What do Russians think of Stalin? - BBC News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
- Under Vladimir Putin, Russia's Victory Day has grown into a major public celebration - and today, once again, tanks will roll across Red Square.
The renewed stress on the Soviet victory against Nazi Germany has recast Joseph Stalin as a great war leader, glossing over his crimes and repression.
The latest polls show that even young Russians now have an increasingly positive view of Stalin, but the reality is not quite as straightforward as the statistics suggest.
Video by Elizaveta Vereykina
Please subscribe HERE bit.ly/1rbfUog
I'm Gay.
Video Archives he’s dead
@Video Archives I'm a ghost
@@rus2073 no u.
@@AbrahamLincoln4 no i am a drunk vodkaholic monster that lives in the CCCP (USSR)
@@rus2073 Well people in America look up to me and praise me as the best president. I'm just saying that guy looks friendly.
I wish BBC made half the effort in educating young Brits about the atrocities done by the Bristish Empire
Atrocities yes, but also built a lot of countries that wouldn't be nearly as developed now
@@fifa22isshite90 u could say the same thing about the soviets
@@vertypop777 who did the soviets build up? Communism never builds up countries
@@fifa22isshite90 compared to the condition most Russians were living in before the Soviet union improved most of the states but they also pointlessly killed many people like all the current superpowers did like the us and uk and china
Nah! Wait till they gang up on you and accuse you of reverse racism as if they still don't profit from their empire's evils.
"47% of young people don't know about his political purges..."
What percentage of young people in Britain don't know about Churchill's famine in India?
@@thechumtoad Tell that to BBC
Churchill's famine in India wasn't meant as genocide or a political action.
It simply happened because Churchill prioritized the lives of young british men over Indian lives. Brutal and awful but war is war, it was necessary.
Killing tons of your own people and ukranians wasn't necessary and dont even compare it to western brutality.
@@Spoontamer4 you don't know shit.
That was hardly his fault at all
@@Spoontamer4 British starved more people than communists
Why don’t you portray Churchill as a tyrant? He is responsible for 4 million dead in the Bengal famine…
Cause their papa British Government will not be happy.
ua-cam.com/video/cIZiSYx1pKE/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/h8Ers8gw_W4/v-deo.html
cause, BBC is a puppet of great britain.🤫
That was hardly his fault at all
@@zacharyboardman7600oh really?... Why don't you read some history... Churchill was a tyrant, even the British historians accepted that.
"Insert quote that was not said by Joseph Stalin."
- Joseph Stalin
Oh yeah it's all coming together
- Ho Chi Minh
"I hate it when people in the internet put some random quotes that I don't even say."
-Adolf Hitler
‘I wish people would stop misquoting me’,
Albert Einstein
"One death is a tragedy a million is a statistic"
-Joseph Stalin
@@thegamerkhan He didn't say that, right?
You see?
*THEY LOVE ME*
Joseph Stalin 😂😂😂
Papa please come back
Joseph Stalin sure they do!
hello?
IMPOSTOR! TROTSKY PLOT!
BBC: "Most say they respect Stalin for beating the Nazis in WWII.
Also BBC: "So what makes Stalin so popular?"
he did not beat nazis the people did and by the way stalins tactics was horrible cause of him a lot of people died
@@amirhankhatsiev1035 You are Right
@@amirhankhatsiev1035 Agreed, they think Stalin played a pivotal role in winning the war, but in reality, Russia would have won it either way, and Stalin’s tyranny actually made it harder for Russia than easier.
This idea that Stalin was a bad military commander originates from Khrushchev’s 1956 “Secret Speech”. Aside from Khrushchev, no one else said this. Marshals Zhukov, Vasilevsky and Golovanov, long after Khrushchev’s ousting (and by extension, Stalin’s regime), all praised Stalin’s ability as a wartime commander.
@@bullmoosevelt4495 only it wasn’t Russia,whiteout help of all republicans which are now independent and all nations in Russia who have fight than russia alone would be f..d,and now they try taking all the glory of this victory to russians and more so to there bloody dictator,and thinking everyone owns them…
Imagine British school history book's focussing on and even inflating the importance of Churchill's role in WW2 whilst paying for less attention to the part he played in the Bengal famine.
Pretty much hit the nail on the head, the home front for example was actually run under Labour.
He was important but his fame comes from his own writing, which like David Lloyd george, inflated what he did. As a war leader churchill was good, a poor strategist however.
and Stalin was someone who sent aid to india during that famine
@@HT-lr1rs Gallipoli...
@@americancommunist6076 only to keep up the appearance that everything was fine in the Soviet Union, despite 3 million starving to death in Ukraine.
@@bno6156 Millions starved at the same time over europe, unless you childishly want to blame the fact food can't grow on one man?
Best part: Stalin wasn't even Russian, he's from Georgia
Go back to Georgia dead boy
At the time of his birth Georgia was part of the Russian Empire so in a way he was
Not only that but he went to seminary to train to become a priest in his youth. Imagine how different history would be had he followed through.
I know, I was like: What the fuck? Why is Stalin a Georgian?
bt he killed million of ppl in russia
It is not heroes that make history, but history that makes heroes.”
― Joseph Stalin
"Remember, no Ukrainians"
My Self we both know Stalin did not say that.
Im 100% sure he didn’t said that, you just put the phrase and the name together because it looked cool
Why don't bbc do a survey about 'what people think of Winston Churchill in modern Britain'.
Oh wait britishers are also propagandists!
History is not History, History itself History ,History is all about known fact but more......
Anybody notice Lenin sitting over there? 0:50
“school books focus heavily on Soviet role in WW2”
yeah, it’s not like the Soviet Union was literally never mentioned when you’re taught about WW2 in the UK
I wonder what the result would be if you did the same poll in Ukraine.
ua-cam.com/video/J9bjgkS41HA/v-deo.html
If you do this in Kiev yes you eill get trigged by Ukrianian people
But if you do that in some part of Eastern or donbass maybe yes
*Triggered*
Do Churchill's poll in India. You would find same result
6 out of 10 Ukrainians according to Pew Research preferred communist governments
Next video: What Germans think of Hitler
😂😂
@@playboicartisleatherpants4894 Actually Germans hate Hitler now unlike many Russians who idolize Stalin.
@@milelemi8725 Tbh he fixed it first
It's nowhere near what Russian people think of stalin because our governments actually promoted to educate the truth, until now.
Any sane person in germany has only negative thoughts about him, only positive thing is that he built the autobahn lol
@@legoyoda3546 fuck you Nazi
I am a German and I can tell you everyone here except for the right wing people hates him. So pretty much 90%+ absolutely hates Hitler
Bro asked Stalin what he thought of Stalin 💀
In 1945 Stalin was liked in all allied nations that won ww2, expecially in the USA, beucause it was told to the people for years that Uncle Stalin was helping the war effort against Germany, also thanks to the land lease.
The bad reputation came only after. In 1945 Churchill, the only person more respected than Stalin in the USA, was invited to New York and held a speech against Stalin, calling him a tyrant. This was part of the plan to change public opinion against him, since the rivality between West and East had started, and with that the Cold War.
In a couple of years Stalin went from one of the most respected world leaders to the most hated, and this perception still remains strong today.
This shows how easily people are influenced by political moves and propaganda and how true "in time of need, the enemy of my enemy is my friend" is.
Yeah propaganda can change a nation view pretty quickly one time you are great friend and an allied but just one negative speech about you and the whole nation just imidiately hate you, the power of propaganda is terrifying and it is very hard to identify it
Churchill was useless in big three.
Ох уж эта пропаганда. Она сотворила чудо с украинским народом
Does that change the fact that Stalin was a tyrant? Spoiler: it doesn't
@@Rayitolaser569 Ok
Stalin: wanna hear a joke?
Hitler:Sure
Stalin: Stalingrad
Hitler: I don’t get it
Stalin: *cause you never will get it*
Do you have any more jokes that have already been used a million times?
@@joninator7858 let him be
@ColaKing84 could be worse, could be you.
@@thebigfeller lol
@@kingbread5808 I agreed
*hitler invades russia*
Stalin : im about to end this man's career
With the help of my teammates of course.(Roosvelt and Churchill) who later became worst enemies.
Here are real numbers for Stalin's years: After that, 7 million sounds quite a pedestrian number. Real numbers are even lower. Two best and most reliable documents regarding numbers of imprisoned and killed in Stalin’s days are (1) The Attorney General et al report to Nikita Khrushchev in 1954, saying 2.5 million were imprisoned for all Soviet period, and 600 thousand sentenced to death, and (2) Dr Victor Zemskov painstaking research, well known for its thoroughness. Zemskov had studied activities of the state security bodies from 1921 to 1954, and he discovered that in this period 650 thousand persons have been sentenced to death (not all of them were actually executed) and 2.3 million were sentenced to prison terms. That’s for 33 difficult years of Stalin’s rule. That’s all, folks.
Its funny that the BBC never actually mention where their sources come from concerning the number of dead or imprisoned during Stalins period, they start by mentioning that he was a repressive monster that killed millions to give shock value to the audience so that they believe their bullshit uncritically.
Κοινωνικός Ορθολογιστής Roosevelt didn’t do shit, It was the British that saved the world
@@GlutenFr33 Britain and US were just sidekicks it was Soviet Union who did most of the work and saved the world. Biggest lend lease aid was given to Britain even though their country was a pile of rubble for most of the war. Russia received peanuts compared to what Britain got and most of the aid came late during the war.
I don’t care about ANYTHING Brits have to say about the Russian history.
You prefer to believe one dictator after another.
What about Indians
According tyo BBC brits child learning about what britain did in africa and asia'
childs:🙄
Brits talking about crimes? Nah, that's something new😂@@thetruecrimeshow6882
The irony is for everyone to see. Stalin (who fought Hitler) rightly gets called out by the BBC for the thousands of deaths under his watch. Meanwhile, Churchill (who also fought Hitler), who also caused thousands of deaths, has that fact completely overlooked.
You better go and interview people from the UK. They’ll say exactly what these people have said about Stalin. The irony.
He also worked with Hitler in the invasion of poland.
@@Comrade_Cookies they made a deal in person to carve up Poland between the two countries
@@Comrade_Cookies lol Soviet Union was sending supplies to Hitler for years even a while after Wehrmacht crossed Soviet Union's boarders in 1942..
During WWII - Americans Stalin is a god.
After WWII - Stalin is a tyrant
Well yeah but actually it's the other way around, lol
well do you call basically sacrificing 28 million of your own people to slow down the Germans kind? no its called being a tyrant, over his political time (which only lasted because he locked up or killed his opponents) he killed 8.8 million people through famine and executions alone, you dont call that being a tyrant??
@@Boomy2710x U got me wrong, basically every russian was kinda afraid of Stalin, but after the war (his death) kinda every russian loved him, like he is god or something. love is maybe the wrong word, but u get what I mean.
DeathBoy 546 I wasn’t responding to you but I get you
@@Boomy2710x still he was better than Roosevelt
Imagine this
You're Chillin, having a nice Russian ice cream
And who do you see?
S t a l i n
I would give him an ice cream,too!
@@sovietheart3883 give him ur entire stock
@@josephstalin5379 Yes my dude
And then you see Trotsky and they start boxing each other
@@victorcarneiro3779 perfection
Next up : what do Britishers think about Winston Churchill ?
The Bengal famine was hardly his fault at all
@@zacharyboardman7600Don’t tell Indians that, they’re not very bright when it comes to history and they get all upset when you confront them.
@@zacharyboardman7600if you think that it was not his fault then why did he have such a derogatory opinion about Indians ,he said that they were Beastly people with Beastly religion that's not an attitude of a person who would not cause a famine
@@aniruddhnaik5277Yes, he likely believed these things, alongside quoting that they bred "like rabbits". But in the context of imperial Britain and an overall racially minded world this is unsurprising. What is important is that he didn't act on these beliefs. He did not receive information about the severity of the Bengal famine for quite some time. And when he finally did, he instantly agreed that food should be dispatched from Iraq and Australia to aid the Indians, saying that “something must be done.” Within the war cabinet itself, Churchills role was one of broad oversight rather than detailed management, so the idea that he had much influence on actual relief aid to Bengal is far-fetched, especially at the height of the war. I think, exaggerated as the British role was in the famine, certain high ranking figures did make the situation worse, particularly the somewhat racist economist John Maynard Keynes, but assigning the blame to the prime minister is false.
@@zacharyboardman7600The fuck do you mean context makes racism okay? Lenin made all nationalities equal in the most backward country in the world, the USSR, in 1917. What’s churchill’s excuse?
“I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy”
-Stalin
These anti-stalinists, critics, ignorant idiots both in the east and west, brainwashed democracy lovers, both eastern and western morons will never understand that statement and how deep that statement goes!
Yeah, Russia being patriotic is bad, but the US never mentioning their Coups and supporting terrorist groups is fine
As a russian living in the USA i was always taught about Soviet crimes against humanity and other things but they never mentioned many of the US war crimes and crimes against humanity
The us attempted over 500 coups in cuba alone
US stole Mexico’s half of the country, with guns and blood. Now they said they are the free world protectors and make sanctions to Rusia because Crimea and so and so ...
I am with you but I am more concerned with the Bolshevism that murdered the Tsar and focusing on him than the one non-jew bolshevik.
@@itsmywayorthegeminimethod1095 you do realise lenin killed tsar nicholas not stalin
Fun fact: The most famous Russian dictator was Georgian.
mapletree another fun fact: he wasn’t a Russian dictator
@@solsolsolomon another fun fact: the great churchill killed as many as hitler in british empires over the world, and churchill looks good in the media
@@marcelkleinetz7648 fuck the allies
@@marcelkleinetz7648 except Canada
He had a good mustach
If I say Stalin to you, what comes to mind?
me: mustache
Let’s be honest. Stalin’s mustache is what makes him popular.
I'd purge half my country for a Mustache like that.
@@g.r.senterprisevenatorclas7314 Pol Pot be like
:D
What about great...purge
@@enei7045 You're also calling Charlie Chaplin a virgin?
Meanwhile in America, kids are blasting the Soviet Anthem
Everything communistic should be banned in America. Those people completely annihilated Stalin's legacy and turned communism into rainbow shitshow. Fuck that.
haha, why?)
@@wendigo017 hey thats not very free speech of you!
it's done ironically though
@@wendigo017 So you don't like free speech?
Do a report on what Churchill did to Bengal or Ireland next
He did nothing.
As students and non-historians, I feel as though we tend to weigh both the negative and positive against one another to judge whether an individual was of historic significance as a hero or villain. Stalin and the Soviet Union made absolutely significant contributions towards the Allies' victory over the Axis in WWII, and I believe things would certainly have been a bit different, had it not been for their contributions to the war, but I also think it's important to learn of the terrible things that occurred while he was in power also, rather than recognizing only the positive OR negative. We should learn of BOTH the positive AND negative. I feel as though it would take away from a bias.
I see him as a super strict dictator whose brutal methods WORKED at bringing up the living standards of his citizens in the long run
Was he a good guy? No
was his methods good? NO
Was he effective? absolutely yes!
Stalin was much much worse than any other russian leader who would've fought in the war, the war would be won much earlier if it wasn't for stalin who executed generals who tried telling him Hitler is going to invade Russia, and it would of ended faster if Stalin didn't try to join the goddam axis. He also murdered over 10 million innocent russians, and before he died he started executing innocent jews
@@salahabdalla368 Small sacrifices for great progress
@Oddity lenin did not want stalin in power
@@banana-bunny wouldn’t call genocide of millions of your own people a “Small sacrifice” but you do you
When I am dead, mountains of garbage will be placed over my grave. But wind of history will clear it all off.
- Stalin.
@@dankmemes7342 ok dank memes
Did he really say this?
@@rahmat4848 Yep. It shows up on call of duty when you die too
@@boranates1320 lol
@@rahmat4848 He did, in 1943, in a conversation with Molotov and Golovanov.
The quote is very likely very much out of context. Most definitely Stalin did not utter those words to specifically defend his good name 70-80 years in the future.
Never the less, like all prophetic statements - the words became relevant at some point in time.
It's like how Winston Churchill is portrayed as a hero in UK oh wait..
@Daniël N. Bantjes lol
@@calvinhoward3808 how did the United States resist the Nazis? how did this manifest itself?
@@calvinhoward3808 America AND the Soviets technically
@Daniël N. Bantjes yes he was a villain.
@Daniël N. Bantjes haha funny
Brainwashing, brainwashing everywhere.
ua-cam.com/video/k0rxPT9XsH8/v-deo.html
Just like how 99% of the US doesn't know half of Ronald Reagan's awful actions...
The war on d*ugs being close to the top!!
Did you defeat the germans?
Stalin: Yes
What did it cost?
Stalin: *nothing*
@@sarlsane No, but at least he could try to use them effectively and not just as a meat shield.
@@ing.hemoroid9938 he wouldnt win the war if he didn't use his soldiers effectively
@@sarlsane Please tell me how effective soviet soldiers were.
@emaneux Yeah, some 27 million soldiers
@@Dandaman1710 ...No? These are losses including civilians, dude. From army 6,818,300 died in a fights and 1,850,000 did not return from captivity.
What makes Stalin so popular?
Me: Communist memes
Edit: *USUS
Dont forget the bias and the sekrit dokumints ))))
Best and most accurate comment so far
Real communists don't like Stalin... because like China, he only called himself communist rather than keeping to his word and implementing communist policy
You're not wrong Nuht Hao Tieu.
@@alwayschanging5821 Really. Ffs my dude...
Westerners seething and coping about how awesome Stalin was
1:28 - 1:36 That is such a Bri’ish propaganda moment.
That’s literally exactly what Putin is trying to do since 2002
The BBC accusing other countries of revisionist history, oh my the irony. Poor sods.
Nice whataboutism
@@broodjeal-cohol5033 this is not whataboutism. this is discredit the accuser. which in this case I think makes sense, actually.
@@TheMrzhangjason No it's a whataboutism you moron. The implication is that the BBC can't talk about misinformation because they also spread misinformation.
BBC spreads misinformation.UK is now paying the price for misinformation campaign.Ex colonial subjects have become all powerful. In due course of time,the ethnic Britishers will be thrown out of their own country/Kingdom.
Of course anything that contradicts Western chauvinism must be revisionist! How dare they refuse to acknowledge the superiority the British Empire!
Same goes for Winston Churchill.. people in uk see him as hero but we indians know because of him millions of indians died.. uk histry books didnt cover this at all
I learned the dark side of him because of “Mr Slav”
Churchill is the G
@@jamesthejoker7415 G is for Genocidal maniac
agree. it's taboo to say you like lenin, but it's normal to like Churchill. the hypocrisy of it all
@@rickrolld1367 He saved my nation, that’s good enough for me. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not criticising anyone in this video here, just giving my thoughts is all.
Stalin: A true hero of proletariat...
Stalin took a crippled country with revolution and anarchy and made it world superpower.
He is one of the major reason for power of Russia so, I don't think people have negative perception of him.
Why he did a lot of things good and bad... He lead a country from bottom to top with his leadership.
I want to hug the guy that's playing Stalin, look's like a cool guy to talk to.
oh no its tito
And that one playing Lenin.
Come back our immortal leader
@@superperson7325 Tito was a revisionist god bless Enver Hoxha
@@daseapickleofjustice7231 yea based titoism euro -communism and deng xiaoping thepry are betrayals of marxist-leninism
To be fair in Britain we still idolise Churchill, so this isn't particularly special.
So?
LOL. Are you comparing Chruchill to Stalin? The fuck?
@@weasle2904 cause churchill is the same. He caused the death of millions in india
@@weasle2904 he literally starved millions of Indian people during ww2
anus well Churchill was the man that stopped the Nazis, he was always against them and never wanted to surrender, while Stalin helped Hitler conquer Poland and made a non-aggression pact with him
See? They love me!
I miss you Joe
As Russians, I declare to you that in our country, on the contrary, propaganda accuses both Stalin and the entire USSR in general of all human sins (Putin also constantly accuses Lenin of the collapse of the USSR, and reminds about Stalin's repressions). Stalin is popular with us because of the oligarchy that arose in Russia and because of the poor social level.
Stalin for all his faults gave not just Russians but all member states of the soviet union a far better and much more stable life than they had ever had prior.
But at least he still left many economic and military achievements for the countries of the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russia, successes that today's capitalists can hardly claim.
Why would Putin accuse Lenin of collapse of USSR? He died 70 years before it. The USSR had only just been established a year before he died.
Ты не можешь говорить от лица всех русских. Поверь мне Сталина есть за что любить и уважать. А всю эту дешевую западную пропаганду оставь для себя и тебе подобных
@@user-hv4hf7xe3x ох уж эти либералы, которые говорят с марксистских позиций о том, что Ленин - большевик-коммунист, а Сталин - оппортунист, ведь именно так и разговаривают либералы, почитывая Маркса, Энгельса и Ленина, критикуя как Российский империализм, так и американо-украинский, да? Сталина можно уважать лишь тогда, когда его сравнивают с любым буржуазным лидером Европы конца XIX-XX веков, но не когда смотрят исключительно на его действия в рамках пролетарского государства СССР
" So he's basically no one to you? "
" In theory, yes "
Me : " Western spies blyat "
Aryan Ferdiansyah To Gulag he goes
To get some truth about Russian history watch "Europa The Last Battle" at archive-dot-org. Entire doc banned on YT
@Interceptor
Don't know why people shame someone just because there interest is different. You sound like some patriotic boomers.
@@LazyAndFabulous Have you never heard of the saying
"Person who doesn't know history, is doomed to repeat it" or something like that, everyone should know their countries history.
@@lancomepotatoes5753
History tried Communism, and it ended up as Authoritarianism since authority is needed to educate the people and balance the people choice, Democracy has a leader who focus on other majority claim while the minority get no benefits, Dictatorship is just a one person's benefits. All ideology are tried, and they all have there own problems. That's why I stick to centrism since its *kind of* okay.
Fun facts: Stalin was Georgian, not Russian…and Hitler was Austrian, not German
We can go on, Alexander the great was Macedonian, not Greek
Che Guevara was argentinian, not cuban
@@TheArtInterviews Alexander was Greek tho Macedonia was a hellenic state .
@@kingmike7965 says who? Not them, at least not then, certainly not now. Greeks didn't consider the Macedonians as greeks either...
@@kingmike7965 Alexander the great was Macedonian
napoleon was corsican not french
British guy when Mao's bad policies led to millions of deaths in china: he is a tyrant!
British guy when Churchill intentionally led to millions of deaths in India: it was because of war. Our uncle Chill is innocent and he is our savior!
I love how BBC makes it seem like a bad thing that Russia are glorifying Stalin with Patroitism like they and the UK don't do the same thing with basically all our history.
Queue - Ueue is silent
Tsunami - T is silent
Honest - H is silent
Winter - German Army is silent
Silence is golden. Except for the movie: "The silence of the lambs". That movie was just creepy.
Germans would have lost regardless of weather.
They lost battle for Moscow after all.
@@someesingh2827 finally someone who understands.
1989 - Tiananmen Square is silent
@@notanythinganymore
And every time it shouts, it will be silenced.
Khrushchev: ALL THOSE ROUBLES I SPEND TO STOP YOU PEOPLE FROM LIKING STALIN OMG
_"Stop liking Stalin, start liking corn."_
- Krushchev
Why don't bbc do a survey about 'what people think of Winston Churchill in modern Britain'.
Oh wait britishers are also propagandists!
@@giriprasad1624 bro you're Indian no wonder you hate them
It doesn't matter what they do
@@suedetree970 that is not patriotism thats jingoism,if you think jingoism is good than look at what happen in nazi germany
@@chillaxo9863 how ignorant must you be to say that💀
So funny Russian claiming that the war would have ended differently if not Stalin. This man started the war with Hitler when they both attacked Poland.
Russian propaganda is 2nd to none.
right, because stalin totally didnt know what was coming and bought time so all the industries could be moved east and the scorched earth policy could work
@@giantsashavor7809 Because Stalin thought he will go after Hitler first and Hitler attacked his best friend first instead.
@@jerryorange6983 oh yeah give me 1 credible source that supports that. first explain how they were "best friends" (you cant, there is a mountain of obvious facts to prove otherwise) and then show me evidence that stalin was gonna attack first. the debate regarding that is pretty self evident- the claims that stalin was gonna attack first have... no disclosed sources and only circumstantial evidence... whereas the other stance, which was hitler planning first strike... once again... has an abudance of evidence. dont talk about propaganda when what ur pushing is even more twisted. literally your argument is so bad that even wikipedia's 'criticism' section of ur argument is larger than the actual argument/pro-stance instead. if you actually believe what u originally posted, then the only explanation for why your gullibility hasnt made you fall victim to russian propaganda is because you have a prejudice for anything russian that overrides it. not really good either
@@giantsashavor7809 what about Katyń where Soviets animals killed over 20k Polish pow officers shooting them in the head. Is that true or false?
@@jerryorange6983 yes, in fact by 2010 the russian government concluded their investigation into it and blamed joseph stalin and other soviet officials for it. they didnt call it a war crime though or classify it as part of the great purge. they stopped the investigation since all the perpetrators were dead
BBC cope
The British should be the last people to point the finger and talk about crimes against humanity, just before the United States.
Yes
Yes
I’ve never thought the problem was war crimes, I’ve always thought the problem was burying them under the rug and not learning from them. The Brits buried a lot of the dark history of the British Empire, the Americans have buried a lot of dark history of the Cold War(I grew up in the US system, they teach us our past war crimes extensively up until the Cold War era where they just stop talking about them), the Russians have buried a lot of dark history related to Stalin’s famines, and Japan buried their brutal imperialism and militarism in the early 1900s. Germany for the most part is the only exception, all other countries that committed these war crimes should not only own up to them more, but should enforce the teaching of them in class.
Bruh, pretty much every country/nation has committed crimes against humanity.
Why does everyone act like the country their in is pure?
@@panda3792 who killed over 20 000 Polish officers?
There are no problem with USA friendly dictators though!
There is, but i bet they dont teach it to your country. Here in my country which usa imperialized in ww2, they teach it. It is really hypocritical since usa is preaching against imperialism, but they invaded my country and killed millions of people and even stole artifacts to get a strategic location
@@lc-mx1ir what is your country?
@@lc-mx1ir what is your country
@@lc-mx1ir *by the way we had journalism at that time* usa
@@l.4723 Philippines, i know you won't care or be racist to me but ill still say it
It make sense. Stalin was a dictator. It's easy for him to manipulate history books by making books have more pages that praise him as a good leader.
0:52 What the Lenin doing?
His mum: Hey Son, what are you going to do today?
Him: Oh, nothing special. Just walking around ramdomly and being Stalin.
His mum:....
I'm something of a Tsar myself
- Joseph Stalin to his Mom.
His mum: I hope you wont be going to Ukraine dressed like that, dear
@@jackgrant7356 Him: Well, about that...
@@jackgrant7356 they like him even in Ukraine =) (eastern part. Yes, when you will say "holodomor" to them you will start a fight or antoher civilian war with "russians")
Oo
"What do you think of Stalin?"
*I skipped history class*
Don't listen to western Media is all i have to say
Imagine skipping the best class in school
Bro, at least he was aware of it!
Lol that reminds me of the Japanese person saying they didn’t remember if Japan was the bad guy in ww2
Cisco OK then I’ll say the same thing to our RT
As a Russian, I can say that Stalin's crimes are not hidden. Our school was participated in the special evented devoted to Memory of Stalin's repressions...репрессиям Сталинским, короче (don't know how to write that in English, I hope, you understand what I mean). There is also an opinion that Stalin and Hitler have many similarities.
The horrors of black cars that can take your relativies away at ahy time is also a well-known fact.
But I'd say that we are too used to controversial politics. Stalin did a great thing because if it wasn't his strict power and tough orders, our ancestors wouldn't have defended our country from nazi. That's why he is said to be a strong leader.
What people really don't know about Stalin is that he isn't Stalin:D
Praying for your country and your neighboring countries. 💔🙏
Then compare it to Brits not being teached anything about Churchill's atrocities.
@@parvchetri0995 Churchill and Stalin had positive role in the defeat of Nazism! Then we can discuss their crimes!
If stalin is tyrant then what Churchill was? Poor British people still love him also.😅😅😅
Двойные стандарты
@@Прионthey both suck
@@Прион Not the same at all dude. I understand pride in your country, but you live somewhere where your president (dictator) kills people just for simple criticism.
When STALIN was born he slapped the doctor for not crying
Lolllllllll
Xdddddddd
Nah bro Stalin got slapped by the doctor, his mother, and his dad
When STALIN failed the exam, the teacher got kicked out of school
@@lnzskk nah he sent teacher to gulag for that
Next: what do Germans think of Hitler 🤔
That's not a valid comparison. Hitler started history's most destructive war WHICH DESTROYED GERMANY. So even without the Holocaust, no German can ever think positively of a leader who DESTROYED their country! The fact there was a Holocaust as well is two strikes against the Fuehrer. As I and others have said here, Stalin wasn't just a Totalitarian who caused the deaths of tens of millions (few people deny this!) The fact is that his rule with an iron fist had very real positive impacts, not least of which, the Industrialisation of the Soviet Union, which enabled its victory over Germany in World War II. Stalin left his country in a far stronger state than he found it (in 1953, the USSR had nuclear missiles and was a superpower rivaling the US). When Hitler shot a bullet in his head, Germany was nothing but a smoking pile of ruins. Huge difference!
@@eip81 Stalin destroyed Russia.He also made holocosts but not against jews - but against the free thinkers.
Everything u write about him is a myth created by the soviet propaganda
Germans have no free of speech in this matter
Shit unfortunately you can't raise your hand in Germany you will go to jail
@@catch_me_if_you_can6596 Not myths. Facts that can be readily looked up by inspecting the record what the Soviet Union was producing and when.
eip81 you're fucked in the head if you think hitler is worse then shit face stalin
Imagine germans speaking about Hitler in a positive way.
At least Germans weren't afraid of learning from History, while Putin disbanded Memorial International because they said bad things about Stalin
Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it
@@nobbynobbs8182 Indeed. And are repeating the same mistake Hitler did in 21 century. How unbelievably stupid that is.
@@nobbynobbs8182 Почему англичане не ненавидят черчилля тогда? Чем он лучше то?
I mean.
*HE DID BUILD MANY ROADS*
@@Adammarshall2341 lol. And what about the volkswagen beetle?
Looks like Putler is bringing back the good ol' days, they must be happy
*If men like Winston Churchill can be dubbed as "heroes" in Western world, then I fully respect Russia and its views*
*Sorry BBC, Britain does the same too, just teach the "good" aspects of its colonialism. And your youth too feels proud of your history, had you shown them some middle school Indian history books. Sorry, a murderer should'nt be the judge for another*
Churchill wasn't a dictator; Stalin was. Therein lies the difference.
Also, when did Churchill hold show trials and force members of his own party to sign false confessions of guilt and then have them executed?
@@Extra-dg7uv Indians didn't elect Churchill, did they? Churchill was imposed on Indians. That is dictatorship(oh sorry, "colonialism").
Also it hardly matters what he did to his fellow whites, if he had them seated on golden thrones or thrown them in thorn bushes When one commits the swiftest genocide in history in another country, it hardly matters dear what he does to his fellow men.
@@PaulAllen6304 "Indians didn't elect Churchill, did they? Churchill was imposed on Indians. That is dictatorship(oh sorry, "colonialism")."
Churchill was not the dictator of India. He didn't rule directly over it. That job belonged to the viceroy.
"When one commits the swiftest genocide in history"
When did Churchill commit the "swiftest genocide in history"?
@@Extra-dg7uv You seriously need some history lessons pal.
Ever heard of Bengal famine, certainly not?! That is the "swiftest genocide in history" by a man who left very little evidence behind.
Also during the World Wars, power of administration was shifted to London, with the crown leading the then colony. Viceroys would just supervise the execution of policies made by the crown and his ministers. Also still then, Indians couldn't elect the viceroys. Indians only had few random respresentatives from Congress in British Houses, who in truth, had no power at all.
@@Extra-dg7uv learn some history bruh
What about Winston Churchill ?? He was a ruthless leader . His policies initiated famines in India and many other colonial countries .He didn't care about the natives .Either all of them should be condemned or none of them should be . Don't be a hypocrite !!
Exactly, same with most US presidents
He would be praised as long as the British people was the one in concern, after all, colonies were to serve home country.
@@nicolasmartin9463 Yes. Everyone had faults in their ways . Just think about George Bush Jr . He destabilized an entire region , invaded a country on false claims . He is a war criminal .
@@fsdds1488 throughout history , innocent souls suffered fighting someone's war's and the rich and powerful thrived !!
From my knowledge Winston Churchill didn't starve over 20 million people.
Thank you comrades
хорош)
BBC is funny..... Im waiting a similar report about Churchill hahahahaha
BBC: let's show people how Russians love Stalin a traitor!
Winston Churchill: yea go on.
@government of russia what do you mean?
@government of russia I asked because before the message had a really bad grammar and I did not understand it
i think Churchill liked stalin
@@pilkpog7952 he really didn’t, Roosevelt actually liked Stalin but Churchill didn’t.
Both were tyrants!
Lets also remember sir Winston Churchill who allowed 4 million Bengalis to die due to starvation and stored the grains as ratio for future calamity in the UK.
four million* not forty
And then when officers in India told him about the situation he asked them "Why hasn't that arse Gandhi died??" Btw India was the country with most cassualties of both ww1 and ww2
@@zuhairahmed7782 Soviet Union was in ww2
Are you seriously that stupid that you think he purposely allowed it? They were at war on two fronts. The Japanese completely occupied Burma a year prior the famine. Bengal was dependent on rice imports from Burma.
@@bananarama9000 exactly ^
The guy cosplaying as Stalin seems chill :)
A Russian dressing up like Stalin is like a Jew dressing up as Hitler.
0:44 How did Lenin get out of his mausoleum
He escaped
He broke his glass casing and removed his formalin wax lmao
*Simpsons flashbacks* must crush.......
He fled to start a revolution against Putin
@@kritanusharma8530 You must remember now
"rebranding a tyrant"
Sorry but who's Churchill ?
Adi is it you?
A racist Tory that happened to know how to play war games
A person who cause famine in India Bengal and Bangladesh
More than 3 million people died
I hope he burn in hell
@C R 1 L 3 Xイオニック coz these Britishers was clever they show the world that they r heroes but they all r same
Same thing applies here though. I think of WWII (and the heavy tank named after him) when Churchill comes to mind, and what happened to Britain might have been different if someone else was in power.
I mean. Our founding fathers also enslaved black people for centuries but our schools overlooked that.
Me when i'm in a doing nothing wrong competition and my opponent is Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin: 😰😰😰
All these people saying nice things about me
Jin J it’s a joke
Unless if they playing csgo
There uneducated about you that’s why if they were American they would know your worse than Hitler
@@user-if2uz4ur8o thee have spoken the truth
Ah yes daddy Stalin
Brits-“Stalin murdered millions of his own people!
Everyone else-“Let’s talk about Churchill and the Indians”
Brits-“No, no I don’t think I will”
I don't remember Churchill holding show trials and forcing members of the Conservative Party to sign false confessions of treason.
@@Extra-dg7uv The Brits did hold show trials in India indicting all freedom fighters and they shutdown the local media completely...just google Rowlatt Act and Judge Simon. Also Churchills mismanagement led to famines causing deaths of millions.. If they can't govern a country they forcibly colonialise, they shd have solemnly departed in shame, not draining its resources fr 250 yrs.
@@Extra-dg7uv yeye aways forced when literally there were operations that have found the trotskyst and counteranti stalin, "operation Trust", search it propaganda user
Directly ordering the "liquidation" of a class and killing millions more in political purges directly ordered by you is a bit different then mismanagement of a famine that was going to happen anyway due to bad harvest.
@@CornG4397 Most deaths attribited to Stalin are from the mismanaged famine in Ukraine, that happened in part because of a bad harvest.
"Is Russia rebranding a Tyrant"
What Tyrant? I see no Tyrant here
You know you love me.
Next: What *Chinese* thinks of *Mao Zedong. Did Chinese really understand his atrocities, especially during *Cultural Revolution.*
Well, it's from my personal experience of speaking with some Chinese so it may lack credibility, but many of them actually knows. Furthermore, some of them even resent the ruling communist party itself for their censorship and draconian law. But, the most dominant emotion for both Mao and the CCP, I think is apathy. They really don't care anymore. What they do care about is to make China a global superpower, with cutting edge technology and unstopping of innovation. And they believe that communist party, for the past decade, has done a quite good job at bringing those in. So even if they don't agree with everything the party was or is, they still consider it to being a necessary evil, rather than a demon that needs to be eradicated.
@Комиссар Xексин You need a free helicopter ride.
ninglumKS But if there wasn't him, Chinese nation can never arise. so meanly, he was a great person.
So what a you think of Mao Zedong?
Mao Zedong is a great helmsman.the Chinese have stood up.
0:23 Looks like he survived the stroke.
USSR is dead, communism is not.
Better than Churchill
Most of the comment section are just brits getting mad because people are mentioning churchill lol
@@itisprofile Churchill was a big nob but he won the war so no body cares unfortunately
@@jimboonie9885 he didn't win the war, it was the soviets who captured Berlin and caused kitler to kill himself and were facing the majority of the nazi forces, thats why you we see literally all cities from east europe destroyed because the majority of the bloodshed and fighting was occurring in the east, western Europe was just freebies for the US and Britain since Germany was prioritizing the eastern front
@@velcranoxofficials9970 as an American I can say that is true and false. People die in war for their country or ideology and millions died in WWII for what they believed and to make there fathers and mothers proud, capitalists, communists and fascists all fought and died for their own cause, moral or not, and the western front was not a freebie as many died in Omaha beach and many died in Belgium, Holland, etc, as well millions of Soviets died in Poland, Ukraine, Moscow, Leningrad, etc so undermining ones effort of borderline disrespectful to those who died. Also, Churchill was not a good man however in my eyes he did a lot as mainland France would not exist if not for him taking power as opposed to Halifax, just like if DeGaulle wasn’t popular there would likely be less French resistance and France would not be the same, and if Wilkie had won the election over Roosevelt we likely would have stayed out even after Pearl Harbor and so forth. Maybe Britain did not have men to throw at the enemy but Britain in WWII was at least a symbol of the Nazis not winning and how the German army could fail (Battle of Britain). And although he did not engineer the Bengal Famine he didn’t help it as much as he should have, although this is also debatable due to the fact that Japan would have made British efforts to get food there difficult, so although this does not make it right there are a lot of factors in things and saying one is good or bad without looking deeper is just ignorant, not saying you are but I am saying many who don’t look at the time are being that way.
@@bltdffrnt860 the western allies were at fault, the USSR wanted to create a united front to counter nazi germany before the war because they actually saw germany's ambitions at taking europe, the allies didn't want to because they hoped that both countries would destroy eachother while they sat back and watched, this is why Stalin was forced to create a non aggression Treaty with germany because he had no other choice but to, when everything went to hell Britain and America waited off the invasion and didnt even move to try and take germany but instead took pockets of France and Belgium while moving UP italy instead of driving straight to the german industrial heartland like they should have because they hoped that germany would have weakened the ussr enough for them to actually invade e
the USSR, im not kidding you when the USSR invaded finland they wanted to bomb the caucuses and invade the soviet union while they were still fighting germany but that proved to be impossible because well the soviet union is strong, and they also wanted to make germany join them as they were making their way into their territory from France in hopes that the new front would be fought against the soviet union, thats what operation unthinkable was about and was named unthinkable because they found out that the soviets had alot more tanks than they did so invading them would be unthinkable because the soviets would have beaten them in Europe and the people in America and Britain would most likely start to riot asking for a peace Treaty causing the western allies to make peace and also let the USSR keep europe. So the only real victim in WW2 were the soviets because the nazis invaded their homes and the west wanted to invade them too. And the USSR didn't just "throw bodies" at the enemy, that is a myth they just had more people than germany in the army and many soviets listed to fight to protect their homelands from the nazi hoards
@@velcranoxofficials9970 sorry but it's hard to push into into Nazi Germany when they have as many ships as modern Day Russia, and They invented missiles.
KGB: still watching you lmao
I got scord
We want a same episode on Winston Churchill
Stalin wasn't a dictator, Putin is
bruh
No, he is. And so is Putin.
bruh
"Facepalm"
Both are
This issue exists in all countries, America and Britain included. All of our countries have committed atrocities. Different levels and circumstances, but it remains the same how our countries choose to educate the people about our histories and role in global events
Yep. Really wish there was an actual caliphate in the world.
@Deus Vult Rashidun caliphate. Not these fake ones.
I am half German and half Russian.
In Germany they try to educate people about the horrible things Hitler did. They really show the entirety about his actions. They really try to inform people and don't hide the fact that Germany was a horrible place a few decades ago. The n@zi symbol is banned too.
But in Russia oh my god lord.
As you saw in the video the people are mostly brainwashed. They don't get that Stalin was as bad as Hitler or even worse than him. There is no education at all about the horrible things he did. It's crazy how literally everybody talks positive about him.
Wanting back the Soviet union in Russia is the equivalent of wanting back n@zis in Germany.
Actually, many in the US know about its history of slavery, Native American genocide, Japanese American internment, Jim Crow laws, Chinese exclusion laws and many more. Although I do think that schools do not do a good job of teaching about it mostly as a result of politics, the history is very much available to the people to learn about it. I do believe, it is one of the things that makes the US special.
@@javiercastro8466 Bruh what? Americans learn history from such a biased point of view that it's insane. Especially modern history from WW2 to today. Almost every bad deed of USA is either whitewashed to not look as bad as it is or completely erased off of history books. It is true that freedom of information exists, but the education system in USA is extremely bad and non-objective
"What is youre opinion on Stalin?"
"Cant complain"
"Oh, thats grea-"
"no seriously i cant complain"
XD
Underrated comment
*Stalin
Shut up with the actual comment also
@@drdestrukt1367 Overrated*
@Jesus F Christ Overrated*
But he literally killed innocent people
khrushchev lied
Ask the Irish and Indians what they think of Churchill ;) I'm SURE it would fit the conservative BBC rhetoric :)
@Haytham Muhammet Rhys AbdarRahim conservative or liberal, they are all on the same boat
They are liberals dammit. What are you talking about? You are probably so far left that you consider them as Conservative
I'm Indian and LMAO BBC is totally leftist
@The After Prison TROLL no its supposed to be neutral actually and for the most part it is, in fact its illegal for the BBC to be politically bias
Cait HP I’m Northern Irish and I like Churchill.
“I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy.” -Joseph Stalin
Well umm Stalin must be some psychological freak cause how in the.. that is right
No rubbish upon your grave... The blood of thousands innocent victims scream for the truth to be revealed about the horrible tyrant, you blood-thirsty fiend from hell!...
"The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of a million is a statistic" - Stalin.
The Greedy Orphan he didn’t say that, there’s no evidence at all
The Greedy Orphan www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0603/Political-misquotes-The-10-most-famous-things-never-actually-said/The-death-of-one-man-is-a-tragedy.-The-death-of-millions-is-a-statistic.-Josef-Stalin
Its just like how in America we believe we have a positive role in history. Even though we ruined Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, most central American countries, and a few Latin American countries. I think almost all countries teach themselves in a positive right except for maybe Germany and Canada who accept the fact that they had a negative role. I cant speak much about Germany, but for Canada, we are constantly taught that that Canadian government was cruel to First Nations. In fact, its almost the only topic we learn in history from grade 4-8. In grade 9 and 10 we cover the world wars, the cold wars, and the Quebec rebellions.
❤️YOU DO NOT HAVE TO FEAR DEATH IF YOU BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST, AND TRUST IN HIM WITH ALL YOUR HEART, BECAUSE HE ATONED FOR YOU FOR ALL YOUR INSULTS, THAT YOU WOULD OBTAIN PEACE WITH ALMIGHTY GOD, AND GO TO HEAVEN BY HIS GRACE!😊
@@josepoika5388 How can God have a son? Also how are the son and the father the same people? Also why did Jesus pray to his father? Also what does Jesus' death have to do with my sins?
its stalin
Next one: What Italian think about Mussolinni
All the normal people hate Mussolini but unfortunately there are still some dickheads who think Mussolini was great.
They tipically say:
Mussolini destroyed mafia ( was fought from before and was already crushed but americans armed them when they landed in sicily because they needed local support)
Or
When there was Mussolini train used to arrive on time( bullshit)
Or
What about the foibes ( fascists did the same before)
Or
Communism killed more people ( no communist country ever existed, only socialist)
Or
Mussolini invented the pensions ( existed from 1896 or something like that)
@@davideb.4290 He kills Giacomo Matteotti , enclausures Gramsci and destroys the african ethiopians
@@willianramos5650 Gramsci was a communist, and communist, in Italy are not well seen by the ppl. But:
He was a dictator.
He killed Ethiopians
He killed Albanians
He killed Greeks
He stopped the information
He shutted down every media that was not ok with him
He killed Italians
Ecc.
There was a cerimony if you didn't want to become fascist:
They beated you with bats ( like, the police one, not the baseball one ) and forced you to drink a special oil that caused diarhea. I don't know the name of it in english, sorry
*Spaghetti*