James Webb Discovers a Galaxy That Could Break Physics
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 тра 2024
- James Webb Discovers a Galaxy That Could Break Physics
► Subscribe: goo.gl/r5jd1F
It’s been almost a year since the James Webb Space Telescope sent back its first image after becoming fully operational on July 11, 2022.
Since then it’s been sending back some stunning images such as this NIRCam image of the Carina Nebula which shows countless stars being formed which were previously invisible to other telescopes.
And this image of the Pillars Of Creation taken by the James Webb Space Telescope’s Mid-Infrared Instrument is downright eerie looking.
Aside from all the jaw-dropping images we are getting, the James Webb Space Telescope’s main objective is to help scientists find out more about the origin of the universe by looking at the first galaxies that formed in the early universe.
What has the James Webb Space Telescope found recently with its powerful infrared gaze, and are we closer to understanding the Universe and our origins?
Get ready to find out, and see the incredible images that it’s taken, including objects in our own solar system like you’ve never seen them before.
We are on social media:
/ destinymediaa
The Destiny voice:
www.TomsVoiceovers.co.uk
![Everything NASA Discovered from James Webb's First Year in Space [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nbDQEo0uA0Q/mqdefault.jpg)
6:54 - the "six orange spikes" are not a part of that galactic collision's shape. The six points are an artifact of JWST itself. All JWST images with bright sources in them have the telltale six pointed starburst effect because of the hexagonal pattern of it's mirrors. You can see in the comparison photos between Hubble and JWST that Hubble always has a four pointed starburst and JWST always has six pointed ones.
I didn't know that. Thanks.
If black holes consume light and matter, it makes sense to me the biggest black holes we find are at the edge of the observable universe. You can't tell me light can orbit a black hole and still not have any mass. Also neutrinos? I mean come on.
Yea, just like the hubble had spikes.
lol destiny sucks
Can we all appreciate the clearest image of 'Uranus'
8:45 thanks for taking the clearest image of Uranus
So brace for impact in about 9.84 quintillion miles. Actually I read that the distance between stars and planets inside of galaxies is so great that when the Milky Way and Andromeda actually converge they'll pass through each other without anything colliding.
Great video 👍, The visuals were stunning and the music was perfectly suited to the tone. I also appreciate the informative narration. Keep up the amazing work! 🙌
The quality of this channel is always appreciative
💯
Pardon me while I throw up.
If you check the description, the narration is AI. Lol
Just found this, can't wait to watch it a little later tonight when I have time to take it all in. Brilliant...
Don't throw up little boy.
Did you watch it? If not this is your reminder
This is fascinating!
I love how JWST is consistently shaking up science. I knew from the day it launched, that JWST was going to make a bunch of well qualified Scientists
There is no edge. Great video!
So good ive watched this twice already
the best channel, thanks
I fall asleep so quick, TY !
Amazing recap
Awesome video 👍👍👍
What an absolute trip.
So many expert astrophysicists in the comments 😂
Nothing like a nice clear image of Uranus...
I LOVE IT!!!! 🥰
These objects are at an unthinkable distance from us. And they exist much earlier than us, well, judging specifically by the pictures that are revealed to us. It's literally a different world. I'm going crazy after trying to imagine planets in those galaxies and possible life in them. Imagine what those beings could achieve! In any case, these photos were very interesting to look at.😉
Unthinkable distance for us, pretty close for a different species that has evolved 2 million years before us. The possibilities of this are slim but still possible.
Also I've had a thought about this for a while. I say this as a layman but it seems to me scientists measure the age of a galaxy by its distance due to expansion and therefore the stretching of the light. But stars are being formed all over the universe regardless of distance so I would assume galaxies are also forming across the universe regardless of distance. So why do they insist that the furthest galaxies must be the oldest?
@@insidiousbeatz48good point! I'm sure there are other markers for age besides how far out it is.
I'm more excited to see giant creatures
Because the distance is measured in time. “Light years”. If a new galaxy formed at the edge today we wouldnt see it’s light for billions of years
Misleading title, it is not the edge it is the limit of how far it can see, simples. 😊
And when we can see 13.7 million years ago..."the universe is actually forever years old"
Bcs we live in a simulation (sandbox). We are less insignificant than the ants are for us.
People really look for farfetched explanations. The current theories to measure time are prbbly wrong.
But it still isn't as old as your mom
Billion mate
If it’s pointed in one direction but space would keep going in any direction you point, what determines what direction they point, either way would only be a tiny sliver of the sphere
It still blows my mind that this telescope can see back in time up to 13.5 billion years ago but we can’t see what’s in our water backyard (THE OCEANS) only 5% we no 90% unknown… how bout y’all make a James web telescope for the oceans next
@@Jonny_Rotten909 well yeah we’re still pretty low which is unfortunate… compared to what the science claims to kno about the universe/ space ..
Indeed, very true! They already know the aliens r in the ocean as well as the skies!
@@Jonny_Rotten909 I believe that theory as well 100%
Because that's not how telescopes work...
People always say this but we just don’t have the damn technology. There is a big ass difference in the OCEAN and SPACE. Also NASA is currently working on exploring the ocean. They have a whole ass team and project currently working on it. Do your research
“The James Web Telescope took the clearest images of Uranus that’s ever been taken” 💀
Just because we can only see back so far that doesn't mean there isn't or wasn't something there beyond what we can see. The penrose diagram describes it more accurately. Just because we can't see it and never will that doesn't mean it isn't there.
My wife says that about my penis 😂
Mind boggling!That's all I have to say!
Alone at the edge of the universe humming a tune
I like this video its so interestyng
Excellent Video. 🇺🇸
Possibly another dimension at the edge of ours. Reality is amazing🤩
How do you define, "universe"?
No this is infinte , our dimentional bubbles edge is at near the moon. From the centre of the earth there are 31 dimensions.a one dimentional bubble has 31 dimentions. Beyond our dimentional bubble there are other dimentional bubbles which also have 31 dimensions.
@@bestiebestieb Fascinating!!
The universe must be a lot older than we think
Ching
The universe is infinite. The 'big bang ' (IMO) is like a supernova ( but it was not a star . Maybe a gigantic black hole reaching its peak of energy absorbency and 'bursting ' ( hence dark matter and dark energy ) . The energy released by this 'bursting ' created the abundance of galaxies we see today . We live in a universe that has always been there , and always will be.
It actually was confirmed to be twice as old hehe
nice pics of uranus
@ 5:40 Question: If the Universe is only 13.7 billion years old how is it possible to see an object that is 35 billion light years away? Isn't there not enough time for the light to travel to earth?
Because 13.7 billion is only the time of our universe.big bangs like ours happens multiple times. The amount of energy these black holes absorbe , needs to be expelled by the other end of the wormholes. This expulsion of massive amounts of energy forms other stars,planets nebulas etc. that is where the real big bang happens imo,and it happens to form multiple universes
The light you see is 13.7 billion years old. If the Universe is expanding, that light as it exists now, is actually 35 billion light years away. Thus, you are seeing the light as it existed 13.7 billion years ago.
@@cxzb Got t. Thanks.
@@cxzb is that mean the universe has expanded (35 - 13.7) light years in 13.7 light years.
@@kanwarsingh0 It means that the Universe, since it's beginning, has expanded the distance light would travel over the course of 21.3 billion years.
how do they know which direction to look or does that really matter?
They are choosing places we’ve already known about
Super cool fight . Totally cool beans
Subbed and liked. I’ve been watching loads of your content, it’s so well structured and narrated. Top work guys
Wow 😮
I keep on hearing about how much larger these galaxies are than expected to be. How large are they in comparison to today'today's
What's at the edge? More universe.
Norm Macdonald - He Sits on the Edge of our
at 7:00 i believe those spikes in the galaxy are just the diffraction spikes from JWST.....must be a bright core
yes... that is an artifact of the hexagon mirrors of JWST.
@@glenn_r_frank_author I knew it.....I wish people would learn a little more
Will we ever develop a telescope that can see "beyond" the edge of our universe?
Never, as there is no edge , idont know james can or future telesccope will be able to see that far , believe me there is a No Zone. No galaxies or stars only the dark space. It is infinite. Sometimes scientists will find that.
The way we are searching universe and our origin is completely wrong. We just taste the fantacy
If you can't vision what the end looks like just turn off your bedroom light and it's just a stretch of more planetary and galaxy formation; beyond darkness there is only more darkness. The mind comes to accept that as there is no other depiction of what an end is supposed to look like in cosmology terms. It's endless until that endless gets phased out by more planetary dimension perhaps in a mathematical scale that you couldn't make up. The cosmic microwave background can't be visibly proven that it's somewhat 92 Billion light years away as the light of 13.5 Billion lightyear oversized galaxys throws away those odds that there was a big bang and that there is such radiation
It wouldn’t be a telescope that works the way we know them to. The best telescope that could ever possibly exist would only be able to see the edge of the “observable universe”. Beyond that area, photons physically cannot reach any telescope within our galaxy. It would be like trying to detect someone yelling at you from mars with the best microphone ever made. I personally don’t think it’s even theoretically possible to see beyond the observable universe without breaking physics entirely.
billions millions years is just a word not time an actual time for sure.
"What James Webb Saw Near the Edge of the Universe"
More universe?
Pretty paintings wHO IS THE ARTIST?
Damn, it feels like i want to die, escape from this mortal body, and became one with the world
Why not a snap of proxima Centauri by JWST ?
That title is absurd. No one knows if we're looking at 99% or less than 1% of the universe. Making assumptions like that is why science is in a tizzy right now.
I disagree that light travels at a fixed speed. In a sense, that is true, but its relative to the speed of time at its location. Time is warped in various parts of the universe. Where time is slower, light travels slower due to gravitational waves causing time distortion. Through a telescope, it all looks normal and the same, but it is not. I'm not a scientist, but I have done some reading on it. I'm not exactly sure how significant time warps. Its all based on the strength of gravitational waves in space, and I'm not sure how accurate we can measure gravity at a long distance.
We need to come up with a totally different concept of telescope, if we want to look beyond the edge
i think we would have to break the rules of physics
I love these videos but they give me a headache at the same time.
8:44 🤣
0:26 Elephant trunks‽ Looks more like elephant tusks to me.
sweet.
Scientist confirmed that after tonight there is only going to be 7 planets. After i destroy Uranus.
Where do you end? Close your eyes. Are you the universe, or are you in the universe? The universe can not exist if there is nobody are aware of it. Universe is dependent of counsiousness, in fast, counsiousness create existens.
Spot on! Best comment by far! 🍾🥂
@@robinhood6954 Thank you 😀
What's at the Edge of the Universe --- A Sign that says --- DO NOT OPEN!
Enough questions. How about some answers?
Put another James W at the "edge" to search the other edge and so on to infinity again and again trillions of times
How do you say that the universe is infinite ?
James webb also proved the big bang wrong.
8:11 I know how this sounds, but the "halo" at the poles of the planet sort of look like a biblical halo on a god or an angel's head. I am wondering if Earth's own halo (the northern lights) played a role in the canonical representation of "halos" on divine beings. I do know that, for as far back as recorded history goes, all mankind was largely under the assumption that other planets in our Solar System were gods. That is to say, when we saw them in the sky, we called them gods, worshipped them as gods, and canonically wrote about their features as if they were gods. And these objects have halos that can be seen with the naked eye under certain conditions. As I said, I know how ridiculous it sounds, but could this phenomenon of "magnetic fields," which creates the polar lights in the first place, actually be the primary reason for the canonical creation of "halos" on gods/angels throughout history? Fascinating to think about. Can't find any evidence to back it. It could just be a coincidence, but it seems like everything in every religion was at one time or another actually observed by a human (whether or not they saw it correctly is another story, lol).
Actually I prefer hubble space telescope image is much brighter and better with more details at 11:49. Comparing to JWST.
8:44 lol
Has Webb really seen the edge of the universe or the edge of as far as it can see? The Sagan will see further..
we know gravity can be different from different sized objects, but has anybody thought that gravity could be different within the span of time? what if gravity isn't a constant
If gravity isn't a constant, then time isn't a constant as well. This raises ENORMOUS questions.
omg, that would
@@dustinmasondustan1904 ????
@@stefanblumhoff2744exactly. That s the point.
@@stefanblumhoff2744 mmmm piss?
Uranus is so blue 😳
There was another telescope looking back...
whats at the edge? More universe.
Any adverse comments are being removed, to give the idea that everyone supports this video. Just be aware.
8:45 😁
This is the The End..
Take a picture of earth. It might pick up a dust ring. Who knows.
Geeee! I wonder why?
Personally I don't doubt that the universe doesn't have an edge but it could easily have a hedge (a large privet for example). ☝️
Do you have an edge ?
@@bestiebestieb Nope, but I've got a conifer and a wisteria hedge in my garden, lol! As for the Universe, I'd say it's a möbius strip! 😉
@@robinhood6954 there is no answer to what universe is . By the ongoing science we wont be able to find an answer ever .
From our childhood , we frequently asked who we are and what the world is. I think i found a reasonable answer for that. It might be reasonable to you.
I say it in a nutshel , matters have three kinds of energy . Attractiive energy , repulsive energy and rotative energy .. those energy generate in our minds. We are in a stage of evolution , we have evolved from superhumans. The things that we experience around us are the creations of superhumans. They didnt create those things intentionally. for some reasons there created things as effects. . All the animals are evolved from superhumans. Animals are not a another form . All living animals including micro forms are once super humans. The trees are created by superhumans for some reasons as effects . The sun, solar system , milky way is created as effects for some reasons . Solar system is not a spontanious thing , its a system by us. Mars is red for some reasons venus is bright for some reasons..
Everything is us.
Once Universe is created from nothingness and expands . And again it collapses to nothingness (shrinking). This is a cycle.
@@bestiebestieb There's sense in what you've written. I've always known that no benevolent God created a system where, among other atrocities, animals (and humans!) rip each other to shreds in order to 'survive'. And another thing to remember is that trying to discover the truth as to the origins and fabric of this very existence cannot possibly be achieved by way of third dimensional subjective/conceptual sense perception. We have to aspire to a higher vibratory level of consciousness for that, lol! 😊
@@robinhood6954 genious , i am satisfied with you. No comment.
If I had a time machine I'd go into the future 4 billions years and grab some popcorn 🍿😎
talking about the edge of the universe is like talking about the edge of the earth, isn't it?
Well, yeah, but the edge of the universe is a bit further away!
ohh im familiar with Uranus
A structure is something assembled by man or being capable.
Wrong. noun ; a · the arrangement of particles or parts in a substance or body. You are using a colloquial definition for structure, but that is not the only definition. b
: something arranged in a definite pattern of organization i.e. leaves and plant structures
@@connix69 Mr know it all! I wondered where you were.
water above,water below ,in the middle firmament
Well ... maybe there never was a "Big Bang" ... ever contemplated that possibility?!. 🙄
My brain...just hurts
Redshift is a measure of rate of recession, not of distance. We use it as a proxy for distance in the absence of standard candles. We need to be looking for standard candles to correlate with red shift in order to fine tune our calculations of changes in recession rate. Science!
Shouldn't be a problem. You can buy standard candles in any highstreet hardware store! ☝️
When they say, "big bang", I think, "BIG FOOLS".
quick question
I remember when they said the universe was 15 billion years old. Wouldn’t surprise me if they turn around and find out that they way off and it is 30 billion.
It was found to be 26 billion recently, good job my guy. Idk if it's completely confirmed yet though
@@Rucksoxy Are you referencing University of Ottawa Adjunct professor Rajendra Gupta’s paper saying it is 26.7?
@@Kosree1 yesh
@@Rucksoxy Yeah, that’s not been “agreed upon” by the greater scientific community. But, it is interesting.
@@Kosree1 yep it rlly is, doesn't sound too unbelievable, and it would explain why galaxies were so big 13 billion years ago (probably)
as the decades roll by our crass laws of physics fall away one after the other , ''jeeze'' they all break down the closer you get to the singularity at the heart or a black hole. Einstein was a buffoon , and so are we.
never clicked so fast
how fast
@@bob-kmdw very fast
There is no end, just like the earth has no end for it is a ball. It is just the illusion of that we just dont understand, yet.
I am confused - I thought I saw statements where the James Webb discovered things that deemed the Big Bang Theory incorrect/a false theory
We came with preconceived conceptions,
and now leave with denial.
And I’m a billion years old. 😂😂😂
You should be familiar with Uranus.
It's 'YOUR', not 'ur'...! 🤣
Is these are real colours the telescope shut?
Color is pretty much our human brain interpreting the frequency of light. JWST can perceive light at the infrared end of the spectum so technically... no. What you see is the infrared image translated to colors we can see... but I think they do try to shift back the spectrum from it's redshift to be close to what we might see if we were closer to objects in space and time.
No. Infrared is non-observable by the human eye. Only technology & other certain kinds of animals can view it naturally. Technology has to map it and apply visible light spectrum to it for us to view.
Seen The HAL AI 🕳
Flaw in red shift theory.
The real question
What is the universe expanding into? What space does it take over?
In to the space , what space ? How does it create ? What force is supporting that ?
It's the big bang...
Directed space magnifying glass that can burn you like ants
Here is a question 4 U: So we have all this technology to view ions of space outside our galaxy. Why can't we drill down on things in our own galaxy instead?? It's pretty big, but they don't seem to care about looking at anything "in our neighborhood".
Ok