I think that both the Houlgate and the Stern are quite good. The Houlgate might be slightly better, but the problem with it is that he gives short shrift to the later sections, precisely when one needs more help. I've taught both when doing the Phenomenology in class.
@@toddmcgowan8233 Have you had a chance to look at Pinkard's guide he published alongside his translation? It's tempting to pair them for more direct continuity, but if he's missing an element in his text maybe that would only compound the lack.
6:37 reminded me of this hilarious/necessary statement from William Blattner’s guide to B&T: "Being: Macquarrie and Robinson insist on capitalizing the word "being." The capitalization does nothing but add an odd sense of mystery and obscurity to Heidegger's language, something that it certainly does not need. Thus, I will throughout write "being" with a lower-case "b."
I've always thought this about Heidegger as well, but I would say that it's slightly more justified in his case since he is more invested in a mystical approach than Hegel. Generally, however, I'm in total agreement with this choice.
If you know about it, do you have any thoughts on the infamous (or maybe just famous) Half Hour Hegel series by Professor Gregory Sadler? Would it be a good companion or would it just be a detriment compared to other secondary sources, or even just reading it by itself?
How would you characterize the value added in learning the German? The perspective you have on these other translations seems to have come from your undergoing the ordeal of reading The Phenomenology in the original language. I have heard you say before that translation is a fetish and, as you said in this video, that it is a thankless job. My main concern is that now, for *some* reason, I have a desire to learn German so that I can read Hegel. So: Do you think that it is particular to Hegel's Phenomenology that the value of the original language gives this surplus value to the text? Would one get more out of other texts in German if I can read them in their original language? It's certainly given me pause to consider what the idiom does to the thinking. I've only had limited experience with languages other than English. I suppose I'm asking for you to do a video (someday maybe? Please and thank you.) on the value of learning other languages.
Yes, there is a value for sure, although I think more so for someone like Hegel than for someone like Kant. I think with Kant, the benefit is pretty minimal. In my view, it's very dependent on the thinker. But I do believe that one can fully understand a philosophy without knowing the original language. If not, then that's a serious limitation of the philosophy itself. Of course, one has to be able to correct mistranslations, which does require some acquaintance with the original language or, at least, the textual scholarship on the thinker.
Nothing from Hegel, that's for sure. Jean-Paul Sartre's Existentialism Is a Humanism would be a good place to start, or Sigmund Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents. Both very, very readable for a total beginner.
@@toddmcgowan8233 Hi Todd, could you comment about what Sartre means in the text you mentioned about mans responsibility(legislating) for all men. I find it slightly confusing/paradoxical, is it an idea he fleshes out elsewhere? hope that's clear, thanks.
@@K31R17 It's defined fleshed out in Being and Nothingness. But the idea is that one's free act implies a whole world, and one is responsible not just for one's act but also for this world that follows from it.
It would be awesome to see a video about all the books collection you have in your background.
You know what, maybe not able to recognize the books in your background, is the reason why I keep coming back to watch the videos in the first place.
@@Wade2003 Funny
The 2050 translation will be talking about dilly dallying with the cringe
best youtube comment I have ever seen
I was introduced to the Miller translation but now I love the clarity from the Baillie translation, thanks for the video
Hi Todd, apologies for being greedy but could you recommend a phenomenology reading guide ?
What would you recommend to one of your students?
Thanks
I think that both the Houlgate and the Stern are quite good. The Houlgate might be slightly better, but the problem with it is that he gives short shrift to the later sections, precisely when one needs more help. I've taught both when doing the Phenomenology in class.
@@toddmcgowan8233 Have you had a chance to look at Pinkard's guide he published alongside his translation? It's tempting to pair them for more direct continuity, but if he's missing an element in his text maybe that would only compound the lack.
@@granthamilton5616 I have glanced it but not read it thoroughly. It looks helpful.
Hi Todd, thanks for that I appreciate it.
I think your videos are superb.
I hope to see many more !:)
Jon Stewart, 'The Unity of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Systematic Interpretation', 2000.
joke was fantastic todd thank you for helping me on my reread of hegel
Interesting to note that William James translated Zerrissenheit as “torn-to-pieces-hood.”
6:37 reminded me of this hilarious/necessary statement from William Blattner’s guide to B&T: "Being: Macquarrie and Robinson insist on capitalizing the word "being." The capitalization does nothing but add an odd sense of mystery and obscurity to Heidegger's language, something that it certainly does not need. Thus, I will throughout write "being" with a lower-case "b."
I've always thought this about Heidegger as well, but I would say that it's slightly more justified in his case since he is more invested in a mystical approach than Hegel. Generally, however, I'm in total agreement with this choice.
...¿Me podrías recomendar la mejor traducción de FENOMENOLOGÍA DEL ESPÍRITU de Hegel en español?... Gracias...
If you know about it, do you have any thoughts on the infamous (or maybe just famous) Half Hour Hegel series by Professor Gregory Sadler? Would it be a good companion or would it just be a detriment compared to other secondary sources, or even just reading it by itself?
Sorry, I don't know it
...ja but it also means ghost! and that is important to know since the word derives directly form the German word Geist.
Thanks Todd. Watching this later!
How would you characterize the value added in learning the German? The perspective you have on these other translations seems to have come from your undergoing the ordeal of reading The Phenomenology in the original language. I have heard you say before that translation is a fetish and, as you said in this video, that it is a thankless job. My main concern is that now, for *some* reason, I have a desire to learn German so that I can read Hegel.
So:
Do you think that it is particular to Hegel's Phenomenology that the value of the original language gives this surplus value to the text? Would one get more out of other texts in German if I can read them in their original language? It's certainly given me pause to consider what the idiom does to the thinking. I've only had limited experience with languages other than English. I suppose I'm asking for you to do a video (someday maybe? Please and thank you.) on the value of learning other languages.
Yes, there is a value for sure, although I think more so for someone like Hegel than for someone like Kant. I think with Kant, the benefit is pretty minimal. In my view, it's very dependent on the thinker. But I do believe that one can fully understand a philosophy without knowing the original language. If not, then that's a serious limitation of the philosophy itself. Of course, one has to be able to correct mistranslations, which does require some acquaintance with the original language or, at least, the textual scholarship on the thinker.
Todd you always wear wild hats, they''re fantastic
Todd McG translation when? 🥺
Ha
Hey I was wondering if you thought love was possible?
Todd, can you name book which is suitable for beginners to study philosophy
Nothing from Hegel, that's for sure. Jean-Paul Sartre's Existentialism Is a Humanism would be a good place to start, or Sigmund Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents. Both very, very readable for a total beginner.
Thanks @@toddmcgowan8233
I think the last days of socrates is accessible too.
@@toddmcgowan8233 Hi Todd, could you comment about what Sartre means in the text you mentioned about mans responsibility(legislating) for all men. I find it slightly confusing/paradoxical, is it an idea he fleshes out elsewhere?
hope that's clear, thanks.
@@K31R17 It's defined fleshed out in Being and Nothingness. But the idea is that one's free act implies a whole world, and one is responsible not just for one's act but also for this world that follows from it.
Who dey think gonna sublate dem Bengals?
unsublatable
I’m sorry Todd, but Hegel would be a Chiefs fan