Would be interesting to see these GPUs compared on a 7800X3D. Not because the 13900K is a bottleneck or anything, but because that's the CPU gamers would opt for if they chose either of those GPUs.
I mean if the 13900K isn’t bottlenecking I don’t see how it could be interesting. But yea, I get what you mean on the “it’s more realistic” part. There just isn’t really a point in a GPU benchmark
@@mitsuhh Yeah, thats a LOT of money! A DOLLAR a day, and if you ain't gaming 4 hours a day, 365 days a year, you're paying $1/Day tax for nothing, added to the depreciation when you re-sell for pennies. 980Ti was a 5 year GPU. It cost £550. 1950XTX was a 5 year GPU, it cost £380. Even if you ignore the fact that Covid sent the 4090 price into the $2500 range for MOST of it's shelf life, even if you focus on the current $1800 pricetag, that's 3.25x more expensive than the 980Ti was. Absolutely insane! The fact that the 4070 series, essentially the same performance as a GTX970 was, is 2.5x more expensive. You can't *justify* that, it's simple - PC gamers are getting shafted. Today, you have to pay £1800 for the top end card, £1000 for a 3 year card, like those reviewed. MASSIVE difference. And super expensive for a GPU. Shit they even charged people $400 for a 4060, a card that could not even run modern games at 1080p 60fps without turning down detail settings! Even the HD7870 or GTX 560Ti, cards that played modern games on release at 60fps 1080p, cost under £200 at launch for basic models. Why aren't you angry? Are you a prince? :D 99% of people are not princes.
In Poland, you can buy RTX 4080 for less money than RX 7900 XTX and for me this is better choice. RTX have dlss, frame generation and its way better in ray tracing. Only advantage of XTX is 8gb of vram more.
Can u give me link to website or store comrade ? I wouldnt mind making a flixbus trip to the store. I always enjoy being in poland when I leave germany.
Wow I didny realize this is 7900 xtx, miss read it as 7900 xt. 4070 ti super does gave a good value, in asia region 7900 xtx still 1000 usd compared to 4070tiS 800 usd
In my country,the prices of both rtx 4070ti super and rx7900xtx are same,I guess its better to go with amd since the raster performance is much more better than rtx 4070ti super and also its more future proof because of 24gb vram
@@Qelyn and dont forget to learn about adrenalin software, this looks like he dont know shit about amd and did not change anything, thats why ppl who dont know about hardware think "wow! nvidia is so close with performance and cheaper, they must be better...."
@@Qelyn Yup. Is not the fanciest model tho, Is a PNY VERTO, but is an OC model, and it runs frealing cold. Highest i've seen it reach is 60 celsius while gaming and im in a room with no AC, but my case is damn well ventilated: 3 bottom intake fans, 3 upper exhaust aio radiatior fans, currently runing it with my 5800x3d, about to upgrade to a 7800x3d tho. So the card looks fine, just not fancy rgb, but the cooler is huge, damn solid, it even came with a neat anti-sag bracket that is pretty stealth, and of course metal backplate.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but it looks like there's a minor CPU bottleneck on the 7900 XTX in Red Dead 2 and Starfield. That GPU could run the games even faster if the 13900K wasn't slowing it down...at 1440p. Sigh.
I live in Türkiye. Both gpu's are same price here (1150 usd). im gonna choose! Surely 7800 xt. İt is 680 usd bro. Almost all games at 4k 60fps in ultra settings.
@@saiyannegi 90 dollars. Delux extra. But last summer it was 13 dollars. In 2024 %700 prices up. Im just talkin about ps plus. Products are not like that. Usually standart.
So basically same ray tracing performance apart from cyberpunk, I'll take it and it has 24GB Vram to use , it's 840 in the UK , same price as the 4070 Ti Super
The test is biased. 7900 XTX needs to be compared with 4080 super - this is the first thing. Secondly, I will definitely prefer Nvidia because of the "RTX HDR" and DLSS.
Same. AMD way better price but NVIDIA with all it has is overall slightly better than AMD rn. This is coming from someone with an RX 7900 XTX. AMD is overhated for sure but it’s definitely not better than NVIDIA
The thing is the 7900 XTX isn’t £1000 amymore was msrp cheapest i found was £849.99 cheapest ti super was 819.99 and if you have the 7800x3D you can then use SAM and get 10% increase in performance such a great gpu
@@clem9808the 7000 series have really good drivers and if we have seen from amd before they will improve drivers alot over time just like the 6000 series had reduced in power consumption from driver updates
@@clem9808my mate has a 7900 xtx not crashed and has very good temps below 60C but he has a sapphire nitro model which is also undervolted but most of these cards stay lower then 70 or around it
Can't say the same for the US though. xtx has been averaging around 1k and up lately and rtx around 900, with one listed at 819.00 oddly enough as of this writing. Basically depends on your market, think AU has some odd numbers too.
no, this brainfart is just not using the adrenalin software correctly and benchmarking only with intel cpu without amd cpu and amd sam on, so the real boost for the poor rx is not given here, what you see here, if you use like me a ryzen and know how to use adrenalin, you can add like 10-15% on top of his ass benchmarks and then you know the real stats...
As soon as we turn on RT, AMD cards fall apart… Money-wise the AMD is in raster as good as the Nvidia: price/framerate is similar; with RT on… AMD cards are very bad. I would buy neither in 2024. I’ll wait for newer chips and prices: I’m confident that the next gen will be more power saving and AMD will raise the RT bar significantly, then maybe with a competitive price/fps.
Those tests are always a bit stupid, both cards are fine, you don’t need to put everything at max settings… Especially shadows… Hell ! Sometimes you don’t even see the difference while playing with some settings (Yes I’m looking at you Depth of field and Bloom). The main difference is that Nvidia cards have lower temperature overall which is an interesting point for me.
In my personal opinion top of the range AMD is pretty poor. You don't get very good ray tracing, don't get shadowplay or highlights, don't get DLSS and most of the time you're paying similar if not more than NVIDIA cards. Granted the 4080 series and the 4090 are insanely expensive but when the 4070 ti super is about the same as your top of the range card at a fracion of the cost it's surely gotta ring some alarm bells. Never been a big fan of AMD but even ik they're better than this...
It beats the 4080 in raw raster and these cards are good when its comes to undervolting my friends 7900 XTX never passes 300W and 60C sapphire nitro model and if amd improves drivers like they did with 6000 series which caused a drop in power consumption then itll be even better
Мне одному кажется, что Хуанг впадает в детство?! И свой продукт тащит туда же! Иначе как назвать то, что с каждым выходом нового продукта, он вместо того, что бы быть лучше, он ни то, что бы оправдать ожидания не может, становится только хуже и дороже????????!!!!!!!!!!
4070ti super has better temps and less power draw meaning more longevity and less eletric cost. The performance is near identical and i have a 7800x3d paired with my super. It really is the king at 1440p and can even do 4k. I use an uw Oled 175hz and its the best gpu ive ever owned coming from a 3080, i will stick with this until the 6000 series if not maybe longer cause i can game at ultra 4k on older games and even 4k ultra on new games so 1440p is more than good enough
Универсальность карты постигается в играх с лучами? Ладно проф приложения,тут у нвидиа всегда был +,но Лучи... Начнем с того,что лучи никогда не будут массовы,ибо чуть ли не 90% полбзователей либо не могут либо не хотят ими пользоваться,а 7900хтх за ту же либо меньшую цену чем 4070ти с дает на 2-20% производительности лучше в зависимости от игры. И как раз таки универсальность видеокарты достигается в наиболее используемых ими приложениях. Например, стрим и рендер-это увлечение 20% подьзователей видеокарт 4070ти с,когда остальные 80% это разнообразные игры,где 7900хтх справляется лучше. То бишь 1:0 в пользу рх. 2:0 достигается путем меньшей цены за производительность в среднем,то бишь без использования костылей и бесполезных функций,которыми пользуются либо обладатели 4060 чтобы догнать 3060 и даже выйти вперед,либо посмотркть разок на тени, понять,что снижение производительности ради едва заметной функции в 90% игр,ну такое. 2:1 получает синяя карта счет своей "адаптированности" к софту. Тут не поспоришь: хочешь аи,монтаж,новые технологии-берешь нвидиа(выше обрубка 4060,мертворожденного) 4:2 отдам амд за эфимерный запас производительности. Да, этими 24гб видеопамяти,суорее всего,никто не воспользуется в мере,но тогда прибавлю.+1 в пользу нвидиа,за заполнение ниш производительности. Хочешь свеохбюджет? 1650,1630,2060,3050. У амд мало подобного по производительности 1+1;1+2;1+3 и т д итого 4:3 И тут на сцену выходит доступность +1 амд. Ну камон, что раньше,что сейчас переходники на питание видеокарты? Может вернемся к 2 молекс-6+2 пин? Так еще и чуть подогнешь и получишь пожар😅 5:3 Ну и последний лично мой вкус как фаната амд: фириенные титанХ, титан V, версии 20хх 30хх в исполнении нвидиа смотрятся ,как по мне, вне конкуренции. Итого по моему сугубо оичному мнению 7900хтх претендует на топ 1 по рейтингу видеокарт для пользователей,набирая 5 баллов,против 4 у нвидиа.
I would 1000% sacrifce 25fps or so and save wattage, that 7900xtx is a power house with almost 40% more the power draw of the 4070TiS, and barely gets 30fps more AT MOST! Believe it or not, the wattage draw makes a difference on your electric bill over the course of months or even years.
I am pleasantly surprised by 7900 XTX RT performance. I thout it would be about 2 (or even 3) times more FPS on 4070 Ti Super in RT but it's advantage is not so big.
if u consider the ti super is a 1440p card and the xtx is a 4k card for 200 more usd then the rt performance is quite big and it way bigger for path tracing. amd is quite bad for rt not that it's an important feature imo, i think the dlss advantage is much more important
@@62185hhh Ok? Not everybody is going to use RT lmfao. Some people prefer playing competitive FPSes do u think they’re going to use RT to ruin their frames? I’m a comp player so I got the best card for the money and I don’t give af 💀
I’m so sick of hearing nvidia cards or more expensive this & that complaining when there cards have a $200plus more dollar value worth over Amd cards anyway.Whats never mention in all these price comparisons is the fact you can use nvidia cards for professional work along with much better features, that along eliminates the price argument. Not to mention also AMD cards suck at VR..
Kind of crazy how so many people are upgrading to these high end GPU's even the 4090, never would spend so much money on a single PC component even when i have the money, no thanks.
Nah if you can afford it and it doesn't bother you, why not? If you have the money why not? Why do you think rich people are living a different lifestyle? 😂 People saying that can't believe or aren't able to imagine that. Ofc if its useless, not better, or in any use for you don't buy it.
@@mojit27 spending money on things that aren't real ain't worth it and rich people aren't idiots they don't spend shit on these types of things, only desperate and rejects buy these kind of stuff to make themselves feel good.
@@CurseEnforcer What are you yapping about? What is not real??? Either way if you get or build a PC and if you’re rich why not buy the best on the market for whatever purpose? And I already said, if it’s not in any use for you don’t buy it, im not just talking abt GPU's you geek
the dlss and fsr difference has to do with the image quality. the fsr is a worse upscaler because it doesn't use ai technology, in 4k the difference isn't so big since u upscale from higher resolutions but if you play on 1440p and use the upscaler the difference is very noticeable. the fps difference comes from ray tracing. nvidia has special cores that handle ray tracing performance quite better.
Try something soon with 1280x1024 Resoltuion in the future as a fun test! Im curious to see how it looks like on todays games, since almost everyone using widescreen, so give non Widescreen a another chance!
not at all but the upscaler is imo, given that now it's a must in gaming and since dlss is much better, especially below 4k resolutions i think that makes the ti super the clear winner, plus there are other advantages u will get, faster and better fg implementation, the ability to stream on twitch, better drivers, lower power consumption and 200usd lower pricetag.
Same price here beats in every game easily apart from RT its more like the base 4070 but it’ll be more futureproofed because of the vram and raw rasterisation
@@CNTRI715 amd did last gen with the 6000 were more eficient than 3000 and for the most part more powerfull in every tier that was relevant (talking about raster) with the exception of the 3090 ti but that was a monster (in consumption). this generation nvidia did better, even if 4k cards are kinda a flop.
@@mihaialex5668 welcome to the future old man, where devs are made to optimize with upscaling in mind and can't afford to optimize properly. sadly even right now for proper fps u kinda need upscaling even for 1440p for newer aaa games.
These 1440p comparisons are only of limited use to me. With my 4070 ti Super, I display between 1800p - 2160p depending on the game, due to gaming on a large living room TV display.
Love AMD but 100W more power consumption for almost the same fps isn't a good choice but AMD still can be a good choice for futureproofing because 24GB Vram you can running good games at least next 5 or 7 years
Good to compare on the only 10 games where ray tracing make sense but if we made an average of 100 games or, of the most PLAYED games, the RTX and all nvidia cards was bad for 70% of games played by people who buy it and play LoL, CS , gta online and never use dlss ray tracing of Their Life
Yea, but the games you mentioned don’t need DLSS/FSR (and pretty much any game that does need it has it) to run well anyways and definitely don’t need high end cards like these. A 6600 would run these said games at high refresh rate just fine. So just imagine what these cards could do. You wouldn’t even be able to notice the difference between them because the FPS is so high
@@notbrokebrolt6281 yeah buy a RX 7900 gre /xt/xtx was overkill for it so, imagine Numbers of people buying nvidia 4070 ti S/4080/4090 ray tracing beast 300$ more at the place and never use it , and say « nvidia is better ».
Future GN review "Is 2027 my friends and the 7900xtx still can handle 4k native gaming GTA6 AND WITCHER4 thanks to very large vram what old beast, meanwhile our 4080 cant achieve 60 fps 4k gaming ultra gta6 and witcher4 at native we need to turn on dlss performance mode to achive that i think our 4080 is now 1440p card well that how hardware work this games are very vram hungry at 4k. Hope you enjoy this video thats all thanks for watching.
@@СолембумI mean it is about $150-200 cheaper, so most of the games here are a win/tie for the 4070 Ti S. But I guess wouldn’t say it’s a “clear and decisive victory”
@@Солембумyeah but amd lack of features especially for productivity like CUDA and TensorRT, thats why people keep buying nvidia card because it can gaming and also for productivity
Nvidia win as alway 💚 and from now more and more and more and more.... Ehm, youtuber, why you don't set maxed out settings on RT tests? It doesn't give the right prospective of the performance for borh gpu. Why you don't do Hogwarts legacy RT tests? Can you do this last things?
Games :
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 0:00
Cyberpunk 2077 - 0:44 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Cyberpunk 2077 | RT, DLSS\FSR - 1:50
Hogwarts Legacy - 2:55 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Alan Wake 2 - 3:53
Alan Wake 2 | RT, DLSS\FSR - 4:54
Forza Horizon 5 - 5:54 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 6:54 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Starfield - 7:55
Resident Evil 4 | RT - 8:53
The Last of Us Part I - 9:52
Remnant 2 - 11:02
System:
Windows 11
Core i9-13900K - bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
CPU Cooler - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 - bit.ly/3Pn2xVx
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16GB - bit.ly/3vNwtSK
RADEON RX 7900 XTX 24GB - bit.ly/3Hx6keI
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Would be interesting to see these GPUs compared on a 7800X3D. Not because the 13900K is a bottleneck or anything, but because that's the CPU gamers would opt for if they chose either of those GPUs.
I mean if the 13900K isn’t bottlenecking I don’t see how it could be interesting. But yea, I get what you mean on the “it’s more realistic” part. There just isn’t really a point in a GPU benchmark
Depend of resolution... 4k no bottleneck.. 5% fps its not bottleneck..😂😂
+
I dont have any bottleneck on 13900K + RTX 4090. No I dont play 720p with DLSS xD
I'm using 12600k@5GHz + 4070 Ti Super at 3440x1440p without any bottleneck at AAA and Fortnite as well
Mate, I am so glad you are back! Your channel was delleted for some time for some reason. You are the only UA-camr I trust to test hardware
So much money for a GPU.
Less than a dollar a day if you use it for 3 years
@@mitsuhh Yeah, thats a LOT of money! A DOLLAR a day, and if you ain't gaming 4 hours a day, 365 days a year, you're paying $1/Day tax for nothing, added to the depreciation when you re-sell for pennies.
980Ti was a 5 year GPU. It cost £550. 1950XTX was a 5 year GPU, it cost £380. Even if you ignore the fact that Covid sent the 4090 price into the $2500 range for MOST of it's shelf life, even if you focus on the current $1800 pricetag, that's 3.25x more expensive than the 980Ti was. Absolutely insane! The fact that the 4070 series, essentially the same performance as a GTX970 was, is 2.5x more expensive. You can't *justify* that, it's simple - PC gamers are getting shafted.
Today, you have to pay £1800 for the top end card, £1000 for a 3 year card, like those reviewed.
MASSIVE difference. And super expensive for a GPU.
Shit they even charged people $400 for a 4060, a card that could not even run modern games at 1080p 60fps without turning down detail settings!
Even the HD7870 or GTX 560Ti, cards that played modern games on release at 60fps 1080p, cost under £200 at launch for basic models.
Why aren't you angry? Are you a prince? :D
99% of people are not princes.
and the price depreciate 50% in 3 years.
Yeah GTX 970 was launched for ~325€ and GTX 1070 for 500€
even the 1070 was for most of its life 350-400@@remstesthd6784
4070Ti S= The actual 4070 super , one of the finest nvidia gpu ever made till date
Please 4080 super+7800x3d vs rx 7900 xtx+7800x3d
RTX4000 series really are improvement. Power usage lower but still best performance.
are they though, when u gotta jump to the 800+ usd price for 16 gb of vrma? not saying that amd is doing better btw, the state of gpus is just sad
4060 ti has 16gb and is 400 usd or even less@@metalface_villain
@@metalface_villain Yeah and RX7600 also 8 GB
In Poland, you can buy RTX 4080 for less money than RX 7900 XTX and for me this is better choice. RTX have dlss, frame generation and its way better in ray tracing. Only advantage of XTX is 8gb of vram more.
In US 4080 is like 300 more for me💀
Can u give me link to website or store comrade ? I wouldnt mind making a flixbus trip to the store. I always enjoy being in poland when I leave germany.
Wow I didny realize this is 7900 xtx, miss read it as 7900 xt. 4070 ti super does gave a good value, in asia region 7900 xtx still 1000 usd compared to 4070tiS 800 usd
In my country,the prices of both rtx 4070ti super and rx7900xtx are same,I guess its better to go with amd since the raster performance is much more better than rtx 4070ti super and also its more future proof because of 24gb vram
I doubt it. Please provide the link. What I have found so far is a diff of 20k between them.
7900xtx is a beast btw pls test using 7800x3d it's the best gaming processor
Yea and then you can use sam and get extra 5-10% increase in performance
@@Qelyn SAM = REBAR
@@Qelyn and dont forget to learn about adrenalin software, this looks like he dont know shit about amd and did not change anything, thats why ppl who dont know about hardware think "wow! nvidia is so close with performance and cheaper, they must be better...."
In my country 7900 xtx is 1300usd and rtx 4070 ti super around 1000 usd so its much better to go with Nvidia
Yeah i just paid roughly the equivalent to 700 dlls for my 4070ti super. The cheapest 7900xtx here is nearly 1k usa dlls.
@@josejuanandrade4439where u finding a 4070 ti super for 700 wtf cheapest here is 819.99 and 7900 xtx 849.99 in europe
@@Qelyn Yup. Is not the fanciest model tho, Is a PNY VERTO, but is an OC model, and it runs frealing cold. Highest i've seen it reach is 60 celsius while gaming and im in a room with no AC, but my case is damn well ventilated: 3 bottom intake fans, 3 upper exhaust aio radiatior fans, currently runing it with my 5800x3d, about to upgrade to a 7800x3d tho.
So the card looks fine, just not fancy rgb, but the cooler is huge, damn solid, it even came with a neat anti-sag bracket that is pretty stealth, and of course metal backplate.
Where do you even live, im from Switzerland and my 7900xtx cost me 819$ lmao
@@lucasetche Pakistan
Why does fsr decrease performance??? But amd better without fsr and nvidia with dlss 💀💀💀
9:04 oh nice, actually testing the most demanding/unoptimized section of the game! Thanks for this
both gpus have the same fps at this area cause its a cpu limited area
I can't believe I'm saying this, but it looks like there's a minor CPU bottleneck on the 7900 XTX in Red Dead 2 and Starfield. That GPU could run the games even faster if the 13900K wasn't slowing it down...at 1440p. Sigh.
??????????
should have used x3d its 40% faster
I live in Türkiye. Both gpu's are same price here (1150 usd). im gonna choose! Surely 7800 xt. İt is 680 usd bro. Almost all games at 4k 60fps in ultra settings.
a bit offtopic but can u please tell how much playstation plus EXTRA teier costs for 12 monthsin your regional currency
@@saiyannegi 85 dollars per year.
680 USD for 7800xt? Damn thats crazy. I can get a 7900xt for 690€
@@saiyannegi 90 dollars. Delux extra. But last summer it was 13 dollars. In 2024 %700 prices up. Im just talkin about ps plus. Products are not like that. Usually standart.
@@thilo_5880 bro thats was not the point but anyway. Good for you then
So basically same ray tracing performance apart from cyberpunk, I'll take it and it has 24GB Vram to use , it's 840 in the UK , same price as the 4070 Ti Super
Nvidia is better, energy very very low
the 7900 xtx consumes more because also performs 20% faster.
@@nicane-9966amd cards tend to have high wattage out the box they tend to undervolt alot better
@@Qelyn its funny you say that because the rtx 3000 were less efficient compared to rx 6000 so is not "tend", it all depends.
@@nicane-9966 yah
The test is biased. 7900 XTX needs to be compared with 4080 super - this is the first thing. Secondly, I will definitely prefer Nvidia because of the "RTX HDR" and DLSS.
Same. AMD way better price but NVIDIA with all it has is overall slightly better than AMD rn. This is coming from someone with an RX 7900 XTX. AMD is overhated for sure but it’s definitely not better than NVIDIA
i want to see more DX11 and VULKAN type of games for comparison, not all DX12
The thing is the 7900 XTX isn’t £1000 amymore was msrp cheapest i found was £849.99 cheapest ti super was 819.99 and if you have the 7800x3D you can then use SAM and get 10% increase in performance such a great gpu
No... 7900xtx ain't rdna 2 bud, means it's going to crash alot. So I'd recommend not to.
@@clem9808bro I have owned a XTX for 5 months and never once had a crash.
@@clem9808the 7000 series have really good drivers and if we have seen from amd before they will improve drivers alot over time just like the 6000 series had reduced in power consumption from driver updates
@@clem9808my mate has a 7900 xtx not crashed and has very good temps below 60C but he has a sapphire nitro model which is also undervolted but most of these cards stay lower then 70 or around it
Can't say the same for the US though. xtx has been averaging around 1k and up lately and rtx around 900, with one listed at 819.00 oddly enough as of this writing. Basically depends on your market, think AU has some odd numbers too.
Which game in the thumbnail?
Alan wake 2
this 7900xtx is performing about 5% worse than mine. are u using reference model or something else vs oc 4070ti super version ?
no, this brainfart is just not using the adrenalin software correctly and benchmarking only with intel cpu without amd cpu and amd sam on, so the real boost for the poor rx is not given here, what you see here, if you use like me a ryzen and know how to use adrenalin, you can add like 10-15% on top of his ass benchmarks and then you know the real stats...
It's called OC
@@bober9615 not only use of adrenaline software makes things better for xtx
this is without frame generation AI?
As soon as we turn on RT, AMD cards fall apart… Money-wise the AMD is in raster as good as the Nvidia: price/framerate is similar; with RT on… AMD cards are very bad. I would buy neither in 2024. I’ll wait for newer chips and prices: I’m confident that the next gen will be more power saving and AMD will raise the RT bar significantly, then maybe with a competitive price/fps.
Those tests are always a bit stupid, both cards are fine, you don’t need to put everything at max settings… Especially shadows… Hell ! Sometimes you don’t even see the difference while playing with some settings (Yes I’m looking at you Depth of field and Bloom).
The main difference is that Nvidia cards have lower temperature overall which is an interesting point for me.
In my personal opinion top of the range AMD is pretty poor. You don't get very good ray tracing, don't get shadowplay or highlights, don't get DLSS and most of the time you're paying similar if not more than NVIDIA cards. Granted the 4080 series and the 4090 are insanely expensive but when the 4070 ti super is about the same as your top of the range card at a fracion of the cost it's surely gotta ring some alarm bells. Never been a big fan of AMD but even ik they're better than this...
If only they would improve Amd gpu power consumption.
Xtx is competing with 4080 super not 4070ti that is competing with xt version
If trashdeon has rainbow unicorn will be better then this junk 🥴
It beats the 4080 in raw raster and these cards are good when its comes to undervolting my friends 7900 XTX never passes 300W and 60C sapphire nitro model and if amd improves drivers like they did with 6000 series which caused a drop in power consumption then itll be even better
@@Qelynhahahahah you are so delusional with trashdeon
@@Qelyn mind if tweks 4080 how cen get pooron sub human scAMT a rd danboy
Мне одному кажется, что Хуанг впадает в детство?! И свой продукт тащит туда же! Иначе как назвать то, что с каждым выходом нового продукта, он вместо того, что бы быть лучше, он ни то, что бы оправдать ожидания не может, становится только хуже и дороже????????!!!!!!!!!!
4070ti super has better temps and less power draw meaning more longevity and less eletric cost.
The performance is near identical and i have a 7800x3d paired with my super. It really is the king at 1440p and can even do 4k. I use an uw Oled 175hz and its the best gpu ive ever owned coming from a 3080, i will stick with this until the 6000 series if not maybe longer cause i can game at ultra 4k on older games and even 4k ultra on new games so 1440p is more than good enough
Forgot to mention mine is oc
Imagine you buy Pc for over £3000 and after 2 years its worth less than £2000
You buy Console for 450 and after 4 years its still 409.
Thats new consoles are released every 5 years or so while theres tons of new pc Hardware every year
Универсальность карты постигается в играх с лучами? Ладно проф приложения,тут у нвидиа всегда был +,но Лучи... Начнем с того,что лучи никогда не будут массовы,ибо чуть ли не 90% полбзователей либо не могут либо не хотят ими пользоваться,а 7900хтх за ту же либо меньшую цену чем 4070ти с дает на 2-20% производительности лучше в зависимости от игры. И как раз таки универсальность видеокарты достигается в наиболее используемых ими приложениях. Например, стрим и рендер-это увлечение 20% подьзователей видеокарт 4070ти с,когда остальные 80% это разнообразные игры,где 7900хтх справляется лучше. То бишь 1:0 в пользу рх. 2:0 достигается путем меньшей цены за производительность в среднем,то бишь без использования костылей и бесполезных функций,которыми пользуются либо обладатели 4060 чтобы догнать 3060 и даже выйти вперед,либо посмотркть разок на тени, понять,что снижение производительности ради едва заметной функции в 90% игр,ну такое. 2:1 получает синяя карта счет своей "адаптированности" к софту. Тут не поспоришь: хочешь аи,монтаж,новые технологии-берешь нвидиа(выше обрубка 4060,мертворожденного)
4:2 отдам амд за эфимерный запас производительности. Да, этими 24гб видеопамяти,суорее всего,никто не воспользуется в мере,но тогда прибавлю.+1 в пользу нвидиа,за заполнение ниш производительности. Хочешь свеохбюджет? 1650,1630,2060,3050. У амд мало подобного по производительности 1+1;1+2;1+3 и т д итого 4:3
И тут на сцену выходит доступность +1 амд. Ну камон, что раньше,что сейчас переходники на питание видеокарты? Может вернемся к 2 молекс-6+2 пин? Так еще и чуть подогнешь и получишь пожар😅 5:3
Ну и последний лично мой вкус как фаната амд: фириенные титанХ, титан V, версии 20хх 30хх в исполнении нвидиа смотрятся ,как по мне, вне конкуренции. Итого по моему сугубо оичному мнению 7900хтх претендует на топ 1 по рейтингу видеокарт для пользователей,набирая 5 баллов,против 4 у нвидиа.
I would 1000% sacrifce 25fps or so and save wattage, that 7900xtx is a power house with almost 40% more the power draw of the 4070TiS, and barely gets 30fps more AT MOST! Believe it or not, the wattage draw makes a difference on your electric bill over the course of months or even years.
not if you are renting lol
@@kreamcolaa6667 that’s only in some places. There is many MANY places where you pay rent and bills (water and electricity) on top of that.
@@louiienation8497 you are completly right but here whete I live in Canada it heats my whole bassement during winter.
@@kreamcolaa6667 yes in deed our PC’s are a warm heater during winter haha
I am pleasantly surprised by 7900 XTX RT performance. I thout it would be about 2 (or even 3) times more FPS on 4070 Ti Super in RT but it's advantage is not so big.
advantage is not so big in non rt too between the 2 and 4070 ti is cheaper
@@leeeomeesi advantage is pretty considerable in my opinion, about 15-20 more fps on average
89/67 = 32% faster on a weaker card. Shame on amd and their fan.
if u consider the ti super is a 1440p card and the xtx is a 4k card for 200 more usd then the rt performance is quite big and it way bigger for path tracing. amd is quite bad for rt not that it's an important feature imo, i think the dlss advantage is much more important
what... the 4070 ti super is a 4k card, too@@metalface_villain
even when intel or nvidia has the better price to performance, there will always be someone who praises amd for no reason
There’s no way u said that lmfao. XTX is like $40 more expensive. And like 20% faster on average
@@pluschy7886hahahahah in rt nvidia destroy amd, go away amd fanboy
@@62185hhh Ok? Not everybody is going to use RT lmfao. Some people prefer playing competitive FPSes do u think they’re going to use RT to ruin their frames? I’m a comp player so I got the best card for the money and I don’t give af 💀
@@62185hhhand in rasterization amd destroys nvidia so wheres the point?
@@pluschy7886the fk, 4070ti super is 800 usd and XTX is over 900 usd 😂
I’m so sick of hearing nvidia cards or more expensive this & that complaining when there cards have a $200plus more dollar value worth over Amd cards anyway.Whats never mention in all these price comparisons is the fact you can use nvidia cards for professional work along with much better features, that along eliminates the price argument. Not to mention also AMD cards suck at VR..
I'm building a new pc. Is the Nvidia 4070ti super for 1440p gaming good?
Yes really good
Yes, 4070ti Super is good. Another option is 4090.
Yeess
Yeah , and also future proof
Yes, mine is 12600k@5ghz + 4070 ti super at 3440x1440p and it's perfect, everything at max 60+FPS, even cyberpunk with path tracing.
Kind of crazy how so many people are upgrading to these high end GPU's even the 4090, never would spend so much money on a single PC component even when i have the money, no thanks.
Real
Correct, I have a rtx 3060 for $250 bought 2nd hand and I can play anything in 1080p high to ultra settings.
Nah if you can afford it and it doesn't bother you, why not? If you have the money why not? Why do you think rich people are living a different lifestyle? 😂 People saying that can't believe or aren't able to imagine that. Ofc if its useless, not better, or in any use for you don't buy it.
@@mojit27 spending money on things that aren't real ain't worth it and rich people aren't idiots they don't spend shit on these types of things, only desperate and rejects buy these kind of stuff to make themselves feel good.
@@CurseEnforcer What are you yapping about? What is not real??? Either way if you get or build a PC and if you’re rich why not buy the best on the market for whatever purpose? And I already said, if it’s not in any use for you don’t buy it, im not just talking abt GPU's you geek
Intel cpu is junk , use the 7800x3d and the 7900xtx would dominate even more.
2:03 Ok what, the fps increased for the 4070 Ti S? Because of DLSS?
Because NVIDIA cards can handle Raytracing much better than AMD. The heavier the Raytracing, the bigger struggle AMD cards have.
Yes
nvidia use dlss, and amd use fsr. but nvdia can handle ray tracing better than amd
RT cores
the dlss and fsr difference has to do with the image quality. the fsr is a worse upscaler because it doesn't use ai technology, in 4k the difference isn't so big since u upscale from higher resolutions but if you play on 1440p and use the upscaler the difference is very noticeable. the fps difference comes from ray tracing. nvidia has special cores that handle ray tracing performance quite better.
4070 ti super beast in 1440 p
Try something soon with 1280x1024 Resoltuion in the future as a fun test!
Im curious to see how it looks like on todays games, since almost everyone using widescreen, so give non Widescreen a another chance!
RTX 4070 TI SUPER ❤❤
AMD is the king of CPU's. Nvidia is the king of GPU's.
Ah, ray tracing, very important, right?
For some people it is for some not it depends on person to person.
You never played with Ray tracing did you?
If your gpu capable try using RT and you will never want back to raster, because raster is suck especially for reflection
not at all but the upscaler is imo, given that now it's a must in gaming and since dlss is much better, especially below 4k resolutions i think that makes the ti super the clear winner, plus there are other advantages u will get, faster and better fg implementation, the ability to stream on twitch, better drivers, lower power consumption and 200usd lower pricetag.
Easy win for 7900
what a shame amd 😂
It won in every game?
Same price here beats in every game easily apart from RT its more like the base 4070 but it’ll be more futureproofed because of the vram and raw rasterisation
En México esta la 4070 ti super a 1000 dolares y la rx 7900xtx a 1100 dolares
In other words if ray tracing is a must the go with the 4070ti super if you want raw 1440p-4k power at higher frames then go with the xtx
AMD efficiency crown where?
Only CPUs. AMD graphic cards are not efficient.
Nvidia is trouncing AMD in efficiency this gen. Probably won't change anytime soon.
@@CNTRI715 amd did last gen with the 6000 were more eficient than 3000 and for the most part more powerfull in every tier that was relevant (talking about raster) with the exception of the 3090 ti but that was a monster (in consumption). this generation nvidia did better, even if 4k cards are kinda a flop.
4070 ti super = 7900 xt
Not when you compare with 4070TS's Ray Tracing, DLSS, Frame Gen, and 2x NVENC. 4070TS pulls way ahead with that technology.
@@CptBrian i like gpu just native. No dlls, no fsr. 🤝 My opinion.
@@mihaialex5668 welcome to the future old man, where devs are made to optimize with upscaling in mind and can't afford to optimize properly. sadly even right now for proper fps u kinda need upscaling even for 1440p for newer aaa games.
@@metalface_villainwhich is what sucks. I miss when games were optimized for native res. It’s so ass now
@@pluschy7886 i like it as much as you do but this is how it is sadly
These 1440p comparisons are only of limited use to me. With my 4070 ti Super, I display between 1800p - 2160p depending on the game, due to gaming on a large living room TV display.
what small differences, it's gone now amd what a better option 😂
4070super with game the callisto protocol
Love AMD but 100W more power consumption for almost the same fps isn't a good choice but AMD still can be a good choice for futureproofing because 24GB Vram you can running good games at least next 5 or 7 years
All game ray tracing on!!!!!!!!
Rx 7900xtx is much better
Not if you want to save money on electricity. The 7900xtx is using 60-70 watts more than the RTX 4070 Ti Super.
And a 100 bucks more usually
Good to compare on the only 10 games where ray tracing make sense but if we made an average of 100 games or, of the most PLAYED games, the RTX and all nvidia cards was bad for 70% of games played by people who buy it and play LoL, CS , gta online and never use dlss ray tracing of Their Life
Yea, but the games you mentioned don’t need DLSS/FSR (and pretty much any game that does need it has it) to run well anyways and definitely don’t need high end cards like these. A 6600 would run these said games at high refresh rate just fine. So just imagine what these cards could do. You wouldn’t even be able to notice the difference between them because the FPS is so high
@@notbrokebrolt6281 yeah buy a RX 7900 gre /xt/xtx was overkill for it so, imagine Numbers of people buying nvidia 4070 ti S/4080/4090 ray tracing beast 300$ more at the place and never use it , and say « nvidia is better ».
Hater detected
@@lethanhtung4972 only facts
what's the point comparing for lol and cs? i can run those games on my gtx 1050 laptop with 2gb of vram xD
Future GN review
"Is 2027 my friends and the 7900xtx still can handle 4k native gaming GTA6 AND WITCHER4 thanks to very large vram what old beast, meanwhile our 4080 cant achieve 60 fps 4k gaming ultra gta6 and witcher4 at native we need to turn on dlss performance mode to achive that i think our 4080 is now 1440p card well that how hardware work this games are very vram hungry at 4k. Hope you enjoy this video thats all thanks for watching.
RX 7900 XTX wins
👏👏👏
1st
a clear and decisive victory for the 4070 ti super
With 20 to 30% more fps on 7900xtx in 8 scenarios of 12?
🤣😂
@@Солембум yea but it's 300 usd more expensive as well
@@СолембумI mean it is about $150-200 cheaper, so most of the games here are a win/tie for the 4070 Ti S. But I guess wouldn’t say it’s a “clear and decisive victory”
@@Солембумyeah but amd lack of features especially for productivity like CUDA and TensorRT, thats why people keep buying nvidia card because it can gaming and also for productivity
Nvidia win as alway 💚 and from now more and more and more and more....
Ehm, youtuber, why you don't set maxed out settings on RT tests? It doesn't give the right prospective of the performance for borh gpu. Why you don't do Hogwarts legacy RT tests? Can you do this last things?