Susan Etlinger: What do we do with all this big data?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 жов 2014
- Does a set of data make you feel more comfortable? More successful? Then your interpretation of it is likely wrong. In a surprisingly moving talk, Susan Etlinger explains why, as we receive more and more data, we need to deepen our critical thinking skills. Because it's hard to move beyond counting things to really understanding them.
TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and much more.
Find closed captions and translated subtitles in many languages at www.ted.com/translate
Follow TED news on Twitter: / tednews
Like TED on Facebook: / ted
Subscribe to our channel: / tedtalksdirector - Наука та технологія
Trying to figure out what this has to do with my discussion question.
yoooo same bro
@@ethanguerrero3963 management class?
@@muhammadahmed3588 Thats why im on here rn lmao
😂 mgt3003😂
@@muhammadahmed3588 I’m pretty sure this was for a socio class. Never taken a management class
Trying to make a coherent discussion post out of this is hurting my brain
Did this video get uploaded with the correct title?
She has a very pleasant voice.
God dammit Phyllis.
Lol I thought she looked familiar.
Rarely have I heard someone make so trivial a point (analyze the data, don't accept the given analysis - or lack thereof - at face value) in so many words.
On the one hand, she can hold the crowd's attention, On the other hand, the talk needs more structure
Aah this talk needs to be more structured
This talk needs to have more substance and originality.
I think you aren't used to hear premisses...
Attention spans are dwindling....
I still dont get were is the main topic
does bigdata generate more revenue for company
Those glasses...
David Chen laughing out loud
So, what do we do with all this big data?
This os perfectly parallel to a segment NPR just ran on an organization called R.E.D and their use of philosophy and anthropology to give context to analytics.
Everything is not always as it seems to be.... The reason of a cause and the effect of the reason...
Is there are speaker that would want this degree and duration of EXTREME CLOSE-UPS?
Sheesh.
1:41 you heard it here folks
such a soothing voice she has
Hi there Ted
Can you believe that we are talking a lot of quizzes based on what she is saying!!! I hope she makes it easy next time 😅
TED CAMERA PEOPLE: Enough with the close-ups. Nobody wins.
Brilliant!
Smart Lady
great video Susan! I think all these dislikes are people coming here expecting to hear about google using your search history, when shes actually talking about something more meaningful.
nice : )
Any Plymouth uni students?
Exactly, facts are stupid - if do not contain a reference to a known model they are supposed to fit in.
Nice talk, not much content.
What is her point?!
Seriously?? How could you not get what her point was? Isn't it beyond obvious? Just listen.... -____-
She is all over the place. It´s not a good structured talk.
That we need to be able to process the context of data, not just raw data, otherwise we could take bad decissons (talking aobut enterprieses) based in info that might not be good at all
Nothing new. Nietzsche wrote that there are no facts, only interpretations. Don't need 12 minutes for that, although some interesting anecdotes make it amazing.
2nd?
Sadly this talk isnt about what we're doing with the data, but what we should or should not do. Didnt expect anything else but its still a bad title
Nope, not a bad title. It definitely refers to the future, not the current. The question "What do we do with all this data?" does not refer to the current in any grammatical sense. Rather, it is almost equivalent to the question "What should we do with all this data?"
The question "What are we doing with all this data?" would refer to the current. The title is correct, you just understood it wrong.
I can't focus the closeups are getting on my nerves. Bye.
the people in the audience are enjoying this too much, I find it agonizing personally.
The comments made on this video made me realize she's right. Most people don't have any critical skills at all.
It was a great presentation, she made very valid points.
Facts need to be analyzed carefully and from different perspectives, cause-effect is not the only way to reach conclusions, correlations are not so simple to understand.
We need smarter people more than ever to face new challenges ahead.
she looks and talks like a kindergarten teacher... and has about as much fashion sense...
poor choice of glasses...
Time to end this Capitalistic Fascist state loving era once and for all. Freedom!
*tips fedora*
You can't have freedom without Capitalism. Don't confuse Cronyism with Capitalism.
Dark Day Ministries Crony capitalism is the inevitable result of _any_ capitalist system and that's why we must abolish it.
***** Fascism is the idea that the state is bigger and more important than the individual. An Orwillian society is just like that; the state must be served and "protected" to all cost, even if this means enslaving the individual. "Big data" is nothing more than that; seeing the interests of the state as more important than the freedom of individual.
In order to live in an Orwillian state you must give up your private life and serve the state with all information you have, because - you know - the state knows better than you.
TheLeftLibertarianAtheist What alternative do you propose? Is it free of corruption and the influence of cronyism?
I know for a fact that any governing system involving people will corrupt almost immediately. That's the way people operate in general: benefits for my friends, screw everyone else.
It may be unoriginal... which is fine. But the big problem I have with it is that she is talking about a totalitarian world she doesn't want to be part of yet supporting an effort to shape the thinking of individuals using government money. I mean come on.
what?
bro those mouth noises :(
hahaha I am very sensitive to sounds and was literally tortured. It was like cereal eating smackers.
This is a prime example of using many words, and saying nothing. She is talking about being able to spot false correlations/etc, and yet making many herself in this talk. While I understand that there is a 12.5 minute timeframe to fit this in, removing substance in lieu of timeframe is tragic.
I know for a fact, this speaker is an expert in her field and should be taken seriously, but this is not a speech that I would point to as a shining example.
Not concise
*yawn
how evil r u,Susan?
This was the worst ted talk I’ve ever watched
Yeah, go ahead and study Humanities, and Sociology, and the Liberal Arts... Just don't expect anyone to give us jobs after... or for employers to even like that you can think.
All those people who made the negative comments really have a short attention span as they did not listen to the whole point of the talk. she said we need to be more critical of how we use data. Please listen again and open your mind a bit ... being negative about every thing you hear only makes you stupid.