How about the pneumonia like deaths in July 2019 in the US blamed on vaping? Or the fact that the military biological lab in Fort Detrick was shut down for safety reasons in July 2019? Or the pnuemonia deaths in the summer of 2019 in a retirement home in Maryland? Were all these cases investigated?
No. There are scientists who wanted to have access to those sample to run some COVID test, but weren’t allowed to. To say those were caused by caping is farce. The 2019 military game was also questioned and weren’t allowed to investigate either. There were positive samples in Italy in as early as Sept 2019. Not much of similar data from US, esp those “vaping”cases. This still not the direct evidence of lab leak in US either, but much more questionable.
It’s WHO job to investigate and close borders. But they didn’t do that in the beginning... with China. They looked the other way. That’s because China is the biggest supporter for WHO- hardly anyone talks about that. They only talk about Gates.. supporting WHO. In the beginning of pandemic there was a documentary film on Netflix in Netherlands. It was taken down very quickly....I was shocked to learn a lot of things concerning this marriage . WHO & China. Now I’m still amazed how long it takes to connect the dots.
Yes, the science is important, but if it can’t give us a definite answer on origin (doubtful), it doesn’t matter. We can know things without science just by understanding human behavior. Totalitarian thinkers use censorship to shut down voices that oppose what they know is true but don’t want anyone to know. The virus came from a lab and was deliberately released, and we know this because the people in power are authoritarian and they acted to cover their ass and mocked the lab theory as a conspiracy theory. We know.
Amen. I worked for the CDPH and (Steinaker) told us "we" were going to see a pandemic that would kill millions. We would not be working in the field, but from home. They gave us new tablets and phones (unheard of, spending wise). That was curious, as we had not seen even one case in the US as of that day of our meeting in December 2019. We had trained all year on Emergency preparedness and pandemics. We had to watch endless videos and read about Event 201. So. Its all bullshit. It was contrived. Otherwise you wouldn't have the head of CIA/DNI sitting at the round table at Event 201, shot calling how they were going to handle misinformation Let that sink in. No wonder Bill Gates knew in 2015 about a pandemic, vaccines and a 10% reduction in population. Let that sink in. Oh! And look up how many politicians bought Pfizer stock in 2019. Then let that sink in. And watch those sickening WEF videos. Ill hold your hair while you vomit.
Dr I agree. With all events across the globe that began with covid...then ukraine then energy now Dutch go v seizing farms....it seems governments are against humanity.....what is happening to us?
Well..this is all part of the communistic movement towards NWO/OWG and entire international org.s are their establishment. And no this is not a conspircy theory but the truth itself..
Gain of function research was conducted in the University of North Carolina before 2016, there were articles written about it in 2015. Look up "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research"
Outstanding job. Why would two of the smartest men in the world and others in the United States government, try to limit the discussion to zoonotic origin and dismiss the lab leak theory? NIH is responsible for Pandemic Preparedness and “Bioweapon Preparedness”.
because NIH and almost all biolabs around the world are under bgi pekin and china national gen bank. BGI is a private hand to operate china dream. Money from all sources are granted to so called "children" who are crazy researchers around the globe, children of bgi founders choice. NIH has a head in pharmas as much more is behind what an ordinary person sees. Eg, crispr molecule to redact any alive is on a free market for 90 usd. That is a commercial state. NIH runs the paid courses for anyone who wants under pure security to teach how to make new life with that molecule and how to change dna. That is the base of facility. The trade of the "sups" for the experiment to grow, of the liquids, crispr etc is a business. The more people are involved in this craziness the more business develops. Certain laws have been changed to make biotech frames free. There is NO punishment meant for the failures, mistakes, causes of life risks etc in biotech. That is done by lobbies and politicians, means, with chinese money, with crazy people in boards and leadership, with crazy inner and cold wa--rs, with the support of the govs, biotech goes on to move its own direction despite humanity needs. Its a business for a half of involved and its a crazy distorted world for the other half, and both cover their backs. What happened in 2020 is not a job of one party, its and china itself, and other countries and organizations. Biotech is granted all around, its a blessed field with flow of money from all sources, and all who get that money for whatever blsh they do they will fight for their seat and do whatever needed to remain the source. It starts from very top and ends up with the lab cleaner and PhD student who is there not because of his talent but opposite, because of his ability to do crazy acts despite morals. Its an army to protect one of their kind, it's an army to protect organization that has links, lists, profiles etc. Despite release of whatever participles in the air at the end of 2019 we already drink nano stuff and modified participles with our tape water (somebody tells us and notify they use that things to clean the water? no), we eat it in the seas (dna changed organisms are their), we eat it with food (tomatoes with vax content were released in all countries sourcing tomatoes to the different markets), asian people got all that in the airplanes when the sprays were required with unknown liquid to be sprayed when people were ready on board with fixed belts etc etc. Somebody knows the conenction between Harvard, OCRU (Oxford) and other biotech in Thai and Singapore (quite crazy stuff is done there)? I think no. And that is all CONNECTED! it's a huge net of crazy people, who will protect their feed and who will take part even in social crack to down ppl who see the things. Such one was Leigh A.Johns, an OCRU and many other biotech facilities staff, who spent 4 months of her life arguing with people on FB in Vietnam calling everyone with questions and reasonable talks in any possible bad words, creating followers to praise western (nih) story and fight against those who think. Its a huge mess where a huge number of people are involved and responsible.
@@jerryplenda381 It has crossed my mind many times. The US open-door policy with China over the past 50 years has not worked. Over the last 30 years China has conducted the many Actions. I am sure that I that my list is not exhaustive and missing many other actions / dots / events. Stealing Intellectual Property (AI / Research / etc). Trying to buy Leading AI / Machine Learning / etc companies. Trying to buy companies that would facilitate spying on military bases and operations. PLA has infiltrated itself into country institutions, etc. How about the way Hong Kong and Taiwan. It doesn’t seem to me that the people of Hong Kong and Tiawan want to be governed by the CPC. It this the US fault? FBI says that half of their investigations are related to China. China building islands in the South China Sea for military bases. China has recruited more than 30 former British military pilots. Canada kicked Chinese researchers out of Canada for sending Eboli and other dangerous viruses from a lab in Canada to China. What about China’s supporting Russia? Go back a look at China’s responses to Russia’s attack on the Ukraine. I ask where does China stand? I think it’s very clear where China stands. We tried engagement and playing nice in the stand box for 50 years and this is what we get? The 1st defining moment for China was the cover up of the pandemic lab leak or a release of a bioweapon. The 2nd defining moment for China was not condemning Russia attacking Ukraine. The 3rd defining moment for China was parroting Russia's bioweapon labs in Ukraine rhetoric as one the major reasons for their attack. The 4th defining moment for China was comparing the Quad to NATO. China bans LNG supply to Europe. The COVID outbreak in Wuhan / the WORLD was the straw that broke the WORLD's back. China response to the COVID outbreak was less the transparent, some would say criminal. This from a country that clearly wants to be the number 1 leader of the world no matter what it takes. The west has had enough of China’s tactics (say one thing / do another), I think a lot of countries have now decided that enough is enough and they are starting to push back. The push started with the Trump administration (Trade War / Arrests of PLA / Huawei, Huawei General’s daughter was under house arrest in Canada) and this push back continues with the Biden administration (Chips Act, visits to Taiwan, weapons sales to Taiwan, Naval presence in South China Sea, pandemic / bioweapon preparedness) and the other countries (removal of Huawei equipment from countries UK, Australia, US, etc). There are too many dots / actions / events / bad behaviors by China that can no longer go unanswered. Companies invested or thinking of investing in China are very worried. I understand that US has done bad things in the past as well, but this is the real world. Most if not all countries have a history with black eyes. China wants to be respected and wants to show the world that their way of running a government is the best. To be respected, it is not what you say that matters, but importantly it is what you do that matters. Pick your poison, pick your bully, stay with the current bully the US or pick the next bully on block China. God help us all.
Moderna patented the key inserted nucleotide sequence that weaponized SARS (the 12 nucleotide furin cleavage site that allows the virus to unzip the human cell wall after attaching to the ACE2 receptor). Moderna’s patent US 9587003, which was filed in 2017
Moderna should sue the Pangolin et al. Somehow those treacherous wild animals stole the intellectual property and smuggled it back in to a wet market to keep the "zoonotic spillover" theory alive. The Lancet is here to spread more Surgisphere-style BS to muddy the waters.
So they killed millions of people and then made billions of dollars. No wonder they tried to blame it on China, increasingly it looks like China caught and stopped a bioweapon attack from the US or am I wrong?
The one sure thing, is that the covid19 virus, was not made the same month it was detected!!! They have been working on it for many years. They started with an acorn, now they have a 70 foot tall oak tree!!! I have not been near a test or vaccine, and I am not even giving any DNA samples away at the moment. Why are people so good a remembering meaningless sports statistics, but, they don't remember the 30,000 guillotine's that the government bought, or that they want around 7,000,000,000 of us dead,,, yesterday!!! No knowledge of JadeHelm15, or 16, Sun simulators, ect. But, ask a man; Who is the quarterback of any NFL team, and they got it!!! Brother James Kendall Moore OSB OFS OSC
I had two viruses in 2016. It was a two flu year??? Then I caught the Rhinovirus. I went from 189lbs. To 138lbs!!! In 2019, when I heard about covid19 I was ready. During 2016-2020, I gained back 42lbs!!! I moved to a mountain house and have stayed on my own 4 acres, for almost 3 years now. I started doing research on Covid19 and I knew it was a plan, not an illness. Brother James Kendall Moore OSB OFS OSC
The NIH has a huge responsibility here. Maybe cause and effect. Their redactatations certainly point to culpability. At the minimum the NIH certainly needs to redefine its oversight. And leadership!
@@adolfhitlerowicztrocki495 Thing is, behind all this you have the U.S. Department of Defense. Try getting them to give you information. It's a lose lose, sadly. Faceless bureaucracy. No accountability. Maddening, but the sad raw facts, I'm afraid.
1:58 Start 16:23 Dr. Alina Chan 30:46 Dr. Richard H. Ebright 52:03 Ms. Emily Kopp 1:11:20 (Q&A Start) Dr. Ismail Serageldin 1:16:19 Dr. Phoebe Kounduri
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
Apologies if the following question has already been asked. What about the often cited examples of detection of the SARS-2 virus in other parts of the world prior to the main outbreak in Wuhan? For example, in Italy in a medical survey earlier in the year. In Spain in sewage water. And in the US. Surely, this must be one of the first questions that should be addressed and confirmed or refuted...
Quite possible that the origins date from early to mid 2019, covered up, and merely discovered in Wuhan at the very end of 2019. Even supposedly clever people just accept that 'it started in Wuhan' - that's geopolitics.
If you ask me Pat, this video is part of psyops program. He wants to give WHO oversight of viral research. Look at WHO plan for a sars-covid type outbreak as late as 2019. All the responses to the 'pandemic' that were de rigeur in 2020 were pretty much off the table in 2019. Also vaccinating during an outbreak was not recommended as this was known to cause viruses to rapidly mutate.
As a purely lay person on these subjects, my thanks to Professor Sachs and all associated with this presentation. I found it both informative but also well balance and evidence driven and seeking which is the best of what science does. Again, my thanks to all.
Your tireless dedication to bringing truth to people, your unwavering will to expose the lies and crimes of the Deep State makes you indispensable to us. You have the sources that are closed to people like me. Mr. Sachs, you do a great job!! Thank you.
Are you serious? This guy is the deep state. Wake up. Hes not a scientist hes an economist. Hes a Soros pawn. He is all about population control with his cronis.
@@MelissaR784 yes. Absolutely. Read it. I’ve been studying Clinical Parisitology for 2 years. From a textbook. I’m not “ into “anything …it comes to me by way of “ seeing with eyes that see and hearing with ears to hear” read LAB 257 by Michael Christopher Carroll
Asking WHO to have more oversight makes Jeffrey Sachs look like an "oxymoron!" As an economist myself I always looked forward towards a unified world, unfortunately the unified world we are currently moving towards is one under a fascist corporate rule. There are many issues currently facing the future of existence, but the emergence of corporate technocratic oligarchy will just push humanity towards a mass genocide. There are better solutions and a better way of oversight that allows a bottom up approach. I hope Jeffrey really looks into that! Aloha from Hawai'i!
The search for Utopia never ends well..... Some group will always suffer at the success of utopia... Our true strength is in our diversity of cultures and ideas, brought together, is a powerful thing... No Nukes or Bio-weapons, no corporate leadership, no wallstreet, no more fascists, no more US-led NATO, WHO, UN or WEF.... Bring back the real diplomats...
@@Nmacct With all due respect, I and many others disagree. It is more than a tool. It is a part of culture, a part of humanity...In fact there is also knowledge that is unique to each language (even primitive ones).
Very interesting debate, but I would like to offer up some constructive criticism:- although paying lip service to other possibilities, most of the presentations focus their analysis on a single assumption - that the Wuhan outbreak was the FIRST outbreak in the human population. And there is information out there which proves otherwise, for example:- > the Italian smokers study, which retained blood samples, which on retesting confirmed the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 virus in people across all regions of Italy, including the islands of Sicily and Sardinia, some as early as 2nd September 2019. Given the time needed for an infected person to create antibodies, and the exponential transmission combined with the fact that the outbreak wasn't localised in a single region, but widespread - these point to a much earlier outbreak in Italy - at least as early as August. > the Spanish (Barcelona) sewage sample of February 2019, where the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus was found, point to an even earlier, possibly smaller outbreak. > the boom in severe respiratory diseases across Europe, which were rather shoddily written off as "atypical pneumonia" or "severe influenza" (despite the negative results to the flu virus tests), point to multiple earlier outbreaks of COVID-19 in Europe during 2019. This is confirmed by the retests of samples of Paris Hospital patients who died from some of these "atypical pneumonias" which showed that they were in fact caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It would have been impossible for a COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan in late December 2019, where the first confirmed deaths occurred in January 2020, to have been the source of these European outbreaks, unless the infected person from Wuhan travelled to Europe in a time machine (excuse the sarcasm). The consequences of making such an assumption are considerable:- > perhaps we haven't been able to identify the transition animal species, because we have been looking for it in the wrong place, in China, instead of in Europe, in zoos, in mink farms, and in some of the very crowded factory farms where animals are kept in very unnatural and crowded environments. > perhaps the case for the lab escape theory is unnecessarily being restricted to a single lab in Wuhan, when we know that there were dozens of similar US-funded bio-labs in Ukraine and other eastern European countries, all equally murky. Ukraine's poor track record on following safety standards is already known (e.g. the Chernobil disaster), > perhaps the evidence that the virus was deliberately released, lies in the fact that multiple outbreaks occurred across so many different and distant parts of the globe. I completely agree that even before we know the origin of the virus, the regulations and safety and security standards should be immediately tightened up. But the very first question needs to be - when and where was the very first outbreak of COVID-19. All archives of historic samples should be tested for the presence of the virus and antibodies. For example sewage samples, hospital tissue and blood samples, snow and ice cores top sections, water samples, WADA anti-doping blood samples, autopsy samples, etc. When we have a full and detailed chronology of all the outbreaks, we can then try to link them together, and we might discover that they are not linked by natural virus evolution, or that they are.
There was a covid symptoms like severe flu outbroke at north America in March of 2019. Many people were sick in the office due to virus spreading by coughing at the moment.
Yes, 100% agree and have been arguing this myself. Is some kind of citizens' initiative needed to have this happen? Also, not linked, fur farming should be investigated given the widespread infections in them.
What if the the virus was brought into Wuhan via the Wuhan Military Games, an Olympic styled competition for military personnel all over the world in October/November of 2019.
@@zhoubaidinh403 Maybe. It wouldn't explain the earlier outbreaks in Italy, Spain, etc. but I wouldn't exclude it from investigation. It's possible that the virus escaped in multiple locations.
Yes, however, I smell NSA's involvement. We have been timely tossed a few crumbs. All government investigative committees are to affirm the belief justice is being served, for their biggest fear is a revolution,
@@gillium3 people who pointed to this fact were called "conspiracy theorists" by the kabal of virologists who published in Nature Magazine denying the lab origin categorically.
Whichever hypothesis is true, I'm afraid human arrogance combined with incredible destructive capacities of applied science does not bode well for this species. Bioethics is a mere afterthought for these scientists and their teams. I recall reading a bioethics book chapter that had the memorable title, "How to play God and do it Responsibly." I remember reading Doudna's Crack In Creation, and at first she experienced moments of dread and nightmares. Yet here we are, the masses utterly incurious about all of it; biosafety and biosecurity hardly codified in the US and elsewhere. And it's not just bioethics. Consider that almost daily we hear pundits, politicians and military experts opine on the considerable risk of nuclear war-- including Presiden Biden. It has become so normalized that nobody shivers at the thought nowadays. How unlike the Cold War in which I grew up (the later years of it). The way it is discussed resembles the analysis of a football game, or strategy in chess. Dull-eyed and anesthetized the masses doomscroll through all of it with only a vague awareness of just what could happen. The media mimic the gov't line nowadays (on just fighting against Russians "as long as it takes" no matter the economic or nuclear world-wide risks). They identify all who would seek diplomacy as "Putin appeasers." Same with Covid. Any suggestion that the official narrative could be wrong was suppressed for years, and even now you are ostracized for having discussions like this one. Sachs has become persona non gratis for daring to question these things, as have the other panelists here. None of the natural spillover proponents will even *discuss* the issue, and info at gov't levels is shrouded in layers upon layers of secrecy. As I said, ethics is a mere after -thought in an age of very dangerous toys, and a lot of reckless people.
@@nobodymatters3294 There are seriously dangerous, demonic people who had the means and the clout, and they absolutely do not understand the line about not doing to others bla bla bla. They have zero empathy, their lives are so completely self absorbed that they view 'others' as subhuman
( 2:00) Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs (15:00) Dr. Alina Chan (30:05) Dr. Richard H. Ebright (50:07) Ms. Emily Kopp (1:04:26) Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs (1:10:40) Dr. Ismail Serageldin ( 1:13:37) Dr. Richard H. Ebright (1:14:45) Dr. Alina Chan (1:15:55) Prof. Phoebe Koundouri (1:17:53 ) Dr. Alina Chan (1:19:40) Ms. Emily Kopp ...
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
Thank you so much for trying to get to the truth. I know how difficult it is for many lab people to speak in public. I have biology degree from Univ of MN and spent time in the lab. I've also studied epidemiology & Cell Bio. I think it's outrageous that the vector hasn't even been found yet after 3 years. I understood that's the primary concern when investigating a contagion. Maybe Epidemiology has drastically changed since I was in school? Thank you once again to everyone for having the courage to pursue this crazy situation.
Depopulation is needed as everything of the whole universe is of black and white. Nothing disgrace about it, too many human on earth, birth rate is out of control, majority of people are the same; not a complete multiracial not a multilingual never been living around the world all alone since childhood, all are predictable borings.
Ellen Jean oh of course it is changed. In fact, I’ve been a cancer patient for over 20 yrs. I can say incredible progress has been made since I was diagnosed but in the light of that, I see something very different now. The once small hospital I was first treated has now become a behemoth everywhere you go you see their logo taking over the entire state and around the original building sprang up right under our noses eugenics labs, labs working on gene modification. Is it to reverse damage done from 50s,60s,70s where most people I know have autoimmune disease or is it for a future we’ve not conceived? I think sometimes some of the things I read about were tried out on me or my group. I am here but defied odds vía diet. So if the cure lies in what we eat, is the moral compass pointed at helping more of us unlearn the sugar- loaded diet plaguing some countries? Or is it pointed at destroying our food supply? That question was recently given to me. My cousin worked for a company known for its “ modified “ products.
Please review Dr John Campbell’s post regarding blood samples taken across the whole of Italy from early September 2019 to March 2020, which were subsequently screened for Covid 19 antibodies. Over 100 samples showed positive for antibodies and every person was asymptomatic.
I recall the post and followed up by reading the studies. I don't recall symptoms being reviewed. But one child had died. Clearly there should be international study of lung biopsy material dating ( initially) from the beginning of 2019.
I recall Dr Campbell stating that most cases were asymptomatic and had the information been available it would have changed the statistics and reduced fear about lethality of the virus.
@@Bernard-ux2eb what did I say? No one is seeing the picture I’m painting for you. Right off our coast. Try visiting it. Take a ferry to Plum Island off coast of NY.
so people (g4tes) and other people (deep state) cause a global out break of a killer Virus... and people (g4tea again) and other people (more of that damn deep state) make loads of money from curing the out break of a killer global virus.............. and we dont even get a chance to check their homework.............. hmm am I missing something here? ? I keep seeing these patterns...like in some former soviet states,, a few wars.. some pharma stuff.. housing.... where did they get all their power from.... hmmm why.. taxes? I may be going mad... dont worry.. lilly has a silly pilly for that
Great dialogue/discussions/hypothesis One serious concern I do have is to suggest the WHO to conduct/oversee this investigation. It has Clearly been proven that they are not trustworthy given that they are funded by numerous countries. The WHO was also delayed in taking action and communicating the Pandemic. Looking forward to part 2 and 3
They are part of the problem. They should be included in the investigation by being investigated, and definitely not overseeing anything. It is good to see others who see the issue.
Sacgs is tge deep State. They used Fauci and now threw him under the bus. Now they will go after the US government as being responsible for pandemic. And with midterms being over and communist democrats in control. This US communist government will be happy to turn over control to WHO and UN. And keep in mind how they will mix sustainable living into the mix.
Learn where the funding for WHO comes from? What's the history of this organization? Who established WHO???? 😄😂🤣 Who's Tedros? What did he do in Ethiopia before joining WHO? Who funding him? Find the money traces.
UN body is useless, there are none but western gov tool. Cant get a real result from them. UN is political bidy.. Can expect them to get result without potical meddling.
Sorry, Jeff. I expected more from you about the origin. There was no leak in Wuhan. The 170+ attendees at the Chinese Military Games in October of 2019, a month after we dropped "Gain of Function" on Wuhan in September of 2019. The 170+ US participants of the 9,000 attendees from the other 109 countries attendees. Most of the US participants were sick and we won only 8 metals, 3 silver and 5 bronze. The US came in 35th in the ranking. Many smaller countries came in much better, but most of the other countries went home from Wuhan sick as patient zero for their countries. We have met the enemy and they are us. My assertion is easily tested, go to the 108 different countries and see if patient zero for each country was at Wuhan Military Games.
@@Nmacct Fort Detrick closed right before the pandemic. A ton of people in that area got sick and are being silenced as well. You can find it on UA-cam.
@@BrandiNelson Dr Ralph Baric had worked closely with the biolabs in Fort Detrick too. He had taken out a patent for his research work creating a 'chimarra' of the SARR virus in his Gain of Function lifelong work and he has his own biolab in the University of Carolina.
@@jerryplenda381 as is Rand Paul, like him or not (and I don't, but i think he's right about Fauci's obfuscation of gain-of-function research funding at Wuhan, and it's a shame that he's the only one in congress taking Fauci on)
*There was no lab leak!* Covid originated in a WEF meeting, where this rule was invented: *"If someone dies WITH covid-19 [positive PCR], we are counting that."* -Dr. Birx. Same rule applied worldwide.
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
@@LiberalsHateFacts There is nothing to vaccinate against. Kary Mullis, inventor of PCR "with pcr, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody". Now combine that with the rule in my original comment.
@@LiberalsHateFacts Zinc, quercetin, "high dose" vitamin D3 at 3X or 4X of the UL (set at a wrong level by 'morons'), menaquinone, ubiquinone, high dose melatonin or ample near infrared exposure, certain sulfur compounds including a specific sulfur containing amino acid, all taken together are vastly more effective in the context of being metabolically healthy is vastly more effective than your two choices.
I didn't just fall off a turnip truck yesterday and already understand there is goofy research going on worldwide, where I object is anyone spending US tax dollars for something that's looking increasingly like fraud. I'd like to thank this organization and anybody really, willing to investigate chain of custody etc. in research, you're the unsung heroes possessing the professional gravitas people can take seriously. And Miss Emily, you are the future I can be grateful and hopeful for. PS... My father, a philosophy and logic professor at university and my mother degreed but who chose to teach youngsters in public school are the reason I know what heroes look like, so no vegetables here although I will say a farmer driving a turnip truck away from glyphosate gets to cut in line to the top of the planet's new hero list.
It's so refreshing to hear an American such as Dr Sachs and the other scientists being so frank in discussions on the virus origins. For more 2 years we have only been allowed to hear discussions mostly around the narrative that it originated from Wuhan. Thank you Dr Sachs for the battle you took on to investigate and report the truth.
Sachs simply does not represent a neutral perspective. The bottom line..just look up, "Unredacted emails Finally Reveal the Shocking Truth" released on Nov. 29th.
The reason for that 'narrative ' is because it is the most logical one. It is the most logical one BECAUSE the first cases were discovered in close proximity to the Wuhan Laboratory. It makes me enquire : Why are you trying to protect the Chinese Government ? The Wuhan Laboratory under duress of the CCP were forced to delete information on their studies. The CCP also used the 'narrative ' that the outbreak was non Zoonotic - they later retracted this. Anyone, within the first month of the outbreak found guilty of the actual crime of spreading ' rumours ' was arrested. Virologists were placed under pressure including one HK based virologist - she had to flee to the USA for her own safety. The first Virologist to die in China (close to Wuhan was in September 2019 under the Euphemism 'Respiratory failure '. Stop shilling for Fascist countries. Before, you get into your head that I'm some kind of pro Trump Westerner I should remind you that I'm a left Wing Anarchist and a Biology Lecturer.
Didn't you think it was rather fishy, no baty, that Trump in his last year of office took every opportunity, when speaking in public, to point his finger at China and blame them for cv19. Sadly he had no idea how to take the disease seriously and dispursed so much misinformation and used it for his own political gain, consequently many Americans suffered or died and hatred towards China increased. .
I would reject the entire classification process, since there is no independent party which would be able to verify valid redactions from invalid ones. And we know from the 50s, 60s and 70s when it comes to the nuclear weapons projects and test on humans using radioactive materials that the classification system was used to simply hide embarrassing information without any valid reason.
9:03 Let us work backwards to this. If this was genuinely a zoonotic spillover or an accidental lab leak, why was there an unscientific focus on vaccine driven solutions (that was understood at the time to take years to develop - with no guarantees) and the forbidding of the wider medical fraternity to try different things? Why the insistence on "well designed clinical trials" for repurposed drugs, but slipshod work with nebulous end goals for vaccines? Why did the WHO lead the charge to discount natural immunity when this went against the "accepted science" at the time? When viral loads were discovered to be equal in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated, how did the insistence to enforce vaccine mandates and passports develop? When these questions are answered, then the answer to the question of origins will become clearer.
Maybe a better question is why was a tennis player unable to play on the us open only a month ago ? This is far from over and all these quesions will be answered but a little too late as they’ve already proven how easily they will gain control and their absolute willingness to do so regardless of the cost
According to the paper from US CDC, they found all nine states showed covid-19 antibodies and that quote sars-cov-2 reactive antibodies were detected in 106 specimens, a small percentage of blood donations from California, Oregon, and Washington as early as December 2019. That's 1.4%(106) of the population with antibodies for covid-19 then. Given that it takes around two weeks for these antibodies to form. Guess how many patients were really there around December 2019 in US?
How about the pneumonia like illness in January 2018 or 19 in manitoba, Canada which l contracted causing me to be the sickest l have ever been in my life,which at that time l believed to be "the flu".. l was sick about 10 days or so..my weight had dropped from 148pounds to 126 lbs...l firmly believe it's possible l might have contracted an earlier variant of covid......when l went to our local hospital EVERY ROOM was occupied with sick people, even the emergency waiting room with 4 beds! Our ambulance came from 100 km in Northern manitoba because there were no ambulances available locally or Winnipeg. The ambulance was for my 91 year old mother who had fallen....we waited for 1.3/4 hr for the ambulance to finally arrive ...at the hospital l found myself wondering what sort of illness had taken hold of so many people and why....
The Biosafety P4 lab at Fort Dietrick Maryland was suspiciously closed down in September 2019 regarding safety and containment. This was the US premiere Biodefense lab since beginning of Cold War. It was focus during Anthrax scare. How come there is never any mention here of its research and function in the Coronavirus work?
Question.. was very recent Boston University (and others) GOF on Corona done in Level 4, 3 , or 2 labs? If not Level 4 is it possible that their viruses have already escaped and are spreading???
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
Yes because hes part of the Deep State that is behind everything going on . They are movingvtoward there goal taking down the US an having one world government.
Operation Mongoose 1962 CIA was going to bioinfecr Cuban Farms crops fields. Kennedy disapproved and they never did it, but govt was saying they were gonna treat it as natural but intl comm. might catch on and it would hurt US intl standing
the UN, geneva conventions on biological weapons committee stemming from the fifth review conference in 2001/2002 was changed in 2006, making the illegal production of virus's for warfare legal again. im so sorry our world leaders are playing god with us now! but truth is called misinformation.
Does the mortality figure of 18 million include all those deaths from other causes that took place within 28 days of a positive Covid test? If so, shouldn’t the final figure be adjusted?
A coalition of INTERNATIONAL SCIENTISTS. Yes. Their used to collaborate and be SOOO proud of their team efforts to discover new scientific stuffs (human genomes, DNA, cures for diseases, vaccines of all kinds) just before the pandemic started. Are there still such a world wide team efforts now or have these things gone undercover? or disappeared?
Their not gone, they are writing the laws to make the nurenburg trial crimes legal again, i.e. lobbying them into existence, and essentially running the world leader show! they are the constituents.
My daughter and I went to 12 States …visiting 5 tourist spots. We started out Nov 2019…the Monday before Thanksgiving. When we returned December 3rd…we were so sick. I was running 4 miles a day and it almost killed me. My young daughter went to er and they took X-ray and tested her for pneumonia. The X-ray showed it as bronchitis. Negative for pneumonia. What we had was from hell. I have never been the same. Six months to recover to a certain extent.
Open debate was stifled. That in itself needs addressing. Scientists and experts wishing to contribute to debate should not be censored by experts in media control.
Agreed, but the broadcast media seemed two have two incompatible functions, here, the BBC was disseminator of government information about how and where to get vaccinated and the need so to do - AND it is also the principal investigative news reporter. You can't really have one organisation spreading propaganda (however well intentioned) AND dissecting the veracity of said propaganda. Because that would involve colleagues attacking each others motives and views in public.
My question is why would you locate an institute conducting such dangerous research in an extremely dense and populated environment? Would it not be better to have it somewhere relatively remote?
Mr . Sachs in my opinion you're the only voice of reason coming from Western Sources and gives hope that there is still a chance for humanity to achieve Global PEACE and STABILITY in this Troubled world. The only alternative for Humanity going Forward is ARMAGEDDON for ALL. THANK YOU, PEACE and MUCH SUCCESS my BROTHER.
We're going to have to be prepared for; 1. Government knowing but covering. (They view Viral Manipulation as a must) 2. Multi-Government Community. (Governments working together opposing democracy) 3. Abandoned Citizenry. (We are on our own, worse government let's corporations prey on our vulnerability)
How can you have a discussion of the origin of SARSCov2 if those that initially suggested the lab theory were banned from this and other media, some lost their jobs for it?
You have no "idea" of what's DESPERATELY needed. While you follow these shills distracting you from what's really going on, the world is in peril, not from any "invisible" virus or fear mongering as they have pulled this in past wars. Do your research. Look for Klaus Schwab and his 4th Industrial Revolution, head of the World Economic Forum. They will enslave every human on the planet and transfer wealth to the elites. DO NOT GIVE THESE PEOPLE IN THIS VIDEO ANOTHER SECOND OF YOUR PRECIOUS TIME. The clock is ticking
@@rapidsk8 Those who laugh, will not be laughing soon enough. Keep following controlled opposition, and find yourself with nothing in the end but "global enslavement". Hear me now, believe me later
May God continue to Bless and keep you and yours safe Mr Sachs! You are a Refreshing and Much Needed voice in these times! I truly hope that The Lancet can recoup their standing in the scientific realm! Et Tu Lancet? You broke my PreMed Educated Heart and Mind! NEVER AGAIN & 🚫NO PANDEMIC AMNESTY 🚫 Medical Ethics Required for Treatment: 1) Necessary? 2) Effective? 3) Safety/Risk Ratio for most reasonable
Nearly all this info was revealed by Harvard lawyer Dr. Francis Boyle (author of the the International Bioweapons Convention) nearly 3 years ago in his discussion with Alex Jones on Infowars in Feb of 2020. But thanks for having the courage to put together such a solid comprehensive summary. Sharing this version will be politically correct!
Having followed the story for some time it is interesting to see the change of views since the original Lancet article which had Peter Daszak as a co author, the same chap who went on the WHO visit to Wuhan and the recipient of funding at Eco Health Alliance from 'I am Science' the most blessed Saint Fauci. As many say, follow the money.
At the Grayzone with Max and Aaron, Prof Sachs told of his findings and how it was narrative, NOT facts about Covid that the players were into as for the historic move that took place, seriously check out his interview there.
"18 million deaths" was a figure arrived at by computer modelling employing the usual suspects assumptions, i.e., dying 'with' as opposed to 'from' etc.....Right off the bat this number should have been questioned.
The UK org that came out with these high projections that scared everyone to overreact have done the same sky high estimates several times prior...One guess who help funds them? Yes $ill Gate$
Immense thanks to you, Professor Sachs, and all true scientists for working to carefully sift through the data for the distilled scientific facts. Kudos! Keeps me wanting to get out of bed every day. ☮️❤️🐾
Very comprehensive and informative. Thank you so much for making this issue public. Ways forward to prevent any pandemic from happening again is very important.
Jerry Sachs is an angel who fights against injustice. Respect Jeffrey Sachs of speaking out the truth against the majority of Americans. A high moral standard and brave individual. We need more of him so that we can have a peaceful world.
@@brendanmay9585 it is pretty much concluded now that it was circulating in September 2019 in several countries. It could be related to military games in Wuhan but who knows?
@@skaterkraines2691 so no Source, just doubling down on a claim. Too bad. I absolutely entertain it as a possibility,. But without any source or proof, this is just baseless claims. When asked for period you just claim "pretty much accepted". By whom? That is simply not how science works.
@@brendanmay9585 I don't remember which video I was watching 1.5 years ago which was referring to Italy having checked sewage samples from August 2019 and finding evidence. There may have been talk of blood samples too from Italy. At the time any talk outside of the official narrative was cancelled or blocked and I figured that was just another fact you won't g et from your mainstream media sources. It was disturbing but not overly surprising to me at the time. Do some research to see if you can find information on early indications of SARS COV 2 in wastewater or blood samples. I haven't really looked into it.
The Commission wants to the _World Health Organization_ to have oversight responsibilities for biosafety and biosecurity of international research programs about dangerous pathogens? Really? After how well it performed with COVID?
unasked question : concerning the three or more (Boston and others) recent gain of function research experiments creating chimera versions of Omicron/Whuan bits with 80+ lethality to human equivalent mice, ... were the labs using level 2, 3 or 4 protocols? !!!!
From the Boston paper's methodology: "All procedures were performed in a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) facility at the National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories of the Boston University using biosafety protocols approved by the institutional biosafety committee (IBC)." There's a BSL4 there too, but apparently they did not deem it necessary to use for this research. I don't know about the other studies that were vaguely mentioned.
@@brendanmay9585 but a virus with less mortality is not always less dangerous. If 20% survives to transmit the virus to others it might be making more victims.
@@VJNEEF given that COVID 19 typically kills long after the infectious phase (a d is even infectious prior to symptoms) your argument is completely invalid.
@@brendanmay9585 that doesn't make things better, does it? luckily the 100% kill rate in mice didn't actually kill 100% of people. But as I understand it they combined the original "wuhan" virus with an omnicron virus. And what they got was a virus less deadly than wuhan and less transmissable than omicron. But you could also argue more deadly than omicron and more transmissable than wuhan. It depends on your perspective, you could argue both ways. But no one really knows what would happen if this particular variant would go out in the wild. And I rather not find out.
2 questions, maybe 3. Or perhaps 4 or 5. Question 1; Why throughout the entire history of virology as a medical “science” has no physical sample of particles in the nano scale EVER been isolated directly and I mean directly from a sample extracted directly from an organism which is said to be infected with such particles? I am aware of the multiple, now numbering over 2,000 studies which are titled isolation of virus ........ in relation to SARS CoV-2 or any of its variants. I have reviewed many of these papers and ALL of them have been reviewed by one individual or another able to read these studies. ALL the studies follow virtually the same protocols and not ONE has described the isolation of virus particles directly from a sample extracted from a natural host. This is despite the mechanism for doing just such a thing with particles of similar size and density has been done successfully for a very long time now. Why has virology been unable to isolate a sample in such a manner? The only answer given to this enormous problem is that density gradient ultra-centrifugation has failed to produce any significant band in such a manner upon every attempt is that there just aren’t enough of them. The other commonly given answer is “that’s not the way we do it” which is not a reasonable answer. Given that under Virus theory these particles are replication competent and must by nature to be able to move between cells in order to proliferate which one would assume that any natural reservoir should contain billions of these particles even within a small sample. So again, why has no viable sample of virus been isolated DIRECTLY from a sample extracted from any organism? It’s deeply troubling to me that what virology claims is “isolation” is nothing more than insilico modelling. In other words a computer model. Not an actual physical specimen. In other words a cartoon. Question 2; How would virology be able to confirm the accuracy of the in silico (computer model) without having a physical specimen to compare the computer model to? Question 3; How does virology confirm the behaviour of the alleged virus without a physical specimen to use in a tissue assay? Question 4; How can virology call what they’re doing science when they have no physical specimen of virus and only virus to be used as probably THE MOST IMPORTANT independent variable is the tissue assay? In every scientific study you must have a dependant variable (the observed effect being studied-in this case cytopathic effect) and independent variables (in this case an actual physical sample of virus and ONLY virus) there are many other independent variables in the Enders-Peebles based assay protocols which is the assay methodology generally used by every virology lab that has published. In other words virology is not doing science. They are running no controls. Controls does not mean security and PPE and risk assessments etc. I’m talking about a study controls. And the mock infections are not valid controls. Most studies did not publish any of the methodology of the mock infections and the few that did drastically altered the methodology of the mock infections in relation to the study assay hereby invalidating them as a proper control. A valid control would be running the identical assay methodology one with alleged virus in sample and another one without virus in sample. This has never been done. And no researchers or scientists have been able to produce a single paper detailing the actual isolation of a virus in the commonly understood meaning of isolation meaning separating one thing from everything else. Question 5; Since the virus is only an in silico model compiled from tiny fragments of genetic material derived from an assay which used multiple sources of genetic material, how do you know the provenance of the genetic fragments used to compile the in silica model? Question 6; how exactly would one make a chimera out of 2 viruses neither of which exist in the real world, only exist as a computer model?
I just returned from a nice holiday with friends and family out of town, where my partner and I were the only unjabbed out of the group of about 20 people or so. All of of the fully-jabbed and boosted adults reported contracting covid multiple times over the past year. My partner and I were the only ones present that have had no sickness since this all began, other than a slight cold bug that lasted all of 5 days about a year back. Several of the (relatively young) adults that were present recently had heart attacks, one requiring a triple bypass surgery and his spouse required open heart surgery... both now require a slew of prescription drugs including statins. Several of the adults present also displayed profound cognitive decline/forgetfulness that was not present when we last saw them 13 months ago.
The "unknown" intermediate species was known all along to researchers in this field (though they never let on in their articles arguing for a natural origin of the current pandemic): patented hACE2 transgenic mice with humanized airway cells, which a novel bat coronavirus was infected with repeatedly using serial passaging--a technique that the UNC's Ralph Baric was already famous for, and which he taught to Shi Zhengli beginning in 2013.
@@dbadagna with you the one additional qualification of such experimentation carried out in WIV in BSL 2 and 3 labs. Yes, we’re in vehement agreement. (My original comment is sarcastic btw.)
Encouraging initiative to obtain clarity on what has happened and transparant safe new strategies on research worldwide. Thank you so much for doing this. Hopefully important voices worldwide will join coming webinars. All the best.
"clarity" you say?.hmmm lets see: so people (g4tes) and other people (deep state) cause a global out break of a killer Virus... and people (g4tea again) and other people (more of that damn deep state) make loads of money from controlling the out break of a killer global virus.............. and we dont even get a chance to check their homework.............. hmm am I missing something here? ? I keep seeing these same crazy patterns...like in some former soviet states,, a few wars.. some pharma stuff.. housing.... where did they get all their power from.... hmmm why.. my taxes? I may be going mad... dont worry.. lilly has a silly pilly for that.......... "voices " you say? maybe I am hearing something
Or, perhaps the scientists asked to come, did not want to take part in something that could be misinterpreted by the media... Like this so-called investigation done by Dr. Chan.
@@irigopou 1) it could be a biased selection 2) the zoonosis argument has already been presented 3) it could be a strategy to make this analysis and presentation biased 4) Barbara Streisand effect 5) there is nothing to add to the multiple reports and studies already done 6) even the moderator was clear that there is no conclusive proof either way, so why get involved? 7) they all had better things to do I personally think the lab leak theory is slightly more likely. My opinion; just like the argument above is completely irrelevant and cannot be used as evidence.
@@brendanmay9585 1) Extremely unlikely act from entities named Jeffery Sachs and Lancet and for this type of official investigation. 2) This applies to the lab argument as well, but apparently with the opposite effect there. And anyway general relativity arguments are still presented in cosmological discussions aimed to a wider public audience even though they were first presented in 1915. 3) This is a special case of the 1). 4) Do you mean that all zoonosis proponents invitees decided to bolster their position by using the Barbara Streisand effect? Quite unlikely. 5) This applies to the lab argument as well, but apparently with the opposite effect there. And if there is nothing to add, there is a lot to defend. 6) This applies to the lab argument as well, but apparently with the opposite effect there. Usually there is a need to get involved in a discussion if there is no conclusive proof, since on the presence of a conclusive proof all discussion becomes redundant. 7) Possible, but as likely as winning the lottery today, or - it turns out - as the zoonosis argument being valid.
I'd like to take this opportunity to spend 20 minutes thanking my colleagues. Those from Yale and those from Harvard and those from MIT and those from Harvard and MIT. We work so hard and do so much it's amazing. Don't feel bad about paying us a lot of money and expecting no results. We are happy to take your money and we'd also like to extend a warm thanks to you for your money.
SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon ... Don't forget to add John's Hopkins University Department of Public Health ... it was made by USA & Chinese virologists ... at our best universities ... courtesy my tax dollars! thanks for nothing USA ... USA is dead -- our ship is sinking fast.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
How about the pneumonia like deaths in July 2019 in the US blamed on vaping? Or the fact that the military biological lab in Fort Detrick was shut down for safety reasons in July 2019? Or the pnuemonia deaths in the summer of 2019 in a retirement home in Maryland? Were all these cases investigated?
No. There are scientists who wanted to have access to those sample to run some COVID test, but weren’t allowed to. To say those were caused by caping is farce.
The 2019 military game was also questioned and weren’t allowed to investigate either.
There were positive samples in Italy in as early as Sept 2019. Not much of similar data from US, esp those “vaping”cases.
This still not the direct evidence of lab leak in US either, but much more questionable.
The US is exempted from investigations, don't you know that?
It’s WHO job to investigate and close borders. But they didn’t do that in the beginning... with China. They looked the other way. That’s because China is the biggest supporter for WHO- hardly anyone talks about that. They only talk about Gates.. supporting WHO. In the beginning of pandemic there was a documentary film on Netflix in Netherlands. It was taken down very quickly....I was shocked to learn a lot of things concerning this marriage . WHO & China. Now I’m still amazed how long it takes to connect the dots.
@@grazynkatodisco4916 Haven't you heard that the Lancet commission is convinced that covid19 originates from a US bio-weapons lab?
@@grazynkatodisco4916 WHO has conducted their investigation in China twice, yet the U.S. has refused to be investigated so far, why?
As a retired Physician and PhD chemist, I think it is disgraceful how they have withheld information
Yes, the science is important, but if it can’t give us a definite answer on origin (doubtful), it doesn’t matter. We can know things without science just by understanding human behavior. Totalitarian thinkers use censorship to shut down voices that oppose what they know is true but don’t want anyone to know.
The virus came from a lab and was deliberately released, and we know this because the people in power are authoritarian and they acted to cover their ass and mocked the lab theory as a conspiracy theory.
We know.
Amen. I worked for the CDPH and (Steinaker) told us "we" were going to see a pandemic that would kill millions. We would not be working in the field, but from home. They gave us new tablets and phones (unheard of, spending wise). That was curious, as we had not seen even one case in the US as of that day of our meeting in December 2019. We had trained all year on Emergency preparedness and pandemics. We had to watch endless videos and read about Event 201. So. Its all bullshit. It was contrived. Otherwise you wouldn't have the head of CIA/DNI sitting at the round table at Event 201, shot calling how they were going to handle misinformation Let that sink in. No wonder Bill Gates knew in 2015 about a pandemic, vaccines and a 10% reduction in population. Let that sink in. Oh! And look up how many politicians bought Pfizer stock in 2019. Then let that sink in. And watch those sickening WEF videos. Ill hold your hair while you vomit.
Dr I agree. With all events across the globe that began with covid...then ukraine then energy now Dutch go v seizing farms....it seems governments are against humanity.....what is happening to us?
@@lollypop2413 World depopulation - WEF Agenda30.
Well..this is all part of the communistic movement towards NWO/OWG and entire international org.s are their establishment.
And no this is not a conspircy theory but the truth itself..
I have the utmost respect to you Professor Sachs, thank you for telling the truth. The world will remember you for what your courage and dedication!!!
Gain of function research was conducted in the University of North Carolina before 2016, there were articles written about it in 2015.
Look up "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research"
Yes, absolutely right. And the leading resaecher is Dr Ralph Baric
@@iwanagohome326 I think Dr Fauci has continued to fund that research
Dr Ralph got the subcon work result from WIV and he carried on to final product. Dr Ralph had link to DARPA. Funding came from that dark source.
damnnn 😳
It’s leaked from Wuhan, and the Chinese communist party covered it up until it couldn’t.
Outstanding job.
Why would two of the smartest men in the world and others in the United States government, try to limit the discussion to zoonotic origin and dismiss the lab leak theory? NIH is responsible for Pandemic Preparedness and “Bioweapon Preparedness”.
Covid19 outbreak is only due to USA governments (evil bullyin and arrogant ones-Shame )
because NIH and almost all biolabs around the world are under bgi pekin and china national gen bank. BGI is a private hand to operate china dream. Money from all sources are granted to so called "children" who are crazy researchers around the globe, children of bgi founders choice. NIH has a head in pharmas as much more is behind what an ordinary person sees. Eg, crispr molecule to redact any alive is on a free market for 90 usd. That is a commercial state. NIH runs the paid courses for anyone who wants under pure security to teach how to make new life with that molecule and how to change dna. That is the base of facility. The trade of the "sups" for the experiment to grow, of the liquids, crispr etc is a business. The more people are involved in this craziness the more business develops. Certain laws have been changed to make biotech frames free. There is NO punishment meant for the failures, mistakes, causes of life risks etc in biotech. That is done by lobbies and politicians, means, with chinese money, with crazy people in boards and leadership, with crazy inner and cold wa--rs, with the support of the govs, biotech goes on to move its own direction despite humanity needs. Its a business for a half of involved and its a crazy distorted world for the other half, and both cover their backs. What happened in 2020 is not a job of one party, its and china itself, and other countries and organizations. Biotech is granted all around, its a blessed field with flow of money from all sources, and all who get that money for whatever blsh they do they will fight for their seat and do whatever needed to remain the source. It starts from very top and ends up with the lab cleaner and PhD student who is there not because of his talent but opposite, because of his ability to do crazy acts despite morals. Its an army to protect one of their kind, it's an army to protect organization that has links, lists, profiles etc. Despite release of whatever participles in the air at the end of 2019 we already drink nano stuff and modified participles with our tape water (somebody tells us and notify they use that things to clean the water? no), we eat it in the seas (dna changed organisms are their), we eat it with food (tomatoes with vax content were released in all countries sourcing tomatoes to the different markets), asian people got all that in the airplanes when the sprays were required with unknown liquid to be sprayed when people were ready on board with fixed belts etc etc. Somebody knows the conenction between Harvard, OCRU (Oxford) and other biotech in Thai and Singapore (quite crazy stuff is done there)? I think no. And that is all CONNECTED! it's a huge net of crazy people, who will protect their feed and who will take part even in social crack to down ppl who see the things. Such one was Leigh A.Johns, an OCRU and many other biotech facilities staff, who spent 4 months of her life arguing with people on FB in Vietnam calling everyone with questions and reasonable talks in any possible bad words, creating followers to praise western (nih) story and fight against those who think. Its a huge mess where a huge number of people are involved and responsible.
Why aren't we considering deliberate release, considering who benefited?
@@jerryplenda381 American wants to kill China rise by covid biological weapon but it causes backlash to USA governments.
@@jerryplenda381 It has crossed my mind many times.
The US open-door policy with China over the past 50 years has not worked.
Over the last 30 years China has conducted the many Actions. I am sure that I that my list is not exhaustive and missing many other actions / dots / events.
Stealing Intellectual Property (AI / Research / etc).
Trying to buy Leading AI / Machine Learning / etc companies.
Trying to buy companies that would facilitate spying on military bases and operations.
PLA has infiltrated itself into country institutions, etc.
How about the way Hong Kong and Taiwan. It doesn’t seem to me that the people of Hong Kong and Tiawan want to be governed by the CPC. It this the US fault?
FBI says that half of their investigations are related to China.
China building islands in the South China Sea for military bases.
China has recruited more than 30 former British military pilots.
Canada kicked Chinese researchers out of Canada for sending Eboli and other dangerous viruses from a lab in Canada to China.
What about China’s supporting Russia? Go back a look at China’s responses to Russia’s attack on the Ukraine. I ask where does China stand? I think it’s very clear where China stands. We tried engagement and playing nice in the stand box for 50 years and this is what we get?
The 1st defining moment for China was the cover up of the pandemic lab leak or a release of a bioweapon.
The 2nd defining moment for China was not condemning Russia attacking Ukraine.
The 3rd defining moment for China was parroting Russia's bioweapon labs in Ukraine rhetoric as one the major reasons for their attack.
The 4th defining moment for China was comparing the Quad to NATO.
China bans LNG supply to Europe.
The COVID outbreak in Wuhan / the WORLD was the straw that broke the WORLD's back.
China response to the COVID outbreak was less the transparent, some would say criminal. This from a country that clearly wants to be the number 1 leader of the world no matter what it takes.
The west has had enough of China’s tactics (say one thing / do another), I think a lot of countries have now decided that enough is enough and they are starting to push back. The push started with the Trump administration (Trade War / Arrests of PLA / Huawei, Huawei General’s daughter was under house arrest in Canada) and this push back continues with the Biden administration (Chips Act, visits to Taiwan, weapons sales to Taiwan, Naval presence in South China Sea, pandemic / bioweapon preparedness) and the other countries (removal of Huawei equipment from countries UK, Australia, US, etc). There are too many dots / actions / events / bad behaviors by China that can no longer go unanswered.
Companies invested or thinking of investing in China are very worried.
I understand that US has done bad things in the past as well, but this is the real world.
Most if not all countries have a history with black eyes.
China wants to be respected and wants to show the world that their way of running a government is the best.
To be respected, it is not what you say that matters, but importantly it is what you do that matters.
Pick your poison, pick your bully, stay with the current bully the US or pick the next bully on block China.
God help us all.
Moderna patented the key inserted nucleotide sequence that weaponized SARS (the 12 nucleotide furin cleavage site that allows the virus to unzip the human cell wall after attaching to the ACE2 receptor). Moderna’s patent US 9587003, which was filed in 2017
Moderna should sue the Pangolin et al. Somehow those treacherous wild animals stole the intellectual property and smuggled it back in to a wet market to keep the "zoonotic spillover" theory alive. The Lancet is here to spread more Surgisphere-style BS to muddy the waters.
And no one here mention any of this.... Hmmm. How convenient?
So they killed millions of people and then made billions of dollars. No wonder they tried to blame it on China, increasingly it looks like China caught and stopped a bioweapon attack from the US or am I wrong?
The one sure thing, is that the covid19 virus, was not made the same month it was detected!!! They have been working on it for many years. They started with an acorn, now they have a 70 foot tall oak tree!!! I have not been near a test or vaccine, and I am not even giving any DNA samples away at the moment. Why are people so good a remembering meaningless sports statistics, but, they don't remember the 30,000 guillotine's that the government bought, or that they want around 7,000,000,000 of us dead,,, yesterday!!! No knowledge of JadeHelm15, or 16, Sun simulators, ect. But, ask a man; Who is the quarterback of any NFL team, and they got it!!! Brother James Kendall Moore OSB OFS OSC
I had two viruses in 2016. It was a two flu year??? Then I caught the Rhinovirus. I went from 189lbs. To 138lbs!!! In 2019, when I heard about covid19 I was ready. During 2016-2020, I gained back 42lbs!!! I moved to a mountain house and have stayed on my own 4 acres, for almost 3 years now. I started doing research on Covid19 and I knew it was a plan, not an illness. Brother James Kendall Moore OSB OFS OSC
The NIH has a huge responsibility here. Maybe cause and effect. Their redactatations certainly point to culpability. At the minimum the NIH certainly needs to redefine its oversight. And leadership!
Maybe we need to increase their budget so they can do a better job next time
You're way too kind to these criminals.
Just like that? No arrests? No firing squads? Just let them get away?
@@adolfhitlerowicztrocki495 Thing is, behind all this you have the U.S. Department of Defense. Try getting them to give you information. It's a lose lose, sadly. Faceless bureaucracy. No accountability. Maddening, but the sad raw facts, I'm afraid.
And the 19 base sequence apparently in the SpK patented by moderna?
Thank you Jefferey Sachs for everything you do!
like Rape Russia and fracture world peace?
1:58 Start
16:23 Dr. Alina Chan
30:46 Dr. Richard H. Ebright
52:03 Ms. Emily Kopp
1:11:20 (Q&A Start) Dr. Ismail Serageldin
1:16:19 Dr. Phoebe Kounduri
Dr. Robert Redfield 1:07
"🙂".
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
Apologies if the following question has already been asked. What about the often cited examples of detection of the SARS-2 virus in other parts of the world prior to the main outbreak in Wuhan? For example, in Italy in a medical survey earlier in the year. In Spain in sewage water. And in the US. Surely, this must be one of the first questions that should be addressed and confirmed or refuted...
Quite possible that the origins date from early to mid 2019, covered up, and merely discovered in Wuhan at the very end of 2019. Even supposedly clever people just accept that 'it started in Wuhan' - that's geopolitics.
The US control the msm narrative, and want it to be Wuhan, like an arsonist who calls the fire brigade.
Absolutely Pat. The red herring is China. Who profits from this focus on China?
Buena pregunta. Todas estas infos deben estar accessible. Que dice DRASTIC?
If you ask me Pat, this video is part of psyops program. He wants to give WHO oversight of viral research. Look at WHO plan for a sars-covid type outbreak as late as 2019. All the responses to the 'pandemic' that were de rigeur in 2020 were pretty much off the table in 2019. Also vaccinating during an outbreak was not recommended as this was known to cause viruses to rapidly mutate.
As a purely lay person on these subjects, my thanks to Professor Sachs and all associated with this presentation. I found it both informative but also well balance and evidence driven and seeking which is the best of what science does. Again, my thanks to all.
Your tireless dedication to bringing truth to people, your unwavering will to expose the lies and crimes of the Deep State makes you indispensable to us. You have the sources that are closed to people like me. Mr. Sachs, you do a great job!! Thank you.
Are you serious? This guy is the deep state. Wake up. Hes not a scientist hes an economist. Hes a Soros pawn. He is all about population control with his cronis.
but still nothing happens people you must share with everyone even if you only reach 1 person you have done good
Is this the truth?
@@MelissaR784 Unfortunately, yes! Have a good time. Merry Christmas and hopefully a better New Year if remotely possible.
@@MelissaR784 yes. Absolutely. Read it. I’ve been studying Clinical Parisitology for 2 years. From a textbook. I’m not “ into “anything …it comes to me by way of “ seeing with eyes that see and hearing with ears to hear” read LAB 257 by Michael Christopher Carroll
Asking WHO to have more oversight makes Jeffrey Sachs look like an "oxymoron!" As an economist myself I always looked forward towards a unified world, unfortunately the unified world we are currently moving towards is one under a fascist corporate rule. There are many issues currently facing the future of existence, but the emergence of corporate technocratic oligarchy will just push humanity towards a mass genocide. There are better solutions and a better way of oversight that allows a bottom up approach. I hope Jeffrey really looks into that! Aloha from Hawai'i!
fascist corporate rule indeed. Combining corporations with the authoritarian governments of the world.
The search for Utopia never ends well..... Some group will always suffer at the success of utopia...
Our true strength is in our diversity of cultures and ideas, brought together, is a powerful thing...
No Nukes or Bio-weapons, no corporate leadership, no wallstreet, no more fascists, no more US-led NATO, WHO, UN or WEF....
Bring back the real diplomats...
@@davesradiorepairs6344 But languages are disappearing from the earth. They should be recognized and supported.
Someone still has to scrub the toilets. and let's be honest, everyone poops but some people are going to swear theirs don't stink . 🦨
@@Nmacct With all due respect, I and many others disagree. It is more than a tool. It is a part of culture, a part of humanity...In fact there is also knowledge that is unique to each language (even primitive ones).
Very interesting debate, but I would like to offer up some constructive criticism:- although paying lip service to other possibilities, most of the presentations focus their analysis on a single assumption - that the Wuhan outbreak was the FIRST outbreak in the human population. And there is information out there which proves otherwise, for example:-
> the Italian smokers study, which retained blood samples, which on retesting confirmed the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 virus in people across all regions of Italy, including the islands of Sicily and Sardinia, some as early as 2nd September 2019. Given the time needed for an infected person to create antibodies, and the exponential transmission combined with the fact that the outbreak wasn't localised in a single region, but widespread - these point to a much earlier outbreak in Italy - at least as early as August.
> the Spanish (Barcelona) sewage sample of February 2019, where the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus was found, point to an even earlier, possibly smaller outbreak.
> the boom in severe respiratory diseases across Europe, which were rather shoddily written off as "atypical pneumonia" or "severe influenza" (despite the negative results to the flu virus tests), point to multiple earlier outbreaks of COVID-19 in Europe during 2019. This is confirmed by the retests of samples of Paris Hospital patients who died from some of these "atypical pneumonias" which showed that they were in fact caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
It would have been impossible for a COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan in late December 2019, where the first confirmed deaths occurred in January 2020, to have been the source of these European outbreaks, unless the infected person from Wuhan travelled to Europe in a time machine (excuse the sarcasm).
The consequences of making such an assumption are considerable:-
> perhaps we haven't been able to identify the transition animal species, because we have been looking for it in the wrong place, in China, instead of in Europe, in zoos, in mink farms, and in some of the very crowded factory farms where animals are kept in very unnatural and crowded environments.
> perhaps the case for the lab escape theory is unnecessarily being restricted to a single lab in Wuhan, when we know that there were dozens of similar US-funded bio-labs in Ukraine and other eastern European countries, all equally murky. Ukraine's poor track record on following safety standards is already known (e.g. the Chernobil disaster),
> perhaps the evidence that the virus was deliberately released, lies in the fact that multiple outbreaks occurred across so many different and distant parts of the globe.
I completely agree that even before we know the origin of the virus, the regulations and safety and security standards should be immediately tightened up. But the very first question needs to be - when and where was the very first outbreak of COVID-19. All archives of historic samples should be tested for the presence of the virus and antibodies. For example sewage samples, hospital tissue and blood samples, snow and ice cores top sections, water samples, WADA anti-doping blood samples, autopsy samples, etc. When we have a full and detailed chronology of all the outbreaks, we can then try to link them together, and we might discover that they are not linked by natural virus evolution, or that they are.
There was a covid symptoms like severe flu outbroke at north America in March of 2019. Many people were sick in the office due to virus spreading by coughing at the moment.
Constructive suggestions! HOPE somebody investigates! The early peak of Covid disaster in Spain and Italy must be explained!
Yes, 100% agree and have been arguing this myself. Is some kind of citizens' initiative needed to have this happen? Also, not linked, fur farming should be investigated given the widespread infections in them.
What if the the virus was brought into Wuhan via the Wuhan Military Games, an Olympic styled competition for military personnel all over the world in October/November of 2019.
@@zhoubaidinh403 Maybe. It wouldn't explain the earlier outbreaks in Italy, Spain, etc. but I wouldn't exclude it from investigation. It's possible that the virus escaped in multiple locations.
Dr. Sachs. any comment on Fort Detrick and its closure and those patiences nearby?
The world owes Dr. Sachs so much!
We oee him shit. Hes the Deep State.
no. he is part of it.
@@ISLALILLIAN hallelujah!!!! Nothing more than a Doctor of Science fiction.
Yes, however, I smell NSA's involvement. We have been timely tossed a few crumbs. All government investigative committees are to affirm the belief justice is being served, for their biggest fear is a revolution,
The world owes fauci more!!!
Respect to the LANCET committee. Great work led by Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs.
Hes a globalist pawn. Sachs is evil.
@@cv7651 Globalization is evil? Why are still using UA-cam?
Where is the obvious? The proof the virus is manipulated is in the furin cleavage site from samples
The furin cleavage site information was publicly available at least by Ferbruary 2020
@@gillium3 people who pointed to this fact were called "conspiracy theorists" by the kabal of virologists who published in Nature Magazine denying the lab origin categorically.
Whichever hypothesis is true, I'm afraid human arrogance combined with incredible destructive capacities of applied science does not bode well for this species. Bioethics is a mere afterthought for these scientists and their teams. I recall reading a bioethics book chapter that had the memorable title, "How to play God and do it Responsibly." I remember reading Doudna's Crack In Creation, and at first she experienced moments of dread and nightmares. Yet here we are, the masses utterly incurious about all of it; biosafety and biosecurity hardly codified in the US and elsewhere. And it's not just bioethics. Consider that almost daily we hear pundits, politicians and military experts opine on the considerable risk of nuclear war-- including Presiden Biden. It has become so normalized that nobody shivers at the thought nowadays. How unlike the Cold War in which I grew up (the later years of it). The way it is discussed resembles the analysis of a football game, or strategy in chess. Dull-eyed and anesthetized the masses doomscroll through all of it with only a vague awareness of just what could happen. The media mimic the gov't line nowadays (on just fighting against Russians "as long as it takes" no matter the economic or nuclear world-wide risks). They identify all who would seek diplomacy as "Putin appeasers." Same with Covid. Any suggestion that the official narrative could be wrong was suppressed for years, and even now you are ostracized for having discussions like this one. Sachs has become persona non gratis for daring to question these things, as have the other panelists here. None of the natural spillover proponents will even *discuss* the issue, and info at gov't levels is shrouded in layers upon layers of secrecy. As I said, ethics is a mere after -thought in an age of very dangerous toys, and a lot of reckless people.
Beautiful synopsis.... Couldn't have said it better (And I've tried to be as eloquent and on-point as you...)
👍
Simple morals would be pinnacle. Don't do unto others that you wouldn't want done to you.
Great comment.
@@nobodymatters3294 There are seriously dangerous, demonic people who had the means and the clout, and they absolutely do not understand the line about not doing to others bla bla bla. They have zero empathy, their lives are so completely self absorbed that they view 'others' as subhuman
( 2:00) Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs (15:00) Dr. Alina Chan (30:05) Dr. Richard H. Ebright (50:07) Ms. Emily Kopp (1:04:26) Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs (1:10:40) Dr. Ismail Serageldin ( 1:13:37) Dr. Richard H. Ebright (1:14:45) Dr. Alina Chan (1:15:55) Prof. Phoebe Koundouri (1:17:53 ) Dr. Alina Chan (1:19:40) Ms. Emily Kopp ...
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
Thank you so much for trying to get to the truth. I know how difficult it is for many lab people to speak in public. I have biology degree from Univ of MN and spent time in the lab. I've also studied epidemiology & Cell Bio. I think it's outrageous that the vector hasn't even been found yet after 3 years. I understood that's the primary concern when investigating a contagion. Maybe Epidemiology has drastically changed since I was in school? Thank you once again to everyone for having the courage to pursue this crazy situation.
It has changed- exponentially, to my utter dismay
(comment removed)
Depopulation is needed as everything of the whole universe is of black and white.
Nothing disgrace about it, too many human on earth, birth rate is out of control, majority of people are the same; not a complete multiracial not a multilingual never been living around the world all alone since childhood, all are predictable borings.
Ellen Jean oh of course it is changed. In fact, I’ve been a cancer patient for over 20 yrs. I can say incredible progress has been made since I was diagnosed but in the light of that, I see something very different now. The once small hospital I was first treated has now become a behemoth everywhere you go you see their logo taking over the entire state and around the original building sprang up right under our noses eugenics labs, labs working on gene modification. Is it to reverse damage done from 50s,60s,70s where most people I know have autoimmune disease or is it for a future we’ve not conceived? I think sometimes some of the things I read about were tried out on me or my group. I am here but defied odds vía diet. So if the cure lies in what we eat, is the moral compass pointed at helping more of us unlearn the sugar- loaded diet plaguing some countries? Or is it pointed at destroying our food supply? That question was recently given to me. My cousin worked for a company known for its “ modified “ products.
Please review Dr John Campbell’s post regarding blood samples taken across the whole of Italy from early September 2019 to March 2020, which were subsequently screened for Covid 19 antibodies. Over 100 samples showed positive for antibodies and every person was asymptomatic.
I recall the post and followed up by reading the studies. I don't recall symptoms being reviewed. But one child had died. Clearly there should be international study of lung biopsy material dating ( initially) from the beginning of 2019.
I recall Dr Campbell stating that most cases were asymptomatic and had the information been available it would have changed the statistics and reduced fear about lethality of the virus.
exactly ... good info, thank you ✌️ 😑
Professor Jefferey Sachs, your courage and integrity are admirable ! stay healthy and safe, my prayers are with you.
He's full of it.
@@Bernard-ux2eb what did I say? No one is seeing the picture I’m painting for you. Right off our coast. Try visiting it. Take a ferry to Plum Island off coast of NY.
@@Careabout211 What the hell are you on about?
Soop sorry but Sachs does not speak from a position of neutrality.
so people (g4tes) and other people (deep state) cause a global out break of a killer Virus... and people (g4tea again) and other people (more of that damn deep state) make loads of money from curing the out break of a killer global virus.............. and we dont even get a chance to check their homework.............. hmm am I missing something here? ? I keep seeing these patterns...like in some former soviet states,, a few wars.. some pharma stuff.. housing.... where did they get all their power from.... hmmm why.. taxes? I may be going mad... dont worry.. lilly has a silly pilly for that
Great dialogue/discussions/hypothesis
One serious concern I do have is to suggest the WHO to conduct/oversee this investigation.
It has
Clearly been proven that they are not trustworthy given that they are funded by numerous countries.
The WHO was also delayed in taking action and communicating the Pandemic.
Looking forward to part 2 and 3
They are part of the problem. They should be included in the investigation by being investigated, and definitely not overseeing anything. It is good to see others who see the issue.
Sacgs is tge deep State. They used Fauci and now threw him under the bus. Now they will go after the US government as being responsible for pandemic. And with midterms being over and communist democrats in control. This US communist government will be happy to turn over control to WHO and UN. And keep in mind how they will mix sustainable living into the mix.
Learn where the funding for WHO comes from? What's the history of this organization? Who established WHO???? 😄😂🤣 Who's Tedros? What did he do in Ethiopia before joining WHO? Who funding him? Find the money traces.
UN body is useless, there are none but western gov tool. Cant get a real result from them.
UN is political bidy.. Can expect them to get result without potical meddling.
@@mslc22 they can be disbanded instantly. May they be. They are part of the problem.
Sorry, Jeff. I expected more from you about the origin. There was no leak in Wuhan. The 170+ attendees at the Chinese Military Games in October of 2019, a month after we dropped "Gain of Function" on Wuhan in September of 2019. The 170+ US participants of the 9,000 attendees from the other 109 countries attendees. Most of the US participants were sick and we won only 8 metals, 3 silver and 5 bronze. The US came in 35th in the ranking. Many smaller countries came in much better, but most of the other countries went home from Wuhan sick as patient zero for their countries. We have met the enemy and they are us. My assertion is easily tested, go to the 108 different countries and see if patient zero for each country was at Wuhan Military Games.
Did you get to read the Commission Report from the link provided? I got Page "missing" error.
Fort Detrick
You should of mention how well China did in the games. Dos not look like they were sick as they did so well.
@@Nmacct Fort Detrick closed right before the pandemic. A ton of people in that area got sick and are being silenced as well. You can find it on UA-cam.
@@BrandiNelson Dr Ralph Baric had worked closely with the biolabs in Fort Detrick too. He had taken out a patent for his research work creating a 'chimarra' of the SARR virus in his Gain of Function lifelong work and he has his own biolab in the University of Carolina.
We need to talk about Fauci.
Jesuit.
🎯
Absolutely. People have forgotten about the poison cup of the Jesuits.
Kary Mullis was right about him. So is RFK Jr.
@@jerryplenda381 as is Rand Paul, like him or not (and I don't, but i think he's right about Fauci's obfuscation of gain-of-function research funding at Wuhan, and it's a shame that he's the only one in congress taking Fauci on)
*There was no lab leak!*
Covid originated in a WEF meeting, where this rule was invented: *"If someone dies WITH covid-19 [positive PCR], we are counting that."* -Dr. Birx. Same rule applied worldwide.
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
@@LiberalsHateFacts There is nothing to vaccinate against. Kary Mullis, inventor of PCR "with pcr, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody". Now combine that with the rule in my original comment.
@@LiberalsHateFacts Zinc, quercetin, "high dose" vitamin D3 at 3X or 4X of the UL (set at a wrong level by 'morons'), menaquinone, ubiquinone, high dose melatonin or ample near infrared exposure, certain sulfur compounds including a specific sulfur containing amino acid, all taken together are vastly more effective in the context of being metabolically healthy is vastly more effective than your two choices.
Definitely go with exposure,,, variants will always lessen with time,,,
@@alleyoop5185 unless they come up with a deadlier than the other
I didn't just fall off a turnip truck yesterday and already understand there is goofy research going on worldwide, where I object is anyone spending US tax dollars for something that's looking increasingly like fraud. I'd like to thank this organization and anybody really, willing to investigate chain of custody etc. in research, you're the unsung heroes possessing the professional gravitas people can take seriously. And Miss Emily, you are the future I can be grateful and hopeful for.
PS... My father, a philosophy and logic professor at university and my mother degreed but who chose to teach youngsters in public school are the reason I know what heroes look like, so no vegetables here although I will say a farmer driving a turnip truck away from glyphosate gets to cut in line to the top of the planet's new hero list.
@jaffa tyree Aye Wee Jimmy Crankie'l be fuuurious to be sure!!
It was released to remove Trump
It's so refreshing to hear an American such as Dr Sachs and the other scientists being so frank in discussions on the virus origins. For more 2 years we have only been allowed to hear discussions mostly around the narrative that it originated from Wuhan.
Thank you Dr Sachs for the battle you took on to investigate and report the truth.
Sachs simply does not represent a neutral perspective. The bottom line..just look up, "Unredacted emails Finally Reveal the Shocking Truth" released on Nov. 29th.
The reason for that 'narrative ' is because it is the most logical one. It is the most logical one BECAUSE the first cases were discovered in close proximity to the Wuhan Laboratory.
It makes me enquire : Why are you trying to protect the Chinese Government ?
The Wuhan Laboratory under duress of the CCP were forced to delete information on their studies. The CCP also used the 'narrative ' that the outbreak was non Zoonotic - they later retracted this. Anyone, within the first month of the outbreak found guilty of the actual crime of spreading ' rumours ' was arrested.
Virologists were placed under pressure including one HK based virologist - she had to flee to the USA for her own safety.
The first Virologist to die in China (close to Wuhan was in September 2019 under the Euphemism 'Respiratory failure '.
Stop shilling for Fascist countries.
Before, you get into your head that I'm some kind of pro Trump Westerner I should remind you that I'm a left Wing Anarchist and a Biology Lecturer.
Didn't you think it was rather fishy, no baty, that Trump in his last year of office took every opportunity, when speaking in public, to point his finger at China and blame them for cv19. Sadly he had no idea how to take the disease seriously and dispursed so much misinformation and used it for his own political gain, consequently many Americans suffered or died and hatred towards China increased. .
This was released to remove Trump it’s not complex
how about trying to explain the delta vs omicron how are these related DNA or there is a missing gap between these variants...
I would reject the entire classification process, since there is no independent party which would be able to verify valid redactions from invalid ones. And we know from the 50s, 60s and 70s when it comes to the nuclear weapons projects and test on humans using radioactive materials that the classification system was used to simply hide embarrassing information without any valid reason.
All that I expect in anyone is integrity and Jeffery has integrity.
9:03 Let us work backwards to this. If this was genuinely a zoonotic spillover or an accidental lab leak, why was there an unscientific focus on vaccine driven solutions (that was understood at the time to take years to develop - with no guarantees) and the forbidding of the wider medical fraternity to try different things?
Why the insistence on "well designed clinical trials" for repurposed drugs, but slipshod work with nebulous end goals for vaccines?
Why did the WHO lead the charge to discount natural immunity when this went against the "accepted science" at the time?
When viral loads were discovered to be equal in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated, how did the insistence to enforce vaccine mandates and passports develop?
When these questions are answered, then the answer to the question of origins will become clearer.
Consider a deliberate leak as well. If you know of the "Mandate of Heaven", and of CCP politics, you can see the possible why this is plausible.
The WHO is controlled by Big Pharma and Bill Gates
Seems you’ve answered the question accurately ..
Maybe a better question is why was a tennis player unable to play on the us open only a month ago ?
This is far from over and all these quesions will be answered but a little too late as they’ve already proven how easily they will gain control and their absolute willingness to do so regardless of the cost
According to the paper from US CDC, they found all nine states showed covid-19 antibodies and that quote sars-cov-2 reactive antibodies were detected in 106 specimens, a small percentage of blood donations from California, Oregon, and Washington as early as December 2019. That's 1.4%(106) of the population with antibodies for covid-19 then. Given that it takes around two weeks for these antibodies to form. Guess how many patients were really there around December 2019 in US?
How about the pneumonia like illness in January 2018 or 19 in manitoba, Canada which l contracted causing me to be the sickest l have ever been in my life,which at that time l believed to be "the flu".. l was sick about 10 days or so..my weight had dropped from 148pounds to 126 lbs...l firmly believe it's possible l might have contracted an earlier variant of covid......when l went to our local hospital EVERY ROOM was occupied with sick people, even the emergency waiting room with 4 beds! Our ambulance came from 100 km in Northern manitoba because there were no ambulances available locally or Winnipeg. The ambulance was for my 91 year old mother who had fallen....we waited for 1.3/4 hr for the ambulance to finally arrive ...at the hospital l found myself wondering what sort of illness had taken hold of so many people and why....
Writing this comment Nov 13th. Page is "missing" to the Commission Report link provided in the show notes.
The Biosafety P4 lab at Fort Dietrick Maryland was suspiciously closed down in September 2019 regarding safety and containment. This was the US premiere Biodefense lab since beginning of Cold War. It was focus during Anthrax scare. How come there is never any mention here of its research and function in the Coronavirus work?
Question.. was very recent Boston University (and others) GOF on Corona done in Level 4, 3 , or 2 labs? If not Level 4 is it possible that their viruses have already escaped and are spreading???
Here is my DIFFERENT QUESTION ... Which of the following two options would provide the greatest protection against FUTURE COVID VARIANTS, exposure to a mild OMICRON variant, or one of the mRNA shots ???
You should eliminate the bat, because there were no other bats after the only Vuhan's. It's that correct?
this guy has been around 100% correct in every topic not just vrs related. 👍
Yes because hes part of the Deep State that is behind everything going on . They are movingvtoward there goal taking down the US an having one world government.
Yes, why are there not more with the dedication of Sachs?
He is fully Conscious! Too few are.
Which one ?
4:54
Do the world a favor and talk about Chlorine Dioxide/CDS, and how doctors have been using it with 100% success in Bolivia
Thanks to all of you seeking solutions to the prescient Covid issues. Keep up your solid efforts!
Operation Mongoose 1962 CIA was going to bioinfecr Cuban Farms crops fields. Kennedy disapproved and they never did it, but govt was saying they were gonna treat it as natural but intl comm. might catch on and it would hurt US intl standing
Where are the philosophers in biomedical ethics in this discussion? I do hope in future discussions that some who have this specialty will be invited.
the UN, geneva conventions on biological weapons committee stemming from the fifth review conference in 2001/2002 was changed in 2006, making the illegal production of virus's for warfare legal again. im so sorry our world leaders are playing god with us now! but truth is called misinformation.
Isn't/ wasn't that the position held by Dr Fauchi's wife, at NIH?
Does the mortality figure of 18 million include all those deaths from other causes that took place within 28 days of a positive Covid test? If so, shouldn’t the final figure be adjusted?
This mean like the guy who was shot 5 times with real bullets and they said he died from Covid?
A coalition of INTERNATIONAL SCIENTISTS. Yes. Their used to collaborate and be SOOO proud of their team efforts to discover new scientific stuffs (human genomes, DNA, cures for diseases, vaccines of all kinds) just before the pandemic started. Are there still such a world wide team efforts now or have these things gone undercover? or disappeared?
Gone I'm sure. Oops, we F ' d up let's go play some video games
It's a weapon
Their not gone, they are writing the laws to make the nurenburg trial crimes legal again, i.e. lobbying them into existence, and essentially running the world leader show! they are the constituents.
@@Azamat421 myxomatosis for humans.
How about JUUL acute respiratory symptoms? it's about same time line with similar fatality rate.
My daughter and I went to 12 States …visiting 5 tourist spots. We started out Nov 2019…the Monday before Thanksgiving. When we returned December 3rd…we were so sick. I was running 4 miles a day and it almost killed me. My young daughter went to er and they took X-ray and tested her for pneumonia. The X-ray showed it as bronchitis. Negative for pneumonia. What we had was from hell. I have never been the same. Six months to recover to a certain extent.
That was the start , to be sure. Vit C and D will help.
Why was Victoria Nuland so concerned about Russian soldiers getting ahold of the US biolabs in Ukraine?
What research was performed there?
Open debate was stifled. That in itself needs addressing. Scientists and experts wishing to contribute to debate should not be censored by experts in media control.
In my mind that has always been the big issue yet it seems most don't see it. Very strange. I'm thinking the TM rap video Sheeple says it all
Agreed, but the broadcast media seemed two have two incompatible functions, here, the BBC was disseminator of government information about how and where to get vaccinated and the need so to do - AND it is also the principal investigative news reporter.
You can't really have one organisation spreading propaganda (however well intentioned) AND dissecting the veracity of said propaganda. Because that would involve colleagues attacking each others motives and views in public.
Thank you for telling the truth!
My question is why would you locate an institute conducting such dangerous research in an extremely dense and populated environment?
Would it not be better to have it somewhere relatively remote?
Mr . Sachs in my opinion you're the only
voice of reason coming from Western
Sources and gives hope that there is
still a chance for humanity to achieve
Global PEACE and STABILITY in this
Troubled world.
The only alternative for Humanity going
Forward is ARMAGEDDON for ALL.
THANK YOU,
PEACE and MUCH SUCCESS my
BROTHER.
Thank you for this important discussion and discovery process.
Great video! Thank you for all your hard work in revealing the facts underlying this awful pandemic.
We're going to have to be prepared for;
1. Government knowing but covering. (They view Viral Manipulation as a must)
2. Multi-Government Community. (Governments working together opposing democracy)
3. Abandoned Citizenry. (We are on our own, worse government let's corporations prey on our vulnerability)
How can you have a discussion of the origin of SARSCov2 if those that initially suggested the lab theory were banned from this and other media, some lost their jobs for it?
What if the spillover was on purpose ? Can WHO go into military sites where they have bio labs . ?
Most excellent!! More of this is desperately needed.
You have no "idea" of what's DESPERATELY needed. While you follow these shills distracting you from what's really going on, the world is in peril, not from any "invisible" virus or fear mongering as they have pulled this in past wars. Do your research. Look for Klaus Schwab and his 4th Industrial Revolution, head of the World Economic Forum. They will enslave every human on the planet and transfer wealth to the elites. DO NOT GIVE THESE PEOPLE IN THIS VIDEO ANOTHER SECOND OF YOUR PRECIOUS TIME. The clock is ticking
@@lillyv9440 I guess you and only you have an "idea of what's desperately needed"😂😂
@@rapidsk8 Those who laugh, will not be laughing soon enough. Keep following controlled opposition, and find yourself with nothing in the end but "global enslavement". Hear me now, believe me later
Yes, fine work. I take Immune 7 and have since the beginning. Does this supplement work, it's from a mushroom?
May God continue to Bless and keep you and yours safe Mr Sachs! You are a Refreshing and Much Needed voice in these times! I truly hope that The Lancet can recoup their standing in the scientific realm! Et Tu Lancet? You broke my PreMed Educated Heart and Mind! NEVER AGAIN & 🚫NO PANDEMIC AMNESTY 🚫
Medical Ethics Required for Treatment:
1) Necessary?
2) Effective?
3) Safety/Risk Ratio for most reasonable
Nearly all this info was revealed by Harvard lawyer Dr. Francis Boyle (author of the the International Bioweapons Convention) nearly 3 years ago in his discussion with Alex Jones on Infowars in Feb of 2020. But thanks for having the courage to put together such a solid comprehensive summary. Sharing this version will be politically correct!
Just googled it, and would have posted the link, but there's a "bad word" in the title that might get this whole thread torn down. DOWNLOAD NOW!
Thank you. Prof. Boyle had the guts to tell us early
If it was bio defence.. what evidence there of any cure or vaccine these fellows at wiv/NIH came up with prior to the pandemic?
Thank you Jeffrey and all
"Cannot touch us,
for we have made a lie our refuge
and falsehood our hiding place.”--- Isaiah 28:15
Having followed the story for some time it is interesting to see the change of views since the original Lancet article which had Peter Daszak as a co author, the same chap who went on the WHO visit to Wuhan and the recipient of funding at Eco Health Alliance from 'I am Science' the most blessed Saint Fauci. As many say, follow the money.
Lancet is just as corrupt as Baric, Fauci & Daszak
At the Grayzone with Max and Aaron, Prof Sachs told of his findings and how it was narrative, NOT facts about Covid that the players were into as for the historic move that took place, seriously check out his interview there.
Still no evidence
"18 million deaths" was a figure arrived at by computer modelling employing the usual suspects assumptions, i.e., dying 'with' as opposed to 'from' etc.....Right off the bat this number should have been questioned.
The UK org that came out with these high projections that scared everyone to overreact have done the same sky high estimates several times prior...One guess who help funds them? Yes $ill Gate$
We need more people like you !!!
Immense thanks to you, Professor Sachs, and all true scientists for working to carefully sift through the data for the distilled scientific facts. Kudos! Keeps me wanting to get out of bed every day. ☮️❤️🐾
Very comprehensive and informative. Thank you so much for making this issue public. Ways forward to prevent any pandemic from happening again is very important.
listen to the Bible and stop eating unclean animals
Jerry Sachs is an angel who fights against injustice. Respect Jeffrey Sachs of speaking out the truth against the majority of Americans. A high moral standard and brave individual. We need more of him so that we can have a peaceful world.
The 0.1% Wealthy and PHARMACY Companies, DO NOT CARE if we KNOW !
Any EVIDENCE anywhere?
What attention has been given to the fact that by December 2019, 5 million blood samples in the US had antibodies for covid 19?
Do you have a source for this claim?
@@brendanmay9585 it is pretty much concluded now that it was circulating in September 2019 in several countries. It could be related to military games in Wuhan but who knows?
@@skaterkraines2691 so no Source, just doubling down on a claim.
Too bad.
I absolutely entertain it as a possibility,. But without any source or proof, this is just baseless claims.
When asked for period you just claim "pretty much accepted". By whom?
That is simply not how science works.
@@brendanmay9585 I don't remember which video I was watching 1.5 years ago which was referring to Italy having checked sewage samples from August 2019 and finding evidence. There may have been talk of blood samples too from Italy. At the time any talk outside of the official narrative was cancelled or blocked and I figured that was just another fact you won't g et from your mainstream media sources. It was disturbing but not overly surprising to me at the time. Do some research to see if you can find information on early indications of SARS COV 2 in wastewater or blood samples. I haven't really looked into it.
@@skaterkraines2691 great that you are willing to spread information that youre not sure if
What happened to Francis Boyle?
how do stop future plandemics? turn off tv. breathe and think for yourself.
Didn’t stop the plague, Spanish flu or aids did it
Didn’t stop 18 mill people dying , some in horrific ways gasping for air .
Pretending it didn’t happen does not actually make it not happen
Funny to ask organizations to search for answers they already have.
The "Mad Scientist' theory " used to be a useful concept for making scary movies. Today it becomes reality!
"mad" and "malevolent"!
Remind me of Dean Koontz's "The Eyes of Darkness."
Meanwhile, people are suddenly dropping dead worldwide and we can guess the common denominator in these tragedies.
The Commission wants to the _World Health Organization_ to have oversight responsibilities for biosafety and biosecurity of international research programs about dangerous pathogens? Really? After how well it performed with COVID?
Big shout out and applause for Jeffrey Sachs. What an amazing and brave individual. Their is some hope.....
Everyone should be looking back into 2019.
Video was cut when she started to discuss Fauxchi and his creditials. Dead silent video.
Grate teameffort well conducted as usual by GS👍 Many thanks..
Who’s actually responsible for setting the correct BSL for an experiment or research program?
Follow the Patents...the bioweapon has been developed over decades. The origins have already been fully disclosed.
How many has perished with seasonal influenza?
As of November 2022, Covid-19 is the third leading cause of death in the United States.
unasked question : concerning the three or more (Boston and others) recent gain of function research experiments creating chimera versions of Omicron/Whuan bits with 80+ lethality to human equivalent mice, ... were the labs using level 2, 3 or 4 protocols? !!!!
To be fair, the combo virus reduced mouse mortality from 100% for the original strain to 80% at the same dosage.
From the Boston paper's methodology: "All procedures were performed in a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) facility at the National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories of the Boston University using biosafety protocols approved by the institutional biosafety committee (IBC)."
There's a BSL4 there too, but apparently they did not deem it necessary to use for this research. I don't know about the other studies that were vaguely mentioned.
@@brendanmay9585 but a virus with less mortality is not always less dangerous. If 20% survives to transmit the virus to others it might be making more victims.
@@VJNEEF given that COVID 19 typically kills long after the infectious phase (a d is even infectious prior to symptoms) your argument is completely invalid.
@@brendanmay9585 that doesn't make things better, does it?
luckily the 100% kill rate in mice didn't actually kill 100% of people.
But as I understand it they combined the original "wuhan" virus with an omnicron virus. And what they got was a virus less deadly than wuhan and less transmissable than omicron. But you could also argue more deadly than omicron and more transmissable than wuhan.
It depends on your perspective, you could argue both ways.
But no one really knows what would happen if this particular variant would go out in the wild. And I rather not find out.
by the way , do you wear mask when you eat?
Check Ft. Detricks alarming leak rate.
2 questions, maybe 3. Or perhaps 4 or 5. Question 1; Why throughout the entire history of virology as a medical “science” has no physical sample of particles in the nano scale EVER been isolated directly and I mean directly from a sample extracted directly from an organism which is said to be infected with such particles? I am aware of the multiple, now numbering over 2,000 studies which are titled isolation of virus ........ in relation to SARS CoV-2 or any of its variants.
I have reviewed many of these papers and ALL of them have been reviewed by one individual or another able to read these studies. ALL the studies follow virtually the same protocols and not ONE has described the isolation of virus particles directly from a sample extracted from a natural host. This is despite the mechanism for doing just such a thing with particles of similar size and density has been done successfully for a very long time now. Why has virology been unable to isolate a sample in such a manner? The only answer given to this enormous problem is that density gradient ultra-centrifugation has failed to produce any significant band in such a manner upon every attempt is that there just aren’t enough of them. The other commonly given answer is “that’s not the way we do it” which is not a reasonable answer. Given that under Virus theory these particles are replication competent and must by nature to be able to move between cells in order to proliferate which one would assume that any natural reservoir should contain billions of these particles even within a small sample. So again, why has no viable sample of virus been isolated DIRECTLY from a sample extracted from any organism? It’s deeply troubling to me that what virology claims is “isolation” is nothing more than insilico modelling. In other words a computer model. Not an actual physical specimen. In other words a cartoon.
Question 2; How would virology be able to confirm the accuracy of the in silico (computer model) without having a physical specimen to compare the computer model to?
Question 3; How does virology confirm the behaviour of the alleged virus without a physical specimen to use in a tissue assay?
Question 4; How can virology call what they’re doing science when they have no physical specimen of virus and only virus to be used as probably THE MOST IMPORTANT independent variable is the tissue assay? In every scientific study you must have a dependant variable (the observed effect being studied-in this case cytopathic effect) and independent variables (in this case an actual physical sample of virus and ONLY virus) there are many other independent variables in the Enders-Peebles based assay protocols which is the assay methodology generally used by every virology lab that has published. In other words virology is not doing science. They are running no controls. Controls does not mean security and PPE and risk assessments etc. I’m talking about a study controls. And the mock infections are not valid controls. Most studies did not publish any of the methodology of the mock infections and the few that did drastically altered the methodology of the mock infections in relation to the study assay hereby invalidating them as a proper control. A valid control would be running the identical assay methodology one with alleged virus in sample and another one without virus in sample. This has never been done. And no researchers or scientists have been able to produce a single paper detailing the actual isolation of a virus in the commonly understood meaning of isolation meaning separating one thing from everything else.
Question 5; Since the virus is only an in silico model compiled from tiny fragments of genetic material derived from an assay which used multiple sources of genetic material, how do you know the provenance of the genetic fragments used to compile the in silica model?
Question 6; how exactly would one make a chimera out of 2 viruses neither of which exist in the real world, only exist as a computer model?
Your comment was the only truth in this video,
I’m still waiting for answers. Nothing but crickets.
I just returned from a nice holiday with friends and family out of town, where my partner and I were the only unjabbed out of the group of about 20 people or so.
All of of the fully-jabbed and boosted adults reported contracting covid multiple times over the past year.
My partner and I were the only ones present that have had no sickness since this all began, other than a slight cold bug that lasted all of 5 days about a year back.
Several of the (relatively young) adults that were present recently had heart attacks, one requiring a triple bypass surgery and his spouse required open heart surgery... both now require a slew of prescription drugs including statins.
Several of the adults present also displayed profound cognitive decline/forgetfulness that was not present when we last saw them 13 months ago.
And?
Were they boosted
The truth will come out and many individuals and organisations will be in deep d0-d0 ! Demicide by Conspiracy ...
source: trust me bro
@@jifij89 source: definitely not the well paid professional liars in the "new$" that you watch all day.
Still can’t find the zoonotic spillover origin. Still trying to find that host. Maybe in the next decade or two or three or …
They know, their paychecks have the condition of not saying.
Until they admit it's part of our genome it's subterfuge
The "unknown" intermediate species was known all along to researchers in this field (though they never let on in their articles arguing for a natural origin of the current pandemic): patented hACE2 transgenic mice with humanized airway cells, which a novel bat coronavirus was infected with repeatedly using serial passaging--a technique that the UNC's Ralph Baric was already famous for, and which he taught to Shi Zhengli beginning in 2013.
@@dbadagna with you the one additional qualification of such experimentation carried out in WIV in BSL 2 and 3 labs. Yes, we’re in vehement agreement. (My original comment is sarcastic btw.)
Great, informative discussion!! Thanks 🙏 😊
Encouraging initiative to obtain clarity on what has happened and transparant safe new strategies on research worldwide. Thank you so much for doing this. Hopefully important voices worldwide will join coming webinars. All the best.
"clarity" you say?.hmmm lets see: so people (g4tes) and other people (deep state) cause a global out break of a killer Virus... and people (g4tea again) and other people (more of that damn deep state) make loads of money from controlling the out break of a killer global virus.............. and we dont even get a chance to check their homework.............. hmm am I missing something here? ? I keep seeing these same crazy patterns...like in some former soviet states,, a few wars.. some pharma stuff.. housing.... where did they get all their power from.... hmmm why.. my taxes? I may be going mad... dont worry.. lilly has a silly pilly for that.......... "voices " you say? maybe I am hearing something
An amazing discussion. Credit to you all.
We humans will always do what we're capable of.
Making weapons stfu
Or rather incapable of doing properly
On that note, why is there no discussion of the rapid rollout of Pfizer vaccines?
Plandemic in the making!
the fact that nobody showed up to discuss from zoonosis only is a testament to this huge cover up
Or, perhaps the scientists asked to come, did not want to take part in something that could be misinterpreted by the media... Like this so-called investigation done by Dr. Chan.
That is a dumb statement. There are many reasons why this could be and considering it as evidence is just plain wrong.
@@brendanmay9585 Could you state one of these many reasons?
@@irigopou 1) it could be a biased selection
2) the zoonosis argument has already been presented
3) it could be a strategy to make this analysis and presentation biased
4) Barbara Streisand effect
5) there is nothing to add to the multiple reports and studies already done
6) even the moderator was clear that there is no conclusive proof either way, so why get involved?
7) they all had better things to do
I personally think the lab leak theory is slightly more likely. My opinion; just like the argument above is completely irrelevant and cannot be used as evidence.
@@brendanmay9585 1) Extremely unlikely act from entities named Jeffery Sachs and Lancet and for this type of official investigation.
2) This applies to the lab argument as well, but apparently with the opposite effect there. And anyway general relativity arguments are still presented in cosmological discussions aimed to a wider public audience even though they were first presented in 1915.
3) This is a special case of the 1).
4) Do you mean that all zoonosis proponents invitees decided to bolster their position by using the Barbara Streisand effect? Quite unlikely.
5) This applies to the lab argument as well, but apparently with the opposite effect there. And if there is nothing to add, there is a lot to defend.
6) This applies to the lab argument as well, but apparently with the opposite effect there. Usually there is a need to get involved in a discussion if there is no conclusive proof, since on the presence of a conclusive proof all discussion becomes redundant.
7) Possible, but as likely as winning the lottery today, or - it turns out - as the zoonosis argument being valid.
Was the vaccine developed for covid , or covid developed for the vaccine ? Hmmm, now . Which is the most profitable ?
I'd like to take this opportunity to spend 20 minutes thanking my colleagues. Those from Yale and those from Harvard and those from MIT and those from Harvard and MIT. We work so hard and do so much it's amazing. Don't feel bad about paying us a lot of money and expecting no results. We are happy to take your money and we'd also like to extend a warm thanks to you for your money.
SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon ... Don't forget to add John's Hopkins University Department of Public Health ... it was made by USA & Chinese virologists ... at our best universities ... courtesy my tax dollars! thanks for nothing USA ... USA is dead -- our ship is sinking fast.
Well it was you or Zelenski and the guys said like how many people can these geeks kill. So we went for both.✋️
and nothing about the 2018 Changsheng Biolab incident with Rabies vaccin ?