lmao that's awesome, definitely the vibe I'm going for. I'm inspired by my other favourite youtubers, who I watch. Gaming content is probably my favourite thing, more than movies or anything. Glad you enjoyed it!
Another great vid. Glad to see collectors controlled by logic. You might want to consider adding a inserter that uses logic to drop items off the belt and into space. I usually use the logic for the collectors (collect until 80 ice for example) and multiply it by two to get the cutoff limit (start dumping ice at 160)
Awesome, glad you enjoyed it. That's something I think I need to consider for bigger ships, but with this size I don't think it's necessary. I think it's a must on every ship after mid game, we'll see. Thanks for the suggestion!
Nice video. Ive watched a bunch of your videos and i like them and them helpful. I think it would help if you explained your goals before you start making changes. In this video, there was a part where you made a move, and I only understood your reasoning after watching it. It would be great if you could share what you're trying to accomplish as you go-like 'I'm aiming to make a 4x4 square here for a battery later, so I'll leave a gap for that.' That way, I can follow your thought process and understand the steps with you.
I don't see your video showing your first space platform (what I'm up to too, 🤔 I call it the JSS for Jeff Space Station, like the ISS but mine (!)) the JMG Space Platform, which I assume was for Space Science, which is something I need to produce as well... given your heavy use of circuit logic, I'm interested. And, I'm gonna have stuff chucked back into space because I saw that somewhere, and I think that looks cool. In space nobody can hear you scream (except in Disney Star Wars, or put fires out in space without an oxidizer) and I was told many times in various Exec Board emails that pollution doesn't exist if nobody sees you throw it out... ask DuPont!
Lol. Sure, yeah I'll make a vid on my first space platform. It's the John Michael Godier Science platform, as a shoutout to one of my favourite science creators here on UA-cam. All I'm doing is controlling the filters of the pincers to maintain the belt full of the correct astroids. I'll do a video on it, but it might be part of my upcoming Let's Play series.
@@TheJarGames k, cool. I'll look out for that. I watch John too, but one of my comments pissed him off once, Idr the specific topic, it may have been that he presented that the Big Bang hasn't been disproven by the JWST _seeing galaxies,_ let alone stars older than the Big Bang itself. Could have been something else... Idr... he's ok with me these days. But seriously, I was pretty pissed that most of the things we are taught is as real as bedtime stories. I understand the Scientific Method, but the way they present hypotheses as theories and theories as facts, not as yet disproven hypotheses doesn't help the lay ppl take them seriously.* Priests are no longer considered authority (Logical Fallacy: Appeal To Authority) figures because ppl understand the game. Sadly, given the ytube video by Sabine, "The Reproducibility Crisis" demonstrates peer reviewed (freakin' "peer reviewed" studies) are about as real as paying a priest to get into heaven. I left academia decades ago (Applied Mathematics and Statistics dude that speaks da' Engrish, which helped me get a TAship) because I saw what was going on and I could never get funding to honestly find out some things that must have been verboten. I wouldn't take money from the corp that wanted a specific outcome to then say they have a study that shows their product is something the pleb should buy. I'm so not with the program (!) _______________________ * I had the "luxury" of DNA testing my youngest son by the same DNA testing firm as the Maury Show. I know to 99.95% that my son is mine, but I would know with _certainty_ that he was not. Idt the lay person understands that concept at all. That no one, not even God herself can know something is true with certainty (!) though theoretically with numerical methods you can get arbitrarily close depending how much computational time you're willing to use. I know you're not a layperson per se, but if your like my bro (MS Computer Science/MS Computer Engineering) he doesn't get it, or he just won't take anything I can teach him seriously cause he's still mad after all these years that my adv degree he thinks was harder to get than his. (It was, but so what, we're bros! I couldn't make that up even if I tried...)
It's a very compact little starter ship. I also like the relaxed style of the video. Felt like sitting in a lounge and relaxing.
lmao that's awesome, definitely the vibe I'm going for.
I'm inspired by my other favourite youtubers, who I watch. Gaming content is probably my favourite thing, more than movies or anything.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Another great vid. Glad to see collectors controlled by logic. You might want to consider adding a inserter that uses logic to drop items off the belt and into space. I usually use the logic for the collectors (collect until 80 ice for example) and multiply it by two to get the cutoff limit (start dumping ice at 160)
Awesome, glad you enjoyed it.
That's something I think I need to consider for bigger ships, but with this size I don't think it's necessary. I think it's a must on every ship after mid game, we'll see.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Nice video. Ive watched a bunch of your videos and i like them and them helpful. I think it would help if you explained your goals before you start making changes. In this video, there was a part where you made a move, and I only understood your reasoning after watching it. It would be great if you could share what you're trying to accomplish as you go-like 'I'm aiming to make a 4x4 square here for a battery later, so I'll leave a gap for that.' That way, I can follow your thought process and understand the steps with you.
Thanks Chris!
I appreciate your thoughts on it, and will strive to be more clear with my goals.
I don't see your video showing your first space platform (what I'm up to too, 🤔 I call it the JSS for Jeff Space Station, like the ISS but mine (!)) the JMG Space Platform, which I assume was for Space Science, which is something I need to produce as well... given your heavy use of circuit logic, I'm interested.
And, I'm gonna have stuff chucked back into space because I saw that somewhere, and I think that looks cool. In space nobody can hear you scream (except in Disney Star Wars, or put fires out in space without an oxidizer) and I was told many times in various Exec Board emails that pollution doesn't exist if nobody sees you throw it out... ask DuPont!
Lol. Sure, yeah I'll make a vid on my first space platform.
It's the John Michael Godier Science platform, as a shoutout to one of my favourite science creators here on UA-cam.
All I'm doing is controlling the filters of the pincers to maintain the belt full of the correct astroids.
I'll do a video on it, but it might be part of my upcoming Let's Play series.
@@TheJarGames k, cool. I'll look out for that.
I watch John too, but one of my comments pissed him off once, Idr the specific topic, it may have been that he presented that the Big Bang hasn't been disproven by the JWST _seeing galaxies,_ let alone stars older than the Big Bang itself. Could have been something else... Idr... he's ok with me these days.
But seriously, I was pretty pissed that most of the things we are taught is as real as bedtime stories. I understand the Scientific Method, but the way they present hypotheses as theories and theories as facts, not as yet disproven hypotheses doesn't help the lay ppl take them seriously.*
Priests are no longer considered authority (Logical Fallacy: Appeal To Authority) figures because ppl understand the game. Sadly, given the ytube video by Sabine, "The Reproducibility Crisis" demonstrates peer reviewed (freakin' "peer reviewed" studies) are about as real as paying a priest to get into heaven.
I left academia decades ago (Applied Mathematics and Statistics dude that speaks da' Engrish, which helped me get a TAship) because I saw what was going on and I could never get funding to honestly find out some things that must have been verboten. I wouldn't take money from the corp that wanted a specific outcome to then say they have a study that shows their product is something the pleb should buy.
I'm so not with the program (!)
_______________________
* I had the "luxury" of DNA testing my youngest son by the same DNA testing firm as the Maury Show. I know to 99.95% that my son is mine, but I would know with _certainty_ that he was not.
Idt the lay person understands that concept at all. That no one, not even God herself can know something is true with certainty (!) though theoretically with numerical methods you can get arbitrarily close depending how much computational time you're willing to use.
I know you're not a layperson per se, but if your like my bro (MS Computer Science/MS Computer Engineering) he doesn't get it, or he just won't take anything I can teach him seriously cause he's still mad after all these years that my adv degree he thinks was harder to get than his. (It was, but so what, we're bros! I couldn't make that up even if I tried...)