13 Lies You Were Told About Space
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
- When you think of ringed planets, you probably assume there's only one of them in our Solar System, Saturn. But what if I told you that there are three other planets similar to Saturn? It's true. Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune all have their own sets of rings.
00:00 Saturn is the only ringed planet in the Solar System
00:54 Black holes suck everything in
01:35 The Moon has a dark side
02:00 Nuking an asteroid is a great idea
03:08 Thanks to our sponsor
04:05 You can see stars from the Moon
04:40 You grow taller in space
05:04 You age slower in space
05:40 You can't cry in space
06:13 Martian dust storms destroy equipment
07:05 Stars twinkle
07:35 The Asteroid Belt is full of asteroids
08:21 The Great Wall of China is Visible from Space
Questions or concerns? Contact us at underknown.com/contact/
Interested in sponsoring our episodes or collaborating? Email us: inquiries@underknown.com
Get our 100 best episodes in one mind-blowing book: bit.ly/ytc-the-what-if-100-book
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @whatifscienceshow
Check out our other channels:
How to Survive: bit.ly/how-to-survive-show
Aperture: bit.ly/aperture-show
Your Body On: bit.ly/your-body-on-show
Watch what-if scenarios by topic:
Planet Earth: bit.ly/YT-what-if-Earth
The Cosmos: bit.ly/YT-what-if-Cosmos
Technology: bit.ly/YT-what-if-Technology
Your Body: bit.ly/YT-what-if-Body
Humanity: bit.ly/YT-what-if-Humanity
T-shirts and merch: bit.ly/whatifstore
Suggest an episode: bit.ly/suggest-whatif
Newsletter: bit.ly/whatif-newsletter
What If elsewhere:
Instagram: bit.ly/whatif-instagram
Discord: / discord
Twitter: bit.ly/whatif-twitter
Facebook: bit.ly/facebook-whatif
What If in Spanish: bit.ly/YT-Spanish-what-if
What If is a mini-documentary web series that takes you on an epic journey through hypothetical worlds and possibilities. Join us on an imaginary adventure through time, space and chance while we (hopefully) boil down complex subjects in a fun and entertaining way.
Produced with love by Underknown in Toronto: underknown.com
Contact us at underknown.com/contact/
#whatif #space #cosmos #lies - Наука та технологія
You forgot the most obvious one. The sound effects in space battles. If sound existed in space our sun could be heard roaring at around 100db constantly
If there were sound in space, there would also need to be molecules to propagate the sound waves. Those molecules would also create drag on the earth, messing with our orbit, and cause us to fall into the sun.
Space doesn't exist
@@davidsheckler4450i hope this is a joke
@@bitbreaker_creator The only joke is Sheeple believing in unproven space
@@davidsheckler4450 oh ok a troll
Bye then
About nuking the asteroid, yes it would cause a massive rock to break up into tiny pieces; however, a lot of it would burn up , and even if a lot of the pieces hit, the damage it would cause would be massive, but it wouldnt wipe out all life. Now if that massive asteroid hits the planet as a whole, all life would be gone. Correct me if I am wrong, but blowing it up would at least save some of the world, if we had no other choice.
Depends on how close it was when it went boom 💥. Best to destroy it from 🎑 distance at very least or farther out.
Nice idea for a separate what if episode.
True. A huge asteroid could disrupt seasons life and even potentially end humanity. If you nuke it into smaller pieces then that won't happen for sure.
It's my understanding that the astronauts who landed on the moon could see stars, but only if they stood in the shade of the lander and looked straight up.
I always envisioned a grappling tug boat... Just to move it laterally. Why worry about slowing it down?
Earth has rings now with all the satellites that orbit
In the words of a famous 90s cartoon character..."Space...it's really, really, really, really...Big" 😂
In the words of famous 90s cartoon characters...
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"I think so, Brain, but chickens don't have lips."
that is the truest thing that any cartoon has and will ever say.
"Billions and billions of stars in our galaxy. Made up of all this cosmic stuff".
Literally to the 1% who's reading this, God bless you, and may your dreams come true, stay safe and have a wonderful day.❤❤
God?
What
What god? the one from your religion?
No thanks
Kindly keep your god and blessings to yourself.
@@urielflores9927 what is happening in this comment
I do know that when some/many people refer to the "dark side" of the moon they are mistakenly using that term to indicate permanent darkness as if being unable to see it equates to darkness.
And yes, a more appropriate term is the 'far side', but strictly speaking the moon _does_ have a dark side, just as the Earth does, just as any body revolving around a star does.
Any sphere can only have one side lit in a single star system and though that other, dark side, isn't permanent unless it is tidally locked to its parent star, half of its surface will be 'dark' at any time.
Then explain to us why at times the moon is never lit..since the claim is the sun lights the moon
@@ronkali5365 The moon is always lit. One side of it is always facing the sun. Just because you can't see it from a particular vantage point doesn't mean sunlight isn't falling on the far side from where you are.
There are only 2 times when it appears that the moon is 'never lit'. One is when during a total lunar eclipse the moon is completely covered by the Earth's shadow, although refraction of light through the Earth's atmosphere casts a red glow on the moon, so technically it's still lit.
The only time the moon is completely 'unlit' is during a solar eclipse when the moon is directly in front of us and the lit side is opposite you the viewer, which is also the same as a new moon, with or without an eclipse. But I would add that even then, Earth shine reflects sunlight from the Earth's surface onto the moon which makes it dimly visible.
But the moon is always lit, just because you are at a point where you can't see it does not mean it isn't lit. That doesn't happen. It is obvious.
True, at any given moment, the Moon does have a bright side and a dark side in the sense that one half of the surface of the Moon is sunlit while the other half is not, but I think that many people mistakenly think that these regions are unchanging, that any given point on the Moon will either always be bright or dark. In fact, most places* on the surface of the Moon experience a day night cycle, analogous to that experienced by most places* on Earth, but with a diurnal cycle of about 29.5 days rather than the 24 hours diurnal cycle experienced (at most places) on Earth.
* The exception is those places quite close to the poles.
@@brettschmidt5929 Exactly.
It's like how very often the term 'theory' is confused.
But I would not like for the term dark side to be a taboo word.
We must be swift as the coursing river
(Be a man)
With all the force of a great typhoon
(Be a man)
With all the strength of a raging fire
Mysterious as the dark side of the moon
I love this channel, it serves my childhood curiosities totally. Please keep uploading more and more content….all the best team WhatIf
All who works in NASA, also knows, EARTH IS A CLOSED SYSTEM, NOBODY CANNOT LEAVE EARTH, THERE IS NOWHERE TO GO. They all know it, yet willingly deceive.
+ they are in the masonry club.
"In space no one can hear you scream. You scream, I scream, we all scream for ice scream."
---Albert Einstein
Sounds legit
😔
IF a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?
@@aspenrebel Yes lmao
"Up above the world so high , this rhyme is a big fat lie" got me😂
Same w/the cow! I've yet to see one jumping over the moon!🐄🌙
Depends on the size. You can turn it to complete dust, the rock with enough nukes.
Dang I for real thought, I was gonna grow 2 inches taller if I went to space, but I'm still gonna be 5 foot 4 💀
Hey brother,
how can I help you,
my dear friend?
L, Skill issue.
@@AWarriorFromGodRead
That's a new type of video I've never seen from you guys! It is actually a great idea just keep up the good work, love ya!❤
Nuking a asteriod before it enters the atmosphere should definitely be considered a good idea if the calculations are right cuz it will help the asteroid to split into smaller parts and and friction in the atmosphere takes care thereafter
Technically it's compressive forces heating up the air, not friction, that causes objects falling to earth to heat up and break apart.
But yeah, this would have to be assessed on a case by case basis. One big chunk large enough to destroy all life on Earth, vs many smaller chunks none of which by themselves would destroy life...
Say you get an asteroid 100 miles across. You blow it up into 20 asteroids all 5 miles across then each of those is a planet killer. Able to end all life on Earth. Or nearly all. Combined they would take out all life bigger than bacteria. Even as smaller chunks. Even 100 asteroids 1 mile across would devastate the planet completely.
Bro makes me want to be an astrophysicist 😅
I went to school between 80s and 90s at Thornton Academy in Maine. And we knew and were taught about the planets in our solar system with Rings Jupiter and Neptune were part of the 3 pack.
Back then did Uranus have rings?
Astronauts float in space because there is no gravity."
In reality, there is gravity in space, but the sensation of weightlessness experienced by astronauts is due to being in freefall around the Earth. Astronauts aboard the International Space Station (ISS) are constantly falling towards the Earth but moving horizontally fast enough to keep missing it.
Ohhh we need a video of this explanation, i wanna see it in action.
@@motodro1d621😂😂😂
Comming in
Prove it by going there & showing us
We are also 'falling' into the black hole in the middle of our galaxy, but we are also moving horizontally, at litteral km/seconds, its insane
Really? That's something new for me.
Didn't know about the dark side of the moon though and the stars twinkling. Nice video. Informative and entertaining.
It's called the far side.
You didn’t watch transformers Dark of The Moon?
That is not thinking scientifically
I heard about the dark side of the moon, and I guess everyone heard the same thing: it's called dark side, because we never see it from the earth. This video is pointless.
I knew all what you said here when I was 9 years old.
The astronauts didn't see any stars because there were in the freaking day. It's like trying to see any star here on earth during daytime. If there were on the night site of the moon then they would easily see all the stars, but then they wouldn't be able to see the ground very good.
We want more videos like this. 😊
U make great videos. Keep up the good work👍
so uranus has a large ring around it? cool.
I do not know that I necessarily completely agree with your assessment of the Supreme Courts ruling on the epa. Wasn't that ruling in regard to the epa's overreach concerning landowners use of their private property where the court ruled that the epa overstepped their authority?
Great to see the face behind the voice, such a cool dude, such a cool channel
It was actually quite informative, however I take issue with the video's title.
Saying "Lies" implies that someone deliberately wasn't telling the truth, and it is an emotionally charged, super click-baity word to use.
So don't do it. Say "myths", or "misconceptions", or anything else for that matter.
You're right on both fronts.
OH WOW!!! Lies... oh I gotta watch this video.
Even those creators who make sensible videos fall victim to these tactics. But what can ya do? It gets them the results they want.
I take issue with the use of the number 13. I'm only able to count 12 "lies" in this video. Perhaps the title itself is the 13th lie. But if that were the case then it wouldn't be a lie that there were 13 lies. My brain hurts.
What if, you were told lies about space?
The idea of nuking an asteroid is along two lines of thought - One to move its path of direction, or two, break it into smaller pieces that burn up in the atmosphere - However in both cases - one nuke is not enough, if you are going to nuke it then send like 5,000 nukes.
First time I seen u!! Man I love when a voice goes with a face!!! I love it voice lol ur awesome and I love ur videos please don't stop!!!!
Saturn's rings would be more akin to 'asteroid fields' depicted
Actually given the size of space. There MUST be some star wars style saturated astroid belts. :) MYTH BUSTED
The EPA and other branches of the federal government have way overstepped. Like When the EPA passed a rule for all diesel engines to burn def. 90% of that def comes in 2.5 gal jugs. MILLIONS OF PLASTIC JUGS. That wouldn't otherwise be needed.
First time to see this guy that has answered most of my questions.
Thank you for the valuable informations 🙏
Nuking an asteroid would just dissipate the energy over a wider area, much of it in the atmosphere. So its energy is either spent mostly smashing the ground, or spent heating the atmosphere.
Those were some interesting facts😮
Those are really wonderful!
I already knew that Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune has their own sets of rings
Yea the early 80's when I was in high school was when the "There are rings around Uranus" jokes started. Jupiter's rings were known about before that. Don't remember when Neptune's rings were discovered off hand. Guessing one of the Voyagers.
myanus
@@JedForge Neptune's rings were discovered very quickly from Voyager 2's pictures that it took during its 1989 flyby.
Did you know that Saturn now has 145 moons?
@@aspenrebel *Mind blown*
Been watching this channel for years and kinda disappointed in your Supreme Court mis representation of the ruling. We have 3 branches for a reason and multiple agencies including the epa are operating outside the scope of their jurisdiction. Chevron deference was granted so agencies could enforce law within the scope of the defined law. EPA was changing interpretations so it could fit what it wanted to into it’s scope and this making it’s own law . Which violates separation of power. This is true with other agencies too . Scotus said you cannot enforce what is not in that law passed by Congress…. Chevron deference is next on the chopping block and good riddance. Too much over reach . I’m all for keeping nature clean and happy and safe but you also have to stop government overreach or gov gets too big like it is now
Love what if videos❤❤❤..Thanks for uploading what if videos today because today is my birthday and it makes my day wonderful thanks a lot..Love from melbourne🇦🇺
@@Ninjacool36781 thanks bro🥰
Happy birthday!
Thanks for that news about EPA.
"What If" most reasonably people don't know this already.
best video ever
Would a nuclear bomb near an asteroid rly change its trajectory since there is no air is there a blastwave then ?🤔
The heat from the bomb turns some of the material on the asteroid into gas and it pushes it off course
@@hotsui7374 There is also the pressure of the radiation.
No. Shockwave can't happen no resistance or medium.
Yeah, I was born in the eighties and was taught the 4 planets with rings.
Thank you for telling me what i already know
I've already known there's Rings on other planets in our solar system like Jupiter But these Rings are too small like invizible to seeing Rings here from Earth and other thing i've known you cant see China's great wall from space, that's a FACT. All others came as New information For me like there's no dark side of The moon and stars not twinkling. Btw did you guys heared there Have Been founded a spider from NASA space Station what's truly interesting. In this video ive liked clips from Dont Look up and The Passengers movies what are awesome scifi movies, i really like scifi movies and videos like this. Great Job what If, keep going you do greatest content in The universe. 🌌
Another Fact: The first living creatures sent to Space were Fruit Flies and not the dog,
-Leika- Laika.
I don't know how I feel about the life of a fruit fly but they've send scads of poor animals into space and how dare they send a poor dog into space.😢💓🐕💓
@@isabellind1292 science experiments are always performed on animals before humans. They did the same too. 😢
Someone has to be that person...
_If_ you wanna show off with 'facts', you could at least get them correct, otherwise you look foolish.
Laika.
The dog's name was Laika not Leika.
@@andrewstamford1988 There's always that fool who has to be a dik about correcting someone over a dog's name as if it requires one to be completely uncivil about it, to get their point across. Gross.
@@isabellind1292 And there is also that dik who has to try to be some kind of moron to make the completely useless statement you just made. Need I explain to the simple minded that you seem to be that the OP wanted to be a smart ass like you and state a 'fact' only to get it wrong!
If you think that correcting someone who wants to state a 'fact' only to be wrong is being a dik then feel a need to crawl out from under your rock to express your outrage, you really need to get out more and stop dwelling in your own head as you have some serious issues I have neither the time nor inclination to go over with you. So as I am uncivil, allow me to offer this advice to you... shove that up your ass and think about it dingus!
OH MY GOD….
I never knew when you’re in the moon you can see a giant IF 😦
Number 1 is not a surprise though, while for number 10, I knew that one since I was in 3rd grade. Now at 26, I'm still surprised that most people think they are twinkling.
Isn't it easier to see stars from the moon during the lunar night? If you are on the sunny side, it would surely be as difficult as it is on the daytime side of earth.
There's no atmosphere on Moon so the light from the sun (and the reflected light from the Earth) doesn't get scattered. That's why the sky is dark in all the Moon Landing photos. When you look up at a blue sky on Earth what you are seeing is sunlight bouncing off water and dust in the atmosphere. There is a case to be made for building an observatory on the farside (the so called 'dark side') of the Moon though as the Moon would then block out all the electromagnetic interference our tech is generating here on Earth.
Yes, it would be easier because there's no atmosphere to perturb the light.
Depends how bright Earthlight is. If you were on lunar night but the Earth was there, it might wash out a bit what you can see. Best view would be from the far side of the moon (so, Earth not visible) during the lunar night.
It scares me the fact that no one actually read the details of this case and the opinion. They just presume the scotus ruling will do harm because they like the EPA and consider them above reproach.
Lost interest in the video after his EPA comment.
The guy who made the picture for the advertisement of this video knows nothing about film photography, or photography at all
I enjoyed this one 👏
What do you think happens when a meteor enters the Earth's atmosphere and breaks apart into a lot of pieces? Like the one over Russia several years ago. It breaks apart, and the pieces fall to Earth. Most small, but there may be some large pieces. As for seeing the Great Wall of China from Space, that depends on what you consider to be in Space, how far out.
You won't see something that is less than 10 meters (30 ft) wide even from a plane flying at high altitud.
I dunno. I see a lot of things with Google Satellite view. I've spied on North Korea!! They have a lot of 1) baseball fields, and 2) bright blue roof panels (which I can only assume is to deflect USA spy satellites. They built a new bridge over river into China.@@LaurentCassaro
I'm not too worried about inhaling Martian dust, not because of the fact that I'll probably never step foot on Mars, but because Mars obviously doesn't have a breathable atmosphere so it's not like I'd be attempting to breathe in anything without a helmet on.
And a pressure suit to boot.
a pulsar star could be said to twinkle as it steadily gets brighter and dimmer.
A pulsar doesn't emit in the visible light range.
Also, given that it's the collapsed core of a supergiant star that went supernova, it's more akin to a black hole than a star.
miss your old podcasts
But wouldn't diverting an asteroid come with a vast number of possible (devastating) effects?
Probably not as devastating as letting it hit.
You can see stars in the sky at night, from the earth through miles high blanket and cover of air, but you cannot see any stars in outer space. Which of these could possibly be true ?
That is not true. The absence of light pollution is a must, though. On the side of the moon that is lit by the sun, our eyes are so oversaturated by it that the much fainter stars stand no chance of being seen by us, so the sky appears pitch black. As soon as you move to the dark side of the moon, without any light pollution AND no interference of an atmosphere, the faint light of the stars has no competition, and as soon as your eyes have adapted you’ll be blown away by a srarfilled sky like nothing seen on earth.
@@Godbluffer The shimmering stars are what adorn and deck the night sky and make it beautiful. Why is a James Webb telescope, built at such great expense if not to study the stars, never to study the vastness of empty space. Much of voyagers instruments are switched off and not in operation during it's journey through interstellar space, which is the most of the time.
Again can't see this 🌌 unless you are far away from light pollution. On moon the ☀, 🌍 and 🎑 are too bright to see stars like that. Get on the far side then you'd see it perfectly.
@@sundareshvenugopal6575JWST is 1 million miles from 🌍 and an infared 🔭.
@@darkmatter1152 So during the moons day the stars will not be visible but during the moons night they will be. Its day and night must be of different duration to that earth. If its gravity is a fifth people's weight should also be a fifth. If you weigh 80 kilos on earth, then on the moon that would be only 16 kilos.
The Nebula Xelatic that spans 40 Bi-Light years is able to be seen with a 12 dollar telescope from Dollar General, that is if you are standing on the planet Melmac on the Blamisck mountain range.
I always thought it is called the Far Side on the moon. Also about crying in space, The Expanse book/tv series really covered its accuracy. It has an episode where they can't apply first aid to the wounded in space because there is no gravity
WhatIf *LIED* about the court & the EPA ruling.
The court ruled that the EPA only had say over NAVIGATABLE water ways as spelled out in the law regarding the EPA, not *every single little seasonal wet patch and man-mad pond that led nowhere on the ground* that the EPA had claimed tyrannical dominion over at the expense of countless land owners. That was what that ruling was about - eliminating the EPA's naked, illegal power grab.
False
The epa got spanked because it was violating separation of power . It cannot enforce what is not in the law . And they were changing meanings of expanding meanings to do so thus creating new law . Executive branch agencies cannot write their own law . It is grossly unconstitutional and the judicial system checked it . Mad or not you saw exactly why the founders made 3 branches .
What if there were 13 lies in this video, rather than 12 😂
We actually knew about those rings when Ingo Swam remote viewed them about a year prior to Voyager
I got to give you credit for telling the truth about space. I promise you that 98% of the people watching this video weren't even close to ready to accept the truth, let alone willing to even accept it.
"Space maybe the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement"
ChillPeppers
Only delusional people believe that 🌍 is flat. Only thing that is flat is floons 🧠.
Environmental protection is a state issue, not a federal issue. Supreme Court was correct in opinion. States/localities should be managing their own lands.
What is music in the first one and the last one lie?! I NEED THIS SO MUCH!
The EPA's job is to make sure everyone is keeping the air and water clean..... Not run compines out business... The Superm Court got it right....
You expect from the capitalist corporation driven society that you live in to care about environmental issues instead of profit. No matter who you vote for, there will always be corporate lobbyists that influence corrupt politicians.
Yes, we need stricter regulations on what kind of donations politicians can accept. Preferably as part of a constitutional amendment.
There's Oil Cartel, Pharmaceutical Cartel, Bio-Tech Cartel, Drugs Cartel, etcetera but Banking Cartel is the most powerful amongst all.
Not only they control the debt based system but also the values of Paper 🧻 around the World like ;
1 U.S. $ = 3,00,000 Venezuelan Bolivar,
1 U.S. $ = 40,000 Iranian Rial, etc.
@@ultraviolet7838 Those that make those regulations have also been bought. It remains to the common citizens to take matters into their own hands and not vote for any political party. Remember, you have the option to boycott. That's what theu're all afraid of.
do a video of what is a state of emergency is declared on the state of New York
Lol a Canadian talking about the EPA on another episode of What if😅
First
I mean one big explosion that cracks the planet in half or small chunks that set stuff on fire. I choose small pieces
A nuclear explosion in Space is impossible. The environmental elements in Space would not support such an event to occur, or even to initiate it.
So increased density slows time...seems simple enough
i was told no one can hear you in space, but i now know, sound can be detected through radiowaves
AT 2:45 MIN THE MAP LOOKED LIKE GTA5
There is very little force from a nuclear blast in space, there's no atmosphere to superheat and expand explosively. It would generate a lot of thermal and other radiation, but that would have little effect on an asteroid's trajectory.
This was a fun video and most things were 100% correct though there’s a few that could be explained more.
1. Yes black holes do “suck everything in” at least everything past its event horizon is gone and can’t leave due to its strong gravitational force.
2. Nuking an asteroid even if it doesn’t deflect the asteroid is still better than the alternative. The hope is that the smaller fragments would burn up on entry as most asteroids do. Of course the decision of what to do to a large asteroid on a collision course is complicated and depends on many different factors.
3. Yes you can see stars on the moon. The problem is both with how reflective the surface of the moon is with light and the sun’s brightness. But this is only during lunar day. If you were to stay on the moon for lunar night which lasts 14 earth days, the stars would be very visible and sharp due to the lack of atmosphere.
4. Yes while special relativity does play a role, general relativity was also a theory proposed by Einstein that states gravity also plays a role in time dilation. Astronauts are further away from the surface of the earth so there’d be time dilation. But yeah over 340 days the time dilation is only milliseconds as seen with Scott and Mark Kelly.
can someone please tell me the name of the movie in the background while nuking asteroid part?
5:07 Even so, if you travel at the speed of light - the time for you is the same. Your time for others is "stretched" or sped up by others for you - but your time for you is the same. So you won't age slowly - you will age the same, just slower for others, the same for yourself. And if it's been 5 years for someone - for you it's still just your second. Some other things must be found to slow down aging ;)
multiple little impacts would still be much better than 1 big one😅
6:58. I caught that. Real smooth
Hi what if your my favorite UA-camr I have watched all you videos over the years
The asteroid movie that's used, is that the new movie on Netflix with Adam Driver?
Can you please do a video on What if your body imploded in the ocean..
OceanGate meme… 💀💀💀
What was that movie you showed a scene of where the kids mother gets pulled into a black hole?
Make a video about the missing submarine!!!
You totally misrepresented the SCOTUS ruling. The EPA, like all agencies, have assumed too much authority that they have not been granted by congress.
please make video about oceangate sub. which is lost!
would it really get dark or jus less light bc dont black holes accretion discs produce a light or glow?
3:02 What “force from the blast” exactly? In space there is no air, so no pressure wave and no ‘blast’. A nuke in space just shines like a little sun for half a minute…it does make heat of course, but the only blast is from the tiny bit of vaporised bomb casing.
I thought the reason for a starlets view from the moon was a lack of atmosphere to breakdown the light.... or is it the reflectivity.... or both???
first time i’ve seen the what if guys face
Regarding the comment of aging in space, as I understand it, just being in space will make you age slower than if you were on the surface of Earth (thanks to a small effect by gravity). Your rate of time passage will slow down if you are in space by about .0007 seconds per six months (based on the ISS astronauts). Not exactly noticeable by humans. But it's highly noticeable by the GPS system. I was surprised to learn that GPS had to take Einstein's Theory of General Relativity into account when computing distance
Good One.
Well then what will it be like if we orbit .. White hole ??
SAME THING
Please do uncertified missing titan
Isn't that collision still just a hypothesis? The Giant-Impact Hypothesis?
In the video it's being told like this was a fact. Or has it been confirmed?
very likely - due to the material the moon is made out of - however there are still other ideas put forward that can answer that as well(the easiest, they formed at same time from same material orbiting the Sun, but there is more to support the impact, and creation of the moon after the Earth - a lot more). so still not enough to say concrete 100% but very likely.
The asteroid one was just wrong. A bunch of smaller rocks would burn up in the atmosphere or detonate high up. The detonation or detonations could be sufficient to slow it down or deflect it so that it's velocity is not directed straight at Earth. While there are better options, nuking the asteroid does actually improve a situation from catastrophic to devastating (depending on size and trajectory).
There is no blast wave in space. Nukes are not actually good in space like they are on earth because of the lack of atmosphere. You would need to do a direct hit, not "near" as this video implies. Did they do any research on this subject?