christians and muslims) are slightly higher than hindus
Enslaved by Hinduism through the bakti movement
hinduism is a religion created by aryens with saivam
@seyonekusalavan7970 What is Hinduism?
+++++++++++++++
I have long pondered on what constitutes this so called religion that sweepingly generalises the 'Indian' people and sitting on their head (as cultural hegemony) and have come up with some conclusions ....
A group of priest from the Zoroastrian religion (known as Aryans same as Iran) came to northern 'India' with their Avestan language and fire rituals and later created some slogans to form the Oral Vedas (old Sanskrit) which was never in written form (modern Sanskrit in Brahmi script) until after the 5th century AD.
These priest learnt the principles of the Samana tradition( the mother of Jainism and Buddhism) that originated in the Indus Valley Civilization (admixture of Sumerian agriculturist and hunter gatherers) and thrived all over the sub continent with Tamizh especially in Southern 3 Kingdoms ( tiri- three Vi-Kings Idam-place Dravidam) and started incorporating(stealing)it into their already existent vaiteegam (senseless fire ritual) and produced the Upanishad (later the 3 levels of the Bhagavad-Gita and War Epics were hijacked) and became vegetarians.
For a solid philosophical footing which they needed in a highly philosophized Tamizh (Samana Palli language just as Prakrit is Jain and Pali is Buddhist) infused land (Sanatan Dharma meaning just People's Religiosity) about the 8th century scribes like Adi Sankara came up with Advaita logic that distorted the original Buddhist(Sunya-Void) thoughts and produced a dichotomical nonsense which did not last the test of time.
Later they took up the Tantric Samana Tamizh tradition (where Yoga and the Martial Arts came from) about the 10th century and put forth the bakti methodology (blind surrender). This was inspired by the Christian tradition also. Bakti was based on subtle erotism and appealed to the masses(like cinemas). The high Samana Tantra philosophical (Aaseevagam) basis was ruined for the newly conjectured Saiva and Vainava cult of the wretched puranic tales (porn stories).
This is the history of the Priestly class(Brahmins) that still retain their priesthood in the agamic temples (lifeless stone worship) that held sway through the bakti movement from the 12th century onwards. The consecutive non-Tamizh rulers (Brahmin admixtured race such as Vaduga Telugus) firmly rooted the new found 'Hindu' religion with its caste (karmic birth) institution (twisted from the Samana four occupational make-up of society aka Farmers, Merchants, Rulers, Philosophers) with the insidious brahmin malicious agenda of Non-Dharmic segregation (untouchability) which the colonial British gave the general name by which sealing the new found religion hence the Brahmanic hegemony as Hindooism....
@seyonekusalavan7970 blabber somewhere
90% in stats but they vote for people like Stalin who wish to destroy hinduism....are they really Hindu?
Tamilian here and I agree 100% with everything Abhijit says here.
Interesting, thank you for the input.
bro i am from north india, and i want to ask you why people of south india do not consider DNA testing? this whole argument can be avoided if we knew the genetic makeup of every indian. As far as i know, south indians are 40% aryans and north indians are 60% aryans.
@JodioJoestar-by8sn people South don't actually care about it, its the politicians and anti-india and anti Hindu gang that makes you think that south Indians hate north
@@JodioJoestar-by8sn
Sangi Sir, ua-cam.com/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/v-deo.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR
Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English.
English people and Tamil people have different colours. But how Tamil is mother of English.
DNA test will not show languages..
@@JodioJoestar-by8sn There is no Aryan DNA that is a myth, and yes, all India are genetically similar
Try reading the Indus Valley Script decipherment by Yajnadevam. He deciphered the script as classical Sanskrit. He deciphered the 37% of the corpus and it's going on well.
Okay I will seek this out
I have found the presentation on it, I'll give it a watch
@@ReldrikGeo can u send that?
ua-cam.com/users/liveA-M8IoAlaGI?si=l5GSHasRi1g2t4dT
ua-cam.com/video/b0Z1YDSB1IE/v-deo.htmlsi=ZAWQW1BEZDgg4__r
There shouldn't be denial that Sanskrit is the one language which binds the whole of South Asia. Fun fact : More than 85% of Tamil Hindus have Sanskrit names.
It's just British started this division and later politicians to divide and rule ... Sanskrit and Tamil both were used in tamilnadu widely but Sanskrit is used for spiritual like in temple n scriptures and Tamil is used as common language for all in tamilnadu... I forgot the name but there was many kings of Tamil Nadu hav written many text ,,copper plates were used specifically for Sanskrit text as it was abt spiritual and for general public Tamil is used in non copper plates and leafs
Sanskrit means refined Prakrithm. It got writting 1700 years ago only. How refined Prakrithm be older than original Prakrithm and ancient and mother of languages.
Is it not funny to call this unspoken Sanskrit as ancient..
Tamil is mother of languages including Sanskrit and English.
ua-cam.com/video/Cy-B_ip21Lo/v-deo.html&si=ChcXYW_V_IhJCbCR
Every word of Sanskrit is traced back to Tamil. Tamil alone has root words.
By conspiracy Sanskrit words are inserted into Tamil with the aim of destroying.
Tamil was made into Malayalam language by inserting Sanskrit words and change the script.
Hindi and urudu are same but different scripts. Thus the nomads use divide and rule policy.
@@deepaksahu6075Raja Raja Chola for example
@@TSR64some fake evidence u believe in 😂
lol...do explain with your statistics...
Cholas didn't only use Sanskrit..They have written in their inscriptions that they trace their ancestry to Lord Rama and that they're of Solar dynasty.
Not solar it's Surya dynasty and which lord Rama born
Your lord Ram from kazar region of Ukraine was killed by Tamil Indiran.
Kazar... code in Kerala
Kazar singa nayanar.
He was not born in ancient India and never ruled ayothiya.
It is a lie propaganda..
Bs. Cholas never build any temple for ram . Ram only become popular after the bakthi moment. Cholas only claim their descendants of vishnu not particularly ram as an god or leader
imperial cholas were sanskritized during the 10th century, early cholas or sangam cholas didnt have a bit of sanskrit. it's all made up
@@TSR64as a malayali
You are joking
The word ‘Dravid’ itself actually comes from Sanskrit ‘Tr+vid’ = where the three coasts meet & ‘ary’ means noble. Both ‘aryan & Dravid’ terms were used to ‘divide & rule’ by ‘the British’
No its root word is tamil. Tamil has become dravida in the daily usage of North people.
No it's mean people of South . It root word is tamil
dravida is a corrupted name for Tamil itself. it became damila, dramila, dravida, don't put forth some baseless claim
Are there any linguistical studies that show more info on this?
@@ReldrikGeo The term Dravida is first mentioned in a buddist text which features the word "Dravida " as one of the languages in the Indian Subcontinent...
14:41 Sanatan Dharma is actual name of Hinduism
They told u that
there are 10 schools of thoughts under the DHARMA. the one called vedanta is hinduism
@@ggezs24Lol. All the 6 Astik Philosophies are under Hinduism.
@@atheist8890 go search up what is dharma.
@@atheist8890 im talking about dharma, not hinduism -_-
Yes, Hindu is realtively a new term. Basicially people living in banks of river sindhu and later indus. its Sanathana Dharma the real name
39:25 The first humans migrated out of Africa around 60,000-70,000 years ago. They first reached the Middle East temporarily and settled there for a period of time and eventually reached the Indian subcontinent and settled there. Later spread out in different directions.
Son of current chief minister of Tamil Nadu ( and most probably the next chief minister of Tamil Nadu) openly said “Just like dengue, mosquitoes, malaria, or coronavirus need to be eradicated, we have to eradicate Sanatana"( sanatan =Hinduism) and people there have no problem with this 🤷🏻♂️
That's actually really messed up. Was there no backlash to this?
@@ReldrikGeo yes there are but mostly from other states
@@ReldrikGeoyes they are whole india was erupted at that time there were 3 elections in north india which congress part was alliance with dmk due to backlash against dmk congress got worst defeat in all those three states congress got wiped out due alliance with dmk party and from every state in india lots of fir filed in supreme court against dmk leader who spoke that even I'm telugu and there are 2 telugu states who protested for this at high scale coz dmk Dravidian shit is next to our telugu state Andhra pradesh and we and rest of south india don't give a shit to Dravidian ideology and one more thing because of telugu and kannada people Tamilnadu dmk party Dravidian separatist shit didn't got any proper ground all of these years
He's deputy CM now
True tamil will support his statement
His shorter videos are THE BEST! Make more videos compiling more of his "AskAbhijit" videos...they are Gems ✨
I think the shorter videos work great when put together. Helps build a bigger story
Abhijit Chavda is a fo-ol who is unable to accept the truth as his fragile ego that everything started from India got hurt. If not for migration can he explain why his or any average Indian DNA has Aryan/Iranian origins as well along with other origins while the Harappan civilization did not have Aryan genes.
2:45 no those who believe in aryan invasion theory are the people that say vedic religion now hinduism was never native to india they brought vedas with themselves and pushed dravidians and natives from the north to south.
Wait I thought the vedic religion was a core pillar to basically the entire history of India. From the very beginning
@@ReldrikGeoYou are correct, it indeed is.
What OP mentions is the separatists' view.
But indeed Dravidians are native to India . He himself said about aryan migration theory is true
It's true though. The horse is not native to india but it is frequently mentioned in vedas. The Aryan invasion didn't happen but Aryan migration did happen. Aryan people have little knowledge about infrastructure but Harappans had a better knowledge about infrastructure and they were trading with other civilizations which Aryan people were not doing. Moreover, statue worshipping is not found in early Vedic religion but it is believed that Harappans are statue worshipping people. This mix in culture gives birth to modern hinduism.
@@SussyBaka-uq6nfthese are all very superficial claims. You say the Vedas extensively speak of the use of horses, which are not native to India,nd hence the people who composed India cannot have been Indian. And yet, you ignore all the geographical knowledge embedded in the Vedas, which give high importance to rivers like the now dry Saraswati. How can they have had contact with it, if they had actually migrated from another land. While the Vedas do speak of wars and disputes like the Dasharajna,there is no mention of an inward migration and confrontations with new ethnic groups within the subcontinent. Then how can you make such claims without even considering the accounts in these ancient texts, which are fundamental to understanding the heritage of India?
Even temple in Tamil are safe cause the northindians sacrificed their whole family's to save the country
Temples are safe because Tamil Kings did not let any one in, additionally aided by Western and Eastern Ghats. Stop your BS victimization.
@@kumar.193so north king simply "let them in"?
@@kumar.193our king given them acess na
They give them life
That is the later part you cannot deny sacrifice you must be the biggest clown😊@@kumar.193
yes hinduism is popular but not that much because on paper they are hindu but most of them are atheist
Can't atheists still be Hindu?
@@ReldrikGeo yes they can but they don't belive in god and more lean towards to abrahamic culture
Atheists here in the US hate everything about the abrahamic religions
@@ReldrikGeo
Atheism is a part of Hinduism if you remember the India in Pixels video where he explained 16 Indian philosophies.
@@ReldrikGeo yes there are a lot of diff between india and west
majority reasons hindus don't like christianity because christianity in india is not like christianity in west, western christianity is progressive
you can say christianity in india in 2024 is like christianity in west in 1924
These are the words of a prominent archaeologist/historian of Archeological survey of India :
"If proof were needed to show that Kannada was the spoken language of the region during the early period, one needs only to study the large number of Kannada personal names and place names in the early Prakrit inscriptions on stone and copper in Upper South India [...] Kannada was spoken by relatively large and well- settled populations, living in well- organised states ruled by able dynasties like the Satavahanas, with a high degree of civilisation [...] There is, therefore, no reason to believe that these languages had less rich or less expressive oral traditions than Tamil had towards the end of its pre-literate period."
And to add more.....The Ashoka rock edict found at Brahmagiri (dated to 250 BC) has been suggested to contain words (Isila, meaning to throw, viz. an arrow, etc.) in identifiable Kannada.
30:39 Bengali’s do black magic ☠️☠️
Very weird lol
All I can say with surity is that people in ancient India were very highy intelligent and competent people. And the current generation in comparision is kinda defective. (Some would say damaged goods) Because of all the invasions and colonisations the whole region had to suffer. It screwed up people's minds too. I have no idea how many generations it will take to heal people's minds from this mess...
I don't think modern Indian people are any less intelligent than the past. Look at the world and see how many scientists and ceos are Indian.
I think colonialism definitely had a lot of negative affects but it's nothing that can hold people back
Lessgooo Abhijit Chavda 🔥
GOAT 🐐
Any other videos you recommend?
@@ReldrikGeo just compile more of his shorter videos i.e "AskAbhijit"...there are some videos about Indian gods and Greek gods, there are some on the term Danav, and many more. Feel free to compile.
I'll have to look
@@ReldrikGeo you use anything like Instagram? I have a lot a contexts and suggests to give you
@@ReldrikGeo’Indian philosophy: 5 min crash course’, ‘why genghis didn’t invade India’ & his podcasts with Ranveer & prakhar are really popular
Aryan or Dravidian or Mongoloid it doesn't matter
We are alll Indians first then we are hindus Buddhists Christian muslim sikh Jain then anything else .
Both the Aryans and Dravidians originated from Iranian Neolithic farmers. The Aryans have about one-third Iranian Neolithic ancestry and migrated to the steppe and Russia around 9,000 years ago from Iran, forming the Indo-European culture. In contrast, the Indus Valley people had about 75% Iranian Neolithic ancestry, contributing to the formation of the Dravidian culture in present-day South India. Proto-Tamil and Sanskrit originated from Iran and Balochistan. Most modern Indians have between 40-60% Iranian Neolithic ancestry
Go far enough back we are all related
There is a video called Zeus, Jupiter, Thor: European Versions of Indra (Vedic God) by abijith chavda that's an interesting video
Current tamil we speak is obviously mixed with a lot of languages including sanskrit. But pure tamil that we use for writing developef on its own....
bro reldrik, there is a strong opposition from tamil nadu against sanskrit is because of the things people do in this country. they say hindi is the national language and everyone should speak that and also they are spreading hindutva, while being a hindu from TN, I dont think there is a need to change india from a secular to a hindu nationalist country. and also , to the people saying that old tamils worshipped hinduism, i wanna say that in the sangam period, there were murugan, ceyyon, cenon, kadalon, kotravai, these were the 5 gods that tamils worshipped. murugan is not karthikeya , murugan is in no way related to shiva and parvati. murugan was an ancient tamil king. alright? there is no doubt on it that tamizhakam or tamil country was a seperate country before india , only in 7th century did tamils got introduced to shaivism and vaishnavism, before sangam, or before 300bce, tamils worshipped those 5 gods, 3-7th century, tamils worshipped samanam and boudham(jainism and buddhism) , only after 7th century did hinduism as a force emerged in south india and thats why imperial cholas have sanskrit names and they were sanskritized. u wouldnt see a pinch of sanskrit in early or sangam cholas
Tamil is not oldest language its it's Sanskrit,, people misunderstood..tamil is oldest living language which means its widely used but Sanskrit is considered dead so in this living language category tamil is oldest but if u take language script than Sanskrit is oldest written language.. and bith were not like oposite its similar and there is jo history of struggle in tamilnadu over language before Britishers...its manipulated Sanskrit is still language ised for spiritual means its not meant for common public its hard to learn and tamil was used in tamilnadu as common language..some kings of tamilnadu have written text both in tamil and Sanskrit where his giving rules for public he used tamil where its written abt god and spiritual Sanskrit is used ..
Sanskrit comes from indo Iranian language family which in itself comes under indo European language family from proto indo European whereas tamil comes from proto Dravidian languages family which doesn't have any other root .it developed independently without much influence
The history of the languages is complex and I wish there was a better record of their origins
7:18 NOPE! 80 percent people of tamilnadu state are hindus (on certificate atleast). Well anti hindu and anti national sentiments exist there but only kept alive by politicians for past 75 years but still majority hindus kept their heritage alive in tamil nadu. Yes conversions are rampant there but not at all like wiped out hinduism in tamilnadu. Thousands of years old civilization and faced one thousand years of oppression from invaders various, we're still standing.
Yeah I was under the impression that Tamil Nadu was majority Hindu
Indus script is now decoded very recently. It's older Sanskrit with different script (Indus script).
what really?? indus valley civilization script??
Really? Do you have a link?
Search Yajnadevam, comments with links are getting deleted.
Search Yajnadevam
@@ReldrikGeo just search about Brahmi Script.
I really loved you channel and I told you 6 months ago that we might touch 10k sub... But still 7k is less.. Merry Christmas
There were so many evolutions but only civilizations made us prosperous
Don't fight we all are oriented from mars.
👽
Out of India theory is only about last 10000 years. But what he is talking about post ice age migrations
Aboriginals of Australia have some similarities genetically with Indians (Trivia: The Dingo of Australia is closely related to Indian Pariya dogs) but no they did not speak anything related to Tamil
Yeah, I know genetically they have the similarities but the language is something completely different
Language will obv change over 40K years. Native South Indians still have some Astraloid features common with Australia-natives.
Only South-India & Australia have high retro-flex consonants in language.
@@alani3992 Then you can't call it Tamil, also the Indian DNA entered the Australia about 4000 years ago.
It's very illlogical to claim any language to be oldest/oldest living language
Let’s take two languages X and Y at time t0. Then at a later date through times t1-t5, we will have Xt1, Xt2, Xt3, Xt4 and Xt5 similarly, Yt1, Yt2, Yt3, Yt4 and Yt5. Now, which of these is oldest? Most would answer Xt0 and Yt0. But, in fact none exists other than Xt5 and Yt5. Since, languages are primarily spoken they don't exist beyond the point of utterance. Assume now, we have written records left for each of these, viz., Xt3, Xt4 and Xt5 but Yt4, and Yt5. Which of these is oldest? People would quip with Xt3. In fact, Xt3 wouldn't have come into existence without Xt0, Xt1, Xt2. Hence we should say Xt3 and Yt4 were the earliest recorded stages of X and Y but not the oldest representations of X and Y. Logically, Xt5 and Yt5 are the continuities of Xt0 and Yt0 through ages. Neither of X and Y is older than the other. Ofcourse! It's lot more complex than this. The closeness between X0 and X3 could be higher than the closeness between Y0 and Y1. It gets even more complex. X0 not only creates X1 in T1, but also X1-1,X1-2 and so on,in the same T.X1-2 then to X2-2--1,X2-2--2etc.... Then X2-2--2 to X2-2--2---1,X2-2--2---2 etc.... So does Y0. You can call them different languages or different dialects. It's subjective. Things don't end here. X3-3--3---4 might influence X3-3--1---2 to create a new language (X3-3--3---4)(X3-3--1---2). But whether this newly created language be given an independent language status is subjective. It depends on the magnitude of influence. Just like there's magnitude of influence, there's magnitude of mutation too, to pave the way for more vagueness.(Plot twist: The language X0 was P5-6--9---2----7-----12 and Y0 was P5-2--4---2----7-----1). Now I'd like to know which one is the oldest living language.
((X3-3--3---4)(Y3-3--1---2)3-3) ((X2-1--3)(X2-3--1)3-1--3).
(OR)
((Y3-1--2---1)(Y3-3--1---2)3-2) ((X2-1--2)(X2-1--1)3-2--3)?????
ஹிந்து மதம் என்ற வகைப்பாட்டில் ஹிந்து மதம் என்ற வாசகம் இங்கிலாந்து கிழக்கிந்திய கம்பெனியின் வகைப்படுத்தப்பட்ட வாசகம் தான் ஹிந்து மதம் தமிழர்கள் ஒரு போதும் தங்களை ஹிந்து மதம் என்று கூறுவதில்லை காரணம் தமிழர்கள் வரையறுத்த மதங்கள் இரண்டு 1 . சைவம் அதாவது சிவனை வழிபாடு செய்யும் மக்கள் சைவர்கள் 2. வைணவம் விஷ்ணு பகவானை வழிபாடு செய்பவர்கள் வைணவர்கள் அவ்வளவு தான் இதைதான் சேரன் மன்னர்கள் பல்லவர் மன்னர்கள் சோழன் மன்னர்கள் பாண்டியன் நெடுஞ்செழியன் காலத்தில் இருந்து சங்கம் வைத்து தமிழ் வளர்த்த மன்னர்கள் அருளிய மிகப்பெரிய கொடை
I am a Tamil Vaishnavite. I worship Shiva too. Don't place a divide where none exists
Reldrik Project Shivoham has dedicated video on this topic, if you want to learn more about this Dravidian-Sanskrit divide the origin, the implication you should watch it
21:21 lol no...who told you that?
Civilization built up and started in the Mesopotamia area in the river valley between The Tigris and Euphrates
@ReldrikGeo there are multiple "theories" like that...there are some Anthropologist who believe everything started from Egypt, some say it's Europe, some say it's Middle East...but when read about them you find out about their biases! (Ik this cus I'm an Anthropology student myself)
Please react to graphic india's 18 days, its basically a sci fi version of the mahabharata and most of its episodes are less than 1 minute long it would be awesome if you reacted to a couple of these episodes also the animation is a bit meh but once you get used to it its good
He can't understand Mahabharat , he needs to know the plot, about Krishna, and a lot of background
He can't understand Mahabharat , he needs to know the plot, about Krishna, and a lot of background
I can add it to the list. I'll also need to do a bit of research first?
Modern human started from middle East 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
It's a pretty wide spread theory that civilization was built up in Mesopotamia
30:41 Bangali black magic 🥶🥶
Crazy thing it is happening on my obs capture which is an entirely different PC as I'm capturing my main PC through a capture card lol
He us our self important intellectualized Alex Jones btw.
to know about ancient tamil people spoke tamil or sanskrit there is yt channel "shivoham" recent video "the uncomfortable truth about sanskrit and tamil"
Okay, I know of the channel. I will look for this video
Edit: it was already on my list lol
This is a topic of much debate, with various theories and hypotheses. Over time, many academics have reached a consensus on several points:
-Languages of Europe and Northern India belong to the Indo-European language family.
-This implies that there was likely a common origin, often referred to as the "Aryan" homeland.
-Cultural and religious similarities between ancient Europe and India support this idea.
-Evidence suggests that these people migrated into Europe around 2500 BCE.
-Some languages spread through migration, such as Greek and other Southern European languages.
-The Iranian branch, known from the Avesta texts, separated later from the Indian branch.
-Historical records show that Iranians migrated into modern-day Persia.
-This leaves Central Asia and India as possible origins.
-The consensus is that these people originated in Central Asia and migrated into India.
-However, there is no conclusive archaeological or literary evidence of an "Aryan" migration or invasion into India.
-Tamil belongs to the Dravidian language family.
-There is no evidence to suggest that Tamil-speaking people lived near Northern India in the last 10,000+ years.
-The script of the Saraswathi-Sindhu (Indus) Valley civilization remains undeciphered.
-Modern research often relies on genetics to support migration theories, but genetics alone cannot determine the languages spoken by ancient peoples.
-The decipherment of the Harappan script could provide new insights, but this remains speculative without new evidence.
-Figuring out the Harappan script could give us new insights, but that’s still just a hopeful guess without fresh evidence.
These points are broadly accepted among academics, although many details and interpretations remain subject to ongoing research and debate.
The Dravidian movement is basically the communist modus operandi of the oppressed-oppressor dynamic. The south of India is basically a communist utopia (or hellhole for normal people), and the best way of retaining power is through divide-and-rule politics that the communists are so adept at. These problems never existed historically in any significant way, that is before the communists (or the Periyarists) came into power.
14:56 we have enough red flags . we dont need more of them
Yes, definitely a heated debate, this is why there lots of theories, claims and hypothesis on this topic for centuries with no real answers, also lots of vested interest groups invested heavily in this since the colonial times. But most academics agree on few facts, so let me put few of those,
1. Most of Languages of Europe and Nothern India belong to single groups of language family Indo-European.
2. So, its logical to assume that this group of people lived at one single location at some point, the so called "Aryan" homeland.
3. Cultural and religious similarities between old European and Indian also cemented this hypothesis.
4. There is copious amount of evidence to prove that these people do not belong to Europe, and actually invaded into Europe around 2500BCE (see Yamnaya invasion of Europe)
5. We also know some languages spread by migration (maybe invasion) like Greek and other southern European "Aryan" languages.
6. We know that the last group to separate form Indian branch is Iranian (Avesta or proto-Persian) (Trivia: Iran is Persian word of Aryan)
7. And we know that Iranian also invaded into current Persia from somewhere else.
8. That left us with India and central Asia
9. General consensus is they originated in Central Asia and came into India just like Yamnaya and Iranians
10. But There is not a single archeological or literary evidence to prove that the "Aryans" either invaded or migrated into India, unlike Yamnaya, Iranian or other cases.
11. Tamil does not belong to that group, but part of a sperate language family called "Dravidian"
12. But there is also no proof to say Tamil/"Dravidians" lived anywhere near northern India in last 10000+ years.
13. The Saraswathi-Sindu (Indus) valley script is not yet deciphered conclusively, no matter what anyone claims.
14. So, the modern western academics primarily relay on genetics to prove AIT/AMT/ATT, but the problem is no amount genetic data can reveal what languages people spoke, so it cannot be used as hard evidence.
15. Hard evidence like decipherment of Harapan script could shine a new light, but that's unlikely unless we have some new evidence like Rosetta stone or something.
Everything beyond that is just speculations, claims, hypothesis or outright propaganda right now. I myself have bunch of data points (based on various research) to claim that the homeland of the so called "Aryans" is modern day Haryana/Punjab region but again that is not accepted by everyone and just a hypothesis like AIT/AMT/ATT.
In some 3rd-1st century BC Tamil inscriptions, words of Kannada influence such as Naliyura, kavuDi and posil were found. In a 3rd-century AD Tamil inscription there is usage of oppanappa vIran. Here the honorific appa to a person's name is an influence from Kannada. Another word of Kannada origin is taayviru and is found in a 4th-century AD Tamil inscription. Scholars studied the sittanavAsal inscription of first century AD as also the inscriptions at tirupparamkunram, adakala and neDanUpatti. Scholars and historians assert that the words erumi, kavuDi, poshil and tAyiyar have their origin in Kannada because Tamil cognates are not available. And they add the words nADu and iLayar to this list. They propose that some grammatical categories found in these inscriptions are also unique to Kannada rather than Tamil.Scholars attribute these influences to the movements and spread of Jainas in these regions. These inscriptions belong to the period between the first century BC and fourth century AD. These are some examples that are proof of the early usage of a few Kannada origin words in early Tamil inscriptions before the common era and in the early centuries of the common era.
Church backed separatist have made people believe they are different from north india. This is a 100 year phenomenon. Before, there was no such division. All royal families of South india had sanskrit as their court language just like north india. They claim descent from either Ram or Krishna ( Suryavanshi or Chandravanshi)
21:35
What the!!?
Sanskrith and Malayalam bit of same. Sanskrith was used by high cast and political parties used Thamil speaking ( lower cast and working class)to rebel aganist the high class.
Middle East is dessert and all kinds of mountain terraians and not much habitable for larger human civilizations. but India was always fertile for billions of Humans to co-exist surrounded with mountains, see for people to live without fear of invasions and invents advance maths, astronomy, science, advanced technologies like Vimanas, binary algorithms, calculus, large Ships and so on. and India is the mother of all civilizations. civilizations started when Hindu Vedic maths, luni-solar calander and Param Yantras (pyramids) started spreading across the world from India on all 7 continents. I suggest you to watch Nilesh Oak with BeerBiceps podcast where he shares evidence of 5561 BCE Mahabharat, 12,209BCE Ramayana and 21,000 BCE Rig Vedic civilization evidences from multiple fields of subjects
The Vedas, Upnishads, Puranas are written in SANSKRIT. Vaishnavites or Shaivites all mantra are in SANSKRIT. They are chanting in Sanskrit to praise the lord.
Oo
we have 4000 divya prabhandham to chant to god in vaishnavite traditions. tamil vaishnavites use more tamil than sanskrit. even sanskrit during the bhakti movement, recognize that. there is a saying that goes
Sanskrit is following god for knowledge while God follows Tamil to find bhakti/devotion
Not fan of Chavda but in Covid times I used to watch him he literally changed my perspective about history in every stream he says research yourself you should react him more
Yes research is incredibly important. I am constantly reading about different things in my spare time
@ check on R1a1 haplogroup
Hello buddy! Abhijit chavda was a historian, geopolitics analysis. Reaction his podcast with bear bicep.
Ok
22:20 What Abhijit is saying is indian hindu civilization existed in India and spread out of india to persia to Europe.
Its clear that the life after originating from africa . First settled in india . Idk what do u mean by Europe there because it was all covered in ice . Middle east land wasnt as rich and fertile as india . Thats why they kept migrating till they reach india . This happened 70,000 years ago . The oldest written historical evidence is the ramayana which dates back to 14,000 thousand years ago . Clearly no debate with anything as it as proved using astronomical evidence . Also the oldest language ever was chandos again a more pure language of Sanskrit itself originated in india .
in that 2 hr long podcast he presented all the facts in the detailed....so saying brainwashed justifys why he say so...because he had done all the research..
I plan on watching it. It's why I talked about it in the video. I feel like making sure the full context is presented in my reaction/commentary videos is highly important
You are seriously mistaken possibly because of outdated massaman video and articles based on outdated info
All the current genetics papers are showing that Indus valley "like" ancestry is the predominant ancestry across Indian subcontinent actually North Indians have more Indus valley ancestry than South Indians on average
If you want a detailed explanation you can leave your insta id then we can talk over there
U need to update yourself. The Indus script is meticulously deciphered and all evidences are pointing to Indus valley was speaking and writing in some form of Ancient Sanskrit.
True
idk how many can accept this but the way tamil is being seperated on the aryan theory is straightup bs. tamilians n the rest of the country never had this problem of being adressed seperately to begin with, before british time, during the colonial rule some linguist (forgot the name) tried spilting india into north n south.... he started with telugu, failed then considering the first failure he narrated the origin of tamil to be from dravidian family n what not..... this was succesfull this is the only reson of the divide today infact tamil went through "purification" after that particular linguist's article published. tamil was very much a hindu language if not a child lang of sanskrit it was atlest a sibling but today both parties antogonise each other exactly because of the that particular british linguist's work n the current political parties who use that to divide ppl even more. tamil was so integrated in the whole hindu culture that only rival philosophy to the kashmir shaivism would be tamil shaivism n now most of tamil nadu is hindu phobic.
This is simply a tragedy not a debate or rivialry.
Bharatha Nattyam
I mean from his language itself u can say he exaggerates a lot.
Evolution is different civilization is different
True
Oldest living language is Greek (See Mycenaean civilisation) not Tamil
Don't believe random articles
Classical Sanskrit is atleast as old as if not older than Tamil
It is still a living language spoken as primary language in small villages in so it cannot be a dead language but dravidian parties don't mention this
Vedic Sanskrit is much much older atleast as old as or older than Mycenaean Greek so atleast millennium older than Tamil
Our Tamil is great but as a Tamil I don't like random bigots making bombastic claims without any proof
You're right. Near East is the origin of the human civilisation
Hinduism has not been “wiped” off from Tamil Nadu, I challenge anyone to prove me otherwise, on the other hand you can look up for yourself which state in india has the most Hindu temples old and new, spoiler alert, it’s Tamil Nadu.
Yeah I was going to say that southern India would have the most because they weren't destroyed during the Islamic invasions
Just want to check if Nilesh Oak is in your watch list. BeerBiceps podcast with him on the dating of the Mahabharata and Sugriva's Atlas (from Ramayana) should be interesting. They are pretty long so I can understand if you do not want to react to them. But I only wish you can get time to watch them at your own convenience..
The long podcast isn't but I believe some of the clipped segments are
Becoz of this aryan theory, poor little adolf moustache german thoughts they were superior, and this battle (theory) still going on, even in US Canada 😅, exactly what happens between pharaohs jews zorastrian sumerian and many earlier civilization
Yeah, it's weird how human nature is to separate from each other and attack each other
Your videos are amazing
Glad you like them
Pandiyas too overwhelmingly used Sanskrit.
finally it seems that total videos will go down
Well technically only 1 of these was on my list lol
@@ReldrikGeo yeah realised at the end when you opened the playlist
Brooo😂 we don't know what language Indus valley people spoke
Even proto dravidian is dated to 3rd millennium Tamil which is a late derivative of that hypothesized language can't be 5000 years old
Oldest evidence of Tamil comes from around late 1st millennium BCE
So around 400-300 BCE
By the way nobody alive today understands that form of Tamil
Internet is full of articles saying that 5000 years old nonsense no scholar says that
Conspiracy theorists says that
It's time to educate yourself. There is a paper regarding the IVC script decipherment by Yajnadevam. Just read the paper. Be open minded.
@mallarghosh6915 educate yourself
I read it multiple times and listened to his videos I am in personal contact with Yajnadevam through social media
Infact I have read so many paper on that topic
When I said nobody knows I mean it
What I said was the consensus
No authoritative scholar has accepted any of the claims
Let Yajnadevam publish his paper vua journal then we can proceed
Sadly southern India during the period of freedom movement was captured by marxist ideologies whose core agenda is to get rid of the primary religion (in our case hinduism or Sanatan Dharam) from the region and then establish communism. Being hinduism which is a "NON-PROPHET" Religion and no one book to target they are struggling for decades.
The northern parts were invaded by islam and their core strategy was brut force, The europeans (inventors of marxism) who were active in southern India went hand in hand with the missionaries studied the failed tactics of Islam and started to target the very ideology of one culture based on just the language difference (as is the case in Europe). So the temples and native culture remained intact just the idea of south is not same as north and completely different civilisation all together was formed. Marxism was hiding behind christian missionaries & remained dormant until dawn of 20th century and then grew rapidly during freedom struggle was at peak and political environment was not ready for a civil war between north and south. the political parties then took advantage of this divide and here we are today.😅
I do not worry for our civilisation as we have defended our religion and civilisation from such invaders for a millennia.🔥🔥🔱🔱🚩🚩🚩
So ultimately it's Marxism and communism to blame?
@@ReldrikGeo ya, and the current CM of Tamil Nadu is Stalin, his father named him Stalin Bcoz he was born just few days after Stalin died and his father was fan of Stalin.
@@ReldrikGeo Correct.
Tamil language started Chara kingdom today neme kearla
I'm from South India near Tamil Nadu
Nuh We r not crazy Dravidian
It looks like beggar term
Aryan invasion theory is false 😂
It's same culture
its not, if u think like that as a tamilian, that's you dawg, its not "we", Tamizh Race is different
Sanskrit became the elitist language just like english now...
I don't recommend Abhijit Chavda
Nope even before Uruk Bhirrana had urban features so Middle East is not the origin of civilisation with respect to India atleast
Fun fact Tamil & Telugu both languages has more percentage of Sanskrit Sounding or Sanskrit originated words than Hindi or Marathi other Devnagari languages of India. So Sanskrit had wide range of influence on all Indian Languages. Current spoken Hindi was corrupted and more Arebic and persian words as Arebian Persian brutal Invasion happened in Northern India. Mughals tried to forced Persianised Arebic in Northen India hence pure hindi got corrupted. Pure hindi languages has entire Sanskrit based words and not corrupted by Arebic or Persian words. In Schools Hindi Subject taught as a pure Hindi but Spoken Hindi has more persian arebian words. If you wanna learn hindi then learn pure hindi not Persianised Arebianisrd hindi.
React to Indian DNA history & Yamnaya👍
Do you have a link to a particular video?
Actually failed dna - yamnaya DNA higher among people who actually low caste and isolated non Varna people
Even if their was dominated let's say Invasion the Iranian related people successful defended against them and they made them servent in Hindu monarchy
Jats ,ror ( sudra ) , gujjar , pastuns ( isolated, avagana) kalash/ dards ( isolated ) , actually have dominating steppe dna
@@ReldrikGeo Yamnaya on Abhijit Chavda channel and 10 crazy stories of india on Beer Biceps
No you are wrong not Middle east humans are everywhere
?
@ReldrikGeo you know 👍😊
Sanskrit is d oldest language..
Its more than 50000 yrs old
What is this age based on?
@@ReldrikGeo
Rigveda texts...
Rigveda texts has proper astronomical descriptions which dates back to 40000- 50000 yrs...
You can react to Nilesh oaks videos with ranveer allahbadia....
There he tells about all these astronomical descriptions...
@@sanatkhanolkar1436 u just throw out bs dates that doesn't make sense 😂😂
@@ggezs24
Idiot go & see Nilesh oaks video with ranveer allahbadia on channel beerbiceps..
There r 2-3 videos on tht channel about Indian civilization..
He has proved timelines with proofs..
See those videos & thnk me later
Abhijit chavda... Videos are pro political ideology and doesnt stand the academic levels... In simple words he's a 🤡
My take on this is even if you disagree with someone they should still be listened to. I didn't 100% agree with a lot of the things he said or believes but it's still good to listen and give commentary on the subject, rebuttal and what not lol
@@ReldrikGeo but his points are not academically progressive... He just wanna blame Europeans for mistranslations.... Misinformations when such a character doesn't even think of what his $tupidity gonna do he's just spreading info's without even caring how it gonna affect common man from thinking....
Don't react to Chavra . This guy is master fakery
Are you ricebag
I can definitely see him being controversial. He also says things that make me want to do more research
He says that every non African moved out of India, which is rubbish. India like rest of the world made of different immigrants who came into India in last 100000 years and Aryans are one of them. They most probably came from Andro ovan culture in central Asia .
@@ReldrikGeo actually person you are talking to is DMK stooge
@@ABIRPAUL-e7e even after seeing this video and lots of evidence, you still believe in the migration theory, so all I'll say keep living in your delusional world
ua-cam.com/video/uc_plE-nOAc/v-deo.htmlsi=V23rI1VoywLoMIwL
This is already in my list
As an Indian, it feels disheartening that we haven't learned from our history. Our past demonstrates that whenever we have been divided-whether by race, language, region, religion, or caste-others have taken advantage of our divisions. We must focus on unity to safeguard ourselves from such narratives. There is no benefit in dwelling on history; instead, we should learn from it, acknowledge our mistakes, and move forward by forgiving and forgetting the past. Today, our identity as Indians is what matters the most to us.
What do you mean Indian..
Meaning.. Hindi Hindu Hindustan..
India is union of Nations from 1947.
You have no right to change this into one nation as Hindia.
@@TSR64india is foreign word
why is your tamil pronounciation so wierd?
Is it weird?
The L in Tamil isnt pronounced with an L sound. It's supposed to be more of a rolling R sound
@@ReldrikGeo who said that
English rule i think ??@@sandeepkant1815
@@ReldrikGeo u are pronouncing it correctly bro, that guy just doesnt know about it. kudos to u, u managed to learn to pronounce it fluently everytime
I ❤ your channel because i get multiple pov at a same place 😊
I try to be as diverse as possible
Sanskrit, Marathi and Hindi are Devnagari Script languages.
ua-cam.com/video/uc_plE-nOAc/v-deo.htmlsi=V23rI1VoywLoMIwL
This is already in my list
ua-cam.com/video/uc_plE-nOAc/v-deo.htmlsi=V23rI1VoywLoMIwL
This is already in my list
Then please make a reaction vid on it
ua-cam.com/video/uc_plE-nOAc/v-deo.htmlsi=V23rI1VoywLoMIwL
This is already in my list