It’s kinda wild how people are only scratching the surface and don’t take the time to read 25 money secrets from Donald Trump. Get out of the rabbit hole.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
@@TheNobodyZone He is a professional comedian foremost and has barely worked as a social scientist. Hence why his research includes more humour than science.
Facts? ... which facts? Do you believe him because he says it or because he has charm or some other spurious reason? Didn't you notice how extremely cherry picked his data was? I suggest you don't believe anything others say and do your research.
@@SwikingSwe - I do not believe he is American unless you are referring to me. In which case you are wrong again. Feel free to be wrong endlessly like your attempt at a sentence (also wrong) and this video. Or you could try finding out some information for yourself and enlighten yourself rather than having it spoon fed to you by other people.
In Norway we have a concept called "freedom under responsibility". It only works when people are actually responsible. But it gives people more freedom than in countries such as the United States. For example, you can do your job the way you want without the boss caring about what you do. As long as the job is done.
Thank you. By reducing the gap between rich and poor you have a moving economy. A moving economy with people's quality of life at the center along with the environment is the best thing our human societies can accomplish. I honestly hope more countries understand and adopt this incredible system.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
@@ninjapirate123 Indeed, but the issue here is that there shouldn't be any billionaires. There should be a focus on how to raise quality of life for everyone. Automate more, work less, and grow sustainably. We don't need fancy cars and huge houses to be happy. We need to be real with each other.
@@ninjapirate123 What in tarnation are you going to do with a billion dollars? Once you earn $75,000 per year, there is no increase in happiness by earning more than that.
He forgot the government efficiency. Brazilian government huge taxes and nothing comes back to population in terms of education, Health or anything else
Government efficiency? The people are good, not the politicians. I can guarantee you Brazil have better politicians in Sweden. Our politicians doesn't even have educations, whoever wants to be in the parliament is allowed to. Syrian Mafia have planted 2 people there, also an islamic fundamentalist who supported terrorst groups, many criminals and many people who didn't even study at high school. Thank God Swedes are honest, smart and hard workers.
***** Try googling Swedish taxation. And don't forget the tax on fuel, tobacco and alcohol. Also VAT, payroll, income, high income, capital gains, company tax.
Maximilian Wicén Hm, we have by far the longest and most complex fiscal legislation in the world. We have VAT for the states (taxed twice), VAT for some cities and to the central government in one product only. So, we have income tax, house tax, energy tax, water tax, consuming tax, living tax, the sobre tax over the material used in transportation, work and logistics, food and medication is taxed too. And we have the bureaucracy that is insane. We have double income tax over companies profit, over companies manufacturing, and over the income of the employees.
I've been binge-watching TED for quite a while this evening and there have been many worthwhile moments But so far the greatest has been learning of Kant's quip about the dove in airless space
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Actually I got an excellent education in the USA due to our free libraries. I went to college, but already knew everything they taught, I just wanted the piece of paper.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
The Norwegian accent is amazing, you guys always sound so happy! Here in Sweden, we love to say "Jeg er så deprimert" ("I am so depressed" in Norwegian") in an overly happy Norwegian accent.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 Stop buying avocado toast and $5 lattés every day, you lazy 20-something. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Get a job and stop playing Minecraft all day.
One major factor was left out is that we are seeing global inflation . I saw it in the news that most countries are all competing for parts , products , food, OIL etc. Even nations that managed their rates better are seeing major issues . The glut of money was an issue sure, but the surging demand from nation that re-opened from covid lockdowns played a larger role . Add to this pandemic-related staffing issues and the intentional global oil supply problems and its a nightmare . I known the intention was to explain inflation but that doesn’t do justice to the current inflation on a global scale......
U.S inflation hit 7% in December, fastest pace since 1982 . Consumer prices in Germany rose by 3.1% in 2021 . France shows a 12 -months inflation rate of 3.4% the highest since September 2008.
@@PhilipMurray251 I think we need to stop softening the blow with the word “recession”. This is going to be a depression. 4 top economist agree on this. When the market reached high in mid 1930 it took until mid 1932 to reach the bottom. people can’t buy when they have no food, the trucks don’t have DEF to mix with the diesel to run (in all diesel trucks newer than 2009) No trucks-no food-no fertilizer.
@@marianparker7502 In order for us to prepare for the future we need to look into safer investment with good prospect . If you have the mindset of investing 5 years ahead and just keep DCA every time you get paid. My portfolio have accrued gains of about $130k under the guidance of my investment -Advisor "Nicole Ann Sabi!n" whose skills in portfolio diversification are unmatched and client-centered.
@@Robertgriffinne The crazy part is that advisors are probably outperforming the market and raising good returns. I will give this a look, thanks a bunch for sharing this Web.
I'm curious to know the proportion of people that went from "riches to rags" in various countries, think that would also be an interesting indicator of social mobility.
+jethreezy Good point. According to the paper I got my numbers from (table 12 in ftp.iza.org/dp1938.pdf): From riches to rags: Scandinavia: 15%, USA and UK: 10%. Interesting detail: from riches to riches almost identical in Scandinavia and the US: around 35%.
Harald Eia Very interesting, so it would appear a "glass floor" of varying degrees is very much in place in these countries. By the way, I really admire your work and enjoyed the Hjernevask documentation series you made.
+jethreezy Thank you so much! About the "glass floor": genetics also have an effect, of course, so even in a society with no discrimination, free higher education and no heritage, class differences will - to some extent - reproduce themselves from one generation to another.
+Harald Eia Great talk and stats! I wonder about the differences within the U.S. though? U.S. billionaires more commonly make their fortunes in the states of California and New York (3.2 and 4.7 billionaires per million inhabitants). Interestingly enough, these states are also known for being left-leaning by U.S. standards with high taxes, stronger unions (e.g. new $15 minimum wage), and at least a minimum to half decent safety net. Bernie-land, generally hated by conservatives. Education not free of course but community college and grants can get you going.
What a great demonstration of what egoistic altruism can be like! I have always felt extremely fortunate for being born in Denmark, and it's not just the economy that matters. Free healthcare and free education (not just free education, since I actually get paid for taking an education) is something I appreciate so, so much.
@@rohangarje5886 You should see the situation of having a child in Japan. Doctor: "The bill comes to $128". Jubilant father: "Oh, that's pretty cheap, lemme grab my wal-..." Doctor: "No sir, this is what you will _receive_ ." Now compare that to the 10-30K cost in the US with a $40 price tag on holding your newborn.
I think one key factor also is that in Scandinavia, people are less likely to pretend to be rich. They have something called "Janteloven" which essentially means that "showing off" wealth is frowned upon, and that nobody should think that they are better than or above other people. This seems to be lacking in the US and most other countries where people aim to appear to be successful/rich etc. Well the problem is that those who pretend to be rich by buying stuff they can't afford are less likely to become rich. You need to live well below your means and invest as much as possible to achieve that goal. So I think it is more a matter of the mentality instilled in the population than anything else. Of course the Scandinavian countries also have more natural resources per capita than just about any other country in the world so that is a huge factor as well.
"A Scandinavian economist once said to Milton Friedman, ‘In Scandinavia, we have no poverty’. Milton Friedman replied, ‘That’s interesting, because in America, among Scandinavians, we have no poverty, either’. Indeed, the poverty rate for Americans with Swedish ancestry is only 6.7 per cent: half the US average (US Census)."
kejsarmakten you’re comparing Americans with Scandinavian ancestry to Scandinavians. Are you saying that Scandinavians are simply less productive? If so, you need to provide evidence.
@@drewpocernich2540 Why would less productive people have lower poverty rates? The point is that the Scandinavians have, or did have, an usually exceptional work ethic, a cultural factor that predicts their success outside of the Scandinavian system.
theminute man how would you prove that? There isn’t really a way to prove that. For example, psychologists know that the environment you are raised in has a large impact on your psychology/philosophies. Therefore, how could you link “people with Scandinavian ancestry” to actually Scandinavian people. Here’s a hint: There are very different culture in the two countries. Culture doesn’t exactly transition from country to country perfectly so you might have to drop that assumption (on top of that, how do we know that all Scandinavians are the same? Are there bad apples in the bunch? To top that, 6.7% must have been half the poverty rate at the time of this study, so we’ll just accept that as fact. Even then (if we were to discount the contradiction about culture earlier), this study still has flaws. How much Scandinavian ancestry did the participants have? If it was any less than 75% it might be a little counterintuitive (Simpson’s paradox). I conclude that there are a few too many confounding variables in this study to say that it’s in any way conclusive.
@@drewpocernich2540 Lol it's not biological. It is cultural and I assume that you aren't from an immigrant family because then you would know that immigrant families have similar cultures to those of their origin countries. As for how we know that Scandinavians have high work ethics (or did), there's a standardized set of Likert scale questions asking questions like how much do you agree with: "It is okay to steal if I need it" or "It is moral to call in sick if I am not but don't want to work". To conclude, you conclude nothing because you literally have no idea what you're talking about. I'd guess you're a middle schooler pretending to be educated by using the biggest words you know without knowing what they actually mean.
theminute man no, rather I am asking clarifying questions about the study. First off, I have a hard time believing people would actually answer “yes I believe it moral to call in sick if I am not but don’t want to work” partially because of sub-conscious bias towards oneself (imagine the following scenario: people realize that the study is about something along the lines of merit because all of the questions on the questionnaire are about that topic and thus their answers become different from their actual thoughts because they think “if I answer this way, I might be taken off of social security or some other program like that. This is why scientists will add illusory questions to mislead participants. That way the answers are more firmly coming from a sub-conscious plane of thought). As for psychology being biological. It has been proven that psychology is at least partially linked to genetics. This is because certain genes can make certain parts of your brain more active or less active. This is important because certain areas of your brain have different functions releasing different hormones which elicit different emotional reactions. The release of such hormones are caused by the firing of neurons (see also: theory of psychological evolution). Outside of this, we also have more anecdotal evidence that psychological development is environmental in nature (learning or nurture in nurture vs nature). It is still at least partially unknown how this area applies to our psyches as the evidence is anecdotal in nature. Something interesting you could research in your spare time is really low base sounds and their effects causing things like schizophrenia. You could further ask questions about whether “Scandinavian are that great of a constant in the equation, or “how does culture change through generations?” That was at least good for a laugh (I’m in college btw). There is definitely still a lot of research that needs to be done.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA
@@ninjapirate123 I disagree with your statement. Riches peoples who are using all means to avoid paying taxes while the average earns are the ones paying the large amount of taxes been impose on them. That's not fair
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Sweden is actually quite a good place for people that have a net worth of 30M+ . They don't have a wealth tax, unlike Switzerland, they barely have any property tax(capped at 700$/year) unlike Switzerland, they don't have any gift tax which Switzerland sometimes has. For the people that are worth a lot but don't earn a crazy amount, Sweden can be quite the tax haven
Dude you totally missed the point. You’re reverting to the broken politics of blaming the rich. His point is that social democracy can create more wealth.
You can retire at a young age if you invest wisely on time, Most times it amaze me greatly the way I moved from an average lifestyle to earning over $63k per month, utter shock is the word. I have understood a lot in the past few years to doubt that opportunities are bound in the financial markets, The only thing is to know where to focus.
@@susanhaynes679 That won't bother you if you trade with a professional like Mr Tony Alin berker my coach, you may have come across him on interviews relating to bitcoin. He trades, manage trading account and offer mentorship program for clients who wish to become professional investors.
Wow I can't believe you guys are discussing about Mr Tony Alin berker, I once met him at a conference in California 2019, just before the pandemic. I can testify that is very good in trading..Highly recommended.
@@macherie9554 Well this not my first time of seeing this name on social platform. A CNBC news host spoke highly of this man and his trading strategies. Do you know him ? if yes , did you invest with him ?
15:00 "the welfare state and unions work in tandem with capitalist dynamics” I can see this as I've had some friends in Norway who muscled through (free) school and now is a high paid working professional. they may have complained about taking loans out for living expenses but they didn't have to struggle with a high interest school loan after graduating. imho, education is one of the best ways for social mobility. great video, thank you for sharing.
Yes, we've seen this time in and again through out history, in both developed and developing nations. Education = Opportunity. People that argue against that, based on mere antidotes, don't have a sense of history or society.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
The Scandinavian countries have had uniquely consistent cultural values in which some sort of income redistribution is not as harmful as it would be in other cultures. They are also small in population. All but Sweden have fewer residents than New York City. But let's see how things continue as they open up to more immigration, and as young people lose the work ethic of their postwar grandparents and parents. But note that they are NOT socialist countries. They have a combination.
As a Norwegian its so great to have lecturers in Scandinavia that have a trustworthy education and reliable studies. The focus is not on the person on stage, he simply shares knowledge from plenty of educated people that are involved. I can never trust a lecturer that are American, because it seems like theres 100% focus on a oblivious person on stage where i never see a sign of a reliable education behind. They can scream all they want with the biggest passion, but they simply never teaches us anything, while everything in a lecture from Scandinavia is always a result of an educated study, not from one persons ego
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 then why does Scandinavia and probably most of EU not care a thing about USA? Theres noone who has any interest- or says anything good about USA other than in the topic of a joke or something to make fun of. Theres no need for billionaires when the cost of that is other people suffering and when most of that money goes to meaningless causes anyway. They have always had population with a lot of rich, and a lot of poor, which is not a good balance
No matter who you are and where in the world you live, the only way to get wealthier is to make more money than you spend. If you can do that over time, you become rich. There's one factor Harald Eia overlooked: Large oppressed lower class = social unrest = unpredictable future = less long term development and planning. Contrary to the video's title, it is probably easier to get rich in a dog-eats-dog society but what if you want to *stay* rich too? That is much easier in a society with more equality.
I’m almost convinced. If you can prove those rich people didn’t move from other countries where they acquired their wealth then he has a pretty good argument. I would also like to see studies on success of starting businesses in countries with high regulation and lots of legal paperwork vs less paperwork and little to no government or mafia interference.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@devinkk Actually, I made a robot to help me post this over and over again. I was the one who wrote the comment, but it was the robot I made who is copy/pasting this :)
@@devinkk My second reply, I wrote it myself, but the reply that was copy/paste, I only need to write it once and then ask my robot to copy/paste the rest for me
For those commenting on this presenters comedic timing. He is actually a very famous and very talented norwegian comedian. One of my favorite infact. Very funny and intelligent guy!
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
Although I agree to some of his points, excluding Hong Kong and Singapore is biais. Although very small countries they have similar or more population than Denmark, Norway or Iceland.
US and Norway has about the same unemployment rate, but we count our unemployed that does not go back to work much longer! Getting disability in Norway is a long and difficult process compered to the US!
He is comparing numbers - not what you can actually buy for the money you have. Like the limit of 2 USD /day as a limit of being poor. In Sweden 2 dollars a day is POOR! In DRC 2 dollars a day gives you a normal life with the ability to raise a family and build your own house. Very nice guy to listen to :-) He could lecture numerous topics and be interesting!!
The talk was about rich people; the poverty line was a tangent. To the very rich, the cost of living is irrelevant. Jeff Bezos doesn't worry about the cost of milk; if it cost $1,000 per gallon, he still wouldn't worry about it.
A discussion as to where the taxes are being spent might add some clarification to the implications that high taxes are in themselves beneficial. Example, here in the US taxes are relatively quite high for the middle class. The analysis might benefit from asking where is the money going? Military industrial complex, bailed out banks, prison complex etc. It would be interesting to see a lower tax experiment with excellent book keeping and little waste combined with high social freedom vs the socialist models? One.also might compare the value created technologically speaking is greater.
@@465marko Social Feedom - the freedom to die from hunger ,homelessness, no healthcare or being shot by a mindless right wing moron with more guns than brain cells
Completely wrong, taxes in the US have been down dramatically since the 80s and raeganism. Clinton raised them a bit but not by much, then bush Jr. and obama both cut them again, and now trump cut them even more. These tax cuts are responsible for the huge budget deficits.
Thanks for the speech. I agree, all debts, especially student loans are only good to keep you back and limit you on finishing college with a degree. I've been in college about 5 times and most of the time I've been forced to drop because not being able to cover the tuition. Free education would allow everyone including mothers and blue collar workers to achieve their full potential.
Overall more education the better. But bc of subsidies in the US, now everyone goes to college, and a BBA is now the equivalent of a high diploma in 1980. Everyone has one. It used to be that could get you ahead, now you're just not as far behind.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Norway people are the nicest, respectful people in the entire world. Extremely well educated, peace loving people, polite, ...... Scandinavians equals top list of very civilized people. And they rank the top of Cyber security moving over there :) love to live surrounded by good very civilized people
Hi, you can't say one country have nicest people in world. In every country you have nice, kind, educated and polite people, but also in the same country you have idiots...(In Norway also). So what i'm trying to say it's not smart to say that one country have the most polite people. Just saying...
@@Born4Gameing I don't think what you said is the truth at all. I've been to a lot of different countries, and I've discovered that the people in some countries are way way more polite than the people in other countries. Compare Italy to Sweden, and you will find there is no equivalence whatsoever. I don't know Norway, but I lived in Sweden, and they are way more polite than Americans, on average. In Sweden, they hardly even look at each other. I know it must seem logical to you to think that people are just people, and all people are the same no matter where you go, but the truth is that the culture you live in can drastically change your mentality.
While Norway’s "Nordic model" is praised for its high living standards and strong social safety nets, it's largely built on oil wealth, which funds much of the country’s prosperity. This creates an ironic tension: Norway profits heavily from fossil fuels while presenting itself as a leader in green policies. As the world shifts toward renewables, Norway’s dependence on oil threatens the sustainability of its welfare state. Additionally, Norway’s increasing move toward American-style market-driven policies risks undermining the social equality the Nordic model is known for, potentially eroding key aspects of its success.
@@aerogamer1 I read that book about 20 years ago. I thought it was great at the time. The only thing I remember now is, buying things like a house or a car isn't an "asset" as these things are called, it's really a liability because they cost you money!! (Unless they're making money for you).
I'm not sure if we can leave out tax havens: Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Cyprus, Monaco purely because they have "artificially high number of billionaires (per capita)" and these countries are too small, outliers. But Sweden is also small, like, not much bigger than Hong Kong, ~10M population vs. 7M, and is also an outlier. Norway population is similar to Singapore's one (5.5M vs. 5.6M). There's also such thing as "old money", these weren't ruled out also, and Europe obviously has much more of them.
I have student loan debt from the US government, and it's essentially indentured servitude for life. That's why I chose to live abroad for the next 20 years, paying the minimum amount, taking advantage of Foreign Tax Exclusion laws, and put as much as I can in investments.
I have a question. How do the numbers stack up when they are normalized against cost of living? Here in Wisconsin, I live very well when I'm earning $50,000 per year. Rent for a modest place is around $1,000 per month, utilities about $250. Monthly expenses for groceries, detergent, toiletries, paper towels, etc come up to about $250 to $300 per month. I've been offered work in San Francisco, Seattle, San Diego, Boston, New York, etc. for $100,000 and more, but I always turn them down because my real wage and standard of living would dramatically decrease. I'd be happy living in Central America earning $10,000 per year if rent were $120 per month, for example. What do these numbers look like in the real world when cost and standard of living is considered?
I watch this video only for the purpose of improving my English .along with my improving English it's give me a information .this guy talk very good easily understand .
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
Unions vary from one nation to the next. In some countries strong Unions have been very harmful to productivity. You only have to look at the productivity of the car industry in the UK during the1970’s. The Unions were very adversarial and were frequently striking, which cause a huge reduction in productivity. In Germany on the other hand the Unions are arguably beneficial and behave very differently. This has a lot to do with cultural differences. In the UK there was a class war taking place between the Unions and Management.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 Im not sure you even watched the TED talk. It is harder to become a billionaire in the US than many other countries is the point of the talk.
@@jasonmiddleweek1509 Im not sure you even read my reply carefully. I said it's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA, which means it's mostly USA that makes you more likely to become a billionaire
Before anyone thinks that this means that high taxes are good, it's worth noting that in the Nordic countries, high taxes are paid exclusively by the middle class. The highest income people have the lowest rates. The middle class goes along with this for two reasons. The minor one is that the rich don't use any of the social services that taxes support. The main reason is that the rich have made it clear that they will leave, and take the jobs that they provide with them, if their taxes are high. Even Ingemar Bergman fled. To Germany, of all places, where his tax rate at the time was 68% -- but that was still cheaper than Sweden!
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA.
Actually its not about social democracy its about the Nordic Moldel which has high income tax but does not tax companies and corporations much, neither real estate.
Norway is not a social democracy, they are a representative democracy and capitalist. They just have more social services which they can afford thanks a lower national debt. The US is like a 28 year old lawyer who has the big car but still tons of debt.
@@youtuber6185 Social democracies are by definition capitalist democracies. Google "The Nordic model". Norway has good social services because 1. they have high taxes and 2. they have a lot of oil money which they use very responsibly (96% is put in their national oil savings while the rest goes to the national budget). You saying "Norway is not a social democracy, they are a representative democracy and capitalist." kind of leads me to think you don't really know what social democracy is.
Happytown I said “Norway does not use Democratic Socialism.” , which is an economic model requiring the companies to not be be private and to be owned by the community. Everything else you said is correct, they are capitalist with large social services and can afford to do so because of oil.
@@youtuber6185 Dude your comment is right there, I can clearly read that it says "Norway is not a social democracy" which is false. Social democracy necessitates a free capitalist market. You are correct that Norway doesn't run a democratic socialist system, which, as you correctly stated would mean a market socialist economy. Perhaps you got the two terms confused, as democratic socialism and social democracy have very similar namnes - but they are not the same thing.
David Mayer David I thought about his message but I do feel it’s incomplete. Just like statistics and studies can be manipulated due to a bias it’s sometime important to look further into government and circumstances. For example immigration plays a large role. Millionaires Per capita may be skewed by 1st 2nd or 3rd generation Americans vs Scandinavians that may be in the country for many generations
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
because they've only seen one system work (especially for them) and the risk of trying something new is scary (and may cause them to lose their advantage - loss aversion). then when the education system force feeds them example after example of failures from the past at their earliest exposure to the material, they don't bother to do a check on current events because it has been digested as a permanent state of matter
Nowdays with all the remote jobs, snag a job that pays in US dollars and move to Costa Rica, Colombia, Romania, Morocco, Philippines literally just anywhere overseas that’s not Europe and you’ll live like a king 🤴🏻
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Education is not necessarily expensive in the USA. If you are poor you can get paid to go to school with pell grants (free money from the government). My pell grants more than paid my expenses, and I used the rest to buy ski season passes every year.
Just have a look at how Norwegian Air company was restructured in a very logical way. These countries do a much better job at maintaining proper free market function.
Judging by the comments, this seems to be important to people. The fact that there are a lot of rich people is an honor to a country. Wouldn't it be more important the see which country has least poor people or even where the people are happiest?
Nice lecture. However, attributing the fact that it is easier to get rich in scandinavian countries to free education is misleading. He is just handpicking countries to make his point. Many other countries with free education have way less millionaires and billionares per capita than the US (Italy, Spain, France, Portugal, Greece comes to mind but there are many many more). A fact that might explain the differences more accurately is the fact that the coorporate tax rate is actually lower in scandinavian countries than in the US (yes I know, hardly 'socialist' countries in that regard). Obviously there are many other contributing factors - low levels of corruption, for example, surely plays a big part too.
Corruption is a giant fact, I'm in a European country where we have free highschool education and government subsidized college education but the system is so corrupt it's laughable.
His point is to show that the Scandinavian (Nordic) countries, which people like Bernie Sanders point out as socialist dream societies, are in fact NOT socialist.
If there's one thing anybody should have learned over the last several years, it's that the methodology employed by sociologists to measure just about anything is exceptionally flawed.
I know it's hard for US people to realize the US is not as exceptional as you think. To me as a Norwegian this makes perfect sense. It's easy to take a risk when you know the government will be there to catch a fall.
The only thing that was missing from this talk was taking into consideration inherited wealth. Generational wealth in places like Norway is a big deal, as it is in the US. The one statistic that really stands out, for me, as important, is the economic mobility.
His mobility is just that. Sons inherit their fathers wealth, rich guys too. They very seldom move down, though some manage to squander their family fortune. In the theme of this talk it doesn't matter.
yeah, look argentina, we have the highest tax rate, the strongest unions and the biggest government that gives free money to almost half the population... we should be the richest country in the world...
You can compare countries with a population of 5 Million with the US that has 320 Million people. The fact that America appears on that least is incredible.
I think you made a little confusion on terms. It’s better to be born in a *social democratic* state if you’re broke, it’s better to be born in a socialist state if your parents are government cronies or intelligentsja (and then you go study abroad)
Interesting fact: Here in Brazil, 80% of our salary goes to the government. Even with all the taxes and corruption problems, a lot of people here still believe that socialism is good for us. A lot of people believe that working for the government (we have laws that doesn't allow government workers to be fired) is still better than opening their own business and studying hard. If i could give an advise for americans and europeans: Please, don't come and don't invest money in Brazil. We suffer a lot from government and poor minded people.
my sympathies are not always with the rich because sometimes they get rich through scummy means, but the ones who are industrious really do have to work much, much harder.
Takeways from this great talk: 1) Faster penetration of new and advanced technology is the key enabler. 2)Automation in a way is resulting in greater efficiency and productivity which in turn benefits all the stakeholders in a Welfare state.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA
He neglected one very important ingredient- culture. The culture of the US is very different than that of Scandinavian countries. A social-democratic system that works in Scandinavia will fail in the US due to culture.
agreed - culture based education is more important than a school based education, a society where people blame the victim for getting robbed will never get rid of the thieves , while the one where it's not tolerated will go to every length and breadth to fight against it - ultimately succeeding
This guy is a great speaker and his presentation is entertaining but it's also misleading. It's a statistical principle that groups (or countries) on the high end and low end of a distribution (such as billionaires per capita) will tend to have smaller populations. Hence we see Iceland at the top with only one billionaire. The US is the third largest nation by population so you wouldn't expect it to be at the very top of any per capita stat. (Except maybe incarcerations smh). There is just so much more variability in a country with 330 million people. If you look at all the European countries individually, of course there will be a few with more extreme UHNWI numbers per capita, and of course they will have relatively small populations. For a better comparison, you should look at US States and see where they would fall in the ranking since individual state populations are equivalent to many European countries. For example, Wyoming has 12.4 billionaires per million residents, New York has 5.5, Connecticut 4.8, Nevada 4.1, Montana 4, and California has 3.9, all higher than the Scandinavian countries. Not to mention California has 4 times the population of Sweden. If you compare continents, Europe and North America have around the same number of billionaires per capita in 2016 at 1.08. Of course the US has more UHNWIs and billionaires per capita than Europe but it also has half the population so that's not a fair comparison either. Also, this guy didn't show any evidence that free education, welfare, or unions are the cause of the higher number of wealthy individuals. These very well may be the causes but all he said was "Scandinavia has more rich people per capita than the US. Here are some reasons why I think that is." That's all fine and the presentation was interesting but I would have liked to see some evidence for his theories rather than just his best guess.
Yeah, the Iceland stat seemed unfair. Sweden, Norway, and Denmark seem to have a sum total of 22 million, so that's well within the realm of statistical anomalies. Interesting that Europe and NA both have equal numbers. It's so difficult to tease apart what's due to tax evasion and what's due to social support, anyways. I feel like the best measure would be not where billionaires live, but where they grew up and/or where they initially earned their wealth.
i guess it all comes down to two: 1 the word "rich" always attracts people's attention, people like to talk about it or just think about it. 2 people like rankings of whatever it might be, it gives us some sort of satisfaction even it makes no sense at all.
He gets a time slot to fill. He can't do a full exposition, but I agree with some of your criticisms and questions. However the overall thrust still stands - contrary to what people intuit, it's very possible to make it to riches in more socialist countries and social mobility is greater.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
He left out the Australian supermarket checkout: staff standing there watching your every move as you use the automatic self-checkouts because they know you'll cheat whenever possible. Meanwhile, they're ready for this very criticism, and will eagerly tell you that their eagle-eyed supervision is to optimise their ability to assist customers having difficulty. 😃
Interesting that Coles are (slowly) abandoning the colossal, time-wasting stupidity of robot scales, replacing them with an old-fashioned inert bench. Meanwhile, Woollies are doubling down, installing extra cameras that spy into your shopping trolley and call staff when "items" (e.g. your keys or phone) are "detected" there. The rampant stupidity -continues- accelerates.
sounds rather intriguing, as long as you ignore that this a multi‐factor equation. Just have a look at the economic freedoms list and take your conclusions from there. Arguably a much bigger influence
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 If not overtaken by war, China will surpass the USA in the number of millionaires and billionaires. Cause: the past difficulty of the Chinese under un-free communism is a very powerful force that serves one of the motivations the Chinese are now exhibiting.
Actually one thing is missing from his analysis - how did the rich _become_ rich? Just by showing what is the ratio of rich people per capita does not validate that it is easier to _become_ rich in contries where this ratio is highest. For example the rich people in scandinavia might have inherited their wealth. While those in the US might have become rich. Yeah - he talkes about social mobility index, and true - the higher this index, the easier it is for poor people to improve their status. But this does not mean that the really rich (1%) are coming from poor families. For that he would have to show social mobility index to the top 1%, not top 25%. One more thing - at least in Danemark there are no minimum wages laws. Minimum wage laws are effective only when they are in line with the underlying economic situation. If they overshoot, they distort the workplace. In Danemark there are no minimum wage laws, yet the wages are still very high. These two factors are not related.
Well, considering we have taxes on big inheritances in Norway, it is much easier to inherit wealth other places than in Norway. Add to that fact that we have several billionaires who have moved to tax havens. John Fredriksen, Arne Fredly etc, which bring down the averages even more.
@@torod213 perhaps. Still - he focuses on the top 1% and then he talks about social mobility to top 25%. These are two completetly different things. The top 1% are so few, that there is no need for approximations (like social mobility index and thinking about the possible outcome of inheritance tax) - why didn't he simply trace back where their fortunes came from? Besides this inconsistency of course I agree that social mobility is a great thing. I would be just cautious with attributing it to a few factors - the issue usually is much more complex. In my personal opinion it is in large part a matter of culture and value system. But the main point he makes is that state intervention (public education, high minimum wage, etc) is actaully good - at least in this particular case. My take on this is that state intervention is not harmful is and ony if it actually aligns with what the society would do anyway. Hence the example of the lack of minimum wage laws in Danemark and still having very high labor cost there. Norway and Sweden would certainly have the same high labor cost as today witout the minimum wage laws. Using this logic, if people value education, they would get educated even without free public schools. For legislators the most important thing to do is not to get in peoples way ;)
@@a1nd23 I really struggle to understand what you mean.. But quite honestly, wether someone inherited the money or made it themselves doesn't really matter. Someone somewhere will have had to make that money, and I don't see why the level of inheritance will go up or down from one country to another. In fact, Norway is at a great disadvantage here. We used to be extremely poor farmers and fishermen, only in the last 50-60 years has our wealth risen sharply. And we have inheritance tax that other countries hasn't. And we have several billionaires who have moved abroad. Looking at the top lists, there are 3 young people at the top who have inherited their money, the vast majority of the rest have made it all themselves. Our richest, Kjell Inge Røkke, started as a fisherman with absolutely nothing. But like I said, those three who inherited their money doesn't really matter. Just replace them with their parents on the list and then they made it themselves.
It’s kinda wild how people are only scratching the surface and don’t take the time to read 25 money secrets from Donald Trump. Get out of the rabbit hole.
this guy has brilliant comedic timing
He might be the top comedian in Norway trough the last 20 years.
Well he is a comedian
UndisclosedTalent He's a comedian in norway😊
That's weird, considering he's a comedian.
in case you still dont know after 4 people telling you the same, hes a comedian
*easiest way to get rich ... get a job in first world country that you can do from anywhere and move to 3rd world country and live like kings
Example of a good paying remote job plz.
Zarfan Hussain any kind of e commerce site , freelance graphic designer , data entry , some engineering , customer service I’m sure their are more
@@zarfanhussain Loads of high paying IT engineer jobs can be done remotely if you have a decent internet connection
@@zarfanhussain Programming.
@@hypnoosipolku how do i find one?
What an engaging and entertaining presenter!! He knows how to capture the audience while being incredibly informative.
Agree agree
What is your name
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
Too bad the numbers he uses are not proof of what he claims. There is much more data to be analyzed.
@@TheNobodyZone He is a professional comedian foremost and has barely worked as a social scientist. Hence why his research includes more humour than science.
This presenter is super brilliant! He is really calm, I really enjoyed his humor. He presented all the fact without having much stress on audience.
Facts? ... which facts? Do you believe him because he says it or because he has charm or some other spurious reason?
Didn't you notice how extremely cherry picked his data was?
I suggest you don't believe anything others say and do your research.
@@warpeace8891 Found the American.
@@warpeace8891 what facts?
Answer : All presented facts.
@@SwikingSwe - I do not believe he is American unless you are referring to me. In which case you are wrong again. Feel free to be wrong endlessly like your attempt at a sentence (also wrong) and this video.
Or you could try finding out some information for yourself and enlighten yourself rather than having it spoon fed to you by other people.
@@warpeace8891 Do you have any examples of claims he make that are not factual or any of his cherry picked data?
From an America TED watcher it open my mind frantic education. 5 Star all the way up.
In Norway we have a concept called "freedom under responsibility". It only works when people are actually responsible. But it gives people more freedom than in countries such as the United States. For example, you can do your job the way you want without the boss caring about what you do. As long as the job is done.
This is probably the best ted talk I have ever watched
Thank you. By reducing the gap between rich and poor you have a moving economy. A moving economy with people's quality of life at the center along with the environment is the best thing our human societies can accomplish. I honestly hope more countries understand and adopt this incredible system.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
@@ninjapirate123 Indeed, but the issue here is that there shouldn't be any billionaires. There should be a focus on how to raise quality of life for everyone. Automate more, work less, and grow sustainably. We don't need fancy cars and huge houses to be happy. We need to be real with each other.
this was the message of the prophets
But they also forget to mention culture, scandinavian people are very serious when they work
@@ninjapirate123 What in tarnation are you going to do with a billion dollars? Once you earn $75,000 per year, there is no increase in happiness by earning more than that.
He forgot the government efficiency. Brazilian government huge taxes and nothing comes back to population in terms of education, Health or anything else
Government efficiency? The people are good, not the politicians. I can guarantee you Brazil have better politicians in Sweden. Our politicians doesn't even have educations, whoever wants to be in the parliament is allowed to. Syrian Mafia have planted 2 people there, also an islamic fundamentalist who supported terrorst groups, many criminals and many people who didn't even study at high school. Thank God Swedes are honest, smart and hard workers.
@Lucas your taxes are not that high.
Maximilian Wicén The problem with the taxes here is the taxation over taxation, so the prices get high
***** Try googling Swedish taxation. And don't forget the tax on fuel, tobacco and alcohol. Also VAT, payroll, income, high income, capital gains, company tax.
Maximilian Wicén Hm, we have by far the longest and most complex fiscal legislation in the world. We have VAT for the states (taxed twice), VAT for some cities and to the central government in one product only. So, we have income tax, house tax, energy tax, water tax, consuming tax, living tax, the sobre tax over the material used in transportation, work and logistics, food and medication is taxed too. And we have the bureaucracy that is insane. We have double income tax over companies profit, over companies manufacturing, and over the income of the employees.
I've been binge-watching TED for quite a while this evening and there have been many worthwhile moments
But so far the greatest has been learning of Kant's quip about the dove in airless space
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
The girl was so fine... I don’t blame the camera man
Dem white girls!!
when?
@@VinyZikss around 10:35
Billy Larkin There’s no f*cking girl. That’s his uncle!!
Damn white girls!
Serious topic, presented with a good touch of humor = a classic !!
...still good to watch two years later
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Ok my idea
Step 1 Get education from Norway
Step 2 move to America to avoid taxes
Step 3 profit
STONKS
@stan G not by some crazy American? 🤔
@@seyyyer Get shot by who? A muslim? In America, the land of freedom, we can own guns for self defense.
@stan G easier to get killed by a crazy gringo, but then again, I dont go to high school anymore so I should be safe 😎🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Actually I got an excellent education in the USA due to our free libraries. I went to college, but already knew everything they taught, I just wanted the piece of paper.
He treats a so complex affair in a comedic way. In such a way that boring things turn into easy and light.
The whole premise of the talk is comedic.
He studied social science and since became a comedian. One of the top comedians in Norway.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
Sure, not boring, but lacks depth.
the norwegian accent is the best... there is built in comedy in it. its so damn ironic and so subtley fun. love it : )
Joe Rogan should invite this guy and Peter Schiff on his podcast, smoke a blunt and just watch them go at it
yes
you got it
Peter “I am the 1%. Recession and total collapse is coming.
Buy gold” Schiff
😂😂
@joeroganexperience
The funniest part is that this guy is original a comedian
Not only is this an intriguing talk, but it is also an important talk. Great research! Brilliant mind too.
Scandinavian societies "are not anti-rich or anti-capitalist systems" 15:00 "Welfare state and the unions work in tandem with capitalist dynamics"
You have to tell that to our south american polítician.
Wrong Sweden is going broke
@@BinanceUSD it's not true
@@JonSmith-ov6oy But welfare is strong and so compared to Usa they are "socialist".
@@BinanceUSD we are not?
The Norwegian accent is amazing, you guys always sound so happy! Here in Sweden, we love to say "Jeg er så deprimert" ("I am so depressed" in Norwegian") in an overly happy Norwegian accent.
LOL, it's mostly the eastern part of Norway though. On the west coast the dialects and 'sing-song' is more depressive.
Det er sjovt hahaha :D
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 Stop buying avocado toast and $5 lattés every day, you lazy 20-something. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Get a job and stop playing Minecraft all day.
@@test-ne6gf You don't get how much homework I have to get a job during this time
One major factor was left out is that we are seeing global inflation . I saw it in the news that most countries are all competing for parts , products , food, OIL etc. Even nations that managed their rates better are seeing major issues . The glut of money was an issue sure, but the surging demand from nation that re-opened from covid lockdowns played a larger role . Add to this pandemic-related staffing issues and the intentional global oil supply problems and its a nightmare . I known the intention was to explain inflation but that doesn’t do justice to the current inflation on a global scale......
U.S inflation hit 7% in December, fastest pace since 1982 . Consumer prices in Germany rose by 3.1% in 2021 . France shows a 12 -months inflation rate of 3.4% the highest since September 2008.
@@PhilipMurray251 I think we need to stop softening the blow with the word “recession”. This is going to be a depression. 4 top economist agree on this. When the market reached high in mid 1930 it took until mid 1932 to reach the bottom. people can’t buy when they have no food, the trucks don’t have DEF to mix with the diesel to run (in all diesel trucks newer than 2009) No trucks-no food-no fertilizer.
@@marianparker7502 In order for us to prepare for the future we need to look into safer investment with good prospect . If you have the mindset of investing 5 years ahead and just keep DCA every time you get paid. My portfolio have accrued gains of about $130k under the guidance of my investment -Advisor "Nicole Ann Sabi!n" whose skills in portfolio diversification are unmatched and client-centered.
@@Robertgriffinne The crazy part is that advisors are probably outperforming the market and raising good returns. I will give this a look, thanks a bunch for sharing this Web.
@@Robertgriffinne what is the internet site to go to to get info
I'm curious to know the proportion of people that went from "riches to rags" in various countries, think that would also be an interesting indicator of social mobility.
+jethreezy Good point. According to the paper I got my numbers from (table 12 in ftp.iza.org/dp1938.pdf): From riches to rags: Scandinavia: 15%, USA and UK: 10%. Interesting detail: from riches to riches almost identical in Scandinavia and the US: around 35%.
Harald Eia Very interesting, so it would appear a "glass floor" of varying degrees is very much in place in these countries.
By the way, I really admire your work and enjoyed the Hjernevask documentation series you made.
+jethreezy Thank you so much! About the "glass floor": genetics also have an effect, of course, so even in a society with no discrimination, free higher education and no heritage, class differences will - to some extent - reproduce themselves from one generation to another.
+Harald Eia Great talk and stats! I wonder about the differences within the U.S. though? U.S. billionaires more commonly make their fortunes in the states of California and New York (3.2 and 4.7 billionaires per million inhabitants). Interestingly enough, these states are also known for being left-leaning by U.S. standards with high taxes, stronger unions (e.g. new $15 minimum wage), and at least a minimum to half decent safety net. Bernie-land, generally hated by conservatives. Education not free of course but community college and grants can get you going.
Singapore is the number one in rags to riches. Then Hong Kong
What a great demonstration of what egoistic altruism can be like! I have always felt extremely fortunate for being born in Denmark, and it's not just the economy that matters. Free healthcare and free education (not just free education, since I actually get paid for taking an education) is something I appreciate so, so much.
I totally agree.
Dude, you get paid to study wtf?
@@rohangarje5886 Yeah, it is pretty awesome. My international friends also react the same way lol.
@@rohangarje5886 You should see the situation of having a child in Japan.
Doctor: "The bill comes to $128".
Jubilant father: "Oh, that's pretty cheap, lemme grab my wal-..."
Doctor: "No sir, this is what you will _receive_ ."
Now compare that to the 10-30K cost in the US with a $40 price tag on holding your newborn.
@@rohangarje5886 same in Sweden (guess Norway as well)
I think one key factor also is that in Scandinavia, people are less likely to pretend to be rich. They have something called "Janteloven" which essentially means that "showing off" wealth is frowned upon, and that nobody should think that they are better than or above other people. This seems to be lacking in the US and most other countries where people aim to appear to be successful/rich etc. Well the problem is that those who pretend to be rich by buying stuff they can't afford are less likely to become rich. You need to live well below your means and invest as much as possible to achieve that goal. So I think it is more a matter of the mentality instilled in the population than anything else. Of course the Scandinavian countries also have more natural resources per capita than just about any other country in the world so that is a huge factor as well.
"A Scandinavian economist once said to Milton Friedman, ‘In Scandinavia, we have no poverty’. Milton Friedman replied, ‘That’s interesting, because in America, among Scandinavians, we have no poverty, either’. Indeed, the poverty rate for Americans with Swedish ancestry is only 6.7 per cent: half the US average (US Census)."
kejsarmakten you’re comparing Americans with Scandinavian ancestry to Scandinavians. Are you saying that Scandinavians are simply less productive? If so, you need to provide evidence.
@@drewpocernich2540 Why would less productive people have lower poverty rates? The point is that the Scandinavians have, or did have, an usually exceptional work ethic, a cultural factor that predicts their success outside of the Scandinavian system.
theminute man how would you prove that? There isn’t really a way to prove that. For example, psychologists know that the environment you are raised in has a large impact on your psychology/philosophies. Therefore, how could you link “people with Scandinavian ancestry” to actually Scandinavian people. Here’s a hint: There are very different culture in the two countries. Culture doesn’t exactly transition from country to country perfectly so you might have to drop that assumption (on top of that, how do we know that all Scandinavians are the same? Are there bad apples in the bunch? To top that, 6.7% must have been half the poverty rate at the time of this study, so we’ll just accept that as fact. Even then (if we were to discount the contradiction about culture earlier), this study still has flaws. How much Scandinavian ancestry did the participants have? If it was any less than 75% it might be a little counterintuitive (Simpson’s paradox). I conclude that there are a few too many confounding variables in this study to say that it’s in any way conclusive.
@@drewpocernich2540 Lol it's not biological. It is cultural and I assume that you aren't from an immigrant family because then you would know that immigrant families have similar cultures to those of their origin countries. As for how we know that Scandinavians have high work ethics (or did), there's a standardized set of Likert scale questions asking questions like how much do you agree with: "It is okay to steal if I need it" or "It is moral to call in sick if I am not but don't want to work".
To conclude, you conclude nothing because you literally have no idea what you're talking about. I'd guess you're a middle schooler pretending to be educated by using the biggest words you know without knowing what they actually mean.
theminute man no, rather I am asking clarifying questions about the study. First off, I have a hard time believing people would actually answer “yes I believe it moral to call in sick if I am not but don’t want to work” partially because of sub-conscious bias towards oneself (imagine the following scenario: people realize that the study is about something along the lines of merit because all of the questions on the questionnaire are about that topic and thus their answers become different from their actual thoughts because they think “if I answer this way, I might be taken off of social security or some other program like that. This is why scientists will add illusory questions to mislead participants. That way the answers are more firmly coming from a sub-conscious plane of thought). As for psychology being biological. It has been proven that psychology is at least partially linked to genetics. This is because certain genes can make certain parts of your brain more active or less active. This is important because certain areas of your brain have different functions releasing different hormones which elicit different emotional reactions. The release of such hormones are caused by the firing of neurons (see also: theory of psychological evolution). Outside of this, we also have more anecdotal evidence that psychological development is environmental in nature (learning or nurture in nurture vs nature). It is still at least partially unknown how this area applies to our psyches as the evidence is anecdotal in nature. Something interesting you could research in your spare time is really low base sounds and their effects causing things like schizophrenia. You could further ask questions about whether “Scandinavian are that great of a constant in the equation, or “how does culture change through generations?” That was at least good for a laugh (I’m in college btw). There is definitely still a lot of research that needs to be done.
He knows how to engage the audience and hold their attention . Love him
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA
@@ninjapirate123 I disagree with your statement. Riches peoples who are using all means to avoid paying taxes while the average earns are the ones paying the large amount of taxes been impose on them. That's not fair
i love wisdom wrapped in humor. Nice presentation and thanks for sharing
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
If you want to become rich asap, change your definition of rich
Top comment 👍
Love his comedic presentation.....I never once got bored!!! And I agree with him fully.
He's fantastic. I would love to watch him live.
Sweden is actually quite a good place for people that have a net worth of 30M+ . They don't have a wealth tax, unlike Switzerland, they barely have any property tax(capped at 700$/year) unlike Switzerland, they don't have any gift tax which Switzerland sometimes has. For the people that are worth a lot but don't earn a crazy amount, Sweden can be quite the tax haven
Yes, but the US doesn't want upward mobility. The rich who control the US want to maintain at the top without any pressure from the lower classes.
Dude you totally missed the point. You’re reverting to the broken politics of blaming the rich. His point is that social democracy can create more wealth.
You can retire at a young age if you invest wisely on time, Most times it amaze me greatly the way I moved from an average lifestyle to earning over $63k per month, utter shock is the word. I have understood a lot in the past few years to doubt that opportunities are bound in the financial markets, The only thing is to know where to focus.
I keep wondering how people earn money in financial markets, i tried trading bitcoin on my own made a huge loss and now I'm scared of investing more.
@@susanhaynes679 That won't bother you if you trade with a professional like Mr Tony Alin berker my coach, you may have come across him on interviews relating to bitcoin. He trades, manage trading account and offer mentorship program for clients who wish to become professional investors.
@@dralfred2400 You allow people to trade for you ? that's interesting , how safe is it ?
Wow I can't believe you guys are discussing about Mr Tony Alin berker, I once met him at a conference in California 2019, just before the pandemic. I can testify that is very good in trading..Highly recommended.
@@macherie9554 Well this not my first time of seeing this name on social platform. A CNBC news host spoke highly of this man and his trading strategies. Do you know him ? if yes , did you invest with him ?
15:00 "the welfare state and unions work in tandem with capitalist dynamics” I can see this as I've had some friends in Norway who muscled through (free) school and now is a high paid working professional. they may have complained about taking loans out for living expenses but they didn't have to struggle with a high interest school loan after graduating. imho, education is one of the best ways for social mobility. great video, thank you for sharing.
Yes, we've seen this time in and again through out history, in both developed and developing nations. Education = Opportunity.
People that argue against that, based on mere antidotes, don't have a sense of history or society.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 Did you watch the youtube, I think it says the opposite.
@@jasonmiddleweek1509 I didnt
The Scandinavian countries have had uniquely consistent cultural values in which some sort of income redistribution is not as harmful as it would be in other cultures. They are also small in population. All but Sweden have fewer residents than New York City. But let's see how things continue as they open up to more immigration, and as young people lose the work ethic of their postwar grandparents and parents. But note that they are NOT socialist countries. They have a combination.
As a Norwegian its so great to have lecturers in Scandinavia that have a trustworthy education and reliable studies. The focus is not on the person on stage, he simply shares knowledge from plenty of educated people that are involved. I can never trust a lecturer that are American, because it seems like theres 100% focus on a oblivious person on stage where i never see a sign of a reliable education behind. They can scream all they want with the biggest passion, but they simply never teaches us anything, while everything in a lecture from Scandinavia is always a result of an educated study, not from one persons ego
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 then why does Scandinavia and probably most of EU not care a thing about USA? Theres noone who has any interest- or says anything good about USA other than in the topic of a joke or something to make fun of. Theres no need for billionaires when the cost of that is other people suffering and when most of that money goes to meaningless causes anyway. They have always had population with a lot of rich, and a lot of poor, which is not a good balance
No matter who you are and where in the world you live, the only way to get wealthier is to make more money than you spend. If you can do that over time, you become rich.
There's one factor Harald Eia overlooked: Large oppressed lower class = social unrest = unpredictable future = less long term development and planning. Contrary to the video's title, it is probably easier to get rich in a dog-eats-dog society but what if you want to *stay* rich too? That is much easier in a society with more equality.
camera man perving out at 10:36
He got caught!
Nop! its a sample
Vanlife with Dave2D 😂😂😂
I'm not mad at him.
She's a norwegian blogger and journalist.
I’m almost convinced. If you can prove those rich people didn’t move from other countries where they acquired their wealth then he has a pretty good argument.
I would also like to see studies on success of starting businesses in countries with high regulation and lots of legal paperwork vs less paperwork and little to no government or mafia interference.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 whoever is paying you to post this same comment over and over again needs to be congratulated
@@devinkk Actually, I made a robot to help me post this over and over again. I was the one who wrote the comment, but it was the robot I made who is copy/pasting this :)
@@ninjapirate123 quite obviously lol And you started your comment with "Actually" and everything! Amazing
@@devinkk My second reply, I wrote it myself, but the reply that was copy/paste, I only need to write it once and then ask my robot to copy/paste the rest for me
Conveniently categorizes Switzerland as a tax haven. No, it isn't. It's just a regular country that's exceptionally well run. With low taxes.
For super rich Norwegians, it for sure is a tax haven.
For those commenting on this presenters comedic timing. He is actually a very famous and very talented norwegian comedian. One of my favorite infact. Very funny and intelligent guy!
Master of edutainment
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
This video left me speechless.
Although I agree to some of his points, excluding Hong Kong and Singapore is biais. Although very small countries they have similar or more population than Denmark, Norway or Iceland.
I wish Harold would have reviewed the production and unemployment rates in these countries too. I did enjoy his perspective.
US and Norway has about the same unemployment rate, but we count our unemployed that does not go back to work much longer! Getting disability in Norway is a long and difficult process compered to the US!
He is comparing numbers - not what you can actually buy for the money you have. Like the limit of 2 USD /day as a limit of being poor. In Sweden 2 dollars a day is POOR! In DRC 2 dollars a day gives you a normal life with the ability to raise a family and build your own house.
Very nice guy to listen to :-) He could lecture numerous topics and be interesting!!
The talk was about rich people; the poverty line was a tangent. To the very rich, the cost of living is irrelevant. Jeff Bezos doesn't worry about the cost of milk; if it cost $1,000 per gallon, he still wouldn't worry about it.
Im danish, i got kinda sad in the beginning, until he revealed that we're top 5 xD
A discussion as to where the taxes are being spent might add some clarification to the implications that high taxes are in themselves beneficial. Example, here in the US taxes are relatively quite high for the middle class. The analysis might benefit from asking where is the money going? Military industrial complex, bailed out banks, prison complex etc.
It would be interesting to see a lower tax experiment with excellent book keeping and little waste combined with high social freedom vs the socialist models? One.also might compare the value created technologically speaking is greater.
lower in the us you can't it's already low lol, but yes less in military more in education
@@Louis-qo7tf no it's not. The taxes in the US are among the highest in the world compared to what you get out of it, i.e. nothing.
What's social freedom...?
@@465marko Social Feedom - the freedom to die from hunger ,homelessness, no healthcare or being shot by a mindless right wing moron with more guns than brain cells
Excellent book keeping is utopian dream. Power tends to corrupt. Simple but powerful adage
The US has not been a free market for over 60 years. The taxes are sky high, and the government intervenes massively.
Really? Why and how?
Completely wrong, taxes in the US have been down dramatically since the 80s and raeganism. Clinton raised them a bit but not by much, then bush Jr. and obama both cut them again, and now trump cut them even more. These tax cuts are responsible for the huge budget deficits.
Education and new technologies are the key to success
Thanks for the speech.
I agree, all debts, especially student loans are only good to keep you back and limit you on finishing college with a degree. I've been in college about 5 times and most of the time I've been forced to drop because not being able to cover the tuition.
Free education would allow everyone including mothers and blue collar workers to achieve their full potential.
Overall more education the better. But bc of subsidies in the US, now everyone goes to college, and a BBA is now the equivalent of a high diploma in 1980. Everyone has one. It used to be that could get you ahead, now you're just not as far behind.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 It's hard everywhere lol
@@Louis-qo7tf Mostly in USA u are more likely to be a billionaire but it depends on luck
@@ninjapirate123 0,00001% great dude doesn't represent the general population
Norway people are the nicest, respectful people in the entire world. Extremely well educated, peace loving people, polite, ...... Scandinavians equals top list of very civilized people. And they rank the top of Cyber security moving over there :) love to live surrounded by good very civilized people
Hi, you can't say one country have nicest people in world. In every country you have nice, kind, educated and polite people, but also in the same country you have idiots...(In Norway also). So what i'm trying to say it's not smart to say that one country have the most polite people. Just saying...
@@Born4Gameing let me guess, this is your 'gut feeling'?
@@mightypensword My gut feeling?! I just said the truth, nothing else...
@@Born4Gameing I don't think what you said is the truth at all. I've been to a lot of different countries, and I've discovered that the people in some countries are way way more polite than the people in other countries. Compare Italy to Sweden, and you will find there is no equivalence whatsoever. I don't know Norway, but I lived in Sweden, and they are way more polite than Americans, on average. In Sweden, they hardly even look at each other. I know it must seem logical to you to think that people are just people, and all people are the same no matter where you go, but the truth is that the culture you live in can drastically change your mentality.
@Forex Life Seasons are good for your mental health!
While Norway’s "Nordic model" is praised for its high living standards and strong social safety nets, it's largely built on oil wealth, which funds much of the country’s prosperity. This creates an ironic tension: Norway profits heavily from fossil fuels while presenting itself as a leader in green policies. As the world shifts toward renewables, Norway’s dependence on oil threatens the sustainability of its welfare state.
Additionally, Norway’s increasing move toward American-style market-driven policies risks undermining the social equality the Nordic model is known for, potentially eroding key aspects of its success.
Great talk. Important truths about economics.
Have u read the book 'rich dad, poor dad'?
@@aerogamer1 I read that book about 20 years ago. I thought it was great at the time. The only thing I remember now is, buying things like a house or a car isn't an "asset" as these things are called, it's really a liability because they cost you money!! (Unless they're making money for you).
@@465marko yeah it's a good book. it helped me realise poor vs rich mindset.
Amazing Amazing Guy with a lot of sense of humour and very informative.Thanks you Scandinavian Man.
I'm not sure if we can leave out tax havens: Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Cyprus, Monaco purely because they have "artificially high number of billionaires (per capita)" and these countries are too small, outliers. But Sweden is also small, like, not much bigger than Hong Kong, ~10M population vs. 7M, and is also an outlier. Norway population is similar to Singapore's one (5.5M vs. 5.6M). There's also such thing as "old money", these weren't ruled out also, and Europe obviously has much more of them.
I have student loan debt from the US government, and it's essentially indentured servitude for life. That's why I chose to live abroad for the next 20 years, paying the minimum amount, taking advantage of Foreign Tax Exclusion laws, and put as much as I can in investments.
I'd say it's "Here in my garage"
I get the joke, but a lot of the rich people i know about have started in a garage.
Thomas Andersen I can just hear Tai's voice perfectly when I read that
Knowledge!
knowledge??..... OOH! KNALEDGE! rightright. KNAAALEDGE
1 book per day in my Lamborghini
I have a question. How do the numbers stack up when they are normalized against cost of living? Here in Wisconsin, I live very well when I'm earning $50,000 per year. Rent for a modest place is around $1,000 per month, utilities about $250. Monthly expenses for groceries, detergent, toiletries, paper towels, etc come up to about $250 to $300 per month. I've been offered work in San Francisco, Seattle, San Diego, Boston, New York, etc. for $100,000 and more, but I always turn them down because my real wage and standard of living would dramatically decrease. I'd be happy living in Central America earning $10,000 per year if rent were $120 per month, for example. What do these numbers look like in the real world when cost and standard of living is considered?
There is an episode of his TV show w/ English subtitles on UA-cam where he compares countries in this way. Search for rich & equal harald eia
I found myself several times wanting to hit the like button, only to discover that I have already done it. So hilarious and so interesting!!
You probably write 5 page yelp reviews
@@HWM636 you probably think I care about your opinion.
wow.... I didn't see that coming. I love the lecture
One of the best, if not the best, talk ever!
I watch this video only for the purpose of improving my English .along with my improving English it's give me a information .this guy talk very good easily understand .
Me too! And It is why I'm eager to learn English. So many good quality informations exist by English form!
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA..
Unions vary from one nation to the next. In some countries strong Unions have been very harmful to productivity. You only have to look at the productivity of the car industry in the UK during the1970’s. The Unions were very adversarial and were frequently striking, which cause a huge reduction in productivity. In Germany on the other hand the Unions are arguably beneficial and behave very differently. This has a lot to do with cultural differences. In the UK there was a class war taking place between the Unions and Management.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Depends on the culture, swedish people are calm and serious
@@ninjapirate123 Im not sure you even watched the TED talk. It is harder to become a billionaire in the US than many other countries is the point of the talk.
@@jasonmiddleweek1509 Im not sure you even read my reply carefully. I said it's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA, which means it's mostly USA that makes you more likely to become a billionaire
@@ninjapirate123 The video debunks that.
Before anyone thinks that this means that high taxes are good, it's worth noting that in the Nordic countries, high taxes are paid exclusively by the middle class. The highest income people have the lowest rates. The middle class goes along with this for two reasons. The minor one is that the rich don't use any of the social services that taxes support. The main reason is that the rich have made it clear that they will leave, and take the jobs that they provide with them, if their taxes are high. Even Ingemar Bergman fled. To Germany, of all places, where his tax rate at the time was 68% -- but that was still cheaper than Sweden!
Refreshing talk. Enjoyed it greatly! ❤
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA.
Actually its not about social democracy its about the Nordic Moldel which has high income tax but does not tax companies and corporations much, neither real estate.
Well that is just wrong. We have high estate taxes here in Norway, companies pay quite a lot too.
Norway is not a social democracy, they are a representative democracy and capitalist. They just have more social services which they can afford thanks a lower national debt. The US is like a 28 year old lawyer who has the big car but still tons of debt.
@@youtuber6185 Social democracies are by definition capitalist democracies. Google "The Nordic model". Norway has good social services because
1. they have high taxes and
2. they have a lot of oil money which they use very responsibly (96% is put in their national oil savings while the rest goes to the national budget).
You saying "Norway is not a social democracy, they are a representative democracy and capitalist." kind of leads me to think you don't really know what social democracy is.
Happytown I said “Norway does not use Democratic Socialism.” , which is an economic model requiring the companies to not be be private and to be owned by the community.
Everything else you said is correct, they are capitalist with large social services and can afford to do so because of oil.
@@youtuber6185 Dude your comment is right there, I can clearly read that it says "Norway is not a social democracy" which is false. Social democracy necessitates a free capitalist market. You are correct that Norway doesn't run a democratic socialist system, which, as you correctly stated would mean a market socialist economy. Perhaps you got the two terms confused, as democratic socialism and social democracy have very similar namnes - but they are not the same thing.
food for thought. Education as the greatest equaliser.
This talk converted me from right to left.
Bravo.
Why?
Brilliant (and hilarious)! Wish every politician would heed its message.
David Mayer David I thought about his message but I do feel it’s incomplete. Just like statistics and studies can be manipulated due to a bias it’s sometime important to look further into government and circumstances. For example immigration plays a large role. Millionaires Per capita may be skewed by 1st 2nd or 3rd generation Americans vs Scandinavians that may be in the country for many generations
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
What is said here is obviously true. It is sad that so many people deny it, and don´t understand it
because they've only seen one system work (especially for them) and the risk of trying something new is scary (and may cause them to lose their advantage - loss aversion). then when the education system force feeds them example after example of failures from the past at their earliest exposure to the material, they don't bother to do a check on current events because it has been digested as a permanent state of matter
Nowdays with all the remote jobs, snag a job that pays in US dollars and move to Costa Rica, Colombia, Romania, Morocco, Philippines literally just anywhere overseas that’s not Europe and you’ll live like a king 🤴🏻
Yes, totally. That would be King.
What a Presentation! Man, you nailed it.!! 🤩👊🏼
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
Education is not necessarily expensive in the USA. If you are poor you can get paid to go to school with pell grants (free money from the government). My pell grants more than paid my expenses, and I used the rest to buy ski season passes every year.
Just have a look at how Norwegian Air company was restructured in a very logical way. These countries do a much better job at maintaining proper free market function.
set speed to 1.5
red watch you do that and he will sound like simon pegg
Or Ben Shapiro lol
red watch normal speaking speed
or 0,5 xD
Sandroinorge no u mad xD lol
Judging by the comments, this seems to be important to people. The fact that there are a lot of rich people is an honor to a country. Wouldn't it be more important the see which country has least poor people or even where the people are happiest?
One of the best Tedtalks I have ever seen.
Scandinavian countries should be more an ideal for workers and states than U.S.
Nice lecture. However, attributing the fact that it is easier to get rich in scandinavian countries to free education is misleading. He is just handpicking countries to make his point. Many other countries with free education have way less millionaires and billionares per capita than the US (Italy, Spain, France, Portugal, Greece comes to mind but there are many many more).
A fact that might explain the differences more accurately is the fact that the coorporate tax rate is actually lower in scandinavian countries than in the US (yes I know, hardly 'socialist' countries in that regard). Obviously there are many other contributing factors - low levels of corruption, for example, surely plays a big part too.
This is a great analysis
Corruption is a giant fact, I'm in a European country where we have free highschool education and government subsidized college education but the system is so corrupt it's laughable.
The population is a lot smaller too. If the US went to automation in many of those jobs the unemployment rate would skyrocket.
His point is to show that the Scandinavian (Nordic) countries, which people like Bernie Sanders point out as socialist dream societies, are in fact NOT socialist.
Just BEAUTIFULLY Presented 👌☺️
If there's one thing anybody should have learned over the last several years, it's that the methodology employed by sociologists to measure just about anything is exceptionally flawed.
How so?
I know it's hard for US people to realize the US is not as exceptional as you think. To me as a Norwegian this makes perfect sense. It's easy to take a risk when you know the government will be there to catch a fall.
Love this talk. Thank you
The only thing that was missing from this talk was taking into consideration inherited wealth. Generational wealth in places like Norway is a big deal, as it is in the US. The one statistic that really stands out, for me, as important, is the economic mobility.
His mobility is just that. Sons inherit their fathers wealth, rich guys too. They very seldom move down, though some manage to squander their family fortune. In the theme of this talk it doesn't matter.
Amazing. Thank you so much. i love his program "sånn er Norge"
yeah, look argentina, we have the highest tax rate, the strongest unions and the biggest government that gives free money to almost half the population... we should be the richest country in the world...
You can compare countries with a population of 5 Million with the US that has 320 Million people.
The fact that America appears on that least is incredible.
Answer from Video: Scandinavia.
Thank you
Why was Finland left out?
🤣🤣🤣
Also he forgot to mention, that in summary it's better to be in a socialist state if your parent's are broke, but not if you are born rich
Scandinavian countries are not socialist. They are capitalist with high taxes and welfare state.
thats what we call obvious
I think you made a little confusion on terms. It’s better to be born in a *social democratic* state if you’re broke, it’s better to be born in a socialist state if your parents are government cronies or intelligentsja (and then you go study abroad)
Interesting fact: Here in Brazil, 80% of our salary goes to the government. Even with all the taxes and corruption problems, a lot of people here still believe that socialism is good for us. A lot of people believe that working for the government (we have laws that doesn't allow government workers to be fired) is still better than opening their own business and studying hard. If i could give an advise for americans and europeans: Please, don't come and don't invest money in Brazil. We suffer a lot from government and poor minded people.
my sympathies are not always with the rich because sometimes they get rich through scummy means, but the ones who are industrious really do have to work much, much harder.
Takeways from this great talk: 1) Faster penetration of new and advanced technology is the key enabler. 2)Automation in a way is resulting in greater efficiency and productivity which in turn benefits all the stakeholders in a Welfare state.
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA
Life Liberty and the pursuit of happiness 😊 is my favorite ❤ way to get rich
He neglected one very important ingredient- culture. The culture of the US is very different than that of Scandinavian countries. A social-democratic system that works in Scandinavia will fail in the US due to culture.
Why?
I am rich by US standard, and I don’t see why it would fail.
@@monocle8868 Because the level of educated people in US is low.
Open an automated supermarket in the US and see how long till it’s burnt to the ground. That’s essentially the problem I think.
agreed - culture based education is more important than a school based education, a society where people blame the victim for getting robbed will never get rid of the thieves , while the one where it's not tolerated will go to every length and breadth to fight against it - ultimately succeeding
True. “Culture” being that some yt people wouldn’t want to share with colored people in America
This guy is a great speaker and his presentation is entertaining but it's also misleading. It's a statistical principle that groups (or countries) on the high end and low end of a distribution (such as billionaires per capita) will tend to have smaller populations. Hence we see Iceland at the top with only one billionaire. The US is the third largest nation by population so you wouldn't expect it to be at the very top of any per capita stat. (Except maybe incarcerations smh). There is just so much more variability in a country with 330 million people. If you look at all the European countries individually, of course there will be a few with more extreme UHNWI numbers per capita, and of course they will have relatively small populations.
For a better comparison, you should look at US States and see where they would fall in the ranking since individual state populations are equivalent to many European countries. For example, Wyoming has 12.4 billionaires per million residents, New York has 5.5, Connecticut 4.8, Nevada 4.1, Montana 4, and California has 3.9, all higher than the Scandinavian countries. Not to mention California has 4 times the population of Sweden. If you compare continents, Europe and North America have around the same number of billionaires per capita in 2016 at 1.08. Of course the US has more UHNWIs and billionaires per capita than Europe but it also has half the population so that's not a fair comparison either.
Also, this guy didn't show any evidence that free education, welfare, or unions are the cause of the higher number of wealthy individuals. These very well may be the causes but all he said was "Scandinavia has more rich people per capita than the US. Here are some reasons why I think that is." That's all fine and the presentation was interesting but I would have liked to see some evidence for his theories rather than just his best guess.
Yeah, the Iceland stat seemed unfair. Sweden, Norway, and Denmark seem to have a sum total of 22 million, so that's well within the realm of statistical anomalies.
Interesting that Europe and NA both have equal numbers. It's so difficult to tease apart what's due to tax evasion and what's due to social support, anyways. I feel like the best measure would be not where billionaires live, but where they grew up and/or where they initially earned their wealth.
Spot on, in the stats he should have grouped Scandinavia or Europe as a whole and compared that to the US.
Glad someone is making the right sense with these numbers.
i guess it all comes down to two: 1 the word "rich" always attracts people's attention, people like to talk about it or just think about it. 2 people like rankings of whatever it might be, it gives us some sort of satisfaction even it makes no sense at all.
He gets a time slot to fill. He can't do a full exposition, but I agree with some of your criticisms and questions. However the overall thrust still stands - contrary to what people intuit, it's very possible to make it to riches in more socialist countries and social mobility is greater.
Enthralling presentation, I loved this❤
One of the best lectures in tedex..congrats..very good you are and very intersting info you have share
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
He left out the Australian supermarket checkout: staff standing there watching your every move as you use the automatic self-checkouts because they know you'll cheat whenever possible. Meanwhile, they're ready for this very criticism, and will eagerly tell you that their eagle-eyed supervision is to optimise their ability to assist customers having difficulty. 😃
Especially now with inflation
@@jasonmiddleweek1509 PLEASE PLACE THE ITEM IN THE BAGGING AREA.
@@lucasgroves137 *BEEP*.
Interesting that Coles are (slowly) abandoning the colossal, time-wasting stupidity of robot scales, replacing them with an old-fashioned inert bench. Meanwhile, Woollies are doubling down, installing extra cameras that spy into your shopping trolley and call staff when "items" (e.g. your keys or phone) are "detected" there. The rampant stupidity -continues- accelerates.
sounds rather intriguing, as long as you ignore that this a multi‐factor equation. Just have a look at the economic freedoms list and take your conclusions from there. Arguably a much bigger influence
Very interesting. Is there a study like this that's focused on middle class income and standard of living?
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
It may not answer your question, but check out "Harald Eia Rich & Equal". It's the same person.
Great speech. Funny, understandable, informative. Thanks
he`s one of Norway biggest comedians over the last 20 years if you have not already noticed
Its always USA that allows you to get rich, this is why there are more billionaires in USA than the rest of the world. It's so hard to become a billionaire in other countries except USA...
@@ninjapirate123 If not overtaken by war, China will surpass the USA in the number of millionaires and billionaires. Cause: the past difficulty of the Chinese under un-free communism is a very powerful force that serves one of the motivations the Chinese are now exhibiting.
@@kokoyyu579 Thanks for the info, I now know
Great talk! 👍 On the Social mobility slide the source is misspelled, should be "Jäntti".
Actually one thing is missing from his analysis - how did the rich _become_ rich? Just by showing what is the ratio of rich people per capita does not validate that it is easier to _become_ rich in contries where this ratio is highest. For example the rich people in scandinavia might have inherited their wealth. While those in the US might have become rich. Yeah - he talkes about social mobility index, and true - the higher this index, the easier it is for poor people to improve their status. But this does not mean that the really rich (1%) are coming from poor families. For that he would have to show social mobility index to the top 1%, not top 25%.
One more thing - at least in Danemark there are no minimum wages laws. Minimum wage laws are effective only when they are in line with the underlying economic situation. If they overshoot, they distort the workplace. In Danemark there are no minimum wage laws, yet the wages are still very high. These two factors are not related.
Well, considering we have taxes on big inheritances in Norway, it is much easier to inherit wealth other places than in Norway. Add to that fact that we have several billionaires who have moved to tax havens. John Fredriksen, Arne Fredly etc, which bring down the averages even more.
@@torod213 perhaps. Still - he focuses on the top 1% and then he talks about social mobility to top 25%. These are two completetly different things. The top 1% are so few, that there is no need for approximations (like social mobility index and thinking about the possible outcome of inheritance tax) - why didn't he simply trace back where their fortunes came from? Besides this inconsistency of course I agree that social mobility is a great thing. I would be just cautious with attributing it to a few factors - the issue usually is much more complex. In my personal opinion it is in large part a matter of culture and value system. But the main point he makes is that state intervention (public education, high minimum wage, etc) is actaully good - at least in this particular case. My take on this is that state intervention is not harmful is and ony if it actually aligns with what the society would do anyway. Hence the example of the lack of minimum wage laws in Danemark and still having very high labor cost there. Norway and Sweden would certainly have the same high labor cost as today witout the minimum wage laws. Using this logic, if people value education, they would get educated even without free public schools. For legislators the most important thing to do is not to get in peoples way ;)
@@a1nd23 I really struggle to understand what you mean.. But quite honestly, wether someone inherited the money or made it themselves doesn't really matter. Someone somewhere will have had to make that money, and I don't see why the level of inheritance will go up or down from one country to another. In fact, Norway is at a great disadvantage here. We used to be extremely poor farmers and fishermen, only in the last 50-60 years has our wealth risen sharply. And we have inheritance tax that other countries hasn't. And we have several billionaires who have moved abroad. Looking at the top lists, there are 3 young people at the top who have inherited their money, the vast majority of the rest have made it all themselves. Our richest, Kjell Inge Røkke, started as a fisherman with absolutely nothing. But like I said, those three who inherited their money doesn't really matter. Just replace them with their parents on the list and then they made it themselves.