There is a difference between Wallis and Camellia. The king was not married, nor were their children. Camellia, on the other hand broke up a marriage with minor children.
Wallis didn't love Edward she loved her second husband. Letters were found. She loved the attention, the way of life. She didn't want Edward to abidicate because she would have to be with him for the rest of her life. A married woman who was Edward's mistress. She was a wild woman. Don't try to make her a saint . Those times were different to the present. You are talking about Wallis as if she lived in the present. Times have changed. Edward's dad knew that Edward would not Be a good king. Edward didn't want to be King . Good excuse not to be King Wallis played with fire and got burnt. Edward wanted it his way.
...she deceived Edward as she never loved him as a woman loves her husband but the beneFIT$ of being the lover of the next King of England was too much to walk away from. I would give anything to be a fly on the wall during their marriage in exile ~ from the A list to the Shitlist must have been harder on him ~ did he become bitter and take it out on her behind closed doors? the way only the COLD FISH of ROYal$ CAIN do to make an outsider feel inferior...
Not quite true the resembles of Edward and his relationship with the germans before IIWW... Camila and Charles love each other yes, but they brought a lot of pain to Princes Diana and her children and that's a fact too. I don't see them as King and Queen, they are just a charade. As other people said, "we remember what happened, don't try to rewrite history"!!
Diana was also a grownup that acted really childish many many times. But just bcs she died a tragic death she is somehow freed of any personal responsibility..
I really wish when they tell the story about Charles and Camilla that they would tell the truth and mentioned that Camilla was on a seven year campaign to become the bride of Andrew Parker Bowles. And when Charles. went to see, she got her man- Well, at least in marriage End of story. Stop trying to rewrite history!! There are those of us who remember it well
Frizzbegirl hmmm....seven year campaign? Wow...and they have made it appear that Andrew just couldn't go on resisting Millie's charms and skills...lies of omission is still a lie.
You were ofc there yourself, so you know! 🤦♀️ You only think you know anything bcs you read a lot of rumours & slander.. But if you think about it for even one second you realise that NO you weren't there so you CAN'T know...
THEY ALL PAIDED THE PRICE FOR THOSE MEN AND WALLIS AND MRS SIMPSON AND TOGETHER WITH EDWARD DARLINGS TOGETHER WITH THOSE OTHERS MEN'S TOGETHER AND WALLIS AND MRS SIMPSON DARLINGS
More like Diana chased Charles even when everyone knew including her WHOLE family that he was with camilla.. But they were all more into being a part of the royal family social climbers & her mom was out for revenge.. using her own daughter to get it..
Charles begged his family to allow him to marry Camilla for years and years. They both maintained that affair, however she has proven to be a fantastic queen consort.
In my opinion, at least Edward abidicated. He knew deep down he didn't want to be King, and certainly without having Wallis as Queen. The Queen should told Charles to take himself out of the ascension line if he truly wanted a life with Camilla. He had a beautiful wife in Diana who loved him, and if he wanted to be King and the position meant so much to him, he should have dedicated himself to keeping his marriage intact After all these people are over the Church of England. Edward wanted the HRH title for his wife, and the Queen Mother and Elizabeth declined, just as they did for Diana. Charles did ask, but the Queen said no. When Charles went to visit his uncle before Edward died, he saw how sad he was. A twist of fate made Elizabeth Queen when she was not ever intended to be.
True, had Edward not married Wallace and had kept his throne, married someone suitable and had children, (heirs to the throne) with this person, then Queen Elizabeth's father would not have been King etc. This would have meant she would not have been Queen. However if Edward had remained King, not married Wallace but had no children then his brother the late Queen's father would have been next in line. So even if Edward outlived the Queen's father, our late Queen Elizabeth would have taken the throne when Edward died, because she was next in line after her deceased father. Just that she would have taken the throne 20 years later than she did at about age 45. At least her children would have not still been so young. Charles would have been 24, Anne about 21, Andrew about 11 or 12 and Edward 8 or 9 years of age. Charles and Anne would have been able to help the Queen with their younger siblings.
Elizabeth would still have been queen even had her uncle not abdicated, simply because Edward's marriage to Wallis did not produced any children and hence, no heir. That lineage would have been pass down to his brother George and eventually to Elizabeth, upon his and George's death. But the fact that Edward only died in 1972, would have meant that Elizabeth would have accended the throne much later as compared to 1952 when her father pass away.
I think one of Edward's brothers who was alive at the time of Edward's death may have received the crown. Might be worth checking the Los at the time of George V's death.
@@LadyCat183If Edward had not abdicated the throne, as he had no children, his niece our late Queen Elizabeth would have still inherited the throne after Edward passed away because she was next in line to the throne after her father, even if he died before Edward. Once a next in line to the throne has children, his or her siblings get knocked further down the line of succession. Before King Charles had children, Prince Andrew was in line after Charles, Edward and then Anne. Now Prince William is in line, then his three children and then Harry 5th in line. 🙂
@@arlenehiles2689 yes, thank you. I am aware of our line of succession. However, I saw something the other day about one of Edward's siblings possibly inheriting. I shall do some investigation. It was some historian who had a theory. Probably incorrect, but like I said, it stuck in my head for some reason
They are the UK's royalty....so yes....they are better in the way of hierarchy...and deserve the respect of the British people ... just because of that.....even if their behaviour is very " modern" !¡ .,..
@@christineweir8979I don't get the logic behind royalty. I couldn't respect someone more than any other "commoner" just because they came out of a uterus with a fancy surname. I respect honest work and human decency. Period.
Camilla and Charles were also cruel fox hunters. Any human that hounds an animal to it's death for sport is a vile, repellent reprehensible individual.
I have much respect for Camilla, and for Charles by sticking by the woman he loved and loves. Diana had many strengths, but supporting her husband wasn’t one of them. She had several affairs.
@@axemangang1584 oh please Camilla is as careful as you like ,she loves her man but does her very best at being queen ,I don't think she gives a toss about her position
Agree he advocated Charles took a young nieave girl and used her then threw her to the dogs , Also going on Nationale Television saying he didn't love Diana and never loved her how shameful n hurtful thing to say about the mother of his children 💔
I cannot see Charles as any type of handsome 😂. Never have. I don’t care if he was a Prince or King he is not a handsome man. He does have two pretty handsome sons, thanks to Diana’s genes. 🧬
The Good Lookings Royals , Were Anne Boleyn , oPrince Albert , Queen Alexaxdra , King Edward VII, Edward VIII , King George VI , Queen Mary. Princess Alice ,Prince Philip Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Royal p Anne Princess Alexandra , Princess Margaret , Prince Michael Of Kent , The Real Beauty Was Princess Diana. Now It's William & Kate & Their Family.
I have always said for the Royal Family it is only about each individual of the Firm to have what he/she wants & no one will stand in the way. I lost all respect for Queen Elizabeth II when she gave in to accept Camilla and gave her the Royal title Queen Consort. This is the woman who destroyed her son’s marriage to Princess Diana & gave Charles permission to lie about it.
Diana was bedding a lot of men during the marriage. She knew what she was getting into and played a large role in the destruction of her marriage and ultimately herself. Grow up and take your blinders off, you ass
The Queen: was sickly and I believe lost her will to fight. They were too strong for her in her last moments on Earth. Prince Philip was gone and I truly feel that QE11 was ready to be with her husband....
I felt that she got what she deserved. She was a Jezebel in my book ...ditto for camILLa ... Did you know that She comes from the same Family Tree as George Washington's MOTHER MARY MONTAGUE is FRENCH
I've always felt that Wallis, in her own way, helped save the monarchy by sacrificing her relatively happy marriage and tying herself to a man she didn't really love. Whether that was her intent is another issue altogether, but she runs circles around the duchess of dogfood, who is little more than a gold digger on her best days, and a low-down grifter on her worst. And Camilla is the Queen Consort, which was what Queen Elizabeth II wanted, which makes her vastly superior to either of them.
The only difference is camILLa has a pedigree but is a Jezebel just the same... and in my book camILLa was porKING charLIE before during and after his marriage to OUR beLOVEd Lady Diana ISrael/isREAL Queen of England not his 2nd couSIN. camILLa!!!
Charles and Camilla were in love when they were younger, but their families separated them. Andrew Parker Bowles ..married.Camilla whilst Charles was on Naval convoy duty.
Mid 60's when she was 18 and he 17. Pictures are absent for about 6 strong months, when she was photographed again, she was fuller faces and large busted. She was 19 years old and he was sent off to Australia. The child is filmed with The Queen, aged maybe 6 or 7, on her lap, in her car. Why would that child be on the Queen's lap? He was adopted by one of her 'workers' and her husband who after retirement, went to Australia to retire. 57 or 58 years later, that same 'child' has advocated to have DNA of the Shand's or Windsor's and not one human will? DNA, DNA!
Diana was shy, i can't believe this one sided report. He gave camilla a gift the night before his wedding! He should have left diana alone and she would be alive today.
Camilla, hard work!!!! She was known as the laziest woman in the UK. Now she doesn’t have to lift a finger, only turn up. Even that was too hard as shown during the Australia visit. It was too hard for her so she caught a plane home and left Charles on his own for days to continue the tour. Camilla was also know to be dirty. One of her friends said that she would ride the hunt and then go home and put a ball gown on without a shower. Another said that you could not look at her without wondering if she had changed her knickers for days. Yes Camilla and Charles should have married, they are good for each other however in the process a beautiful good woman was destroyed in the process. Without Diana how long before Aids patients be accepted into society rather than being ostracised? Would Camilla have amongst land mines and brought the tragedy of them to the world’s attention?
I think as I've aged my views on all "the other/or not" women has softened. History has proven that when the Royal men misbehave or go against the Royal "norms", the women they get involved with become the scapegoats. As long as the couples are truly in love, like most of us in loving relationships, I do feel everyone should step back & not judge too harshly. I am not a hard no on Harry & Meghan either but I do feel Harry sh*t on his family & I don't see how those relationships will mend. It's still possible because all but William have harmed their family relationships with their actions in the name of love & their own perceptions on what went wrong & who is truly the guiltiest parties. Harry should have been seeing a professional counselor young.
William has always been bossy and pushy about his brother; it's that primogeniture issue. That entire generation--the Queen's grandchildren---behaved badly, sniping, complaining and sniggering, ridiculing the black Episcopalian/Anglica bishop as he preached the wedding. I was embarrassed for the Queen when their poor behavior was so evident. No respect for the Church.. Shocking.
That wedding was boring I'm a royalist but I went out shopping half way through that preachers looooooong and very over the top sermon he clearly wanted his 1hour of fame@@meeeka
What people need to understand is her letters was automatically owned by the crown I wouldn’t be surprised if they re-wrote history to suit the narrative
@@graceyoakum8863 please reread your comment. It makes absolutely no sense the way you have written it. Yes, her Grandmother was Alice Kepple. So what?? Do you take the blame for anything your ancestors did?
I do. She and Charles are perfect for one another. And if the institution had modernized at the rate that the rest of the world had they would have been able to get married at the very beginning.
Please - Camilla got more than what she deserved. Whilst most in the UK excuse her horrendous behaviour. It’s about time the royal family retires from their life of privilege while a large % (just under 12 million) of those in the UK live in ABSOLUTE poverty. Charles and Camilla do nothing but live a life of luxury- same goes for William and Kate. They are not needed!!! I only hope Australia becomes a republic and breaks ties with them. They do nothing for our country anyway.
I would like to see you(a nobody) raise the amount of money for charities like they do ,we are known around the world for our royalty and that's what attracts tourism which helps to fund all sorts of things ,they can put a spot light on different things like no other certainly like no republic country so think a little before spouting out such bias hate
Queen Camila has proven she's worthy w/ her hard work & the late Queen Elizabeth Would Never have changed her mind on this No 1 pressured the late Queen she used her judgement that's served her all her life Bless the British Royal Family & keep sending prayers 4 King Charles & Princess Catherine 💙🇬🇧💙👑💙🙏💙👑💙🇬🇧💙
Camilla and Charles should never have broken up families. They are bad examples for people and do not deserve to be king and queen. They should have skipped Charles and give the crown to William and Kate. Camilla and Charles do not have any personalities. Charles is rude and selfish and jealous. Camillais like a confused mouse and acted like a harlot running after a married man while still married. What example is that for your children?
Camilla was hell bent on being Queen and she didn’t care who she destroyed in the process. If Charles loved her soo much he would have abdicated for her. Camilla being the tramp she is was obviously better in the sack than the Young Dianna. She is Queen consort, not Queen. I don’t think the Public love her, they tolerate her as they have no choice, to do otherwise is treason.
Like 99% of men King Charles only knows lust not love, complete selfishness to the extent of extreme narcissism. So he is just an ordinary bloke with "greatness thrust upon him" through birth, doing the best he can for his country.
Charles and Diana's wedding would most likely have collapsed even if Camilla had not been on the scene,they were two people who had nothing but their class in common, Charlesloved country life,hunting, fishing while Diana loved city life,going to club, shopping in high end stores,plus Diana had many affairs before Charles and Camilla reunited but we've been fed this story of Diana being this innocent victim who could do no wrong.
People hating on camilla when in reality Diana + her whole family, were the bigger golddigger/social climber here, NOT camilla. Diana stated that she KNEW she was destined for something great (really wierd thing to say & really immature, most teenagers have a period when they think they are destined for something special.. Most grow out of it, Diana did not) & she made sure to be in Charles presence.. People are just ageist & sexist to go after camilla. When she was in the picture long before Diana.. and she was always the one Charles wanted to marry. He was really pressured to marry Diana.. And where was Dianas family at the time? Everyone left her to fend for herself just basking in the glory of being married into TRF.. but people never criticise them.. only camilla..
Edward married for love & respected his country by abdication. Shame Charles does not have the same spine. Camilla from a history of Ho's to Kings damaged the Monarchy for years to come.
I get Wallace. Meghan is motivated by hurting people close to her inner circle. Meghan seems to have a cruel side. Wallace I don't read as being hurtful
Walls up Simpson, Nutmeg Markled... It is all the same, isn't it? Go on, everyone...optimistic, with all the 'truths'... We all make choices and Edward or David, never ever looked happy, period.
Maybe was better if Prince Charles married Camila. Princes Diana found someone who loved her and respected her and she wouldn't suffer before and after divorce. And maybe she was alive even today with her family...
Wallis and Meghan are two identical women - two narcissists - separated in time. Wallis' letters are no different from modern-day narcissists (though nowadays you'll find the communication via telephone, emails and text messages), who, just like Wallis, continue to stay in touch with their exes. They do this just in case things don't work out with the new relationship, or even just for continued attention and validation. It's nothing new. Narcissists love to play the victim, and having an ex feel sorry for them is just another way of stringing them along. People's impressions of Wallis' letters are 100% incorrect. If the letters paint Wallis as a scapegoat, it's because that's exactly what Wallis wanted her ex to think. Anyone who thinks there's anything innocent about Wallis or Meghan, needs to do some research into narcissism. Prince Harry, another victim, is just as narcissistic. And, just so you know, it has nothing to do with Diana's death when he was 12. Narcissists are created within the first years after birth. As Aristotle said, show me the 7-year old, and I'll show you the man. The same goes for Edward. Both Edward and Harry are (in Edward's case was) weak, narcissistic men who met narcissistic women much stronger, and way more cunning than them. Edward died sad and alone, while Wallis would've been secretly obsessed with how others viewed her until the day she died, privately unhappy and unfulfilled like narcissists are for life. Harry and Meghan's marriage won't last. Harry will remain an angry, bitter man for life, which is exactly what he is now. On the other hand, having achieved what she set out to achieve, Meghan is "happier" than Harry, but, like Wallis, will obsess over how others view her until the day she dies. Why? Because that's one thing a narcissist cannot control.
Oh stop! She set out to get him with vengeance even though she was married and stabbed her ‘friend’ in the back!! 🙄 Obviously this is rather a one sided view on both women!🙄
Charles is happy & they have loved eachother since 1972 . Diana knew the Sun had that tape for over 2 years thats why she helped with the Morton book . She couldnt be seen as the first one that cheated with her body guard Barry Manikiee who by the way was married with kids . Also oliver Hore Diana stalked 300 phone calls to his wife hang ups & threating calls that were trace from Diana private line at her home in Kenniston palace ! She was unhinged at times
No matter what world says, both the men stood besides their love of the life and proved that if men is in love he will fight the entire world. And you also put Harry and his wife here, he is also a lover boy.
Sad that Wallis always got the blame for the abdication. Equally sad that Meghan is blamed for her and Harry’s journey and departure from the royal family. Not so sure about Camilla’s innocence.
Uhm, Wallis IS the reason for Edward's abdication. And Meghan IS to blame for Harry leaving the British Royal Family. Both are narcissistic women who claim (ed) not to be narcissistic. That they were simply being victimized whilst, in fact, their husbands CHOSE to leave the BRF. Both Edward was, and Harry is, highly narcissistic, yet weak men, who ended up with narcissistic women MUCH stronger than them. Women who played them for their own gain, whilst all the while acting the victim in scenarios wholly created by themselves in order to bring about situations that would benefit them according to very specific plans - concocted by themselves - to obtain money, wealth, status, and fame. Narcissists are all the same. Know one, know them all. For all Harry's whining about wanting to just be a "normal" person, the reality is that he is nothing without his title and link to the royal family. Harry loves attention, just like his mother did. He loves his wealth and fame, and is an arrogant, entitled, spoilt brat. A narcissist. And it had nothing to do with Diana's death when he was 12. Narcissists are created between birth and age 6. Harry was truly a brat by the time Diana died already, and his use of drugs and alcohol is symptomatic of his narcissism. Meghan created a scenario that forced Harry to leave his family, so that she could have total control over him. That's what narcissists commonly do. Wallis wanted to be the mistress of a King, not really the wife of a nobody. But she had to wield considerable control over him, because King Geoge couldn't stand her. She walked a tight rope of creating just enough distance between Edward and his parents to ensure that they did not manage to turn him against her, yet not so much that he would abdicate in order to marry her. This would've been extremely difficult for her to do, given that she needed to keep him under her spell. And, as it turned out, he was well and truly under her spell, as he didn't want to give her up. True to form, and like a typical narcissist, Wallis would continue to write to her ex-husband, complaining about how unhappy she was, how Edward would soon replace her with a younger model (yeah, right, not while she was ensuring he remained addicted to her!), and so on. This is what narcissists do. They keep in touch with exes, often stringing them along, for continued validation and attention. Not because they want them back. I have no problem with narcissists, other than the fact that they are disordered, and as a result are attention-seeking, greedy, selfish, jealous, vindictive, woe-is-me victims, liars, arrogant, entitled, etc. And in that mindset of theirs, anything goes. Anything can be justified. For example Harry and Meghan's treatment of Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth in their final years. Harry found in Meghan a kindred spirit, and someone who is as narcissistic as he is. Sadly, their fights behind closed doors in Montecito will be EPIC. Meghan has what she always wanted. Money, status, and fame. Harry, on the other hand, has lost everything. Sadly, that's his problem, but I can assure you their marriage won't last, and their two children will necessarily become dysfunctional adults. All children of narcissists do, unless they were blessed with a generous dose of empathy, and a good life partner. Like William. Edward would necessarily have been narcissistic too, given his upbringing, but he was a weak man ready for manipulation by a stronger, crafty, and clever woman. The rest, as they say, is history. 🤷♀️
Meghan absolutely is to blame. She’s a lying grifter and never intended to stay in the UK. She’s a greedy, pathetic pig just like her spineless husband
No one knows what kate did to megan@@jeremiahwood4749the fact that Harry and megan were more popular than William caused all the problems. But I know Harry and megan will survive like Wallace and Edward. As for Camilla, the said she had a baby for charles which was adopted and sent to live in austrailia. Simon Day is his name and he is fighting to get Charles DNA to prove Carles and camillia are his parents. I believe this is true, in which I am convince that the queen knew and sent charles to austrailia for a few years. If you see this young man you will see the resemblance of this young man to C& C
I LOOOVED DIANA. But let's face it --Charles didn't. He loved and wanted to marry Camilla and visa versa. Diana sensed that BEFORE the marriage and wanted to get out of the engagement. Her sister's talked her into staying and marrying Charles. It only seemed like a fairytale. I realize that, I wish the rest of the public would.
After all these years, snd still there is the attempt to fix Wallace Simpson's unfixable reputation. And just imagine the utter disaster for England if Edward 8th had been the king thru ww1, instead of his more mature brother, who replaced him.
No one could have Predicted Wrong Diana Predicted her death n How She Would Die . An it's like this there's so many things don't add up Doties Father only stop his investigation for Diana son's ,for there well being . They new after time people would calm n they did she was not supposed to take Qween when they announced they were going to marry she said she wouldn't accept if offered but we see she jumped on it .
Only thing in camilla's favor was Charles could not let her go and get on with his marriage. Granted Diana was not without her flings. She wanted the royal title, he needed a wife who would look the other way. They both got what they wanted until they no longer did. Charles and camilla should of never been granted permission by the queen to marry, it was only to save face and give her soiled/spoiled son his way. The abdication was the right thing to do, but the queen never forgave him for doing so.
Charles didn't love Camille as much as Edward loved Wallace , I don't like Horse Face she was not supposed to take Qween title , None Nigosible by ass if it had been her or the Thrown he would have never married her that's why they weren't married from the very beginning ,
Great revisionist portriat of those two that I don’t accept. If he actually loved Camilla more than the future throne, he should have abdicated. If she was so in tuned with him, she would have left him alone scandal free albeit he was in an imperfect marriage so he could become King. Cloaking this as some great love story is someone having hired a good PR firm. Love is not love without sacrifice, honor and responsibility. This is just a sordid tale of ambition, entitlement and privilege.
I have no pity for Jezebel as she slept her way to the TOP of the food ChAIN and found out too late that her man CAIN was NOT ABEL as SHE .... now we have HARRY & MEGAn ~ did ya know Harry is his nick name as his birth name is HENRY and if he were to be KING ~ he would be King Henry #9 is an upside down 6 ~ 69 is YingYang ~ King Henry #8 was the 2nd born Son too so HE is ABEL to be KING if he keep's MEGAn as his Queen as the Queen is the most powerful person on the BLACK and WHITE chess board ..... and MEGA means HUge .....
camilla will ALWAYS BE the whore/mistress/homewrecker lol Diana was her own Royal force of Nature.. more famous than her husband. Camilla licked his boots so no doubt he preferred service to him(camilla) rather then duty to the Firm(diana).
Hang in there. Sherpa can pick up on your energy, so try hard to not let all these events get you down. Unfortunately all these events are part of getting old. We know it's hard to get through this difficult time. My prayers are with you 2.
Really all what your are saying because she probably your friends ! She is the mistress ! Maybe the reason Diana died ! And your are not talking that there is money involved in between Charles the wrecker and the husband ( Bowles ) and probably her children Too ! But now there is more issue about money involved !!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@therealgodessisisPrincess Catherine met Prince William at the same university they both attended. They shared accomodation at university with two other students. As students they hung out at similar venues etc. Not exactly stalking in my opinion. Even after student days, they had similar places they liked to go to with friends. So chances are when they had Broken up at one stage they would still bump into each other or still hang out at certain places with friends that both did when together. So no Catherine definitely not a stalker. She dated and went out after William broke it off with her for a bit.
There is a difference between Wallis and Camellia. The king was not married, nor were their children. Camellia, on the other hand broke up a marriage with minor children.
Wallis didn't love Edward she loved her second husband. Letters were found. She loved the attention, the way of life. She didn't want Edward to abidicate because she would have to be with him for the rest of her life. A married woman who was Edward's mistress. She was a wild woman. Don't try to make her a saint . Those times were different to the present. You are talking about Wallis as if she lived in the present. Times have changed. Edward's dad knew that Edward would not
Be a good king. Edward didn't want to be King . Good excuse not to be King Wallis played with fire and got burnt. Edward wanted it his way.
You are correct 💯%
In the end they both used each other
She loved money and Cartier jewels more
You really need to read Andrew Lownie’s book ‘The Traitor King’. Very well researched as is always the case with this author.
...she deceived Edward as she never loved him as a woman loves her husband but the beneFIT$ of being the lover of the next King of England was too much to walk away from. I would give anything to be a fly on the wall during their marriage in exile ~ from the A list to the Shitlist must have been harder on him ~ did he become bitter and take it out on her behind closed doors? the way only the COLD FISH of ROYal$ CAIN do to make an outsider feel inferior...
Not quite true the resembles of Edward and his relationship with the germans before IIWW... Camila and Charles love each other yes, but they brought a lot of pain to Princes Diana and her children and that's a fact too. I don't see them as King and Queen, they are just a charade. As other people said, "we remember what happened, don't try to rewrite history"!!
Diana was also a grownup that acted really childish many many times. But just bcs she died a tragic death she is somehow freed of any personal responsibility..
I really wish when they tell the story about Charles and Camilla that they would tell the truth and mentioned that Camilla was on a seven year campaign to become the bride of Andrew Parker Bowles. And when Charles. went to see, she got her man- Well, at least in marriage End of story.
Stop trying to rewrite history!! There are those of us who remember it well
Frizzbegirl hmmm....seven year campaign? Wow...and they have made it appear that Andrew just couldn't go on resisting Millie's charms and skills...lies of omission is still a lie.
@@search4answers849 ... Andrew who? Millie who?
You were ofc there yourself, so you know!
🤦♀️
You only think you know anything bcs you read a lot of rumours & slander..
But if you think about it for even one second you realise that NO you weren't there so you CAN'T know...
@@ingridakerblom7577
It’s been well (Over and over again) documented since the 80s
THEY ALL PAIDED THE PRICE FOR THOSE MEN AND WALLIS AND MRS SIMPSON AND TOGETHER WITH EDWARD DARLINGS TOGETHER WITH THOSE OTHERS MEN'S TOGETHER AND WALLIS AND MRS SIMPSON DARLINGS
Wallis did not chase Edward but Camilla did chase Charles knowing he was married !
She did too!!!
Oh rubbish
More like Diana chased Charles even when everyone knew including her WHOLE family that he was with camilla..
But they were all more into being a part of the royal family social climbers & her mom was out for revenge.. using her own daughter to get it..
Charles begged his family to allow him to marry Camilla for years and years. They both maintained that affair, however she has proven to be a fantastic queen consort.
In my opinion, at least Edward abidicated. He knew deep down he didn't want to be King, and certainly without having Wallis as Queen. The Queen should told Charles to take himself out of the ascension line if he truly wanted a life with Camilla. He had a beautiful wife in Diana who loved him, and if he wanted to be King and the position meant so much to him, he should have dedicated himself to keeping his marriage intact
After all these people are over the Church of England. Edward wanted the HRH title for his wife, and the Queen Mother and Elizabeth declined, just as they did for Diana. Charles did ask, but the Queen said no. When Charles went to visit his uncle before Edward died, he saw how sad he was. A twist of fate made Elizabeth Queen when she was not ever intended to be.
True, had Edward not married Wallace and had kept his throne, married someone suitable and had children, (heirs to the throne) with this person, then Queen Elizabeth's father would not have been King etc. This would have meant she would not have been Queen.
However if Edward had remained King, not married Wallace but had no children then his brother the late Queen's father would have been next in line. So even if Edward outlived the Queen's father, our late Queen Elizabeth would have taken the throne when Edward died, because she was next in line after her deceased father. Just that she would have taken the throne 20 years later than she did at about age 45. At least her children would have not still been so young. Charles would have been 24, Anne about 21, Andrew about 11 or 12 and Edward 8 or 9 years of age.
Charles and Anne would have been able to help the Queen with their younger siblings.
He was a traitor. Stanley Baldwin didn’t like him or his Nazi sympathies.
Spot on
And so the public and media shld be on the side of diana. Hate how modern media try to change history re diana. Charlie did not love her she was used.
Elizabeth would still have been queen even had her uncle not abdicated, simply because Edward's marriage to Wallis did not produced any children and hence, no heir.
That lineage would have been pass down to his brother George and eventually to Elizabeth, upon his and George's death.
But the fact that Edward only died in 1972, would have meant that Elizabeth would have accended the throne much later as compared to 1952 when her father pass away.
I think one of Edward's brothers who was alive at the time of Edward's death may have received the crown. Might be worth checking the Los at the time of George V's death.
@@LadyCat183If Edward had not abdicated the throne, as he had no children, his niece our late Queen Elizabeth would have still inherited the throne after Edward passed away because she was next in line to the throne after her father, even if he died before Edward.
Once a next in line to the throne has children, his or her siblings get knocked further down the line of succession.
Before King Charles had children, Prince Andrew was in line after Charles, Edward and then Anne. Now Prince William is in line, then his three children and then Harry 5th in line. 🙂
@@arlenehiles2689 yes, thank you. I am aware of our line of succession. However, I saw something the other day about one of Edward's siblings possibly inheriting. I shall do some investigation. It was some historian who had a theory. Probably incorrect, but like I said, it stuck in my head for some reason
Nope he would have done a deal with the Nazis nothing the would have been anything like it is
@@LadyCat183 alla morte di Edoardo nessu fratello era in vita, comunque Elisabetta era a dicembre 1936 seconda in linea di successione dopo suo padre
This Royal family has been a royal mess from decades, still they think they are better than everyone. Sad.
And hypocritical.
@@jennifer1552SOOOOO hypocritical
We don't know the half akot has been covered up
They are the UK's royalty....so yes....they are better in the way of hierarchy...and deserve the respect of the British people ... just because of that.....even if their behaviour is very " modern" !¡ .,..
@@christineweir8979I don't get the logic behind royalty. I couldn't respect someone more than any other "commoner" just because they came out of a uterus with a fancy surname. I respect honest work and human decency. Period.
Camilla and Charles were also cruel fox hunters. Any human that hounds an animal to it's death for sport is a vile, repellent reprehensible individual.
Don't look into botox...
I still have NO respect for Camilla.
I do
She wanted to be a "queen" and had her hook to on Her "king", never letting him go.
I have much respect for Camilla, and for Charles by sticking by the woman he loved and loves. Diana had many strengths, but supporting her husband wasn’t one of them. She had several affairs.
@@axemangang1584 oh please Camilla is as careful as you like ,she loves her man but does her very best at being queen ,I don't think she gives a toss about her position
I agree....she doesnt deserve any.
How they abused Wallis and Edward, for their love, is how they SHOULD be handling Charles and Camilla, because c&c are corrupted.
She was twice divorced. Edward and Wallis were not abused. He was very unsuitable for royal duties and they were both nazi lovers.
Agree he advocated Charles took a young nieave girl and used her then threw her to the dogs , Also going on Nationale Television saying he didn't love Diana and never loved her how shameful n hurtful thing to say about the mother of his children 💔
I cannot see Charles as any type of handsome 😂. Never have. I don’t care if he was a Prince or King he is not a handsome man. He does have two pretty handsome sons, thanks to Diana’s genes. 🧬
None Are good looking letsface it 🎉
He wasn't bad in late 70s when swimming in Australia his ears and nose seemed to fit him then and he had a fit body.
Prince William and Harry are more your age?
Charles is as ugly outside as his behaviour is inside.
The Good Lookings Royals , Were Anne Boleyn , oPrince Albert , Queen Alexaxdra , King Edward VII, Edward VIII , King George VI , Queen Mary. Princess Alice ,Prince Philip Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Royal p Anne Princess Alexandra , Princess Margaret , Prince
Michael Of Kent , The Real Beauty Was Princess Diana. Now It's William & Kate & Their Family.
Diana filled the bill of protocol, but incompatibility loomed!!
I have always said for the Royal Family it is only about each individual of the Firm to have what he/she wants & no one will stand in the way. I lost all respect for Queen Elizabeth II when she gave in to accept Camilla and gave her the Royal title Queen Consort. This is the woman who destroyed her son’s marriage to Princess Diana & gave Charles permission to lie about it.
Isn't the marriage of Charles and Diana doomed, complicated, and torturous due to societal mores???
Diana was bedding a lot of men during the marriage. She knew what she was getting into and played a large role in the destruction of her marriage and ultimately herself. Grow up and take your blinders off, you ass
I think Diana destroyed that marriage because she had such issues. Her childhood was really ruined by her father’s behaviour.
The Queen: was sickly and I believe lost her will to fight. They were too strong for her in her last moments on Earth. Prince Philip was gone and I truly feel that QE11 was ready to be with her husband....
I have never blamed Wallis. I felt sorry for her.
I felt that she got what she deserved. She was a Jezebel in my book ...ditto for camILLa ... Did you know that She comes from the same Family Tree as George Washington's MOTHER MARY MONTAGUE is FRENCH
I've always felt that Wallis, in her own way, helped save the monarchy by sacrificing her relatively happy marriage and tying herself to a man she didn't really love. Whether that was her intent is another issue altogether, but she runs circles around the duchess of dogfood, who is little more than a gold digger on her best days, and a low-down grifter on her worst. And Camilla is the Queen Consort, which was what Queen Elizabeth II wanted, which makes her vastly superior to either of them.
Camilla was nothing like Wallis.
The only difference is camILLa has a pedigree but is a Jezebel just the same... and in my book camILLa was porKING charLIE before during and after his marriage to OUR beLOVEd Lady Diana ISrael/isREAL Queen of England not his 2nd couSIN. camILLa!!!
The look in her eyes is pure depression.
Charles and Camilla were in love when they were younger, but their families separated them. Andrew Parker Bowles ..married.Camilla whilst Charles was on Naval convoy duty.
Well at that time Camilla preferred APB and married him. She wasn't forced.
Mid 60's when she was 18 and he 17. Pictures are absent for about 6 strong months, when she was photographed again, she was fuller faces and large busted. She was 19 years old and he was sent off to Australia. The child is filmed with The Queen, aged maybe 6 or 7, on her lap, in her car. Why would that child be on the Queen's lap? He was adopted by one of her 'workers' and her husband who after retirement, went to Australia to retire. 57 or 58 years later, that same 'child' has advocated to have DNA of the Shand's or Windsor's and not one human will? DNA, DNA!
Charles and Godzilla Camilla are a disgrace. They neither have a moral compass
Diana was shy, i can't believe this one sided report. He gave camilla a gift the night before his wedding! He should have left diana alone and she would be alive today.
Camilla, hard work!!!! She was known as the laziest woman in the UK. Now she doesn’t have to lift a finger, only turn up. Even that was too hard as shown during the Australia visit. It was too hard for her so she caught a plane home and left Charles on his own for days to continue the tour.
Camilla was also know to be dirty. One of her friends said that she would ride the hunt and then go home and put a ball gown on without a shower. Another said that you could not look at her without wondering if she had changed her knickers for days.
Yes Camilla and Charles should have married, they are good for each other however in the process a beautiful good woman was destroyed in the process.
Without Diana how long before Aids patients be accepted into society rather than being ostracised? Would Camilla have amongst land mines and brought the tragedy of them to the world’s attention?
🇬🇧 My Great Aunt was cook to Wallis Simpson when she stayed at the Beach House Felixstowe awaiting her divorce from Ernest Simpson in 1937.
My goodness, the struggles of these two couples is quite striking! A great deal of turmoil caused by couples trying to navigate public opinion.
I think as I've aged my views on all "the other/or not" women has softened. History has proven that when the Royal men misbehave or go against the Royal "norms", the women they get involved with become the scapegoats. As long as the couples are truly in love, like most of us in loving relationships, I do feel everyone should step back & not judge too harshly. I am not a hard no on Harry & Meghan either but I do feel Harry sh*t on his family & I don't see how those relationships will mend. It's still possible because all but William have harmed their family relationships with their actions in the name of love & their own perceptions on what went wrong & who is truly the guiltiest parties. Harry should have been seeing a professional counselor young.
Maybe he did but Meghan Markle took over!!!
Tell that to w and his rose bush.
William has always been bossy and pushy about his brother; it's that primogeniture issue.
That entire generation--the Queen's grandchildren---behaved badly, sniping, complaining and sniggering, ridiculing the black Episcopalian/Anglica bishop as he preached the wedding. I was embarrassed for the Queen when their poor behavior was so evident. No respect for the Church..
Shocking.
That wedding was boring I'm a royalist but I went out shopping half way through that preachers looooooong and very over the top sermon he clearly wanted his 1hour of fame@@meeeka
In the future my kids and grandchildren will read or listen to this, but it would read : Wallace, Camilla and Megan.
What people need to understand is her letters was automatically owned by the crown I wouldn’t be surprised if they re-wrote history to suit the narrative
Queen Camilla does not seem to be an outcast
Not anymore
She will always be king edward mistress and cowmilla grandmother.
@@graceyoakum8863Do you have any idea how dumb your comment is.
@@graceyoakum8863 please reread your comment. It makes absolutely no sense the way you have written it. Yes, her Grandmother was Alice Kepple. So what?? Do you take the blame for anything your ancestors did?
I do.
She and Charles are perfect for one another. And if the institution had modernized at the rate that the rest of the world had they would have been able to get married at the very beginning.
I wouldn't consider Camilla the tramp an outcast! If anything she is the luckiest side-chick in history. 🤔
Lol side chick
Exactly....hold on side chicks you might become queen too.
Only in a patriarchal society would a woman be chastised for divorcing an abusive husband
Please - Camilla got more than what she deserved. Whilst most in the UK excuse her horrendous behaviour. It’s about time the royal family retires from their life of privilege while a large % (just under 12 million) of those in the UK live in ABSOLUTE poverty.
Charles and Camilla do nothing but live a life of luxury- same goes for William and Kate. They are not needed!!! I only hope Australia becomes a republic and breaks ties with them. They do nothing for our country anyway.
I would like to see you(a nobody) raise the amount of money for charities like they do ,we are known around the world for our royalty and that's what attracts tourism which helps to fund all sorts of things ,they can put a spot light on different things like no other certainly like no republic country so think a little before spouting out such bias hate
@@lucyroberts9226having a monarchy one can admire - I'd support. Having defenders of the faith who break the 10 Commandments is laughable.
@lucyroberts9226 sure. Everyone should throw your tea in the harbor so you stop using the riches of other peoples' countries to fund your bs.
Meghan is the better comparison to Wallace. Camilla was never outcast from the Royals. Quite the opposite in fact.
camilla will ALWAYS BE the whore/mistress/homewrecker lol
Camilla fit in with Charles' social circle
@@artn2950 And she fit in with the RF's mission.
Social media educated are you
Well it was MANY years before the Queen would even meet her.
Queen Camila has proven she's worthy w/ her hard work & the late Queen Elizabeth Would Never have changed her mind on this No 1 pressured the late Queen she used her judgement that's served her all her life
Bless the British Royal Family & keep sending prayers 4 King Charles & Princess Catherine 💙🇬🇧💙👑💙🙏💙👑💙🇬🇧💙
See the picture of this exposed villain ? She look like witch. A sorcerer
Charles loved camillis before he married Dianna. To have his Aires William and Harry Blue Bloods
Oh stop blaming these women.The men had no morals .Also dont leave out KANGA
That’s why Charles and Camilla are the least remembered monarchs they’re old geriatrics
Oh, not because they have only been King and Queen for less than two years?
The way these people talk about Diana so softly so foundly, complementing her in ever sentence
You lot need to read the letters and notes wtiten to snd between Wallis and david. You are wrong on a numbrr of levels.
Camilla and Charles should never have broken up families.
They are bad examples for people and do not deserve to be king and queen.
They should have skipped Charles and give the crown to William and Kate.
Camilla and Charles do not have any personalities.
Charles is rude and selfish and jealous.
Camillais like a confused mouse and acted like a harlot running after a married man while still married.
What example is that for your children?
Camilla was hell bent on being Queen and she didn’t care who she destroyed in the process. If Charles loved her soo much he would have abdicated for her. Camilla being the tramp she is was obviously better in the sack than the Young Dianna. She is Queen consort, not Queen. I don’t think the Public love her, they tolerate her as they have no choice, to do otherwise is treason.
Diana was the one that broke up a few marriages...she was certainly no saint...
Diana had tons of affairs and was a bit crazy
@@Westpark16I'd like to see how you'd behave, married to a cheater who abused you.
Like 99% of men King Charles only knows lust not love, complete selfishness to the extent of extreme narcissism. So he is just an ordinary bloke with "greatness thrust upon him" through birth, doing the best he can for his country.
Charles and Diana's wedding would most likely have collapsed even if Camilla had not been on the scene,they were two people who had nothing but their class in common, Charlesloved country life,hunting, fishing while Diana loved city life,going to club, shopping in high end stores,plus Diana had many affairs before Charles and Camilla reunited but we've been fed this story of Diana being this innocent victim who could do no wrong.
Every one loved Dianna. But Charles loves Dianna
People hating on camilla when in reality Diana + her whole family, were the bigger golddigger/social climber here, NOT camilla.
Diana stated that she KNEW she was destined for something great (really wierd thing to say & really immature, most teenagers have a period when they think they are destined for something special.. Most grow out of it, Diana did not) & she made sure to be in Charles presence..
People are just ageist & sexist to go after camilla. When she was in the picture long before Diana.. and she was always the one Charles wanted to marry. He was really pressured to marry Diana..
And where was Dianas family at the time? Everyone left her to fend for herself just basking in the glory of being married into TRF.. but people never criticise them.. only camilla..
How many kings were faithful??? George V & VI good chance!
V was too busy with his stamps.
George III.
Edward married for love & respected his country by abdication. Shame Charles does not have the same spine. Camilla from a history of Ho's to Kings damaged the Monarchy for years to come.
She does not care what u think of her. She only cares what Charles thinks
Poor, Much maligned Mrs. Simpson. Did his own Father not say "The Boy will F**k it within the first Year"?
I get Wallace. Meghan is motivated by hurting people close to her inner circle. Meghan seems to have a cruel side. Wallace I don't read as being hurtful
Camilla ,is not an outcast
Terrible how Wallis was treated. The QM should not have attended her funeral it was reminiscent of a vulture picking over its' prey.
No comparison dtween the two. Camilla was never an outcast.
When Camilla went shopping people threw bread rolls at her. Not an outcast, eh?
Camilla is just a tramp, Wallis Simpson wasn’t she’d only been married before.
Walls up Simpson, Nutmeg Markled... It is all the same, isn't it? Go on, everyone...optimistic, with all the 'truths'... We all make choices and Edward or David, never ever looked happy, period.
There is simply no comparison between the two. Camilla is an embarrassment.
Edward was the spoiled one if truth be known! I don't think she planned on spending her life with him " but he didn't want to let her go!!
Maybe was better if Prince Charles married Camila.
Princes Diana found someone who loved her and respected her and she wouldn't suffer before and after divorce. And maybe she was alive even today with her family...
Wallis and Meghan are two identical women - two narcissists - separated in time. Wallis' letters are no different from modern-day narcissists (though nowadays you'll find the communication via telephone, emails and text messages), who, just like Wallis, continue to stay in touch with their exes. They do this just in case things don't work out with the new relationship, or even just for continued attention and validation. It's nothing new. Narcissists love to play the victim, and having an ex feel sorry for them is just another way of stringing them along. People's impressions of Wallis' letters are 100% incorrect. If the letters paint Wallis as a scapegoat, it's because that's exactly what Wallis wanted her ex to think. Anyone who thinks there's anything innocent about Wallis or Meghan, needs to do some research into narcissism. Prince Harry, another victim, is just as narcissistic. And, just so you know, it has nothing to do with Diana's death when he was 12. Narcissists are created within the first years after birth. As Aristotle said, show me the 7-year old, and I'll show you the man. The same goes for Edward. Both Edward and Harry are (in Edward's case was) weak, narcissistic men who met narcissistic women much stronger, and way more cunning than them. Edward died sad and alone, while Wallis would've been secretly obsessed with how others viewed her until the day she died, privately unhappy and unfulfilled like narcissists are for life. Harry and Meghan's marriage won't last. Harry will remain an angry, bitter man for life, which is exactly what he is now. On the other hand, having achieved what she set out to achieve, Meghan is "happier" than Harry, but, like Wallis, will obsess over how others view her until the day she dies. Why? Because that's one thing a narcissist cannot control.
You know a lot about people you've never met
Agree with you 100 percent...
Oh stop! She set out to get him with vengeance even though she was married and stabbed her ‘friend’ in the back!! 🙄
Obviously this is rather a one sided view on both women!🙄
The outcasts wives of british royals 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I feel for Wallis.. different era It is a real shame at least they are at rest together
Charles is happy & they have loved eachother since 1972 . Diana knew the Sun had that tape for over 2 years thats why she helped with the Morton book . She couldnt be seen as the first one that cheated with her body guard Barry Manikiee who by the way was married with kids . Also oliver Hore Diana stalked 300 phone calls to his wife hang ups & threating calls that were trace from Diana private line at her home in Kenniston palace ! She was unhinged at times
No matter what world says, both the men stood besides their love of the life and proved that if men is in love he will fight the entire world. And you also put Harry and his wife here, he is also a lover boy.
Sad that Wallis always got the blame for the abdication. Equally sad that Meghan is blamed for her and Harry’s journey and departure from the royal family. Not so sure about Camilla’s innocence.
Uhm, Wallis IS the reason for Edward's abdication. And Meghan IS to blame for Harry leaving the British Royal Family. Both are narcissistic women who claim (ed) not to be narcissistic. That they were simply being victimized whilst, in fact, their husbands CHOSE to leave the BRF. Both Edward was, and Harry is, highly narcissistic, yet weak men, who ended up with narcissistic women MUCH stronger than them. Women who played them for their own gain, whilst all the while acting the victim in scenarios wholly created by themselves in order to bring about situations that would benefit them according to very specific plans - concocted by themselves - to obtain money, wealth, status, and fame. Narcissists are all the same. Know one, know them all. For all Harry's whining about wanting to just be a "normal" person, the reality is that he is nothing without his title and link to the royal family. Harry loves attention, just like his mother did. He loves his wealth and fame, and is an arrogant, entitled, spoilt brat. A narcissist. And it had nothing to do with Diana's death when he was 12. Narcissists are created between birth and age 6. Harry was truly a brat by the time Diana died already, and his use of drugs and alcohol is symptomatic of his narcissism. Meghan created a scenario that forced Harry to leave his family, so that she could have total control over him. That's what narcissists commonly do. Wallis wanted to be the mistress of a King, not really the wife of a nobody. But she had to wield considerable control over him, because King Geoge couldn't stand her. She walked a tight rope of creating just enough distance between Edward and his parents to ensure that they did not manage to turn him against her, yet not so much that he would abdicate in order to marry her. This would've been extremely difficult for her to do, given that she needed to keep him under her spell. And, as it turned out, he was well and truly under her spell, as he didn't want to give her up. True to form, and like a typical narcissist, Wallis would continue to write to her ex-husband, complaining about how unhappy she was, how Edward would soon replace her with a younger model (yeah, right, not while she was ensuring he remained addicted to her!), and so on. This is what narcissists do. They keep in touch with exes, often stringing them along, for continued validation and attention. Not because they want them back. I have no problem with narcissists, other than the fact that they are disordered, and as a result are attention-seeking, greedy, selfish, jealous, vindictive, woe-is-me victims, liars, arrogant, entitled, etc. And in that mindset of theirs, anything goes. Anything can be justified. For example Harry and Meghan's treatment of Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth in their final years. Harry found in Meghan a kindred spirit, and someone who is as narcissistic as he is. Sadly, their fights behind closed doors in Montecito will be EPIC. Meghan has what she always wanted. Money, status, and fame. Harry, on the other hand, has lost everything. Sadly, that's his problem, but I can assure you their marriage won't last, and their two children will necessarily become dysfunctional adults. All children of narcissists do, unless they were blessed with a generous dose of empathy, and a good life partner. Like William. Edward would necessarily have been narcissistic too, given his upbringing, but he was a weak man ready for manipulation by a stronger, crafty, and clever woman. The rest, as they say, is history. 🤷♀️
Meghan absolutely is to blame. She’s a lying grifter and never intended to stay in the UK. She’s a greedy, pathetic pig just like her spineless husband
Meg is a manipulative gold digger...a narcissist...and a liar...
I agree with you on Wallis Simpson she didn’t deserve what she got. I’m not sure about Meghan’s and Camilla’s innocence though.
No one knows what kate did to megan@@jeremiahwood4749the fact that Harry and megan were more popular than William caused all the problems. But I know Harry and megan will survive like Wallace and Edward. As for Camilla, the said she had a baby for charles which was adopted and sent to live in austrailia. Simon Day is his name and he is fighting to get Charles DNA to prove Carles and camillia are his parents.
I believe this is true, in which I am convince that the queen knew and sent charles to austrailia for a few years. If you see this young man you will see the resemblance of this young man to C& C
I LOOOVED DIANA. But let's face it --Charles didn't. He loved and wanted to marry Camilla and visa versa. Diana sensed that BEFORE the marriage and wanted to get out of the engagement. Her sister's talked her into staying and marrying Charles. It only seemed like a fairytale. I realize that, I wish the rest of the public would.
Charles loved camillis parker bowls. And is finally allowed to married the love of his life.
THEY HAD IT'S ALL AND LOST IT'S ALL DARLINGS TRAGIC FOR ALL THOSE MEN AND WALLIS SIMPSON AND EDWARD DARLINGS
After all these years, snd still there is the attempt to fix Wallace Simpson's unfixable reputation. And just imagine the utter disaster for England if Edward 8th had been the king thru ww1, instead of his more mature brother, who replaced him.
Stop blaming Camilla, Dianne was no saint
They have one strong connection. They have double LL in their christian names.
Never mind the peasants.
For me Wallis Simpson was pretty and elegant unlike Camilla.
Agree 100% Wallis Simpson was really pretty & sophisticated & Camilla is no where near it.😊
These hosts are such mega liar. Shame on them🇨🇦
No one could have Predicted Wrong Diana Predicted her death n How She Would Die . An it's like this there's so many things don't add up Doties Father only stop his investigation for Diana son's ,for there well being . They new after time people would calm n they did she was not supposed to take Qween when they announced they were going to marry she said she wouldn't accept if offered but we see she jumped on it .
Diana would be alive if he didnt fell for a man?🤡😱
Love conquers all. 🥰🥰
The Queen wore white to Charles and Camilla’s wedding. What does that say? 🤫😉
Dianna was merely a birthing arangement
Camilla is Queen, not an outcast. Who makes this rubbish? Wallis wasn't an outcast because she was never "in"
She was desired!!!!
Only thing in camilla's favor was Charles could not let her go and get on with his marriage. Granted Diana was not without her flings. She wanted the royal title, he needed a wife who would look the other way. They both got what they wanted until they no longer did. Charles and camilla should of never been granted permission by the queen to marry, it was only to save face and give her soiled/spoiled son his way. The abdication was the right thing to do, but the queen never forgave him for doing so.
She's queen consort. That's a big difference.
@@absolutetruthgirl England doesn't use the title Consort unless it's granted, for example Albert, Prince Consort the husband of Queen Victoria
EVERY ONE HAD IT'S ALL DARLINGS LOST IT'S ALL DARLINGS
Prince Charles çould have a tone but he loves camellia
Charles didn't love Camille as much as Edward loved Wallace , I don't like Horse Face she was not supposed to take Qween title , None Nigosible by ass if it had been her or the Thrown he would have never married her that's why they weren't married from the very beginning ,
Camilla is now Queen of the U.K., so she is hardly an "outcast."
Diana was in love with him, not fair to say she saw a package for her future. He was spoiled always got what he wanted and camilla was evil.
Wallis👍🏿
Camilla 👎
Great revisionist portriat of those two that I don’t accept. If he actually loved Camilla more than the future throne, he
should have abdicated. If she was so in tuned with him, she would have left him alone scandal free albeit he was in an imperfect marriage so he could become King. Cloaking this as some great love story is someone having hired a good PR firm. Love is not love without sacrifice, honor and responsibility. This is just a sordid tale of ambition, entitlement and privilege.
A grifter....craving wealth. She loved her second husband but he wanted out. She has to stay with tje king.
What about the nazi past, see Marburg Files
How's Camilla a royal outcast? She is Queen of England!
You've swallowed the blue pill
I have no pity for Jezebel as she slept her way to the TOP of the food ChAIN and found out too late that her man CAIN was NOT ABEL as SHE .... now we have HARRY & MEGAn ~ did ya know Harry is his nick name as his birth name is HENRY and if he were to be KING ~ he would be King Henry #9 is an upside down 6 ~ 69 is YingYang ~ King Henry #8 was the 2nd born Son too so HE is ABEL to be KING if he keep's MEGAn as his Queen as the Queen is the most powerful person on the BLACK and WHITE chess board ..... and MEGA means HUge .....
Charles loves the love of his life Camilla Bowls parker
She will never be a Queen.like always charles twisted mummies arm
Truest love story of the century in. Camilla and Charles
camilla will ALWAYS BE the whore/mistress/homewrecker lol
Diana was her own Royal force of Nature.. more famous than her husband. Camilla licked his boots so no doubt he preferred service to him(camilla) rather then duty to the Firm(diana).
She is his completer.... not all couples have that????
🥱😑
Hang in there. Sherpa can pick up on your energy, so try hard to not let all these events get you down. Unfortunately all these events are part of getting old. We know it's hard to get through this difficult time. My prayers are with you 2.
❤❤
Really all what your are saying because she probably your friends ! She is the mistress ! Maybe the reason Diana died ! And your are not talking that there is money involved in between Charles the wrecker and the husband ( Bowles ) and probably her children Too ! But now there is more issue about money involved !!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Oli komea kuningas. Oli. Mitään ei ole periytynyt.
When will Megan be added.
Khate who stalked william should be added.
@@therealgodessisisokay sugar...
@@therealgodessisisPrincess Catherine met Prince William at the same university they both attended. They shared accomodation at university with two other students. As students they hung out at similar venues etc. Not exactly stalking in my opinion.
Even after student days, they had similar places they liked to go to with friends. So chances are when they had Broken up at one stage they would still bump into each other or still hang out at certain places with friends that both did when together. So no Catherine definitely not a stalker. She dated and went out after William broke it off with her for a bit.
Megan?! More like William and Rose