Focke-Wulf Fw 190

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 388

  • @j.muckafignotti4226
    @j.muckafignotti4226 3 роки тому +34

    I’ve worked on a FW190 D-9, nothing magic other than the fact that it was cobbled together using various materiel types due to material shortages in the latter stages of the war. The thing that impressed me the most about the FW-190 is the fact that it’s Jumo engine ran on fuel one octane higher than filtered horse shit. For them to get almost 2200 hp out of that engine fascinated me as I am an aircraft mechanic by trade. The Germans were VERY clever engineers. Don’t know if many of you know this or not, but the Germans used to harvest fuel out of crashed allied aircraft to perform engine testing with the allied 115-145 octane fuel. Due to constraints imposed on their aviation war machine because of the lower quality fuel, engines tested with the allied 115-145 octane fuels usually resulted in a 50% increase in horsepower. Detonation margins were drastically raised and the big fighter engines like the DB605, BMW 801, and the Jumo 213A produced amazing horsepower. Imagine the performance increases they would have realized if they’d had access to excellent fuel like we used.

    • @Realitygetreal
      @Realitygetreal 3 роки тому +2

      Well designed engines for sure, designed to get more out of better fuel is good engineering, think about today performance cars, corvette, Ferrari, Lamborghini require much higher octane fuel but run like horrible shit if they use even slightly lower octane (up to and including not running), but the engines in the FW 190 could run on no octane, yes they performed with 1/2 horsepower but they ran VERY WELL.

    • @Militaria_Collector
      @Militaria_Collector 3 роки тому

      Wow...

    • @anthonyxuereb792
      @anthonyxuereb792 3 роки тому

      Lucky for the allies the Germans had poor quality fuel then?

    • @j.muckafignotti4226
      @j.muckafignotti4226 3 роки тому

      @@davegeisler7802 Agreed!

    • @anthonyxuereb792
      @anthonyxuereb792 3 роки тому +2

      @@davegeisler7802 You don't need to make a choice between the two, it's all history now.

  • @alanwayte432
    @alanwayte432 3 роки тому +11

    My Great Grandfather flew Spitfire Mk2 Mk5 Mk9 then Tempest, he was shot down in 1941 twice, once over the Chanel, again in 1944 by ground fire, he survived war and flew Jets until 1960. His favourite plane was the Mk9, he said his favourite moment was first flight in MK9 his flight was bounced, he had struggled terribly in MK5, but said after a few minutes he was out of ammunition, turning for home he saw a 190 slightly below and just behind..in Mk 5 he said he would have been in trouble, he opened throttle wide in a slight dive and just pulled away no drama, his airspeed indicator in slight dive was 500mph

  • @b.j.vanspaendonck450
    @b.j.vanspaendonck450 3 роки тому +36

    Unfortunately no mention is made of the "Kommandogerät", a mechanical computer which combined throttle, propellor pitch, boost, manifold pressure, engine rpm, altitude, etc. all into one single power lever, making the FW 190 very easy to fly.

    • @anthonyxuereb792
      @anthonyxuereb792 3 роки тому +5

      Today's equivalent would be the ECU?

    • @MrTiti
      @MrTiti 3 роки тому +9

      @@anthonyxuereb792 yes. analogue computer it was

    • @Jarlaxle72
      @Jarlaxle72 2 роки тому +2

      The Americans successfully reverse enginered the "commandogerate" late in the war, after when captured some 190A and F models, then implemented the improved version into the Bearcat navy fighter-bombers early in the fifties..

    • @Whiteshell204
      @Whiteshell204 2 місяці тому

      @@Jarlaxle72 they captured lots of German and Japanese tech/personal ..they would never made it to space without Von Braun & the biological germ warfare would have been behind without scientist from Unit 731

  • @garychynne1377
    @garychynne1377 3 роки тому +4

    thank you. when i saw pools cove i got a tear in my eye. take care. have fun.

  • @ericgiebel498
    @ericgiebel498 3 роки тому +4

    Of all the aircraft models I built and finished when I was growing up , a 1:32 scale model of the Fw-190 has still not made landed on my craft table yet. And with all the tech kids are taking up now,good quality plastic models are getting harder to find.

    • @bigdaddy7119
      @bigdaddy7119 3 роки тому

      Sad but true. I built a lot of models all the way into my 20’s, and have a few kits now I need to build. But as you said, Walmart and many of the stores that used to have entire aisles of model kits on both sides, no longer sell them. Hobby Lobby is really the only place you can get them aside from a hobby shop, and they have gotten crazy expensive as a result. A 1/24-25 scale car kit is $30 now and many of the better aircraft kits are even higher.

    • @Riverrockphotos
      @Riverrockphotos 3 роки тому +1

      I just bought a 1:32 Fw-190 kit its my next project.

  • @jimkirby1799
    @jimkirby1799 3 роки тому +7

    Is it just me, or does anyone notice a resemblance to the Grumman f8f bearcat, alongside the fw109?

  • @utkarshtrivedi8870
    @utkarshtrivedi8870 2 роки тому +6

    The "Butcher Bird" surely lived upto its name. The FW-190 D-9 even outclassed P-51 D Mustang.
    Kurt Tank was such a legendary man.

    • @sirdukemoose4448
      @sirdukemoose4448 2 роки тому

      Yet he lost the war...

    • @KarlCruz655
      @KarlCruz655 2 роки тому

      @@sirdukemoose4448 and still need 4 powers to defeat germany? WHY?? because britain is so weak on land forces without thw english channel hitler would fuck britain in the butt.

    • @KarlCruz655
      @KarlCruz655 2 роки тому

      @@sirdukemoose4448 and that happend 2x!!

    • @KarlCruz655
      @KarlCruz655 2 роки тому +3

      @@sirdukemoose4448 i want to see little britain fight germany without the english channel

    • @j.muckafignotti4226
      @j.muckafignotti4226 2 роки тому +1

      Not really, the D9 variant was good but didn’t “outclass” the Mustang. Compared to the Mustang, the Dora had shitty aerodynamics when you realize the Mustang was doing everything the Dora did on 500 less horsepower. The Mustang had better firepower, a better gun site, better pilot protection, we won’t mention range as the ‘Stang set the mark on that. The Mustang had better visibility, better pilot comfort, and could do what it did all day long, every day!

  • @benedicttalor9331
    @benedicttalor9331 3 роки тому +4

    I love this plane the versions top notch

  • @HotelPapa100
    @HotelPapa100 3 роки тому +1

    "Butcher Bird" was not a name given to the plane by their opposition; it is a translation of the German "Würger" (shrike, butcher bird) the machine was given by the manufacturer. The guys being shot at may have been instrumental in choosing the less flattering translation, though.

  • @CliSwe
    @CliSwe 3 роки тому +7

    At ~27.15 - The narrator uses the term "Mark". What he is referring to, is the term Maschinen Kanone - shortened to MK. This is used to designate German cannons.

  • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
    @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 3 роки тому +6

    Time 52:10 is the best, it shows the front fan rotating at twice the rate of the prop being pulled through.

  • @DocZ82
    @DocZ82 9 років тому +23

    I love this plane!! Perfection in every way.

    • @rollingstopp
      @rollingstopp 8 років тому +5

      yes but in the wrong hands

    • @rollingstopp
      @rollingstopp 8 років тому +1

      this pic looks like the engine on this one is not a radial

    • @gpdude22
      @gpdude22 4 роки тому +3

      You may want to look up the word "perfection".

    • @r129r16pfl
      @r129r16pfl 4 роки тому +6

      @@rollingstopp Right hands ;)
      Remember winners writte the history.

    • @paulojosecarvalho1127
      @paulojosecarvalho1127 3 роки тому

      @@rollingstopp T. ,,,,,,L

  • @zendonbuilds948
    @zendonbuilds948 2 роки тому

    Even the Japanese army was given a copy of a Fw190. When the plant for the Ki-61 "Tony" engines was bombed by the US, the Japanese turned to this copy of the 190 to study its engine mounting, and the Ki-100 "radial Tony" was the result.

  • @tekis0
    @tekis0 8 років тому +5

    Very good FW 190 doc!

    • @bobbailey2587
      @bobbailey2587 6 років тому

      Except for that when it starts off saying that it was a radial engine when I was air-cooled tell the D model

    • @SuperUnknown1967
      @SuperUnknown1967 4 роки тому +1

      @@bobbailey2587 What is the problem? It had a radial, air-cooled engine until the D model with the L/C V-12. Simple.

  • @NewController01
    @NewController01 Рік тому

    I believe there was one instance where a 190...was downed by a steam engine's exploding boiler

  • @carcharinus6367
    @carcharinus6367 3 роки тому +1

    And I quote: "The Yak-3 could reach 720 km/h" - In the jetstream, probably; "The Il-2 with the rear gunner undertook the fight on equal terms with the German fighters".. What a natural curiosity! It`s a Good... Strong!

  • @Chironex_Fleckeri
    @Chironex_Fleckeri 5 років тому +17

    Why are Germans so good at making beautiful machines?

  • @anthonywilson4873
    @anthonywilson4873 3 роки тому +18

    Il2 was a ground attack bomber no way could it take on a fighter like the 109 or the 190. Whoever or wherever you got that info from was wrong. A fighter would get on its tail and take it down. The fighter would use its speed to chose where to attack from and would not take it on head on! One rear gunner against cannons? I visited Bletchley Park where they decoded the German Top Secret messages. The Russians knew the Germans where coming at Kursk due to info from Bletchley Park and had prepared in depth with the local population helping dig anti tank ditches etc, The Germans moved up to their forward positions ready to attack under the cover of night, just before they moved off the Russians opened up with a devastating artillery barrage and did a huge amount of damage. The Fighting was hard and at times it looked like the Germans may break through in some areas, almost fought to a standstill the Russians then brought in their huge reserves and forced a German retreat. Certainly a decisive battle. Huge German loss of equipment and skilled men.

    • @jaimelaureano6649
      @jaimelaureano6649 3 роки тому

      ... How do you know? "I visited..." doesn't mean as much as you think ..... Are you aware P51s successfully shot down ME-262s? ... An F4U Corsair shot down a MIG-15 during the Korean War ... Stranger things have happened.

    • @BlueMax109
      @BlueMax109 2 роки тому +1

      The fact they were even able to perform an offensive at that point was remarkable. The Luftwaffe acquitted itself well during Kursk but in the end it wasn't enough against such numbers.

  • @ayforfay4625
    @ayforfay4625 7 років тому +12

    Did he knew that mk and mg stands for maschinenkanone and maschinengewehr respectively. Not mark 108.

  • @AJHyland63
    @AJHyland63 3 роки тому +2

    Funny that the thumbnail shows a Spitfire and not the Fw 190. You can see the roundel under the wing as well as its distinctive lines and cockpit and inline rather than the radial engine.
    ( edit: bloody spelling auto correct, roundel not rounded)

  • @michiroom1526
    @michiroom1526 3 роки тому +3

    Its beauty and danger to allies makes it a legend.

  • @Hordalending
    @Hordalending 8 років тому +2

    Besides Heinz Knockes "I flew for the Führer", do any of you know any books where we can learn more about the admission requirements for pilot training in the Luftwaffe during WW2? This is an interesting topic.

    • @wylierudhman1603
      @wylierudhman1603 3 роки тому +3

      I heard the pilot candidates had to be able hear thunder and see lightning. They needed anyone who could fly by the end of the war.

    • @104thDIVTimberwolf
      @104thDIVTimberwolf 3 роки тому

      Erich Hartmann's "The Blond Knight of Germany" is a good one.

  • @geldoncupi1
    @geldoncupi1 6 років тому +7

    Fw 190 was also a very good turning fighter

    • @wrathofatlantis2316
      @wrathofatlantis2316 2 роки тому

      Indeed, but only at speeds below 250 mph (400 km/h). In real life that mattered more than high speed, which is why it was excellent. Both 109 and 190s bested the Spitfire in turning at low speeds according to Clostermann.

  • @lindamcentaffer5969
    @lindamcentaffer5969 3 роки тому +16

    34:00 EEEEH, an IL2 on equal terms with a FW 190?! Not even close, man.

    • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
      @ngauruhoezodiac3143 3 роки тому +2

      The 20mm cannons were effective against the Il2, which was almost impervious to ground fire from small arms.

    • @spysareamyth
      @spysareamyth 3 роки тому

      The Il-2 was mean, slow and heavy sure, but with its low speed came the ability to turn quickly and force a head on, which it would likely win. (A skilled pilot was necessary however)

    • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
      @ngauruhoezodiac3143 3 роки тому

      @@spysareamyth In the Finnish continuation war against Russia the IL2 was observed to be inaccurate when bombing. It was good for strafing but in the Finnish forests thy could not find the targets. Because of it's armour it was almost impervious to email arms ground fire and was very effective in the open plains of Ukraine.

  • @JesusSilva-jz6xk
    @JesusSilva-jz6xk 3 роки тому +3

    Im sorry, to me though, as I grew up, the absolute greatest, grandest WWII era fighter plane was the P-40.
    She had absolutely beautiful, lovely curves and when called upon to fight, it fought with unmatched distinction.
    Right, the American grand command didn't like it, it was built in the U.S.A. so American commanders had the right to like it or dislike it. Not the Brits. As soon as the British saw it, they saw competition to their Spitfire.
    Well, let me throw some real bright light on the subject: The American Volunteer Group in China, while helping China to survive the war against the Jappers, killed hundreds of their fighters included the zeroes.
    During the Lend-Lease Act, our country sent dozens of P-40 fighters to the Soviet Union. There were several aces with over a hundred kills against the ME-109.
    To me, the P-40 had such gorgeous, sexy lines that everyone should have fallen in love with that aircraft, sadly, no one did, and who can blam3 them, there was the P-51 mustang and the F-4U Corsair. But just imagine for a crazy second, what if they would have fitted the merlin engine on the P-40?.

    • @grendelgrendelsson5493
      @grendelgrendelsson5493 3 роки тому

      Jesus Silva; they did! The P40F and L had the Merlin fitted. They can be distinguished by the lack of a carburetor intake on the top of the nose. I believe that something like 200 pilots became aces in the P40 and around 20 were double aces. The aces came from Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, Russia, South Africa and the USA.

    • @BlueMax109
      @BlueMax109 2 роки тому

      I like the look of the P40 and my uncle flew them in the RNZAF during the war - but they had poor high altitude performance.

    • @timbussens4940
      @timbussens4940 2 роки тому

      Over 100 kills in P40? I haven't heard of any Red Army pilot claiming that many Victories. I thought their top Aces were around the 60 kill mark.✌️🤔

  • @psilvakimo
    @psilvakimo 3 роки тому +17

    "More than a 100 allied aircraft were destroyed on the ground" It was more than 100 alright. The actual number was over 400. Rule of thumb, multiply their stated casualties by two and divide the enemy casualties by two.

    • @sirdukemoose4448
      @sirdukemoose4448 2 роки тому

      And they still lost the war.

    • @FPScanadaPC
      @FPScanadaPC Рік тому

      @@sirdukemoose4448 yep. they lost against the whole capitalist and communist world. Funny how the "good guys" always win, huh?

  • @johnvaleanbaily246
    @johnvaleanbaily246 3 роки тому +2

    Good video, but I don't quite understand why you would show a Spitfire instead of a FW190 in the thumbnail still pic...?!

    • @frankmiller95
      @frankmiller95 3 роки тому

      The most obvious possible explanations are laziness or stupidity.

  • @svenhassel8178
    @svenhassel8178 3 роки тому +5

    The Masterpiece of Kurt Tank.Masterpiece of German Engineering!!!

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому

      Fun fact, there was a proposal to make a jet engine version of this plane called FW190 TL

    • @Lucky-sh1dm
      @Lucky-sh1dm 3 роки тому

      Bf-109 sexier

    • @davegeisler7802
      @davegeisler7802 3 роки тому

      Until you met up with a P47M diving down on your Dora 🤩💪🏁

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому

      @@davegeisler7802 P47M cant even out turn a FW190 LMAO

    • @davegeisler7802
      @davegeisler7802 3 роки тому

      @@startingbark0356 it didn’t have to, it would slash down on the Dora and cut its wings off in one pass .And if it didn’t get you on the first pass it roll down on you on the second pass and finish you off. Sorry Focke Wulf, game over !! And then the Jug would probably kill a ME262 or a Locomotive on the way home 🤩 ❤️🏁

  • @sinamark-com
    @sinamark-com 4 роки тому +9

    21:10 British response to the butcherbird was extremely rapid because they captured a pristine FW190 when the German pilot got disoriented and accidentally landed on British soil thinking he was over France.

    • @kh2b573
      @kh2b573 4 роки тому +2

      The british already had plans for the spitfire's engine to be upgraded and it alreadt was the Fw 190 they captured just helped the british to kink out any problems with their designs to best help in utilizing its new design to good use so technically the Mk 8/9 was just improved versions of the prototypes before them

    • @spitfiremark1a768
      @spitfiremark1a768 3 роки тому +2

      There was a plan to land a commando raid on a German airfield and try to get Jeffrey Quill (Supermarine test pilot) into a 190 and attemot to steal it.
      Luckily the 190 landed at Pembrey in Wales putting an immediate halt to the operation.
      Much to the relief of Quill.

    • @hoodoo2001
      @hoodoo2001 3 роки тому

      NO.

    • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
      @ngauruhoezodiac3143 3 роки тому +4

      And when the British tested it they found it to be superior to the Spitfire Mk V at almost all altitudes.

    • @spitfiremark1a768
      @spitfiremark1a768 3 роки тому +6

      @@ngauruhoezodiac3143 Correct. Until the Merlin 61 was fitted. An incredible engine. A power graph shows compared with that of the 190 that with increasing altitude the 61 increases in power where the DB 601 is decreasing.
      Clever people on both sides back then!

  • @edwardjj4224
    @edwardjj4224 3 роки тому

    Just another great Germans machine Kurt Tank did know exactly what he was doing Great video Thanks for posting Utube

  • @RideAcrossTheRiver
    @RideAcrossTheRiver 3 роки тому +1

    Shows a Spitfire + Merlin in the thumbnail. Okay?

  • @yzorgone
    @yzorgone 3 роки тому

    Please send the awesome footage to the guys with the AI that can colour in old video.

  • @RENEGADEJon19
    @RENEGADEJon19 3 роки тому +5

    "The resistance of the Luftwaffe had ended."
    Allied bomber pilot: "This is so much easier when they're not shooting back."
    Allied bombardier: "I still can't seem to hit anything."

    • @silvirhunter3607
      @silvirhunter3607 3 роки тому +1

      Other Allied Bombardier. "Hey Boss, I think that was my house."

    • @RENEGADEJon19
      @RENEGADEJon19 3 роки тому

      @@silvirhunter3607 Navigator: "Why did we head west?! I said east! EAST!"

    • @sirdukemoose4448
      @sirdukemoose4448 2 роки тому

      Yet the allies won.

  • @frankmiller95
    @frankmiller95 3 роки тому

    Why does the thumbnail show an inline engine?

  • @hurri7720
    @hurri7720 3 роки тому +3

    The fact that this was a very balanced narrative surprised me at first but then I realised it's not British but American.

    • @myparceltape1169
      @myparceltape1169 3 роки тому

      The RAF wanted a better Spitfire. Once they got one, life was better.

  • @testy462
    @testy462 2 роки тому

    I bet that photocell thing shot a ton of clouds. Imagine that damn thing, armed back there and your flying along...suddenly it spots a seagull and rips off a dozen shots. Scare the hell out of you.

  • @neiloflongbeck5705
    @neiloflongbeck5705 3 роки тому

    I read somewhere, many years ago, that Tank liked to give his planes nicknamed that were bird related and that he gave the FW.190 the shrike nickname which was rarely used outside of FW.

  • @gonewiththewind8072
    @gonewiththewind8072 7 років тому +4

    I'm British and I approve 👍💓💓

    • @markmitchell450
      @markmitchell450 4 роки тому +1

      It was a good plane using an air-cooled rotary engine traditionally which had a much larger drag over in line piston aircraft so the 190 was streamlined and although had some flaws as all planes have it was a cheaper easier plane to build

    • @doppelbanger5797
      @doppelbanger5797 3 роки тому +1

      America's a British colony😂

    • @bnipmnaa
      @bnipmnaa 3 роки тому

      @P. Tiesti Nobody cares whether 'muricans care.

  • @mikebrownhill8955
    @mikebrownhill8955 3 роки тому +10

    I dont think the British copied the BMW 801. I think the Bristol Centaurus was a totally different design philosophy with sleeve valves and produced more power.
    Stanley Hooker called the BMW 801 all brute force and ignorance with its huge 47 litre capacity. He designed the blower on the Merlin 61 which gave an engine with almost half the displacement very nearly the same power output.

    • @MrTiti
      @MrTiti 3 роки тому +3

      because of the compression. if you have fuel that has so low octane, you simply need the displacement. simple as that. people cannot understand this

    • @BlueMax109
      @BlueMax109 2 роки тому

      @@MrTiti Saved me from having to reply to this ignorance

  • @Funcore
    @Funcore 3 роки тому

    War Thunder - Test Flight playlist ua-cam.com/video/b1bizsyqqd4/v-deo.html

  • @FreedomForAll2013
    @FreedomForAll2013 3 роки тому

    The 109 has a better turn time so what are they talking about outturning? The 109 also looped faster and was a better vertical fighter but not as good at boom and zoom tactics, due to the typically lesser armament

  • @carriahcarrera1334
    @carriahcarrera1334 3 роки тому

    what song is it at 51 minutes

  • @devgupta8815
    @devgupta8815 3 роки тому

    A lot of this program on the FW 190 is recycled from one on the Bf 109 by the same outfit !

  • @jackmunday7602
    @jackmunday7602 3 роки тому

    A8 or D9?

  • @sblack48
    @sblack48 3 роки тому

    Are the loss numbers quoted from the channel dash and dieppe actions based on luftwaffe claims or actual raf losses?

  • @kennyraicherter1264
    @kennyraicherter1264 3 роки тому

    Very good dock

  • @GJediAR
    @GJediAR 8 років тому +4

    The Bomber Hunter, such fond of it in WarThunder. Blitz in and run out. . . . If the german's did not commit such evil in this world I would had loved to see them continue the FW line with improvements and see how far they could have taken that plane!

    • @Holztransistor
      @Holztransistor 7 років тому +1

      Yes, the Ta 152 would have been the last. The future already belonged to jet planes. Many projects were ready for production when the war ended.

    • @greightaa8791
      @greightaa8791 6 років тому

      Nazi's would probably have been a more accurate account

  • @hsinyeahuang8371
    @hsinyeahuang8371 6 років тому +4

    What a wonderful plane.

  • @robmiller1964
    @robmiller1964 3 роки тому +5

    And the Brits had 100 Octane Fuel supplied by the USA where as the Germans were having to make aviation gas out of Coal, Yes that black stuff that is like a rock out of the ground! Yes Texas Tea and the battle of the Atlantic made a huge impact on the air war in Europe in WW2

    • @anthonyxuereb792
      @anthonyxuereb792 3 роки тому +2

      The British owe a huge debt to the Americans that can never be repaid yet they behave as if victory was all their doing.

    • @conservativemike3768
      @conservativemike3768 3 роки тому +3

      Actually, we routinely experimented with fuels up to 150 octane.

    • @robmiller1964
      @robmiller1964 3 роки тому +3

      ​@@anthonyxuereb792 I'm a New Zealander and we had the greatest losses per capita in the British Empire out of active troops, pilots, sailors. We ddin't have any losses on our own territory because of where we live! We live in Paradise! We fought for the British Empire in 1939 not for democracy!

    • @anthonyxuereb792
      @anthonyxuereb792 3 роки тому

      @@robmiller1964 yes you paid a heavy price

    • @johnjones4825
      @johnjones4825 3 роки тому +3

      And of course, you do realise that South Africa has been producing fuel and oil from coal for donkey's years? Sasol is still operating to this day, producing products of the highest quality.

  • @marcusrussell8660
    @marcusrussell8660 6 років тому +9

    True FW 190D or also called the TA 152 could fly at 48,500 plus AGL at 473 mph!!,. There was no other aircraft other than the twin jet 263 that was close. But by the time of it’s introduction the war was really over. This FW was also called the long nose 190. The Brits with their “ the spitfire was the ultimate fighter” were so wrong. Overall as long as we could keep wing tanks on the P51 and P 47 those were the best day in and out plane. The long nose was too rare. And Germany had too little fuel, so for peak airplane it was the FW190D, for everyday thousand at a time it was close between the 47 then the 51.

    • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
      @ngauruhoezodiac3143 3 роки тому +1

      The Arado Pfeil held the speed record for piston engine aircraft for many years.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому +3

      Ta 152 is developed from FW 190 D

    • @drjimjam1112
      @drjimjam1112 3 роки тому

      I’m seeing different figures:fw 190d
      Service Ceiling:39,000’
      Max Speed: 426mph
      HP:1750
      Max Rate of Climb: 3,3000’/min
      Range:520miles

    • @BlueMax109
      @BlueMax109 2 роки тому

      The P47 kill ratio far outstripped the P51. The P47 by far is the most successful fighter during the war for the USAAF by the numbers.

  • @jamesmitchell5126
    @jamesmitchell5126 2 роки тому

    The problem with Germany at the near end of war there were plenty of manufactured planes they just most of there top fighter pilots plus they were no experienced instructors. They were getting very short training time before they got put basically on the front line.

  • @johnhagemeyer8578
    @johnhagemeyer8578 3 роки тому +5

    Funny,I kept staring at the picture of spitfire mod L(clip wing) reading the title of the plane it was to kill.

    • @frankmiller95
      @frankmiller95 3 роки тому +1

      That's because the maker of the video is an idiot, or thinks the potential viewers are idiots.

  • @stephenconnolly3018
    @stephenconnolly3018 3 роки тому +2

    Over states it's abilities Still a very good airplane and one of best WW2 fighters.

  • @kkteutsch6416
    @kkteutsch6416 3 місяці тому

    Again the quantity triumphed against the quality...

  • @mrivantchernegovski3869
    @mrivantchernegovski3869 3 роки тому +1

    The BMW motor overheated lol their car motors are still doing that to this day

  • @josephstalin364
    @josephstalin364 4 роки тому +3

    Never knew how destructive these planes were until 36:28. May something like this never happen again

  • @hurri7720
    @hurri7720 3 роки тому +4

    If the Fw 190 and Kurt Tank is of interest to you then also have a look at Greg's airplane ...
    Focke-Wulf Fw 190 Pt. 1, design philosophy and features
    ua-cam.com/video/9QycCd3U4Hg/v-deo.html

  • @OgrabliatorKorovanov
    @OgrabliatorKorovanov 4 роки тому +1

    17:38 what a dramatic moment! spitfire tried to get that ju-88(or me-210?) but got shot instead ;(

  • @johnlangford3905
    @johnlangford3905 3 роки тому

    BMW was licensed to build the Pratt and Whitney Hornet engine.

    • @grantsmythe8625
      @grantsmythe8625 3 роки тому

      Yrs, that's true but I'm not sure that the BMW and the Prat & Whitney were identical.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому

      Its not a copy

  • @scarsflash
    @scarsflash 8 років тому +2

    ¡Troy Tempest!...The skipper of the SUPERCAR...¡Haven´t heard about him at least 40 or 50 years!...¡groovy!

  • @andreaswetzke855
    @andreaswetzke855 2 роки тому

    DAS BUCH: holt Hartmann runter. Der, mit den meisten Abschüßen, ist
    phänominal...

  • @peterasp1968
    @peterasp1968 3 роки тому

    The Il-2 Stormovik capable of taking on the Fw-190 on equal terms?????

    • @spysareamyth
      @spysareamyth 3 роки тому

      Kinda... the Il-2 was mean in a turn, and was well armed and armoured. With a skilled pilot it could easily force a head-on attack which it would usually win... with a skilled pilot...

  • @MisteriosGloriosos922
    @MisteriosGloriosos922 3 роки тому

    Great video!!!

  • @andrefocke6267
    @andrefocke6267 7 років тому +1

    Great video.

    • @ronkline
      @ronkline 6 років тому

      André Focke a

  • @svenhassel8178
    @svenhassel8178 3 роки тому +1

    Best Bird in the World!

  • @68orangecrate26
    @68orangecrate26 3 роки тому +6

    Miss the days when ground crewmen were trusted with their own safety - running under the wing of a taxiing airplane. Miss the days before low-life lawyers and safety Karens took over the world…. Safety CULTure

  • @oscarblaketon3381
    @oscarblaketon3381 7 років тому +6

    The Focke wulf 190 was the better than the Messcherschidt 109 but im a Brit so I love the Spitfire and Hurricane more.

    • @gonewiththewind8072
      @gonewiththewind8072 7 років тому

      oscar Blaketon yes my friend!!

    • @chopchop7938
      @chopchop7938 5 років тому +1

      The spits the most overrated plane ever. But that's by the British and nobody outside of Britain cares about the British.

    • @markmitchell450
      @markmitchell450 4 роки тому

      @@chopchop7938 hardly overrated but like all planes had its flaws it was an expensive and harder plane to build esp its wings
      As an all rounder it was up with the best
      Plus what's not to like about the awesome engine sound of the merlin

    • @markmitchell450
      @markmitchell450 4 роки тому

      The 190 butcher bird as it was known was a good use of old engine technology and better aerodynamics clever engineering plus despite its flaws it was much feared

    • @hoodoo2001
      @hoodoo2001 3 роки тому

      What has love got to with it? The Fw 190 was a premier fighter in late 1941 through 1942 but by 1943 was evenly matched by the Spit IX by (late 1942) and was inferior to the P-47. The Fw 190 made a fight of it in 1943 due to pilot quality but that ended pretty quickly as the P-47 pilots became equally experienced. The Spit IX was OK and generally superior to the 109G's and equal to the Fw 190. Sptifires were not strategic fighters, neither were the 109 or 190. Strategic fighters have to have range. The Spit XIV was dominant over the Fw 190A which was obsolete in the West by 1944. The Spit V was markedly inferior to the Fw 190 but generally equal to the 109F in terms of combat effectiveness and the Brits made a whole lot more of them during the critical period of the war and had a whole lot more impact in the med than either the Fw 190 or Bf 109. The Germans failed to upgrade the Fw 190 until late 1944 with the D model which were built in small numbers and at their best were equal to the most common allied fighters but still inferior to later war allied fighters.

  • @Shleemaa
    @Shleemaa 7 років тому +2

    Jak-3 had top speed of 720 km/h? LOL It actually was only 645 Km/m. They have mistaken it for some experimental models that had their engines burn out after one flight. But what was important is Jak-3 being much faster at the ground level then any German fighter.

    • @Sturminfantrist
      @Sturminfantrist 6 років тому

      because of that advantage order were given to german pilots not to dogfight with Yaks without oilcooler (yak-3) under Nose under 4000-5000m, above that the german planes had the advantage

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому +1

      Not then then BF109 K model which could go 710km/h

  • @rayz8000
    @rayz8000 3 роки тому

    Alot of Mustang gun camera footage in this video

  • @daveponder2754
    @daveponder2754 6 років тому +4

    All allied fighters with Merlin 61s, and the P-47, and P-38 had the altitude advantage over both 190, and109. Especially when the German machines ran out of glycol/methanol, and/or nitrous. The Nazi planes had a short range
    and larger engines in later models used even more fuel. Ammo loads for the cannons were pathetic. The Mustangs
    and Thunderbolts in 44 were equipped with radar gun sights. Only about 200 190s had the equivalent too late to matter.

    • @hakapeszimaki8369
      @hakapeszimaki8369 4 роки тому +3

      Then check some thunderbolt documentary shoot by the last 2 months of the war. US pilots lived 2 hours (1-2 sorties) in combat only and it was the end of the war! I am Hungarian and my granpa was a land crew for HUN airfoce that time. The allied simply had the quantity that is all. The axis pilots were fighting against 1:10, 1:15 ratio. Sometimes only 4 fighter planes attacked a fromation consists of 1000 allied planes. And yes, methanol injection helped to escape when 10 allied fighter was hanging behind. That is the courage to fly suicide missios over and over again, day by day. Majority of ariwar was between 1000-5000 m and the german planes had their supercharger set to that altitude range. Erich Harthmann pointed out that above 5000 m P51 was better under 5000 the BF109. German planes had also external tanks so their range was not bad and fit to purpose.

    • @toddduffy1658
      @toddduffy1658 4 роки тому +1

      Germans averaged 3 rounds per kill and the 30 mm was one round one plane.
      Where as allieds needed thousand plus rounds per kill.

    • @toddduffy1658
      @toddduffy1658 4 роки тому

      American radar could not fit in a plane and weighed 800 lbs and 6 ft diameter . But yes they did have new sight Gyro that helped new pilots. Germany had them also. That would calculate the lead on the target and size of target.
      Then after the war they were called radar sights after improvements.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому +1

      The BF109 used only engines of the DB600 series which where all basically the same size and didnt really change in fuel consumption, FW 190 tho used either the BMW 801 or the junkers inverted V12

    • @BlueMax109
      @BlueMax109 2 роки тому

      @@hakapeszimaki8369 During the Battle Of Normandy on June 4th all the Luftwaffe could field against the entire allied armada was 2x FW190's - people have little perception of just how badly outnumbered the Luftwaffe truly was especially in late war.

  • @jimkirby1799
    @jimkirby1799 3 роки тому

    Is it just me, or does a yone see a resemblance

  • @rayyannavilafreda325
    @rayyannavilafreda325 3 роки тому

    Title:focke wulf 290
    Pic:spitfire
    NICE

  • @justinmjdell
    @justinmjdell 3 роки тому

    “Hidden and Dangerous” narrator.

  • @andreaswetzke855
    @andreaswetzke855 3 роки тому

    Hi! War 4 Jahre Luftwaffe Nike Herkules. Hobbyist Modellbau. Auf der rechten Suchleiste, sehe ich, yeehaa
    Fw 190... --- Aber -- erstaunt -- sehe das Bild einer Messerschmitt Me 109 E ohne Haube, erkennbar
    an der Radaufhängung...
    Sehr dummer Fehler...

  • @ihsanamsal2947
    @ihsanamsal2947 3 роки тому

    The war is ugly... but the fw190's designs were beautiful... what an irony...

  • @thezodiak6666
    @thezodiak6666 3 роки тому

    Germany named their Units after animals Like Tiger and Wolfpack...
    Focke-Wulf meant "Fuckwolf" which is totally normal in German and Not offensive at all...

  • @iamgod6464
    @iamgod6464 3 роки тому

    What a piece of Junk! It was no match for the Typhoons and Tempests which is was based on.

  • @devgupta8815
    @devgupta8815 3 роки тому

    The Narrator mispronounces PLOESTI ( Oil field and Refinery in Rumania, Hitler’s main source of Fuel ) as PLOETSI !

  • @davidhayes7596
    @davidhayes7596 3 роки тому

    The hawker hurricane with Browning.303’s mounted in the wings saved the British in the Battle of Britain. Every plan on all sides was designed to fulfill a specific role. It’s hard to compare and designate who’s #1. P51#1.

  • @mariusjustus4599
    @mariusjustus4599 8 років тому +3

    the BEST f... the rest.greetings from a GERMAN

    • @davidrivera6807
      @davidrivera6807 4 роки тому +2

      People don't know that almost all the military equipment that the germans had were built by force labor of holocaust victims.

  • @jpmtlhead39
    @jpmtlhead39 3 роки тому

    The best engine piston fighter of ww2.

    • @RENEGADEJon19
      @RENEGADEJon19 3 роки тому +1

      Best German one, sure. Not sure about overall though.

    • @carcharinus6367
      @carcharinus6367 3 роки тому +1

      @@RENEGADEJon19 Vought F4U Corsair. It`s a very simple answer...

    • @UkrainianPaulie
      @UkrainianPaulie Рік тому

      P-47...Hold my beer!

    • @jpmtlhead39
      @jpmtlhead39 Рік тому

      @@UkrainianPaulie the jokes channel is the other one,ok pal.

  • @anthonywilson4873
    @anthonywilson4873 3 роки тому +1

    The Spitfire had to be developed to counter the threat. The Spitfire was improved short term with an upowered version of the Merlin and permanently with a new engine the Griffin. Merlin 27 litre Griffin 37 Litre.

  • @HerrReinhard
    @HerrReinhard 4 роки тому

    Nice documentary movie

  • @caseyjones0113
    @caseyjones0113 3 роки тому

    ❤️

  • @derin111
    @derin111 3 роки тому +2

    51.13….see the little BMW badge on the front. Just like my cars. 🤣

    • @Realitygetreal
      @Realitygetreal 3 роки тому

      Now you ruined it for me, I have owned multiple BMW's overwhelming maintenance, parts failures, great to drive when they WORK CORRECTLY and beyond that pure hell to own.
      B ig
      M otoring
      W aste

  • @peterjohnstaples
    @peterjohnstaples 3 роки тому

    Spitfire pilot ace and escapee Douglas Bader was not British he was an Australian, known as tin legs Bader as he lost his legs in the war but continued to fight as a pilot and one of his failed escapes when shot down over the occupied continent, was with his tin legs.

    • @ianvaughan9028
      @ianvaughan9028 3 роки тому +1

      Douglas Bader was born in St John's Wood, London, ENGLAND.

  • @Jhossack
    @Jhossack 3 роки тому +2

    Half about the plane, half a bunch of stolen general footage.

  • @yannicknharts4176
    @yannicknharts4176 8 років тому +4

    lol spitfire in tn

    • @deejaystump
      @deejaystump 5 років тому +2

      one of the best planes around, but sad it was owned by a lot of nutters there boss was a know all who at the end chicken out by shooting himself

  • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
    @ngauruhoezodiac3143 3 роки тому

    The picture on the thumbnail was a Mustang, not a Focke Wulf.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому +1

      No thats a spitfire

    • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
      @ngauruhoezodiac3143 3 роки тому

      @@startingbark0356 yes, it's a Spit, but I clicked a thumbnail with a Mustang.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому

      @@ngauruhoezodiac3143 no i clicked a thumbnail with a spit

    • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
      @ngauruhoezodiac3143 3 роки тому

      @@startingbark0356 I tried to watch Mustang vs 190 but got the wrong tape.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому

      @@ngauruhoezodiac3143 oh

  • @linyyanmonster4559
    @linyyanmonster4559 8 років тому +9

    fw 190 can' t out turn the bf 109 but can sertainly out roll it

    • @hoodoo2001
      @hoodoo2001 3 роки тому

      Which is saying nothing. Both the 109 and 190 were "through" by the end of 1943.

  • @736693
    @736693 3 роки тому

    When the Luftwaffe turned their 109’s & 190’s into heavy fighters & heavy bomber destroyers (the Sturnbocke), those heavy planes ultimately had less maneuverable against the P51 Mustangs.

    • @startingbark0356
      @startingbark0356 3 роки тому

      I dont know how you could turn a single engine fighter into a heavy fighter

    • @736693
      @736693 3 роки тому

      Add more cannons & machine guns to a single engine fighter to make that fighter a heavy fighter or heavy bomber destroyer.

  • @justusstern9125
    @justusstern9125 3 роки тому

    The BEST airplane in.....and then the DORNIERS came and smiled ^^

  • @alabamamothman2986
    @alabamamothman2986 3 роки тому +2

    I always wondered how the Germans could be blamed for WWI. They were caught up in it like all the others. And if the WWI veterans had returned home and hung their leaders, like they should have, there wouldn't have been a WWII.

  • @linzmcgeorge
    @linzmcgeorge 3 роки тому

    Focke Wolf 190 but show a Hawker Hurricane.

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 3 роки тому

    D version was the best

  • @markmitchell450
    @markmitchell450 4 роки тому +4

    The 190 shot down 40 sword fish torpedo bombers well no shocks there 190 were fast highly manovable esp at lower altitudes the sword fish was a slow bi plane

  • @-lightningwill-6014
    @-lightningwill-6014 3 роки тому

    Thank fuck we had the spitfire and mosquito or it would have absl dominated

  • @736693
    @736693 3 роки тому

    What if the Luftwaffe started more ramming missions earlier with more lightly armed fighters just like Sonderkommando Elbe did in April 1945?

  • @21C5
    @21C5 3 роки тому

    British ‘copied’ german engines?
    Il-2 equal to Fw190?
    Luftwaffe gained control of night skies?
    🤨

    • @spysareamyth
      @spysareamyth 3 роки тому

      1. Yes, but nothing really came of it as they weren't really in a position to introduce them during the war in large numbers, though machines like the Sea Fury and Tempest II used them.
      2. Il-2 defensive formations caused big problems for German fighters, as attacking one Il-2 would have another shooting at you with its devastating guns, and the one you shot is probably fine thanks to their solid construction.
      3. Yes. Just yes. German night fighters were the most capable by far of any nation up until the breakdown of the Luftwaffe in 44', and they were so effective British bomber crews weren't properly warned of them for fear of shattering morale as ones attack was almost guaranteed to kill you barring a massive mistake on the Germans' side.

  • @mcguire4162
    @mcguire4162 9 років тому +10

    If only the D-9 model would have been available in 1941👍

    • @mcguire4162
      @mcguire4162 9 років тому

      Max Power - for high altitude work, the Fw-190D by 1936 the Fw-190 for ground attack, MP-44 by 1936, Panzerfaust by 1938, and a Germanized T-34 tank with the feared 88mm gun!

    • @M4xPower
      @M4xPower 9 років тому +4

      +Richard McGuire To what end, though?

    • @mcguire4162
      @mcguire4162 9 років тому +2

      Victory!

    • @M4xPower
      @M4xPower 9 років тому

      ***** Yeah the Focke Wulf was a cool airplane and everything but.....

    • @bodoque_csm
      @bodoque_csm 9 років тому +2

      +Richard McGuire You know what that implies, right?