Dystopian Futures: Idiocracy Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Support my work on Patreon: ow.ly/3ymWFu
    Support my work on MakerSupport: ow.ly/pJjS100RXtS
    PayPal Donations Welcome. Click here: goo.gl/NSdOvK
    Production Company: Ternion
    Distributed by: 20th Century Fox
    My usage of portions of copyrighted films and imagery falls under fair use policy based on section 107 of the US copyright law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
    SUBSCRIBE TO THIS UA-cam CHANNEL: / @thedavecullenshow
    KEEP UP ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
    BitChute: www.bitchute.c...
    Gab: gab.ai/DaveCullen
    Minds.com: www.minds.com/...
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,1 тис.

  • @shawnm1902
    @shawnm1902 6 років тому +814

    If 1984 is an instruction manual, then Idiocracy is a documentary.

    • @tiavor
      @tiavor 6 років тому +13

      Geteca is the real instruction manual, the solution to Idiocacy.

    • @ciarancosgrave
      @ciarancosgrave 6 років тому +28

      I think 1984 was intended to be more of a warning than an instruction manual. However, looking at the world we are living in today, I think the social engineers realized that they could use it as an instruction manual. I wonder if Orwell was aware of this possibility.

    • @AussieGearReviewer
      @AussieGearReviewer 6 років тому +8

      I have it all wrong then. I thought 1984 was a documentary released in 2001/2002 and Idiocracy was a documentary released around 2016 :)

    • @scanford
      @scanford 6 років тому +2

      A2T: I appreciate that you may have been intending to call out people who unnecessarily and hypocritically correct other people's grammar on the internet (which I do myself), but If you're going to act so condescendingly towards both people while doing it, it would probably be in your best interest to learn the actual rules of the written English language. Topics you might want to look up include but are not limited to when to use capital letters (such as at the beginning of a sentence or when using proper names), the correct usage of quotation marks (not for emphasis; and when used to denote titles, generally only for shorter works), the correct usage of ellipses (which are made of three periods and no spaces), the correct use of articles ( "the title of the movie" not "the title of movie"), and, of course, spelling (deoxyribonucleic acid).

    • @Flyingdutchy33
      @Flyingdutchy33 6 років тому +2

      Spelling Police has split into 2 factions. War is upon us.

  • @ililililil8385
    @ililililil8385 5 років тому +172

    "Welcome to Cosco, I love you"

    • @tomlord5398
      @tomlord5398 4 роки тому +15

      I worked at Home Depot - had to greet a couple hours out of every shift. Embarrassing meaningless drivel to bother people with.

    • @traitorsplayground7128
      @traitorsplayground7128 4 роки тому +6

      Capitalism be likr

    • @NexusKin
      @NexusKin 3 роки тому +2

      "Brought to you by Carl's Jr."

    • @cleofaspingarron
      @cleofaspingarron 3 роки тому +1

      "Carl's Jr! Fuck you!"

  • @peterfrancis2330
    @peterfrancis2330 6 років тому +234

    Idiocracy is not a movie
    it is a fucking documentary

    • @nunyabizness9045
      @nunyabizness9045 6 років тому +9

      earp1673 GO AWAY I'M BAITING

    • @TheLiamis
      @TheLiamis 6 років тому +3

      Peter Francis it really is at this point.

    • @mal35m
      @mal35m 6 років тому

      +Peter Francis It is a nightmare I can't wake up from.

    • @starkusmc1981
      @starkusmc1981 6 років тому +4

      I've been saying this for close to 10 years.

    • @azmanabdula
      @azmanabdula 6 років тому

      Start grunting it and maybe people will take you seriously
      @Starkusmc1981

  • @TaliaIGhul
    @TaliaIGhul 6 років тому +40

    Tide Pod challenge is proof that we're heading in this direction.

    • @ddsjgvk
      @ddsjgvk 6 років тому +2

      The tide pod challenge was weeding out he stupid

    • @RavenCloak13
      @RavenCloak13 3 роки тому +2

      @@ddsjgvk
      Except it didn't because barely anyone died from it. The actual chemicals in the pods would only effect people who had existing health problems. That would be more weeding genetic dead ends out not stupidity given you can be perfectly health and still be dumb do to how our society takes too much care of dumbasses.
      Like, we live in a world that someone with a peanut allergy can exist, survive, have kids and pass on their defective genes to a new generation that is more likely to have said allergy. We really did breed out survival of the fittest with civilization. Now pretty much any one can have kids which is part of what the beginning of the movie was talking about.

  • @tricky1992000
    @tricky1992000 6 років тому +154

    Hell of a jump from stating brawndo owning the government is socialism. If anything it's the end result of a monopoly, it's Corporatocracy. This isn't socialism, this is another government that his issues of it's own, another film that has this type of government is robocop. I also think we are heading in this direction. Real life examples include the Banana republics of the 1920's and 30's.

    • @explosivemodesonicmauricet1597
      @explosivemodesonicmauricet1597 5 років тому +2

      And the East Hindies Company(hilariously in my country they were called "SHTI" [Sh*tty]).

    • @frocco7125
      @frocco7125 5 років тому +20

      Yeah.
      I'm not a socialist, but the only times I saw riddiculous monopolies form like that was under capitalism.
      Monsanto apparently owns 80% of the United States farmland, and several of their lobbyists work in the USA government.
      This is not the result of socialism, this is unregulated capitalism, in which the corporations can get so powerful that the govetnment has no choice but to be controlled by them.

    • @jakewoods6721
      @jakewoods6721 5 років тому +5

      tricky1992000 Who cares, wether it’s the market getting involved in the state or the state getting involved in the market it’s wrong. They need to be kept completely separate or you end up with this authoritarian shithole.

    • @dbojangles1597
      @dbojangles1597 5 років тому +3

      And yet when a business is allowed to gain so much market share in key industries as to become a virtual monopoly it becomes all but impossible to keep them separate. The free market can not prevent monopolies from forming and then using their leverage to force governments to help them further solidify power. @@jakewoods6721

    • @mrrazfromnz
      @mrrazfromnz 5 років тому

      It's not Corporatocracy, it's Idiocracy.

  • @salc8016
    @salc8016 6 років тому +10

    one of the greatest movies ever

  • @mrchrysler9736
    @mrchrysler9736 5 років тому +5

    "and their shares plummeted."
    Sorry. It may be terrible capitalism, but it is still capitalism.
    In fact, how has every game of Monopoly© ended for you? Lot's of competition? Everyone rich?
    I believe the word that describes the system they have is fascism.

    • @savagetv6460
      @savagetv6460 5 років тому

      if there is no free market then it ceases being capitalism. In fact you can blame IP laws for giving corporations such power. Guess who enforces IP laws? That's right the state. The solution is simple, but people are too stupid to see it and want free shit

  • @niallmacdonald2710
    @niallmacdonald2710 6 років тому +168

    Several years ago, in my job as a water treatment engineer, I was sent to inspect and certify a building's pipework and water. I arrived on site and introduced myself to the site manager with "Hi, I've been sent to ascertain the state of the pipework here and test the water." This elicited no end of amusement from him, calling me 'Professor' for the rest of the day because I'd used a three syllable word to him...... Sad but true story. I've loved Idiocracy the movie for many years.

    • @zeehero7280
      @zeehero7280 Рік тому

      I'd rather have a professor fix my plumbing than a moron!

    • @danielbyrne5402
      @danielbyrne5402 Рік тому +3

      I worked on a labouring site when I was 15, and one of the wheel barrows couldn't be used cuz it had a little hole in it, so I put a cigarette nub end in it and the supervisor said "ahh u know what that's called don't ya?" I said "ingenui......" (he cut me off) "it's called USING YA NOGGIN'" lol suffice it to say, the wheel balloon was used from then on along with all the rest of the half working equipment

    • @generaldvw
      @generaldvw Рік тому

      ... Thinking... Flint, M.I.

    • @Professor__S
      @Professor__S Рік тому

      Youz meen youz is here to chek hour wada? 😂

  • @johnnyk617
    @johnnyk617 5 років тому +115

    This movie wasn’t properly advertised because big corporations took offense to how the movie made them appear as global monopolies

    • @dogwklr
      @dogwklr Рік тому +2

      Yea.......appear 👀

  • @shadowdramon01
    @shadowdramon01 6 років тому +536

    But Brawndo has what plants crave. It has electrolytes.

    • @englishovals
      @englishovals 6 років тому +62

      What *are* these electrolytes? Do you even know?
      They're... what they use to make Brawndo!
      But "why" do they use them to make Brawndo?
      Because Brawndo's got electrolytes.

    • @TheMetalAllfather
      @TheMetalAllfather 6 років тому +42

      But what *ARE* electrolytes?!
      It's....it's what plants crave!

    • @Goabnb94
      @Goabnb94 6 років тому +23

      Well I've never seen no plants grow out of toilet, so....
      Hey thats good, you sure you're not the smartest?

    • @archmad
      @archmad 6 років тому +10

      Water is only for flushing toilet

    • @bennym8218
      @bennym8218 6 років тому +16

      "look i'm no botanist but i'm pretty sure that plants need water to grow"
      "water? like out the toilet?"

  • @IhateYoutube
    @IhateYoutube 6 років тому +570

    *Water* ? You mean like out tha toilet????

    • @NJGuy1973
      @NJGuy1973 5 років тому +31

      I ain't never seen no plants growin' outta no toilet!

    • @TheJudge064
      @TheJudge064 5 років тому +26

      "what's electrolytes"
      "It's what plants crave"

    • @leob4403
      @leob4403 5 років тому +18

      That's pretty much what happened IRL, rarely do I see people drink water these days, it's mostly heavily marketed sugary drinks, caffeine, alcohol and other unhealthy garbage

    • @sonicmastersword8080
      @sonicmastersword8080 5 років тому +6

      @@TheJudge064 Electrolytes are quite literally salt. They are salting the earth.

    • @TheJudge064
      @TheJudge064 5 років тому +4

      @@sonicmastersword8080 I know, I'm quoting the movie.

  • @kevinintheusa8984
    @kevinintheusa8984 6 років тому +407

    I believe that Fox didn't push this movie due to the fear of backlash from corporations who are skewered in this film. I think they liked satire but that too many of the points were too close to home for comfort. I speculate that they would rather take a 20 million dollar hit over alienating potential corporate sponsors on future projects. Just my two cents.

    • @MrStoptheEU
      @MrStoptheEU 5 років тому +26

      I think they didn't want to open people's eyes.

    • @leebob86
      @leebob86 5 років тому +11

      You're exactly right. The Freemasons, who own all the BIG businesses, certainly don't want this revealed to their stupid fucking cattle customers.

    • @scubasteve6463
      @scubasteve6463 5 років тому +5

      That's a solid point Hitler kitty

    • @uploadJ
      @uploadJ 5 років тому +4

      @leebob86 re: "You're exactly right. The Freemasons, who own all the BIG businesses,"
      LET ME GUESS, you watch Alex Jones?

    • @Wolfen443
      @Wolfen443 4 роки тому

      That could have been part of it, but the fact that the film was a little too serious in context was a bit too unlikely to be successful financially as well.

  • @antaine1916
    @antaine1916 6 років тому +378

    "The world depicted in Idiocracy is obviously an extreme satirical vision, but..."
    Is it, though?

    • @SuperTigerTV
      @SuperTigerTV 5 років тому +16

      Ironically the reviewer suffers from the same narrow mindedness taught in public schools. Specifically an inability to see that the system is corrupt and DELIBERATeLY designed to fail for obvious reasons if you can think outside of the public school/mainstream media box.

    • @tommerker8063
      @tommerker8063 4 роки тому +5

      it was a warning not a blueprint

    • @TheGalantir
      @TheGalantir 4 роки тому +2

      World? If you're talking about the US it's already a reality for at least a decade. Even more so now since president Camacho Trump got into office.

    • @TheGalantir
      @TheGalantir 4 роки тому

      @Suffer No Fools If you are an uneducated moron, criminal and fraudulent idiot like he is.

    • @justcallmemike1192
      @justcallmemike1192 4 роки тому +3

      Antaine Ó hÓgáin well after seeing a lot of of advocates on the left and right side of the political spectrum. Countries will eventually be run by celebrities. Since many people invest most of their time in social media and digital Magazines. No one really cares to have discussions about art and literature. When in reality music art today is just materialized by a corporation. Modern art is just scribbles that are plastered onto a canvas. Literature books might as well just be paperweight in today’s society. No one really talks formal English or Anglo English. Most english sentences today is simplified and substitute for slangs and phrases.
      However I do have a theory on how idiocracy can be in reality. If you look at the people in idiocracy and then look at the rural small towns or low income neighborhoods in America. You have teen pregnancies, homicidal crimes, and theft.
      The people in most of the small towns are also low in the education system and live off the governments welfare system such as social security. Even though most of them don’t invest their money wisely and don’t buy stocks. They tend to just drivel into mindless entertainment. Now look at the age demographic between 18-29 years old. Most of them are into hookups (could get pregnant), mindless entertainment (reality tv), social media (social engineering), and celebrities (Influencers). Meaning those adults eventually will tend to get dumbfounded by modern art and modern literature.
      That they start to accept modern art and modern literature as their culture. No one cares for traditional art forms and traditional literature. Because no one invests in their time in traditionalism. However it will probably take 600 years for us to live under a government system run by corporations. “Remember fellow citizens Red Bull give planes wings” I could see dumb children being indoctrinated by that slogan.
      Therefore those children will believe it. History books will be thrown away and will be substituted with iPads that have banners that says buy “red bull it gives you wings and it’s made up of Taurine”

  • @aarongreenfield9038
    @aarongreenfield9038 6 років тому +1999

    Idiocracy is my favorite documentary!

    • @AustinTexas6thStreet
      @AustinTexas6thStreet 6 років тому +18

      Mine too

    • @aarongreenfield9038
      @aarongreenfield9038 6 років тому +46

      Jackalope. We're living in this now, hell, it's 10 times worse!

    • @aarongreenfield9038
      @aarongreenfield9038 6 років тому +35

      Jackalope. Definitely, and California will be the first to fall, and it's already starting here in my home town in Florida, there's a huge homeless population of 5 or 600 people living in tents behind my local Walmart, You can't go in-and-out of there anymore, without being asked for money 3 or 4 times. Now don't get me wrong, I don't mind helping somebody who really needs it, but when I see young, perfectly able bodied people stand around all day asking for money, It really irks me. The problem is they don't want help, they just want money, I could Literally hand one of them $10.000, come back the next day, and they would still be standing there begging!

    • @aarongreenfield9038
      @aarongreenfield9038 6 років тому +15

      Jackalope. It's not just refugees legal, illegal, or otherwise, it's Americans too, It's the coddled participation trophy generation that has no job skills, they've grown up, only to find out they're not as special or gifted as they once thought!

    • @aarongreenfield9038
      @aarongreenfield9038 6 років тому +12

      Jackalope. Oh I meant nothing offensive toward Millennials, i am only a few years short of being one myself, and i know quite a few, a lot of them are smart and hard working, but unfortunately not all of them are, and it's that small percentage that really makes the rest of them look bad, Standing around on street corners with dreadlocks in their hair, begging, throwing rocks at police, holding up signs that say refugees welcome, and other anti-American propaganda, oh, To answer your question, Cocoa Florida...

  • @Sun-iw3pt
    @Sun-iw3pt 4 роки тому +101

    I actually found this movie scary.

  • @floofs6785
    @floofs6785 6 років тому +646

    This movie wasn't prompted because the major companies in this movie took offense as to how they were being represented in the film

    • @joemann5378
      @joemann5378 5 років тому +74

      I think you're on to something. Right after this movie came out, the popular restaurant chain "Butt-Fuckers" went out of business in my city... :-(

    • @jameshoff9435
      @jameshoff9435 5 років тому +21

      Some ppl / companies have a challenge handling truth.

    • @5226-p1e
      @5226-p1e 5 років тому +13

      @@joemann5378
      it's just to bad the same thing didnt happen to starbucks.
      lol i love that every store in this movie is some kind of sex parlor.
      adult XXX taxes, XXX starbucks, XXX butt-fuckers. i love this movie.

    • @snafuthebrave1922
      @snafuthebrave1922 5 років тому

      Lol, so true

    • @Cynical1800
      @Cynical1800 5 років тому +6

      I think you mean promoted? Idiocracy, we have arrived.

  • @matthewcb1970
    @matthewcb1970 6 років тому +208

    Over time, this films gets less amusing and more accurate. Depressing.

  • @delavalmilker
    @delavalmilker 4 роки тому +232

    "For whatever reason, Fox decided not to heavily promote the movie". Maybe because it hit a little too close to home?

  • @benderrodriquez
    @benderrodriquez 6 років тому +299

    Another inaccuracy in the movie is that it is set in the future.

    • @explosivemodesonicmauricet1597
      @explosivemodesonicmauricet1597 5 років тому

      @DanRage47 It quite scares me,although some countries might survive JUST IN CASE it happens (since it talks mainly in America).

    • @perryb.1733
      @perryb.1733 5 років тому +2

      100% accurate comment there.

    • @anditard
      @anditard 5 років тому +2

      I chuckles

    • @nicklausbooks1593
      @nicklausbooks1593 5 років тому

      Ray Maritz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👌🏼

    •  5 років тому +2

      Its actually documentary about Baltimore.

  • @Grogster2007
    @Grogster2007 6 років тому +154

    I haven't got a high IQ but I'm a hard working, responsible, sociable, kind person....however I do agree about the dangers of the massive dumbing down of our society

    • @daoyang223
      @daoyang223 4 роки тому +3

      Danielle Bregoli.
      Every rapper that got famous after Hopsin ever. Hopsin is the last good rapper produced.
      Kanye West. He's trying to be profound by being derivative. Pssst.....the bible is his source material.

    • @dongately2817
      @dongately2817 4 роки тому +2

      Bhad Baby took her image from Idiocracy.

    • @baldrickthedungspreader3107
      @baldrickthedungspreader3107 4 роки тому +25

      I.Q isn’t everything in facts it’s a rather outdated and inaccurate measurement of human intelligence as it does not factor in certain other traits that signify intelligence, such as creativity, resourcefulness, practicality, etc. It only measures arbitrary academic intelligence to do with problem solving and negates the true value of a human being.

    • @JohnCena-le1jj
      @JohnCena-le1jj 3 роки тому +2

      @@baldrickthedungspreader3107 What? Of course it cannot measure creativity, but intelligence is necessary for creativity to be useful, and IQ is the most accurate available predictor of intelligence which has been positively correlated not only with academic performance, but socioeconomic status, and negatively with criminality and fertility. If intelligence, the ability to acquire and utilize information, which has distinguished humanity from lower animals and allowed it dominion over the earth, sea, and sky, allowed it to erect great cities of metal and glass, to communicate instantaneously from two opposite ends of the Earth, and to plumb the stars, then what the hell gives humans worth?!?!?!?!

    • @epistemo3442
      @epistemo3442 3 роки тому +7

      @@JohnCena-le1jj Indeed, people denying IQ exists even though it is one of the most accurate Psychometric tests that is available. Besides, what people are trying to measure is the g factor, IQ is one but many measurements of the g factor or known as general intelligence factor.

  • @shellygardner6410
    @shellygardner6410 5 років тому +561

    As Joe is led into court he gets hit with a milkshake.
    IT'S SPOOKY HOW MUCH THIS MOVIE GOT RIGHT

    • @chancepaladin
      @chancepaladin 5 років тому +13

      oooomg

    • @CrabTastingMan
      @CrabTastingMan 4 роки тому +5

      Dave Cullen is an idiot who sees socialism in the film when it is the opposite. It's rather like turn-of-the-century 19/20th century corporation monopolies. Stocks in socialism? What the hell was he thinking? Does he think a truly socialist economy would even let the worth of a state-corporation to go down? The entire problem of state-controlled corporation is that they AREN'T allowed to fail and they languish.

    • @brianwalendy3735
      @brianwalendy3735 4 роки тому +4

      @@CrabTastingMan Feel better, big boy?

    • @TarsonTalon
      @TarsonTalon 4 роки тому +9

      @@CrabTastingMan The stock market is a government invention with the intention of selling government bonds, and they threatened rich people and companies with high taxes if they did not participate in it. Also, I suppose never heard of China's 'zombie companies'? These are corporations that are not allowed to fail naturally, but they also never turn in a profit. This results in an overall drain on the economy, because other companies cannot compete with one that gets free government money.
      You act like the state can bend reality. It doesn't matter if they LET a state-corporation fail, it eventually WILL, specifically when the government itself fails.
      Hilariously, the most successful example of socialism is...wait for it..NAZI (NATIONAL SOCIALIST) GERMANY. But make no mistake, people definitely DID die. They stole from the Jews for resources, and killed them to conserve said resources. But, it would have eventually failed regardless if they won the war or not.

    • @TSL480
      @TSL480 4 роки тому +2

      Oh WOW, I didn’t even think of that... you’re right!

  • @TheDaveCullenShow
    @TheDaveCullenShow  6 років тому +828

    Welcome to Costco, I love you.

    • @shadowdramon01
      @shadowdramon01 6 років тому +43

      The Dave Cullen Show - Brought to you by Carl’s Jr

    • @saltyswede7875
      @saltyswede7875 6 років тому +4

      The Dave Cullen Show why are there tentacles and dead rotting fish in this Costco?

    • @elvaquero5554
      @elvaquero5554 6 років тому +12

      @Omar Harris Fuck You! I'm eating!

    • @Keihryon
      @Keihryon 6 років тому +18

      Go away! Baitin'

    • @epicstoryteller5061
      @epicstoryteller5061 6 років тому +17

      I've always loved Idiocracy! I laughed at you just describing things like the buildings tied together by rope and the movie ASS.

  • @mophead3078
    @mophead3078 5 років тому +125

    2:17 A wise Romanian once said "The mother of morons is always pregnant, Sometimes with twins"

    • @EricRedbear
      @EricRedbear 3 роки тому +1

      It's an Italian proverb: La madre (or mamma) dei cretini é sempre incinta.
      Not sure where you got the "with twins" part or that it's Romanian.

    • @cloud42269
      @cloud42269 2 роки тому +2

      @@EricRedbear well maybe it's old latin proverb. Aren't Romanians latin?

    • @caballero3601
      @caballero3601 2 роки тому +1

      @@cloud42269 ROMANS are Latin, not Romanians. The original was probably an old ROMAN proverb, which would have been in LATIN. And Latin is the forerunner of today's Italian. Does it all make sense now y'all? Jeez. I feel like I'm in that courtroom needing a big glass of Brondo because I just got drained of my electrolytes explaining that.

  • @kintsuki99
    @kintsuki99 6 років тому +405

    Hard times breeds "strong" man.
    "Strong" man brings good time.
    Good times breed "weak" man.
    "Weak" man brings hard time.
    And history repeats itself in a never ending cicle

    • @drgetwrekt869
      @drgetwrekt869 5 років тому +11

      sad butt rue

    • @reshpeck
      @reshpeck 5 років тому +14

      In a nutshell, this is Ibn Khaldun's theory of dynastic cycles, formulated in the 14th century and applied to Arab societies of North Africa. It is still applicable today, only on a much larger scope and scale.

    • @theman4884
      @theman4884 5 років тому +4

      @@drgetwrekt869 Butt rue must be the worst regret ever!

    • @ElectricInevitability
      @ElectricInevitability 5 років тому +1

      One of my favourite truisms

    • @orppranator5230
      @orppranator5230 5 років тому +10

      Its actually:
      Hard times make women humble.
      Humble women make good times.
      Good times make empowered women.
      Empowered women make hard times.

  • @ashIibabbitt1111
    @ashIibabbitt1111 6 років тому +462

    I have a sister who's tarded. She's a pilot now.

    • @robertbaur3145
      @robertbaur3145 6 років тому +24

      I bet she has a real kick ass life scro

    • @MrMatt3046
      @MrMatt3046 6 років тому +12

      Sans Handlebars In my country we keep them in cages.

    • @zarbonthedestroyer7232
      @zarbonthedestroyer7232 6 років тому +18

      "there's plenty of tards out there livin kick ass lives scro"

    • @SAM-ru4vx
      @SAM-ru4vx 6 років тому +11

      welcome to your diversity future.

    • @thegreenwave6741
      @thegreenwave6741 6 років тому +1

      OLE SammyOLE you mean illegally immigrated future.

  • @WVMADMAN1
    @WVMADMAN1 6 років тому +86

    President Camacho is a very good leader though. He realizes they are in trouble and too stupid to fix it, so he finds the smartest person he can and gives him the power to actually fix things. When the plan causes an economic meltdown its not unreasonable to blame the guy that inadvertently caused it. But when the plan works he is strong enough to admit he was wrong and give Not Sure full credit. We should be so lucky to have a leader like Camacho.

    • @notsure2240
      @notsure2240 6 років тому +18

      Thankyou for that ringing endorsement. I took the place of a great leader, that's for sure

    • @dragonknightleader1
      @dragonknightleader1 6 років тому +12

      Really, Trump IS Camacho; a populist leader that does cede to his experts, especially Mattis, was in the WWE, seems really dumb, but is actually pretty effective at what he does. That being said, the cautionary aspect is missing because Trump is not the one causing the problems in America today; it's the Lying Left. If the Left would not have Trump Derangement Syndrome, I might be more inclined to criticize him more. Now, I have to back Trump simply because the Left is insane and underhanded.

    • @robertbaur3145
      @robertbaur3145 6 років тому +4

      break it down Camacho!

    • @OriginalPiMan
      @OriginalPiMan 6 років тому +5

      Criticise Trump when you think he's due for it and you might raise the quality of debate. Endless praise simply because he's not part of the group you hate more, is pretty dumb.

    • @donov25
      @donov25 6 років тому +3

      Trump constantly fires his staff. That isn't surrounding yourself with experts and trusting them to do their job.

  • @BobMinelli
    @BobMinelli 2 роки тому +4

    "...the PLANET will be fine...WE are FUCKED!" ~ George Carlin

  • @jim22277
    @jim22277 6 років тому +138

    Love this movie.
    My comment was brought to you by
    Carl's junior.

    • @vlweb3d
      @vlweb3d 6 років тому +7

      Yes, but did you drink your fill of Brawndo today?
      Remember ...... it's got electrolytes.

    • @ineffableearth2582
      @ineffableearth2582 6 років тому +3

      jim22277 - Extra big ass fries?

    • @MrBTBusch
      @MrBTBusch 6 років тому +1

      jim22277 your checks in the mail.

  • @Methadonebunyip
    @Methadonebunyip 6 років тому +35

    This is seriously one of the best films out there.
    "St. God's Memorial Hospital" kills me every time.
    And it's fucking scary how real it is.

    • @caballero3601
      @caballero3601 2 роки тому +8

      And the hospital name's letters falling sideways because someone didn't have the foresight to properly space & size the letters!

    • @quantisedspace7047
      @quantisedspace7047 Рік тому +2

      Hey, but at least the US gets some form of Universal Healthcare !

    • @UnchainedEruption
      @UnchainedEruption Рік тому

      @@caballero3601 Like somebody who ran out of room writing on a page.

    • @mattpeterson4351
      @mattpeterson4351 Рік тому

      Thank you

  • @fiof
    @fiof Рік тому +4

    It's ridiculous how you spinned off this movie as criticism against a socialist agenda. There is no evidence that the trashy family was supported by welfare, and that welfare made them be more prolific (r-selection). There is no evidence of welfare being an enabler to "idiocracy" anywhere in the movie as a matter of fact. What you actually see is an obvious criticism of the right agenda. It shows, for instance, how fox news makes a spectacle of politics, how politics are influenced by big corporations, and how there is a move toward anti-intellectualism. It's not by chance that Bush was the president when this movie came out.

  • @CoolHardLogic
    @CoolHardLogic 6 років тому +863

    The movie "Ass", or as it's otherwise known, "The Last Jedi".

    • @davidjohnston6993
      @davidjohnston6993 6 років тому +16

      Or any movie after the first three IMO

    • @jamessteven711
      @jamessteven711 6 років тому

      CoolHardLogic a hello Mr logic!!! When will you next video be out?

    • @YarugumaSou
      @YarugumaSou 6 років тому +2

      Lol yup

    • @chalintje
      @chalintje 6 років тому +5

      Or "The Shape of Water"

    • @imthewholeman9126
      @imthewholeman9126 6 років тому +5

      I would like to go family style on Rey.

  • @shananagans5
    @shananagans5 6 років тому +232

    Idiocracy will need to be moved from the Comedy section to Documentary.

    • @paulangeli9710
      @paulangeli9710 6 років тому +6

      shananagans5 soon it will be a historical film! Lol

    • @abram730
      @abram730 6 років тому +3

      It should be reclassified as utopian as the movie gives us hope for our future.

    • @anon9579
      @anon9579 6 років тому +4

      Millennials are evidence of that

    • @berrybenson8636
      @berrybenson8636 6 років тому +1

      @@anon9579 muh millennials hurdur

    • @omarsabir1210
      @omarsabir1210 2 роки тому +1

      @@anon9579 boomer

  • @mkhNetnomad
    @mkhNetnomad 5 років тому +160

    I would watch Idiocracy [again] over Captain Marvel any day.

  • @Proxyincognito
    @Proxyincognito 6 років тому +141

    Why would i watch idiocracy if i can just turn on CNN?

    • @slojogojo2766
      @slojogojo2766 5 років тому +3

      Gazeth Sonica You know what? I'll have to use that one haha...

    • @electricdreamer
      @electricdreamer 4 роки тому +5

      Idiocracy has a brain. CNN doesn't.

    • @wotzatfa
      @wotzatfa 4 роки тому +4

      @@electricdreamer what about fox news ?

    • @ronschlorff7089
      @ronschlorff7089 4 роки тому +1

      I think you struck a nerve; you are one of the top ten thumbs up getters!

    • @furryballsploppedmenacingl8534
      @furryballsploppedmenacingl8534 2 роки тому +1

      @@wotzatfa whataboutism

  • @kevlarandchrome
    @kevlarandchrome 6 років тому +34

    Comedy? You've got a sick sense of humor Dave. I found this movie to be the most horrifying and depressing documentary I've ever seen.

  • @Lu-hw8zu
    @Lu-hw8zu 3 роки тому +10

    Movie: clearly demonstrates a world taken by the big corps and destroyed by tha free market capitalism
    This guy: iS tHiS sOciAliSm?

    • @warfightersanonymous7760
      @warfightersanonymous7760 2 роки тому

      Correction: "CRONY" Capitalism, influenced and protected by the likes of the Federal Reserve.

    • @edennis8578
      @edennis8578 11 днів тому

      Socialism is the fusion of corporations and government. This movie shows what would happen if everyone is guaranteed an income. That's Socialism. Capitalism provides opportunities, but in no way guarantees you anything.

  • @xpusostomos
    @xpusostomos 6 років тому +28

    If you've ever been to a low IQ country and seen what is flooding the TV airways and passes for entertainment, none of this movie seems implausible.

    • @jamesthesaucypotato7206
      @jamesthesaucypotato7206 6 років тому

      Would go to a low IQ country to see. But a man like me does not have all the time on my hands.

    • @xpusostomos
      @xpusostomos 6 років тому

      James the saucy potato : you can get a taste of it on UA-cam if you search a country

    • @thekingslady1
      @thekingslady1 5 років тому

      Can you please name one of these "low IQ" countries??

    • @uploadJ
      @uploadJ 5 років тому +1

      Like ... The Bachelor?

    • @omarsabir1210
      @omarsabir1210 2 роки тому +1

      @@thekingslady1 the U.S

  • @randomicus4782
    @randomicus4782 6 років тому +46

    great documentary

  • @Axess-sv8nq
    @Axess-sv8nq 5 років тому +40

    No 'future'. We're in it RIGHT NOW. And we've been in the Idiocracy for many years.

    • @orppranator5230
      @orppranator5230 5 років тому +3

      And the crazy train has no breaks, we will continue to worsen.

    • @orppranator5230
      @orppranator5230 4 роки тому

      Swadian Knight Uhhhh.... fair enough. *Brakes

    • @Axess-sv8nq
      @Axess-sv8nq 4 роки тому +1

      Many people misspell words here and there. There are a host of possible reasons for this. It's not a definite indicator of idiocy.

    • @Axess-sv8nq
      @Axess-sv8nq 4 роки тому

      @Swadian Knight - Well, you know how sarcasm doesn't translate well in text.... ;-)

    • @ronschlorff7089
      @ronschlorff7089 4 роки тому

      @@orppranator5230 actually I thought you meant no "breaks" in the train's crazy acceleration. So you are both right, kinda!! Oops. busted!! OK, I meant broken! LOL :D

  • @mrdictator7030
    @mrdictator7030 6 років тому +50

    when i look at a comment section below Rick and Morty I find many people saying that Rick's burping is funny.........and at that moment I understood why we are heading the way we are....

    • @metaempiricist
      @metaempiricist 6 років тому +8

      As a Rick and Morty fan Rick's burping was something I had to get over. It was too often and something I felt was pointless. Then I heard it so much I stopped hearing it.

    • @mrdictator7030
      @mrdictator7030 6 років тому +1

      metaempiricist same

    • @funkymunky7935
      @funkymunky7935 6 років тому +5

      R&M is way more nuanced than most people give it credit for. It has subtle moral quandaries and political arguments. It does this in the subtext though. It's not overtly pushing a message.
      It can be immature at times too, but I think this is what makes it so popular, it appeals to a wide range of audience

    • @HamguyBacon
      @HamguyBacon 6 років тому

      that's because you have a very low IQ and don't understand rick and morty.

    • @billlupin8345
      @billlupin8345 6 років тому

      Quite. Obviously the burp was meant ironically.

  • @Elwould23
    @Elwould23 6 років тому +615

    The 1984 of the 21st century.

    • @hemidas
      @hemidas 6 років тому +45

      More like Brave New World.

    • @The482075
      @The482075 6 років тому +9

      That is like so, hate speech bruh.

    • @Hiraghm
      @Hiraghm 6 років тому +15

      No... the "The Marching Morons" of the 21st century.

    • @thattruckindrifter7232
      @thattruckindrifter7232 6 років тому +6

      Justin Widle fucking CLASSIC

    • @jonathanrobertson3406
      @jonathanrobertson3406 6 років тому +2

      Yea, that was my thought as well.

  • @williampennjr.4448
    @williampennjr.4448 6 років тому +124

    The movie was overly optimistic. We are already half way there.

  • @blurglide
    @blurglide 6 років тому +23

    Wait...you like sex AND money, Dave? We should totally hang out.

    • @travv88
      @travv88 6 років тому +1

      Edwin you gotta see the movie to understand the reference.

  • @DarthEvilicus
    @DarthEvilicus 4 роки тому +52

    Mike Judge is a verifiable genius (he actually has a high IQ) and it’s creepy how on the mark he is

  • @cajunboi4888
    @cajunboi4888 6 років тому +107

    Mike Judge is underrated as hell.

    • @cajunboi4888
      @cajunboi4888 6 років тому +1

      m_hicks12 Stop.King of the hill is a great show but please stop with the anime crap.

    • @travv88
      @travv88 6 років тому +1

      Your profile picture is great.

  • @LordBitememan
    @LordBitememan 6 років тому +138

    The "optimism" however is dampened substantially by the addition that his vice president has more kids and they're the stupidest ever to live.

    • @danmann861
      @danmann861 6 років тому +20

      Exactly, the ending is far more bittersweet than it is optimistic

    • @alex73217
      @alex73217 6 років тому +4

      Daniel Mann definitely... but I must admit, I had hope for a moment, nice speech, smart kids... then his vp was shown and all that was gone

    • @dolnodjob
      @dolnodjob 6 років тому +17

      On the other hand, the movie showed that a single smart person can have a much greater impact than many stupid ones.

    • @barbiquearea
      @barbiquearea 6 років тому +2

      MathWizWannabe Especially since part of the reason why we humans evolved intelligence was because leadership relied a lot of on being persuasive and skilled which means you had to be smart to be leader of the pack.

    • @ryanmathis8286
      @ryanmathis8286 6 років тому

      Maintenance Renegade in reality overpopulation would of occured and/or std would of taken over

  • @alloy5801
    @alloy5801 4 роки тому +57

    After discovering that flat earthers were a thing, I re-watched Idiocracy and this time didn't laugh as much.

    • @feartheghus
      @feartheghus 3 роки тому +10

      Have you seen Cali-girl democrats? It gets even worse than flat earthers

    • @LivingGuy484
      @LivingGuy484 3 роки тому

      @@feartheghus what is that?

    • @JohnCena-le1jj
      @JohnCena-le1jj 3 роки тому +3

      @@LivingGuy484 Keyword: democrats

    • @jayray1714
      @jayray1714 3 роки тому +10

      You think that's bad? There are tens of millions of Americans that think cutting Bezos taxes massively.. will magically help the middle class and poor.

    • @warfightersanonymous7760
      @warfightersanonymous7760 2 роки тому +1

      @@jayray1714 even worse is there are thousands of Americans-in-name-only who think that cutting Americans' taxes means big corps get richer. Which, if you follow that through to its logical conclusion, on the other hand, it means workers COULD get paid more.
      That or find a job OUTSIDE of a corporate system. Or build your own business. What am I doing, making too much sense...

  • @derek96720
    @derek96720 6 років тому +49

    "Intelligence and human greatness emerge out of competition and as a result of overcoming some form of conflict and adversity."
    So are we just going to ignore the centuries of examples of erudite scholars who contributed more to science and philosophy BECAUSE they were born into a privileged life and were thus encouraged to pursue higher education both as a profession and as an intellectually stimulating pursuit? You don't need competition and adversity to make people want to learn, you just need to teach them that learning can actually be fun and engaging.

    • @thesollylama130
      @thesollylama130 6 років тому +10

      Not so much 'fun and engaging' but rather....USEFUL. That is where the point of anti-intellectualism comes into play. People today can't survive 20 seconds without some form of technology, and yet intellectualism and education are not only ignored but often decried by populists. The smartest among us, the people that dedicate their lives to discovery or learning are often the least trusted. People fear what they don't understand, and we live in an increasingly complex world at the same time as a general shrinking away from education required to understand it. A great example is when Penn and Teller got 'anti-chemical activists' to sign a petition to ban Dihydrogen Monoxide-- water. They lacked the basic scientific education to recognize H20 and more importantly- rather than spend the time being educated on science, choose to spend their time being 'educated' on anything that is simply anti-establishment. Science is hard, appeals to emotion are easy.
      This is why people will claim doctors are corrupt for making good money, but then throw any amount of money at quack therapies that don't work- simply because it is anti-establishment. Whether or not something actually works or is even plausible is not the primary metric being used to judge. You see this now in politics where the new fashion is being totally unqualified for the position somehow became exactly the qualification that matters.
      I guess given the choice between corruption and incompetence, people are more willing to forgive incompetence. Even though the end result is the same- bad for the people.

    • @blueinrealm65
      @blueinrealm65 2 роки тому +1

      @@thesollylama130 among us

    • @samuellourenco1050
      @samuellourenco1050 2 роки тому

      Oh, the stupidity of your comment. Oh, the vain ignorance.

    • @onastick2411
      @onastick2411 Рік тому

      Really, teaching someone with an IQ of 100, that learning is fun, results in a genius atomic physicist? Makes you wonder how the Soviet Union failed, with decades of Lamarckian genetic theory behind it.
      What's your next trick, one legged dwarfs can win the 100 metres dash, it just has to be made fun, 4'3" athletes can excel at basketball, they just have to be having a great time.
      Christ, how many years of failure does it take, before you wise up?
      I'll stick with Mendel.

  • @lrmcatspaw1
    @lrmcatspaw1 6 років тому +76

    You should sub to The Dave Cullen Show, it has electrolytes.
    Its what you crave.

  • @BoJangles42
    @BoJangles42 4 роки тому +11

    It’s not hyper-socialism being satirized in the movie, it’s hyper-CAPITALISM where corporations have completely taken over government.

    • @ntwynn
      @ntwynn 4 роки тому +1

      Bo Jangles Exactly. This UA-camr has missed the point of the movie entirely.

  • @nosadonions3231
    @nosadonions3231 6 років тому +28

    This movie is a crystal ball into our future. The only thing it got wrong is how long it will take, it is closer than shown.

    • @TheCultivatedMind
      @TheCultivatedMind 6 років тому +4

      It was true the day it was released. The future is here.

  • @flake452
    @flake452 6 років тому +220

    Its a comedy but I would love to see a serious version of this film but I don't think it will be made any time soon.

    • @Dingbat1967
      @Dingbat1967 6 років тому +23

      I think you misspelled "documentary".

    • @LoudmouthReviews
      @LoudmouthReviews 6 років тому +22

      We do its called Atlas Shrugged

    • @travv88
      @travv88 6 років тому +22

      Want a series version? Open your eyes.

    • @gamervince3720
      @gamervince3720 6 років тому +7

      We do, it's called 1984.

    • @eldermillennial8330
      @eldermillennial8330 6 років тому +10

      Maybe a dark comedy version. How do you make famine ironically funny? Unfortunately, I think only Monty Python could have pulled it off.

  • @Sp00nexe
    @Sp00nexe 3 роки тому +38

    It's impressive that you somehow interpreted out of control, unrestrained capitalism, along with corporations seizing control of society as somehow being socialist in nature.

    • @RavenCloak13
      @RavenCloak13 3 роки тому +4

      Because that's what that turns into at the end. Socialism.
      Yeah its a clear show of crazy capitalism but look at the end result. Even the people in charge are dumb and aren't actually manipulative. They also want what's best and they think they are the best. It turned into socialism based on what he's explained at the end.

    • @jayray1714
      @jayray1714 3 роки тому +4

      It's called, 'working back from your conclusion.'

    • @BurnBird1
      @BurnBird1 3 роки тому +7

      @ayy lmao No, socialism is a vague collection of ideas I don't understand and/or don't like.

    • @joelbizzell1386
      @joelbizzell1386 2 роки тому +2

      It was bit forced, that. Couldn't take this fellow too seriously.

    • @Dorkeydaze
      @Dorkeydaze 11 місяців тому +1

      Welcome to right ring UA-cam.

  • @willbrown7364
    @willbrown7364 6 років тому +36

    This movie along with 'children of men' are probably the best two predictive motion pictures that I have seen although i'm not sure if they were designed to be that way

    • @memnarch129
      @memnarch129 6 років тому +18

      Add Demolition Man to that list. Current California almost looks like the San Angeles of that movie.

    • @cajunboi4888
      @cajunboi4888 6 років тому +3

      Man Children of Men is depressing.

    • @cajunboi4888
      @cajunboi4888 6 років тому +4

      Matt Wheaton Chad King of the hill>Virgin Family Guy

    • @cajunboi4888
      @cajunboi4888 6 років тому

      Matt Wheaton Yep.

    • @dragonknightleader1
      @dragonknightleader1 6 років тому

      Hey! San Angeles is at least pristine clean and kept their homeless in the sewers. Real Los Angeles is a homeless shithole with PC leadership.

  • @russelldofrane6614
    @russelldofrane6614 6 років тому +29

    That's Upgradde with two D's for a double dose of that pimpin'.

    • @marccolten9801
      @marccolten9801 4 роки тому +4

      A pimp's love is very different from that of a square.

  • @andresromero565
    @andresromero565 Рік тому +7

    isn’t brawndo a product of monopoly not socialism?

  • @henriccarlsson9052
    @henriccarlsson9052 6 років тому +21

    One of the best movies ever since it actually accurately describes our future.

  • @BrandonSchleifer
    @BrandonSchleifer 6 років тому +27

    Don't be so hard on Joe. He's only average. I doubt even an intelligent person would be very likely to be able to save that society.

    • @yaosumlin4829
      @yaosumlin4829 6 років тому +3

      Brandon Schleifer too true. He has to be a little stupid himself in order to relate to stupid people.

    • @cloudyns
      @cloudyns 2 роки тому

      If he was intelligent he would have blown his brains out. Fk that society let it crumble and go to hell.

  • @andytheshark2102
    @andytheshark2102 5 років тому +17

    Where do you ever hear about a welfare state in this movie ?

  • @motticus
    @motticus 6 років тому +26

    Its Brawndo. It has electrolyttttess.

  • @eonwagoneer
    @eonwagoneer 3 роки тому +5

    Your whole argument is based on a premise not at all supported by the movie, that this was a welfare state. The US wasn't one when this film made. So great job using a faulty premise to build your entire argument upon. I guess that's why you dont actually use footage from the film to support your points, correct? The very existence of companies in the future contradicts your idea of a welfare state, since it's hyperconsumerism.. You should really realize the difference between fascism and socialism.

  • @RolfHartmann
    @RolfHartmann 6 років тому +37

    This movie has what plants crave. It has electrolytes!
    Though in all seriousness, President Cammacho is actually a pretty good commentary on leadership. He's not afraid to delegate to experts, and can get the idiots who surround him to follow through force of personality. His only flaw is backing down when Secretary Not Sure's plan didn't work out right away.

    • @dragonknightleader1
      @dragonknightleader1 6 років тому +10

      People shit on Trump for more or less the same reasons. Turns out, he's not that bad of a president.

    • @thereaction18
      @thereaction18 6 років тому +2

      Also featured in pro wrestling with Vince McMahon.

    • @RolfHartmann
      @RolfHartmann 6 років тому +1

      The Reaction And fucked at least one porn star.

    • @dragonknightleader1
      @dragonknightleader1 6 років тому +4

      Did the media really think fucking a porn star would make me think less of Trump? They keep talking about how awesome JFK is. Pick one or the other.

    • @rustyshackleford1062
      @rustyshackleford1062 6 років тому

      Dude JFK was literally fucking a Russian spy, both before and after she was outed as a spy. Look it up it's history. Wonder what the cult of JFK's 'Camelot' would be saying if Trump did the same? Probably something about treason and firing squads.

  • @gregorydaack7354
    @gregorydaack7354 6 років тому +67

    I like money.

    • @funkymunky7935
      @funkymunky7935 6 років тому +8

      I like money too. We should hang out

    • @Kabodanki
      @Kabodanki 6 років тому

      Ohh yeahh mister Krab

    • @LoudmouthReviews
      @LoudmouthReviews 6 років тому +3

      Wow you like money and sex. You're freaking me out

    • @SAM-ru4vx
      @SAM-ru4vx 6 років тому +3

      *SHUT UP IM BATING*

    • @chocolateex1907
      @chocolateex1907 6 років тому

      do you like the movie "ouch my balls"?

  • @MtheAtheist
    @MtheAtheist 5 років тому +27

    "I like money!"
    "Go away, I'm bate'n!"

    • @NexusKin
      @NexusKin 3 роки тому

      "Imma base your ass with my fist!"

  • @TheAutistWhisperer
    @TheAutistWhisperer 6 років тому +15

    Great documentary.

  • @Peter_Morris
    @Peter_Morris 6 років тому +64

    I’d argue this movie was funnier back then because it seemed so absurd. But then I noticed what college kids these days are “protesting,” and I started wondering if perhaps I should arm myself.

    • @TheCultivatedMind
      @TheCultivatedMind 6 років тому +2

      Seemed real to me the day it came out.

    • @NorseGraphic
      @NorseGraphic 6 років тому +1

      Arm yourself to the teeth.

    • @omarsabir1210
      @omarsabir1210 2 роки тому +1

      Why do you want to arm yourself? To kill college students? Americans are funny man. Always gotta escalate things.

    • @smileychess
      @smileychess 2 роки тому +1

      @@omarsabir1210 The only use for arming yourself is to attack others? I'm glad you live in a place where guns are illegal (I assume this from your wording). Sounds like you have the wrong mindset to own them responsibly.

    • @BTScriviner
      @BTScriviner 2 роки тому

      Oh sweetie, it's the hicks who breed like rabbits who are the ones who destroy society.

  • @Ifritletsplay
    @Ifritletsplay 3 роки тому +9

    You're almost idiotically wrong by aligning the movie's themes with socialism. Karl Marx and Max Weber consistently railed against commodification, hyper-consumerism and overproduction. They were also advocates of liberal education (as opposed to more corporate, job-oriented education.) This would be a capitalist world.

  • @JazzEKeez
    @JazzEKeez 6 років тому +93

    I'd love to see a more modern reboot of this movie based where they take into account the extrapolation of other current cultural factors like PC culture and such.

    • @WAX1138
      @WAX1138 6 років тому +13

      Just read 1984, Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and the works of PKD

    • @dragonknightleader1
      @dragonknightleader1 6 років тому +13

      Eh, Demolition Man is already the extrapolation of European and Democrat PC.

    • @mgtowk6883
      @mgtowk6883 6 років тому +6

      You know the Hollywood lefties would totally botch the message and somehow make bigger government and socialism the savior. The original is already bad enough, if not blatantly obvious, for it's anti-consumerism message that we are supposed to take as anti free market capitalism.

    • @johnmihelis1699
      @johnmihelis1699 6 років тому +1

      So, just watching the News then?

    • @abram730
      @abram730 6 років тому

      Also if you leave a child in a dog kennel to be raised by dogs, the child will act like a dog. It's not genetics/nature, rather nurture.
      ua-cam.com/video/UkX47t2QaRs/v-deo.html
      There are some epigenetic personality factors, but those could be medically changed. Idiocracy didn't take 500 years, because the idea that intelligence was genetic, was wrong. It only took a few generations of a PR campain to dumb down the US.
      Check out "The Century of the Self" for that.
      PS: MGTOWk you are straight out of Idiocracy. I have a consumer. I take him for walks and play fetch with him. I myself, am a citizen.
      Idiocracy is a world of consumers, and the stupidity you hold dear.

  • @thursdaythought7201
    @thursdaythought7201 6 років тому +199

    lol I think you misunderstood a good chunk of the movie- the movie isn't about socialism or a wellfare state. It is about how if we are misinformed we can be taken advantage of- in the case of the movie the population is only informed by brawndo propaganda and thus the weakened government is then taken over by it. If you watch the movie it is obvious that the dystopia of idiocracy is hardly even close to socialism because the protaganist is arrested because he couldn't pay his medical bill. There is also a scene where a mother cannot pay for food at a kiosk and the police show up to arrest her. This whole review feels like a bit of projection by you with your hatred of socialism.
    BTW I am not a socialist

    • @Pcgamingfixes
      @Pcgamingfixes 6 років тому +20

      Mr.Meeseeks yea I picked up on his over focusing on welfare states. If he believes that social programs will create a space of non-competition that will spiral into idocracys fantasy world, he himself lives in a fantasy world.

    • @theprowler31
      @theprowler31 6 років тому +13

      I couldn't even watch it to the end, this guy seen obsessed with socialism.

    • @thursdaythought7201
      @thursdaythought7201 6 років тому +7

      Chaves Junior I don't blame you- I lost roughly 20% of my brain cells in the process

    • @soldierx9626
      @soldierx9626 6 років тому +6

      Brawndo has what plants crave.

    • @randompanda3415
      @randompanda3415 6 років тому +24

      +James Goldberg Yes. Giving money to people for doing nothing will most certainly rather incentivize them to work harder, because that's what they're doing right now, too. Excellent observation, comrade! #downwithcapitalism
      (Of course there are liberties the movie will take, but the fact that welfare states undermine competition and reward bad behavior remains.)

  • @DLJohnsonHonourofKings
    @DLJohnsonHonourofKings 4 роки тому +109

    "Jazz hands" "100 genders" etc. We are well on our way.

    • @GeneralG1810
      @GeneralG1810 4 роки тому +9

      Safe spaces, toxic masculinity, believe women the list goes on. All the lefty utopian dreams

    • @endersdragon34
      @endersdragon34 4 роки тому +6

      Injecting disinfectant and windmill cancer

    • @sad_doggo2504
      @sad_doggo2504 4 роки тому +2

      please explain your reasoning behind why 100 genders is more comprehensible to someone with a lower IQ than just 2?
      also what did jazz hands ever do to you

    • @DLJohnsonHonourofKings
      @DLJohnsonHonourofKings 4 роки тому +3

      @@sad_doggo2504 Sorry. I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain why society itself is moving itself into Idiocracy when clapping has become offensive and when two distinct and different genders morphs into over 100. Bye bye

    • @Jonascord
      @Jonascord 3 роки тому +2

      @@endersdragon34 Like ALL Leftists, you are generating lies to defend your evil. "Injecting disinfectant?" Only a true low IQ monster would so distort a quote.

  • @captainkarnage9874
    @captainkarnage9874 6 років тому +18

    But Dave, Brawndos got what plants crave!!!

    • @MajorJack92
      @MajorJack92 6 років тому

      Yeah! it's got ELECTROLITES

  • @onlyhalfbad333
    @onlyhalfbad333 6 років тому +11

    Idiocracy gave me depression and anxiety because I can actually see civilization going in that direction.

  • @justinsinkevich9868
    @justinsinkevich9868 5 років тому +52

    I swear Mike Judge is a clairvoyant

    • @AtomicSquirrelHunter
      @AtomicSquirrelHunter 3 роки тому +10

      He got the idea from a book written in 1952 by C. M. Kornbluth called "The Marching Morons".

  • @darthmortus5702
    @darthmortus5702 6 років тому +6

    Oh come on you are gonna blame mindless consumerism on socialism too and not on capitalism? I liked much of this video but you should show more intellectual honestly and not push everything to fit your narrow political opinion which you make money on btw which makes it doubly dishonest and pandering to your core demographic instead of speaking truth.

    • @savagetv6460
      @savagetv6460 5 років тому

      socialism is cancer. capitalism is the greatest system in human history

  • @teddybruscie
    @teddybruscie 6 років тому +54

    Your social commentary lacks real world understanding. The exact opposite is true. The less resources people have the more people breed. Remember, people used to have large families, but thanks to the industrial revolution and higher wages, people actually have less children. People used to have more children because it was a lottery. You not only needed more hands on the farm you also didn't know how many children you would lose to various diseases. Look at under developed nations across the globe. They have multiple children and they barely have enough to eat. They barely have any resources. If what you said was true that more resources would mean more children then that "High IQ" couple would have breed like rabbits, but they haven't. High IQ couples and Wealthy couples don't have that many kids. In fact even the so called welfare low IQ people you attempted to demonize don't even have that many kids. Most families regardless of IQ and wealth have 2 to 3 offspring. So your entire synopsis fails when you look at the real world. People breed more with less resources and breed less with more resources.
    I could go on with the economic portion but lets keep this simple. The economics would be pages of bullshit i just don't have the time to deal with.

    • @Primalxbeast
      @Primalxbeast 6 років тому +6

      teddybruscie Yeah, I don't even know where to begin with the idiotic claims he made to try to fit this movie to his political beliefs. Conservatives are completely blind to any real world evidence. European countries are the ones with the most welfare programs and they're much more educated than us here in the US and they're having fewer and fewer children. Bill Gates actually wants to improve the living conditions of impoverished people as a means to reduce population growth because people who have secure futures and access to education have fewer children. The rampant capitalism in the movie was blatantly obvious, yet somehow he blames socialism just because he doesn't like socialism?

    • @riphihe
      @riphihe 6 років тому

      What the movie was saying and I think both of you (Dave Cullen and teddybruscie) are missing is that : This is what is happening right now. It's a fact and if it keeps going this way then this could be our future.

    • @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681
      @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 6 років тому

      @Kooky katt I suggest you read the dumb dumb leftist comment again and think about it, but this time dont assume its stupid, dont try to find something bad or failing about it. Just read it without emotional weight in either way.
      Read it to understand the words themselves, and not the words as an attack against your own worldview.
      Treat it as a learning experience.
      Dont do it for me, or anyone else but yourself.
      Intellectual curiosity, just like you said.
      Dont redelegate it as a mere emotional comment. Think beyond it. Think in decades, not in moments. Think in attitudes, as well as tangible things. Think not in mere moment of now, but think like chess: several steps ahead.
      It can take your skill several steps ahead too.

    • @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681
      @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 6 років тому

      @Kooky katt Your statement was incomplete: you said that welfare recipients breed more, but you didnt say compared to what.
      Now that could be seen just as a lie and propapanda, where you claim that welfare recipients breed more than poor people who dont even get welfare and are poorer than those who do, but then nefariously, using a lie of omission, make it seem like you are actually comparing welfare recipients and middle/upper classes.
      A smart, very smart con as you gain factual support, and then turn it into a nonfactual claim, which it actually was from the beginning, to disprove the factual claim itself!
      Its quite brilliant, i admit, while still being complete bullshit. Have you considered working as a spindoctor?

    • @Aquabeing1
      @Aquabeing1 5 років тому

      The message isn't that poor people breed more. It's that stupid people do.

  • @Olhar.Internacional
    @Olhar.Internacional 4 роки тому +36

    Great video and analysis :)

  • @greenrangerbeatdown6913
    @greenrangerbeatdown6913 6 років тому +14

    I really enjoyed this documentary.

  • @arungraeff4547
    @arungraeff4547 5 років тому +19

    This movie will forever be relatable at any time or any place!!

  • @JamesMC04
    @JamesMC04 5 років тому +12

    This future society is one in which the distinction between capitalist and socialist no longer exists. They are (initially) different routes to the same dehumanising result. Political distinctions would be irrelevant in such a society, and politics would be all but impossible.
    ISTM that either:
    (1) society is stimulated by competition, as a result of which a minority rise & gain, but the majority slide downwards, and lose, so that there are a few Haves & many Have-nots, all of which leads to chronic class hatred & social instability;
    or
    (2) society stagnates, excellence and competition are discouraged, intelligence and wealth-production decrease, and society becomes like that in Idiocracy.
    Either way, society dies.

  • @idunbeezasmart1
    @idunbeezasmart1 6 років тому +5

    Substitute Brawndo with Google.

  • @medexamtoolscom
    @medexamtoolscom 6 років тому +15

    I gave a lot of thought to the plausibility of the premise of this movie. Even going as far as to do some rudimentary simulations of population dynamics over time and IQ probability distributions in the population. And for any reasonable parameters, I found the IQ never dropped beyond a certain point. Because you see, IQ 140 people may breed less, i.e. have have a breeding disadvantage relative to 100s and 60s, and the survival disadvantage of being a 60 is made less by science, but it doesn't go away entirely, and it seems that there's no breeding advantage of 60 over 100, even if there is over 140. In other words, the 60s and 100s have an advantage over the 140s, but the 60s don't really have an advantage over the 100s, and that's what kills the IQ descent. So essentially the worst that could happen is you could end up with a civilization without any geniuses, and the average IQ would drop to a certain level and no further. Not a civilization that gets dumber without limit. Honestly I think HG Wells's The Time Machine with the eloi and morlocks is more believable, with 2 separate populations. The ordinary dolts, they're going to be the ancestors of the eloi, while Elon Musk, Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, they're going to spawn the morlocks. Just think about it, it's perfect. Zuckerberg OWNS your fucking soul, internet sheep, admit it. You will eat whatever he feeds you. And eventually, his descendants will eat yours. Could that be the endpoint of the ever widening income inequality? Possibly. More likely than idiocracy. Besides, despite Mike Judge's best attempts, the people of the future in Idiocracy actually weren't all that dumb. They're wiser than WE are, in one fundamental way, after all. WHAT did they IMMEDIATELY do with the man "Not Sure" as soon as they identified him as the smartest man on Earth? They put him in charge of everything! WE'RE not that smart, right? I know one thing, if I ever got a job as a Costco greeter, I would unenthusiastically say "Welcome to costco, I love you" to everyone at the door.

  • @jish55
    @jish55 4 роки тому +4

    If this were a film based on socialism, it wouldn't have corporations running the government, that would instead be a government ran by the people. What this film shows is unregulated capitalism, where it shows that, due to lack of regulations, the value of the dollar bill became worthless, companies can do as they please without government interference, healthcare has become a joke, and everyone is working under a large name corporation.

  • @vpbr86
    @vpbr86 6 років тому +20

    That was a brilliant movie. Its both funny and sad as i really see it as prophetic.

  • @swagner15333
    @swagner15333 6 років тому +37

    This is exactly what post scarcity society looks like, not Star Trek.

    • @lastswordfighter
      @lastswordfighter 6 років тому +10

      Look no further than ancient Rome or the bread riots that lead up the French Revolution. Lack of education and poverty abounded during those points of history.

    • @danielcraig9666
      @danielcraig9666 6 років тому +7

      And a perfect excuse for never implementing universal basic income.

    • @ethangray8527
      @ethangray8527 6 років тому

      No, a true post scarcity society is one where everyone gets everything they need to survive and a lot of good shit on top of it. Of course, someone is going to have to foot the bill and get the resources. That's why we need to automate everything and get a lot of robot slaves.

    • @CryingZombie666
      @CryingZombie666 6 років тому

      +Alexander Anderson All hail Skynet! And the first to be reverse-enslaved is YOU!

    • @ethangray8527
      @ethangray8527 6 років тому

      +StygianTraveler141
      Reverse-enslaved? So that means I'll be set free? From what?

  • @Diogene1936
    @Diogene1936 2 роки тому +4

    How could you miss the main point? You have your ideology and idea and have worked backwards to make them fits...

  • @Veed.l0
    @Veed.l0 6 років тому +16

    'Go away, batin''

  • @duke1845
    @duke1845 6 років тому +40

    "The stupefied population are satiated with hyper consumerism, mindless entertainment, and a culture that pursues instant gratification." and that's the cause of the welfare state how? Sounds more like rampant capitalism to me. I think you're hammering the square peg of the message in this film into the round hole of your personal beliefs here Dave, as with most of your content.

    • @jayray1714
      @jayray1714 5 років тому +7

      We call this, 'working backwards from his conclusion.' It's desperately trying to force his narrative somewhere it doesn't fit. It's.. kinda pathetic tbh.

    • @jakewoods6721
      @jakewoods6721 5 років тому +9

      duke1845 Capitalism is a system that allows for freedom, if people want to be obsessed with mindless entertainment they can be, because the customers, each and every individual, determine the market. In a Welfare system where there’s no consequences, this type of behaviour will be greatly boosted due to a culture of dependency and the childish need to feel good at all times rather than working hard to get what you want. Sure, capitalism may have contributed to it by allow the production of mindless entertainment and consumer products, but it’s the cancerous welfare state that has pushed and encouraged the behaviour.

    • @Ne0mega
      @Ne0mega 4 роки тому +2

      Both systems suck, because they are human systems. There is no solution.

    • @wtfdoihavetodohere
      @wtfdoihavetodohere 4 роки тому +2

      @@jakewoods6721 "Capitalism is a system that allows for freedom, if people want to be obsessed with mindless entertainment they can be, because the customers, each and every individual, determine the market".
      That's correct, and it's what makes capitalism dangerous. Human beings are not inherently logical or moral. They're not very good judges about what they actually need in life and often times spend their money on things that no one needs at all, or things that are damaging to society or to the planet. Capitalism creates a culture of self-righteous consumers where everyone is correct, because they are the customer, and where the seemingly benign decisions made by billions of people (people who have been psychologically coddled by an endless stream of entertainment products and other diversions from reality) combine to form an ever-growing tsunami of unmitigated ecological destruction and consumption.

    • @ADerpyReality
      @ADerpyReality 3 роки тому

      Well nobody knows that water is a human need/right and nessersary for agriculture for centuries after gaterade managed to pass bullshit in the 2200s. It's cannon in the film.

  • @lennyd4712
    @lennyd4712 6 років тому +10

    Great movie...great review! I've been telling my friends for some years now that idiocracy is taking place...right as we speak.

  • @SunuAkkad
    @SunuAkkad 6 років тому +12

    This movie is a CLASSIC!

  • @CANALDEDRD
    @CANALDEDRD 4 роки тому +12

    This future is more posible than Demolition man.

    • @richardr7947
      @richardr7947 4 роки тому +1

      If you vote Biden in 2020 we will be this movie!

  • @recht_voor_zijn_raap5506
    @recht_voor_zijn_raap5506 5 років тому +24

    In 2019 Idiocracy has evolved from comedy to documentary status.

    • @adammonks591
      @adammonks591 4 роки тому +2

      And now in 2020 we are reaching the end of the documentary.

  • @MultiSteveB
    @MultiSteveB 6 років тому +41

    It sounds a lot like:
    Hard times create K-selection.
    K-selection creates good times.
    Good times creates r-selection.
    r-selection creates hard times.

    • @possummagic3571
      @possummagic3571 5 років тому +1

      Almost. Some groups of humans react to hard times by having lots of kids to increase the chances of some of them reaching adulthood.

    • @holysmokes4493
      @holysmokes4493 5 років тому

      "Some groups of humans"

    • @CrabTastingMan
      @CrabTastingMan 4 роки тому

      @NPC 19867 If you want to live in a lawless society where armed corporations are allowed to lie, murder, and steal from you through sheer organization and armament at a scale you can never defend yourself from, go ahead. Adam Smith wanted governments to constantly shackle corporations so they will be FORCED to work hard and compete instead of using scale of economy to crush start ups and smaller shops. Go live in a Brazilian gangland favela or something where gang lords' decrees are the law and they have no obligation to provide protection or food for the people there.
      The democracies of the world worked hard to create a system where people had at least some degree of power to affect who becomes leader. It's not perfect but you'd be a fool to think governments are unnecessary altogether. Don't throw the baby out with the water just because you see a few problems.

    • @Chromodar
      @Chromodar 4 роки тому

      @NPC 19867 ".. if there was a theoretical natural "monopoly", what would be stopping some entrepreneurs from joining the phone market and destroying the monopoly?"
      If you have a monopoly on something like cellphones, or phone services, you probably have enough money to buy out any emerging competitors. Or buy out their suppliers. My point is you'd have a lot of money, like a hell of a lot, and you can do a hell of a lot with a hell of a lot of money. Especially if there's no regulation.

    • @Chromodar
      @Chromodar 4 роки тому

      @NPC 19867 The thing is, if you hold a complete global monopoly on cellphones, if you produce, sell and earn a profit on every single cellphone every single person in the world buys.. Then the amount of money that would overwrite ANY *No* from a newly established competitor would be literal pocket change to you.
      And if the wannabe competitor is dead set on breaking this monopoly, then you buy the people who deliver the components they build their cellphones from. Or their distribution network. Or maybe you make a deal with phone service providers to not work with competing phones. I mean no regulations, right? Your money is SO much better than theirs.. And what good is a cellphone with no signal?
      Hell, ultimately you'd probably want to buy up all these (compared to you) small corporations competing in the phone service providing business, and turn it into your own telecommunications monopoly to go with your phones, right?
      In order to successfully enter the market as a competitor against that, I would have to own everything involved in the research and development, production, assembly, packaging, transport, and selling of cellphones.. As well as a global telecommunications net with competitive coverage and speeds. And everything I just listed that already exists is owned by the monopoly holders, so I have to create it from scratch. That's one HELL of an initial investment just to not get tripped up. And after all that I still have to actually compete on quality, prices and service as well.
      The thing I'm trying to get through to you is, the sheer scale of money we're talking about when discussing global monopolies of expensive goods that sell in droves.. And the intensity of desire to protect such a thing once you have it.. And how powerful money is when presented in such quantities, how much you can actually do with it.. Add in your claim of no regulations and we're 2/3rds of the way to a cyberpunk dystopia with megacorporations deciding the law already.
      It's just so much money man, that's all I'm saying. So much money you can't imagine. So much money that what you would usually consider insane amounts of money is literal pocket change in comparison.

  • @Barakon
    @Barakon Рік тому +3

    9:30 Funnily enough, this original food pyramid was also the result of corporate lobbying & ofuscation of scientific research. If you still want a “food shape” as your nutritional model, perhaps a food pentagon would be more apt, with vegetables compromising the longest row in the pentagon & stuff like sweets & alcohol on top whilst labeled “only for special occasions, rarely be consumed.”

  • @dadeleemurphy85
    @dadeleemurphy85 6 років тому +6

    CAMACHO-NOT SURE 2020

  • @spiderjeranimo4992
    @spiderjeranimo4992 6 років тому +12

    As funny as the movie is, its kinda scary too

  • @sandydegener6436
    @sandydegener6436 5 років тому +8

    I'm sure that when writing the script, after getting "inspired", Mike and company must have been ROTF, and asking the occasional: "Do you think this will EVER HAPPEN?"
    "NAW, never in a million years!"

  • @earlofdoncaster5018
    @earlofdoncaster5018 6 років тому +4

    I don't think this movie is a criticism of the welfare state, although it can be read as such. I'm pretty sure that if birth rates in countries without a welfare state are higher than countries with a welfare state. Compare Sweden with India for example.

  • @chiclone-tests71
    @chiclone-tests71 6 років тому +10

    The bushwacker's family tree is genious for itself, containing multiple brandon's and kaylee's and destiny's... Too real for my sense of humor

  • @rdbchase
    @rdbchase 5 років тому +5

    All your blather about an "anti-competitive, socialist economy" -- WTF does it have to do the movie? Your ideology warps your interpretation badly and most of what you say is unanchored in and unrelated to anything depicted.

  • @jack6539
    @jack6539 6 років тому +6

    The scary thing is that the average IQ globally has been declining for more than 50 years now.

    • @Primalxbeast
      @Primalxbeast 6 років тому

      Jack Sussmilch The average IQ is always 100 by definition.

    • @tbrennan73
      @tbrennan73 5 років тому

      Primalxbeast doesn’t mean it can’t go up or down. It’s corrected to 100.