Episode 174. The T-80. The Flying Tank. The Arctic. Part I

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
  • The West has nicknamed this combat vehicle a lying tank. It accelerates up to 50miles per hour, performs bootlegger reverses and jumps up to 46feet. Combat Approved will show a two-part film about the T-80, the only Russian tank with a gas turbine engine. In the first part the journalists of the program will go visit the 61st Armored Factory in Saint-Petersburg, where they repair almost all of our tanks today. And there they will test the reliability of the upgraded T-80 gun. They will do it in an unusual way: they will fire it at a target with a wooden log. The whole process will be filmed by a high-speed camera. Then the film crew of Combat Approved will conduct a unique experiment - using a special device they will compare the noise level of the T-80 and the noise of an ordinary car to find out who and how drives quieter. In addition, the viewers of Zvezda TV will see unique footage of T-80 jumping up to 46feet and its famous acceleration to 50miles per hour.
    #Russianmilitarypower #Russianmilitary #military #CombatApproved #Zvezdatv #army #russianarmy #CombatApproved #Zvezdatv #vehicle #lying tank #tank #t80 #t-80
    / zvezdanews
    / zvezdanews
    / tvzvezda
    / zvezdanews
    t.me/zvezdanews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 247

  • @RedboRF
    @RedboRF 3 роки тому +55

    always glad to hear Batman again

  • @neromastic4512
    @neromastic4512 3 роки тому +14

    This Documentary sure is amazing,I've learned a lot of the T-80 and its magnificent features

    • @jamesjross
      @jamesjross Рік тому

      oh shut up

    • @neromastic4512
      @neromastic4512 Рік тому

      @@jamesjross Shut up about what? The Tanks history?
      I love Soviet History in Armour and Aviation Warfare.
      I do not wish to support the Russians if that's what your comment is leading.

    • @jamesjross
      @jamesjross Рік тому

      @@neromastic4512 shut up

    • @schizophrennicautist3858
      @schizophrennicautist3858 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@neromastic4512 they dont understand we are just tank enjoyer

  • @a.m.armstrong8354
    @a.m.armstrong8354 3 роки тому +16

    This is my favourite tank!It is the perfect combination of speed, firepower and protection!

    • @noproki2838
      @noproki2838 2 роки тому +5

      Yes, expecially the special defense operation, that the turret dome is being ejected when a missile hits the tank.

    • @Ivan-pw3sn
      @Ivan-pw3sn 2 роки тому

      @@noproki2838 Ukrainian kid thinks he can save Ukraine with his pfp and m1 ibrams and leopard 2 turents will fly if a kornet hits them

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 Рік тому +3

      @@noproki2838 that's the best part. Russian tanks are unmatched in their turret ejection system.

    • @blackstoneblkstntv5551
      @blackstoneblkstntv5551 9 місяців тому

      ​@@noproki2838 you mean those terminator?
      yes those terminator is designed to make the Ukrainian become a meat

  • @jaroslavpalecek4513
    @jaroslavpalecek4513 3 роки тому +16

    Greetings from Czech republic!

  • @aarondylan5606
    @aarondylan5606 3 роки тому +18

    I have not even watched past 2 minutes and i'm already blown away by the fact that it shoots pieces of logs as projectile.

  • @mdjd.8893
    @mdjd.8893 3 роки тому +8

    look at the t80 man, so inspirational.

  • @jafon9
    @jafon9 3 роки тому +44

    Finally a look at the T80BVM hopefully, even though the beautiful T80U should've been upgraded instead of the BV.

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 3 роки тому +5

      I want them to upgrade the t-80u too
      T-80uk was the most advanced Soviet tank

    • @jafon9
      @jafon9 3 роки тому +9

      @@mr.waffentrager4400 Yes, it just simply doesn't make any sense that they would upgrade the T80BV over the T80U. They are upgrading T80BVs with the 1250HP engine, which the U already has, as well as improved thermals and the better gun and autoloader. Some T80Us already have that!. As well as the T80U having a much stronger turret. It would be a cheaper and quicker upgrade and make a much better tank if they put Relikt and stuff on a T80U instead of a BV!

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 3 роки тому

      @@jafon9 , The T-80U was produced in Ukraine, in Kharkov city, mostly... Any questions? 😃

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 3 роки тому +9

      @@maksimluzin1121 no . T-80u was produced in Omsk Russia .
      Only some t-64s and a variant of t-80 called t-80ud with diesel engine was produced in Ukraine .

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 3 роки тому +2

      @@mr.waffentrager4400 , You right, sorry. T-80U and UD. Quite close by the index... Anyway, what I know, Russia has a lot of T-80UD on the Strategical Storages, but most of them are in very bad shape and need a total recreation... The gas turbine T-80 are quite in very good shape. They are and modernized by Russia, at first!

  • @jasonmartin1668
    @jasonmartin1668 3 роки тому +12

    Awesome tank! The show just gets better every episode! Still waiting on an updated combat medicine show but keep up the great work!!

  • @jackmack4164
    @jackmack4164 3 роки тому +30

    Swedish Stridsvagn 103 was the first in the world to produce gas turbine with piston engine in 1967. A decade later, the soviet developed the world first single gas turbine engine without piston engine. Roughly fours years later, the Americans created M1 Abrams using the soviet concept.

    • @devilishwolfie6975
      @devilishwolfie6975 3 роки тому +1

      First tank to use a Gas turbine was the FV200 back in the 50s by the British the Strv was definitely the first to use both

    • @miquelescribanoivars5049
      @miquelescribanoivars5049 2 роки тому +5

      Soviets also created a turbine power prototype heavy tank in the 50's

    • @korana6308
      @korana6308 Місяць тому

      It was not a tank. It is a movable cannon as it doesn't have a turret. Every other tank has a turret. Even turretless tanks from WW1 had side turrets that could move. So it is a movable cannon. And second, it used several engines and only 1 of them was gas turbine. So it wasn't strictly designed for it and there wasn't enough power. Unlike for the T80. Which you could actually say is the first gas turbine engine.

  • @maccheese8379
    @maccheese8379 3 роки тому +3

    Been waiting for this for ages. I am saving this to watch at uninterrupted time.

  • @svicozoro1502
    @svicozoro1502 3 роки тому +10

    Good tank pozdrav rusiji

  • @dantemarasca
    @dantemarasca 3 роки тому +5

    Espectacular tanque ruso, para mi el mejor. Muchas gracias por el video

  • @Zelectrocutica
    @Zelectrocutica 3 роки тому +17

    The tank that have one of the most advance and and the best turret ejection system.
    XD

  • @alb8573
    @alb8573 3 роки тому +5

    The host is like this one friend everyone had as kid, that goes and touch everything when at your place without asking. Hope he dont stuck in to some tank barrel or something.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 Рік тому

      I won't be surprised if he blows himself up some day.

  • @oler777
    @oler777 3 роки тому +4

    im ready im ready

  • @stewartrogerson1369
    @stewartrogerson1369 3 роки тому +7

    Wise move, no one can afford large numbers of T-14s. Perfectly good stock of 70 , 80 , 90 series models to refurbish.

    • @egonieser
      @egonieser 3 роки тому +5

      Pretty much. Just have the T-14's for special operations or unique situations where a more precision tool is required, but use the platoons of T72's-90's as the backbone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, just modernize it xD

    • @anarchyandempires5452
      @anarchyandempires5452 2 роки тому

      @@egonieser so what was that thing you were saying about not broke? Because I got to tell you from where I'm standing those t80s t90s and t72s ain't doing too good

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 Рік тому

      @@egonieser smart thing to do would be to not waste their time/resources producing T-14s at all, but as we've seen over the past 9 months Russians aren't known for their smarts.

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 Рік тому

      @@anarchyandempires5452 they are so useful that Ukraine is now begging for new tanks the t-90s ate all Ukraine's tanks. Now the leopard 2 and Abrams will meet the same faith. Because Russia destroyed about 3k Ukrainian tanks 30 or 60 Abrams will not make a difference

  • @QueenDaenerysTargaryen
    @QueenDaenerysTargaryen 3 роки тому +5

    Great video and tank.

  • @trevortaylor5501
    @trevortaylor5501 3 роки тому +28

    That would be a great job working in a tank factory! Did you see all the variants of tanks there being modified, looks like there pulling tanks out of long term storage and upgrading them. T 80 bvm is no joke. I'm curious if there going to use the new 4th generation thermal sights on the bvm during the upgrade. Someone the other day argued with me on UA-cam about the production line of the T14 and I told them watch combat approved as it showed the t14 line being next to the t90m line. They didn't like that their agenda was blown up lol... This military channel is awesome, getting to see all the stuff we don't get to see normally.

    • @jafon9
      @jafon9 3 роки тому +1

      4th generation?

    • @trevortaylor5501
      @trevortaylor5501 3 роки тому +3

      @@jafon9 ibris k series (locally produced) apparently better then the French thermals.

    • @sandradwyer4292
      @sandradwyer4292 Рік тому

      DECADES OLD TANKS LMAO RUSSIA THE PAPER BEAR WITH PAPER TANKS that ukraine armed forces are killing left right and centre

    • @user-hz4gy6iq1d
      @user-hz4gy6iq1d Рік тому

      Да. Конечно. Иначе зачем модернизировать. Но считаю, что французская оптика лучшая. Но у нас есть своя оптика не хуже чем у других.

    • @sandradwyer4292
      @sandradwyer4292 Рік тому

      wheres the t14 ? i just see t60's ,70s and 80s getting their tops blown off but no T14 , SMH

  • @EcchiRevenge
    @EcchiRevenge 3 роки тому +9

    TIL: Stalinium log works as ammunition too.

  • @zabdas83
    @zabdas83 3 роки тому +2

    Love T80s T90s -

  • @garmfield2977
    @garmfield2977 3 роки тому +2

    Pretty interesting way to make wood chips for playgrounds...

  • @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131
    @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 3 роки тому +7

    The Abrams tanks feel deep envy, 😆

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 Рік тому +2

      Yeah the Abrams can't even dream of tossing its turret so high.

    • @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131
      @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 Рік тому +3

      @@sam8404 , yea, they just freeze of fear and cold, refusing to go to the front.

  • @lalruatdikavarte7943
    @lalruatdikavarte7943 3 роки тому +2

    Nice video and very informative and very entertaining and very satisfaction more videos.

  • @Alexandrosalex
    @Alexandrosalex 3 роки тому +2

    Greeting from Greece 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷☦️

  • @GloopSerious-nt9dv
    @GloopSerious-nt9dv 3 роки тому +11

    Yeah now this is something, T-80 FINALLY! The best Russian tank ever, we are yet to see how T-14 does! The first serial production tank with gas turbine as an engine. Americans stole that idea and used it with Abrams, its a fact.

    • @Wogby
      @Wogby 3 роки тому

      That's just not true, the gas turbine in the Abrams and T80 are entirely unrelated. Chrysler, the company that built the Abrams prototype and is still the manufacturer of its engine, developed the first gas turbine engine in the 50s. Even the earliest XM-1 Abrams prototype had Chrysler's gas turbine engine.

    • @GloopSerious-nt9dv
      @GloopSerious-nt9dv 3 роки тому +1

      @@Wogby Dude, turbine system is the same for everyone... Please, cut the crap, fact is SSSR did it first.

    • @GloopSerious-nt9dv
      @GloopSerious-nt9dv 3 роки тому

      @@Wogby They developed my ass, them just stole it from germans

    • @Wogby
      @Wogby 3 роки тому

      @@GloopSerious-nt9dv If the USSR did develop the first turbine engine, then it's crazy that there are no records before Chrysler's. They didn't even initially intend their turbine engine to be used in a tank, rather a line of racing cars. All of this is public and well documented. You just don't do your research or you're being willfully ignorant.

    • @thermite10k40
      @thermite10k40 3 роки тому

      @@Wogby as far as i know they were working on a gas turbine powered tank sine 1955. the project was object 278, although i'm not sure if they beat Americans to finishing it, the engine was worse than diesel ones in almost every way and the project stopped during 1960. than they tried giving the t64 a gasturbine which was a limited thing only.

  • @adityanharish377
    @adityanharish377 5 місяців тому

    Solid snake explaining tanks

  • @tzeentchnianexaltedsorcero2041
    @tzeentchnianexaltedsorcero2041 3 роки тому +3

    It's quite obsolete, t-90m is the MVP now.

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 3 роки тому

      Russians have about 700-800 T-80 tanks on their the Strategical Tank Storages... Just to scrap and destroy them? Actually, only about 300-400 can be used, for nowadays, somehow... Anyway, how many operational tanks has Germany, for example, for now? Do you know it? 😅

    • @hahdanghongha7810
      @hahdanghongha7810 3 роки тому

      no
      T90 is for smaller battles
      big battles need big tanks
      T80s are still the best.
      the improvement of T80s are still more advanced

  • @vedantchorge304
    @vedantchorge304 3 роки тому +1

    This is good for fast offensive with ground units busting bunkers and other small protected vehicles

  • @rollingthunder6215
    @rollingthunder6215 3 роки тому +3

    T80.......MASS PRODUCE...

  • @alexantikrylo7508
    @alexantikrylo7508 3 роки тому +1

    good!

  • @andrzejwozniak7721
    @andrzejwozniak7721 3 місяці тому

    👌 intressant.

  • @dragicadjuric3635
    @dragicadjuric3635 3 роки тому +1

    Very powerful machine T80BVM 🦾

  • @hasanfoyejul5500
    @hasanfoyejul5500 3 роки тому +2

    ধন্যবাদ...
    thanks

  • @danielthethird0949
    @danielthethird0949 3 роки тому +1

    The tank was in the air like a Ford raptor wtf beast for sure .

  • @sarven5974
    @sarven5974 3 роки тому +1

    this narrator is the perfect mix of constipation and batman

  • @StarFyodperor
    @StarFyodperor 3 роки тому +2

    Make that engine for Armata... :D

  • @praveenranndika5083
    @praveenranndika5083 3 роки тому +2

    Yeah man...

  • @MartinFialaMeganeRs
    @MartinFialaMeganeRs 8 місяців тому

    Zdravím z České republiky krasny mašiny 😊❤

  • @muhdhazmanhasnizan8596
    @muhdhazmanhasnizan8596 3 роки тому +1

    Grozny loves this tank!

  • @nicholasleon7819
    @nicholasleon7819 3 роки тому

    ural vagon zavod is such a fun phrase to say and listen to

  • @MR-M16
    @MR-M16 3 роки тому

    Very nice

  • @lenkautsugi5747
    @lenkautsugi5747 3 роки тому +2

    T80 is good but I like the t90 more

  • @Viktorbazda
    @Viktorbazda 3 роки тому +13

    T 80 is the greatest tank in soviet union btw.

  • @jawadmalik8146
    @jawadmalik8146 3 роки тому +4

    Russian tank perfect manufacturing

  • @aarondylan5606
    @aarondylan5606 3 роки тому +13

    The deadliest tank. Definitely better than the "democratic" Abraham

    • @shanek6582
      @shanek6582 3 роки тому

      Better?

    • @da_duccchannel
      @da_duccchannel 3 роки тому +2

      @@shanek6582 See how fast the T-80 goes? How durable it is? If you do, you'll know it's better (of course Abrams can be better in some aspect)

    • @austinbunyard2132
      @austinbunyard2132 3 роки тому +1

      The frontal armor ain't nothing compared to Abraham's or a leopard or a Challenger

    • @da_duccchannel
      @da_duccchannel 3 роки тому

      @@austinbunyard2132 T-80 is worse in that aspect

    • @austinbunyard2132
      @austinbunyard2132 3 роки тому

      Yeah I was just saying that it is better in some aspects and I love the t-80 don't get me wrong it's probably the best tank the USSR ever produced I think it's even better than the t-90 but not better than the new t90 variants

  • @LjubomirLjubojevic
    @LjubomirLjubojevic 3 роки тому +4

    The title should be "The Flying Tank for Arctic"..

  • @engineer0831
    @engineer0831 3 роки тому +4

    Russian Arctic !!!

  • @arashifujimaru8772
    @arashifujimaru8772 3 роки тому +1

    By the name of flying tank I thought the tank was going to take off

  • @danielthethird0949
    @danielthethird0949 3 роки тому +4

    Can u show Russian hand to hand combat since I’m in Arizona and no Russians Around .

  • @michaelh4804
    @michaelh4804 Рік тому +5

    The only thing that's flying on that tank is the turret, when it gets shot in Ukraine 😂😂

    • @alexnderrrthewoke4479
      @alexnderrrthewoke4479 2 місяці тому

      How so? Is that why we barely see that? And these same tanks destroying abrams, leopards? Etc? The copium is real

  • @jacksparrow-ie8uq
    @jacksparrow-ie8uq Рік тому +3

    If this guy narrates the elimination of half human population by a nuclear exchanges I won’t mind losing some billions of people

  • @husseinzakizadeh1864
    @husseinzakizadeh1864 3 роки тому +3

    Can u guys make a proper program that explain and introduce all Russian MRAP, armored vehicles and typhoon’s Projects

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 Рік тому

      Each vehicles have their own videos already search the playlist

  • @Rambo55293
    @Rambo55293 Рік тому +2

    Hasnt the Abrams destroyed enough russian tanks to prove its clearly better over the years?

    • @Xavier28200
      @Xavier28200 Рік тому +2

      What tanks? The t55 😂pathetic fucking land of racism 🦅🇺🇸

  • @annoyinletmein615
    @annoyinletmein615 3 роки тому +1

    This would be such a good series if you didn't have such a tryhard narrating it. Subtitles, a robot narrator, hell get Dung Tran to do the narration.

  • @daddyg5654
    @daddyg5654 3 роки тому +1

    Only the Russians would make the most powerful wood chipper ever!

  • @marijnnn4992
    @marijnnn4992 5 місяців тому

    1:22 anythank depending on the hicht of the ramp

  • @hahahehe3276
    @hahahehe3276 3 роки тому +2

    Slav wepons❤️

  • @angelomicallef3916
    @angelomicallef3916 3 роки тому

    Keep improving

  • @fj852
    @fj852 2 роки тому +1

    Why is kevin from the office narrating this?

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому

      Damn it now I can't unhear it.

  • @lightning1434
    @lightning1434 10 місяців тому

    Bro what goofy ahh voiceover is this “don’t you dare think this is a joke, today we’re going to make this piece of wood into a cylinder” like bro this is so funny

  • @freeplestine4982
    @freeplestine4982 3 роки тому +8

    Huuraaa....👍🇵🇹♥️🇷🇺💯

  • @pkmachinegun
    @pkmachinegun 2 роки тому +3

    DAMN THESE ABOUT TO GET SMACKED WITH PANZERFAUST 3’s! How’s it feel to be on the receiving end of Panzerfausts again?!?!?

  • @ands3227
    @ands3227 3 роки тому +5

    The T-80 had some performance issues in Chechnya. Probably not as capable as the T-90. The T-90s are being modernize and built in new variants, along with next generation T-14.

    • @tzeentchnianexaltedsorcero2041
      @tzeentchnianexaltedsorcero2041 3 роки тому +1

      Mainly due to the huge fuel consumption that t-80 requires to operate.

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 3 роки тому +5

      The T-80 has the Battle Organization and Command Control Problems in Chechnya. People, not the tank itself...

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому

      I'm not sure the T14 will ever be produced in large numbers.

  • @JamesWebbKilledTheBigBangStars
    @JamesWebbKilledTheBigBangStars 3 роки тому +11

    I'm waiting that distinctive laughter from the narrator JoergSprave...

  • @pj_ytmt-123
    @pj_ytmt-123 Рік тому +1

    The effective tank should have:
    1- powerful cannon
    2- lethal ammunition
    3- plentiful horsepower
    4- homogeneous steel base armour
    5- modular inert composite armour blocks
    6- modular reactive explosive armour blocks (optional imo)
    7- active protection (also optional)
    8- secure radio communications
    9- digital information networking
    10- 360 deg. visual feed with software assisted threat identification***
    11- the usual stuff: smoke device, nightvision & infrared, fast accurate firing computer, firing on the move (gun stabilizer), higher gun elevation, low profile, machine gun, snorkel, laser/radar warning system (if practical)
    Wow quite a package. No wonder these things are SOOOO expensive. To think there are 3-4 soldiers in each one that is a potential 1-hit kill by enemy guided weapons (especially top-down or rear attacks) is worrisome.
    Russia is doing the right thing by sending out tanks singly or in pairs.
    Infantry support is a fallacy. Modern anti-tank weapons have ~2 km ranges, you can't expect infantry support to dash the distance in full combat gear.
    The destructive power of drone borne missiles and precision artillery in top-down attacks will also cause serious collateral damage to nearby infantry.
    I've seen a video of a ukrainian platoon almost wiped out to the last man when the tank they were following hit a mine.
    The infantry support doctrine for armoured combat is obsolete and disastrous.

    • @kyizelma
      @kyizelma 3 місяці тому

      you just described 99 percent of modern tanks

    • @pj_ytmt-123
      @pj_ytmt-123 3 місяці тому

      @@kyizelma Yep, including the Merkava.

    • @alexnderrrthewoke4479
      @alexnderrrthewoke4479 2 місяці тому

      ​@@kyizelmanot for the west

  • @woveetymailyke4101
    @woveetymailyke4101 3 роки тому +2

    وعلى أمسالك

  • @elcormoran1
    @elcormoran1 3 роки тому +2

    The truth ir that nato tanks forces Cross into russian Woodland and muddy territory it's gonna be a turkey shoot for they russians, nato tank are only design for plainfields

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому +2

      Russians seem to be having a very hard time with mud right now, tons of abandoned tanks that got stuck.

  • @ΝΙΚΟΣΠΡΟΚΟΠΙΟΥ
    @ΝΙΚΟΣΠΡΟΚΟΠΙΟΥ 3 роки тому +11

    God bless Putin !

  • @woveetymailyke4101
    @woveetymailyke4101 3 роки тому +1

    على أمسالك وعلى أموالك وعلى شبابك

  • @vivir-la-vida
    @vivir-la-vida Рік тому

    typical american dramatic voice-over , kill it with fire thank you!!!!

  • @woveetymailyke4101
    @woveetymailyke4101 3 роки тому +1

    وفناءها

  • @Arctic_Capital
    @Arctic_Capital 2 роки тому +8

    The claims about this tank did not age well, at least for the crew that met the NLAW

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому +6

      Yeah it isn't a good time to be a Russian tanker right now.

  • @pra1ma246
    @pra1ma246 3 роки тому

    This a$$hole was a pain in the a$$ in Project IGI, but one law80 took out this 80 and problem solved

  • @warhawkfan1234
    @warhawkfan1234 3 роки тому

    50 mph? This channel's primary audience is america isn't it.

  • @AMRapideS
    @AMRapideS 2 роки тому +4

    Russia's Coffin on Wheels

    • @jeffrl0249
      @jeffrl0249 2 роки тому +1

      More like crematorium on wheels

  • @woveetymailyke4101
    @woveetymailyke4101 3 роки тому +1

    وعلى أمسالك وعلى شبابك وعلى أطفالك وعلى أموالك وعلى شبابك

  • @ruhithudakara2802
    @ruhithudakara2802 2 роки тому +1

    The Flying Tank, literally after hit by jawline

  • @porterwallace9541
    @porterwallace9541 7 днів тому

    An 800 Dollar drone can fuck these things up... poor russia

  • @ginoomarramirezolivera7605
    @ginoomarramirezolivera7605 3 роки тому

    T-80BM

  • @austinbunyard2132
    @austinbunyard2132 3 роки тому

    The Abrams can fly to

    • @notinmyairspace
      @notinmyairspace 3 роки тому

      But it is almost twice as heavy while only having a slighly better engine

  • @xavichuvy9047
    @xavichuvy9047 3 роки тому +4

    Get rid of this horrid English voice-over

  • @aerostaraircraftsanctuary604
    @aerostaraircraftsanctuary604 2 роки тому +3

    Yes it's really amazing how the $3 Million dollar T-80's turrets fly off when hit by a $30,000 dollar NLAW missile!

  • @aishorts-i4q
    @aishorts-i4q 9 місяців тому

    Russia emang beda dalam tecnologi militer

  • @woveetymailyke4101
    @woveetymailyke4101 3 роки тому

    على أطفالك وعلى أموالك وعلى شبابك وعلى أطفالك

  • @praveenranndika5083
    @praveenranndika5083 3 роки тому

    🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰 🇱🇰

  • @reelmsy3831
    @reelmsy3831 4 місяці тому

    "a lying tank" 😭

  • @asiftalpur3758
    @asiftalpur3758 3 роки тому

    Guys is it rUwUssia or the sOwOviet union

  • @sam8404
    @sam8404 2 роки тому +1

    I'd love to visit Russia to see stuff like this but I doubt it will ever happen now.

    • @anarchyandempires5452
      @anarchyandempires5452 2 роки тому

      Meh just visit Ukraine they have a lot more of this tanks then Russia does by now.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 Рік тому

      @@anarchyandempires5452 very true.

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 Рік тому +1

      @@anarchyandempires5452 this aged well 😂😂😂. It looks like Ukraine needs more tanks than Russia

  • @brianladouceur7393
    @brianladouceur7393 Рік тому +3

    More Russian junk these shows are pure comedy

  • @TacoLover1
    @TacoLover1 3 роки тому +1

    Every modern Anti-Tank missile will bust that T-80 like a can opener.

    • @Kalashnikov413
      @Kalashnikov413 3 роки тому +4

      and pretty much every tanks

    • @notinmyairspace
      @notinmyairspace 3 роки тому

      What do you expect? It is from the 80s, but T-80BVM is frontally protected against most ATGMs due to the new ERA, but not to kinetic projeticles.

    • @TacoLover1
      @TacoLover1 3 роки тому +2

      @@notinmyairspace No armor is able to withstand modern anti-tank missiles.

    • @notinmyairspace
      @notinmyairspace 3 роки тому +1

      @@TacoLover1 Many modern MBTs are protected against most ATGMs, there is no ATGM capable of piercing the turret of Abrams and Leo 2 A5 / A6 /7. Most missiles have 1000-1300mm of peneration (Cornet M) while for example Abrams turret is prooven be no less than 1400mm against shapedcharges (not APFDSDS). They are not invincible, atleast but most turrets are protected. Older ATGMs like TOW 2 are pretty useless as Relikt ERA (present on T-80BVM) can stop 700mm tandem charges all by itself.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому

      @@notinmyairspace this didn't age well lol.

  • @TianDiener
    @TianDiener 3 роки тому +2

    Ah yes! Because the M1 Abrams tanks used in the 1991 Desert Storm campaign is exactly the same as the ones used in 2021. No upgrades at all?

  • @cjclark2002
    @cjclark2002 3 роки тому +2

    Russian propaganda is comical I love it, keep trying. 🤣

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 3 роки тому +2

      American propaganda is more effective for you?..

    • @RandomCoffee101
      @RandomCoffee101 3 роки тому +4

      Good butthurt. keep watching the show

    • @petterderter6354
      @petterderter6354 2 роки тому

      @@maksimluzin1121 at least we don’t always need to compare to other countries and our designs are not stolen

  • @woveetymailyke4101
    @woveetymailyke4101 3 роки тому

    على أطفالك

  • @aerostaraircraftsanctuary604
    @aerostaraircraftsanctuary604 2 роки тому +1

    A high number of T-80BVM tanks have been destroyed in Ukraine. 57 Russian T-80Us have also been lost. Only 15 were destroyed, 42 were abandoned. As of 26 June 2022, 146 T-80 tanks have been visually confirmed as lost by Russia, including 40 T-80BV, 71 T-80U and 27 T-80BVM by OSINT site Oryx

  • @nasasurn5451
    @nasasurn5451 2 роки тому +3

    Javelin $150,000 / NLAW $40,000 vs T-72 $1M / T80 $3M / T84 $5M - Слава Україні Slava Ukrayini

    • @Orcawhale1
      @Orcawhale1 2 роки тому

      T-84 is a tank in use with Ukraine, not Russia.

    • @MaximGhost
      @MaximGhost 2 роки тому

      Also ...
      Carl Gustav AT round ...,.,,.. $3,000
      Stugna-P AT round ......,,.... $20,000

    • @kyizelma
      @kyizelma 3 місяці тому

      T-84 is a ukrainian tank, your thinking of t80 but i dont except Z or NAFO tards to know anything about tanks

  • @speterj
    @speterj 2 роки тому

    So far 109 T-80’s have been destroyed,abandoned,or captured in Ukraine.

  • @mafiosomemer3730
    @mafiosomemer3730 3 роки тому

    What happens when it met the Ukrainian T-84?

    • @notinmyairspace
      @notinmyairspace 3 роки тому

      If T-84 is fighting a T-80 or T-80B it will win, a fight against a T-80U would be pretty equal and the T-80BVM would probably win most of the times

    • @miquelescribanoivars5049
      @miquelescribanoivars5049 2 роки тому

      Aren't there like, 5 operational T-84 in Ukraine service?
      Maybe that's being Wikipedia trash.

  • @coderider3022
    @coderider3022 Рік тому

    This is the one they can’t afford to run or fix in Ukraine ? Safety 3rd …. Counted 1 pair of gloves there.

  • @huanliyuan7349
    @huanliyuan7349 3 роки тому +1

    Kharkiv‘s flying castle

  • @rubenayala2203
    @rubenayala2203 3 роки тому +1

    Abrams all day..