"Thus said Hashem Who established the sun for light by day, The laws of moon and stars for light by night, Who stirs up the sea into roaring waves, Whose name is Hashem of Hosts: If these laws should ever be annulled by Me, declares Hashem, Only then would the offspring of Israel cease to be a nation before Me for all of time. Thus said Hashem: If the heavens above could be measured, and the foundations of the earth below could be fathomed, only then would I reject all the offspring of Israel for all that they have done, declares Hashem." Jeremiah 31:34-36.
@@firstcentury1885 "Because for many days will the children of Israel dwell with no king and no official and no sacrafices...and then the children of Israel shall return [to the land of Israel] and seek Hashem their God *[Hashem alone is their God]* and David their King [the Messiah, who is NOT Hashem/God], and they will be in Awe of Hashem and of His goodness *that will be at the end of days* " Hoseah 3:4,5.
@@firstcentury1885 the tribe of judah was the bigger tribe that stayed in Israel and king David is from judah so yes judah is still on the throne. Judah = Jew.
"...behold, they are a nation that dwells alone, and among the nations they are not counted... May my soul die [like] the death of the straight ones, and may my end be like theirs" Numbers 23:9&10.
"Lest there be among you a man or woman or a family or a tribe, whos heart is today straying from HaShem our God to go and worship the gods of the nations, lest there be among you a root sprouting these bitter things... And when they hear these warning words and they say to themselves "I will be safe even though I follow my own willful heart"...Hashem will not forgive such a person..." Deuteronomy 29 verses 17-20. [Ie: Hashem forgives all true repenters, but He does not forgive those whom abondon His Torah].
@Joshua X17 Yehonsatan keeps saying Hashem our God. Hashem, means, the name. So really that IS saying, our God, the name. SOoooo I guess Moses told Pharoah Ramses, Hey Faye Roe. The name sent me. 🤣 😊
@Jesus Christ Is Lord U do not pay much attention overall to what Rabbi Trail SIN ger & HIS FLOCKERS SAY & BELIEVE! Fyi, They preach that everything written in & from Matthew to & including Revelation is FALSE. Whoever is not a frail- surface-cursory-skimmer-flimsy thinnish-superficial reader & THINKER, will SEE & KNOW that The Rabbi Trail Shady Lane Garden Path Pied Piper Tovia SINger & ASSOciates AND the VAST MAJORITY of his opponents are ALL superficial-surface-cursory-skimmer-frail-thinnish-flimsy readers & THINKERS. BUT!! VERY GOOD @ DECEIVING!! BOTH SIDES, PRO & CON ARE THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND! All I C HERE, is one mass cycle of CONFUSION!
@Joshua X17 This may sound/appear like I'm not telling U the Truth, BUT I am telling U the TRUTH. I KNOW the name of the one most people call/say is Jesus. < > His name IS Yeshua, & I KNOW THIS IS TRUE BUT I DO NOT KNOW the name of his/my, & your Father WHO DID REAVEAL TO ME IN A DREAM THE NAME OF HIS SON, AND!! THAT WAS/IS THE FIRST TIME I EVER SAW OR HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THAT NAME, >Yeshua. < That dream occurred about 5 years ago & UNTIL then I said Jesus TOO! It was ALL I KNEW at the time AND YES FOR MOST OF MY LIFE!! NOW!! I have asked the Father to reveal HIS own personal name the same way OR IN ANY WAY so I would know his name TOO BUT so far He has not done that. AND I think I know why but that is for another time & place to discuss. Shalom
Love and blessings to you Rabbi, the cults of Christianity even have their own book which is not the forever words which they call the bible. Your patience is remarkable,
End of days prophecy: "I will bring them to My sacred mount, and let them rejoice in My house of prayer. Their burnt offerings and sacrifices shall be welcome on My altar; For My House shall be called a house of prayer for ALL peoples.” Isaiah 56:7.
@Rylo Christblood Talmud says women have a greater portion in the world to come than even their husbands, talmud says the redemption from egypt was all in the merit of righteous women and that the final redemption is in the merit of righteous women. Take your antisemetic propaganda elsewhere.
@Rylo Christblood Isaiah 9:6 ; For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. When was Jesus called the Mighty God, the Eternal Father and the Prince of Peace? If according to you, Jesus in John 17: indicates that the father is the one and only true God, then he is not the mighty God. The Eternal Father: Is Jesus the Father? where is he called father? If you say so, then you fall under heresy according to Christian dogma. Prince of Peace: Martheus 10:34 Don't think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. Isaiah 9:6 is invalidated by Jesus' own words in your book. Now you can say context context context. First read the context about Isaiah 9 yourself without your Christian lens.
"Because for many days will the children of Israel dwell with no king and no official and no sacrafices...and then the children of Israel shall return [to the land of Israel] and seek Hashem their God *[Hashem alone is their God]* and David their King [the Messiah, who is not God], and they will be in Awe of Hashem and of His goodness *that will be at the end of days* " Hoseah 3:4,5.
@Iyas kelu hebrew is my 1st language, i dont use translations, I inserted the brackets myself so that ppl have a clue whats being spoken of, wake up idolater.
@@Yehonatan613 Well it IS TRUE that the original understanding of Christianity has been perverted & corrupted in EVERY way, INCLUDING those inspired of Satan paintings & pictures of Yeshua whose name, spelling, has also been corrupted. Satan gets involved in everything CLEAN & makes it UNCLEAN BUT SAYS IT NOW IS CLEAN!! Anyway here is something U Noahiders are apparently unable to grasp. WHY is this Christian Religion STILL ALIVE? Read what one of YOUR RABBIS, Gamaliel said in Acts Chapter 4 verses 34 through 39 about this NEW RELIGION People call Christianity. AND NO!! Gamaliel WAS NOT A CHRISTIAN!! HE WAS A PROFESSOR OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE OF JUDASIM!!
@@Trych_78678 Re: "There is no difference between Christianity and Hinduism." MaryalleluYA!! MAY-REE-LEW-LEW YA. Marluluya. Black Virgin Mother of Czestochowa MaryalleluYA. Viva Laaaa POOP-PUH!! GLAWRAH! MURSAH. Viva La Poo Poopuh Mama, Pope Papa. Novo Ordo Mass. Marlewyer
"So said the Lord of Hosts: The fast of the fourth [month], the fast of the fifth [month], the fast of the seventh [month], and the fast of the tenth [month] shall be for the house of Judah for joy and happiness and for happy holidays-but love truth and peace." Zecharia 8. *These are the fasts that Religious Jews have been observing for thousands of years.* No other people observe these fasts...what does that imply? [That the redemption spoken of all over Jewish scriptures, applies to the Jewish people, not else...]
@@FrankNStein-pf9rr the majority of the jewish people today are from the house of Judah...do you know any other people who observe these fasts other than orthodox religious jews? That's whom its about. My name btw is two hebrew words, Yeho-Natan, the same exact name of Jonathan (King Sauls son, king Davids best friend), but good job revealing your true colors, your posts speak volumes, continue kissing ur man statues and we'll see which faith/religion gets the last laugh 😘😘😘
@@Yehonatan613 @ & Re: > "orthodox religious jew fasts." To answer your 1st question first. I DO KNOW of several million NON JEWS who DO observe the annual FEASTS aka Holy Convocations AND I AM ONE OF THOSE. U remind me of the Pharisee Jew who fasted 2 times every week & bragged about it. Here is the story, Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood alone by himself and prayed: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other people-robbers, evil-doers, adulterers-or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get. The tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, ‘God, have mercy on me, a sinner.’ “YEHONATAN!! That tax collector, rather than the bragging Pharisee was justified before > אֱלֹהִ֑ים . For all those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” Now be a good Yehonatan & FAST and do not be SLOW!
@@FrankNStein-pf9rr you fast on the 17nth of tamuz, the 9th of Av, the 3rd of tishrei and the 10th of Tevet? They are not biblical, they are tradition, and mentioned explicitly in this verse. Only religious jews observe them, no one else. And it proves your pagan religion, false.
The story of Christianity is really simple and a man named Paul invented a new religion out of a combination of Judaism with a religion of Mitra He took a well-known figure of a rebel in Rome (who were many) and converted the whole religion upon him. This is exactly what the Muslim king Abdulmalek did when he took a figure of a warrior in the Persian Empire named Issa Abu Kabisa and called him the blessed Arabic Muhammad! While Paul took variables from Judaism Abdelmak took elements from Gnostic Christianity Both of these religions are human inventions - which is why they are fluid and can contain a lot of conflicting messages in their content! To suit many types of people!
This interview is the best from Rabbi Singuer. In my point of view, the opponent stayed totally naked. VIRGIN is VIRGIN and woman is woman in english, in spanish and in any other logical lenguage.
@@ronashman8463 learn Hebrew. It's that simple. And how is it logical? Do tell us. How is a virgin birth logical? It has Greek mythology written allover it. How is it logical that someone whose father was apparently God, be a descendant of David's? There is nothing logical in what you believe. And I still don't understand how clever people can believe this whole story. Learn the original language and you'd stop believing in this nonsense.
@@firstcentury1885 obviously not Isaiah 7:14. But gods sleeping with earthlings and semigods being born, yes Greek and Roman mythology. Get real. Even the early Christian theologists agree that the trinity story and the virgin birth were created to get people to lean more towards monotheism. Till then they had believed in a series of deities. You should try and trace Zeus' family tree lol.
@Rylo Christblood thank Rabbi for spreading the truth with facts and exposing fake christianity and fake jesus, I know it makes you mad stay ignorant and mad then, you will never grow, you lost
To those Christians who believe that the word almah is defined as virgin, please explain the following: Isaiah had used the word Betulah 5 times in his corpus of Isaiah found in the following places: Isaiah 23:4; 23:12 ; 37: 22; 47:1; 62:5 If Isaiah wanted to convey that almah was a virgin why didn't he use betulah in the one place Christianity desperately needed it to, to tie the narrative of Matthew 1:23 to Isaiah 7:14? Instead in Isaiah 7:14 he chose to use Almah, why?
@@Love-One-Another Wrong, Almah means young woman. Further, its use is "ha almah"in Isaiah 7:14, "The young woman". The "ha" means "the". Thus a reference to a specific woman. Additionally it uses the word "hyne", which means "here is" or "here". Thus , here is the young woman. Try again! This time answer why Isaiah used betulah 5 times in the book of isaiah and not in Isaiah 7:14? Will you now apply the masculine version of almah, "alem" to king David as "a young virgin male". The NT translates in Samuel alem correctly as young man, yet the words almah and alem are the same word with one used to describe a young woman and the other a young man. You're spinning yourself into a web that's entrapped you.
@@firstcentury1885 The sign was the age in which the boy would be, a time before he knew to reject bad and choose good, that the 2 kingdoms will have disappeared. Which 2 kingdoms disappeared during Jesus's life? Read Isaiah 7:15-16. Reading comprehension my friend. Further, you didn't address the original question, why didn't Isaiah use betulah in Isaiah 7:14 but chose almah. Isaiah used betulah in 5 other locations within the corpus of Isaiah, why not in 7:14?
@@firstcentury1885 Saying you're right and I'm wrong doesn't make it so. Read Isaiah 7:14 through 7:16. Cream and honey he shall eat when he knows to reject bad and choose good, for when the boy is old enough to know to reject bad and choose good, the kingdom king Ahaz dreads shall be abandoned, or no longer in existence. 7:14 is continued through 7:16. The sign is the age at which the boy will be by the time the kingdoms King Ahaz fears will be abandoned or disappear. When the child is old enough to choose good over bad, by that time those kingdoms are no longer a threat.
@@firstcentury1885 I don't have to ask Isaiah anything. He chose not to use it because it has nothing to do with virginity. As we already know. He uses the word virginity 5 times and doesn't use it in Isaiah 7:14. Isaiah already knew the difference between the two words (young woman and virginity) and chose not to use virgin here in 7:14. Try again.
@@Love-One-Another The original Septuagint is the translation of only the five books of Moses, and not the prophets. There are 3 sets. The 5 books of Moses, The Prophets, And the Writings. The Septuagint was a translation of the 5 books of Moses and not of the prophets nor the Writings. Try again.
HaShem blesses you for telling the truth...which many Christians do not want to hear. Slowly, but surely Jews are coming to Israel. Every Sunday, I study Hebrew with a tutor. I converted 10 years ago. I hope to come to Israel in 3 years and 9 months (not really counting) when I retire, I have already been once. I am the only child of my secular Jewish grandmother who figured out this Christianity thing is not working.
@@firstcentury1885 How can a person be those things when God Himself says that only He and His eternal Law are the way to live? If it's a choice between God's word and that of a Jew from the Galilee executed 2000 years ago by the Romans, I'll vote for God every time.
@@firstcentury1885 Where in the Hebrew Bible (the one that Jewish Jesus followed) is there even a remote hint about the Messiah being executed, or someone "illegally" executed being resurrected? You can believe whatever stories you want but God's word is One and He doesn't teach any such thing.
@@firstcentury1885 That's a good answer I'm sure, but not to the question I asked you: Where in the Hebrew Bible is there even a hint to the Messiah being executed or someone executed "illegally" being resurrected? The verse you quoted is Isaiah talking (in the past tense) about himself being ridiculed. No mention of death, crosses, Roman, changing God's Law, resurrection or Christianity.
@@firstcentury1885 , you mean the anonymous author of the Gospe of "John" made that assertion, don't you? Jesus may not have even said it. The four Gospels are anonymous writings. They are just HEARSAY claims by unknown authors, who did not even keep Jesus' actual words (Aramaic) but wrote in Greek (which the uneducated, Aramaic-speaking fishermen apostles would not have been able to do). You don't know what Jesus said.
This is easier to explain in another language that has grammatical gender with a single word translation. Most English speakers viewing this video would be familiar with the most basic of Spanish (especially in the USA). Señor = man👨🏻 איש Señora = woman 👩🏾 אישה Señorito = young man🧑🏽🦱 עלם Señorita = young woman 👱🏻♀️עלמה Niño = young boy 👦🏼 ילד Niña = young girl 👧🏻 ילדה Nene = male baby 👶🏼 תִּינוֹק Nena = female baby 👶🏻 תִּינוֹקֶת Then you can pluralize each of those Spanish words, or in Hebrew you can either pluralize, or more rarely use the dual form, but I digress. None of the above Spanish words convey virginity, or lack therefore, and the same is true of their Hebrew counterparts. Unfortunately, most Spanish translations of the Bible are themselves translated from earlier mistranslations of the Bible into other languages which themselves incorrectly translated עלמה as “virgin” rather than that language’s equivalent of “señorita”. The Hebrew word used in the Hebrew Bible is עַלְמָה pronounced ʕal’ma (it is feminine singular and the equivalent of “señorita”), the masculine singular counterpart is עֶלֶם, ʕel’em. The Hebrew verbal pattern is קַטְלָה (qatˤ’la). Like señorita, the word ʕal’ma means a young, unmarried female of marriageable age, it is independent and irrespective of her virginity. Once a young woman marries, she is a señora, irrespective of whether she remains a virgin after marriage, throughout her marriage and into widowhood or divorce. Neither “señora” nor “señorita” nor any of the other words convey virginity. They just concern gender and age and if they’re married but not if they’re virgins, whether before or after marriage. The Bible uses the equivalent of señorita. It doesn’t use the word for a virgin in the feminine singular which would be בתולה pronounced Betulah. That’s as simple an explanation as can be given.
@Rylo Christblood you’re joking, right? Stop projecting. It is Christianity which is obsessed with Judaism. The whole premise of the religion of Christianity is predicated on fulfilment of Jewish prophecy (which is misconstrued and mistranslated in any event). It would’ve been better for Christianity to do what Islam did: start their religion from scratch and not rely on the Hebrew Bible (or the Christian New Testament) to prove the accuracy of the Quran. The fact that the Christian New Testament predicates itself as relying on the Hebrew Bible to assert its divinity and validity, and therefore the truthfulness of Christianity, is itself what destroys the Christian New Testament’s (and therefore Christianity’s) claims. The Quran doesn’t do that with either Christianity or Judaism because the Quran deliberately doesn’t rely on the Christian New Testament nor the Hebrew Bible, it starts from scratch. The Quran (and therefore Islam) dismisses any contradictions between the Quran and the New Testament or the Hebrew Bible as the fault of what Islam asserts is the corruption in transmission (deliberate and/or negligent) by Christians and Jews of their respective scriptures.
@Rylo Christblood it’s a simple question: Does the Christian New Testament predicate itself as relying on the Hebrew Bible to assert its divinity and validity, and therefore the truthfulness of Christianity? Yes or no?
Problem is that preachers , most, go to a school, college, to learn....so they are teaching what they were taught.....and the teaching wrong from way....way ..back....so these preachers need to be re- taught....
They need to Humble themselves, Repent and turn to Gd and His Truth and seek instruction from whom He sent to Instruct us, His Son/Servant Israel the Jews, His Light to the Nations.
The word that comes after העלמה is הרה which is the most important word, because is means pregnant. Even if the woman being described was a virgin, it still doesn’t help the Xtian version of event because the woman is ALREADY pregnant. הרה is in a PRESENT form
@@firstcentury1885 The sign from G-d is a prophecy for Divine Protection, not of a future Messiah. Immanuel = “G-d is with us” is in reference to the Kingdom of Judaea, since the southern kingdom (Judaea) was about to go to war with the two northern kingdoms, Isaiah was issuing a prophesy of protection during the war in the NEAR future that G-d is “with us” (southern kingdom) if he maintains faith in G-d.
The myth about a "double prophecy" has become a new strategy in Christianity. I've had arguments beyond anger with Christians about this notion. All they trying to do is to reverse engineer scripture.
B H It is more appropriate & correct to say TRANSLATED scripture. AND Translations are saturated with contradictions and conflictions. Translations are OPINIONS nothing more or less. If U disagree come on back & say so. Last man standing is the winner in this evil world. For over 20 years I have been the loser. But that's ok. It's the end result that matters, & YES! In everything.
@Abraham Mani Why R U telling me this? Btw. I know what the DAY OF THE LORD REALLY MEANS! Do You?? And I am very familiar with what is written in Isaiah Chapter 66 verse 15 & 16 AND Zechariah Chapter 14. < ALL VERSES!!
You're only half correct, @Cosmic Donut. All religions are man made, and in man's image. Yes, they contain bits of spiritual wisdom, but also gallons and gallons and gallons of "bath water," and tons of "chaff."
You haven't addressed my comment, @Cosmic Donut. Every single last word of Judaism was written down by a human being. That is FACT, not opinion. Every last claim about Judaism was made by a human being. That is FACT, not opinion. Every last interpretation of Judaism was made by a human being. That is FACT, not opinion. The same goes for every other religion on Earth. By the way: If God cannot take material form that makes him limited as there is something He cannot do.
@Cosmic Donut How can Messiah be king over all earth while God according to Zechariah 14 would be King over the earth? I thought God didn’t share his glory with no one.
@Abraham Mani go away pagan The Messiah must be from the Tribe of Judah and a Descendant of King David AND King Solomon The Messiah must be a member of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:10) and a direct descendant of King David & King Solomon (2 Samuel 7:12-14; 1 Chronicles 22:9-10). Genealogy in the Bible is only passed down from father to son (Numbers 1:1-18). There is no evidence that Jesus really had this pedigree, and the Christian Bible actually claims that he did not have a “birth-father” from the tribe of Judah descending from King David and King Solomon (Matt. 1:18-20). Ingathering of the Jewish Exiles When the Messiah is reigning as King of Israel, the Jews will be ingathered from their exile and will return to Israel, their homeland (Deut. 30:3; Isaiah 11:11-12; Jeremiah 30:3, 32:37; Ezekiel 11:17, 36:24). This has clearly not yet happened and we still await its fulfillment. Rebuilding of the Holy Temple The Temple in Jerusalem will be rebuilt (Isaiah 2:2-3, 56:6-7, 60:7, 66:20; Ezekiel 37:26-27; Malachi 3:4; Zech. 14:20-21). The Temple was still standing in Jesus’ day. It was destroyed 38 years after Jesus’ crucifixion and it has not yet been rebuilt. Worldwide Reign of Peace There will be universal disarmament and worldwide peace with a complete end to war (Micah 4:1-4; Hoseah 2:20; Isaiah 2:1-4, 60:18). Wars have increased dramatically in the world since the start of Christianity. Observance of the Torah Embraced by All Jews The Messiah will reign as King at a time when all the Jewish people will observe G-d’s commandments (Ezekiel 37:24; Deut. 30:8,10; Jeremiah 31:32; Ezekiel 11:19-20, 36:26-27). Jesus never ruled as King, nor have all Jews embraced the commandments of G-d’s Torah. Universal Knowledge of G-d The Messiah will rule at a time when all the people of the world will come to acknowledge and serve the one true G-d (Zechariah 3:9, 8:23,14:9,16; Isaiah 45:23, 66:23; Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 38:23; Psalm 86:9; Zeph. 3:9). This, as well, has not yet taken place and we await its fulfillment. A Biblical Portrait of the Messiah All of these criteria for the Messiah are found in numerous places in the Jewish Bible. One foundational example is in the book of Ezekiel, Chapter 37:24-28: “24 And My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd, and they will walk in My ordinances, and keep My statutes, and observe them 25 and they shall live on the land that I gave to Jacob My servant, in which your fathers have lived; and they shall live there, they, and their children, and their children’s children for ever; and My servant David will be their prince for ever. 26 Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant, which I will give them; and I will multiply them, and will set My sanctuary in their midst forever 27 and My tabernacle shall be with them, and I will be their God and they will be My people. 28 And the nations will know that I am the Lord who sanctifies Israel, when My sanctuary is in their midst forever.” Anyone can claim to be the Messiah or a group of people can claim that someone is the Messiah. However, if that person fails to fulfill all the criteria found in the Jewish Bible, he cannot be the Messiah. According to the Christian scriptures, Jesus seems to have understood this. As he was being crucified by the Romans, he cried out “My G-d, my G-d, why have You forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46).
I wish rabbi Tovia can read this and get his feed back on it: There is new research emerging recently by some group claims that who was crucified is Judas Iscariot, who laid down his life for jesus and sacrificed himself on the cross to redeem him as escape goat. They come up with some proves to that : Jesus was disguising as a peasant standing next to his mother Mary without her recognizing him. Judas on the crossed looked at mary saying:" woman why do you weep behold your son"! In Mark it says that quote but attributed to Jesus. I always was puzzled as to why would Jesus be so rude to his mother while he's dying on the cross? But if it was Judas that says that to Mary it makes perfect sense! Second thing that puzzled me in the conventional story ; why would Jesus cries out on the cross saying " God, God, why thou forsaking me?" That doesn't make sense if he's the alleged son of the God and his whole mission is to suffer and die on the cross for human's sins then why is he crying and winging to his father for neglecting him? Doesn't make sense either! Moreover in those researches they say that Jesus' entire mission was to find a redeemer from among the people that willing to lay down his life for him. They say Jesus survived and escaped with his mother to Damascus and lived there till old age and died and buried in where people know now as John the Baptist tomb!
@@Love-One-Another guess Dinah was a hidden and concealed virgin after she was raped, because the Septuagint uses the same word “parthenos” to refer to Dinah after she was rped. Parthenos is also the word Christians thinks means virgin in Isaiah 7:14
language, context, and culture. these things are key to understanding the old and new testaments. when i read the old testament (and i read it several times) i most of the time didn't get what was going on. i wasnt equipped to. you cant just read it in plain english and just try to get it. it doesnt work that way
The Original Jewish Bible: ''BEHOLD, THE YOUNG WOMAN IS WITH CHILD" Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 7: 14Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel. ידלָ֠כֵן יִתֵּ֨ן אֲדֹנָ֥י ה֛וּא לָכֶ֖ם א֑וֹת הִנֵּ֣ה הָֽעַלְמָ֗ה הָרָה֙ וְיֹלֶ֣דֶת בֵּ֔ן וְקָרָ֥את שְׁמ֖וֹ עִמָּ֥נוּ אֵֽל:
@@Nudnik1 Exactly! This is the First Truth that I learned that Gd used to deliver me from a lifetime of Idolatry. The Second Truth was Isaiah 9 which was also current/past tense, not future tense.
The new testament is clear that Mary did not know a man at the conception of Jesus. This is the sign and Immanuel is God with us and that is what Jesus was. His coming was told in Genesis ch.3 vs.15.
Another point is how is what happened or didn’t happen in someone’s bedroom a sign. A sign for whom ? It just doesn’t make sense . A sign is when it’s evident to everyone. Like the prophet says “that For before the lad knows to reject the bad and choose the good, the ground whose two kings you dread shall be abandoned.” Now that is a sign .
*Gen.5. Adam to Noah Geniology.* Adam = Man Seth = Appointment Enosh = Mortal Cainan = Sorrow Mahalalel = The Blessed God Jared = Shall come down Enoch = Teaching Methuselah = His death shall bring Lamech = The Despairing Noah = Rest *Matthew.24:* 14And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. . Selah
@@THEACANDAS There is absolutely no sign in a young woman having a child . In contrast to Abraham and Sarah no sign is mentioned ( because there is no evident sign in what happens in one’s bedroom)by the angel ,rather a promise that even in her old age she’ll still bear Abraham’s child . “Then one said, “I will return to you next year,* and your wife Sarah shall have a son!” Sarah was listening at the entrance of the tent, which was behind him(Genesis 18:10). A promise but not a sign . This is so simple it’s ridiculous to have to explain.
@@Sola-Scriptura444 Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar,( story of Judah and Tamar) Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab,( he means Rachab of Jericho ???) Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth,(the Moabite) David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife( The Story of Bat Sheeba) There’s a reason why Mathew highlights all the questionable relationships. Hint hint The Nazarene was also of questionable union therefore trying to answer to those mocking the immaculate conception , and not buying into the virgin birth thing.
@@zafirjoe18 *Jeremiah.8:* 4“Say to them, ‘This is what the Lord says: “ ‘When people fall down, do they not get up? When someone turns away, do they not return? 5Why then have these people turned away? Why does Jerusalem always turn away? They cling to deceit; they refuse to return. 6I have listened attentively, but they do not say what is right. None of them repent of their wickedness, saying, “What have I done?” Each pursues their own course like a horse charging into battle. 7Even the stork in the sky knows her appointed seasons, and the dove, the swift and the thrush observe the time of their migration. But my people do not know the requirements of the Lord. 8“ ‘How can you say, “We are wise, for we have the law of the Lord,” when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? 9The wise will be put to shame; they will be dismayed and trapped. Since they have rejected the word of the Lord, what kind of wisdom do they have?
DEAD SEA SCROLL: ''LOOK, THE YOUNG WOMAN HAS CONCEIVED" Isaiah Chapter 7 : Verse 14 Therefore the LORD himself will give y[ou a sign. Loo]k, the young woman has conceived and is bearing a son, and his name will be Immanuel. dss collection The Israel Museum Jerusalem
Virgin Births are like Unicorns and Fairies, they are found only in the Myths of Man, NOT Scripture. Mary and Jesus are like the Devil and his lake of fire, they are but fabricated characters found only in the Greek Tall Tales of Man and Joe Smith Jr.'s Book of Mormon, Not the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh. Edom/Rome/Christianity/Last Beast = Enemy of Gd and His Son/Servant Israel the Jews.
@Ruth the proof is that there were 3 million people who witnessed G-d giving the 10 commandments to the Jewish people ( read Exodus 19 the last five verses, Moses is not on the mountain but with the people). And years later, the people were told to remember, not forget, what happened at Mount Sinai, and tell their children and grandchildren.( Deut. 4: 9-10). Moses at that point was a proven prophet, because all the other people were prophets, and one of the proofs, is a proven prophet testifying someone else is a prophet. Saying your a prophet doesn't make you one. Also christians agree the Jewish Bible is true,why should I believe the new testament?
Oh that's a commandment to tell our descendants, to this day, and until about 250 years ago, when some Jews decided they wanted to be like everybody else, nobody ever said, my parents never told me that. The prophets accuse the People of Israel of lots of sins, but never in not believing in the revelation
@Ruth So you reject the Creator and His Holy Torah but you believe Man and his Perverted Greek Tall Tales of Man, your sin, your choice to be a willful Adversary of the Creator, your sin, your choice to stand against His Son/Servant/Light to the Nations and despise them but please give your kiddies the heads up to start practicing Bending Over and start practicing your prostrating you and your kind are going to need it. Gd warned Mankind long ago, you come against His Son/Servant Israel the Jews He is going to come against YOU!
@@EdgarStyles1234 thanks bro but only if u can give me an example or two for a bit clarity i see even now the great power christians hold even in my small community
This is easier to explain in another language that has grammatical gender with a single word translation. Most English speakers viewing this video would be familiar with the most basic of Spanish (especially in the USA). Señor = man👨🏻 איש Señora = woman 👩🏾 אישה Señorito = young man🧑🏽🦱 עלם Señorita = young woman 👱🏻♀️עלמה Niño = young boy 👦🏼 ילד Niña = young girl 👧🏻 ילדה Nene = male baby 👶🏼 תִּינוֹק Nena = female baby 👶🏻 תִּינוֹקֶת Then you can pluralize each of those Spanish words, or in Hebrew you can either pluralize, or more rarely use the dual form, but I digress. None of the above Spanish words convey virginity, or lack therefore, and the same is true of their Hebrew counterparts. Unfortunately, most Spanish translations of the Bible are themselves translated from earlier mistranslations of the Bible into other languages which themselves incorrectly translated עלמה as “virgin” rather than that language’s equivalent of “señorita”. The Hebrew word used in the Hebrew Bible is עַלְמָה pronounced ʕal’ma (it is feminine singular and the equivalent of “señorita”), the masculine singular counterpart is עֶלֶם, ʕel’em. The Hebrew verbal pattern is קַטְלָה (qatˤ’la). Like señorita, the word ʕal’ma means a young, unmarried female of marriageable age, it is independent and irrespective of her virginity. Once a young woman marries, she is a señora, irrespective of whether she remains a virgin after marriage, throughout her marriage and into widowhood or divorce. Neither “señora” nor “señorita” nor any of the other words convey virginity. They just concern gender and age and if they’re married but not if they’re virgins, whether before or after marriage. The Bible uses the equivalent of señorita. It doesn’t use the word for a virgin in the feminine singular which would be בתולה pronounced Betulah. That’s as simple an explanation as can be given.
@@Christianos_Theophile Proverbs 30:18-20 There are three things that are concealed from me, and four that I do not know; The way of the eagle in the heavens, the way of a serpent on a rock, the way of a ship in the heart of the sea, and the way of a man with a young woman (Alma). So is the way of an adulterous woman; she eats and wipes her mouth, and she says, "I have committed no sin." To explain the meaning of these verses: An eagle flys in the sky, but leaves no trace that it has ever done so. A snake leaves no trace when it travels on the rocks, as opposed to the trace it leaves on the dirt. A ship leaves no trace behind after it travels through the ocean. And an adulterous woman leaves no trace that the had done anything wrong with a man, as she has already lost her token of virginity.
@@firstcentury1885 The Moshiach of the Bible is an instrument of Gd, who Gd will use to transform the World to a Utopian, I look to the Creator and His Will to be done, Wake up, you are the one who follows and worships a man, NOT me! Gd delivered me from the very thing you are afflicted with, as I sought Him and His Truth and He had MERCY on me, HE would do the same for you, if you would but turn to Him instead of your Idol.
Dear to all That Says The Ñew Testament is Fake; i have a question for you; Which one that Correct from the Tanakh: Ahazia become the KING at 22 Years old or 42 Years Old? 2 Chronicles 22:2 (JPOT) Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem; and his mother's name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri. 2 Kings 8:26 (JPOT) Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri king of Israel.
the virgin הָעַלְמָ֗ה (hā·‘al·māh) Article | Noun - feminine singular Strong's Hebrew 5959: 1) virgin, young woman 1a) of marriageable age 1b) maid or newly married ++++ There is no instance where it can be proved that this word designates a young woman who is not a virgin. (TWOT)
Song of songs 6:8-9 and many more. Also, it seems you didn't even watch the video. There is a comment on the thread that said if you don't know Hebrew, then forever hold your piece. I suggest you do just that.
@@ronashman8463 yet he is able to explain the Bible better than you and the original poster here who made a very embarrassing mistake. Show me where R Tovia is wrong and I will become the Pope.
I know I've asked this before, but does Rabbi see any of the comments? Is this is 'official' channel? There's never a reply to comments and we have no idea what he's picking up if anything.
ZECHARIYAH (Book of Zechariah) Chapter 8 22 Yea, many peoples and mighty nations shall come to seek HaShem of hosts in Jerusalem, and to entreat the favour of HaShem. 23 Thus saith HaShem of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all the languages of the nations, shall even take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying: We will go with you, for we have heard that G-d is with you
The truth is that betula and alma are both words that can translate as virgin if the context points in that direction, even if virgin is neither word’s technical meaning. It should be remembered as well that in Ancient Near East culture any girl who was unmarried would be expected and assumed to be a virgin.
No, a young woman/Almah can be a virgin or even a pregnant woman like the Prophetess in Isaiah 7, it describes her age, Bethula on the other hand is the Hebrew word for Virgin, which has not a thing to with her age.
@@paulawallace8784 There is plenty of evidence to prove the Hebrew word behind “virgin” (עַלְמָה alma) in Isaiah 7 simply means “young woman.” Is Isaiah really speaking of a virgin conception? It is often argued that if Isaiah meant “virgin,” he would have used the Hebrew word betula (בְּתוּלָ֕ה). The word betula occurs 50x in the Old Testament. Sometimes it does clearly refer to a virgin, for example: If a man seduces a [betula] who is not betrothed and lies with her, he shall give the bride-price for her and make her his wife. If her father utterly refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the bride-price for [betulot, plural] (Exodus 22:16). In this and similar examples, betula clearly refers to a virgin, but the context tells us this as much as the word itself, and “virgin” is not necessarily the essential meaning of the word. In fact, it seems not to be, since in a few cases the virgin-status of the betula is further spelled-out, for example: And they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead 400 young [betulot, plural] who had not known a man by lying with him, and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan (Judges 21:12). If betula by itself means “virgin” the clause “who had not known a man by lying with him” here seems redundant. But a more telling and illuminating case occurs in Genesis 24, because both betula and alma are used, and so more direct comparison is possible. Abraham’s servant has gone to find a wife for Isaac, and while sitting at a well he sees Rebekah. Genesis 24:16 says, The young woman was very attractive in appearance, a [betula] whom no man had known. She went down to the spring and filled her jar and came up. Here again, the word betula by itself does not seem to be enough to indicate virginity, since the narrator specifies that no man had known her. But further down in the chapter, in vv. 42-43, when the servant is recounting the story to Rebekah’s family, he says, I came today to the spring and said, ‘Yahweh, the God of my master Abraham, if now you are prospering the way that I go, behold, I am standing by the spring of water. Let the [alma] who comes out to draw water, to whom I shall say, “Please give me a little water from your jar to drink…” Here alma seems to assume the virgin condition that betula does not. It is a summary term for Rebekah’s status. Alma is a less common word, occurring only 9x in the Old Testament, and granted, in a few of those cases the context gives no clue one way or the other whether a virgin is in view (e.g., “The singers in front, the musicians last, between them [almot, plural] playing tambourines” - Psalm 68:25). But when the context does offer a hint, as in Genesis 24:43, alma does clearly refer to a “virgin.” Another example is Song of Solomon 6:8, “There are sixty queens and eighty concubines, and [almot plural] without number.” Here virgins (almot) are distinguished from queens and concubines. One scholar, Alec Motyer, sums up this linguistic evidence this way: There is no ground for the common assertion that had Isaiah intended virgo intacta he would have used betula. Alma lies closer to this meaning than the other word. In fact, this is its meaning in every explicit context. Isaiah thus used the word which, among those available to him, came nearest to expressing ‘virgin birth’ and which, without linguistic impropriety, opens the door to such a meaning. Added to this is the fact that the Greek Old Testament (which Matthew quotes in his gospel) translates alma with the Greek word parthenos (παρθένος), which does mean “virgin.” So the pre-New Testament translators of the Old Testament understood alma to mean virgin, at least in this instance, and they certainly had no theological agenda regarding Jesus. R.T. France, a bit more reticent than Motyer and saying that alma “does not explicitly mean ‘virgin,’” still acknowledges that the context in Isaiah “suggests something other than a normal childbirth within marriage,” and he assumes that it was on that basis that the Greek translators of the Old Testament rendered the word as parthenos-“virgin.” The truth then appears to be that betula and alma are both words that can translate as virgin if the context points in that direction, even if virgin is neither word’s technical meaning. It should be remembered as well that in Ancient Near East culture any girl who was unmarried would be expected and assumed to be a virgin. So we may conclude that Isaiah’s language is not as unambiguous as we might like, but that “virgin” is a perfectly fair and even probable translation. In addition, it ought to be said that however open to interpretation Isaiah’s original statement may be, Matthew’s account of Jesus’ birth is certainly clear enough. Believers will of course accept Matthew’s interpretation of Isaiah as inspired by the Spirit and therefore valid, but in any case the historical fact of the virgin birth does not ultimately depend on the precise meaning of alma. Luke, who is especially acting as a reporter of history, also recounts the virgin conception, and never cites Isaiah’s prophecy. So testimony to the virgin birth can stand quite apart from Matthew’s interpretation of Isaiah, flawed or not. But now we need to address another issue: If Isaiah indeed foresaw and spoke concerning the birth of Jesus to the virgin Mary, how could this serve as a sign for Ahaz who died centuries before it would come to pass?
The Lord Himself Will Give You a Sign A second reason why skeptics will deny the virgin birth as the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy is that it does not seem to work as a “sign” for Ahaz. King Ahaz would be dead long before Jesus was born. But hold up. First, the Lord offers a sign to Ahaz that he would defend Jerusalem, but Ahaz rebelliously refused it. In reply, the prophet addresses not Ahaz personally but the house of David: “Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign . . .” (Isaiah 7:13-14). In Hebrew, the you’s in this passage are plural. So the proper recipients of the sign are a broader category than Ahaz personally. The promise is made to the entire royal house as such. Second, according to Isaiah 7:15-16, by the time the child spoken of in the sign grows up, the threat that Ahaz faces will be in some sense over with. “For before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land whose two kings you dread will be deserted” (v. 16).[1] It is the case that when Jesus was born, Assyria was long gone as an empire, the northern kingdom of Israel was gone, and the kingdom of Syria as well was simply a Roman province. The fulfillment might therefore have been further off in the future than Ahaz or even Isaiah realized, but the explicit terms of the promise were still met in Jesus’ birth. Third, if the sign does in fact refer to a normal (non-virgin) birth which Ahaz would see, the question arises: What is the sign quality in that? A young woman will have a baby. So? Children are born all the time. On the other hand, if Isaiah did speak of a virgin birth, but it was one that was to take place during Ahaz’s lifetime (as some actually suppose), why was the fulfillment of the sign never recorded? God had offered a sign as “deep as Sheol or high as heaven” (v. 11), but when it came to pass it was apparently so undramatic that it wasn’t worth mentioning? That seems unlikely. The reality is that as we read on in Isaiah, we hear more in the very near context about a child being born, a son being given, who would bear the government on his shoulder and be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (9:6), and this was to be a royal son of the house of David, whose rule would have no end (9:7). In chapter 11 we again hear about a “shoot from the stump of Jesse.” The Lord promised a sign to the house of David, a virgin bearing a son, who would represent the presence of God with his people-God with us.[2] Isaiah 7:14 does not stand in isolation, but must be read in light of Isaiah’s broader outlook. The whole scenario and context points to something quite special which may indeed lay beyond the horizon of Ahaz. Ahaz and his house would have no royal power when this sign came to fulfillment. Because of Ahaz’s capitulation to Assyria, Judah would become a puppet-state and hardly ever again be a fully independent power, but would be subject to foreign empires in one way or another even until the time of Christ. As Motyer puts it, “Because of [Ahaz’s] unbelief the promised Messiah would be born into poverty, heir to a meaningless throne in a conquered land.” In this regard, the sign of the virgin birth functions partly as a word of judgment: Immanuel would have no human father, and thus Ahaz and his successors would not father the royal Savior in a physical sense. The virgin birth implies a broader judgment than this though: It is a judgment on human nature. Not human nature as such or as created, but simply on human nature as corrupt in Adam. The rebuke on Ahaz is thus ultimately turned into a blessing, as the child born of the virgin would mean the birth of a new Adam, ultimately saving not only Israel but offering a fresh start to the whole of humanity.
@@richardmukasa8828 The Original Jewish Bible: ''BEHOLD, THE YOUNG WOMAN IS WITH CHILD" Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 7: 14Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel. ידלָ֠כֵן יִתֵּ֨ן אֲדֹנָ֥י ה֛וּא לָכֶ֖ם א֑וֹת הִנֵּ֣ה הָֽעַלְמָ֗ה הָרָה֙ וְיֹלֶ֣דֶת בֵּ֔ן וְקָרָ֥את שְׁמ֖וֹ עִמָּ֥נוּ אֵֽל:
@@richardmukasa8828 DEAD SEA SCROLL: ''LOOK, THE YOUNG WOMAN HAS CONCEIVED" Isaiah Chapter 7 : Verse 14 Therefore the LORD himself will give y[ou a sign. Loo]k, the young woman has conceived and is bearing a son, and his name will be Immanuel. dss collection The Israel Museum Jerusalem
I want to ask you, are you American or Jewish? I read the information like an American. This will be my inspiration for converts to Judaism. Anyone know please reply me
@@hannanelson8575Gentiles have been converting to Judaism along, have you never heard of Ruth? Of course if Gd is calling you to convert then by all means contact your local Orthodox Rabbi.
@@hannanelson8575 A convert to Judaism is fully Jewish, as Numbers 15:15 states 'the convert shall be the same as you.' However, conversion is discouraged because Jewish obligations are more restrictive and numerous.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 This decree was recently read to me. Although it is challenging, i continue to insist on using the same word to convert. Austerity appeals to me since it assists me in being a more responsible person in life, as well as the HaShem Act. I’m hoping everything goes smoothly. I’m seeking for a rabbi course to convert to Judaism.
The Hebrew's borrowed their stories from ancient Sumerian tablets and edited them to tell the stories of Moses, etc. Moses did not write the (5) books --- he dies and yet told about his own death. Moses did not write in the first person.
Many ordinary people were done a disservice by the doctrines of the church and its obvious contradictions. For it made them abandon even the true scriptures , and it’s simple message . Namely to believe that the divinity committed adultery with a married woman (if God was to be “born “ why not from an unmarried woman?). And to accept a god who was his own father and who begot himself from his own mother , and who came into the world via a woman’s uterus, and allowed himself to be put to death, and who came alive again, and(as Paul claimed) abolished his own Torah which “ he himself “ had given. These abhorrent doctrines, when labelled “ Bible “, caused people to turn away even from the true Scriptures; and they use this as an excuse to close their eyes to the evidence of a creator which the unbiased mind is capable of seeing.
So, @kivi zafirjoez, you prefer to worship a "god" who is wrathful, seeks vengeance, is jealous, promotes genocide, rape, slavery, and is generally speaking an infinitely powerful sadistic narcissist… … essentially just an infinitely powerful version of donald trump, kim jong un, or vladimir putin.
@@peterblock6964 Even Rabbi Paul says ; All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” (2 Timothy 3:16) He wasn’t talking about the gospel writers or about his own letters they were not considered scripture.
So, @@zafirjoe18, you don't have any response at all to the "god" of the OT being described as nothing more than an all powerful version of donald trump, kim jong un, or vladimir putin. ¿Why would anyone willingly worship such a demon? Out of fear, I guess-that "god" is also described as fear inducing.
If I remember correctly God revealed his name to Moses when he asked him and who shall I say sent me God says I am. Funny of all the times in the Bible God revealed his name why didn't God say yo Moses it's Jesus hahahaha.
@@madmanmark8387 I did not say, Jesus is mentioned, it is a balloon from your own brain.# I don't know Hebrew but I know that in original ancient Hebrew manuscripts, no Name is mentioned, only four letters with space mentioned. The full word of those Four letters is mentioned in the New Testament. From where you brought the words you have mentioned as Name of God?
@@SonOfChrist777 then explain John when he talks about creation and seems to reference Jesus as God. It's illogical and blasphemy to call a man God for numbers 23:19 specifically says for God is not a man that lies.
It’s real simple God said that there is no other savior then me (God) yet a lot of modern Jews are waiting for a human a man the messiah to come & deliver them but in contradiction they bash “Christians for believing the savior the messiah was God” it makes you think who actually has the right Idea
Gd's Light to the Nations, the Jews teach that GD ALONE IS SAVIOR, GD ALONE IS REDEEMER just as HE stated, the Moshiach of the Bible is but an instrument of Gd's Will, he comes at the End of the Days and his teachings of Gd and His Holy Torah will transform the World to a Utopia where all of Mankind Rightly worships the Creator and Him Alone, that TO HIM AND HIM ALONE, EVERY KNEE SHALL KNEEL AND EVERY TONGUE SHALL SWEAR! However Christianity, the cult of Jesus worships him, a Man Made Phallic Idol and a Trio of false deities as well as his mother, other dead people, Angels, Paintings, crackers, a dirty painted sheet and wooden sticks. Christianity is Blasphemous, Idolatrous, Heretical, Polytheistic, Pagan and Antisemitic. It SPEAKS AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, A HALLMARK OF THE LAST BEAST!
@@THEACANDAS The Jewish God is one. He is not two or more, but one, unified in a manner which surpasses any unity that is found in the world; i.e., He is not one in the manner of a general category which includes many individual entities, nor one in the way that the body is divided into different portions and dimensions. Rather, He is unified, and there exists no unity similar to His in this world.
They have, they know it for what it is, a Greco Roman propaganda text that stands against Gd and Scripture. Christianity is pure Pagan Idolatry, to a T, it alone fits the description of the morphing Last Beast.
i read it thanks to rabi tovia singer , and i praised the god of israel who brought me as jewish woman and inlighting me to know him and be his devoted daughter 😍
Gezera Shava Methode apply on alma case ( Isaiah 7:14) Example from Genesis 37:15 we read Then a man found him, and behold, he was straying in the field, and the man asked him, saying, "What are you looking for?" טווַיִּמְצָאֵ֣הוּ אִ֔ישׁ וְהִנֵּ֥ה תֹעֶ֖ה בַּשָּׂדֶ֑ה וַיִּשְׁאָלֵ֧הוּ הָאִ֛ישׁ לֵאמֹ֖ר מַה־תְּבַקֵּֽשׁ Rashi states here as interpretation Then a man found him: This is [the angel] Gabriel, as it is said: “And the man Gabriel” (Dan. 9:21). [From Tanchuma Vayeshev 2] If we using Gezera Shava Methode to determine WHO is the Alma is very easy ? THE WORD ALMA appear in EXODUS 2: AND WE CAN EASY TO KNOW WHO IS THE ALMA NAME: MIRYAM; she will give bear a son and call his name Immanuel If you ask Why using Exodus 2 as the Connection With Isaiah 7:14 : my answer is simple because Moses is the typical of the Messiah ( as the first Redemer was so The Last Redemer is) One Other things: According to talmud Yevamot 64a..Sarah the wife of Abraham not have a womb So if you say the virgin birth is a myth : how about sarah the old lady without womb?
In the Holy Bible, in Hebrews, is all the facts there it know of the letter to the Hebrews is from the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob forever! Paul wrote. Jesus is LORD
@@azhajouj Almah in Hebrew means Young Woman, Bethula in Hebrew means Virgin. The young woman in Isaiah 7 is ALREADY PREGNANT, she has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband Isaiah and CONCEIVED, IS WITH CHILD, PREGNANT NO LONGER A VIRGIN! Immanuel was Isaiah's own son.
@@azhajouj No, it means young woman, period. It has not a thing to do with either she is married, or a virgin or not a virgin. Again the young woman in Isaiah 7 is the Prophetess, the wife of Isaiah, she is ALREADY PREGNANT, the child is Isaiah's son who he calls Maher-shalal-hash-baz just as Gd ordered him to do.
As the rabbi says learn Hebrew and you will understand what is written. If you don't know something you logically have to learn to understand. People in ancient days could speak obviously,but most were illiterate they weren't taught how to read whatever the language.
James Bond!? 😂 The anthropologist Wallace lied like crazy and bought many Egyptian antiques. Police were called and a bunch of anthropologist were angry. BUT he got the scroll of Ani which was intact with vivid colors also. It was the best kept copy from the book of the dead.
@Abraham Mani Have you even read the Old and New Testament and do you know Hebrew? I think you are just listening to someone else who not did that either. I'm not going down the cliff with you all. Blind leading the blind. Respectfully.
The Nephilim were Hedonistic men who did what ever they so desired, their behavior so offended the Creator that it made Him want to blot out Man, but then Gd found Noah. The Book of Enoch is NOT Biblical, it is for entertainment not spiritual edification.
The "Book of Enoch" is part of the Catholic Bible, that is NOT scripture that was given to mankind by God, therefore it is ineffectual for spiritual learning and growth. .
@@curly_dock: It is a religious book that, in my experience, only Catholics quote from, so I may have mistakenly thought that it's part of the Catholic Bible. My apologies.
Revelation13 Eve & Cain >and the dragon stood before the *Woman* who was ready to be delivered. Ready to devour her child from the moment he was born and she brought forth a *Man~ Child* who was to rule *All Nations* with a rod of Iron and her child was caught up to G_d unto his Throne! >the woman of the Apocalypse!! The New Testament prophecy!!
But hold up. First, the Lord offers a sign to Ahaz that he would defend Jerusalem, but Ahaz rebelliously refused it. In reply, the prophet addresses not Ahaz personally but the house of David: “Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign . . .” (Isaiah 7:13-14). In Hebrew, the you’s in this passage are plural. So the proper recipients of the sign are a broader category than Ahaz personally. The promise is made to the entire royal house as such. Second, according to Isaiah 7:15-16, by the time the child spoken of in the sign grows up, the threat that Ahaz faces will be in some sense over with. “For before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land whose two kings you dread will be deserted” (v. 16).[1] It is the case that when Jesus was born, Assyria was long gone as an empire, the northern kingdom of Israel was gone, and the kingdom of Syria as well was simply a Roman province. The fulfillment might therefore have been further off in the future than Ahaz or even Isaiah realized, but the explicit terms of the promise were still met in Jesus’ birth. Third, if the sign does in fact refer to a normal (non-virgin) birth which Ahaz would see, the question arises: What is the sign quality in that? A young woman will have a baby. So? Children are born all the time. On the other hand, if Isaiah did speak of a virgin birth, but it was one that was to take place during Ahaz’s lifetime (as some actually suppose), why was the fulfillment of the sign never recorded? God had offered a sign as “deep as Sheol or high as heaven” (v. 11), but when it came to pass it was apparently so undramatic that it wasn’t worth mentioning? That seems unlikely. The reality is that as we read on in Isaiah, we hear more in the very near context about a child being born, a son being given, who would bear the government on his shoulder and be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (9:6), and this was to be a royal son of the house of David, whose rule would have no end (9:7). In chapter 11 we again hear about a “shoot from the stump of Jesse.” The Lord promised a sign to the house of David, a virgin bearing a son, who would represent the presence of God with his people-God with us.[2] Isaiah 7:14 does not stand in isolation, but must be read in light of Isaiah’s broader outlook. The whole scenario and context points to something quite special which may indeed lay beyond the horizon of Ahaz. Ahaz and his house would have no royal power when this sign came to fulfillment. Because of Ahaz’s capitulation to Assyria, Judah would become a puppet-state and hardly ever again be a fully independent power, but would be subject to foreign empires in one way or another even until the time of Christ. As Motyer puts it, “Because of [Ahaz’s] unbelief the promised Messiah would be born into poverty, heir to a meaningless throne in a conquered land.” In this regard, the sign of the virgin birth functions partly as a word of judgment: Immanuel would have no human father, and thus Ahaz and his successors would not father the royal Savior in a physical sense. The virgin birth implies a broader judgment than this though: It is a judgment on human nature. Not human nature as such or as created, but simply on human nature as corrupt in Adam. The rebuke on Ahaz is thus ultimately turned into a blessing, as the child born of the virgin would mean the birth of a new Adam, ultimately saving not only Israel but offering a fresh start to the whole of humanity.
"But hold up. First, the Lord offers a sign to Ahaz that he would defend Jerusalem, but Ahaz rebelliously refused it. In reply, the prophet addresses not Ahaz personally but the house of David: “Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign . . .” (Isaiah 7:13-14)." I don't understand how those words ("Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also?") are supposed to make sense if they're directed at anyone other than Ahaz. It wasn't the future kings of Israel who were trying God's patience in that moment, it was Ahaz. _______ "In Hebrew, the you’s in this passage are plural" When jews and noahides point out that the word "lamo" in Isaiah 53:8 is plural, the response I've seen from christians is to point to examples in which plural hebrew words can have singular usages. So couldn't one make the same case here?
Regarding your second point, I’m curious if you have a theory as to why Isaiah chooses a specific point in the child’s life as the temporal marker, rather than saying something like “before the child is born, the land of the two kings… etc.” If the event Isaiah describes was supposed to take place during the early lifetime of the child, then it makes some sense why Isaiah would choose a specific point in the child’s life as the reference point (the point at which the child comes to know right from wrong). But if the event Isaiah describes was supposed to take place centuries before the child was even born, it make very little sense why Isaiah would say “before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good”. This seems to strongly imply that the life of the child would be contemporary with destruction of the northern armies. Regarding your third point, you ask a good question. It’s not clear to me how a child born of regular birth could qualify as a sign, though I also don’t see how a child born of a virgin could be a sign either since the mother’s virginity isn’t verifiable. It seems to me that Isaiah believed that a child could be a sign without being born of a virgin, since he says in Isaiah 8, “Behold, I and the children whom the Lord has given me are *_signs_* and portents in Israel from the Lord of hosts, who dwells on Mount Zion. (Isaiah 8:18) Do you have an explanation as to how Isaiah’s children were sings? The answer will probably shed some light as to how the Immanuel child could be a sign.
@@chad969 You have preferences which you want to impose on the prophet in order force to prophecy to support your beliefs. There is no reason why Isaiah would have said that before child is born instead of saying that before the child knows right from wrong. Indeed, by the time Jesus matured, the Kingdoms were no more. I understand that you would have preferred another phrase such as before the child is born. But the Prophet chose otherwise. Lastly are Isaiah's children known as MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE?
@@richardmukasa8828 Isaiah tells that Gd, the Wondrous Counselor, the Mighty Gd, the Everlasting Father called his son-in-law Hezekiah the Prince of Peace. Isaiah 7 tells of Immanuel and his already PREGNANT mother, who has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband Isaiah and CONCEIVED, IS WITH CHILD, PREGNANT, NO LONGER A VIRGIN, his maturity levels stood as the Signs of the fulfillment of the prophecy his father uttered, that GD WOULD BE WITH JUDAH and take care of it's 2 Enemies, Rezin the King of Aram and Pekah, the son Remaliah, the King of Israel, and HE did just that.
יד לָכֵן יִתֵּן אֲדֹנָי הוּא, לָכֶם--אוֹת: הִנֵּה הָעַלְמָה, הָרָה וְיֹלֶדֶת בֵּן, וְקָרָאת שְׁמוֹ, עִמָּנוּ אֵל 14 Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: behold, the young woman shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Isaiah speaks of his son-in-law, whose reign he called a Great Light: ''FOR A CHILD HAS BEEN BORN TO US, A SON GIVEN TO US, AND THE AUTHORITY IS UPON HIS SHOULDER, AND THE WONDROUS ADVISER, THE MIGHTY GD, THE EVERLASTING FATHER, CALLED HIS NAME, ''THE PRINCE OF PEACE" 5For a child has been born to us, a son given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, called his name, "the prince of peace." הכִּי־יֶ֣לֶד יֻלַּד־לָ֗נוּ בֵּן נִתַּן־לָ֔נוּ וַתְּהִ֥י הַמִּשְׂרָ֖ה עַל־שִׁכְמ֑וֹ וַיִּקְרָ֨א שְׁמ֜וֹ פֶּ֠לֶא יוֹעֵץ֙ אֵ֣ל גִּבּ֔וֹר אֲבִי־עַ֖ד שַׂר־שָׁלֽוֹם:
Why would a young lady given birth to a son be remarkable ? And used a a sign? Any young lady could give birth. Tell me why was this a sign? Could not anyone name their son Emmanuel? I know a lot of Mexicans name Jesus. What's the point I am making? It was a virgin birth, that's why it was remarkable, that's why it was a sign
"It was a virgin birth, that's why it was remarkable, that's why it was a sign" So then Isaiah and his children were also born of a virgin too, right? Here am I, and the children the Lord has given me. We are *_signs_* and symbols in Israel from the Lord Almighty, who dwells on Mount Zion. (Isaiah 8:18)
Except Scripture in no uncertain terms testify that she is ALREADY PREGNANT, she has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband and HAS CONCEIVED/IS WITH CHILD/PREGNANT, NO LONGER A VIRGIN. The child/Lad's maturity levels are what stood as the SIGNS for the fulfillment of the Prophecy his father Isaiah uttered to King Ahaz, that GD PROMISED TO BE WITH JUDAH AND TAKE CARE OF IT'S 2 ENEMIES, Rezin the King of Aram and Pekah the son of Remaliah, the King of Israel. And HE did just that!
The Hebrew Bible and the Jewish sages describe the Messiah in more detail than many realize. From these writings we can know his genealogical background, place of birth, the timeframe of his arrival, and other identifying characteristics. These credentials enable us to identify the Messiah and to recognize imposters. Only a few can be listed below; there are many others. Early rabbis and sages recognized all of these passages as referring to the Messiah. Messiah would be from the tribe of Judah: Genesis 49:10 (Hebrew) Messiah would be a descendant of King David: 2 Samuel 7:12-16 (Hebrew) Messiah was to be born at Bethlehem: Micah 5:2 (Hebrew - Micah 5:1) Messiah would arrive before the destruction of the Second Temple: Daniel 9:24-27 (Hebrew) Messiah would present himself by riding on a donkey: Zechariah 9:9 (Hebrew) Messiah would be tortured to death: Psalm 22:1-31 (Hebrew) Messiah’s life would match a particular description, including suffering, silence at his arrest and trial, death and burial in a rich man’s tomb, and resurrection: Isaiah 52:13-53:12 (Hebrew - Is. 52; Hebrew - Is. 53) In regard to lineage, birthplace, time, and lifestyle, Jesus matched the Messianic expectations of the Hebrew Scriptures. The record of this fulfillment is to be found in the pages of the New Testament. But several other factors combine to further substantiate the Messiahship of Jesus. If Jesus had never made the claim to be the Messiah, why would we bother to try and prove that he was? In the first place, he claimed to be the Messiah! When a woman said to him, "I know that Messiah is coming," he replied, "I who speak to you am he" (John 4:25-26). Naturally, that doesn't prove anything one way or the other. But if Jesus had never made the claim to be the Messiah, why would we bother to try and prove that he was? His own claim lays the groundwork for the rest of the evidence. If these "credentials" in the Hebrew Scriptures are so clear, why didn't most Jewish people believe in Jesus? To understand this, one must realize that by the time of Jesus, the messianic hope had become greatly politicized in the minds of the people. They were seeking deliverance from the tyranny of Rome. Although the Scripture spoke both of the sufferings and of the victories of the messiah, the victorious aspect had become uppermost in the minds of the common people because of Roman domination. This "lopsided" view of the Messiah has stuck with many Jewish people, and the politicization of the messianic hope has continued to this day. This is not to say that all Jewish people rejected the claims of Jesus. On the contrary, all the first followers of Jesus were Jews. In fact, the rabbis of that time and afterwards were well aware of the many messianic prophecies which Christians claimed were fulfilled in Jesus. So, for instance, although the Talmudic rabbis concurred that Isaiah 53 was a prediction of the Messiah, by medieval times the pressure from those who applied this prophecy to Jesus was so great that Rashi, one of the greatest medieval Biblical scholars, reinterpreted the chapter and said it referred to the nation of Israel. This interpretation is maintained today by many Jewish scholars, though it only dates back to the Middle Ages. What makes Jesus different from others who have claimed to be the Messiah? There have been false messiahs throughout Jewish history. Among the most prominent were Bar Kokhba who led a revolt against Rom (AD 132-135) and Shabbetai Zevi, a self proclaimed messiah of the seventeenth century. During Bar Kokhba's revolt, one of the most famous figures in Jewish history, Rabbi Akiva, proclaimed him to be "King Messiah." Unfortunately, Bar Kochba, Akiva and thousands of Jews were killed in AD 135. when the Romans stormed the stronghold of Betar. Shabbetai Zevi, on the other hand, was a self-proclaimed messiah. Flourishing in seventeenth-century Europe, the Shabbatean movement spread among both the common people and the rabbis. But when Shabbetai Zevi was arrested in 1666 by the Sultan of Turkey, he converted to Islam rather than face death. We have been tragically wrong before, so it is not surprising that hard evidence should be sought for believing in Jesus. Jesus' life stands in sharp contrast to those of the false messiahs. Jesus' life stands in sharp contrast to those of the false messiahs, and it is a positive demonstration of what we would expect the Messiah to do. Jesus worked many miracles of healing, bringing wholeness into people's lives, forgiving sin and restoring relationships. In contrast to Shabbetai Zevi, for instance, Jesus carried out the Law of Moses as a devout Jew. And in contrast to Bar Kokhba, although Jesus died he was also resurrected! Jesus rose from the dead. The resurrection is a piece of additional evidence, and it is perhaps the most convincing vindication of Jesus' claims. Israeli scholar, Pinchas Lapide, wrote a book that has attracted no small amount of attention in the Jewish community. In The Resurrection of Jesus: A Jewish Perspective, Lapide argued that the resurrection of Jesus is well within the realm of possibility. After all, he reasoned, the Hebrew Scriptures give a number of accounts of people coming back to life. Why not Jesus as well? Regrettably, Lapide fails to note that the resurrection of Jesus is described in terms that go far beyond the resuscitations of the other stories. He fails to come to grips with the fact that Jesus predicted his own resurrection, which vindicated his claims to Messiahship. Throughout history, people have explained away the resurrection as either non-historical ("It never happened") or as non-supernatural ("Here's how it could have happened"). But these explanations have not been successful. Run through the possibilities yourself and see which makes the most sense. Did the Roman authorities steal the body of Jesus from the tomb? Then why didn't they produce it when the word spread that Jesus was risen? Or maybe the disciples stole it. But could such a fabrication on their part account for the change in their attitude? Three days earlier, they were disillusioned, defeated idealists who had hoped that Jesus would usher in a new world order. Could a lie, which they knew to be a lie, now account for their hope, their boldness in the face of official persecution, and for the high ethical standards. Perhaps Jesus never died; perhaps he just fainted on the cross and revived in the tomb. This idea was popularized in the book The Passover Plot by Hugh J. Schonfield. Unfortunately, the author overlooked the fact that the Romans pierced Jesus’ side, which would have most certainly killed him. Also, there was a contingent of Roman soldiers guarding the tomb as well as a huge stone that blocked its entrance. There was no way that a resuscitated Jesus could have escaped and then convinced hundreds of skeptical eyewitnesses that he had conquered death forever! Or was it all a hallucination? It must have been quite a hallucination to be seen by vastly different kinds of people at different times of day in many different places. You might be able to fool one person, but can you fool 500 who saw him at one time? And, unlike hallucinations, these appearances of the resurrected Jesus stopped as suddenly as they started, 40 days after the resurrection had taken place. The only satisfactory explanation is that the resurrection actually occurred, just as the record says. And if that’s the case, it’s a solid reason for accepting the Messiahship of Jesus. Jesus transforms people's lives. Because he provides atonement for sin and reconciliation with God, Jesus brings peace, joy, and purpose into people's lives. Apart from faith in him, there is no basis for true peace or direction, for, as the psalmist says, "Man is estranged from the womb." That this estrangement is healed by the reconciling ministry of Jesus is the common experience of those who believe in him. Between the objective evidence of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, and the subjective verification in our own lives-we think there's ample evidence that Jesus was who he claimed to be!
כִּי-יֶלֶד יֻלַּד-לָנוּ, בֵּן נִתַּן-לָנוּ, וַתְּהִי הַמִּשְׂרָה, עַל-שִׁכְמוֹ; וַיִּקְרָא שְׁמוֹ פֶּלֶא יוֹעֵץ, אֵל גִּבּוֹר, אֲבִי-עַד, שַׂר-שָׁלוֹם. 5 For a child is born unto us, a son is given unto us; and the government is upon his shoulder; and his name is called Pele-joez-el-gibbor-Abi-ad-sar-shalom;
The translation of the boy that will be born doesn't make a sense. in Hebrew it means Wonder Counselor , Hero God , Everlasting Father , and Peace minister ..
@@azhajouj Isaiah speaks of his son-in-law, whose reign he called a Great Light: ''FOR A CHILD HAS BEEN BORN TO US, A SON GIVEN TO US, AND THE AUTHORITY IS UPON HIS SHOULDER, AND THE WONDROUS ADVISER, THE MIGHTY GD, THE EVERLASTING FATHER, CALLED HIS NAME, ''THE PRINCE OF PEACE" 5For a child has been born to us, a son given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, called his name, "the prince of peace." הכִּי־יֶ֣לֶד יֻלַּד־לָ֗נוּ בֵּן נִתַּן־לָ֔נוּ וַתְּהִ֥י הַמִּשְׂרָ֖ה עַל־שִׁכְמ֑וֹ וַיִּקְרָ֨א שְׁמ֜וֹ פֶּ֠לֶא יוֹעֵץ֙ אֵ֣ל גִּבּ֔וֹר אֲבִי־עַ֖ד שַׂר־שָׁלֽוֹם:
BEFORE THE FIRST ENSLAVER ( TITUS) was born, the FIRST Redeemer was born. Genesis Rabbah 85:1 variant given by Theodor, p 1030. MESIAH BORN NEAR THE TIME OF TITUS. TITUS DESTROY THE TEMPLE ON 70AD. WHO IS THE MESSIAH?🤔
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 how can it be nonsese? You just dont admit that. Or are you want to say Bar Kokbba is the Messiah? Even one Of the Great Kabbalist Yitzhak Kaduri leaving a note before He pass away; He Write the Name of the Messiah : YESHUA ( Maybe you will say it's fake, it's up to you because if We give the evidence even according by your Sage writing you will say it was poluted and corrupted) If you dont admint that fact ; Let be see on the Future When The Messiah take Ruler of The World: We Will See Who is Him?😇 He is Jesus or Someone Else; Just wait
Philip A said, and referring to what is written in Daniel Chapter 7 verse 13 and re: what Abraham Mani said re: verse 13, Anyway Philip A said, "This kind of interpretation of prophesy goes back at least to St. Augustine. It is not new." My suggestion 2 Phillip A IS Don't interpret it. It means what it says. The problem is, it means different things to different people. Now be truthful & say it means what U say it means. Also, compare verse 9 in Daniel Chapter 7 with verses 12 through 16 in Revelation Chapter 1. Now as far as WHO that was/IS, read what is written in verse 17 & 18.
We will using the Gezeira Shava Methode Using TORAH to determine who is the Alma? this Methode is introduce by Rabbi Hillel 🤗 This Methode is Using on TALMUD Gezeira shava - is a verbal analogy. If the same word or phrase appears in two places in the Torah, we may infer on the basis of “verbal analogy” that the same law must apply in the other case, as well 1. The Alma Will take care and Nurse THE GREAT HOUSE SON (Exodus 2:9) 2. The Alma will Drew out The Son From the Water (Exodus 2:10) 3. The Alma name is Miryam (Number 26:59) 4. The Alma are the Naarah and Betulah ( Genesis 24:16,43) So It very Clear The Alma is Refering To Miryam the Mother of YESHUA. 🤗
@@jimnasium3979 when the two kings totaly Forsaken? Read the History; thats in 4BC during the Romans Occupy . during that time Jesus is about 2 Years Old. the King of Judah is Heord Archelaus the King of Samaria is Philip The tetarch,. the two Kingdom Totaly Forsaken during Jesus time
Numbers 24:24 (DRA) They shall come in galleys from Italy, they shall overcome the Assyrians, and shall waste the Hebrews, and at the last they themselves also shall perish.
Your proof is no proof at all - quite the opposite. As well as Rebecca being an "alma" (young woman), the Bible specifically states that she was also a "betula" (a virgin) and that no man had intimate knowledge of her (Gen. 24:16). If the word "alma" meant virgin, the Bible would not have also gone to pains to point out that she was a virgin. Not every young woman is a betula and not every betula is a young woman. Rebecca was both. The woman referred to in Isaiah was not. Don't you find it curious that every other time (and there are dozens) that the Hebrew Bible uses the word "alma" the Christian translation is "young woman"?
@@steviedalawir7152 You completely ignored the TRUTH of who the 2 Enemies were, as it is clearly stated: THE 2 ENEMIES WERE REZIN THE KING OF ARAM AND PEKAH THE SON REMALIAH, THE KING OF ISRAEL! 1And it came to pass in the days of Ahaz son of Jotham son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin, king of Aram, and Pekah son of Remaliah, king of Israel, marched on Jerusalem to wage war against it, and he could not wage war against it. אוַיְהִ֡י בִּימֵ֣י אָ֠חָז בֶּן־יוֹתָ֨ם בֶּן־עֻזִּיָּ֜הוּ מֶ֣לֶךְ יְהוּדָ֗ה עָלָ֣ה רְצִ֣ין מֶֽלֶךְ־אֲ֠רָם וּפֶ֨קַח בֶּן־רְמַלְיָ֚הוּ מֶֽלֶךְ־יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ יְר֣וּשָׁלִַ֔ם לַמִּלְחָמָ֖ה עָלֶ֑יהָ וְלֹ֥א יָכֹ֖ל לְהִלָּחֵ֥ם עָלֶֽיהָ: 2And it was told to the House of David, saying, "Aram has allied itself with Ephraim," and his heart and the heart of his people trembled as the trees of the forest tremble because of the wind. בוַיֻּגַּ֗ד לְבֵ֚ית דָּוִד֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר נָ֥חָה אֲרָ֖ם עַל־אֶפְרָ֑יִם וַיָּ֚נַע לְבָבוֹ֙ וּלְבַ֣ב עַמּ֔וֹ כְּנ֥וֹעַ עֲצֵי־יַ֖עַר מִפְּנֵי־רֽוּחַ: 3And the Lord said to Isaiah, "Now go out toward Ahaz, you and Shear-Yashuv your son, to the edge of the conduit of the upper pool, to the road of the washer's field. גוַיֹּ֣אמֶר יְהֹוָה֘ אֶל־יְשַׁעְיָהוּ֒ צֵא־נָא֙ לִקְרַ֣את אָחָ֔ז אַתָּ֕ה וּשְׁאָ֖ר יָשׁ֣וּב בְּנֶ֑ךָ אֶל־קְצֵ֗ה תְּעָלַת֙ הַבְּרֵכָ֣ה הָֽעֶלְיוֹנָ֔ה אֶל־מְסִלַּ֖ת שְׂדֵ֥ה כוֹבֵֽס: 4And you shall say to him, "Feel secure and calm yourself, do not fear, and let your heart not be faint because of these two smoking stubs of firebrands, because of the raging anger of Rezin and Aram and the son of Remaliah. דוְאָמַרְתָּ֣ אֵ֠לָיו הִשָּׁמֵ֨ר וְהַשְׁקֵ֜ט אַל־תִּירָ֗א וּלְבָֽבְךָ֙ אַל־יֵרַ֔ךְ מִשְּׁנֵ֨י זַנְב֧וֹת הָֽאוּדִ֛ים הָֽעֲשֵׁנִ֖ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה בָּֽחֳרִי־אַ֛ף רְצִ֥ין וַֽאֲרָ֖ם וּבֶן־רְמַלְיָֽהוּ: 5Since Aram planned harm to you, Ephraim and the son of Remaliah, saying: היַ֗עַן כִּֽי־יָעַ֥ץ עָלֶ֛יךָ אֲרָ֖ם רָעָ֑ה אֶפְרַ֥יִם וּבֶן־רְמַלְיָ֖הוּ לֵאמֹֽר: 6'Let us go up against Judah and provoke it, and annex it to us; and let us crown a king in its midst, one who is good for us,' ונַֽעֲלֶ֚ה בִֽיהוּדָה֙ וּנְקִיצֶ֔נָּה וְנַבְקִעֶ֖נָּה אֵלֵ֑ינוּ וְנַמְלִ֥יךְ מֶ֙לֶךְ֙ בְּתוֹכָ֔הּ אֵ֖ת בֶּן־טָֽבְאַֽל: 7So said the Lord God, 'Neither shall it succeed, nor shall it come to pass. זכֹּ֥ה אָמַ֖ר אֲדֹנָ֣י יֱהֹוִ֑ה לֹ֥א תָק֖וּם וְלֹ֥א תִֽהְיֶֽה: 8For the head of Aram is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and in another sixty-five years, Ephraim shall be broken, no longer to be a people. חכִּ֣י רֹ֚אשׁ אֲרָם֙ דַּמֶּ֔שֶׂק וְרֹ֥אשׁ דַּמֶּ֖שֶׂק רְצִ֑ין וּבְע֗וֹד שִׁשִּׁ֚ים וְחָמֵשׁ֙ שָׁנָ֔ה יֵחַ֥ת אֶפְרַ֖יִם מֵעָֽם: 9And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is the son of Remaliah; if you do not believe, it is because you cannot be believed." טוְרֹ֚אשׁ אֶפְרַ֙יִם֙ שֹֽׁמְר֔וֹן וְרֹ֥אשׁ שֹֽׁמְר֖וֹן בֶּן־רְמַלְיָ֑הוּ אִם לֹ֣א תַֽאֲמִ֔ינוּ כִּ֖י לֹ֥א תֵֽאָמֵֽנוּ:
So Jewish Rabbi do not believe that the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary and she conceived ? How about Can God became a man ( Messiah) to save man kind( Humans)?
The Moshiach of the Bible is a mortal man of flesh and blood who Gd will use as an instrument of His Will just as He used Moses, just as He used David his forefather. The Moshiach of the Bible comes at the End of the Days, not before, his teachings of Gd and His Holy Torah will transform the World to a UTOPIA WHERE PEACE REIGNS AND WAR IS NO MORE, but as Jesus said, he did NOT come to bring PEACE BUT DIVISION to set family one against the other, the very reason why Gd sends Elijah, to come and UNDO ALL THE DIVISION FOSTERED BY FALSE TEACHERS, lest HE smite the Earth with utter destruction. As this Hedonistic, Pagan Filled World of DIVISION, CHAOS, MAYHEM AND ANOTHER BLOODY WAR going on, it all TESTIFIES that Neither ELIJAH Nor MOSHIACH have yet come, so far only fakes have shown up.
of course not god of israel warned that no mortal can see him if that occured that man would die only by his vision of god, and our god doesnt need human sucrifies that way he reject the sacrifie of izahk by abraham which was a test to show the entire world that he is the true god and these canbial gods who were given human to the alter read the hebrew bible the word of god of israel
Based on all the comments about what the 3 letter English word God means, and being that Hashem means, the name, AND with all of these hyphenated GD'S i.e., e.g., G-D;G_D; G-d; G_d; g-d & g_d, then the man almost everybody calls/says is G-zus should have told his disciples this. When You pray, say Tetragrammaton in heaven, hallowed be your Tetragrammaton. Luke 11:1-2. Why is is not ONE of You Rabbi Trail SINger flockers will tell me what those hyphenated GD'S MEAN?? WHEN did this hyphenization begin?? WHY is it ALL OF YA type God then somewhere else type at least ONE of these, > G-D;G_D; G-d; G_d; g-d; g_d. ?
So in the Torah Hashem says I Hashem love the Jews only I Hashem am coining a word to describe the lowly non-Jews Goyeem Don’t mix with them I plan to send you my favorite children to heaven While the rest by default will go to Hell Very hard to believe that Hashem and not the Jews of the time authored those words
no one said that sir , on the contrary the jews sent by the true god of israel to proclaim him to the gentils when the messiah arrives with god willing everyone will now him inculding you , but the jews are his chosen people that a fact and for it we suffered more than 2000 years for being loyal to our beloved god of israel
hahahaha AGAIN! afraid to let jews see my other comment? YOU PEOPLE GOT THE MESSAGE and the TRUTH If you want to hide my message its up to you... I have no control over your insecurities... I did my part, i wash my hands... Now this is between You and the Holy Spirit of God...
2: Uriel, @ > "Carl Tuckerson great come back! So full of wisdom. I am convinced. Lol " Urinal Uriel. Weak response to my, as you say, great comeback. Now I am CONVINCED U R F O S. LOL 🤣 😂 😊 😂 < LOL LOL 😊
Quran also doesn't talk about virgin mary and virgin birth . Quran says Esa /Jesus is the revelation which was revealed to Miriam pbuh, she was the prophet of God. The traditional translation of the Quran is wrong. Dr Kashif Khan is doing the correct translation with proof on the internet. Muhammad means praiseworthy. God says Quran IS Muhammad, meaning Quran is praiseworthy. When God says Muhammad in the Quran, HE is talking about the Quran not about the prophet. Read Dr Kashif Khan's articles on the internet to know God's real message which 99 percent muslims and non muslims don't know and ask him questions. He's there to explain and answer. La ilaha il Allah. No deity but God. Allah / Hashem / God etc. ( all titles of the one and only Creator ), IS the one and only creator of the universe.
Ur mistaken, virgin birth os mentioned in the Quran, when Mary exclaimed that how is she going to have a son when no man has touched her, then the angel replied that it is easy for Allah, for He only says" Be " and it is.
Ohh! God also doesn't care about people who want to remain astray and continue to reject the faith, I will rather die than accepting that David(pbuh) committed adultery, we Muslims have very strong objections to such blasphemous and disgusting contents agaisnt prophets in the Hebrew scriptures.
@Margie Sofia I think that most people who commit incest look up into the bible that how many types of incest they can commit, btw there ten different cases of incest in the Hebrew scriptures.
@@mdaslam6337 i urge you to read Dr Kashif Khan's articles on the internet with an open mind and ask him questions. He's there to explain and answer questions. Read his article " Jesus the son of Mary ". 👍
We should respect everyone, their culture and religion. God loves all of us the same. You don't choose where you are born and the religion. We should look more and focus on ourselves, leave others alone. Attacking others and their religion will only harm you, short term and long term. Fear God and keep the commandments.
Christianity in Jesus' name has been Persecuting, Oppressing and Slaughtering Jews for 1700+ years, becoming the Jews longest enduring and most Deadliest of all their Oppressors. Christianity is who forced their beliefs and Slaughtered those who wouldn't convert.
2000 years ago, on Nissan 14, around 3 PM, Son of God Almighty, Yeshua died on cross of Calvary for the sins of Israel and the Gentile world, as foretold by prophet Yeshayahu. His innocent blood washes us from all our sins! See what Lord foretold through prophet Yeshayahu long before! Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 53 (This Hebrew Bible was edited by esteemed translator and scholar, Rabbi A.J. Rosenberg.) 1 Who would have believed our report, and to whom was the arm of the Lord revealed? 2 And he (Arm of Lord) came up like a sapling before it, and like a root from dry ground, he had neither form nor comeliness; and we saw him that he had no appearance. Now shall we desire him (Arm of Lord)? 4 Indeed, he (Arm of Lord) bore our illnesses, and our pains-he carried them, yet we accounted him (Arm of Lord) as plagued, smitten by God and oppressed. 3 Despised and rejected by men, a man of pains and accustomed to illness, and as one who hides his face from us, despised and we held him (Arm of Lord) of no account. 5 But he (Arm of Lord) was pained because of our transgressions, crushed because of our iniquities; the chastisement of our welfare was upon him (Arm of Lord), and with his (Arm of Lord's) wound we were healed. 6 We (Jewish nation, Israel) all went astray like sheep, we (Jewish nation) have turned, each one on his way, and the Lord accepted his (Arm of Lord's) prayers for the iniquity of all of us. 7 He (Arm of Lord) was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he would not open his mouth; like a lamb to the slaughter he (Arm of Lord) would be brought, and like a ewe that is mute before her shearers, and he (Arm of Lord) would not open his mouth. 8 For he (Arm of Lord) was cut off from the land of the living; because of the transgression of my people (Lord's people and Yeshayahu's people, that is Israel), a plague befell them (Israel). ( What was that plague befell on Israel and Jews? Is it the endless sufferings for last 2000 years, till today?) 9 And he (Arm of Lord) gave his grave to the wicked, and to the wealthy with his kinds of death, because he (Arm of Lord) committed no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth. 10 And the Lord wished to crush him (Arm of Lord), He made him (Arm of Lord) ill; if his soul makes itself restitution, he (Arm of Lord) shall see children, he (Arm of Lord) shall prolong his days, and God's purpose shall prosper in his hand. 11 From the toil of his (Arm of Lord's) soul he would see, he would be satisfied; with his knowledge My servant would vindicate the just for many, and their iniquities he (Arm of Lord) would bear. 12 Therefore, I will allot him (Arm of Lord) a portion in public, and with the strong he (Arm of Lord) shall share plunder, because he (Arm of Lord) poured out his soul to death, and with transgressors he (Arm of Lord) was counted; and he (Arm of Lord) bore the sin of many (both Jews and Gentiles), and interceded for the transgressors.
The “young woman” is from The Masoretic Text (MT). It came about around AD 500, which differs from the text from the DSS. So by going back to the original Hebrew text, you should be going back to the earlier text, which is the DSS.
Hi. Be careful to make sure that what you're saying is true next time. the DSS Isaiah has the same word as the MT: haalmah - the young woman. Kind regards.
DEAD SEA SCROLL: ''LOOK, THE YOUNG WOMAN HAS CONCEIVED" Chapter 7 : Verse 14 Therefore the LORD himself will give y[ou a sign. Loo]k, the young woman has conceived and is bearing a son, and his name will be Immanuel. dss collection The Israel Museum Jerusalem
@@curly_dock The DSS, the MT and the Tankah all tell of IMMANUEL AND HIS ALREADY PREGNANT MOTHER, who has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband and has CONCEIVED/IS WITH CHILD/PREGNANT/NO LONGER A VIRGIN. Immanuel was Isaiah's own son, his maturity levels are what stood as SIGNS to the Fulfilmment of the Prophecy his father uttered to King Ahaz, that GD PROMISED TO BE WITH JUDAH AND TAKE CARE OF IT'S 2 ENEMIES, Rezin the King of Aram and Pekah, the son of Remaliah, the King of Israel. The Pagan Greco Roman Phallic Idol Jesus is not but a composite of a myriad of Pagan Greco Roman Idols of Myth: PERSEUS THE VIRTUOUS VIRGIN BORN DEMIGOD, DIONYSUS THE WATER INTO WINE MIRACLE MAKING IDOL and MITHRAS THE DYING RESURRECTING IDOL who dies for the People, whose Devotees EAT OF THE FLESH AND DRINK OF THE BLOOD, like his sidekick the Devil and his lake of fire, they are but 2 fabricated characters found only in the Greek Tall Tales of Man and Joe Smith Jr's Book of Mormon, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.
Are you fighting with God, Rabbi Tovia? RABBI GAMALIEL “When they heard this, they were enraged and wanted to kill them. But a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law who was respected by all the people, stood up in the Sanhedrin and ordered the men to be taken outside for a little while. He said to them, “Men of Israel, be careful about what you’re about to do to these men. Some time ago Theudas rose up, claiming to be somebody, and a group of about four hundred men rallied to him. He was killed, and all his followers were dispersed and came to nothing. After this man, Judas the Galilean rose up in the days of the census and attracted a following. He also perished, and all his followers were scattered. So in the present case, I tell you, stay away from these men and leave them alone. For if this plan or this work is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You may even be found fighting against God.” They were persuaded by him.” Acts 5:33-39
Scriptures in Tanakh of Yeshua is risen for Israel! For you will not abandon my soul to Sheol; nor will you allow your “holy one” to undergo decay. Psalms 16:8-10 Who is Holy? Only God! Israel you are a sinful nation loaded down with guilt. You are wicked and corrupt and have turned from the Lord, the “holy one” of Israel. Isaiah 1:4 For thus said the Lord God, the “holy one” of Israel to saved in quietness and in confidence shall be your strength, and yet Israel would not. Isaiah 30:15 Ephraim has encircled me with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit But Judah still walks with God, even the “holy one” who is faithful. Hosea 11:12 But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, too little to be among to clans of Judah, from you “One” will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, from the days of eternity. Micah 5:2 Who was from the days of eternity with God? Who is the “One”? The messiah of Israel! God is to us a God of deliverances; and to YHVH the Lord belong escapes from death. Psalms 68:20 Same as you Israel! After two days he will restore Israel; on the tired day he will restore us, that we may live in his presence (forever) Hosea 6:2 It should be understood in historical context but also all the words of God have deep spiritual meaning for you Israel in the past and today and in the future. I spoke to the prophets, gave them many visions and told parables through them. Hosea 12:10 let them be for “signs” and for divine appointed times Genesis 1:14 God’s appointed times (moedim) are not just an amazing history but signs for the Messiah of Israel. You will arise and have compassion on Zion; for it is time to be gracious to Israel, for the appointed time has come! Psalms 102:13,18 The Messiah your Passover Lamb has been sacrificed at the Passover. So tired day after Passover is the firstfruits. As God commanded you shall bring the sheaf of the first fruits of your harvest to the priest. He shall wave the sheaf before the YHVH for you to be accepted. Leviticus 23:10,11 Your Messiah has been raised from the dead as the first fruits of those who are asleep. For since by a man came death, By a man also came the resurrection of the dead. Because it must first die to bear much fruit. The Messiah of Israel had to suffer for your iniquities and transgressions just like the first broken covenant of Israel. But the Messiah de David will return as a new covenant with heavenly authority and fullness of Torah.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 most Jews react like you. Israel has duty and are called to preach the truth to all nations but they have lack of compassion. Because His salvation is among all nations. Let the nations be glad and sing for joy! Psalms 67 He will bring justice to the nations. I will appoint you as a covenant to the people, as a light to the nations. Isaiah 421,6,7 and many more scriptures say that all mankind will come to bow down before Me, says YHVH Isaiah 66 So He is not only your God. He is much bigger then your God. For zion’s sake I won’t be silent for Jerusalem’s sake I will not remain quiet. God bless you and your family and your nation.
@@Marieseungmi I think you missed one Jeremiah 16:19 L_rd, my strength and my stronghold, my refuge in a time of distress, the nations will come to You from the ends of the earth, and they will say, “Our fathers inherited only lies, worthless idols of no benefit at all. Teach it to your children
The Moshiach of the Bible is a mortal man, a direct son/seed/shoot of King David, through his son Solomon, son after son, from the Tribe of Judah, of the House of David, who Isaiah tells comes at the End of Days and brings All of Mankind to the Rightful Worship of the Creator and Him Alone, the Restoration and Redemption of Israel/the Jews and World Peace where the Wolves abide with the Lambs, where the Implements of War are turned into Implements of Agriculture, but all your Jesus brought to Mankind is More PAGAN IDOLATRY of himself, a trio of Man Made deities, his mother, other dead people, Statues of Wood and Stone, Angels, a dirty painted sheet, crackers and wooden sticks. To Israel/the Jews Jesus brought only 1700+ years of PERSECUTION, OPPRESSION AND DEATH as History testifies that Christianity became the Jews longest enduring and most DEADLIEST OF ALL THEIR OPPRESSORS, to a T it alone fits the description of the morphing Last Beast and as Jesus said, he did NOT COME TO BRING PEACE BUT DIVISION, to set family one against the other, the very reason why Gd send Elijah, to come and UNDO ALL THE DIVISION FOSTERED BY FALSE TEACHERS, lest HE smite the Earth with Utter Destruction. As this Hedonistic, Pagan Filled World of DIVISION, CHAOS AND MAYHEM TESTIFY that Neither Elijah Nor Moshiach have yet come, so far only Fakes have shown up. Your Jesus was the Ultimate Antimoshiach and his cult of Christianity is the Last Beast.
''WE WILL SACRIFICE THE ABOMINATION OF THE EGYPTIANS TO GD OUR LRD. WILL WE SACRIFICE THE DEITY OF THE EGYPTIANS BEFORE THEIR EYES, AND THEY WILL NOT STONE US?" Shemot - Exodus - Chapter 8: 22But Moses said, "It is improper to do that, for we will sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians to God our Lord. Will we sacrifice the deity of the Egyptians before their eyes, and they will not stone us? כבוַיֹּ֣אמֶר משֶׁ֗ה לֹ֤א נָכוֹן֙ לַֽעֲשׂ֣וֹת כֵּ֔ן כִּ֚י תּֽוֹעֲבַ֣ת מִצְרַ֔יִם נִזְבַּ֖ח לַֽיהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֵ֑ינוּ הֵ֣ן נִזְבַּ֞ח אֶת־תּֽוֹעֲבַ֥ת מִצְרַ֛יִם לְעֵֽינֵיהֶ֖ם וְלֹ֥א יִסְקְלֻֽנוּ:
"Thus said Hashem Who established the sun for light by day, The laws of moon and stars for light by night, Who stirs up the sea into roaring waves, Whose name is Hashem of Hosts: If these laws should ever be annulled by Me, declares Hashem, Only then would the offspring of Israel cease to be a nation before Me for all of time. Thus said Hashem: If the heavens above could be measured, and the foundations of the earth below could be fathomed, only then would I reject all the offspring of Israel for all that they have done, declares Hashem." Jeremiah 31:34-36.
@@firstcentury1885 "Because for many days will the children of Israel dwell with no king and no official and no sacrafices...and then the children of Israel shall return [to the land of Israel] and seek Hashem their God *[Hashem alone is their God]* and David their King [the Messiah, who is NOT Hashem/God], and they will be in Awe of Hashem and of His goodness *that will be at the end of days* " Hoseah 3:4,5.
@@firstcentury1885 HaShem is the one true g-d. jesus is a dead man.
@@firstcentury1885 the tribe of judah was the bigger tribe that stayed in Israel and king David is from judah so yes judah is still on the throne. Judah = Jew.
@@Yehonatan613 I'm so amazed how the great love for Iesus makes someone spew hate so easy.
Thank you Rabbi Singer for this interview opportunity with you. Dale
"...behold, they are a nation that dwells alone, and among the nations they are not counted... May my soul die [like] the death of the straight ones, and may my end be like theirs" Numbers 23:9&10.
"Lest there be among you a man or woman or a family or a tribe, whos heart is today straying from HaShem our God to go and worship the gods of the nations, lest there be among you a root sprouting these bitter things... And when they hear these warning words and they say to themselves "I will be safe even though I follow my own willful heart"...Hashem will not forgive such a person..." Deuteronomy 29 verses 17-20. [Ie: Hashem forgives all true repenters, but He does not forgive those whom abondon His Torah].
@Joshua X17
Yehonsatan keeps saying Hashem our God. Hashem, means, the name. So really that IS saying, our God, the name. SOoooo I guess Moses told Pharoah Ramses, Hey Faye Roe. The name sent me. 🤣 😊
@Jesus Christ Is Lord
U do not pay much attention overall to what Rabbi Trail SIN ger & HIS FLOCKERS SAY & BELIEVE! Fyi, They preach that everything written in & from Matthew to & including Revelation is FALSE. Whoever is not a frail- surface-cursory-skimmer-flimsy thinnish-superficial reader & THINKER, will SEE & KNOW that The Rabbi Trail Shady Lane Garden Path Pied Piper Tovia SINger & ASSOciates AND the VAST MAJORITY of his opponents are ALL superficial-surface-cursory-skimmer-frail-thinnish-flimsy readers & THINKERS. BUT!! VERY GOOD @ DECEIVING!! BOTH SIDES, PRO & CON ARE THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND! All I C HERE, is one mass cycle of CONFUSION!
@Joshua X17
This may sound/appear like I'm not telling U the Truth, BUT I am telling U the TRUTH.
I KNOW the name of the one most people call/say is Jesus. < > His name IS Yeshua, & I KNOW THIS IS TRUE BUT I DO NOT KNOW the name of his/my, & your Father WHO DID REAVEAL TO ME IN A DREAM THE NAME OF HIS SON, AND!! THAT WAS/IS THE FIRST TIME I EVER SAW OR HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THAT NAME, >Yeshua. < That dream occurred about 5 years ago & UNTIL then I said Jesus TOO! It was ALL I KNEW at the time AND YES FOR MOST OF MY LIFE!! NOW!! I have asked the Father to reveal HIS own personal name the same way OR IN ANY WAY so I would know his name TOO BUT so far He has not done that. AND I think I know why but that is for another time & place to discuss. Shalom
@@FrankNStein-pf9rr Moses told Pharo exactly who sent him. We say HaShem because to use the holy name for mundane reasons would be blasphemy.
@Jesus Christ Is Lord you do realize xtianity is the Greco Roman sun god cult right?
Love and blessings to you Rabbi, the cults of Christianity even have their own book which is not the forever words which they call the bible. Your patience is remarkable,
Yes his patience is remarkable
End of days prophecy: "I will bring them to My sacred mount, and let them rejoice in My house of prayer. Their burnt offerings and sacrifices shall be welcome on My altar; For My House shall be called a house of prayer for ALL peoples.” Isaiah 56:7.
@Barbara B God bless you dear Barbara🙌💞😊
@Rylo Christblood Talmud says women have a greater portion in the world to come than even their husbands, talmud says the redemption from egypt was all in the merit of righteous women and that the final redemption is in the merit of righteous women. Take your antisemetic propaganda elsewhere.
@Rylo Christblood Jesus is NOT God!
@Rylo Christblood No he is not! And Isaiah 9 is about Hezekiah ! How about reading the WHOLE chapter and not ripping out one verse
@Rylo Christblood Isaiah 9:6 ; For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
When was Jesus called the Mighty God, the Eternal Father and the Prince of Peace?
If according to you, Jesus in John 17: indicates that the father is the one and only true God, then he is not the mighty God.
The Eternal Father: Is Jesus the Father?
where is he called father?
If you say so, then you fall under heresy according to Christian dogma.
Prince of Peace: Martheus 10:34 Don't think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.
Isaiah 9:6 is invalidated by Jesus' own words in your book.
Now you can say context context context. First read the context about Isaiah 9 yourself without your Christian lens.
"Because for many days will the children of Israel dwell with no king and no official and no sacrafices...and then the children of Israel shall return [to the land of Israel] and seek Hashem their God *[Hashem alone is their God]* and David their King [the Messiah, who is not God], and they will be in Awe of Hashem and of His goodness *that will be at the end of days* " Hoseah 3:4,5.
@Iyas kelu Every verse quoted single handedly disproves the idolatrous doctrines of the invented pagan false religion of christianity.
@Iyas kelu hebrew is my 1st language, i dont use translations, I inserted the brackets myself so that ppl have a clue whats being spoken of, wake up idolater.
@Iyas kelu
👍 👍
@@Yehonatan613
Well it IS TRUE that the original understanding of Christianity has been perverted & corrupted in EVERY way, INCLUDING those inspired of Satan paintings & pictures of Yeshua whose name, spelling, has also been corrupted. Satan gets involved in everything CLEAN & makes it UNCLEAN BUT SAYS IT NOW IS CLEAN!! Anyway here is something U Noahiders are apparently unable to grasp. WHY is this Christian Religion STILL ALIVE? Read what one of YOUR RABBIS, Gamaliel said in Acts Chapter 4 verses 34 through 39 about this NEW RELIGION People call Christianity. AND NO!! Gamaliel WAS NOT A CHRISTIAN!! HE WAS A PROFESSOR OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE OF JUDASIM!!
@@Trych_78678
Re: "There is no difference between Christianity and Hinduism."
MaryalleluYA!! MAY-REE-LEW-LEW YA. Marluluya.
Black Virgin Mother of Czestochowa MaryalleluYA. Viva Laaaa POOP-PUH!! GLAWRAH! MURSAH. Viva La Poo Poopuh Mama, Pope Papa. Novo Ordo Mass. Marlewyer
"So said the Lord of Hosts: The fast of the fourth [month], the fast of the fifth [month], the fast of the seventh [month], and the fast of the tenth [month] shall be for the house of Judah for joy and happiness and for happy holidays-but love truth and peace." Zecharia 8. *These are the fasts that Religious Jews have been observing for thousands of years.* No other people observe these fasts...what does that imply? [That the redemption spoken of all over Jewish scriptures, applies to the Jewish people, not else...]
To: Yehonasatan
AND my friend!! The House OF JUDAH IS NOT THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL!!
@@FrankNStein-pf9rr the majority of the jewish people today are from the house of Judah...do you know any other people who observe these fasts other than orthodox religious jews? That's whom its about. My name btw is two hebrew words, Yeho-Natan, the same exact name of Jonathan (King Sauls son, king Davids best friend), but good job revealing your true colors, your posts speak volumes, continue kissing ur man statues and we'll see which faith/religion gets the last laugh 😘😘😘
Awesome 👌 thanks for helping out here!!!
@@Yehonatan613
@ & Re: > "orthodox religious jew fasts."
To answer your 1st question first. I DO KNOW of several million NON JEWS who DO observe the annual FEASTS aka Holy Convocations AND I AM ONE OF THOSE. U remind me of the Pharisee Jew who fasted 2 times every week & bragged about it. Here is the story, Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood alone by himself and prayed: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other people-robbers, evil-doers, adulterers-or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get.
The tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, ‘God, have mercy on me, a sinner.’
“YEHONATAN!! That tax collector, rather than the bragging Pharisee was justified before > אֱלֹהִ֑ים . For all those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” Now be a good Yehonatan & FAST and do not be SLOW!
@@FrankNStein-pf9rr you fast on the 17nth of tamuz, the 9th of Av, the 3rd of tishrei and the 10th of Tevet? They are not biblical, they are tradition, and mentioned explicitly in this verse. Only religious jews observe them, no one else. And it proves your pagan religion, false.
Rabbi Singer is a tzaddik for bringing forth the truth!
Is that a picture of your wife?
@@crusadesdidnothingwrong No, it's a picture of your mother.
May HaShem continue to bless you Rabbi Singer. Rick Davis aKohen ✡️✡️🇮🇱🇮🇱
The story of Christianity is really simple and a man named Paul invented a new religion out of a combination of Judaism with a religion of Mitra
He took a well-known figure of a rebel in Rome (who were many) and converted the whole religion upon him.
This is exactly what the Muslim king Abdulmalek did when he took a figure of a warrior in the Persian Empire named Issa Abu Kabisa and called him the blessed Arabic Muhammad!
While Paul took variables from Judaism Abdelmak took elements from Gnostic Christianity
Both of these religions are human inventions - which is why they are fluid and can contain a lot of conflicting messages in their content! To suit many types of people!
Uhhh explain more about king abdulmalek
you are right there
This interview is the best from Rabbi Singuer. In my point of view, the opponent stayed totally naked. VIRGIN is VIRGIN and woman is woman in english, in spanish and in any other logical lenguage.
Amazing you have to spend so much time explaining this simple concept. 'Woman" v "Virgin".
@@firstcentury1885 according to your fake bible
@@ronashman8463 did not watch the video just spout nonsense
@@firstcentury1885 that is Greek mythology not a sign from God.
@@ronashman8463 learn Hebrew. It's that simple. And how is it logical? Do tell us. How is a virgin birth logical? It has Greek mythology written allover it. How is it logical that someone whose father was apparently God, be a descendant of David's? There is nothing logical in what you believe. And I still don't understand how clever people can believe this whole story. Learn the original language and you'd stop believing in this nonsense.
@@firstcentury1885 obviously not Isaiah 7:14. But gods sleeping with earthlings and semigods being born, yes Greek and Roman mythology. Get real. Even the early Christian theologists agree that the trinity story and the virgin birth were created to get people to lean more towards monotheism. Till then they had believed in a series of deities. You should try and trace Zeus' family tree lol.
Baruk Hashem for this insight. Toda Rabba.
Thank you Rabbi Singer
@Rylo Christblood thank Rabbi for spreading the truth with facts and exposing fake christianity and fake jesus, I know it makes you mad stay ignorant and mad then, you will never grow, you lost
@Rylo Christblood "Old Testament" a classic Christian insult
@First Century evil lying spirit of christianity
@First Century fake news, christianity is evil 🤣
@Rylo Christblood Ooooooh, such a talmudic scholar!
Always nice to hear rabbi singer on this topics thanks rabbi tovia singer
To those Christians who believe that the word almah is defined as virgin, please explain the following:
Isaiah had used the word Betulah 5 times in his corpus of Isaiah found in the following places:
Isaiah 23:4; 23:12 ; 37: 22; 47:1; 62:5
If Isaiah wanted to convey that almah was a virgin why didn't he use betulah in the one place Christianity desperately needed it to, to tie the narrative of Matthew 1:23 to Isaiah 7:14? Instead in Isaiah 7:14 he chose to use Almah, why?
@@Love-One-Another
Wrong, Almah means young woman. Further, its use is "ha almah"in Isaiah 7:14, "The young woman". The "ha" means "the". Thus a reference to a specific woman. Additionally it uses the word "hyne", which means "here is" or "here". Thus , here is the young woman.
Try again! This time answer why Isaiah used betulah 5 times in the book of isaiah and not in Isaiah 7:14?
Will you now apply the masculine version of almah, "alem" to king David as "a young virgin male". The NT translates in Samuel alem correctly as young man, yet the words almah and alem are the same word with one used to describe a young woman and the other a young man.
You're spinning yourself into a web that's entrapped you.
@@firstcentury1885
The sign was the age in which the boy would be, a time before he knew to reject bad and choose good, that the 2 kingdoms will have disappeared. Which 2 kingdoms disappeared during Jesus's life?
Read Isaiah 7:15-16.
Reading comprehension my friend.
Further, you didn't address the original question, why didn't Isaiah use betulah in Isaiah 7:14 but chose almah. Isaiah used betulah in 5 other locations within the corpus of Isaiah, why not in 7:14?
@@firstcentury1885
Saying you're right and I'm wrong doesn't make it so.
Read Isaiah 7:14 through 7:16. Cream and honey he shall eat when he knows to reject bad and choose good, for when the boy is old enough to know to reject bad and choose good, the kingdom king Ahaz dreads shall be abandoned, or no longer in existence.
7:14 is continued through 7:16. The sign is the age at which the boy will be by the time the kingdoms King Ahaz fears will be abandoned or disappear.
When the child is old enough to choose good over bad, by that time those kingdoms are no longer a threat.
@@firstcentury1885
I don't have to ask Isaiah anything. He chose not to use it because it has nothing to do with virginity. As we already know. He uses the word virginity 5 times and doesn't use it in Isaiah 7:14. Isaiah already knew the difference between the two words (young woman and virginity) and chose not to use virgin here in 7:14.
Try again.
@@Love-One-Another
The original Septuagint is the translation of only the five books of Moses, and not the prophets.
There are 3 sets.
The 5 books of Moses,
The Prophets,
And the Writings.
The Septuagint was a translation of the 5 books of Moses and not of the prophets nor the Writings.
Try again.
True
Neither all young women are virgins, nor all virgins are young women.
Thank you so much dear rabbi!!
HaShem blesses you for telling the truth...which many Christians do not want to hear. Slowly, but surely Jews are coming to Israel. Every Sunday, I study Hebrew with a tutor. I converted 10 years ago. I hope to come to Israel in 3 years and 9 months (not really counting) when I retire, I have already been once. I am the only child of my secular Jewish grandmother who figured out this Christianity thing is not working.
Much love to you!
Please ignore the comment from the hate filled man.
@@firstcentury1885 How can a person be those things when God Himself says that only He and His eternal Law are the way to live?
If it's a choice between God's word and that of a Jew from the Galilee executed 2000 years ago by the Romans, I'll vote for God every time.
@@firstcentury1885 Where in the Hebrew Bible (the one that Jewish Jesus followed) is there even a remote hint about the Messiah being executed, or someone "illegally" executed being resurrected?
You can believe whatever stories you want but God's word is One and He doesn't teach any such thing.
@@firstcentury1885 That's a good answer I'm sure, but not to the question I asked you:
Where in the Hebrew Bible is there even a hint to the Messiah being executed or someone executed "illegally" being resurrected?
The verse you quoted is Isaiah talking (in the past tense) about himself being ridiculed. No mention of death, crosses, Roman, changing God's Law, resurrection or Christianity.
@@firstcentury1885 , you mean the anonymous author of the Gospe of "John" made that assertion, don't you? Jesus may not have even said it. The four Gospels are anonymous writings. They are just HEARSAY claims by unknown authors, who did not even keep Jesus' actual words (Aramaic) but wrote in Greek (which the uneducated, Aramaic-speaking fishermen apostles would not have been able to do). You don't know what Jesus said.
You are exactly correct learn Hebrew or forever hold your peace
This is easier to explain in another language that has grammatical gender with a single word translation. Most English speakers viewing this video would be familiar with the most basic of Spanish (especially in the USA).
Señor = man👨🏻 איש
Señora = woman 👩🏾 אישה
Señorito = young man🧑🏽🦱 עלם
Señorita = young woman 👱🏻♀️עלמה
Niño = young boy 👦🏼 ילד
Niña = young girl 👧🏻 ילדה
Nene = male baby 👶🏼 תִּינוֹק
Nena = female baby 👶🏻 תִּינוֹקֶת
Then you can pluralize each of those Spanish words, or in Hebrew you can either pluralize, or more rarely use the dual form, but I digress.
None of the above Spanish words convey virginity, or lack therefore, and the same is true of their Hebrew counterparts.
Unfortunately, most Spanish translations of the Bible are themselves translated from earlier mistranslations of the Bible into other languages which themselves incorrectly translated עלמה as “virgin” rather than that language’s equivalent of “señorita”.
The Hebrew word used in the Hebrew Bible is עַלְמָה pronounced ʕal’ma (it is feminine singular and the equivalent of “señorita”), the masculine singular counterpart is עֶלֶם, ʕel’em.
The Hebrew verbal pattern is קַטְלָה (qatˤ’la).
Like señorita, the word ʕal’ma means a young, unmarried female of marriageable age, it is independent and irrespective of her virginity. Once a young woman marries, she is a señora, irrespective of whether she remains a virgin after marriage, throughout her marriage and into widowhood or divorce.
Neither “señora” nor “señorita” nor any of the other words convey virginity. They just concern gender and age and if they’re married but not if they’re virgins, whether before or after marriage.
The Bible uses the equivalent of señorita. It doesn’t use the word for a virgin in the feminine singular which would be בתולה pronounced Betulah.
That’s as simple an explanation as can be given.
@Rylo Christblood what does the Christian Bible say about cursing or blessing the Jews?
@Rylo Christblood you’re joking, right? Stop projecting.
It is Christianity which is obsessed with Judaism. The whole premise of the religion of Christianity is predicated on fulfilment of Jewish prophecy (which is misconstrued and mistranslated in any event).
It would’ve been better for Christianity to do what Islam did: start their religion from scratch and not rely on the Hebrew Bible (or the Christian New Testament) to prove the accuracy of the Quran.
The fact that the Christian New Testament predicates itself as relying on the Hebrew Bible to assert its divinity and validity, and therefore the truthfulness of Christianity, is itself what destroys the Christian New Testament’s (and therefore Christianity’s) claims.
The Quran doesn’t do that with either Christianity or Judaism because the Quran deliberately doesn’t rely on the Christian New Testament nor the Hebrew Bible, it starts from scratch. The Quran (and therefore Islam) dismisses any contradictions between the Quran and the New Testament or the Hebrew Bible as the fault of what Islam asserts is the corruption in transmission (deliberate and/or negligent) by Christians and Jews of their respective scriptures.
@Rylo Christblood does the Christian New Testament itself claim that it predicates itself on the Hebrew Scriptures? Yes or no?
@Rylo Christblood it’s a simple question:
Does the Christian New Testament predicate itself as relying on the Hebrew Bible to assert its divinity and validity, and therefore the truthfulness of Christianity? Yes or no?
Problem is that preachers , most, go to a school, college, to learn....so they are teaching what they were taught.....and the teaching wrong from way....way ..back....so these preachers need to be re- taught....
They need to Humble themselves, Repent and turn to Gd and His Truth and seek instruction from whom He sent to Instruct us, His Son/Servant Israel the Jews, His Light to the Nations.
The word that comes after העלמה is הרה which is the most important word, because is means pregnant. Even if the woman being described was a virgin, it still doesn’t help the Xtian version of event because the woman is ALREADY pregnant. הרה is in a PRESENT form
@@firstcentury1885 The sign from G-d is a prophecy for Divine Protection, not of a future Messiah.
Immanuel = “G-d is with us” is in reference to the Kingdom of Judaea, since the southern kingdom (Judaea) was about to go to war with the two northern kingdoms, Isaiah was issuing a prophesy of protection during the war in the NEAR future that G-d is “with us” (southern kingdom) if he maintains faith in G-d.
יש לך הברקה גאונית בדיוק כך. עצם העובדה שהיא הרה היא לא בתולה. כל הכבוד
The myth about a "double prophecy" has become a new strategy in Christianity. I've had arguments beyond anger with Christians about this notion. All they trying to do is to reverse engineer scripture.
@Abraham Mani There you go misinterpreting scripture once more.
@Abraham Mani Jesus is not the savior. Never was, never will be. You are the one who needs to repent because you perverting scripture.
@@bh1422 , don't feed the troll (Mani)!
B H
It is more appropriate & correct to say TRANSLATED scripture. AND Translations are saturated with contradictions and conflictions. Translations are OPINIONS nothing more or less. If U disagree come on back & say so. Last man standing is the winner in this evil world. For over 20 years I have been the loser. But that's ok. It's the end result that matters, & YES! In everything.
@Abraham Mani
Why R U telling me this? Btw. I know what the DAY OF THE LORD REALLY MEANS! Do You?? And I am very familiar with what is written in Isaiah Chapter 66 verse 15 & 16 AND Zechariah Chapter 14. < ALL VERSES!!
christianity is so twisted and evil.
@Ruth lol what's hard to understand. You follow the words of men. We follow the words of God.
You're only half correct, @Cosmic Donut.
All religions are man made, and in man's image.
Yes, they contain bits of spiritual wisdom, but also gallons and gallons and gallons of "bath water," and tons of "chaff."
You haven't addressed my comment, @Cosmic Donut.
Every single last word of Judaism was written down by a human being.
That is FACT, not opinion.
Every last claim about Judaism was made by a human being.
That is FACT, not opinion.
Every last interpretation of Judaism was made by a human being.
That is FACT, not opinion.
The same goes for every other religion on Earth.
By the way:
If God cannot take material form that makes him limited as there is something He cannot do.
@Cosmic Donut How can Messiah be king over all earth while God according to Zechariah 14 would be King over the earth? I thought God didn’t share his glory with no one.
@Cosmic Donut Why don’t you respond in regards to Messiah and God sharing a kingdom throne on earth?
Christianity is to Judaism what Christianity is to Hinduism. They are completely separate religions.
Christianity is the heretics of Judaism
The similarities between Arabic & Hebrew are striking.
The languages are both similar.
They are both Semitic languages, just different branches.
@Abraham Mani go away pagan
The Messiah must be from the Tribe of Judah and a Descendant of King David AND King Solomon
The Messiah must be a member of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:10) and a direct descendant of King David & King Solomon (2 Samuel 7:12-14; 1 Chronicles 22:9-10). Genealogy in the Bible is only passed down from father to son (Numbers 1:1-18).
There is no evidence that Jesus really had this pedigree, and the Christian Bible actually claims that he did not have a “birth-father” from the tribe of Judah descending from King David and King Solomon (Matt. 1:18-20).
Ingathering of the Jewish Exiles
When the Messiah is reigning as King of Israel, the Jews will be ingathered from their exile and will return to Israel, their homeland (Deut. 30:3; Isaiah 11:11-12; Jeremiah 30:3, 32:37; Ezekiel 11:17, 36:24).
This has clearly not yet happened and we still await its fulfillment.
Rebuilding of the Holy Temple
The Temple in Jerusalem will be rebuilt (Isaiah 2:2-3, 56:6-7, 60:7, 66:20; Ezekiel 37:26-27; Malachi 3:4; Zech. 14:20-21).
The Temple was still standing in Jesus’ day. It was destroyed 38 years after Jesus’ crucifixion and it has not yet been rebuilt.
Worldwide Reign of Peace
There will be universal disarmament and worldwide peace with a complete end to war (Micah 4:1-4; Hoseah 2:20; Isaiah 2:1-4, 60:18).
Wars have increased dramatically in the world since the start of Christianity.
Observance of the Torah Embraced by All Jews
The Messiah will reign as King at a time when all the Jewish people will observe G-d’s commandments (Ezekiel 37:24; Deut. 30:8,10; Jeremiah 31:32; Ezekiel 11:19-20, 36:26-27).
Jesus never ruled as King, nor have all Jews embraced the commandments of G-d’s Torah.
Universal Knowledge of G-d
The Messiah will rule at a time when all the people of the world will come to acknowledge and serve the one true G-d (Zechariah 3:9, 8:23,14:9,16; Isaiah 45:23, 66:23; Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 38:23; Psalm 86:9; Zeph. 3:9).
This, as well, has not yet taken place and we await its fulfillment.
A Biblical Portrait of the Messiah
All of these criteria for the Messiah are found in numerous places in the Jewish Bible. One foundational example is in the book of Ezekiel, Chapter 37:24-28:
“24 And My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd, and they will walk in My ordinances, and keep My statutes, and observe them
25 and they shall live on the land that I gave to Jacob My servant, in which your fathers have lived; and they shall live there, they, and their children, and their children’s children for ever; and My servant David will be their prince for ever.
26 Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant, which I will give them; and I will multiply them, and will set My sanctuary in their midst forever
27 and My tabernacle shall be with them, and I will be their God and they will be My people.
28 And the nations will know that I am the Lord who sanctifies Israel, when My sanctuary is in their midst forever.”
Anyone can claim to be the Messiah or a group of people can claim that someone is the Messiah. However, if that person fails to fulfill all the criteria found in the Jewish Bible, he cannot be the Messiah.
According to the Christian scriptures, Jesus seems to have understood this. As he was being crucified by the Romans, he cried out “My G-d, my G-d, why have You forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46).
I wish rabbi Tovia can read this and get his feed back on it:
There is new research emerging recently by some group claims that who was crucified is Judas Iscariot, who laid down his life for jesus and sacrificed himself on the cross to redeem him as escape goat. They come up with some proves to that : Jesus was disguising as a peasant standing next to his mother Mary without her recognizing him. Judas on the crossed looked at mary saying:" woman why do you weep behold your son"! In Mark it says that quote but attributed to Jesus. I always was puzzled as to why would Jesus be so rude to his mother while he's dying on the cross? But if it was Judas that says that to Mary it makes perfect sense!
Second thing that puzzled me in the conventional story ; why would Jesus cries out on the cross saying " God, God, why thou forsaking me?" That doesn't make sense if he's the alleged son of the God and his whole mission is to suffer and die on the cross for human's sins then why is he crying and winging to his father for neglecting him? Doesn't make sense either!
Moreover in those researches they say that Jesus' entire mission was to find a redeemer from among the people that willing to lay down his life for him. They say Jesus survived and escaped with his mother to Damascus and lived there till old age and died and buried in where people know now as John the Baptist tomb!
Judas didn't teach the idolatrous doctrine of the trinity in Matthew 28:19. Jesus did.
God God why are you forsaking me was a line stolen from the psalms. King David says that.
Jesus is Lucifer the morning star
Soooooooo true
@Abraham Mani beware christians of the wrath of god on you
Super dear Rabbi Singer. Thank you
Rabbi explanation is clear like day and night. Translation has many error
@@Love-One-Another guess Dinah was a hidden and concealed virgin after she was raped, because the Septuagint uses the same word “parthenos” to refer to Dinah after she was rped. Parthenos is also the word Christians thinks means virgin in Isaiah 7:14
@@Love-One-Another there is nothing about a virgin birth in your channel
@@Love-One-Another yea we all know about gematria doesn’t change the fact that Isaiah 7:14 isn’t about Jesus or a virgin birth
Clearly wrong lmao
language, context, and culture. these things are key to understanding the old and new testaments. when i read the old testament (and i read it several times) i most of the time didn't get what was going on. i wasnt equipped to. you cant just read it in plain english and just try to get it. it doesnt work that way
In America if you change documents you get elected...
Almah is a young woman, betulah is a virgin. Two different words.
The Original Jewish Bible: ''BEHOLD, THE YOUNG WOMAN IS WITH CHILD"
Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 7:
14Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel. ידלָ֠כֵן יִתֵּ֨ן אֲדֹנָ֥י ה֛וּא לָכֶ֖ם א֑וֹת הִנֵּ֣ה הָֽעַלְמָ֗ה הָרָה֙ וְיֹלֶ֣דֶת בֵּ֔ן וְקָרָ֥את שְׁמ֖וֹ עִמָּ֥נוּ אֵֽל:
Young woman is with child in current tense in hebrew not future tense as church modified 7:14 along with virgin lie..
Young woman is with child in current tense in hebrew not future tense as church modified 7:14 along with virgin lie..
@@Nudnik1 Exactly! This is the First Truth that I learned that Gd used to deliver me from a lifetime of Idolatry.
The Second Truth was Isaiah 9 which was also current/past tense, not future tense.
@@feliperodriguez4187 evidence for that?
The new testament is clear that Mary did not know a man at the conception of Jesus. This is the sign and Immanuel is God with us and that is what Jesus was. His coming was told in Genesis ch.3 vs.15.
Another point is
how is what happened or didn’t happen in someone’s bedroom a sign.
A sign for whom ?
It just doesn’t make sense . A sign is when it’s evident to everyone. Like the prophet says “that
For before the lad knows to reject the bad and choose the good, the ground whose two kings you dread shall be abandoned.”
Now that is a sign .
God gave a sign to Abraham and Sarah. Were you in the bedroom to make sure Isaac was Abraham’s son using your same reasoning?
*Gen.5. Adam to Noah Geniology.*
Adam = Man
Seth = Appointment
Enosh = Mortal
Cainan = Sorrow
Mahalalel = The Blessed God
Jared = Shall come down
Enoch = Teaching
Methuselah = His death shall bring
Lamech = The Despairing
Noah = Rest
*Matthew.24:*
14And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
. Selah
@@THEACANDAS
There is absolutely no sign in a young woman having a child .
In contrast to Abraham and Sarah no sign is mentioned ( because there is no evident sign in what happens in one’s bedroom)by the angel ,rather a promise that even in her old age she’ll still bear Abraham’s child .
“Then one said, “I will return to you next year,* and your wife Sarah shall have a son!” Sarah was listening at the entrance of the tent, which was behind him(Genesis 18:10).
A promise but not a sign .
This is so simple it’s ridiculous to have to explain.
@@Sola-Scriptura444
Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar,( story of Judah and Tamar)
Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab,( he means Rachab of Jericho ???)
Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth,(the Moabite)
David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife( The Story of Bat Sheeba)
There’s a reason why Mathew highlights all the questionable relationships.
Hint hint The Nazarene was also of questionable union therefore trying to answer to those mocking the immaculate conception , and not buying into the virgin birth thing.
@@zafirjoe18
*Jeremiah.8:*
4“Say to them, ‘This is what the Lord says:
“ ‘When people fall down, do they not get up?
When someone turns away, do they not return?
5Why then have these people turned away?
Why does Jerusalem always turn away?
They cling to deceit;
they refuse to return.
6I have listened attentively,
but they do not say what is right.
None of them repent of their wickedness,
saying, “What have I done?”
Each pursues their own course
like a horse charging into battle.
7Even the stork in the sky
knows her appointed seasons,
and the dove, the swift and the thrush
observe the time of their migration.
But my people do not know
the requirements of the Lord.
8“ ‘How can you say, “We are wise,
for we have the law of the Lord,”
when actually the lying pen of the scribes
has handled it falsely?
9The wise will be put to shame;
they will be dismayed and trapped.
Since they have rejected the word of the Lord,
what kind of wisdom do they have?
Christian should learn from rabbi tobiar singer. Naver lie to a rabbai. Ha ha
@@firstcentury1885 no one has ears that can hear a false prophet who has been dead for 2000 years
@@firstcentury1885 of course. Will be a mass resurrection after the messiah comes. Ezekiel is very detailed
@@firstcentury1885 really getting tired 8f your pagan christian nonsense. Go back to your idolatry. See how that works out for you
What is meant by "Book of the covenant" in Exodus Chapter 24 verse 7, AND "BLOOD OF THE COVENANT" in Exodus Chapter 24 verse 8??
DEAD SEA SCROLL: ''LOOK, THE YOUNG WOMAN HAS CONCEIVED"
Isaiah Chapter 7 : Verse 14
Therefore the LORD himself will give y[ou a sign. Loo]k, the young woman has conceived and is bearing a son, and his name will be Immanuel.
dss collection The Israel Museum Jerusalem
But what proof that Mary was a virgin? Her word? One person's word means nothing in a Jewish court of law. Circular reasoning is very bad logic.
Virgin Births are like Unicorns and Fairies, they are found only in the Myths of Man, NOT Scripture. Mary and Jesus are like the Devil and his lake of fire, they are but fabricated characters found only in the Greek Tall Tales of Man and Joe Smith Jr.'s Book of Mormon, Not the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.
Edom/Rome/Christianity/Last Beast = Enemy of Gd and His Son/Servant Israel the Jews.
@Ruth the proof is that there were 3 million people who witnessed G-d giving the 10 commandments to the Jewish people ( read Exodus 19 the last five verses, Moses is not on the mountain but with the people). And years later, the people were told to remember, not forget, what happened at Mount Sinai, and tell their children and grandchildren.( Deut. 4: 9-10). Moses at that point was a proven prophet, because all the other people were prophets, and one of the proofs, is a proven prophet testifying someone else is a prophet.
Saying your a prophet doesn't make you one.
Also christians agree the Jewish Bible is true,why should I believe the new testament?
Oh that's a commandment to tell our descendants, to this day, and until about 250 years ago, when some Jews decided they wanted to be like everybody else, nobody ever said, my parents never told me that.
The prophets accuse the People of Israel of lots of sins, but never in not believing in the revelation
@Ruth So you reject the Creator and His Holy Torah but you believe Man and his Perverted Greek Tall Tales of Man, your sin, your choice to be a willful Adversary of the Creator, your sin, your choice to stand against His Son/Servant/Light to the Nations and despise them but please give your kiddies the heads up to start practicing Bending Over and start practicing your prostrating you and your kind are going to need it. Gd warned Mankind long ago, you come against His Son/Servant Israel the Jews He is going to come against YOU!
Why did the christians corrupt the jewish scriptures tovia singer ?
To gain power
@@EdgarStyles1234 thanks bro but only if u can give me an example or two for a bit clarity i see even now the great power christians hold even in my small community
This is easier to explain in another language that has grammatical gender with a single word translation. Most English speakers viewing this video would be familiar with the most basic of Spanish (especially in the USA).
Señor = man👨🏻 איש
Señora = woman 👩🏾 אישה
Señorito = young man🧑🏽🦱 עלם
Señorita = young woman 👱🏻♀️עלמה
Niño = young boy 👦🏼 ילד
Niña = young girl 👧🏻 ילדה
Nene = male baby 👶🏼 תִּינוֹק
Nena = female baby 👶🏻 תִּינוֹקֶת
Then you can pluralize each of those Spanish words, or in Hebrew you can either pluralize, or more rarely use the dual form, but I digress.
None of the above Spanish words convey virginity, or lack therefore, and the same is true of their Hebrew counterparts.
Unfortunately, most Spanish translations of the Bible are themselves translated from earlier mistranslations of the Bible into other languages which themselves incorrectly translated עלמה as “virgin” rather than that language’s equivalent of “señorita”.
The Hebrew word used in the Hebrew Bible is עַלְמָה pronounced ʕal’ma (it is feminine singular and the equivalent of “señorita”), the masculine singular counterpart is עֶלֶם, ʕel’em.
The Hebrew verbal pattern is קַטְלָה (qatˤ’la).
Like señorita, the word ʕal’ma means a young, unmarried female of marriageable age, it is independent and irrespective of her virginity. Once a young woman marries, she is a señora, irrespective of whether she remains a virgin after marriage, throughout her marriage and into widowhood or divorce.
Neither “señora” nor “señorita” nor any of the other words convey virginity. They just concern gender and age and if they’re married but not if they’re virgins, whether before or after marriage.
The Bible uses the equivalent of señorita. It doesn’t use the word for a virgin in the feminine singular which would be בתולה pronounced Betulah.
That’s as simple an explanation as can be given.
@@Christianos_Theophile Proverbs 30:18-20
There are three things that are concealed from me, and four that I do not know;
The way of the eagle in the heavens, the way of a serpent on a rock, the way of a ship in the heart of the sea, and the way of a man with a young woman (Alma).
So is the way of an adulterous woman; she eats and wipes her mouth, and she says, "I have committed no sin."
To explain the meaning of these verses:
An eagle flys in the sky, but leaves no trace that it has ever done so.
A snake leaves no trace when it travels on the rocks, as opposed to the trace it leaves on the dirt.
A ship leaves no trace behind after it travels through the ocean.
And an adulterous woman leaves no trace that the had done anything wrong with a man, as she has already lost her token of virginity.
@@Christianos_Theophile long wait?
@@Christianos_Theophile My point was that Alma makes no comment on virginity. It can be a virgin but it can also not be. All it implies is youth.
How to we reach out to ask a question?
An infant GOD , a baby God , a teenager God a human God and A POOPING AND FILTHY GOD ... WHAT????? ;!!!???? 🤣♥
Such vile filth comes from Man and his pathetic Ego, Man worshiping his own self.
@@paulawallace8784 Jesus did need to use the bathroom occasionally
@@mikev4621 Jesus is a Man Made Phallic Idol, an Abomination to the Creator. Christianity is the Last Beast.
Please do a video on why Jews don't support a rapture until end of Great Tribulation.
Christian teachings serve only to keep Gentiles in the Dark, away from Gd and His Truth.
JESUS IS GOD ❤
God is not a man and Gentiles are obligated to keep His 7 Noahide commandments.
@@firstcentury1885 We aren't, Gd alone is Savior.
@@firstcentury1885 You are the one looking to man to save you, wake Up!
@@firstcentury1885 I depend on the CREATOR, as my posts reflect and as your posts reflect, you are all about a created creature, NOT THE CREATOR!
@@firstcentury1885 The Moshiach of the Bible is an instrument of Gd, who Gd will use to transform the World to a Utopian, I look to the Creator and His Will to be done, Wake up, you are the one who follows and worships a man, NOT me! Gd delivered me from the very thing you are afflicted with, as I sought Him and His Truth and He had MERCY on me, HE would do the same for you, if you would but turn to Him instead of your Idol.
Dear to all That Says The Ñew Testament is Fake; i have a question for you;
Which one that Correct from the Tanakh:
Ahazia become the KING at 22 Years old or 42 Years Old?
2 Chronicles 22:2 (JPOT) Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem; and his mother's name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
2 Kings 8:26 (JPOT) Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri king of Israel.
both are correct
@@Pasture_Prime what the explanation?
@@steviedalawir7152 look up Rashi
or Radak
the virgin
הָעַלְמָ֗ה (hā·‘al·māh)
Article | Noun - feminine singular
Strong's Hebrew 5959: 1) virgin, young woman 1a) of marriageable age 1b) maid or newly married ++++ There is no instance where it can be proved that this word designates a young woman who is not a virgin. (TWOT)
Song of songs 6:8-9 and many more. Also, it seems you didn't even watch the video.
There is a comment on the thread that said if you don't know Hebrew, then forever hold your piece. I suggest you do just that.
@@ronashman8463 yet he is able to explain the Bible better than you and the original poster here who made a very embarrassing mistake. Show me where R Tovia is wrong and I will become the Pope.
@@ronashman8463 how do you know your translation is accurate if you can’t read what it’s translated from?
@Ron Ashman you should learn Hebrew to Kyle the true context until then you just speak ignorance
@Rylo Christblood pray tell: what exactly is “Christian English?”
Very simply,rabbi tovia is genius!!!
Why hasn't he figured out that Talmudism is a made up religion like scientology? You're all scientologists LARPing as something ancient. Lol
Another amazing video. I still get over the mistranslation of virgin.
I know I've asked this before, but does Rabbi see any of the comments? Is this is 'official' channel? There's never a reply to comments and we have no idea what he's picking up if anything.
He hardly ever replies. Too busy doing awesome counter christian missionary work and we love him for it
ZECHARIYAH
(Book of Zechariah)
Chapter 8
22
Yea, many peoples and mighty nations shall come to seek HaShem of hosts in Jerusalem, and to entreat the favour of HaShem.
23
Thus saith HaShem of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all the languages of the nations, shall even take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying: We will go with you, for we have heard that G-d is with you
Well, "woman" USED to mean "female." But it seems like that's a subject of much debate these days...🤦♂️
The truth is that betula and alma are both words that can translate as virgin if the context points in that direction, even if virgin is neither word’s technical meaning. It should be remembered as well that in Ancient Near East culture any girl who was unmarried would be expected and assumed to be a virgin.
No, a young woman/Almah can be a virgin or even a pregnant woman like the Prophetess in Isaiah 7, it describes her age, Bethula on the other hand is the Hebrew word for Virgin, which has not a thing to with her age.
@@paulawallace8784
There is plenty of evidence to prove the Hebrew word behind “virgin” (עַלְמָה alma) in Isaiah 7 simply means “young woman.”
Is Isaiah really speaking of a virgin conception? It is often argued that if Isaiah meant “virgin,” he would have used the Hebrew word betula (בְּתוּלָ֕ה). The word betula occurs 50x in the Old Testament. Sometimes it does clearly refer to a virgin, for example:
If a man seduces a [betula] who is not betrothed and lies with her, he shall give the bride-price for her and make her his wife. If her father utterly refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the bride-price for [betulot, plural] (Exodus 22:16).
In this and similar examples, betula clearly refers to a virgin, but the context tells us this as much as the word itself, and “virgin” is not necessarily the essential meaning of the word. In fact, it seems not to be, since in a few cases the virgin-status of the betula is further spelled-out, for example:
And they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead 400 young [betulot, plural] who had not known a man by lying with him, and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan (Judges 21:12).
If betula by itself means “virgin” the clause “who had not known a man by lying with him” here seems redundant. But a more telling and illuminating case occurs in Genesis 24, because both betula and alma are used, and so more direct comparison is possible. Abraham’s servant has gone to find a wife for Isaac, and while sitting at a well he sees Rebekah.
Genesis 24:16 says,
The young woman was very attractive in appearance, a [betula] whom no man had known. She went down to the spring and filled her jar and came up.
Here again, the word betula by itself does not seem to be enough to indicate virginity, since the narrator specifies that no man had known her. But further down in the chapter, in vv. 42-43, when the servant is recounting the story to Rebekah’s family, he says,
I came today to the spring and said, ‘Yahweh, the God of my master Abraham, if now you are prospering the way that I go, behold, I am standing by the spring of water. Let the [alma] who comes out to draw water, to whom I shall say, “Please give me a little water from your jar to drink…”
Here alma seems to assume the virgin condition that betula does not. It is a summary term for Rebekah’s status.
Alma is a less common word, occurring only 9x in the Old Testament, and granted, in a few of those cases the context gives no clue one way or the other whether a virgin is in view (e.g., “The singers in front, the musicians last, between them [almot, plural] playing tambourines” - Psalm 68:25). But when the context does offer a hint, as in Genesis 24:43, alma does clearly refer to a “virgin.” Another example is Song of Solomon 6:8, “There are sixty queens and eighty concubines, and [almot plural] without number.” Here virgins (almot) are distinguished from queens and concubines. One scholar, Alec Motyer, sums up this linguistic evidence this way:
There is no ground for the common assertion that had Isaiah intended virgo intacta he would have used betula. Alma lies closer to this meaning than the other word. In fact, this is its meaning in every explicit context. Isaiah thus used the word which, among those available to him, came nearest to expressing ‘virgin birth’ and which, without linguistic impropriety, opens the door to such a meaning.
Added to this is the fact that the Greek Old Testament (which Matthew quotes in his gospel) translates alma with the Greek word parthenos (παρθένος), which does mean “virgin.” So the pre-New Testament translators of the Old Testament understood alma to mean virgin, at least in this instance, and they certainly had no theological agenda regarding Jesus. R.T. France, a bit more reticent than Motyer and saying that alma “does not explicitly mean ‘virgin,’” still acknowledges that the context in Isaiah “suggests something other than a normal childbirth within marriage,” and he assumes that it was on that basis that the Greek translators of the Old Testament rendered the word as parthenos-“virgin.”
The truth then appears to be that betula and alma are both words that can translate as virgin if the context points in that direction, even if virgin is neither word’s technical meaning. It should be remembered as well that in Ancient Near East culture any girl who was unmarried would be expected and assumed to be a virgin.
So we may conclude that Isaiah’s language is not as unambiguous as we might like, but that “virgin” is a perfectly fair and even probable translation.
In addition, it ought to be said that however open to interpretation Isaiah’s original statement may be, Matthew’s account of Jesus’ birth is certainly clear enough. Believers will of course accept Matthew’s interpretation of Isaiah as inspired by the Spirit and therefore valid, but in any case the historical fact of the virgin birth does not ultimately depend on the precise meaning of alma.
Luke, who is especially acting as a reporter of history, also recounts the virgin conception, and never cites Isaiah’s prophecy. So testimony to the virgin birth can stand quite apart from Matthew’s interpretation of Isaiah, flawed or not.
But now we need to address another issue: If Isaiah indeed foresaw and spoke concerning the birth of Jesus to the virgin Mary, how could this serve as a sign for Ahaz who died centuries before it would come to pass?
The Lord Himself Will Give You a Sign
A second reason why skeptics will deny the virgin birth as the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy is that it does not seem to work as a “sign” for Ahaz. King Ahaz would be dead long before Jesus was born.
But hold up. First, the Lord offers a sign to Ahaz that he would defend Jerusalem, but Ahaz rebelliously refused it. In reply, the prophet addresses not Ahaz personally but the house of David: “Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign . . .” (Isaiah 7:13-14).
In Hebrew, the you’s in this passage are plural. So the proper recipients of the sign are a broader category than Ahaz personally. The promise is made to the entire royal house as such.
Second, according to Isaiah 7:15-16, by the time the child spoken of in the sign grows up, the threat that Ahaz faces will be in some sense over with. “For before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land whose two kings you dread will be deserted” (v. 16).[1]
It is the case that when Jesus was born, Assyria was long gone as an empire, the northern kingdom of Israel was gone, and the kingdom of Syria as well was simply a Roman province.
The fulfillment might therefore have been further off in the future than Ahaz or even Isaiah realized, but the explicit terms of the promise were still met in Jesus’ birth.
Third, if the sign does in fact refer to a normal (non-virgin) birth which Ahaz would see, the question arises: What is the sign quality in that? A young woman will have a baby. So? Children are born all the time.
On the other hand, if Isaiah did speak of a virgin birth, but it was one that was to take place during Ahaz’s lifetime (as some actually suppose), why was the fulfillment of the sign never recorded? God had offered a sign as “deep as Sheol or high as heaven” (v. 11), but when it came to pass it was apparently so undramatic that it wasn’t worth mentioning? That seems unlikely.
The reality is that as we read on in Isaiah, we hear more in the very near context about a child being born, a son being given, who would bear the government on his shoulder and be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (9:6), and this was to be a royal son of the house of David, whose rule would have no end (9:7).
In chapter 11 we again hear about a “shoot from the stump of Jesse.” The Lord promised a sign to the house of David, a virgin bearing a son, who would represent the presence of God with his people-God with us.[2] Isaiah 7:14 does not stand in isolation, but must be read in light of Isaiah’s broader outlook. The whole scenario and context points to something quite special which may indeed lay beyond the horizon of Ahaz.
Ahaz and his house would have no royal power when this sign came to fulfillment. Because of Ahaz’s capitulation to Assyria, Judah would become a puppet-state and hardly ever again be a fully independent power, but would be subject to foreign empires in one way or another even until the time of Christ.
As Motyer puts it, “Because of [Ahaz’s] unbelief the promised Messiah would be born into poverty, heir to a meaningless throne in a conquered land.” In this regard, the sign of the virgin birth functions partly as a word of judgment:
Immanuel would have no human father, and thus Ahaz and his successors would not father the royal Savior in a physical sense. The virgin birth implies a broader judgment than this though: It is a judgment on human nature.
Not human nature as such or as created, but simply on human nature as corrupt in Adam. The rebuke on Ahaz is thus ultimately turned into a blessing, as the child born of the virgin would mean the birth of a new Adam, ultimately saving not only Israel but offering a fresh start to the whole of humanity.
@@richardmukasa8828 The Original Jewish Bible: ''BEHOLD, THE YOUNG WOMAN IS WITH CHILD"
Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 7:
14Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel. ידלָ֠כֵן יִתֵּ֨ן אֲדֹנָ֥י ה֛וּא לָכֶ֖ם א֑וֹת הִנֵּ֣ה הָֽעַלְמָ֗ה הָרָה֙ וְיֹלֶ֣דֶת בֵּ֔ן וְקָרָ֥את שְׁמ֖וֹ עִמָּ֥נוּ אֵֽל:
@@richardmukasa8828 DEAD SEA SCROLL: ''LOOK, THE YOUNG WOMAN HAS CONCEIVED"
Isaiah Chapter 7 : Verse 14
Therefore the LORD himself will give y[ou a sign. Loo]k, the young woman has conceived and is bearing a son, and his name will be Immanuel.
dss collection The Israel Museum Jerusalem
I want to ask you, are you American or Jewish? I read the information like an American. This will be my inspiration for converts to Judaism. Anyone know please reply me
Gd and His Truth are for all of Mankind, you don't need to convert to believe Gd and His Truth. Gentiles are obligated to keep the Law of Noah.
@@paulawallace8784 Oh, thank you veri much, then do Gentiles have no chance to convert to Judaism?
@@hannanelson8575Gentiles have been converting to Judaism along, have you never heard of Ruth? Of course if Gd is calling you to convert then by all means contact your local Orthodox Rabbi.
@@hannanelson8575 A convert to Judaism is fully Jewish, as Numbers 15:15 states 'the convert shall be the same as you.' However, conversion is discouraged because Jewish obligations are more restrictive and numerous.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 This decree was recently read to me. Although it is challenging, i continue to insist on using the same word to convert. Austerity appeals to me since it assists me in being a more responsible person in life, as well as the HaShem Act. I’m hoping everything goes smoothly. I’m seeking for a rabbi course to convert to Judaism.
Rabbi
It would be very interesting to here a discussion between you and Dr. Bart Ehrman
Dishonest tactics that will convince anyone who doesn't know Hebrew.
The Hebrew's borrowed their stories from ancient Sumerian tablets and edited them to tell the stories of Moses, etc. Moses did not write the (5) books --- he dies and yet told about his own death. Moses did not write in the first person.
Many ordinary people were done a disservice by the doctrines of the church and its obvious contradictions.
For it made them abandon even the true scriptures , and it’s simple message .
Namely to believe that the divinity committed adultery with a married woman (if God was to be “born “ why not from an unmarried woman?). And to accept a god who was his own father and who begot himself from his own mother , and who came into the world via a woman’s uterus, and allowed himself to be put to death, and who came alive again, and(as Paul claimed) abolished his own Torah which “ he himself “ had given.
These abhorrent doctrines, when labelled “ Bible “, caused people to turn away even from the true Scriptures; and they use this as an excuse to close their eyes to the evidence of a creator which the unbiased mind is capable of seeing.
So, @kivi zafirjoez, you prefer to worship a "god" who is wrathful, seeks vengeance, is jealous, promotes genocide, rape, slavery, and is generally speaking an infinitely powerful sadistic narcissist…
… essentially just an infinitely powerful version of donald trump, kim jong un, or vladimir putin.
@@peterblock6964 Even Rabbi Paul says ;
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” (2 Timothy 3:16)
He wasn’t talking about the gospel writers or about his own letters they were not considered scripture.
¿And just how, @@zafirjoe18, is that a response to my comment,
(which was very clearly an explicit response to your original post)?
@@peterblock6964 if you’re an atheist or a Marcion , Then I said nothing. But if you are a believer then what I wrote should resonate.
So, @@zafirjoe18, you don't have any response at all to the "god" of the OT being described as nothing more than an all powerful version of donald trump, kim jong un, or vladimir putin.
¿Why would anyone willingly worship such a demon?
Out of fear, I guess-that "god" is also described as fear inducing.
God did not reveal His Name to Abraham. In Exodus 3: 14-15, the Name of God not mentioned. What does it mean and prove?
If I remember correctly God revealed his name to Moses when he asked him and who shall I say sent me God says I am. Funny of all the times in the Bible God revealed his name why didn't God say yo Moses it's Jesus hahahaha.
@@madmanmark8387 madman, I gave reference also. Check it, then speak. There are four letters with space. Where is the Name?
@@SonOfChrist777 the name is not Jesus. Ehyeh asher eheh.
@@madmanmark8387 I did not say, Jesus is mentioned, it is a balloon from your own brain.# I don't know Hebrew but I know that in original ancient Hebrew manuscripts, no Name is mentioned, only four letters with space mentioned. The full word of those Four letters is mentioned in the New Testament. From where you brought the words you have mentioned as Name of God?
@@SonOfChrist777 then explain John when he talks about creation and seems to reference Jesus as God. It's illogical and blasphemy to call a man God for numbers 23:19 specifically says for God is not a man that lies.
It’s real simple God said that there is no other savior then me (God) yet a lot of modern Jews are waiting for a human a man the messiah to come & deliver them but in contradiction they bash “Christians for believing the savior the messiah was God” it makes you think who actually has the right Idea
Gd's Light to the Nations, the Jews teach that GD ALONE IS SAVIOR, GD ALONE IS REDEEMER just as HE stated, the Moshiach of the Bible is but an instrument of Gd's Will, he comes at the End of the Days and his teachings of Gd and His Holy Torah will transform the World to a Utopia where all of Mankind Rightly worships the Creator and Him Alone, that TO HIM AND HIM ALONE, EVERY KNEE SHALL KNEEL AND EVERY TONGUE SHALL SWEAR!
However Christianity, the cult of Jesus worships him, a Man Made Phallic Idol and a Trio of false deities as well as his mother, other dead people, Angels, Paintings, crackers, a dirty painted sheet and wooden sticks. Christianity is Blasphemous, Idolatrous, Heretical, Polytheistic, Pagan and Antisemitic. It SPEAKS AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, A HALLMARK OF THE LAST BEAST!
@@paulawallace8784 So you think god doesn’t have an associate/partner?
@@THEACANDAS The Jewish God is one. He is not two or more, but one, unified in a manner which surpasses any unity that is found in the world; i.e., He is not one in the manner of a general category which includes many individual entities, nor one in the way that the body is divided into different portions and dimensions. Rather, He is unified, and there exists no unity similar to His in this world.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 So you don’t believe that he has an associate/partner?
@@THEACANDAS God has no partners, no.
Not all young women are virgins; and not all virgins are young women. Simple.
Jews should read the New testament and decide for themselves . Don't listen to anyone elses biased opinion.
They have, they know it for what it is, a Greco Roman propaganda text that stands against Gd and Scripture. Christianity is pure Pagan Idolatry, to a T, it alone fits the description of the morphing Last Beast.
i read it thanks to rabi tovia singer , and i praised the god of israel who brought me as jewish woman and inlighting me to know him and be his devoted daughter 😍
Gezera Shava Methode apply on alma case ( Isaiah 7:14)
Example from
Genesis 37:15 we read
Then a man found him, and behold, he was straying in the field, and the man asked him, saying, "What are you looking for?"
טווַיִּמְצָאֵ֣הוּ אִ֔ישׁ וְהִנֵּ֥ה תֹעֶ֖ה בַּשָּׂדֶ֑ה וַיִּשְׁאָלֵ֧הוּ הָאִ֛ישׁ לֵאמֹ֖ר מַה־תְּבַקֵּֽשׁ
Rashi states here as interpretation
Then a man found him: This is [the angel] Gabriel, as it is said: “And the man Gabriel” (Dan. 9:21). [From Tanchuma Vayeshev 2]
If we using Gezera Shava Methode to determine WHO is the Alma is very easy ? THE WORD ALMA appear in EXODUS 2: AND WE CAN EASY TO KNOW WHO IS THE ALMA NAME: MIRYAM; she will give bear a son and call his name Immanuel
If you ask Why using Exodus 2 as the Connection With Isaiah 7:14 : my answer is simple because Moses is the typical of the Messiah
( as the first Redemer was so The Last Redemer is)
One Other things: According to talmud Yevamot 64a..Sarah the wife of Abraham not have a womb
So if you say the virgin birth is a myth : how about sarah the old lady without womb?
Immanuel was Isaiah's own son, his young wife the Almah is ALREADY PREGNANT!
In the Holy Bible, in Hebrews, is all the facts there it know of the letter to the Hebrews is from the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob forever!
Paul wrote.
Jesus is LORD
More meanings for עַלמָה
It means Young Girl that never got married that means Virgin !!
@@azhajouj Almah in Hebrew means Young Woman, Bethula in Hebrew means Virgin. The young woman in Isaiah 7 is ALREADY PREGNANT, she has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband Isaiah and CONCEIVED, IS WITH CHILD, PREGNANT NO LONGER A VIRGIN!
Immanuel was Isaiah's own son.
@@paulawallace8784 עלמה it means young girl that never married before check thet hebrew dictionary
@@azhajouj No, it means young woman, period. It has not a thing to do with either she is married, or a virgin or not a virgin. Again the young woman in Isaiah 7 is the Prophetess, the wife of Isaiah, she is ALREADY PREGNANT, the child is Isaiah's son who he calls Maher-shalal-hash-baz just as Gd ordered him to do.
@@paulawallace8784 השם שלו יש לו משמעות . תתרגם את השם לאנגלית
As the rabbi says learn Hebrew and you will understand what is written. If you don't know something you logically have to learn to understand. People in ancient days could speak obviously,but most were illiterate they weren't taught how to read whatever the language.
Dale Norman
Why does my name make the agents of antichrist seethe and rage??
Does woman=female in Hebrew?
James Bond!? 😂 The anthropologist Wallace lied like crazy and bought many Egyptian antiques. Police were called and a bunch of anthropologist were angry. BUT he got the scroll of Ani which was intact with vivid colors also. It was the best kept copy from the book of the dead.
@Abraham Mani Have you even read the Old and New Testament and do you know Hebrew? I think you are just listening to someone else who not did that either. I'm not going down the cliff with you all. Blind leading the blind. Respectfully.
Rabbi pls comment on Gen. 6 & the Book of Enoch. Thank you.
The Nephilim were Hedonistic men who did what ever they so desired, their behavior so offended the Creator that it made Him want to blot out Man, but then Gd found Noah.
The Book of Enoch is NOT Biblical, it is for entertainment not spiritual edification.
The "Book of Enoch" is part of the Catholic Bible, that is NOT scripture that was given to mankind by God, therefore it is ineffectual for spiritual learning and growth. .
Alternatively, it is discussed on tenak talk episode 968
@@curly_dock: It is a religious book that, in my experience, only Catholics quote from, so I may have mistakenly thought that it's part of the Catholic Bible. My apologies.
@@curly_dock: OK, thanks for that info!
Revelation13 Eve & Cain >and the dragon stood before the *Woman* who was ready to be delivered. Ready to devour her child from the moment he was born and she brought forth a *Man~ Child* who was to rule *All Nations* with a rod of Iron and her child was caught up to G_d unto his Throne! >the woman of the Apocalypse!! The New Testament prophecy!!
But hold up. First, the Lord offers a sign to Ahaz that he would defend Jerusalem, but Ahaz rebelliously refused it.
In reply, the prophet addresses not Ahaz personally but the house of David: “Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also?
Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign . . .” (Isaiah 7:13-14). In Hebrew, the you’s in this passage are plural. So the proper recipients of the sign are a broader category than Ahaz personally.
The promise is made to the entire royal house as such.
Second, according to Isaiah 7:15-16, by the time the child spoken of in the sign grows up, the threat that Ahaz faces will be in some sense over with. “For before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land whose two kings you dread will be deserted” (v. 16).[1]
It is the case that when Jesus was born, Assyria was long gone as an empire, the northern kingdom of Israel was gone, and the kingdom of Syria as well was simply a Roman province.
The fulfillment might therefore have been further off in the future than Ahaz or even Isaiah realized, but the explicit terms of the promise were still met in Jesus’ birth.
Third, if the sign does in fact refer to a normal (non-virgin) birth which Ahaz would see, the question arises: What is the sign quality in that?
A young woman will have a baby. So? Children are born all the time. On the other hand, if Isaiah did speak of a virgin birth, but it was one that was to take place during Ahaz’s lifetime (as some actually suppose), why was the fulfillment of the sign never recorded?
God had offered a sign as “deep as Sheol or high as heaven” (v. 11), but when it came to pass it was apparently so undramatic that it wasn’t worth mentioning? That seems unlikely.
The reality is that as we read on in Isaiah, we hear more in the very near context about a child being born, a son being given, who would bear the government on his shoulder and be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (9:6), and this was to be a royal son of the house of David, whose rule would have no end (9:7). In chapter 11 we again hear about a “shoot from the stump of Jesse.”
The Lord promised a sign to the house of David, a virgin bearing a son, who would represent the presence of God with his people-God with us.[2] Isaiah 7:14 does not stand in isolation, but must be read in light of Isaiah’s broader outlook. The whole scenario and context points to something quite special which may indeed lay beyond the horizon of Ahaz.
Ahaz and his house would have no royal power when this sign came to fulfillment. Because of Ahaz’s capitulation to Assyria, Judah would become a puppet-state and hardly ever again be a fully independent power, but would be subject to foreign empires in one way or another even until the time of Christ.
As Motyer puts it, “Because of [Ahaz’s] unbelief the promised Messiah would be born into poverty, heir to a meaningless throne in a conquered land.” In this regard, the sign of the virgin birth functions partly as a word of judgment: Immanuel would have no human father, and thus Ahaz and his successors would not father the royal Savior in a physical sense.
The virgin birth implies a broader judgment than this though: It is a judgment on human nature. Not human nature as such or as created, but simply on human nature as corrupt in Adam. The rebuke on Ahaz is thus ultimately turned into a blessing, as the child born of the virgin would mean the birth of a new Adam, ultimately saving not only Israel but offering a fresh start to the whole of humanity.
Keep the 7 Noahide commandments and leave Jews alone.
"But hold up. First, the Lord offers a sign to Ahaz that he would defend Jerusalem, but Ahaz rebelliously refused it. In reply, the prophet addresses not Ahaz personally but the house of David: “Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign . . .” (Isaiah 7:13-14)."
I don't understand how those words ("Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also?") are supposed to make sense if they're directed at anyone other than Ahaz. It wasn't the future kings of Israel who were trying God's patience in that moment, it was Ahaz.
_______
"In Hebrew, the you’s in this passage are plural"
When jews and noahides point out that the word "lamo" in Isaiah 53:8 is plural, the response I've seen from christians is to point to examples in which plural hebrew words can have singular usages. So couldn't one make the same case here?
Regarding your second point, I’m curious if you have a theory as to why Isaiah chooses a specific point in the child’s life as the temporal marker, rather than saying something like “before the child is born, the land of the two kings… etc.” If the event Isaiah describes was supposed to take place during the early lifetime of the child, then it makes some sense why Isaiah would choose a specific point in the child’s life as the reference point (the point at which the child comes to know right from wrong). But if the event Isaiah describes was supposed to take place centuries before the child was even born, it make very little sense why Isaiah would say “before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good”. This seems to strongly imply that the life of the child would be contemporary with destruction of the northern armies.
Regarding your third point, you ask a good question. It’s not clear to me how a child born of regular birth could qualify as a sign, though I also don’t see how a child born of a virgin could be a sign either since the mother’s virginity isn’t verifiable. It seems to me that Isaiah believed that a child could be a sign without being born of a virgin, since he says in Isaiah 8, “Behold, I and the children whom the Lord has given me are *_signs_* and portents in Israel from the Lord of hosts, who dwells on Mount Zion. (Isaiah 8:18)
Do you have an explanation as to how Isaiah’s children were sings? The answer will probably shed some light as to how the Immanuel child could be a sign.
@@chad969
You have preferences which you want to impose on the prophet in order force to prophecy to support your beliefs. There is no reason why Isaiah would have said that before child is born instead of saying that before the child knows right from wrong. Indeed, by the time Jesus matured, the Kingdoms were no more.
I understand that you would have preferred another phrase such as before the child is born. But the Prophet chose otherwise.
Lastly are Isaiah's children known as MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE?
@@richardmukasa8828 Isaiah tells that Gd, the Wondrous Counselor, the Mighty Gd, the Everlasting Father called his son-in-law Hezekiah the Prince of Peace. Isaiah 7 tells of Immanuel and his already PREGNANT mother, who has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband Isaiah and CONCEIVED, IS WITH CHILD, PREGNANT, NO LONGER A VIRGIN, his maturity levels stood as the Signs of the fulfillment of the prophecy his father uttered, that GD WOULD BE WITH JUDAH and take care of it's 2 Enemies, Rezin the King of Aram and Pekah, the son Remaliah, the King of Israel, and HE did just that.
What did in your opinion , Paul or Mathew do this what did they gain? What’s the point of starting your own religion? Did they not believe in GOD?
יד לָכֵן יִתֵּן אֲדֹנָי הוּא, לָכֶם--אוֹת: הִנֵּה הָעַלְמָה, הָרָה וְיֹלֶדֶת בֵּן, וְקָרָאת שְׁמוֹ, עִמָּנוּ אֵל 14 Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: behold, the young woman shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Isaiah speaks of his son-in-law, whose reign he called a Great Light: ''FOR A CHILD HAS BEEN BORN TO US, A SON GIVEN TO US, AND THE AUTHORITY IS UPON HIS SHOULDER, AND THE WONDROUS ADVISER, THE MIGHTY GD, THE EVERLASTING FATHER, CALLED HIS NAME, ''THE PRINCE OF PEACE"
5For a child has been born to us, a son given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, called his name, "the prince of peace." הכִּי־יֶ֣לֶד יֻלַּד־לָ֗נוּ בֵּן נִתַּן־לָ֔נוּ וַתְּהִ֥י הַמִּשְׂרָ֖ה עַל־שִׁכְמ֑וֹ וַיִּקְרָ֨א שְׁמ֜וֹ פֶּ֠לֶא יוֹעֵץ֙ אֵ֣ל גִּבּ֔וֹר אֲבִי־עַ֖ד שַׂר־שָׁלֽוֹם:
If we using the Geizera Shava Method: We can determine who is the Alma
Por favor en español.....
Peccato.posso parlare solo italiano
Why would a young lady given birth to a son be remarkable ? And used a a sign? Any young lady could give birth. Tell me why was this a sign? Could not anyone name their son Emmanuel? I know a lot of Mexicans name Jesus. What's the point I am making? It was a virgin birth, that's why it was remarkable, that's why it was a sign
"It was a virgin birth, that's why it was remarkable, that's why it was a sign"
So then Isaiah and his children were also born of a virgin too, right?
Here am I, and the children the Lord has given me. We are *_signs_* and symbols in Israel from the Lord Almighty, who dwells on Mount Zion. (Isaiah 8:18)
Except Scripture in no uncertain terms testify that she is ALREADY PREGNANT, she has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband and HAS CONCEIVED/IS WITH CHILD/PREGNANT, NO LONGER A VIRGIN. The child/Lad's maturity levels are what stood as the SIGNS for the fulfillment of the Prophecy his father Isaiah uttered to King Ahaz, that GD PROMISED TO BE WITH JUDAH AND TAKE CARE OF IT'S 2 ENEMIES, Rezin the King of Aram and Pekah the son of Remaliah, the King of Israel. And HE did just that!
The Hebrew Bible and the Jewish sages describe the Messiah in more detail than many realize. From these writings we can know his genealogical background, place of birth, the timeframe of his arrival, and other identifying characteristics. These credentials enable us to identify the Messiah and to recognize imposters. Only a few can be listed below; there are many others. Early rabbis and sages recognized all of these passages as referring to the Messiah.
Messiah would be from the tribe of Judah: Genesis 49:10 (Hebrew)
Messiah would be a descendant of King David: 2 Samuel 7:12-16 (Hebrew)
Messiah was to be born at Bethlehem:
Micah 5:2 (Hebrew - Micah 5:1)
Messiah would arrive before the destruction of the Second Temple: Daniel 9:24-27 (Hebrew)
Messiah would present himself by riding on a donkey: Zechariah 9:9 (Hebrew)
Messiah would be tortured to death: Psalm 22:1-31 (Hebrew)
Messiah’s life would match a particular description, including suffering, silence at his arrest and trial, death and burial in a rich man’s tomb, and resurrection: Isaiah 52:13-53:12 (Hebrew - Is. 52; Hebrew - Is. 53)
In regard to lineage, birthplace, time, and lifestyle, Jesus matched the Messianic expectations of the Hebrew Scriptures.
The record of this fulfillment is to be found in the pages of the New Testament. But several other factors combine to further substantiate the Messiahship of Jesus.
If Jesus had never made the claim to be the Messiah, why would we bother to try and prove that he was?
In the first place, he claimed to be the Messiah! When a woman said to him, "I know that Messiah is coming," he replied, "I who speak to you am he" (John 4:25-26). Naturally, that doesn't prove anything one way or the other. But if Jesus had never made the claim to be the Messiah, why would we bother to try and prove that he was? His own claim lays the groundwork for the rest of the evidence.
If these "credentials" in the Hebrew Scriptures are so clear, why didn't most Jewish people believe in Jesus?
To understand this, one must realize that by the time of Jesus, the messianic hope had become greatly politicized in the minds of the people. They were seeking deliverance from the tyranny of Rome. Although the Scripture spoke both of the sufferings and of the victories of the messiah, the victorious aspect had become uppermost in the minds of the common people because of Roman domination. This "lopsided" view of the Messiah has stuck with many Jewish people, and the politicization of the messianic hope has continued to this day.
This is not to say that all Jewish people rejected the claims of Jesus. On the contrary, all the first followers of Jesus were Jews. In fact, the rabbis of that time and afterwards were well aware of the many messianic prophecies which Christians claimed were fulfilled in Jesus. So, for instance, although the Talmudic rabbis concurred that Isaiah 53 was a prediction of the Messiah, by medieval times the pressure from those who applied this prophecy to Jesus was so great that Rashi, one of the greatest medieval Biblical scholars, reinterpreted the chapter and said it referred to the nation of Israel. This interpretation is maintained today by many Jewish scholars, though it only dates back to the Middle Ages.
What makes Jesus different from others who have claimed to be the Messiah?
There have been false messiahs throughout Jewish history. Among the most prominent were Bar Kokhba who led a revolt against Rom (AD 132-135) and Shabbetai Zevi, a self proclaimed messiah of the seventeenth century.
During Bar Kokhba's revolt, one of the most famous figures in Jewish history, Rabbi Akiva, proclaimed him to be "King Messiah." Unfortunately, Bar Kochba, Akiva and thousands of Jews were killed in AD 135. when the Romans stormed the stronghold of Betar.
Shabbetai Zevi, on the other hand, was a self-proclaimed messiah. Flourishing in seventeenth-century Europe, the Shabbatean movement spread among both the common people and the rabbis. But when Shabbetai Zevi was arrested in 1666 by the Sultan of Turkey, he converted to Islam rather than face death. We have been tragically wrong before, so it is not surprising that hard evidence should be sought for believing in Jesus.
Jesus' life stands in sharp contrast to those of the false messiahs.
Jesus' life stands in sharp contrast to those of the false messiahs, and it is a positive demonstration of what we would expect the Messiah to do. Jesus worked many miracles of healing, bringing wholeness into people's lives, forgiving sin and restoring relationships. In contrast to Shabbetai Zevi, for instance, Jesus carried out the Law of Moses as a devout Jew. And in contrast to Bar Kokhba, although Jesus died he was also resurrected!
Jesus rose from the dead.
The resurrection is a piece of additional evidence, and it is perhaps the most convincing vindication of Jesus' claims. Israeli scholar, Pinchas Lapide, wrote a book that has attracted no small amount of attention in the Jewish community. In The Resurrection of Jesus: A Jewish Perspective, Lapide argued that the resurrection of Jesus is well within the realm of possibility. After all, he reasoned, the Hebrew Scriptures give a number of accounts of people coming back to life. Why not Jesus as well? Regrettably, Lapide fails to note that the resurrection of Jesus is described in terms that go far beyond the resuscitations of the other stories. He fails to come to grips with the fact that Jesus predicted his own resurrection, which vindicated his claims to Messiahship.
Throughout history, people have explained away the resurrection as either non-historical ("It never happened") or as non-supernatural ("Here's how it could have happened"). But these explanations have not been successful. Run through the possibilities yourself and see which makes the most sense. Did the Roman authorities steal the body of Jesus from the tomb? Then why didn't they produce it when the word spread that Jesus was risen? Or maybe the disciples stole it. But could such a fabrication on their part account for the change in their attitude? Three days earlier, they were disillusioned, defeated idealists who had hoped that Jesus would usher in a new world order. Could a lie, which they knew to be a lie, now account for their hope, their boldness in the face of official persecution, and for the high ethical standards. Perhaps Jesus never died; perhaps he just fainted on the cross and revived in the tomb. This idea was popularized in the book The Passover Plot by Hugh J. Schonfield. Unfortunately, the author overlooked the fact that the Romans pierced Jesus’ side, which would have most certainly killed him. Also, there was a contingent of Roman soldiers guarding the tomb as well as a huge stone that blocked its entrance. There was no way that a resuscitated Jesus could have escaped and then convinced hundreds of skeptical eyewitnesses that he had conquered death forever! Or was it all a hallucination? It must have been quite a hallucination to be seen by vastly different kinds of people at different times of day in many different places. You might be able to fool one person, but can you fool 500 who saw him at one time? And, unlike hallucinations, these appearances of the resurrected Jesus stopped as suddenly as they started, 40 days after the resurrection had taken place.
The only satisfactory explanation is that the resurrection actually occurred, just as the record says. And if that’s the case, it’s a solid reason for accepting the Messiahship of Jesus.
Jesus transforms people's lives.
Because he provides atonement for sin and reconciliation with God, Jesus brings peace, joy, and purpose into people's lives. Apart from faith in him, there is no basis for true peace or direction, for, as the psalmist says, "Man is estranged from the womb." That this estrangement is healed by the reconciling ministry of Jesus is the common experience of those who believe in him.
Between the objective evidence of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, and the subjective verification in our own lives-we think there's ample evidence that Jesus was who he claimed to be!
כִּי-יֶלֶד יֻלַּד-לָנוּ, בֵּן נִתַּן-לָנוּ, וַתְּהִי הַמִּשְׂרָה, עַל-שִׁכְמוֹ; וַיִּקְרָא שְׁמוֹ פֶּלֶא יוֹעֵץ, אֵל גִּבּוֹר, אֲבִי-עַד, שַׂר-שָׁלוֹם. 5 For a child is born unto us, a son is given unto us; and the government is upon his shoulder; and his name is called Pele-joez-el-gibbor-Abi-ad-sar-shalom;
The translation of the boy that will be born doesn't make a sense. in Hebrew it means Wonder Counselor , Hero God , Everlasting Father , and Peace minister ..
@@azhajouj Isaiah speaks of his son-in-law, whose reign he called a Great Light: ''FOR A CHILD HAS BEEN BORN TO US, A SON GIVEN TO US, AND THE AUTHORITY IS UPON HIS SHOULDER, AND THE WONDROUS ADVISER, THE MIGHTY GD, THE EVERLASTING FATHER, CALLED HIS NAME, ''THE PRINCE OF PEACE"
5For a child has been born to us, a son given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, called his name, "the prince of peace." הכִּי־יֶ֣לֶד יֻלַּד־לָ֗נוּ בֵּן נִתַּן־לָ֔נוּ וַתְּהִ֥י הַמִּשְׂרָ֖ה עַל־שִׁכְמ֑וֹ וַיִּקְרָ֨א שְׁמ֜וֹ פֶּ֠לֶא יוֹעֵץ֙ אֵ֣ל גִּבּ֔וֹר אֲבִי־עַ֖ד שַׂר־שָׁלֽוֹם:
@@azhajouj Isaiah shares that Gd called his son-in-law good King Hezekiah the Prince of Peace.
@@paulawallace8784 in Hebrew it means Wonder Counselor , Hero God , Everlasting Father , and Peace minister .
@@paulawallace8784 The truth his name can be undestood by christians as exactly translated . I cant blame them even though I am a Muslim
muslim says mariam was a virgin .
BEFORE THE FIRST ENSLAVER ( TITUS) was born, the FIRST Redeemer was born.
Genesis Rabbah 85:1 variant given by Theodor, p 1030.
MESIAH BORN NEAR THE TIME OF TITUS. TITUS DESTROY THE TEMPLE ON 70AD.
WHO IS THE MESSIAH?🤔
Not your false prophet.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 who do you think?..
@@dalawirdavid8567 I think it is nonsense to question from the midrash against a sefer halaha.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 how can it be nonsese? You just dont admit that. Or are you want to say Bar Kokbba is the Messiah?
Even one Of the Great Kabbalist Yitzhak Kaduri leaving a note before He pass away; He Write the Name of the Messiah : YESHUA
( Maybe you will say it's fake, it's up to you because if We give the evidence even according by your Sage writing you will say it was poluted and corrupted)
If you dont admint that fact ; Let be see on the Future When The Messiah take Ruler of The World: We Will See Who is Him?😇 He is Jesus or Someone Else; Just wait
Philip A said, and referring to what is written in Daniel Chapter 7 verse 13 and re: what Abraham Mani said re: verse 13, Anyway Philip A said,
"This kind of interpretation of prophesy goes back at least to St. Augustine. It is not new."
My suggestion 2 Phillip A IS
Don't interpret it. It means what it says. The problem is, it means different things to different people. Now be truthful & say it means what U say it means. Also, compare verse 9 in Daniel Chapter 7 with verses 12 through 16 in Revelation Chapter 1. Now as far as WHO that was/IS, read what is written in verse 17 & 18.
We will using the Gezeira Shava Methode Using TORAH to determine who is the Alma?
this Methode is introduce by Rabbi Hillel 🤗
This Methode is Using on TALMUD
Gezeira shava - is a verbal analogy. If the same word or phrase appears in two places in the Torah, we may infer on the basis of “verbal analogy” that the same law must apply in the other case, as well
1. The Alma Will take care and Nurse THE GREAT HOUSE SON
(Exodus 2:9)
2. The Alma will Drew out The Son From the Water (Exodus 2:10)
3. The Alma name is Miryam
(Number 26:59)
4. The Alma are the Naarah and Betulah ( Genesis 24:16,43)
So It very Clear The Alma is Refering To Miryam the Mother of YESHUA. 🤗
Please explain how this is a sign that alleviated Ahaz's concerns about his predicament...since that is what the text says the sign concerns
@@jimnasium3979 when the two kings totaly Forsaken? Read the History; thats in 4BC during the Romans Occupy . during that time Jesus is about 2 Years Old.
the King of Judah is Heord Archelaus
the King of Samaria is Philip The tetarch,.
the two Kingdom Totaly Forsaken during Jesus time
Numbers 24:24 (DRA) They shall come in galleys from Italy, they shall overcome the Assyrians, and shall waste the Hebrews, and at the last they themselves also shall perish.
Your proof is no proof at all - quite the opposite. As well as Rebecca being an "alma" (young woman), the Bible specifically states that she was also a "betula" (a virgin) and that no man had intimate knowledge of her (Gen. 24:16). If the word "alma" meant virgin, the Bible would not have also gone to pains to point out that she was a virgin. Not every young woman is a betula and not every betula is a young woman. Rebecca was both. The woman referred to in Isaiah was not.
Don't you find it curious that every other time (and there are dozens) that the Hebrew Bible uses the word "alma" the Christian translation is "young woman"?
@@steviedalawir7152 You completely ignored the TRUTH of who the 2 Enemies were, as it is clearly stated: THE 2 ENEMIES WERE REZIN THE KING OF ARAM AND PEKAH THE SON REMALIAH, THE KING OF ISRAEL!
1And it came to pass in the days of Ahaz son of Jotham son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin, king of Aram, and Pekah son of Remaliah, king of Israel, marched on Jerusalem to wage war against it, and he could not wage war against it. אוַיְהִ֡י בִּימֵ֣י אָ֠חָז בֶּן־יוֹתָ֨ם בֶּן־עֻזִּיָּ֜הוּ מֶ֣לֶךְ יְהוּדָ֗ה עָלָ֣ה רְצִ֣ין מֶֽלֶךְ־אֲ֠רָם וּפֶ֨קַח בֶּן־רְמַלְיָ֚הוּ מֶֽלֶךְ־יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ יְר֣וּשָׁלִַ֔ם לַמִּלְחָמָ֖ה עָלֶ֑יהָ וְלֹ֥א יָכֹ֖ל לְהִלָּחֵ֥ם עָלֶֽיהָ:
2And it was told to the House of David, saying, "Aram has allied itself with Ephraim," and his heart and the heart of his people trembled as the trees of the forest tremble because of the wind. בוַיֻּגַּ֗ד לְבֵ֚ית דָּוִד֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר נָ֥חָה אֲרָ֖ם עַל־אֶפְרָ֑יִם וַיָּ֚נַע לְבָבוֹ֙ וּלְבַ֣ב עַמּ֔וֹ כְּנ֥וֹעַ עֲצֵי־יַ֖עַר מִפְּנֵי־רֽוּחַ:
3And the Lord said to Isaiah, "Now go out toward Ahaz, you and Shear-Yashuv your son, to the edge of the conduit of the upper pool, to the road of the washer's field. גוַיֹּ֣אמֶר יְהֹוָה֘ אֶל־יְשַׁעְיָהוּ֒ צֵא־נָא֙ לִקְרַ֣את אָחָ֔ז אַתָּ֕ה וּשְׁאָ֖ר יָשׁ֣וּב בְּנֶ֑ךָ אֶל־קְצֵ֗ה תְּעָלַת֙ הַבְּרֵכָ֣ה הָֽעֶלְיוֹנָ֔ה אֶל־מְסִלַּ֖ת שְׂדֵ֥ה כוֹבֵֽס:
4And you shall say to him, "Feel secure and calm yourself, do not fear, and let your heart not be faint because of these two smoking stubs of firebrands, because of the raging anger of Rezin and Aram and the son of Remaliah. דוְאָמַרְתָּ֣ אֵ֠לָיו הִשָּׁמֵ֨ר וְהַשְׁקֵ֜ט אַל־תִּירָ֗א וּלְבָֽבְךָ֙ אַל־יֵרַ֔ךְ מִשְּׁנֵ֨י זַנְב֧וֹת הָֽאוּדִ֛ים הָֽעֲשֵׁנִ֖ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה בָּֽחֳרִי־אַ֛ף רְצִ֥ין וַֽאֲרָ֖ם וּבֶן־רְמַלְיָֽהוּ:
5Since Aram planned harm to you, Ephraim and the son of Remaliah, saying: היַ֗עַן כִּֽי־יָעַ֥ץ עָלֶ֛יךָ אֲרָ֖ם רָעָ֑ה אֶפְרַ֥יִם וּבֶן־רְמַלְיָ֖הוּ לֵאמֹֽר:
6'Let us go up against Judah and provoke it, and annex it to us; and let us crown a king in its midst, one who is good for us,' ונַֽעֲלֶ֚ה בִֽיהוּדָה֙ וּנְקִיצֶ֔נָּה וְנַבְקִעֶ֖נָּה אֵלֵ֑ינוּ וְנַמְלִ֥יךְ מֶ֙לֶךְ֙ בְּתוֹכָ֔הּ אֵ֖ת בֶּן־טָֽבְאַֽל:
7So said the Lord God, 'Neither shall it succeed, nor shall it come to pass. זכֹּ֥ה אָמַ֖ר אֲדֹנָ֣י יֱהֹוִ֑ה לֹ֥א תָק֖וּם וְלֹ֥א תִֽהְיֶֽה:
8For the head of Aram is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and in another sixty-five years, Ephraim shall be broken, no longer to be a people. חכִּ֣י רֹ֚אשׁ אֲרָם֙ דַּמֶּ֔שֶׂק וְרֹ֥אשׁ דַּמֶּ֖שֶׂק רְצִ֑ין וּבְע֗וֹד שִׁשִּׁ֚ים וְחָמֵשׁ֙ שָׁנָ֔ה יֵחַ֥ת אֶפְרַ֖יִם מֵעָֽם:
9And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is the son of Remaliah; if you do not believe, it is because you cannot be believed." טוְרֹ֚אשׁ אֶפְרַ֙יִם֙ שֹֽׁמְר֔וֹן וְרֹ֥אשׁ שֹֽׁמְר֖וֹן בֶּן־רְמַלְיָ֑הוּ אִם לֹ֣א תַֽאֲמִ֔ינוּ כִּ֖י לֹ֥א תֵֽאָמֵֽנוּ:
Thank you Rabbi
7.39
So Jewish Rabbi do not believe that the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary and she conceived ? How about Can God became a man ( Messiah) to save man kind( Humans)?
God is not a man and Gentiles are obligated to keep His 7 Noahide commandments.
Of course not heriah. You said yourself 'Jewish rabbi'. Not christian but Jewish
The Moshiach of the Bible is a mortal man of flesh and blood who Gd will use as an instrument of His Will just as He used Moses, just as He used David his forefather. The Moshiach of the Bible comes at the End of the Days, not before, his teachings of Gd and His Holy Torah will transform the World to a UTOPIA WHERE PEACE REIGNS AND WAR IS NO MORE, but as Jesus said, he did NOT come to bring PEACE BUT DIVISION to set family one against the other, the very reason why Gd sends Elijah, to come and UNDO ALL THE DIVISION FOSTERED BY FALSE TEACHERS, lest HE smite the Earth with utter destruction. As this Hedonistic, Pagan Filled World of DIVISION, CHAOS, MAYHEM AND ANOTHER BLOODY WAR going on, it all TESTIFIES that Neither ELIJAH Nor MOSHIACH have yet come, so far only fakes have shown up.
of course not god of israel warned that no mortal can see him if that occured that man would die only by his vision of god, and our god doesnt need human sucrifies that way he reject the sacrifie of izahk by abraham which was a test to show the entire world that he is the true god and these canbial gods who were given human to the alter read the hebrew bible the word of god of israel
Based on all the comments about what the 3 letter English word God means, and being that Hashem means, the name, AND with all of these hyphenated GD'S i.e., e.g., G-D;G_D; G-d; G_d; g-d & g_d, then the man almost everybody calls/says is G-zus should have told his disciples this. When You pray, say Tetragrammaton in heaven, hallowed be your Tetragrammaton. Luke 11:1-2. Why is is not ONE of You Rabbi Trail SINger flockers will tell me what those hyphenated GD'S MEAN?? WHEN did this hyphenization begin?? WHY is it ALL OF YA type God then somewhere else type at least ONE of these, > G-D;G_D; G-d; G_d; g-d; g_d. ?
So in the Torah
Hashem says I Hashem love the Jews only
I Hashem am coining a word to describe the lowly non-Jews Goyeem
Don’t mix with them
I plan to send you my favorite children to heaven
While the rest by default will go to Hell
Very hard to believe that Hashem and not the Jews of the time authored those words
No it doesnt say love tge Jews only you keep misrepresenting Judaism
@@saul2491 Judaism is only about Jews Israel and Hebrew period the rest of the universe doesn’t interest the author of the book
no one said that sir , on the contrary the jews sent by the true god of israel to proclaim him to the gentils when the messiah arrives with god willing everyone will now him inculding you , but the jews are his chosen people that a fact and for it we suffered more than 2000 years for being loyal to our beloved god of israel
7:00
hahahaha AGAIN! afraid to let jews see my other comment? YOU PEOPLE GOT THE MESSAGE and the TRUTH If you want to hide my message its up to you... I have no control over your insecurities... I did my part, i wash my hands... Now this is between You and the Holy Spirit of God...
IS this YOU and your Dad?????...Did you win?
2: Uriel,
@ > "Carl Tuckerson great come back! So full of wisdom. I am convinced. Lol "
Urinal Uriel. Weak response to my, as you say, great comeback. Now I am CONVINCED U R F O S. LOL 🤣 😂 😊 😂 < LOL LOL 😊
Quran also doesn't talk about virgin mary and virgin birth . Quran says Esa /Jesus is the revelation which was revealed to Miriam pbuh, she was the prophet of God. The traditional translation of the Quran is wrong. Dr Kashif Khan is doing the correct translation with proof on the internet.
Muhammad means praiseworthy. God says Quran IS Muhammad, meaning Quran is praiseworthy. When God says Muhammad in the Quran, HE is talking about the Quran not about the prophet.
Read Dr Kashif Khan's articles on the internet to know God's real message which 99 percent muslims and non muslims don't know and ask him questions. He's there to explain and answer.
La ilaha il Allah. No deity but God.
Allah / Hashem / God etc. ( all titles of the one and only Creator ), IS the one and only creator of the universe.
Ur mistaken, virgin birth os mentioned in the Quran, when Mary exclaimed that how is she going to have a son when no man has touched her, then the angel replied that it is easy for Allah, for He only says" Be " and it is.
Ohh! God also doesn't care about people who want to remain astray and continue to reject the faith, I will rather die than accepting that David(pbuh) committed adultery, we Muslims have very strong objections to such blasphemous and disgusting contents agaisnt prophets in the Hebrew scriptures.
@Margie Sofia I think that most people who commit incest look up into the bible that how many types of incest they can commit, btw there ten different cases of incest in the Hebrew scriptures.
@@mdaslam6337 i urge you to read Dr Kashif Khan's articles on the internet with an open mind and ask him questions. He's there to explain and answer questions. Read his article " Jesus the son of Mary ". 👍
@Margie Sofia keep your mouth shut if u can't say anything intelligent.
We should respect everyone, their culture and religion. God loves all of us the same. You don't choose where you are born and the religion.
We should look more and focus on ourselves, leave others alone. Attacking others and their religion will only harm you, short term and long term. Fear God and keep the commandments.
How do you square that with Deuteronomy 12:2-3?
Christianity in Jesus' name has been Persecuting, Oppressing and Slaughtering Jews for 1700+ years, becoming the Jews longest enduring and most Deadliest of all their Oppressors. Christianity is who forced their beliefs and Slaughtered those who wouldn't convert.
2000 years ago, on Nissan 14, around 3 PM, Son of God Almighty, Yeshua died on cross of Calvary for the sins of Israel and the Gentile world, as foretold by prophet Yeshayahu. His innocent blood washes us from all our sins!
See what Lord foretold through prophet Yeshayahu long before!
Yeshayahu - Isaiah - Chapter 53 (This Hebrew Bible was edited by esteemed translator and scholar, Rabbi A.J. Rosenberg.)
1 Who would have believed our report, and to whom was the arm of the Lord revealed?
2 And he (Arm of Lord) came up like a sapling before it, and like a root from dry ground, he had neither form nor comeliness; and we saw him that he had no appearance. Now shall we desire him (Arm of Lord)?
4 Indeed, he (Arm of Lord) bore our illnesses, and our pains-he carried them, yet we accounted him (Arm of Lord) as plagued, smitten by God and oppressed. 3 Despised and rejected by men, a man of pains and accustomed to illness, and as one who hides his face from us, despised and we held him (Arm of Lord) of no account.
5 But he (Arm of Lord) was pained because of our transgressions, crushed because of our iniquities; the chastisement of our welfare was upon him (Arm of Lord), and with his (Arm of Lord's) wound we were healed.
6 We (Jewish nation, Israel) all went astray like sheep, we (Jewish nation) have turned, each one on his way, and the Lord accepted his (Arm of Lord's) prayers for the iniquity of all of us.
7 He (Arm of Lord) was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he would not open his mouth; like a lamb to the slaughter he (Arm of Lord) would be brought, and like a ewe that is mute before her shearers, and he (Arm of Lord) would not open his mouth.
8 For he (Arm of Lord) was cut off from the land of the living; because of the transgression of my people (Lord's people and Yeshayahu's people, that is Israel), a plague befell them (Israel). ( What was that plague befell on Israel and Jews? Is it the endless sufferings for last 2000 years, till today?)
9 And he (Arm of Lord) gave his grave to the wicked, and to the wealthy with his kinds of death, because he (Arm of Lord) committed no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth.
10 And the Lord wished to crush him (Arm of Lord), He made him (Arm of Lord) ill; if his soul makes itself restitution, he (Arm of Lord) shall see children, he (Arm of Lord) shall prolong his days, and God's purpose shall prosper in his hand.
11 From the toil of his (Arm of Lord's) soul he would see, he would be satisfied; with his knowledge My servant would vindicate the just for many, and their iniquities he (Arm of Lord) would bear.
12 Therefore, I will allot him (Arm of Lord) a portion in public, and with the strong he (Arm of Lord) shall share plunder, because he (Arm of Lord) poured out his soul to death, and with transgressors he (Arm of Lord) was counted; and he (Arm of Lord) bore the sin of many (both Jews and Gentiles), and interceded for the transgressors.
The “young woman” is from The Masoretic Text (MT). It came about around AD 500, which differs from the text from the DSS. So by going back to the original Hebrew text, you should be going back to the earlier text, which is the DSS.
Hi. Be careful to make sure that what you're saying is true next time. the DSS Isaiah has the same word as the MT: haalmah - the young woman. Kind regards.
The Dead Sea Scrolls has the same word as the Mesoretic Text: "young woman." So why do you say they differ?
I thought it used “betulah.” Thanks, Paul, for your input. I’ll have to dig into it more.
DEAD SEA SCROLL: ''LOOK, THE YOUNG WOMAN HAS CONCEIVED"
Chapter 7 : Verse 14
Therefore the LORD himself will give y[ou a sign. Loo]k, the young woman has conceived and is bearing a son, and his name will be Immanuel.
dss collection The Israel Museum Jerusalem
@@curly_dock The DSS, the MT and the Tankah all tell of IMMANUEL AND HIS ALREADY PREGNANT MOTHER, who has already engaged in sexual intercourse with her husband and has CONCEIVED/IS WITH CHILD/PREGNANT/NO LONGER A VIRGIN. Immanuel was Isaiah's own son, his maturity levels are what stood as SIGNS to the Fulfilmment of the Prophecy his father uttered to King Ahaz, that GD PROMISED TO BE WITH JUDAH AND TAKE CARE OF IT'S 2 ENEMIES, Rezin the King of Aram and Pekah, the son of Remaliah, the King of Israel.
The Pagan Greco Roman Phallic Idol Jesus is not but a composite of a myriad of Pagan Greco Roman Idols of Myth: PERSEUS THE VIRTUOUS VIRGIN BORN DEMIGOD, DIONYSUS THE WATER INTO WINE MIRACLE MAKING IDOL and MITHRAS THE DYING RESURRECTING IDOL who dies for the People, whose Devotees EAT OF THE FLESH AND DRINK OF THE BLOOD, like his sidekick the Devil and his lake of fire, they are but 2 fabricated characters found only in the Greek Tall Tales of Man and Joe Smith Jr's Book of Mormon, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.
I love fairy tales
Are you fighting with God, Rabbi Tovia?
RABBI GAMALIEL
“When they heard this, they were enraged and wanted to kill them. But a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law who was respected by all the people, stood up in the Sanhedrin and ordered the men to be taken outside for a little while. He said to them, “Men of Israel, be careful about what you’re about to do to these men. Some time ago Theudas rose up, claiming to be somebody, and a group of about four hundred men rallied to him. He was killed, and all his followers were dispersed and came to nothing. After this man, Judas the Galilean rose up in the days of the census and attracted a following. He also perished, and all his followers were scattered. So in the present case, I tell you, stay away from these men and leave them alone. For if this plan or this work is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You may even be found fighting against God.” They were persuaded by him.”
Acts 5:33-39
rabbi tovia is the angle of god of israel on this plant
Scriptures in Tanakh of Yeshua is risen for Israel!
For you will not abandon my soul to Sheol; nor will you allow your “holy one” to undergo decay.
Psalms 16:8-10
Who is Holy? Only God!
Israel you are a sinful nation loaded down with guilt. You are wicked and corrupt and have turned from the Lord, the “holy one” of Israel. Isaiah 1:4
For thus said the Lord God, the “holy one” of Israel to saved in quietness and in confidence shall be your strength, and yet Israel would not.
Isaiah 30:15
Ephraim has encircled me with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit But Judah still walks with God, even the “holy one” who is faithful. Hosea 11:12
But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, too little to be among to clans of Judah, from you “One”
will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, from the days of eternity. Micah 5:2
Who was from the days of eternity with God? Who is the “One”? The messiah of Israel!
God is to us a God of deliverances; and to YHVH the Lord belong escapes from death. Psalms 68:20
Same as you Israel!
After two days he will restore Israel; on the tired day he will restore us, that we may live in his presence (forever) Hosea 6:2
It should be understood in historical context but also all the words of God have deep spiritual meaning for you Israel in the past and today and in the future.
I spoke to the prophets, gave them many visions and told parables through them. Hosea 12:10 let them be for “signs” and for divine appointed times Genesis 1:14
God’s appointed times (moedim) are not just an amazing history but signs for the Messiah of Israel.
You will arise and have compassion on Zion; for it is time to be gracious to Israel, for the appointed time has come! Psalms 102:13,18
The Messiah your Passover Lamb has been sacrificed at the Passover. So tired day after Passover is the firstfruits. As God commanded you shall bring the sheaf of the first fruits of your harvest to the priest. He shall wave the sheaf before the YHVH for you to be accepted. Leviticus 23:10,11
Your Messiah has been raised from the dead as the first fruits of those who are asleep. For since by a man came death, By a man also came the resurrection of the dead. Because it must first die to bear much fruit.
The Messiah of Israel had to suffer for your iniquities and transgressions just like the first broken covenant of Israel. But the Messiah de David will return as a new covenant with heavenly authority and fullness of Torah.
Keep the 7 Noahide commandments and leave Jews alone.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 most Jews react like you. Israel has duty and are called to preach the truth to all nations but they have lack of compassion.
Because His salvation is among all nations. Let the nations be glad and sing for joy! Psalms 67
He will bring justice to the nations. I will appoint you as a covenant to the people, as a light to the nations. Isaiah 421,6,7 and many more scriptures say that all mankind will come to bow down before Me, says YHVH Isaiah 66 So He is not only your God. He is much bigger then your God. For zion’s sake I won’t be silent for Jerusalem’s sake I will not remain quiet. God bless you and your family and your nation.
@@Marieseungmi I think you missed one
Jeremiah 16:19
L_rd, my strength and my stronghold, my refuge in a time of distress, the nations will come to You from the ends of the earth,
and they will say,
“Our fathers inherited only lies, worthless idols of no benefit at all.
Teach it to your children
The Moshiach of the Bible is a mortal man, a direct son/seed/shoot of King David, through his son Solomon, son after son, from the Tribe of Judah, of the House of David, who Isaiah tells comes at the End of Days and brings All of Mankind to the Rightful Worship of the Creator and Him Alone, the Restoration and Redemption of Israel/the Jews and World Peace where the Wolves abide with the Lambs, where the Implements of War are turned into Implements of Agriculture, but all your Jesus brought to Mankind is More PAGAN IDOLATRY of himself, a trio of Man Made deities, his mother, other dead people, Statues of Wood and Stone, Angels, a dirty painted sheet, crackers and wooden sticks. To Israel/the Jews Jesus brought only 1700+ years of PERSECUTION, OPPRESSION AND DEATH as History testifies that Christianity became the Jews longest enduring and most DEADLIEST OF ALL THEIR OPPRESSORS, to a T it alone fits the description of the morphing Last Beast and as Jesus said, he did NOT COME TO BRING PEACE BUT DIVISION, to set family one against the other, the very reason why Gd send Elijah, to come and UNDO ALL THE DIVISION FOSTERED BY FALSE TEACHERS, lest HE smite the Earth with Utter Destruction. As this Hedonistic, Pagan Filled World of DIVISION, CHAOS AND MAYHEM TESTIFY that Neither Elijah Nor Moshiach have yet come, so far only Fakes have shown up. Your Jesus was the Ultimate Antimoshiach and his cult of Christianity is the Last Beast.
''WE WILL SACRIFICE THE ABOMINATION OF THE EGYPTIANS TO GD OUR LRD. WILL WE SACRIFICE THE DEITY OF THE EGYPTIANS BEFORE THEIR EYES, AND THEY WILL NOT STONE US?"
Shemot - Exodus - Chapter 8:
22But Moses said, "It is improper to do that, for we will sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians to God our Lord. Will we sacrifice the deity of the Egyptians before their eyes, and they will not stone us? כבוַיֹּ֣אמֶר משֶׁ֗ה לֹ֤א נָכוֹן֙ לַֽעֲשׂ֣וֹת כֵּ֔ן כִּ֚י תּֽוֹעֲבַ֣ת מִצְרַ֔יִם נִזְבַּ֖ח לַֽיהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֵ֑ינוּ הֵ֣ן נִזְבַּ֞ח אֶת־תּֽוֹעֲבַ֥ת מִצְרַ֛יִם לְעֵֽינֵיהֶ֖ם וְלֹ֥א יִסְקְלֻֽנוּ: