How ExxonMobil Is Planning For A Future Of EVs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 сер 2024
  • In this interview conducted for CNBC’s documentary, ExxonMobil at the Crossroads, CEO Darren Woods reveals why his company predicted that by 2040 all new passenger car sales would be electric. He also talks about the low carbon solutions ExxonMobil is investing in, climate change, governmental policy, oil demand and more in this extended interview with CNBC’s David Faber.
    » Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    » Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
    Connect with CNBC News Online
    Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
    Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedI...
    Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/Instagr...
    #cnbc
    How ExxonMobil Is Planning For A Future Of EVs

КОМЕНТАРІ • 646

  • @Knoar
    @Knoar 2 роки тому +199

    What a long advertisement

    • @jefferyjeffery1707
      @jefferyjeffery1707 2 роки тому

      Yep....!! He completely left out. That governments are also phasing heavy duty transportation fuels out also. And that as solar and wind energy develop. It will also convert water back to Hydrogen!! And that does not need oil at all!!
      In addition....40% of the corn crop is grown for the energy business... just to be used to make alcohol. Which is then blended with gasoline, to make gasohol!!!
      And as gasoline engines disappear...40% of the corn crop is not needed!!! And as such....farming is downsized. In which, farming practices itself, also accounts for almost 40% of the world's global warming games.
      I have a large farm...And am already planning to move away from growing corn. And I also used to work at the corporate level for ExxonMobil...!!!

    • @T4KKFI
      @T4KKFI 2 роки тому +4

      I swear i didn't hear MSNBC ask this CEO if he believe in a gloabal climate sustainability. Im just ready for the day everyone has to suffer. I feel the weather GA nowadays and you won't catch me having a heat stroke from wasting energy and talking. I'm a bee as realistic as possible i have umbrellas in this weather seriously. The weather is A1 though I'm not talking out there caught in that sun and it's official black people can get skin burned smfh

    • @Thelango99
      @Thelango99 2 роки тому +6

      @@T4KKFI This is CNBC, not MSNBC. I am inclined to believe Darren would be a part of driving a cost-effective way for arriving at sustainable solutions.

    • @jefferyjeffery1707
      @jefferyjeffery1707 2 роки тому +4

      @@T4KKFI Yep....👍
      Even in the midwest.....its becoming to hot to grow corn. As corn likes mid-80's temp. But pushing into the 90's is not good.

    • @Tython_
      @Tython_ 2 роки тому +1

      😂😂😂😂

  • @joejoey7272
    @joejoey7272 2 роки тому +55

    So basically this is a large advertisement for Exxon’s greenwashing campaign

    • @james3440
      @james3440 2 роки тому +1

      Your comment without proof is frankly just as bad.

    • @TheFlagUnit
      @TheFlagUnit 2 роки тому

      @@james3440 no they actively knew and denied climate change via fossil fuels

  • @petername2608
    @petername2608 2 роки тому +14

    Is this a joke

    • @jasonrock5220
      @jasonrock5220 2 роки тому

      Yes sir,
      This is the biggest joke perpetrated in American history. It’s called “man-made” global warming. The greatest guilt trip ever that was designed to increase energy costs and make people voluntarily pay more money for less energy.

  • @spiffyh
    @spiffyh 2 роки тому +148

    We already have a carbon capture system. It is called plants. But what he is talking about is an industrial carbon capture system so that they can extract MORE money from the problem they created in the first place.

    • @Patmorgan235Us
      @Patmorgan235Us 2 роки тому +20

      execpt we've dug up/pumped out trillions of tons of carbon out of the ground. it took millions of years for that carbon to be sequestered there. Plants are not sufficient.

    • @fritzstauffacher6931
      @fritzstauffacher6931 2 роки тому

      The problem they created? Lol everything you use is from fossil fuel. We got to work together not point blame on the engineering that fuels the modern world.

    • @joejoey7272
      @joejoey7272 2 роки тому

      Carbon capture is just greenwashing , it’s a way for these companies to pretend like they are doing something

    • @idontcare6662
      @idontcare6662 2 роки тому +5

      The amount of plants we currently have aren't yes, however it is effective and If we built our cities and towns to be more pedestrian friendly and left more nature in urban areas, yea it would make a big difference actually.
      Among many other things we aren't doing, it's all talking heads and nobody doing.

    • @PG-3462
      @PG-3462 2 роки тому +26

      It's not the problem that THEY created, but that WE created with our lifestyle and behaviors. You can't blame Exxon for producing something we all overconsume on a daily basis.

  • @gopalrathi9810
    @gopalrathi9810 2 роки тому +11

    Here we go again with propoganda

  • @enriqueoliveram
    @enriqueoliveram Рік тому +6

    I used to work for Exxon, now ExxonMobil, since a long time, the company has invested in investigation and new technologies, one of them is MTG, converts methanol into gasoline, methanol used to be produced from natural gas, now is going to be produced using green hydrogen, that means, a way to produce fuels directly from solar and wind energy

    • @lesliehatun2044
      @lesliehatun2044 Рік тому +1

      Where's the result? Where's the price relief? Since 1979 it all jibberish.

  • @matthewhenrysmith7498
    @matthewhenrysmith7498 2 роки тому +5

    Absence of nuclear in this conversation is telling.

    • @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
      @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 роки тому

      @@IOFLOOD “only good for baseload power” - as if that’s a problem? The problem with wind and solar is that they can’t produce consistent dnergy

    • @Son37Lumiere
      @Son37Lumiere 2 роки тому

      Nuclear has always been a dead end for a large number of reasons that always get glossed over and ignored by nuclear advocates.

  • @slimjim3229
    @slimjim3229 2 роки тому +50

    Geothermal is the most overlooked option out there. It time it gets more attention. It can help.

    • @robitmcclain6107
      @robitmcclain6107 2 роки тому +1

      DOE is investing in using enhanced geothermal using depleated gas wells.

    • @ivywhite9589
      @ivywhite9589 2 роки тому

      Nuclear power is best, but nukes are used to distract from it.

    • @ivywhite9589
      @ivywhite9589 2 роки тому

      The world has been at war for a long time, WW1 & WW2 is used to distract from that.

    • @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
      @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 роки тому +3

      Peanuts compared to potential of nuclear

    • @romeou4965
      @romeou4965 2 роки тому

      Planned Bitcoin city in El Salvador is prime example

  • @sooocheesy
    @sooocheesy 2 роки тому +56

    The (literal) blue collar shirt on this guy tells you right away that this interview was highly curated by their marketing department.

  • @johnthompson7548
    @johnthompson7548 2 роки тому +4

    Nice commercial for Exxon

  • @DanA-nl5uo
    @DanA-nl5uo 2 роки тому +9

    With all the hot air he is blowing he should look into wind power he could definitely provide the fuel for a few wind turbines in this interview alone.

  • @bru512
    @bru512 2 роки тому +9

    Dennis is predicting that ICE vehicles will be sold until 2040? Tony Seba is predicting that this will happen well before 2030.
    Dennis is hoping to fool people with Hydrogen fuel despite it's huge cost and production of CO2.
    This interview will not age well.

    • @jasonkiminseoul
      @jasonkiminseoul 2 роки тому

      ICE cars might be sold only until the 2030s in developed countries(North America, EU, China, Japan, and South Korea) but it will take some time for developing countries to catch up, so I would say 2040 is a realistic forecast.

  • @timothydevries383
    @timothydevries383 2 роки тому +6

    He's right. Everyone focuses on personal transport because that's what's easy to understand. In reality personal transport is only about 7% of global CO2 emissions.

    • @daydreamer8373
      @daydreamer8373 2 роки тому +1

      The thing is EV's are the catalyst for huge changes in how we create, store and use energy. There are massive changes coming, EV's are just the start.

    • @mozambique9113
      @mozambique9113 Рік тому

      The evolution of humans mind can make us transport without moving our bodies are more reliable and sustainable.

  • @vonBottorff
    @vonBottorff 2 роки тому +22

    If oil is truly a non-renewable resource then destroying it by burning is insane. We have no viable replacement for hydrocarbon-based plastics and other chemical products. Long-term they're more important than transportation.

    • @AnimeBeefRandoms
      @AnimeBeefRandoms 2 роки тому +3

      Not burning it and leaving it in the ground is not very useful to humans either.

    • @Thelango99
      @Thelango99 2 роки тому +8

      @@AnimeBeefRandoms The user implies prioritizing chemical production over burning for fuel.
      I agree with this approach more. Oil has so many applications that just burning it is comparatively wasteful.

    • @planefan082
      @planefan082 2 роки тому +2

      ​@@Thelango99 Exactly. Nor is burning it even profitable compared to renewable generation in most places without huge fossil fuel subsidies.

    • @Batmangutten
      @Batmangutten 2 роки тому +1

      We have more than enough oil for all the worlds plastics and petrochemicals. This would still be the case if we continued to use oil for energy throughout this century. Also, oil is renewable in the sense that all it would take to make oil is to pull the carbon back out of the air and make oil. The only downside here is that it requires enormous amounts of energy. This wouldn't be practical for energy use and we still have cheaper oil for petrochemicals and plastics which is why we aren't currently doing it. However, in the future with solar getting cheaper and new breakthroughs in fusion and geothermal, (see Quaise, Zap Energy and Helion Energy) we will for all intents and purposes have unlimited energy. Running out of petrochemicals will therefore not be a problem.

    • @eazolan
      @eazolan 2 роки тому +1

      We don't have a replacement for getting oil out of the ground. But we can get it out of the air.

  • @dagarnertn
    @dagarnertn 2 роки тому +66

    You’d almost think they’ve been hoping for the world to move beyond fossil fuels rather than actively fighting against such moves for decades.

    • @bjkarana
      @bjkarana 2 роки тому +7

      How? You can order an EV online right now. Plus, oil and natural gas are used in all kinds of everyday things, from the electricity that powers your computer, to the plastic keys you used to type your comment.

    • @trevorssillyplace
      @trevorssillyplace 2 роки тому +4

      They are probably rock hard thinking about evs. Powergrids will require more fuel to generate electricity taking into account all the power loss in transmission there probably will be more of a demand for oil lol

    • @RasakBlood
      @RasakBlood 2 роки тому +3

      @@trevorssillyplace It will be a net loss of oil use. Gas cars are very inefficient. Power plants using gas will still be more efficient and use less gas then now. And this is ignoring the massive growth of solar and wind.

    • @trevorssillyplace
      @trevorssillyplace 2 роки тому +2

      @@RasakBlood less than 5 percent of the powergrid is renewable. Increased power demand from consumers ie charging their evs will increase power demand from the power grid. If you run the numbers of how much gas is required to actually generate the 50kw to charge a tesla and the range it gets including the loss in transmission lines. It comes out to like 10 mpg about a 4th as efficient as a Honda civic. Teslas are sick but at this time ur only saving yourself money not the environment unless ur charging completly off the grid.

    • @jpcool95480
      @jpcool95480 2 роки тому +2

      @@trevorssillyplace depends on the country. A quick Wikipedia search says almost 20% of the US electricity produced is renewable. And if you add nuclear that is even more.

  • @Backseatobserver0075
    @Backseatobserver0075 2 роки тому +22

    Somebody needs to tell him it’s going to be much sooner than 2040 , considering some countries car registration last month have been as high as 70% EV .

    • @bitcoindaddy1
      @bitcoindaddy1 2 роки тому

      Most ppl dont realize the USD is pegged to crude oil (petrodollar), well...if world moving away from crude into EVs. Theres no need for world to hold USDs. Exxon revenue and emmisions is least of US problem

    • @spriteNchoke
      @spriteNchoke 2 роки тому +1

      Which countries are that? I bet only the rich developed countries. I am from a poor country where rolling blackouts are still a monthly thing. Many poor countries are like this. EVs are not viable in poor countries since no one can afford the charging stations and there are no mechanics or parts to fix the EVs. This is where Exxon will get the demand for its products to make up for the lack of demand in rich countries like the USA.

    • @bitcoindaddy1
      @bitcoindaddy1 2 роки тому

      @@spriteNchoke poor countries just need to migrate out of dollar debt...and also leap frog tech development if they choose to...developed countries will have harder time because they are source of the problem

    • @darinherrick9224
      @darinherrick9224 2 роки тому

      @@spriteNchoke You have it exactly backwards. Poor countries cannot afford gas but CAN afford solar power and other ways to generate electriity. They will find a way to charge vehicles with local charging solutions rather than imported ones. Since electrics break down less and have less parts that break they cannot afford NOT to transition to electric.

    • @darinherrick9224
      @darinherrick9224 2 роки тому

      They won't be using Teslas and first world charging stations, but it would shock me if the third world doesn't rapidly switch to solar-powered low horsepower electric vehicles of some sort with a dirt-cheap price tag.

  • @ryhol5417
    @ryhol5417 2 роки тому +13

    Why are we giving them free advertising and why isn’t this labeled as advertising?

  • @robitmcclain6107
    @robitmcclain6107 2 роки тому +30

    Is it deliberate that he left nuclear and geothermal off his list of technologies?

    • @beautifulgirl219
      @beautifulgirl219 2 роки тому +6

      Yes, because they provide real solutions today. Nuclear alone can solve the global energy need, and should be the largest solution. It takes responsibility for all the "waste" it produces.

    • @eric5901
      @eric5901 2 роки тому

      Why is Buffet buying oil???? Occidental petroleum and Chevron to be specific

    • @MrBadbonesaw
      @MrBadbonesaw 2 роки тому

      @@beautifulgirl219 It takes over 10 years to get new Nuclear plants built due to all the extra precautions. Meanwhile, China gets 10 built every year. We might as well buy energy off China as well LOL

    • @beautifulgirl219
      @beautifulgirl219 2 роки тому

      @@MrBadbonesaw The time issue doesn't change nuclear being our best option, in my opinion. I suspect that with enough motivation we could shorten the time. Small modular reactors and other approaches could help. Where there is a will, there is a way (?).

    • @MrBadbonesaw
      @MrBadbonesaw 2 роки тому

      @@beautifulgirl219 I am all for nuclear but waiting 10 years like the one in France and costing Billions of dollars hurts the payback period. Without Government assistance, it would probably take an additional 20 years for each nuclear reactor to break even. I do think we should have enough nuclear to run everything we need overnight and then during the day nuclear + solar and Wind could be recharging long-term energy storage like redux flow batteries or electrolysis to produce hydrogen and clean water desalination plants. A nuclear power plant should never have to throttle down less than 75% full power at any time besides maintenance periods. Phase-out coal and phase-out natural gas peaker plants asap.

  • @vidainvestor
    @vidainvestor 2 роки тому +1

    This company will shrink like 30% in the next 10 years

  • @user-fw1cq9py2q
    @user-fw1cq9py2q 7 місяців тому

    ExxonMobil is a great name for a corporation creating clean energy

  • @RushingRussianify
    @RushingRussianify 2 роки тому +2

    Nice ad CNBC, put a disclosure banner at the bottom next time

  • @fleshreap
    @fleshreap 2 роки тому +20

    ExxonMobil must be paying a ton for all these videos.

  • @dlewis8405
    @dlewis8405 2 роки тому +7

    I wonder if he logs in as Wayne Tracker whenever he needs to discuss climate change internally on the Exxon email system.

    • @Saiputera
      @Saiputera 2 роки тому

      AOC and Bernie Sanders is having a hard time 😂😂

  • @dgupta42
    @dgupta42 2 роки тому +6

    So much fake news in this interview.
    If you look at the world's total crude and gas production of roughly 100 mboe per year, there is no way the world needs all of that to become plastics in the future. Unless the company is also working on modifying or replacing humans to be made out of plastic, and eat and drink plastic.
    There is a fundamental reason sane people are skeptical about carbon capture ever scaling up. Why even bother producing and burning petroleum, and then spend even more capital and operating cost to capture emissions? How can that be cheaper than renewable energy that is already cheaper than just the cost of producing expensive oil & gas in the first place? Yes, we need oil & gas during the transition because it will take time to switch. We cannot just shut off the wells today. But the economic logic of the switch will move oil & gas consuming sectors away quickly. Which is why oil & gas is lobbying to stop governments and cities to act on moving away from usage like gas for heating buildings. They know they will not win the case on fair competition basis.
    We do NOT need to invest in replacing the full capacity of our old fossil fuel energy system. The man is smart enough to know that, but he cannot say it because then his company's future looks like badly burnt toast. Of no value to society or shareholders.
    Everyone knows the largest use for petroleum is transportation fuels. But, battery to wheels has higher than 85% efficiency already, compared to hardly 25-27% for tank to wheels in a gasoline car. Electricity is easily 3x more efficient in the largest oil & gas consumption market! Another large use for oil & gas is building heat. Electric heat pumps can transfer 3-5 times more heat to the building, compared to burning gas to produce 1x heat. So, you need to produce only 1/3rd to 1/5th of the energy for the same end result.
    You don't have to believe me. Look at the US Energy consumption charts from Lawrence Livermore National Lab. 67.5% of the energy consumed in the US is just wasted as rejected energy. That is more than two thirds of energy going to waste. Electrification needs to replace only the actually useful 32%! Adding another 10% losses takes it to 35% of today's energy system. That means we need more electricity in the future. But far less total primary energy in our system.
    But the best moment of this video is around 14 minutes. An Exxon Mobil Chairman & CEO says that they always understood that climate change is man-made and driven by CO2 added to the atmosphere! After claiming for years in the courts and in the public that they never knew.
    Just Wow!!

    • @De-tw7by
      @De-tw7by 2 роки тому

      Oil companies fooled the govt and people so long and kept to use kerosene lamp, now everyone realised it's time to switch from kerosene lamp to high effect and zero pollution LED lamp. It is time to dump oil and move to high efficient and less pollutant EV.

    • @osoquik4447
      @osoquik4447 2 роки тому

      You always hear about electrification this and that but no one speaks on how they will resolve the power generation needs for this type of future. FYI fossil fuels make up the majority of electricity generation in the US. Plenty of “green” examples in Europe and you see the result of going green especially during an energy crisis.
      Fossil fuels also provide the concept known as heat and power which will require a industrial sectors to completely revamp their process of creating steel, plastics, paint & etc. Easy concept on paper but who’s going foot that bill? Taxpayers, investors, governments?

    • @dgupta42
      @dgupta42 2 роки тому

      @@osoquik4447 This interview was about specifics of oil & gas demand in an electric future. Vast majority of oil goes into transportation fuels, as all data clearly shows. That demand will slowly decline over the next 15-20 years, and ExxonMobil and other oil & gas companies are just not prepared for it. The fact that other sectors like industrial manufacturing may continue to need some fossil fuels in 2040 is not disputed by most. It just doesn't do anything to save O&G from the massive demand destruction coming up in sectors like transportation and building heat.
      I agree that the decline curve will not be smooth, there will be ugly disruptions on the way. That is normal for fossil fuels. O&G markets have always been cyclical and subject to geopolitics. That's now new. Every major price boom leads to a bust and vice versa.
      Frankly, Putin's war is a gift to O&G companies at the cost of ordinary people. The extra tens of billions of Oil & Gas profits should help fund their move to clean energy. Of course, it may have the exactly opposite effect of lulling these companies into false sense of security.

  • @Michael-il5wd
    @Michael-il5wd 2 роки тому +5

    as batteries get better and cheaper, it will disrupt more than just consumer vehicles. It will change how to drive, fly and sail. I wonder if they've considered this.

    • @happyscrub
      @happyscrub 2 роки тому +1

      Batteries are not going to get cheaper. EV demand and global politics are driving up the the demand for the minerals.

  • @ninjaatheist
    @ninjaatheist 2 роки тому +17

    When carbon dioxide is stored underground in a process known as geological sequestration, it can find multiple escape pathways due to chemical reactions between carbon dioxide, water, rocks and cement from abandoned wells, according to Penn State researchers.

    • @robertlee8805
      @robertlee8805 2 роки тому

      Wishing they'd add Biofuels to their mix.

    • @rad2gnarly9
      @rad2gnarly9 2 роки тому +1

      Aw geez too bad more research can't be done

    • @ronaldgarrison8478
      @ronaldgarrison8478 2 роки тому

      It doesn't have to be perfect, nor does it have to be forever. No, that is not a fundamental barrier.

  • @william53
    @william53 2 роки тому +6

    Interview much better than CNBC Faber’s Exxon-at-the Crossrodes show. Business exists to fulfill a consumer need. That is what Exxon attempts to do each day - we are blessed to have such a thoughtful business!

    • @erikk77
      @erikk77 2 роки тому +1

      Yes, the problem is we have too many consumers. Reduce the number of consumers. That will reduce the need more toxic mining and drilling. Stop having kids.

    • @tornadosirenwednesday
      @tornadosirenwednesday Рік тому +1

      Thoughtful business??? EXXON?? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

  • @buckymoto
    @buckymoto 2 роки тому +13

    This entire interview was a massive nothing-burger. The CEO basically said they don't want to invest in greener technologies cause they don't see a need to. They think it's more economically viable to recapture carbon emissions, but don't want to commit to doing it because there aren't government incentives or demand. And their estimates that demand will be similar to '13-14 years if ALL EVs are on the road? Their profit margins are MASSIVE from Transportation and Oil Demands from Transportation... they think they're going to maintain those levels by making plastic products? Give me a break. Massive nothing burger of an interview and it boils down to "We're not changing anything."

    • @Mistro07
      @Mistro07 2 роки тому

      Go cry about it..EVs have a looooong way to go before they can replace ICE engines..the cars/tech themselves might not, but everything around them (infrastructure, cost, etc.) have a long way to go

    • @De-tw7by
      @De-tw7by 2 роки тому

      @@Mistro07 it is very easy to replace ICE with EV. Oil companies where fooling us until Tesla and Chinese govt. demonstrated it. World largest population China is already on EV.

    • @thomasgibson1028
      @thomasgibson1028 2 роки тому +1

      Best comment I’ve seen here yet.

    • @Son37Lumiere
      @Son37Lumiere 2 роки тому

      @@Mistro07 ICE is out, seems like you and the rest of the oil industry lackeys are the ones crying about it. The infrastructure doesn't need nearly as much upgrading as the pro oil propaganda wants you to believe.

    • @Son37Lumiere
      @Son37Lumiere 2 роки тому +1

      And people are starting to move away from plastic as well as they're realizing it's yet another pollution heavy product of the disgusting oil industry of which only 5% actually gets recycled.

  • @progressreason_1
    @progressreason_1 2 роки тому +3

    Exxon is waking up to reality

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 4 місяці тому

    PHYSICS! CHEMISTRY! MATHEMATICS! COMPUTER SCIENCE!

  • @sepase2676
    @sepase2676 2 роки тому +1

    EVs are not the future, public transit and high speed trains are.

  • @williamharding9753
    @williamharding9753 2 роки тому +22

    ExxonMobil need to put their profits into building wind and solar farms

    • @romeou4965
      @romeou4965 2 роки тому +5

      But CEO clearly said XOM is not in the power generation industry. Instead they manipulate hydrocarbons.

    • @shadfletcher6815
      @shadfletcher6815 2 роки тому

      No they do not.....unlike your suggestions...nuclear makes power 24 hours a day

    • @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
      @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 роки тому +3

      Not sure if you’re aware but the wind and sun aren’t always able to be harvested

    • @bjkarana
      @bjkarana 2 роки тому +2

      That's like selling a car which starts 100% of the time (hydrocarbons), for a car that starts 50% of the time (wind and solar). Dumb...

    • @tomblandford
      @tomblandford 2 роки тому +1

      Why would they want to do that? That industry is very competitive and they have no knowledge. And they are not a charity.

  • @Josh-sx7wn
    @Josh-sx7wn 2 роки тому +3

    I think they know something we don’t… like that we are running out of oil

    • @RandomUserOnTheInterWebs
      @RandomUserOnTheInterWebs 2 роки тому

      Who exactly doesn't know this?

    • @romeou4965
      @romeou4965 2 роки тому +1

      Smart and fast move by Elon musk

    • @Boxagami
      @Boxagami 2 роки тому

      No, that's a total lie they keep telling about running out. Oil fields that ran dry, many filled back up! The rockafellar criminal family coined the term "fossil fuels" to raise the cost. Oil is abiotic and they keep lying about it.

    • @Josh-sx7wn
      @Josh-sx7wn 2 роки тому

      @@RandomUserOnTheInterWebs people with they head in the sand 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @petertatt
    @petertatt 2 роки тому +5

    Bio-fuels and carbon capture? Really! So depressing. We will never get to net zero if guys like this get their way.

  • @Gary-ec4lc
    @Gary-ec4lc 2 роки тому +1

    Red Flag 🚩 here

  • @fluxfaze
    @fluxfaze 2 роки тому

    Exxon-Mobile. Destroyers of Earth.

  • @masaharumorimoto4761
    @masaharumorimoto4761 2 роки тому +5

    Fantastic interview, really enjoyed this one!!!

  • @realdeal139
    @realdeal139 2 роки тому +3

    Exxon ceo is a sharp guy.

  • @jjerome8867
    @jjerome8867 2 роки тому +2

    What a leader for XOM! Vision plus…

  • @bjkarana
    @bjkarana 2 роки тому +2

    EVs don't have point source pollution and that is good for local air quality, but people also need to understand that EV manufacture emits a lot more CO2 than making combustion engine vehicles, so the lifetime savings in CO2 (as of 2022) is not substantial. EV carbon footprints will likely improve over time, but the world still needs quite a lot of oil and natural gas to, ironically, enable the transition away from oil and natural gas.

    • @TrevorStandley
      @TrevorStandley 2 роки тому

      I think I saw a calculation for this and it's really not that different. And can be done better than ice cars in many circumstances.

    • @MrBadbonesaw
      @MrBadbonesaw 2 роки тому

      We should probably be looking to transition to electric mopeds or trikes instead of EV Cars and EV SUVs/Trucks. Less traffic, less wear and tear on roads and same mileage for 1/10 battery size. Not practical for long distances but for 85% of my commuting it would be a good use.

    • @TrevorStandley
      @TrevorStandley 2 роки тому

      @@MrBadbonesaw There are also kids to consider. And the transportation of stuff, so the roads will always have to support cars and trucks.

  • @kingrichard7935
    @kingrichard7935 2 роки тому

    75% gas Vehicles 20% Electric vehicle oil is the economics of the world ,

  • @williamhoffer9277
    @williamhoffer9277 2 роки тому +1

    Just remember that it wasn't the head of an oil company that invented the internal combustion engine, or the automobile!

    • @gmv0553
      @gmv0553 2 роки тому

      The only reason internal combustion engines were invented was because of the lack of battery technology in the early 1900's. That technology is here today and will improve in the future and there is no better time to start the change today!

    • @mozambique9113
      @mozambique9113 Рік тому

      but it takes the head of a company, to make money out of it.💸💲💰

  • @johnzhao3086
    @johnzhao3086 2 роки тому +3

    I like the snake oil he’s selling. I’m gonna buy some!

  • @MakoKong
    @MakoKong 2 роки тому +20

    After seeing how greedy they are with what they're doing with gas prices, I'm looking forward to seeing them lose billions when EVs take over.

    • @ari_is_faded8611
      @ari_is_faded8611 2 роки тому +5

      You think when gas prices were cheaper by about 3X under Trump the energy companies were any less greedy? Were they not greedy when gas prices were 2.5 a gallon?

    • @LordSandwichII
      @LordSandwichII 2 роки тому +1

      You think they won't figure out a way to make EVs an advantage for them?

    • @Boxagami
      @Boxagami 2 роки тому

      So, you want a fossil fuel built EV car, that's powered by fossil fuels. LMAO You know NOTHING about manufacturing and it's simply NOT GOING TO HAPPEN until the power grid funds trillions in upgrades to charge all these stupid EV's.

    • @NHseacoast
      @NHseacoast 2 роки тому +1

      Yah we’re Does the electricity to power these EVS come from? Nuclear!. Probably Wind ? Nope solar ? Doubtful !

    • @Son37Lumiere
      @Son37Lumiere 2 роки тому

      @@LordSandwichII Even if they buy power companies and start jacking up the rates you can get your own solar system.

  • @henryshen1156
    @henryshen1156 2 роки тому +4

    We need energy in all forms. Fossil fuel has high energy density. Until we find replacement, we have to rely on this source of energy while building more green energy plants. Instead of blaming the oil company, people should devote their focus on education and be prepared to advance in science and technology. Without people devoting their career in science and technology, Green energy will not come by wishful thinking and bashing oil company.

    • @Alexander_MD
      @Alexander_MD 2 роки тому

      Doesn't help our future when children say they want to be influencers, gamers, or tiktokers lol.

  • @DSS-jj2cw
    @DSS-jj2cw 2 роки тому +4

    I will believe it when i see it.

  • @mrswjr4061
    @mrswjr4061 2 роки тому +1

    The oil companies aren’t going to “take a hit” because they will fueling the power stations that generate the electricity everyone will have to plug into. 😂

    • @gmv0553
      @gmv0553 2 роки тому

      And that is why Aptera will succeed in their solar mobility movement!

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 9 місяців тому

    Have you ever considered utilizing "dirty money" to help finance corporate infrastructure? How does one define "dirty money," that which is derived from cocaine trafficking?

  • @rlcsite
    @rlcsite 2 роки тому +2

    It might not come about soon, but it has to work. Some areas will continue to need fuel for power for a really long time.

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 4 місяці тому

    Isn’t their a place for electrification, gasoline, and alternative fuels so that when one source is exhausted the city dwellers don’t die of Mass starvation and societies fall apart?

  • @SaltySparrow
    @SaltySparrow 2 роки тому +2

    Yeah and this is why gas companies are cranking up prices. It’s the last gasp of air before they switch over

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 4 місяці тому

    Is the current Catholic Church liable for the actions of Cortez in South America despite drastic policy change?

  • @pablosel3857
    @pablosel3857 2 роки тому +15

    This company is only focused on oil and gas prices and cares about nothing else. The company is extremely traditional in the way they do things and that's partly because they've never been challenged with trying to find ways to cope with financial struggle. Since all they do is extract crude from the ground and then refine it, and that's how it's always been, they were never pushed into changing their mindset. So if they cannot do simple things like automating easy processes or conducting IT implementations, why should I believe these guys will ever shift their ways of producing? Plus they have a perverse ideology. They see employees as part od the cost equation, so regardless of your merit within the organisation, they will dump you if they have to or simply let you go no questions asked. They do the same with inflation, postponing as much as they can every possible salary adjustment, and with other regulations as well. If a company behaves terrible with its employees, I do not really think this company has any good intentions at all.

    • @Saiputera
      @Saiputera 2 роки тому +5

      Using Electric cars ain't gonna solve climate change lmao

    • @pablosel3857
      @pablosel3857 2 роки тому

      @@Saiputera What does that even have to do with what I said? I dont know about that, though, really.

  • @glennschaub560
    @glennschaub560 2 роки тому +1

    When did Exxon Mobile get involved with producing electrical power plants ?

  • @75robg
    @75robg 2 роки тому

    That is a joke. If there's nothing but electric vehicles by 2040, then ExxonMobil will be out of business. There's no way they could replicate their numbers in 2013 & 2014, that's impossible.

    • @MrBadbonesaw
      @MrBadbonesaw 2 роки тому

      Maybe they could focus on rocket fuel for Space X LOL

  • @ebubeawachie
    @ebubeawachie 2 роки тому

    I like how the seats look deliberately uncomfortable to keep both the interviewer and interviewee on their toes. 😂😂😂

  • @marmie3382
    @marmie3382 Рік тому

    GREAT CEO , A PATRIOT YES

  • @JasonKing247
    @JasonKing247 Рік тому

    There’s a demand for carbon in the air because the technology hasn’t progressed enough to meet the current demand… is this an argument or a statement on how they’re not helping the situation.

  • @stevebuss69
    @stevebuss69 2 роки тому

    The problem with oil and extraction is not just climate change.

  • @florantemanuel5000
    @florantemanuel5000 2 роки тому +3

    One thing not mentioned... there is tech in its infancy called gyrotron millimeter wave drilling which aims to help drill at depths past what mechanical drills can do. That will lead to optimized geothermal systems that could supply electricity to the next generation power grid. I think ExxonMobil will partner with one of the companies developing them and that will be their next carbon free business model

  • @MyUniversalUniversity
    @MyUniversalUniversity 2 роки тому +5

    A few things. Whatever this guy is saying does not mean that it’s true and does not mean that they are at a point where he’s says they are!
    The other issue is is that he thinks they are going to be able to work with energy creation. It’s transitioning extremely quick. California had two days in the last month and a half that were 100% renewable, as far as energy for the state. Renewable energy for homes, and companies is going way faster then EV’s.
    I am skeptical, and I don’t think they are smart enough to believe in 2040 all cars sold may be electric.
    The last issue of Gas is going to run out at something.

  • @TRUCKERTHANGZ
    @TRUCKERTHANGZ 2 роки тому +1

    This is the reason gas prices are high

  • @jamesmaduabuchi6100
    @jamesmaduabuchi6100 2 роки тому +2

    The stock market has been a really tough one this past year, but I watched an interview on CNBC where the anchor kept mentioning " TERESA JENSEN WHITE ". This prompted me to get in touch with her, and from March 2022 till now we have been working together, and I can now boast of $540,000 in my trading portfolio.

    • @wilsonjudson1650
      @wilsonjudson1650 2 роки тому

      That's right, getting in touch with a consultant during the pandemic was how I was able to scale through the crazy stock downtrend.

    • @dorissteve912
      @dorissteve912 2 роки тому

      That's massive. Can you please connect me with your personal broker, I would love to work with her

    • @jamesmaduabuchi6100
      @jamesmaduabuchi6100 2 роки тому

      Like I said previously, her name is TERESA JENSEN WHITE , and you can reach her via her website.

    • @jamesmaduabuchi6100
      @jamesmaduabuchi6100 2 роки тому

      Just run a search on her name, and you would see all you need.

    • @dorissteve912
      @dorissteve912 2 роки тому

      thanks for the info . Found her website and it impressive

  • @bocanjm215
    @bocanjm215 2 роки тому +6

    I'm glad they're changing their view on green energy. Wind turbines, solar panels, batteries, plastics, etc are all made using oil. Their business isn't going anywhere.

  • @TedTabaka
    @TedTabaka 2 роки тому

    Fuel is not going away! Exxon needs to switch from a gas and diesel company to a hydrogen generating, plastic producing, and renewable only company. This CEO just does not see the future of the company and that is why it will fail in 40 years.

  • @benbohannon
    @benbohannon 8 місяців тому

    The global energy supply has changed over history and will continue to change. Biomass. Whale oil. Kerosene. Leaded. Unleaded. Natural gas. Nuclear. Wind. Solar. Pop Rocks.

  • @pargevkarapetyan2251
    @pargevkarapetyan2251 2 роки тому +2

    Smart guy and thinks telling very logical and offering right solutions .
    I hope thay truthful and on mission helping fix global worming and carbon emissions problems.

    • @logtron
      @logtron 2 роки тому

      He's smart and good at talking, but the solutions are all wrong. Those solutions are just in the best interest in extending the usefulness of Exxon's assets as long as possible. Remember that he is the CEO of Exxon, he only cares about profits.

    • @ebubeawachie
      @ebubeawachie 2 роки тому

      @@logtron as he should be 🤷🏾‍♂️

  • @RAHMANBANKS
    @RAHMANBANKS Рік тому

    ROTHCHILDS THIS OUR COMPANY

  • @jasonrock5220
    @jasonrock5220 2 роки тому +2

    Let’s increase taxes and everyone can be voluntold to pay more money for less energy because the government calls it “clean” energy. I think if everyone pays the government more money we will save the world. lol 😂

  • @melophoga
    @melophoga 2 роки тому +3

    Put a mini carbon capture on the front of every vehicle driving on the road and you have a giant capture machine.

    • @planefan082
      @planefan082 2 роки тому

      Powering a carbon capture system with electricity created by burning carbon would be a net increase, no?

    • @gigemgreg
      @gigemgreg 2 роки тому +1

      Too energy intensive. Would need EV's with 2x or more battery capacity and then collection system for captured CO2. Not practical.

  • @concernedrn2844
    @concernedrn2844 2 роки тому +1

    This is such BS

  • @jimbojimbo6873
    @jimbojimbo6873 2 роки тому +1

    Oil and gas should just be bucketed under the wider bucket of energy

  • @trailguy
    @trailguy 2 роки тому +2

    Have you calculated the tons of metals that will need to be mined in order to get to full EV conversion of new cars by 2040? Apparently not. Copper for example is about 150 lbs of every EV. We currently barely have enough to make 3% of new vehicles EVs. It takes about 10 years to turn a copper discovery into a producing mine and that’s optimistic. That’s all you need to know, but ponder lithium, cobalt, silver and many others. Invest in mines, that’s the next big boom.

  • @greatlakesproductions
    @greatlakesproductions 2 роки тому

    At first sight I thought it was former Australian pm Scott Morrison lol

  • @TampaFLPlug813
    @TampaFLPlug813 2 роки тому

    Look into the process of how lithium is mined from the soil and how it effects aquatic life, then tell me electric vehicles are "green technology." Forget the interview.

  • @Itsellasky
    @Itsellasky 2 роки тому +1

    Oil Companies don’t like this EV/ Solar wave. Oil industry is shaking in there boots. Car companies are racing to make EVs and they can’t build them fast enough! I feel sorry for all the mechanics, service center employees… EV don’t require service, gas, smog, really anything for the most part.

    • @gmv0553
      @gmv0553 2 роки тому

      Shell and BP are moving their business plan toward EVs, solar, and wind as we speak!

    • @Itsellasky
      @Itsellasky 2 роки тому

      @@gmv0553 they are but before that they had all the power… now they are forced to go with the times

    • @edrake1989
      @edrake1989 2 роки тому

      @@Itsellasky
      Mechanics will still be busy fixing EVs lol

  • @shiblu6918
    @shiblu6918 2 роки тому +3

    YOU should r&d in Solar, Wind, Wave, geothermal Energy..

    • @blackwind743
      @blackwind743 2 роки тому +1

      Gyrotron (millimeter wave technology) drilled geothermal seems up their alley and might allow us to expand the coverage and scope of geothermal in the energy mix. I imagine they'll let Quaise sort it out first though.

    • @blackwind743
      @blackwind743 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheMko4321 Fossil fuels get 11 million dollars in subsidies per minute. They aren't efficient. Solar is cheaper per kilowatt hour. However, they can't be shut down immediately because a great deal of infrastructure must be replaced this will take money and time but eventually green energy will be better in pretty much every way. There will always be a use for oil though for non-energy purposes.

    • @Thelango99
      @Thelango99 2 роки тому +2

      Of those you listed, Geothermal energy is the only one Exxon can meaningfully contribute to right now.
      Their drilling tech specifically.

    • @blackwind743
      @blackwind743 2 роки тому

      @@TheMko4321 Ok. Enough of the sun's energy is reflected back into space every day to power roughly six thousand of our civilizations. There is no energy shortage. There is only lack of utilization.

    • @blackwind743
      @blackwind743 2 роки тому

      ​@@TheMko4321 Solar panels last for decades and modern conventional solar panels are not the only option. You can build multiple panels off the energy of one panel so energy is irrelevant. What is more, we have multiple other non-fossil technologies which taken by themselves could provide thousands of times the energy we will need for the next several million years at least. Maybe if you could explain to me why you believe total energy to be a factor you can bring me over to the dark side. Is it C02? Because once you use green energy to make green energy that point is obsolete. Convert me.

  • @stephendoherty8291
    @stephendoherty8291 Рік тому

    So ExxonMobil should start buying petrochemical companies so they don't source non-oil ingredients. I suspect bigoil would prefer to sell to bigger users. Shipping/cement/big industry and natural gas (with CCS). Bigoil is praying that its politicians will buy into CCS so they can offer a reverse money maker ie pay is to send the carbon back down. The IPCC report does mention that CCS will be needed but the economics are NOWHERE near the cost thats affordable. Bigoil has also done alot to cut the extraction cost of oil since the oil price fall and now its war related bumper profits and bumper management bonuses. Meantime demand keeps rising. Interesting to see that Exxon don't consider nuclear and battery cannot bridge the gap.
    So meantime Exxon are saying we will "invest in tech for the miracle changes" and just keep working as usual. Pity Exxon lied about climate change for so long. 2050 as a target will not be accepted by shareholders for just carbon neutrality.

  • @robertfield4103
    @robertfield4103 2 роки тому

    Carbon capture is war on plants. Discuss amongst yourselves.

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 9 місяців тому

    How do you regenerate oil that's been pumped out of the ground?

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 4 місяці тому

    What can I buy in American cities with a check from a Panamanian Bank?

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 9 місяців тому

    AVIATION, OIL FOR MACHINES INCLUDING ELECTRIC ONES provides a future for oil. However, when all the oil is pumped out of the ground and spewed into the atmosphere will society collapse if and electric based infrastructure is present at that time?

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 4 місяці тому

    If Exxon mobile has a language barrier, try learning the natives languages with Apple’s products! They’re cheaper and more efficient than Universities as well as portable!

  • @HappyGoLuckyPanda
    @HappyGoLuckyPanda Рік тому

    We want to talk about 30yrs ago

  • @williamharding9753
    @williamharding9753 2 роки тому +8

    ExxonMobil will become a shell of the former company in the near future

    • @ronbakker1300
      @ronbakker1300 2 роки тому +1

      Shell of the former company, that's funny.

    • @bbarn3973
      @bbarn3973 2 роки тому

      People are hoping Exxon fails.... If exxon breaks even at $41/barrel(and going down) and they are producing 5 mm barrels/day and oil is say $100/barrel. That's 295 mm/day. Exxon pays a dividend of 3.7 bb/quarter. That's 12 days to cover the dividend nut. Exxon and Chevron are proceeding very cautiously. They were both burnt in the past. Oil went below 0/barrel. No congressman rushed to help exxon or chevron but now they cry foul when fortunes have turned. Exxon is a 366 bb company. What would a shell of a company look like? Progressive democrats would have to have complete control and crash the economy as we know it for exxon to be a "shell" of itself. AOC(head of progressive democrats) touts political rhetoric to hold her position but she has very little understanding of actual economics. Her actions illustrate a "good for thee but not for me" entitlement that most politicians enjoy.

    • @jasonrock5220
      @jasonrock5220 2 роки тому +1

      Funny statement but not true. 10 years from now most people will still be driving gasoline fueled vehicles.

    • @ronbakker1300
      @ronbakker1300 2 роки тому

      @@jasonrock5220 I think until at least 2030 there will be unfulfilled demand for electric vehicles, and that 65% of new cars will be electric, but the will be a very large fleet of ice cars still on the road.

  • @retirementmillions6533
    @retirementmillions6533 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you ad

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 4 місяці тому

    Have you studied the history of European exploration before the Industrial Revolution?

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 9 місяців тому

    Are these alternatives in fuels and power feasible for powering transportation and the countries cities?

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 9 місяців тому

    What's Exxon's relationship with the EPA, currently?

  • @alfredobras6043
    @alfredobras6043 Рік тому +1

    Boa tarde, gostaria trabalhar com vosco can i have this opportunity to work with the company?

  • @neddreadmaynard
    @neddreadmaynard 2 роки тому +2

    Don't worry about these negative comments mate, cause after the stuff you pump out of the ground destroys the human race there won't be any electricity to power the comments section of this video. Win Win yeah?

    • @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
      @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 роки тому

      There wouldn’t be electricity without it

    • @neddreadmaynard
      @neddreadmaynard 2 роки тому

      @@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 Pretty sure you can generate electricity in many different ways without burning something. Fossil fuels have been chosen for it's energy density it's convenience and the ability to market it as a commodity i.e. profits. Sunlight is difficult to own. You get me?

  • @Gary-ec4lc
    @Gary-ec4lc 2 роки тому +1

    He Dreaming , bye bye Exxon , it’s all about cost , ev Trucks are far cheaper and more powerful and improving.
    Get with the program all these renewable issues have been overcome , he simply has not done the numbers….$

  • @aminesaib
    @aminesaib 2 роки тому +1

    Intersting take.

  • @weirdshibainu
    @weirdshibainu 2 роки тому

    The CEO is mocking the CNBC interviewer

  • @adiposerex5150
    @adiposerex5150 Рік тому

    Charging stations will be needed. Some of the gas stations can create those and reduce oil pumps.

  • @googlebanmetoomuch2601
    @googlebanmetoomuch2601 2 роки тому +3

    What does he think of government price controls?🤔

    • @Mistro07
      @Mistro07 2 роки тому +3

      He just sells to another country and the one with the controls get screwed

    • @Son37Lumiere
      @Son37Lumiere 2 роки тому

      @@Mistro07 Higher prices will incentivize people to move to better alternatives.

  • @TwoLargePizzas
    @TwoLargePizzas 2 роки тому +13

    According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Petroleum is the main source of energy for transportation. In 2021, petroleum products accounted for about *90%* of the total U.S. transportation sector energy use. Biofuels contributed about 6%. Natural gas accounted for about 4%, most of which was used in natural gas pipeline compressors. Electricity use by mass transit systems provided less than 1% of total transportation sector energy use. Even though transportation only accounts for 28% of the total US energy consumption in 2021 and the other 72% goes to electric power, industrial, residential, and commercial, that is still a hefty chunk.
    You sitting here telling me that by 2040 Exxon is still gonna be alive? Exxon must have transformed into a diff company by then.

    • @osoquik4447
      @osoquik4447 2 роки тому

      Transportation is dominated by petroleum but industrial and residential/commercial have a more diversified energy mix. By 2050, we may see a petro come down quite a bit however, US producers could simply export any surplus. Globally, petroleum and natural gas consumption has continued to increase while developed nations have undergone a change in theirs.

    • @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
      @bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 роки тому

      Plenty of people will still be driving 15-20 year old gasoline vehicles in 2040. Look around you, I see early 2000s models all the time. And they will be cheap.

  • @ninjaatheist
    @ninjaatheist 2 роки тому +1

    The sooner these dinosaur companies die the better!

  • @timogul
    @timogul 2 роки тому +4

    The problem is though "where [Exxon] is today," is where Exxon should have been twenty years ago, and then they would be in an even better place today. Instead, Exxon has always chosen to take the most profitable course, even if it's also the most destructive. Every generation, Exxon will shed crocodile tears about how they are better than they were a generation ago, and how they're "just getting started" at doing the right thing, when everyone was telling them to "just get started" a generation previous to that. When will they ever get out _ahead_ of problems and not cause damage that they need to clean up later? If Exxon had started working toward a carbon neutral future two decades ago, then it would be much less stressful to do it today.

    • @rolandotillit2867
      @rolandotillit2867 2 роки тому +1

      Nonsense. Carbon neutrality is a pipe dream, and Mr. Wood's approach is correct. We can't switch to full electric cars, the grid can't handle it without huge infrastructure expenditures. I respect his solution focused approach instead of preaching pipe dream solutions that will cost just as much and likely deliver less value.

    • @timogul
      @timogul 2 роки тому

      @@rolandotillit2867 We can't switch 100% to Electric cars _tomorrow_ because we haven't been investing into it, but if we had been investing into it 10-15 years ago, then we would be ready today to do so, and if we invest enough today, then we will be ready for it 5-10 years from now. That's the point, Exxon spent decades doing the worst things possible because it was the most profitable, and now they want brownie points for doing the bare _minimum_ to be "less bad." Exxon has made outrageous profits over the last few years, they should be posting losses. They should be spending more money than they make toward fixing the harm they've caused, to make up for the profits that they'd been making while fighting against the climate change discussion.They did wrong. They owe a debt more than "we'll do slightly less wrong over time, while maintaining high profit margins."

    • @rolandotillit2867
      @rolandotillit2867 2 роки тому

      @@timogul I sincerely doubt that.

    • @timogul
      @timogul 2 роки тому

      @@rolandotillit2867 That's just because you have not done your research. You'll get there eventually, as Exxon did.

    • @rolandotillit2867
      @rolandotillit2867 2 роки тому

      @@timogul The only reason Exxon considered it, was because of the useless activists that infiltrated the board. Make no mistake, they are ineffective and have no concrete plans.

  • @markmassy
    @markmassy 2 роки тому +2

    ExxonMobil, propaganda. Call for a 50% windfall profits tax. No deduction on this tax.