4:37 Several methods of fabrication of the polygonal masonry using clay/gypsum replicas, a topography translator, and reduced clay models of the stone blocks along with a 3D-pantograph are described in the article “Fabrication methods of the polygonal masonry of large tightly-fitted stone blocks with curved surface interfaces in megalithic structures of Peru” (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0087.v7). UA-cam does not allow a direct link. Search by the article title.
There's an old mapuche story here in Chile about a bird called pitio who "knows" how to soften metals and stones, even the hardest ones. It's said that the pitio uses a misterious plant to do that and, if you are humble and righteous enough, this bird will sing to you and there's a chance it shows you the secret to melt stones.
+monixa I just posted in part 1, a story I read of a bird watcher seeing a kingfisher's burrow in solid rock, upon asking a local villager, was told that it used a plant to soften the rock and burrow into. He couldn't find the plants, but got lost along the way to meet people or something like that found his metal hooks in his laces had sort of melted ... he tried to back track but couldn't find what he had walked through.
I live on the west coast, when i was young i was fascinated by the pictures of peru in my grandparents collection of National Geographic and remember a story of a plant that could turn stone soft . How strange 50+ years have passed and i see your post of that very story...
@@j0358 Thank you for saying where the hand prints were found. I think the last caption prior to the image said, "Indonesia" and I had been trying to search for the location in Indonesia when they were actually located in what's now Utah.
You are exactly right. As a past archaeologist working in various parts of the world, it is more than obvious to me that they had the technology to not only soften the stone, but also to make it extraordinarily lightweight to transport it to various destinations. There were no chisels and hammers used on these...in my opinion it was all done with the use of various frequencies, possibly combined frequencies. “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” ― Nikola Tesla
Tesla was a genius and the rich people sought to subvert what he wanted to do.here is a quote many people haven't seen.Tesla Universe NIKOLA TESLA QUOTES Profound words from the world's greatest inventor Home / Nikola Tesla / Nikola Tesla Quotes / Quote 38 JOIN TODAY AND RECEIVE EXCLUSIVE CONTENT, AD FREE PAGES AND SPECIAL OFFERS NIKOLA TESLA QUOTE 38 When wireless is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain, which in fact it is, all things being particles of a real and rhythmic whole. We shall be able to communicate with one another instantly, irrespective of distance. Not only this, but through television and telephony we shall see and hear one another as perfectly as though we were face to face, despite intervening distances of thousands of miles; and the instruments through which we shall be able to do this will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone. A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket. NIKOLA TESLA 1921
Yes. The trick is not to make the stone more malleable but to match the tool to the stone through base frequency vibration. Strange things happen on a molecular level when you find a body's vibrational rate and match it.
From 'Journey to the Lost City of Z' .. pg 75-77 "Talking of birds, all through the Peruvian and Bolivian Montana is to be found a small bird like a kingfisher, which makes its nest in neat round holes in the rocky escarpment above the river. These holes can plainly be seen, but are not usually accessible, and strangely enough they are found only where the birds are present. I once expressed surprise that they were lucky enough to find nesting-holes conveniently placed for them, and so neatly hollowed out - as though with a drill. "They make the holes themselves." The words were spoken by a man who had spent a quarter of a century in the forests. "I've seen how they do it, many a time. I've watched, I have, and seen the birds come to the cliff with leaves of some sort in their beaks, and cling to the rock like woodpeckers to a tree while they rubbed the leaves in a circular motion over the surface. Then they would fly off, and come back with more leaves, and carry on with the rubbing process. After three or four repetitions they dropped the leaves and started pecking at the place with their sharp beaks, and - here's the marvellous part - they would soon open out a round hole in the stone. Then off they'd go again, and go through the rubbing process with leaves several times before continuing to peck. It took several days, but finally they had opened out holes deep enough to contain their nests. I've climbed up and taken a look at them, and, believe me, a man couldn't drill a neater hole!" "Do you mean to say that the bird's beak can penetrate solid rock?" "A woodpecker's beak penetrates solid wood, doesn't it? ...No, I don't think the bird can get through solid rock. I believe, as everyone who has watched them believes, that those birds know of a leaf with juice that can soften up rock till it's like wet clay."
6:05 This looks as if a bunch of stone cylinders were stacked and melted together. 7:12 proves that the rock was soft! Someone dug their hands into it and scooped out grooves with their fingers. It wasn't carved--why would anyone carve that?? The mainstream explanations just don't make sense.
It is tendons from humongous giants that were called cloud eater's . They did hide this from us all the elite are the one's that contril the historians. Tendons soft after the giants died during the flood but once they dried , like stone. Stack or build quickly and using tool or hand hurriedly. CaCO3 ..calcium carbonate or basalt as dome call it. Just know this is deep and there's lost of hidden shiot that will blow your mind !
I watched a video where guys superheated stone in a quarry, and poured massive amounts of water on it. They were then able to completely pulverize the stone with diorite stone balls. I am taking through a foot of the granite in a couple hours. The end result was what appeared like scoop marks. You might want to look into this as being the method used.
Couldn’t agree more. Definite evidence of scoop marks as opposed to chisel, or angular marks. The degree of exactness, and perfectly straight flat lines has got to have been laser cut, or softened somehow. Why present day archaeologists are opposed to this is beyond me. I suppose admitting they know nothing of our past renders them useless. A degree in archaeology becomes a degree in lies and untruths.
Its not just archaeology. The problem is far worse across most of academia. Science has degenerated into croneyism. Einsteinism is the fundamental culprit. Faked lunar landings. The war on drugs is a holacaust. Queer marriage. Monopolies use the title 'free trade'. The days are numbered. We are beyond our zenith.
Einstein himself was a fraud, plagiarist, and an idiot in mathematics. He couldn't even pass an entrance exam to get into engineering school just a few years before 'his theory' was published. In reality stolen from Lorentz and Poincare, and turned out to be largely false anyway. How did he gain this huge notoriety? Because the Jewish bankers liked everyone thinking that the smartest man alive was Jewish; also, Einstein was a rabid Zionist, and his fame allowed him to spread their philosophy.
@@alouiciousjackson5812 Most of his "theories" are as ridiculous as anything else we're taught, but Einstein was not a bad man. He signed a letter to the New York Times in 1948 warning the world about fascism in Israel and turned down an offer to be Israel's president in 1952. He also said “I came to America because of the great, great freedom which I heard existed in this country. I made a mistake in selecting America as a land of freedom, a mistake I cannot repair in the balance of my lifetime.”
So the ancients gathered tens of tons of material and softened it up. They built complex molds to keep the mush in shape until it hardened. The molds were "pillow curved" in some cases, rigidly rectangular in others. The stone was soft enough to mold like clay but firm enough not to slump (even at truly massive weights). And this makes sense to some folks. I don't think we have a clue how massive megalithic and polygonal structures were made and I don't think we will ever figure it out. Also, there are many places where we know the stone was quarried and moved (Ollantaytambo and Baalbek, for examples). And there are thousands of stones that still have identifiable and distinctive veining and layering of the quarries they came from.
Where are they? Also where are the tailings, the unused rock removed the project pieces? Not trying to cast doubt, I think there is too much evidence pointing towards lost tech.Has anyone who's been to these sites noticed any scrap, or waste rock that may have been softened?
Extracting a cube leaving the back side smooth is like magic. We couldn't even do this with soft wood. It is beyond cutting, routing, shaping or even using heat. They left no machines or instructions for us to wonder how it was done.
My thought is that the stone may not have been softened per se, but only the part in direct contact with the cutting tool being employed, sort of the way that an ice cream scoop rinsed in hot water can easily cut through hard ice cream, without effecting the solidity of the rest of the ice cream - just the part that comes into contact with the scoop. So it could have been with the stone - whether the method was sonic or heat or some other method of softening, it would need only be applied in a fine, precisely targeted and focused "line" or "beam" coming from the leading edge of the cutting tool. As for the stone with the hand prints, unless it has been identified as a specific type of stone, which was then softened by some method other than heat, it could very well be some form of high quality cement, better than anything we have today.
Stone Age technology was so awesome. I want to build my house like they did in the good ol' days. If only hundreds of 500 ton pieces of granite would be approved by the housing association.
I bet the town and city where you have a 500 ton home would not even come close to doing anything against you. It would be too dang heavy for them to remove it, they would just leave you and your house a lone alone
The biggest concentration of dolmens in the world was built to house humans who were being farmed like goats, in ancient Bashan, Lebanon, and actually throughout the region. The king of Bashan who allied the giants in the 100,000 giants war dictated in his memoirs that they were eating the black headed people and keeping the smaller selves as temple singers and servants. After four years of night frosts and drought the Amorites were convinced by their monotheist-infiltrated priesthood to sacrifice all their women too. No kidding. Darn Babylonians and Marduk.
Lost ancient technology, the answers are buried deep enough to find and the riddle's truly staring us in the face but we're too blind to see past our noses...
What if the Ancients used sound technology to reduce the granite's frequency (density) and to make it malleable? Once the stones were properly placed, they would "harden". The stone cut-outs, holes, grooves, etc., could be forms placed while the stone was still "soft". As crazy as this sounds, the finished products make more sense than hand carving with copper tools.
I seen some thing a fee days back about a woman claiming rocks were soft they harden when we approach them and it showed the rock where it looked as if someone squished she says if u sneak upon them u wld see...sounds far fetched but who knows anything is possible.
What I would like to see with pictures is geographic coordinates and date of photo to aid in follow-up research. I don't see the malleability aspect but I do see obvious signs of machine milling that need to be explained.
An additional thought: mainstream archaeology seems fixated on "religious" themes. Most of what they unearth gets billed as a tomb or a temple; avenues become "processionals", yada, yada, yada. This is tantamount to driving into a town and finding nothing but churches and cemeteries. Seriously? Where are the factories, warehouses, schools, playgrounds, etc? I've begun to think, looking at an old aerial photo of the Temple of Karnak, that it was a theme park. After all, consider what archaeologists of the far future, absent any explanation, might think when visiting the ruins of Disney. It suggests a race of beings who worshiped a four-fingered rodent wearing shorts. The Disney pantheon: Mickey, Minnie, Donald, Daisy, Goofy and Pluto... gotta love it.
Couldn't agree more everything the quackademics come across is a 'temple' or tomb when often they have zero evidence, as with calling the Egyptian pyramids tombs etc. If they dug up something like a jet aeroplane it would be a religious symbol made with copper chisels and stone tools. The quackademics really need some engineering expertise and experience before spouting their nonsense on many of these megalithic structures!
Ha, ha! Did you ever read David Macaulay’s book Motel of the Mysteries? It is an illustrated send up of exactly this propensity of archaeologists. You would love it. However, there is still truth in these interpretations as the temples and tombs represented power and they were built to last, whereas the homes and markets were much more humble and take more work to uncover. However, if you have been paying attention to more recent archaeology, you will have seen that that is the direction many are taking these days. Investigating the lives of the common man.
Sorry, but our civilization is quasi unique in its triviality. Even the "games" of the Romans were quite serious. People died in them. It is just an educated guess that anything in the ancient that required effort to make had to have had some serious meaning to the people who made them.
1. Are the knobs only facing north or south? 2. Are the knobs only on the outer most blocks? 3. Are the knobs a scale model of the complete blocks required size? 4. Have the knobs ever been found on a completely finished surface? 5. Does the number of knobs or placement indicate where that specific block has to be placed - or used at in the wall? 7. Are the knobs there to be contact points for the tool/machine that insures final adjustment/placing of the block. To ensure that the block doesn’t get damaged or cracked in that process of precise alignment? 8. Is the knobs just the last bit of stone they leave when cutting under the block in the quarry? The thing that will lift the block from the quarry will then have room to lift under and then just break that last remaining knobs off? 9. Is the scoop marks all the same width? Maybe the cutting/digging tool resembled a modern machine that’s dig trenches? Like a chainsaw but as wide as the scoops?
For the molded stones. As Tesla showed, if you can create a resonant harmonic frequency of a target molecule , you can break down or alter its molecular structure.
Beautiful, this is undeniable for those with any experience with soft materials. The stone was being scooped, sliced and molded. My belief is with ultrasonic via electromagnetic energy tools. They understood the power of the Creator. The Electric Universe... thanks for the vid.
0:37... On the left side, third stone down from the top, is that the big dipper constellation pictured using those stone dots? And check out the lizard a few stones below that. Amazing!
Hi! I,m a machinist 20 year of turning, milling, grinding, drilling I,we also worked in stone! The evidence off machining is obvious, I would have problems today too make that, it beats me.
Most people have no clue. If your working an irregular chunk of hard wood, one foot square let us say, to another chunk of wood ~~> would require hundreds of fittings. A single fitting requires marking, checking, moving object, making corrections by cutting or scrapping then re-fitting and over and over till tightly fit no gaps. Not easy with 50 plus ton blocks of red granite!!
No l don't know what was used or any chemicals in whatever state they were in to cause such reactions, I do see the results of them being used over and over again in all countries in all stone work and walls,has there been any surface scrapping samples been taken or you to busy looking at the sky for UFO's
In tamilnadu is famous for rock cut temples,, I personally visited mamallapuram famous for its shore temples and single rock cut images,,I discovered some unfinished rocks with holeswith one feet distance covering the entire rock,, after that they pour water in the holes till the rock cut into two pieces,, that's the technique used by tamil sculptors 2000 years back
Maravilhosas imagens do que fomos visitados e entre nós viveram!🙌 Seres que tiveram aqui e nós ajudaram, muito também o cultivo de alimentos neste planeta que chamamos de Terra.
To change the subject, Horsetail (Equisetum hyemale) was used as sandpaper for centuries. Slit one side and dry it and you have sandpaper. Italian violin makers used it to sand their violins. Incas may of used it for small projects.
It is tendons from humongous giants that were called cloud eater's . They did hide this from us all the elite are the one's that contril the historians. Tendons soft after the giants died during the flood but once they dried , like stone. Stack or build quickly and using tool or hand hurriedly. CaCO3 ..calcium carbonate or basalt as dome call it. Just know this is deep and there's lost of hidden shiot that will blow your mind !
There are a couple of examples of ancient concrete in there, but mostly what you are seeing is machining. That is to say very high quality precision abrasion. If it were done with molding we would see more forms that reveal it as obvious. We would see the same things we see in every ceramics classroom but we don't. We see things that required powered tools of immense scale, but very few things that could not have been done that way. There are geo-polymers for certain, but not most examples shown here.
Maybe there is chemistry behind this just to form a large lump or position a basic shape? Look at the boxes in the Sakkara Serrapuem to see the finished product.
Maybe just the outer inch or two of each stone was softened. They could meld together when put in place and the worker could scrape out the junction like a mason or like a cake decorator molding icing. Nobs that failed softening process would persist but only stick out an inch or two. Dents would appear where the still heavy rocks were levered or rammed into place. Did some rocks need more than one softening treatment?
My theory is they tune each rock and send high voltage high frequency power into it. 4.2 kHz was a frequency that stuck out (from a Japanese study Electromagnetic emissions from dry and wet granite associated with acoustic emissions), and Shingo Yoshida and Tsutomu Ogawa snapped the granite block Piezo-electric effect of the quartz is likely a factor. Three thin copper plates were mounted outside the sleeve as electrodes. One electrode was used for measuring low‐pass filtered EME (DC to 500 Hz) and the other two electrodes were for measuring high‐pass filtered EME (10 kHz to 1 MHz).This from wikipedia on Granite: The production of granite at crustal depths requires high heat flow, which cannot be provided by heat production elements in the crust. Furthermore, high heat flow is necessary to produce granulite facies metamorphic rocks in orogens, indicating extreme metamorphism at high thermal gradients. In-situ granitisation by the extreme metamorphism is possible if crustal rocks would be heated by the asthenospheric mantle in rifting orogens, where collision-thickened orogenic lithosphere is thinned at first and then underwent extensional tectonism for active rifting
@RealityQuest Clearly high technology and high level of understanding of physics. Probably some sort of magnetic induction for softening and acoustic levitation for transport.
There aren't any megaliths that are still attached to the bedrock. A megalith is an ancient large stone. I wouldn't refer to the Hitching Post of the Sun as a megalithic stone. It's in a megalithic site. But it's not a megalith.
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 There are some potential megaliths that are still in the quarry, half carved, still apparently attached to the bedrock, as if abandoned whilst in process.
Nice videos, and I love your taste in music. I was thinking to myself, "If it were soft, why don't we see hand prints?" Something children and playful people can't resist today with concrete and clay, etc. Then, at the end, there they are! At 7:07. Clearly made with hands.
It has been discovered that there is a plant with roots that excrete a very alkaline substance that does indeed soften, crumble, melt stone. Birds use it to make their home in the side of rock walls/mountains. It is in use today actually but not the way the ancients did because that would put the building industry on it’s head. There is a company working on a marketable version but you best believe they will patent it so only they can control it. Google it for yourself, question everything. Above Top Secret website article “The plant that softens stone”. The exact plant is not mentioned but it is explained. I continued to look into it and found that the extract can be purchased. Of course it is not advertised/mentioned anywhere that it has the ability to dissolve stone, so... I plan on buying a small pkg and trying it. Check Labgenome.com. Item 12033-5 Cayman Chemical Daminozide. It’s an alkaline, not an acid from what I can tell. I’m open to any insight or feedback, or even correction. Just looking for the truth to ancient mysteries.
@@gensara1 I've just read your post that was written 1 year ago. It is VERY interesting! Can you tell me if you could get that extract of a plant and used it? Could you soften any stone? I'd appreciate your answer to my query. Thank you.
Rumors abound in Peru that the natives know of a special vegetable-based softening compound. It would seem that there must be some plant extracts which, when mixed, could produce the chemical heat necessary in a localized area. The stones hold heat well and it may have been long enough for them to be worked.
i honestly cannot think of any other theory than rock softening , look at how rocks melt with each other in peru with the scoop marks as well as in egypt , some people say the casing stones of the pyramids are geopolymer , and i absolutely have no problem with that theory , but the giant granit stones and the limestone that makes the inside of the pyramid are surely not geopolymers , the incomplete obelisk makes know for sure the ancients carved real hard rocks out of the earth , maybe it was chemicals , maybe it was sound technology , either way it is real rock
I've tried to find the photograph of the hand-shaped scoop marks in the rock at 7:10 in this video and I could only find a very similar image from some place in Wyoming. But it isn't the same image as the one in this video. Does anyone know where this hand-shaped image is from? I can't find it anywhere.
The softening is only relevant for explaining the complex connections in the walls primarily known from South America, though I think such walls with irregular connections and irregular surfaces - which are hard to imagine being shaped and fit together - exist a number of places around the world. The softening would not be an advantage for stones that were to be polished. We can witness saw marks and drill marks which have to be made in a stable material to end up being precise. Another really mind bugling aspect is the level of precision of flat and curved polished surfaces made in granite. I recommend the book Lost Technologies of Ancient Egypt by Christopher Dunn. He's an engineer who has studied this topic in depth.
If each stone is different, then molding is not a viable option. Think outside of the box. Once one stone is formed the following space is scanned and a new block is formed. Visualize a technology similar to 3D printing and I think you are nearly there. Instead of epoxy they were using liquefied stone. Each block is different because it makes the structure stronger when stacked. Blocks of a unified shape are weak when stacked like brick. Logic dictates that whoever built these things used this method because it was EASY for them, not hard.
In addition to this ability to soften stone, which I would say is irrefutable they must also have been able to lift and position huge multi ton blocks with relative ease. It is probably easier to image stone softening technology than it is gravity reduction technology.
Google Coral Castle and you'll find out the last man that knew the secrets about moving and molding stonesthat is unless you already seen all those videos but what you said is absolutely right on
@@Michael-eo5nf You qualify as one of the many morons who have posted here. The coral castle was built of ...wait for it. .. coral - not granite or basalt. The old coot who built it and moved it many miles from where he first constructed it had machines to lift the stone, something which the pre Incas did not have.
@@phyl1283 you must have clicked the wrong button I know full well it was built of coral and not basalt or granite either you read my comment wrong or you replied wrong
@@phyl1283 and also he had no machines he had a tripod and had radio and electronic equipment in a small room to this day no one knows how we move those stones
Have wondered about this for years. Of all the different theories offered to date, this by far makes the most potential sense . . . which, of course, leads to another question. If the process of temporary liquefaction of hard stone was indeed known then, how did it get replicated at so many different locations around the world? This strongly suggests that the world was traveled much more extensively at a "prehistoric" time than current mainstream anthropology has an explanation for. Nicely done video, thanks for posting.
read Genesis 10:25 it is a great secret what God did.the Earth was one land mass and this technology whatever it was ,was a gift of God to make the work easy so people could have these structures but when they fell away before the Floodall was destroyed.
Lies, Barney got his blast name from what was left behind because it is an immortal. That’s why we call rocks ruble today. Soccer tea said it in a meeting with Isaac Newton and Confucius at the builder berg meeting. This is also how rocking fellers was bread and now we have food! Idiot!!!!
Those hand prints at 7:09, remarkable! The place is not identified, though. Thank you so much for this video! Beautiful pictures of beautiful stone structures. (Two small spelling errors: mysteries, not mysterys; and, in the first video, at 0:36, anomalies, not anomolies.)
i'm going to Cusco next April. would love to know where some of these pics are from. They don't look like they're from common sites like Machu Picchu, Some from Sacsayhuamana, but like that 3 doored cave hut thing? And the "staired" cuts from the solid piece of stone. I'd love to know any "must see" spots that are less common. love visiting polygonal architecture and super curious where some of these peru pics are from. Ty
More than most know. Have you seen mud fossil university on UA-cam ? The earth is full of fossilized giant creatures remains. ( bodies ) A 900 mile long dragon. A second dragon in central Australia, Ayres rock is its heart. That means we are the size of parasites, mining the remains of the fossilized minerals. ?
At 7:08 is there any way to tell the scale of what we're looking at? Are there any different pictures? They do kind of look like hand prints but that means nothing if they aren't the size of hands.
I have a theory, one where they used the ‘lay line’ energy to vibrate the stones. Which would be why all these great constructions are located on lay lines (apparently). It may not be vibration but I don’t think you could put hand prints on 1000degree stone, not without leaving your fingers. We know they used the sun and the stars for various things and had a great knowledge for the planet and math so it’s reasonable to assume they were smart enough not to chip away at a rock for years (6ft wide chipped pathways etc) if they only needed to chip a small section. So the fact they over excavated and sculpted meant they did it with ease. The monoliths stump me the most as they were clearly to be carried and lifted in one piece. The mind boggles
I think MAYBE sound made the stone soft. A certain frequency might have done the hard work. I say bring a portable sound amplifier to site with an adjustable frequency device. Try every freq. from 1 hertz to whatever. Keep trying. That might be the answer. Then again I could be wrong, I dont really have a clue.how they did it. Just a guess
Thank you so much for this video. I've been trying to talk to people for ages about this, this is exactly how these stones were made. In Peru the rocks were molded in place. If you look closely enough you will find trawl marks on many of the stones. On many other of the stones those nodules protruding from the tops or bottoms were how they moved them or mold marks to hold the mold in place. JS
You should do a video of the extremely fine carved stone vases that were found in the tombs of Egypt. They have no idea how they were made being that the inside is polished and the hole in the top of the vase is way too small to carve out the larger bottom inner portion of the vase. They are amazing to look at and also quite beautifully designed.
I can absolutely demonstrate how they are made. When you say " they" have no idea, you mean flaky crackhead who cant or wont do real research , which is piss easy in the internet age. If pseudoscience continues at this decline in 100 years people will say "they have no idea how who or how the Sydney harbor bridge was built"
All stone is made up of crystal s. All crystal vibrates if you can tune in to the correct frequency. I think the stone was altered in molecular structure using sound, radio or some sort of energy that the frequency can be tuned in.
Of course hammers and chisels could NEVER do this fine a job sculpting Granite...Its ridiculous to even imagine it because of the impossibility of the angles, let alone the precision craftsmanship levels achieved ...Definitely frequency molecular manipulation...
RandomPlaceHolderName the pyramids were built before 10,000 BC by a global civilisation which was enlightened enough to understand that the universe is held together by sonic vibration. They knew how to use sonic vibration to alter the physical properties of stone and fit huge megaliths together seamlessly.
Yes you are right and they did turn the stone into Mud or soft putty. This was done with a Frequency Material Agitator. The frequency had to be matched up to object they wanted to turn into liquid mud then you can basicly just scoop it out. It never was hot to the touch. Tesla touched apon this technology and also John Hutchison.
Sounds like a simple explanation but geologists have already discounted that theory for a number of reasons. On microscopic examination you can see that individial mineral crystals in the rock have been cut. If the rock was made soft, these crystals would remain intact as they moulded position around the shape desired much like aggregate would in moulded concrete. The crystalline structure of these rocks also conform to the original structure in solidified lava or magma from a volcano. For it to be moulded, the only way would be if the molten lava itself was moulded...something that even today is not possible due to the 3,000-5,000 degree temperatures of lava and magma. There is a block of pink granite in Peru neat Lake Titicaca that weighs 140 tonnes and is flat on two sides at a perfect right angle. Its in the side of a pyramid that was buried under mud until ten years ago. The variation in level for its entire 37m length and 2m width is less than 2mm. Such a feat of stonemasonry cannot even be achieved today. On the smooth surface, again, all the mineral crystals including quartz, are ground flat, not moulded. The only mineral harder than quartz is diamond. If there were diamond cutting tools used by these 10,000 year old civilizations, there is no evidence of it. The only explanation is that the work was done using a technology that has never existed on earth. And the fact that similar megaliths are found all over South and Central America and also of the same age, 10-12,000 BCE, in the Middle East and Africa, suggest that a civilization of vastly superior capability than even ours in the present day, existed over a wide area, spanning oceans, back then. So it's quite possible that another world colonised ours back 7,000 years before the Bronze Age. We were still in the Stone Age back then. Its estimated that this civilization lasted 2,000 years and then either died out (no fossil remains exist), was destroyed in a cataclysm or left. But one thing is for certain, it was not us. One can't help thinking now that instead of wondering when aliens are going to come and visit us, in fact they came and then left a very long time ago.
The only mineral harder than quartz is a diamond? Mohs Scale of hardness has quartz at a 7 out of 10 in hardness. There are many minerals above quartz. Also the fact that quartz will cut quartz. So you can use sand to cut all the stones.
@@hens93 : Is that history mystery guy the narrator for Oak Island Mystery too? Ugh, that insipid voice drives up a tree, cant watch. There's way too many formulaic narrations nowadays. Almistvas bad as listening to Beeny boy trying to sound like Tucker Carlson.
If everyone who wants to and is willing, let's pray for the answer. Maybe our Creator will answer one or some of us if multitudes pray....but please pray by yourself, alone, in secret. Ask how these stones, all over the Earth, were made. Open your dreams to an answer and please tell me on my channel under "discussion"....no hurry. peace
you know what that's exactly what I've been doing which I think it's a secret.I'm hoping God will show me.I think only he's the one that knows.I'm a carpenter and a pretty darn good one at that.and I've got great reasoning abilities.and I'm totally stumped as to all of this.yes let us pray and ask Godhave a good day
Ancient stone work has intrigued me for years. It is not the work of using forms to cast blocks because why would the not just cast entire walls or larger more uniform sized blocks? The shapes and sizes of the blocks are not uniform but yet fit with precision much like a large puzzle. Brilliant!
" what materials did they use that could withstand the temperatures and pressures involved in casting megalithic sized stone blocks?" in Peru..along the Pasaje Ahuacpinta for instance. after placing a rough stone conventionally shaped next it's final place, a parabolic large mirror(s) of gold aimed concentrated sunlight onto the face of, or side of, the block being fitted into position. Once that side area of the rock is glowing & malleable to a depth of a few inches or so, an "artist" or someone with a talented spade, would shape or smooth-out the sides being placed. Then the two Nephylium dudes would gently place the megalithic piece in place for a perfect fit. simple.
Yeah right, your so fucking high it's pathetic!! It's totally obvious you've NEVER heated a stone of any kind, slow or fast, doesn't matter what density except it takes longer to heat a dense rock! Anyway, either way when you heat a rock it gets to a certain point when the rock will start to bubble and when it cools it looks like glass where it bubbled! But NOWHERE during the heating process DOES THE ROCK GET SOFT AND MALLEABLE, ROCKS DO NOT GET SOFT!!! Except when you're melting them, but all you'll end up with is a puddle of burnt glass like substance! Rock is basically tight compacted sand. Glass is basically melted sand! So like I said if you heat rock it's basically like heating sand, it melts into glass it does NOT get SOFT like clay! Trust me, get a torch and heat up a rock, try all different kinds so you can't say it was the wrong kind of rock. When heated, it will turn black and start bubbling before it ever gets SOFT!!!!
Yes i have seen rock melted using a parabolic mirror ! But it was levitation that moved them as was done on Coral Castle ! The Original Egyptians revered the Bumble bee and the scarab beetle , These 2 insects levitate using a vibration or sound ! Also at that time gravity was different , probable less then today .
laura theodora gravity hasn't changed. beetles and scarabs use wings. Do u believe some giants were running around S. America 8000-16000 years ago or earlier?
Andesitic lava is an example of a high viscosity lava . Viscosity... the state of being thick, sticky, and semifluid in consistency, due to internal friction. "cooling the fluid raises its viscosity". It's really not that complicated . Shaped underwater imo. 🍀 How did they lift large stones ? North America formerly had elephants . The bumps on the stones likely to strap on and lift ...likely using simple levers .
My question is..If they got it so hot as to be able to shape this stone like butter or soft cheese wouldn't that mean that its so dam hot they couldn't even get close to it to shape it without a blast furnace out fit on so they didn't melt too...?..lol
this is technology or stone softening techniques beyond what you and I deem capable, who said they had to heat the stones? for all we know they could reverse the effects of gravity in localised space through the use of meditation, harnessing the natural energy which is all around them. What we knew in these times is far beyond anything capable of us now, it is entirely possible we come back to times like this and we rediscover the hidden knowledge.
I have spent a lot of time in Cambodia, looking at pre Ankor Wat era architecture.. where the elders will tell you that the handed down history is that "The Gods could make the stone soft"
These are formed from geopolymer. Viscous stone packed into molds and shaped before it hardens. Once it hardens it is identical to natural stone. Hence the difficulty of the geologists/archaelogists to recognize the obvious manmade shaping.
Brian Porteous The few researchers that have discovered the geopolymer knowledge of these ancient cultures explain the quarries very simply. The rock found in the monuments does not exactly match any single quarry. The monument rock is a combination from multiple quarries. An inconvenient truth hidden by mainstream archaeologists.
no, geopolymer cannot be made for all granite block , it is only possible for limestone and with a very restricted quantities , granite include crystals of quartz , feldspar, that are made by slow cooling under continent
If they did use bronze or stone chisels and hammers there would be plenty of evidence left behind to back this up. They would have had to have used thousands if not tens of thousands of simple hammers and chisels to shape the stone. There would be the remains of these that were damaged or worn out and beyond practical use, left behind to support this. There must be some other explanation as to how these huge pieces of stone were shaped and molded. And then there is the question of the transportation from the quarries to the sites - another mystery that we have yet to come up with plausible answers. We are still in the dark but I think we are getting closer to some answers.
Here’s just a crazy theory, maybe a combination of leverage, with wind power 🤷🏼♂️ I’m thinking maybe tying ropes around the stones & using the help of something like wind sails or hot air balloons to help guide them into place alongside leverage, weights & counterweights, and also maybe employing the help of strong animals like horses or camels. Just a thought
hard stone like granite doesn't soften to become malleable. if heated it only spalls and fissures then disintegrates into sand and powder. if you keep heating that pile of sand it turns into a black glassy slag.
It's not stoned it's a technology called a geopolymer it would be poured into molds this also explains how they were able to move such big itemsthey didn't move them all at once they moved all the material and then mixed and poured
Not if you listen to some of the idiots who post here. They don't have any thing to say about how to do it, they give us the very limited extent of their ideas of how it must have been done - and that is a very real limitation.
One thing I know and I'm sure of is the ancients were incredibly smarter than mainstream scientists give them credit for,,I know believe it's a pre flood technology
This blocks are actually made out of some kind of cement and they used molds to shape the blocks, on spot, than made all those square holes so that the cement would dry faster in the center.....but also as a test to see if the cement had already dryed out. And when one block dries off they can continue the proces and keep building the structure up.
yeah it's the so-called learned people in many of the sciences that are absolutely utterly insane mad men. Richard Feynman spoke about this on numerous occasions
During my 7 decades of studying these megalithic structures I remember reading a ancient manuscript that was a private diary and the author wrote about a glowing light “worm” that could cut through the stone in any shape or form . I remember seeing a laser beam cutting through steel and wondering if somehow the same thing was used on the stone somehow.
Should stop claiming stone softening until you know how. The fact is all of those varied shapes would require extremely precise molds for every rock that could handle those large rocks. I make sculputers and molded rocks Just using ancient civilization music does not suggest rock molding. The rocks at Aswan with the grooves the grooves were cut with tools you just dont recognise. Dr. Ronald Cutburth, . engineering scientist, intelligence expert.
Not obvious fusing. Same problem when claiming melting rocks. You must state the technology of melting or fusing. Melting or fusing would require huge ovens to hold them and process them. Also large molds if forming them. The molds would need at least double the strength of the weight of the rock. One needs to raise to the level of their large scale technology. It's known that the uneven shapes make the walls less vulnerable to earthquakes. Those are stated as fact and the walls stood for centuries. When using large grinding machines that are computer controlled, they simply dial in the numbers and do a counter match for its fit rock. Go find books by engineer manufacturer Christopher Dunn. He reveals known machine tool marks. I certify he is correct as I evaluated engineering designs all over the US. Go pick up a handbook on manufacturing engineering.
You always assume. "Energy field? Somehow loosen the atomic bond? Those two phrases require high energy technology. One can not loosten the atomic bond unless they disintegrate. To melt the large rocks Would require a large furnace. Then always forgotten is the exact profile of the exterior of each Rock. They are not the same. You are grabbing at thoughts. Nice to think but thinking without studying physics does not do you well. I don't want to comment any more. I can not teach you the numbers of classes one would require. I suggest you pick up a handbook of physics as well. Bye Bye.
You are assuming again. Since you don't seem to know any of the physics that is required for your assumption, you then assume the textbooks don't have that level of technology. They do have that level of technology, but since you chose to not research them you assume again. Stop putting my name in your comments.
Dr. Ronald Cutburth Nobody is claiming they used precise molds, claims are being made the stones were softened to shape. I feel it's clear as day. How else? I mean come on, many stones are smooth as glass
Spot-on. Funny how people who have never worked such materials make certain assumptions. I believe most of these examples were abraded and that in itself is still just as amazing as the fantasy stuff people go on about. Ancient high-tech yes... ancient or alien magic tech no thank-you. These folks could do to watch some jade carvers grinding huge boulders with little more than powered and properly lubricated sand.
by hitting on granite surface you turn the surface crystals into powder... so it's basically not that hard process. that red granite in egypt has pretty big quartz crystals, so you would remove 1mm of surface per hit...
Just a thought, I wonder if it possible that the earth's gravity was lighter thousands of years ago possibly explaining the possible existence of much larger people that are rumored to have existed and possibly making the moving and handling of very large stones easier. This in conjunction with an unknown technology whereupon these people were able machine these stones. Maybe these stones weren't impossibly heavy to move after all. Just a wild thought.
Scooping thin layers of stone, so extensively might leave remnants of thin layers of what the scooping removed. Has the quarry been thoroughly searched for any evidence of fragments of this scooped out material?
If you see the same work marks everywhere it of cause the same technique. Most probably because they used the same ressources, so one must look for something that's available everywhere: sunlight, harder rocks, whater, wood. Maybe vinegar as an acid. I don't know if they all had steel back then, I think not. So it must be the simpliest of methods which can be used by a lot of people. My hypothesis it it has to do with heat by concentrated sunlight by reflectors made of silver or gold and shock cooling by water, then chiseling or grinding. Natural erosion did the rest.
4:37 Several methods of fabrication of the polygonal masonry using clay/gypsum replicas, a topography translator, and reduced clay models of the stone blocks along with a 3D-pantograph are described in the article “Fabrication methods of the polygonal masonry of large tightly-fitted stone blocks with curved surface interfaces in megalithic structures of Peru” (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0087.v7). UA-cam does not allow a direct link. Search by the article title.
The 10th article edition (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0087.v10) is posted. Search the article by DOI or by title.
Thank you for trying, but there will be no end of people believing in magic elixirs.
There is still the problem of moving and stacking megaliths.
There's an old mapuche story here in Chile about a bird called pitio who "knows" how to soften metals and stones, even the hardest ones. It's said that the pitio uses a misterious plant to do that and, if you are humble and righteous enough, this bird will sing to you and there's a chance it shows you the secret to melt stones.
+monixa I just posted in part 1, a story I read of a bird watcher seeing a kingfisher's burrow in solid rock, upon asking a local villager, was told that it used a plant to soften the rock and burrow into.
He couldn't find the plants, but got lost along the way to meet people or something like that found his metal hooks in his laces had sort of melted ... he tried to back track but couldn't find what he had walked through.
I live on the west coast, when i was young i was fascinated
by the pictures of peru in my grandparents collection of National
Geographic and remember a story of a plant that could turn stone
soft . How strange 50+ years have passed and i see your post
of that very story...
Like on another realm. Or people that are from the sky. Birds, that sing to tell you wich plant. Is like alien with secrets to show the ways.
Amen! That same bird is called Garuda in India.
The "Pito" bird is the Andean Flicker, closely related to the woodpecker flicker from North-America.
The last few minutes of this video where there were obvious human hand and finger grooves in solid stone are absolutely mind boggling.
I mean a hand could be carved into the stone with sand as an abrasive..smooth surfaces are possible
Man, if they can make an impression on a rock like that, imagine what a smack across the face would feel like.
@@j0358 yeah sure...u start on one now and let me know when u finish. .u bloody ignirant!!!!!
@@j0358 Thank you for saying where the hand prints were found. I think the last caption prior to the image said, "Indonesia" and I had been trying to search for the location in Indonesia when they were actually located in what's now Utah.
You are exactly right. As a past archaeologist working in various parts of the world, it is more than obvious to me that they had the technology to not only soften the stone, but also to make it extraordinarily lightweight to transport it to various destinations. There were no chisels and hammers used on these...in my opinion it was all done with the use of various frequencies, possibly combined frequencies. “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”
― Nikola Tesla
Tesla was a genius and the rich people sought to subvert what he wanted to do.here is a quote many people haven't seen.Tesla Universe
NIKOLA TESLA QUOTES
Profound words from the world's greatest inventor
Home / Nikola Tesla / Nikola Tesla Quotes / Quote 38
JOIN TODAY AND RECEIVE EXCLUSIVE CONTENT, AD FREE PAGES AND SPECIAL OFFERS
NIKOLA TESLA QUOTE 38
When wireless is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain, which in fact it is, all things being particles of a real and rhythmic whole. We shall be able to communicate with one another instantly, irrespective of distance. Not only this, but through television and telephony we shall see and hear one another as perfectly as though we were face to face, despite intervening distances of thousands of miles; and the instruments through which we shall be able to do this will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone. A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket.
NIKOLA TESLA 1921
In the previous comment, the elders of Cambodia could soften stone. Elders meaning the watchers aka fallen angels of God.
Yes. The trick is not to make the stone more malleable but to match the tool to the stone through base frequency vibration. Strange things happen on a molecular level when you find a body's vibrational rate and match it.
I want some of what your smoking
You're a crack head.
The music and the contents of the video take me to a different world ...
At 1:33 it’s very clearly a slab of reinforced concrete with a core hole. The rusted rebar is visible in the hole as are individual rocks.
From 'Journey to the Lost City of Z' .. pg 75-77 "Talking of birds, all through the Peruvian and Bolivian Montana is to be found a small bird like a kingfisher, which makes its nest in neat round holes in the rocky escarpment above the river. These holes can plainly be seen, but are not usually accessible, and strangely enough they are found only where the birds are present. I once expressed surprise that they were lucky enough to find nesting-holes conveniently placed for them, and so neatly hollowed out - as though with a drill.
"They make the holes themselves." The words were spoken by a man who had spent a quarter of a century in the forests. "I've seen how they do it, many a time. I've watched, I have, and seen the birds come to the cliff with leaves of some sort in their beaks, and cling to the rock like woodpeckers to a tree while they rubbed the leaves in a circular motion over the surface. Then they would fly off, and come back with more leaves, and carry on with the rubbing process. After three or four repetitions they dropped the leaves and started pecking at the place with their sharp beaks, and - here's the marvellous part - they would soon open out a round hole in the stone. Then off they'd go again, and go through the rubbing process with leaves several times before continuing to peck. It took several days, but finally they had opened out holes deep enough to contain their nests. I've climbed up and taken a look at them, and, believe me, a man couldn't drill a neater hole!"
"Do you mean to say that the bird's beak can penetrate solid rock?"
"A woodpecker's beak penetrates solid wood, doesn't it? ...No, I don't think the bird can get through solid rock. I believe, as everyone who has watched them believes, that those birds know of a leaf with juice that can soften up rock till it's like wet clay."
That's amazing! Thanks for sharing
What leaves do they use?
6:05 This looks as if a bunch of stone cylinders were stacked and melted together.
7:12 proves that the rock was soft! Someone dug their hands into it and scooped out grooves with their fingers. It wasn't carved--why would anyone carve that?? The mainstream explanations just don't make sense.
It is tendons from humongous giants that were called cloud eater's .
They did hide this from us all the elite are the one's that contril the historians.
Tendons soft after the giants died during the flood but once they dried , like stone.
Stack or build quickly and using tool or hand hurriedly.
CaCO3 ..calcium carbonate or basalt as dome call it.
Just know this is deep and there's lost of hidden shiot that will blow your mind !
@Jeremy Kirkpatrick Given that everywhere in South America are legends of extracts from certain plants being used to soften stone, then - yes.
I watched a video where guys superheated stone in a quarry, and poured massive amounts of water on it. They were then able to completely pulverize the stone with diorite stone balls. I am taking through a foot of the granite in a couple hours. The end result was what appeared like scoop marks. You might want to look into this as being the method used.
But I thought the people of all these civilizations were cavemen and savages?..... 🤔
Would like to see that video myself.
@@swervsplatt9672 They prefer to be called “Hunter Gatherers”… ;;-))
pls: link?
Couldn’t agree more. Definite evidence of scoop marks as opposed to chisel, or angular marks. The degree of exactness, and perfectly straight flat lines has got to have been laser cut, or softened somehow. Why present day archaeologists are opposed to this is beyond me. I suppose admitting they know nothing of our past renders them useless. A degree in archaeology becomes a degree in lies and untruths.
Its not just archaeology. The problem is far worse across most of academia. Science has degenerated into croneyism. Einsteinism is the fundamental culprit. Faked lunar landings. The war on drugs is a holacaust. Queer marriage. Monopolies use the title 'free trade'. The days are numbered. We are beyond our zenith.
Einstein himself was a fraud, plagiarist, and an idiot in mathematics. He couldn't even pass an entrance exam to get into engineering school just a few years before 'his theory' was published. In reality stolen from Lorentz and Poincare, and turned out to be largely false anyway. How did he gain this huge notoriety? Because the Jewish bankers liked everyone thinking that the smartest man alive was Jewish; also, Einstein was a rabid Zionist, and his fame allowed him to spread their philosophy.
As an old stone Carver myself I see no mystery here just ignorance of an old craft
Alouicious Jackson ... brilliant Mr Jackson, brilliant !
@@alouiciousjackson5812 Most of his "theories" are as ridiculous as anything else we're taught, but Einstein was not a bad man. He signed a letter to the New York Times in 1948 warning the world about fascism in Israel and turned down an offer to be Israel's president in 1952. He also said “I came to America because of the great, great freedom which I heard existed in this country. I made a mistake in selecting America as a land of freedom, a mistake I cannot repair in the balance of my lifetime.”
So the ancients gathered tens of tons of material and softened it up. They built complex molds to keep the mush in shape until it hardened. The molds were "pillow curved" in some cases, rigidly rectangular in others. The stone was soft enough to mold like clay but firm enough not to slump (even at truly massive weights). And this makes sense to some folks. I don't think we have a clue how massive megalithic and polygonal structures were made and I don't think we will ever figure it out. Also, there are many places where we know the stone was quarried and moved (Ollantaytambo and Baalbek, for examples). And there are thousands of stones that still have identifiable and distinctive veining and layering of the quarries they came from.
Where are they?
Also where are the tailings, the unused rock removed the project pieces?
Not trying to cast doubt, I think there is too much evidence pointing towards lost tech.Has
anyone who's been to these sites noticed any scrap, or waste rock that may have been softened?
Oh, you mean cement.
This softening of stones like this should be a top research project. Number two project is figuring out how they moved these block so precisely.
Extracting a cube leaving the back side smooth is like magic. We couldn't even do this with soft wood. It is beyond cutting, routing, shaping or even using heat. They left no machines or instructions for us to wonder how it was done.
My thought is that the stone may not have been softened per se, but only the part in direct contact with the cutting tool being employed, sort of the way that an ice cream scoop rinsed in hot water can easily cut through hard ice cream, without effecting the solidity of the rest of the ice cream - just the part that comes into contact with the scoop. So it could have been with the stone - whether the method was sonic or heat or some other method of softening, it would need only be applied in a fine, precisely targeted and focused "line" or "beam" coming from the leading edge of the cutting tool. As for the stone with the hand prints, unless it has been identified as a specific type of stone, which was then softened by some method other than heat, it could very well be some form of high quality cement, better than anything we have today.
Great comment....Thank you!
Stone Age technology was so awesome.
I want to build my house like they did in the good ol' days.
If only hundreds of 500 ton pieces of granite would be approved by the housing association.
Me too!!!! You can't beat real stone.
I'm wondering if some of these stones were cast as a geopolymer, as opposed to sculpting the rock with a light saber tool like out of star wars.
I would be to scared to sleep under such weight
I bet the town and city where you have a 500 ton home would not even come close to doing anything against you. It would be too dang heavy for them to remove it, they would just leave you and your house a lone alone
The biggest concentration of dolmens in the world was built to house humans who were being farmed like goats, in ancient Bashan, Lebanon, and actually throughout the region. The king of Bashan who allied the giants in the 100,000 giants war dictated in his memoirs that they were eating the black headed people and keeping the smaller selves as temple singers and servants. After four years of night frosts and drought the Amorites were convinced by their monotheist-infiltrated priesthood to sacrifice all their women too. No kidding. Darn Babylonians and Marduk.
Lost ancient technology, the answers are buried deep enough to find and the riddle's truly staring us in the face but we're too blind to see past our noses...
What if the Ancients used sound technology to reduce the granite's frequency (density) and to make it malleable? Once the stones were properly placed, they would "harden". The stone cut-outs, holes, grooves, etc., could be forms placed while the stone was still "soft".
As crazy as this sounds, the finished products make more sense than hand carving with copper tools.
@name name and it's more likely a really advanced civilisation was around along time ago
I seen some thing a fee days back about a woman claiming rocks were soft they harden when we approach them and it showed the rock where it looked as if someone squished she says if u sneak upon them u wld see...sounds far fetched but who knows anything is possible.
Do you want to give us the benefit of you immense intelligence as to how that "sound" might have been generated and controlled. I didn't think so.
@@phyl1283 Amazing. You don't know how these stones were worked, but you'll bash someone for offering up a theory.
nope. silly idea.
This is an impressive collection of photos set to great music.
It is a physics we have forgotten. Our past is truly awesome.
What I would like to see with pictures is geographic coordinates and date of photo to aid in follow-up research. I don't see the malleability aspect but I do see obvious signs of machine milling that need to be explained.
An additional thought: mainstream archaeology seems fixated on "religious" themes. Most of what they unearth gets billed as a tomb or a temple; avenues become "processionals", yada, yada, yada. This is tantamount to driving into a town and finding nothing but churches and cemeteries. Seriously? Where are the factories, warehouses, schools, playgrounds, etc? I've begun to think, looking at an old aerial photo of the Temple of Karnak, that it was a theme park. After all, consider what archaeologists of the far future, absent any explanation, might think when visiting the ruins of Disney. It suggests a race of beings who worshiped a four-fingered rodent wearing shorts. The Disney pantheon: Mickey, Minnie, Donald, Daisy, Goofy and Pluto... gotta love it.
Keith Higgins love the simplicity of your argument but it does make a lot of sense.
Couldn't agree more everything the quackademics come across is a 'temple' or tomb when often they have zero evidence, as with calling the Egyptian pyramids tombs etc. If they dug up something like a jet aeroplane it would be a religious symbol made with copper chisels and stone tools. The quackademics really need some engineering expertise and experience before spouting their nonsense on many of these megalithic structures!
Ha, ha! Did you ever read David Macaulay’s book Motel of the Mysteries? It is an illustrated send up of exactly this propensity of archaeologists. You would love it. However, there is still truth in these interpretations as the temples and tombs represented power and they were built to last, whereas the homes and markets were much more humble and take more work to uncover. However, if you have been paying attention to more recent archaeology, you will have seen that that is the direction many are taking these days. Investigating the lives of the common man.
Sorry, but our civilization is quasi unique in its triviality. Even the "games" of the Romans were quite serious. People died in them. It is just an educated guess that anything in the ancient that required effort to make had to have had some serious meaning to the people who made them.
Idiot.
1. Are the knobs only facing north or south?
2. Are the knobs only on the outer most blocks?
3. Are the knobs a scale model of the complete blocks required size?
4. Have the knobs ever been found on a completely finished surface?
5. Does the number of knobs or placement indicate where that specific block has to be placed - or used at in the wall?
7. Are the knobs there to be contact points for the tool/machine that insures final adjustment/placing of the block. To ensure that the block doesn’t get damaged or cracked in that process of precise alignment?
8. Is the knobs just the last bit of stone they leave when cutting under the block in the quarry? The thing that will lift the block from the quarry will then have room to lift under and then just break that last remaining knobs off?
9. Is the scoop marks all the same width? Maybe the cutting/digging tool resembled a modern machine that’s dig trenches? Like a chainsaw but as wide as the scoops?
Tout simplement magnifique et musique très bien choisie. Merci
For the molded stones. As Tesla showed, if you can create a resonant harmonic frequency of a target molecule , you can break down or alter its molecular structure.
yeah and Tesla was a genius.if you haven't seen Coral Castle Google it and you will freak out.
6:42 - That column is just pure perfection.
Absolutely amazing video thanks 😊🙏
Beautiful, this is undeniable for those with any experience with soft materials. The stone was being scooped, sliced and molded. My belief is with ultrasonic via electromagnetic energy tools. They understood the power of the Creator. The Electric Universe... thanks for the vid.
Google Coral Castle if you don't know anything about it
0:37... On the left side, third stone down from the top, is that the big dipper constellation pictured using those stone dots? And check out the lizard a few stones below that. Amazing!
Looks like hexagonal stone bricks at 6:05. Melted together?
Look at Mud fossil University. I don't agree with everything he says but it is interesting.
Hi! I,m a machinist 20 year of turning, milling, grinding, drilling I,we also worked in stone! The evidence off machining is obvious, I would have problems today too make that, it beats me.
Most people have no clue. If your working an irregular chunk of hard wood, one foot square let us say, to another chunk of wood ~~> would require hundreds of fittings. A single fitting requires marking, checking, moving object, making corrections by cutting or scrapping then re-fitting and over and over till tightly fit no gaps. Not easy with 50 plus ton blocks of red granite!!
SBS man: you explained the situation very well, simply, logically and demistyfing the secrets people built around the these stones.
Well no, not if you have a liquid that desloves stone you could fit two stones together with surfaces matching perfectly without moving once
@@stephencurrie4965 Interesting do you know of this liquid??
No l don't know what was used or any chemicals in whatever state they were in to cause such reactions, I do see the results of them being used over and over again in all countries in all stone work and walls,has there been any surface scrapping samples been taken or you to busy looking at the sky for UFO's
In tamilnadu is famous for rock cut temples,, I personally visited mamallapuram famous for its shore temples and single rock cut images,,I discovered some unfinished rocks with holeswith one feet distance covering the entire rock,, after that they pour water in the holes till the rock cut into two pieces,, that's the technique used by tamil sculptors 2000 years back
Thanks for the video! :-)
What is that place in Indonesia called at 7:11? I would like to find out more about it.
Maravilhosas imagens do que fomos visitados e entre nós viveram!🙌 Seres que tiveram aqui e nós ajudaram, muito também o cultivo de alimentos neste planeta que chamamos de Terra.
I can't believe it's not butter
To change the subject, Horsetail (Equisetum hyemale) was used as sandpaper for centuries. Slit one side and dry it and you have sandpaper. Italian violin makers used it to sand their violins. Incas may of used it for small projects.
There would be evidence in the crystal structure of any "softening" technology used, wouldn't there?
Probably but we would also not find it if we dont know what we are searching for
It is tendons from humongous giants that were called cloud eater's .
They did hide this from us all the elite are the one's that contril the historians.
Tendons soft after the giants died during the flood but once they dried , like stone.
Stack or build quickly and using tool or hand hurriedly.
CaCO3 ..calcium carbonate or basalt as dome call it.
Just know this is deep and there's lost of hidden shiot that will blow your mind !
NOTTHASAME you should be ashamed of yourself for putting together so much stupidity in one comment.
There are a couple of examples of ancient concrete in there, but mostly what you are seeing is machining. That is to say very high quality precision abrasion. If it were done with molding we would see more forms that reveal it as obvious. We would see the same things we see in every ceramics classroom but we don't. We see things that required powered tools of immense scale, but very few things that could not have been done that way. There are geo-polymers for certain, but not most examples shown here.
if some of those blocks were 'soft or malleable' to allow for working then they would also sag into shapeless lumps under their own weight ?
very good point
hahahahahahha
Maybe there is chemistry behind this just to form a large lump or position a basic shape? Look at the boxes in the Sakkara Serrapuem to see the finished product.
Maybe just the outer inch or two of each stone was softened. They could meld together when put in place and the worker could scrape out the junction like a mason or like a cake decorator molding icing. Nobs that failed softening process would persist but only stick out an inch or two. Dents would appear where the still heavy rocks were levered or rammed into place. Did some rocks need more than one softening treatment?
My theory is they tune each rock and send high voltage high frequency power into it. 4.2 kHz was a frequency that stuck out (from a Japanese study Electromagnetic emissions from dry and wet granite associated with acoustic emissions), and Shingo Yoshida and Tsutomu Ogawa snapped the granite block Piezo-electric effect of the quartz is likely a factor. Three thin copper plates were mounted outside the sleeve as electrodes. One electrode was used for measuring low‐pass filtered EME (DC to 500 Hz) and the other two electrodes were for measuring high‐pass filtered EME (10 kHz to 1 MHz).This from wikipedia on Granite: The production of granite at crustal depths requires high heat flow, which cannot be provided by heat production elements in the crust. Furthermore, high heat flow is necessary to produce granulite facies metamorphic rocks in orogens, indicating extreme metamorphism at high thermal gradients. In-situ granitisation by the extreme metamorphism is possible if crustal rocks would be heated by the asthenospheric mantle in rifting orogens, where collision-thickened orogenic lithosphere is thinned at first and then underwent extensional tectonism for active rifting
The material was soggy organic life.
How do you explain megaliths still attached to bedrock.the bedrock is not concrete so the megaliths are obviously made of raw stone.
@RealityQuest Clearly high technology and high level of understanding of physics. Probably some sort of magnetic induction for softening and acoustic levitation for transport.
I don't think this video is suggesting concrete. I think it is suggesting that they had a way of softening the rock, and could then work it.
Are you aware of the fact that the 'lith' in megaLITH stands for stone in Latin? Megaliths are just big stones, just saying...
There aren't any megaliths that are still attached to the bedrock. A megalith is an ancient large stone. I wouldn't refer to the Hitching Post of the Sun as a megalithic stone. It's in a megalithic site. But it's not a megalith.
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 There are some potential megaliths that are still in the quarry, half carved, still apparently attached to the bedrock, as if abandoned whilst in process.
The handprint at 7 ;11 is totally mind boggling. Some kind of harmonic vibrations maybe?
Nice videos, and I love your taste in music. I was thinking to myself, "If it were soft, why don't we see hand prints?" Something children and playful people can't resist today with concrete and clay, etc. Then, at the end, there they are! At 7:07. Clearly made with hands.
At 7.10 in this second video. surely these marks are made by someone dragging their fingers through a wet cement?
It has been discovered that there is a plant with roots that excrete a very alkaline substance that does indeed soften, crumble, melt stone. Birds use it to make their home in the side of rock walls/mountains. It is in use today actually but not the way the ancients did because that would put the building industry on it’s head. There is a company working on a marketable version but you best believe they will patent it so only they can control it. Google it for yourself, question everything. Above Top Secret website article “The plant that softens stone”. The exact plant is not mentioned but it is explained. I continued to look into it and found that the extract can be purchased. Of course it is not advertised/mentioned anywhere that it has the ability to dissolve stone, so... I plan on buying a small pkg and trying it. Check Labgenome.com. Item 12033-5 Cayman Chemical Daminozide. It’s an alkaline, not an acid from what I can tell. I’m open to any insight or feedback, or even correction. Just looking for the truth to ancient mysteries.
After thousands of years, weathering would smooth down everything, hence, no jagged edges. Don't use science, use common sense.
Because, maybe it needed to be hot before it was soft?
@@gensara1 I've just read your post that was written 1 year ago. It is VERY interesting! Can you tell me if you could get that extract of a plant and used it? Could you soften any stone? I'd appreciate your answer to my query. Thank you.
Essas teses mitológicas são alegorias pra explicarem , e não admitirem que não estamos sós no universo. Boa noite.
My jaw dropped when the 'hand prints' were shown at the end.
Rumors abound in Peru that the natives know of a special vegetable-based softening compound. It would seem that there must be some plant extracts which, when mixed, could produce the chemical heat necessary in a localized area. The stones hold heat well and it may have been long enough for them to be worked.
still a rumour the only thing that can dissolve granite ( quartz) is hydrofluoric acid
@@al2207 Could it also be possible that the plant mixture could have produced the acid ??
@@vinnylamoureux1187 no, it is an acid base on fluorine element i do not know any plant that had fluor in it
i honestly cannot think of any other theory than rock softening , look at how rocks melt with each other in peru with the scoop marks as well as in egypt , some people say the casing stones of the pyramids are geopolymer , and i absolutely have no problem with that theory , but the giant granit stones and the limestone that makes the inside of the pyramid are surely not geopolymers , the incomplete obelisk makes know for sure the ancients carved real hard rocks out of the earth , maybe it was chemicals , maybe it was sound technology , either way it is real rock
ua-cam.com/video/C1y8N0ePuF8/v-deo.html
I've tried to find the photograph of the hand-shaped scoop marks in the rock at 7:10 in this video and I could only find a very similar image from some place in Wyoming. But it isn't the same image as the one in this video. Does anyone know where this hand-shaped image is from? I can't find it anywhere.
Where is the formation with the hands imprinted in it from 7:08 located? Does anyone know?
+texasfossilguy Ya...I'd like to know also...!!!
That alone gives a clue no machines or tools were used
texasfossilguy ..beside the toilet paper in the magalithic public toilets..
texasfossilguy it only shows that those stones today are just clay and forming to stone back then
+SCOT . LAND that was hilarious
The softening is only relevant for explaining the complex connections in the walls primarily known from South America, though I think such walls with irregular connections and irregular surfaces - which are hard to imagine being shaped and fit together - exist a number of places around the world. The softening would not be an advantage for stones that were to be polished. We can witness saw marks and drill marks which have to be made in a stable material to end up being precise. Another really mind bugling aspect is the level of precision of flat and curved polished surfaces made in granite. I recommend the book Lost Technologies of Ancient Egypt by Christopher Dunn. He's an engineer who has studied this topic in depth.
why no attribution to the "hand prints" at 7:09? If that is real that makes your point perfectly.. . which leads me to suspect that one as fake.
Utah: photoseek.photoshelter.com/image/I0000KLCkcAut3Uw
If each stone is different, then molding is not a viable option. Think
outside of the box. Once one stone is formed the following space is
scanned and a new block is formed. Visualize a technology similar to 3D
printing and I think you are nearly there. Instead of epoxy they were
using liquefied stone. Each block is different because it makes the
structure stronger when stacked. Blocks of a unified shape are weak when
stacked like brick. Logic dictates that whoever built these things used
this method because it was EASY for them, not hard.
In addition to this ability to soften stone, which I would say is irrefutable they must also have been able to lift and position huge multi ton blocks with relative ease. It is probably easier to image stone softening technology than it is gravity reduction technology.
Google Coral Castle and you'll find out the last man that knew the secrets about moving and molding stonesthat is unless you already seen all those videos but what you said is absolutely right on
@@Michael-eo5nf You qualify as one of the many morons who have posted here. The coral castle was built of ...wait for it. .. coral - not granite or basalt. The old coot who built it and moved it many miles from where he first constructed it had machines to lift the stone, something which the pre Incas did not have.
@@phyl1283 you must have clicked the wrong button I know full well it was built of coral and not basalt or granite either you read my comment wrong or you replied wrong
@@phyl1283 and also he had no machines he had a tripod and had radio and electronic equipment in a small room to this day no one knows how we move those stones
They didn't believe in the gravity lie back then.
Have wondered about this for years. Of all the different theories offered to date, this by far makes the most potential sense . . . which, of course, leads to another question. If the process of temporary liquefaction of hard stone was indeed known then, how did it get replicated at so many different locations around the world? This strongly suggests that the world was traveled much more extensively at a "prehistoric" time than current mainstream anthropology has an explanation for. Nicely done video, thanks for posting.
Thank you Charles
read Genesis 10:25 it is a great secret what God did.the Earth was one land mass and this technology whatever it was ,was a gift of God to make the work easy so people could have these structures but when they fell away before the Floodall was destroyed.
The secret died with Fred Flintstone and Barney Ruble.
Lies, Barney got his blast name from what was left behind because it is an immortal.
That’s why we call rocks ruble today. Soccer tea said it in a meeting with Isaac Newton and Confucius at the builder berg meeting. This is also how rocking fellers was bread and now we have food! Idiot!!!!
Se how your primitive mind resorts to ridicual.
Those hand prints at 7:09, remarkable! The place is not identified, though.
Thank you so much for this video! Beautiful pictures of beautiful stone structures.
(Two small spelling errors: mysteries, not mysterys; and, in the first video, at 0:36, anomalies, not anomolies.)
looks like more than single one civilization's works, different style and means
Great movie and great job - you do compare and it is the key to open minds. Please continue :)
5:15 this honestly looks like they were harvesting off this piece or even practicing or teaching on it..lol
i'm going to Cusco next April. would love to know where some of these pics are from. They don't look like they're from common sites like Machu Picchu, Some from Sacsayhuamana, but like that 3 doored cave hut thing? And the "staired" cuts from the solid piece of stone. I'd love to know any "must see" spots that are less common. love visiting polygonal architecture and super curious where some of these peru pics are from. Ty
Almost like humans are merely the ants cleaning up after the picnic that has been and gone
We are like Ants when the Ant hole has been destroyed we run around all crazy like looking for Home lol...
More than most know. Have you seen mud fossil university on UA-cam ?
The earth is full of fossilized giant creatures remains. ( bodies )
A 900 mile long dragon. A second dragon in central Australia, Ayres rock is its heart.
That means we are the size of parasites, mining the remains of the fossilized minerals. ?
Mankind's age of glory has long past, antediluvian in fact, as the sea rose man's true greatness was hidden.
At 7:08 is there any way to tell the scale of what we're looking at? Are there any different pictures? They do kind of look like hand prints but that means nothing if they aren't the size of hands.
I have a theory, one where they used the ‘lay line’ energy to vibrate the stones. Which would be why all these great constructions are located on lay lines (apparently). It may not be vibration but I don’t think you could put hand prints on 1000degree stone, not without leaving your fingers.
We know they used the sun and the stars for various things and had a great knowledge for the planet and math so it’s reasonable to assume they were smart enough not to chip away at a rock for years (6ft wide chipped pathways etc) if they only needed to chip a small section.
So the fact they over excavated and sculpted meant they did it with ease.
The monoliths stump me the most as they were clearly to be carried and lifted in one piece. The mind boggles
If a time machine was a reality... This era would be my first visit.
Just to see how they did it.
It was moonbeams. Clear and certain.
I think MAYBE sound made the stone soft. A certain frequency might have done the hard work. I say bring a portable sound amplifier to site with an adjustable frequency device. Try every freq. from 1 hertz to whatever. Keep trying. That might be the answer. Then again I could be wrong, I dont really have a clue.how they did it. Just a guess
Thank you so much for this video. I've been trying to talk to people for ages about this, this is exactly how these stones were made. In Peru the rocks were molded in place. If you look closely enough you will find trawl marks on many of the stones. On many other of the stones those nodules protruding from the tops or bottoms were how they moved them or mold marks to hold the mold in place. JS
Dimwit !
Where are the hand-prints at 7:07 located? Thank you for your video work, and nice choice of music.
You should do a video of the extremely fine carved stone vases that were found in the tombs of Egypt. They have no idea how they were made being that the inside is polished and the hole in the top of the vase is way too small to carve out the larger bottom inner portion of the vase. They are amazing to look at and also quite beautifully designed.
I can absolutely demonstrate how they are made. When you say " they" have no idea, you mean flaky crackhead who cant or wont do real research , which is piss easy in the internet age. If pseudoscience continues at this decline in 100 years people will say "they have no idea how who or how the Sydney harbor bridge was built"
All stone is made up of crystal s. All crystal vibrates if you can tune in to the correct frequency. I think the stone was altered in molecular structure using sound, radio or some sort of energy that the frequency can be tuned in.
....totally agree.
Of course hammers and chisels could NEVER do this fine a job sculpting Granite...Its ridiculous to even imagine it because of the impossibility of the angles, let alone the precision craftsmanship levels achieved ...Definitely frequency molecular manipulation...
agree, cutting at molecular level by breaking atoms bonding with energy field , magnetic
The ancient egyptians crafted polished granite pyramid capstones by 2000bc using emery (a harder type of stone) and well ... elbow grease.
RandomPlaceHolderName the pyramids were built before 10,000 BC by a global civilisation which was enlightened enough to understand that the universe is held together by sonic vibration. They knew how to use sonic vibration to alter the physical properties of stone and fit huge megaliths together seamlessly.
Yes you are right and they did turn the stone into Mud or soft putty. This was done with a Frequency Material Agitator. The frequency had to be matched up to object they wanted to turn into liquid mud then you can basicly just scoop it out. It never was hot to the touch. Tesla touched apon this technology and also John Hutchison.
great theory to explain my favorite mystery! I'd love to learn more about what the science behind this process would be.
I subscribed to your channel, hope that's cool
It actually makes more sense than what mainstream academics would have us believe
Sounds like a simple explanation but geologists have already discounted that theory for a number of reasons. On microscopic examination you can see that individial mineral crystals in the rock have been cut. If the rock was made soft, these crystals would remain intact as they moulded position around the shape desired much like aggregate would in moulded concrete. The crystalline structure of these rocks also conform to the original structure in solidified lava or magma from a volcano. For it to be moulded, the only way would be if the molten lava itself was moulded...something that even today is not possible due to the 3,000-5,000 degree temperatures of lava and magma.
There is a block of pink granite in Peru neat Lake Titicaca that weighs 140 tonnes and is flat on two sides at a perfect right angle. Its in the side of a pyramid that was buried under mud until ten years ago. The variation in level for its entire 37m length and 2m width is less than 2mm. Such a feat of stonemasonry cannot even be achieved today. On the smooth surface, again, all the mineral crystals including quartz, are ground flat, not moulded. The only mineral harder than quartz is diamond. If there were diamond cutting tools used by these 10,000 year old civilizations, there is no evidence of it.
The only explanation is that the work was done using a technology that has never existed on earth. And the fact that similar megaliths are found all over South and Central America and also of the same age, 10-12,000 BCE, in the Middle East and Africa, suggest that a civilization of vastly superior capability than even ours in the present day, existed over a wide area, spanning oceans, back then. So it's quite possible that another world colonised ours back 7,000 years before the Bronze Age. We were still in the Stone Age back then. Its estimated that this civilization lasted 2,000 years and then either died out (no fossil remains exist), was destroyed in a cataclysm or left. But one thing is for certain, it was not us.
One can't help thinking now that instead of wondering when aliens are going to come and visit us, in fact they came and then left a very long time ago.
The only mineral harder than quartz is a diamond? Mohs Scale of hardness has quartz at a 7 out of 10 in hardness. There are many minerals above quartz. Also the fact that quartz will cut quartz. So you can use sand to cut all the stones.
The hand print is your smoking gun and you dont give location and details!!??
ua-cam.com/video/TPB83E6iwNE/v-deo.html
@@hens93 Thank you those hand prints are mind boggling
That’s crazy! How do explain that?! It was almost like it was soft as clay at one point.
@@hens93 : Is that history mystery guy the narrator for Oak Island Mystery too? Ugh, that insipid voice drives up a tree, cant watch. There's way too many formulaic narrations nowadays. Almistvas bad as listening to Beeny boy trying to sound like Tucker Carlson.
@@rogerscottcathey I'll admit the narration is a little nnoying but it's interesting stuff.
If everyone who wants to and is willing, let's pray for the answer. Maybe our Creator will answer one or some of us if multitudes pray....but please pray by yourself, alone, in secret. Ask how these stones, all over the Earth, were made. Open your dreams to an answer and please tell me on my channel under "discussion"....no hurry. peace
you know what that's exactly what I've been doing which I think it's a secret.I'm hoping God will show me.I think only he's the one that knows.I'm a carpenter and a pretty darn good one at that.and I've got great reasoning abilities.and I'm totally stumped as to all of this.yes let us pray and ask Godhave a good day
If it was pre-flood could the pressure and time harden the material to stone?
Ancient stone work has intrigued me for years. It is not the work of using forms to cast blocks because why would the not just cast entire walls or larger more uniform sized blocks? The shapes and sizes of the blocks are not uniform but yet fit with precision much like a large puzzle. Brilliant!
" what materials did they use that could withstand the temperatures and
pressures involved in casting megalithic sized stone blocks?" in Peru..along the Pasaje Ahuacpinta for instance.
after placing a rough stone conventionally shaped next it's final
place, a parabolic large mirror(s) of gold aimed concentrated sunlight
onto the face of, or side of, the block being fitted into position.
Once that side area of the rock is glowing & malleable to a depth of
a few inches or so, an "artist" or someone with a talented spade, would
shape or smooth-out the sides being placed. Then the two Nephylium
dudes would gently place the megalithic piece in place for a perfect
fit. simple.
Yeah right, your so fucking high it's pathetic!! It's totally obvious you've NEVER heated a stone of any kind, slow or fast, doesn't matter what density except it takes longer to heat a dense rock! Anyway, either way when you heat a rock it gets to a certain point when the rock will start to bubble and when it cools it looks like glass where it bubbled! But NOWHERE during the heating process DOES THE ROCK GET SOFT AND MALLEABLE, ROCKS DO NOT GET SOFT!!! Except when you're melting them, but all you'll end up with is a puddle of burnt glass like substance! Rock is basically tight compacted sand. Glass is basically melted sand! So like I said if you heat rock it's basically like heating sand, it melts into glass it does NOT get SOFT like clay! Trust me, get a torch and heat up a rock, try all different kinds so you can't say it was the wrong kind of rock. When heated, it will turn black and start bubbling before it ever gets SOFT!!!!
Yes i have seen rock melted using a parabolic mirror ! But it was levitation that moved them as was done on Coral Castle ! The Original Egyptians revered the Bumble bee and the scarab beetle , These 2 insects levitate using a vibration or sound ! Also at that time gravity was different , probable less then today .
Magma is rock melted - so it does go soft !
laura theodora scoop marks... can only be made by scoops. aka; spade, trowel, shovel, spatula, spoon.
laura theodora
gravity hasn't changed. beetles and scarabs use wings. Do u believe some giants were running around S. America 8000-16000 years ago or earlier?
Andesitic lava is an example of a high viscosity lava . Viscosity...
the state of being thick, sticky, and semifluid in consistency, due to internal friction.
"cooling the fluid raises its viscosity". It's really not that complicated . Shaped underwater imo. 🍀 How did they lift large stones ? North America formerly had elephants . The bumps on the stones likely to strap on and lift ...likely using simple levers .
My question is..If they got it so hot as to be able to shape this stone like butter or soft cheese wouldn't that mean that its so dam hot they couldn't even get close to it to shape it without a blast furnace out fit on so they didn't melt too...?..lol
this is technology or stone softening techniques beyond what you and I deem capable, who said they had to heat the stones? for all we know they could reverse the effects of gravity in localised space through the use of meditation, harnessing the natural energy which is all around them. What we knew in these times is far beyond anything capable of us now, it is entirely possible we come back to times like this and we rediscover the hidden knowledge.
I have spent a lot of time in Cambodia, looking at pre Ankor Wat era architecture.. where the elders will tell you that the handed down history is that "The Gods could make the stone soft"
Ah, so the watchers did make the stones soft.
Whatever there was in the drugs they used, was also used to soften stone (Drugs = Gods)
These are formed from geopolymer. Viscous stone packed into molds and shaped before it hardens. Once it hardens it is identical to natural stone. Hence the difficulty of the geologists/archaelogists to recognize the obvious manmade shaping.
So how do you explain the quaries that the majority of this stone was taken from ?
Brian Porteous The few researchers that have discovered the geopolymer knowledge of these ancient cultures explain the quarries very simply. The rock found in the monuments does not exactly match any single quarry. The monument rock is a combination from multiple quarries. An inconvenient truth hidden by mainstream archaeologists.
Professor Joseph Davidovits...the modern "father" of Geopolymer and the technique for creating stone
no, geopolymer cannot be made for all granite block , it is only possible for limestone and with a very restricted quantities , granite include crystals of quartz , feldspar, that are made by slow cooling under continent
francois clermont
so much misinformation it's not worth responding.
If they did use bronze or stone chisels and hammers there would be plenty of evidence left behind to back this up. They would have had to have used thousands if not tens of thousands of simple hammers and chisels to shape the stone. There would be the remains of these that were damaged or worn out and beyond practical use, left behind to support this. There must be some other explanation as to how these huge pieces of stone were shaped and molded. And then there is the question of the transportation from the quarries to the sites - another mystery that we have yet to come up with plausible answers. We are still in the dark but I think we are getting closer to some answers.
Ok. Somehow they managed to make them soft. But what about lifting these huge blocks ?
the megalith blocks still left in the quarries would indicate they could lift them some how
Here’s just a crazy theory, maybe a combination of leverage, with wind power 🤷🏼♂️ I’m thinking maybe tying ropes around the stones & using the help of something like wind sails or hot air balloons to help guide them into place alongside leverage, weights & counterweights, and also maybe employing the help of strong animals like horses or camels.
Just a thought
They couldn't lift them so they left them in the quarries!
hard stone like granite doesn't soften to become malleable. if heated it only spalls and fissures then disintegrates into sand and powder. if you keep heating that pile of sand it turns into a black glassy slag.
Softening a several 100 ton Stone into something like chees would make it even more dificult to move
It was softened AFTER moving to its final resting place.
whos to say they didnt move smaller pieces then 'melted' them into larger pieces for construction. They clearly were molding blocks in peru
It's not stoned it's a technology called a geopolymer it would be poured into molds this also explains how they were able to move such big itemsthey didn't move them all at once they moved all the material and then mixed and poured
Not if you listen to some of the idiots who post here. They don't have any thing to say about how to do it, they give us the very limited extent of their ideas of how it must have been done - and that is a very real limitation.
They may have also known how to change the molecular mass to weigh a lot less. Imagine a big marshmallow.
Man oh man awesome video!!!! Your video has alot to say. Nicely done
One thing I know and I'm sure of is the ancients were incredibly smarter than mainstream scientists give them credit for,,I know believe it's a pre flood technology
absolutely and whatever evidence that would show us has been forever lost and buried somewhere in the Earth
Possible, then there’s more questions 😎☝🏼surfer dude here 🏄🏽🚴🏽♂️🪕
This blocks are actually made out of some kind of cement and they used molds to shape the blocks, on spot, than made all those square holes so that the cement would dry faster in the center.....but also as a test to see if the cement had already dryed out. And when one block dries off they can continue the proces and keep building the structure up.
Mainstream archaeologists are becoming a laughing stock thanks to the Internet. Hahaha hammers and chisels!
yeah it's the so-called learned people in many of the sciences that are absolutely utterly insane mad men. Richard Feynman spoke about this on numerous occasions
@@Michael-eo5nf
....he knew because he was one of them.....him and his cult of bumping particles.
Imagine being the extremely brave soul underneath the obelisk at aswan, softening it. lol
Videos are Great except for the Demon Music 😲
During my 7 decades of studying these megalithic structures I remember reading a ancient manuscript that was a private diary and the author wrote about a glowing light “worm” that could cut through the stone in any shape or form . I remember seeing a laser beam cutting through steel and wondering if somehow the same thing was used on the stone somehow.
Should stop claiming stone softening until you know how. The fact is all of those varied shapes would require extremely precise molds for every rock that could handle those large rocks. I make sculputers and molded rocks Just using ancient civilization music does not suggest rock molding. The rocks at Aswan with the grooves the grooves were cut with tools you just dont recognise. Dr. Ronald Cutburth, . engineering scientist, intelligence expert.
Not obvious fusing. Same problem when claiming melting rocks. You must state the technology of melting or fusing. Melting or fusing would require huge ovens to hold them and process them. Also large molds if forming them. The molds would need at least double the strength of the weight of the rock. One needs to raise to the level of their large scale technology. It's known that the uneven shapes make the walls less vulnerable to earthquakes. Those are stated as fact and the walls stood for centuries. When using large grinding machines that are computer controlled, they simply dial in the numbers and do a counter match for its fit rock. Go find books by engineer manufacturer Christopher Dunn. He reveals known machine tool marks. I certify he is correct as I evaluated engineering designs all over the US. Go pick up a handbook on manufacturing engineering.
You always assume. "Energy field? Somehow loosen the atomic bond? Those two phrases require high energy technology. One can not loosten the atomic bond unless they disintegrate. To melt the large rocks Would require a large furnace. Then always forgotten is the exact profile of the exterior of each Rock. They are not the same. You are grabbing at thoughts. Nice to think but thinking without studying physics does not do you well. I don't want to comment any more. I can not teach you the numbers of classes one would require. I suggest you pick up a handbook of physics as well. Bye Bye.
You are assuming again. Since you don't seem to know any of the physics that is required for your assumption, you then assume the textbooks don't have that level of technology. They do have that level of technology, but since you chose to not research them you assume again. Stop putting my name in your comments.
Dr. Ronald Cutburth Nobody is claiming they used precise molds, claims are being made the stones were softened to shape. I feel it's clear as day. How else? I mean come on, many stones are smooth as glass
Spot-on. Funny how people who have never worked such materials make certain assumptions. I believe most of these examples were abraded and that in itself is still just as amazing as the fantasy stuff people go on about. Ancient high-tech yes... ancient or alien magic tech no thank-you. These folks could do to watch some jade carvers grinding huge boulders with little more than powered and properly lubricated sand.
by hitting on granite surface you turn the surface crystals into powder... so it's basically not that hard process. that red granite in egypt has pretty big quartz crystals, so you would remove 1mm of surface per hit...
Yeah!
Superior technological society, dedicated only to carve rocks!
good comment
Only??? That's funny! Calling the kettle black. A tongue with no voice.
I am becoming convinced that we were not the only advanced civilizations that existed on this earth! !!
we are connected yet so disconnected at the same time, we will wake up soon.
The simplicity size and precision are the statement. In the silence the deafening roar of superiority in building.
Just a thought, I wonder if it possible that the earth's gravity was lighter thousands of years ago possibly explaining the possible existence of much larger people that are rumored to have existed and possibly making the moving and handling of very large stones easier. This in conjunction with an unknown technology whereupon these people were able machine these stones. Maybe these stones weren't impossibly heavy to move after all. Just a wild thought.
Scooping thin layers of stone, so extensively might leave remnants of thin layers of what the scooping removed. Has the quarry been thoroughly searched for any evidence of fragments of this scooped out material?
If you see the same work marks everywhere it of cause the same technique. Most probably because they used the same ressources, so one must look for something that's available everywhere: sunlight, harder rocks, whater, wood. Maybe vinegar as an acid. I don't know if they all had steel back then, I think not. So it must be the simpliest of methods which can be used by a lot of people.
My hypothesis it it has to do with heat by concentrated sunlight by reflectors made of silver or gold and shock cooling by water, then chiseling or grinding. Natural erosion did the rest.