California’s Lithium Valley could power electric vehicle industry | 60 Minutes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • As the U.S. auto industry goes green, companies are developing lithium extraction for batteries in California’s Imperial Valley. Bill Whitaker reports.
    #electriccar #electricvehicle #battery
    "60 Minutes" is the most successful television broadcast in history. Offering hard-hitting investigative reports, interviews, feature segments and profiles of people in the news, the broadcast began in 1968 and is still a hit, over 50 seasons later, regularly making Nielsen's Top 10.
    Subscribe to the “60 Minutes” UA-cam channel: bit.ly/1S7CLRu
    Watch full episodes: cbsn.ws/1Qkjo1F
    Get more “60 Minutes” from “60 Minutes: Overtime”: cbsn.ws/1KG3sdr
    Follow “60 Minutes” on Instagram: bit.ly/23Xv8Ry
    Like “60 Minutes” on Facebook: on. 1Xb1Dao
    Follow “60 Minutes” on Twitter: bit.ly/1KxUsqX
    Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
    Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
    Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
    For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @jaredspencer3304
    @jaredspencer3304 Рік тому +164

    I appreciate the Audubon man's pragmatism. The reality is that most people can't focus on environmentalism until they're financial secure; worldwide, conservation is largely led by people who aren't fighting for survival. So balancing environmentalism with economic progress gets the best of both worlds.

    • @neeljavia2965
      @neeljavia2965 Рік тому +7

      Exactly.
      And he seemed sensible enough to understand that preserving environment doesn't mean you just stop progress.

    • @jrmcpuff-n-stuff7524
      @jrmcpuff-n-stuff7524 Рік тому +5

      He’s on the lithium company’s payroll

    • @Gcanno
      @Gcanno Рік тому +2

      Got It Stick To The Current Way Of Thinking Which Puts People Into Poverty .

    • @luke_cohen1
      @luke_cohen1 Рік тому +6

      The good is that Lithium Valley is based in California which has some of the strictest environmental regulations along with huge incentives and subsidies (on a state by state basis) towards renewable and green energy sources. These companies can make money but their dollars must benefit the local communities as much as possible while doing so.

    • @khunopie9159
      @khunopie9159 Рік тому

      Environmentalism is largely a scam on the level of "public health"
      Used to wield control over the population

  • @mowcowbell
    @mowcowbell Рік тому +14

    I own a Stellantis product... a '23 Jeep Wrangler 4xe. The 17kWh battery pack provides enough range for me to work each day without using any gas. With 375hp and 470lb/ft of torque, it is a blast to drive.

    • @sergiyavorski9977
      @sergiyavorski9977 Рік тому +3

      That jeep's upkeep will cost you an arm and a leg in the future. The electrification will cause prices of everything to skyrocket and your taxes will be much higher.

    • @mowcowbell
      @mowcowbell Рік тому +2

      @@sergiyavorski9977 that's your opinion. I'm enjoying driving hundreds of miles on a few dollars of electricity. Top open, too.

    • @owenkittredge3433
      @owenkittredge3433 Рік тому

      @@sergiyavorski9977 That the upkeep will cost you an arm and a leg in the future. Were will all the gasoline come from? It will cause prices of everything to skyrocket and your taxes will be much higher. I will stick with my horse and buggy hay is everywhere.

    • @blackout7615
      @blackout7615 Рік тому +2

      Where does your electricity come from? Most likely coal and natural gas. You drive a fossil fuel vehicle just like everyone else and when your battery has a dead cell you are going to want a combustion engine and not a battery pack.

    • @mowcowbell
      @mowcowbell Рік тому +3

      @@blackout7615 Electricity in my area is 30% wind, the rest is mainly natural gas.

  • @joeblack4436
    @joeblack4436 Рік тому +198

    Lithium is not scarce. The challenge is to extract it cleanly. I was blown away by the company that is essentially putting the water back in the ground cleaner. That is par excellence. The Salton Sea, much like the dead sea, is also a prime body of water for floating solar. The waters are calm. And, then you have the dual benefits of the electricity produced as well as fractionally lower evaporation with every installation. A win-win. To top it off there's the geothermal potential. That region could become an energy hub like few others.

    • @mrtopcat2
      @mrtopcat2 Рік тому

      Promises given. Promises broken. When you realize the costs, you will INSIST to buy Lithium batteries that are made in China. Just like you insist to buy anything else from China. So please don't kid yourself. You care about the environment only as long as you think someone else will pick up the tab. It is all about your consumption.

    • @dennisg4053
      @dennisg4053 Рік тому +14

      Except California already ADDED a Very high Lithium Extraction Tax. A tax so high... That is if the price of Lithium ever drops substantially... The Company would Owe more in Extraction Taxes..
      Then the Lithium itself was worth. One company ALREADY abandoned a HUGE Lithium Project ... Once THAT Tax was passed into Law.

    • @lucaskp16
      @lucaskp16 Рік тому +10

      why in the world would you put floating solar in a lake, MORE so a salty lake. a ground installation is already cheaper and doesn't have to deal with corrotion. terrible idea. when the only thing that people care about grid energy is the cost. just because you can do something doesn't mean is a good or even decent idea

    • @newfreenayshaun6651
      @newfreenayshaun6651 Рік тому

      If solar was actually practical and not so expensive, the Great Salt Lake would have already been covered years and years ago. It still doesn't absolutely need to be covered in solar panels, should people figure out and start utilizing Nicola Tesla's technology, the exact stuff that your government is hiding

    • @danielcarroll3358
      @danielcarroll3358 Рік тому +9

      @@lucaskp16 There is actually something a bit (only a bit) like the floating proposal. Sometimes canals are roofed over with solar arrays. No more land is needed. The electricity production increases because cells are more efficient when cooler. And water evaporation is reduced. A win, win, win situation.

  • @RiannaRichardsOfficial
    @RiannaRichardsOfficial Рік тому +16

    ❤❤❤ Finally, there is a piece of positive news this week! Thank you!

  • @baddoggie101
    @baddoggie101 Рік тому +11

    A minor correction: lithium is not a "dense" metal, but quite the opposite.

    • @hagestad
      @hagestad Рік тому +2

      Major correction - how are they suppose to be competitive to cheap batteries and cars from China? California is by far the most expensive place to do it.

    • @Kenobi_Cowboy
      @Kenobi_Cowboy Рік тому

      @@hagestad Who cares? China is done. I expect a Pan-American industry will run within a decade from Argentina to Canada. The Americas will become its own powerhouse of things, and the food will be amazing.
      If they kick out the meddling folks from elsewhere dividing their people and countries on the continent, and in the Caribbean, they will not need anything further from any part of Asia/Europe/Middle East.
      Sustainable badassery. Tacos included.

    • @Kenobi_Cowboy
      @Kenobi_Cowboy Рік тому +1

      It's easily available like sand for Silicon Valley. It's just bringing the process closer to home.

  • @scpdatabase969
    @scpdatabase969 Рік тому +13

    The Salton Sea is a great place to visit when doing a road trip in the area. Hopefully this kickstarts the economy there again so more people visit.
    You can fly a drone over the sea for half it's battery and barely get anywhere. It's HUGE.

    • @KB-ke3fi
      @KB-ke3fi Рік тому

      Yeah it's so clean and pretty there.

    • @Kenobi_Cowboy
      @Kenobi_Cowboy Рік тому +1

      There's a reason the Navy was out there in the 40's. It's literally a "Sea"

  • @ronkirk5099
    @ronkirk5099 Рік тому +141

    Back in the day, we used to fish, swim and water ski at the Salton Sea, but now the salt has become so concentrated it is mostly dead and the salt pans around the shore quickly becoming an ecological disaster. Good to see it might be put to some good use. Li-ion batteries are the best technology now, but battery technology is still evolving and Sodium-ion batteries may quickly reduce the need for Li and Iron-air batteries may become the solution for grid scale energy storage.

    • @chrisbarnhart4178
      @chrisbarnhart4178 Рік тому

      😊😊😊😊😊😊

    • @foxrex351
      @foxrex351 Рік тому +2

      Nerd

    • @larryg7109
      @larryg7109 Рік тому +4

      Right now, they are just adding sodium to lithium to make batteries, but that can change. You are correct. There is no promise of a boom.

    • @philborer877
      @philborer877 Рік тому +6

      I agree but every type of battery will find it's niche. The world is going to need so many batteries over the next 50 years that every type of battery will be in use. By that time I'll be dead so they can figure it out in 50 years.

    • @caddy1001
      @caddy1001 Рік тому +4

      Mining this area would be shameful...period.

  • @ocker2000
    @ocker2000 Рік тому +11

    Yes, here in Europe we found a massive supply of Lithium in France. Same benefits there.

    • @adimart2214
      @adimart2214 6 місяців тому

      this is more than anywhere in the world including France

  • @fireofenergy
    @fireofenergy Рік тому +8

    We need more info like this, from respected news sources, like 60 minutes, to continually inform the public about how cheap the solar battery infrastructure will be - as long as we mine and refine at the same scale as we do for gasoline, now.
    Thanks!

    • @TimJr.
      @TimJr. Рік тому +3

      60 Minutes WAS respected.. A couple decades ago.

    • @disinformationstation2072
      @disinformationstation2072 Рік тому +2

      Lol, you still respect modern mainstream media?? What decade are you living in? Lol at you.

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому +2

      🤣He said "respected." 🤣

    • @fireofenergy
      @fireofenergy Рік тому

      @@CarbageMan
      It's definitely looked up to by millions whether or not anti Tesla or anti American sentiment is, really projected by them.
      I haven't watched 60 minutes in years, so, I wouldn't really know, compared to how the rest of the mainstream seems to be that way.

    • @fireofenergy
      @fireofenergy Рік тому

      @@TimJr.
      See my other comments under this thread...

  • @Ojames600
    @Ojames600 Рік тому +22

    Everyone talking about batteries for EVs, they are not talking about the big market with grid energy storage and home energy storage. Being able to store all that excess energy being produce is a game changer

    • @ProXcaliber
      @ProXcaliber Рік тому +5

      If you think about it, as EV and battery technology in general improves, we could see EV batteries also being used as part of that storage system. Especially with EVs like the Ford lightning as an example that have the capability to also share its battery storage with a home if needed.

    • @1serhiy
      @1serhiy Рік тому +7

      The benefits of lithum, weight and enegery density, are not that relevant to Grid / Home storage. There are multiple companies that are ditching lithium and using less energy dense chemistires in an attempt to bring the price down, allowing for larger installations.

    • @roostercogburn7243
      @roostercogburn7243 Рік тому +1

      Tesla was a free energy guy. Elon's company are not free energy vehicles.

    • @stephensullivan1011
      @stephensullivan1011 Рік тому +1

      True, true, true.
      Fax man.
      That was going thru my head during this video.
      Let's go clean energy!

    • @tinyturnip7676
      @tinyturnip7676 Рік тому

      The key is to have a renewable power grid, like our current electrical one, so we can transport ourselves without the concern of being stranded in the middle of Nebraska with no power stations.

  • @o0o-jd-o0o95
    @o0o-jd-o0o95 Рік тому +25

    As long as we're reducing our dependence on China then I'm all for it

    • @thecapricorn11
      @thecapricorn11 Рік тому +1

      😂

    • @robbetts
      @robbetts Рік тому

      Amen to that.

    • @blackout7615
      @blackout7615 Рік тому

      That's so xenophobic and racist. We need to rely more on them and partner up with them like boe jiden did.

  • @JasonCarmichael
    @JasonCarmichael Рік тому +2

    Tesla, Lithium, Refinery, Texas

  • @confirmhandle
    @confirmhandle Рік тому +34

    Most commercial lithium extraction is from salt-flat brines through a process of evaporation and chemical recovery. Lithium is also recovered from lithium-bearing ores, such as spodumene, through a process that involves crushing, roasting and acid leaching.

    • @DissYraiN
      @DissYraiN Рік тому

      and it still ravages usable lands and pollutes groundwater. support hydrogen fuel cell.

    • @pascalouellette8516
      @pascalouellette8516 Рік тому

      Oh yeah, and what will the environmentalist do to this mining, shut it down or no permits....

  • @MikeJava
    @MikeJava Рік тому +24

    It's so refreshing to watch a news story that is not politically charged. It's sort of like "hey here is some progress we are making and the world is becoming a better place for it..." have a nice day.

    • @tvm73827
      @tvm73827 Рік тому +1

      You're so right! I hate watching any news these days because no one thinks of their country and it’s just ideological blabber. This segment was a breath of fresh air.

    • @John-ir2zf
      @John-ir2zf Рік тому

      Sad that you are that naive....
      Soooo, 60 minutes and everything they do ISNT politically motivated ?? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Stop falling for the scam.
      Why do you think that the climate zealots like Obama (and the other rich globalist) are buying beach front at record pace ? Seeing as they scream that despite being in an ice age (which we are) that sea levels are going to DROWN THE WORLD in 15 years ?
      Guess you don't remember the "ice age scare" they all pushed in the late 70s either, huh ?
      Or the big "oil scare" of the 80s ? WORLD DEPLETED OF OIL RESERVES IN 10 YEARS !!!! they said
      Then they tried the "global warming scare".... but after it was proven overall Temps have actually DROPPED, they switched it to "climate CHANGE scare"... so no matter what way it goes, they can fear monger with it.

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому

      If it's dirty green, it's politically charged.

  • @Brian-pq2mo
    @Brian-pq2mo Рік тому +3

    Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and Lithium Valley dammmm

  • @philborer877
    @philborer877 Рік тому +16

    I'm glad to see this area is finally in use. I learned about it 3 years ago. But they still aren't moving fast enough.

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 Рік тому +4

      They have to wait for environmental impact studies and permits.
      It can take 10 years to build a house in California.
      Suzanne Somers house in Malibu burned a few years ago. She ended up moving. She said she's too old to wait for the permit to rebuild her house. It may not have been done in her lifetime.

    • @thegreatone11
      @thegreatone11 Рік тому

      ​@@TheBandit7613 ah Susan summer was a beautiful lady.

    • @andrewschliewe6392
      @andrewschliewe6392 Рік тому +1

      Why when one can get lithium cheaper from overseas. Remember, CA is heavily taxing lithium production in that area.

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 Рік тому +3

      @@andrewschliewe6392 Not enough available. Imagine how much lithium we need if we are going to start replacing cars and trucks.
      Haven't even scratched the surface yet.

    • @philborer877
      @philborer877 Рік тому +2

      @@andrewschliewe6392 why?
      Because the amount of carbon put into the air when transporting across the world is in the millions of tons. To acquire minerals close to home. Saves huge on carbon and reduces costs even if there is a little extra taxing going on. Taxes aren't that much of an issue in the whole grand scheme of things.

  • @davidmcdonald9180
    @davidmcdonald9180 Рік тому +9

    Not just cars, grid storage, cell phones, bikes, lawnmowers, snowblower the lithium Ion and LFP batteries use is going to grow exponentially.

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому +1

      Grid storage and vehicles dwarfs all the rest.

    • @blackout7615
      @blackout7615 Рік тому

      And we will burn fossil fuels to generate the electricity to charge them.

    • @gaberoyalll
      @gaberoyalll Рік тому

      And humanoid 🤖 robots

    • @billyballsup2685
      @billyballsup2685 Рік тому

      It's a disaster waiting to happen. Better of making coal power stations cleaner. It's already mainly in after coming out of chimneys now.

  • @Livlifetaistdeth
    @Livlifetaistdeth Рік тому +2

    That blue/purple suite coat is the most car salesman coat I've ever seen.

  • @Toby_Flenderson_1982
    @Toby_Flenderson_1982 Рік тому +9

    "Operational in just a few months..." Famous last words... I do hope this takes off.

    • @andrewschliewe6392
      @andrewschliewe6392 Рік тому +6

      I'd say 2/3 of everything mentioned in the segment will never occur.

  • @maozedung7270
    @maozedung7270 Рік тому +6

    We have no energy crisis , we have a spiritual one.

  • @Phillip_Reese
    @Phillip_Reese Рік тому +7

    it feels like old news already, so many other 'things' are happening but it is a nice view of that old forgotten area. GOOD!

  • @user-cw2py6wh8l
    @user-cw2py6wh8l Рік тому +3

    Government should give tax break to companies that offers full-time work from home. Then you don't need so many vehicles.

  • @jasonschlegel4027
    @jasonschlegel4027 Рік тому +13

    60 Minutes - after all these years you are among my favorite sources.

  • @tayler2396
    @tayler2396 Рік тому +5

    How is it a "dense metal" with atomic number 3? Are the atoms packed especially tight? It seems like small disposable lithium batteries are very lightweight.

    • @tvm73827
      @tvm73827 Рік тому +1

      You're one the few smart people watching this segment!

    • @michaelayeni177
      @michaelayeni177 Рік тому +3

      Probably talking about its energy density or eletron density (electrons produced over atomic weight) rather then weight.

    • @Laminar-Flow
      @Laminar-Flow 7 місяців тому

      It's low atomic weight and small atomic radius is precisely what gives it such high energy density. He was talking about it being an energy-dense metal; in fact, it is the most energy dense metal at more than 700 Wh/kg in its pure state. Nothing can even come close to it's energy density, or unit charge per (light) weight. It also has the highest specific heat capacity of any solid element.

  • @AdamBorseti
    @AdamBorseti Рік тому +5

    This all sounds too good to be true.

  • @tedbozarth8300
    @tedbozarth8300 Рік тому +2

    “if I could turn back my crystal ball” 😂

  • @lottiegray8790
    @lottiegray8790 Рік тому

    I'm new to stock market /Crypto and would like to invest but I've got no idea on how to make good profits. Pls what's the best approach you'd recommend?

    • @sophiakimberly8244
      @sophiakimberly8244 Рік тому

      Exactly, at the moment bitcoin is the best and profitable coin to buy and invest in..

  • @zachansen8293
    @zachansen8293 Рік тому +2

    No mention of tesla groundbreaking the same day?

  • @MeLoSonn
    @MeLoSonn Рік тому +11

    This really is an eye opener and motivates me to focus more on the needs of our future.

  • @jackrandom4893
    @jackrandom4893 Рік тому +2

    Come to Wyoming. We have lithium near Rock Springs.

  • @Briguy1027
    @Briguy1027 Рік тому +3

    Odd that they would call lithium dense. I could swear it's near the beginning of the periodic table.

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip Рік тому +2

      Probably meant energy dense, as well as physically when crunched together into a battery cell. Water is likewise denser than oil despite being only three atoms wide compared to the long chains of an -ane molecule.

    • @victorhopper6774
      @victorhopper6774 Рік тому +1

      @@doujinflip water is not a element

  • @JamesHerron-j1t
    @JamesHerron-j1t Рік тому +2

    Look people lithium is even more rare by 50 times then petroleum and it is no more renewable than petroleum and you still have to burn petroleum to process the lithium

  • @russell2449
    @russell2449 Рік тому +8

    I wonder why you failed to mention the fact that Tesla JUST BROKE GROUND in Texas on the first lithium REFINERY here in the US??? It, like a lot of other industries Elon has disrupted, will revolutionize lithium refining and will be the LEADER in clean/green lithium, something I think would have been worth mentioning.

  • @alfredadler9140
    @alfredadler9140 Рік тому +1

    The new gasoline. I am sold.

  • @jillcrowe2626
    @jillcrowe2626 Рік тому +3

    The stench of the Salton Sea is overpowering. The whole area is full of vegetable farming. It uses clean water from the Colorado river.

  • @MamaLifeBre
    @MamaLifeBre Рік тому +4

    Can u guys prevent the salton sea from drying up while you're at it?

    • @stephensullivan1011
      @stephensullivan1011 Рік тому +1

      Lol. That'd be great

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip Рік тому +2

      Why though? It was never supposed to even exist to begin with

    • @adimart2214
      @adimart2214 6 місяців тому

      it was an accidental lake let it dry up

  • @om7303
    @om7303 Рік тому +15

    Too many 60 minutes viewers need to direct attention to their Denny's 55+ menu rather than leave these embarrassing comments.

    • @Alexzw92
      @Alexzw92 Рік тому +1

      Hahaha

    • @kevinmatheson-fi7jt
      @kevinmatheson-fi7jt Рік тому +1

      You sound like you work at dollar general

    • @Alexzw92
      @Alexzw92 Рік тому +2

      @@kevinmatheson-fi7jt You sound like you are offended

    • @kevinmatheson-fi7jt
      @kevinmatheson-fi7jt Рік тому

      @@Alexzw92 nobody was talking to you little man. Go find a corner to stand in

    • @ProXcaliber
      @ProXcaliber Рік тому

      Lmao, good one!

  • @scottparr5606
    @scottparr5606 Рік тому +1

    And how did they say they will create this new ocean of clean electricity? Or how to deliver the electricity without overloading the grid? Gas tanks never need replacing but these batteries need replacing after a few hundred cycles , or just a few years. How will these toxic batteries be recycled? How will they clean the sludge before pumping it back into the ground as to not poison the land? This whole thing does not appear to be very well thought out...

  • @linguist8623
    @linguist8623 Рік тому +4

    @60 Minutes
    ShiYan, HuBei Province, PRC, and MianYang, SiChuan Province, PRC, have a lot of carbon capture technology already in-place, though minimal in scale. They had such in-place and expanded, from the 90's until now. I know, because I worked and lived in those areas, and helped with energy design.
    We can do such in the US too, with US and allied tech, collaboration, with better quality, too. Let's make the US very high-tech, clean, and industrial, as a new "industrial tech revolution" heats up.

  • @westrnite
    @westrnite Рік тому +1

    All natural resources in America belong to We the people. Even California! So remember we all get a slice of that pie.

  • @TalonID
    @TalonID Рік тому +29

    This is the 2nd attempt at Lithium Extraction within the same 10 square miles. There are some real issues with pulling this off. I hope the teams get it right as the last were too arrogant to listen to those that could help them perfect the process. Hint, don't try to apply Heat Management Systems late in the design cycle, when you're low on development cash...

    • @tommersch4296
      @tommersch4296 Рік тому +3

      Has berkshire-hathaway learned the horrible dangers that make you quake?

    • @awesomo9k
      @awesomo9k Рік тому +2

      Didn't you hear the guy in the outdated wing-tipped suit and wacky shirt? This is going to usher in an entirely new INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION!

    • @Jim-Tuner
      @Jim-Tuner Рік тому +1

      NONSENSE. Science is magic and stop questioning authority.

  • @ryonsanders4045
    @ryonsanders4045 Рік тому +2

    Vehicles per year sounds great until you realize that number is reduced to 0 when a current years batteries have to be replaced 10 yrs later…. Or does production magically double when resources are used to maintain existing vehicles?

  • @timower5850
    @timower5850 Рік тому +3

    As long as it's not Tesla, MSM has no problem supporting EVs.

    • @LafemmebearMusic
      @LafemmebearMusic Рік тому

      Yes cus Elon is an awful human objectively. He’s literally the son of a man who got rich during the apartheid and now spouts racist sexist stereotypes against any group he deems beneath him and uses said blood money to buy and do anything he wants. I know you white dudes envy his ability to live with out caring about anyone 😅

  • @garyives1218
    @garyives1218 Рік тому +2

    WTF! Lithium doesn't "power" electric vehicles. Electricity powers electric vehicles. Where will all the additional electricity needed come from?

    • @MERLE1593
      @MERLE1593 Рік тому

      From stationary power plants, wind, solar and hydro. All of these can be environmentally safe.

  • @turbostixxx
    @turbostixxx Рік тому +50

    Cool story. Tesla just broke ground in Texas for a new lithium refining plant yesterday. Should be fully operational and ramped to full production in 2 years. These normally take 6-8 years to come online normally.
    Good for 1,000,000 EVs to start and able to be expanded as needed.

    • @MikeYurbasovich
      @MikeYurbasovich Рік тому +6

      Where's the copper and nickel coming from?

    • @Gasoline4ever
      @Gasoline4ever Рік тому +3

      ​@@MikeYurbasovich great question. Also, wheres the people to buy these expensive e.v's? Middle class is dieing in this country.

    • @TheMagicJIZZ
      @TheMagicJIZZ Рік тому +1

      ​@@MikeYurbasovich Indonesia

    • @makerspace533
      @makerspace533 Рік тому +2

      Canada

    • @phillyphil1513
      @phillyphil1513 Рік тому +2

      Taiwan

  • @zanshin720
    @zanshin720 Рік тому +2

    Geothermal power plant generates power for lithium mining and refining.

  • @GamerplayerWT
    @GamerplayerWT Рік тому +20

    I would recommend that they take ALL the minerals from the underground slurry and refine them, and store them… because we’re eventually gonna need them, instead of shoving them back underground after removing the lithium only.

    • @SpaceTravel1776
      @SpaceTravel1776 Рік тому +4

      And it's so easy to do that, so why not? Just snap your fingers and extract all the minerals, right? Good plan my man, I'm sure you will supply the capital, provide the technology, and handle the storage, sales, and shipping logistics. Thanks bro.

    • @abdiganiaden
      @abdiganiaden Рік тому +4

      @@SpaceTravel1776 Lol he’s naive, leave him alone.

    • @2cartalkers
      @2cartalkers Рік тому +7

      They are storing them......underground.

    • @bobfoster687
      @bobfoster687 Рік тому +1

      @@SpaceTravel1776 A guy named space travel criticizing and idea. Amazing!!!

    • @ronaldking1054
      @ronaldking1054 Рік тому

      It doesn't matter right now as the same slurry is going to be pumped again to extract energy. Take the stuff needed now so that it can be stored in the same thing that will be heated and pumped again. Why pay to store something that is not needed to be used?

  • @u3b3rg33k
    @u3b3rg33k Рік тому

    CBS can you please post de-interlaced videos to youtube? thanks!

  • @shmookins
    @shmookins Рік тому +18

    Fantastic news. This is what I like to hear.
    And the products being in cars by 2025 is very fast as well.

    • @andrewschliewe6392
      @andrewschliewe6392 Рік тому

      Don't count on it and don't be surprised if the batteries are 20% more expensive.

    • @shmookins
      @shmookins Рік тому +2

      @@andrewschliewe6392 You're thinking short term. Think bigger. Imagine the effect of the US and West in general having chips and battery factories and how that will play out in the decades to come.
      Imagine how things could be different with and without such projects in the year 2050, for example.

    • @Kenobi_Cowboy
      @Kenobi_Cowboy Рік тому

      @@shmookins Agreed man the long-term is the goal. We've pulled a lot of manufacturing back to America. Chips, batteries, steel...etc. That is jobs up front but that is also sustainable because we don't have to ship it anywhere. Back to American basics- we'll do it better, smarter, and harder.

    • @tekiwi
      @tekiwi Рік тому

      Only thing is by 2045 in California and many other U.S States you we won't have the energy production to run anything if you don't get busy building electrical storage facilities if you want ALL this supposed "Clean Energy" Lol

    • @shmookins
      @shmookins Рік тому

      @@tekiwi Time to start working. We 'only' have 22 years to get it done. :)

  • @ENNESdESIGN
    @ENNESdESIGN Рік тому +2

    guess Tesla forgot to pay their CBS monthly subscription...good for them!

  • @firehorse2008
    @firehorse2008 Рік тому +12

    Sounds too good to be true. I never trust industry representatives that claim their factory is super clean. I don't think that is 100% steam being released. Also skeptical of pumping processed brine back into the ground.

    • @E1VM
      @E1VM Рік тому +2

      Yes it probably is too good to be true. Remember, 60 minutes also said Trump was a Russian asset and January 6th was an insurrection...

    • @sparky2008sparky
      @sparky2008sparky Рік тому

      Li batteries energy density still pales in comparison to fossil fuels. 1000 times less
      There is no denying this.

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 Рік тому +1

      ​@@sparky2008sparkyThe question is A) will the electric car get you where you need to go, without costing a lot more?
      And B) Will the gas car cause the climate to go haywire and flood out millions of people in just the US?
      A the answer is YES. B the answer is YES.

    • @FOX11GUY
      @FOX11GUY Рік тому

      Coal goes into the furnace when you plug in a fast charge EV. No tail pipe doesn't mean no emissions.

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 Рік тому +1

      @@FOX11GUY Actually, you're wrong. About 40% of EVs sold in the US are in California. And California has decommissioned all of its coal plants (because they are too expensive to operate). Since those plants were decommissioned, they have added so much solar generation that there were no more rolling blackouts even during the massive statewide heat wave of 2022.
      The cost of continually refueling and continually repairing and maintaining coal plants is very high compared to wind and solar. For this reason, coal is rapidly disappearing as a power source, across the US. Natural gas is also more expensive than renewables and is also shrinking in its share of energy generation. If the Republicans don't force the country back to the stone age, we'll see the US grid as a whole go over 80% emissions free within a decade. And close to 100% within the decade after that.

  • @KelValMax
    @KelValMax Рік тому

    60 minutes producers... please adjust the audio on the bumper. It's too hot. It's been too hot for years now.

  • @mclau1524
    @mclau1524 Рік тому +5

    Stellantis only has the Jeep brand keeping them alive, and people are quickly realizing how overpriced and non-reliable they are

    • @trebombs4life
      @trebombs4life Рік тому

      ya stellantis is a sellout stacked on top of a sellout. nobody wants their globalist crap(jeep liberty built on fiat garbage) except the wrangler and the ram. they are featured cause they are being positioned to be Globalist Automotive in the brave new world is my guess

  • @YouGotHousesWeGotMahomes
    @YouGotHousesWeGotMahomes Рік тому +2

    Mark Stewart might be all about lithium, but his face is definitely about mining for Botox.

  • @jamiepatterson1214
    @jamiepatterson1214 Рік тому +7

    Okay, lithium is available for the manufacture of rechargeable batteries. But the main question still hasn't been answered. Will there be enough clean, reliable electricity available to charge every EV predicted to be sold in the coming years?
    California has already suffered an order not to charge EVs because of insufficient power supply.

    • @davet766
      @davet766 Рік тому

      Of course there will be. On beloved governor wouldn't be so stupid as to outlaw the manufacture and sale of ICE vehicles in 2035 if it wasn't so. Fantasyland used to be a spot in a Disney park. It now engulfs the entire state.

    • @bman6502
      @bman6502 Рік тому +1

      Jamie, providing necessary “total” power is not the problem if our power usage were constant. The problem is we have spike demands… the key will be power storage…

    • @jamiepatterson1214
      @jamiepatterson1214 Рік тому

      @@bman6502 Spike demand is something I forgot about, but is indeed a problem. And unless I miss my guess, spike demand is a cause of brown and blackouts.
      Your thought on storage is a nice idea, but where would the cells be placed? There would be a need for additional equipment in order to store electricity.

    • @bman6502
      @bman6502 Рік тому +1

      @@jamiepatterson1214 correct.. basically we’d have to build very large battery packs, which we’re currently partnering with Tesla on in California.. providing power for electric cars to charge at night is not an issue as we have plenty of night capability to produce power.. in fact, most hydro plants are reduced at night because we have excess electricity at night.. the 6 million dollar question is how to flatten out the use curve, or expand battery storage to 10x what we have now…

    • @jamiepatterson1214
      @jamiepatterson1214 Рік тому

      @@bman6502 Flatening the use curve is an attitude problem in many cases. In other cases it's a structural issue of homes or buildings.
      My questions concerns placement of the batteries. Would they be at the electrical provider or an individual's home or apartment. Power would have to be converted to DC for battery storage and.converted back to AC for normal use. At least that's how I understand it.

  • @linguist8623
    @linguist8623 Рік тому +7

    "...more than half the world's supply of lithium.." Wow.

    • @stephensullivan1011
      @stephensullivan1011 Рік тому

      Current.
      Yep

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 Рік тому +1

      I think that's a pure guess. Not sure how they can estimate that much based on what is known.

    • @linguist8623
      @linguist8623 Рік тому +4

      @@tonysu8860 Thankfully, it is not a pure guess. We have the knowhow, expertise to know... I'll leave it at that. Therefore, it is not a pure guess on his end.

  • @TexasRanchu
    @TexasRanchu Рік тому +1

    Didn't Tesla just broke grounds on lithium mining, I guess they are ahead of the game again

  • @user-nz9dw7fv8s
    @user-nz9dw7fv8s Рік тому +4

    Sounds promising. I just hope they don't produce any pollution.

    • @valdivia1234567
      @valdivia1234567 Рік тому +2

      Lol

    • @stevecoffman2559
      @stevecoffman2559 Рік тому +2

      Sure. Don’t want ‘clean’ energy electric cars to pollute. That would just be crazy ironic

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому

      Sadly, dirty green isn't clean. It's 95% scam. Plug-in hybrids aren't that bad.

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому +1

      @@stevecoffman2559 That's exactly what's happening.

  • @lotklear1379
    @lotklear1379 Рік тому +1

    The numbers suggest it takes about 80lbs of lithium per car? Is that correct?

  • @thatlegendaryguy9480
    @thatlegendaryguy9480 Рік тому +7

    My boy can’t stop smiling through the interview 🤣💲

  • @joshua.snyder
    @joshua.snyder Рік тому

    Ion exchange resins have been around for many years. Fascinating approach.

  • @aaranjackson2080
    @aaranjackson2080 Рік тому +3

    I'd like to mention that i don't feel lithium is safe, sustainable or meant to be used alone/without combination of other elements.

    • @tess5844
      @tess5844 Рік тому

      As someone who ingests a form of lithium everyday I can assure it’s safe. As for if it’s sustainability, I think that depends on if the resource is over extracted or not.

  • @r4raced4doom2
    @r4raced4doom2 Рік тому

    That dealership dudes blue velvet suit should be a war crime.

  • @shawncirignano4876
    @shawncirignano4876 Рік тому +13

    Sodium batteries 🔋 is going to put lithium batteries to shame.

    • @Pernection
      @Pernection Рік тому

      Only in cost and cold weather

    • @epictangent
      @epictangent Рік тому

      Sure 😂 sodium is just a racket to undermine the functional battery tech

  • @m4rvinmartian
    @m4rvinmartian Рік тому

    *2:00** Hey! Once you get those cars built, I got a bridge to sell you!*

  • @coyote5851
    @coyote5851 Рік тому +6

    Well I know being middle class this won’t be affordable

    • @MayorMcheese12
      @MayorMcheese12 Рік тому

      You won’t be middle class any more soon buddy

  • @nikitakucherov5028
    @nikitakucherov5028 Рік тому

    Finally a level headed environmentalist. You radical environmentalists out there should follow suit. NOTHING will stop economic development, therefore, work WITH developers not just blindly working against them.

  • @levismith7444
    @levismith7444 Рік тому +12

    I had no idea lithium could even be mined that cleanly

  • @lawerancelanham
    @lawerancelanham Рік тому

    Who else remembered that Vice video on the Salton Sea while watching this?

  • @coyote5851
    @coyote5851 Рік тому +3

    It’s so clean you can taste it

    • @dansmithorsomething4359
      @dansmithorsomething4359 Рік тому +1

      Lol, when you mention 'clean' so many times, something tells me that it's not clean.

  • @JamesHerron-j1t
    @JamesHerron-j1t Рік тому +1

    There you go build more geothermal power plants sustainable, clean energy. If the damn goal is net zero why is everybody trying to tell you hydrogen is bad

  • @jaybasil1239
    @jaybasil1239 Рік тому +9

    Nothing like a bunch of conservatives raging in the comments at the mere mention of California and alternative energy sources 🤣🤣🤣
    Cry more little men.

    • @dski8097
      @dski8097 Рік тому

      Comifornia you mean, it's a cesspool of trash and corruption.

    • @vickyabramowitz2885
      @vickyabramowitz2885 Рік тому

      That's because they don't want to believe that something beneficial to Americans could come out of Commiefornia./s

    • @kevinmatheson-fi7jt
      @kevinmatheson-fi7jt Рік тому

      Nothing like a bunch of liberals moving one non-renewable resource to another non-renewable resource with even more pollution

    • @ras22273
      @ras22273 Рік тому +1

      I've been scrolling for a min, haven't seen any. I have seen several hateful comments about conservative comments tho. I'm confused 🤨

    • @reallifehack4790
      @reallifehack4790 Рік тому

      @@vickyabramowitz2885 it will come out of Alabama and Mississippi ..conservative heavens

  • @garylangley4502
    @garylangley4502 Рік тому +1

    I've lived in San Diego and Yuma AZ for most of my life, so I know the area well. It has gone from a vacation/recreation spot to a ghost town. The people that live there are mostly squatters. As the Salton Sea has evaporated, the concentration of minerals has increased, so less and less aquatic life can survive there. With that, the area smells horrible. The shores are covered with dead shrimp. I didn't know about the geothermal wells activity there, and that sounds great. It seems that the other minerals there could be mined and sold also.

  • @normanbraslow7902
    @normanbraslow7902 Рік тому +6

    The electricity still must be generated.

  • @cory8837
    @cory8837 Рік тому +6

    Good that EV news is finally making its way to old people news sources.

  • @betterthingshub
    @betterthingshub Рік тому +1

    Great opportunity for investors !

  • @makerspace533
    @makerspace533 Рік тому +3

    Lithium will not be a problem, cobalt is the problem. There's twice as much cobalt as lithium in the batteries. The bright side is that none of these materials are used up in a battery. So at some point a near quiescent point will be reached where the recycled batteries will approach the number of new batteries. Thus the need for new materials will drop significantly.

    • @gerryburde5663
      @gerryburde5663 Рік тому +1

      Cobalt isn't used at all in LFP batteries

    • @makerspace533
      @makerspace533 Рік тому

      @@gerryburde5663 Right, my Tesla is 3.5 years old and has the old NMC battery.

  • @at1970
    @at1970 Рік тому +1

    There’s almost nothing sustainable, green or clean about most of these technologies. The problem is not a lack of technology but far too many people. No matter what we do if we don’t come up with a sustainable population policy we are wasting our time. Population growth will always overwhelm any lifestyle or technology.

  • @FrappuccinoAlfredo
    @FrappuccinoAlfredo Рік тому +5

    Wow i love how it takes 6 years of driving EVs to achieve net neutral emissions :) surely i must be saving the environment giving money to car companies :)

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому +1

      Then pretty soon you have to shitcan the batteries.

  • @alfredoramirez-uw5ub
    @alfredoramirez-uw5ub Рік тому +1

    Sounds like they gonna need tools for the brine wells. Hit me up

  • @sillydog70
    @sillydog70 Рік тому +3

    Lithium batteries can be dangerous! There are numerous videos on UA-cam of lithium vehicles in China bursting into flames, and as we all know lithium batteries are very hard to put out even once they’ve been submerged in water they still burn

  • @marythompson4654
    @marythompson4654 Рік тому

    The only lithium mine in NV has already leaked chemicals in waters

  • @luistpuig
    @luistpuig Рік тому +5

    The problem is the aging electric power grid which must be updated to handle the massive upcoming electric demand in the system...

    • @g2gcio
      @g2gcio Рік тому +1

      If solar panel are installed in homes; then aging electrical grid should not be a major concern😅

    • @Matt-kt9nm
      @Matt-kt9nm Рік тому

      You are correct. Last summer they asked people not to charge their electric cars.

    • @Solitude47152
      @Solitude47152 Рік тому +1

      What a epic disaster, being completely dependent on “the grid” is not a good idea. We will never be able to upgrade to meet this insane demand

    • @peterh5165
      @peterh5165 Рік тому

      Gosh, really too bad that we can't do things like we did in the 1950s Luis T. Puig.
      I mean it's just a crying shame that the US can't invest in infrastructure like the US did in the past. I think it is funny that many people have seem to have forgotten about (or don't want to acknowledge) the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 (aka National Interstate and Defense Highways Act)! I wonder how many people know that it was a Republican (wow, let that thought sink in!) President by the name of Dwight Eisenhower who signed that act back in 1956 (BTW, Eisenhower was also Supreme Allied Commander of the D-Day invasion in WW2). This highway act resulted in construction of 41,000 miles of the Interstate Highway System over ten years. Also part of this act: the construction of gas stations along these new highways, since without gas stations these new highways are kind of hard to use unless you want to drive miles from a highway to the nearest town in rural areas! I have read reports that Dwight Eisenhower was impressed by the German Autobahn when he was over there at the end of WW2, and he also took part in an exercise to move a bunch of Army equipment from one end of the US to the other using roads instead of just railroads back in the 1930s. That 1930s exercise left a lot to be desired because of the condition of many roads in the country at that time.
      And then there is president FDR's bringing electricity to rural areas during the Great Depression (Deja vu!).
      Or the Pacific Railway Act (1862) that built the transcontinental railroad.
      It is too bad that investment in a healthy future for our country is no longer possible.

    • @aolvaar8792
      @aolvaar8792 Рік тому

      @@peterh5165 one in seven Americans eats for FREE.
      ~$2 Trillion/year on welfare

  • @blairmiller9160
    @blairmiller9160 Рік тому

    If new zealand had this resource, we'd still buy from overseas.

  • @reubenj.cogburn8546
    @reubenj.cogburn8546 Рік тому +3

    California's lithium supply would be better used on its population, instead of its vehicles.

    • @TwinTurboOnly
      @TwinTurboOnly Рік тому

      You show your lack of intelligence with comments like this. Yet are trying to insult others. lmao. The USA would really be a 3rd world country without California.

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому

      Best comment of the day! 😀

  • @rustycar9177
    @rustycar9177 Рік тому

    I think this story is an investors' presentation.
    2025 yeah right 😂

  • @tylerpetit33
    @tylerpetit33 Рік тому +3

    I'm curious what the potential risks this may have to the water table as they pump the brine back underground. But, this is also huge positive news!

    • @M.Mae.M
      @M.Mae.M Рік тому +5

      This really changes nothing as they have been doing it for years. The only change is lithium is removed.

    • @mrtopcat2
      @mrtopcat2 Рік тому

      @@M.Mae.M So were you told. Please do a bit more research. Also please research what other materials needed to make these batteries. Hint: lithium is not the only one.

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 Рік тому +3

      The Salton Sea is already considered a dying if not nearly dead sea due to lack of water.

    • @lahaina4791
      @lahaina4791 Рік тому

      ​@@mrtopcat2 Zambonium also. 😅

  • @alfs3
    @alfs3 Рік тому +1

    #FAIL! I’m not sure when this segment was shot exactly but to not even bring up Tesla’s lithium refinery that’s already broken ground in Texas is an EPIC FAIL for 60 minutes’ lazy or shoddy reporting at best!

  • @SL4PSYM4XY
    @SL4PSYM4XY Рік тому +5

    Trading one limited resource for another, trading one form of pollution for another. I really don't understand it. Porsche developed an ingenious carbon neutral bio-fuel.

    • @The1978johnny
      @The1978johnny Рік тому +1

      Sodium is the next stop not bio fuel. It’s all about efficiency. If you turn fuel in to energy 80% of the energy is heat and not an asset. The entire chain of electric vehicles from manufacturing to charging is 80% efficient.

    • @ProXcaliber
      @ProXcaliber Рік тому +1

      Besides producing basically zero emissions while using the vehicle, another reason EVs are becoming so popular is because they require MUCH lower operating costs. Plus, you also have to consider how efficiently a combustion engine uses the energy from said fuel. Combustion engines can only capture less than 40% of the energy from the process, meanwhile EVs can use the energy from the grid much more efficiently.

    • @SL4PSYM4XY
      @SL4PSYM4XY Рік тому

      @@ProXcaliber look up the efficiency rates of the grid and get back to me.

    • @SL4PSYM4XY
      @SL4PSYM4XY Рік тому

      @@The1978johnny that number can’t be correct. Almost 1/4 of the US power grid still comes from coal. There is no way your EV being charged on coal power is 80% efficient. That’s absurd.

    • @ProXcaliber
      @ProXcaliber Рік тому +1

      @@SL4PSYM4XY While it is true that the overall efficiency from primary energy to delivered work is about 33% for energy in the US, there are opportunities to make the electric grid more efficient. For example, by displacing coal-fired steam turbine generating plants with newer distributed technology, such as gas turbines or solar and wind power. Combined cycle gas turbines are capable of generating electricity at over 60% efficiency. Additionally, Combined Heat and Power systems (CHP) have the potential to increase efficiency to more than 80% by using almost all waste heat for other purposes. And that also isn’t considering the fact that it is overall better to run a central power location to power thousands/millions of cars than to have millions of cars driving around producing their own emissions. And even still the added benefit of the lower operating cost of an EV still out weighs combustion engine vehicles throughout ownership for anyone who buys them. Consumer reports noted that the average EV buyer saves anywhere from $6,000 to $10,000 throughout ownership in maintenance when compared to combustion engine vehicles.

  • @miles9038
    @miles9038 Рік тому

    This segment is extremely favorable towards business interests and does not fully explain the dire status of the Salton Sea. While Lithium extraction has big benefits, 60 Minutes totally failed to highlight how bad the toxic dust and environmental impacts of mining will have on the surrounding area.
    The Pacific Institute's 2014 report states, "Even at the low estimate, the long-term social and economic costs of a deteriorating Salton Sea could approach $29 billion."
    Failing to include the economic consequences of the Salton Sea's demise does not provide the viewer with a full picture as to the stakes of lithium extraction.

  • @pah1921il
    @pah1921il Рік тому +7

    Fantastic piece of journalism, extremely informative, balanced and easy to understand how it impacts “me”.

    • @andrewschliewe6392
      @andrewschliewe6392 Рік тому +1

      No it isn't balanced. I didn't see/hear anything about CA heavily taxing lithium production in the area. And everything in the segment is may or can or potential. And what about the emissions generated in the production.

  • @Me97202
    @Me97202 Рік тому +4

    The term “green technology” is starting to sound a little like propaganda to me. _Producing_ these batteries is absolutely *horrible* for the environment.

    • @mikafiltenborg7572
      @mikafiltenborg7572 Рік тому

      Burning gas is horrible

    • @CarbageMan
      @CarbageMan Рік тому

      It's PURE propaganda, sadly. A fraction of the damage would be done by plug-in hybrids, but that's not good enough for the religious left.

  • @joedennehy386
    @joedennehy386 Рік тому +2

    They better start doubling the power grid, and building hundreds of mw storage

    • @EfficientRVer
      @EfficientRVer Рік тому

      EVs themselves can become the storage, if grid tied. And if EVERY car were suddenly an EV, it would only increase power needs 30%. A smaller increase than when people started buying air conditioners. It will take a long time to replace every car with an EV.

  • @chrisrolandsoundbath
    @chrisrolandsoundbath Рік тому +2

    This could have and should have happened decades ago, it’s always been possible. While the sudden shift should be applauded, the auto and fossil fuel giants which blocked this for decades should never be applauded.

    • @yourlogicalnightmare1014
      @yourlogicalnightmare1014 Рік тому +1

      No worries, Wokefornia environmentalist a wholes will tie this up in court for years without help from big oil or conventional car makers

  • @AA-eh7co
    @AA-eh7co Рік тому +3

    Don't let these guys fool you, we will never be competitive due to our greedy CEOs. All the competitive margin$ go lined their pockets.
    Also, by the time all the Lithium in the sea dries up, we will have formulated another energy solution.

  • @Caniac76
    @Caniac76 Рік тому

    This is already out-of-date news. Most batteries for cars and energy storage will be made using sodium. Lithium will be used for smaller batteries and planes.

  • @sp4rksaflyin
    @sp4rksaflyin Рік тому +5

    We need a truthful story about how DIRTY it is for the environment to extract Lithium. Not to mention, our entire U.S. electrical grid is no where near able to handle this fast push.

    • @MrAbstractj
      @MrAbstractj Рік тому

      We already know how harmful and dirty to extract and use petroleum.
      As for the grid, if there’s incentives like any other political agenda, I’m sure the utility providers will be all over it. Additionally, not everyone can afford an EV, so it’s not like we’ll need the infrastructure overnight.

    • @coop3814
      @coop3814 Рік тому

      everything we do as a human race is, to some extent, dirty. We're in a 'pick your poison situation', and the science backs that mining up lithium, copper, etc for batteries and development of the grid is cleaner than mining up coal or drilling up oil to burn for a one-time use.

    • @sevenflashowls
      @sevenflashowls Рік тому

      The Grid is actually several regional grids and is constantly being changed. Surprisingly, the grid operators are aware of what is coming and have adjusted their forecasts and planning.

  • @joeking433
    @joeking433 Рік тому +1

    When was this originally aired? They need to make a not of that in the description.

  • @WeAreLegion-
    @WeAreLegion- Рік тому +4

    What about the cobalt??

    • @edricaldones9639
      @edricaldones9639 Рік тому +4

      There's always the Congo to exploit, it appears.

    • @Denzilb55
      @Denzilb55 Рік тому +5

      Cobalt is not strictly necessary. Lithium Iron Phosphate batteries, for instance, contain no cobalt.

    • @Alexzw92
      @Alexzw92 Рік тому +6

      LFP batteries don’t need cobalt

    • @4literv6
      @4literv6 Рік тому

      @@edricaldones9639 Canada and Indonesia would like a word. Plus lfp cells now make up over 40% of all ev sales globally and don't use cobalt or nickel in them. New lmfp chemistry is making lfp energy densities competitive with nmc cells. So expect lfp to explode even more as we climb the ev s curve adoption rate. 👍🏻😎

    • @mikafiltenborg7572
      @mikafiltenborg7572 Рік тому +1

      Big Oil use cobalt in gas refinery

  • @drasticmart
    @drasticmart Рік тому

    So not pulling oil out anymore but pulling lithium from different parts of the earth. It’s called saving the planet