You seem a little confused on how to use the T-72 gun sights, you're using the top of the chevron as the aiming point, and the red circle is where the laser range finder is aimed. This means you put the laser range finder circle on the target you want to hit, lase it, then aim with the top of the chevron.
crazy how you hit the fighting compartment dozens of times as well as the crew yet they can continue to fight with zero issue. This game's biased and that much is clear
@@Valquiria-A2 fair I've played it recently and have run in to similar issues though that's just in my own case it might not be an overarching issue anymore
If it was an M1 prior to its upgrades in the early 90s I would bet money on the T72 or at least they’re even but if it was a latter version of the Abrams it’s not much of a comparison
@@jungletroll3844 the old M1 had a 105mm gun not a 120mm like the t72 the m1 also had shit for armor before it’s upgrade in the early 90s most Soviet and nato tanks where better than the Abrams and I don’t think the early m1 did have thermals.
@@jesseterrell2109 Both are wrong, the M1 with M833 shot had 450-500mm of penetration depending on your source. That is more than enough to defeat the glacis surrounding the driver's hatch, the gun mantlet and the lower plate on a T-72M/M1. The M1 always had a thermal sight (gen 1 came standard) and it didn't have "shit" armor, although prior to the BRL-2 package on the M1IP and M1A1 the turret armor did suffer a little bit.
@@jesseterrell2109 no because he falls for rossiya stronk Facebook memes and blew it completely both on Ukraine and Russian military capabilities. I am quoting Steven zaloga and hunicutt on the m1 btw
Tal y como yo lo entiendo, el caso de ESTA munición APFSDS concreta, por que no me ha pasado con otros tanques. No fragmenta lo suficiente, o el abanico de fragmentos es demasiado estrecho. Dando como resultado que los proyectiles pasen a través del vehículo sin dañar o dañando lo mínimo. Pero me pareció muy exagerado. Da la sensación de estar atravesando aire.
I assume you mean the gaijing one in 0:23 It was just a joke that implies the feeling of dying in the same way in that moment. The thumbnail and the title has the GHPC logo.
0:19 Gayjiggles is everywhere
You seem a little confused on how to use the T-72 gun sights, you're using the top of the chevron as the aiming point, and the red circle is where the laser range finder is aimed. This means you put the laser range finder circle on the target you want to hit, lase it, then aim with the top of the chevron.
crazy how you hit the fighting compartment dozens of times as well as the crew yet they can continue to fight with zero issue. This game's biased and that much is clear
Well, this video is more than two years old. I haven't played it since then but wanna asume that it's probably gotten better over time.
@@Valquiria-A2 fair
I've played it recently and have run in to similar issues though that's just in my own case it might not be an overarching issue anymore
If it was an M1 prior to its upgrades in the early 90s I would bet money on the T72 or at least they’re even but if it was a latter version of the Abrams it’s not much of a comparison
This east German t72 has no thermals and a weird night sight so i would bet money on the old abrams
@@jungletroll3844 the old M1 had a 105mm gun not a 120mm like the t72 the m1 also had shit for armor before it’s upgrade in the early 90s most Soviet and nato tanks where better than the Abrams and I don’t think the early m1 did have thermals.
@@jesseterrell2109 Both are wrong, the M1 with M833 shot had 450-500mm of penetration depending on your source. That is more than enough to defeat the glacis surrounding the driver's hatch, the gun mantlet and the lower plate on a T-72M/M1. The M1 always had a thermal sight (gen 1 came standard) and it didn't have "shit" armor, although prior to the BRL-2 package on the M1IP and M1A1 the turret armor did suffer a little bit.
@@YukarisGearReviews iam guessing you’re not a fan of Red effect on UA-cam
@@jesseterrell2109 no because he falls for rossiya stronk Facebook memes and blew it completely both on Ukraine and Russian military capabilities. I am quoting Steven zaloga and hunicutt on the m1 btw
No entiendo....algunos tiros tuyos han sido muy buenos, pero no les han hecho nada? Esta hecho el juego para que ganen los abrams...?
Tal y como yo lo entiendo, el caso de ESTA munición APFSDS concreta, por que no me ha pasado con otros tanques. No fragmenta lo suficiente, o el abanico de fragmentos es demasiado estrecho. Dando como resultado que los proyectiles pasen a través del vehículo sin dañar o dañando lo mínimo. Pero me pareció muy exagerado.
Da la sensación de estar atravesando aire.
Т-72 it's a pail of low-cost steel...shame of it's own country
very good video
I dont like that u put that emblem ! This is Gunner heat PC !
I assume you mean the gaijing one in 0:23 It was just a joke that implies the feeling of dying in the same way in that moment.
The thumbnail and the title has the GHPC logo.
You clearly didn't get the joke