I just noticed youre not a regular UA-camr and only uploaded to inform about this Project. Thank you so much for that effort❤ Im really curios, please keep us updated, especially about other Settings \ Antennas. Im new to the hobby with low budget and cant wait to get my first digital fpv this way.😊
I don't own these Box goggles, but I've heard that the HDMI connection on them introduceses a lot of additional latency (compared to when connecting to the HDMI on Fatsharks, Orqas,HDZero goodles)
Very interesting! Keep testing! I wonder if the devs will invent some ways to avoid frame dropping in exchange of lowering the resolution/quality. Is this is even possible with this technology?
@@jhulztahanlangit I have the Radxa. So far it looks like the WiFi modules you use affect the range, but the processing power of the VRX affects the latency.
They aren't in the thumbnail, but they are during the flight. I made little slots to pinch them between the hatch and the fuselage. I flew again with nicer antennas and a higher bitrate and it worked much better.
I just noticed youre not a regular UA-camr and only uploaded to inform about this Project.
Thank you so much for that effort❤
Im really curios, please keep us updated, especially about other Settings \ Antennas.
Im new to the hobby with low budget and cant wait to get my first digital fpv this way.😊
Fantastic insights!
I don't own these Box goggles, but I've heard that the HDMI connection on them introduceses a lot of additional latency (compared to when connecting to the HDMI on Fatsharks, Orqas,HDZero goodles)
@@ChrisGripeos the cobras do have a bit of added latency on the hdmi input compared to other goggles.
Very cool
Very interesting! Keep testing! I wonder if the devs will invent some ways to avoid frame dropping in exchange of lowering the resolution/quality. Is this is even possible with this technology?
Not right now, since they dont talk back.
Need to mount higher not seeing much other than front
Switching between H264/H265 may solve the problem of frame loss.
Nice testing. I am still waiting for mine to be in the mailbox. Which VRX module do you have?
@@jhulztahanlangit I have the Radxa. So far it looks like the WiFi modules you use affect the range, but the processing power of the VRX affects the latency.
@@owen_is_on_the_internet Is Radxa by far the best VRX to be paired with it?
One way transmission is really disapointed.
The antennas are to be mounted up in the air your killing the signal
They aren't in the thumbnail, but they are during the flight. I made little slots to pinch them between the hatch and the fuselage. I flew again with nicer antennas and a higher bitrate and it worked much better.
@owen_is_on_the_internet what antennas your using now
@@jimmytheriot8978 iFlight Sigma
The WiFiLink experience should be a bit better if the code uses H265, the antennas are not crossed and are up as far as possible.
😊