The 2020 Cadillac CT4-V is a Caddy’s New 325 HP RWD Small Sport Sedan

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2020
  • Follow Redline on social channels:
    Instagram: / redline_reviews
    Facebook: / liketheredline
    Tesla referral code: ts.la/sofyan13379
    Cadillac remains a bit unsure of where they want to position themselves in the segment, and that is especially true when you look at their latest crop of sedans. The #CadillacCT4V is a new RWD small sedan competing against cars like the CLA35, S3, and M235i Gran coupe. All of its rivals are based on FWD platforms with standard AWD, while the #CT4V is the only RWD offering with available AWD. It’s 325 HP turbocharged 4-cylinder traces its roots to a truck engine but it does offer the most HP and torque in the segment and it’s snappy 10-speed transmission offers the most gears. Currently, the quickest #CadillacCT4 #V will sprint to 60 in 4.6 seconds and should attract a few niche buyers who must have RWD.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 456

  • @yingtianyu4129
    @yingtianyu4129 3 роки тому +77

    It's strange everyone hates the rear, but i think it's exceptionally good

    • @danielc3321
      @danielc3321 3 роки тому +2

      Agreed. It’s not that bad. It’s just a little unusual because the trunk lid is so wide.

    • @bobbowie9350
      @bobbowie9350 3 роки тому

      The trunk lid should follow the line of the inner taillights. Otherwise its looks too junky.

    • @richardtaylor7273
      @richardtaylor7273 3 роки тому +2

      I agree with you. Love the way it carries the Cadillac badge look to its design language. It does need the tech upgrades the 2021 brings but otherwise I love this car.

    • @goldchampagne3556
      @goldchampagne3556 3 роки тому +1

      Me too

    • @VaunShiz
      @VaunShiz 3 роки тому +1

      Y'all blind you look at it dead on from the back and it looks like a mouse that has downs

  • @hgoodman9
    @hgoodman9 3 роки тому +58

    This interior doesn’t scream luxury.

    • @CalvinHikes
      @CalvinHikes 3 роки тому +14

      It barely screams Mazda

    • @bobbowie9350
      @bobbowie9350 3 роки тому +7

      For a supposed luxury brand its a good gen behind, maybe 2

    • @pontiacGXPfan
      @pontiacGXPfan 3 роки тому +6

      It's the cheapest Cad sedan they currently offer. What do you expect?

    • @jimmehp2748
      @jimmehp2748 3 роки тому +10

      ​@@pontiacGXPfan I expect better than this. GM is putting more effort into their Chevy interiors even.

    • @pontiacGXPfan
      @pontiacGXPfan 3 роки тому +4

      @@jimmehp2748 In the Suburban and Tahoe maybe, but not so much everywhere else

  • @danielc3321
    @danielc3321 3 роки тому +5

    Saw a burnt orange one at my local dealer. That color is awesome. Tired of luxe brands offering 17 different greys.

  • @tri3pleagent
    @tri3pleagent 3 роки тому +62

    That car could be something special with a little more effort in the interior.

    • @wassha09
      @wassha09 3 роки тому +3

      I totally agree with that.

    • @sunnyvalentino
      @sunnyvalentino 3 роки тому +5

      And the hideous rear bangle butt. The CT5V is just a no brainer upgrade, u get a much better motor, interior and exterior. You still get the great handling I hear.

    • @Stressless2023
      @Stressless2023 3 роки тому +3

      @@sunnyvalentino I hated the rear of this car when I 1st saw it too. Now I just "kinda" don't like it. In a few months it might just look okay lol.

    • @sunnyvalentino
      @sunnyvalentino 3 роки тому

      @@Stressless2023 lo.l. I can understand that. The 5-V is such a looker tho...

    • @rubennajera6735
      @rubennajera6735 3 роки тому

      So then this should be a Chevy.... I’m thinking of the concept cars they unveiled at the LA Auto show in 2013/2014... I think it was the code 130R

  • @Sacapuntas69
    @Sacapuntas69 3 роки тому +43

    Engine gets smaller, Cadillac emblem gets bigger!

  • @dtay8913
    @dtay8913 3 роки тому +16

    This year, I'm thankful for the redline team

  • @camlife6930
    @camlife6930 3 роки тому +5

    The seats are surprisingly nice looking. Very premium IMO

  • @willthorson4543
    @willthorson4543 3 роки тому +3

    I think it looks better than most cars in it's class.

  • @thelastsamurai5583
    @thelastsamurai5583 3 роки тому +1

    It’s weird how u can’t buy all the cars from this channel but still U want to see all the cars they show...bravo to this channel

  • @stephonathancheeto
    @stephonathancheeto 3 роки тому +3

    This is the most honest review of the CT4 I've seen yet. Thank you guys for keeping it real

    • @VaunShiz
      @VaunShiz 3 роки тому

      No matt Farah's is lol

  • @cywoods60
    @cywoods60 3 роки тому +3

    Always the best reviews

  • @briannavarrete49
    @briannavarrete49 3 роки тому +19

    1:47 Sofyan:"it now has a
    *///t i m e t r a v e l///* 10 speed automatic transmission"

  • @JeffKing310
    @JeffKing310 3 роки тому

    Very comprehensive review - thanks !

  • @gregstacy4498
    @gregstacy4498 3 роки тому +12

    Caddy putting in that work

    • @JDMSwervo2001
      @JDMSwervo2001 3 роки тому +9

      They need to work on the interiors

    • @gregstacy4498
      @gregstacy4498 3 роки тому

      True

    • @mybro727
      @mybro727 3 роки тому +1

      @@JDMSwervo2001 The first manufacturer to develop a OLED display infotainment system is Cadillac. Every 2021 model Cadillac get wireless Android Auto/Apple CarPlay as standard equipment. Fully reconfigurable digital 12.3-inch LCD displays are now available on even their entry level products like this CT4 for 2021 model year. The infotainment system has improved dramatically. There’s always room for improvement so I agree there’s more work to be done.

  • @jamesoakes4869
    @jamesoakes4869 3 роки тому

    Always great information

  • @jonesjones7057
    @jonesjones7057 3 роки тому +17

    Looking forward to the refresh in 2022 with the twin turbo 2 cylinder and CVT!

  • @CardiffGiant100
    @CardiffGiant100 3 роки тому +1

    I didn’t like the CT4 until I had one as a loaner. It was the “sport” model with the 2.0 turbo and I liked it much more than I thought I would.
    I can’t wait to drive the Blackwing with a manual!

  • @Circean13
    @Circean13 3 роки тому +1

    Where did you get the rainbow shoe laces??

  • @csharp57
    @csharp57 2 роки тому +3

    All of the visual parts he finds "boring or plain" is exactly how I want my next car. I've been looking for a "sleeper" car. I want to stay off the cops radar yet have the ability to put a smile on my face when I step on the gas. I'm a quiet kind of guy so I don't want a loud exhaust drawing attention
    I think I found my next car

  • @Nestle245
    @Nestle245 3 роки тому +54

    So they devalued the V and the Blackwing is what the V used to be? Interesting

    • @pontiacGXPfan
      @pontiacGXPfan 3 роки тому +10

      Mercedes did it to the AMG
      BMW did it to the M

    • @Nestle245
      @Nestle245 3 роки тому +5

      @@pontiacGXPfan Not really with BMW because the M is still top of the line. They have M sport, M performance, then the original M to distinguish. With this they kept the same name but depowered it altogether and created a new name to replace what it once was.

    • @mybro727
      @mybro727 3 роки тому +2

      @@Nestle245 What’s the difference? Last generation V-Sport Cadillacs received the same “V” logos as the high performance variations. The lower tier AMG models receive the same badging as high performance AMG variants. Same with BMW. So what’s the difference? They’re ALL “devaluing” the names of their performance divisions, the only difference is now Cadillac has done it and suddenly it’s a problem.
      Audi is one of few that distinctly separates them with “S-line”, “S”, and “RS”.

    • @Nestle245
      @Nestle245 3 роки тому +1

      @@mybro727 This isn't a V Sport, it's a V. If it was a V sport then it'll make sense but it's a V. This car's spec's are closer to the V sport than it is a V, but they discontinued the name "V Sport" and just called it "V" which is backwards because it performs like a V sport and not a V. That's like a BMW M downgrading it's specs to an "M performance" and still naming it M and not M performance.

    • @hellkitty1014
      @hellkitty1014 3 роки тому +2

      Naming a car a M340i or E53 AMG is certainly devaluing.

  • @MrWongnawa
    @MrWongnawa 3 роки тому +18

    Would love to see this compared against other non European compact luxury too. Especially the g70 and is300.

    • @VaunShiz
      @VaunShiz 3 роки тому

      I'll save you the wait , both those cars are better than this lol

    • @closg9309
      @closg9309 2 роки тому +1

      IS300 is slow ass Sh1t, so is the IS350.
      G70 3.3t is fast (I currently own a 2020 3.3t) previous car was IS350.
      The G70 transmission sucks and so does the Lexus.
      Haven’t Driven the CADDY

    • @ajf5745
      @ajf5745 Місяць тому

      @@closg9309 the 3rd gen is350 is slower, but the 2nd gen one is not slow. It could do 0-60 in 4.8 seconds

  • @goodlife1500
    @goodlife1500 3 роки тому +1

    I like it. Very different from any other sedans out there.

  • @nikolasschefold8035
    @nikolasschefold8035 2 роки тому

    Great car money for the buck!! Love The CT4's alpha platform! handling and feel is amazing!

  • @vsar1938
    @vsar1938 3 роки тому +29

    Lets see how it sounds ::
    ***sad engine groans***

    • @sietafak
      @sietafak 3 роки тому

      Very sad...like a blender ;)

    • @James-May
      @James-May 3 роки тому

      @@sietafak A dying blender...

    • @csharp57
      @csharp57 2 роки тому

      I love it!! My town is starting to crack down on loud exhausts. This is perfect

  • @halfwaydecentvehicles
    @halfwaydecentvehicles 3 роки тому

    Yes keep Rockin it
    Redline

  • @wilbert-oppegard
    @wilbert-oppegard 3 роки тому

    Hey man, I would like to see if you could include fuel injection type on the engine option description part, I'm curious to know if direct, or port, or both. For every review not just this one, I know toyota sold rights to they're dual setup so I'm curious to know what manufacturers are using it yet or they're own, thanks

    • @bmshaven
      @bmshaven 2 роки тому

      extremely doubtful that this is port

  • @effa114
    @effa114 3 роки тому +4

    I think you should do full drive before you start your intros (off camera) It’s plain to see you came into this not expecting or wanting to like it. But after driving it your tone changed a lot. It’s a pattern I’ve noticed in your recent videos.

  • @lrod8692
    @lrod8692 2 роки тому

    Would you take this over a Type S?

  • @treylennon4858
    @treylennon4858 3 роки тому +17

    The interior would be nice... in a Chevy.

    • @theodavis9778
      @theodavis9778 3 роки тому +1

      @Trey Lennon: Ooooh, That was harsh!!

    • @e.a.p3174
      @e.a.p3174 3 роки тому

      you are right, it looks like something out of 90's Lumina

  • @justinthaw-bolton3142
    @justinthaw-bolton3142 3 роки тому +1

    Great video as usual. I don’t understand why certain car companies are getting rid of there 6 cylinder engines like Honda.

  • @w41duvernay
    @w41duvernay 2 роки тому

    I wouldlike to know if Alex would take this or a ATS v instead, and why.

  • @hornetkiller4
    @hornetkiller4 3 роки тому

    will you review the diesel escalade

  • @ozahmed4523
    @ozahmed4523 3 роки тому

    I think it looks beautiful!

  • @weirdshibainu
    @weirdshibainu 3 роки тому +52

    Cadillac has suffered from an identity crisis for 20 years ...

    • @mybro727
      @mybro727 3 роки тому +2

      Please explain this...lol

    • @DaddyDan77
      @DaddyDan77 3 роки тому +5

      Roughly since the introduction of the FWD sedans in the early mid 80s. Which means that Caddy has been in an identity crisis most of my life (born 1977.)
      Go back and read car comparisons and tests from the 1960s and Cadillac would be compared to Rolls Royce and kick Rolls Royce's ass most of the time. Oh how the mighty have fallen.

    • @MercOne
      @MercOne 3 роки тому

      @@DaddyDan77 Correct. Cadillac stood among the best, period. Now they're largely irrelevant beyond the Escalade.

    • @kgisabeast
      @kgisabeast 3 роки тому

      Granted they’ve always been poorly made vehicles, the problem is they aren’t as nice as the other unreliable German brands so why by a poorly made less nice Cadillac

    • @MercOne
      @MercOne 3 роки тому

      @@kgisabeast Well all German brands aren't created equal. A Mercedes, depending on year/model is proven more reliable also, but yeah that is what I've been saying for year. Even when a vehicle like this works as intended it's nothing special. That is why people buy Land Rovers, BMWs and every other unreliable brand, for when it's working, the experience is superior to something like this CT4 or any Cadillac. The Escalade is their only bright spot right now.

  • @paulcondie2520
    @paulcondie2520 3 роки тому +5

    Wish it had the 3.6 v6 like the ats. A better exhaust note. Love the look. If it handles like the magna ride in my ats premium with performance pkg it's a win, should be better with the upgraded mag ride. Will see as I plan to test one soon. I'm probably gonna be getting the ct5v, we will see........ Lol

  • @XZAKLY99
    @XZAKLY99 3 роки тому +3

    Im so confused with the announcement of them going all electric. Are we getting electric versions of these or are they gonna axe them like they always do to their good models? (*cough cough* CT6)

  • @ddtalaski
    @ddtalaski 3 роки тому

    Thanks Sofyan. No complaints from me regarding your review. I did note that the mini-V managed to get a few chuckles out of you. I'm looking forward to a full cackle when the Blackwing version comes out (please, please pull some strings to get a tester with the manual trans!). Also, you gave the exhaust note a major pass - sounded like a lawnmower to me! :-)

  • @kaibaumgartner7721
    @kaibaumgartner7721 3 роки тому +5

    4:33 the sound of a kazoo with a turbo 😄, I wouldn’t call that beefy

    • @VaunShiz
      @VaunShiz 3 роки тому

      Beefy as in it's large , 2.7L is about as big as a 4 cyl gets

  • @guizarbg
    @guizarbg 3 роки тому +5

    The Genesis G70 was not mentioned that is also RWD or AWD and offers better value, performance, tech and warranty. It should be a much better choice.

    • @hermannparkhomenko1166
      @hermannparkhomenko1166 3 роки тому

      genesis isn't a competitor of this car, its more like competitor to other Korean brands.

  • @AllStars2525
    @AllStars2525 3 роки тому

    With your high standards, if you like this, that says a lot! I'm debating about going back to a sports sedan from a crossover and this might be the one.

  • @krasnaludek298
    @krasnaludek298 2 роки тому

    Such a nice car - Soyfan know with these Cadillac. 👍🏻

  • @Retiredmco
    @Retiredmco 3 роки тому +6

    Sofyan at 9:25 AND 15:00 you said 8 sp automatic transmission! Bro you having flashbacks lol! It's a 10 speed transmission lol. Your editor didn't whooops the 9:25 misquote.

  • @paulcondie2520
    @paulcondie2520 3 роки тому

    Beautiful car

  • @saimafaisal6144
    @saimafaisal6144 3 роки тому +6

    Can we see an S-class review on this channel, we love to watch

  • @nickwilczynski3684
    @nickwilczynski3684 3 роки тому

    That engine sounds like our Ninja blender.... Whooooooo.... :( Glad you turned the hazard lights on, MotorWeek style!

  • @Natethegreat200c
    @Natethegreat200c 3 роки тому

    My Chrysler 200 did that rev hang thing when I was parked before it scared the shit out of me.

  • @phat-b6771
    @phat-b6771 3 роки тому +3

    0-60 in 4.5 is actually equivalent to a dodge rt, for a daily drive it’s actually a pretty good car

    • @bmshaven
      @bmshaven 2 роки тому +1

      What R/T from Dodge prints a 4.5 0-60?

    • @phat-b6771
      @phat-b6771 2 роки тому +1

      @@bmshaven 4.8 challenger rt close enough

  • @Tully3674
    @Tully3674 3 роки тому

    About 20 yrs ago, 60 Minutes reported that 11% of the average cost of most GM cars (back then I think the average cost was $27,600 based on cars sold during a calendar year), is attributed towards UAW concessions. This may be one reason why as a value preposition, similar Acura, Lexus, Audi, Mercedes cars have the upper hand. If the MSRP on a CT4-V is $52K and an Acura TLX (w/ SH-AWD) is $48.8,..... Same for a C-Class ($48.6), Lexus ES350 F Sport ($46.9) or a loaded Audi A4 ($42K with AWD). I like everything the Caddy has to offer. But from a value perspective,...

  • @tombolinorest.6827
    @tombolinorest.6827 3 роки тому

    This car in person is very nice.

  • @treylennon4858
    @treylennon4858 3 роки тому +4

    The engine sounds like an angry blender

  • @Southfloridelphia
    @Southfloridelphia 3 роки тому

    I am glad there is no flat bottom steering wheel. I really don't see the point. It just makes it so the wheel won't slide smoothly through your hand while driving around.

  • @steve11377
    @steve11377 3 роки тому +1

    The problem they are having is marketing. Cadillac should have kept V for Track edition and kept Vsport for sport upgrade. They are confusing everyone by saying Vsport = V now and
    V = Blackwing. People are not invested enough to know that change. The new Cadillac V = Vsport = Audi S line = BMW M200/300/400 series etc... For a Vsport I think the car is fine!

  • @lucascarreviews
    @lucascarreviews 3 роки тому +22

    I think the ATS-V is better.

    • @devn3813
      @devn3813 3 роки тому

      The ats v had 140 more horsepower

    • @djghostflorence1911
      @djghostflorence1911 3 роки тому +3

      Correct why buy a half ass car

    • @wagrj5738
      @wagrj5738 3 роки тому +2

      Don't say that, is you say this and gm see it, next generation of cadillac's compact sport sedan will be on a front wheel drive platform.

    • @lucascarreviews
      @lucascarreviews 3 роки тому +2

      @@wagrj5738 GM isn’t going to look at some random dudes comment.

    • @wagrj5738
      @wagrj5738 3 роки тому +1

      @@lucascarreviews gm asked sofyan to make a video for their newest product, which means they will definitely read it

  • @62pumas
    @62pumas 3 роки тому

    genesia g70 lexus is350 rsport?

  • @4406bbldb
    @4406bbldb 3 роки тому

    That's perfect for me. I don't even have a car but this is swell.

  • @icecold8974
    @icecold8974 3 роки тому

    This is similar to what lexus did with the ISF, F- sport. This is like a V-sport, confusing to say the least. It makes good power, has good fit and finish, I hate the rear, but love the CT5V. With bolts-ons and a good tune, shouldn't be hard to see 400whp.

  • @bobbowie9350
    @bobbowie9350 3 роки тому +6

    8:34 those 2 knobs. Cant un see that lol

  • @richki.24
    @richki.24 3 роки тому

    good torque

  • @richki.24
    @richki.24 3 роки тому

    shame they didn't include this powertrain in the current Camaro ... I'm kinda liking this CT4-V

  • @SurelyYewJest
    @SurelyYewJest 3 роки тому

    Sofyan is thinking "GOD DAMNIT! shut those birds the FUCK UP!"

  • @wesgrooms941
    @wesgrooms941 3 роки тому +21

    As a viewer, this interior doesn’t look to be any nicer in quality or design than that of a Nissan.

    • @sasothestrategizer
      @sasothestrategizer 3 роки тому +8

      I agree with you. In my mind it just seems that Cadillac is just trying to get by. They have to change people’s perception. I know that Cadillac still shares parts with GM. You can make the exterior look good, but I personally appreciate a well crafted interior.

    • @buytheredcar
      @buytheredcar 3 роки тому +2

      Exactly

    • @sopwithsnoopy8779
      @sopwithsnoopy8779 3 роки тому +1

      More like the new Mazdas, to me at least.

    • @mustasheolll2020
      @mustasheolll2020 3 роки тому

      @@sopwithsnoopy8779 it’s so ugly and dated looking. Those gauges look straight out of 2014, embarrassing for GM.

  • @johnhenrymcmahon6878
    @johnhenrymcmahon6878 3 роки тому +2

    I love this handsome little sports sedan. My favorite in the segment, no doubt.

  • @MB-ub5ns
    @MB-ub5ns 10 місяців тому +1

    why do you say the interior is basic? It has metal buttons, thick steering wheel, nice infotainment, premium sound, and leather.

  • @yahtadi5152
    @yahtadi5152 3 роки тому

    Id buy it

  • @sully3900
    @sully3900 3 роки тому +1

    $52K is a little steep for that car. Although I like it I think it’s more in the $45K price range. I would also prefer the AWD model. Great review 👊🏻

  • @garrylogan5995
    @garrylogan5995 3 роки тому

    Error. The LT-1, LT-4 engines from the Nineties into the early 2000's, depending on the car model and engine options from GM cars in which the engine options were chosen during ordering a vehicle.

  • @caglioso
    @caglioso 3 роки тому +22

    That interior is incredibly disappointing. Major low effort from Caddy and GM yet again. Non-luxury brands offer nicer and more modern looking interiors. Hell the new Sonata’s interior is nicer than this.

    • @pontiacGXPfan
      @pontiacGXPfan 3 роки тому

      See what 50k will buy you at the BMW store

    • @caglioso
      @caglioso 3 роки тому +6

      @@pontiacGXPfan who said anything about a bmw? A bad interior is a bad interior. You don’t need to compare to a bimmer to see that.

    • @pontiacGXPfan
      @pontiacGXPfan 3 роки тому +5

      @@caglioso people act like Cadillac is the only luxury brand that has ever built a cheap interior. German brands intentionally cheap out so they can upsell you to pay for something more expensive

    • @caglioso
      @caglioso 3 роки тому +5

      @@pontiacGXPfan I don’t see what one has to do with the other. This isn’t a comparison with German brands.

    • @92ASC
      @92ASC 3 роки тому +2

      @@pontiacGXPfan a $50k BMW will still have a much nicer interior space. This Caddy's interior is a joke.

  • @Enforcer_WJDE
    @Enforcer_WJDE 3 роки тому +4

    Would be a sweet alternative if you could buy one over here in Germanistan. Could be mistaken for a Peugeot though because of the similar DLRs.

  • @nfugitt89
    @nfugitt89 3 роки тому

    I like the looks and I like the idea of a three tier setup. But the interior man...I’d honestly rather just save my money and get an Accord

  • @w41duvernay
    @w41duvernay Рік тому +1

    MAYBE cadillac should have kept the 2.0l from the ATS and turned up the boost for the ct4, because it already made 282 hp and didn't sound like crap.

  • @chrisak49
    @chrisak49 3 роки тому +1

    Kinda dumb how they are trying to say this CT4 competes with CLA/A3 when it’s 10 inches longer. Nope. It should be marketed as a 3 Series competitor that costs a lot less.

  • @shopwithaaron
    @shopwithaaron 3 роки тому +1

    So right about the rear end design....not good! Thx Sofyan

  • @sunnyvalentino
    @sunnyvalentino 3 роки тому +1

    I'm looking at a Caddy as a next car. This car is for drivers like me, but I just cant part with my dollars when the CT5-V is just a far superior package (interior, exterior, engine) without handling compromises for a 5K or so more. I really dont like the way the rear looks here, its 4 cylinder and the interior is drab.

  • @Xtragicfever
    @Xtragicfever 3 роки тому

    No sun roof?

  • @Djevan41598
    @Djevan41598 3 роки тому

    Can they make the CT4 with a manual

  • @iamhawkeye3162
    @iamhawkeye3162 3 роки тому +2

    It looks like a late 2000’s Camry from the side lol.

    • @bobbowie9350
      @bobbowie9350 3 роки тому +1

      Yup. I have one. Still going strong

  • @vomErsten
    @vomErsten 3 роки тому +1

    The Alfa Romeo Giulia is another rear-biased option competing in the same price and similar performance points. Not that I'm endorsing it, just pointing it out.

  • @matthewmarone9690
    @matthewmarone9690 3 роки тому +18

    Over 50k for this???? What a joke.. Lol

    • @yes8032
      @yes8032 3 роки тому +4

      Nah good deal for me the car looks beautiful and feels luxurious

    • @buytheredcar
      @buytheredcar 3 роки тому +2

      Generic motors

    • @irishuwould5185
      @irishuwould5185 3 роки тому +3

      I’d give maybe 15k for it with that cute little 4 banger

    • @joshlovepopcorn
      @joshlovepopcorn 3 роки тому +6

      What do you expect a luxury car with 300+ hp? Were not in 2010 anymore you idiot. Go buy a civic si for 30k and get 200hp lol

    • @AjaniJohnson
      @AjaniJohnson 3 роки тому +2

      its a luxury brand lol everything isn't going to be 20k anymore yo

  • @ericmotion4488
    @ericmotion4488 3 роки тому

    It's not the best sounding exhaust note, but it sounds just a tad better than that 2018 Buick Regal GS from a few years back.

    • @mrissiah22
      @mrissiah22 Рік тому

      Delete the exhaust and it'll sound wayyyyy better

  • @willkmoorman
    @willkmoorman 3 роки тому

    I don’t understand why this competes with the A3, CLA, and 2 series gran coupe but not the c300, 3 series or Lexus IS when it is literally THE SAME SIZE as those but cheaper. Same goes for the CT5 with the 5 series, e class, etc. Why are these cadillacs put into the lower classes when they are obviously bigger?

  • @wagrj5738
    @wagrj5738 3 роки тому +2

    I miss the ats-v

  • @SR-pv4ix
    @SR-pv4ix 3 роки тому

    Nice

  • @digitaldoc100
    @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому +3

    Too much truck engine DNA in that turbo 4. However, would like to see it make its way to the XT4.

  • @tripledelight8104
    @tripledelight8104 3 роки тому +2

    Beautiful car 😍😍

  • @freedomvan2970
    @freedomvan2970 3 роки тому

    That conversation after the videographer gets out of the car after revving it is the most "stop taking to me" interaction I've ever heard 🤣🤣🤣

  • @58631061
    @58631061 2 роки тому

    M340i rivals ?

  • @terrancesneed3757
    @terrancesneed3757 3 роки тому +1

    If only Cadillac put as much effort in interior design as they do exterior design. With mainstream brands moving upmarket each year, Cadillac needs to do better. A mazda 6 signature makes a better impression

  • @mikeharris7261
    @mikeharris7261 3 роки тому +5

    19inch wheels should be standard on this thing also a sunroof

  • @360milliondollars
    @360milliondollars 3 роки тому +2

    I thought Genesis also had RWD......with more bells and whistles on the interior......They come out with a super version they got them all beat in my book.

  • @darrell9616
    @darrell9616 3 роки тому +2

    This car feels a little too compromised to meet a specific price point. Maybe the driving experience is the wow factor with this car because, otherwise, it does nothing for me. The pricing seems consistent with the competition. MB is simply ridiculous. I don't know why anyone would spend 60K on a CLA-35.

  • @mustasheolll2020
    @mustasheolll2020 3 роки тому +3

    The interior looks like it belongs in 2014

  • @ccvr6
    @ccvr6 3 роки тому +2

    That was odd how it held that rev on its own like that...

  • @clinical3300
    @clinical3300 3 роки тому +12

    It has more hp that the s3,a35and the m235i.

    • @raccs600
      @raccs600 3 роки тому +7

      So ? .... - s3 owner

    • @yes8032
      @yes8032 3 роки тому +9

      I’d get the s3

    • @mybro727
      @mybro727 3 роки тому +1

      @@yes8032 This drives circles around the S3 while simultaneously being worlds more versatile, comfortable and spacious.

    • @joecool9739
      @joecool9739 3 роки тому +3

      @@mybro727
      Lol except it will never be an Audi
      It will always be a Chevy

    • @AYouTubeChannelwithNoName
      @AYouTubeChannelwithNoName 3 роки тому +3

      @@joecool9739 And Audi will always be and still is a Volkswagen

  • @hartfischer5509
    @hartfischer5509 3 роки тому +1

    Looks beautiful. And 385 pond feet of torque is so much better than anything out there. Except Tesla. And 20/29 mpg versus 130mpge is a game changer. Hope they can make an electrified version of this Cadillac :)

  • @Goated483
    @Goated483 3 роки тому

    Get a regular ct4 light tune and it’s the same thing if not faster

  • @danr154
    @danr154 3 роки тому

    So if its ten inches longer than its competitors and still has a smaller than average trunk how is backseat legroom so small? Geez my Dodge Dart has more legroom than that. Where did all the space go?

  • @biglcjohnson
    @biglcjohnson 3 роки тому +1

    For the money I would get the top of the line G70

  • @user-yz4sn4mq2h
    @user-yz4sn4mq2h 3 роки тому +6

    Delicious‼︎‼︎

  • @rodneynasir8089
    @rodneynasir8089 3 роки тому

    I just had to google CT4 and CT5 to tell they are different cars. I must of missed the reveal of the CT4.

  • @yingtianyu4129
    @yingtianyu4129 3 роки тому

    and noone ever even attempted to hear 4-cylrs....😂