Wildes is my favorite of the three main hosts. I love Brou and Nick, too. I am a KC fan, so I started following the show because I really appreciate Nick's unshakable support, defense, and even his bias for the Chiefs. But KW has such an entertaining demeanor and style that he has won me over as the best of the bunch.
funny how Wildes is like "enough with the preamble, get to the content!" when he spends 45 seconds at the top of every show with preamble before getting to the content lol
'01-07 Patriots 5 AFCCG appearances 4 Super Bowl appearances 3 Super Bowl titles Only 16-0 regular season in NFL history '11-18 Patriots 8 AFCCG appearances 5 Super Bowl appearances 3 Super Bowl titles That's the only fair way to break up the Patriots Dynasty but if you ask me it encompasses the entire thing
For me Patriots are a 20 year conference level dynasty that has 2 league level dynasties that book ended it. Between the cores of the main runs just doesn't have enough be counted as full league level dominance that a league level dynasty requires. Certainly has enough AFC dominance for a conference level dynasty.
I think that’s reasonable, but ultimately a worse argument than just saying they’re all one. As a longtime Chiefs fan, although I thought the Pats dynasty was over in ‘04 (or at least when they lost in ‘07), I would now consider it a 20 year dynasty. Same QB. Same coach. A few SB losses in the middle, but they were always in the mix. Definitely the greatest dynasty of all time (at least so far). A Chiefs win next Sunday will only catch up with SF and PIT. 🤷♂️
Wildes is slowly starting to see the Chiefs as a threat to Patriots legacy. He was low key dissing the Chiefs calling them a "mini dynasty". Wildes might end up on the bulletin board before the Superbowl. He is definitely picking the Eagles. Second excommunication is on the horizon.
@@AlexHendershotidc they didn’t win a single ring which is even more impressive to do considering they literally had 4 tries, twice against the same team. They don’t belong with any of those those teams
I agree. If they are using the afc/nfc championships in there then I don't see how NE isn't 1 big dynasty. They went to a sb once every 2 years basically lol
Patriots should be one single Dynasty as during the 10 year title drought they were still a perennial contender making 2 Super Bowls and even more Conference Championships and since Nick seems to value Super Bowl and Conference Title game appearances, him breaking it into 2 dynasties is just so he can more easily put the Chiefs #1 which just isn't true... yet.
Nick can’t do that, he manipulates stats to make his Chiefs look better. QB wins stat only applies to Mahomes when ranking QBs and if applied to anyone else he complains he hates QB wins.
The patriots made 8 straight conference championships. Disingenuous. He puts conference championships in the count, they EASILY dominate that conversation.
@@bigcroc-rr6hythe greatest the sport had ever seen what where they doing for those 10 years oh yea losing to mark Sanchez,Jake Plummer and Eli best my a$$
@@tannerbrown4953 Went into K.C and beat the Chiefs in the AFC final though stopping Mahomes right in his tracks though.. Then Brady and the Bucs stopped The Chiefs again and and Eli, Plummer and Sanchez all put up better numbers than Mahomes and his 3 Field Goals Hahahaah
Man, as a Giants fan I still find it kinda crazy that they really were on their way to back to back SB wins and ultimately woukdve been a dynasty and it all fell apart because Plax shot himself in the leg. Man what a massive what if
Giants fan here myself. As grateful as I am for the 4 titles, it’ll always feel like both of those eras left one on the table. The 89 giants were prob better than the 90 giants, and they should’ve won the title that year. Got upset by the rams at home. Same case with the 08 giants. 4 titles is great. *6* titles with 2 back to backs in the space of 20 years sounds much better.
08, 09, 10 Giants teams were massive chokers. Such an odd run.. literally the strangest ever lol. Win a SB, choke for 3 straight years.. then win again.. 😂
Meh. The Bills BARELY made it and the Vikings didn't go to 4 straight (it was 4 in 8 years) so you are just arguing for the sake of arguing otherwise why not put up a bunch more almost dynasties like when Elway went to 3 Super Bowls in 4 years? 🤷🏾♂
@@jasoncain9602basketball? MAYBE THE EAGLES A LITTLE BIT? Outside of the hurts QB focused segment they did once yesteday? The last 3 years the lead up to the superbowl for this show is just Chiefs glazing and it’s honestly lazy
@@TheBlackestKnight21 NBA interest is at an all time low tbh… it’s not glazing just talking about the best team in the league lol. They talk about the eagles too but like it or not, the narrative is about the Chiefs and Mahomes and making history. It would be stupid not to talk about it.
If the Eagles win the Super Bowl, are we a mini dynasty?!? We would’ve won 2017, made it in 2022, and then win 2024. That would be 3 Bowls in 7 years, with 2 wins. And if the birds win, it would mean both SB wins were vs the Pats, and Chiefs dynasty teams. I’m sure Nick will Love this take!
I think the argument against that is the lack of continuity. Different headcoach, different QB, even Jason Kelce retired before seeing this SB. Not throwing any shade, still an impressive team.
I'd place them around, but below, the '07-'11 Giants territory with that. Since Lane Johnson and Brandon Graham are the only two that would be on both SB winning teams (unless I'm forgetting someone) and two different coaches they fall into the "quazi/confrence" dynasty group. They certainly would belong in that group the lack of continuity holds them back to the bottom of it.
It’s crazy how they separated the patriots dynasty into two different eras…the era they didn’t include had two Super Bowl appearances and 5 or 6 afc championship game appearances in 8 years also very impressive still just as dominant it just didn’t go their way…unless Kc can go to another 2 superbowls in the next 15 years the patriots will be the best team of all time for the foreseeable future, pats 1a chiefs 1b when we win the Super Bowl
The patriots had 2 NFL dynasties that book ended during a 20 year AFC dynasty. The middle part wasn't league level dominance, "just" conference level dominance.
Why would you include a 10 year period where you did nothing but lose? Went to 6 conference games but lost 4. Went to 2 Super Bowls but lost both. And had ugly wild card and divisional round losses
Pats put a real dagger into the Chiefs plans when they went right into Arrowhead and knocked off Mahomes and the Chiefs in the 2018 AFC Championship game..
Wildes and Brou clearly don't understand the definition of a dynasty lol it's about winning multiple championships in a short period of time, not about how long you were in general a good team, and it ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT START COUNTING until you win your first Championship
For everyone commenting it should be the Patriots, they cannot be considered a 20 year dynasty when they went 10 years without winning the SB. It’s more impressive that the Pats had 2 dynastic runs in a 20 period. Stop being ridiculous 💀
@@bennwardhaugh3013 One of those years was without Brady . The Pats sure made this a conversation when Brady and New England walked right into Arrowhead and beat Mahomes and the Chiefs in the AFC final in 2018. Then The Bucs and Brady really made this conversation interesting by beating Mahomes and Chiefs where all the Chiefs did is put up 3 FG's. And if the Chiefs lose this SB then try beating the dynasty The Pats put up between 2014 and 2018 - 4 SB appearances, 3 SB wins and beating The Chief in 2018 to get to one SB Only hope the Chiefs have is winning this SB
The perspectives these men bring to the table are off the metrics. They don’t argue or debate. They make compelling cases for their views & ALL of them can be true. This group is perfect.
THe point Nick made for the Pats 10 yr stretch not winning a SB is in the Pats favor, they didn't win a Chip but they still were a very successful team making it to multiple SBs and AFC chip games
Yeah I dont understand how it's even close .. well I do Nick had to try and put Mahomes over Brady some how so break Bradys career into 2 separate years 😂.. kind of embarrassing..one of the reasons I dislike the Chiefs .. Im from the UK so used to love the chiefs until I found this show but Nick has slowly turned that lol
Dynasty is an elite achievement that is in sync with the Pittsburgh Steelers, San Francisco 49 niners , Dallas Cowboys and especially the New England Patriots. The Cheats don't make the cut even with the refs on the roster... I'm independent and unbiased Raiders fan...
Exactly for the 2decades brady was there, everytime that team went out there, victory was all that was expected, and when they didn't win...it was such a big deal, breaking news type of ish😂...Nick think people forgot..
Yea the pats had a 10 year gap between their championships but 5 of those years they lost to the eventual champions and one year tom got hurt … so it should definitely be one dynasty
Nick also namedrops the quarterbacks of the teams of some of the teams they lost to just to make them look bad as if those teams didn't have INSANE defenses. The Patriots didn't lose to "Joe Flacco's Ravens", they lost to Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, Haloti Ngata and Terrell Suggs' Ravens. They didnt lose to "Jake Plummer's Broncos", they lost to a 13-3 Broncos that had the 3rd best defense in the entire league led by Hall of Famers Champ Bailey and John Lynch plus First Team All-Pro Linebacker Al Wilson.
I think the best dynasties are the early Steelers, 49ers, and Cowboys of the 90s. As good as the Chiefs are, we can't pretend like the last 15-20 years haven't seen the league try to downplay defense and protect the QB way too much. The physicality of the pre Brady, pre-QB protection Era is more impressive to me
If you gave Brady and Mahomes those Non Salary Cap teams where the Cowboy's or Niners were1 and 2 for about 15 years straight in spending can you imagine what they would do - 13 times the Niners spent more money on either offense or defense than the combined salaries of 13 other teams. As for toughness > Brady was sacked twice as many times as Montana was in his career. And as for it being easier on QB's today.. Care to go through the list with me on QB injury's in the last 10 years? This would be the point where you and the 5 people who agreed with you lost this debate Now go back and listen to your Huey Lewis and The News cassette
Man the chiefs are in the Super Bowl deservedly so but it’s become exhausting how much they talk about them all year lol. Seems like no matter what they fit in 7 chiefs segments every episode of the year
@ lol i get it you love the chiefs. They deserve to be talked about. And I’m allowed to have my opinion that this show talks about them too much. Still the best show but that’s how I feel. No need to get pissy😂
@@skubaRu7it’s not that I love the chiefs, it’s that salty, whiney fans of the other teams complaining is annoying. If you want them to talk about someone else then say it with your chest, so we can all laugh at them.
I'll give you standards about those Niners teams.. For 15 years straight the Niners and Cowboy's were 1 or 2 in spending . 13 times the Niners spent either more on offense or defense that 13 other teams combined salaries *asterisk *Non Cap Era*
THANK YOU!!! I hate this time of the show every year, it’s just making up hypotheticals for Kansas City etc and I get they’re the best team but they don’t have the allure imo to have this many segments about them
Wildes is going to pick the Eagles to win the SuperBowl. If the Eagles win, he's going to have bragging rights. If the Eagles lose, he's going to be like, "I did it to help give the Trifecta Kansas City Chiefs motivation" and Nick is going to lose his mind about it too 😂 I love this show!
Nick's claim that the Patriots isn't one giant dynasty that lasted 20 years while also stating the Bills, that never even won a super bowl, is a dynasty is all you need to know about him
To Wildes point, I became a Cowboys fan in 1997 when my front runner cousin gave me a hand me down hat. This prompted nearly 30 years of pain and disappointment due to the Cowboys performance. To make matters worse, I’m from the NY/Mass boarder and thus was surrounded by obnoxious fans who’s teams were winning.
12:30 “we didn’t make a bunch more deep playoff runs.” The Pats went to the conference championship in 06,07,11,12,13, and went to the SB twice, but lost on crazy plays.. so you can’t say they didn’t go on any deep playoff runs lol
Patriots have to be connected. Same QB same, same Head coach, within that 10 year hiatus they went to 2 SB and multiple playoffs they remained extremely consistent. Clownish behavior from Nick as usual.
Seriously, how can you say that a team that was in the AFC Championship game for 13 out of 18 years with the same coach and QB, are not one singular dynasty? The drought for the Patriots was from 08 to 2010, and one of those years the QB was injured the entire season.
@@DonnyStanley i agree totally, hes is putting the bills there, and is showing the Conference champ appearencens in the graphs. I think dynasty is way more nuanced than "won 3 in 4 year" or something, i would put the niners as a bigger dinasty too, from 1981-1994: 9 NFCCG APP, 5 TITTLES
The difference between all those franchises and the Chiefs, is the fact that nobody is allowed to touch Mahomes, much less tackle him. Every defender is worried about a bs flag being thrown for a 15 yard penalty. QBs like Montana, Bradshaw, Young, Aikman, etc got fkn drilled in to the ground and it was fair game. Teams are getting flagged for ALMOST tacking Mahomes 😂 it’s apples to oranges
Wildes had Nick on the ropes then inexplicably let him off when he veered into the “why doesn’t the KC dynasty show 2018” territory. I get what he was going for, but he should’ve stuck to the 6>4 point. 😂
Subscribe to First Things First now: www.youtube.com/@FirstThingsFirst
Plus no one is gunna care what nick thinks. It's his opinion and to some ppl it's garbage
My All time List Goes
1. Manning Family
2. Tom Brady Dynasty
3. Modern Chiefs
4. 49ers All time
5 Green Bay Packers All time
6. 70s Steelers
7. 90s Cowboys
Has this show become a giant Troll?
How can you split the Patriot one when they had the same QB and Coach?
Wildes calling the current Chiefs a “mini-dynasty” to get a rise out of Nick is exactly why he’s leader of the show
talk about another guy get his name out of your throat jesus
Wildes is my favorite of the three main hosts. I love Brou and Nick, too. I am a KC fan, so I started following the show because I really appreciate Nick's unshakable support, defense, and even his bias for the Chiefs. But KW has such an entertaining demeanor and style that he has won me over as the best of the bunch.
@@Servbell0 kid all you've done is make 10 comments everywhere about how you hate that people like Wildes, get a life lol jesus
@@Servbell0 agreed. These sheep just love to parrot love for a dude because others said so
@@skyler62itodi "anyone who likes something i don't like is a sheep parrot" lol yall are highkey pathetic
Wildes calling out Nick for being boring because he was talking about “dates” of a previous show had me rollin 😂
Lol Nick was being a super nerdy dude. Glad someone stopped his rambling.
Straight glazing wildes
Man nick can give the jabs but can't take them lol
funny how Wildes is like "enough with the preamble, get to the content!" when he spends 45 seconds at the top of every show with preamble before getting to the content lol
@@mikeelton3686 nick seemed fine what you talkin about
Wildes hits new epic levels of Nick trolling here. It is so great. Such a cute dynasty; check in with me in a couple decades. 😂
stop glazing wildes
'01-07 Patriots
5 AFCCG appearances
4 Super Bowl appearances
3 Super Bowl titles
Only 16-0 regular season in NFL history
'11-18 Patriots
8 AFCCG appearances
5 Super Bowl appearances
3 Super Bowl titles
That's the only fair way to break up the Patriots Dynasty but if you ask me it encompasses the entire thing
For me Patriots are a 20 year conference level dynasty that has 2 league level dynasties that book ended it. Between the cores of the main runs just doesn't have enough be counted as full league level dominance that a league level dynasty requires. Certainly has enough AFC dominance for a conference level dynasty.
I think that’s reasonable, but ultimately a worse argument than just saying they’re all one. As a longtime Chiefs fan, although I thought the Pats dynasty was over in ‘04 (or at least when they lost in ‘07), I would now consider it a 20 year dynasty. Same QB. Same coach. A few SB losses in the middle, but they were always in the mix. Definitely the greatest dynasty of all time (at least so far). A Chiefs win next Sunday will only catch up with SF and PIT. 🤷♂️
Wildes is slowly starting to see the Chiefs as a threat to Patriots legacy. He was low key dissing the Chiefs calling them a "mini dynasty". Wildes might end up on the bulletin board before the Superbowl. He is definitely picking the Eagles. Second excommunication is on the horizon.
Wildes was so in his feelings. He just started emotionally arguing.
😂😂😂😂
2012 to 16 Seahawks should be on that bottom row. Truly the most "almost" dynasty ever if 1 play goes differently
Good call out. They deserve it more than the Bills.
Not running it with BEAST MODE because A: you were paid to lose, or B: you are a Sht head coach; either way no dynasty would ever do that Sht.
@@monteellis4436do you know how hard it is to win 4 straight conference championships
Nah, 2005-2010 Steelers made more SB’s & conference championships. They’re ahead
@@AlexHendershotidc they didn’t win a single ring which is even more impressive to do considering they literally had 4 tries, twice against the same team. They don’t belong with any of those those teams
Pats are number 1, it shouldn’t be broken up they made two super bowls and multiple playoffs / AFC Championships appearances in between the two
It’s the Pats. Nick doing Nick things to put the Chiefs at the top of the
It’s 10 years apart. It should absolute be two dynasties.
Ten years in between super bowls seems like an issue
I agree. If they are using the afc/nfc championships in there then I don't see how NE isn't 1 big dynasty. They went to a sb once every 2 years basically lol
not even close to 1 dynasty lmao
Patriots should be one single Dynasty as during the 10 year title drought they were still a perennial contender making 2 Super Bowls and even more Conference Championships and since Nick seems to value Super Bowl and Conference Title game appearances, him breaking it into 2 dynasties is just so he can more easily put the Chiefs #1 which just isn't true... yet.
Bills made 4 in a row and didn't even qualify for a real dynasty in this list. So why reach?
Nick can’t do that, he manipulates stats to make his Chiefs look better. QB wins stat only applies to Mahomes when ranking QBs and if applied to anyone else he complains he hates QB wins.
Nah 10 year drought with take points away.
@@xcwilliams7980 18-1 record and 2 SB appearances in that span though . Niners also won 4 in 9 years
Yup 😂
How did I know which team would be on top? Lol
Weird right? Almost like a chiefs fan made the list.
He's unbearable when the Chiefs are involved
Absolute joke lol
Because they’re the best lol? Bit that hard. 5 Super Bowl appearances in 7 years
@@stevenlannister184cry some more
The patriots made 8 straight conference championships. Disingenuous. He puts conference championships in the count, they EASILY dominate that conversation.
10 year gap is a very big question mark to call it one dynasty just because 2 people were there the whole time
Yeah those 2 people so happened to be the greatest the sport has ever seen lol
@@bigcroc-rr6hythe greatest the sport had ever seen what where they doing for those 10 years oh yea losing to mark Sanchez,Jake Plummer and Eli best my a$$
Call it what you will, they were still going to afc championship games and sb. Its not like that 10 yrs they were the dolphins or something.
They went to 2 super bowls in that ten year stretch and also went to multiple afc championship games.
@@tannerbrown4953 Went into K.C and beat the Chiefs in the AFC final though stopping Mahomes right in his tracks though.. Then Brady and the Bucs stopped The Chiefs again and and Eli, Plummer and Sanchez all put up better numbers than Mahomes and his 3 Field Goals Hahahaah
Man, as a Giants fan I still find it kinda crazy that they really were on their way to back to back SB wins and ultimately woukdve been a dynasty and it all fell apart because Plax shot himself in the leg. Man what a massive what if
Yea I kno 😢
Giants fan here myself. As grateful as I am for the 4 titles, it’ll always feel like both of those eras left one on the table. The 89 giants were prob better than the 90 giants, and they should’ve won the title that year. Got upset by the rams at home. Same case with the 08 giants. 4 titles is great. *6* titles with 2 back to backs in the space of 20 years sounds much better.
08, 09, 10 Giants teams were massive chokers. Such an odd run.. literally the strangest ever lol. Win a SB, choke for 3 straight years.. then win again.. 😂
Wildes was cooking
If the 90s bills are on the tiers. The 70s vikings should be too 🤷🏾♂️
Meh. The Bills BARELY made it and the Vikings didn't go to 4 straight (it was 4 in 8 years) so you are just arguing for the sake of arguing otherwise why not put up a bunch more almost dynasties like when Elway went to 3 Super Bowls in 4 years? 🤷🏾♂
Wildes throwing out the bait only for nick to bite immediately lol😂😂
Nick casually forgetting the Chiefs were "decisively" defeated by the Bucs in the super bowl.
Why would that matter to the argument he's making at all lmao
bruh if you watched that game or knew anything about it you wouldn’t be bringing it up trying to slate them lmao
This show has just turned into Nick trying to rationalize how to put the Chiefs on top of every list
that's cool and all, but you're still watching so it must not bother you that much
Ok but like… the chiefs are the best team of the past 7 years and in the superbowl… they supposed to talk about the saints or something?
Ignore the comments I agree
@@jasoncain9602basketball? MAYBE THE EAGLES A LITTLE BIT? Outside of the hurts QB focused segment they did once yesteday? The last 3 years the lead up to the superbowl for this show is just Chiefs glazing and it’s honestly lazy
@@TheBlackestKnight21 NBA interest is at an all time low tbh… it’s not glazing just talking about the best team in the league lol. They talk about the eagles too but like it or not, the narrative is about the Chiefs and Mahomes and making history. It would be stupid not to talk about it.
0:48 this is why wildes is the leader of the show
what he said i ain’t hear
If the Eagles win the Super Bowl, are we a mini dynasty?!? We would’ve won 2017, made it in 2022, and then win 2024. That would be 3 Bowls in 7 years, with 2 wins. And if the birds win, it would mean both SB wins were vs the Pats, and Chiefs dynasty teams. I’m sure Nick will Love this take!
I think the argument against that is the lack of continuity. Different headcoach, different QB, even Jason Kelce retired before seeing this SB.
Not throwing any shade, still an impressive team.
Naw it's 2 separate eras, nice try. Poor eagles were the Cleveland Browns till a few yrs ago lol. Cope about it
@@DonnyStanley fair enough. But Lane Johnson, and BG were on that 2017 team. I know I’m reaching
@@samoavseverybody_814 3 SB appearance in less than 10 years doesn’t sound like the Browns to me champ.
I'd place them around, but below, the '07-'11 Giants territory with that. Since Lane Johnson and Brandon Graham are the only two that would be on both SB winning teams (unless I'm forgetting someone) and two different coaches they fall into the "quazi/confrence" dynasty group. They certainly would belong in that group the lack of continuity holds them back to the bottom of it.
The best sports show fr
“That they lost to yours truly” went hard.
Greg is awesome lol, "And they lost in 2010 to yours truly" that had to feel good to say that lol
Thank you for not revealing the tiers in the title or thumbnail 🙏
Wildes really digging at Nick there at the end, “you got a nice little dynasty” 😂
It’s crazy how they separated the patriots dynasty into two different eras…the era they didn’t include had two Super Bowl appearances and 5 or 6 afc championship game appearances in 8 years also very impressive still just as dominant it just didn’t go their way…unless Kc can go to another 2 superbowls in the next 15 years the patriots will be the best team of all time for the foreseeable future, pats 1a chiefs 1b when we win the Super Bowl
The patriots had 2 NFL dynasties that book ended during a 20 year AFC dynasty. The middle part wasn't league level dominance, "just" conference level dominance.
Why would you include a 10 year period where you did nothing but lose? Went to 6 conference games but lost 4. Went to 2 Super Bowls but lost both. And had ugly wild card and divisional round losses
@@henrystreet6152 it’s ugly for the patriots but 25 other teams would die to have that be their history in a ten year stretch
I love when Wildes messes with Nick and almost makes him cry lol
Pats put a real dagger into the Chiefs plans when they went right into Arrowhead and knocked off Mahomes and the Chiefs in the 2018 AFC Championship game..
who could've seen nick being biased towards his team putting them at the very top SHOCKER
Greg be having that face of "I'm only here so I don't get fired."
I'm agreeing with Broshard Steelers is #1 dynasty. If Chiefs win they be #1 dynasty.
I disagree with the Kurt Warner cardinals take. That team was very live every time they made the playoffs.
Wildes and Brou clearly don't understand the definition of a dynasty lol
it's about winning multiple championships in a short period of time, not about how long you were in general a good team, and it ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT START COUNTING until you win your first Championship
Patriots is #1, because even in the 10 year drought, they never had to rebuild. They were literally always relevant / top contenders.
The Packers won the title the year before the first two super bowls and 5 titles in 7 years. Do those years just not exist or what?
For everyone commenting it should be the Patriots, they cannot be considered a 20 year dynasty when they went 10 years without winning the SB.
It’s more impressive that the Pats had 2 dynastic runs in a 20 period.
Stop being ridiculous 💀
They did go 18-1 and got to 2 SB's in that period..
@@90sGrungeKid And? 10 years between SB wins is a clear break in a Dynasty.
@@bennwardhaugh3013 One of those years was without Brady . The Pats sure made this a conversation when Brady and New England walked right into Arrowhead and beat Mahomes and the Chiefs in the AFC final in 2018. Then The Bucs and Brady really made this conversation interesting by beating Mahomes and Chiefs where all the Chiefs did is put up 3 FG's.
And if the Chiefs lose this SB then try beating the dynasty The Pats put up between 2014 and 2018 - 4 SB appearances, 3 SB wins and beating The Chief in 2018 to get to one SB
Only hope the Chiefs have is winning this SB
Wildes is making a lot of valid points
Wildes @ 18:04-06 saying "yeah" kills me!😂😂❤
He loved Jennings 6 inch/ foot long analogy!😂
The perspectives these men bring to the table are off the metrics. They don’t argue or debate. They make compelling cases for their views & ALL of them can be true. This group is perfect.
Too me the best dynasty’s are the 70’s Steelers, 80’s 9ers and the Pats.!
Thank you brou
THe point Nick made for the Pats 10 yr stretch not winning a SB is in the Pats favor, they didn't win a Chip but they still were a very successful team making it to multiple SBs and AFC chip games
The Pats are one dynasty because they made superbowls and championship games in the middle which makes it contiguous
18:56 wildes really ended on a bad take there LOL. i expect conversation of this at the post game presser
It was a great take. Patriots are the best lol
The only way Nick gets the Chiefs to the top is if he breaks up the Patriots dynasty. I never would have thought that that’s what Nick would do 😂🤣
Nick's daily reminders of how wonderful his Chiefs are is getting old
You're gonna be suffering for the next ten years, man
9 superbowls in 18 years. 9 afc championships and 6 superbowl wins ....Tom Brady and the Patriots are the number 1 dynasty
Yeah I dont understand how it's even close .. well I do Nick had to try and put Mahomes over Brady some how so break Bradys career into 2 separate years 😂.. kind of embarrassing..one of the reasons I dislike the Chiefs .. Im from the UK so used to love the chiefs until I found this show but Nick has slowly turned that lol
@chrishaswell4405 yeah I know 😂
Nick got rattled he knows pats are the best
I am not even a Patriots fan but the fact that TB12 was at the helm for all of those they made the conference championships over and over...
Dynasty is an elite achievement that is in sync with the Pittsburgh Steelers, San Francisco 49 niners , Dallas Cowboys and especially the New England Patriots. The Cheats don't make the cut even with the refs on the roster... I'm independent and unbiased Raiders fan...
I think to anyone who knows football, and watches the games, the patriots were clearly cut from a different cloth.
Exactly for the 2decades brady was there, everytime that team went out there, victory was all that was expected, and when they didn't win...it was such a big deal, breaking news type of ish😂...Nick think people forgot..
Yea the pats had a 10 year gap between their championships but 5 of those years they lost to the eventual champions and one year tom got hurt … so it should definitely be one dynasty
Nick also namedrops the quarterbacks of the teams of some of the teams they lost to just to make them look bad as if those teams didn't have INSANE defenses.
The Patriots didn't lose to "Joe Flacco's Ravens", they lost to Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, Haloti Ngata and Terrell Suggs' Ravens. They didnt lose to "Jake Plummer's Broncos", they lost to a 13-3 Broncos that had the 3rd best defense in the entire league led by Hall of Famers Champ Bailey and John Lynch plus First Team All-Pro Linebacker Al Wilson.
The actual greatest dynasty in NFL history is the 01-18 Patriots. Two decades of dominance. Chiefs can have #2 tho
Kevin Wildes has never been more right about something than what he presented in this segment. Masterclass.
I think the best dynasties are the early Steelers, 49ers, and Cowboys of the 90s. As good as the Chiefs are, we can't pretend like the last 15-20 years haven't seen the league try to downplay defense and protect the QB way too much. The physicality of the pre Brady, pre-QB protection Era is more impressive to me
Two words, salary cap
If you gave Brady and Mahomes those Non Salary Cap teams where the Cowboy's or Niners were1 and 2 for about 15 years straight in spending can you imagine what they would do - 13 times the Niners spent more money on either offense or defense than the combined salaries of 13 other teams. As for toughness > Brady was sacked twice as many times as Montana was in his career. And as for it being easier on QB's today.. Care to go through the list with me on QB injury's in the last 10 years?
This would be the point where you and the 5 people who agreed with you lost this debate
Now go back and listen to your Huey Lewis and The News cassette
Locked my family in the basement just so I could watch this segment in peace
Best and most original comment on here and the only one i laughed at 💯🔥
No matter what happens we all know that Tom Brady beat Patrick Mahomes end of conversation.
Eli beat Brady 🤔
QB head to head is the absolute laziest, low IQ version of football analysis.
Eli is the goat confirmed end of discussion
@aswanwilliam bro, Eli isn't the Goat in his own family. Stop.
Jake Plummer, Mark Sanchez, Nick Foles, Ryan Tannehill, Peyton Manning (3x), Eli Manning (2x), Matt Stafford, Joe Flacco (2x), Dak Prescott....
Its 7 straight confrence game app
Spurs were never a dynasty. If you can't go back to back once, then you can't be a dynasty.
Man the chiefs are in the Super Bowl deservedly so but it’s become exhausting how much they talk about them all year lol. Seems like no matter what they fit in 7 chiefs segments every episode of the year
Well if your team would make the SB they would talk about them. Complain to your team owner that your team sucks.
@ lol i get it you love the chiefs. They deserve to be talked about. And I’m allowed to have my opinion that this show talks about them too much. Still the best show but that’s how I feel. No need to get pissy😂
@@skubaRu7it’s not that I love the chiefs, it’s that salty, whiney fans of the other teams complaining is annoying. If you want them to talk about someone else then say it with your chest, so we can all laugh at them.
@@mattstone9364 supportive or salty, fans are gonna fan regardless. They don’t make comment sections for everyone to agree.
He has to break the years down so Pats wouldn’t be #1 🤡🤡
It's fair to break them up. They went a decade without a championship.
And the chiefs ? Lol ill wait @@drexeldragon1723
10 year gap?
@drexeldragon1723 i might agree with this if they didn't go the SB twice during that 10 year window, even if they lost both
Maybe you don't understand what a dynasty is?? You cannot connect two dynasties with a 10-year Gap.
FINALLY WILDES COOKING AND FREE OF THE GROSS HOSTAGE CHIEFS AND MAHOMES FANDOM
I don't even read the video titles anymore if it's First Things First I'm clicking on it!
Thank you Nick for confirming that Eli Manning should it have been higher on your quarterback tiers list🎤
Wildes DESTROYED Nick 😂
Patriots with Tom Brady are dynasty from Tom’s 1st Superbowl until his last Superbowl with New England.
Exactly
Even if that's the case, that moves them nowhere on the pyramid.
By these standard 49ers 1981-1994.
81-Superbowl Winner
83-NFC Championship Appearance
84-Superbowl Winner
88-Superbowl Winner
89-Superbowl Winner
90-NFC Championship Appearance
92-NFC Championship Appearance
93-NFC Championship Appearance
94-Superbowl Winner
I'll give you standards about those Niners teams.. For 15 years straight the Niners and Cowboy's were 1 or 2 in spending . 13 times the Niners spent either more on offense or defense that 13 other teams combined salaries
*asterisk *Non Cap Era*
@@90sGrungeKidquick name all the hall of famers from those 1980s niners teams and tell me what they have in common.
Chiefs need to win first calm down
The best thing that could happen at this show would be for the kansas city to lose so they can at least have something new to talk about
No, chiefs win they talk abt the 4peat🤣🔥🔥🔥
Fr
@@Aii896as a chiefs fan, this made me bust out laughing. I do feel bad for Non chiefs fans.
THANK YOU!!! I hate this time of the show every year, it’s just making up hypotheticals for Kansas City etc and I get they’re the best team but they don’t have the allure imo to have this many segments about them
they literally talk about the chiefs and their opponents, go rewatch bengals rams coverage
I mean how are the 2003-2011 Steelers not on this. In 3 super bowls, 2 titles, 4 afc championship game appearances. This is ridiculous
Nick putting his chiefs at top is too funny, cant wait when eagles take them down
“Nice lil dynasty” 😂😂
"It's like a medium sized soda. It's nice. It's not bad." - Wildes on the Chiefs' dynasty.
The Patriots Dynasty 14-18 is greater than this Chiefs Dynasty
So making a Super Bowl doesn’t matter??? I totally understand you gotta finish and win the prize but come on now lol
Steelers winning four titles while two of their competitors are on this list is insane.
Greg Jennings! Thank you! I was screaming about that Steelers team to at least be on the last row
Wildes is going to pick the Eagles to win the SuperBowl. If the Eagles win, he's going to have bragging rights. If the Eagles lose, he's going to be like, "I did it to help give the Trifecta Kansas City Chiefs motivation" and Nick is going to lose his mind about it too 😂 I love this show!
Nick's claim that the Patriots isn't one giant dynasty that lasted 20 years while also stating the Bills, that never even won a super bowl, is a dynasty is all you need to know about him
Wildes should had said that two dynasties played each other. One won
To Wildes point, I became a Cowboys fan in 1997 when my front runner cousin gave me a hand me down hat. This prompted nearly 30 years of pain and disappointment due to the Cowboys performance. To make matters worse, I’m from the NY/Mass boarder and thus was surrounded by obnoxious fans who’s teams were winning.
Nelson from the Simpsons launch ,, Haha
I 100 percent agree with Wildes about the Patriots fanbase shrinking they are Chiefs fans now
Wildes is the best 😂
10:02 Brous face says it all 😂
these are more like presidential terms than a dynasty.
49ers 81-94 5 super bowls, 9 NFC Championship games
Put both Pats dynasties on the second tier because if you think about them together it’s better than either the Steelers or niners
49ers dynasty should go all the way to the late 90s and the two patriots dynasty’s should be combined. They should both be ahead of the chiefs.
Vic Vangio needs to rush 5 to keep Carter one on one. Press the Chief's receivers to prevent screens and picks
12:30 “we didn’t make a bunch more deep playoff runs.” The Pats went to the conference championship in 06,07,11,12,13, and went to the SB twice, but lost on crazy plays.. so you can’t say they didn’t go on any deep playoff runs lol
Eagerly awaiting Wildes' excommunication (again) from Chiefs Kingdom.
We’re not combing the Patriots runs because in 10 years they only won 2 conference championships and lost 2 Super Bowls. Not dynastic at all
Loving the special edition version of segments
Patriots have to be connected. Same QB same, same Head coach, within that 10 year hiatus they went to 2 SB and multiple playoffs they remained extremely consistent. Clownish behavior from Nick as usual.
‘14-20’ Tom Brady should be up there himself
Hey Nick, its 9 SB appearances, 13 AFCCG appearances, from '01 to '18, 6 SB wins. One dynasty, your Chiefs don't come close.
Seriously, how can you say that a team that was in the AFC Championship game for 13 out of 18 years with the same coach and QB, are not one singular dynasty? The drought for the Patriots was from 08 to 2010, and one of those years the QB was injured the entire season.
@@DonnyStanley i agree totally, hes is putting the bills there, and is showing the Conference champ appearencens in the graphs. I think dynasty is way more nuanced than "won 3 in 4 year" or something, i would put the niners as a bigger dinasty too, from 1981-1994: 9 NFCCG APP, 5 TITTLES
Man I really do hope Nick gets humbled eagles pull this shi off 😂
The difference between all those franchises and the Chiefs, is the fact that nobody is allowed to touch Mahomes, much less tackle him. Every defender is worried about a bs flag being thrown for a 15 yard penalty. QBs like Montana, Bradshaw, Young, Aikman, etc got fkn drilled in to the ground and it was fair game. Teams are getting flagged for ALMOST tacking Mahomes 😂 it’s apples to oranges
Wildes had Nick on the ropes then inexplicably let him off when he veered into the “why doesn’t the KC dynasty show 2018” territory. I get what he was going for, but he should’ve stuck to the 6>4 point. 😂