An Exponential Equation From 101 Problems in Algebra

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @Lucky-rj8jd
    @Lucky-rj8jd 5 місяців тому +1

    I just discovered your channel a few days ago and I am liking the types of differential equations you bring. Keep them coming i am eager to solve some more!!

  • @JefiKnight
    @JefiKnight 5 місяців тому +4

    10^x + 11^x + 12^x - 13^x - 14^x is an interesting enough graph.

  • @WahranRai
    @WahranRai 5 місяців тому +1

    Plagiat and copy paste not allowed
    Let S the sum of each side ---> 3*10^x < S < 3* 12^x and 2*13^x < S < 2* 14^x
    Trying with x = 0, 1, 2, 3.. will show you that x= 2 is the unique solution...
    x= 3 3.10^3 = 3000 < S < 3.12^3 = 5184 and 2.13^3 = 4394 < S < 2.14^3 = 5488
    x= 2 3.10^2 = 300 < S < 3.12^2 = 432 and 2.13^2 = 338< S < 2.14^2 = 392
    With x= 2 S = 365 in interval (338,392) will satisfy the condition in interval (300,432)

  • @charlesmrader
    @charlesmrader 5 місяців тому

    When you see a problem like this, always begin with a guess that the solution is a small integer. x=0 doesn't work, which you will see in less than a second. x=1 can be eliminated by looking at the mod 10 sum: 0+1+2 = 3 mod 10 and 3+4 = 7 mod 10. The mod 10 sums for x=3 are 5 for both sums so that's worth more thought. Plug in x=2 and get 365=365.

  • @rakenzarnsworld2
    @rakenzarnsworld2 5 місяців тому +1

    x = 2
    100+121+144=365
    169+196=365

  • @shahinjahanlu2199
    @shahinjahanlu2199 5 місяців тому

    When you want to prove sum if two decreasing function is a decrease function , I think you can't use derivative. You should use definition of decreasing. May be they don't have derivative.

  • @yoav613
    @yoav613 5 місяців тому

    Nice

  • @lawrencejelsma8118
    @lawrencejelsma8118 5 місяців тому +1

    I was waiting for your ending math joke humor! 🤓😄👉 So after dividing by 13^x to see < 1s adding together on the left and only 1 adding to 1 on the right ... The moral of the story on the left to right is "sum of squares on the left means some are squares on the right!" 😆😑

  • @scottleung9587
    @scottleung9587 5 місяців тому

    Did you get x=2 by trial and error?

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  5 місяців тому +2

      Yes.

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 5 місяців тому

      ​@SyberMath OK you say a good reason for diving by 13 but wouldn't you agree it's RA DOM and would eb equally smart a dlogicslmtomdivide by 14 or not divide at all..wpuldnt you agree I don't see anyone thinking of dividing right off the bat at all anywaybright..why would they? Just wondering wouldn't you agree it seems contrived and not a good way to start off the bat, all due respect? Thanks for sharing.

    • @russelltownsend6105
      @russelltownsend6105 5 місяців тому +1

      I analysed the equation using modular arithmetic in Mod 10 to work out that X=2 provides the solution.

  • @tomvitale3555
    @tomvitale3555 5 місяців тому

    Wait a minute! At the end of the day, you just guessed the answer as 2! How would you actually solve it?

  • @giuseppemalaguti435
    @giuseppemalaguti435 5 місяців тому +1

    X=2...????

  • @АпролЙцукенгович
    @АпролЙцукенгович 5 місяців тому

    saw problem (10^2+11^2+12^2+13^2+14^2)/365 no calculators, so ans was instant, bt no shr the only) thx 4 analys!