Fine. Here's your golden opinion
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 кві 2024
- something something something golden girls 1985
🟢 MERCH STORE - orchideight.com/
🟡 MORE CONTENT - / @brickyep2
🔴 MAIN CHANNEL - / @bricky
🟣 TWITCH - / bricky
⚪ DISCORD - / discord
🔵 TWITTER - / bricky
🟣 INSTAGRAM - brickyig?h...
⬛ TIKTOK - / brickytoks - Ігри
Rocky Mountain chocolate factory going out of business when I'm done with them today
RIP your waistline
More like opening 20 new stores
Goober
apple moment
Based and apple pilled
>Click on video
>It's about warhammer
where is my piss
I'm very disappointed in you bricky I thought this was gonna be a 20 minute video on why peeing in the shower makes you superior to everyone else.
It better be the next video or I'm unsubscribing!
He doesn’t even need to make that video, it’s self-apparent why shower pissers are better.
Real.
!
Not gonna lie I thought so too
Following this trend of how they announce new material I hope GW reveals that the Great Rift was closed in a MySpace post and an Age of Sigmar short story.
Pancreas!
Pancreas is here!! Next Halohammer when?
Also xeelee vid when?
General Pancreas! Hello there!
This point exactly. Why does it have to be such a 'bleh' announcement. Work it into the lore! Make it real! Not just....... whatever
@@skwoogleyeah how it's done should be the main focus.
instead some ppl just yap about how there's more women in their faction lol
Honestly yeah, actually if they just came up and said that the custodes are now experimenting with female recruits and the introduction was just that story of the gal teleporting a nuke into the throne room I think it would have been received much better
or hack, use the hores Hersey series to do it.
No kidding. Progressivism will always fall flat on its face when it doesn't realize the immense level of weaponized autism the anti-woke crowd can conjure up out of absolutely nothing.
Nah stop being weak brother
I really think people are forgetting that the Custodes were created by the Big E himself, you know the guy that hated religion and was all about secularism and logic. If a woman met the prereqs to becaome a Custodes do we really thing he would just be like "lol na"?
@@jackjames7283 Horus Heresy ends with Constantin Valdor just saying "oh thank atheism that the Emperor is in a coma, we can start making women custodes instead of just dudes."
We use gender neutral pronouns here like “meat”, “expendable” and “dead”
"Biomass"
"Cannon Fodder"
Would "Sacrifices" count or is that too Chaos-leaning?
Soldier
"Martyrs" would do too
Actually thought this video was gonna be about piss ngl
He has strong opinions on shower pissing. His stance on it is W I D E.
@@Tukenfarben people either piss in the shower, or lie and say they dont
@@Tukenfarben almost as W I D E as his forehead.
Some people in his chat doth protest way too fucking much, like they're ashamed of something.
But hey, at least they're not waffle-stompers.
Same. Needless to say, I'm rather disappointed it wasn't.
Was more disappointed that there wasnt an expansion to the SoS as a part of the Custodian Codex
EXCATLY
More SoS lore was all they had to do🤷🤦
SoS
SoB
Female guardsmen
Inquisitor women
Xeno women
There's enough girlboss already
Perfect balance 👌 no need to add to it.
The bottom line is
1.) There is better ways to do this.
2.) Doing it this way is dumb and would only ever cause outrage.
3.) Why capitulate to people who don't play?
I keep hearing people say the change was to bring in new female fans. Frankly I think we’ve hit the saturation point with that. Plenty of other factions have women and it didn’t bring in tons of new fans. Most of the female fans I know found the change pandering and it kinda screws with the aesthetic of the custodies. Like how if you made the sisters of battle male, it would screw up the nun thing
@@KerncBurns Also it seems only male "golden mommy!" fanbois enjoy the lore change it seems. At least in my local game stores, the women don't care and keep playing what they want and only "strange" guys now like Custodes all of a sudden and talk about weird conversion kits...
@@DamonDemolition True. It really makes the community look gross. I was a kid when i first got into warhammer and that kind of stuff would have put me off the hobby
Best take
Custodes armour is no where nearly as shiny as your forehead
😂😂😂
This news was utterly whelming. The real news is how terrible half the detachments are for custodes and only getting one new model like Ad-mech did
Not even a new model, a new version of an existing model
I mean the model part is how it works for edition across both aos and 40k.
There are a bunch of factions that get a range refresh or a score of new models when their codex launches while other factions get a new character and thats it.
Sometimes they get maybe some new stuff later in the edition.
@@PlasmaPea04 There haven't been a new squad of custodes in 6 years.
and it's a miserable little wargear option and nothing more.
@@ryan3171 ye they are in a bit of a model drought when it comes to squads, though that just happends to factions sometimes, up until 9th, necrons didnt have one for 7 years while eldar had 5 years instead.
Admech have currently had have not had one for 5 years.
I'm always thankful to remember real life isn't like twitter
Internet anonymity is a hell of a drug.
8:14
Exactly this. I don't care about the lore change itself. It's not the most outrageous thing they've done, it's whatever.
But it's the fact that they did in such a shitty way. Like, we know lore changes all the time, just acknowledge it and make it good. Don't give me that "Oh female Custodes were always there, k thx bye"
It feels forced and lazy
Remember: GW is a company founded in Britain and, since the Brexit, they Intelligence has devolved and make them stupid decisions all the time.
Thus they are, and should be, now called "The Bri'ish".
That's my only and logical conclusion!
But to be honest, i'm conflicted about this new retcon. I can't decide which side i should pick.
@@MrMuelltube There is no side to pick. Everyone should hate this style of retcon. It should be stupid to 40k fans who probably know more lore than the guy doing the retcon and the tweet that followed, and it should be equally stupid to people outside who should clearly see this is done as lazily as possible to appeal for ESG money without putting in the legwork to actually fit it in the lore. At the very least it's insulting to both sides.
It's not a matter of feeling. *It is* forced and lazy. At any point they could have released something to build up this change; a couple stories, maybe a in-universe event, something. It would have been infinitely more preferable than the slothful way they did it. And while there would still be some people complaining about it (there always will be), it wouldn't be nearly as bad as it is now. Just plain stupidity on GW's part.
It's the most corporate, boring, lazy and cowardly way of retcon possible. Just throw it out there, duck until the shit storm passes and then carry on like nothing changed. What's sad is that, IIRC there was an author who wanted to write about female custodes and got shot down in the past, could have been a way better inclusion than this mess.
@@axios4702 yup if i recall correctly it was Aron Demsky bowden who wanted to make some women in the custodians in "the master of mankind" but it was shut down... At least it would have been a good way with one the best authors in the black library, but nope...
Thinking about it, an AdRic episode going over all the lore that has been retconned would be cool
I think they mentioned this during the 13th black crusade retcon episode
Yeah!!
It would probably also be over 4 hours long which we would all watch
@@catnerdadrian7601 make it the 500k sub special
@@catnerdadrian7601 That just gives the excuse for a multi part EP.
"Just have Cawl do it" like literally haha
This is my go to for all the arguments. Cawl is the literal Deus Ex Machina.
Cawl: "Guilliman, look! I've created female space marines!"
Guilliman: "That's cool... why is their armor exposed around the midriff?"
Cawl:"... no reason."
And the argument would be quite understandable, considering the situation in the galaxy - "we are just running out of men fitting specific genetic requirements at this point"
I mean, there would be still complaints, but at least it would fit the tone and general progression of the story without a retcon whiplash that were femstodes
@@Invizive And like, of course, origionally it's because GW was unbased 30-40 years ago when they decided Women couldn't become Space Marines. But then later they made some lore on WHY females couldn't become Space Marines, which was basically, "We would like to, and we tried, but it didn't work." Which means the Imperium IS receptive to the idea of Female Space Marines. So with that, GW doesn't need to make any other lore reason why Space Marines can be Female other than "Someone figured it out. Probably Cawl, flipping the Chromosomes on the Gene Seeds or whatever non-sense science reason GW comes up with, and BAM, double the Space Marine Budget. The only thing GW needs to worry abot is the Date in which this Scientific Breakthrough happens, and maybe a few lines on how the Space Marines feel about the sudden influx of troops, which will probably go something like, "Space Marines skeptical, Females are just as cappable because Gene Seeds makes everyone equal, everyone happy." Unless they overcomplicate things FSM would be an easy inclusion. It certainly not as far-fetched as some might want you to think.
Actually, GW made Female Space marines originally. It was the retail sellers that literally asked GW to no longer include the female ones in resupply because they weren't selling so they would have waaaayy too many in stock. So eventually they just kinda stopped making them, and then later wrote lore to explain it retroactively. Genuinely a fanbase problem@@daddysempaichan
13:36
Not a peep made is an insane accusation really. There are many times that GW tried to retcon lore and they have received HUGE BACKLASH.
The ones I can come up with on the top of my head is
1. The attempt to change Mortarions intentions when joining nurgle
2. The introduction of primaris and replacement of the old marines
3. The addition of leagues of Votann.
The reaction to all of those were very different from each other and none of them except maybe primaris are comparable to the reaction this has had
@@maxkordonthat is true, tho the difference with the other two is that it didn’t harm the lore that much. And not only that but mortarions retcon of his intentions with nurgle was so bad even Chris wright himself had to go back and say it’s a demons words so it could all be lies, where he essentially retconned a retcon.
I don’t think the leagues of votan have gotten anywhere near close to the concept of hate. Maybe a bit disgruntled over no longer being called squats, but I love the new take on them.
Squats are so 80s warhammer while leagues of votan match the settings current theme.
@@maxkordonand I think the primaris was taken as badly as it was because it’s so blatantly a cash grab that is once again retreading the same exact story lines as before.
The space marines gain literally nothing to their lore from the primaris the same as femstodese… except, the fematodese have zero impact on buying while the primaris force you to get all new factions entirely.
Oh no, what'd they do to morty
The Votann were much much bigger Retcon. Then "Hey, the Squats have been eaten by Tyranids." Later: "Squats were one Faction that has been eaten by Tyranids. The rest of them had a huge Empire like Society in the galactic core since... forever."
That was pretty dumb but the reason for doing it matters - they wanted to bring back a faction everyone missed. The custodes thing? Pandering to a group of moaning harpies who don't even play the game.
Squats are much more acceptable in this regard. It is conceivable that the people qe knew as squats were something of a frontier of a larger coreward empire, and that frontier got eaten by tyrannids. Still a retcon, but overall plausible.
The bigger problem I have in this regard are the Demiurg and the whole squats being demihumans thing. The latter just barely fits with the ancient empire idea, but the demiurg thing is just dumb.
Also, they look like bearded, even smoother primaris. Which is a bit of a waste.
Like the thing that bothers me is why not give the sisters of Silence a glow up like the Kroot got.
because they arent tall bananas... like the sisters of silence are blanks they about as close to a human as a human is getting to a custodes there cool af but they arent the crazy banana gaurd 1 greasy peel away from ending the imperium trying to protect big e, the sisters of battle are several flavors of battle nun i feel like if this was exlusively about HEY WOMEN Theye'd add space marines to them but like this is just custodes doing custodes shit and they have boobs its not that big a deal when the important part is they are STILL TRYING TO BLOW UP THE IMPERIUM AS A GAME
While i agree, i also don't really like to compare them to the Custodians since their functions are different...
SoS aren't just female custodes, they actually have their own thing going on.
Yup!
I think that's what he meant by the custodes codex is pretty bad. It an army that desperately needed an expansion to the range, characters, vehicles, units, everything. They need anything. Bananas or sisters of silence.
@@rigel9228 You mean to tell me they have a gender specific counterpart of the other gender specific army, and both are... DIFFERENT?
Sounds good. Sounds like a really good reason to not add a gender to one army.
I'm not gonna lie, even with Bricky saying it out loud in the beginning, it took me 3 solid minute to understand what the fuck we were even talking about
i think people is scared because a lot of story goes around with disney and such and don't want to see them hobby slaughtered by all this ideology.
Oh hey Ghazghkull vs Thrall,guy.
I have zero issue with female Custodes.
I have issues with how poorly it was handled.
Could have had lore reasons for it etc. Instead it's the laziest retcon+gaslight ever. "They were always there duh".
Feels like such a corporate checkbox cop-out.
They wrote a big series of books and models explaining the creation of Primaris, that didn't save anyone any outrage
@@MarieAvora agree, and when the complete range of Sororitas was remade, the drama surounding the redesign of the Repentias was absolutly ridiculous, another proof that everytime women are involved those damn gatekeepers can't hold their mouth. Lore change, or not.
These morons literally retconned thousands of years of Tau FTL existing without giving any real explanation on how the fuck they ever managed to make a multi system empire...
GW is just fucking lazy, what did you expect?
Its not gaslighting. Its clumsy but gaslighting means something specific and using it like this cheapens the term
@@MarieAvora To be fair the initial Primaris introduction was pretty bad. Only after a bunch of good books came out did it die down as it calmed down enough people that the outrage didn't have enough voices anymore.
I'd argue that there is some correlation between the diversity in Star Wars and it sucking. It's writers assuming that they could use diversity to get out of needing to write a good story with good characters. Allowing minorities to have representation shouldn't be work hard enough to make writers too exhausted to write a good story, but some certainly act like it is. Andor gave us incredibly strong female characters and people of different ethnicities and it is, I argue, the best Star Wars media since Disney bought the IP, because the writers don't view representation as a chore, but as part of writing a good story.
If ADB can write fucking Nightlords well I'm sure 40K writers can write a female Custodian just as well as they would a male one. I'm just bracing for the Mary Sue accusations as if the Custodes didn't start out as the most perfect golden boys this side of Sanguinius.
I think you’re somewhat right, but the flat characters seemed to result more from needing them to all be extremely marketable. Diversity was just one aspect of pushing that marketability, not the root cause. It’s the same reason there was a random new cute alien or droid every 30 minutes.
@@epicwaba6424 Fair point lol, thats definitely a part of it. Enshitification and income comes hand in hand.
>video titled “fine. here’s your golden opinion”
>not a single thing on shower pissing
My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined
Biggest lesson from this is that, once again, Twitter is a cess pool. Still waiting for people to just stop looking at it.
Oh don’t worry UA-cam also is
same as facebook, but for boomers
Reddit as well
Instagram too
They're all the worst but twitter has the power of "my troll/shit/racist take" is going be the first thing you see and it and others will pollute the feed on anything mildly worth looking at.
Tyranids: It's all food in the end.
"I'm so tired"
This is how I've been feeling about discourse in games lately.
Same here, this debacle made me realize just how tired I am when it comes to fandoms on the internet in general. People arguing for weeks on end about pointless conjecture until they’re blue in the face and then just move on to the next hot-button issue like nothing happened. Best to just stay away and have your hobbies/interests in peace.
@@omegaonthefly1977 Real life politics should definitely be shoved into stories and videogames. They're so fun. They add so much to the discussion. If you disagree, you are media illiterate. You don't understand how important modern social politics are and that it should be shoehorned into every story all the time and we should constantly fight and argue about it. That's how we convince people to change their mind, by hating them and labelling them incel and chud.
Internet culture is nauseating. It’s tearing people apart from one another.
Fuck this how I felt with Fallout in the last few months
The TV show was like the TDC from the pitt but instead of trogs it's a bunch of toxic fans
The only part of 40K where i appreciate gender disparity is for the sisters of Battle, for the sole "gotcha" move of sidestepping the "no man under arms shall serve the ecclesarchy".
I always found that lore funny.
I always appreciated them for being the most extreme subversion and satire the setting can offer. They are nuns but they fight, they are women but they are more fanatical, church-loyal and gung-ho than any man, and in a setting that tends towards "secular is good" they are the only good-aligned faction that can ACTUALLY manifest miracles. In fact, they are the only Imperial faction with living saints in it.
If it wasn´t for the commercially testicular pull of Space Marines, Sisters of Battle would be the most representative army of the setting.
@@katamariroller2837feel like "good alligned" should definately be in question lmao
@@kill-me-jessxd704"Ostensibly good-adjacent" is a bit too long.
@@katamariroller2837 honestly, that doesn't sound like representation, it sounds more like glorification. Only the women are capable of miracles. Only the women are true believers. That kind of thing.
Don't take that the wrong way, please. I like the sisters. They make sense lore wise. Fewer women go into military service, but those who do tend to believe in the cause a lot more than their male counterparts. I just kind of want people to remember that representation means they should be equal to, not better than, the thing they represent. (This happened alot with Gay people in movies, they were the wise friend who always gave the best advice)
I really fucking thought this was gonna be about the pee debate yall had.
The what?
@@holdenroth5929Holden you're trapped now so answer: Do you pee in the shower?
@@ryanlorenzo5003 No, that's disgusting. I pee in the toilet like a normal person.
@@holdenroth5929He had a chat with some vtubers about this subject.
@@holdenroth5929 consider yourself an op.
The difference with lore retcons then and now:
Then: we wanted to move the story in a different way
Now: this is not a retcon, there've always been femstodies
If they would've just said "yes, this is a retcone" to "you're wrong, we're right" there wouldn'tve been such a revolt.
I mean, that’s what a retcon is…
@@smileyface6583 No because they said it was always the case in reference to someone asking why they made the change. That's not a retcon, that's a lie. A retcon requires thing to have been one way, then the "continuity" being "retroactively" changed.
What they did was say in real life its always been that way.
@@Brnolan22 Yeah that’s what a retcon is. New information that imposes a different interpretation or fact on previously described events. And this is a retcon that changes literally nothing about the lore apart for potentially expanding to allow more women into the franchise, so I don’t understand your problem with it.
Also what you described isn’t a retcon, that’s just something new. If the imperium figured out a way to make femstodes, that wouldn’t be a change in already established lore, that would just be…….new lore, because custodes would’ve been men only up until recently, not “always have been”.
Now to be fair, I personally don’t like that method, but I don’t think it affects anything in any way, nor does it take away anything from the sisters of silence, and so I’m not upsetti spaghetti about it, and most people don’t seem to be either. Maybe there’s something I’m missing, but I genuinely don’t think there’s anything wrong with it.
@@smileyface6583
1. Yes the change was a Retcon.
2. Their response was not a retcon.
3. Them saying it has always been the case that custodes were both male and female was in response to a real life person asking why in real life the change was made.
4. which means they either dodged the question by saying a retcon, or they are lying and saying that is how its always been, which it has not.
@@Brnolan22 But how do you know that the 10,000 are all-male? We’ve barely seen them in the lore apart from 30k and there’s little mention other than a couple of self-contradictory sentences in a few blink-and-you’ll-miss texts in their codexes. If you can provide some evidence I will actually agree with you somewhat.
Honestly as someone who is Gay I've personally never felt like I was excluded I've only ever felt welcomes which funny enough I live ina largely conservative area so most people at my shop are as well, the biggest thing I hate about this is how poorly it was handled. That and how the hobby has become some culture war ground for some on both sides either getting mad and yelling or rubbing in people's faces just to make them mad it's all annoying I just want to enjoy my hobby, and mfs make it hard to enjoy when all you hear when something like this happens it's "woke" this or "chud" that it's actually annoying and that if anything makes me feel like I'd be better off not playing Warhammer if that's what it's going to become. I'm just tired of constant arguing by people who don't care about the lore and don't play the game and never will care or interact with either.
I agree, when the first female space marine argument came around i just came to the conclusion that if they added it, cool. If they don’t cool, it’s really whatever, and that’s how I feel now, I feel like people that are on both political spectrums just don’t care it’s only the extreme ends that do.
@@coneman844 Agreed, tbh I don't want female space marines and that's fine if someone disagrees with me I'm just not sure why it *has* to be made into some BS argument about who is right or who is wrong.
@@IAmACrab2020 yeah I would prefer that we don’t have female space marines but if it happens it happens. And I don’t think we should argue about it either cause In the end it’s just a story.
Yeah. This is why I'm just done with the hobby. GW is gonna keep making bad business decisions and screw over my factions repeatedly. So I'm done. They kept me on the hook for Sisters in plastic for years, and now that they're displaying their open contempt for Sisters I'm just done. I'm not interested in whining from either side.
But, the people saying woke and chud are those that actually care about the lore. A lore that has been well established for 20+ years. The days of rogue trader where the game had no clear definition of what the story was are far, far gone.
Bricky explains why I don't partake in online warhammer communities anymore... XD
I'm in Facebook groups to watch these ppl do mental gymnastics to try to explain away the changes they did like and why those aren't the same thing😂
Any time you have a piece of media that satirizes authoritarian regimes and the horrors of war, you invite a thriving community of people that flat out *dont notice the satire* because they are too stupid to do so, and think that the piece of media is glorifying authoritarian horror stories. And are *excited* about that. And those people usually happen to wear red hats and use "woke" as a slur. For other examples, look at Starship Troopers and Helldivers 2.
@@theovermynd3930 Ironically it's the same views the other direction has as well. they genuine believe that those pieces of media are genuine fascist propaganda and actually glorify authoritarian regimes.
Like that one time some twitter user thought the Tyranids were supposed to be Jews...
It's funny to laugh at both sides being stupid.
Dont forget Star Wars "The Empire Wasnt Bad For Everyone! And it was a few Bad Apples" as if the saying isn't "a few bad apples SPOIL THE BARREL"@theovermynd3930
@@theovermynd3930 You can always count on conservatives to have 0 media literacy and always just take shit at face value every time lmao
My argument against the counterargument of "retcons happen all the time" is simple:
Just because something terrible happens repeatedly doesn't mean you can't complain about it. What, are we not allowed to complain about the IRS because they've been scummy for so long?
My argument against the counterargument that "Bricky has always been woke" is even more simple:
Bricky isn't woke, he just gets off on tall muscle mommies. . . cough cough gamersups cough cough
Video comes off as Bricky trying to prevent GW from giving him the Arch treatment(and I don't even like arch)
Seems a bit hypocritical to say that female Space Marines would take away from Sisters of Battle and yet female Custodes doesn’t take away from Sisters of Silence….
Well sisters of silence have the whole blank stuff going on and female Custodes don’t.
Sisters are just power armour women so having other better power armour women would take away from that.
You can make multiple 1:1 comparisons between Custodes/SoS that are the same for Space Marines and SoB.
Both groups are sworn to protect the Emperor.
Both groups are entirely made up of one gender.
Sos being Blanks are a unique gimmick is no different that SoB being known to manifest miracles due to their faith in the Emperor. To make female Custodes detracts from Sos just the same as female Space Marines detracting from SoB.
@@kye4216Eh Sisters of Battle have the religious zealotry and faith powers though. They're not just unaugmented female space marines...
Did you even listen to the video? Same rules apply: Space Marines are defined by their post-human status. SoB are defined by their turbofaith. SoS are defined by being Blanks. Custodes are Space Marines But More. If anything, the existence of Custodes takes away from Space Marines.
TBH I’m kinda ticked off at how unceremoniously female custodes were introduced. Like, why does it have to be relegated to a few paragraphs? Why can’t it be a big deal? You could’ve done so much more with this pretty cool thing and now it just comes off as lazy.
It seems to be more a money grab thing than an actual effort to expand the lore. I bet you they are not mentioning them ever again
It's not really a big deal at all though. It's just a confirmation of what people suspected for years now and doesn't change anything.
Even if it was new lore ala primaris custodes adding female custodes due to them being on the frontlines now to replenish their ranks quicker would be fine too. Instead they dont even care and just say they were always around. Lazy af
"Lazy" sums up this entire codex... and edition... in general.
I think it depends on the case. Primaris marines having a ridiculously elaborate lore drop that amounted to "they have 2 wounds now" is an example of something that could've just been a retcon, and I think this is a similar situation.
I'll share a tiny anecdote as someone who got into the hobby because of your "Every Warhammer 40k faction in a nutshell" videos Brick, since those last couple minutes of the video hits hard. While yeah, most of my models are still just primed and unpainted, I do want to share this. This happened last Wednesday. I was just picking up the mini of the month from the Warhammer shop near my internship. Just assembling the mini in the store, being a nerd and having brought some Grey Knight parts I wanted to stick on it because that mini will be my Kaldor Draigo, being able to chat with the store manager and one of the employees, being able to chat with other customers... unironically, that moment even more so than initially buying my first couple of models or even painting my first models... That half an hour was magical.
Hearing some British kid talk about how he wants to go from Warhammer shop to Warhammer shop, trying to snag as many free Deathwing Knights because he plays Dark Angels, seeing some German kid and his mom walk in and browse the shop, sitting next to a Raven Guard guy who is gonna try and make his mini into a Terminator Captain, hearing the store owner give instructions to some foreigners into painting their first Marines and of course, one of the trio asked for white paint and made the owner groan. That moment felt magical. That moment made me fall in love with the hobby again, to such a point that I'll most likely be asking friends for another painting starter set for my birthday so I can actually finish my Grey Knights in a way that I like 'em and hopefully get some games in at some point. That moment made me so much more happy that I was able to get that mini of the month. That is what I want to be able to share with others at some point. Not all this Twitter bullshit. I want to be able to nerd out, talk about plastic toy soldiers, ask people why they painted their toy soldiers in a certain way and be proud (or well, proud enough) about saying why I painted mine a certain way.
That was beautiful to read, that really does compile together all the small parts that make this hobby nice. This game for all it's faults, it's bullshit, it's retcons (which I typically don't mind to make that clear) and so on but I can't deny it has brought joy in multiple ways biggest being I have made new friends through this hobby. Right now I am in the middle of a crusade and I am looking forward it how it unfolds.
amazing read, hope i get to vs you or someone like you one day in a game of 40k :)
Well said. I don't really see anyone mad about Custodes having women members, I see people mad that it was done so poorly. I also see people mad that the female based factions get little to no attention. Such as the sisters of silence or perhaps the harlequins. Very very powerful factions that are essentially female only and yet GW refuses to add lore. Sisters of Silence are the most important faction in WH40K and they don't have 1 novel nor their own detachment.
@@jubseest8439 Haha, if you're ever in the Netherlands or I go to... whichever country you live in, we just might be able to!
No one cares if you paint stuff a certain way but having the official company try and gaslight people into something is dumb.
As a certified xeno player, I always told people that once you get past space marines, 40k really is one of the most inclusive and progressive settings in fiction. My drukhari love all gender identities~
Wait, wait. Female Custodes? The important question is, do they have golden abs worthy of the Golden Throne?
Of course. Why wouldn’t they have the glorious golden abs worthy of the Throne. Muscle Mommy Custodes for the win!!
I can't wait for deviantart's output.
You know it
@@Wampa842 based.
Every Custodes is handcrafted to be perfect
So obviously the answer is YES
Afaik there wasnt even a "few knew that many of the emperor's champions were, in fact, female"
That would have gone a long way in contrast to "there were always women, what you didnt know?"
Also, release more sisters of silence stuff in general, they're cool and they could use more stuff.
@@BAGELMENSK this part I agree wholeheartedly. Especially now that the codex has given them their own detachment.
This feels like that time in TCG Yugioh! where a certain card was released long before the required card to actually summon it properly... so yeah, that card was useless for years... and still was when the required card has finally been released😂
@@BAGELMENSK The other thing they could have done if they knew this was coming, was made the new shield captain model with a female head option...but they didn't.
That would've been an even worse piece of text because few know much about the Emperor's champions at all.
@@FictionWeavile just lampshade it under that too. "Scarce few knew the existence of the adeptus custodes, fewer still knew some of them were women, etc etc"
there is no war in Ba Sing Se...
So then lets have the brothers of battle and the brothers of silence if it doesn't matter? It's not about the fact that female custodes exist necessarily, its more what precedent it sets for the rest of the setting; a move away from the grimdark nature towards making the fucking imperium inclusive.
It is also quite obvious why this was thrown in with little to no regard to established lore, GW couldn't justify a retcon that would have unmade decades of books and lore so they had to lie and say that "There have always been female custodes.
But more to the point: why is it that nearly every goddamn time there's a male centric faction in any fiction it needs to adapt and be changed? When the same cannot be said for female centric factions, i.e. the sisters of battle. Factions no one has a problem with and no one wants to change.
But all of a sudden when there is but one faction that provides a male power fantasy its wrong and you have to be inclusive. Why? Why can't we have that without it being fucked with? The Sisters of Silence have been starved for lore for ages and this is the route GW goes?
It's obvious, they don't want to make the setting better, they want it to fit an agenda.
You, my brother, spoke from the world`s wisdom itself
You're right bro
for wokes it's always a problem when in fiction there's a faction/army formed only by men, but they never complain, cry or demand to be "more inclusive" when it comes to factions formed only by women
“Would have had to unmake decades of lores and books”
It’s literally just the 8th edition codex, that is the only thing that has ever specifically said only men with almost every other thing on their creation being vague with us still not even knowing what the actual process is outside of darkage techno-magic, besides ADB who was a leading figure when custodes got their start in the tabletop back in 2014 when they were first getting real lore he had intended for some custodes to be woman but gw was lazy as they had not included female head sculpts in the kits as confirmed in one of his blog posts around 6 years ago
As for factions of all woman factions getting men, there have been some such as the Amazonians who in the comics later had lore changed to where they did have sons but they were either thrown into the sea to drown or given to Hephaestus to work his forge
Bricky's laugh while he describes how Star Wars sucked is absolutely contagious.
But not why it started sucking.
Star Wars has always sucked if you were an adult. We loved it because we were children when we got exposed to it. Do you ever notice how 0 30 year olds who watch a New Hope for the first time become big fans of it? Because its a dumb ass, goof series for kids. And kids love the new Star Wars, which makes sense. Its still a goofy series for them.
@@brya9681 I thought the original series was charming. It had adventure and a main character trying to deal with a lot of emotional subjects while ultimately deciding to be a good person and believe that people can be redeemed. It's absolutely crammed full of cliches, but it's nice to watch.
@@brya9681 Weird it's almost like if you show a 30 year old a 44 year old movie they won't really like it.
The prequel movies were most politics, in the end pretty much everyone dies and you are saying it aimed at children?
Not to mention the books and clone wars series.
@@brya9681 « always » what are you saying ? Isn’t the original trilogy good ? I do find bits of the old republic era good, the KOTOR games are pretty good too. I find your take pretty bad it would be the same as saying that LOTR sucks and is pretty bad because it released in 1954.
Daaamn, having Bile do it and only the CSMs having female members would be hilarious.
Thatd be cool, but THOSE "fans" would use it as some sorta bull to say women and inclusivity is evil, because chaos 🙄
Bile actually had a female CSM working for him in his books
@@kill-me-jessxd704 it'd be p funny
@@shimi3739wait really?!
@@TechSupportPriest they're called the nu-men
Personally I don't have a problem with it from the lore perspective. But I hate that decision because it's obviously made out of desire to virtue signal. And to retcon the lore because you want to virtue signal is simply a step that should be regarded as stupid or needless at best. Simple as. Other than that, it should also be criticized because it might snowball into other retcons made out of desire to virtue signal. In other words, this retcon should be preemptively hated unless we want to risk getting more retcons.
Personally I'm a little fed up with the fact that anyone who doesn't approve of this kind of retcon is referred to as a bigot, I just don't like this kind of writing OK from GW I don't expect death in Venice or the heart of Tomas
(or more appropriate The Rose of Versailles)
but a little more effort, these people to introduce bigger marins they had to overturned the 40K universe like a sock and for the Custodians
"No, it's always been like this"
Frankly I think it’s a vocal minority of new fans. You try to explain the aesthetic or logic reasons you object to a change and the just call you a phobe or a chud. It’s exhausting and sad
Is this “overturning the 40K universe like a sock” though? Was the fictive integrity of the 40K universe really all that incumbent on all the custodes having dicks?
@@KerncBurnsThat's because they themselves are projecting upon us. I could go through and list off all the times the Emperor had stated the various reasons why he chose men for Thunder Warriors, Custodies, and Astartes. Namely, so that the tools that are underneath his control could not breed and then go out of control and then try to kill all of mankind. But Everybody knows exactly how that argument is going to go. They will just call you in neckbeard and And a bigot and a racist and whatever phobic thing, Because these people really don't actually care about the lore at all. It's all about getting a scratch on the face of the franchise. It's all about Getting a foothold in.
@@KerncBurnsand you know they’re just gonna fucc off after a few months max. They always do this
@@joeschmo4646 as soon as they ruined it they’ll pick a new target
I want male Sisters of Battle now. Same armor, just as caked up, massive fluer de lis codpieces.
You know that won't happen tho. The female only bits will remain exclusive due to their stunning amounts of diversity
Also the dudes should referred each other as sisters as well
Sisters of Battle don't get feats bro.
@@cabnbeeschurgr6440 There are male howling banshees tho, difference is that nobody apart from Pancreas seems to give a shit about the Eldar
We alredy have them > Black templar
I can imagine, like, there's a dude in the Sisters of Silence, and some guardsman goes, "uhhh, why is there a man in the "sisters" of silence? Hmmm?"
And then some inquisitior goes: "I literally had to kill a demon on my way to this conversation here, it does not matter."
I just realized that male blanks might actually be kinda screwed in the 40k universe. I'm not 100% sure if there are female Culexus assassins but if there are, then a female blank at least has a 2 out of 3 chance not to die. Males kinda have a 50-50 chance if their only chance is either Culexus or dead.
@@CptPhilippnes Blanks are incredibly rare AND useful. You are not necessarily going to end up "Culexus or dead".
@@katamariroller2837
Yes but also people in 40k are incredibly stupid, and a blank is more than unsettling enough to get the 41st millennium bigotry a-firin' lol
That is the same guardsman that was almost executed by a commissar when he complained that there were women guardsMEN and that his salary wasn't paid in salt or something
Lmfaoooo
The way they ret conned it has Big JK Rowling "Dumbledore is gay actually" energy and I abhore it. I don't care if there are female custodies, what I do care about is a well written story and to not be talked down to and gas lit. GW should have used this big dumb, cool, crazy universe have at their finger tips and make it interesting. That's the least GW could have done.
>Adds women to the Custodes
>Nerfs the army
>Gaslights the entire fandom
>Lazy writing
>"There have always been female Custodians"
I'm *not* out of the fandom, *but* i am getting a 3d printer. My money my choice.
Have fun pansy, printers are expensive as shit.
Literally 1984 type shii “There have always been female bananas” like fucking no, at least try to work it into the lore Jfc
@@TheDeadlyBlueWolfI’m not sure you’ve even seen the prices on GW models 😂
@@joeschmo4646Yeah, adding women to your toy soldier army is exactly like 1984…you guys are truly insufferable losers with zero media literacy
@@TheDeadlyBlueWolf Not in relation to GWs 'competetive' pricing choices to feed the shareholdes to maximum fatness.
This could've been a very interesting and fun inclusion, but it was thrown as such a whateva burger in a book that is a complete waste of paper.
Nah, there's a really cool two-page story in the codex that does them justice, I think. Look it up!
I agree they should have sais "fuck it we ball" and go all the way. But I don't think it's a waste of paper. I mean if anything it shows how irrational some parts of this fandom still are. I expect Arch to rant about this change for the next decade.
Welcome to actually corporate diversity. Meh
But it going to make for great writing potential. Come on next stories where a female custody is awesome and we get a freaking model.
@TempRawr It opens interesting avenues. I'm a poor Stodes player because I haven't read the novels yet, but from what I understand our faction is currently working on expanding expeditions beyond Terra and restoring the SoS after they were almost genocided, so it would be a good two birds-one stone move to have the next novel focus on the restoration and possible expansion of the Custodes and Sisters of Silence to lay the foundation for the new direction we're taking things and smooth all this over. (And if James is reading, I'll work cheap as a writer lol)
Yup!@@Mantonization
We need ‘Misters of silence’ AMIRITE
I mean, I can't see the logic against it if you have female Custodes. Why not male Sisters of Silence?
Pals of Quietude
If only the annoying blue check markers on Twitter could pick up that occupation, as in not being able to constantly and publicly type out annoying nonsense.
"The Guys of quiet", "The Mute Bois", "The Loudless lads" Hmm...
The Muted Men, The Hush Hombres, The Muzzled Males, The Didn't-say-anything Dudes
I’m not angry, just disappointed
I have to disagree with one key point Bricky. I would argue complaining about something GW has done is completely within the normal community mindset and has been since the get go - it just gets worse at certain stages. The big ones that got me annoyed at them was the end times and getting rid of WHFB and the ridiculous firstborn/primaris attempt at invalidating past models. Neither of which seem to have worked all that well given the direction they seem to be going in lately.
For the custodes thing I think the thing most people dislike is actually that its the obvious IPO company dip the toe, half in half out, hedge their bets bs that is so common and always shows weak leadership of a company. For everyone else, I agree with you, they are just jumping on the "go woke, go broke" mentality. They aren't completely wrong though, slippery slopes will be (and are) a problem but in law, not in lore.
Honestly, if they went with a full range refresh, complete with a novel and upgrade sprue, I would be way more onboard with it. Going with one short story in a shit codex, and a bunch of gaslighting tweets was the worst way to execute this kind of lore change, and honestly that's what makes it so infuriating to me. There's portraying an unreliable narrator, and then there's a lack of integrity and trust in your narrative. This situation feels like the latter.
this is corporate water testing 101. GW are legitimately scared of upsetting the "no women" crowd, even if they tweet about acceptance and tolerance, they are concerned only about their bottom line. Fiduciary responsibility. They looked at custodes, weighed the opportunity cost of women/no women, but decided to test the waters. I don't think its a surprise that its a single female custodes. Think about it, if there was some huge backlash , they could simply walk it back and tweet "this custodes is trans" and change the spin entirely.
Now that the road is clear however, perhaps we'll see next codex they get something.
@@M3RUL3Zto be fair Warhammer have gone a lot more mainstream so there will be a lot more people who don't know how bad gw are with retcons
My only real problem is the lack of women in custodes previously, and then GW being like “what do you mean they’ve always been here.” I’ve always seen custodes as the 40k stormcast eternals equivalent, so it’s not a big deal. If we get more in depth looks at how custodes are made, it shouldn’t be a big deal. I mean, sure custodes are pumped full of testosterone and other things just like space marines, but they’re also rebuilt at the genetic level instead of being filled with implants, so I mean it could be fine. I just want to know why and how from an in game science level, that’s all
custodes are not like space marines in any capacity.
They are not pumped full of testosterone nor implanted with new organs. Every aspect of a Custodian is handcrafted cell-by-cell by the emperor, working from the basis of a newborn.
They are the ascended next stage in human evolution, arcane demigods, not roided-out factory-made soldiers.
Although an actual technical description of the exact processes involved is not something we will ever get and if we do it will probably just be a load of science magic jargon on par with 'arcane genetic alchemy'.
It seems more of a money grab decision than anything. Like GW saying "hey look, we got wamen Custodes, look at how progressive we are please give us money". I bet you they are never mentioning female Custodes ever again
Given how little Custodes have been actually around in lore, them always having being there is no real issue.
They should have just made the sisters of silence a proper faction
I mean, that's essentially how they always do their lore stuff though. The Rogal Dorn tank wasn't there until it always was there since a model was coming out. The T'au weren't a thing until they were and then they were always there. The T'au's FTL travel has been re-done like 5 times at this point, but this most recent version is always how it worked. Leagues of Votann weren't there until they were and then they were always there, the Imperium just didn't look hard enough. WH40K is an ever evolving setting. Not narrative mind you, I explicitly mean a setting. The lore will be whatever it needs to be to sell plastic figures and books to us. Nothing more, nothing less.
9:36 Star Wars went down because it sucks.
And why does it suck? Could it be because it focuses on something other than a well written and executed story?
Wokeness is a sign the writing will suck
Reddit moment
Congratulations, you win, you are truly the Warhammer 40k. This leHECKING funni mem has beaten any arguments made by all in the community, you may now claim your ultimate prize, you get the Emperors chamber pot as a reward
@@wheezel3481 lol thanks for the reddit comment
I personally don’t care if there’s women in it BUT the way they retconned it was horrible
I mean it was more lazy than it was a crime the way some people are crying about it
@@CasualSlayer oh 100%, all they literally had to do was have an actual explanation other than gaslighting the community and hiding from the fact they never had females in there in the first place. If GW actually cared they would put more effort into it rather than how they handled it so it feels cheap
@@strider8799Hey question how did they introduce the Royal Dorn battle tank?
@@DefaultProphet I don’t think they revealed that yet but I mean it’s the same thing if they said the rogal dorn has actually been around the entire time it’s just as bad.
@@DefaultPropheta armored vehicle in a multi ten thousand year galaxy mega war, is far more realistic. The Strickland ten thousand only person guard of one planet that barely gets any losses. Barely gets used snd barely gets made desperately to just be gas lighten. And not to mention a random armored vehicle still needs it too, if they gave it lore how it was founded that’s even better than lazy fucken writing. Stop defending stupid garbage bay saying “oh they did it multiple times” yes exactly and I want that shit to stop and put more effort in a franchise ffs
Had literally an easy way to make it canon and keep everyone happy. Fall of Cadia return of Guilliman and Custodes joining the fight would necessitate more Custodes. Hence more candidates regardless of gender they would bolster the ranks in current lore. Also why not buff Sisters of Silence or promote THEM to be new Custodes. Saying "they were always there" is lazy and pathetic.
Custodes are not really made anymore (only Big E had the knowledge to do it, but also they could just say "Well Cawl also knows how to" so whatever) so that wouldn't fit.
Big E probably created them way back and because, you know, they are covered in the same armour as the male ones it's not very noticeable
Actually you know what? That would've made FAR more sense than saying "they were always there", plus it would still mean the Sisters would be the yin to the yang of previous Custodes. I honestly think that would have EASILY been the less awful version of getting female Custodes. The male Custodes could be masters against physical threats and the female ones against psychic and metaphysical ones. They would both be incredibly powerful, but in different ways.
@@ronantheronin3521 exactly. And no one would have complained as its a pretty smart change. But nope😂 gaslight and lie instead.
You could pull some crazy psychic shit out of the vault that only sos can take, because blanks or something, idk
I saw an explanation someone made on reddit that I liked. It was that the genestealer cult on terra had infected too many of the noble bloodlines, so they had to expand the range for recruitment.
Fabius Bile and Belisarius Cawl have a pissing match between themselves to see if they can make female marines first
Both of them were beat by the Emperor's Children, by accident.
It should be Fabius Bile, as I think slaanesh would just love female space marines.
Also F**k Cawl the warp squirrel
It's just the fact that it was implemented in the worst way possible.
If they just said "oh they are master crafted so they can choose from a larger pool of candidates that include women" then who cares. You gave a actual explanation but just "there always have been" is so insulting to people who read the books because now they wasted all that because "they always existed you just missed the part"
Another thing is they have male factions, the have female factions, and they have mixed. For example the sister of silence, Space marines, and the imperial gaurd. And now you kinda just disregard the look and aesthetic of a faction because the orks wouldn't be the same if you saw a extremely femine ork because so far most of the people I see that like female custodians are gooners, they want a muscle mommy in 40k and they have to find it in these male factions.
For me if they gave a actually good Twitter response then who cares but it feels like it is just disregarding the look to a faaction and the genuine effort that can go into making a faction work with just "there always have been"
Like imagine the shitstorm if they added male sisters of battle and just said "there always have been" and the said "everyone is welcome in warhammer. Now leave."
This is the most "you know what I'm gonna say so here"
The Warhammer 40K lore can be whatever Belisarius Cawl wants it to be.
As a avid Cawl enjoyer I see nothing wrong with this comment.
Tourist take
@@Raevyn01 no
literally happened with the primaris primaris tanks and their dreads
The mastermind
@@Raevyn01cringe
6:45 how can you just teleport into the throne room?
Bad writing
@@phht0568 apparently the Custodes in question tried an old code to get through the shields that still worked.
If anything that’s what the blood games are for: testing the defenses of the palace. It’s like if someone left the password to the front gate as “Passeord123”.
@@phht0568 apparently the Custodes in question tried an old code to get through the shields that still worked.
If anything that’s what the blood games are for: testing the defenses of the palace. It’s like if someone left the password to the front gate as “Passeord123”.
A betrayal that rivals the Horus heresy
Sad but true
Sad but true
Majorkill's (yes, the controversial australian) take is pretty good to me. Not a problem, but as they're been not mentioned before (in the lore), it would make sense if they were a smaller percentage than the men. I mean, it would come down to writing and it's 50/50 whether it will be well implemented cause It's GW.
On the case of Fem Astartes: Why? You have battle sisters who are infinitely better in every way. There's really no point
Battle sisters aren't buff demigods.
Yes, I prefer sisters as well but to say that they're the same thing isn't true.
@Turai12 Well, they are clearly supposed to be an equivalent force, better than the guard like the Astartes. Either way, I just think they are better in every way: more interesting and the fact that they are not inhuman lab experiments makes them more relatable with a realistic zeal and devotion.
Man I learned how to blend colours properly and highlighting in general by asking a friend how they did their makeup.
I dont think people are mad about the retcon, i think people are mad because they are trying to claim that there have always been female custodians, and that has always been the case. Retconning is one thing but claiming that something has always been the case when it hasn't is what people are angry about.
Yeah this.
It's gaslighting and insulting to fans. And yeah it is cause it's a retcon too
GW has done this many times and this for some reason crosses the line?
A perfect opportunity to make a "10,000 times" joke and Bricky missed it? He really must be tired.
he did say he recorded at like 10 o clock
My issue with GW over the whole Female Custodes isn’t the inclusion of them, that’s cool and I’m here for it.
My issue is GW treating its fanbase to a healthy dose of retcon bullshit with their attempts to mug us off with “they have always been there” when the lore explicitly states otherwise.
Why not introduce them with some quality fresh storytelling which explains why there haven’t been female Custodes up until now and how and why they are starting now.
Surely that isn’t too much to ask? 🙃
"their attempts to mug us off with “they have always been there” when the lore explicitly states otherwise."
Proves that the Social Media manager should maybe receive a twice a year quiz on the franchise they manage the social media for.
Literally who gives a fuck. You people only have so much time on this earth and you're spending it being mad about a clumsy tweet. Get real problems, Jesus Christ
I’m more mad at the retcon then I am at female Custodes.
There were plenty of ways to go about it, and they chose the worst one.
Tbh, this is pretty much entirely in line with every other time they've done this, 'lmao what do you mean the necrons were always like this', but they definitely need to do the legwork from here with this, and honestly the Votann, to make it feel substantial.
Where is it explicitly stated that the Custodes are only male? The Brotherhood of Steel (Fallout) has female members, but nobody ever bitched about THAT!
I have no faith that GW will actually flesh out female Custodes any further than this, causing this just to end up like that one Grey Knights - Sisters of Battle interaction that everyone knows but never talks about. I think that female Custodes is pretty cool and would work because first, theres not really anything to say women cannot be custodians, and second, it would help bring the Custodes away from the idea of just being ‘super space marines’, and thirdly it might cause GW do actually make more plastic Custodes.
Theres also a multitude of ways this change could be properly implemented, one of Big E’s/Malcador’s final orders could’ve been for the Custodes to start recruiting women for the custodian guard. Maybe after the return of Guilliman, with the Custodes finally acting outside of the golden palace, they could have decided to begin recruiting women to help increase their numbers and to also signify a radical change in their dogma that the Adeptus Custodes will be taking a more permanent and active role in the Imperium at large.
Again, the way GW is handling this online it really feels like they just wanted to get some internet brownie points and have no plans of actually expanding this. If they do actually create proper lore and stories behind the creation and implementation of female Custodians, then they need to go full swing and not half-ass it. They also need to get a new Codex team that is capable of making more than four detachments cause damn that is just sad, and if they are trying to get the Sisters of Silence more tabletop representation with the detachments give them more than just one dedicated model kit.
Why does "female custodes" have to be fleshed out more as a concept? Why can't they just exist as they are?
Why do YOU need it to be such a big deal?
You say that like there is a problem with the topic being expanded upon and "fleshed out". This isn't the gotcha ya think it is
They may add female models now that they have female Stormcast models they can repurpose.
btw the grey knights thing was retconned, because it was that stupid.
@@thesun5275they don't exist, that's what's frustrating. There are no models, there is 1 brand new character in a short story.
It wouldn't be hard to make a female head, but they didn't. It wouldn't be hard to make a novel, but they didn't. It wouldn't be hard to have mentioned this at some point, but they didn't.
GW saying that it's always been true when they have actively supported the opposite and still support the opposite is just insulting.
If gw wants to make this statement, that there are women custodians, then they should actually do something to make that statement true.
Making models would have been the perfect way to do that, making new custodes sculpts with female heads would have been perfect for the new codex, far better than the shield captain.
There are ways GW could have done this, ways that would have appeased the angry minority and made everyone else like the change, instead gw did it in one of the worst possible ways.
cant wait for them to add men to the "sisters" of battle. Then lets see brickys opnion
If they want to they should make SoS or SoB even more genetically altered super soldiers. Make them twice as strong as the space Marines and custodes. Just like the boy scouts, making the male equivalent gender neutral while keeping the girl scouts is the shittiest way to do it.
SoB got buff from the Big E himself through their sheer faith.
SoS were put through enchancing procedures by Cawl to face even greater dangers.
There, GW. I did it. Give me money.
Just the lore you know if this ok then I guess the lore is a joke.
Yes the lore from something like 10 years ago that was written in the side margins of their book. Nothing hard set in stone. Also this "lore" is made to set mini dolls.
@@ZealValdez so you are telling that in the world of 40k there are only male space Marines because they are the only sex able to live though the process but a forces greater then them and there for would be harder to become one there are some how females custodes yeah I would say the lore is a joke and you never ask why they are doing this and you are ok with it look you don't want it to become dr. Who where something that has been set in stone from the beginning gets changed on a dime like the custodes if this is ok then nothing is off limits.
@@michaelmerino5642 Remember when orcs were slaves to the snotlings? Or when the necrons were just scary emotionless robots with the mindflayers are terrifying zombie creatures? Remember when there was no horus heresy and the primarchs were just dudes? Stuff gets retconned all the time. The lore matters, changing it does not. It happens more than you probably realize. Like Bricky said, first time?
@@michaelmerino5642that’s because unlike space marines who are the slap-chop version of a custodes, the process of a custodes is perfect and every time a custodes is taken from birth they always are successful made into custodes
Also space marines only have men because they need to be compatable with geneseed, not because women are just too weak to go through the process.
Besides women being too weak dosent matter when custodes are taken at birth rather than how space marines steal 6 year olds to become astartes
The twitter thing was probably the worst thing they coulda done because it's the same energy as the ol jk Rowling retcon shit people always made fun of her for
if they wanted to do a coed astartes-level thing, just have Bile's Nu Men hammered out into a proper faction. it's already canon he's got both male and female subjects.
I suspect they’ll become a thing eventually too anyway
I dont think it matters that much but I think it was incredibly lazy and pandering. If they wanted to do it, there was a better way than "actually he is a she"
Give us a freaking model, or put her in a book and make her awesome, or both.
@@AlriikRidesAgain I imagine we'll get a model eventually, in the 40k fashion. They probably just wanted to release it later when the usual suspects quieted down.
She didn't just teleport in a nuke, but a planet killer bomb. And it was armed and ready to go. She would have succeeded in killing the emperor and destroying terra if the vox-officer on the ship she commanded hadn't sent a message to the palace.
That's the part that annoys me, that so many very loud people are going "oh no lady custodes boo hoo" that the fact she almost did what Horus couldn't is being buried under it
that is an average blood game to be fair
Horus specifically wanted to win and prove his superiority, hence the siege , plus him just using a bomb isn't very interesting.
I thought she only got close?
@@JamesotronartYeah his ego probably prevented him from ever attempting something like that. No matter how clever the steps leading up to the goal are, he needed to have a big grand confrontation and then win that confrontation.
I think Calladayce is actually the reincarnated soul of Lotarra Sarin for the level of ABS she had to have to almost pull that off.
HAIL CALLADAYCE, THE EMPEROR'S ABS! *stompstomp*
I truly do not give two apples about inclusivity, make the writing good.
Yep.
This is fucking around with the more established, "fossilized" lore upon which many more recent lore entries used as reference in the name of "inclusivity". I don't think this is important enough to be called a "cornerstone/lodestone" of the universes' lore, but it was consistently adhered to for so long one would have considered it self-evident.
You start breaking apart the "fossilized" parts of the structure and other things built atop it start to get shaky and will collapse like a Jenga tower at some point; then you're left with a mess no one cares about or wants to clean up.
Well the short story with the female custodes was pretty good.
@@Idontevenwanachannel they've been breaking apart the fossilized bits since 5th edition with Matt
@@PlasmaPea04 Not really, she was supposed to be on a blood game, in lore when a Custodian is the attacker they leave their weapons, armour and authority behind as the point is they're supposed to be simulating an unknown infiltrator..... this bint broke all the rules of a blood game in one paragraph.
GW have definitely done it in one of the worst possible ways.
I can imagine a way cooler option to introduce us to the concept of female Custodes. Instead of the 10th edition Codex simply describing a female custodian doing whatever, have one male custodian impressed by the fact a woman has been able to survive the process of becoming a Custode, and welcoming her as the first ever female Custode.
After that, they could introduce a new mini for this particular female custodian (bonus points if she has a squad of SoS at her command with unique abilities) and announce a book where she does something cool that cements her as a badass. Give us something to get invested in the concept, instead of simply going "yeah they've always been a thing" because the way they've done it is... not great honestly. Doesn't look like they care about it at all, they've added female Custodes like it was an afterthought and just didn't care. The impression given, at least to me, is that they don't care enough about the product, which ain't a good look on consumers.
Don't really care, I play Orkz and our codex is great this edition. Doesn't matter if I stomp a golden dude or a golden gal, both will get krumped.
Ere we go ere we go ere we go!
"Yeah they've always been a thing," and you never noticed because A: You're just a lowly yardworker on an agriworld who's never seen an Astartes before, let alone a Custodes, and B: You can't even tell under that power armour!
The point is litterally that gender doesn't matter regarding the Custodes and that becoming one was only a matter of being worthy. That's what "They've always been there mean", we don't need to stick with past choices (aka all Custo are men) if it doesn't add anything relevant to their story. Having access to female head options for them could be neat though
i don't hate the fact of women in the custodian guard, i hate how it was made into the lore... i would have loved a book with some characters and more moments of "badassery" but nope just one tweet and that's it... it's sound more like a marketing choice than anything else...
Ps: if fem marines become a thing i will hope that the 2 missing primarchs will be revealed as female so that it would fit with the lore ! But with what they pulled, i know that they won't...
you mean how they always do stuff like this. wow. how horrible.
@@darkstalkerknight63 i just don't like that way of changing things... and this is a new low....
@@anonyme253 you mean the way they always changed things. again you are upset at nothing. this is not a "new low". this has always been the case over near 40 years.
@@darkstalkerknight63 My bf says Warhammer retcons things A LOT
@@marcen12 yea well basic research shows the same thing. This is literally nothing new. Over 30 years of this.
What's wild to me is that everyone focused on THIS and not the fact that GW started blocking anyone who had critiques over the new custodes codex. like one of the more easier ways to touch base with the design process and offer CONSTRUCTIVE responses and ideas to bring the faction... but i guess women are scary or something
I think we've already gotten used to GW treating their fans like dogshit.
@@Birthday888 I dunno if thats entirely true. Not all the content we get are bangers but there’s new editions rolling out, new codexes being made, balance data slates are coming, meta watch reviews are still being done, weekend long narrative events being hosted, full on conventions and live stream reveals, new models new side games, new books, new media, Henry cavil is making a full on show based on this IP, plenty of video games are out and still being made-
They do shit the bed every now and then- this codex is a big one, but like…it’s the exception, not the norm.
Considering the rest of this comment section, I sadly can't blame them. Like, the rules are kinda shit, but no-one wants to talk about them anyway.
Imo, Custodes should go back to being a subfaction that can go into any Imperial army list
They're just flushing the incels out of the system. Pay no heed to their cries of lament!
Embarrassing is absolutely the right word.
How so?
@@lupuskonig9 Lore changes and retcons, even lazy ones, happen a lot in 40K. This one has caused a huge stink and it really feels like it’s just because it added women. It’s an annoyingly loud minority of bigoted man children that have plagued tabletop and war games for a long time. It’s an embarrassment for the hobby.
@@lupuskonig9 Go look at Critical Drinker's comment section and tell me you don't feel the least bit embarrassed.
@@TheDeadlyBlueWolf The only thing that makes me embarrassed. is that i like warhammer lore, despite knowing GW will change something for no reason. And act like I am weird for asking questions.
@@TheDeadlyBlueWolf Why? if you don't like it then argue or ignore. Don't do this cunty performance of "**sigh** I'm so embarassed about the fanbase, I'm one of the good ones tho" because no one asked
i politely disagree.
I thought it was lazy how they implemented it, but did not care that it actually happened. All my models have helmets anyway so ya know...🤷♂️ who know whats under there I guess
The fucked up part is that ADB, according to a Reddit comment he made *FIVE YEARS AGO*, wanted to have Femstodes in Master of Mankind, but got told "No" but upper management. Not for lore reasons, but because all the models in production were male; management wanted the lore to match the tabletop.
That book came out in 2016. We could have had Femstodes almost a DECADE ago. This has been possible for ages.
so you base your your opinions on reddit wow.
@@jackjames7283 No, they base their opinions on the guy who writes the lore you proclaim as sacred.
@matthewgagnon9426 when did I say it was sacred? I don't rats butts about if thar girl space marine what I care about is how they introduce them
@@jackjames7283That was probably the stupidest “gotcha” attempt I’ve ever seen.
@@a.conditioner9022 It's also the fall back for someone when you catch them in that "The guy who writes the lore you hold to this standard has wanted this for a while" "Oh well I didn't say I held the lore to this standard...." it's a backpedal so they don't look stupid and try to move a gotcha.
Should do an Adeptus ridiculous episode on all the GW retcons
I know the AdRidic episodes can go a little long but I doubt everyone involved has THAT amount of time...
A 24 hour endurance stream coil not cover all the retcons…but by the end the brain damage from talking about them all might make the 40K universe finally seem sane!
But who will do an episode when the bullies come for the lore channels?
You know my thought on this topic before I saw this was "so what? GW recons things all the time, nothing new." But that was before I knew how they did it. Now I'm mad about it. I don't mind the female custodies, that's not the issue, I believe if you want to do something like this you should at least write it well and try and have it make sense. Hell, make a book out of it and cover the journey, but don't just make it some throw away story covered in 1 page of a codex.
i mean yeah but who says we dont get that later especially when the discourse is they've been ignoring custodes for a few years now id probably take this and feel hopeful im getting more rather than complain make them think it is a better idea to focus on space marines....again
I take the way it was dropped to mean that "You never noticed that there were female Custodes" because under power armour, it doesn't make a lick of difference!
@@BlackEpyon literally just samus style story telling
@@KalicoKal Boy what a shock it must have been to the first kid in the 80's to have beaten Metroid in less than 5 hours to discover they were playing a chick the entire time!
@@BlackEpyon Having been a kid back then and playing Metroid it was mind blowing, not because it was something we felt was wrong, but it was just so cool. Made you feel like anyone could be the hero.
What Methods can we use to alter, the vast amounts of lore, and world building of 40K
CAUL: Hold My Toaster, es about to get wacky up in here
In Five Years: Somehow, Horus returned!
Bricky: It's Fine?
Gw would be the kind of people to pull a palpatine, before adding any xeno lore.
This happened to Guilliman and Lion already
@@MarieAvora Those two were never dead, tourist.
Yeah, I can't see how he does not see the correlation between problems he has had reviewing Star Wars ep. 8 and 9 and the current retcon.
The pattern has been repeating for multiple franchises for a while now. This kind of thing was always the step 1 in having everything collapse.
@@MarieAvora the fuck you mean it happened to Guilliman? he was never dead and his resurrection was clear as fucking day in Gathering Storm III
I just find it exhausting. It's always the same thing.
I don't have any strong opinion on Fem Custodes; kinda like Bricky, I'm just thinking "That's cool I guess", and GW is known to retcon frequently. But the fact that GW says "We're changing the thing, if you don't like the new thing you can fuck off" is what irks me.
Not only that, but GW is also pulling the "it was there all along" card, while addressing a very passionate (if not obsessed) fanbase who literally possesses written proof that it was, in fact, not there all along. GW isn't just insulting the conservative's opinion, they're also insulting their intelligence and that is just shameful.
Don't get me wrong, gatekeeping is toxic, imposing your view is toxic, but here's a metaphor:
You have a bar that serves the same beer to the same customers for year. Then, one day, new customers come in and say:
"I don't like your beer, can you make a better one?"
Barman says "okay, I'm changing the beer for everyone."
Old customers say "Wait, that's not the beer I used to like anymore!"
"Well if you don't like it then you can leave, bigot!"
Congrats, you've gatekept not only the gatekeepers, but also the old fans who simply don't like the change. Now who's the toxic one imposing their view on others?
The Halo show did the same thing: "If you hate the show then you're not a true Halo fan"
Rings of Power did the same thing.
Witcher show did the same thing.
I don't care about who's right or wrong anymore. I'm just tired of the hypocrisy, the hatred and the demonizing of whoever disagrees with you.
Your metaphor is bad and stupid. It would be accurate if GW came out and said “You now HAVE to run women in your Custodes army”, but they didn’t, and nothing is stopping any Custodes player from still running only male models, and in fact most probably will have to since GW to my knowledge does not have any female head sculpts to use and has no plans to introduce any. Also insulting conservatives intelligence is easy because they’re stupid lmao
Pretty sure they did it to cover the dumpster fire codex. At least the Custodes can still play in Horus Heresy.
I am embarrassed with you:
>Talks about how everyone on twitter that has opposite opinion payed for it to be viewed.
>Talks about how people that disagree with him are them and we know who they are, those bad people who disagree with him, not like those all good people that agree with him.
>Talks about how everyone who disagrees is not a real fan like him.
>Says that people are being not tolerant to women while people that disagree specifically say that they have no problems with all female armies, because they know people like Bricky would jump to conclusions.
>Says that we can't even discuss it on twitter because irl events are more important?? While also discussing it?
>Being a hypocrite, in sister of battle episode he said that he feels bad about how sisters of battle were potrayed in old lore while also doing posters with them in a much more revealing way jsut to earn some money.
>And so much more, it's just dissapointing
>People most of the time opposed to what they thought were bad changes to lore, but they were always made for lore reasons (the human aeldari hybrids) and not because of the irl politics or stock acqusitions
Wait so you are saying they made female custodies and didn’t even made minis of them? Then what was the point of it?
didnt you say that you opposed FSM because they take away from SoB on the SoB episode of AdRic?
The custodes aren’t the space marines and the sisters of silence are not the sisters of battle
Tourist.
Literally how
I’d say I would’ve be more triggered if they’d made loyal female space marine , chaos can have whatever since it’s chaos (yee) but in case of loyalists , they have sororitas , I know they’re not “female space marine” but for god sake they’re basic concept is that
I would have loved a full page describing how Custodes are created and them just adding that there are females in there.
Could have been really interresting to read and maybe include references that malcador originally wanted female space marines but they couldn't make them and therefore Custodes are made differently.
This wouldn't have worked for multiple lire reasons but, again, its not like we can ask GW to care about their own setting's integrity.
Hell, you could have just written that one of the stooges given the honor of applying the Emperor's half-understood Gene Alchemy got fed up with the small recruitment pool of male-only infants, so he asked a particularly desperate noblewoman to offer up a daughter instead.
She had twins or something, so he applied to both and then either one or both miraculously survived the initial mutagen injections, despite the chance of success for a female candidate being multiple hundreds of decimal points after zero.
He was then either executed for trying to improve upon something the Emperor created or rewarded for finding a way of expanding the recruitment pool of Custodians by finding a bloodline that produces women capable if surviving the process.
Justify it by saying the Custodes now require a faster reinforcement rate after Rowboat Girlyman decreed they leave Terra and put themselves in harm's way and boom, instant W.
This is the most amount of time I've watched Bricky's face in HD quality. I usually watch on my phone.
Im proud of you for speaking your mind on this, I've always gotten good vibes from you and Ive always gotten the sense that youre very inclusive. I understand not wanting to get too involved with stuff like this but I'm really glad you deiced to say something
Honestly, I really don’t care about the retcons because my reason for leaving that fandom was that I was being priced out. I don’t want a new book every year, and I don’t want to have to buy new miniatures every so often because most of my army is relegated to “Legends”. But yeah, the writers are either being lazy or they reek of desperation. I’ll stick with my 2nd hand Battletech minis.
GW can change everything in 40k...but please give us a short story or a novel for stuff like this. I like the idea of mixed custodians, it sells the entire "peak of humanity" thing a bit better. But put some effort into it. I HATE lazy writing and we ARE paying a premium for this stuff. (Also bricky sounds depressed...can we create an apple and coffee fund? I think he needs it.)
They did give us a short story about this stuff though, bricky even brought that up.
Thats even why gw tweeted that.
@PlasmaPea04 Yes and no.
GW should have given us a proper origin story or an explanation for the changes.
The blood games story is a good character introduction, no problems with that.
But the entire thing feels forced and kinda lazy. They could've introduced female custodians towards the final days of the heresy. I mean, they did talk about female primarchs in some of those books. They chose the absolute worst way to introduce them. 5 pages would've been enough. I just want a good explanation why they never came up in the lore. :/
@@kaon9393 I can understand your frustration, but you gotta remember that 1 If big E only implemented female custodes at the end of the horus heresy it would make it seem like he just handicapped himself and thus his empire and mankind up to that point by having less recruits for the custodes on purpose for no reason.
And well if you want an explanation for why you never saw them for lore its basically the same explanation for almost every time a new unit is introduced for a faction in lore.
They were there but just out of frame, or in this case just had their helmets on and never talked or where on other missions when the books followed the custodes.
@PlasmaPea04 I mean, he did handicap himself by only making male astartes already.
But yeah, I'm just really disappointed in GW for the low effort.
I think much of the backlash right now isn't purely about the female custodians. The AOS thing threw people off, and the codices seem lacklustre. (Or from what I can tell, my local group isn't happy about both)
GW's just stating a fact. It's not GW's fault that you never noticed the hot muscle mommy abs under all their power armour!