bacterial flagellum

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 676

  • @bladimadrigal9221
    @bladimadrigal9221 Рік тому +35

    This is absolutely amazing, as a mechanic I always thought that moters were completely lifeless until I realized that these have been since the inception of biology

  • @grahammcdonald
    @grahammcdonald Рік тому +135

    When you think we invented motors, but nature got there first

    • @glenliesegang233
      @glenliesegang233 11 місяців тому +19

      And, that nature encoded each part of its construction in base 4 digital unidirectional, uni-strand format, along with all the other parts capable of reading and acting on it!

    • @grahammcdonald
      @grahammcdonald 11 місяців тому

      @@glenliesegang233 ❤️

    • @vladimiryordanov8765
      @vladimiryordanov8765 10 місяців тому

      There is no Nature, there is only God. Natire is a nonsense term cpined by freemasons for the plebs

    • @lightlybatteredjustcrispy
      @lightlybatteredjustcrispy 10 місяців тому

      ​@@glenliesegang233we got a one upper here

    • @DaleDanErnie
      @DaleDanErnie 9 місяців тому +23

      GOD got there first.

  • @craigbikes8831
    @craigbikes8831 Рік тому +179

    I'm still having trouble wrapping my mind around the idea that something organic can rotate 360 degrees without being directly attached to the body

    • @LukePuplett
      @LukePuplett 11 місяців тому +27

      Nothing is attached if you zoom in far enough. Within the atom, it's mostly empty space, 99.9999999999999% I think.

    • @TheWizardGamez
      @TheWizardGamez 11 місяців тому +40

      I totally understand what you mean. I’ve been asking myself, why didn’t god or whatever make 1 animal that rolls on wheels. Turns out. It’s in your balls

    • @seven-qpitt2176
      @seven-qpitt2176 10 місяців тому +6

      @@TheWizardGamez💀💀💀

    • @HOLLASOUNDS
      @HOLLASOUNDS 10 місяців тому +8

      @@TheWizardGamez Theses structures only work on a tini scale, a bit like lego, ypu can make some really intricate stuff but if its to big it will fall to bits.

    • @darespusta
      @darespusta 9 місяців тому +1

      Electromagnetic force everything follows that

  • @academiadaeletricidade
    @academiadaeletricidade 10 місяців тому +44

    I’ve no words for this! As an electrical engineer who works in a hydroelectric power plant and see generators for 20 years I’m astonished!!!

  • @Numinus_Arts
    @Numinus_Arts 7 місяців тому +7

    I’ve worked on turbofan engines for 10 years In the military and to see that bacteria already did it without all the complicated engineering blows me away

  • @KitKitChanIsaac
    @KitKitChanIsaac 3 роки тому +114

    kudos to the cameraman who shrunk to even smaller than a bacteria

  • @cheepsh0t
    @cheepsh0t 3 роки тому +82

    I wonder if anyone has built a large scale version and tested the design on a boat. Now that would be interesting. We know that Leonardo Devinchi used to copy designs found in nature.

    • @mikimiki1634
      @mikimiki1634 3 роки тому +19

      Im prtty sure a proton based motor isnt possbile to be built at real scale and also it isnt even known for sure how the motor works for it to be able to be used at a boat

    • @aleksitjvladica.
      @aleksitjvladica. 3 роки тому

      Yes. Miki.

    • @al2644
      @al2644 3 роки тому +10

      Some of these can get up to 100,000 rpm and change direction within a quarter of a turn. I do not see how materials we use would handle that kind of inertia. You would not be able to scale the mass and acceleration of the moving parts to that of a real boat.
      There is also a chance, due to size, that some physical effects (that we understand or do not fully understand) come into play. Most likely involving rigidity of small molecules allowing for those change of directions.

    • @geobla6600
      @geobla6600 2 роки тому +1

      Well , Mazda Engineers built a very similar motor with almost identical parts with the help of computers and thousands of hours of research , but it lacked
      the sophistication and thus the abililty of the flagellum motor and was eventually taken out of production.

    • @zasyed114
      @zasyed114 2 роки тому +1

      The efficiency of a single-blade propeller is more than multi-blade propeller. I also thought we may try using a flagellum instead of a metallic propeller for ships propulsion

  • @onlyformagicians7174
    @onlyformagicians7174 Рік тому +9

    00:01 Bacterial flagella are helical motorized structures that bacteria use to move through their environment.
    00:39 The bacterial flagellum consists of a filament, hook, and basal body.
    01:11 The bacterial flagellum remains stationary and derives its power from a proton gradient.
    01:50 The molecular mechanism of rotation in bacterial flagellum is not known.
    02:22 Flagellar assembly begins with the formation of the MS ring.
    03:01 The rotor and flagellar proteins make up the extracellular portion of the flagellum.
    03:35 The bacterial flagellum is assembled through a cylindrical structure with the help of cap proteins.
    04:16 Proteins assemble to form the bacterial flagellum

  • @gilmarjunior7700
    @gilmarjunior7700 13 днів тому +1

    "Yeah that evolved spontaneously" 💀

  • @jamesclerkmaxwell8020
    @jamesclerkmaxwell8020 Рік тому +8

    Some intelligent entity is giving us a Tech demo.

  • @baraskparas9559
    @baraskparas9559 3 місяці тому +2

    Magnificent presentation. Thanks! Recent studies have shown that Mot A - Mot B can move horizontally under the force of a C ring conformation change whilst still spinning in the same direction under the proton motive force. This simple change of position changes the direction of spin of the rotor almost instantaneously to cause a tumble or a change in direction from forward to backwards.
    The spiral alignment of individual flagellin proteins makes spin direction of the flagellum a critical factor in direction of motion and speed with reverse being 50% faster.
    A new book published by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth outlines abiogenesis in great detail with a solution to the evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome as well as the cell in general using 290 references, 50 illustrations and several information tables with a proposed molecular natural selection formula with a worked example for ATP.

  • @muhammadwaxali4494
    @muhammadwaxali4494 5 місяців тому +6

    And now we’re essentially creating the same thing in AI. Guess nature had us beat by a long shot though. Intelligent design

  • @mrsdiggory3211
    @mrsdiggory3211 5 років тому +35

    FINALLY, I FOUND THE BEST FLAGELLA VIDEO! THANKS! xxx it was beautiful!

    • @tcm2623
      @tcm2623 5 років тому

      Here is better one: www youtube com/watch?v=MNR48hUd-Hw

    • @that_pac123
      @that_pac123 5 років тому

      TCM lol ofcourse it's a link to the moronic, inaccurate, and unscientific creationist one. 😂😂😂 It's not better, it's wrong

    • @eagleartillery1361
      @eagleartillery1361 4 роки тому +5

      Why is it so hard to find? Isn't it because it makes every unbiased human brain to question evolution?

  • @damonhackney6142
    @damonhackney6142 4 місяці тому +1

    Very lucid explanation-even to a layman. I learned about the flagellar motor last night and it's been blowing my freaking mind today.

  • @DanDaFreakinMan
    @DanDaFreakinMan 2 роки тому +13

    Whoa so it's the closest thing you can get to a techno-organic life form then

    • @klyxx8990
      @klyxx8990 10 місяців тому

      red or blue?

  • @JordanBeagle
    @JordanBeagle 9 місяців тому +3

    4:50 So billions of proteins are dancing in me at any second 😄

  • @joec8332
    @joec8332 5 років тому +161

    So, bacteria is best described as a small machine. No one else is finding this a little strange??

    • @leonardoalcantara7394
      @leonardoalcantara7394 5 років тому +11

      Mason Gilbert I think this is the best piece of writing in youtube i’ve seen in a long time. Damn straight.

    • @MostafaElSakari
      @MostafaElSakari 5 років тому +1

      Mason Gilbert you can’t write for shit

    • @Komodo1312
      @Komodo1312 4 роки тому +2

      @@MostafaElSakari Cope

    • @bruhidk3069
      @bruhidk3069 4 роки тому +1

      Komodo lmao

    • @sanchitagolder
      @sanchitagolder 4 роки тому

      @Mason Gilbert maybe i love you

  • @kmkall6874
    @kmkall6874 Рік тому +5

    Definitely made by chance😂

  • @ismailsaritas7170
    @ismailsaritas7170 10 днів тому +2

    How almighty God is...

  • @VoidHalo
    @VoidHalo Рік тому +3

    A capsule shaped creature which propels itself along with a bunch of helical flagella. I guess this is where they get the idea for the sentinels in The Matrix.

  • @eagleartillery1361
    @eagleartillery1361 4 роки тому +8

    That's too bad we can't see invisible under the NanoScope.

  • @rodrigoapaza8086
    @rodrigoapaza8086 8 місяців тому +2

    Bro, I see so much similarities betwen this and how actual electric motor works. It makes so much sense. I'm scared now

  • @ropao6310
    @ropao6310 11 місяців тому +12

    Seems to me like the most plausible explanation for this is intelligent design. It’s called irreducible complexity. Darwin cannot explain how all this came together if he suggests a gradual slow process of multiple small changes to reach the present organism. How could this small machine work without all the pieces being assembled together at the same time? You can build a car engine gradually but you can’t drive it until it’s complete.

    • @romeucapelasa
      @romeucapelasa 10 місяців тому +4

      Maybe the car was just a flat sled that only worked in slippery surfaces, then it started with rails for better efficiency than flexible ones that can prevent damage than self detachable rails that roll... than made of rubber.... there's no "intelligence" there are problems that only the random things with the solution solve and survive, probably with trillions of attempts and millions of years

    • @lordbored2706
      @lordbored2706 10 місяців тому +1

      Thank you for being rational,@@romeucapelasa

    • @eldeberryhamster
      @eldeberryhamster 10 місяців тому +1

      I would recommend reading "The blind Watchmaker" by Richard Dawkins, if you want to understand how complex things might come about gradually.

    • @d83f90
      @d83f90 10 місяців тому +1

      That’s stupid. Cars evolved over time. No one just sat down and invented a working car from nothing. Many designs and changes made over time over the entire history of humans creating things. So, that is a very bad analogy that does not support your assertion at all and if anything counters it.

    • @VicDeLacross
      @VicDeLacross 10 місяців тому +1

      Very slowly over time and in different stages all eventually ending (possibly) in this design.

  • @being_artist298
    @being_artist298 3 роки тому +24

    Fun fact: this is happening inside single cell

    • @yangwang9460
      @yangwang9460 3 роки тому

      @Shannon Rehwinkel I dare u prove allah doesn't exist 😎

    • @KitKitChanIsaac
      @KitKitChanIsaac 3 роки тому

      @Shannon Rehwinkel fun fact:you just pissed off all of the Muslims and nobody gives a fuck about what you just said

    • @jimd9339
      @jimd9339 3 роки тому

      @@yangwang9460 Do some research... It is easy to find the evidence that "allah" is nothing more than a man made pagan "moon god".

    • @yangwang9460
      @yangwang9460 3 роки тому +2

      @@jimd9339 you are the one who has to know who is god ,not me !
      the god who created u and I and everything , the visible and the invisible , the bigest and the lowest !
      tell me , did u create yourself ?
      did the this life come from nothing ??
      did it creat itself ??????
      it is soooo clear that a god who created every single thing
      his name is ALLAH

    • @jimd9339
      @jimd9339 3 роки тому

      @@yangwang9460 You are trusting in a pagan moon god.
      The God that created *EVERYTHING* is Jesus Christ the Lord God. Your "god" is man made. Do some research.
      Jesus can and will forgive *ALL* your sin. Just repent and believe the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ! Jesus *IS* God.

  • @toogs8571
    @toogs8571 4 роки тому +6

    How in the world was this discovered??

    • @Ampliflyer
      @Ampliflyer 4 роки тому +6

      people were curious and started investigating this

    • @ns6q333
      @ns6q333 4 роки тому +8

      electron microscopes and lots of science

  • @anonymousplayer6378
    @anonymousplayer6378 3 роки тому +2

    I'm still surprised that only 700 subscribed you guys, thanks for your videos you have a new subscriber now, so please continue making new videos.

  • @alondram.colonvega812
    @alondram.colonvega812 4 роки тому +11

    This really helped me, thank you so much!

  • @bradhilton2283
    @bradhilton2283 2 роки тому +2

    This doest seam that different from auto mechanics or a jet engeine ? What if we started engineering this stuff better than I found in nature?

  • @Erika-hh8xl
    @Erika-hh8xl 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you for helping me out ❤❤❤ now i am totally understood the mechanism.

  • @91StePPeWOOFER
    @91StePPeWOOFER 13 днів тому +1

    Looks just like a turbine😮

  • @willh978
    @willh978 3 роки тому +1

    Do flagella receive signals when to cease growth then?

  • @baraskparas
    @baraskparas Рік тому +1

    Amazing presentation. Thanks!

  • @JoJoJe
    @JoJoJe 2 роки тому +10

    Such complex design. Superbbb

    • @r.guerreiro140
      @r.guerreiro140 Рік тому +5

      But don't forget it's there by chance, ok 😅

    • @TheWizardGamez
      @TheWizardGamez 11 місяців тому

      @@r.guerreiro140if millions of years of evolution don’t make shit like this. Then I’d believe aliens aren’t real and somewhere out there. But this. This is simply too cool to not be possible somewhere out there. Wandering on one planet or moon

  • @jamiesmith4293
    @jamiesmith4293 10 місяців тому +4

    "Irreducible complexity" lead me here.

    • @Drew_goo
      @Drew_goo 10 місяців тому

      Just because something is irreducible, doesn’t mean it can’t evolve

    • @jamiesmith4293
      @jamiesmith4293 10 місяців тому +3

      @@Drew_goo What was its previous stage of evolution, slightly de-evolved from this?

    • @flamingswordapologetics
      @flamingswordapologetics 10 місяців тому +1

      Exactly, these are little machines, it takes information, who is the information giver should be the question, but modern so called science will not allow such talk.

  • @DennisInVenice
    @DennisInVenice 3 роки тому +6

    Is there any background on how the animation was made? How in the world did they get the dimensions and shapes?

    •  3 роки тому

      "Molecular structure of the intact bacterial flagellar basal body" (2020) has an extremely detailed description of the methods used. It also has amazing pictures :).

    •  3 роки тому

      ​@The Elder Indeed it's electron microscopy! (Cryo-EM) Indeed they are not imaged while alive. The movement is just inferred from the structure. "Intact" in the title refers to being able to image the basal body as a whole, instead of assembling the structure from images of fragments.

  • @wendy8246
    @wendy8246 Рік тому +1

    Ok I'm asking for a low key global sociological study including pillars of power

  • @JordanBeagle
    @JordanBeagle 9 місяців тому +1

    People who ask why evolution near created wheels, when this out here, with efficiency greater than any manmade machine

  • @desireerose2861
    @desireerose2861 Рік тому +1

    where can I buy this?

    • @posoild
      @posoild Місяць тому

      you already having it

  • @FLORIDIANMILLIONAIRE
    @FLORIDIANMILLIONAIRE 8 місяців тому

    Im not convinced simply by diagram that says protein and then an orthogonal linear movement becomes rotation it has to be more concrete chemo mechanical explanation that involves force to torque conversion

  • @geobla6600
    @geobla6600 5 років тому +8

    Excellent video. It's fascinating how blind random chance can have the foresight
    to make the many specific parts (which themselves are made up of 100's and
    sometimes 1000's of amino acids which ) that are purpose specific.
    Anyhow , it's truly incredible how an actual mechanical rotary motor that uses
    a fuel source to operate and which exceeds the quality and efficiency of what
    our best mechanical engineers are able to engineer and develop can even exist
    from random chance.
    And to think there are over 30.000 different types of proteins that are
    required for life and many are much more complex then the flagellum.

    • @koppite9600
      @koppite9600 5 років тому +8

      Its not fascinating..
      It is abnormal and we should think something else rather than random chance

    • @davidjd123
      @davidjd123 4 роки тому +2

      or.... it was designed that way. ITs crazy that people hold onto evolution doing mental gymnastics even after more proof of a design

    • @lawthirtyfour2953
      @lawthirtyfour2953 2 роки тому +4

      That's the power of having hundred of millions of years to try out everything that works until something does.

    • @KateeAngel
      @KateeAngel Рік тому +2

      ​@@koppite9600natural selection isn't "random chance". I like how you creationists are constantly using fallacies and straw man

    • @koppite9600
      @koppite9600 Рік тому

      @@KateeAngel creation is compatible with evolution. I might have got something wrong but why are you so quick to slander me?

  • @mariomaster64dslite
    @mariomaster64dslite 7 місяців тому

    One time, a teacher called me dumb for wondering why aminals couldn't have wheels for feet and said no organic part could survive while being able to freely rotate 360

    • @nickc8819
      @nickc8819 4 місяці тому

      @mariommaster you were ahead of the time. I do believe Einstein would of listened to you.

  • @mathiastwahirwa1276
    @mathiastwahirwa1276 8 місяців тому +1

    Any aeronautical engineers here? I am blown away

  • @block9390
    @block9390 Рік тому

    @@bacterial flagellum...I would like to use this video in my youtube video, how do I contact you??

  • @vandananair3287
    @vandananair3287 4 роки тому +4

    you explained it so well

  • @tribikrambarai4988
    @tribikrambarai4988 2 роки тому +2

    Wonderful animation !!

  • @mikeydashank3897
    @mikeydashank3897 Рік тому +1

    Very similar to the machine I saw during my salvia trip

  • @countdoof8724
    @countdoof8724 9 місяців тому

    wow. imagine the amount of time something has to adapt into a machine like this.

  • @r.guerreiro140
    @r.guerreiro140 12 днів тому +1

    "But of course it can be explained by evolution
    We don't how yet but someday we will explain it
    I do believe it!"
    😅

  • @wendy8246
    @wendy8246 Рік тому

    For example again if you didn't go to church to get actual food or housing would it hold your interest? Levels ect...

    • @glenliesegang233
      @glenliesegang233 Рік тому

      Remove churches. Would the amounts previously given by them to charities increase, decrease, or stay the same?
      I suspect the atheist groups which meet weekly to discuss their philosophies ( church equivalents) as organized groups would actually give more.

  • @jimbert50
    @jimbert50 9 місяців тому +1

    The first pistons.

  • @bl-64rajanroopsingh77
    @bl-64rajanroopsingh77 Рік тому +1

    Mind blowing animation 😮

  • @charlescowan6121
    @charlescowan6121 6 місяців тому

    Nature is beautiful! A 100% efficient motor attached to a microtuble.

  • @joons3374
    @joons3374 4 роки тому +6

    I love knowledge.

  • @glenliesegang233
    @glenliesegang233 Рік тому +3

    How do people explain that random pieces can be added to a simple functioning machine and enhance its function? Ask an auto mechanic why a Volvo engine turbocharger retrofit kit will not fit a Subaru engine.

    • @KateeAngel
      @KateeAngel Рік тому +2

      Because bacteria aren't machines and cars, and this is just a symbolic representation

  • @dima8955i
    @dima8955i 2 місяці тому +5

    I can't believe that people will still deny the creator after watching this.

    • @Unlucky-Luke-gl7ex
      @Unlucky-Luke-gl7ex 11 днів тому

      How does this point to a creator? How else was bacteria supposed to exist and move? Your deduction makes no sense. You just don't understand, so your religion MUST be the answer 🙄.

  • @ultralaggerREV1
    @ultralaggerREV1 7 місяців тому

    Incredible bacteria have brushless DC motors!

  • @tygerbyrn
    @tygerbyrn 2 роки тому +1

    Fascinating. Intriguing.

  • @wendy8246
    @wendy8246 Рік тому

    Potential gains are included however please don't rush too fast beyond basic comforts types?

  • @alicefilograna5751
    @alicefilograna5751 Рік тому +1

    Thank you!!!!🥰🥰

  • @bilis2866
    @bilis2866 Рік тому

    how do they know all of this???

  • @themaccabee1890
    @themaccabee1890 2 роки тому +23

    I can't comprehend ever that something can build itself from scratch, design itself, realise by itself at the nascent stage ohh i need this ohh i need that. You need intelligence to do that. Does intelligence arise from random mixtures of chemicals?. The universe itself is moving towards randomness, and here we are saying that it is the universe itself that exhibit peculiar behaviour by bringing some chemicals to life with a very high level of order and fine tuning.
    When you see codes or designs or even letters on the wall, you know that is not random, it comes from intelligence out of an intelligent being.
    When we happen to see a Landrover in the midst of a storm in Congo, we obviously won't conclude that some mixtures of random rocks and a bolt a lightning strike cause the landrover to came into existence after million and million of years of evolution from a bolt to a complex vehicle that it is now. It is stupid, and it is not even laughable, it is an insult to our intelligence. Infact we are more likely to conclude someone had made it, and if we haven't see a vehicle before, we are more likely to say that it belongs to God or a being that is super intelligent.
    But sadly even if we realise this truth most will look for excuses, because in their heart they know that believing in God comes with a baggage which they don't want to carry.

    • @darthhunter69
      @darthhunter69 2 роки тому +1

      this comment is way too underrated

    • @pablohorna9499
      @pablohorna9499 2 роки тому +1

      Imagine a religion with a sacred text that says and affirms for a fact what you are refuting here... how many would believe this? Wouldn't they be called names? Oh, not at all! This is science! You see, it takes more than faith to believe in evolution.

    • @dogdoggddog
      @dogdoggddog Рік тому

      Dunning-Kruger effect in full fucking force here.
      1. No organism builds itself. Natural selection isn't a self-directed process. It is a process of mutations arising randomly, being filtered by the environment, and then going on to replicate themselves. This is all a bottom-up causal process, there's no teleology involved.
      2. No, intelligence does not arise from random mixtures of chemicals, and no one claims it does. It took many billions of years for something like the human brain to evolve, each step along the way requiring prior adaptations. There's nothing random about the anatomy of organisms, there's a function to every feature. The point of evolution is to explain how this order can emerge naturally, and evolution by natural selection is an incredibly powerful theory for explaining this.
      3. There's a difference between artificial and complex. A single bacterial cell is more complex than a landrover, yet a landrover has no DNA--it is incapable of self-assembly. Honestly not a difficult distinction to grasp once you actually understand what DNA is and how it is able to replicate.
      4. Yes, the baggage of believing in a being for which there is less than zero evidence to believe in...Right. As the existentialists have long known, not believing in God comes with immense baggage of its own. You have to rely on yourself to make sense of the world, both in empirical and moral terms. This bears an enormous responsibility which the "faithful" are able to slyly circumvent through the neuroanaesthetic balm that is dogma.

    • @KateeAngel
      @KateeAngel Рік тому +2

      You are so ignorant. There is a huge difference between machines and living beings with reproduction. Also you should learn about inequilibrium thermodynamics and dissipative systems. Complexity arises naturally in such systems

  • @wendy8246
    @wendy8246 Рік тому

    Some level of incentive is perhaps appropriate

  • @theregalproletariat
    @theregalproletariat 2 роки тому +1

    Nanotechnology is already real. It's just not fully understood yet.

  • @ericchristen5275
    @ericchristen5275 Рік тому +6

    So these just randomly came about. LOL

    • @flamingswordapologetics
      @flamingswordapologetics 10 місяців тому +1

      Exactly!

    • @user-lp7tx1fe6t
      @user-lp7tx1fe6t 9 місяців тому +2

      No, they were actually created by a God who randomly came about and then created everything out of thin air using his magical powers.

    • @flamingswordapologetics
      @flamingswordapologetics 9 місяців тому +1

      @@user-lp7tx1fe6t God is out of space, time, etc...that is why the Universe cannot come about from nothing. Your objection is based on a false premise. All scientist, atheist and theist alike agree with that premise.
      God being beyond the laws of the Universe, is eternal, THAT is the dfference.
      So either the Universe came about on its own, which again, non one believes anymore, or something outside of it created or started it somehow.
      Both views take faith, its just that one view takes much more faith than the other.

  • @wudchuck
    @wudchuck 10 місяців тому +2

    One of the better arguments for intelligent design. How does something evolve into this? Proteins just accidently arranged themselves?

    • @flamingswordapologetics
      @flamingswordapologetics 10 місяців тому

      Nailed it! Can't happen, its clearly designed.

    • @mc_kublai
      @mc_kublai 9 місяців тому

      ​@flamingswordapologetics except it can happen, because it clearly did 🙄

    • @flamingswordapologetics
      @flamingswordapologetics 9 місяців тому

      @@mc_kublai Because its programmed, designed, molecules didn't make themselves. Just think about it logically...we didn't design or even know how to make an outboard motor until what? 100-125 years ago? Yet these little motors made themselves. Nope.

  • @Francisco-j1e
    @Francisco-j1e 4 роки тому +11

    Oddly similar to a electric motor...stator, shaft, rotor... Omg.
    EDIT: isn't that the exact same principles as a electric motor? A biological electrical motor?

    • @HungryGreeny
      @HungryGreeny 4 роки тому +4

      Doesn't seems so. Electrical motor relies on the interaction of magnetics fields, and flagellum using electochemical reactions to drive rod-like proteins much like pistons of the internal combustion engine. Their reciprocating movement then converted into rotational movement by what seems like purely mechanical means.

    • @CristalMediumBlue
      @CristalMediumBlue 3 роки тому +9

      Yes, scary similar. Like when you zoom into the Mandelbrot set and find the same structure at a smaller scale.
      Look at the ATP synthase in the mitochondria. This machinery uses the potential energy from a proton gradient between two different zones (divided by a membrane) to rotate, which is then used to synthesize ATP. ATP is "the standard" way to deliver energy to countless process in every living organism. The energy used to create the proton gradient comes from the combustion of several compounds (carbohydrates and lipids) generating CO2, water, and heat. So, we can see the mitochondria as a place were several sources of energy are transformed to a very simple and convenient type of energy, which is ATP.
      Now look at the turbine generator in a power plant. This machinery uses the potential energy from a pressure gradient (commonly from water vapor) between two different zones to rotate, which is then used to generate electric energy. Electric energy is "the standard" way to deliver energy to countless process in every society. The energy used to create the pressure gradient comes from the combustion of several compounds (oil, coal, wood) generating CO2, water, and heat. So, we can see the power plant as a place were several sources of energy are transformed to a very simple and convenient type of energy, which is Electric energy.
      There are several analogies between organisms of different complexities. www.reddit.com/r/topology/comments/mckf95/the_father_of_mathematical_biophysics_and/

    • @lumieresombre7512
      @lumieresombre7512 3 роки тому +3

      The movement of electrons in these motors do create electric fields which could in theory be detected! So you could put your very sensitive detector near one of those things and see the flow of protons powering the motor. This is engineering of the highest level. This example impresses people because it's looks like something we all know. But the biological world is full of such mechanism that no evolutionist wants to talk about or make animations of.

    • @r.guerreiro140
      @r.guerreiro140 Рік тому

      Indeed, with no need of lubricants, a flexible cable and moved by the flow of protons instead electrons at 6000 rpm

    • @r.guerreiro140
      @r.guerreiro140 Рік тому

      ​@@HungryGreeny but there are magnetic dipoles inside those molecules

  • @block9390
    @block9390 Рік тому

    Can I use this in a video that I am making?

    • @jeffderhak9210
      @jeffderhak9210 10 місяців тому

      no! lol

    • @block9390
      @block9390 10 місяців тому

      @@jeffderhak9210 I did not ask you! LOL

  • @aishwarsudhan
    @aishwarsudhan 4 роки тому +1

    Wish u a 100k subscribers

  • @PreacherDan
    @PreacherDan Рік тому +3

    Who is here because of Steven C Meyer?

  • @wendy8246
    @wendy8246 Рік тому

    Similarly with markets and government types btw

  • @alokkundu57
    @alokkundu57 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much.

  • @okman9684
    @okman9684 5 місяців тому +1

    Here after Smarter Everyday video

  • @locke8847
    @locke8847 3 роки тому +1

    Yup, we biotechnology. Crazy.

  • @drcyantist6993
    @drcyantist6993 5 місяців тому

    And some people still say theres no creator.

  • @jamesfletcher7196
    @jamesfletcher7196 10 місяців тому +1

    Great design

  • @Noughtgate
    @Noughtgate 4 роки тому +6

    Frictionless motors. Nice

    • @james6401
      @james6401 3 роки тому +5

      All spinning around in a nice sea of 5W-30 lubricating cytoplasm. Toyota needs to get onto that proton-powered two-stroke design...

  • @shagunsharma2812
    @shagunsharma2812 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much 😊

  • @kadakshikshantutorialsbyso7498
    @kadakshikshantutorialsbyso7498 3 роки тому +1

    Nice explaination

  • @fahadp7454
    @fahadp7454 3 роки тому

    Like what Dennis asked, How did they find this out? Did they cut E.Coli and found all these?!!

    • @gavincurtis
      @gavincurtis 3 роки тому +3

      In 1997 they reverse engineered this motor from the Euglena. Freeze dry and take atom thin slices of the motor unit under electron microscope to build up the 3D model. The 2 scientists won a Nobel Prize if memory serves and changed their perception of biology.
      They found the motor was almost digital, that is without load, the RPM would always be the same, but had multiple levels of torque and ability to change direction.

  • @steelmember6326
    @steelmember6326 4 роки тому +3

    crazy stuff. Intelligent design or evolution.

    • @patldennis
      @patldennis 3 роки тому +1

      Evolution. Flagella are a potent adaptation for some bacteria to cause disease. Is it reasonable to conclude they were designed to cause disease?

    • @TheSun_89
      @TheSun_89 3 роки тому

      @@patldennis it takes design to evolve. Every engineer knows this.

    • @patldennis
      @patldennis 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheSun_89 nope... if you think the lineage of jawless fish -> humans over 500 million years was a planned set of mods then you have some weird ideas about genetics and how a supernatural agent with Thanos type powers must get from A to B

    • @patldennis
      @patldennis 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheSun_89 but your position is that the designs of disease causing organisms was a purposeful engineering? Also weird and unconventional.

    • @Ryan-ze9fz
      @Ryan-ze9fz 3 роки тому +1

      Those things aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive. Scientists have yet to explain how something comes from nothing

  • @Orlanzepol123
    @Orlanzepol123 4 роки тому +48

    I am blown away. How can this even be possible without a designer.?

    • @ohhellno8759
      @ohhellno8759 4 роки тому +12

      evolution

    • @shiba983
      @shiba983 4 роки тому +9

      It can't be !

    • @jamesginty6684
      @jamesginty6684 4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/LLMPd41GvWM/v-deo.html

    • @shiba983
      @shiba983 4 роки тому +11

      @@jamesginty6684 Everything has to have a creator, like a bulding has a creator or a painting has it's own creator.
      So does universe have a creator, the God from the Bible. And yes, this bacteria did evolve to some extend, but has to have a designer, creator. God bless you, read Bible which will empower you with the Holy Spirit!

    • @jamesginty6684
      @jamesginty6684 4 роки тому +11

      @@shiba983 "Everything has to have a creator, like a bulding has a creator or a painting has it's own creator" are you trying to make me laugh with that silly argument. I guess that your a ray comfort fan. watchmakers analogy dose not work because animals can reproduce but watches, buildings and paintings can not.
      "And yes, this bacteria did evolve to some extend," Bacteria are Domain, higher than kingdom.

  • @daddyof3gaming522
    @daddyof3gaming522 2 місяці тому

    Someone explain how this occurs through evolution? No one can. Evolution is gradual we are led to believe. So they're saying it took millions of years for the bacteria to create itself tails to move with? How did survive and move in those millions of years?

    • @gilmarjunior7700
      @gilmarjunior7700 13 днів тому

      Yeah and they say that we are the brain rot 💀

  • @thatoneguywithahugethang
    @thatoneguywithahugethang 7 місяців тому

    Hold up a min
    Im building up my rod

  • @jibran6635
    @jibran6635 4 роки тому

    Can someone explain the conformational change. Why does the addition of proton to the acid result in movement of the protein?

    • @Mch676
      @Mch676 4 роки тому +1

      the molecular change is not well understood yet, so that's probably why the video didn't explain it much. It is just proposed that the binding of a proton induces a conformational change in one of the motors. But the motion is probably based on the proton motor force as well

    • @joons3374
      @joons3374 4 роки тому

      Yeah it looked like a rough guess, but video admits they do not know things exactly. My guess would be that adding a proton to the acid charges it positively and that results in repulsive static force that moves the MotA to a position in which conditions for acid to retain charge becomes unfavorable.... but it is just a guess based on a guess.

    • @morroghaiky6580
      @morroghaiky6580 3 роки тому

      Proteins structure is for most part decided by hydrophilic and hydrophobic effects, so my guess is that the addition of proton to the acid changes its properties regarding interaction with water, which then forces the protein to change it structure. Later the the acid lets go of the proton and the protein change its structure to original state.

    • @Sausketo
      @Sausketo 2 роки тому +1

      @techstuf4637 if it was an EM straight up then it would be electrons moving, not protons

  • @Mfields4517
    @Mfields4517 Рік тому +1

    How did this evolve naturally? One part of the system missing renders it inoperable. So why would multiple generations build toward this motor without it being functioning? Why would it have a for example a rod without a stator. Or a stator without a rod. It doesn’t make sense

    • @bethbromley9590
      @bethbromley9590 Рік тому +1

      It didn't evolve piece by piece, it evolved as a collective functional machine from a very very bad version with only a couple of components through billions of generations to a very efficient and effective machine with 50+components.

    • @Mfields4517
      @Mfields4517 Рік тому +1

      @@bethbromley9590 You're ignoring that the machine is not functional period if any of these components gets broken

    • @bethbromley9590
      @bethbromley9590 Рік тому

      That's not correct. Unlike most mechanical machines made by mankind, naturally evolved motors can tolerate minor mutations without losing function, and those mutations that happen to confer superior function can be accepted and kept. @@Mfields4517

    • @cortster12
      @cortster12 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@Mfields4517
      It actually is functional if pieces of it are missing, the function simply changes slightly.

  • @jimd9339
    @jimd9339 3 роки тому +12

    Thus the Creator and creations design is validated!

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 3 роки тому +1

      How?

    • @spatrk6634
      @spatrk6634 3 роки тому +6

      @@carlosandleon because he cannot comprehend how evolution works.
      he thinks the flagellum is irreducibly complex.

    • @akhiltabraham6717
      @akhiltabraham6717 3 роки тому +2

      Yes. These kind of sophisticated machines are beyond the reach of any naturalistic processes.

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 3 роки тому +1

      @@akhiltabraham6717 What?

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 3 роки тому +1

      @@akhiltabraham6717 How?

  • @mayumimori3279
    @mayumimori3279 3 роки тому +4

    so cool that it looks like a machine. Natural selection is rlly mind blowing.

    • @Rami_Zaki-k2b
      @Rami_Zaki-k2b 3 роки тому +4

      Natural Selection ha ? 😁. Like the one creating car motors. They are naturally occurring too hehehehehehehehe ....

    • @jimd9339
      @jimd9339 3 роки тому

      LOL Natural selection is not natural and nothing selects. Evolution is a fable.

    • @KateeAngel
      @KateeAngel Рік тому +2

      ​@@Rami_Zaki-k2bsince whendo cars reproduce? Creationists are so ignorant

    • @Rami_Zaki-k2b
      @Rami_Zaki-k2b Рік тому

      @@KateeAngel
      Since chance can produce what made them (the cars) ...
      Not as ignorant as those who think that "something can come out of nothing" .... True clowns 🤡

  • @CarTunezzz
    @CarTunezzz 9 місяців тому

    So my car does have feelings 😂🔥

  • @muhammadnazir7188
    @muhammadnazir7188 2 роки тому

    I don't know how these have been discovered what are we. I mean really what in the world would this structure help us in grade 11 12?

  • @ronaldpokatiloff5704
    @ronaldpokatiloff5704 Рік тому +1

    Only a computer can:
    make a blueprint
    program the parts
    make a robot and deliver the parts
    putting it together in proper sequence
    make it work
    timely put together

  • @yawenzoraluan3148
    @yawenzoraluan3148 4 роки тому

    Didn't know men give a lot of thoughts into how to make their sperms swim. lol

  • @agrrb7
    @agrrb7 3 місяці тому

    Of course, there is no designer😂

  • @manojbathula8078
    @manojbathula8078 3 роки тому

    Best animated vedio ever watched

  • @ibr7515
    @ibr7515 2 роки тому +1

    ما شاء الله

  • @noahrobinson2685
    @noahrobinson2685 3 роки тому +1

    fucking fantastic

  • @cliffpetersen6881
    @cliffpetersen6881 4 роки тому +11

    Intelligent Design! Irreducible Complexity Mechanical & Chemical Engineering on Nano Scale

    • @General_Griffin
      @General_Griffin 4 роки тому +4

      Incorrect.

    • @jamesginty6684
      @jamesginty6684 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/GJWy_pQKZCg/v-deo.html

    • @jimd9339
      @jimd9339 3 роки тому +2

      @@General_Griffin You misspelled *CORRECT*

    • @astroid-ws4py
      @astroid-ws4py 2 роки тому +2

      And Genetical Engineering

    • @KateeAngel
      @KateeAngel Рік тому +1

      It is not irreducibly complex.

  • @Truthmybannerl4631
    @Truthmybannerl4631 5 місяців тому +2

    Wow this just proves the existence of God
    Who created all this and we are just discovering all these !

    • @nicelol5241
      @nicelol5241 4 місяці тому

      it actually proves adaptation

  • @dusundurucux118
    @dusundurucux118 3 роки тому +6

    SubhanAllah

    • @Tlyrc
      @Tlyrc 3 роки тому

      subhanEke

    • @lev3738
      @lev3738 3 роки тому

      SubhanAnnunaki

    • @asiffarouk7838
      @asiffarouk7838 2 роки тому +1

      Indeed. Only this came to my mind while watching

    • @dusundurucux118
      @dusundurucux118 2 роки тому

      @@asiffarouk7838 me too

  • @apexlifeismine100
    @apexlifeismine100 2 роки тому +1

    Recognize that design? Human beings reproduced this design in real life based on something inside a cell in everyone's own body . They did this a long time BEFORE they ever saw the flagella as microbiology had yet to be invented . Who made who ? Are we a result of randomness ?

  • @Numinus_Arts
    @Numinus_Arts 7 місяців тому

    Amazing.