Sinking of US Cargo Vessel SS El Faro

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 гру 2017
  • Near Acklins and Crooked Island
    Bahamas
    October1, 2015
    This two-dimensional animation reconstructs the sequence of events leading to the sinking of the US-flagged cargo vessel SS El Faro in the Atlantic Ocean near Acklins and Crooked Island, Bahamas, which occurred on the morning of October 1, 2015.
    The animation displays the position of El Faro as a yellow circle, and a solid white line indicates the track path of the vessel. During the animation, the planned course and proposed course changes for El Faro are shown as dotted white lines.
    The Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) was recovered on August 8, 2016. The VDR retained the last 26 hours of conversation on the bridge and vessel operating data. Data from the VDR were used to determine the position and heading of the accident vessel. The bridge audio from the VDR was also used in reconstructing the sequence of events in the accident. The animation does not depict visibility conditions at the time of the accident. The animation includes audio narration, and the script of the narration is appended to this description/disclaimer.
    The animation begins with an overall map of the area between Jacksonville, Florida and San Juan, Puerto Rico. An inset photograph of the fully loaded El Faro is shown in the upper right side of the screen, and the typical course from Jacksonville to San Juan traveling to the east of the Bahama Islands is depicted. An inset photograph shows the VDR in its position on El Faro before the voyage; the inset transitions to a photograph of the VDR in its location on the bottom of the ocean before it was recovered. An arrow indicating north, and a scale are shown in the lower left side of the screen.
    The departure of the El Faro on September 29, 2015 at 9:48 pm Easter Daylight Time (EDT) is indicated, along with the position and development of Hurricane Joaquin from a tropical depression through a tropical storm to a hurricane. A series of predicted storm tracks are animated, indicating that the storm was consistently predicted to move
    southwest, then turn north. The National Hurricane Center’s Best Track (the actual track calculated after the accident) is also shown.
    The date and time in EDT of selected events are displayed on the lower left side of the screen, as they are depicted or when mentioned in the narration. The sequence of events starts at 5:36 am EDT on September 30 with the earliest information available from the VDR. The position of El Faro is shown along with the predicted storm tracks from Bon Voyage System (BVS) and from the National Hurricane Center Sat-C, plus the National Hurricane Center Best Track. The hurricane position is interpolated on the BVS or Sat-C tracks to indicate where the hurricane would have been expected to be at any time. The BVS information is shown in blue, the Sat-C information is shown in red and the National Hurricane Center Best Track is shown in black. Beginning at 2:30 pm EDT on September 30, the animation changes to a closer view including the islands in the Bahamas, with the islands of San Salvador, Rum Cay and Samana Cay identified with text labels. The Old Bahama Channel north of Cuba is also labeled with text.
    Beginning at 12:00 am EDT on October 1, the animation changes to a closer view centered on San Salvador, Rum Cay and Samana Cay, which are identified with text labels. The Old Bahama Channel north of Cuba is again labeled with text. An inset photograph looking at the aft and starboard side of El Faro is shown, superimposed with twelve white ovals to indicate the openings in the hull that would have allowed water to enter the second deck of the vessel.
    Beginning at 5:43 am EDT on October 1, the animation changes to closer view showing the position, heading and track path of El Faro, along with Samana Cay identified with a text label. The vessel is shown 30 times actual size. Selected summarized or paraphrased comments from the bridge audio from the VDR are displayed as text along with the time in EDT at the time they occurred. The center of the hurricane along the National Hurricane Center Best Track is shown, along with the wind circulation directions. An inset photograph illustrates a scuttle from El Faro. An inset graphic indicates the listing of the ship to starboard or to port, as reported in the narration.
    The animation is followed by an underwater photo of the stern of El Faro resting on the seafloor.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 506

  • @juniorballs6025
    @juniorballs6025 4 роки тому +111

    Captain was criminally negligent.

  • @FLaDave351
    @FLaDave351 6 років тому +282

    The Crew was aware they were heading right for a hurricane the whole voyage, and this was per the captains orders. The captain never even came out of his cabin till it was too late. The coast guard said they would have revoked the captains license if he would have survived.

    • @seansteele1269
      @seansteele1269 6 років тому +30

      Amble Lane Howard Schoenly the 2nd engineer on El Faro if Captain Davidson survived his license would be the least of his worries

    • @thedigitalproductevolution3379
      @thedigitalproductevolution3379 2 роки тому +1

      Was this Possible a Suicide Run For the Ship Master?

    • @hoot1141
      @hoot1141 Рік тому +6

      @@thedigitalproductevolution3379 Didn’t sound like it. It really sounds like incompetence.

    • @Richard-zc1cj
      @Richard-zc1cj Рік тому

      Whatever happened to a good old mutiny? The crew needs to think about themselves when I think the captain is a blanking idiot.

    • @C_AVATAR
      @C_AVATAR Рік тому +12

      @@hoot1141 Arrogance, incompetence and gross negligence. RIP to the crew except for the Capt.

  • @selec21
    @selec21 4 роки тому +153

    This is a case where you throw the captain overboard, And save 32 lives.

    • @hermanbruner2913
      @hermanbruner2913 3 роки тому +1

      Stupid you are. Working at sea is not black and white especially when you are a captain.

    • @motorcop505
      @motorcop505 2 роки тому +9

      Herman Bruner Actually it very much is a black and white issue. Just like being pregnant, you either are or you aren't. The crew either lived or they didn't, and they most certainly didn't. The captain gets paid more for their judgement over and above their experience. Any shipping line that doesn't recognize this isn't one that you should work for in the first place.

    • @SvenTviking
      @SvenTviking 2 роки тому +9

      @@hermanbruner2913 The captain is the responsible officer. He chose an unreliable weather forecast system, could not be bothered to get out of his bunk, could not be bothered to download the inaccurate weather forecast. He’s responsible, that’s what he gets paid for, he’s captain.

    • @roseg.4354
      @roseg.4354 2 роки тому

      Exactly..

    • @roseg.4354
      @roseg.4354 2 роки тому

      Exactly

  • @JeffCowan
    @JeffCowan 6 років тому +210

    Gross negligence.

  • @ronaldgreen8423
    @ronaldgreen8423 Рік тому +19

    I've been on a ship during a light rain storm. And that was terrifying to me so I could imagine the terror the crew went thru.

  • @mudchair16
    @mudchair16 5 років тому +286

    12 hours behind NHC? You might as well use tarot cards.

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +30

      or flip a coin. or consult a magic 8-ball.

    • @BackyardBeeKeepingNuevo
      @BackyardBeeKeepingNuevo 4 роки тому +10

      Schlomo Weissbergman-Goldsteinwitz, Ph.D. I prefer tea leaves or if I am feeling really risky I’ll roll the bones.

    • @mdlclassworker3384
      @mdlclassworker3384 4 роки тому +10

      What was the companies liability on this, why did they utilize old forecast

    • @Venezolano410
      @Venezolano410 4 роки тому +2

      I prefer to roll percentile dice.

    • @munky123jw
      @munky123jw 4 роки тому +4

      call the psychic hot line with Miss Cleo for a reading!

  • @mrgreen2570
    @mrgreen2570 6 років тому +249

    My childhood friend Rafal Zdobych was one of the crew. RIP

  • @divox9pqr
    @divox9pqr 6 років тому +156

    Gross hubris and negligence.....Rest In Peace all members of the crew.

  • @tm13tube
    @tm13tube 6 років тому +207

    As captain, heading towards a hurricane I'd want every report updated asap. Shame the crew had to die because the captain was too lazy to stay up to date on their position in relation to the hurricane. Inexplicable, like the captain of the Bounty.

    • @vicmclaglen1631
      @vicmclaglen1631 6 років тому +9

      7:20 Agreed; those couple sentences are particularly damning. Why, especially given the situation you are already in? Poor bastards.

    • @geoh7777
      @geoh7777 6 років тому +11

      After years at sea churning the distance away, it must become quite something of a boredom to some seamen.
      Also, sometimes corporate is adamant about not diverging course from the most direct one.

    • @rubenmagtotosr5691
      @rubenmagtotosr5691 6 років тому +5

      captain is old sick and depressed to process the disaster approaching

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +4

      @@rubenmagtotosr5691 Pretty stupid statement you've made there.

    • @rubenmagtotosr5691
      @rubenmagtotosr5691 5 років тому +2

      fuzzy point stop directing hate comments be polite in using the internet its not in my spirit to fomment hatred we as christians celebrate christmas to spread love of our Lord Jesus Christ and his eternal salvation if you were objective my comment wasnt even attacking the captains character but his disadvantaged state and the distressing affairs they went through to dignify them my goodness you really narrowed it down to shallow animosity on your part have a heart

  • @comanche180
    @comanche180 6 років тому +178

    Good job by NTSB, as always.
    Vanity Fair had an excellent article on this with background information about the pressure that the crews were subject to to make the trips on schedule and with the least amount of fuel burn possible. Blame the Shipping execs!

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +45

      @Rich NO. Whilst the Captain *does* have the authority, he also must answer to those execs comanche mentioned. Shorbound execs with no sea-going experience often take a dim view of a ship being delayed.

    • @manatee2500
      @manatee2500 4 роки тому +17

      fuzzypony The owners lose their ability to limit their liability when they interfere with the judgment of the master.

    • @djbloo8996
      @djbloo8996 4 роки тому +2

      @Rich and lose his job yep rich genius so simple

    • @McRocket
      @McRocket 4 роки тому +14

      @@djbloo8996 Better than losing his life and his crew's lives as well. That - in peacetime - should ALWAYS be the Captain's first thought...his job a distant second.

    • @McRocket
      @McRocket 4 роки тому +24

      comanche180
      - sure, if the execs put the captain under pressure - blame them...to a point. But the Captain has a duty to his crew. No matter what pressure he/she is under, he should not put his ship into a dangerous situation.
      I blame the captain first, the execs second.

  • @patconlon7835
    @patconlon7835 6 років тому +105

    ---i dont think anyone was "sleeping"--They were in the middle of a Stage 3 Hurricane--A lot of noise---Stuff crashing around--- Alarms going off--The whole engine department was up, i assume, trying to keep the ship afloat--The steward dept. would of been up at 5 am--The only person that got a good nites sleep was the Captain

    • @SkylersWorldofGaming
      @SkylersWorldofGaming 4 роки тому

      Pat Conlon Named Micheal

    • @djbloo8996
      @djbloo8996 4 роки тому

      @@SkylersWorldofGaming scott

    • @hometownmedic7355
      @hometownmedic7355 3 роки тому +13

      It is unlikely that he got a “good” nights sleep; but the quality of what little sleep he did get is irrelevant. Weather that bad, he should have been up to the bridge to check on things no less than hourly, if he left at all.
      He picked the wrong source to trust, and it cost him his life, so no further payment is due from him. Sad for sure, but as an amalgamation of other posts have said, greed and mismanagement on the part of the ship owners combined with ignorance and hubris on the part of the ships master met to create a deadly situation, one that is sadly not uncommon in the industry. Time and tides wait for no man. If you don’t get the job done, they will for damn sure find a man who will.

    • @motorcop505
      @motorcop505 2 роки тому +1

      HomeTown Medic And he damn sure didn't get it done. This was all due to the captain, end of story.

  • @evidenceismygod9992
    @evidenceismygod9992 3 роки тому +13

    I worked on that ships boilers a year before she sank while we sailed from puerto Rico to mobile Alabama where we dry docked and worked on el faro for another month. This is sad a little creepy for me. Rip to all the souls lost...

  • @Matt-mo8sl
    @Matt-mo8sl 3 роки тому +14

    And the thought of 2nd mate, Danielle Randolph knowing they were headed directly into a hurricane the day before because she emailed her family saying they're headed straight for it, I can't imagine what she must had been feeling knowing that she knew they were headed for trouble and she knew how to get out of it long before but her advice was ignored. It was her watch during the overnight hours where the weather went down hill REAL fast. The only thing this gal was guilty of was being a loyal sailor who obviously was not will to break the chain of command as she had the chance to turn that ship of of harm's way while the captain was sleeping like a baby in his cabin and would have had no idea until he got up at 4am to see they were headed off HIS course and out of danger.

  • @alanmaroney8395
    @alanmaroney8395 6 років тому +38

    that ship was moored in Baltimore harbor well over a year and did not move. ship looked in horrible shape and a rusting heap. hard to believe that was sea worthy

    • @seansteele1269
      @seansteele1269 6 років тому +20

      Alan Maroney my brother was 2nd engineer on El Faro when it sank he told me the ship was a piece of shit many times.

    • @golightly5121
      @golightly5121 5 років тому

      Alan Maroney : The whole story has a hoax feeling to it.

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +8

      A good question to ask the management at Totes Services as well.

    • @ransom182
      @ransom182 3 роки тому +1

      Go Lightly oh lord… here we go… 🙄

    • @u686st7
      @u686st7 Рік тому

      It was in Baltimore for several years, first at Port Covington then at the old Pennsy coal pier on Clinton St.

  • @rosspbarnett458
    @rosspbarnett458 4 роки тому +18

    El Faro is deeper then the Titanic ! 40 + foot waves and 100 + MPH winds, how could anyone survive !

  • @pikkyndan
    @pikkyndan 4 роки тому +35

    Holy Ghosts. The VDR was recovered 10 months after the vessel sank. Still retaining the last 26 hours of sailing

    • @RubenKelevra
      @RubenKelevra Рік тому +1

      Yeah I mean, that's what it was designed to do.

    • @pikkyndan
      @pikkyndan Рік тому +5

      @@RubenKelevra No Mate. I wasn’t surprised by the VDR still being operational. I was surprised that they managed to find it 10 months later. I mean still searching 10 months after is commitment. They spent same tie on MH370 and found neither recorders

    • @RubenKelevra
      @RubenKelevra Рік тому +2

      @@pikkyndan well, the ship got tracking until the end and has also send a distress signal. So it was just a matter of finding the position which it travelled after it started sinking plus the underwater travel it made before reaching the ground.
      As ships are dead slow compared to airplanes that's a much easier task than finding an aircraft with none of that

    • @pikkyndan
      @pikkyndan Рік тому

      @@RubenKelevra ummmmm. Pretty much

  • @jamesboerner4172
    @jamesboerner4172 2 роки тому +18

    Despite how ghastly and even a bit negligent the whole thing is, this is absolutely wonderful work! Truly a fine accounting of what took place - professional and educational.

  • @JamminClemmons
    @JamminClemmons 6 років тому +18

    15,000 feet of water just off the coast of San Salvador----What the hell! That's nearly 3 miles. I hadn't a clue. - RIP to those lost.

  • @garrydavis3475
    @garrydavis3475 Рік тому +14

    My heart goes out to the families of the crew as well as the family of the captain who made the fatal decisions

    • @yolo_burrito
      @yolo_burrito 5 місяців тому

      They were sued by the ships owner within 30 days of the sinking.

  • @cindytepper8878
    @cindytepper8878 4 роки тому +8

    Listing bad enough that the sumps were starving the engines for oil. WTH, at that point you know things aren't going to end well. Nothing like ending up dead in the water in the middle of a hurricane

  • @mikehartman5326
    @mikehartman5326 Рік тому +6

    A more detailed video of this sinking called Disastrous Indifference by Brick Immortar which is over an hour long point the blame at the captain for refusing to take the advise of others on the bridge. His convictions that that storm would not be an issue drove him to try and maintain an on time arrival an error he probably realized after it was too late.

    • @ellisjackson3355
      @ellisjackson3355 Рік тому +2

      I saw that video and have been on an el faro binge for the past few days. Because even though I'm not a sailor, I could still see myself on that ship.......RIP

  • @robm4526
    @robm4526 4 роки тому +35

    I remember reading stories about how El Faro & the crew used to brag about sailing through violent storm systems.. This wasn't their first rodeo, but was unfortunately their last. Seems to be due to the arrogance of a cocky captain.

    • @suzannetaylor5374
      @suzannetaylor5374 3 роки тому +11

      The captain bragged about the weather in the Alaskian seas where El faro had been working.I think he had no idea how bad a hurricane can get.

    • @TacticalOkuu
      @TacticalOkuu 2 роки тому +3

      The ship had also operated in Iraq where it somehow took a few explosions from missiles with no major damage, at that point they probably thought they were invincible since. Though the ship was a fossil that shouldn't have even been sailing at all.

    • @thedigitalproductevolution3379
      @thedigitalproductevolution3379 2 роки тому +1

      crew may have bragged but not like the CEO Did at that time

  • @thomasridley8675
    @thomasridley8675 4 роки тому +71

    Why would any ship depend on data 6 hrs old. This was totally on the captain.

    • @TechOut
      @TechOut Місяць тому

      No it’s not. The was just the delay from the NWS updates had nothing to do with the captain. You don’t get live detailed weather minute by minute in the middle of the ocean

    • @thomasridley8675
      @thomasridley8675 Місяць тому

      @@TechOut
      He had several chances to divert and he didn't. He knew he was heading into a class 3 and still did nothing. He failed in his duty to protect the ship. As captain all the blame is on his shoulders.
      We will never know why he was so stubborn.

    • @TechOut
      @TechOut Місяць тому

      @thomasridley8675 I didn't say that didn't happen i said the BVS data being 6 hours old was the system not him

    • @thomasridley8675
      @thomasridley8675 Місяць тому

      @@TechOut
      I reviewed the post again and my opinion stands. He had plenty of warnings from several different sources. His crew even recommended a divertion to stear clear of the storm based on that information. He didnt.

  • @geoh7777
    @geoh7777 6 років тому +31

    Damn the hurricane, full speed ahead.

  • @terribarrett9381
    @terribarrett9381 Рік тому +4

    It is pounded into every sailor's head to obey the Captain's orders without question. It is absolutely heartbreaking to know this Captain did not listen to his crew and more importantly to his 2nd Mate.

    • @woodnbikes
      @woodnbikes 8 місяців тому

      I was friends with the second mate. She told me a few weeks before this happened all about his ego and the way he ran the ship. No one on board liked him very much most of the time, he could never admit he was wrong, ever. Except this time it cost them all their lives....

  • @zakelwe
    @zakelwe 5 років тому +8

    There is company pressure on ships to complete trips of course. In this case the captain did not seem to be under pressure, indeed the company did not even know where the ship was, which is a poor mark on them already. He asked for a change of route on the way back to avoid the storm and also he had changed route previously to go above Cuba for a prior storm.
    My summary is
    1.This was a very unusual storm with track and intensity, the predictions were all wrong. Note NHC best track is with hindsight.
    2. The ships went to sea consistently with not enough sump oil as recommended so in big swells the intake could get an airlock and stop the engines.
    3. The cargo was not lashed correctly, no storm lashings was done one the cars below decks.
    4.The captain did not use the best information available and did not be on the bridge when needed, the bridge crew did not press their concerns.
    5. A scuttle was left open so leading to water ingress which led to cars sliding about and breaking a fire main that meant the bilge pumps could not shift the amount of water coming in.
    The captain made some very bad calls all along the voyage. But there is a lot more to it than this, as my points above show.
    The sister ship was sailing through the storm in the opposite direction at the same time and reported 100 kt winds ... and lived to tell the tail.
    Nobody comments on her captain ...............

    • @someguy9778
      @someguy9778 2 роки тому +1

      Knowingly headed towards a hurricane with nothing strapped down...From the transcripts, they didn't even have straps on board.

    • @amillionemptybranches9553
      @amillionemptybranches9553 Рік тому

      Which sister ship?

    • @ellisjackson3355
      @ellisjackson3355 Рік тому

      @@amillionemptybranches9553 a ship called el yunque

  • @AWildPenguin
    @AWildPenguin 5 років тому +15

    Terrible captain + Terrible delayed weather data = Avoidable tragedy.

  • @englebergsmith5420
    @englebergsmith5420 6 років тому +25

    Captain was a fool.

  • @lwing77
    @lwing77 3 роки тому +6

    Crew did not stand a chance, they tried to convince captain but he was too proud rip

  • @bigtuna4037
    @bigtuna4037 3 роки тому +24

    I've sailed those ships and other old steam ships with only steam turbine generator s and an emergency diesel generator the size of a truck engine. No where near enough electrical power if steam plant gets into trouble. I imagine rolling stirred up crap in fuel tanks clogging strainers continuously.

    • @herseem
      @herseem Рік тому +2

      From another video about this, the key issue was that the list made it difficult for the engine to suck up oil for lubrication, and that seemed to have eventually caused the engine to fail.

  • @Spyke-lz2hl
    @Spyke-lz2hl 3 роки тому +6

    Wow, what a story. I have trouble understanding why they continued, even the helmsman could see there was trouble ahead, but he can only suggest or ask, the Captain is the final word. On Wikipedia the final moments are absolutely harrowing.

  • @alimin8r201
    @alimin8r201 2 роки тому +3

    As the saying goes- there are old captains and bold captains but there are no old bold captains.

  • @Matt-mo8sl
    @Matt-mo8sl 5 років тому +5

    I don't want to crucify a dead man but the captain bares responsibility to craft and crew. The captain along with 3 others on the crew, 2nd mate Danielle Randolph, and engineering crewmen Mike Holland and Dylan Mecklin were all fellow Mainers and Maine Maritime Academy grads and our state was devastated by their loss along with the other 29 brave crew members. If there was every a time for a mutiny, that was probably it. I cannot even imagine the fear those crew members must have felt knowing that the skipper was steering them into the 5th ring of hell even after from what it sounds like in the transcripts, the chief, 2nd and 3rd mates all but begging the skipper to "get out of there". It appears had the skipper either heeded their pleas and or kept up with the weather literally hour by hour, they would have had time to get turned around and either head for Florida or any safe port within the islands. I'm no sailor so I'm fat, dumb and stupid when it comes to this stuff but it just seems to me that this really didn't need to happen. I guess based on the captain's actions or lack there of, had the chief mate tackled the captain and tied him up and he took over command, maybe they'd all be alive today and the El Faro coulda met its natural fate at a scrap yard rather than 3 miles plus under water forever.

    • @frankmiller95
      @frankmiller95 4 роки тому +3

      You are generally correct. Had the other deck officers collaborated and overruled the captain, they might well have been exonerated. Even if they had not, they would still have been alive. Having been both a deck officer and captain, trying to protect the financial interests of the vessel's owners and the safety and lives of the crew is a constant balancing act. Lose you balance and lose your job, your ship, or your life ln this case, it's clear that the captain gambled and lost. Speaking from personal experience, l too have gambled and lived to tell the story. Luck played a big part. lt always has and always will. When things go bad at sea, they usually do so in a hurry.

  • @kathyyoung1774
    @kathyyoung1774 4 роки тому +17

    A hurricane was somewhat unpredictable?. Imagine that!

  • @marvinwatkins8889
    @marvinwatkins8889 6 років тому +26

    Oh captain, my captain, your pride and arrogance made you screw up and take your crew three miles down with you and your ship. You should've waited it out at Jax and told the bosses and shippers it was for the best. An expensive and tragic lesson.

    • @ellisjackson3355
      @ellisjackson3355 Рік тому +1

      They probably would've let him do it. Or at least take a detour away from the hurricane

  • @tedgey4286
    @tedgey4286 6 років тому +36

    Preoccupation with the job in hand or a desire not to disturb the skipper should never result in disregard of a rapidly falling barometer.

    • @funkagent
      @funkagent 6 років тому +12

      He told the skipper what, 3 times? Who's not disturbing?

    • @seansteele1269
      @seansteele1269 6 років тому +7

      Fuck Captain Davidson he killed my brother on that ship I hope he rots in hell

    • @1997Banane
      @1997Banane 6 років тому +4

      Sean Thats sad... RIP

  • @warrenpuckett4203
    @warrenpuckett4203 2 роки тому +5

    Having been in storm with 70-90 knot winds and 100-120 ft trough to peak seas, our captain changed course to the leeward side on the land mass.
    The ship I was on pulled into Seward and the carrier pulled into Anchorage. Those storms that come in out the Bering Sea are not called hurricanes or typhoons. But they do match them.
    Did not do much about the waves but did a lot about the wind. The aircraft carrier was taking water over the bow. That was enough to have the captain change course. Without permission.
    Keeping the mast perpendicular to the sea is critical.
    Those same storms generate the 90 footers on the north shore of Oahu. Also the 9 footers on the south side. Guess which side the US Navy was steaming on?
    2hd one. Left port in Mumbai with a typhoon coming right at Mumbai.. 500 Miles out. Once out of port did did a 90 degree course change with 40 knot winds and 30 foot seas.
    The typhoon was on a South west course and we went north east.
    What I am surprised about was the course was not changed to the south along Florida at once along the ship put out to sea. Use leaward side of Cuba to get to less seas and wind and other islands. Approaching Puerto Rico from the south.
    The captain was probably more concerned about fuel and port arrival time.

    • @hansvonmannschaft9062
      @hansvonmannschaft9062 2 роки тому

      Excuse me sir, did I read you well? The CV was taking water... *_over the bow?_* Holy mother...

  • @geoffreydevore9503
    @geoffreydevore9503 6 років тому +18

    RIP!! Brave souls who venture out into the sea!!

  • @mostlynew
    @mostlynew 6 років тому +9

    Imagine the crew as the fate of the ship became obvious - and the abandon ship alarm sounded

    • @flparrotz1
      @flparrotz1 6 років тому +5

      Captain was wrong on ALL accounts and even waited too late to sound the alarm to abandon ship!! Those guys NEVER had a chance listening to him! Had they abandoned ship fifteen minutes before, some probably would have made it or i'd like to think all would have! I feel so bad for those guys that they didn't listen to their own instincts and say BS Captain, this is our lives at stake here; and to hell with the company and their Greed$$$.

    • @DevinEMILE
      @DevinEMILE 3 роки тому +2

      @@flparrotz1 wouldn’t have mattered most likely. A tiny boat in pissing distance of a cat 4 hurricane. They would have had a chance in the lifeboat but I wouldn’t want to imagine the hell that they would have gone through in it.

    • @cherlylena6956
      @cherlylena6956 3 роки тому

      @@DevinEMILE They would have had a choice regardless to save their own lives.

  • @1824arthur
    @1824arthur 6 років тому +27

    Have to believe that the ship should never have left the harbor of Jacksonville while a tropical storm was offshore. What was the Captain thinking?

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +9

      Likely that he's lose his billet if he didn't get to sea.

    • @KB4QAA
      @KB4QAA 4 роки тому +7

      AF; There are always storms at sea, somewhere. The problem is that neither the captain nor the shipping company were performing their duties properly.

    • @LIamaLlama554
      @LIamaLlama554 4 роки тому +7

      Captain and his bosses were in a mindset of profits over safety. Also, far better weather data is available to skippers of 35 ft pleasure boats. More legislation is needed to make sure these ships have access to and are USING good up-to-date weather forecasts.

    • @suzannetaylor5374
      @suzannetaylor5374 3 роки тому +1

      @@LIamaLlama554 Won't happen if it costs money.Profit before lives.

  • @dubious6718
    @dubious6718 4 роки тому +6

    Why would you sail towards a storm?
    I only drive a truck and check the weather and if its raining, I wont drive (I do a lot of loading/unloading and its nicer to work when its not raining..)

  • @ellisjackson3355
    @ellisjackson3355 Рік тому +1

    Imagine if the crew just resorted to mutiny. Worse case scenario, they would've all lost their jobs. But they would still be alive and they could argue that they did it because the captain wanted to drive into a hurricane.

    • @Lion718
      @Lion718 Рік тому +1

      Given the accurate weather reports, they would have made the right decision to disobey orders.

  • @annaem937
    @annaem937 3 роки тому +15

    I just this evening finished listening to the book, "Into the Raging Sea," and drove home to research this tragedy online. I'm left feeling so distressed about the completely unnecessary loss of lives. It's clear that many things conspired to lead to El Faro's fate, as I believe is true with most such tragedies. However, this does not release TOTE from its ultimate moral and ethical responsibility. Every single decision which contributed to the sinking of this ship should have been analyzed and evaluated. The entire ship should have been checked, tested, and remedies applied, especially those discovered to have contributed to its demise. Company procedures should have been reviewed, updated, corrected, or thrown out and new ones written. The only ethical and moral response would have been for TOTE to do precisely what it did not: To take responsibility, even if the company was not completely responsible. In more popular vernacular, TOTE should have grown some.
    Unconscionable.

  • @WarblesOnALot
    @WarblesOnALot 6 років тому +23

    G'day,
    As the Wartime Posters used to ask...
    Was this Journey really neccessary ?
    It sounds like a delay of a day would've made a major difference to the outcome.
    Such is Life,
    Have a good one...
    ;-p
    Ciao !

  • @permartinsen6854
    @permartinsen6854 6 років тому +50

    incompetent captain and a too trustful crew

    • @x--.
      @x--. 4 роки тому +8

      too trustful crew? I mean, what are they supposed to do, disobey the Captain's orders? Take over the ship? I'm not being sarcastic here, what choice does a crew have when a Captain is in charge?

    • @greenseaships
      @greenseaships 4 роки тому +1

      Crew did not have a choice. It was literally their jobs to trust the captain. They didn't have any more current weather info than the captain did after all.

    • @x--.
      @x--. 4 роки тому +5

      @@greenseaships Actually, unfortunately, the crew did have the more up to date information (well, the 2nd or 3rd mate, I believe it was) during the night shift and attempted to share it with the Captain. Eventually, even the Captain remarked on the updated weather report but took it to mean the weather reports were in conflict; they weren't... one was an out of date prediction, the other was the current report.

    • @jonathanbrady5243
      @jonathanbrady5243 3 роки тому +4

      @@x--. Read the book about this. The first and second mate repeatedly tried to get the captain to go the right thing.

    • @x--.
      @x--. 3 роки тому +1

      @@jonathanbrady5243 Hey, I have not read the book, so forgive me, but I did read a couple of the reports and it wasn't as clear cut as 'do the right thing.' That makes it sound like they knew what the right thing was and the Captain ignored their life-saving demands.
      I didn't read it that way -- they knew that the latest weather reports put them closer to the storm but they seemed to assume it wasn't deadly close. If they had realized they were steaming into death, they would have disobeyed orders and changed course while Captain was in his quarters. (To be clear, I'm not absolving the Captain who denied the two requests that he come to the bridge to assess the situation but those requests weren't forceful or desperate pleas).

  • @EricOngerth
    @EricOngerth 6 років тому +2

    There was a mexican restaurant, El Faro, in my neighborhood until shortly after this. As far as I knew it was simply taken over by a new owner, who changed the name to match their other restaurants, El Rancho Grande. However, the timing of the name change turns out to fit very well with the sinking of a ship sharing the restaurant's old name.

  • @brianwideman2342
    @brianwideman2342 3 роки тому +3

    Details can be the difference between life or death. Complacency kills!

  • @ricksadler797
    @ricksadler797 3 роки тому +3

    Should have stayed in port at Jacksonville

  • @jessicam5712
    @jessicam5712 3 місяці тому

    This captain believed a job he wanted was potentially on the line, he had interviewed for it and despite Tote allowing for course changes there's some who believe he was trying to make it on time because he was up for a job as captain on the first lng powered cargo ship, also owned by Tote. However, Tote had decided against him because he had allowed for personnel issues on El Faro, not disciplining people who were repeatedly found sleeping on duty. However, Tote hadnt told him this yet, perhaps if they had he wouldn't have taken these unnecessary risks. Im not sure, but I believe El Faro was being replaced on that route, so his job as captain of El Faro might have been on the line as well.

  • @Noisy_Cricket
    @Noisy_Cricket 7 місяців тому

    Imagine being so hardheaded that drive directly into a hurricane with today's technology.

  • @kurtb5512
    @kurtb5512 6 років тому +7

    George Foy Book Run the storm is the best book explaining everything. I hope everyone will read this book

    • @Mineminemine8
      @Mineminemine8 5 років тому +1

      Kurt Bruer I’m reading the book right now, and am shocked at the descriptions of the condition of the ship as well as the captain’s behavior. I’m so sorry for your loss, as well as the losses of the other families. I hope you keep speaking out!

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +1

      Read "Captains of Thor" as well.

    • @bradleykuss7623
      @bradleykuss7623 4 роки тому +3

      I bought the hardback version of this book and read this book because of a review in the U.S. Naval Institute's magazine Proceedings. The book is (c) 2018 , three years after the sinking. THe author includes information from the Voice Data Recorder, the Coast Guard and NTSB investigation results, and interviews with many of the crew's friends and relatives. It is a very good read. At the end of the book I was disgusted with the attitudes of the ship owners: Tote Services, the ship's captain, and even an officer of the U.S. Coast Guard, former Captain Jeffrey L. Dixon. He called off the close-up inspection of El Faro's sister ship by a group of Coast Guard Inspectors at the end of the first day of their inspection in Feb 2016. In April 2017 Captain Dixon voluntarily resigned from the Coast Guard (probably had to wait to qualify for his 20 year retirement) and two weeks later joined Tote Services Inc. as vice president for marine operations. Suspicious? I would say so! This is a book I will keep and reread at least twice over the next few years while researching the Jone Act and the state or the United States Merchant Marine ship capacity. But I know this already, some of the Defense budget needs to go to subsidising the construction of U.S Merchant Marine vessels or else there will be none very soon.

  • @TakeDeadAim
    @TakeDeadAim 3 роки тому +4

    The gross negligence is appalling to me. As a longtime seafarer, I would have had the entire crew up all night fighting the flooding. As well...the nail in the coffin was moving ballast and then changing course without moving it back. Add the weight and sail effect of that wind lashing the stbd side and it was doomed from that point. Shoulda abandoned ship an hour before they did. Not even mentioning the fact that they were 12 hrs behind the weather...the REAL Genesis of this tragedy.

  • @wtrdogg20
    @wtrdogg20 3 роки тому +2

    32 lives lost, because a stubborn and and negligent captain!! This was very sad...

  • @peterheide2019
    @peterheide2019 6 років тому +3

    Great article in the latest Vanity Fair about the mess.

  • @duckslayer92
    @duckslayer92 6 років тому +13

    I love watching these videos

    • @seansteele1269
      @seansteele1269 6 років тому +3

      duckslayer92 I don’t my brother died on that ship

    • @duckslayer92
      @duckslayer92 6 років тому +6

      Sean Steele, Sean my condolences I didn't mean it that way. It's like watching the show Air Disasters on Smithsonian channel. Obviously I don't enjoy the fact that it's a catastrophe and many people lost their lives. I do however find it very interesting seeing how they figure out what happened and the story of how things went South. Being from around the great lakes I also love the story of the Edmund Fitzgerald and the mystery surrounding it but not the fact of the lives lost. My brother is in the coast guard in Maine, so I do understand the importance and gravity of the situation. Once again my apologies you took it that way and I'm sorry for your loss. I hope you get what I'm trying to say...

    • @dominiquestephenson1541
      @dominiquestephenson1541 6 років тому +1

      Sean Steele -your brother is a hero! He did his job honorably....unlike his Captain. My condolences.

  • @scottdore5438
    @scottdore5438 6 років тому +10

    Sad sad rip to the crew

  • @bendover9411
    @bendover9411 4 роки тому +3

    WTF was the captain thinking?? And the Titanic had better forescasts than El Faro!

  • @Cantor214
    @Cantor214 6 років тому +22

    If the captain had used only the SAT-C weather data I wonder if the disaster would have been avoided?

    • @blizzardfan777
      @blizzardfan777 6 років тому +7

      Anthony Brown Most likely not.

    • @nordlandia3034
      @nordlandia3034 6 років тому +11

      What's wrong with the captain. Full steam ahead against iceberg (hurricane) titanic...

    • @dominiquestephenson1541
      @dominiquestephenson1541 6 років тому +9

      Anthony Brown -Ego, arrogance and complacency is a deadly combination on the sea! I was US Navy, not merchant ships but sailors are all one family. At sea your life is in the hands of your Captain & Command staff. Pray you are fortunate to serve under a wise one. R.I.P. El Faro crew! They did not abandon their posts!

    • @blizzardfan777
      @blizzardfan777 6 років тому +14

      Dominique Stephenson Amen Brother! Amen! I was USMM (USN turned me down because of my concussions from 10 years of hockey). I was fortunate enough to have Captains who respected all of their crews. The most dangerous incident I was ever placed in was a pirate attack off of Somalia in international waters (no, this incident was not with Maersk) following our resupplying of USN personnel in Djibouti. I’ve seen my fair share of cocky inept ensigns straight out of Kings Point who get straightened out by the unforgiving life at sea (especially for those who spent the bulk of their time learning about ships and navigation in a classroom rather than busting their butts to learn the ropes from experience). I had the time of my life because of the men and women I served with who placed safety first and foremost. My only complaint about the USMM comes from shrapnel in my knee that came from encountering combat without the means of appropriate self-defense, nor having any appreciation or protection from our own government (despite the Jones Act mandating them to do so). I’m highly appreciative for your service, and I’m also very honored that you see us all as one family. Thank you to all who have served and who are serving, and thank you to all who gave the ultimate sacrifice for their nation.

    • @billn9910
      @billn9910 4 роки тому +7

      Read the book - the Captain was telling everybody he was the smartest one on the ship - but he was the dumbest.

  • @MrLuckytrucker21
    @MrLuckytrucker21 5 років тому +8

    Are their marine laws that allow a 2nd or 3rd mate to take command of a ship if he/she feels the captain is putting the ship/crew in danger!

    • @Matt-mo8sl
      @Matt-mo8sl 5 років тому +6

      Mutiny............Ever seen the movie "The Cain Mutiny"?

    • @elang3366
      @elang3366 4 роки тому +8

      Answer...yes...but risky if successful or not. It is called a mutiny...is still a mutiny for good cause. Im sure they regreted not taking the action when it became obvious... but at what point would the "conspiracy" to arrest the captain be supported by the majority. Perhaps only a dedicated minority would be needed. I'd rather be alive and have to
      face the maritime court of inquiry. 20 20 hind sight as the main deck goes under.

    • @sarahdawn7075
      @sarahdawn7075 2 місяці тому

      I wonder why crews of aircraft are encouraged to watch for signs of subtle incapacitation and to take action to intervene when necessary but when aboard ship it's mutiny? The Captain went to bed rather than monitor a dangerous and unpredictable situation. Did he realize that hurricanes are known to change course and worsen?

  • @rayshelldaniels5899
    @rayshelldaniels5899 5 років тому +9

    If I were in charge of driving or whatever the terminology is... I would have change course, damn that captain!....now my family member is gone because of the captains incompetence and laziness!

    • @InchonDM
      @InchonDM 4 роки тому +1

      It's driving on a motor boat, yeah. You don't sail a ship with engines, since it has no sails!
      My condolences on your loss, man. Hopefully you're all doing alright by now.

  • @clarkgriswold6307
    @clarkgriswold6307 3 роки тому +2

    "Coast Guard investigators placed nearly all of the blame on Michael Davidson, El Faro's captain. Davidson underestimated the strength of the storm and the ship's vulnerability in rough weather, and did not take enough measures to evade the storm, even though his crew raised concerns about its increasing strength and changing direction. Investigators stated that if Davidson had survived the storm, his actions would have been grounds for the Coast Guard to revoke his captain's license. "
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_El_Faro#U.S._Coast_Guard

  • @jjosephm7539
    @jjosephm7539 4 роки тому +6

    Old Bahama Channel would have been my choice. Especially with lashed down cargo on a old RoRo. Let the office complain, they always find something to complain about.

  • @christophermadden9210
    @christophermadden9210 5 років тому +4

    I am just really surprised that in this day and age of satellite communications and all, ships are relying on weather information that is already several hours old by the time they receive it.. One would think everything would be real time or close to it. A surprise that large sea going vessels don't all posess some degree of weather monitoring equipment as well.

    • @KB4QAA
      @KB4QAA 4 роки тому +4

      @Rich MF/HF radio had nothing to do with this loss. They could have obtained hourly updates if they had merely taken the action to do so. The ship had communications intact until less than minutes before sinking.

    • @kathyyoung1774
      @kathyyoung1774 4 роки тому

      He ignored it.

    • @bobbeckstead8340
      @bobbeckstead8340 3 роки тому

      On average, two dozen merchant ships sink per year.

  • @willlyhickey
    @willlyhickey 3 роки тому +1

    I wonder when/if the Captain fully realized he had doomed 30+ people? Was it before they lost the engine? I mean, you have the 3rd mate saying they are going to run into a hurricane...Captain doesn’t listen. You then have the Second Mate say it AS conditions are getting way worse...and still this guy doesn’t do anything. Comes back on bridge at like 4am....is it when they lose the engine? Or does it start to creep in to his mind that they may not get out of this before then? The second mate wrote to her mom that they were heading straight into a hurricane. She knew there was about to be a very dangerous situation. Did the Captain I wonder?
    Follow up question: a ship like El Faro, if it doesn’t lose the engine by having the list...could it survive going into a Category 3 hurricane like that normally? I don’t know that is why I ask.

  • @RubenKelevra
    @RubenKelevra Рік тому +1

    Kinda crazy that the crew was unable to leave the ship safely in 10 minutes after beeing warned before. I feel like the emergency equipment wasn't up to the task for this kind of weather - so it's definitely a regulation/company issue as well.

    • @svgranma7203
      @svgranma7203 Рік тому

      The voice recorder shows the crew had no idea where their survival suit were. There were none in the bridge. 2nd mate left to find some just before they went down. One body was found in a survival suit, but the helicopter left it because they got a report of another survival suit with a person waving. They were unable to find them. They came back for the body, but it also was never seen again.

    • @RubenKelevra
      @RubenKelevra Рік тому

      @@svgranma7203 is it normal to sail into cat 4 tornados while going full retard on the safety equipment front? 🤔

    • @Pugetwitch
      @Pugetwitch 8 місяців тому

      The lifeboats on one side of the boat were like 45 ft above the sea level and The ones on the other side were submersed underneath the water because of the list. if they would have tried to leave on the ones that were high above the ocean, they would have died because they would have tumbled into the sea.

  • @christopherkiely8707
    @christopherkiely8707 3 роки тому

    Very well done...

  • @theredacted3805
    @theredacted3805 2 роки тому +2

    There is a great Disasters at Sea episode that also talks about it. I don't know how I'd feel about losing a daughter/son/brother/sister because one guy with a superiority complex doesn't utilize his crew in the right way. Do mariners learn Crew Resource Management? Because if not they need to, just because your the captain does NOT mean you are always right, and have the best available knowledge on a certain subject. You have a 2nd and 3rd officer for a reason listen to them.

  • @herseem
    @herseem Рік тому +1

    From the situation that was developing, it seems to me this would have been justified circumstances for a mutiny in order to had in a safer direction. Can anyone here comment on the issues that would have been involved?

  • @DownNeptune
    @DownNeptune 6 років тому +3

    Were there other ships on that approx route that made better decisions?

    • @mr.tohsaka409
      @mr.tohsaka409 6 років тому +1

      DownNeptune if there were they probably died look up a vide of the Bermuda Triangle that’s where this boat went through

    • @glennrishton5679
      @glennrishton5679 5 років тому +4

      No A foreign flag (not US flag) small ship did sink in the Windward Passage area, between Cuba and Haiti. All crew rescued by USCG. A tug and barge broke their tow wire on a north bound trip from SJ to JAX but think they were further to the east at the time not in the middle of the storm.
      I was on a tug towing a barge from JAX to SJ, left Jacksonville same day. We went down the Florida coast west of the Bahamas to the Old Bahama Channel had a pretty nice ride the whole way. Return trip passed through debris from the El Faro, a pretty sad time to see that.

  • @paulnguyen8910
    @paulnguyen8910 2 роки тому

    Raise up the El Faro. But for how much? Stainless steel cables from barges will try lifting up, but when?

  • @zhyachts
    @zhyachts Рік тому

    If both anchors were lowered would this create enough drag to keep the bow into the seas?

  • @benwilson6145
    @benwilson6145 4 роки тому +1

    Bad weather, but nothing that should sink a well found vessel. There must more that went wrong. Was there an angle of lol? What flooded?

  • @wraynephew6838
    @wraynephew6838 Рік тому

    why are there openings to the 2nd deck on the starboard side. Is that for ventilation?

  • @woodnbikes
    @woodnbikes 8 місяців тому

    Great job "captain" , A simple course change and you'd all be alive. You killed them all. You killed my friend... RIP Danielle Randolph ...You are severely missed 💔

  • @Lost-In-Blank
    @Lost-In-Blank 2 роки тому

    Here is a link to the full final NTSB report: www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/MAR1701.pdf

  • @MtnMig
    @MtnMig 6 років тому +11

    That captain killed his crew. What a fool.

  • @jwarmstrong
    @jwarmstrong 4 роки тому +1

    As a shipboard electrician I would disable the low oil switch so the engine could have started - damn the engine's bearings since seeing spongebob isn't my dream....

    • @ronalddavis
      @ronalddavis 4 роки тому +1

      more complicated than that. it was a steam ship

  • @furyfalcon1933
    @furyfalcon1933 3 роки тому +1

    The cargo compartment was not safely secured causing extra problems also those big holes below the deck swallowed a lot of water I guess it was fate but safety regulations and new design model putting them in hurricane and test whether it can float might give some clue as how and hurricane safety book should be released as how act in emergency and checklist should be made for each day with int. standards might give a gist to the following gen. following them and to instruct the captain not to use subscription products without reading the note, precaution and t&c I believe.

  • @dutchhoke6555
    @dutchhoke6555 Рік тому +1

    The best course to avoid that hurricane was to the safest port away from the storm.

  • @hankgs
    @hankgs 4 роки тому +14

    Incompetent Captain killed his crew and sunk a vessel due to an inflated sense of "self".

  • @mitchwood6609
    @mitchwood6609 Рік тому +1

    In the final minutes of the recording, Davidson pleads with a sailor to move.
    “We gotta move. You gotta get up. You gotta snap out of it and we gotta get out,” he says.
    “Okay,” the sailor answers. “Help me.”
    “You gotta get to safety,” Davidson shouts.
    “Help me,” the sailor cries. “Help me.”
    “Don’t panic. Don’t panic. Work your way up here,” the captain says. He refuses to leave.
    “I can’t. I’m a goner.”
    “It's time to come this way,” Davidson shouts. Then the recording stops.

  • @christianpaul3303
    @christianpaul3303 9 місяців тому

    Wait - did he say "steam powered"?

  • @felixcat9318
    @felixcat9318 Рік тому +1

    I would recommend that anyone wanting more detailed information on this entirely foreseeable and preventable incident, read, Into The Raging Sea, Thirty-Three Mariners, One Megastorm And The Sinking Of El Faro, written by Rachel Slade.
    Despite the bridge Crew knowing full well that they were on a collision course with the category 3 hurricane, not one of them fulfilled their duty of care to save the vessel and Crew by countermanding the reckkessly dangerous orders of their imbecile captain and taking a safer route, away from the hurricane, rather than directly into it!
    They betrayed the rest of the Crew by obediently steaming directly to what they knew to be their certain deaths!
    Thankfully, they can no longer endanger the lives of their trusting Crewmates...

  • @richardanthonygilbey
    @richardanthonygilbey 6 років тому +4

    Yeah no doubt the el faro took a gut thumping hit from the stern. Check out that bowed safety rail. Serious tonnage. Um im off to the khazi man.

  • @CoffeeTimeBrian11
    @CoffeeTimeBrian11 4 роки тому +4

    This loss of life was completely avoidable. Weather faxes come off the bouys and weather info every hour. You don't need to rely on just one form of data. Maybe these ships need meteorologist? Yes, the Captain should've turned round; instead, risking and losing all those lives; for what? Those poor families.

  • @robbiemckinnon7901
    @robbiemckinnon7901 Рік тому

    It's about 2034 km from Jacksonville to San Juan (as the crow flies), according to Google Maps measuring tool. To have swung West of the Bahamas right at the beginning of the trip, and passed closer to Cuba, south of the West Indes Islands, and then go North of the Dominican Republic to San Juan would have added only 200 km to the trip, or about 10% further. I know time is money in shipping, but when you're facing a freaking CAT 4 HURRICANE, its better to make your decisions on the safe side of things. I'm certain the captain could have justified alternate actions to the ship's owners based on the extreme weather, but he chose instead to maintain course, to keep to schedule and therefore the profitability of the voyage. I imagine he was under an intense amount of pressure from head office to make every trip count, and to keep the schedule at all costs. Sad state of affairs.

  • @jimmyuk007
    @jimmyuk007 5 років тому

    Did that bodies found?

  • @CallsItLikeISeizeIts
    @CallsItLikeISeizeIts 3 роки тому

    That's when you relieve him from command and take matters in your own hands! Only a lunatic or inept leader would intentionally steer you directly into a Cat 3

  • @splagyetsi3287
    @splagyetsi3287 2 роки тому +1

    Companies love men like this Captain who will risk all for profit.

  • @carloscortes5570
    @carloscortes5570 3 роки тому

    Good job Cap!😩

  • @OneProudBBC
    @OneProudBBC 4 роки тому +1

    Deadlier (by ratio), more avoidable and tragic of a sinking than the much shallower wreck up north that happened in 1912.

  • @theodorecharles635
    @theodorecharles635 Рік тому

    Those guys really didn't stand a chance of getting off that ship alive. When you see where the lifeboats were, they wouldn't have had a hope in hell of lowering those safely. With the ship rolling like crazy they would have been smashed to pieces before they got halfway down. Same with the life rafts. As soon as the canisters opened the wind would have carried those off like balloons. A freefall lifeboat off the stern would have been about the only way to get off safely but the ship wasn't equipped with one.

  • @SuperDaleski1
    @SuperDaleski1 Рік тому

    The NTSB is about the only government agency that's still proper and honest.

  • @RayVal53
    @RayVal53 5 років тому +1

    Go easy boys. R.I.P.

  • @Hojiii
    @Hojiii Рік тому

    Did the VDR have data on email?

  • @scottl.1568
    @scottl.1568 6 років тому +16

    Lawsuit time....

  • @xx_ironman77_xx1
    @xx_ironman77_xx1 2 роки тому

    They should make a law that Sellthrough a dangerous area and hasn’t been using current weather data and making A decision that would possibly lead to the ship sinking And one of the ships mates wants to change the course away from the storm and the Captain refuses that The mate has the legal right to change course of the ship despite of what the captain says A law like this can save a lot of lives at sea🤷🏼

  • @josephastier7421
    @josephastier7421 6 років тому +5

    Can ship engines be built with oil sumps that are more tolerant of list? That doesn't sound like a hard problem to solve.

    • @jamesng8554
      @jamesng8554 6 років тому +2

      ntsb.capitolconnection.org/121217/ntsb_archive_flv.htm Forward video to about 40/41 mins in to see NTSB discussion of exactly that.

    • @nightwaves3203
      @nightwaves3203 5 років тому +1

      0:04 40 year old steam powered. Not modern engineering.

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +4

      @@nightwaves3203 Actually the plant was a good one. Totes never allowed the lube oil tank to be topped off. If the tank had been topped off, the list wouldn't have made a difference. it was so low that when the ship listed, the suction pulled air, not fluid

    • @nightwaves3203
      @nightwaves3203 5 років тому +2

      @fuzzypony I wouldn't trust even a completely operational vessel in storm conditions. Low pressure makes the waves real big and getting near islands can have worse conditions. Sadly it's too easy to say wwhat would be the right thing to do after the accident. Steering clear seems the easiest preventive action.

    • @fuzzypony
      @fuzzypony 5 років тому +5

      @@nightwaves3203 Agreed, but sometimes you have no choice but face a storm-in which case you want a ship able to handle it. Part of that means your engineering plant is up to the challenge.
      In EL FARO's case, she didn't need to be anywhere near that hurricane, but plenty of pressures from head office and poor decision making by Davidson made that happen. All of the form a link in the chain that ended with EF foundering.
      That said, if you *are* taking vessel to sea, you should have a ship able to handle most storms, EL FARO was poorly maintained and that poor maintenance took out her last defence against the sea-her engineering plant. When it failed, she was done for. Corporate culture at Tote signed the death warrants for that crew in more ways than one. We should have learned those lessons permanently from the MARINE ELECTRIC disaster.

  • @f.w.1318
    @f.w.1318 3 роки тому

    My free cell phone weather app can give me updates with 5 min delays radar imagery included, and yes it’s been around for years, all someone had to do is go to his cabin and show him the app data. I could see happening in 1915 not in 2015.

    • @5roundsrapid263
      @5roundsrapid263 3 роки тому

      Cell phones don’t work out in the ocean...

  • @-UNKNOWN-13
    @-UNKNOWN-13 2 місяці тому

    I had no idea it was steam powered.