You are WRONG About Apple Vision Pro...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 січ 2024
- The Apple Vision Pro isn't just another VR headset, and if you think it is you are underestimating exactly how much effort Apple put into developing a headset that can actually be a revolutionary computing platform that is just as capable and powerful as the Mac and as intuitive and revolutionary as the iPhone.
- Наука та технологія
I’m old enough to remember when computers did not have GUI’s… instead you only had command lines and text and they were mostly only able to crunch numbers and do very basic word processing. When Apple introduced the Graphical User Interface they didn’t reinvent computers but they did revolutionize their functionality. The first field to really take off as a result was desktop publishing… Which was made possible because people could now use computers for paste up and layout. Maybe Vision Pro will be something similar: a new interface which allows people to use computers differently to do things they couldn’t do before.
People are thinking of this the wrong way. It’s not going to replace your iPhone. I’m not sure anything ever will unless they can shrink the Vision Pro down to the size of a contact lens 50 years from now. But it might replace your desktop/laptop, your home theatre and your game console. It’s not something to always carry around or wear passively. You put the Vision Pro on in order to do a specific activity just like when you take out your laptop to do some work or fire up your PlayStation to play a game.
It’s definitely the future of gaming that’s for sure
Well imagine how fast data transfer is over 6G or even 7G then you can easily see that light glasses will probably be thin-clients over the eyes along with potent multi-modal AI. That's less than 10 years for 6G and AI and probably light glasses using these?
thats litterally the same argument for the meta q3
This is why I don’t expect the price to come down as much as some people are hoping. It’ll be expensive but you’ll buy it instead of multiple other expensive products.
Glasses 👓 NOT contacts. Unless they shrink them to glasses size🤦♂️. Then I’m sure this will replace the phone.
This video is so weird. Everybody already uses the meta-quest three as a productivity device too. When he was describing all of the used cases for the vision pro, I was like people already do this in other headsets too
Exactly!
The hand gesture being compared to Steve unveiling the main input method being fingers on the iPhone was spot on. Steve truly believed in the multi touch technology and even presented it as “magic” in the keynote! Tim clearly has the same feelings towards the hand gesture motion capture/eye tracking technology they have and he knows it’s only going to get better. Tim may not fully encompass Steve in terms of innovation, but every so often Steve’s spirit pops out in Tim and this was definitely it with Vision Pro.
Yeah even though he isn’t is innovative as Steve I still think in the end Tim was the
Best option and iPhone X and Vision Pro are his best products yet
input method being fingers was done by the quest 3 first not apple
@@vd0o666 didn’t say Apple did gestures first. Just that Tim believes in their tech being the best. Apple didn’t have the first touch screen, but they had the best touch technology.
You are absolutely correct. People who are buying this v1 are not buying a VR headset, they are buying Apple's vision for the future of spatial computing even if v1 isn't completely there yet.
100% agree. Apple thinks out of the box. Just like it did with the iPhone, and with the Macintosh, both industry changing devices. And I believe it's about to do it with the vision pro. You could even say the Apple watch was an industry changing device - of course, not to the same degree, but only shows that when Apple puts its mind into a specific industry, it's not to just to "be" there, but to change it, evolve it.
This is exactly why I bought it.
Classic, people already using the "spatial computing" language. Just another marketing term Apple introduced but it's already part of the lexicon.
Apple didn't introduce it, it's been around for quite a while. In fact Magic Leap used it for a bit.
yeah 100% spatial computing,so you can slap a half a kilo brick on your face all day long,this is just copycat Meta VR,nothing about spatial computing shit,its all about marketing and apple brand
I think that it would be good for developers to buy it so they can develop apps the first smart phones were used as development kits anyways. Even if they cant buy it they can still develop for it using vision os simulator in xcode so its important that software devs like us learn to develop for the vision pro so we get a head start in developing for this new hardware.
Great and in-depth explanation of where we stand with tech. Also, very interesting for me who is not that interested in tech, and know now what vision pro actually is for.... Great presenting skills Sir. 💫
They did not make 500k-1M for the launch. They have about 80k on hand for launch weekend and about ~40K/mo coming in as the year progresses.
It's 500k-1M for the year.
Wrong. You can literally look this up. They sold 200k, and all those will ship by the end of March. They are on track to make and sell 400k by EOY, and that is only because of manufacturing needs for materials not because of demand. They also only opened it up to the US. Mark my words this is the start of spatial computing adoption as the new standard. It will take time like smartphones but it will happen.
@@DrNoThanks no you're wrong. Launch batch was for Feb 2. Any unit shipping after that is post launch batch (post 80k). This gives them time to manufacture more. Apple products never go "out of stock", their dates just get pushed out so they can make more.
@@DrNoThanks I would ask you to read the comment again and use some critical thinking here. There were *approximately* 80k available for launch supply. They allegedly sold "200k" which most should be shipped by end of March as you said. ~80K initial batch and around 40k/mo coming in per month as the year progresses, as I said. 80k initial batch + 40k feb + 40k march = 160,000 units. Maybe they had a few more at the start, maybe the monthly supply coming from the factory is a 10-20k units higher than I estimated, and maybe some orders at the very end of the line have early April estimates. 160k is within shooting distance of the rumored 200k mark and nothing I said is "wrong" by any stretch.
Launch batch is first 7 days (they look specifically at having been able to deliver actual devices in purchasers' hands). It has always been that way for Apple and most tech companies sales data. Apple also released some numbers today stating that they sold over 200k pre-orders with about 100-120K shipping to customers and stores between 2/3 and 2/11, with the rest expected to be fully shipped by the First week of April. They will probably be able to produce another 250k-300k this year. @@mikemanzano5363
Yes I think you are right. I see it as a new work environment. In my opinion, it could even go so far as to reduce the renting of office space. Along with faster fiber connections, work is becoming more of a community. This will be a 20-year process, similar to the telephone. I believe the office will no longer be just an office with this Vision Pro.
Good luck having eyes that work with that screen 1cm from your eyes.
@@t0st >t. look at screen that is 40cm from his eyes all day
a literal global pandemic that killed millions hasn't put an end to office space because office space owners want to make their money, but you think this stupid, overpriced gimmick will succeed?
Greg, you totally nailed it. Excellent references to 1st gen Apple Products for context.
Well-done!
Looking forward to your experiences with the Vision Pro.
Thanks for the video, really informative. How often do you think Apple will launch a new version of the Vision Pro? They tend to come up with a new version of their main products every year, and at $3.5k a pop, that price should provide some longevity to consumers.
I’ve been thinking about ways to increase the battery life. So we have the device, possibly keyboard and trackpad if desired, carry case, I’m thinking one should carry this in a backpack when not using it (the whole setup I mean). So if Apple could license that connector used for the battery? Like they did with lightning? Perhaps they someone could create a backpack with a huge battery in it for Vision Pro?
In 1983, the DynaTAC 8000x was the first commercially available handheld mobile phone. Not the 70s.
That is exactly right ! First MacBook Air for example was crappy device (poor choice of ports, hinges, ZIF drive connector....) but 2nd and 3rd gen were gems and from then on became yardstick for lighweigh laptop.
Wrong? I don't even know what the hell is going on.
i wonder if for gaming if it’ll add compatibility with quest pro controllers at some point in time
You are so right. And this device is revolutionary. Eventually it will be replacing lap tops, tablets and eventually the smart phones as these devices get smaller and more affordable for the masses.
Does anyone know about the App Store? Like are all apps and games in the app store usable for Vision Pro? Also how long doe sit take to recharge? Worth the price to me depending on the answer here.
I'm impressed by the Apple Vision Pro! But it's just too expensive for me. I'll look into getting one in about 5-6 years. Either gen 2 or 3 used.
Literally not a single person on earth cares
@@drumbum7999you obviously cared enough to comment 🤷♂️
@@watchdark1738 lmao W
Gen 3 will probably come out in 2030s and will be a whole different architecture design
@@alexhein1738yeah probably won't have updates too often, probably every 4 years,
Finally someone understanding it, thank you Greg :) In my opinion it is a Pro Modell you should compare it to the Pro computers for the price range, which the Vision wants to replace sooner or later. But it will take a while for the mass market to accept it as it took at least 4-5 years until Smartphones really became a thing. The Vision (without Pro and cheaper) Glasses may come too. Now they want to revolutionize computers indoors. By combining terms like home office, TVs, a real „Metaverse“ inclusion in your own four walls and maybe even gaming (even if that’s not really an Apple thing so far). It has and wants to be just operating in VR.(As it just shows you your surroundings because of the cameras that’s only virtual or XR?)
AR Glasses will come but target something completely different, namely the outdoors and with that smartphones. The step inbetween is the Apple Watch maybe even in combination with AR Glasses. But that’s just what I’m thinking ✌
Excellent video quality. I prefer productivity and consuming content vs. gaming so this should work for me. My only concern is that getting it this early means that within the return window, I may not get the best feel for whether it's worth keeping. I say that because I expect apps to be sparse. Maybe the hype will die down in week 3 after I can no longer return it.
Does it have microled or micro oled display ?
Great video Greg! So glad to see someone else with a view of the potential that the Apple Vision Pro could have for the future of computing rather than condemning it and labeling it without any context. I can't wait to get mine!
The place where that “what do you think about the Vision Pro” conversation will be at the office. This device will be purchased and used regularly by people for work, those conversations will happen in Zoom/webex meetings when a persona shows up in video chat, or when someone walks up to a desk and they see you using one for work. My two cents
Will logic Pro run natively on Vision Pro?
Im not 100% sure but I believe not, there no Final Cut so I assume there won’t be logic too, the best u could to is still use your Mac but with the Vision Pro as a monitor
When the iPhone was announced my thoughts were 'I'll wait for the 3rd or 4th gen model when they've worked it out' My first iPhone was a 4s. When the Apple Watch was announced I thought the same thing though it was the Series 7 with fast charging and the Qwerty keyboard that got me to buy one
The Vision Pro is in that category atm for me, when there's an SE model that can project an infinite screen in the room for my Mac I'll want one.
As a professional user, the question Apple hasn’t answered for me is: how does the Vision Pro improve my workflow? At this point, there isn’t an answer for that. The Apple Vision Pro can’t do anything, that I can’t do already. Sure it can display 3 additional monitors, but do I need them? Maybe it’s just that Apple didn’t do a good job of communicating their vision, but I don’t see how this can actually improve my workflow. So it’s just another fancy VR gadget that would end up collecting dust on the shelf after using it for a couple of times…
None VR improve your workflow, unless you have a very specific need for 3D design or simulation (car design for example). 3 physical monitors would always beat virtual monitors, unless you need 3 monitors for 30 minutes a day at a time. Apple itself will be telling you to take frequent breaks and use it only for a limited time.
There will be ways that "spatial" capacity will open up major doors in organization for your tasks. Our minds are built to work in 3D, not in 2D, and while we're seeing 3 or 4 screens in the demos, there's no requirement for the interface to be in "screens" at all, except familiarity. The dinosaur demo they've showed off is also kind of an example of this device as more than a "movie theatre" ... yes, we've had 3D movies in theatres, but with this device you could literally have the screen expand around you and have the action going on all around you. It's only a matter of time before a revolutionary film takes full advantage of this. It's early days, still, but there will be ways that that "spatial" aspect makes every task you work on more intuitive and organized.
It'd be nice if you had the chapters so I know if you ever talked about gaming or another topic. As it is, I dont have 21min to see if you address that part.
One of the most complete nail on the head videos on Apple Vision Pro! This is the video I’m sending people to when I’m asked about the Vision Pro. Subbed and liked
this man does not tested a meta quest 3
One the best objective insightful analysis about Vision Pro I have seen. I agree that it's gonna rock!
The idea that someday I don't need to sit at my desk with 4 ultrawide monitors to do my work is extremely appealing. Imagine how much energy and money and space would be saved long term to be able to work just using a Vision Pro.
you already can do that with quest 2 & 3 and pro using virtual desktop
My last comment didn't show up so I'll post again: I'm new to your channel and own a Quest 3. I'd really like to see an honest comparison by you between the two devices. Please try them in parallel and really use the Q3 extensively. The Q3 has a lot of hidden potential that one only becomes familiar with after spending time with it. (E.g. you should install an optimizer app for old Quest 1 / 2 apps called quest games optimizer rather soon after buying it to use old apps with high resolution.)
Vision Pro is a whole computer in ur face which is very impressive
As usual, your takes are well thought out and makes all the sense.
I think that you disregard a very important functionality of the controlers: they give feedback, you can feel if you are touching something, they vibrate continuosly if you are "pressing" something...
That's something that the people like. Controlers are not only input devices but output devices, and Apple has just lost that very important inmersive factor.
Don't missunderstand me, I would love it to be a success and I would surely buy the third version of this product, as I did with the iPhone and the iPad, and I concur with you that it needs some iterations too, but I just think that the abscence of controlers is a minus, not a plus, and a big minus IMHO.
I think they would have been better off releasing ar glasses that connect to your macbook. Only needing cameras and processing power to be able to allow your virtual screens to hold position and basic hand controls.
I think the key on the technology side of the Vision Pro is not the M2 chip, but the R1 chip. This seems to be the Chip, that handles all the "spatial computing", aka it is responsible to track your hand movements and and streaming images to the screens. So the M2 really only does what any M2 chip in any MacBook does and the magic happens in the R1 chip.
And the price.... a refurbished Mac Pro M2 with 16 GB ram and 256 GB ssd is like 1200 bucks, then add two 4K monitors and basically another chip as capable as the M2 chip. Sadly, as far as Apple prices go, the 3500 for the VisionPro make sense in that framework.
Very well explained and argued ... will certainly watch your review once you have the device "on your head"
nice deeper analys video thank you
Interesting video. I want to see what people say when they actually get the device. I want to see what developers come up with in terms of applications.
This is movie-like technology. Can you imagine being able to control a virtual screen with just your hands and eyes. Imagine that in the next couple of years it will get even smaller and lighter and cheaper so yeah: this is the future!!!
Such a good take finally. It’s really not even in people’s hands and they be hating. I love your take on the product and I’m also exited to see where this will be going.
Do you think DJI will update or port over its Fly drone app for Vision Pro for FPV viewing of their drones?
The DjI fly app is currently available on iOS and iPadOS
I’m excited for Feb 2! It can’t get here fast enough!
You are correct. Success is not about "how may" people buy it or " how many" apple sells, rather, people are not looking at the audience for this. This is not your std gaming VR headset at all but rather a tool for productivity (with entertainment). Just those micro-oleds are something I would pay for. I personally have been waiting for years to get one headset that could "really" let me watch movies at their best and something that would allow me to work... Vision Pro bring exactly that. Just the ability to use it as a hi resolution monitor, and being able to enjoy a movie experience better than any iMax is brilliant. Again, each person for his own. But definitely see its worth and thanks to Apple for bringing this to us. Not debating about price point being something not for everyone, but it will come down soon in a few years
Oh, I’m waiting for this thing. Not for the price to go down, but for it to do something worthwhile. Hopefully they get it right for the next gen.
What exactly is your idea of it doing something worthwhile? It's launching compatible with basically all ipad apps. It's a spatial computer with great multi-tasking. I don't really get what people could be waiting on except for a good gaming experience.. in which case you should probably opt for something from another company.
@@mitchell10394 let me know what you find worthwhile about browsing your photos and watching barely a movie on a single battery charge. If that’s worth $3500+tax to you, I’m glad you like wasting money.
Yea lol you want actual objects to come to reality? The hell? If that’s the case the next gen will be 100k dollars 😂
When the first iPhone price increase till today is applied to the Vision Pro, the Vision Pro would climb to 10k+ over the years
i wonder if by the R1 has its own RAM, i imagine it’d have to?
Great video. Even better points. Subbed
It might not be perfect, but the hardware is so forward and cutting edge, software can keep this product viable for some time yet. This hardware isn't like the first gen iphone hardware at all.
Good point
Exactly. Most people hating on this just don't understand how cutting edge this device is. The microOLEDs alone are a one of a kind thing for headsets. Resolution equals immersion and this thing right now has no peers even close to the image quality this thing can produce. That isn't even touching the eye tracking being best in class, the spatial computing and that it works with the entire Apple ecosystem. In five years those same haters will be saying how they knew this thing would change how we use tech.
@@DrNoThanksI think it’s not the price. It’s the bulkiness of it. That’s the issue.
I personally own a quest 3 and everything I seen on the Vision Pro reviews can also be done on The quest as well except for some minor functions such as the facetime & the virtual Eyes. also the quest has an advantage which is gaming with controllers, yeah sure the passthrough cameras are better on the vision pro but that still for me doesn't justify the super High price of the Vision Pro, also why would you need a high end processor like the one on the vision pro if its not going to be for gaming? Don’t make sense to me. don't get me wrong I like apple products but this device is way overpriced
First off I also have a Quest 3 and a PSVR 2. This is a spatial PC. Those other two are gaming devices. Apple has never once said this is a gaming device or geared towards that. It can do gaming but it's more of a PC replacement than a gaming headset. Also the Quest 3 is terrible at hand tracking, the passthrough is terrible especially in low light and there are no cameras on the inside for eye tracking. The is the Quest PRO at over 1k is what you are talking about. The AVP also has best in class resolution by a mile. It is an actual PC meaning anything you can do on a mac you can do on the Vision Pro. People like you look at this as apples to apples and that is just plain ignorant. Also this thing costs about 2k to make and that does not include R&D and adverts.@@josevalles1010
I wasn’t. I know it’s the future of home computing.
It's not the future for me as it's not even Steam compatible.
@@dtz1000 gamers usually find a way.
@@DaveGme They haven't found a way for PSVR2 yet.
@DaveGme maybe but with no controllers you can't play most games. They should have added an option for some kinda ring that adds haptic feedback at least. And a top strap option, at least give the option.
@@Speedbolt74 I believe the top strap is now standard on it.
All very nice, but comfort is still a issue, especially on a hot/humid day.
Well that’s the best insight into Vision Pro I’ve seen.excellent work sir 👌👏
The apple vision pro is simply just the starting point, the price and specs is just to show How Pro models will be priced
The current vision pro is the standard going forward... I do not think there will be Glasses
I think its all about the goggles or headset approach
the next pro model will just have the next chip that is part of the higher tier ex M3 max or M3 ultra or M3 pro and possibly introduce a Pro R chip
I believe their full line up by the 3rd generation would be something like this:
Apple Vision Ultra - M4 ultra, R3 pro
Apple vision Pro - M4 max or M4 pro , R3 pro
Apple Vision Studio- M4 pro or M4, R3 pro
Apple Vision Air - M4 , R3
or
Apple Vision Se - M3,R2
Apple Vision Ultra - $4200
Apple vision Pro - $3500
Apple Vision Studio- $2500
Apple Vision Air - $1700 - $2000
or
Apple Vision Se - $1500
Apple Vision Ultra - Extra Button, water resistant, swim proof, More outdoor specs, haptics, internal battery (2hrs)
satellite, recreational dive features, hiking assist)
Apple vision Pro - Extra Button, water resistant, More outdoor specs, haptics, internal battery (2hrs)
Apple Vision Studio - standard, Internal battery (2hrs)
Apple Vision Air - standard, internal battery (2hrs)
or
Apple Vision Se- previous model standard, no internal Battery (2hrs)
The same:
all to have cellular use
Better Siri
imessage with shared space features
external battery won't go away because it will act as a longer battery time even when they figure out an internal battery
Air or Se part: there is an or here because it is not necessary for a 5 models but rather the fourth model has to be reasonable enough that it is entry level for those who want to buy in.
I would prefer a Air model over an se model because the way apple treats se models are like models that are slight improvements of a previous model within that product line. I also believe an air model will allow them to keep the hardware to be more uniformed with there other higher tier models as they improve this year over year although I would prefer biannual but with apple they most likely make a new one every year if the second gen line up pays off.
I dont think it will be slimmer or smaller this will be the size and weight for awhile the amount of tech, cameras, or sensors wont allow it to be smaller and honestly it is actually already smaller than most headsets
Wrong. Next gen will be lighter for sure by a lot. Right out the gate the materials used are GLASS and Aluminum. And the battery off device was genius by apple because thats how your going to get glasses level AR to work. This was predicted by Palmer Luckey.
@@WigganNuG palmer didn't say by the next gen they would figure it out he said that the external battery will allow them to allow them to ease users to get used to the external puck and then over time use the puck to store some of the features to make the headset part weigh less but did not give a time frame and also all because palmer said that does not mean that is what apple will ultimately go for
Also if you keep putting things into the puck then the puck will weigh more
@@sobeso What if in the future, the "puck" is also your phone and a controller you can use with the headset for certain tasks that might be more tiresome with simple hand gestures. I haven't used the device, obviously, but I imagine swiping through things or typing or certain tasks might benefit a touch-sensitive surface.
@@joelface The "Puck" for apple would be for battery based on how they made this headset they will most likely make room for internal battery in the future for at least 2 hours and keep the puck for the same 2hrs or more and then all day will be plugged in. Vision Pro with battery same 1.5 pound and the external battery to stay at 0.7 pounds.
Currently without battery weighs 1.5 pounds. so having a battery with the same weight as gen 1 will still be an achievement.
Other companies may adopt the Puck idea but again if you adopt the puck idea you will be taking away from the main headset which is the opposite of what Apple is known for doing at the moment. They want this headset to be a standalone as possible. You can see this from the design. Alot of other headset cannot change the band or light seal and that is because those headset are designed as one unit. For 1.5 pounds the Vision Pro is everything in one unit not the band or light seal.
Scrolling from the first impressions online and eye tracking seem to work so well that you won't need a controller as of now but yes for typing faster maybe you must use a keyboard until they figure how to improve the virtual version. Probably put haptics by the audiopods on the AVP in the future...
A better analogy might be the iPod to mp3 players that existed prior to iPods.
I don't think the iPod would have done well if it was $3500.
This is a terrible analogy. lol
I have the exact feeling from Vison pro as it was with first iPhone. A mixture of excitement from defenitely a breakthrough piece of gear and a pinch of disappointment from aspects.
12 cameras - 2 of which are double duty. Low latency Bluetooth audio too.
How much did Apply pay you?
Greetings from Germany ❤ Really good content and arguments! Keep going 😅
I remember my first flatscreen TV cost me well over $5000. I just bought the Apple vision pro and I feel like this is going to be the same thing 5 to 10 years from now but I don’t mind jumping in and enjoying GEN one. I did enjoy the first flat screen tv but it does suck knowing I spent $5000 on it
Stoked for picking up my 1tb AVP on launch day, LFG!🤩
I wanna see how movies are played on this. That would be awesome. But this is a game changer for the medical field and any kind of training. Sports training, mechanical possibilities are endless
I think 3d content is the killer app. Music went stereo and never looked back. Videos will all go stereo
If I can use Apple Vision Pro as a nice monitor for my MacBook Pro, that I could do real work on, like I do on my Apple Studio Display, I would seriously consider it. Looking forward to learning more!
Excellent video. Good points.
do you have a sub membership? Also are you getting Vision Pro?
my issue with the M2 isn’t performance it’s efficiency
with 2 - 2.5 hrs battery life the move to the 3nm of the M3 or the M4 could be significant
This is not the iPhone revolution
I don't know where to start.
Quest3 a fully dedicated XR2 VR:AR specialized processor able to manage 7 camera feed at the same time.
You can already use ONLY your hands only to navigate the whole productivity suite on Quest. Yes it has cameras looking in all direction.
Everything that apple has shown is already available on quest there's absolutely no new feature here other than screen that shows an uncanny version of your face.
I pre ordered the AVP but you might have sold me on a new Apple Watch as I’m still using the very first one that came out!
💀upgrade that watch.
Thank you for the memory of that first iPhone scroll 😀
If this is a productivity machine, presumably to be used for real work by creative types (as Apple computers are usually used for), how do you upload GBs of photos and video from your professional camera or video equipment on to this device? It doesn't have USB-C ports or slots for microSD cards etc. Also, even with the 1TB, eventually that will fill up too, then what, you gotta use Apple Cloud? Also, we all know that to be efficiently productive, nothing has come along that beats a mouse/trackpad and keyboard.
It’s the first passive computer like you do need to learn to interact with it but it’s the first example of a computer I’ve seen where it adapts 100% to you …
Laptops you have to fine a posture and a good surface desktops you have to set up a good desk hight and chair and keyboard combo
Tablets you can pick up but you have to hold them and all of the actions are all active you have to move the mouse you have to touch the screen
The vision prisczye tracking means it knows what you’re looking at so it’s already offloading that step of interaction with your brain and you just click and drag
If anything else I hope this stays in apples products that aren’t augmented reality headsets
As for price.... What if a second version, rather than having an M2, allows you to connect to your existing Mac, and let that do the processing
Thanks for sharing. Blessings on your day!
It took me a while to get it. It’s not a VR headset. It’s a computer. You can buy this and use it like a computer. Without hooking it up to anything else. That makes the price point make more sense.
Down the road, it may make it to a stand alone computer. However, right now, it is too heavy, the battery life is too short, and the lack of applications will make it limited in comparison. I would rather have a much more versatile laptop that you can sit in your lap rather than wearing on your face, at this point. If I wanted something now, I would probably get a pair of (much cheaper and lighter) Xreal glasses that can connect to multiple devices and give me separate screens with stuff I already own. For example, if you have a Nintendo Switch, you can use it with Xreal, while you can't use it with your Apple goggles. Until they solve the weight issues, I can't see very many people that will want to wear this all day. For now, it's a cool novelty device and probably best for single people that don't watch movies and sports with other people. I would still rather have something cheaper now while this new technology ripens. Will wait this one out and see what the next few versions look like.
@@uofmtigertech1316 All great points. We will see if it gets there eventually. I also wouldn’t buy one now. But I think it’s very interesting that they seem to be soft pedaling the fact that it’s a standalone device. In my opinion Apple is putting it out there will some ideas and will let the world figure out what it can best be used for. My personal bet is as way to get a break from reality for short amounts of time. The meditations apps seem to have a big wow factor. We shall see!
Can't be use for work unless you are in cold conditioned room. Because you will be sweating inside the thing.
Since we’re celebrating the 40 year anniversary of the Mac this week. Let’s put the price of the original Mac in perspective when thinking about Apple Vision Pro. Released in 1984, the motherboard, a 9 in (23 cm) CRT black and white monitor, and a floppy drive were housed in a beige case with integrated carrying handle; it came with a keyboard and single-button mouse. It sold for US$2,495 (equivalent to $7,000 in 2022).
Cannot wait your unboxing Greg on 2nd February. 🎉
$3500? Don’t kid yourself. Add 1TB storage, carrying case, charger, charging cable, Zeiss lenses and you’re at $4800! Well, as Homer says, “What are ya gonna do?
On the Quest 3 there is the opportunity to use hand gestures but I don't like using them compared to a controller because of the lack of haptic feedback. A glove-like controller that incorporates haptic feedback and that works even when your hands are, for example, in your pockets would be ideal. Haptic feedback is essential for a greater sense of immersion and realism and I would not buy a VR unit that did not have that feature. When I bought the Quest 3 I had a large library of games and apps to choose from, plus I use it as a PCVR device which expands my options even more. The Apple Vision Pro has a dearth of games and decent apps and I don't need to strap something to my face to work with productivity apps. Besides that, the graphics card in my computer is way more powerful than the Vision Pro's graphic processor enabling me with wireless 6e and the Quest 3 to run powerful apps like Microsoft Flight simulator with astounding realism. That is why I am not going to pay Apple for their rip-off, niche, walled garden crap. Of course, Apple fanboyz will gladly just bend over and take it up the ol wazoo, paying whatever Apple demands.
Your eyes are the feedback.
fr, the vision pro is just a scam because of the poor graphics and the poor battery, idk why they thought it was a good idea to commercialize it with all this cons
@@Oblivionze said someone who never used it.
@@k.vn.k whats the correlation of using it to his specs?
@@k.vn.k apple said that for general use it last only 2 hours, is not even my opinion, thats a very poor feature and it's not what you usually expect from Apple
You nailed it man Great video
The biggest misconception of the Apple Vision Pro is that it will replace their Quest 3 and they will be able to play steam vr games or it will have killer game apps. If your thinking of using the Apple Vision Pro as just a gaming headset you might be disappointed.
Allright i did some math... Iphone 15 pro = $1200. 13" Macbook Air with M2 chip = $1100. Meta Quest 3 = $500. Total of these = $2800. Why is it so expensive, it makes no sense.
Either a lot of stock came in or many people cancelled their pre orders because here in SoCal many 256gb models can be picked up Feb 2-5 at most stores. 🤔
No, that happens with all new Apple devices. They always set aside inventory for stores vs online. No matter what they’ll sell out every unit they make this year. What’s different with this product is the displays are difficult to make. But that will be resolved in year 2.
My concern is the social implications of this. We've already become more disconnected than ever because of social media, and I'd rather not have that exacerbated.
The ex leaker guy that works at the chocolate smart bar channel said the opposite about the meta head set. I disagree but one thing that I do agree with is the 2 hour battery life could be a hassle but I get it as weight. Not much more they can do about that.
I'm waiting for the M3 PRO Vision pro Studio Ultra Pro
Good points covered. I will be waiting for Vision 2 device, more affordable, when visionOS platform will be more populated. IMO, this new platform will be huge.
I think a cheaper version may not be out until the third interation and I think the cheapest they will go for is 1500-2000 depending on how they want to market it
If anyone feels like their hand is going to fall off from performing air gestures...see a doctor immediately!
Vídeo excelente
Parabéns
It's 100% a VR headset. Saying otherwise is just marketing BS to justify a huge price point, small external battery and no controller support. Hand gestures are not good enough to control your VR headset, it's just a gimmick for a few use cases.
I think the real question is.... Why get a Pro Display XDR, when you can get a Vision Pro?
I keep saying its an augmented reality headset with VR built in.
I can see people breaking this 3k thing quickly if it had a vr controller.
All us vr ppl had all these thought 7 years ago when we first tried vr. So fun that everyone is getting onboard with xr now
*I'm going to wait for the Apple Vision Pro X (10th gen) for my first purchase. It will release in 15-20 years time.*
it will release in 10 years
@@slojinPA *no it will not because for the first few generations apple will not update the vision pro every year.*
The marketing is smart in creating a buzz.
11:02 PlayStation intro, this is not your family!