Is there a reason you didn’t use the Sony 360 RA to isolate this track? Definitely not an issue, just wondering because the isolations that use it are unbelievably clean
extremely good question : I don't think I explained it anywhere, so here's the explanation in the stems of those surround version, you usually have one main channel which is basically the full track like on the album, but maybe a little bit different (some instruments missing, or the mix of the instrument is different, etc...) and then you have all the other channels with a few things on them, like it's only details. So when you have something you want to isolate on one of those other channels, that's great, cause you will not have all the instruments of the song to isolate, but only the one in the channel, and since you have less instruments to remove your isolation will be better (the more you have stuff to remove to get what you want to isolate, the less the isolation will be clear and precise) But if what you want to isolate is not in the other channels, so only in the main channel, well it's like isolating it from the album, which I already did. So there's no point isolating it, it will be the same thing.
oh yeah I should have explain sorry it's an isolation of the isolation haha basically I took the first isolation that you hear and I tried to separate the different vocal parts, but I only managed to isolate one of this layer, which I added here as a "bonus"
Such a pleasant and comforting sound, nice post.
Hold oOoOoOon
This is everything I ever wanted man, lovely work!!!
Is there a reason you didn’t use the Sony 360 RA to isolate this track? Definitely not an issue, just wondering because the isolations that use it are unbelievably clean
extremely good question :
I don't think I explained it anywhere, so here's the explanation
in the stems of those surround version, you usually have one main channel which is basically the full track like on the album, but maybe a little bit different (some instruments missing, or the mix of the instrument is different, etc...) and then you have all the other channels with a few things on them, like it's only details.
So when you have something you want to isolate on one of those other channels, that's great, cause you will not have all the instruments of the song to isolate, but only the one in the channel, and since you have less instruments to remove your isolation will be better
(the more you have stuff to remove to get what you want to isolate, the less the isolation will be clear and precise)
But if what you want to isolate is not in the other channels, so only in the main channel, well it's like isolating it from the album, which I already did.
So there's no point isolating it, it will be the same thing.
@@-TSX- ahhh ok, thanks
What's the difference with the bonus section? Is it a different version of the vocoder, or separated with different software?
I think it's a vocoder cover/reconstruction by TSX himself :)
@@braxeton671 OOh, that makes sense yeah! They're very well-made covers, well done TSX.
oh yeah I should have explain sorry
it's an isolation of the isolation haha
basically I took the first isolation that you hear and I tried to separate the different vocal parts, but I only managed to isolate one of this layer, which I added here as a "bonus"
What is the text font of RAM?
i dont think that’s a font as such .
they (daft punk) had artist Warren Fu write this way
Comic sans
@@mandothepotato2321 LOL
Looks like the one used on the cover of thriller MJ
It's called cursive which is forced upon you in private school X>