You know I love you for this one bro! Thank you. I've had my ASR-X for a couple of years and I still need these videos to help me though it. I guess I have too much gear and no time to get to it all. Still trying to learn my 2000XL. I'll check out that ASR-X beginners manual. Keep up the good work homie.
Really interesting. Sound wise, source and ASR-X are very close, which is, I expect, the benefits of a relatively high-quality late-90s converters. What seems to be 'lost', via the ASR-X, is a small iota of the high-frequency detail, in a way that sounds pleasing to my ears. The filter section is interesting too. It's definitely doing something when simply engaged-I thought I detected a loss in the sub-frequencies, and something like a pleasing saturation in the high-end, perhaps a little dynamic compression. Who knows why, but it sounds good to me, and lends itself to the 'silkiness' I've thought I can hear in the ASR-X.
One thing about the ASR X and Daw is Daw will NEVER be able to match its warmth and serious THICK sound. even trying to record the ASR-X fails because the recording gear can't match its sound.
Think of filters and EQs as tape delays with one or more read heads, with the total tape length being a fraction of a sample to a few samples in length. The amount of gain on each read head defines the filter type. Changing the gains along a range of values changes the cutoff frequency. Some configurations put the delayed signal back into the tape delay. The site dspguide shows these algebraic equations in more detail.
My uncle used to have one of these back in the day, I’ll never forget those battered pentagon pads. Cheers, lovely quality you’ve got here 🍻
Del used this sampler back in the day.
You know I love you for this one bro! Thank you. I've had my ASR-X for a couple of years and I still need these videos to help me though it. I guess I have too much gear and no time to get to it all. Still trying to learn my 2000XL. I'll check out that ASR-X beginners manual. Keep up the good work homie.
Also your beginners manual are they video tutorials where I can see you scrolling thru menus and follow along? Same question for the MPC tutorials.
I mixed and mastered an orchestra using the same ESP 2 chip (DP/4) this week. My life is changed forever. Find some stems and give it a try.
Really interesting. Sound wise, source and ASR-X are very close, which is, I expect, the benefits of a relatively high-quality late-90s converters. What seems to be 'lost', via the ASR-X, is a small iota of the high-frequency detail, in a way that sounds pleasing to my ears.
The filter section is interesting too. It's definitely doing something when simply engaged-I thought I detected a loss in the sub-frequencies, and something like a pleasing saturation in the high-end, perhaps a little dynamic compression. Who knows why, but it sounds good to me, and lends itself to the 'silkiness' I've thought I can hear in the ASR-X.
thats hard.
One thing about the ASR X and Daw is Daw will NEVER be able to match its warmth and serious THICK sound. even trying to record the ASR-X fails because the recording gear can't match its sound.
Great video man! 🔥💣🧨🎧👀
Hi! Love your channel.
What kind of external cd rom drive do you recommend for the asr x?
Thanx!
dope!!
Is this the wrong channel to ask what are the technical differences between filter and EQ?
Think of filters and EQs as tape delays with one or more read heads, with the total tape length being a fraction of a sample to a few samples in length. The amount of gain on each read head defines the filter type. Changing the gains along a range of values changes the cutoff frequency. Some configurations put the delayed signal back into the tape delay. The site dspguide shows these algebraic equations in more detail.
@@BrandonZeeb I think u scared em bro 🤣
@@BrandonZeeb lol!