Dunno man ive had a lot of fun with the 9030 at 9.3, i think its suckyness is overhyped asf, as for the CV90 MKIV, they boned it, it doesnt have the 35mm, IRST, extra armor or anything it SHOULD have
MkIV also comes in 35, 40, and 50mm versions. It's also supposed to have the D turret with Iron Fist APS, IRST, airburst rounds (yes, even on the 30mm version), and an upgraded armour package that makes it impervious to 30mm apfsds frontally; it got none of these, with them giving it worse armour than the 9040c. This is a mkIV about as much as a fiat 500 with a Lamborghini badge is an Aventador.
@@ideadlift20kg83The CV90120 can easily go higher than that. It's ridiculously good. 5s reload, 600mm of pen, great mobility and probably the best set of optics in the entire game.
Hey Jon, I'm happy to say with the UA-cam recaps happening you were my top creator this year! Thanks for all the great content and I can't wait to see next year.
I mean, on the bright side spikes are great for taking down helis and I didn't think gjn was even going to add the CV with spikes at all so this is a surprise to me. Now if they could just make the 50mm Bushmaster version, with IRST, fuze rounds, 70km/h ... but probably they'd make it BR 12.0.
Pretty sure you can switch to ammo belt 2 in .5 seconds if you are reloading the other belt when in a situation where you need more ammo but don't have time to reload. That's why i keep 3 APFSDS belts and 1 APDS belt on the VBC instead of all APFSDS.
There are multiple different sub variants of the MkIV and they chose to give us the worst one. There is one with a Bushmaster III 50mm autocannon and there are also some equipped with the 35mm and of course the 40mm Bofors we have on the 9040C. All of them would have been good fun, especially the 50mm since we don't have that cannon in the game yet.
The need to allow us to switch between direct, indirect, and topdown for spikes/other F&F missiles. We have scout drones that provide a laser lock, can easily be used for indirect mode. It's wild they refuse to model things correctly, even when given unclassified sources (Drives the spookster mad lol)
It's because theyve added things to the game that if implemented properly would show just how shitty their game design and map design is. All these modern features like drones, F^F missiles, helis, thermals just dont fit with their design and game modes that havent changed in literally a decade
@@JeyKalda yet at top tier it's the other way around and their only saving grace is an anti-air and helicopters. If there was so much russian bias as everyone says, I'd have expected the T-14 Armata to be in game already (or the Leopards nerfed) and some jet that could hold a candle to an F-15, let's not even say an EFT. So why is that the case? How come gaijin doesn't make them as strong at the BR everyone cares about? Bias?
@@leviathantsp Leopards already got nerfed and Russia has the highest win rate with 70% and the second best nation has 64%. But I know that it's hard for Russian mains when they can't just press w and shoot center mass to win a tank battle.
@@Konegdererste Win rates only reflect the playerbase quality, not the vehicles. U.S has the worst and they have by far the best air tree and easily 2nd best tanks after Leopards all things considered. Otherwise how can you explain minor nations with significantly worse vehicles to be on top of the U.S? Like Leclercs or Challengers. Also what nerf did the Leopards receive? They are still superior to Soviet sad mobiles with no reverse or gun depression, because who needs that anyway.
@@leviathantsp Yeah win rate sais absolutely nothing except the skill because only skilled players choose Russia. xD Russia having the biggest playerbase by far must mean that most people in war thunder are so skilled and don't choose Russia for another reason. xD But I must admit that you are right with usa being better than what their win rate shows, because of many new players without experience buying the premium. And the nerfed Leopards can't put their barrels down anymore if the enemy is coming from the side/slightly behind, which means they can't shoot back. Before the nerf, they only coudn't shoot back if the enemy is behind them(like the Abrams).
This is the CV9030 MK.IV or the first gen of the MK.IV series, gaijin failed to give it its correct armor. Didn't give it its ABM, its AA tracking or even the correct weight and every time people ask Smin or any of the mods on the forums they are ignored. What a joke of a company
Even though everyone seems to be hating on this thing, the spikes make it very easy to get a few kills or assists then get into the excellent CAS Sweden has at 10.7.
Yea exactly that’s the whole point of it, get behind a good vantage point, scout, get 3-6 kills with the spikes then run at the enemy, die, and hop in the maverick launching Viggen (or gripen if u play this tank at top tier)
Can we just boycott this game again, review bomb the shit out of it. look at the pzh2000, look at the mk iv, look at all the overtiered vehicles of NATO then take one glance at the BMD4M
I agree, gaijin just wants to contribute to russias ultra strong 9.3-10.3 lineup because it makes a whoooole lot of money, if that wasnt the case the 2S38 and similar would have been moved up already
they really need to reconsider the BR of some of these IFVs, the only one I can see at 10.7 is the Freccia, and its mainly because I prefer the Orleikon KBA over the Bushmasters, aaaaaand it gets like 10 spikes. Plus its much faster than things like the Lynx or this poor sadmobile.
´just like every western 30mm absolut no fucking dmg at all i once pumped like 40-50 shots from Puma into an enemy BVM from like 50 meter and he didnt fucking die xD
It's the fastest 90xx and that's all that matters to me. Is it worth +1 BR over the 35's nope. But the nonexistent mobility and garbage first stage setup of the 9040 makes them the worst out of the lot imo
well it not a russian shit box so of course its terrible, if u want a good vehicle you need to play absolute trash vehicles from Russia made in the 60s
The footage doesn't resemble what your experience was, next time show that it really sucks not 10+ kill games which show the opposite of what you claim.
But BMD 4 is allowed to be 9.3 lmao
Is good balinse, da? ))))
with IRST! wtf
Exactly, man.
Da komrade soviet tank iz clearly superior
@@schnitzel_enjoyer yes it is... in bias
The regular CV9030 is garbage at 9.3.. so now they give it 4 spikes and put it at 10.7..
every spike worth 0.3 br. very gaijin.
Skill issues? Just joking. Super balanced.
nah bro you're wrong! it has 6 spikes.
Dunno man ive had a lot of fun with the 9030 at 9.3, i think its suckyness is overhyped asf, as for the CV90 MKIV, they boned it, it doesnt have the 35mm, IRST, extra armor or anything it SHOULD have
@mintman825 well if you think the 9030 doesn't suck at 9.3 let me remind you that the BMD-4/M and VBC(pt2) are at 9.3, very balanced
No spikes were --harmed-- launched in the making of this video.
they could just Add the CV 9035 Mk.3C.
35MM cannon, Spikes, and an Trophy APS
The 35mm is ass as well. Just put in the version with the 40 or even 50mm and make it a viable vehicle and not trash
MkIV also comes in 35, 40, and 50mm versions. It's also supposed to have the D turret with Iron Fist APS, IRST, airburst rounds (yes, even on the 30mm version), and an upgraded armour package that makes it impervious to 30mm apfsds frontally; it got none of these, with them giving it worse armour than the 9040c.
This is a mkIV about as much as a fiat 500 with a Lamborghini badge is an Aventador.
None of the CV90s should me 10.7 lmao. It is rediculous.
@@ideadlift20kg83The CV90120 can easily go higher than that.
It's ridiculously good.
5s reload, 600mm of pen, great mobility and probably the best set of optics in the entire game.
@@brunobegic3841 We are talking about IFVs not TDs.
Hey Jon, I'm happy to say with the UA-cam recaps happening you were my top creator this year! Thanks for all the great content and I can't wait to see next year.
I mean, on the bright side spikes are great for taking down helis and I didn't think gjn was even going to add the CV with spikes at all so this is a surprise to me. Now if they could just make the 50mm Bushmaster version, with IRST, fuze rounds, 70km/h ... but probably they'd make it BR 12.0.
that intro shows how sad this vehicle is
Pretty sure you can switch to ammo belt 2 in .5 seconds if you are reloading the other belt when in a situation where you need more ammo but don't have time to reload. That's why i keep 3 APFSDS belts and 1 APDS belt on the VBC instead of all APFSDS.
There are multiple different sub variants of the MkIV and they chose to give us the worst one.
There is one with a Bushmaster III 50mm autocannon and there are also some equipped with the 35mm and of course the 40mm Bofors we have on the 9040C.
All of them would have been good fun, especially the 50mm since we don't have that cannon in the game yet.
The need to allow us to switch between direct, indirect, and topdown for spikes/other F&F missiles. We have scout drones that provide a laser lock, can easily be used for indirect mode. It's wild they refuse to model things correctly, even when given unclassified sources (Drives the spookster mad lol)
It's because theyve added things to the game that if implemented properly would show just how shitty their game design and map design is. All these modern features like drones, F^F missiles, helis, thermals just dont fit with their design and game modes that havent changed in literally a decade
pretty sure you need the Akerons or the Spike NLOS for indirect fire, which the CV90mk4 would have if they gave it the D turret
Aside from having ATGMs, it seems to be better than the Desert Warrior
well obviously, desert warrior is a sadmobile also.
@@konna6130 It is Spain without the S :'(
it's pretty much the PUMA VJTF but even less survivable
When I hear this gun fire, it triggers my PTSD from the VBCI2
9030FIN but at 10.7 sounds positively awful.
Gaijin “balancing” is something out of this world. This crap is 10+ meanwhile bmpd4 is a god of war. This game is getting out of control.
wdym, its always been like this with USSR vehicles compared to almost everything else
@@JeyKalda yet at top tier it's the other way around and their only saving grace is an anti-air and helicopters. If there was so much russian bias as everyone says, I'd have expected the T-14 Armata to be in game already (or the Leopards nerfed) and some jet that could hold a candle to an F-15, let's not even say an EFT. So why is that the case? How come gaijin doesn't make them as strong at the BR everyone cares about? Bias?
@@leviathantsp Leopards already got nerfed and Russia has the highest win rate with 70% and the second best nation has 64%. But I know that it's hard for Russian mains when they can't just press w and shoot center mass to win a tank battle.
@@Konegdererste Win rates only reflect the playerbase quality, not the vehicles. U.S has the worst and they have by far the best air tree and easily 2nd best tanks after Leopards all things considered. Otherwise how can you explain minor nations with significantly worse vehicles to be on top of the U.S? Like Leclercs or Challengers.
Also what nerf did the Leopards receive? They are still superior to Soviet sad mobiles with no reverse or gun depression, because who needs that anyway.
@@leviathantsp Yeah win rate sais absolutely nothing except the skill because only skilled players choose Russia. xD Russia having the biggest playerbase by far must mean that most people in war thunder are so skilled and don't choose Russia for another reason. xD But I must admit that you are right with usa being better than what their win rate shows, because of many new players without experience buying the premium. And the nerfed Leopards can't put their barrels down anymore if the enemy is coming from the side/slightly behind, which means they can't shoot back. Before the nerf, they only coudn't shoot back if the enemy is behind them(like the Abrams).
This is the CV9030 MK.IV or the first gen of the MK.IV series, gaijin failed to give it its correct armor. Didn't give it its ABM, its AA tracking or even the correct weight and every time people ask Smin or any of the mods on the forums they are ignored. What a joke of a company
You gotta pay 69.99 for that
Oh hey, new War Thunder CC! Nice video and earned my sub
Even though everyone seems to be hating on this thing, the spikes make it very easy to get a few kills or assists then get into the excellent CAS Sweden has at 10.7.
Yea exactly that’s the whole point of it, get behind a good vantage point, scout, get 3-6 kills with the spikes then run at the enemy, die, and hop in the maverick launching Viggen (or gripen if u play this tank at top tier)
@ the rb75T maverick buff was huge last update. And the fact the mi28 didn’t move up with the tanks was awesome.
Hey guys, hey jon, does anybody know / what do you think: Will there be a new years sale were premium account is 50% cheaper this year ?
with the BILL launcher still being broken theres not much alternative for missile and gun in sweden.
I hate the bill so much
can you try the new japanese f16?
Isn’t the cv90 mkIV supposed to have the 35mm like the Denmark and Netherlands cv90s?
Its great to see how the Spikes really contribute to this things combat-effectiveness, definitely worth 10.7 comrade!
Yes sir my daily morning dose of warthunder your a goat love the content broski keep it up
the fact that its a rank *8* like dawg why
will you be playing the new namer?
Can we just boycott this game again, review bomb the shit out of it. look at the pzh2000, look at the mk iv, look at all the overtiered vehicles of NATO then take one glance at the BMD4M
I agree, gaijin just wants to contribute to russias ultra strong 9.3-10.3 lineup because it makes a whoooole lot of money, if that wasnt the case the 2S38 and similar would have been moved up already
Yes can you plz boycott the game and not play it? Thanks.
"pero las risas no faltaron" ahh vehicle😭🙏
they really need to reconsider the BR of some of these IFVs, the only one I can see at 10.7 is the Freccia, and its mainly because I prefer the Orleikon KBA over the Bushmasters, aaaaaand it gets like 10 spikes. Plus its much faster than things like the Lynx or this poor sadmobile.
Why are you not using RTX ON and DirectX 12?
I thought it would be the CV9035 at least
This is just the Swedish version of the PUMA S1 except woest because the bushmaster is pitifully bad damage wise
How is this thing different from the Spike Puma?
Worse armor and crew in the turret.
Worse armor, heavier, worse gun, no Anti air tracking, no remote control turret and no ABM. It's worse than the vilkas at 10.7
Play the American T54e1 or e2 next
Do you like the begleit?
Their’s a version of the cv90 mk iv that has a 50mm cannon
now we need 50mm Upgraded version
cv9050 also has trophy aps
A CV9030FIN with Spikes at 10.7. Hard pass. I love the CV9040s and the CV90105 but the 9030... nah.
Your favorite IFV! Clueless.jpg
why is this thing a higher BR than the 9040 BILL?
Shouldve just foldered this thing with it
The 24x commander ball is the only interesting thing about this lmao
also the PUMA with x4 spikes but at 11.0, sure bro it's balanced.
they need to change it to the 40 or 50 mm variant
not worth 400k research
"sad mobile"
Gets 11 kills in 1st match.
yeah small caliber apfsds spall is sooo bad for some reason and spikes aren't as accurate as they should be
Cv9030 at 10.7, way worse than its counterparts but they made it tier 8 so you have to grind 400k instead of 300k xp
thanks jon do some video about ifv. this vehicle is not modeled well rn. and really sad.
day 14 of asking for udes
Misread this comment 💀
udes+n
I usually do that on snapchat
´just like every western 30mm absolut no fucking dmg at all i once pumped like 40-50 shots from Puma into an enemy BVM from like 50 meter and he didnt fucking die xD
sweden suffers
Damn CV-90 without a 40mm really is just trash (in war thunder, ik in real life the 30 and 35 have programmable ammunition and such)
*shoots the tank in a shit way*
"This thing is shit"
Mfw?
It's the fastest 90xx and that's all that matters to me. Is it worth +1 BR over the 35's nope. But the nonexistent mobility and garbage first stage setup of the 9040 makes them the worst out of the lot imo
cv9030 already have problem fighting things at its BR and they think cv9030 with SPIKE is worthy 10.7? it cant even CV9050
well it not a russian shit box so of course its terrible, if u want a good vehicle you need to play absolute trash vehicles from Russia made in the 60s
10.7 bro, what is wrong with gaijin
day 11 of asking you to play chi nu 2
Complaining but still doing better than half the team ... its bad he said ... huh
This guy gets a nuke every 2nd round hes playing - hes not comparable to the average player
Jon is former thunder league player isnt he? He's better than 99% of players in this game
The footage doesn't resemble what your experience was, next time show that it really sucks not 10+ kill games which show the opposite of what you claim.
no one wants to watch bad games on youtube. That's what the streams are for.
First