Todd McGowan: Emancipation After Hegel (Part 1/2)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @epoche6327
    @epoche6327 2 роки тому +5

    Thank you so much. I got so much from this. For the first time ever, the hegelian identity of substance and subject makes sense to me now. Gonna listen it again and make some notes.

    • @epoche6327
      @epoche6327 2 роки тому

      @@telosbound I haven't red McGowan yet, although i am going to. I'we been getting the impression that EAH is a good place to start unwrapping zizek, lacan, and ultimately, hegel. Mcgowan seems accessible to someone who's not native to english.

  • @lalalistic
    @lalalistic 2 роки тому +2

    First Cadell and Co and now this. What an evening 🤯🙏🏻

  • @lcrow8675
    @lcrow8675 2 роки тому +1

    excellent work!

  • @Javier-il1xi
    @Javier-il1xi 2 роки тому

    Just finished reading the book. Thanks for the video!

  • @Wesenschau
    @Wesenschau 2 роки тому +1

    Absolutely bloody revolutionary video 🐟🚀😇

  • @johnd.hernandezrey8577
    @johnd.hernandezrey8577 Рік тому +1

    The comparison with love appears in Hegel himself. It is in his youth texts. It is exactly as McGowan describes it. So, we might suppose he got it directly from there and forgot or got it indirectly and maybe is unaware.
    As happened with Heraclitus, hate but more intensely, love, have a lot to do with Hegel's ontology.

  • @parmiggianoreggie-ano1832
    @parmiggianoreggie-ano1832 2 роки тому

    God bless you for your work.
    You cannot understand how much does this mean to me! ;)

  • @hmanoff
    @hmanoff 2 роки тому

    Great work!! Thanks!!

  • @Bromios18
    @Bromios18 2 роки тому +1

    Dark Deleuze + Heraclitus + Proclean trigonometry ontology = Ur-Hegel before Hegel. Sounds good.

  • @gabrielsprach8323
    @gabrielsprach8323 2 роки тому +1

    Nice

  • @deforeestwright2469
    @deforeestwright2469 2 місяці тому

    But Hegel doesn’t “work through” formal logic; he rejects it outright.

  • @amarmujezinovic
    @amarmujezinovic 2 роки тому +1

    Law of identity is: A is A, not A = A... Surprisingly, this is a massive difference.

  • @deforeestwright2469
    @deforeestwright2469 2 місяці тому

    I think McGowan’s whole philosophy is just embracing Orwellian doublespeak. 😂

  • @marioalvarez4316
    @marioalvarez4316 3 місяці тому

    TRASH WAY TO TALK ABOUT HEGEL

  • @PeterM8987
    @PeterM8987 4 місяці тому

    A load of nonsense.