More Bizarre Attempts at Perpetual Motion Machines

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 вер 2024
  • Explore the weirdest attempts at creating perpetual motion machines, from quirky toys like the Drinking Bird to misguided inventions claiming divine power. Find out what really keeps these contraptions moving!
    Warographics: / @warographics643
    MegaProjects: / @megaprojects9649
    Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
    Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
    Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
    Brain Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
    Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
    Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373
    Places: / @places302
    Astrographics: / @astrographics-ve4yq

КОМЕНТАРІ • 845

  • @etunimenisukunimeni1302
    @etunimenisukunimeni1302 4 дні тому +825

    There's that old saying: the hardest part of inventing a perpetual motion machine is to figure out where to hide the batteries

    • @beginnereasy
      @beginnereasy 4 дні тому +2

      It's irrelevant

    • @AGnorTheChannel
      @AGnorTheChannel 4 дні тому +55

      ​@@beginnereasy considering the multiple mentions of batteries in this video and that no one has yet actually invented such a machine as far as we're aware, it's entirely relevant.

    • @samuelgarrod8327
      @samuelgarrod8327 4 дні тому +3

      That's the first time I've ever heard it so it's not old.

    • @DecrepitBiden
      @DecrepitBiden 4 дні тому +3

      The duality of the irrelevant makes it relevant

    • @Doi-
      @Doi- 4 дні тому +12

      ​@@beginnereasysays the man with a real irrelevant statement.

  • @agalah408
    @agalah408 3 дні тому +118

    "Lisa! In this house we OBEY the laws of thermodynamics"

    • @UnionYes1021
      @UnionYes1021 2 дні тому +1

      And you don’t want to have to pay the fine that comes with breaking the third law!

    • @jeanaprewitt9658
      @jeanaprewitt9658 День тому +2

      "I reject your reality and substitute my own!"

    • @bioLarzen
      @bioLarzen День тому +3

      "Physics - it's not just a fancy idea, it's the law." ;)

    • @tturi2
      @tturi2 18 годин тому +1

      enforced by the second law

    • @kimcheelove
      @kimcheelove Годину тому

      this perpetual motion device just keeps going faster and faster!

  • @Joseph-z7s3b
    @Joseph-z7s3b 4 дні тому +422

    Perpetual motion exists. It's Simon moving from channel to channel and subject to subject. Good God Simon. Don't just do something. Sit there.

    • @williestyle35
      @williestyle35 4 дні тому +24

      As a matter of fact, Simon was wearing this exact same outfit in another video I saw on a different one of his channels', two days ago. lol He must film nearly a dozen or so of these at a time...

    • @michaelhowell2326
      @michaelhowell2326 4 дні тому +6

      Solid comment.

    • @murrayscott9546
      @murrayscott9546 4 дні тому +7

      Batteries not included.

    • @MSjackiesaunders
      @MSjackiesaunders 4 дні тому +2

      😅😅😅

    • @MSjackiesaunders
      @MSjackiesaunders 4 дні тому +4

      ​@@williestyle35 he is known for being parsimonious with his clothing budget.

  • @johnlewan1114
    @johnlewan1114 4 дні тому +130

    Up next, 50 channels you didn't know Simon narrates.

    • @CoPoint
      @CoPoint 4 дні тому +3

      ...part 1, beginning of a LONG series 😁...

    • @MindBodySoulOk
      @MindBodySoulOk 3 дні тому +1

      Fascinating eggskull however

    • @MattBellzminion
      @MattBellzminion 3 дні тому +1

      Although their production may suggest to some that the Infographics team is a perpetual motion machine, you have to keep feeding them.

    • @tertrih9078
      @tertrih9078 Годину тому

      Haha. So true

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 3 дні тому +37

    0:30 - Chapter 1 - The drinking bird
    3:05 - Chapter 2 - Perpetual marble machine
    5:25 - Chapter 3 - Magnetic fidget spinner motor
    8:25 - Chapter 4 - Dreadco perpetual motion machine
    12:00 - Chapter 5 - Perpetual energy from god

    • @DrWhat2
      @DrWhat2 2 дні тому

      You forgot to discuss Besslers Wheel. Unless I missed it

  • @adrielburned6924
    @adrielburned6924 4 дні тому +90

    If my 42 yr old little brother is reading this; I hope this video finally convinces you that your magnet perpetual motion design WILL NOT WORK. I'm sorry, but it was a good try. 😊 Love ya brother! ❤

    • @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667
      @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667 2 дні тому

      Actually your brother is correct that the only possible way to even conceive of or attempt to produce a machine of perpetual motion would be through magnetism. Electromagnetism is the strongest force in the universe. The only reason there is no way to make a perpetual motion machine, even with magnetism, is that all things eventually corrode and break down and so will a perpetual motion machine. Even if successfully harnessing the magnetism to gain perpetual motion. That truly is the only folly in your brothers thinking so I would give him a bit more credit than you are.

    • @Chris47368
      @Chris47368 2 дні тому +7

      I came up with a similar concept when i was 14 or 15... needless to say i was disappointed to learn thermodynamics makes such a thing impossible shortly after 😂
      Reality truly can be disappointing 😢

    • @JoeSmith-cy9wj
      @JoeSmith-cy9wj 2 дні тому

      You might want to encourage your little brother.
      After all, every atom in the universe, as far as anyone can tell, is a perpetual motion machine.

    • @jasonbutler4867
      @jasonbutler4867 2 дні тому +5

      I have made a beta version of what I’m assuming is your brother’s idea of a spinning, magnetic electrical system and the second you add any resistance to it won’t work even using the most super super magnets

    • @rebirth_mishap
      @rebirth_mishap День тому +1

      Is name isn't Issac is it?

  • @velzekt4598
    @velzekt4598 2 дні тому +14

    Every machine can be a perpetual motion machine if you apply enough external energy to it

    • @rashidisw
      @rashidisw Годину тому

      That is why I always advocates to siphon Earth rotational momentum for power generator.

  • @prestonsingersoll
    @prestonsingersoll 4 дні тому +185

    Holy shit that last one hit way too close to home. When I was 13 my dad quit his teaching job and cashed out his retirement because he thought that god had told him the designs for an AC solid state battery. He drove my family to bankruptcy trying to put together an incoherent non-sensical mess of a battery that never worked.

    • @MizterTonik
      @MizterTonik 4 дні тому +32

      You hate to hear it, man. That sucks.

    • @vladimirjar3800
      @vladimirjar3800 4 дні тому +50

      if god is powering the perpetual motion machine then it is not perpetual motion because it is powerd by an out side force

    • @MichaelWinter-ss6lx
      @MichaelWinter-ss6lx 4 дні тому +14

      He was too far ahead of his time, as solid state batteries now are being researched.

    • @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x
      @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x 4 дні тому

      🙄 😒​@@vladimirjar3800

    • @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x
      @xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x 4 дні тому +17

      Sorry to hear that. I'm no psychiatrist but that sounds like some undiagnosed mental health issues.

  • @dbblues.9168
    @dbblues.9168 День тому +22

    There's an old saying: the hardest part of inventing a perpetual motion machine is figuring out how to get money for it on crowd funding sites.

  • @Reegareth
    @Reegareth День тому +11

    I have no idea why were so obsessed with the idea of a perpetual motion machine for energy when we have a massive fusion reactor that we're all literally floating around...

    • @ryshellso526
      @ryshellso526 8 годин тому

      Chill out musk...

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 7 годин тому

      There is a pretty big cultural element to it. when you rubberneck the free energy communities, you find that they tend to be rather conspiratorial and anti semitic.. their world is dominated by the idea that the world is wrong and that a group of (unworthy) people are intentionally keeping the world they deserve away from them. Kinda like flat earthers or sovereign citizens.. and once they have that shared belief of fighting the great evil and persecution for being superior, they bond over it.
      Can't get that from something that works.

    • @joeshmoe7967
      @joeshmoe7967 5 годин тому

      Well, the fusion reactor gets blocked for a good part of the 'day', plus clouds etc. Now if someone could invent a pocket sized device to use the output of the reactor, in a meaningful way. I mean NOT a 3 watt phone charger etc. Or run your house, but not cost $30K up front. 'Free' is always an attractive option. Unfortunately there is no 'free', anywhere.

  • @Ed_Stuckey
    @Ed_Stuckey 4 дні тому +51

    0:21 Harbor Freight free multimeter shows tools of a true scientist.

    • @lelokong6898
      @lelokong6898 3 дні тому +3

      Sad that they don't do, free tape measures anymore,

    • @drkastenbrot
      @drkastenbrot 2 дні тому +5

      @@lelokong6898 the tape measure is a decent free tool but the multimeter is a serious hazard with the completely unsuitable fuses inside.

    • @SteveSiegelin
      @SteveSiegelin 2 дні тому +1

      When you need multiple meters they work fine. They are as accurate as my $150 meter but they have no security circuit so the are easy to destroy. I use up to 5 sometimes so that I can have live readings from multiple points of my projects at the same time. It is cheaper than an oscilloscope yet still pretty accurate. Bad batteries will give you bad readings but the meters cost $7-$12 and as long as you use a good meter to calibrate initially you will be fine.

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 дні тому

      Free with purchase tyvm

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 дні тому

      ​@@drkastenbrotand that's a hazard how?

  • @michaeldowson6988
    @michaeldowson6988 4 дні тому +24

    There already is a perpetual motion machine. It's generally referred to as a 'two year old'.

    • @PLUV1
      @PLUV1 2 години тому

      sadly those 2 year old only keeps in motion when under surveillance .

  • @SarahC2
    @SarahC2 3 дні тому +7

    2:55 That's my piccy from my Flickr page! Wooooo! Internet famous. Thanks Simon!

  • @ArtUniverse
    @ArtUniverse 2 дні тому +7

    The biggest challenge in making a perpetual motion machine is hiding the energy source.

    • @ulvschmidt7174
      @ulvschmidt7174 2 дні тому

      My favourite are those clocks that get powered by the heat difference in the day night cycle

    • @commitfelonyfeline
      @commitfelonyfeline День тому +2

      Wow, this joke is even funnier the 100th time

  • @lawnmowerdude
    @lawnmowerdude 3 дні тому +5

    I got an ad on UA-cam the other day trying to sell me perpetual motion plans. What a crock of garbage. It went on and on about how amazing it was and took them 5 whole minutes of constantly hyping this pile of garbage up to show a two second video of it “working”. What amounted to two stepper motors coupled together with a battery and a bunch of useless circuits.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 3 дні тому

      There a much better version, where you buy a large set of plans for big bucks ...which turn out to be copied from several free-energy websites. It's perpetual motion: selling free stuff.

  • @ABD5667
    @ABD5667 4 дні тому +5

    All motion needs energy. Friction stops motion. In the end a person needs more energy to overcome friction, for perpetual motion perpetual energy is needed

  • @AdamtheRed-
    @AdamtheRed- 4 дні тому +29

    Gotta say that thumbnail looks like the most useless machine that the AI could come up with. None of the gears connect. It looks neat though.

    • @brionfranks478
      @brionfranks478 3 дні тому +1

      @@AdamtheRed- a Rube Goldberg contraption for sure...

    • @SpydersByte
      @SpydersByte 2 дні тому

      lol right? Definitely an AI generated image, those gears are completely pointless. Also the teeth near the screw look a bit wonky

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 дні тому

      Well the mechanism is sound though. Obviously not for perpetual motion since that doesn't exist. But in theory the horizontal gear turns the spiral gear, which oscillates the bar above it back and forth, which on a particular stroke pushes the vertical gears (which should be clock gears) that rotate the bottom horizontal gear, which turns the spiral gear, which oscillates the bar which turns the two vertical gears etc etc.

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- 2 дні тому

      @@A_Stereotypical_Heretic none of the gears actually connect. It's a nonsense AI image. Look at the left most vertical gear. It doesn't have a top, past the horizontal bar, that also seems useless. The bottom horizontal gear is fixed to the base with the screws that can be seen, and it seems like all the vertical gears would be inside of it where they intersect. It looks neat, though. The center, what looks like a worm gear, isn't actually a gear at all. It's like four inverted bowls on the shaft. No power is being transferred there.

    • @A_Stereotypical_Heretic
      @A_Stereotypical_Heretic 2 дні тому

      @@AdamtheRed- i mean yeah of course it's a garbage image, but you can understand the deeply buried gist.

  • @murrayscott9546
    @murrayscott9546 4 дні тому +12

    I once tried to invent a perpetual motion machine. Piece of junk, I threw it away. Stupid thing kept going faster and faster !

  • @InfinateIntensity
    @InfinateIntensity 3 дні тому +10

    The main problem with perpetual motion is that even IF it WAS possible, it would never generate enough torque to spin a turbine generator

    • @Global-yt
      @Global-yt День тому

      I mean, even if you got just a single watt from a machine, all you need is 1 billion of them to make 1 billion watts...

    • @InfinateIntensity
      @InfinateIntensity День тому +1

      @@Global-yt I wonder what the return on investment would be for something like that, probably a million years

    • @Global-yt
      @Global-yt 20 годин тому

      ​@@InfinateIntensity I mean, there's a billion and a half iPhones in existence. It really isn't that hard.

  • @35ABSTRACT
    @35ABSTRACT 3 дні тому +29

    So enlarge the bird by a factor of 100 and place it next to a lake. Voila. My work here is done.

    • @akulkis
      @akulkis 3 дні тому +9

      Not perpetual motion, but the energy input (ambient heat) is relatively free.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 3 дні тому +5

      Already been done, in the 1970s. The "Minto Wheel," was four or six giant dipping-birds on the same axel, made with huge propane tanks, dipping into solar-heated warm water.

    • @someguy15721
      @someguy15721 День тому

      @@wbeaty So, what would have happened if someone hooked it up to a generator? so it could possibly produce energy?

    • @Briggsby
      @Briggsby День тому +3

      ​@@someguy15721I mean, yeah, you *can* do that. Or you can use that space to build a 50kw solar array that has no moving parts, produces hundreds of times more energy, and doesn't involve flammable gasses under pressure.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty День тому +2

      @@someguy15721 I think they did. Gearbox to step it up. Wally Minto. But the efficiency is terrible. Instead use a giant solar mirror focused on a boiler, like they do today in Nevada etc.

  • @kenbrown2808
    @kenbrown2808 3 дні тому +6

    I have access to a system that will remain in motion until the heat death of the universe. I call it, "the universe"

    • @Blitterbug
      @Blitterbug День тому +1

      Yes. Been looking for someone to state this.

  • @leonskum6864
    @leonskum6864 2 дні тому +5

    The only thing perpetual about claims of perpetual motion machines is the unending BS.

  • @TheMNWolf
    @TheMNWolf 2 дні тому +5

    From someone who loves shows like Penn and Teller Fool Us, the best illusions are the ones that are extremely simple but made to look extremely complex. I am certain I could replicate the Dreadco machine believably. I am not certain it would use the same mechanism, but I'm relatively certain you couldn't tell it apart from the original.

  • @therealjammit
    @therealjammit 4 дні тому +15

    As a kid I thought about making a motor that ran off of opposing magnets. But I never thought for one second I was making a perpetual motion machine. I was thinking of a motor that used magnets as an energy storage and expected the magnets to get weaker and run out of magnetic field or "power". My idea was to use them in portable tape recorders to drive the tape path and use auxiliary battery power just to power the amplifier since the electric motors used the majority of the battery power. A mechanical feedback hooked up to a mechanical brake was used for speed regulation or to turn it off.

    • @JackBWatkins
      @JackBWatkins 3 дні тому +3

      So I assume the magnets wouldn’t erase the tape.

    • @akulkis
      @akulkis 3 дні тому +1

      ​@@JackBWatkins
      No. Magnetic tape is stable in weak, non-oscillating magnetic fields.
      Erasure requires a high intensity, oscillating magnetic fields which decreases in intensity.

    • @MichaelPoage666
      @MichaelPoage666 3 дні тому +3

      On magnets erasing tape, I was a college radio DJ. We had a magnetic tape eraser. It's basically a big, square, electromagnet with a hole to pass the cassette or other magnetic media through. This thing was big and heavy and plugged into a wall outlet. The power of magnets to erase magnetic tape is kind of exaggerated in most people's minds. It takes a pretty serious magnet to do it effectively.

    • @therealjammit
      @therealjammit 3 дні тому +4

      @@JackBWatkins If you put them too close to the tape, yes. But remember the electric motor also has magnets. Some sort of shielding would have been necessary. It's all moot because the magnet motor would have never worked anyway.

    • @JackBWatkins
      @JackBWatkins 3 дні тому +4

      @@therealjammit
      Well I was just trying to be funny, but instead all of you gave me some great information. Best part was nobody was mean and everyone stayed positive. Best UA-cam thread ever.

  • @DavidBenner-cy4zl
    @DavidBenner-cy4zl 4 дні тому +24

    As the Universe expands it is winding down. Nothing physical is perpetual.

    • @michaeldowson6988
      @michaeldowson6988 4 дні тому +2

      ...and human stupidity isn't physical, so...

    • @mitchsmith7472
      @mitchsmith7472 4 дні тому +8

      The universe is speeding up

    • @DavidBenner-cy4zl
      @DavidBenner-cy4zl 4 дні тому +1

      @mitchsmith7472 yes. To our extremely limited understanding. And going to end one day

    • @samuelgarrod8327
      @samuelgarrod8327 4 дні тому +4

      ​@@mitchsmith7472No it isn't. Expansion may be accelerating but that doesn't mean 'speed' is increasing.That would make a nonsense of the arrow of time, atrophy.

    • @mitchsmith7472
      @mitchsmith7472 4 дні тому

      @@samuelgarrod8327 yes it is. Anyway

  • @Uajd-hb1qs
    @Uajd-hb1qs День тому

    When I found out about perpetual motion machines as a kid, I couldn’t help but think up a few concepts myself. I even got chatting with my science teacher at school who also theorised a perpetual machine himself when he was younger. His concept wasn’t really perpetual motion, more perpetual energy conversion. It consisted of a bank of lightbulbs contained in a box made from basically solar panels that would convert the light and heat energy from the bulbs into electricity that would then be fed back to the bulbs to, in theory, keep them indefinitely lit. The problem being that every component would have to be 100% efficient in its task, which no modern electrical equipment is capable of. My own concept was a self-propelling A/C unit. The idea was a Stirling engine linked mechanically to two fan rotors geared in a way that one rotor would spin faster than the other. The Stirling engine would be started with a heat source first to spin up the fans. The fan geared to spin faster would force air over the slower fan which itself was geared to the crank of the Stirling engine, sending the power back to the faster fan until an equilibrium was reached. The heat source could then be removed and the Stirling engine could be allowed to operate as a motor to create cold air. My guess for how this wouldn’t work is the supposed “equilibrium” of the two fans creating a sort of feedback loop would be impossible without needing to artificially energise the airflow.

  • @Diehydro
    @Diehydro 4 дні тому +11

    The drinking bird you might know from such films as “Alien” & “Darkman”

    • @Nick-v7b3l
      @Nick-v7b3l 4 дні тому +1

      Darkman was the first thing I thought of. An underrated Liam Neeson and Sam Raimi classic!

    • @Diehydro
      @Diehydro 4 дні тому

      @@Nick-v7b3l Totally agree

    • @squidly2112
      @squidly2112 День тому +1

      I had one of those birds as a kid

    • @mattburley3189
      @mattburley3189 День тому +1

      Darkman!! Thank you! That was driving me nuts trying to remember.

    • @Diehydro
      @Diehydro День тому

      @@mattburley3189 🙂

  • @geoff2504
    @geoff2504 2 дні тому +2

    Perpetually reminding us about perpetual motion machines. Do I feel a sense of Deja-vu? I seem to remember hearing about that!

  • @martinstallard2742
    @martinstallard2742 4 дні тому +10

    0:27 the drinking bird
    3:02 perpetual marble machine
    5:20 magnetic fidget spinning motor
    8:21 dreadco perpetual motion machine
    11:57 perpetual energy from god

    • @MrSunDevil23
      @MrSunDevil23 4 дні тому +1

      My ex-wife called me the perpetual drinking bird…

    • @thetroll1247
      @thetroll1247 4 дні тому +1

      Still watching lol thank you

    • @kingnaga619
      @kingnaga619 4 дні тому +1

      God bless

  • @gregh378
    @gregh378 День тому

    I'm a complete sceptic of perpetual motion, but I am fascinated by the approaches. It started when I was a kid and hooked 6 dynamos up to a single motor and was perplexed when they would produce enough energy to power the motor.

  • @julianhigginson5946
    @julianhigginson5946 3 дні тому +3

    My kids have come close to inventing perpetually motion I turn the lights off and they leave them on. It never stops

    • @westwonic
      @westwonic 2 дні тому +1

      Same with the toilet seat.....

  • @Reece-u3f
    @Reece-u3f 4 дні тому +5

    Bots everywhere within the first minute of uploading 😂

  • @MouseGoat
    @MouseGoat 18 годин тому

    "its Perpetual Motion!"
    "of you device?"
    "no people will Perpetually though the use of motion replace the batteries with new working ones"

  • @josephpk4878
    @josephpk4878 День тому

    Had my headphone volume cranked when this video started. Almost blew out my eardrums with the "PREVIOUSLY!!!" intro.

  • @joshshoop2313
    @joshshoop2313 3 дні тому +2

    The only thing perpetual about these machines are the people that think they can make one work 😂

  • @charleediaven6278
    @charleediaven6278 3 дні тому +1

    A self trained Mechanical Engineer and home inventor, a friend of mine used the magnetic wheel gadget. However his wheel also had water pouring on it, like the old water wheels. He was proud of his magnets accelerating the wheel to incredible speeds. When last seen he was tweaking the magnet switching mechanics. I never had the heart to point out the many flaws. Water wheels have great power and easily charged the low voltage DC batteries and for the solenoids. I never had the heart to say it was not perpetual motion which he claimed.

  • @jorgelotr3752
    @jorgelotr3752 3 дні тому +1

    3:40 also, the original and some of the knock-offs worked by different principles (magnets in the base in the original, a motorized wheel in at least some knock-offs).

  • @donaldasayers
    @donaldasayers День тому

    I'm a horologist and I'm familiar with one particular type of mystery clock. The clock in question has only one hand which can be spun feely, but it always comes to rest pointing to the correct time and left to itself, the hand rotates in 12 hours always indicating the correct time, with no obvious means of propulsion. I know how it works.
    When I saw Jones' 'perpetual motion' machine I postulated a connection, so I made my own version at the school where I worked. It ran for many years, intriguing and annoying staff and pupils alike.
    My youngest aged about three, dismissed it with the opinion the it 'had batteries in it.' He was correct.

  • @Guedez1
    @Guedez1 День тому

    A good point that was not mentioned on the magnet wheels:
    The reason people even consider that it could ever be possible is because most people have an extremely rudimentary intuition for how magnets work
    They make continuous force fields
    They don't just make in front of the magnets where N pushes N
    They also do it to the sides
    Sliding two N facing magnets against one another takes exactly as much energy than they produce when they push each other apart
    You are better to think of magnets as "springy gears" than "pushing force fields"

  • @pmsteamrailroading
    @pmsteamrailroading День тому

    My wife used to work with Sullivan’s daughter. (She had great stories (like dad moving things around in the living room with magnets held to basement ceiling))

  • @Birthing_Bovines
    @Birthing_Bovines День тому

    The most difficult part about perpetual motion ISN’T where to hide the battery, it’s figuring out how to use quantum science to summon infinite amounts of energy.

  • @esra_erimez
    @esra_erimez 2 дні тому +1

    The most difficult part of building a Perpetual Motion Machine is where to hide the battery

  • @GlassDeviant
    @GlassDeviant День тому

    Sadly the one thing all perpetual motion machines fail on is the presence of friction in the system, which immediately prevents any hope of perpetual motion. Even the giant pendulums at many museums have a minute bit of friction that takes energy out.

  • @frogmad
    @frogmad День тому

    Nuclear fusion may well be considered the best ‘perpetual motion machine’ we’ll ever be able to make, but admittedly it is pretty damn impressive.

  • @douggiles7647
    @douggiles7647 4 дні тому +2

    It's said that the hardest part about building a perpetual motion machine is finding a place to hide the battery. Could be why those 2 were disappointed in the truth of how the Dreadco machine works.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 3 дні тому

      I've had a Dreadco machine apart (when it was at MOS in Boston, a slightly different one with big black horse-shoe magnets.) It won't run for an entire year. For the secret, think Dilbert's pointy-haired boss engineering (or perhaps Wally.) While it was there, a little kid guessed the secret, won the $1K prize.

  • @Doggy-B
    @Doggy-B 3 дні тому

    Perpetual motion is YT's autoplay feature playing Simon's greatest hits... its truly endless.

  • @L08Productions
    @L08Productions 3 дні тому +2

    I thought he was going to start off by saying "Hey vSauce, it's Michael."
    Are you his long lost twin?

  • @flamesofhellstudio
    @flamesofhellstudio День тому

    The entire universe is the closest thing to a perpetual motion machine and it's not even perpetual, it just has a lot of energy.

  • @mrmosty5167
    @mrmosty5167 2 дні тому

    The Daedalus Cartwheel is one of the most fascinating inventions ever made

  • @texmex9721
    @texmex9721 День тому

    When most people say "perpetual motion machine", they really mean an over unity machine. They don't want something that will spin by itself forever, they want something that will spin forever even when you extract power.

    • @Reverend_Salem
      @Reverend_Salem 6 годин тому

      perpetual motion work in theory (assuming no friction, and no energy losses) and technically exist in real life with time crystals ( quantum state of particals whos lowest energy state is one of repetitive motion. because the particals are already in their lowest energy state, no energy can be extracted from them.)
      over unity devices are not possible, even on paper.

  • @TheNazzerDawk
    @TheNazzerDawk День тому

    I once heard that the idea of perpetual motion will never work for the same reason that no method of shuffling cards around will result in another card being added to the deck. If one did, it had to come from elsewhere.

  • @wags9777
    @wags9777 День тому

    The last inventor probably reinvented the arc of the covenant on a large scale but well never know. 😂

  • @Qwerty-rx5pd
    @Qwerty-rx5pd 2 дні тому

    Build massive versions of that bird and dip the beaks in the sea, free energy for life 😂

  • @boogieknee3781
    @boogieknee3781 День тому

    My personal favourite is the static electricity motor category since concealing how the energy enters the system is child's play.

  • @Palemagpie
    @Palemagpie 2 дні тому +2

    I love designing these things.
    Yea theyre an impossible project. But thats the fun.
    Super good for lateral thinking.
    Ive developed some actually useful components and stuff out of it.

  • @jmr
    @jmr 2 дні тому +1

    I like to say if you can hear it running you can hear it using energy.

  • @jakeeasterwood3204
    @jakeeasterwood3204 День тому

    The only true perpetual motion machine will always be people who perpetually try to make one.

  • @johnmadsen37
    @johnmadsen37 2 дні тому

    This does explain why my drinking bird curses at me.

  • @YUProductionz
    @YUProductionz 2 дні тому +2

    Theres a new saying that its not truly a perpetual motion video unless there is a comment about that old saying: The most difficult thing about building perpetual motion machines is figuring out where to hide the battery.

  • @Blackvertigo1
    @Blackvertigo1 5 годин тому

    The only reason why perpetual motion machines don't work is simple: Friction.

  • @drkastenbrot
    @drkastenbrot 2 дні тому +1

    my personal conclusion for one of the daedalus machines is compressed air at low pressure being blown onto the sides of the bicycle wheel. its dead simple, low maintenance and extremely reliable, and all parts needed are clearly there.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 дні тому

      That's not it. When his machine was exhibited at Boston's Museum of Science, we had it apart every nine months, for "servicing." It would only run for about that long.

  • @CountJeffula
    @CountJeffula День тому

    What’s funny is that even if they made a perpetual motion machine, that isn’t enough. You need perpetual excess motion to extract usable energy from it. Just barely being able to reset itself means no energy left over to extract for usable ends. What a Sisyphean task. Lol

  • @KelticTim
    @KelticTim 4 дні тому +2

    How can we not figure out how to use the ocean to get perpetual motion? It’s not like some giant baffles that are pushed by the tides will ever stop the tides. The moon is gonna win that tug of war every time. There has to be a way. Maybe Elon should do that instead of tunneling under LA.

  • @damaddog8065
    @damaddog8065 День тому

    As the universe is not subject to the laws of physics, time and space are basically magic, a perpetual motion machine is possible, until we figure out what makes it go, and then it is not.

  • @novacorponline
    @novacorponline День тому

    On the one hand, it feels like magnets would be the key to a perpetual motion device, but on the other hand, I'm not sure if it would *count* because magnets are kind of a power source. And magnets *can* become demagnetized so we know they aren't unlimited power sources.

  • @JaredBrewerAerospace
    @JaredBrewerAerospace День тому

    @12:40 I love how genuinely school-girl giddy Simon gets.🤗

  • @nickhickey3
    @nickhickey3 4 дні тому

    This is the top 10 side projects episode. Simon killed it

  • @kirbywaite1586
    @kirbywaite1586 4 дні тому +4

    If any machine were actually capable of perpetual motion, it would begin moving without any initial push.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 2 дні тому

      If the Wright Brothers' plane was actually real, it wouldn't need to be launched using a falling-weight catapult. And industrial AC synchronous motors are an obvious hoax, since they won't start without an initial push.

  • @lauriepenner350
    @lauriepenner350 4 дні тому +23

    I still say there's got to be a market for a "nearly" perpetual motion machine that generates unlimited power as long as you pay some kid minimum wage to give it a push whenever it slows down.

    • @jerotoro2021
      @jerotoro2021 4 дні тому +10

      I think most everything is "nearly" perpetual, as long as you keep adding fuel and replacing worn parts.

    • @danielpope6498
      @danielpope6498 4 дні тому +5

      That would only ever output the amount of power the kid was able to produce. Whats the point then?

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 4 дні тому +1

      Well yeah, if you spin a bicycle wheel in the vacuum of space far away from Earth it will spin there for a very long time. But guess what?! Even that will stop eventually from the gravitational pull of the Sun and other planets.... eventually.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 3 дні тому +1

      Man, if we could only get a magnet-destroying motor to work. That's the kind where it keeps spinning for an hour, but the magnets get weaker and weaker. It would be the start of a million-dollar toy industry. (And, note that if we use ceramic magnets as the "fuel," we can easily re-charged them again, by holding them against a neo rare-earth magnet.)

    • @ulvschmidt7174
      @ulvschmidt7174 2 дні тому +1

      Sure like solar panels and wind turbines?

  • @Zer0fuks
    @Zer0fuks 2 дні тому +1

    May not be truly perpetual, but these devices could definitely boost efficiency, mechanically speaking.

  • @nicholascook9584
    @nicholascook9584 4 дні тому +2

    So Floyd just described a nuclear reactor with a pretty good half life to make power for a while, or at least that is what sounds like.

  • @benjaminbotley
    @benjaminbotley 4 дні тому

    “Because that’s how perpetual motion works!” 😂

  • @DanielLCarrier
    @DanielLCarrier День тому

    If the last one was real, you presumably would need to replace the batteries because they don't last that long. There's more to why perpetual motion is impossible than parts wearing out.

  • @tomickes409
    @tomickes409 11 годин тому

    A common oversight when considering the possibility of a perpetual motion machine is the need for it to operate in conditions that are virtually impossible to achieve. For such a device to work, it would require a "perfect" vacuum-completely devoid of any matter or particles. Additionally, it would need to exist at absolute zero, the theoretical temperature where all molecular motion ceases. Moreover, it couldn't be influenced by any external forces, such as gravity, sunlight, radio waves, or any form of external energy or interference.
    Beyond that, the machine couldn't rely on anything that deteriorates over time, such as batteries, chemical reactions, or nuclear decay. These materials all break down and lose efficiency, leading to inevitable energy loss. This is why perpetual motion machines are fundamentally impossible-they violate the laws of thermodynamics, especially the conservation of energy, which dictates that energy cannot be created or destroyed in an isolated system.
    Even the testing facility for a perpetual motion machine would be nearly impossible to engineer. Creating a perfectly isolated environment, completely free from external influences, and maintaining it at absolute zero is beyond our current technological capabilities. These extreme conditions underscore why the concept of perpetual motion, while intriguing, is simply unattainable in practice.

  • @dinsdalemontypiranha4349
    @dinsdalemontypiranha4349 3 дні тому

    That was fun Simon! Thanks!

  • @KlaxontheImpailr
    @KlaxontheImpailr 8 годин тому

    Number 4 was really clever, in that it's more like a critical thinking puzzle rather than an actual pmm.

  • @bertram-raven
    @bertram-raven 4 дні тому +1

    I do not know who writes the script but they need to understand the difference between "use" and "utilise." Clue: Every use of the word "utilise" in this video is wrong.

  • @denissavgir2881
    @denissavgir2881 17 годин тому

    Perpetual motion: quantum fluctuations

  • @SamuraiPipotchi
    @SamuraiPipotchi День тому

    This is how I find out that you have not one but two other channels you present on

  • @kenbrown2808
    @kenbrown2808 3 дні тому +3

    when I was young, my parents took me to science museums. several of them had demonstration rigs that had various human powered generators connected to light bulbs. the harder the generator was cranked, the more light bulbs could be lighted up. but the commonality of all of them was how much effort it took to increase the power output. I think many "free energy by boostrapping" believers have never seen such a device.

    • @wbeaty
      @wbeaty 3 дні тому

      The Exploratorium in SF once had a longwire antenna, a couple hundred feet long, which would flash a single LED, blinking once every several minutes. (And so, all the "ambient RF" crackpots never actually tried to harvest atmospheric energy. It's there, and its real, and maybe it was powerful enough that it could keep a single Crookes Radiometer spinning, even when it was dark outside.)

    • @kenbrown2808
      @kenbrown2808 3 дні тому

      @@wbeaty you know what makes really good collectors for "free to me" energy? commercially made solar systems.

  • @ortizguard2816
    @ortizguard2816 4 дні тому

    You can tell the crew had fun writing this script!😂❤

  • @rtqii
    @rtqii 3 дні тому +1

    There was a guy who had a machine that turned a large fan blade rather slowly with just a very tiny current from a 9 volt battery. The battery energized a gerbil wheel with a high voltage from a multiplier circuit and shocked their little feet into running really fast.

    • @paradiselost9946
      @paradiselost9946 День тому

      gerbils only last for so long, and their excrement tends to accumulate.

  • @Jodawo
    @Jodawo 9 годин тому +1

    I believe the only possible perpetual machine would be a robot with an AI brain. The AI part would be given the knowledge of how to repair itself and get energy. The robot part would be able to do the physical labor necessary to sustain itself. Making it possible to send it to anywhere. With its knowledge, it would be able to manufacture or create what is necessary to keep it going indefinitely. The robot part could be made to run on any type of energy. The AI part would give it knowledge on how to take raw materials for its own repair and to create power sources. We have AI's today that can learn. A good example of this is AlphaZero. Given just the rules of chess was able to teach itself to be any Grandmaster within hours. Giving it all of the knowledge necessary to keep itself running would allow it to be autonomous. We are not at that level yet to create such a machine but technically it would fulfill the definition of a perpetual motion machine.

    • @duudsuufd
      @duudsuufd 5 годин тому

      Perpetual motion machines are not supposed to use some external energy. It is not the same as autonomous.

  • @BloodSteyn
    @BloodSteyn 21 годину тому

    I came up with the idea for a Magnetic Perpetual Motion Power Generator back in high school, and wondered why nobody else had done it yet... well, that was until I discovered the laws of thermodynamics. Also, no internet back then.

  • @mitaskeledzija6269
    @mitaskeledzija6269 2 дні тому

    The closest we can get in my opinion to perpetual motion, because I have always been fascinated by this, is making more energy output than the initial input.. so either by combining all aspects of existing technologies that generate electricity and it's output and other outputs that can successfully be reused to power the same machine or added to the total output generated.. but idk. We have disproven some laws of physics but these are fundamental.

  • @vinichab
    @vinichab День тому

    I know for a fact perpetual motion is impossible, but I just can't accept it lol. It's a facinating concept

  • @CeeKayz0rz
    @CeeKayz0rz 3 дні тому

    >Batteries
    >Perpetual motion
    I mean, the "motion" of the generator could indeed be "perpetual", whilst feeding batteries that act as charge storage and leveling (i.e. not a spike of say 12v every cycle, but instead charging a battery that will deliver a constant 12v)....
    Though, arguing the semantics of perpetual motion machine terminology sure feels like a really silly thing to be doing.... Especially in a YT comments section...... XD

  • @Cantab-ml6pw
    @Cantab-ml6pw 3 дні тому +1

    The saddest thing about all of this (except for the beauty of the pursuit of pure science) is that for a perpetual motion machine to have any groundbreaking human relevance it will have to deliver MORE power than is put into it, not just sit there at a point of energy equilibrium. So not only do you have to counteract friction etc (which also means that you will ultimately have to pay money to replace worn out parts), you have to create something out of more than its parts.
    The closest thing I can think of in terms of perpetual motion are the stars and planets, doing their orbital/gravitational dance. Even then we know that won't last forever.
    Still, the drive to create the nearest possible thing to a perpetual motion machine is FUN!

    • @crappyusername69
      @crappyusername69 2 дні тому

      Technically gravity never stops "pulling" the objects, but eventually they'll hit the object, which obviously ceases movement.
      If you could somehow prevent collision, it would pull straight to the center before stopping.
      So it never really runs out of "energy" but that energy can only move things to 1 spot.

    • @paradiselost9946
      @paradiselost9946 День тому

      none of us have been around long enough to verify that aspect...
      as one astrophycisist states... "a lot of this work is like watching a blade of grass and predicting the winner of the kentucky derby..."
      come on, pluto hasnt even performed a full orbit since being discovered...

  • @Bapuji42
    @Bapuji42 День тому

    this guy will never be vsauce no matter how hard he tries

  • @Laggyness
    @Laggyness 3 години тому

    The people that believe perpetual motion machines really work are probably the same ones that thought the "Chase money glitch" was also real. 😂

  • @ChuckvdL
    @ChuckvdL День тому

    Heh, I had a drinking bird as a kid in the 60’s. It was obviously ‘powered’ by the evaporating water as it stopped once its beak could no longer reach the water. Also the heat from your hand on its bottom would make it go faster, so even as a young kid I knew it wasn’t magic..

  • @wolfrainexxx
    @wolfrainexxx 2 дні тому

    "Apparently 'God' is a nationalist."
    Tell us you know nothing about religion without telling us.
    "Perpetual motion is Scientifically impossible."
    "Energy cannot be created, or destroyed.."
    "Even if we could harvest the sun's energy for 10 million years, it would still not be perpetual energy."
    Yeah. Reasoning like this is why we abandoned nuclear energy.

  • @jamesedwards5702
    @jamesedwards5702 2 дні тому

    I had one as a kid in the 60s - 70s. Pretty cool toy.

  • @Buster-Sharp
    @Buster-Sharp 2 дні тому

    If you think of yourself and your writers as well lubricated moters, your video empire is kinda like a perpetual money machine 😆

  • @oldfrittenfett1276
    @oldfrittenfett1276 2 дні тому

    Even if someone comes up with a concept: I don't think you could extract any energy fom it.

  • @AndyBonesSynthPro
    @AndyBonesSynthPro 2 дні тому

    So you're telling me this thing on my desk will stop twirling at some point

  • @Caffin8tor
    @Caffin8tor 8 годин тому

    I mean, the device is definitely not a perpetual motion device, but batteries do stop working after a number of charge and discharge cycles. That would be the reason that the batteries would need to be replaced on the last device assuming that it actually did work.

  • @JGoodrich-ny1ds
    @JGoodrich-ny1ds День тому

    Even if a 100% efficient machine were possible, Motion itself expends energy in the form of drag/ resistance to motion. That aside (In reality it can't be put aside) outside energy is always required on startup. The balls first bounce is always the highest.

  • @Navoii.
    @Navoii. 22 години тому

    "Perpetual motion is impossible" Mfs when I throw them in the cold void of space (they're moving without any external force)

  • @bioLarzen
    @bioLarzen День тому

    Even if any magnet-based "perpetuum mobile" seemed to genuinely work (they don't) - magnets lose their magnetic properties over time (even if very slowly), so they wouldn't work "forever".