Kirchhoff's Laws - IB Physics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @keeganohara5462
    @keeganohara5462 2 роки тому +11

    Watching this I felt like the SpongeBob meme where SpongeBob has binoculars and is like "write that down, write that down."

  • @danielchoi3440
    @danielchoi3440 2 роки тому +6

    Best Video on kirchhoff’s law

  • @juniorcyans2988
    @juniorcyans2988 Рік тому +1

    After I watched this video I realized I misunderstood the Kirchhoff’s Laws😅 Thank you very much!

  • @ruchitaobhan1232
    @ruchitaobhan1232 11 місяців тому +1

    why would the 18 volts in loop 3 not be positive? Would it not be 3V - I3(400) - (-18V) since the current going in the battery is in opposite direction?

  • @kadiryel6237
    @kadiryel6237 2 роки тому +5

    This was the only video that was actually quite good about this topic. But, as a suggestion, I would say it could be better if you could use drawings when explaining the signs instead of just telling them verbally. It seems complex for many as to why the potential differences are taken positive or negative in the loop, so a bit more clarification on that would be extremely helpful, Sir. Regardless, thanks a lot.

  • @cherylhli
    @cherylhli 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the video, it was really helpful! At 1:08, did you mean "the battery subtracts voltage and resistors add voltage"? Since V=IR I guess it's the same thing but I was wondering if the focus here should be on voltage instead. Thank you!

  • @rudefrog9726
    @rudefrog9726 8 місяців тому +1

    9:08, V1 is not I1 x R1 its I2 x R1. and 9:13 its not I3 multiplied by the "second current" its I3 multiplied by R2. Thanks for the video btw!

  • @jamesluc6506
    @jamesluc6506 Рік тому +2

    Hi, sir! Thanks for the great content. I am wondering how does two junctions being both part of a same junction (because they yield the same equation) matter when we solve the problem? Thank you

  • @kevinmaguire2707
    @kevinmaguire2707 6 місяців тому

    you said something wrong at 9:06 it should be I2 time R2 but you said I1 time R1. also for the same part, for V2, you said R3 times the second current where it should have been the second resistor. Beside that, this has been one of the most helpful video I have seen on Kirchhoff's law.

  • @markkennedy9767
    @markkennedy9767 Рік тому

    Can you comment on what determines our choice of loops should be in a given circuit generally. In particular, should no loop be the combination of any of the other loops chosen. For example, would choosing the outer loop also here at 5:10 just yield the same information as the two inner loops.
    Also, can you give any intuition whether Kirchoff rules always lead to a solution: ie that we always get as many independent equations as variables. Thanks.

  • @prisonmike7198
    @prisonmike7198 3 роки тому +2

    you are amazing pal

  • @arwa3370
    @arwa3370 Рік тому

    how did you find the first current in the last question?

  • @micz6319
    @micz6319 Рік тому +2

    everything was great but i got lost when you started explaining the 3 loops, it got really chaotic for me

    • @AndyMasley
      @AndyMasley  Рік тому +1

      Yeah this wasn't my best! Tried to run through as clearly as I could but it's a complicated topic

  • @sithilliyanage3676
    @sithilliyanage3676 2 роки тому

    Isn't I0 at 9:00 equal to 0.0525 ?

    • @fionnuala7042
      @fionnuala7042 Рік тому +1

      Find I3 first. It turns out to be negative (I3= -0.0375). Then find I2 = 0.015.So when plugging that back into the JA equation
      JA: I1 -I2-I3=0 becomes
      I1-0.015-(-0.0375)=0,
      I1= -0.0375+0.015
      I1= -0.0225

  • @fabricefab3518
    @fabricefab3518 Рік тому

    Life saver

  • @abeddar9843
    @abeddar9843 3 роки тому +6

    Oh my god... I just had a test abt this 2 days ago and I failed it