Owen
Owen
  • 2
  • 1 976
Better results from OpenIPC on the Runcam WifiLink
Different settings + better antennas = success!
Переглядів: 622

Відео

First OpenIPC Runcam Wifi Link Test
Переглядів 1,4 тис.2 місяці тому
My first time flying the RunCam Wifi Link Open IPC camera/VTX.

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @charlsmuts3775
    @charlsmuts3775 Місяць тому

    What bitrate did you change to? Also are you using a radxa or a different sbc for your receiver?

  • @gadgetman404
    @gadgetman404 Місяць тому

    Need to mount higher not seeing much other than front

  • @Petra-f2k
    @Petra-f2k Місяць тому

    Quick question: Can i put the Antenna on my roof or somewere high and relay the signal down to me ? For extra Range without trees in the Way ?

    • @Br1ckInTh3W4LL
      @Br1ckInTh3W4LL Місяць тому

      50ft hdmi cable?

    • @Petra-f2k
      @Petra-f2k Місяць тому

      @@Br1ckInTh3W4LL That wasnt the Question.

  • @Petra-f2k
    @Petra-f2k Місяць тому

    I just noticed youre not a regular UA-camr and only uploaded to inform about this Project. Thank you so much for that effort❤ Im really curios, please keep us updated, especially about other Settings \ Antennas. Im new to the hobby with low budget and cant wait to get my first digital fpv this way.😊

  • @Takeover738
    @Takeover738 Місяць тому

    I tried looking for those iflight sigma antennas are these 5.8ghz?

  • @ChrisGripeos
    @ChrisGripeos 2 місяці тому

    I don't own these Box goggles, but I've heard that the HDMI connection on them introduceses a lot of additional latency (compared to when connecting to the HDMI on Fatsharks, Orqas,HDZero goodles)

    • @owen_is_on_the_internet
      @owen_is_on_the_internet 2 місяці тому

      @@ChrisGripeos the cobras do have a bit of added latency on the hdmi input compared to other goggles.

  • @krazed0451
    @krazed0451 2 місяці тому

    Have you had a chance to play further?

  • @rraymakers
    @rraymakers 2 місяці тому

    and this is just some beta software and hardware

  • @k0r0e0s
    @k0r0e0s 2 місяці тому

    Fantastic! Keep it on! I am looking the EMAX hardware as well. BTW. I think your prop is seriously unbalanced or even the motor shaft bent, it should not be AS MUCH jellyous.

    • @owen_is_on_the_internet
      @owen_is_on_the_internet 2 місяці тому

      @@k0r0e0s I think it’s because the camera was held on by a rubber band haha. It’s permanently mounted now in a new nose I designed for the dart.

  • @k0r0e0s
    @k0r0e0s 2 місяці тому

    Very interesting! Keep testing! I wonder if the devs will invent some ways to avoid frame dropping in exchange of lowering the resolution/quality. Is this is even possible with this technology?

    • @Petra-f2k
      @Petra-f2k Місяць тому

      Not right now, since they dont talk back.

  • @jimmytheriot8978
    @jimmytheriot8978 2 місяці тому

    2.5 klm with stock runcam unit , phone and wifi module sitting on hood of truck wit tree line 100yards in front

  • @notsogood4321
    @notsogood4321 2 місяці тому

    Quite a few people on the telegram suggest having 2 wifi cards attached to your radxa for better consistency and switching out the rtl8812au for rtl8812eu -apparently it has better performance, i havent tried it myself since im still building the basic vrx module but it seems like a worth while endevour. Also i could be super wrong but i could have sworn on the specs of the radxa 3E is worse than the 3W , the 3E's advantage was the gigabit ethernet port. Also if your only flying rc planes and you dont mind alittle bit extra latency try using the ruby image on your vrx module , ruby supports retransmition i believe so it again should enhance the consistency issue you have been facing . Thanks for the video though i understand how much of a time sink openIPC can be

  • @darkwingfpv
    @darkwingfpv 2 місяці тому

    15 views.... wtf, are people not getting it???? Fantastic job, even at lower bit rate I can't see the loss of detail, looks great.

  • @enochsu7617
    @enochsu7617 2 місяці тому

    Switching between H264/H265 may solve the problem of frame loss.

  • @enochsu7617
    @enochsu7617 2 місяці тому

    The WiFiLink experience should be a bit better if the code uses H265, the antennas are not crossed and are up as far as possible. 😊

  • @jimmytheriot8978
    @jimmytheriot8978 2 місяці тому

    The antennas are to be mounted up in the air your killing the signal

    • @owen_is_on_the_internet
      @owen_is_on_the_internet 2 місяці тому

      They aren't in the thumbnail, but they are during the flight. I made little slots to pinch them between the hatch and the fuselage. I flew again with nicer antennas and a higher bitrate and it worked much better.

    • @jimmytheriot8978
      @jimmytheriot8978 2 місяці тому

      @owen_is_on_the_internet what antennas your using now

    • @owen_is_on_the_internet
      @owen_is_on_the_internet 2 місяці тому

      @@jimmytheriot8978 iFlight Sigma

  • @jhulztahanlangit
    @jhulztahanlangit 2 місяці тому

    Nice testing. I am still waiting for mine to be in the mailbox. Which VRX module do you have?

    • @owen_is_on_the_internet
      @owen_is_on_the_internet 2 місяці тому

      @@jhulztahanlangit I have the Radxa. So far it looks like the WiFi modules you use affect the range, but the processing power of the VRX affects the latency.

    • @jhulztahanlangit
      @jhulztahanlangit 2 місяці тому

      @@owen_is_on_the_internet Is Radxa by far the best VRX to be paired with it?

  • @Ghost_Of_FPV_1151
    @Ghost_Of_FPV_1151 2 місяці тому

    Very cool

  • @electronicGRL
    @electronicGRL 2 місяці тому

    One way transmission is really disapointed.

  • @darkwingfpv
    @darkwingfpv 2 місяці тому

    Fantastic insights!