RTX 4080 SUPER vs RX 7900 XTX - Test in 9 Games
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 тра 2024
- RX 7900 XTX 24GB vs RTX 4080 SUPER 16GB l 4K
Buy games at the best prices on gamivo.com - gvo.deals/TestingGames
Use coupon code and get discount - TG3
Buy RTX 4080 SUPER at newegg.com - bit.ly/48U6jfH
Ad - 0:00
Games :
Starfield - 0:06
Cyberpunk 2077 - 1:06 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Cyberpunk 2077 | RT, DLSS\FSR - 2:13
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 3:16
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:16 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Hogwarts Legacy - 5:22 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Hogwarts Legacy | RT - 6:24
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 7:23 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Remnant 2 - 8:26
Alan Wake 2 - 9:20
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 10:28 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
System:
Windows 11
Core i9-13900K - bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
CPU Cooler - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 - bit.ly/3Pn2xVx
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 16GB - bit.ly/48U6jfH
RADEON RX 7900 XTX 24GB - bit.ly/3Hx6keI
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI - Ігри
Games :
Starfield - 0:06
Cyberpunk 2077 - 1:06 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Cyberpunk 2077 | RT, DLSS\FSR - 2:13
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 3:16
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:16 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Hogwarts Legacy - 5:22 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Hogwarts Legacy | RT - 6:24
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 7:23 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Remnant 2 - 8:26
Alan Wake 2 - 9:20
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 10:28 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
System:
Windows 11
Core i9-13900K - bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
CPU Cooler - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 - bit.ly/3Pn2xVx
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 16GB - bit.ly/48U6jfH
RADEON RX 7900 XTX 24GB - bit.ly/3Hx6keI
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
I have... insane drive timeout issues on several games with the 7900 XTX. Darktide is unplayable and I have had 2 RMA'd cards so far with the same driver issues, but I can run a 7600 RX on my system no issues. Phantom Brigade also drive timeouts, and a few DX12 old games like Deus Ex on DX 12 will crash, but DX 11 will not. I'd love to keep the 7900 XTX but... this issue makes it garbage.
Cyberpunk no issues, a few bigger games no issues. BUt you CANNOT rely on this card to be able to run something.
DO NOT. Get the 7900 XTX. Its drivers are insane, they are awful, AMD is not responding to us either. There's a hardware survey of 200+ people reporting this issue with hundreds of different hardware combinations. AMD will NOT answer.
@@ErgonomicChair hi, this sounds like there is a problem somewhere else in your system that only happens when you run a more powerful GPU (rx 7600 150W vs 7900xtx 350W).
and once the 7900xtx is running is stressing more your system that that flaw is noticeable, power supply, ram even the motherboard power delivery.
@@TheBoltcranck Can't be, I have a 1200 watt power supply. That and it runs Cyberpunk 2077 ultra perfectly fine, it has nothing to do with power draw as I can also run synthetic benches fine.
It IS an issue with the drives. DarkTide runs at 100 FPS, Cyberpunk at 60 FPS. Cyberpunk draws more power. Phantom brigade is less power/graphically draining than either and also crashes.
This is a flaw with the driver suite of AMD and has been reproted on a survey of 200 people now all with different configurations and AMD knows about the issue, have acknowledged it to us in emails, but release ZERO press statements or recalls. Starfield actually had this isuse but they patched it out quickly enough... so they KNOW the issue and are doing nothing to fix it.
Motherboard is an X670 Carbon Wifi, thing has zero issues, again, on Cyberpunk 2077. FAR more grpahically demanding than darktide.
@@ErgonomicChair hi, try disabling SAM bcuz for some users that helped in some motherboard models and maybe is motherboard vendor related in the bios.
@@TheBoltcranck Yeah, have tried this and XPO etc too, ntohing workd. This and there are around 200 responses on the hardware survey and it affects us all despite different hardware. It's... just horrid support for the 7900 XTX driver wise. No one can fix it but AMD, and even some verynew games like Darktide are unplayable for7900 XTX owners.
Crazy how some games just run like shite no matter what gpu you have
he used the most demanding games with insane settings to make the gpus struggle.
Real nowadays game developers just care about graphics and optimization is zero
they really ain't optimizing games properly anymore because of this upscaling DLSS/FSR bs 🤷
@@Zenbeau real
@@dallenishere7783 Did you check how both cards do well on RDR (which is also looks more beautiful and bigger) than Hogwarts or Remnant? The only demanding here is Alan Wake and Cyberpunk but that's just it.
In Germany you can buy a 7900XTX for 950€, the 4080 Super starts at around 1150€ and it has been like this for months (4080 was 1250€+ even).
Auch Strom kostet Geld :x
I got my 7900XTX for only 700€ brand new, fuck the power consumption.
Payed almost half of a 4080 😂
For months? The 4080 S has only been out for a couple of weeks.
same in finland. if you dont need ray tracing much then 7900xtx is better. Also for longevity the massive vram is great.
in bulgaria 7900xtx is 1100 euro the cheapest crap models ...
Can you make a comparison on 1440p? Would be much appreciated!
+
+1
Prefer 1080p
@@Antipiperosdeclonyi think both 7900xtx and 4080s are straight overkill for 1080p.
@@dungeondeezdragons4242 no unless you use ultra with rtx on and 200% in game that allow it
I guess if you don't need RT you can go with either one
Xtx gives better frametime and is 15-40% cheaper depending on your location. cheaper
@@dungeondeezdragons4242 ok so go buy amd no body cares
@@rochester3 Lol, calm down bro' :D
@@rochester3lol so let’s just ignore price cause I guess it doesn’t matter.
@@dungeondeezdragons4242 Ray tracing performance is worse than 4060Ti
Awesome video. Can you do an updated video with Fluid Frames turned on plz? It’s a game changer apparently.
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX I just ordered one of these on NewEgg and got it for $919 with a promo with $20 off
in bulgaria 7900xtx is 1100 euro the cheapest crap models ...
One going for $909.99 on Newegg rn, 7900XT going for $719.99 on Amazon
@@xxx333mmm Croatia here. 1152€ for the cheapest 7900xtx and 1350€ for 4080 super
SAPPHIRE PULSE is the best satisfaction model of Radeon RX 7900 XTX lineup
It will be interesting to see how Unreal Engine 5 changes the ray tracing aspect of GPUs. The problem is that many game developers still use their own engine which might still create a demand for hardware ray tracing.
This is why every single game looks and behaves the same everyone is using the same engine with the same premade textures nothing is unique anymore
am I the only one who thinks the most important comparison would be for 4070 ti super and 4080 super in 1440p/4k? there is not a single video on these two so far..
4070 Ti SUPER gets destroyed by the 4080 SUPER... 4070 Ti SUPER is there to upsell you to the 4080 SUPER.
@@laszlozsurka8991 bruh what its like a 10% difference at 1440p
@@andym171 What 10% difference? 4080 SUPER is about 20% faster than the 4070 Ti SUPER. A 20% increase can push you with 12 FPS which is enough to put you from 48 FPS to 60 FPS. Also the 4080 SUPER is 25% more expensive but you also gain 20% better performance so the 4070 Ti SUPER is just an upsell to the 4080 SUPER
Daniel Owen Made a Video For that already.
The difference in power draw though
50w?
@@noumenom1345 i think 50w is too much for 4fps LOL and NVIDIA have better temps, Core and memory clocks and AMD use AVG. 0.5GB more VRAM... for what?????😅😅 there is sovereignly 3:1 for NVIDIA, AMD have only bigger VRAM thats All...
@@kenjibushido26 4fps? Some games grant a bigger fps difference lol. And regarding the vram, its called future proofing, the industry i changing liek crazy and in a couple of years we will need a minimum of 20gb. Be quiet if you have nothing good to say
@@oscarnilsson2872 AVG. 4fps kiddo dont cry with your futureproof AMD at your home only one who need too much GB VRAM is AMD with his "futureproof" memory clock
The XTX use the old and reliable connector, that's one point that has to be considered.
In the 4080 super case, better to undervolt it to avoid "surprises" with the new conector, because there were cases of melting contector with the 4080.
I will not deny that the 7900 XTX is an amazing GPU... For gaming. But, I still ended up going with an Msi 4080 Super OC for $1029 (actually more bc of taxes). Mainly because I wanted my next build to be balanced between productivity and gaming.
with the 7900xtx did yo have frame generation and super resolution on? it would be great to see geforce and adrenalin settings also
Nope all was tested on Native for both Gpu
@@KenneXS does amd have all features which also has rtx or which one is better ?
@@DianeFoxxx It's a very tricky question since Amd just released FSR3 is very great but nvidia RT & Dlss is still leading but vram is not that much if we compared to 24gb..
However 7900xtx is great on performance without RT on but downside it consume alot of power it reach 460w while rtx 4070ti S better performance RT ion & Dlss is great but only 16gb & it consume between 240w & 300w
dlss3 is useless. Lossless scaling killed this crap out. LSFG is way better than DLSS3 and just 7 bucks on steam
The 7900xtx is what the rtx 4080 super should’ve been when it comes to the better framerates on the 7900xtx
Was DLSS on for the 4080S on these tests?
He takes it off for some of them but when it’s turned on it performs better then the other card
Moral of the story both cards are strong enough to play any game 4k ultra you like and it just comes down to pricing, unless you really care about rt but let's be honest if you're in the middle of the game do you really see it?
I think the 4080 is a very good card for 4k heavy RT (and non RT) games if you use DLSS on balanced or performance with Frame Generation where possible.
And it might get better with future driver and DLSS updates. You can use 'DLSS Swapper' for tinkering with that.
When I noticed that my PSU was struggling with the XTX (400W++ powerdraw) I switched to the RTX. A bit less fps but more stability).
Do you live in antartica? why are the cpu temps not even hitting 50 with an i9?
Undervolt
Because you've been led to believe that the i9 is a very hot card, when in reality, under normal conditions it isn't.
The i9 doesn't perform that badly in most games in terms of efficiency. Most people blow intel's power consumption and heat problem(which ill admit is still isnt ideal) out of proportion, with supposed '300W' and '100C' temperatures only showing after running the CPU in extremely intensive applications for extended periods of time.
@@auritro3903 True.
500k congratulations 🎉❤
what k ?
Happy 500k Subscribers!
At the launch of 7900 xtx it gave performance similar to rtx 4080 (without ray tracing) now it is better than 4080 super amd cards are sure laike fine wine
Nah at start it gave performance worse than 4080 even without ray tracing
@@slmonbhoi2246 There was never a point where 7900 XTX wasn't faster than 4080 in raster. 4080 has always been behind in raster and ahead in RT. What's really interesting is most XTX are AIB models which are 5% faster (10% faster if overclocked) than the models used in these benchmark comparisons. Use my mildly overclocked Merc 310 in this same comparison and the 4080 super looks like a 4070 Ti
Nobody mentioning how the 4080 super is hitting the max vram in a few games. Kinda nuts
That is why you should get a 24gig card, i think
@@dungeondeezdragons4242no.
@@dungeondeezdragons4242 I agree. Really need amd to drop prices. I’m so broke lol
Nvidia taking the Apple approach to RAM pretending it’s made of gold and Vibranium.
Besides Vram 7900xtx is still winning in raw performance@@dungeondeezdragons4242
Could you compare these cards again in 1440p? I'm considering buying a 1440p 240Hz monitor, and I don't think either of these cards are truly suited for 4K.
new games themselves are shite bro, do yourself a favour and get one of these GPUs and pair it with a 7800x3s or something. It'll easily last your 7+ years
@@anodyneliniment2326 Can vouch for the 7800X3D being an absolute fucking demon. This CPU absolutely stomps anything that even attempts to tank it lol
Are this GPU´s simulatet?
Thank you so much
4080 the best.. Much-much better RT performance, and much lower energy consuption, so quieter! This is fact! The decision is clear! For me, these two things are the main aspects, the ~ 15-20% price difference is secondary to me!
buy it and post it
@@asdfg4330 I've had a 4080 for a while now, I don't need to buy one, I've got one at the moment! I said I prefer energy efficiency and good RT performance! Not just for gaming, but also because I render in - Blender 3D editor - in Optix render mode! However, to give you an idea of what I'm talking about... I limited the maximum power consumption of my card to 250 watts! 3Dmark Port Royal -- at default setting I get 17510 points. Sometimes a little more, sometimes a little less, depending on the automatic frequency control. In games I always use the RT function where possible! The card is very quiet when used this way, and I am particularly sensitive to this! Unfortunately, AMD cards with RT or using the HIP renderer in Blender don't even come close to this level at this power consumption! I emphasize, at this power consumption! Yes, the 4080 costs more, but it's not unaffordable. The 4090 was not an option for me, because of the high power consumption and the melting connectors! I didn't want to risk the latter! The 4080 is perfectly acceptable, I have been using it for over a year. Some people have the car as a hobby and spend 10,000 Euro every 2-3 years, but that would be a luxury for me! The petrol is unrealistically expensive, it would take a small fortune a year, and so would the service when the time comes! Compared to that, it's a "penny" item, symbolically of course! I upgrade video cards every 4 years, in that time, I can easily save up what I need! I know it's a "lot" of money, but to each his own...
yea the power efficiency of the 40 series is crazy good. The 7900 XTX only beats the 4080 via brute force. not very elegant but it works
I love how people point out the power difference like they aren’t giant BS’ers. Oh, you were worried about the extra wattage with your $1000 GPU were you? *Insert Willy Wonka Smirk*
_Rich enough to spend $1000+ on a GPU but poor enough that you’re worried about less than a 1% difference on your total power bill._
*^This hypothetical person doesn’t exist in real life lol.*
God I hate memes and snarky internet smuggery
@@johnmoore1495 The GPU is only 0.01% of your house value, why dont we spend more?
@@DungxxHen confused at what you’re trying to say. That’d be a $10,000,000 home lol
I run a server (work/research related) 24x7 at home that uses ~200 watts average, that's now costing me ~£600 a year with current UK energy prices, it's not pre COVID energy prices where an extra 50 watts might set you back an extra £50 years, that now closer to £150.... while I can currently afford that difference ,mainly because I'm a bit older now and only game for maybe 16 hours a month, but I certainly do pay attention to such operational costs, and if it was the younger me playing at least the equivalent of a couple hours a day it would certainly matter with current energy prices, at least here Europe.
Everyone is looking at GPU performance but I saw no1 talk about how much more power the AMD GPU is using compared to the nVidia GPU...
AMD fanboys hate it when you bring that up.
the 7900XTX is underclocked and Power limited ? Mine runs at around 2900 MHz with Memory of 2700 MHz and Power Consumption of 450W
Same question xtx literally runs at 400w out of the box, kinda funny to watch comparison video where one card is power limited by the user... next lets try power limited 4090 vs xtx
@@ImAziby It would have been funny if he undervolted XTX and fine tuned bit memory also. It would have taken less power but run better. What im saying its not always so simple that only power = better at least with amd. Everyone knows last 2 gens from AMD cards they run faster when undervolted.
In Brazil ( my country ) the diference of this cards is 7900 XTX for 6500 Reais and RTX 4080 SUPER for 7700 Reais (lowest prices I found), in dollars the difference would be something close to 250, so the cheapest 7900 XTX costs 1300 dollars and the RTX 4080 SUPER costs 1550
This is Brazil
$1550?😱😱
@@A_dhit_a_m_ado the L
In Australia the 7900xtx is $1500 AUD and the 4080 super is $2000 AUD
@@asdfg4330it's almost the same price in India too.1500 $ to 2250$ for 4080 super
1070€ vs 1350€ in lesser price.
Seems like 4080S not worth 300€ more.
Where are u search noob? 4080 cost 1100$ at minimum price, u r ignorant
The temp and power draw
@@Universeverse923?
@@NickT9330 the temp and power draw of trashdown is 💩
@@Thejacketof-huang My 3080ti consumes +400w. So it's trash, right?
*Test please in 1440p for 240 hz monitor users!*
I have the 4080s and it slaps for 1440p 240hz. Stuff like Path traced Cyberpunk still looks unreal in 1440p and I get like 100-120 fps. Also nearly any FPS game I get 240+ fps. I use DLDSR as well for some single player games to upscale to 4k, which works great most of the time.
4080's have over a 300 to 600 premium over the 7900 xtx. Making the 7900 xtx a no brainer. Thank the dirty Nvida scalpers.
Except the massive power draw of the 7900. Ouch.
@@mintymusan extra 5 cents a day of power consumption means nothing.
@@anonymoose2474 So then you don't mind the higher power consumption of the Intel CPUs, right?
@@mintymus I don't really care either way, no. I'm not a fanboy in either direction
You cant go wrong with either of those two
Both of em are wrong in the most core factor PRICE!!!
@@samiraslan9735 if you watch these videos then its meant to show which one you wanna buy, if you watch these videos you shouldnt give a shit either cost above 1000$
you're brainwashed. GPU did not used to be as expensive as they are now and sheeple like you keep buying it and raising demand. there comes a time to put your foot down
I take it you didn't have Fluid Motion Frames on in AMD settings?
MHO, both these cards aren't meant for 4K. It would be meant for 4K if the devs weren't that lazy to fully optimize their games to run great on PCs. But I guess, that will take a few years for devs to really consider us as PC gamers to optimize their games to accommodate us.
Nevertheless, these GPUs can run perfectly fine on 4K but I would suggest 1440P. If you are a streamer especially on Twitch, then 4K gaming is pointless because viewers won't really see the difference. As for 1440P, thats the go to resolution in 2024 and beyond for now of course until games fully matured to run 4K res properly on PC. VRAM isn't an easy for GPUs these days, its the Devs that's flippen lazy to optimize the games.
Nvidia- great for RT+DLSS, streaming, content creation and work of course. Power efficient. Caters for everyone but greedy like Apple.
AMD- gaming only. Very Power-hungry. Caters for gamers only and make GPUs affordable for now but soon will skyrocket their pricing because AMD doesn't really make much profits.
I have an RTX 4070 and I am quite happy with it even though I only have 12GB Vram.
I believe that if I had both these cards, I would've just tweaked a few settings in-game to get 100+ FPS on 4K. Unless bro didn't enable any special features on Team Green and Team Reds GPUs.
Great video bro 👍 👌 👏
Everyone should go for the Ada card with the biggest L2 cache crossbar that you can afford.
Nvidia change his Strategy to stay thief : release a new gpu almost the same of Rtx 4080 (+2 fps) and put it at the price it should be at the start for the rtx 4080
despite the FPS difference, did you notice any visual differences? did a card have better image quality?
The cards are pretty even with each other. It will come down to features and price for some people. Sadly most people are gonna go with brand over all else but thats for those types of people.
If its strictly price I would buy the amd card. But if nvidias encoder (for streaming and recording) , and the rt performance is worth the extra cost then i would go with that.
If you are a prospective buyer never let brand bias sway ur decision. Both companies have had bad drivers and both companies have had high power draw and high temps before. Just go with what fits ur needs.
Please, PLEASE, make a 1440p version of this comparrison.
For what's essentially the same raster performance for the same price, I would prefer Nvidia this time. But still 7900 XTX and 4080 SUPER are priced like flagships but are just mediocre.
7900xtx is like 900
@@phantom0590 I think I saw it at $930, but I think $70 is worth 2x better RT performance and DLSS, because it certainly is pretty good to have. Though, 4070 SUPER is not worth $100 more than the 7800 XT lol, and also I think the 7900 XT needs to drop more in price.
In my country the 4080 s is 800 more than the 7900 xtx, the rquivalent of roughly 180 in dollars
calma calabreso
4080s is 200€ more here in Germany, not sure if its worth it, personally i would go xtx because i dont care about RT.
i dont get Nvidia, what is the difference between 4070 Ti super and 4080? WHat is the diffrence between 4070 ti super and 4070 super?
4080 every so slightly faster then 4070 ti super and the dif between ti super and super is about 5 - 10% faster tho it depends on game obv
Hey Mate , i want to buy new 4800S or the 7900 XTX , mainly I play PubG can you include PUBG in a test
You don't need these videocards for this game. You need a good processor
Hola gente, se ve constantemente comentarios sobre el consumo elevado que puede llegar a consumir la 7900 XTX. Entiendo que no todos cuentan y me incluyo con una fuente de poder de al menos 1000w o 1200w., pero si ese fuera el caso y tubiese ese tipo de fuente, me importaría un cuerno cuanto me consuma la placa, mientras me rinda lo que tiene que dar estaré tranquilo. Sacando esto, aunque tenga menos cuda core que su contrincante, pero tiene más cantidad de transistores, más ancho de banda de memoria, más vram, más bits anchura del bus de memoria, más TFLOPS, mayor Índice de textura, con todo esto, sin duda para mí la 7900XTX encara su vida a un futuro más extendido.
We need those comparisons but in triple 1440p monitors for us sim racers, 3 1440p monitors is a bit more pixels than 4k and will require a lot more power. My 7800XT is barely running iRacing at 100-130fps at mediocre graphics, and this is a ancient racing game.
I also have triples 1440p for sim racing. Dirt Rally 2 avg 90 fps, 40 avg high preset in ETS2, for a 12 year old game. I guess my 8700k and 6800XT are too weak, gonna upgrade to a 14600k to see if there's any improvement. We've gone far beyond the 4k realm. Fucking hell.
@@QuanLuuI have a 5800x3d but the 7800xt might not be cutting it, I might have to upgrade to a 4080 Super or the new 5000 series and maybe leave the 7800xt for a 2nd PC later on.
@@TheACCHRM Thoughts on the 7900XTX? In my country, you can buy a top 7900XTX (Sapphire Nitro+) for the money of an entry 4080S (MSI Ventus). From what I researched, AMD for rasterization and Nvidia for ray tracing. Haven't tried ray tracing, not sure if I need it tho.
for non Ray Tracing radeoon is good but when RTX ON is slow... hope RX 8000 series or 9000 can AMD make it powerfull
AMD will always be a whole gen under NVIDIA at RT.
they can easily catch up but for some reason they dont@@laszlozsurka8991
@@laszlozsurka8991 Always? 😂 Avatar uses RT by default and their performance is nearly the same
The difference won't get any better with the next Generation. To make matters worse, AMD is NOT going to come out with enthusiast class RDNA 4 cards. The highest models you'll see will be the RX 8800 xt and maybe an 8850xt down the line. The RX 8800xt is supposedly going to be as fast as the RX 7900xtx but it will be 40% cheaper.
Rumors say AMD tried to make a high end, MCM, RDNA 4 card to take on the 5090, but it would have ended up costing around $2400usd.
The 7900 XTX is cheaper and offers more pure rasterisation, but at the cost of higher TDP and suffers significantly worse performance at raytracing. The 4080 super is more expensive and is marginally weaker at rasterised graphics, but excels at raytracing, draws less power, and comes with the added benefits of NVIDIA software features like DLSS and support for streaming.
It's entirely up to user preference, but if I had the money, I'd personally choose the AMD card.
P.S. I almost forgot to mention the VRAM capacity! The 7900 XTX has 24 GB, and the 4080 Super has 16. Currently, both are more than sufficient for modern games, but the 7900 XTX may age more gracefully due to the larger capacity.
I can guarantee you that AMD card is not going to age more gracefully. More and more games are going to be using RT. Unreal 5 games with dynamic ToD are all gonna use it. You are gonna run into terrible RT performance lot sooner than you will run into VRAM limitation of 16GB..
I see lots of complaning about 50 watts more power draw on rx7900xtx , but so many yet pair rtx4080 with intel cpus that uses 200 watts more to run similar fps .
That complaining on power draw is nonsense, just hating amd thats all you guys do ,
Can we maybe for once in our life get a video where it's not just running and have actual fights/battles or something where we can see how it would affect the fps? But i guess i doesn't really matter for me as i never use high settings and will be buying high end pc anyway.
My guess is that it would affect the consistency of the test as the scene would be unpredictable between test runs.
Whats the point in spending the money to get either card when you still cant achieve 4k 100+ fps in modern games.
Id rather play in 2k and get a 7800xt, wait a few more years and see if theres a massive jump like when we got the 1080ti.
Its not that the cards aren't powerful enough, the games are just way too crappy and unoptimised
And that's why I play at 1440p ultrawide with a 4080 super. Will never move to 4K.
@@caribbaviator7058 yeah spending 1000 dollars to play on 2k
@@parasgupta8411 My monitor is 3440x1440. My mistake
That resolution is still demanding.
@@parasgupta8411 Nothing wrong with playing on 2k tho and higher frames. Ofc this depends on what type of games you play. However I agree that the current market is overpriced for GPU's but that theme has been going on for a few years.
Program name please what shows temp and % ?
Light and reflections seem to be handled better by RTX.
*Where is the Witcher 3 Next-Gen?*
very Similar In Performance in some games the 7900 xtx does better and in some games the 4080 super does better the only difference is that the 7900 xtx has more vram and raw performance While the rtx 4080 super has better ray tracing performance and Stability
*Test please again in 2560*1440 (2K)!*
And that is why I got myself a 4080 super. As soon as there is raytracing, the AMD card just falls apart.
Yeah. I feel like I should’ve waited before I got my XTX but I got a killer deal on it for $800 on FB market
@@pluschy7886 7900XTX at 800$ sounds like a steal ngl
doesn't matter if nvidia or amd both lose over 50% fps in heavy rt, not worth it. Both can do software raytracing similar, hardware RT aint worth the fps cost.
I've had ray tracing cards for 6 years now and I can honestly say I've turned on ray tracing for a grand total of maybe 10min.
AMD is also completely cancer when it comes to heat,power draw, drivers, coil whine. And the list goes on. AMD is great for cpus. But gpu's aren't their thing.
i got 7900 xtx and really wanted to like it, got refund after 4 days of really trying to like it. So many bugs and glitches, Put old 2070 back in for normality again.
Typical AMD.
In Europe the minimal real price are :
4080 sup : 1100euro
7900xtx : 950 euro
It is 150 euro difference but at the same time RT in 1440p is fully playable on Nvidia so it can be a good idea too
Rt? For the whole 4 games that actually support it?
What about power consumption, dlss support much more games than fsr and stabel drivers? And used Nvidia gpu easier to sell. t@@dungeondeezdragons4242
@@dungeondeezdragons4242it's not 2018 but cope
@@coroysaa7074 ok, name serious games that actually support rt, aside from cyberprank, control and alan wake.
@@coroysaa7074 ok, list worthwhile games that support rt.
C'est pas mal mais pas assez vieux. Moi c'était Street fighter 2, Nba Jam ou ISS Pro Evolution 2 !
7900xtx wins. And something is to point. Power draw was low, becouse it can go up to 460w. Core frequency was low, it can go up to 3000-3100 mhz.
So there's a lot more performance that can be squeezed from 7900xtx. (I have one. The nitro+)
7900 is way less efficient. +50-100W just for a few more FPS? Ouch!
I bought 4080 for $870 with 2 years warranty, while cheapest 7900xtx cost $960 here. Outside America, Australia and Europe, Nvidia is cheaper.
Am I missing something? I have a 7800xt and I don’t run it in ultra on everything but I can get 100 fps when playing 4k. I’m guessing this is more just “raw” or no adjustments in adrenaline, turning motion blur off, etc. ? Cause I literally just sold my 7800xt to grab a 7900xtx 😂 hope it’s worth it!
i just want 7900xtx to run warframe and future soulframe on 4k max out both games and at least i hope get 240fps i know i could in warframe and for sure in soulframe some friend is in the beta and with a 3070 he can run it on everything on max at 1080p at 200 fps and he show me some pics and looks sooo beutiful amazing better than pandora no ofense but still in alpha beta soo i know in the future gonna look more sick
With setting like high or very high u get amazing fps on AMD cards but with raytracing on u get better ones on nvidia but still amd catches up good
nVidia 50W less power consumption FTW
Price is the difference. Price has always been the difference.
7900xtx is just the better card for the average consumer especially if you dont care about maxed RT.
Even though they are the same price and Nvidia wins in some games I'd still get the RX7900XTX , since the AMD Card still wins most of the time and has more VRAM that I will probably need in the future. But at least this time the performance is close enough for the price for me to at least consider going with Nvidia for the first time since my gtx 1050Ti
Can AMD change your mind if xtx price gets lowered may be for 799$?
RT performance is going to be much bigger bottleneck sooner than VRAM..
More VRAM that you will need in the future. Wrong way of thinking in so many ways... But hey it's your money
no bro. Sorry. Because the current memory clock speed of 7900 xtx will never allow the use of 24 GB vram. You can look at the 4070 ti and 3090 tests. 4070 ti is %2 faster than 3090. (in native comparison) Even though 3090 is 12 gigs more, you will not be able to find a solution to the clock speed. Because any 12 GB GPU card that will come a few years from now will give 60 fps at 4k, while the 24 GB xtx will perhaps have a power below 30 fps. More vram will be of no use in this case
Which video card should I take 7900xтх or 4080?
xtx
xtx will be more future proof. just put win power profile on high performance. AMD cards do not like the windows balanced mode atm. (dx crashes will be completely avoided this way)
@@jorgalbertkonigseder Terrible efficiency though. Much higher power draw for AMD. Ouch!
I don't think your test is very honest, it's impossible for the 13900k to have such low consumption, I have the 14900k under UV and on cyberpunk it's around 160watts in 4k
He undervolted?
Daamn thats sad! Games recommend these cards at 4k ultra & cant even go pass 60+ fps. The 1st 3 games should be running at like 80 to 90 fps 4k not below 60! This here is why i stick with 1080p. Graphics cards are still having issues keeping up with 4k 60 unless is Esports related titles. Other than that its not great to have 4k display. Ive seen so many tests with highest performing hardware & still struggle at 4k 60+. 70 feels like it struggled to that fps. Like i said this is why im staying at 1080p ultra.
Yep people say these are 4k cards but in reality not even the fucking 4090 is a legit 4k card. But that's the only card I'll get if I wanted to play 4k. It's too damn expensive so I'll go with a 7900xtx/4080S for a 1440p monitor. The pinnacle of 4k era is not here yet
Все спорят, нужно rt или нет, а вывод-то только одни из видео: на сегодня топовый сегмент видеокарт еле-еле дотягивает до 60+ fps в играх в 4К. И то с костылями типа dlss. Короче, как сидели на full HD, так и продолжаем. Для 4К запас небольшой у сегодняшних карт или вообще нет.
Nvidia for RT, DLSS 3, Upscaling image quality, power consumption, VR, Streaming, Video HDR and Upscaling, upcoming RTX Real HDR.
AMD XTX is like buying a last gen GPU for 5 extra rasterized fps. Seems so worth it.
In another comment another person shared info about amd's improvement in all areas. Might be worth checking it out
you have low fps even with RT and DLSS so its pointless .... also less than 1% of people even own a HDR display.. 7900XTX costs only a little more than the 4070 Ti Super... the 4080 super is 150-200$ more expensive than the 7900XTX
imagine typing this with a straight face
Don’t forget Nvidea is best for Working in Blender, Game engines, Substance Painter, and other professional workloads.
All those are great if you make game mods. Or, if you do anything outside the narrow scope of gaming Nvidea is the way to go
AMD sucks big time in VR performance, their best 7900xtx cant compete with even a 4070s
MSRP may be 999 vs 999 US dollars, but in reality on any given average day in the US the 7900 XTX is 920 and the 4080 Super is 1150. I do believe that the 4080 Super is the better card overall, but it's not a whopping 230 dollars better. If you are one of the few lucky ones to be able to grab a 4080 Super for the super rare 999 MSRP price then yes, it's the better deal. Thing is though, the 7900 XTX is going to keep dropping in price, and the 4080 Super will not drop lower than 999 for a long time.
Brasil:
RX 7900 XTX Sapphire R$ 6.499,99
GeForce RTX 4080 Super ICHILL X3 R$ 7.599,99
7900XTX가 전기를 50W 더 먹는 것과 드라이버 대응이 조금 느린점,RT 약한게 단점
엔비디아 대비 비슷한 성능에 싼 가격과 AMFM 지원에서 장점
In crearivitie ,3d,pictures creation ,the xtx make 3X more time de create pictureq,video etc
I prefere nvidia ,most performance in everythings
One problem....I love RT in all games and PT in Cyberpunk even more,so you can kiss XTX goodbye
Path tracing in Cyberpunk? Kiss the 4080 goodbye lmao. That shit even brings the 4090 to its knees. Ray and pathtracing are alpha/beta technologies for which us fools with overpriced GPUs are the Guinee Pigs. Why on earth people would rather have RT at 60fps, over no RT at 144+ is absolutely beyond me... it's staggering.
RTX 4080 seems a better choice here, it consume less power for almost the same FPS.
Sobald RT an ist kannst du AMD in die Tonne schmeißen.
2:13 You say the game runs at 4K in description but you used DLSS quality? And 7900 XTX can't use the DLSS. What is the Fairness?
not DLSS but it can use FSR. have a good look around. games aren't being optimized properly anymore. we are forced to use sht like DLSS cuz all these new games are really demanding to play and require the very best card
BROOO, please, compare 5700x3D vs 5800x3D, nobody in the world did that test ((
why 5800x3d still stronger than 5700x3d that is new why would amd let 5700x3d be faster than 5800x3d it wont sell them if they do that
In my country rtx 4080s ₹ 125000 =$1500 and rx 7900xtx is ₹ 111000=$1300
I've got the 4080s and honestly its not that impressive considering the price, and also, who would play 60fps with RT ? Nowadays we all have at least 120/144hz monitor. and it sells for freaking 1326.10usd here. crazy right
Yep bought the 4080S and it's a bit underwhelming.
My monitor max is 100hz ultrawide and there are some games that fall below that.
Here in Ecuador RX 7900XTX 1100 Dollars RTX 4080 SÚPER 1450 Dollars...
Its basically same for all EU countries. 4080S costs around 300+ euroes more same decent AIB models not the cheapest crap versions.
This is false advertising. I have 4080 S and with max settings, DLSS quality on, no frame gen, I get 80-90 FPS in 4k.
these cards trade blows with each other but i feel the 4080 is superior
Just expecting the promised AI upscaling AMD, if they made it good, I have no reasons to buy Nvidia
If you are a sim racer then amd is pretty goated. Plus I prefer raw performance anyways lol.
Went with the rtx 4080S. Nvidia has continued to be the leader in technological advancements. My rx6800 was a disaster. It was bland Bugs, crashes ain't no way I'm buying rdna 3.
Oh AMD and VR? That's a no.
I literally got in an argument with some troll this morning claiming that AMD doesnt have a single GPU that can compare to the 4080... so here I am to prove them wrong lol.
yeah and yourv7900xtx uses more electricity hahahaha
@@cronoxtrigger4791????????????????????????????????????????????????????
If you only play in games and rt not matter for you:
buy the 7900 xtx
But if you use:
Rt and fg
Ai image generation
Video edit and render
buy the 4080 or 4080s
Amd good cards in middle segment but ,if take the top segment,cards from nvidia better in all
Everybody talking about the 5 fps difference whit no RT, but have you seen the 100Watt More power consumption of the 7900xtx ..
People still buy Intel latest CPU's also... many dont care about power draw. It was same with 30 series nvidia cards that consumed more than AMD yet they still bought it 3080's. In the end is what matters is perf vs cost.
If you don't have anything good to say, just be quiet yall. Raytracing matters, only if you can still maintain above 60 fps. And it's not including the Frame Generation of course. If you don't even have that base, just know your card is not there yet. Kinda ironic because you get more VRAM but can't utilize the Raytracing because it's not powerful enough. It's a win-win I guess but looking at this trend I think this is a good way how to make your card less future-proofing. Also contradic to get an RTX card to play with Raytracing disabled. 😂
should I go for a rtx 4080 or 7900 xtx to use with a 5800x 3d for 4k gaming?
For 4k with the 5800x3d, I would go with the rx 7900xtx. It has more vram and it can also benefit from SmartAcessMemory in some games. Also, it can typically be found at a cheaper price than the 4080/s but that will depend on your country/region.
ty
Either way, the only game that stands out, fps wise, is Forza Horizon 5. For all the others, you're dependant on the gimmicks (upscaling and frame generation), if you want to game at 4K and have over 60/70 fps. For the prices they're asking for these gpu's, it's just not worth it. Then again, it's the same thing with 2K gpu's.
So ... What are we left with here: spend money on 4K gpu and game at 2K, to achieve better frame rates!? A big NO, thank you, from me.
I can't stand how expensive Nvidia priced their cards and how little RAM they use in comparison with AMD. However Nvidia simply wins over AMD in every category other than price. Much better ray tracing performance, better upscaling performance, better upscaling quality, better software & drivers, less power consumption.
It's totally false DLSS and FSR are almost same, i have no driver problem with AMD, AMD have more fps in raster and cheaper
@@louislemieux5312 DLSS perfromance looks better than fsr quality at 4k.
@@DungxxHen tested this in cyberpunk, no way in hell
@@mihairomulus2488 in motion DLSS is better, fsr looks like an oil painting
@@DungxxHen opposite for me, fsr in stills looks not great but in motion its cool, dlss makes screenshots great but otherwise it feels like depth of field to anything
Why doesnt amd fanboys talk about the 50w power difference and 5 degrees tempersture
If you want excellent experience in future UE5 games and you’re not patient, 4080 super. Bc AMD upscales, frame gen, and Ray tracing is still not mature.
But if you aim for native res no RT, or competitive games at 300fps, 7900xtx. The 24GBs vram will last you forever. 😂
I am assuming this was done with DLSS3? Is there a test to do this with AMD's FMF because DLSS3 includes frame generation?