Why don't perpetual motion machines ever work? - Netta Schramm

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 тра 2024
  • Check out our Patreon page: / teded
    View full lesson: ed.ted.com/lessons/why-don-t-p...
    Perpetual motion machines - devices that can do work indefinitely without any external energy source - have captured many inventors’ imaginations because they could totally transform our relationship with energy. There’s just one problem: they don’t work. Why not? Netta Schramm describes the pitfalls of perpetual motion machines.
    Lesson by Netta Schramm, animation by TED-Ed.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22 тис.

  • @TEDEd
    @TEDEd  2 роки тому +1092

    Thanks for watching! If you want to learn more about feats of engineering, wacky creatures, hidden historical figures, weird body questions you don’t want ask aloud, brain-busting riddles (and *so much* more!) make sure to subscribe to our channel ➡️ bit.ly/TEDEdSubscribe Stay tuned and stay curious!

    • @moaningpig5299
      @moaningpig5299 2 роки тому +17

      You a couple years late

    • @sianlol
      @sianlol 2 роки тому +7

      Your 4 years late

    • @confused4971
      @confused4971 2 роки тому +5

      Only around half a decade later, no biggie

    • @daniel4647
      @daniel4647 2 роки тому +3

      Don't we sort of have perpetual motion though? Superfluidity has no friction so if you stir it it'll keep spinning forever. Don't know is that breaks any of the physics laws or whatever, but from what I read it'll never stop, and they can definitely be created.

    • @coiners9426
      @coiners9426 2 роки тому +1

      yes

  • @mclovin2408
    @mclovin2408 2 роки тому +7353

    Damn, the devs didn’t leave any bugs or glitches in this game.

    • @williamsmith6921
      @williamsmith6921 2 роки тому +355

      No there are many, this just happens to be an exception

    • @NetheriteMiner
      @NetheriteMiner 2 роки тому +156

      @@williamsmith6921 Agreed, for example, deja vú (or however you accent it)

    • @williamsmith6921
      @williamsmith6921 2 роки тому +93

      @@NetheriteMiner or quantum mechanics

    • @kakyoindonut3213
      @kakyoindonut3213 2 роки тому +47

      @@williamsmith6921 is quantum mechanic a bug?

    • @williamsmith6921
      @williamsmith6921 2 роки тому +126

      @@kakyoindonut3213 I mean it kindof depends on how you define it, it's not like we know the developers of the universe, or even know they exist, so it's not like we can ask them what is a bug and what is a feature, but these parts of our universe are definitely strange

  • @jibifufu3540
    @jibifufu3540 4 роки тому +8946

    Me trying to charge my power bank with itself

  • @blue-1079
    @blue-1079 Рік тому +1332

    The real perpetual motion machine was the journey we made along the way.

  • @samuraiMOURS
    @samuraiMOURS Рік тому +27

    1:32 First Law
    3:56 Second Law
    4:25 Mix of First Law and Second Law (Not Third Law)

  • @muffincrumbss
    @muffincrumbss 6 років тому +11264

    Humans: Can I?
    Physics: No.

    • @BerryAB
      @BerryAB 6 років тому +67

      Wtf lol 😂

    • @Mike-uv8sy
      @Mike-uv8sy 6 років тому +258

      live interview with physics itself

    • @ardiansyahputra03
      @ardiansyahputra03 6 років тому +132

      I hate you, Physics

    • @jxp7555
      @jxp7555 6 років тому +26

      TechnoWimp ask physics we can find a way a new way make one, one that can change the world as we know maybe on a different planet

    • @walexia
      @walexia 6 років тому +71

      seeing as we still know so little , the most appropriate answer would be : "not like that"

  • @JackSmith331
    @JackSmith331 4 роки тому +7755

    "The only perpetual thing is our never-ending search"
    So the perpetual motion machine... was inside us all along?

    • @michalviktorin6758
      @michalviktorin6758 4 роки тому +247

      Not inside us. More like absolutely everywhere, since energy itself is never ending motion.

    • @amalabishek4463
      @amalabishek4463 4 роки тому +15

      Exactly

    • @trentyoung6791
      @trentyoung6791 4 роки тому +55

      Philosphy

    • @eliozagreus
      @eliozagreus 4 роки тому +3

      Or maybe we'll disappear from the face of the universe in a few years and we'll have to go on searching even if we'll not be able to do that🤔

    • @corvidmorgue
      @corvidmorgue 4 роки тому +225

      mabye the *real* perpetual motion machine was the friends we made along the way

  • @ahG7na4
    @ahG7na4 11 місяців тому +72

    another (and simpler) way to look at the overbalanced wheel is that while those weights that stick out should be turning the wheel, there's also fewer of them than of the weights on the other side that don't stick out

    • @VidhanShrivastava-iu2xx
      @VidhanShrivastava-iu2xx 2 місяці тому

      If the weight on the other side will be larger how can they even rotate.

    • @Puskar3k
      @Puskar3k Місяць тому +1

      ​@@VidhanShrivastava-iu2xx inertia

    • @VidhanShrivastava-iu2xx
      @VidhanShrivastava-iu2xx Місяць тому

      @@Puskar3k but doesn't it will break symmetry and eventually stop??

    • @Puskar3k
      @Puskar3k Місяць тому

      @@VidhanShrivastava-iu2xx I didn't quiet get what you said but I think my answer to your qsn is yes.

  • @sunbleachedangel
    @sunbleachedangel 6 місяців тому +14

    A few other things:
    1) If a closed system could produce more energy than it consumes, then it would just infinitely accelerate until it.. explodes or something?
    2) There is no way to actually prove that a machine would never stop, the same as there is no way to check beforehand if a computer program would loop forever or stop at some point (Tom Scott made a very good video about that)

  • @iambatman2303
    @iambatman2303 3 роки тому +18154

    Why don't we just get rid of these laws of thermodynamics, seems like a simple solution.

    • @mashrafialam682
      @mashrafialam682 3 роки тому +692

      I love this comment

    • @yt.rebeloutionkael5490
      @yt.rebeloutionkael5490 3 роки тому +492

      Genius!

    • @WilbertLek
      @WilbertLek 3 роки тому +892

      Just change the gravitational constant of the universe. Simple...

    • @joseph-mariopelerin7028
      @joseph-mariopelerin7028 3 роки тому +526

      Ya... let’s gather all the Greek in the same room and make them change their own laws

    • @wellshit9489
      @wellshit9489 3 роки тому +242

      @@WilbertLek hey the gravitational constant might be wrong on a quantum level so you never know

  • @nut2964
    @nut2964 2 роки тому +4637

    *“in this house we follow the laws of thermodynamics!”*

    • @henrybusse7513
      @henrybusse7513 2 роки тому +46

      Pfft, follow the laws of thermodynamics? What a nerd!

    • @julianverdugo5957
      @julianverdugo5957 2 роки тому +38

      If you say so Homer

    • @lionelhuts875
      @lionelhuts875 2 роки тому +30

      *Obey. I sure hope you get fired for that blunder.

    • @garygrim9235
      @garygrim9235 2 роки тому +5

      Make me

    • @mkechandler5776
      @mkechandler5776 2 роки тому +1

      Well then your house is probably extinct by now so it's all good

  • @m.nasrseb4260
    @m.nasrseb4260 Рік тому +261

    great video, as someone who loves math and botany at the same time, I would like to add that. It can be very, very difficult for a machine to generate and expend its own energy, but a plant placed in a jar or lantern can create a kind of recirculation by producing its own oxygen and then expending its own carbon dioxide. Of course, another point that needs to be said here is that this plant can achieve this by taking energy from the sun...

    • @harshavardhanthorat3910
      @harshavardhanthorat3910 Рік тому

      Lmao

    • @GustavoGomes-nn5np
      @GustavoGomes-nn5np Рік тому +7

      The sun is pretty much infinite so it has a point

    • @ColyBaloneyCLBL
      @ColyBaloneyCLBL Рік тому +35

      @@GustavoGomes-nn5npIt will last for a long time, but not forever.

    • @Totally_Bonkers
      @Totally_Bonkers Рік тому +9

      in our lifetime we dont gotta worry about the sun. The people who have to worry about it can worry about it, not us.

    • @mydarkestlovely2166
      @mydarkestlovely2166 Рік тому

      In the end, nothing can function without getting energy from the outside. Need to get more energy than they produce. If the plant is isolated from the sun, it'll eventually die.

  • @kylew2165
    @kylew2165 4 місяці тому +13

    I've been asking myself this forever. It never ends.

    • @donatedflea
      @donatedflea 3 місяці тому +1

      Your Neverending thoughts on it are a perpetual motion machine

  • @whiiffed9002
    @whiiffed9002 2 роки тому +1246

    Law #1: You can't get out more energy than you put in
    Law #2: *No*

    • @coolelectronics1759
      @coolelectronics1759 2 роки тому +34

      but what about stepup transformer
      but that only changes the voltage
      Im probably just wasting my time commenting

    • @cherrysatin730
      @cherrysatin730 2 роки тому +11

      I don’t know why I laughed so hard at this

    • @TunaBear64
      @TunaBear64 2 роки тому +29

      Law #2: You will get as many energy than you put in but only a fraction will be usable

    • @magosexploratoradeon6409
      @magosexploratoradeon6409 2 роки тому +32

      @@coolelectronics1759 The power is still the same in a transformer. You just increased the voltage while lowering its current.

    • @lebronjames4705
      @lebronjames4705 2 роки тому +1

      what happens when you split an atom with one tiny process to cause an explosion large enough to wipe out of town. Technically an atom bomb is less heat and energy before it separates the atom to create exponentially more energy with the help of
      nuclear fusion

  • @sleepyysleep
    @sleepyysleep 5 років тому +23258

    Humans: *gets idea that sounds reasonable and easy to make*
    Physics: lol no

    • @leosolis3214
      @leosolis3214 5 років тому +132

      Hahahahahaha

    • @adolforosado
      @adolforosado 4 роки тому +244

      physics is wrong

    • @timmyturner6575
      @timmyturner6575 4 роки тому +121

      Okay what about that capillary action thing with that goo that if a little bit spills the entire thing spills with it. I don't remember what it's called but its blue and looks slimy and I'm sure some fellow nerds know what I'm talking about.
      Lmk how it goes.

    • @nutmeggaming11261
      @nutmeggaming11261 4 роки тому +47

      Action lab did that experiment. Didn’t go so well

    • @darkdragonx2911
      @darkdragonx2911 4 роки тому +3

      I'm not liking this comment because it already has 777 likes

  • @timothybradek3560
    @timothybradek3560 Рік тому +24

    What... ? Here I am at 70 f__ yrs old and never really knew that! Their art, design and engineering is truly jaw dropping.

  • @yasy4291
    @yasy4291 8 місяців тому +3

    If an automatic watch is a half-prepetual machine, we just need another half-prepetual machine to complete its circle.

  • @prashantsamaiya1793
    @prashantsamaiya1793 3 роки тому +2709

    "There is just one problem:
    THEY DON'T WORK."
    such a small problem.

    • @johneygd
      @johneygd 3 роки тому +31

      I really really hate when he just says that.

    • @ilovecairns5181
      @ilovecairns5181 3 роки тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/ltjRoNsPNy4/v-deo.html&feature=share

    • @psilocybemusashi
      @psilocybemusashi 3 роки тому +4

      so many successful hucksters out there this really is a small problem in practice. can't wait to have myself injected with the covid vaccine for a disease that hasn't killed anyone and there is no gold standard test for.

    • @carlosvasquez6054
      @carlosvasquez6054 3 роки тому +40

      @@psilocybemusashi I know people that have died from it stop spewing your conspiracy theories

    • @dari9345
      @dari9345 3 роки тому +26

      @@psilocybemusashi Jeez dude, go out and get sick if you think it ain't real, because right now, me and my family are indeed sick, it's a real thing, thanks to my aunt, now I'm afraid, since it puts in danger my family.

  • @alexniggins1799
    @alexniggins1799 4 роки тому +2795

    Humans: Why don't perpetual motion machines ever work?
    Friction: *Laughs in Heat*

    • @VisualJoey
      @VisualJoey 4 роки тому +7

      This made my day lol

    • @phamdunk3345
      @phamdunk3345 4 роки тому +44

      Friction: *F R I C K*

    • @jinwu7788
      @jinwu7788 4 роки тому +7

      @@phamdunk3345 Fric*

    • @timothyshannon5187
      @timothyshannon5187 4 роки тому +8

      Friction! Hah! That's gonna rub some people the wrong way!
      "So...you're saying that resistance will cause things to lose velocity?"
      You're getting warmer!
      I tried to come up with a third friction joke but that's all I got.

    • @reidb9422
      @reidb9422 4 роки тому +4

      Gregory Sullivan are you refuting that friction due to air molecules is a real thing?

  • @paultaylor7082
    @paultaylor7082 6 місяців тому +6

    Back to the Laws of Thermodynamics, beloved of my time in the early to mid 1970s, studying Applied Chemistry at Uni. It's so long ago, at the start of the article here, I could only remember the First Law, and the narrative reminded me of the Second aw. If there are any others (I'm honestly not sure), I'll have to look them up.

    • @tonylawrence9157
      @tonylawrence9157 5 місяців тому

      There was enthalpy, the entropy, all rolled up into free energy. In the end I gave up and got a Ph D in organic chemistry. Now it is quontum theory.

  • @zboy365
    @zboy365 Рік тому +5

    Love how to the point these videos are

  • @nickrutsky242
    @nickrutsky242 3 роки тому +5540

    Maybe the real perpetual motion machines were the friends we made along the way

    • @ThaFuzzwood
      @ThaFuzzwood 3 роки тому +480

      No, because those require a constant investment of energy.

    • @ioneiroi8350
      @ioneiroi8350 3 роки тому +195

      @@ThaFuzzwood yeah sorry nick he got a point

    • @joseph-mariopelerin7028
      @joseph-mariopelerin7028 3 роки тому +42

      The perpetual motion in this case would be having all these friends trying to stab you in the back...

    • @irfanhossainbhuiyanstudent3757
      @irfanhossainbhuiyanstudent3757 3 роки тому +7

      Is this hunter x hunter reference?

    • @onilord1830
      @onilord1830 3 роки тому +4

      1 sin for the "it was not the megaffin at the end it was the friends we maid" cliche

  • @henriqueferreirao559
    @henriqueferreirao559 4 роки тому +2946

    "perpetual motion doesn't exist"
    redstone: am i a joke to you

    • @user-mz7cn9hq8v
      @user-mz7cn9hq8v 4 роки тому +46

      Fully underrated

    • @aretard7995
      @aretard7995 4 роки тому +5

      RCT2 Corkscrew: Am I a joke to you?

    • @metallabx407
      @metallabx407 4 роки тому +32

      Fun fact: redstone uses real electricity.

    • @Snugglelol
      @Snugglelol 4 роки тому +26

      Red stone is technically powered by ur computer

    • @jonlincoln5133
      @jonlincoln5133 4 роки тому +1

      It does our solar system is one, but we are a bionary system witch means, two stars or suns pushing off the other keeping both systems running at same time

  • @jackhepworth3053
    @jackhepworth3053 Рік тому +6

    well said, i enjoyed every moment of this video!

  • @Aerational
    @Aerational Рік тому +18

    I feel like this is one of those things humanity really shouldn't give up on.

    • @angelcano4567
      @angelcano4567 2 місяці тому +2

      But it really isn't possible, and even if it was somehow done, there would be no real use. Like he said in the video, the most it would ever be able to do is just run itself forever, with no energy left for anything else

    • @NGOANHKHOIA-
      @NGOANHKHOIA- 2 місяці тому

      If we could make a perpetual motion machine with >100% efficiency then we could do a LOT of things.@@angelcano4567

    • @IrisWasTaken1
      @IrisWasTaken1 Місяць тому +1

      Why?

  • @chanralewis
    @chanralewis 4 роки тому +10336

    Lol it worked before it got patched in universe v0.013

    • @girieditx
      @girieditx 4 роки тому +228

      Underrated

    • @Seedx
      @Seedx 4 роки тому +27

      lel

    • @hassanahmadi4882
      @hassanahmadi4882 4 роки тому +97

      this comment deserves more credit

    • @JB-to2nz
      @JB-to2nz 4 роки тому +25

      don't forget, there's always the One

    • @mariafe7050
      @mariafe7050 4 роки тому +17

      How do you patch the universe?

  • @anibaldk
    @anibaldk 4 роки тому +2674

    "As long as you live under my roof, you're gonna live by my rules" - Thermodynamics.

    • @anibaldk
      @anibaldk 4 роки тому +24

      @synchromorph Somebody took the red pill

    • @MarkusAxunIllianus
      @MarkusAxunIllianus 4 роки тому +7

      The Simpsons did it

    • @hitkid2456
      @hitkid2456 4 роки тому +3

      If only it would be kind enough to let us be able to go outside that.

    • @Someone-ll1rc
      @Someone-ll1rc 4 роки тому +25

      Me:Then I’ll move out
      Thermodynamics: that’s called death.

    • @anibaldk
      @anibaldk 3 роки тому +3

      @matthe ai Really!? I didn't know Satan was Dutch!

  • @maicholor2849
    @maicholor2849 Місяць тому

    Gotta love explanations of things that can't ever be solved!

  • @jetspalt9550
    @jetspalt9550 7 місяців тому +2

    Have you tried turning it off and on again?

  • @NPCrash
    @NPCrash 2 роки тому +2015

    1st law of thermodynamics: We don't talk about thermodynamics.

    • @fortnitegaming4187
      @fortnitegaming4187 2 роки тому +6

      tyler deez nuts was never real

    • @nachiket7565
      @nachiket7565 2 роки тому +40

      2nd law of thermodynamics : WE DON'T *TALK* ABOUT THERMODYNAMICS..

    • @doublehit9165
      @doublehit9165 2 роки тому +5

      1rst law of thermodinamics: Cold does not exist
      2nd law of thermodinamics: hot air will go up adn swirl, radiant heat will go all around
      3rd law of thermodinamics: we dont know all kind of energy so changing one into another will cause part of it to become something unexpected

    • @Papa_Reecio
      @Papa_Reecio 2 роки тому

      Great minds think alike!

    • @Zamu273
      @Zamu273 2 роки тому +6

      It's funny because the guy who discovered it AND his assistant commited suicide

  • @parzival8786
    @parzival8786 3 роки тому +1827

    "No machine is 100% efficient because energy is lost as heat"
    Sad electric heater noises

    • @GIRGHGH
      @GIRGHGH 3 роки тому +60

      In that case energy would still be lost through sound and air friction, so it still can't.

    • @lyger_playz
      @lyger_playz 3 роки тому +226

      @@GIRGHGH Sad electric heater which plays music and act like a lamp noises

    • @ptrinch
      @ptrinch 3 роки тому +52

      I'd like to know why my electric heater claims to be 100% efficient, yet somehow manages to power the LED display.

    • @parzival8786
      @parzival8786 3 роки тому +12

      @@GIRGHGH r/woooosh

    • @GIRGHGH
      @GIRGHGH 3 роки тому +36

      Stating why your joke doesn't work doesn't mean I didn't understand what you were trying to say. Don't be a poor sport.

  • @Davidsavage8008
    @Davidsavage8008 7 місяців тому +1

    I've got 2 that work. Static wheel and a stackable permanent mag motor..
    Unfortunately they are restricted from patents because they go against vested interests.

    • @leoquinn04
      @leoquinn04 2 місяці тому

      look for the hidden batteries

  • @johmlemon532
    @johmlemon532 Рік тому +5

    This explains why at your old schools playground those spinner things never worked. You could get in them and be pushed, but the thought of leaning yourself inward or outward to go faster doesn’t work because immediately it will just rotate back and forth after maybe one forceful spin.

  • @josephrennocks8098
    @josephrennocks8098 7 років тому +4840

    Actually the first law of Thermodynamics is don't talk about Thermodynamics.

    • @Shiny100L
      @Shiny100L 7 років тому +71

      Sepy Thirteen but since so many people seem to know of thermodynamics I figure that law has been broken

    • @ethan6223
      @ethan6223 7 років тому +11

      Sepy Thirteen nice pfp

    • @josephrennocks8098
      @josephrennocks8098 7 років тому +90

      You're kicked out of Thermodynamics club

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox 7 років тому +43

      Sepy Thirteen Hey that’s Mumbo’s profile pic

    • @andregon4366
      @andregon4366 7 років тому +6

      What is the 34th law?

  • @vkze
    @vkze 3 роки тому +1505

    "Lisa......in this house we follow the laws of thermodynamics!"

    • @tuketound7944
      @tuketound7944 3 роки тому +58

      "YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO" starts making 10 more perpetual motion machines

    • @benjackhenry
      @benjackhenry 3 роки тому +21

      Obey the laws, not follow!

    • @t0mtom49
      @t0mtom49 3 роки тому +5

      But mom!

    • @benjackhenry
      @benjackhenry 3 роки тому +14

      @@t0mtom49 oh my god does anyone watch the Simpsons?? First off it's Homer second Lisa doesn't say anything in response!! What is happening?!?!

    • @francesco_fd_2212
      @francesco_fd_2212 3 роки тому +3

      Stonecutters everywhere

  • @evank3718
    @evank3718 Рік тому +222

    The hardest part about building a perpetual motion machine is figuring out where to hide the battery

    • @Desperajoe
      @Desperajoe Рік тому +5

      My favourite quote.
      Cool profile pic btw. Brings back memories :)

    • @rednetherbrick3178
      @rednetherbrick3178 Рік тому +14

      Copied

    • @yenespace406
      @yenespace406 Рік тому +5

      Tired of this comment

    • @evank3718
      @evank3718 Рік тому +5

      Legit sorry bout that, didn’t see this quip in the comments. I’d be annoyed too

    • @user-td3ut4tg3v
      @user-td3ut4tg3v 10 місяців тому

      Just saw a Chinese version

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 2 місяці тому

    drop into a open shaft to fill the other side higher counter balance heavy in lighter lift up

  • @crashwebb4715
    @crashwebb4715 3 роки тому +3327

    He obviously doesn't know about taping a piece of buttered bread to a cat

  • @jrkws
    @jrkws 2 роки тому +1091

    "For now, the one thing that seems truly perpetual is our search."
    Just put the perpetual searchers on a treadmill.

    • @jaredtandle2596
      @jaredtandle2596 2 роки тому +34

      Connect that to a generator and we could have enough energy to make one, tell them.

    • @user-ds3hb5iq7h
      @user-ds3hb5iq7h 2 роки тому +23

      @@jaredtandle2596 but then they'd stop searching and won't make energy, machine will then stop

    • @markthurst9751
      @markthurst9751 2 роки тому +2

      And when they die, soylent green for everyone!

    • @rhabeldibabeldi6812
      @rhabeldibabeldi6812 2 роки тому +1

      @@user-ds3hb5iq7h what if we dont tell them which machine they are strapped to? Or we tell them its a perpetual machine searching machine

    • @Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
      @Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 2 роки тому

      your pfp gives me chill.
      Edit: why did you change it :/

  • @Kaador
    @Kaador 5 місяців тому +1

    English:
    Even if it were completely self-sustaining, you cannot add or remove energy without changing the system, which would lead to a failure.
    If you take away energy, it can no longer sustain itself.
    If you add energy, the whole thing is pointless because you don't mean "perpetuum mobile" as such, but as a generator. E=0, i.e. E=(input=output) and thermodynamics don't play a role because energy is ALWAYS lost, be it through friction or something else, especially if you want to convert electricity into heat or kinetic energy.
    Of course, I can, for example, equip 2 disks with magnets and let them rotate forever. But you then change the initial situation by building a translation for the desired type of energy, which is absolutely necessary somewhere if you want to use things.
    Sooner or later the disks stop when the angular momentum ends or is stopped by the magnetic field and you need (relatively quite a lot) of energy to make them rotate.
    If something like this had already been invented to work, the Internet and newspapers would be full of it. Would be (almost) better than finally seeing a fusion power plant in operation.
    German:
    Selbst wenn es sich vollständig selbst erhielte kann man auch dann keine Energie zu- oder abführen ohne das System zu verändern was zu einem Ausfall führen würde.
    Entnimmt man Energie kann es sich nicht mehr selbst halten.
    Fügt man Energie zu, ist das ganze Ding sinnlos weil man ja nicht "Perpetuum mobiles" als solches meint, sondern als Generator. E=0 ,also E=(Eingang=Ausgabe) und die Thermodynamik spielen da nicht mit denn es geht IMMER Energie verloren, sei es durch Reibung oder sonst was, erst recht wenn man Strom in Wärme- oder Bewegungsenergie umwandeln will.
    Klar kann ich beispielsweise 2 Scheiben mit Magneten bestücken und es sich ewig drehen lassen. Nur, verändert man dann die Ausgangslage indem man eine Übersetzung für die gewünschte Energieart baut, was ja irgendwo zwingend erforderlich ist wenn man dingen benutzen will.
    Über kurz oder lang bleiben die Scheiben stehen wenn der Drehimpuls endet oder vom Magnetfeld beendet wird und man braucht wieder (Verhältnissmäßig ziemlich viel) Energie die es sich drehen ließe.
    Wäre sowas bereits funktionsfähig erfunden, wären Internet und Zeitungen voll davon. Wäre ja (fast) besser als endlich mal ein Fusionskraftwerk in Betrieb zu sehen.

  • @delburtphend6016
    @delburtphend6016 9 місяців тому

    A 1 kg mass moving 24.26 m/sec will rise for 2.473 seconds (this needs 24.26 N * sec: 9.81 N for 2.473 sec) and it will travel up 30 meters. After it has been raised 30 m the 1 kg mass can be placed in a 199 kg Atwood’s and dropped for 30 m. This takes 34.97 sec for (9.81 N/kg) 343.10 Ns. There is much more momentum in the Atwood’s than is needed for the rise.
    Newton's second law of motion: states that in a closed system, not affected by external forces, the total linear momentum does not change.
    This line can be the line that is the circumference of a circle. The interactions in this line are the same as interactions in a straight line. If a 40 kg rim gives all of its linear momentum to 1 kg: the momentum is still conserved even though all the mass is moving in a circle. One kg moving 40 m/sec has 40 times as much energy as 40 kg moving 1 m/sec; but it has the same linear momentum.
    This means that the Laws of Physics ‘require’ that energy can be made from preexisting momentum. And this energy can be easily recycled. The friction is minimal; because this 40 times increase is done in just a few seconds

  • @albertm7178
    @albertm7178 7 років тому +2998

    Simple because physics says we cant have nice things.

    • @arthurtancredi
      @arthurtancredi 7 років тому +24

      have you ever seen a gyroscope???

    • @mds19238
      @mds19238 7 років тому +6

      Arthur Leite ... again, who caused the motion to get the gyroscope started in the first place?

    • @arthurtancredi
      @arthurtancredi 7 років тому +6

      Vsauce did kkkk

    • @Billy-I-Am-Not
      @Billy-I-Am-Not 7 років тому +16

      Albert M DAMMIT PHYSICS, THIS IS WHY WE CANT HAVE NICE THINGS

    • @saavestro2154
      @saavestro2154 7 років тому +11

      that is why scientist are so excited about high temperature superconductivity, it allows to have a very little amount of energy loss when transporting electricity

  • @TheRishabhkumar
    @TheRishabhkumar 7 років тому +10477

    The animators of TED Ed should be given an award..

    • @matthewneubeck4421
      @matthewneubeck4421 7 років тому +14

      Rishabh Kumar ain't that tee truth

    • @EyesofMangekyou
      @EyesofMangekyou 7 років тому +51

      Rishabh Kumar I think you shouldnt compare adventure time with this animation as it were good. Just average Joe animation here. Y'all lack taste.

    • @EXHellfire
      @EXHellfire 7 років тому +30

      edgy

    • @CHRISTCHURCHUNITEDFC
      @CHRISTCHURCHUNITEDFC 7 років тому +3

      Rishabh Kumar I

    • @mikefutcher
      @mikefutcher 7 років тому +67

      You're not comparing like with like. Most TED Ed vids are created by a single animator who also storyboards, designs and interprets, rather than a cog in a huge machine.

  • @yigawaffle
    @yigawaffle 8 місяців тому

    Short answer: thermodynamics. Long answer: 0:00

  • @ezekielsparadise4633
    @ezekielsparadise4633 9 місяців тому

    I have a picture on my wall of that perpetual motion one at the 0:46 mark. I never knew what it was until now, but ive looked at it so much wondering how it worked😂

  • @d0da719
    @d0da719 3 роки тому +2577

    I broke the laws of thermodynamics..... Now I'm in physics jail.

    • @arandomseal4793
      @arandomseal4793 3 роки тому +26

      Zed YT how long until you get out

    • @f1rebreather123
      @f1rebreather123 3 роки тому +36

      Meme Goose forever

    • @khiemhoang419
      @khiemhoang419 3 роки тому +38

      f1rebreather123 you mean perpetual

    • @mayankraj2294
      @mayankraj2294 3 роки тому +3

      @@f1rebreather123 why is your name f1rebreather lol.?

    • @marianskodowski8337
      @marianskodowski8337 3 роки тому +9

      Some physics policeman arrested you? "You have to pay us for energy!" Even if it is free like an air to breath. But listen.. the boss of Nestle said that the water, say from rain, should be taxed. They are crazy.

  • @Ragzzy-R
    @Ragzzy-R 2 роки тому +3574

    The most difficult part of building a free energy device is figuring out the complex Engineering in how to hide the battery.

    • @ZaPpaul
      @ZaPpaul Рік тому +58

      This did give me a chuckle. Thanks.

    • @Landoftheignorant
      @Landoftheignorant Рік тому +86

      The difficult part is not getting murdered for the ideas.

    • @TheRenwickp
      @TheRenwickp Рік тому +10

      i think if it has a battery and generates its own power forever its a good build

    • @Acehamster
      @Acehamster Рік тому +8

      @@TheRenwickp true but forever hasn’t happened yet

    • @ohelio2766
      @ohelio2766 Рік тому +5

      @@Acehamster forever will never happen 😊

  • @nickirmen6671
    @nickirmen6671 26 днів тому

    This makes a lot of sense actually, the first law says you can't use physics and certain natural reactions because there's always an imbalance, and the second law says that energy will try to escape no matter what materials you use or how much you spend or study there will always be troubleshooting. Even if a perpetual motion machine was created that could break those laws it's going to be affected by so many other factors such as gravity and acceleration and aerodynamics, you name it.

  • @LordBelakor
    @LordBelakor 7 місяців тому

    such a great question with just a funny answer: they break the laws of physics :D
    funny side note: curious why the eight pointed star of Chaos was used for the 2nd thermodynamic law

  • @Intrafacial86
    @Intrafacial86 2 роки тому +2623

    *Law #1:* “Perfectly balanced - as all things should be.”
    *Law #2:* “The ruinous powers of Chaos.”

    • @Us3r739
      @Us3r739 2 роки тому +31

      Absolute power corrupt absolute chaos

    • @Ikajo
      @Ikajo 2 роки тому +58

      Law #1: Thanos
      Law #2: Loki

    • @akriegguardsman
      @akriegguardsman 2 роки тому +14

      *Blood good intensifies*

    • @tektoastium7241
      @tektoastium7241 2 роки тому +3

      *glass breaking noise*

    • @Liam-iv7wk
      @Liam-iv7wk 2 роки тому +10

      Law #3: "everything eventually dies?"

  • @kacper8435
    @kacper8435 5 років тому +1308

    This glitch was patched in the V.01.2 Update

    • @Megasterik
      @Megasterik 5 років тому +14

      r/outside

    • @Megasterik
      @Megasterik 5 років тому +38

      @@ThumbsTup Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality?

    • @shemidreamer8701
      @shemidreamer8701 5 років тому +6

      R/whoosh

    • @user-mq3ry6nr7z
      @user-mq3ry6nr7z 5 років тому +6

      @@Megasterik The matrix has you...

    • @Megasterik
      @Megasterik 5 років тому

      @@user-mq3ry6nr7z Yes.

  • @nosleep9494
    @nosleep9494 4 місяці тому

    “The only thing that is truly perpetual is our search” is fr a hard line. Cause at the same time I feel like we are gonna become energy ourself in the future.

  • @thomasjordan5619
    @thomasjordan5619 8 місяців тому

    We literally live on a perpetual motion device, in a system of perpetual motion devices, in a galaxy of perpetual motion and so on so fourth.

    • @PrinceAzura
      @PrinceAzura 8 місяців тому +1

      The movement of celestial bodies isn't perpetual, they all require external energy (gravity) to occur

  • @Carlbarl.
    @Carlbarl. 2 роки тому +1832

    He obviously doesn’t know about Afk machines in Minecraft

    • @Vodka6329
      @Vodka6329 2 роки тому +101

      Didn't know imprisoning villagers to take advantage of their farming behavior could pass as a Perpetual Machine.

    • @morgajoka838
      @morgajoka838 2 роки тому +3

      @@slivyo monkaW

    • @joescofield8459
      @joescofield8459 2 роки тому +4

      using water to continually move a ball in circles should count

    • @TylerJayWalker
      @TylerJayWalker 2 роки тому +1

      @@joescofield8459 what? Do you mean something in minecraft? Thats impossible

    • @caniget600subscriberswitho5
      @caniget600subscriberswitho5 2 роки тому

      500th like

  • @MrCasperChew
    @MrCasperChew 7 років тому +1220

    ".. one thing that's truly perpetual is our search." what a great ending !

    • @Zex-4729
      @Zex-4729 7 років тому +14

      that is bullshit, human will extinct anyway.

    • @horrorpill
      @horrorpill 7 років тому +2

      Robots will find the way to create it.

    • @serektaibah4091
      @serektaibah4091 7 років тому +7

      well technicly our searsh is powered by the sun eenergy cz without it we wont get food to get energy to searsh

    • @jvcmarc
      @jvcmarc 7 років тому +12

      Casper Chew spoiler alert

    • @Despotic_Waffle
      @Despotic_Waffle 7 років тому +4

      Casper Chew SPOILERS

  • @abigyan21
    @abigyan21 2 місяці тому

    Love from India 🎉
    It's Bhaskaracharya, our Indian mathematician. Felling proud to be indian.

  • @mythbusters866
    @mythbusters866 6 місяців тому +3

    2:35 That idea is one also one little problem, evaporation...

  • @KYLE-zo4bm
    @KYLE-zo4bm 7 років тому +953

    we need to legislate and change these laws!

    • @evilotto9200
      @evilotto9200 7 років тому +90

      The current US administration is hard at work repealing and replacing all scientific law

    • @KYLE-zo4bm
      @KYLE-zo4bm 7 років тому +12

      Evil Otto oh good

    • @sushantahuja9067
      @sushantahuja9067 6 років тому +12

      well let me tell you that you are in luck!.. Trump just became POTUS!

    • @joaovitormatos8147
      @joaovitormatos8147 6 років тому +12

      First thing we need is democracy! Who voted for Carnot? I didn't!

    • @dabiskitt
      @dabiskitt 6 років тому

      KY LE oki

  • @brodyelliott6181
    @brodyelliott6181 5 років тому +2838

    Ever heard of something called an infinite red stone source?

    • @deivisony
      @deivisony 5 років тому +153

      This man right here is a geniud

    • @chaosakazero
      @chaosakazero 5 років тому +29

      Sounds like a philosophers stone and I wouldn't call those infinite

    • @AWSMcube
      @AWSMcube 5 років тому +104

      @@thedude___dude4399 Take a quick look at your username

    • @greasypablo1315
      @greasypablo1315 5 років тому +41

      @@thedude___dude4399 your username makes me think that you secretly play minecraft.

    • @kisuke80
      @kisuke80 5 років тому +2

      Color itself is infinite but not with stone until the universe exists the colors will remain but not the stone heard of it but is half right and half wrong

  • @ejunky66
    @ejunky66 9 днів тому +2

    The hardest thing about building a perpetual motion machine is hiding the batteries.😆

  • @fijabo
    @fijabo 5 місяців тому +1

    I used to think like the author of this video until I learned about Nikolai Tesla. In my opinion, Tesla is the most important inventor of all times and he was a keen observer.
    I was in shocked with the Tesla's statement saying that we do not need to burn fuel to generate electricity. It is the reason why Tesla went through several assassination attempts. The 1st attempt happened in 1894 when his lab was bombed.
    People need to learn the true nature of the famous Tesla coil and its principle of operation based on what Tesla called "Radiant Electricity". That's right, because his transformer does not operate on magnetic field, it can avoid the energy limiting issues due to the Lenz's law.

    • @zeendaniels5809
      @zeendaniels5809 5 місяців тому +1

      Why don't you try to create the coil then? See what happens...

  • @1polyron1
    @1polyron1 2 роки тому +3185

    "The one thing that seems truly perpetual, is our search."
    I felt that

    • @j2csharp
      @j2csharp 2 роки тому +39

      And that perpetual search is exactly why we'll find the solution. We don't quit! :)

    • @ishaanmurarka9082
      @ishaanmurarka9082 2 роки тому +35

      @@j2csharp There is no solution. Because there is no problem. They are two sides of the ever moving same coin. Exactly same things divided into problem and solution by us for our entertainment.

    • @TelepathShield
      @TelepathShield 2 роки тому

      Me too

    • @1polyron1
      @1polyron1 2 роки тому +5

      @@ishaanmurarka9082 I love these types of philosophical debates

    • @phatrickmoore
      @phatrickmoore 2 роки тому

      Ted Ed is just the best.

  • @Isagiyoichi7K
    @Isagiyoichi7K 4 роки тому +19068

    Imagine if Newton hadn't invented the laws of thermodynamics

    • @esquire981
      @esquire981 4 роки тому +1281

      waiting for an r/woooosh comment

    • @wave8447
      @wave8447 4 роки тому +139

      SsanzZ r/woooosh

    • @107_javidmuhammad3
      @107_javidmuhammad3 4 роки тому +747

      Lmfaoo....Newton didn't discover laws of thermodynamics tho... People like carnot, kelvin etc., Did.

    • @CM-dx6xu
      @CM-dx6xu 4 роки тому +42

      this needs more like

    • @user-iv7jt1ex7j
      @user-iv7jt1ex7j 4 роки тому +77

      Well, they're false so he technically did invent them

  • @whothefrickareyou8106
    @whothefrickareyou8106 3 місяці тому

    5:03 "the one thing that seems truly prepertial is our search."
    *THE SOLUTION LITERALLY ON THE SCREEN*

  • @God.Of.Men.
    @God.Of.Men. 9 місяців тому +1

    Time to break the laws of physics.

  • @burgerbun2207
    @burgerbun2207 4 роки тому +1391

    Me: *Connects an extension cord to itself*
    Physics: Hehe I’m in trouble

    • @monal9918
      @monal9918 4 роки тому +30

      get this man a nobel prize

    • @yourmum3479
      @yourmum3479 4 роки тому +3

      i am weird i am weirdo r/woooosh

    • @canuckeraust
      @canuckeraust 4 роки тому +4

      Me: I like memes
      xXSlurpJuiceXx: *chuckles* I’m in danger

    • @atharvabendre973
      @atharvabendre973 4 роки тому +11

      xXSlurpJuiceXx
      Internal resistance of the wire:
      *Am I a joke to you?*

    • @animationfreak6552
      @animationfreak6552 4 роки тому

      this is a good video.just saying guy's.

  • @NintenUnity
    @NintenUnity 2 роки тому +1882

    "He chose the path of perpetual torment"

  • @softwalkz
    @softwalkz 10 місяців тому

    Can someone tell me what type of art of architecture is in the thumbnail (excluding the engines), because I have seen those warped, sketchy, or very jarring images depicted in scenes of cartoons of a style that's out of our world. Or just interpreting foreign terrain idk. I think it's very cool!

  • @radianzero
    @radianzero 4 роки тому +1729

    Bhaskara: *Creates Idea of perpetuarl motion machine*
    Newton after creating Thermodynamics: "Sorry, we patched it."

    • @mariafe7050
      @mariafe7050 4 роки тому +13

      He didn't create it he discovered it

    • @micheal5117
      @micheal5117 4 роки тому +89

      @@mariafe7050 the joke

    • @nachomartinez4758
      @nachomartinez4758 4 роки тому +22

      Thermodynamics were described many years after Newton died. He had nothing to do with it. Newton did not even used nor understand the term "energy".

    • @chocofrolik834
      @chocofrolik834 4 роки тому +3

      @@mariafe7050 r/woooosh

    • @Movie2Documentary
      @Movie2Documentary 4 роки тому

      salty

  • @ezucra
    @ezucra 4 роки тому +756

    Me who has made insane theories: *hmm what if....*
    Rules of physics: *no just stop*

    • @imfunaplaymahgames8880
      @imfunaplaymahgames8880 4 роки тому +8

      Mev Cilbox
      Rules of physics: everyone/everything must follow the rules.
      Super liquid helium: Step aside.

    • @stixinst5791
      @stixinst5791 4 роки тому +4

      @@imfunaplaymahgames8880 or neutron matter

    • @imfunaplaymahgames8880
      @imfunaplaymahgames8880 4 роки тому

      Connor Toriello 😱 THATS GENIUS! 😱

  • @Zedblitz6002
    @Zedblitz6002 9 місяців тому

    If I’m not mistaken in theory yes perpetual motion is possible if no energy escapes since energy can’t be created nor destroyed, but in practice it’s not possible because with our current technology there will always be a source for energy transfer, even with out friction, some energy is transferred to sound, and heat just to mention two. There is simply too many ways energy can escape, and even if you decrease this to a fractional amount, eventually all the energy will escape. Anyways I’m never paid much attention in physics so correct me if I’m wrong.

    • @LineOfThy
      @LineOfThy 6 місяців тому

      Even if you managed to stop all forms of energy (it’s impossible) it would still be useless.

  • @PYRO_KING_TUTORIALS
    @PYRO_KING_TUTORIALS 9 місяців тому

    Low of thermodynamics 100-10=90
    Perpetual motion 100-10=100

  • @murgmir
    @murgmir 7 років тому +3419

    That last statement is deep.

    • @katowo6521
      @katowo6521 7 років тому +147

      It's so deep, adele wants to roll in it

    • @ragnaroksora8129
      @ragnaroksora8129 7 років тому +4

      very deep

    • @blueshanks1
      @blueshanks1 7 років тому +22

      Ignatius talking balls deep?

    • @groznyentertainment
      @groznyentertainment 7 років тому +15

      they show the planet earth spinning in the last statment , and they overlook the fact the orbiting planets are perpetual in motion

    • @briandiehl9257
      @briandiehl9257 7 років тому +43

      That is not perpetual motion

  • @sireanthony1793
    @sireanthony1793 5 років тому +1332

    Infinite water source just make it 2 by 2

    • @mis_l5858
      @mis_l5858 5 років тому +4

      lmao amirite?

    • @darkhorsearmor3513
      @darkhorsearmor3513 5 років тому +13

      wierd dog lol Minecraft logic.

    • @fitzjordy
      @fitzjordy 5 років тому +29

      Or 3x1, take the water from the middle

    • @mis_l5858
      @mis_l5858 5 років тому +35

      Jordy Manurung Ew, nobody uses that at all.

    • @sireanthony1793
      @sireanthony1793 5 років тому +4

      @@fitzjordy i have played for over 5 years and didn't know that was a thing

  • @HesOneShot88
    @HesOneShot88 Рік тому

    I believe that the problem is the toroidal influence of the planets axis.so its all fine until the axis reaches an shifting point.And maybe have magnets pushing then switch all of the magnets polarities at once.

  • @chazwyman
    @chazwyman 7 місяців тому

    The closest thing to a PM machine is the earth going round he sun, continually in free fall, and not acquiring any resistence. However , even the earth's orbt can decay.

  • @reversesin
    @reversesin 4 роки тому +664

    When you try to plug the extension cord in to itself

    • @Carl-LaFong1618
      @Carl-LaFong1618 4 роки тому +19

      I tried to buy a cordless extension cord.

    • @ladyhaha7548
      @ladyhaha7548 4 роки тому +17

      @@Carl-LaFong1618 wait,tthats illegal

    • @user-xt4gh7tn9p
      @user-xt4gh7tn9p 4 роки тому +4

      @HZB OcYpcWr'Ctwu Odzs this sounds really, really wrong

    • @KemestA7X
      @KemestA7X 4 роки тому +6

      i have a friend that asked me why his computer wasn't turning on. I checked it out and he had plugged the power bar into itself....

    • @Joshuaxiong2
      @Joshuaxiong2 4 роки тому

      Lol ikr. I was thinking of this too. I thought of this too when I was little.

  • @DlSASTERCHlLD
    @DlSASTERCHlLD 2 роки тому +342

    Perpetual motion machinery has always interested me, not because I think it's worth pursuing in particular, but because the field is a breeding ground for thoughts about how to overcome energy loss to the extremes. I don't want a perpetual energy source, I want to see a piece of machinery that is so efficient that ones interaction with could be so intuitive and low frequency that practically anyone and their dog could use them to make energy, in the future.

    • @timelessadventurer
      @timelessadventurer 2 роки тому +2

      Yes! I agree with your statement!

    • @pizzaman9859
      @pizzaman9859 2 роки тому +4

      Oh yeah, it’s big brain time.

    • @rennsoy
      @rennsoy Рік тому +2

      Omaayghadd, I'm thinking the same thing. For years now.

    • @graves5371
      @graves5371 Рік тому +2

      Solar panels, all you need is the Sunlight and a battery

    • @CMogula
      @CMogula Рік тому +5

      congratulations you just invent what called as "gears" a complex gear could manipulate small energy collectively overtime into task that needs big and quick energy in other terms delaying powers needed into small but continuous cycle

  • @divyahapani
    @divyahapani Рік тому

    Great topic

  • @Wolfgame30
    @Wolfgame30 6 місяців тому

    I believe it was Da Vinci that created a kind of windmill that had metal balls in the propeller blades .. the inside of blades had a hollowed out track so as the blades reached the top they'd fall to the center.. and as it spun the ball would force the propeller to turn as the fell towards the out edge of the propeller.. therefore gravity always forcing the blades to turn.. I always wondered why engineers did not incorporate this engineering into wind turbines

    • @LineOfThy
      @LineOfThy 3 місяці тому

      Because it doesn't work.

  • @ItlsWhatltls
    @ItlsWhatltls 2 роки тому +2032

    So they’ve obviously never plugged an extension chord into itself🙄

    • @Schnort
      @Schnort 2 роки тому +176

      Can't believe we've been trusting these "scientists" this whole time. They just don't want to give the populous infinite energy!

    • @mikejohnson3338
      @mikejohnson3338 2 роки тому +168

      * extension *cord*
      _you're too musically inclined, Ben_

    • @smashpillow8513
      @smashpillow8513 2 роки тому +35

      @@mikejohnson3338 Gold

    • @squindle.
      @squindle. 2 роки тому +27

      @@smashpillow8513 copper

    • @jay1185
      @jay1185 2 роки тому +19

      @@squindle. Titanium

  • @hailegabriel5771
    @hailegabriel5771 5 років тому +1309

    Human: We will make PERPETUAL MOTION.
    Universe: No
    Human: Why?
    Universe: Just suffer.

    • @acrsclspdrcls1365
      @acrsclspdrcls1365 5 років тому +24

      The Universe is a cold and cruel mistress.

    • @WomenCoalition
      @WomenCoalition 5 років тому +3

      @@acrsclspdrcls1365
      YES
      They don't care you and you should not giving F on it

    • @seradow
      @seradow 5 років тому

      Acrsicles Pedrcles yet it seems possibilities are endless

    • @FhargaZ
      @FhargaZ 5 років тому +1

      Universe: i hate you now.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 4 роки тому +1

      "In Soviet Russia..." ok enough of that sh*t already! ha-ha

  • @abhilashasinha5186
    @abhilashasinha5186 Рік тому

    0:53 good idea just kickstart it and it will make its own light

  • @JustHuman87
    @JustHuman87 Рік тому +2

    One of the greatest questions of all time

  • @jeffminder4067
    @jeffminder4067 6 років тому +2700

    if I scratch my dogs belly in the right spot his foot will start to scratch the air. if I keep scratching his foot will get closer and closer to the spot on his belly until he starts scratching there himself. I remove my hand and he continues to scratch the spot that makes him have to scratch. BOOM: perpetual motion machine.

    • @GoogleHelpYou
      @GoogleHelpYou 6 років тому +348

      Jeff Minder But you need to feed your dog

    • @nathancraig4710
      @nathancraig4710 6 років тому +283

      Quick somebody get this man a Nobel Prize

    • @maximoooooooo8os
      @maximoooooooo8os 6 років тому +47

      Genius.

    • @temptation6006
      @temptation6006 6 років тому +24

      Jeff Minder your dog would get tired

    • @Mike-uv8sy
      @Mike-uv8sy 6 років тому +84

      10/10 Issac newton would read again

  • @msun6526
    @msun6526 4 роки тому +1793

    The real perpetual motion machines were the friends we made along the way.

    • @bearthatrun
      @bearthatrun 4 роки тому +39

      i dont have friends =(

    • @oxfordcommaisthegreatest
      @oxfordcommaisthegreatest 4 роки тому +82

      @@bearthatrun
      Then you don't have perpetual motion machines

    • @torrent8446
      @torrent8446 4 роки тому +34

      @@bearthatrun i'll be your perpetual motion machine anytime

    • @EmanuelRay3232
      @EmanuelRay3232 4 роки тому +1

      here were dragons Hunter X Hunter?

    • @ThomasonCG
      @ThomasonCG 4 роки тому +10

      @@torrent8446 can i be the third wheel in the motion machine?

  • @helo9316
    @helo9316 Рік тому +3

    3:16 about that one, what if you make the hole bigger and wider so that the ball still falls through from some kind of slide and then reaches back the starting point? I know it probably wouldn't reach the starting point but if it hypothetically did then would it finally be a true perpetual motion machine?

    • @vincez460
      @vincez460 Рік тому +1

      Magnets get weaker over time and eventually stop working

    • @thefluffybunny5083
      @thefluffybunny5083 10 місяців тому

      and what if we add a weak magnet below the base of the hole like beliw the slide that would prevent the ball from being held at the bigger magnet because gravity is there too and then a wek magnet to pull it to the start

    • @LineOfThy
      @LineOfThy 6 місяців тому

      @@thefluffybunny5083not gonna work

    • @lolgamer16
      @lolgamer16 3 місяці тому

      ​@@thefluffybunny5083 the magnet will not pull the ball when it is down the slope

  • @adityavaishy6120
    @adityavaishy6120 7 місяців тому

    One TED-Ed video is worth many hours of university classes. 😏

  • @littlecreature1328
    @littlecreature1328 4 роки тому +1199

    Ted ed: Perpetual Motion machines never work
    Minecraft redstone: Im about to end this mans whole career

    • @lucadascalu5727
      @lucadascalu5727 4 роки тому +87

      *laughs in flying machine*

    • @nickwilson3499
      @nickwilson3499 4 роки тому +56

      j a it’s funny because if you think about it, a button or a lever is literally infinite energy.

    • @garettjohnson2234
      @garettjohnson2234 4 роки тому +30

      @@nickwilson3499 a button is temporary, a lever lasts for as long as it's on

    • @lucapowell5502
      @lucapowell5502 4 роки тому +59

      If you consider the "Redstone System" as the code running in your computer's processor/s and being stored in memory, then the system is in fact drawing power from an external source. Interesting to think that the redstone's "energy" is just virtual - virtually infinite - though still limited by the physical energy which you can give to your computer.

    • @littlecreature1328
      @littlecreature1328 4 роки тому +23

      @@lucapowell5502 god, why you gotta ruin everything
      (jk)

  • @makutamon
    @makutamon 4 роки тому +422

    I once saw this in a Dilbert Comic:
    Dilbert: I’m obsessed with creating a perpetual motion device. Most scientists say it can’t be done, but I have one thing they don’t have.
    Dogbert: A lot of spare time?
    Dilbert: Exactly.

  • @DefeatLust
    @DefeatLust Рік тому

    Wow, I actually learned something!

  • @harryrussell154
    @harryrussell154 2 місяці тому

    The Power Multiplier Device: Open sourced, gravity driven, free energy generator:
    Functions as follows:
    There are two large sprockets, one on the roof of the building, the other at ground level. A chain connects both so that when one side of the chain is pulled down it turns both sprockets.
    On the axle of the lower sprocket there is another sprocket that connects to a transmission that is connected to a generator. When the same side of the chain is pulled down it turns the lower sprocket and the second sprocket which turns the generator to produce energy. This requires a downward pull of 2,000 pounds to produce sufficient energy.
    On the inside of the chain that is pulled down there is a small drive sprocket that is kept in place by two heavy plates, one of each side of the small sprocket, having the axle of the small sprocket going through each weight. On the outside of the chain there are two idler wheels above and below where the small sprocket is on the other side to keep the chain on the small sprocket. Two more idler wheels at the top of each weight to keep it attached to the chain. Each axle of the idler sprocket has threads for a machine nut so they stay in place as connectors.
    The axle of the small sprocket goes through the weights on both sides and extends out. A large bicycle-type wheel is placed on this axle and has a diameter of 7 feet. At the top of the weight on the side of this bicycle-type wheel is a small motor that has a chain around its drive sprocket that goes around the circumference of the bicycle-type wheel.
    Small motor draws energy from the battery to turn a large bicycle-type wheel clockwise, turning the drive sprocket clockwise also because both share the same axle. This has the drive sprocket climb the chain, taking the whole assembly with its 2,000 pounds of weights. Three things now happen:
    1) The motor takes the assembly to the top of the chain with its 400 pound pull, taking 1 hour to do so, requiring the energy amount from the battery. Energy Expended going up. EE/up= 1 hour pull of 400 pounds from the battery.
    2) As the assembly is climbing the chain, it's heavy weight (2,000 lbs.) is still hanging/pulling on the chain, pulling the chain down which turns the transmission/generator, producing a full charge of energy going back into the battery. Energy generated going up, EG/Up = 1 hour of a 2,000 pound pull by the heavy mechanism.
    3) When the assembly reaches the top the small motor shuts off and the assembly's weight slowly begins to descend, pulling the chain down with it. Since it climbed the chain faster than it pulled the chain down, its descent will take longer than 1 hour for its energy generated down charge into the battery. EG/Down = 1+ hour of a 2,000 pound pull charging into the battery.
    EE/Up 1 hour of a 400 pound pull < EG/UP (1 hour of a 2,000 pound pull charge into the battery) + EG/Down (1+ hours of the 2,000 pound pull charge into the battery) = FE, EE/up < (EG/UP + EG/Down) = FE.
    With a heavier weight:
    1) The motor takes the assembly to the top of the chain, taking 3 minutes to do so, requiring the energy amount from the battery that is represented by the expression 1N. Energy expended going up. EE/up=1N.
    2) As the assembly is climbing the chain, it's heavy weight is still hanging/pulling on the chain, pulling the chain down which turns the transmission/generator, producing a full charge of energy going back into the battery. Energy generated going up, EG/up=.4N.
    3) When the assembly reaches the top, the small motor shuts off and the assembly's weight slowly begins to descend, pulling the chain down with it. This descent takes 10 times longer than the ascent due to the heavy weight of the assembly, and the low gearing of the transmission, it 'creeps' down.
    In 3 minutes going up, .4N was charged back into the battery. In 6 minutes going down .8N will be charged into the battery, replacing all of the energy the small motor expended. The remaining 24 minutes of the descent will charge 3.2N into the battery, Energy generated going down, EG/down=3.2N energy not needed for the mechanism's operation, free energy.
    EE/up < (EG/up + EG/down) = FE, or, 1N < (.4N + 4N) = 3.4N FE. Connecting another PMD with five times the weight, to the first one, having the lower sprocket be the small motor for the second one's larger bicycle-type wheel, will produce more energy.

  • @yourjunes
    @yourjunes 5 років тому +770

    Short answer: Entropy
    Long Answer: Entropy

    • @pilentus1230
      @pilentus1230 5 років тому +7

      Under appreciated comment

    • @ashfennelly76
      @ashfennelly76 5 років тому +1

      Nice

    • @holdge5382
      @holdge5382 5 років тому +23

      Shouldn't it be eeeeeeennnnnnnntttrrroooopy?

    • @yourjunes
      @yourjunes 5 років тому +8

      @@Nordkiinach The universe is finite, its expansion is infinite. Very different.

    • @Sophia.L64
      @Sophia.L64 5 років тому +20

      @Déjà Siku I don't understand your thought process. In my opinion you have said a lot without really saying anything at all.

  • @RandomPerson-kf6qm
    @RandomPerson-kf6qm 3 роки тому +452

    “Oh look a self watering bowl of infinite energy!”
    Gravity : *Thats cute*

    • @brucemiller1696
      @brucemiller1696 3 роки тому +5

      What happens if you take gravity out of the equation of some of the machines?

    • @bobamsd5559
      @bobamsd5559 2 роки тому +5

      @@brucemiller1696 if you did, it would theoretically be wrong as gravity always acts on the machines.

    • @brucemiller1696
      @brucemiller1696 2 роки тому

      @@bobamsd5559 not in space.

    • @bobamsd5559
      @bobamsd5559 2 роки тому

      @@brucemiller1696 yeah I was talking about earth

    • @christianmohammed3728
      @christianmohammed3728 2 роки тому +1

      @@brucemiller1696 gravity occurs with everything, you exert gravity on something but it's just miniscule compared to earth.

  • @Mr.Coldfire421
    @Mr.Coldfire421 Рік тому

    Although earth movement and other object in the cosmos seems moving in a perpetual motion (even though we know its not due to the law of entropy) but in our lifespan as a human in our perspective it seems to be moving in a perpetual way. Perhaps lets stop to look on a solution for perpetual motion but we can focus on how to prolong a movement of an object like how earth, stars, and planets does.

    • @caldeira_a
      @caldeira_a Рік тому

      we know how to do it but the aprtpart you don't understand is that we gain nothing from it, in order to spin the earth it had to be given enough energy to spin for all this time, we can make something spin for millions of years by making an object with a LOT of mass and spinning it, it will be spinning for a very long time but we will make less energy from it than we wasted to put it spinning on the first place

  • @maggietang4536
    @maggietang4536 Місяць тому

    What about the super conductor ring with current going it in circles with no signs of slowing down?

  • @Wildash
    @Wildash 4 роки тому +663

    Yoo, ted just tricked me into learning for 5 minutes

    • @adityadabas9408
      @adityadabas9408 4 роки тому +1

      Lol 😂

    • @ByMorraDiabo
      @ByMorraDiabo 4 роки тому +1

      your ancestors: shame

    • @gordonh9921
      @gordonh9921 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah what were they thinking?

    • @amp4105
      @amp4105 4 роки тому +4

      i couldnt imagine not wanting to learn things like this, its so interesting.

    • @MessedUpBrainspike
      @MessedUpBrainspike 4 роки тому +3

      It's the narrator's voice, I swear. I could listen to him talk about things I'm not even remotely interested in for hours.

  • @jessepinkman2291
    @jessepinkman2291 5 років тому +422

    trying to invent one of this must be the same feeling of trying a gta5 glitch for 2 hours and then figure out it was already patched

    • @GandalfTheSilver
      @GandalfTheSilver 5 років тому +13

      *_gets glitchers ptsd_*
      damn... patches...

    • @aidenchaos
      @aidenchaos 4 роки тому +4

      The worst feeling FrFr

    • @snazzyjovialwyrm3314
      @snazzyjovialwyrm3314 4 роки тому +1

      It's the equivalent of trying to install a bunch of mods for Skyrim.

  • @jimmyagnew2184
    @jimmyagnew2184 11 місяців тому

    I,ve been thinking that if we could change the weight of some material, heavy at the bottom light at the top, like as it passes through some polarity, not sure

  • @naxel37
    @naxel37 7 місяців тому +1

    Maybe, these laws don't apply as much in space and we haven't experimented enough. Some objects in space may float indefinitely as they have been for eons. Carrying kinetic and potential energy unlike objects that are subject to Earths personal entropy, resistance and restrictions.