Lawrence Krauss: Aliens, God, Darwin & Evolution, NASA, The Multiverse | 180

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @JulianDorey
    @JulianDorey  8 місяців тому +28

    ✅ PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU **SUBSCRIBE** & LIKE THE VIDEO EVERYBODY! THANK YOU! 🙌
    ➡ Protect Your Retirement W/ A Gold. IRA
    www.noblegoldinvestments.com/... or call 877-646-5347
    Noble Gold is Who I Trust ^^^
    ⬇***TIMESTAMPS***⬇
    0:00 - Lawrence Krauss Physics Background; The Concept of “Nothing”
    9:31 - Black Holes; Flat vs. Curved Universe
    14:52 - Why Interstellar is a Bad Sci-Fi Movie
    22:08 - How far can we see in Galaxy; Moving Earth; NASA Asteroid Mission
    28:39 - Asteroid Dinosaur Extinction; Theory of Everything from Nothing; Miracles
    33:53 - Charles Darwin & Evolution; Extinction Events
    39:42 - First humans on earth; Science vs Religion
    49:51 - William Lane Craig Debate; Why people believe in God
    55:41 - Werner Herzog’s “Grizzly Man”; The Physics of Climate Change
    1:09:57 - Behind funding of Scientific Research
    1:15:11 - Elon Musk; Inflation & the Multiverse
    1:27:21 - Multiverse Map; Time Travel; Michio Kaku
    1:41:00 - Building Alien Craft; UFOs & Proof; UFO Gov Disclosure
    1:48:17 - Lawrence’s expertise; Star Trek
    1:54:07 - Working w/ NASA & DARPA; NASA Denied UFOs
    1:59:07 - Lawrence’s work

    • @cornfarts
      @cornfarts 8 місяців тому +5

      I appreciate your work but i and most cant watch this one buddy.. excited for the next one

    • @nothanks9503
      @nothanks9503 8 місяців тому +2

      This is the most sensible guest I’ve seen in a while good to see some sanity

    • @Pals777
      @Pals777 8 місяців тому +3

      Bad choice on this one JD ✌🏿out.

    • @perhapsyes2493
      @perhapsyes2493 8 місяців тому +2

      Sorry man, skipping this one. I know exactly what he's going to say, because I've heard him talk before. Once was enough.
      He's more religious than the most dogmatic theistic believer. It's just the church of "Modern Science™", not accepting that what is not true now, might be truth tomorrow.

    • @StoreRunDotCom
      @StoreRunDotCom 8 місяців тому +2

      @@cornfartsIm gonna watch it but the comments are predicted to be BRUTAL. great name! isnt it corn poops?? Let's do the time warp again! Is a tic tac shaped craft really aerodynamic?@ No offense Julian, I love you but Nick Pope is a puppet, he didnt have ANYTHING of value to say. This guy is probably worse. I cant start the vid till im done jammin. Got the RHCP on screen 2

  • @syedalishanzaidi1
    @syedalishanzaidi1 3 місяці тому +10

    I liked that the interviewer didn't mind stopping Dr. Krauss in the middle of things to ask some basic high school questions, as this made Dr. Krauss speak even more fluently and with greater eloquence. Every word the Professor speaks is filled with intellectual sincerity, and where theoretical Physics is concerned, he keeps opening doors and lighting lamps. One's understanding keeps getting enlarged. The sound and video quality of this interview was very good as well. So thanks to Julian Dore, and I have put thumbs up and also subscribed.

    • @artax7664
      @artax7664 19 днів тому +1

      He’s so amazing that you just felt compelled to crawl totally up his butt in a public forum huh? lol I’m just messing around.
      He’s an intelligent man I agree, but he’s got some blind spots. Those blind spots show up as contradictions. Sometimes these contradictions can be subtle, and are harder to spot when spoken in an eloquent, confident way, while simultaneously having an inferior understanding of the topic.

  • @Billy420-69
    @Billy420-69 8 місяців тому +80

    Up until 1993 all my teachers told me the exact same thing about planets outside our solar system. they said they didnt exist because nobody had proof.

    • @radzishbuslmari9965
      @radzishbuslmari9965 8 місяців тому +6

      They could not disprove it now did they.. They were teachers not astronomists. He talked at the start about this

    • @gianni_schicchi
      @gianni_schicchi 8 місяців тому +8

      @@radzishbuslmari9965 how does one prove a negative?

    • @NEKRWSPHERE
      @NEKRWSPHERE 8 місяців тому

      If you remember what your teachers said prior to 1993 correctly (given how up to half of human memories are confabulations) - then "all" of your teachers were crappy teachers. Otherwise they'd tell you that Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence (coined by Carl Sagan long before 1993).

    • @aquilajedi
      @aquilajedi 8 місяців тому +5

      Your teachers were dumb or you simply didn’t understand them.

    • @aquilajedi
      @aquilajedi 8 місяців тому +3

      @@gianni_schicchiYou can’t. He just doesn’t understand.

  • @TurboBMRProjectLove
    @TurboBMRProjectLove 8 місяців тому +65

    I remember reading a study about disclosure, I wish I still had it. it talks about the people that will have he worst time dealing with disclosure. It was mathematicians and scientists.

    • @justice_crash2521
      @justice_crash2521 8 місяців тому +2

      What does “disclosure” mean?

    • @Zero_thehero
      @Zero_thehero 8 місяців тому

      @@justice_crash2521when the government admits to ufo now called UAPs the reality of these things is that they are angel/demons

    • @J.D3NNIS
      @J.D3NNIS 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@justice_crash2521🤣👏👏👏

    • @toucheturtle3840
      @toucheturtle3840 8 місяців тому

      @@justice_crash2521It’s a term used by whacko’s, convinced that the government is hiding little green men from us. Dr. Steven Greer is its biggest proponent, has been for 30 years & yet to prove anything.

    • @loosesurfer
      @loosesurfer 8 місяців тому +4

      The act of making new or secret information known

  • @Mirrorgirl492
    @Mirrorgirl492 8 місяців тому +4

    Looks at Rocket Launch
    "Is that, like, a rocket?"
    🙄
    I completely understand Dr Krauss's frustration.

  • @NecroLiquor.
    @NecroLiquor. 6 місяців тому +3

    I've heard his Harvard lectures thru the years.... Fascinating intellect. Kudos to your ability to host such a variety of individuals so smoothly! It's a true gift!

    • @Brian-nh1yf
      @Brian-nh1yf 6 місяців тому +1

      There was zero intellect of his in this video. He is a dinosaur like Tyson

  • @adamhatcher6620
    @adamhatcher6620 6 місяців тому +5

    I truly enjoy listening to Krauss he has always grabbed my attention.

    • @JulianDorey
      @JulianDorey  6 місяців тому +1

      Great to hear Adam! If you enjoy the physicist route, I had Michio Kaku in for episode 145 and Brian Keating in for episode 173

  • @34straw
    @34straw 8 місяців тому +6

    Respects to you brother for having this side of the conversation on. Always good to keep us honest with regards to differing opinions, even if it’s less exciting and fantastical to say no aliens no creator, stoked to give it a watch.🤙🏽

    • @stevenhetzel6483
      @stevenhetzel6483 4 місяці тому

      Well, science is rooted in evidence, and theres none for either. Furthermore if you cant disprove something, like he said, its not scientific, and I'd go so far as to argue it's not real at all.
      God creating the universe only to completely ignore the very laws he created is preposterously stupid, im not saying god doesnt exist, what I am saying is if your religion expects you to believe hes a petulant child who flips the table when he doesnt get his way your religion f*cking sucks.
      Next, Aliens: every reason you can think of for them being here can be done without ever even being f*cking seen. Scouts should have cloaking, we've almost figured it out, why shouldnt they. Cameras and transmitters the size of molocules could swathe the Earth. Killing us could be done by nudging an asteroid, or a targeted disease. Gifting tech is easier than crashing an interstellar craft. Abductions are flat out stupid.

  • @jaggerholland4220
    @jaggerholland4220 8 місяців тому +43

    This guy was boys with Epstien , defended Epstien , and pleaded guilty to soliciting sexual acts from underage women. He said “ "As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people...I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it”

    • @nothanks9503
      @nothanks9503 8 місяців тому

      Sounds reasonable as having to explain yourself to the public

    • @itsmatty365
      @itsmatty365 8 місяців тому

      (((Krauss ))) would you expect anything less

    • @stevehankins5643
      @stevehankins5643 8 місяців тому +4

      Is this true? Or just talking shit dam now I gotta look into thanks for a rabbit hole I gotta dig into lol

    • @zacharyshort384
      @zacharyshort384 8 місяців тому +5

      @@stevehankins5643 It's accurate, yeah. That's a real quote and they were friends. Epstein also donated 250k to the Origins Project that Lawrence was director of.

    • @wilhelmbeck8498
      @wilhelmbeck8498 8 місяців тому

      @@zacharyshort384 Epstein did lots of such - in order to appear as a philantrophist and light some academic "aura" around his undertakings, to widen the spectrum of people accepting invitations ( Basically, it was "just" a scheme to incriminate influental people, so they could be "nudged" to behave in accordance with the wishes of Epstein's employer : Mossad./Zio-israel) The method worked, mainly, by exploiting young women, - but gradually, these became more interesting to him, than the money he was getting paid. That's when he became overconfident and slobby - and cettain powerfull people decided to take him out -

  • @rh3toricalanswer
    @rh3toricalanswer 8 місяців тому +106

    Really interesting to hear all of us be told that aliens aren't real from a guy who looks like an alien

    • @BRAD19773
      @BRAD19773 8 місяців тому +3

      😂

    • @NEKRWSPHERE
      @NEKRWSPHERE 8 місяців тому +3

      Actually he kinda looks like Bob Lazar at this point. 😱 There's this theory that the more we age - the more indistinguishable we become from each other. Didn't believe it until I looked at plenty of human remains. 🤔

    • @realastonryan
      @realastonryan 8 місяців тому +1

      Kinda reminds me of Roger😂

    • @optimisticallycynical.814
      @optimisticallycynical.814 7 місяців тому +3

      He never said aliens aren't real

    • @RayzorSOS
      @RayzorSOS 7 місяців тому +3

      Weirdly the guy looks like the opposite of his field. Steven Greer.
      Also what is weird is that they are quite extremes on both opposites. Makes me think that there are just forces on both sides to muddy the waters...since both are easily "hated" by both sides. Divide and conquer the minds I guess.
      edit: is it me or both look like lizards? And yes, same with Lazar.

  • @qwerty1000x
    @qwerty1000x 8 місяців тому +8

    I love this guy. I love that he cuts Julian off from interrupting him.

    • @brianthebroken7601
      @brianthebroken7601 8 місяців тому

      You probably love under age girls too like Kraus since he hung out with Epstein a lot!!

    • @deSintone
      @deSintone 8 днів тому +1

      straus got a level when he must intervene when there is simply too much bullshit

  • @jokerdiepenbrock
    @jokerdiepenbrock 8 місяців тому +55

    Lawrence Krauss must be the reincarnation of Lord Kelvin - the guy who said some 130 years ago that no object heavier than air can fly. Less than 70 years later humans were building rockets to fly to the moon.

    • @-Awareness
      @-Awareness 8 місяців тому +2

      So on point…

    • @MirrorCanvas01
      @MirrorCanvas01 8 місяців тому +10

      Did birds exist then?

    • @jokerdiepenbrock
      @jokerdiepenbrock 8 місяців тому +4

      @@MirrorCanvas01 Well, the first flying machines did try to emulate bird flight because the drag coefficient of air and the Coanda effect (that is the tendency of a fluid jet - in this case air - to stay attached to a curved surface: this is how airplane wings are shaped today) had to be discovered. If you just face-palmed imagining primitive planes trying to flap their wings to fly, that is how future humans will probably think of today's propulsion systems.
      Saying that because of gravity an object will always fall towards the center of the Earth is like saying that water is wet. Serious scientists acknowledge the fact that although gravity is a ubiquitous force, it is not well understood.

    • @Boogieplex
      @Boogieplex 25 днів тому +2

      Lawrence just lacks imagination. Unimaginable feats could be achieved with future technology that wouldn’t violate known laws of physics, but would completely blow our minds.It’s been done throughout history time and time again. Controlling gravity is just one thing that would completely change everything.Another would be accessing additional dimensions, wich are proven mathematically to be there. Far fetched? Maybe, but doesn’t break Lawrence’s laws of physics.

    • @artax7664
      @artax7664 19 днів тому

      @@Boogieplex I totally agree that he lacks imagination. It takes an imagination to dream of what’s possible. I think this is also the reason he has such an obvious blind spot when it comes to God.

  • @breezy1768
    @breezy1768 6 місяців тому +4

    Also the “woahs” , head explosions gesture, and the red curtain is very Joe Roganish.

  • @Resenbrink
    @Resenbrink 6 місяців тому +25

    Lot of people displaying animosity towards Krauss simply because he doesn’t like a movie they do and because he explains clearly the logic which exposes the absurdity of the UFO circus.

    • @quaterman1270
      @quaterman1270 Місяць тому +7

      He explains his opinion and states that it is logic, but it is not!

    • @Resenbrink
      @Resenbrink Місяць тому +2

      @@quaterman1270 so you have a better understanding than Krauss?

    • @AbhayPeshin
      @AbhayPeshin Місяць тому +5

      ​@@Resenbrink these arguments don't matter after the the david grusch testimony in us congress.

    • @breft3416
      @breft3416 Місяць тому +3

      The ufo circus may be absurd, but the possibility of their existence is not.

    • @Insectoid_
      @Insectoid_ Місяць тому +4

      Doesn’t change the fact they’re real

  • @lajosbaranyi7333
    @lajosbaranyi7333 8 місяців тому +4

    This guy should respect the term “I do not know”.

  • @Jack_Parsons-666
    @Jack_Parsons-666 8 місяців тому +34

    Wow, thanks for reminding me who this guy is in the 1st few seconds of the video so I don't have to waste my time. I'm sure this dude can teach Newtonian physics to college freshmen but beyond that I don't think we'll see any groundbreaking "science" come out of him.

    • @loosesurfer
      @loosesurfer 8 місяців тому

      😂

    • @arkadiuszjandylewski152
      @arkadiuszjandylewski152 8 місяців тому

      I am tired of scientist which do not accept anything beyond their scientific understanding. Science can not be trusted and taken as undeniable fact. It has been seen again and again in history.Only a few decades ago, we thought that homo sapiens appeared 35000 years ago. Today we know it is nearly 10 times earlier. 10 times earlier! So no! Predicting something or explaining extra terrestrial behavior or crafts from our scientific perspective is just foolish.

    • @oskarskalski2982
      @oskarskalski2982 6 місяців тому

      "This guy" posted scientific paper on existence of dark energy before there was a proof of accelerated expansion of space in 1998 (his paper is from 94 or 95).
      Just because you don't agree with somebody doesn't mean that they don't have credentials. Although he has darker page in his book when he was allegedly molesting female coworkers. Although the whole affair is murky.

    • @majoroz4876
      @majoroz4876 4 місяці тому +2

      Apparently, you have NOT read any of his books.

    • @isitme1234
      @isitme1234 4 місяці тому +1

      @@majoroz4876 what do you expect from a joe rogan audience

  • @Dewalthasmymoney
    @Dewalthasmymoney 8 місяців тому +39

    I used to really enjoy listening to Krauss talk physics a decade ago. Like him, I went most of my life thinking NHI was BS. I was wrong. Krauss, like many old-timers , such as Neil Degrasse Tyson, are stuck in their old ways and can't adapt to new data.
    It's very clear from listening to Krauss that he hasn't taken a deep dive into any of the emerging data over the last few years on UAP and NHI.
    Having a strong opinion on the existence of NHI without spending the time and doing his due diligence and taking a seriously in-depth look at the data is no different than some random person claiming to know how to fix the economy based on watching 5 minutes of cable news a day.
    I went 33 years thinking NHI was complete bullshit, but I also spent no time researching the matter. I watched a few blurry videos on UA-cam, watched a few episodes of Ancient Aliens on the History Channel, and decided I had it all figured out.
    In 2017, after the NYT article, and the Commander David Fravor incident going viral, I became interested in the topic. The further I went down the rabbithole, the more apparent it became that there's a tremendous amount of legit data I was unaware of.
    How did I not know this information? As Grusch stated, "There is a sophisticated disinformation campaign targeting the world populous."
    The government (specifically the DoD, the Intelligence Community and the Pentagon) has dedicated a tremendous amount of resources to deceiving not only the public, but also the vast majority of Congress and sitting presidents.
    It took several years of research to change my perspective. Anyone that takes a thorough look at the NHI phenomenon can't help but realize there's a legitimate case for NHI.
    The problem is, most of the world isn't interested, as I was for 33+ years. People will not take the time to research unless they're interested.
    The proof is in the pudding. Chuck Schumer wrote an amendment to the NDAA that references Non-human Intelligence and exotic non-prosaic craft 30-40 times a few months ago. The ENTIRE Senate unanimously passed that bill. The ENTIRE House voted for that bill aside from 4 people.
    Now ask yourself, why the fuck would all these Senators vote in favor of an amendment that is solely aimed at "aliens" and "alien" technology.
    Why did the US Inspector General of Intelligence, essentially the internal affairs for the CIA, FBI, NSA, NGA (National Geospatial Intelligence Agency) just confirm to the SSCI (Senate Select Oversight Committee of Intelligence) and the HOC (House Oversight Committee of Intelligence) that Grusch's claims are credible and legitimate.
    You have powerful Congressmen walking out of a classified meeting with the ICIG in a SCIF (Secure Compartmentalized Information Facility) which is essentially a room that can't be bugged and impervious to eavesdropping have a panic'd look on their face and repeatedly stated "this is a National security issue" and that the media better start taking this NHI/UFO subject seriously.
    The writing is on the wall.

    • @nalbizo2
      @nalbizo2 8 місяців тому +1

      Probably because that kind of data your referring to is anecdotal and serious scientists work in empirical data only.

    • @user-vl4vo2vz4f
      @user-vl4vo2vz4f 8 місяців тому

      bullshit. The only data science accepts are stuff that can be reproduced independently, not hearsay, like the "data" you say. Testimony are no proof, even if it was Einstein saying. Go ahead, shoot a saucer not as a blurry fuzzy point. Bring us 4K video of aliens, interview them, shoot the discs from inside and bring us some object from the craft. On the meanwhile, don't bother coming with "expert witnesses", testimony and Bob Lazar shit.

    • @abracadabrascotty
      @abracadabrascotty 8 місяців тому +4

      I cannot take anyone seriously who says the words "serious scientists and empirical data" in the same sentence...

    • @abracadabrascotty
      @abracadabrascotty 8 місяців тому +2

      Please explain to us why any serious scientists would only accept empirical data to base their argument for what constitutes reality...
      This should be funny...

    • @jimtheakston9732
      @jimtheakston9732 8 місяців тому

      LOL ITS ALL ABOUT THE RATS THAT ARE RUNNING OUR PLANT 😮 THINK YOU SHOULD EAT BUGS AND OWN NOTHING 😮 AND BE HAPPY ??? WHY THEY TAKE A TRIP ON THE MOON TO THERE SUMMER MANSIONS 😢 IF I RUN OUT OF SOYLENT GREEN I WILL START IN D.C. THAN THE WEF TO START ??? 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮

  • @IO-ux2we
    @IO-ux2we 8 місяців тому +115

    Listen to Gary Nolen's take on people like this guy and Neil, they are not acting like scientists at all bro

    • @SeamusMcFitz-jz9if
      @SeamusMcFitz-jz9if 8 місяців тому +11

      You have a liberal arts degree bro... Lol😅

    • @yonisapir6270
      @yonisapir6270 8 місяців тому +4

      Do you actually believe that Gary was abducted by aliens?

    • @SeamusMcFitz-jz9if
      @SeamusMcFitz-jz9if 8 місяців тому +5

      @yonisapir6270 these guys are just out to sell books

    • @mystijkissler8183
      @mystijkissler8183 8 місяців тому

      what an ignorant slam@@SeamusMcFitz-jz9if

    • @SeamusMcFitz-jz9if
      @SeamusMcFitz-jz9if 8 місяців тому

      @mystijkissler8183 you have a lib arts degree as well I bet.
      Here's the scoop: everything you have learned/know is hearsay.

  • @doublesimian
    @doublesimian Місяць тому +2

    Lawrence, your skepticism isn't a badge of intellectual prowess-it's a defense mechanism. You've witnessed strange, unexplainable things over the years, but instead of confronting them, you've buried them deep because they threaten the tidy, materialistic world you've constructed. The truth is, you're terrified of being ontologically shocked, of realizing that your understanding of reality is not only limited but fundamentally flawed. This constant repression of what you know deep down, coupled with your fear of the unknown, is the real source of your unhappiness. You're not just skeptical-you're scared of facing the possibility that everything you believe is woefully small and in error.

  • @reedickyaluss
    @reedickyaluss 8 місяців тому +3

    "The government cant keep things secret" - Yeah. We know. That's why we're all collectively here. Have you been paying attention or?

  • @KickassMcfly
    @KickassMcfly 8 місяців тому +16

    I always try to get both sides of most things, to feel I have the best informed opinions possible and be able to make the best informed decisions I can manage, always enjoyed listening to Krauss and thank you Julian for continuing to bring on great guests and delivering fantastic episodes, might have said this before but you swiftly became one of my favourite podcasts and I always look forward to new episodes ♥

    • @GastonsGuitarCovers
      @GastonsGuitarCovers 8 місяців тому +2

      Yessir. I agree completely.

    • @michael-4k4000
      @michael-4k4000 7 місяців тому +1

      Everything is evidence for God. Nothing is evidence for nothing." Mark Twain

  • @Apollo22251
    @Apollo22251 8 місяців тому +10

    Interesting perspective came into it disagreeing but with an open mind and came out with some food for thought and some perspective! Interesting episode

  • @radiantmind8729
    @radiantmind8729 8 місяців тому +2

    Who the hell ever said flying saucers are aerodynamic?

  • @johnwalker1449
    @johnwalker1449 8 місяців тому +22

    The amount of construction happening in Miami is astounding considering it’s going to be under water 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @Mike36555
    @Mike36555 8 місяців тому +5

    "why would the government keep this a secret" 1.Black projects 2. Black missions 3.CIA

    • @andreavanda5402
      @andreavanda5402 4 місяці тому

      The government just denied denied, denied the validity of anything about UFOs, aliens, etc. But interestingly, now they're warning us about possible alien attack of planet earth! Hmmm...🤔🤥

  • @mn-yr7ht
    @mn-yr7ht 8 місяців тому +5

    I always love when a scientist tells "it just can be, that's all". Very open minded.
    Anyway, great podcast again Julian, greatings from France !

  • @chrisray6385
    @chrisray6385 8 місяців тому +2

    We need people like Mr. Krauss. Their brilliance exists to bring knowledge and the implementation of it into and up to the present time reality.
    However, thank God we have genius presently that can think, postulate and move us into the future.
    Sadly, science is much better at the former.

    • @myhksm3025
      @myhksm3025 Місяць тому

      What makes you think science then was better than the science we now have?

  • @MrDatalore2009
    @MrDatalore2009 8 місяців тому +150

    If this guy was in charge we would still be in the stone age because he can't except that we can learn new laws of physics that changes "known laws of physics "

    • @davidcoles1688
      @davidcoles1688 8 місяців тому +11

      Totally agree buddy, what a Geeky Egocentric Dunce😂

    • @rogerbergez
      @rogerbergez 8 місяців тому

      Your statement reveals that you don’t understand how science works. No new law has ever changed or replaced a previously known law. New laws enhance our understandings of previous laws; they don’t replace them. Once empirical evidence is confirmed by numerous experiments, those results aren’t ever reversed.

    • @RonniePTexan
      @RonniePTexan 8 місяців тому +12

      The basic laws of physics (Thermodynamics) disprove this guy. Something from nothing is completely against those laws of physics.

    • @HardROfficial
      @HardROfficial 8 місяців тому

      He's friends with Jeffrey Epstein and accepted 250k from him.

    • @stephenzavatski8016
      @stephenzavatski8016 8 місяців тому +23

      He literally said he's been wrong many times throughout his life, and that people need to be able to throw away deeply held beliefs "like yesterdays newspaper" upon learning facts that contradict them. You didn't listen to him.

  • @Jack-M1113
    @Jack-M1113 8 місяців тому +6

    Oh cool were you there for the start of the universe? Have you been to all of the planets?

  • @desertbrat8281
    @desertbrat8281 8 місяців тому +15

    I like that you are putting people on here that offer a different perspective on what many of us find to be a fun and intriguing little mystery.

    • @markstriker925
      @markstriker925 8 місяців тому +4

      The UFO community needs more exposure to people like this. So they can be more open minded to skepticism. And not blindly believe in everything.

    • @loosesurfer
      @loosesurfer 8 місяців тому +3

      ​@@markstriker925so true. I want to believe anything remotely exciting regarding e.t life but this guy slams a lot of that b.s

    • @mariamartin6205
      @mariamartin6205 8 місяців тому +2

      absolutely@@markstriker925, and so it works the other way around. Being close-minded does not help anyone.

    • @brianthebroken7601
      @brianthebroken7601 8 місяців тому

      Yes, bring on more people that hung out with Epstein and is a creep that hates our republic. This guys is the enemy of the people!

    • @muffin6369
      @muffin6369 8 місяців тому +1

      Julien is contributing to making people smarter, makes people think and maybe makes you find out you were interested in something you didn't know you would like.

  • @redneckburnoutmidwestmind
    @redneckburnoutmidwestmind 8 місяців тому +23

    Mr. Krauss... here's a quote just for you sir... 'The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.' -- Albert Einstein

    • @majoroz4876
      @majoroz4876 4 місяці тому +2

      E was correct................Krauss agrees, as to all thinking people.

    • @andreavanda5402
      @andreavanda5402 4 місяці тому

      Krauss needs to realize how much he doesn't know. Humility is a good thing. It might make you realize that theories are just that theories and not fact. For example, Darwin's theory of evolution is a theory that has not been proved to be true. As a matter fact, many scientist say it's total made up fiction. Where is the missing link?😉

    • @rayfighter
      @rayfighter Місяць тому

      sure redneck

    • @BlacksburgEV
      @BlacksburgEV Місяць тому

      I can't take anyone seriously ad a scientist, a researcher or critical thinker after they say something along the lines of "The physics doesn't support X, aliens wouldn't of built this because it doesn't make sense with physics ETC."
      The most unscientific thinking you could have. Basing all your assumptions on the fact that we know, all, about science and psychics. After 150 years? Rofl.
      This typically comes from old tenured proffesors who have books and alife of research vested in current theory. Or rich egotistical "personalities" like Neil Tysson.
      It instantly negates their arguments. Listen to any of this guys podcasts and lectures, then do the same thing, for the same length of time for Avi Loeb. You will come away knowing the measure of a real, enthusiastic, non jaded SCIENTIST.
      Science is not saying X doesn't exist. It is looking at all of the evidence and TESTING to verify it doesn't exist. If there us nothing to this, prove it. A lack of evidence does not equate something not existing.
      Anywhoo, have a good day everyone!

    • @frede1905
      @frede1905 Місяць тому

      I agree. Which is why one should acknowledge that we don't know what the UAP phenomenon is, and NOT conclude that it's aliens or technology that violates the laws of physics.

  • @MetalRuleAndHumanFolly
    @MetalRuleAndHumanFolly 8 місяців тому +8

    I beg to differ: a planar object would be ideal (disc or otherwise) for travelling through space (if you don't want to collide with things). Also note, the time that they spend travelling in space would be affected by time dilation - this is proven already. Besides, I don't think time matters. There was a man named Van Neumann who had the right idea.

    • @boatymcboatface666
      @boatymcboatface666 Місяць тому

      Actually, it wouldn't. The craft as depicted in the series, The Expanse, are a more practiced design. If a craft is under constant acceleration, creates its own 'gravity'.

  • @kristinacurrie4385
    @kristinacurrie4385 8 місяців тому +11

    Another great podcast Julian thank you gentleman for putting this out and as always I hope all is well and good with you!!!

  • @andrewpeterson6098
    @andrewpeterson6098 8 місяців тому +3

    Not having proof is exactly why we go searching. We all seek meaning. Someone reminding us of the status quo was a waste of time.

  • @misternevermiss12
    @misternevermiss12 8 місяців тому +2

    Great episode. Finally someone who actually knows his field.

  • @dsmolks1
    @dsmolks1 8 місяців тому +11

    Isn’t it possible that unknown laws of physics can coexist with known laws? Lawrence is assuming the other side is arguing that they’ll break the existing laws, which doesn’t necessarily have to be the case

    • @RonniePTexan
      @RonniePTexan 8 місяців тому +4

      This guy is against the laws of physics. Something from nothing is completely against the laws of physics (Thermodynamics). This guy is a fast talking kook.

    • @oskarskalski2982
      @oskarskalski2982 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@RonniePTexan did you even hear what he says is the real meaning behind "nothing"? There isn't really such thing as nothing, there was airways something, empty space (which isn't empty in reality), laws of physics. The statement "nothing" is a little tonque-in-cheek in contrast to the imaginative being called God who created everything from nothing.

    • @RonniePTexan
      @RonniePTexan 6 місяців тому +2

      @@oskarskalski2982 So he makes a new definition of the word and then makes up a theory based off of a new imaginary meaning. Let me give it a try- I can fly. My definition of flying is walking on the ground. But I can fly forever now!

    • @andreavanda5402
      @andreavanda5402 4 місяці тому

      Not only possible but PROBABLE!

  • @tomstone5110
    @tomstone5110 8 місяців тому +4

    Alright. Youve gotta get Laurence Strauss and Steven Greer in on the same episode. They might be related.

  • @paranormalwithdave
    @paranormalwithdave 8 місяців тому +38

    He lost me at “the government can’t keep stuff secret, that’s ludicrous” - we can look back at history and see flat out that isn’t true. Either way great pod Julian - he was great other than the fact that he’s closed minded like most academics that are deep in the cabal 👀😂

    • @loosesurfer
      @loosesurfer 8 місяців тому

      I think he's just referencing the increase in government leaks we all know they do keep plenty hidden from us and he knows that to

    • @br_andn
      @br_andn 8 місяців тому +6

      Tbf the secrets they kept, and in most cases intended to, haven't been kept, hence why we know about them. So yes, they CAN HAVE secrets, but we keep finding out about them, proving truth to the statement, "the government can't KEEP secrets." He's technically not wrong.

    • @spinny2593
      @spinny2593 8 місяців тому +5

      @@br_andn And how do you know there are not more that we do not know about? You can't prove they can't keep secrets, because they are still secret.

    • @StoreRunDotCom
      @StoreRunDotCom 8 місяців тому

      lost me questioning the aerodynamics of a spaceship. I'm still watching/listening. OHHHH he just said Elon Musk says things that are stupid.

    • @sloppyjoke6062
      @sloppyjoke6062 8 місяців тому +3

      A spaceship could never be made underground without anyone knowing. This guy thinks nukes were just picked off trees

  • @SaturnRooster81
    @SaturnRooster81 8 місяців тому +10

    😂 the word salad of shit 😂
    "We don't prove things to be true in science we prove them to be false😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    Jimmy - "ahhhhh" 😂😂
    If it's off, then it's not on 😂😂😂
    See, I'm a genius 😂😂😂
    These guys are the real comedians. They take the piss out of millions of mouth breathers.

    • @CosmoPhiloPharmaco
      @CosmoPhiloPharmaco 8 місяців тому +1

      "We don't prove things to be true in science we prove them to be false" -- This is Popper's falsificationist anti-induction philosophy. Most philosophers of science today reject this theory.

  • @aaronking8694
    @aaronking8694 8 місяців тому +18

    Ahhhh yes. The Human Ego on full display.. How wrong it is on a regular basis. Typical.

    • @TurboBMRProjectLove
      @TurboBMRProjectLove 8 місяців тому +1

      Yup, what ironic is that the phenomenon is meant to break the human ego and look past the veil. Basically suplex the human ego from the top ropes. This guy is going to have a hard to very soon.

    • @grandtheftaliens
      @grandtheftaliens 8 місяців тому

      Well said 👏

    • @stephenzavatski8016
      @stephenzavatski8016 8 місяців тому +3

      The human ego? Like believing there were ancient super civilizations when there isn't a shred of evidence for them? Lol

    • @grandtheftaliens
      @grandtheftaliens 8 місяців тому

      @@stephenzavatski8016 it's called a coverup. See lack of JFK files as one of many examples as proof of a real world active coverup. 👍

    • @Resenbrink
      @Resenbrink 6 місяців тому +1

      Says the guy who believes in angels and demons

  • @OG-Jakey
    @OG-Jakey 8 місяців тому +5

    I do like listening to this guy. Something about him. Like you can tell he does love what he's talking about.

    • @Genesis_twitch_
      @Genesis_twitch_ 7 місяців тому

      Was thinking the same thing lol

    • @oskarskalski2982
      @oskarskalski2982 6 місяців тому

      I like his lectures very much and bought his latest book. Although I don't agree with him on interstellar. Yes. It had several problems in scientific part of the movie but on the whole I lived it and those inaccuracies didn't prevent me from enjoying the movie.

  • @Theninjagecko
    @Theninjagecko Місяць тому +3

    Lady's and gentlemen i present you the scientific zealot.

  • @glennrudolph
    @glennrudolph 8 місяців тому +29

    I gave it 4 minutes. I feel like that’s more than most of you.

    • @pandarage21
      @pandarage21 8 місяців тому +3

      Nah 35 while I was working 😂

    • @mattstone8878
      @mattstone8878 8 місяців тому +6

      This guest is insufferable. He thinks he has all the answers even though they don't make sense

    • @philfarmintino11
      @philfarmintino11 8 місяців тому +2

      gave it about 10-15 .. pure insanity! 👎

    • @Michael.S.Ryan.
      @Michael.S.Ryan. 7 місяців тому +1

      Too much evidence and way too many similar stories with people who have nothing to gain and a lot to lose. We all have blindados and weaknesses… this is his.

    • @mattstone8878
      @mattstone8878 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Michael.S.Ryan. what is blindados? Is that Spanish for blind spots? 🤔 lol

  • @Laminar-Flow
    @Laminar-Flow 8 місяців тому +3

    My issue with his argument against aliens is simple:
    We cannot explain quantum phenomena. We also cannot explain what lies beyond the event horizon of a black hole, etc. Even the planets most brilliant theoretical physicists cannot truly explain spooky action at a distance or quantum entanglement (maybe other than Hawking and company realizing information is retained beyond the event horizon of a black hole for example).

  • @Heinlein.
    @Heinlein. 8 місяців тому +2

    Seeing is not believing may be best quote for 2024. ( A.I. videos, hearings) I respect where he is coming from, his perspective is needed. Doesn’t mean he is right and others theories are wrong people are wired differently. He just happens to make some great points. How was your brain after this one?

  • @sharonwalsh5577
    @sharonwalsh5577 8 місяців тому +11

    Julian you Jersey podcast stud, you really have gotten some great guests. Congrats, from your not so secret admirer.. love how your brain works and the questions you ask and how you decipher stuff and question it so it's understandable.. ❤❤❤ I feel you are on s Shaw Ryan level & Joe Rogan just breaking shit down that is interesting.

    • @JulianDorey
      @JulianDorey  8 місяців тому +3

      Thank you so much Sharon!!

    • @sharonwalsh5577
      @sharonwalsh5577 8 місяців тому +1

      Collegeville, PA check in.. I don't agree with this guy as much as I do others like Billy Carson but I love to get all aspects from different perspectives.. the climate always have been changing regardless of what we have today..cycles buddy.. I will not eat fake meat.. lol .

    • @kylesheridan5108
      @kylesheridan5108 8 місяців тому +1

      20 minutes in and I am hooked. Another great interview Julian 👏

    • @lisabiegel4017
      @lisabiegel4017 8 місяців тому +1

      AMEN!!!!!

    • @மோடிெவறியன்
      @மோடிெவறியன் 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@JulianDoreyfrom india.love you sir. good and interesting podcast

  • @JonStasevich
    @JonStasevich 5 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for bringing Lawrence on to discuss reality. Not what we might believe but instead what is supported by evidence and observations.

  • @Rmckenzie1980
    @Rmckenzie1980 8 місяців тому +6

    the intro was packed with so many assumptions I knew I wouldn't be able to stomach watching the whole interview.

  • @cambreezy505
    @cambreezy505 8 місяців тому +9

    this dude is smart af and was an awesome episode. The way people put their ignorance and shitty thinking out all proud is disturbing. Saying they'll skip this one and i saw someone comment why do you have the other side on lmao. People really dont want to hear something because its not what they already believe, stuck in a sad hole.

    • @VindensSaga
      @VindensSaga 8 місяців тому +1

      Welcome to reality little man.

    • @andreavanda5402
      @andreavanda5402 4 місяці тому

      Could that possibly be you by any chance?

  • @TheShinPhil
    @TheShinPhil 5 місяців тому +3

    Not 2 dinosaurs doing a podcast but definitely 1 human and 1 dinosaur doing a podcast. Julian is a total pro.

  • @FernandoGonzalez-hq9ei
    @FernandoGonzalez-hq9ei 8 місяців тому +4

    This guy's right about interstellar. I bet Mathew McConaughey is not even a real astronaut... Is this guy foreal ?

  • @zutzun8230
    @zutzun8230 Місяць тому +3

    “The laws of physics don’t permit it!!!!” “There is no God!!!” “I know everything!!!” - the modern day fool

  • @michael-4k4000
    @michael-4k4000 7 місяців тому +1

    If he thinks Interstellar is the worst Sci-fi movie ever he's nuts. The story is about the love about the father and daughter, the Sci-Fi stuff is to get people to watch and stay interested. Now if they start teaching Interstellar in our schools at fact then thats different. The film was not made for education it was made for entertainment.

  • @Iam...---
    @Iam...--- 8 місяців тому +6

    I love reading the comments

    • @tara5742
      @tara5742 6 місяців тому

      And they love being read by you ❤

  • @Brian-nh1yf
    @Brian-nh1yf 6 місяців тому +1

    The philosopher Socrates argued that humility is the greatest of all virtues. His observation was that the wisest people are the first to admit how little they really know and the first to see the fools in people claiming to know it all.

    • @andreavanda5402
      @andreavanda5402 4 місяці тому

      Krauss could use some humility for sure.

  • @jason13stomberg
    @jason13stomberg 8 місяців тому +3

    Julian great job on the new set! Looks awsome!

  • @juanrojas7505
    @juanrojas7505 7 місяців тому +1

    First time I watched one of your podcast. I saw a lot of people comments that were quite discouraging about the guest, but I decided to give it a try and see how it developed. I gotta say that was entertaining some how to see other people train of thought, also make me look into myself and analize what I think or what I stand for, use it like a mirror to analize my own behavior. I have friends that do not believe what I believe and it is fine although. u can't be evangelizing everyone you know with your ultimate truth. even I laughed at some moments. subscribing and keep the good content, shout out from Chile!!!

  • @somekindof2574
    @somekindof2574 8 місяців тому +18

    Someone’s paradigm going to get a reality check

  • @BERGELMIRS
    @BERGELMIRS 8 місяців тому +1

    I was a fan a while back but was turned off when he got into politics and alienated half of his audience. Still I appreciate you having him, its an interesting and entertaining conversation.

  • @sparrowhawk6748
    @sparrowhawk6748 8 місяців тому +9

    How can a Physicist/Cosmologist state so profoundly that "You should listen to me because I'm right," after making such matter of fact statements about things outside his field. This is one of the most closed minded, arrogant, pompous people I've ever had the displeasure of being exposed to and while I wish him luck in his endeavors I pray we don't cross paths again.

    • @zacharyshort384
      @zacharyshort384 8 місяців тому +1

      He was even worse with his discussion with Nick Pope.

    • @redaderoua8816
      @redaderoua8816 8 місяців тому

      Timestamp for the quote?

  • @SoFreshSoCleanDetailers
    @SoFreshSoCleanDetailers 7 місяців тому

    I recently came across your channel and I put it up there with the rest of them. Keep on getting it my guy

  • @theozarktrekker
    @theozarktrekker 8 місяців тому +5

    Listening to Julian ask Lawrence goofy questions reminds me of Shawn Ryan asking Billy Carson what an obelisk and a sarcophagus are.

    • @RichardCookerly
      @RichardCookerly 8 місяців тому +2

      Ha, I had that same thought. Wasn’t that Shawn Ryan episode crazy interesting!?

    • @brettlott570
      @brettlott570 8 місяців тому +1

      @@RichardCookerlyYes the Shawn Ryan show with Carson was interesting. I just found out through another channel ARCHAIX says Carson is full of BS. Arch has some old history information but I don’t understand a lot of it. Check him out and let me know what you think

    • @timw4432
      @timw4432 8 місяців тому +2

      That SRS podcast was rubbish. Billy Carson is full of 💩

    • @JeSTeR-X1o
      @JeSTeR-X1o 8 місяців тому

      ​@@brettlott570Carson is just another grifter making a living off gullible hopeful people

    • @theozarktrekker
      @theozarktrekker 8 місяців тому

      @@RichardCookerly it was, but tbh Billy strikes me as someone who sees a hungry customer base and invents or re-invents a product to feed to them. It’s working for him, he’s getting paid.

  • @heiwatozenryosa
    @heiwatozenryosa 4 місяці тому +1

    I can listen to Lawrence Krauss forever.

  • @ALITIONZ
    @ALITIONZ 8 місяців тому +9

    while looking at a video of a ufo racing through the sky, his response is that seeing is NOT believing. Your mind made it up, and it just so happened to get caught in HD by a fighter pilot.😂

    • @stevenhetzel6483
      @stevenhetzel6483 5 місяців тому

      Okay dork. Say aliens are here. What now? Do you need another video determining why for you? You can figure out everything there is to know about us from the Oort cloud. Not Research. You could wipe us out by nudging an asteroid. Not killing us. You travelled all the way here. Not tech. Manipulation? Again, never have to even enter our atmosphere to do that. Gifting technology? You'd have to be moronic, it's clear what hands that tech would fall into. How about saving us? Again, there's infinitely easier ways to go about it, and they're not doing a very f*cking good job if they are.
      Any line of reasoning is flimsier than overcooked noodles when you TRY to think about it objectively, these are godlike beings, you don't travel light years and successfully hide your origin by being morons.
      Ahkams Razor: they're not here, and millions of dorks want to believe so badly they're ignoring logic, reason, and a lack of evidence to do so.
      Sorry, get real.

  • @JosephPeterson-qw7jr
    @JosephPeterson-qw7jr 8 місяців тому +1

    Being what is classified as a conscious intelligence living in a world created by light that collapses into matter based on mere observation, i try to keep an open mind.

    • @andreavanda5402
      @andreavanda5402 4 місяці тому +1

      What you said is very profound and beautifully stated.

  • @johnnycashblacknc
    @johnnycashblacknc 8 місяців тому +25

    This guy 😂

  • @taylorcarpenter1122
    @taylorcarpenter1122 8 місяців тому +2

    Love how he just rolls over the big bang as if he doesnt have to actually explain it. He has more faith than monotheistic believers lolol

  • @Jimcast86
    @Jimcast86 8 місяців тому +5

    How does he reconcile his recent humanity only being 10,000 years old theory to Gobekli tepe which was built around 12,000 years ago?

    • @JeSTeR-X1o
      @JeSTeR-X1o 8 місяців тому

      And we have sites here in Ireland 100k + years and there's older elsewhere, a lot is and has been hidden from us

    • @TERRENCEJJR
      @TERRENCEJJR 20 днів тому

      Not humanity, but civilization beyond hunter gatherers.

  • @DJ_Khal_Rhaego
    @DJ_Khal_Rhaego 8 місяців тому +1

    The intro are actually questions that scientists would ask an alien..😂

  • @Ashley-lb9jz
    @Ashley-lb9jz 8 місяців тому +4

    What a barrel full of joy this one is. Think I'll skip this one 😂

  • @leedolman3191
    @leedolman3191 6 місяців тому +1

    At the moment he said that anthropogenic climate change was a real threat after saying coastlines transgressed 10km in the past so our ancestors had to eat fish which gave them a high protein diet to give them big brains (maybe)….means there is a flaw somewhere. Marines regression and transgressions are real things and it didn’t happen because fossil fuels were being burned. He did say big fires could have a devastating effect..but he associated that with meteorite impacts etc…..idk…but there is something inconsistant with this.

  • @obfuscateidentity2329
    @obfuscateidentity2329 8 місяців тому +8

    Finally someone who disagrees with the fake aliens story!!!!

  • @happyshillmore
    @happyshillmore 8 місяців тому +1

    Starts off by idolizing Galileo, then proceeds to be as presumptuous as Galileo's detractors with the very same hubris.

    • @happyshillmore
      @happyshillmore 8 місяців тому

      I wonder if he's affiliated with that "gorilla skeptics" debunker non-profit

  • @lewisholdstock8914
    @lewisholdstock8914 8 місяців тому +6

    I think you need to get Willie Soon on your show as he stated the science doesn't fit what we are being told about climate change. He says it's purely the sun and CO2 level make hardly any difference. What people fail to realise is if you limit CO2 you limit all life

    • @andreavanda5402
      @andreavanda5402 4 місяці тому

      EXACTLY!

    • @frede1905
      @frede1905 Місяць тому

      It's fairly trivial to show that it's not the sun causing modern global warming. Look at data showing how the total solar irradiance has been changing the last, say, 100 years. One sees that it has, on average, been dropping since the 1960s, while it is in those years since that we've seen the biggest increase in average global temperature. Plus, if it was the sun causing global warming, then it would heat up all layers of the atmosphere, while we see that the temperature in stratosphere (the layer beginning 10 or so km above the ground) has actually been dropping (which is what we would expect, according to the greenhouse effect). Willie Soon might be fine as an astrophysicist for all I know, but he's not formally educated into the field of climatology. You can know a lot in one field, and yet not know what you're talking about in another. Ask yourself this: if you've decided that you shouldn't believe what most scientists in a field have concluded (and that doing so is an "argument from authority"), then why have you replaced that with listening to some other scientist, and borrowing his expertise (though, in an unrelated field)? THAT would be an argument from authority.

  • @DrThoritah
    @DrThoritah 4 місяці тому +4

    I’m always skeptical when scientists are as sure about anything as Lawrence Krause is about everything.

    • @Pouncealot2023
      @Pouncealot2023 2 місяці тому

      So I guess you’re skeptical about gravity

    • @DrThoritah
      @DrThoritah 2 місяці тому +2

      @@Pouncealot2023 gravitational theory has obvious holes it, which is why physicists had to come up with dark matter and dark energy, or perhaps you were unaware.

    • @Pouncealot2023
      @Pouncealot2023 2 місяці тому

      @@DrThoritah isn’t dark energy responsible for the expansion of the universe...how does that affect gravity

    • @DrThoritah
      @DrThoritah 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Pouncealot2023 lol! Dark energy is just code for physicists not knowing why the expansion is occurring and is essentially negative gravity. You should probably avoid all science debate.

  • @robertnevely4820
    @robertnevely4820 8 місяців тому

    Helloooooo Julian my name is Robert and I love your content & I subscribed to that many podcasts that my laptop was full of them and slow so I cleaned out everything and watched a lot of podcasts and picked the top 20 i like because everyone is talking the same talk with the same people and asking the right questions is the key and calling out people on there shit is awesome to and you do both !! You're going to get there but it will take a little time and try to project your platform out there by anyway possible , there are so many out there !! Once I say your p-cast I have been a loyal customer man! (The Newfie ) :)

  • @saxophone.4513
    @saxophone.4513 7 місяців тому +3

    Who said they flew through interstellar space Lawrence?

  • @Baalzz302
    @Baalzz302 Місяць тому

    Just because god may not exist does not mean there is no purpose to life. Everything has a function, and everything is connected. Life and Consciousness are no accident.

  • @Routing_for_sanity
    @Routing_for_sanity 8 місяців тому +19

    A creation without a creator. Interesting so he alone knows the origin of matter. Man he must be the most intelligent being who ever lived

    • @elissitdesign
      @elissitdesign 8 місяців тому +1

      Almost god like? 😂

    • @loosesurfer
      @loosesurfer 8 місяців тому +1

      Sounds like an accident 😂

    • @Routing_for_sanity
      @Routing_for_sanity 8 місяців тому +2

      @@loosesurfer yeah too bad thermodynamic laws debunk that whole big bang idea

    • @stephenzavatski8016
      @stephenzavatski8016 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@Routing_for_sanityso the universe didn't have a beginning, and therefore no creation/creator?

    • @zacharyshort384
      @zacharyshort384 8 місяців тому

      @@stephenzavatski8016 They walked right into that one :D

  • @marcelor.aiello5050
    @marcelor.aiello5050 6 місяців тому

    Congrats for these interviews.!! One can always learn something from smart people

  • @zeadelgaddari2744
    @zeadelgaddari2744 7 місяців тому +4

    Krauss defended Epstein as the financier tried to restore his reputation after his release from jail " I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey. I feel raised by it. " After Epstein's release, krauss took his money to bankroll the origins project at Arizona state university. Epstein on record gave krauss $250,000 nevermind what he gave off record

  • @Reebonics
    @Reebonics 8 місяців тому +2

    Damn Julian, you walked in and just said “fuck my shit up fam” didn’t you? 😂

  • @Whiteshaddow326
    @Whiteshaddow326 8 місяців тому +5

    This guy reminds me of the scientist on The Simpsons

  • @justinphillips1673
    @justinphillips1673 8 місяців тому

    Let's goooo!! I finally caught a video on the day it was dropped!

  • @JML-TruthBelongsToEverybody
    @JML-TruthBelongsToEverybody 8 місяців тому +3

    Dorey is such a mental fly weight and Krause is so 15yrs ago…

  • @skippayless4357
    @skippayless4357 7 місяців тому +2

    1:45:45 Ok, but if there were a hole drilled all the way through the earth, and you dropped a ball into it; at what point does that ball start falling UP? Mr Smarty Pants 😂

  • @SGliderGuy
    @SGliderGuy Місяць тому +3

    Talk to Krause may be a brilliant scientist. However he repeatedly exhibits that he does not have an open mind

    • @adamburling9551
      @adamburling9551 3 дні тому +1

      No he just has a rational mind. He has a strong point.

  • @josephwilson4178
    @josephwilson4178 7 місяців тому

    Found your podcast like 6 months ago enjoyed it and forgot to subscribe. Couldn’t remember the name and was bummed. So stoked it popped up again. Didn’t forget to subscribe this time.

  • @mikescott9012
    @mikescott9012 8 місяців тому +9

    Pretty frosty for a guy who got nailed on sexual misconduct in the workplace.

  • @CaliforniaBushman
    @CaliforniaBushman 8 місяців тому +1

    I'm glad Lawrence is still out there. Being Lawrence. Because he's too smart bot to be.

  • @Skarlett.Rose.Ink.
    @Skarlett.Rose.Ink. 7 місяців тому

    GNGH gets a really bad reputation, but let me sayz those nurses care so incredibly much. I spent many months there with sepsis, and while recovering. I will keep your friend in my prayers, and am happy that he has the wonderful nurses at GNGH taking care of him.

  • @marcosbrown7467
    @marcosbrown7467 8 місяців тому +3

    This dude just sounds like a salty jealous old guy who didn't get selected to help with the math in a movie...

  • @stephenlamley541
    @stephenlamley541 7 місяців тому

    So happy to have subbed yesterday. Seeing isn't believing. Reminded me of one of my favourite quotes believe half of what you see and nothing you hear unless i butchered it. E.a Poe. Just that quote really made me think.

  • @anthonygoodwin3872
    @anthonygoodwin3872 8 місяців тому +7

    Krauss more close minded than Neil degrasse tyson over this topic. Funny.

  • @rebeccadagostino6299
    @rebeccadagostino6299 4 місяці тому

    Its NOT ABOUT THIS INTERVIEW. ITS HOW YOU PRESENT YOURSELF.

  • @rickyfiting1008
    @rickyfiting1008 8 місяців тому +14

    Let me just make a little note to skip this one 👍🏼

    • @babyhairband6491
      @babyhairband6491 8 місяців тому +4

      Head in the sand because the truth hurts… sad.

  • @Whiteshaddow326
    @Whiteshaddow326 8 місяців тому +1

    I respect you, Dori you’re giving this guy a platform everybody needs to be able to speak their voice

  • @nawdawg4300
    @nawdawg4300 8 місяців тому +10

    I'm dissapointed Lawrence so poorly misrepresented the Grusch situation. "Someone who tells congress that they had a friend who's cousin had seen aliens". Its utter nonsense. Grusch had 40+ interviews with people that worked in these programs on these crafts. He had documents and evidence and spent 2 years in closed hearings with congress before doing the televised hearing. Obviously Lawrence is an extremely intelligent guy so I have to believe he simply hasn't looked into Grusch at all and is basing his opinion off of a handful of headlines he's seen. I get that the topic was so fringe and non-sensical that it could be brushed off without doing any actual investigation, but times are changing and that is no longer the case.

    • @darrell6800
      @darrell6800 5 місяців тому +1

      sure... let's see it. You never will.

    • @stevenhetzel6483
      @stevenhetzel6483 5 місяців тому

      Grusch is a hack. You people want to believe so badly you have brooms attached to your hands to brush off the constant debunking of the nonsense.
      "Non human life forms" LOL. So literally anything on this planet that doesn't have a phone attached to their hip? A goat? A cat? A dog? A f*ckin muscrat, a tulip, who knows, that's literally saying nothing.
      I forget what it was, because it happens so obscenely often, but around the time Grusch gave that outlandish nothingburger on TV congress or the gov was doing something wildly corrupt they didn't want you talking about. And again, it happens so often that I can't even remember what it was, I'm sure you could give it a goog, I could care less, aliens aren't gonna save or doom us, we are. End of.

  • @brooklynweaver1
    @brooklynweaver1 Місяць тому

    this is a really cool edifying pod ep JD

  • @rebeccadagostino6299
    @rebeccadagostino6299 5 місяців тому +3

    Denial. !? He KNOWS SO MUCH.? HE KNOWS NOTHING. TRUE KNOWLEDGE IS TO KNOW YOU KNOW NOTHING.

    • @isitme1234
      @isitme1234 4 місяці тому

      Exactly what he said👍🏻