Something Truly Different! - Fjallraven Kajka 75 Backpack - Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 вер 2015
- Support TOGR with Patreon : / togr
Here's a pack that has been in testing for a very long time; the Fjallraven Kajka 75 Backpack. It's unique with a lot of great features but at the same time, it is heavy and expensive.
Find out more now.
...
Check out our web site for more information concerning everything seen on our Channel including reviews, insight into what is coming up and a chance to vote and influence our upcoming overnight adventures.
www.theoutdoorgearreview.com/
....
Come Join Us on Facebook and Twitter:
Facebook:
/ 281509538652229
Twitter: / outdoorgearrev
..... - Наука та технологія
The two buckles on the front are for having the top lid attached there. My friend used the top lid as a camera bag on his chest attached with those buckles on the front :)
🇹🇷
Just sold me on it. I snagged one from Sierra this morning for just under $200 shipped, and it'll be used during a month long trek through Cambodia. Wish me luck!
Great review! Rocking the 85L Kajka myself, such an awesome backpack! Keep up the good work
Great review, very thoughtful and in depth. Good looking pack, I'm going to have to look into them! Thanks!
I've used one of these for a couple of years now - actually the 65L. Before I purchased, I was able to get an extended test of an Osprey Atmos 65 to compare.
I realise this sounds crazy but even though the Kajka weighs more than a kilo (2.5lbs) more, with the same gear packed in, the Osprey felt like the heavier bag.
The range of adjustability on the Kajka is so wide that the carrying efficiency just seems to be much better optimised. Every trekker I've passed who is carrying a Kajka says the same. After two years owning the bag, I'm still amazed at the way it carries.
For me, there are other two features that mark this bag out as the best of the best.
Its definitely robust - very. VERY.
Its also very practical. Use it like a regular top loader OR, unzip the front . When the pack is loaded, there are two bracing bars that run down alongside the long zips and the compression straps connect to them. This means that you compress the whole back very evenly rather than pulling hard on two areas of the bag where the compression straps run - like on lesser bags. The bag holds its shape beautifully but it also gets a great effect without having to put ridiculous amounts of tension on the components.
In Sweden, where they originate, these bags are hardly ever sold as 65L variants. A lot of people are carrying bags in the 100L range. Personally, I think when you have the volume, you fill it and that eventually means extra weight. However, the frame and the adjustment of the carry position are so good, if I really had to carry 100L, I'd be doing it with one of these and not an Osprey or Gregory. Those packs will never match the quality of materials or construction of a Kajka. To me, two things are almost always true... "you get what you pay for" and "buy cheap, buy twice"
You got paid for this comment :) There is no reason why it performs better. Very basic suspension system. People like it because of nice logo and scandinavian origin. That's it!
All right but which one would you pick out of two, this one or an ILBE...? Tanks
We Swedes do like our rucksacks big. It's propably the "If something comes up it's good to have"-mentality we share. :D
Fjällräven Kajka is one of the most popular backpacks in scandinavia, and for a reason. Built almost like a tank. Those buckles on the shoulder straps, are there so you can attach lid from the top of the pack to your chest. Ofcourse you can attach almost any bag there but that's what those are originally for.
Nice review!
🇹🇷
Ps iv had fjallraven viddas go at the crotch after a week .! Stop blowing smoke up their asses .. quality controll is questionable ,
8:00, the buggles on the shoulder straps are used to connect to the top of the bag (Fannypack).
So that you can have the top part in front of you.
Great review of a superb pack. It looks bigger than you are. I also liked your surprise overnight loadout video also reviewing this pack. Thank you for the great reviews.
the mesh inside the sleeping bag compartment is also for carrying a wet sleeping bag as you walk to let it dry out a bit
Thanks for showing this pack! Im thinking about to buy one! By the way, I like the sound of that zippers and of the fabric, sounds robust! Im a long time Fjallraven user and their stuff worth its price, it mostly holds a lifetime!
Ive owned this pack for 5 years now. Bought it while going to South Africa for 9 months, during which a friend borrowed it for 3 months to North/East Africa (Sudan I believe). I've also used it on multi day extrusions here in Canada.
The pack looks no worse for wear. Worth the price. I original bought it for its duffle-bag access and its harness comfortability/adjustability. As well as being able to hand it down to my kids one day.
Not disappointed! The surprise is using the lid as a fanny pack way more often then I thought i would.
All that said, since being in a car accident, I find it hard to hike for prolonged periods of time these days, so this pack is over kill for my short two or three day hikes. So id say only by if you'll actually use and abuse, still no regrets though, as I know i'll have this for decades
Nice pack and great review dude. Going to have to go in and try one. We have a store here that sells tons of fjallraven gear and I swear by it.
hej Luke! Great video as usual, my friend! ! The two buckles in front are to hook the lid to for better weight distribution.
You can also adjust it some how wide the gap between the shoulder straps is with this pack. And the mesh in the lower pocket. That is also meant to be used as wet department. You can set it so that you have the solid lid rolled down and you have the mesh lid just closed. That way you can store there your swimming stuff example, or some other wet items that you don't want to put inside your main compartment to make stuff wet in there. I think they called it wet and dry pocket. Can't keep your sleepingbag there though at the same time.
As always Luke, great review. This pack is on my shortlist for winter outings well above the tree line here in the UK. The other pack is another Nordic offering, the lundhags gnaur 85 which is almost identical but I think may just edge Infront due to the metal buckles used that are much simpler to use with gloves. Keep up the outstanding videos, it's so refreshing to watch reviews from someone who obviously has a great love for the outdoors but more importantly uses the gear so can give a user's view which on a very crowded UA-cam is still a rare thing. Way to many folk that just unbox anything and briefly preview it for fee, having no real clue, interest or first hand experience using it for any period of time.
Did you end up getting the gnaur? If so, how is it holding up so far?
@@cedrics1220 yes i did buy this pack. Off the bat it is much heavier than all my other packs but strangely once loaded up and being carried that notion falls away because it carries a load so well, its so comfortable. Its tough as nails, full of useful features and a bag that I will keep for a very long time as its my go to winter bag.
hey brother love the Vids can't afford none of that stuff lol so nice to be able to watch you do reviews and over night adventures keep it up bro!!
I recently had the chance to try the Kaika backpack for 2 days during a 5 day trek and I loved it! Despite that it is almost 2kgs heavier than my McKinley backpack, carrying all my gear with the Kaika it actually felt like I was carrying 4kg LESS. Incredible! It kind of sucked when I had to switch back to my McKinley. :P
Perfect backpack for all who loves fishing in the wilderness, it may be a heavy pack but to carry lot of weight on youre back as we fishermen do this is the the bestback pack by all means. Tried 2 backpack before I bought this one in 2018, the backpacks i had before was made for long distance hikers and light weight. I usually have 25-30kg (55-66 pounds) in my backpack when hiking for a fishing spot. Kajka has the best comfort when it comes to weight distribution in my opinion, 55 pounds feels lighter on my back with this backpack then other ones I had before
I have had this for a year and I LOVE it! Sure, it has some more base-weight than the crappy backpacks but it is totally fine because of its stability.
One year I carried 12kg in another pack and it felt super heavy. Last year I carried 18kg in this one and it felt so incrediby light! No soreness anywhere and it was incredibly well balanced!
So true. That's what makes the difference between a badpack and a backpack.
Kind regards.
Also the mesh in the sleeping bag compartment can be used to dry clothes whilst on the move with the outer layer left open.
🇹🇷
Hi, I own the Kajka 85 L for some years, love it. You forgot to mention a couple of details about it. The shoulder straps can be adjusted from S-M-L , I use L because I´m a little wide over the shoulders. And the mesh net in the bottom have a job to keep air flowing in when you store wet close in there. Check out the video from Fjällräven (in Swedish) can´t link to it, it´s 2.21 min.
They make great products.
Good video - have a nice day.
Because of this video i went out and perched this bag in black. Man i love it!
TIMBERLANDWOLF 65l or 75l?
Wow, I just looked on their website and it's being listed at a SOLID $400 USD. But from the reviews I've read it's worth every cent! Nice review btw!
Hi Luke - Thanks for the kick-ass review! Just a heads up, those clicky buckles on the shoulder straps that you weren't entirely sure about - they're for attaching the detachable top to the front for weight distribution/easy access.
Nice review! Got the 85L Kajka myself and it's fantastic. The buckles on the shoulder straps are used for connecting to the lid. You can then carry the lid on the front of your torso in case you want to grab something easily or to distribute the weight better. Also, Fjällräven means The Arctic Fox in swedish in case you didn't know. Keep up the good work Luke! /Chris
Chris Redfield i was about to buy a Kajka too but wonder if it is too big for me. I have looked at 75 and 85L. im 179cm how tall are you if i may ask :) :)
I have had this pack for eight years now and have thoroughly "tested" it. Alright, I mean I have used it on trail, thrown it into cars and trains, onto boats and I suppose abused the hell out of it. It has been on multiple flights (I do recommend the flight bag just to avoid conveyor belt tangles) and it still rock solid. I'm not a weight freak, yes it's a little heavy but I value the versatility, adaptability and front opening more. Not even thinking of replacing this anytime soon.
Nice review! It´s a pack worth the extra wight ;-) I for one, love my Kajak. I only wish that the zippers on the sidepockets would. That way you don't have to close a pocket when you need to open the main compartment and vice versa. It seams that you forgot to mention the second opening in the mesh water bottle pockets.
Thanks for sharing!
Wow I absolutely love this pack.
I have just purchased one and it is unbeatable !
Hi Jozef, the two buckles what you mentioned you don't know for what it is, is simple you can buckle the top lead of the rucksack in case you want to use it as a map bag when you are tracking.
Erik
Fjallraven......you get what you pay for.
Good review, thanks for sharing.
Greetings from Germany
Look real Great. Here in chile we have the same brand too. But you know, we live far far away so is real expensive here. We live in the end of the world. Jejeje great review, great backpack. I allways see your videos. Great
Regards from Chile
🇹🇷
En Rusia la mochila se vende muy caro tambien, pero creo que en Chile mas caro. Todos cosas para deporte no tienen tanta calidad como que tan caros son en Chile.
Great rev :) Your logo reminds me the turkish greywolfs :)
Nicely done review. Weight is an issue, but saving ounces / pounds on other gear can make a difference. The most important thing to me is being able to get the weight onto the hips and minimize weight on the shoulders. That's a big deal for post L4/L5 fusion.
Those two buckles is for the top that you can use as a small bag. You can also fasten it on the front to balance the weight.
Yeah, I have the same pack, I hiked it with 28Kg or 61,7 Pound including the Pack and it worked for 14 Days and almost 200km. Okay I drank every day 3 Kg out of it and ate 10Kg during the trip, but it sits so great, it just felt like 20Kg and were so easy to carry and handle, I love that thing, even it is super heavy!
sup luke, love ur channel. you have a lot of informational Info on a lot of outdoor gears. I wanted to know if you prefer the osprey atmos or falljraven packs?
I also love fjällräven and i am from sweden. But the fun of it is that i like osprey, that come from your country, usa
Another great review..as usual...thanks
Im not sure but if im not misstanken i think thoes two buckles onthe loadlifters are for attaching the top lid, or more smaller "bags" thnx for great vids as usually /thumbs up!
I have a pair of fjällräven pants that my mum got 30 years ago and wore them a lot. Now I’m wearing them and taking care with fjällrävens wax and they are in a completely good condition. +they look nice and vintage
It is true - Fjallraven makes top notch stuff that lasts and lasts and lasts. I love my Rucksack n. 21 in medium for day hikes and around town. The G1000 fabric, while it is heavier than nylon, it is bullet proof!
If you are frugal like me, just be patient and watch for sales or specials on the web. If you are lucky to be part of the inheritance class, then by all means buy their gear and you will not be disappointed.
You can use the front shoulder buckle for you top lit fanypack its the same size buckle .
incredible backpack! you can do the pacific rim only if you know how to adjust the straps above the shoulder straps that will make the pack feell a lot lighter
Just in the moment you touch the skin of this ....."Intelligen Lifeform" ;)....,
you know you have to get it !
Thanks & all the best
Hi, the buckles on the shoulder straps are used to fasten the lid, like a kangaroo pouch. I've been thinking that I'm going to make a camerabag that I can fasten to them, for my heavy camera. It's a great pack, too many functions makes it heavy, but great. Regards from Sweden :).
🇹🇷
Nice pack. Like the features and color.
awesome bag. i need an upgrade from my 48l rucksack...guessing its still faring well?
Your review is quite old but still valid! I was out alone in the Swedish mountains hiking for 7 days a couple of weeks ago and during that hike I tested my new FR KAJKA 100L loaded with a weight close to a 30 kg (66 lb). Yes I know, a crazy weight but I prefer to hike with all the equipment that makes my nature experience into something “comfortable”. E.g. even though I’m alone I carry a three-man tent (Hilleberg Nammatj 3 GT) and I usually look out for a nice spot where I can set-up a basecamp and stay there for a couple of days. Disregarding weather or other obstacles, I’m always comfortable. This time I had winds mounting up to 25m/s and snow but disregarding the weather the equipment I carry with me helped me to stay warm, dry and comfortable. E.g. if it’s raining for a couple of days, I can stay in the tent without feeling crammed into a one-man tent. Well to the point, this requires a large backpack and a backpack that is not just extremely robust but also extremely comfortable to carry and this is something that the FR KAJKA really lives up to. The only complaint I have about this backpack are the side pockets. The opening is in the opposite direction to the larger front opening which is a bit of a nuisance. When e.g. you have opened the large opening and you want to access something in the side pockets then everything falls out of the large opening as you need to turn the backpack around (a situation you’re often confronted with when the backpack is laying in the tent).
A little tip, I used the front carry system to carry my camera in a small pouch. I ordered the required fittings directly from Fjällräven. By doing so you also actually achieve a better balance as this setup will act as a counterbalance to the backpack.
By the way, mountain translates to Fjäll (fjall) in Swedish and fjäll is a Swedish term for our “native” northern mountains and Räven means a fox i.e., Fjällräven means “Mountain fox”.
I have been watching you for a while now. Awesome reviews. I am looking for an Expedition backpack for Hunting/Hiking where I can easily carry lots of gear like an Axe, Saw, sleeping bag/tent/shelter. Preferably something that is waterproof. Looking at Fjallraven Kajka 100L Expedition Backpack but still looking. With your current experience what would you recommend? Or what would anyone recommend I look at? If you have time to respond that would be awesome. If not keep up the cool reviews!
Hey bro, awesome video I really like your channel, btw the click clamps on the front of the shoulder straps are to attach the brain (top) to the front for weight distribution.... I mean, how awesome is that :O
hey luke. love your professionally done reviews. I lived in Charlotte for seven years. where in the mountains do you live? Biltmore?
Would yousuggest this pack for someones first pack over a gregory baltro 75
Hey Luke any chance you could post your thoughts comparing this pack to the Arcteryx echo? I guess this is a fair amount larger capacity wise but seems like they do have some similarities as well? Thanks!
The additional buckles are for attaching the toplid on frond for weight.
Question, I am doing the west coast trail this year and I'm looking for a large volume backpack. I'm debating between the keb 72 or this one. You mentioned the weight might be not ideal for hiking the pacific rim. Would you recommend the keb instead?
Thank you!
Great review👍
Ooooooo!!!!!! those scary North Carolina winters!!!!
Hi... If you have to pick one between the ILBE and this one, which one do you prefer and why? Thanks
Will you review the Arc'teryx drypack 70 ?
Beautiful pack. What colour is it? Graphite or Forest Green? Thank you.
would you recomend this backpack as a summer backpack or do you think that this one is way too big for summer?
in the video you said you used the pack in a surprise overnight video you made. i tried looking for it haha but do you mind telling me which one it is. thanks!
I liked this intro the best!
i wish you would review a DG16 by crossfire in Australia, i really like your review style
Hey, nice review ! I have a question, I bought the osprey atmos ag 65 three months ago ... I'm now looking for a winter backpack something durable I was wondering if there is a huge difference in comfort between the osprey and the kajka ? Basically what are the pros and cons between these two backpacks ? Which one has better outer materials ?
Thank you
+Dimitri9501
The outer fabric on the kajka is bombproof. It is also why this pack is much heavier.
For comfort it is hard to tell. Depends on your physical build and preference. what i really like about the kajka are the metal stays in the front panel that opens. Because when you compress the backpack it stays really flat, no matter what gear is inside, or how its packed. Osprey packs use a lot of diagonal compressions cords which can make weird bulges/lump when you don't pack carefully. If you're coming from an atmos, the main difference will be the back ventilation. The kajka uses thick foam, which breathes ok, but not like a mesh back like the atmos.
The atmos is a great modern backpack, really light, well ventilated. The kajka is the opposite, its old skool , bombproof with good support.
IMHO if you have an atmos, you don't need a kajka for the winter. The atmos is a one of the best backpacks out there. But if you ever have to replace it, defenitely check out the kajka!
Good vid. Thanks.
how does the harness feel or fit with 40lb in it? Is the waist belt hold on tight?
You should review Norrøna SynkroFlex 125 & Bergans Alpinist 130. Because im considering one of those and i need my favorite gear reviewer to decide for me xD
Great stuff. Keep it up 👌 +1 for Fjällräven
Few days ago I tried an Osprey 75 and an exped 75. Ok empty the FjallRaven is heavy, but the 3 of them loaded with 12kg the FR is BY FAR the most confortable.
For anyone wondering about whether or not to buy this pack that may be in the same position as I am...
I have been wondering whether or not to buy this pack because I have had people who backpack (who don't own this pack) discourage me from buying it due to its weight. However, upon researching myself, this 75L Kajka pack is only 3.10 pounds heavier than the Baltoro 75 from Gregory. For three pounds of difference you're getting an extremely durable pack that will last much longer than the competition, given its build quality. I've done the grams to ounces to pounds conversions and there isn't enough of a difference in weight between the nylon competition and the Fjallraven g1000 for me to not consider this pack.
+Uriah Graves I don't know anything about Gregory backpacks, but I do know that despite the weight of the Kaika, it actually felt lighter when I carried my gear with the Kaika compared to when I used my McKinley which is 1,7kg/4lb lighter. Incredibly comfortable!
Even though it may feel lighter, you're still carrying the weight and you'll still feel it in your legs at the end of the day. If the lighter backpack really doesn't fit or isn't comfortable enough or the Kajka has features that are worth the weight, then those are valid arguments in my opinion. But you are carrying considerably more weight.
Good review but if you describe winters in North Carolina as harsh, how would you describe winters in the Canadian north?
Great review bomber pack. Thanks luke atb Opal
This video is now 7 years old. Can you comment on how good the pack did hold up? I have often had problems with PU coating that became brittle after a few years.
What kinda shoes do you have? Like the vid thanks!
Awesome pack I'm a big guy 6' 200 lbs I don't think I would want to carry that monster without some kind of support like horses etc.. Fjällräven pronounced fall-raven Swedish lot of history for that company back to the 50's did you pack the kitchen sink lol man that's big.
Thanks a lot!
Awsome review man. Im from Danmark :) Im considering the 75 or 85L, think the 100L will be a bit big for me, but cant decide :) i am 179cm. How tall are you?
First OGR backpack review that did not feature the use of Susie's pillows!
Hi! Have you checked out the new updated Kajka that came earlier this year?
hey Luke you must be british at heart not many call them trouser. love the vids
Hi. Would you say this pack has enough space for 2 days camping inc food etc or would you go for the 100 ltr? Also i like the colour, is that the green or is the gray colour? Thanks
+plumbingoni 2 days ? No problem, any 75L bag will make 2 days, you can prob go for a week with a 75 l without problems.
How do you feel about that access flap being closed with velcro and the flap facing up towards rain etc? I overload my Arcteryx Echo pack quite often so the lid is sitting up on top of the cinched part of the pack. It seems to me like in this situation if you get rain, it's going to go right into the pack.
It's not. It's sealed with zippers running down each side and only sealed with a huge strip of velcro at the top. The velcro is also hidden from the rain by a flap and, unless your pack is overly full, the floating lid. Of course, this shouldn't matter anyway as you should have a dry-pack/backpack liner in your rucksack anyway.
Wait did you say 65L but the title said 75L...which one is it? Btw...love that pack.
How does this compare to the OSPREY and GREGORY 70 L backpacks?
Have you ever looked into frost river packs?
Gr8 gear, EXPENSIVE AS HELL DOUGH😉
the title says 75 and so does the description, but you mention 65 in the video all the time. which is it?
Does the pack have a ThruNite flashlight?
You said 65 but title says 75?
Fred Sausage naaa think its 68,3.. Lol. There is no 70
Hello,can I ask you what are the trousers you are wearing please…
Super cool
Hi Luke. I like your channel. Good job! Just have a question. You mentioned 2 times at the beginning that this Kajka has 65 liter. In the title is written 75 liters. Which number is correct? Thank you for your answer.
Okay, I have found the answer under another your video in comments. It is 75 liter version. I am about to buy the same one. I like it a lot. Very good review Luke! Jozef
+Jozef Kapicak Sorry about the mix up, yes it is the 75 liter version.
- Luke
@@TheOutdoorGearReview You also mixed up the weight in description and video. The 75l is 3.3kg.
Never noticed the Knight Rider sound effect in the intro before.
What colour is your backpack,green or grey
Nice elfquest logo :p
Fjäll (mountain) räv (fox) = arctic fox.........Fjällräven
🇹🇷
What's the difference between the men and women version? Is the hip belt shorter?