Experiencing God: How?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
  • 👉 Only Consciousness knows Consciousness.
    Non Duality is the path from Religion to Wisdom
    Consciousness is the presence of God in our human body-mind, which is His/Hers instrument
    Discover more of Francis Lucille's wisdom in this video: How can we stop believing to be separate? 🌀
    👉 • How Do I Stop Believin...
    Schedule of MEETINGS and RETREATS:
    👉 linktr.ee/francislucille
    The Advaita Channel Team.
    00:00 Question
    1:00 The intuition of the Divine
    3:00 From religion to wisdom
    5:40 The efficiency of pointers
    6:30 Only God knows God

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @FrancisLucille
    @FrancisLucille  2 місяці тому

    Discover more of Francis Lucille's wisdom in this video: How can we stop believing to be separate? 🌀
    👉 ua-cam.com/video/lgeJUtF6mRs/v-deo.htmlsi=i304PEd0FHwYS1AH
    The Advaita Channel Team.

  • @memento6204
    @memento6204 2 місяці тому +8

    I love you, Francis.

  • @nivedithakamath9388
    @nivedithakamath9388 2 місяці тому +3

    Beautiful 😍

  • @sabaarunanthy6296
    @sabaarunanthy6296 2 місяці тому +1

    Beautifully explained Thanks Francis

    • @awakenotwoke7949
      @awakenotwoke7949 2 місяці тому

      I don't think Francis explained anything. Only God knows God, and yet we are urged to surrender to God

  • @baronbullshyster2996
    @baronbullshyster2996 2 місяці тому +4

    I was told when I was a child, that I was a Christian. As I got older I became a believer in other religions. Now lm not even a believer. You have to step off the path. To be free

    • @lynlavalight
      @lynlavalight 2 місяці тому

      Absolutely agree!

    • @kurtpiket6513
      @kurtpiket6513 2 місяці тому

      In stead of believing there is feeling of feelings.

  • @user-yo2ki7vu7d
    @user-yo2ki7vu7d 2 місяці тому +1

  • @iamruslan-zf7up4zz3o
    @iamruslan-zf7up4zz3o 2 місяці тому +1

    🙏💞🙏

  • @hanayama8721
    @hanayama8721 2 місяці тому +1

    Another term for the ‘divine’ is the ‘vertical’. Francis sometimes refers to it as the ‘noumenal’. If we use the term ‘vertical’ we can contrast it to the ‘horizontal’ and then employ the term ‘Up’ for all worldviews positing a vertical dimension to experience. The ‘Down’ then refers to materialist and scientistic worldviews arguing that it’s all horizontal and the vertical, Up, or ‘divine’, is a fairy tale designed to comfort children. The so-called ‘new atheists’ get a lot of (horizontal) mileage out of such arguments. They make some good points when the ‘Up’ is conceived of in ‘supernaturalist’ terms, but their arguments fall apart when we get to the heart of the matter, what I call the ‘nondual Up’, which is not supernatural, but meta-natural, and where we have no need to posit a supernatural god served and enabled by a cult of priests. So the ‘nondual Up’ is ‘beyond Up and Down’, as the opposition is traditionally conceived.
    Now, if we understand the vertical as that which ‘Is’, call it the ‘Substance’ that is eternal, essential, and necessary, or that which ‘must be’ (or call it sat/chit if you like), then we can understand the horizontal or ‘manifest’ as that which ‘exists’, where existence is an activity, a phenomenal ‘derivation’ (as Francis uses the term) of that which ‘Is’, aka the vertical, Up, or divine. There exist, or can exist, infinite derivations of the vertical, as it were, infinite horizontals, all with their own ‘horizons’. The tendency is to look for a confirmation of one’s intuition of the vertical somewhere ‘over the horizon’, when what is ‘required’ is that we ‘turn around’ (as Plato suggested) and understand the vertical as that which we ‘are’ and from which we (as manifest existence) derive. I don’t know of any ‘actually existing’ horizontal derivation of the vertical better ‘established’ at pointing us in that direction than Francis.
    Apologies to anyone who finds the above to be (at best) a lexically laborious restatement of what Francis was up to, but I enjoy the exercise. I think Francis’ reference to ‘derivations’ got me going, if however derivatively.

    • @kurtpiket6513
      @kurtpiket6513 2 місяці тому

      Love is vertikal. Fighting is horizontel. Intuition is vertikal.
      Instinct is horizontal. Inside the instinctive wave, there is a centre for vertikal intuition of love.
      Inside this centre the perceiver is present.
      Around this centre there are male and femal observers prsent.
      By looking into the centre of being love grows by the singular soul

  • @kurtpiket6513
    @kurtpiket6513 2 місяці тому

    Sensing is separate.
    Feeling is oneness.
    In this case, god is a feeling, which can feel intuitive inside the centre of being.
    A truth is oneness and canot achange or transform enymore and ist therefore infinte.
    Intuition is present inside the centre of an instinctive wave.

  • @alfreddifeo9642
    @alfreddifeo9642 2 місяці тому

    🙏

  • @ryan200978
    @ryan200978 2 місяці тому

    ' This explanation did me sort of pinch and led to stop mind wandering ..

  • @kurtpiket6513
    @kurtpiket6513 2 місяці тому

    WHAT IS A CONCIOUS-NESS OF GODLI-NESS????
    I think that a conciousness ist an organismen in motion, where at the same time there is a motion inside this organism.
    I think that there are many bipolar organismens of consciousness.
    I think that there is only one consciousness by singularity of mass,
    By growing in mass, there is a growth for consciousness into the infiniteness.

  • @isaacakers9347
    @isaacakers9347 2 місяці тому

    Thank you, Francis 🙏

  • @kamaluddinkamal1153
    @kamaluddinkamal1153 2 місяці тому

    If humans are related with divine ( or divine themselves) through intuition, then is it not fear of annihilation (as separate self), also intuitive? Such fear is even stronger as it seems to be more experititeal than intuitive. Even intuition seems to be an experience. If this fear is the result of ignorance, then is it possible that we would be able to overcome it just by understanding that we are the divine not separated from the divine. what the hell the divine then doing in human form? Even the notion of experience itself is problematic to me. All explanations become slippery, especially after some time

  • @sanekabc
    @sanekabc 2 місяці тому

    What is 'verbatim' ?

  • @kiplambel4052
    @kiplambel4052 2 місяці тому +1

    "For them the truth is in the objective statement" (and that's what makes it false) No objective reality has ever been experienced.

  • @IAn0nI
    @IAn0nI 2 місяці тому

    Perhaps he's calling "it" "divine" because he's been conditioned to do so.

  • @kurtpiket6513
    @kurtpiket6513 2 місяці тому

    You say:
    Only God knows who/what God is.
    Wenn this is right, you must be God by knowing what god is.

  • @user-yo2ki7vu7d
    @user-yo2ki7vu7d 2 місяці тому

    More transparent statement and qurest is do you have inner light? Or what is the state you maximum experience in your hightened lucid relaxed spiritual state. Do you feel the presence or beyond?
    Don't say connect with god as it is so vague. From matrix there is no way to connect with divine . You must quit matrix to even realise the experience. Also you had the same experience when you are a child and if not you are simulating because you can't experience something new of consciousness all of sudden. It's in the earlier states and selves. You developed consciousness and experienced them but forgot and dormant within you. You can now only refind the lost states. A truthful life and transparent heart is must and no to pious and humble frauds.