If Trinity is not present in the original Bible (as Original as it can ever get), then how come Christianity is solely based on Jesus dying for our sins? Also, where is the Aramaic NT? How is it that the earliest NT is Greek? Jesus never spoke Greek, nor his disciples. Who wrote this Codex? How do u know that person knew Jesus?
@@addechergui5764 yeah but Peter didn't write the Bible(i never knew that he can write in greek if there is a source for this would be great) , the authors are unknown , the oldest Bible copy is in koine Greek ( dead language ) from the 5th century
@@addechergui5764 even the letters that are attributed to him are thought to be forgeries in his name, which discredits the fact that we know anything about his literacy.
Exactly! Jesus never spoke Greek, he spoke Hebrew and Aramaic. So, yes, where is the Aramaic Bible? Where is the Bible according to Jesus? I do not want a Bible from Mathew, Mark, Luke or John. I want the Bible of Jesus himself.
Mount sinai in egypt us not the real mount sinai.... Its just the place where the roman emperor constantin mothers went to visit. The real mount sinai is in Saudia Arabia today.
Yup most probably the 40 years of wondering in the wilderness was wondering throughout Arabia rather than the Sinai. That makes total sense given that Jewish settlement were found all over Arabia such as in Madinah, Yemen, Oman, Bahrain etc. That’s also why some scholars believe that Moses PBUH also visited Mecca to do pilgrimage.
Yes, I also believe it's in Saudi Arabia. (Quran 7:143) And when Moses arrived at Our appointed time and his Lord spoke to him, he said, "My Lord, show me [Yourself] that I may look at You." [ Allah ] said, "You will not see Me, but look at the mountain; if it should remain in place, then you will see Me." But when his Lord appeared to the mountain, He rendered it level, and Moses fell unconscious. And when he awoke, he said, "Exalted are You! I have repented to You, and I am the first of the believers." This is an amazing screenshot I have taken from Google Maps of Mt. Sinai, Saudi Arabia. Link is here: ibb.co/VtRL4m5
@Gary Dalbec The Qur'an is created. It is the speech of God, it's not God. It is revelation, it is the same as God speaking to Moses on Sinai. It is the speech of God transmitted through the angel of revelation, Gabriel, the same angel who communicated to Daniel and Mary.
A singular thing about this manuscript, not mentioned in this video, is that it was discoverd by Constantin von Tischendorf in a trash can of a monastery, indided to make fire. It shows the big love and interest of the monks to their scriptures.
What evidence other than his word do you have for this small fact? Why wait and not burn the book earlier? Did you mention what year this trash was destined for fire?
Mashallah Paul ! You keep on surprising me with knowledge I never even heard of before ! May Allah (SWT) grant you even more knowledge so you can make even more videos ! :D
To @sikeajax Thank you for replying but you didn't exactly answer my question. "What many Christians accept as Scripture was not my point, nor whether you accept it as Scripture. According to your definition of Christian Scripture, it is flawed and not without error. So if that is what you consider Scripture then how do you deal with the errors that have not been identified as such?
@@sikeajax Unlike you, there are MANY Christians who believe that the books in the Bible are the infallible word of GOD. We must respect their beliefs. On the other hand, Numerous reputable Christian Scholars have made analytical studies of the bible and come out with various opinions which were widely published for public enlightenment. All of them are of the opinion that there are many discrepancies contradictions, and outright mistakes between the various books. It has been confirmed that the works are of various authors who have been using pen names, and that none of them is of a real person. As a matter of fact each of the purported name has more than one author included in them and from various Christian eras with an interval of at least 200 yrs. They must have been moreover vsrious changes in the recordings, translations, and interpretations by several Scribes as the language of the Bible must have transformed from the BABYLONIAN BEDOUIN Language of ABRAHAM,ISAAC and JACOB. The HIEROGLYPHICS HEBREW and MEDYAN of MOSES and AARON, and the ARAMAIC of JESUS. There is no doubt that there would even be more than inevitable confusion,mistakes, deliberate additions and deletions by the numerous scribes charged with further translations of the Works into the CLASSICAL, GREEK , ENGLISH and other Modern languages. The QUR'AANon the other hand has been orally recited by MUHAMMAD since he claimed that the Words were brought to him by his God ALLAAWH through the Angel GABRIEL when he was at the age of 40, about 1450 yrs. ago till his death at the age of 63 yrs. The words written the QUR'AAN are the same ones and from his own Arabic mother tongue which is still alive today and still spoken in the City of MECCA where he was born,the City of MEDINA where he died and various parts of the World. He had repeatedly recited the QUR'AAN in prayers, in his sermons and speeches, in War and Peace , in times of hardship and on feast days. All the time he recited these there would be no inconsistency in word or tone. He had discouraged the recording of the QUR'AAN during the time he claimed it was revealed to him, as the Religion was evolving and the rules could be changed by ALLAAWH HIMSELF to ease the rules as days went on. Even then some of his followers did make some scribblings on various materials to aid them in the memorising thereof. Almost all of his followers had during his lifetime memorised various parts of the QUR'AAN as this was mandatory in the conduct of essential prayers. Several hundreds of them had by the time of his death memorised ALL of the QUR'AAN in the very words they heard from MUHAMMAD himself or of those close to him. A few years after MUHAMMAD died several many HAFIDHS were killed in a battle and the UMAR, the Father in Law , and one of the closest companions of MUHAMMAD advised ABUW BAKAR the KHALIFAH at the time, of the need to preserve the QUR'AAN in writing in the case all the remaining Hafidhs died. This was done by ordering the leading Hafidhs including the Scribe to the PROPHET who he had later on in his life allowed to record the revelation, to come together and record faithfully in the same words they had heard from the mouth of MUHAMMAD in his own life time. All these were checked and double checked to ensure that they tallied with the memorisation of others who were present at the time of revelation and those who had heard first hand from MUHAMMAD. All Pieces and patches of the QUR'AAN scribbled on various materials were brought in to aid in the verification of the the faithfulness of the recording These words were all recorded on pages of parchment compiled, bound and preserved in a book form.Then and only then were all the other scribblings and written patches were ordered to be destroyed to prevent future fraud, forgery and malicious confusion. So from the day MUHAMMAD claimed the QUR'AAN was revealed to him up to this day there has been no change in the words spoken THEN and NOW as recorded in any part of the QUR'AAN and from anywhere in the World. All those reciting the QUR'AAN from all corners of the World and from all races have to be reading lettet and word , faithfully in the same Language and tone Muhammad claimed the QUR'AAN was revealed to him 1450 yrs ago and without the slightest of difference. Muslims are bound as an article of faith to believe that that the TORAH , the Book given to MOSES and the TESTAMENT given to JESUS , are the true Books of GOD sent to two Faithful and and Great PROPHETS of GOD. But they also believe that after some time passed there were many changes, additions and deletions made through genuine mistakes or deliberately done by scholars and scribes for attainment Power or worldly gain that have rendered the formally genuine works of GOD into suspect material to be approached only with extreme suspicion and caution at the risk and peril of the loss of their faith.
@@sikeajax you can't trace Jesus line to the prophets he wasn't even from the children of Israel so how can he have a genealogy to the prophets to be from a nation your father has to be from that that nation Jesus didn't have a father so how is he related to the children of israel
Thier is a book called the history of the Coptic church, an ex priest revert talked about it as it speaks about the history of conflict between arious and ethnasio in the early days of the Christian church, do you know anything about this book,and can you provide us with more information about this conflict
it is already written in Greek and one wonders if there is a valid reason for the preeminence of this language in Christianity yet it is clear that Muslims of European origin read the Holy Quran in Arabic when they pray while the Christians of European descent cannot avoid this obligatory passage although Christ (Peace be upon Him) was not of Greek origin and did not speak Greek any more than the other Israelites. historically Christianity is not European therefore it would be more judicious to introduce this Middle Eastern Monotheism into European culture by insisting on the fact that it is a question of massive conversion of subjects to the religious choice of their overlord. this would perhaps help to understand the de-Christianization of the masses that will come centuries later and even the appeals to pre-Christian paganism in these pre-apocalyptic times.
Around 90 CE, the Shepard of Hermas was considered to be a book of revelation by the church, according to EJ Goodspeed and is one of two books found in the CodexSinaiticus, which have not been included in the modern Bible. In it are twelve commandments and the first is: "believe that God is One and that He created all things and organized them, and out of what did not exist made all things to be, and He contains all things but Alone is Himself uncontained. Trust Him therefore and fear Him, and, fearing Him, be self-controlled. Keep this command and you will cast away from yourself all wickedness, put on every virtue of uprightness, and you will live to God if you keep this commandment." Here God is One and He is uncontained, comparatively, the Anglican affirmation of faith (the Nicene Creed) however goes:“I believe in One God, the father almighty, Maker of the heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of his father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made...And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceedeth from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by Prophets...” According to Theodore Zahn in Articles of the Apostolic Creed22 until around 250 CE the article of faith was simply, “I believe in God, the Almighty,” which today is only one element of the Anglican creed. J.R. Harris quoted Aristedes, an early Christian apologist as saying that “theChristian worship in the beginning was more purely monotheistic than that even of the Jews. During the early history of the Christian church there existed a prospering group called the ‘Ebionites.’ On the origin of the term Robert Wilken says that this Hebrew word means ‘poor persons’ and continues to explain that there is no evidence to support the claim of some Christian writers that it is derived from a person called ‘Ebion,’ he highlights:“The origin, history and distinct character of the Ebionites has been subject to intense debate in recent years. It is possible that the Ebionites go back to the earliest period of Christian history, where most Christians were Jews and some continued to observe the Jewish law. If so, they would be the earliest example of a Christian movement within Judaism that was eventually left behind as Christianity adapted to the influx of gentile converts. These Christians eventually became a distinct group that, along with other groups (e.g. the Gnostics) was rejected as heretical by the emerging ‘great’ church. They are sometimes identified with the Minim (heretics) mentioned in the Talmud. The Ebionites were Jews who accepted Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah(Christ) while continuing to maintain their identity as Jews. They cultivated relations with Jews as well as Christians though they were welcomed by neither. They followed the Jewish law, insisting on circumcision, keeping the Sabbath and celebrating the Jewish festivals (Yom Kippur, Passover etc.) and observing the dietary laws (e.g. abstention from pork) and other Jewish customs. They repudiated the apostle Paul because of his denigration of the Jewish law. They saw Jesus as a prophet, an exceptional man in the line of Jewish prophets (as described in Deuteronomy 18: 15) and denied the virgin birth. They justified their way of life by appealing to the example of Jesus’ life. He was circumcised, observed the Sabbath and celebrated the Jewish festivals, and taught that all the precepts of the law should be observed. They celebrated Easter on the same day that the Jews celebrated the Passover, and they held the city of Jerusalem in high esteem.”
Questions to our Christian Friends. 1. Did you now that the Prophet Muhammad was a direct descendant of Abraham through his first-born son Ishmael? 2. Why do you claim that Isaac was the covenant child when: 1) Ishmael is Abraham’s first-born son. 2) Hagar is Abraham’s lawfully wedded wife. 3) The covenant seed will be as numerous as the stars. 4) The covenant seed will be given the land between the Nile and Euphrates Rivers. 5) Ishmael was Abraham’s only son and seed for fourteen years. 6) Circumcision is the symbol of God’s covenant. 7) Ishmael was circumcised with his father on the same day to fulfill the covenant with the flesh of their foreskins? 3. Why do you think the Jewish scribes have claimed that Ishmael and Hagar were banished from their family during the weaning party of Isaac? This would have made Ishmael seventeen years old yet he is presented as an infant in Genesis 21. 4. If Esau was supposed to serve Jacob as his master (Genesis 25:23), then why does the latter trick the former out of his birthright (Genesis 25:31-34)? Why does Jacob pretend to be Esau when speaking to his elderly father (Genesis 27:22-29)? Why does Jacob call Esau his “lord” and himself “servant” (Genesis 32:3-6, 33:1-10)? 5. Did you know that the term “brethren” used in Deuteronomy 18:18 is also used in reference to Arabs in Deuteronomy 2:4, 23:7? Are you aware that the King of Judaea during the time Christ was born, Herod the Great, was an Arab? If The Torah calls Esau the brother of Jacob a “brother,” why do you consider Ishmael the brother of Isaac (the father of both Esau and Jacob) to be a “foreigner?” 6. Why do you claim Isaiah 42 refers to Jesus when he clearly does not fit the profile? The Chosen One must be accepted by Gentiles, in the islands, and by the Kedarites (Arabs). 7. Can I explain to you the person who is prophesied in Isaiah 21:13-17, 29:12, 60:1-22? As you will see, these prophecies fit the Prophet of Islam like a glove. 8. Did you know that Song of Songs 5:10-16 refers to Muhammad? What do you think the Hebrew for “altogether lovely” is? Can you show me the name “Jesus” as being the Jewish Messiah in any of the hundreds of Old Testament messianic prophecies? 9. Why do you believe that Jesus was the “Prince of Peace” prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 when he outright denies this appellation (Matthew 10:34). 10. Did you know that Habakkuk 3:3-7 & Deuteronomy 33:1-2 refer to Muhammad? ( the wilderness of Paran located in the Sinai peninsula and the place where Ishmael settled, is considered to be northern Arabia (Galatians 4:25). Both prophecies do not say that the Holy One will come from the wilderness of Paran, but rather Mount Paran, a mountain found in Arabia).
Some time ago I boarded a Christian Missionary ship, if I remember correctly, called the M.V.DULOS, when she arrived at our port. Her crew comprised of mostly Christian Youths of both sexes who with their teachers sailed around the World giving the Good News while displaying and selling top quality and mostly books unattainable in our part of the World at about the same price they were donated to the charitable organisation concerned. There were books about many subjects, excluding porn ,of course, the majority of them promoting the Christian Creed I was lucky to choose and buy several of them. These included books on American politics and National Interests, enterprises and escapades throughout the ages. When I was choosing a used bound copy of the Original Saint James's Version of the Bible, an elderly Muslim man, in the que behind, nudged me and warned me that it was of a Christian literature and according to him not suitable to me. I just smiled. The lady at the stall urged me to take it. I had already made my mind to anyway. That book was a treasure trove to me and being written in the classical English Language it as a pleasure to read and at the same time I could compare it to the numerous other editions of the Bible which were printed after and monitor the 'amendments' and updates made since then. It is good to learn from you that there is even an earlier and more original copy in existence. Thank you for your effort and generosity. MAY ALLAH GUIDE AND BLESS YOU. AAAMIYN!
Salam paul in this codex Isaiah 29part 12 there is a word if you translated from Greek to English it will pronounce hira...the word in the codex is xipa ....the word is located in the verse that is and the word given to the one who cant read and said I pray you read he said I cant read ..can you find out the accuracy of this argument plz
So the resurrection was only missing from Mark? The others originally had them? Does Mark start to have some discrepancies after 16:8? Do the other gospels (not including Luke) mention HIS resurrection?
@Salafiyyaaa don’t be dissuaded now? What are you saying there? I assume you’re a Muslim, so you believe that a Jewish carpenter just slipped out the game for a millennia or two (without dying) then is to come back to earth to wage war against a modern politician, then establishes justice on earth?? Then has a family, then “dies”, then goes to heaven?? That’s not more far fetched than a man to be resurrected?? Shit even I’ve been resurrected. I don’t know of anyone claiming insignificance to ISA (Jesus), but you are acting like something I said is irrational. Bring forth your evidence. I’ll be waiting... and you ain’t about that fiyyya buddy
@@jasonsanders3930 what's wrong with believing that jesus is coming back in the end times? He has a mission which is to establish justice on earth and rebuke the christians who twisted his words and believed in what others said about him instead of what he said and commanded. Why is this irrational? It seems like you don't like it because it doesn't fit your theology not because it allegedly doesn't make sense.
In the mid-19th century, a German biblical scholar named Constantin von Tischendorf had secured the patronage of Tsar Alexander II of Russia for an official visit to the monastery. He claimed that the monks had given it to him as a "gift" to present to the Tsar, but the monks themselves claim that he had only been allowed to "borrow" it (with the expectation that it would be given back, and since he never did so, he had stolen it.) The Wikipedia article on the Codex Sinaiticus has some more information about this big dispute.
@@BloggingTheology I searched and the main reason I found for this , that the author was not an apostle that’s why it was not canonical. But actually the author had a vision just like Paul so I don’t know why they ignore this vision and accepts Paul’s. it was considered scripture by Patristic authors such as Irenaeus of Lyon,Clement of Alexandria,Origen,and Didymus the Blind. And Irenaeus of Lyons considered By far the greatest anti-heretical writer, the greatest second-century theologian-was St. Irenaeus of Lyons. Irenaeus is sometimes called the father of Catholic theology. www.academia.edu/31768760/The_Shepherd_of_Hermas_in_Recent_Scholarship_on_the_Canon_A_Review_Article
@Gary Dalbec nice that u admit that Jesus can't be God and prays like Muslims and so Christianity is polytheism. But Allah does not pray he praise and blesses his creation.
Muslims will still insist the Gospel of Barnabas is totally legit and has genuine material in it, while insisting that Christians must completely reject as "lies" 2 Peter, Timothy, etc.
@@ConsideringPhlebas I said there might be something in it. And yes, you should reject all lies. Have not not figured out yet that all your religion is based on are outside interference that had nothing to do with christianity?
@@NeoLegendX Ah yes. Those political and power-acquisition ambitions that contaminated the development of Christianity. Unlike Islam of course which from its beginnings was literally an empire and a state.
H. Lincoln, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh in their controversial and critically acclaimed The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail mention an historical text, The Nag Hammadi Scrolls and state that these manuscripts contain a manuscript entitled 'The Treaties of Seth.' Here it is mentioned that Jesus was not crucified even though a crucifixion did take place, Simon of Cyrene was the victim and not Jesus.
Please sir my humble request, make a video on your life, journey to islam, education, family and how you became muslim and interested in comparative religion Also how many books have you read?
@@oussamakoutair2568 his Twitter handle is literally FreeMonotheist , also he didn't say anything that suggest he isn't a Muslim on the contrary ! And i looked up his Twitter account and i didn't find what you said about him .
Quote Wikipedia Earlier occurrences of a Gospel of Barnabas A "Gospel according to Barnabas" is mentioned in two early Christian lists of "Apocrypha" works: the Latin text of Decretum Gelasianum (6th century), as well as a 7th-century Greek List of the Sixty Books. These lists are independent witnesses. (end quote) Is it really conceivable that these two independent lists just imagined the existence of The Gospel of Barnabas? Or more likely they were talking about a real fifth Gospel? Barnabas was the official scribe of Jesus , when I read his gospel more of what Jesus said and did comes across than the conflicting New Testament gospels put together.
Yes, it is really conceivable that these earlier references to the "Gospel of Barnabas" refer to something completely different. There were only so many apostles and other well-known disciples of Jesus named in the New Testament for a forger to choose from. When the number of choices available is limited, it becomes rather probable that two different forgers will independently choose the same biblical person to falsely attribute their work to. In fact, there are two totally separate works known as the "Gospel of Thomas," one of which scholars renamed the "Infancy Gospel of Thomas" just to distinguish it from the gnostic Gospel of Thomas after it was discovered in Egypt in 1945. The internal evidence of the Gospel of Barnabas that exists today is that it was forged in the late Middle Ages or the Renaissance period by someone who was quite familiar with Medieval Catholicism. As Paul said in the video, this is the consensus of all the scholars who have studied this text. Perhaps its author was a Catholic priest or monk who had converted to Islam and wanted to produce a "life of Jesus" similar to the Christian Gospels found in the Bible, except told from an Islamic perspective. If this is true, then he may have had access to works like the Decretum Gelasianum and he scanned through the list to find the name of a lost Gospel of which no traces remained in his day, so that he could use that name for his own book. The "Gospel of Barnabas" would have been a logical choice for him.
@@photios4779 A “... Catholic priest or monk who had converted to Islam...” would also know the terrible punishment that awaits any soul who dares to alter a single word from THE MOST HIGH. There are many people who have published The Gospel of Barnabas in one I remember the preface telling how copies of this Gospel were hunted down in an attempt to wipe it from history. Also proving how the jubilee wasn’t always celebrated every 50 years. Also how Israeli archaeologists had proved that the location of Nazareth had been changed. Also how the grave of Barnabas had been discovered in Cyprus and a copy of his Gospel found within it. Also proof that the tortures and inquisitions were a part of the coverup to delete certain books. Not the first time the controllers of history have robbed future generations of knowledge , the fire in 48BC in Alexandria is just one example. The ridiculous position western historians find themselves in is there was indeed a Gospel of Barnabas at one time but the one we have know is a sixteenth century forgery. Also I suspect the deliberately lengthy time Israel took to release the Qumran texts was to coverup certain truths...easy if you have fragments already falling apart. The 1500 year old copy scientifically dated and requested by the Vatican from Turkey is proof of this gospel predating Islam.
Sinaiticus*, not "Siniaticus" Additionally, it is not "the oldest". The Codex Vaticanus is just as old as the Codex Sinaiticus. Together, they are the two oldest complete codices.
. HOW WOULD EXPLAIN THE 1600 YEAR OLD BIBLE FOUND IN TURKEY WHICH CONTAINS GOSPEL OF ST BARNABAS IN TACT, MENTIONING THE FORTHCOMING OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD BY NAME ? .
There are some statements in Christianity whenever I heard those it makes me Laughing😂🤣😅. For example- God came and died on the cross for our sins. It makes me crazy. →The father is God the son is god and the ghost is god, but there is not three god but one god. → The father is a person the son is a person and the holy Ghost is a person but there is no three person but one person. 🤔🤔🤔😵😵😵. 1+1+1=1 When god died for your sins it means you are sinful people and still you are doing sin.
Be humble and thankful brother , we are lucky to be Muslims but we will be tested and judged , maybe even harsher than someone who never heard of Islam before . But yeah basically Christianity is so confusing and God is not the author of confusion
St. Paul built the castle of Christianity with the bricks of lies and today Mr Paul exposing the falsehood and those bricks could not withstand the onslaught of force and pressure of Truth but to crumble. Those who doubt the adage, “Truth Triumphs” this is a classic example to ....
@Shalom Shalom In Hebrew bible it clearly states Mohamedim. As for Barnabas, there are different explanations of the meaning of that title given to Joseph, a Cypriot Jew who obviously stood out for his piety.
@Shalom Shalom Mohamedim can be replaced by the word “Mohammad” and the description of the sentence will remain unchanged, because the only known description of Prophet Muhammad matches the description of the song word for word.
No Barnabas was never a disciples of Jesus but he was an apostle. He was a jewish Levite who converted to Christianity and performed a great deed of donating all the money he got from selling land to the church in a time of need because he was led by the HOLY SPIRIT. He later became a fellow companion of Paul where they were both members and teachers in the Antioch Church before the prophets from Jerusalem came and by the inspiration of GOD prophesied and said "set aside for me Paul and Barnabas for the work of the ministry" thus began their apostolic work together. The gospel of Barnabas is a fake book whereas the epistle is authentic for several reasons one being that in the epistle he likened JESUS to many sacrificial and atoning elements in the old testament such as the red heifer. This epistle is quite similar to the book of Hebrews hence the reason why many believe he was the author of Hebrews. His works were similar to those of Paul. They both proclaimed JESUS as the son of GOD and the great high priest for all mankind because he alone is the perfect man, perfect sacrifice, and needs no form of cleansing before ministering on our behalf to the Father. ✝️✝️ c
@@RodriguesPaul360 It would be a nice topic to discuss, but this is not the circle for it. Theology and Abrahamic religions is a large topic already. Muslims don't recognise Israel and Muslims believe that Jesus with his Armies shall destroy that disease along with its Anti-Christ. Obviously, there are hypocrites amongst Muslims who have become turncoats.
No it's not. I've studied this intensely it was written by a scholar and scholar A coping it into English said it was the oldest. The other was able to provide proof that he wrote it. Hence it's not old.
From what I've read, scholars date both manuscripts to the fourth century CE. Vaticanus is dated to the first half of this century and Sinaiticus to between roughly 325 and 370. So Vaticanus might be slightly older, but only by a few decades at most. For all practical intents and purposes, these two manuscripts are regarded as being contemporaries.
Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. When the LORD shall stretch out his hand, both he that helpeth shall fall, and he that is holpen shall fall down, and they all shall fail together.
The three monotheistic religions--Judaism,Christianity,and Islam-all purport to share one fundamental concept:belief in God as the Supreme Being,the Creator and Sustainer of the Universe.Knownas“Tawhid”in Islam,this concept of Oneness of God was stressed by Moses in the Biblical passage Known as the“Shema,”or the Jewish creed of faith:“Hear,O Israel The Lord our God is one Lord”(Deuteronomy6:4) It was repeated word-for word approximately 1500 years later by Jesus when he said“...The first of all the commandments is,Hear,O Israel;the Lord ou God is one Lord.”(Mark12:29) Muhammad came along approximately 600 years later,bringing the same message again:“And you God is One God:there is no God but He”(TheQur'an,al-Bakarah(2):163.
When experts say manuscripts were lost through copying and copying, it gives the impression that a scroll lasts a generation before it evaporates and so the scribes are in a hurry to copy and copy and so they make mistakes. Bart Ehrman has made a carrier out of saying, with his scholars hubris, "they made mistakes", and, ergo, "we have no original manuscripts", because they made mistake etc. So all those copies, a hundred a century until we get to the fourth century! However, a dose of critical thinking leads me to think the Codex Siniaticus was on a book shelf for 1600 years, in perfect condition, in that monastery. And it was written only 300 years after Jesus. So how are the experts so sure that the very original manuscripts were not around by the fourth century? After all, we have ancient books in perfect condition around today. Even the Didache was found sat on a shelf in pristine condition! So maybe the Codex siniaticus is copied from the original manuscript. Surely this isn't stretching anyone's thinking!
Jesus sopke to his people in Aramaic. But the sad thing is his teachings were written in Greek and later translated into Aramaic. Strange. No one knows exactly what words Jesus used.
@Muhammad Hak🗡m 🏴 Your Quran seems to suggest that. It calls the book Isa received as the Injil. Do you know where the word Injil comes from? It comes from a Greek word for gospel through Syriac.
Are there Christians who claim the Bible is Eternal ? ...." not one dot, not one letter has been changed "....dont think so. You seem to hold the Bible to a higher standard of criticism than the koran.
Hmmm... Let me think. I'm sure there was a Christian once who said something like that. What was his name? Oh yeah... Jesus! "For I assure you and most solemnly say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke of the pen will pass away from the Law until all things are accomplished." Matthew 5 : 18. Since "all things" won't be accomplished until (as he says) heaven and earth pass away - meaning the end of the world - this sounds very much like a doctrine of eternal preservation to me. But thanks for playing buddy!
@@alanbishopman Yeshua of Nazareth was not a Christian, He was a Jew. And your interpretation of scripture is flawed. You seem to have ignored the part where He said " until all things are accomplished" . Which the Church interprets as the New Covenant. .....There is no need to be condescending. Thanks for reading.
@@zellak-pr7pu I clearly and unequivocally highlighted the fact that Jesus refers to the accomplishment of all things. I did not shy away from it. This OBVIOUSLY means the end of the world. The whole passage in Matthew is introduced by the phrase "until heaven and earth pass away." That's when all things will be accomplished. Not before. If you're saying that all things were accomplished at the institution of the New Covenant, then I must humbly point out that heaven and earth quite clearly did not pass away at that time. Furthermore, the founder of the new covenant counts as much or more than any member of the New covenant, so we can't dismiss my quotation because Jesus wasn't "Christian". Jesus clearly believed that the words of scripture would be fully preserved without change until the very end of the world. If you think there's something wrong with that doctrine, your disagreement is with your Lord and Savior, not me. But, just so there's no confusion, here are few more gems, for good measure: "Jesus was conscious of the fact that the words of Scripture were preserved without error. He was also conscious of the fact that the very letters and even the small jots under the letters were preserved without error." Turner, Charles V. Biblical Bible Translating. Sovereign Grace Pub. 2001, p. 55 "... but this Book, from age to age, hath remained, and will remain unremoved in full and ample manner, as it was written at the first. But who kept and preserved it from such great and raging power? or, who defendeth it still? Truly, no human creature, but only God himself, who is the right Master thereof. And it is a great wonder that it hath been so long kept and preserved, for the devil and the world are great enemies unto it." Martin Luther, Colloquia of 1541, reprinted in "Familiar Discourses of Dr. Martin Luther" Sussex Press: London, Chapter 1 Tablet VI, p. 2 "... as for what is asserted, namely, that there hath the same fate attended the Scripture in its transcription as hath done other books of antiquity; let me say without offence, this imagination, seems to me to border on atheism. Surely the promise of God for the preservation of his word, with his love and care of his church, of whose faith and obedience that word of his is the only rule, requires other thoughts at our hands. We add that the whole scripture entire, as given out from God, without any loss, is preserved in the Copies of the Originals yet remaining." John Owen, Of the Divine Original and Power of the Scriptures. p. 173 "Have the original texts of the Old and New Testaments come down to us pure and uncorrupted? Indeed. We affirm as much against the papists." Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology vol. 1, p. 106 "The Old Testament in Hebrew, and the New Testament in Greek, being immediately inspired by God, and, by His singular care and providence, kept pure in all ages, are therefore authentical; so as, in all controversies of religion, the Church is finally to appeal unto them. " Westminster Confession of Faith 1.8
Like how you leave archeologically evidence out. Making the Bible look like it’s full of lies. When the Bible is archeologically correct on location and dates of certain event that occurred. What about the mesha stone?
This guy proves that Codex Sinaiticus is fake. Watch this video: ua-cam.com/video/OVjOhDJ5HKo/v-deo.html And watch some of his videos in regards to the Codex.
This 'fake'Codex Sinaiticus is one of the two old Bibles used as the basis for producing the modern Bible. ""The Codex Sinaiticus Bible manuscript has been instrumental in producing almost every modern Bible translation in many languages around the world since 1881. .."" - www.alittleperspective.com/history-of-the-preservation-of-the-biblical-text/
@@letmetalk2240 The codex was found in a trash can. It's logical to find that in the trash can coz there are many errors in Codex Sinaiticus. So it's not valuable.
@@letmetalk2240 old? The same guy in the video whose link I included also discusses the "oldest" codex. Is it really old? You just explore his channel about the codex.
@@vivliforia2262 Whether or not it contained many errors, the interesting part is it "has been instrumental in producing almost every modern Bible translation in many languages around the world since 1881""" in the Christendom. This is the problem when you don't have the original.
brothers we are come from darkness womb and go to darkness grave. We are not created by chance, even the eyelashes of the upper eye are curved up and the bottom is bent down. God said in the Qur’an, you think, but we created you in vain and that you do not return to us. God will return us with fingerprints. Read the Qur’an and read the Bible
Keep digging. More proof that the Greek is a translation. If you want the original then study the Aramaic Peshitta. Referenced right back to antiquity even if extant copies from then are lost. Oh and Mt Sinai is not in Egypt, it is Jabal al- Lawz in Saudi. Any serious researcher will agree. It’s covered in almond trees to this day, some thousands of years old.
It is a good thing the epistle of Barnabas did not make it into the Christian ‘scriptures.’ It is very anti Jewish. Even more so than the gospel of John. This is from that document: [Now, wherefore did Moses say, You shall not eat the swine, nor the eagle, nor the hawk, nor the raven, nor any fish which is not possessed of scales? He embraced three doctrines in his mind [in doing so]. Moreover, the Lord says to them in Deuteronomy, And I will establish my ordinances among this people. Deuteronomy 4:1 Is there then not a command of God they should not eat [these things]? There is, but Moses spoke with a spiritual reference. For this reason he named the swine, as much as to say, You shall not join yourself to men who resemble swine. For when they live in pleasure, they forget their Lord; but when they come to want, they acknowledge the Lord. And [in like manner] the swine, when it has eaten, does not recognize its master; but when hungry it cries out, and on receiving food is quiet again.] The Jews, according to this author, miss-understood the prohibition by Moses against eating swine meat. It was spiritual and not literal.
Let me correct some of your "misinformation" Mr... 1:18 The pre-eminent Aleph you claimed is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, originally in fact is the first letter of the Arabic alphabet which is the mother language with more than 4400 old -at least- of notarized historical scripts that it was found in Sinai.. A simple proof for Arabic is the mother language of them all, It's aggregating more than 2.600.000 term, and the scalar value of its 28 letters is totally 1000, that's a clear presentation of perfection.. In the other hand, the Hebrew scalar value of its letters is totally 400 only, and that's limitedly weak.. Therefore, Arabic wasn't vainly chosen as a strong instrument from Allah as his final message to humanity. And obviously that's why the western world tried and still trying to falsify dumbly that historical truth, and fought very hard to kill it.
Hebrews, or rather Jewish scholars won't admit this. But they use the Arabic to find roots within their language. I swear, these people barely preserved what they were given.
@@Dani-zg7fr A scalar value of the letter Aleph in Arabic is 1 as it's the first, the second is Ba'e with a s.v of 2 and so on until we reach ka'af which is the eleventh letter with a s.c of 20... more clearly it looks like this : أ=1 ، ب=2 ، ج=3 ، د=4 ، ه=5 ، و=6 ، ز=7 ، ح=8 ، ط=9 . ي=10 ، ك=20 ، ل=30 ، م=40 ، ن=50 ، س=60 ، ع=70 ، ف=80 ، ص=90 . ق=100 ، ر=200 ، ش=300 ، ت=400 ، ث=500 ، خ=600 ، ذ=700 ، ض=800 ، ظ=900 . غ=1000
If Trinity is not present in the original Bible (as Original as it can ever get), then how come Christianity is solely based on Jesus dying for our sins?
Also, where is the Aramaic NT? How is it that the earliest NT is Greek? Jesus never spoke Greek, nor his disciples. Who wrote this Codex? How do u know that person knew Jesus?
Gospels wrote not by the witnesses nor diciples of Jesus. Paul did not live in time of Jesus either. It's clearly stated in Luke 1:1-4.
Actually some of his apostles did know how to speak and write in greek, such as Peter. But i get your point :)
@@addechergui5764 yeah but Peter didn't write the Bible(i never knew that he can write in greek if there is a source for this would be great) , the authors are unknown , the oldest Bible copy is in koine Greek ( dead language ) from the 5th century
@@addechergui5764 even the letters that are attributed to him are thought to be forgeries in his name, which discredits the fact that we know anything about his literacy.
Exactly!
Jesus never spoke Greek, he spoke Hebrew and Aramaic. So, yes, where is the Aramaic Bible? Where is the Bible according to Jesus? I do not want a Bible from Mathew, Mark, Luke or John. I want the Bible of Jesus himself.
Mount sinai in egypt us not the real mount sinai.... Its just the place where the roman emperor constantin mothers went to visit.
The real mount sinai is in Saudia Arabia today.
And even the false apostle Paul knew this back in the 1st century, giving strong merit to it even from the Christian side.
Galatians 1:17, 4:25
Yup most probably the 40 years of wondering in the wilderness was wondering throughout Arabia rather than the Sinai. That makes total sense given that Jewish settlement were found all over Arabia such as in Madinah, Yemen, Oman, Bahrain etc. That’s also why some scholars believe that Moses PBUH also visited Mecca to do pilgrimage.
Yes, I also believe it's in Saudi Arabia.
(Quran 7:143)
And when Moses arrived at Our appointed time and his Lord spoke to him, he said, "My Lord, show me [Yourself] that I may look at You." [ Allah ] said, "You will not see Me, but look at the mountain; if it should remain in place, then you will see Me." But when his Lord appeared to the mountain, He rendered it level, and Moses fell unconscious. And when he awoke, he said, "Exalted are You! I have repented to You, and I am the first of the believers."
This is an amazing screenshot I have taken from Google Maps of Mt. Sinai, Saudi Arabia.
Link is here: ibb.co/VtRL4m5
@Gary Dalbec The Qur'an is created. It is the speech of God, it's not God. It is revelation, it is the same as God speaking to Moses on Sinai.
It is the speech of God transmitted through the angel of revelation, Gabriel, the same angel who communicated to Daniel and Mary.
@Gary Dalbec Jesus is created.
جزاك الله خيراً. ننتظر الحلقة القادمة 👍🏻
Thank you Paul for the invaluable work.
Glad it was helpful!
Assalam Alaikum
Br. Paul, Have you read the Asatir Samaritan (secrets of Moses)? I think it mentions Mecca in the 4th chapter 262nd verse.
A singular thing about this manuscript, not mentioned in this video, is that it was discoverd by Constantin von Tischendorf in a trash can of a monastery, indided to make fire.
It shows the big love and interest of the monks to their scriptures.
What evidence other than his word do you have for this small fact? Why wait and not burn the book earlier? Did you mention what year this trash was destined for fire?
Thank you brother Paul for your most valuable info.
Absolutely fascinating! Thankyou for sharing.
I can't thank you enough...thank you so much for these awesome topics ❤🙏😊
Glad you like them!
Now that is what i call a good youtube content 👏 👌
Its like a 2,000 year old movie called "Lost in Translation"
Excellent topic. Keep it up. Humanity is missing such knowledge!
@Gary Dalbec Jesus is created
Mashallah Paul ! You keep on surprising me with knowledge I never even heard of before ! May Allah (SWT) grant you even more knowledge so you can make even more videos ! :D
Great video Paul. Where can one get the booklet on the Codex Sinaiticus? Can it be ordered online?
Very informative & easy to understand. Great work Brother Paul. You are doing something wonderful.
Peace be with you, love your content, keep it up
Y am I seeing this gentleman jus now SubhanAllah brilliant, I like things to make sense and he makes it easy may Allah Grant you Janah inshaAllah
May Allah reward you for creating these bridges among the people of faith. Ameen.
Are you an actual mufti?
I personally don't feel like the Sinai of the Bible is the Sinai Peninsula.
Even Paul (the self-claimed 'apostle') didn't think so either, in Galatians 1:17 and 4:25, he designates Sinai to Arabia, literally.
Love your channel .. I am a Muslim always wanted to learn Christianity through Islamic lens and you do an excellent job ....
You sir, are shaking the very foundations of xtianity. 😎👌Keep it up Akhi
Is it me or is Christianity really confusing?! I thought I knew it but now this...my mind has been blown once more Paul 😂
To @sikeajax
So what do you make of the errors and issues with the Bible? How do you conclude what is from God and what is an error?
To @sikeajax
Thank you for replying but you didn't exactly answer my question. "What many Christians accept as Scripture was not my point, nor whether you accept it as Scripture.
According to your definition of Christian Scripture, it is flawed and not without error. So if that is what you consider Scripture then how do you deal with the errors that have not been identified as such?
@@sikeajax
Unlike you, there
are MANY
Christians who believe that the books
in the Bible are
the infallible word of
GOD. We must respect their beliefs.
On the other hand, Numerous reputable Christian Scholars have made analytical studies of the bible and come
out with various
opinions which were
widely published for
public enlightenment.
All of them are of the
opinion that there are
many discrepancies contradictions,
and outright
mistakes between the various books.
It has been confirmed
that the works are of
various authors who
have been using pen
names, and that none
of them is of a real person.
As a matter of fact
each of the purported name has more than one author included
in them and
from various Christian
eras with an interval
of at least 200 yrs.
They must have been moreover vsrious changes in the
recordings, translations, and
interpretations by
several Scribes as
the language of the
Bible must have
transformed from
the BABYLONIAN
BEDOUIN Language
of ABRAHAM,ISAAC and JACOB. The HIEROGLYPHICS
HEBREW and MEDYAN of MOSES
and AARON, and
the ARAMAIC of
JESUS. There is
no doubt that there
would even be more than inevitable confusion,mistakes, deliberate additions and deletions by the
numerous scribes
charged with further
translations of the Works into the
CLASSICAL, GREEK ,
ENGLISH and other
Modern languages.
The QUR'AANon the other hand has
been orally recited by
MUHAMMAD since
he claimed that the
Words were brought
to him by his God
ALLAAWH through
the Angel GABRIEL
when he was at the
age of 40, about
1450 yrs. ago till
his death at the age
of 63 yrs.
The words written the QUR'AAN are the same ones and
from his own
Arabic mother
tongue which is
still alive today and
still spoken in the City of MECCA
where he was born,the City of
MEDINA where he
died and various parts
of the World.
He had repeatedly
recited the QUR'AAN in prayers, in his
sermons and speeches, in War
and Peace , in
times of hardship
and on feast days.
All the time he
recited these there
would be no inconsistency in
word or tone.
He had discouraged the recording of the
QUR'AAN during the
time he claimed it was revealed to him,
as the Religion was
evolving and the rules
could be changed
by ALLAAWH HIMSELF to ease the
rules as days went on.
Even then some of his followers did make some scribblings on
various materials to
aid them in the
memorising thereof.
Almost all of his
followers had during
his lifetime memorised various
parts of the QUR'AAN
as this was mandatory in the conduct of essential prayers. Several
hundreds of them had by the time of his death memorised
ALL of the QUR'AAN in the very words
they heard from
MUHAMMAD
himself or of those
close to him.
A few years after
MUHAMMAD died
several many HAFIDHS were killed
in a battle and the
UMAR, the Father in
Law , and one of the
closest companions
of MUHAMMAD advised ABUW BAKAR the KHALIFAH at the
time, of the need to
preserve the QUR'AAN
in writing in the case all the remaining
Hafidhs died.
This was done
by ordering the
leading Hafidhs
including the Scribe to
the PROPHET who he had later on in his life
allowed to record the revelation, to come together and
record faithfully in the same words they had
heard from the mouth
of MUHAMMAD in his
own life time. All these were checked and double checked to ensure that they
tallied with the
memorisation of
others who were
present at the
time of revelation and
those who had heard first hand from MUHAMMAD. All
Pieces and patches of the QUR'AAN scribbled on various materials were brought in to aid in
the verification of the
the faithfulness of
the recording
These words were all recorded on pages of parchment
compiled, bound and preserved in a book
form.Then and only then were all the other
scribblings and written patches were
ordered to be destroyed to prevent
future fraud, forgery and malicious confusion.
So from the day
MUHAMMAD claimed
the QUR'AAN was
revealed to him
up to this day there has been no change in the words spoken
THEN and NOW as
recorded in
any part of the
QUR'AAN and from anywhere in the
World.
All those reciting
the QUR'AAN from all corners of the World
and from all races have to be reading lettet and word , faithfully in the same Language and
tone Muhammad claimed the QUR'AAN
was revealed to him
1450 yrs ago and without the slightest of difference.
Muslims are bound as an article of faith to believe that that the
TORAH , the Book
given to MOSES and
the TESTAMENT given to JESUS , are the true
Books of GOD sent
to two Faithful and and Great PROPHETS of GOD.
But they also believe that after some time passed there were
many changes,
additions and
deletions made through genuine mistakes or deliberately done
by scholars and scribes for attainment
Power or worldly gain that have rendered the formally genuine works of GOD into suspect material to be
approached only with
extreme suspicion and caution at the
risk and peril of the
loss of their faith.
That's why were all becoming Muslim
@@sikeajax you can't trace Jesus line to the prophets he wasn't even from the children of Israel so how can he have a genealogy to the prophets to be from a nation your father has to be from that that nation Jesus didn't have a father so how is he related to the children of israel
Paul was the crucifixion verse presented in the oldest manuscripts of Gospels? Or it didn't existed?
Brother you are doing the best. God bless you. You are very brilliant bro.
Thank you so much 😀
Be sure to make more appearances on kalamology
What about the crucifixion is this also omitted from this text?
May I ask, were there twelve Apostles or thirteen.
Where can I find the correct translation of codex Sinaiticus?
Thier is a book called the history of the Coptic church, an ex priest revert talked about it as it speaks about the history of conflict between arious and ethnasio in the early days of the Christian church, do you know anything about this book,and can you provide us with more information about this conflict
Hi Paul, Have you read Jesus after 2000 years by Gerd ludeman?
nope not yet
it is already written in Greek and one wonders if there is a valid reason for the preeminence of this language in Christianity yet it is clear that Muslims of European origin read the Holy Quran in Arabic when they pray while the Christians of European descent cannot avoid this obligatory passage although Christ (Peace be upon Him) was not of Greek origin and did not speak Greek any more than the other Israelites.
historically Christianity is not European therefore it would be more judicious to introduce this Middle Eastern Monotheism into European culture by insisting on the fact that it is a question of massive conversion of subjects to the religious choice of their overlord.
this would perhaps help to understand the de-Christianization of the masses that will come centuries later and even the appeals to pre-Christian paganism in these pre-apocalyptic times.
@Gary Dalbec the most common meaning is "inhabitant" of Nazareth (Nassiria).
@Gary Dalbec are you a "recentist"?
Master paul.. clould you mind to give this vidio the english subtilte... Because of my english weak iam afraid if i miss understanding your main point
Around 90 CE, the Shepard of Hermas was considered to be a book of revelation by the church, according to EJ Goodspeed and is one of two books found in the CodexSinaiticus, which have not been included in the modern Bible. In it are twelve commandments and the first is: "believe that God is One and that He created all things and organized them, and out of what did not exist made all things to be, and He contains all things but Alone is Himself uncontained. Trust Him therefore and fear Him, and, fearing Him, be self-controlled. Keep this command and you will cast away from yourself all wickedness, put on every virtue of uprightness, and you will live to God if you keep this commandment."
Here God is One and He is uncontained, comparatively, the Anglican affirmation of faith (the Nicene Creed) however goes:“I believe in One God, the father almighty, Maker of the heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of his father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made...And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceedeth from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by Prophets...”
According to Theodore Zahn in Articles of the Apostolic Creed22 until around 250 CE the article of faith was simply, “I believe in God, the Almighty,” which today is only one element of the Anglican creed. J.R. Harris quoted Aristedes, an early Christian apologist as saying that “theChristian worship in the beginning was more purely monotheistic than that even of the Jews.
During the early history of the Christian church there existed a prospering group called the ‘Ebionites.’ On the origin of the term Robert Wilken says that this Hebrew word means ‘poor persons’ and continues to explain that there is no evidence to support the claim of some Christian writers that it is derived from a person called ‘Ebion,’ he highlights:“The origin, history and distinct character of the Ebionites has been subject to intense debate in recent years. It is possible that the Ebionites go back to the earliest period of Christian history, where most Christians were Jews and some continued to observe the Jewish law. If so, they would be the earliest example of a Christian movement within Judaism that was eventually left behind as Christianity adapted to the influx of gentile converts. These Christians eventually became a distinct group that, along with other groups (e.g. the Gnostics) was rejected as heretical by the emerging ‘great’ church. They are sometimes identified with the Minim (heretics) mentioned in the Talmud. The Ebionites were Jews who accepted Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah(Christ) while continuing to maintain their identity as Jews. They cultivated relations with Jews as well as Christians though they were welcomed by neither. They followed the Jewish law, insisting on circumcision, keeping the Sabbath and celebrating the Jewish festivals (Yom Kippur, Passover etc.) and observing the dietary laws (e.g. abstention from pork) and other Jewish customs. They repudiated the apostle Paul because of his denigration of the Jewish law. They saw Jesus as a prophet, an exceptional man in the line of Jewish prophets (as described in Deuteronomy 18: 15) and denied the virgin birth. They justified their way of life by appealing to the example of Jesus’ life. He was circumcised, observed the Sabbath and celebrated the Jewish festivals, and taught that all the precepts of the law should be observed. They celebrated Easter on the same day that the Jews celebrated the Passover, and they held the city of Jerusalem in high esteem.”
Keep going Paul.
So much thanks. I would like to so one grows in knowledge with you.
Questions to our Christian Friends.
1. Did you now that the Prophet Muhammad was a
direct descendant of Abraham through his first-born
son Ishmael?
2. Why do you claim that Isaac was the covenant child
when: 1) Ishmael is Abraham’s first-born son. 2)
Hagar is Abraham’s lawfully wedded wife. 3) The
covenant seed will be as numerous as the stars. 4)
The covenant seed will be given the land between
the Nile and Euphrates Rivers. 5) Ishmael was
Abraham’s only son and seed for fourteen years. 6)
Circumcision is the symbol of God’s covenant. 7)
Ishmael was circumcised with his father on the same
day to fulfill the covenant with the flesh of their
foreskins?
3. Why do you think the Jewish scribes have claimed
that Ishmael and Hagar were banished from their
family during the weaning party of Isaac? This
would have made Ishmael seventeen years old yet he
is presented as an infant in Genesis 21.
4. If Esau was supposed to serve Jacob as his master
(Genesis 25:23), then why does the latter trick the
former out of his birthright (Genesis 25:31-34)?
Why does Jacob pretend to be Esau when speaking
to his elderly father (Genesis 27:22-29)? Why does
Jacob call Esau his “lord” and himself “servant”
(Genesis 32:3-6, 33:1-10)?
5. Did you know that the term “brethren” used in
Deuteronomy 18:18 is also used in reference to
Arabs in Deuteronomy 2:4, 23:7? Are you aware
that the King of Judaea during the time Christ was
born, Herod the Great, was an Arab? If The Torah
calls Esau the brother of Jacob a “brother,” why do
you consider Ishmael the brother of Isaac (the father
of both Esau and Jacob) to be a “foreigner?”
6. Why do you claim Isaiah 42 refers to Jesus when he
clearly does not fit the profile? The Chosen One
must be accepted by Gentiles, in the islands, and by
the Kedarites (Arabs).
7. Can I explain to you the person who is prophesied in
Isaiah 21:13-17, 29:12, 60:1-22? As you will see,
these prophecies fit the Prophet of Islam like a
glove.
8. Did you know that Song of Songs 5:10-16 refers to
Muhammad? What do you think the Hebrew for
“altogether lovely” is? Can you show me the name
“Jesus” as being the Jewish Messiah in any of the
hundreds of Old Testament messianic prophecies?
9. Why do you believe that Jesus was the “Prince of
Peace” prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 when he outright
denies this appellation (Matthew 10:34).
10. Did you know that Habakkuk 3:3-7 & Deuteronomy
33:1-2 refer to Muhammad? ( the
wilderness of Paran located in the Sinai peninsula
and the place where Ishmael settled, is considered to
be northern Arabia (Galatians 4:25). Both
prophecies do not say that the Holy One will come
from the wilderness of Paran, but rather Mount
Paran, a mountain found in Arabia).
Thank you brother
Maybe Paul can do a video on the location of Mount Sinai based on historical text.
the site of St Catherine is designated to be the location of mt Sinai because of a dream vision seen by Constantine's mother
Like Mother like
Son.
A dream of a family!
Some time ago
I boarded a Christian
Missionary ship, if I
remember correctly,
called the M.V.DULOS,
when she arrived at
our port.
Her crew
comprised of mostly
Christian Youths of
both sexes who
with their teachers
sailed around the
World giving the
Good News while
displaying and selling top quality and mostly
books unattainable
in our part of the
World at about the same price
they were donated
to the charitable
organisation
concerned.
There were books
about many subjects,
excluding porn ,of
course, the majority of them promoting the Christian Creed
I was lucky to
choose and buy several of them. These included books on American politics
and National
Interests, enterprises
and escapades
throughout the ages.
When I was
choosing a used
bound copy of
the Original Saint
James's Version
of the Bible,
an elderly Muslim
man, in the que
behind, nudged
me and warned me
that it was of a
Christian literature
and according to him
not suitable to me.
I just smiled. The
lady at the stall
urged me to take it.
I had already made my mind to anyway.
That book was
a treasure trove to me
and being written in the classical
English Language it
as a pleasure to read and at the same time I could compare it
to the numerous other
editions of the Bible
which were printed
after and monitor
the 'amendments'
and updates made since then.
It is good to learn
from you that there is even an earlier
and more original
copy in existence.
Thank you for
your effort and
generosity.
MAY ALLAH
GUIDE AND BLESS YOU.
AAAMIYN!
I got a chance purchase books from Doulos 32 years ago but they were mostly on secular topics
There is a criticism to quran. Some christians says quran confused Marys. Would you make a video on this?
more I watch, the more I learn . ur big fan from malaysia 🇲🇾 god bless u
Thanks for watching!
Another fan n admirer from Malaysia. Where is your library located in Englsnd.?? Like to visit n browse over some books
Where can I buy codex saniticus ?
It is available online.
Can you please make a video on the Quran narrative of Joseph (King) and Moses (Pharoah)
You should debate Jordan Peterson on Islam because he said he wanted some help to understanding it
Thats a very good idea...I'll be waiting for the moment
is it the same bible which quran mentions as "injil" during islam came?
A mile and a half away from The British Library? Wow!
That is a a very expensive area!!!
Make a video on the location of Sinai. People seem to make an issue out of it.
Alif - is also the first letter of the arabic alphabet. 01:15
Alif lam meem is still not understood right?
Salam paul in this codex Isaiah 29part 12 there is a word if you translated from Greek to English it will pronounce hira...the word in the codex is xipa ....the word is located in the verse that is and the word given to the one who cant read and said I pray you read he said I cant read ..can you find out the accuracy of this argument plz
So the resurrection was only missing from Mark? The others originally had them? Does Mark start to have some discrepancies after 16:8? Do the other gospels (not including Luke) mention HIS resurrection?
I would love to correspond with you. Jasonstexas@hotmail.com if you have no desire, I understand.
@Salafiyyaaa ....I’m saying either way my dude. Sounds divine to me.
@Salafiyyaaa I prefer J Rock if we are giving pet names.
@Salafiyyaaa don’t be dissuaded now? What are you saying there? I assume you’re a Muslim, so you believe that a Jewish carpenter just slipped out the game for a millennia or two (without dying) then is to come back to earth to wage war against a modern politician, then establishes justice on earth?? Then has a family, then “dies”, then goes to heaven?? That’s not more far fetched than a man to be resurrected?? Shit even I’ve been resurrected. I don’t know of anyone claiming insignificance to ISA (Jesus), but you are acting like something I said is irrational. Bring forth your evidence. I’ll be waiting... and you ain’t about that fiyyya buddy
@@jasonsanders3930 what's wrong with believing that jesus is coming back in the end times? He has a mission which is to establish justice on earth and rebuke the christians who twisted his words and believed in what others said about him instead of what he said and commanded.
Why is this irrational? It seems like you don't like it because it doesn't fit your theology not because it allegedly doesn't make sense.
Dear Sir are you seated in a office or a personal library.
personal library
How did they take it from the monastery? I have been there. The monks are very careful with their library.
There is a big dispute about that..
@@BloggingTheology ...enlighten us please.
In the mid-19th century, a German biblical scholar named Constantin von Tischendorf had secured the patronage of Tsar Alexander II of Russia for an official visit to the monastery. He claimed that the monks had given it to him as a "gift" to present to the Tsar, but the monks themselves claim that he had only been allowed to "borrow" it (with the expectation that it would be given back, and since he never did so, he had stolen it.) The Wikipedia article on the Codex Sinaiticus has some more information about this big dispute.
Tell me about pontis pilates accounts of jesus from the codex please
The Question is why the text of Barbnabas and Hermas not to be considered part of the Bible since it was found among the earliest manuscript?
good question!
@@BloggingTheology
I searched and the main reason I found for this , that the author was not an apostle that’s why it was not canonical. But actually the author had a vision just like Paul so I don’t know why they ignore this vision and accepts Paul’s.
it was considered scripture by Patristic authors
such as Irenaeus of Lyon,Clement of Alexandria,Origen,and Didymus the Blind.
And Irenaeus of Lyons considered
By far the greatest anti-heretical writer, the greatest second-century theologian-was St. Irenaeus of Lyons. Irenaeus is sometimes called the father of Catholic theology.
www.academia.edu/31768760/The_Shepherd_of_Hermas_in_Recent_Scholarship_on_the_Canon_A_Review_Article
Very good and important work...may Allah bless you brother
❤️
@Gary Dalbec only Jesus prays.
@Gary Dalbec nice that u admit that Jesus can't be God and prays like Muslims and so Christianity is polytheism. But Allah does not pray he praise and blesses his creation.
I like what Yusha Evans said regarding the gospel of barnabas.
Study it.
There might be something in it regardless of its forgery.
Muslims will still insist the Gospel of Barnabas is totally legit and has genuine material in it, while insisting that Christians must completely reject as "lies" 2 Peter, Timothy, etc.
@@ConsideringPhlebas
I said there might be something in it.
And yes, you should reject all lies.
Have not not figured out yet that all your religion is based on are outside interference that had nothing to do with christianity?
@@NeoLegendX
Ah yes. Those political and power-acquisition ambitions that contaminated the development of Christianity. Unlike Islam of course which from its beginnings was literally an empire and a state.
@@ConsideringPhlebas
Right
Must be that
@@ConsideringPhlebas
Please edit the
last para fo the sake of Clarity.
Much love Mr paul I do enjoy ur video's u make me learn more about lie in christiandom
Mount Senai i saw in youtube some Ron White found in current Saudi Arabia?
Accurate
Wonderful story
salam alaykoum, brother, Allah ( s.w.t.) reward you.
salam
Little information about quran kromosom bee is 16 chapter bee in quran is 16 utomic wheight of iron is 57 chapter iron in quran is 57
Hi,
I hope you make a video about if the Bible Reliable or not with evidence.
Thank you so much for your hard work
OK, but is it authentic or perhaps it's a fake?
Do you have email address ?
p.a.williams007@btinternet.com
H. Lincoln, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh in their controversial and critically acclaimed The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail mention an historical text, The Nag Hammadi Scrolls and state that these manuscripts contain a manuscript entitled 'The Treaties of Seth.' Here it is mentioned that Jesus was not crucified even though a crucifixion did take place, Simon of Cyrene was the victim and not Jesus.
Please sir my humble request, make a video on your life, journey to islam, education, family and how you became muslim and interested in comparative religion
Also how many books have you read?
What do u mean “journey to Islam”? He is not a Muslim
@@alvirarahman2690 sister calm down. He is Muslim, Alhumdulilla.
@@shariqhasan8186 on twitter he said he is not a muslim
@@oussamakoutair2568 his Twitter handle is literally FreeMonotheist , also he didn't say anything that suggest he isn't a Muslim on the contrary ! And i looked up his Twitter account and i didn't find what you said about him .
@@notforsale1264 he said in a tweet that islam has centran things that disturb him
I always feel lazy to read the books on codex sinaiticus..thx bro Paul
The judgment is for the mind. We do not know when life will leave
Sir what ur opini about fake codex Sinaiticus n vatican?? U now that mr. David w daniels said?
An open invitation, you name the time Mr Williams, to Egypt, i am serious and you won't get disappointed
Quote Wikipedia
Earlier occurrences of a Gospel of Barnabas
A "Gospel according to Barnabas" is mentioned in two early Christian lists of "Apocrypha" works: the Latin text of Decretum Gelasianum (6th century), as well as a 7th-century Greek List of the Sixty Books. These lists are independent witnesses. (end quote)
Is it really conceivable that these two independent lists just imagined the existence of The Gospel of Barnabas?
Or more likely they were talking about a real fifth Gospel?
Barnabas was the official scribe of Jesus , when I read his gospel more of what Jesus said and did comes across than the conflicting New Testament gospels put together.
Yes, it is really conceivable that these earlier references to the "Gospel of Barnabas" refer to something completely different. There were only so many apostles and other well-known disciples of Jesus named in the New Testament for a forger to choose from. When the number of choices available is limited, it becomes rather probable that two different forgers will independently choose the same biblical person to falsely attribute their work to. In fact, there are two totally separate works known as the "Gospel of Thomas," one of which scholars renamed the "Infancy Gospel of Thomas" just to distinguish it from the gnostic Gospel of Thomas after it was discovered in Egypt in 1945.
The internal evidence of the Gospel of Barnabas that exists today is that it was forged in the late Middle Ages or the Renaissance period by someone who was quite familiar with Medieval Catholicism. As Paul said in the video, this is the consensus of all the scholars who have studied this text. Perhaps its author was a Catholic priest or monk who had converted to Islam and wanted to produce a "life of Jesus" similar to the Christian Gospels found in the Bible, except told from an Islamic perspective. If this is true, then he may have had access to works like the Decretum Gelasianum and he scanned through the list to find the name of a lost Gospel of which no traces remained in his day, so that he could use that name for his own book. The "Gospel of Barnabas" would have been a logical choice for him.
@@photios4779 A “... Catholic priest or monk who had converted to Islam...” would also know the terrible punishment that awaits any soul who dares to alter a single word from THE MOST HIGH.
There are many people who have published The Gospel of Barnabas in one I remember the preface telling how copies of this Gospel were hunted down in an attempt to wipe it from history.
Also proving how the jubilee wasn’t always celebrated every 50 years. Also how Israeli archaeologists had proved that the location of Nazareth had been changed. Also how the grave of Barnabas had been discovered in Cyprus and a copy of his Gospel found within it.
Also proof that the tortures and inquisitions were a part of the coverup to delete certain books.
Not the first time the controllers of history have robbed future generations of knowledge , the fire in 48BC in Alexandria is just one example.
The ridiculous position western historians find themselves in is there was indeed a Gospel of Barnabas at one time but the one we have know is a sixteenth century forgery.
Also I suspect the deliberately lengthy time Israel took to release the Qumran texts was to coverup certain truths...easy if you have fragments already falling apart.
The 1500 year old copy scientifically dated and requested by the Vatican from Turkey is proof of this gospel predating Islam.
Sinaiticus*, not "Siniaticus"
Additionally, it is not "the oldest".
The Codex Vaticanus is just as old as the Codex Sinaiticus.
Together, they are the two oldest complete codices.
Tell us about the codex gigas
.
HOW WOULD EXPLAIN THE 1600 YEAR OLD
BIBLE FOUND IN TURKEY WHICH CONTAINS GOSPEL OF ST BARNABAS IN TACT, MENTIONING THE FORTHCOMING OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD BY NAME ?
.
There are some statements in Christianity whenever I heard those it makes me Laughing😂🤣😅.
For example- God came and died on the cross for our sins. It makes me crazy.
→The father is God the son is god and the ghost is god, but there is not three god but one god.
→ The father is a person the son is a person and the holy Ghost is a person but there is no three person but one person. 🤔🤔🤔😵😵😵. 1+1+1=1
When god died for your sins it means you are sinful people and still you are doing sin.
Be humble and thankful brother , we are lucky to be Muslims but we will be tested and judged , maybe even harsher than someone who never heard of Islam before . But yeah basically Christianity is so confusing and God is not the author of confusion
@@notforsale1264 ❤ thank you brother🌹
St. Paul built the castle of Christianity with the bricks of lies and today Mr Paul exposing the falsehood and those bricks could not withstand the onslaught of force and pressure of Truth but to crumble. Those who doubt the adage, “Truth Triumphs” this is a classic example to ....
The word is xipa but you will find out that there is e letter inserted between x and i
Was not Barnabas a disciple of Jesus?
@Shalom Shalom Nice, but not related to the question.
@Shalom Shalom In Hebrew bible it clearly states Mohamedim. As for Barnabas, there are different explanations of the meaning of that title given to Joseph, a Cypriot Jew who obviously stood out for his piety.
@Shalom Shalom Mohamedim can be replaced by the word “Mohammad” and the description of the sentence will remain unchanged, because the only known description of Prophet Muhammad matches the description of the song word for word.
No Barnabas was never a disciples of Jesus but he was an apostle. He was a jewish Levite who converted to Christianity and performed a great deed of donating all the money he got from selling land to the church in a time of need because he was led by the HOLY SPIRIT. He later became a fellow companion of Paul where they were both members and teachers in the Antioch Church before the prophets from Jerusalem came and by the inspiration of GOD prophesied and said "set aside for me Paul and Barnabas for the work of the ministry" thus began their apostolic work together. The gospel of Barnabas is a fake book whereas the epistle is authentic for several reasons one being that in the epistle he likened JESUS to many sacrificial and atoning elements in the old testament such as the red heifer. This epistle is quite similar to the book of Hebrews hence the reason why many believe he was the author of Hebrews. His works were similar to those of Paul. They both proclaimed JESUS as the son of GOD and the great high priest for all mankind because he alone is the perfect man, perfect sacrifice, and needs no form of cleansing before ministering on our behalf to the Father. ✝️✝️ c
@Shalom Shalom Barnabas doesn't mean son of the prophet it means son of encouragement
Alif...also first alphabet in Arabic
Can you also make a video on Zionism and its influence in the world today especially between Palestine and Israel
That would be a waste of time. It's like asking Einstein to explain why a whale is so big and how it came to be in the sea.
@@abu-sulaimanel-bushnaq8052 😂.
@@abu-sulaimanel-bushnaq8052 I just want people to know the truth about Britain's involvement in the whole ordeal
@@RodriguesPaul360 It would be a nice topic to discuss, but this is not the circle for it. Theology and Abrahamic religions is a large topic already. Muslims don't recognise Israel and Muslims believe that Jesus with his Armies shall destroy that disease along with its Anti-Christ. Obviously, there are hypocrites amongst Muslims who have become turncoats.
@@abu-sulaimanel-bushnaq8052 It’s okay, the days are changing. Judgement day draws near. We will retake the holy lands in Shaa Allah.
Hey Paul, don't say the whereabouts of where you are, you don't want those speakers corner fanatics storming in :D
No it's not. I've studied this intensely it was written by a scholar and scholar A coping it into English said it was the oldest. The other was able to provide proof that he wrote it. Hence it's not old.
I believe Codex Vaticanus is older than Codex Sinaiticus.
Doesnt matter. They will called Codex Sinaiticus is fake, and simply follow Codex Vaticanus
It matters because why will he be deceptive to say sinaiticus is the earliest codex
From what I've read, scholars date both manuscripts to the fourth century CE. Vaticanus is dated to the first half of this century and Sinaiticus to between roughly 325 and 370. So Vaticanus might be slightly older, but only by a few decades at most. For all practical intents and purposes, these two manuscripts are regarded as being contemporaries.
I translated from greek it pronounce hira which is hira cave when prophet Mohammed received revelation
Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. When the LORD shall stretch out his hand, both he that helpeth shall fall, and he that is holpen shall fall down, and they all shall fail together.
The three monotheistic religions--Judaism,Christianity,and Islam-all purport to share one fundamental concept:belief in God as the Supreme Being,the Creator and Sustainer of the Universe.Knownas“Tawhid”in Islam,this concept of Oneness of God was stressed by Moses in the Biblical passage Known as the“Shema,”or the Jewish creed of faith:“Hear,O Israel The Lord our God is one Lord”(Deuteronomy6:4)
It was repeated word-for word approximately 1500 years later by Jesus when he said“...The first of all the commandments is,Hear,O Israel;the Lord ou God is one Lord.”(Mark12:29)
Muhammad came along approximately 600 years later,bringing the same message again:“And you God is One God:there is no God but He”(TheQur'an,al-Bakarah(2):163.
Too many fakes making my head spin.
When experts say manuscripts were lost through copying and copying, it gives the impression that a scroll lasts a generation before it evaporates and so the scribes are in a hurry to copy and copy and so they make mistakes. Bart Ehrman has made a carrier out of saying, with his scholars hubris, "they made mistakes", and, ergo, "we have no original manuscripts", because they made mistake etc. So all those copies, a hundred a century until we get to the fourth century!
However, a dose of critical thinking leads me to think the Codex Siniaticus was on a book shelf for 1600 years, in perfect condition, in that monastery. And it was written only 300 years after Jesus. So how are the experts so sure that the very original manuscripts were not around by the fourth century? After all, we have ancient books in perfect condition around today. Even the Didache was found sat on a shelf in pristine condition! So maybe the Codex siniaticus is copied from the original manuscript. Surely this isn't stretching anyone's thinking!
If it was copied from an original manuscript why are some verses , stories and gospels in that one , AND NOT IN THE BIBLE YOU READ TODAY?
Jesus sopke to his people in Aramaic. But the sad thing is his teachings were written in Greek and later translated into Aramaic. Strange.
No one knows exactly what words Jesus used.
True.
@@BloggingTheology That shouldn’t be a problem, should it? Note that the Quran records the words of Jesus in Arabic. But He spoke Aramaic...
@Muhammad Hak🗡m 🏴 Your Quran seems to suggest that. It calls the book Isa received as the Injil. Do you know where the word Injil comes from? It comes from a Greek word for gospel through Syriac.
Are there Christians who claim the Bible is Eternal ? ...." not one dot, not one letter has been changed "....dont think so. You seem to hold the Bible to a higher standard of criticism than the koran.
There are Jews that believe that
Hmmm... Let me think. I'm sure there was a Christian once who said something like that. What was his name?
Oh yeah... Jesus!
"For I assure you and most solemnly say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke of the pen will pass away from the Law until all things are accomplished." Matthew 5 : 18.
Since "all things" won't be accomplished until (as he says) heaven and earth pass away - meaning the end of the world - this sounds very much like a doctrine of eternal preservation to me. But thanks for playing buddy!
@@BloggingTheology That the original Bible is in heaven ?
@@alanbishopman Yeshua of Nazareth was not a Christian, He was a Jew. And your interpretation of scripture is flawed. You seem to have ignored the part where He said " until all things are accomplished" . Which the Church interprets as the New Covenant. .....There is no need to be condescending. Thanks for reading.
@@zellak-pr7pu I clearly and unequivocally highlighted the fact that Jesus refers to the accomplishment of all things. I did not shy away from it. This OBVIOUSLY means the end of the world. The whole passage in Matthew is introduced by the phrase "until heaven and earth pass away." That's when all things will be accomplished. Not before. If you're saying that all things were accomplished at the institution of the New Covenant, then I must humbly point out that heaven and earth quite clearly did not pass away at that time.
Furthermore, the founder of the new covenant counts as much or more than any member of the New covenant, so we can't dismiss my quotation because Jesus wasn't "Christian". Jesus clearly believed that the words of scripture would be fully preserved without change until the very end of the world. If you think there's something wrong with that doctrine, your disagreement is with your Lord and Savior, not me.
But, just so there's no confusion, here are few more gems, for good measure:
"Jesus was conscious of the fact that the words of Scripture were preserved without error. He was also conscious of the fact that the very letters and even the small jots under the letters were preserved without error." Turner, Charles V. Biblical Bible Translating. Sovereign Grace Pub. 2001, p. 55
"... but this Book, from age to age, hath remained, and will remain unremoved in full and ample manner, as it was written at the first. But who kept and preserved it from such great and raging power? or, who defendeth it still? Truly, no human creature, but only God himself, who is the right Master thereof. And it is a great wonder that it hath been so long kept and preserved, for the devil and the world are great enemies unto it." Martin Luther, Colloquia of 1541, reprinted in "Familiar Discourses of Dr. Martin Luther" Sussex Press: London, Chapter 1 Tablet VI, p. 2
"... as for what is asserted, namely, that there hath the same fate attended the Scripture in its transcription as hath done other books of antiquity; let me say without offence, this imagination, seems to me to border on atheism. Surely the promise of God for the preservation of his word, with his love and care of his church, of whose faith and obedience that word of his is the only rule, requires other thoughts at our hands. We add that the whole scripture entire, as given out from God, without any loss, is preserved in the Copies of the Originals yet remaining." John Owen, Of the Divine Original and Power of the Scriptures. p. 173
"Have the original texts of the Old and New Testaments come down to us pure and uncorrupted? Indeed. We affirm as much against the papists." Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology vol. 1, p. 106
"The Old Testament in Hebrew, and the New Testament in Greek, being immediately inspired by God, and, by His singular care and providence, kept pure in all ages, are therefore authentical; so as, in all controversies of religion, the Church is finally to appeal unto them. " Westminster Confession of Faith 1.8
Like how you leave archeologically evidence out. Making the Bible look like it’s full of lies. When the Bible is archeologically correct on location and dates of certain event that occurred. What about the mesha stone?
The bible of the early fathers, like Irenaeus and Cyprian, contained 1 John 5:7. Your remark (8:22) about it being a Medieval insertion is a lie.
This guy proves that Codex Sinaiticus is fake. Watch this video:
ua-cam.com/video/OVjOhDJ5HKo/v-deo.html
And watch some of his videos in regards to the Codex.
This 'fake'Codex Sinaiticus is one of the two old Bibles used as the basis for producing the modern Bible.
""The Codex Sinaiticus Bible manuscript has been instrumental in producing almost every modern Bible translation in many languages around the world since 1881. ..""
- www.alittleperspective.com/history-of-the-preservation-of-the-biblical-text/
@@letmetalk2240 The codex was found in a trash can. It's logical to find that in the trash can coz there are many errors in Codex Sinaiticus. So it's not valuable.
@@letmetalk2240 old? The same guy in the video whose link I included also discusses the "oldest" codex. Is it really old? You just explore his channel about the codex.
@@vivliforia2262 Whether or not it contained many errors, the interesting part is it "has been instrumental in producing almost every modern Bible translation in many languages around the world since 1881""" in the Christendom. This is the problem when you don't have the original.
brothers we are come from darkness womb and go to darkness grave. We are not created by chance, even the eyelashes of the upper eye are curved up and the bottom is bent down. God said in the Qur’an, you think, but we created you in vain and that you do not return to us. God will return us with fingerprints. Read the Qur’an and read the Bible
Keep digging. More proof that the Greek is a translation. If you want the original then study the Aramaic Peshitta. Referenced right back to antiquity even if extant copies from then are lost.
Oh and Mt Sinai is not in Egypt, it is Jabal al- Lawz in Saudi. Any serious researcher will agree. It’s covered in almond trees to this day, some thousands of years old.
How about mount Horeb? Where is it? Two different authors, two different mountain names.
Jesus language was not peshitta aramaic but Ancient Aramaic
@@isaiskander3774 same
@@BenM61 same place
@@MrAndrewHuggins Do the Bible texts state that in one way or another or is it a conjecture?
It is a good thing the epistle of Barnabas did not make it into the Christian ‘scriptures.’ It is very anti Jewish. Even more so than the gospel of John. This is from that document:
[Now, wherefore did Moses say, You shall not eat the swine, nor the eagle, nor the hawk, nor the raven, nor any fish which is not possessed of scales? He embraced three doctrines in his mind [in doing so]. Moreover, the Lord says to them in Deuteronomy, And I will establish my ordinances among this people. Deuteronomy 4:1 Is there then not a command of God they should not eat [these things]? There is, but Moses spoke with a spiritual reference. For this reason he named the swine, as much as to say, You shall not join yourself to men who resemble swine. For when they live in pleasure, they forget their Lord; but when they come to want, they acknowledge the Lord. And [in like manner] the swine, when it has eaten, does not recognize its master; but when hungry it cries out, and on receiving food is quiet again.]
The Jews, according to this author, miss-understood the prohibition by Moses against eating swine meat. It was spiritual and not literal.
Let me correct some of your "misinformation" Mr... 1:18
The pre-eminent Aleph you claimed is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, originally in fact is the first letter of the Arabic alphabet which is the mother language with more than 4400 old -at least- of notarized historical scripts that it was found in Sinai..
A simple proof for Arabic is the mother language of them all, It's aggregating more than 2.600.000 term, and the scalar value of its 28 letters is totally 1000, that's a clear presentation of perfection..
In the other hand, the Hebrew scalar value of its letters is totally 400 only, and that's limitedly weak..
Therefore, Arabic wasn't vainly chosen as a strong instrument from Allah as his final message to humanity. And obviously that's why the western world tried and still trying to falsify dumbly that historical truth, and fought very hard to kill it.
Hebrews, or rather Jewish scholars won't admit this. But they use the Arabic to find roots within their language.
I swear, these people barely preserved what they were given.
What is scalar value of letters?
He was talking about a Hebrew text . He never mentioned Arabic or compared which is older.
@@Dani-zg7fr A scalar value of the letter Aleph in Arabic is 1 as it's the first, the second is Ba'e with a s.v of 2 and so on until we reach ka'af which is the eleventh letter with a s.c of 20... more clearly it looks like this :
أ=1 ، ب=2 ، ج=3 ، د=4 ، ه=5 ، و=6 ، ز=7 ، ح=8 ، ط=9 . ي=10 ، ك=20 ، ل=30 ، م=40 ، ن=50 ، س=60 ، ع=70 ، ف=80 ، ص=90 . ق=100 ، ر=200 ، ش=300 ، ت=400 ، ث=500 ، خ=600 ، ذ=700 ، ض=800 ، ظ=900 . غ=1000
@@popcornagain7034 I did.. and he knows what's the point of what I wrote. You don't have to clear out what's obvious.
If Christianity has been corrupted over time, why is it when they are presented with all the evidence they still choose to believe that Jesus is God?