His portraits and landscapes are just as exalted. Regardless of the motif, it is music of the highest order. The still Life is simply exploring visual reality. The way you use the word simple and economical doesn't do. His work regardless of motif is always a wonderful balance of brush, color, artistic personality and motif, the hallmark of modernism.
“’[My] Greatest artistic admirations were Michelangelo and Cezanne. Greatest personal influence, Morgan Russell.’” - SMW, Color, Myth, & Music (2001), p.149 #Synchromism
I looked at this frash painting and said "this objakt is frash". Other than that, I would have liked to hear something about palette choice or why this composition is so good.
La lumiere que donnait Paul aux objets , l Ame , la Vie , ses nuances de couleurs , ses nuances subtiles , personne jamais va rejoindre Cezanne , Picasso et Paul Klee disaient ; Il est notre Pere
Great video, but Rembrandt's still lifes ?Rembrandt was never famous for his still lifes. You mean his painting of Slaughtered Ox or two dead peacocks ? they are more close to genre paintings cause both paintings involved with human figures. Or anyone else correct me and show me more still lifes by Rembrandt.
Cezanne was a 'progenitor of cubism' , only because Picasso and others projected that conceptually upon him. I would argue that Cezanne went much deeper in terms of the art form.
@@artroshiΙ ve read many books about Picasso and by Picasso, he definitely admired Cezanne and said many times that he owes a lot to him, he understood many things that nobody did at his time, so i don't get what conceptual projection means and i don't think it matters, Picasso's biggest influence was Cezanne
@@dimifisherNever said he didn't admire Cezanne, Braque was more influential tho! But in my opinion, Cezanne is a modern artist and Picasso while brilliant and even showing genius did not go as far or as deep as Cezanne. Cezanne's concerns were not conceptual. Remember his use of the phrase, 'petite sensation". Here's a link to my comparing and contrasting Cezanne and Da Vinci. Might make things clearer for you. ua-cam.com/video/8DFn7D2KzCA/v-deo.htmlsi=l60m8OE8_4XDe1wB Regards!
@@artroshiOh wow thanx, well Picasso and Cezanne are really favorites of mine and i think Cezanne even a little more, i still study his work when i have time, yes i agree Cezanne was far ahead even by Picasso
@@RobberZhi Wow, a while since I've been here. I met her last year. She's gorgeous. I'm a silversmith and restore silver art objects for Sotheby's before they go up for auction. Sotheby's must appreciate my work because they keep sending art for repair, repoussé candelabras, sculptures, Paul Revere pieces and such. The latest object I restored was a 1700's piece of hand hammered silver with cherubs climbing trees. I hand deliver a finished piece to Sotheby's and asked to see this woman and showed her my landscape paintings for her advice. I might call her soon as I need an assessment of the early academic figure drawing by Degas I recently inherited. Maybe over lunch at the Russian Tea Room, or a dark draft at McSorley's Ale House. So, what do you think, Tea Room or McSorley's? Have a nice day, loser.
This would've been so interesting, were it not drenched in background music. Gave up after 40 seconds. It takes a lot of work to prepare and make a video, especially on this high level! Why do you turn al this into a music video? The content could stand for itself, the narration is pleasant to listen to, and the, I assume, intended effect, a viewing experience enhancing atmosphere, could be achieved with a few well placed musical accents of few seconds duration.
When on earth did young Americans start talking like this? Sing songy jerky upward inflections. Someone told me that the croaky petering out phrases is called 'vocal fry' . Whatever, it is difficult to listen to. it's quite a recent thing as Americans never used to speak like this.
2:23-3:18 With all due respect, I really don't appreciate how you're explaining this particular piece of Cezanne's using so many adjectives such as simple, fresh, smart, radical. I'm still so very lost. This is far from helpful.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
His portraits and landscapes are just as exalted. Regardless of the motif, it is music of the highest order. The still Life is simply exploring visual reality. The way you use the word simple and economical doesn't do. His work regardless of motif is always a wonderful balance of brush, color, artistic personality and motif, the hallmark of modernism.
This is wonderful. You are beautiful and so is Cezanne.
“’[My] Greatest artistic admirations were Michelangelo and Cezanne. Greatest personal influence, Morgan Russell.’” - SMW, Color, Myth, & Music (2001), p.149 #Synchromism
Came here for Brooke
She has a great look. I never saw her before this video.
Quite clearly!!
Yes, quitely so.
I looked at this frash painting and said "this objakt is frash". Other than that, I would have liked to hear something about palette choice or why this composition is so good.
She is wearing a Balenciaga blouse! Looks so good ❤
La lumiere que donnait Paul aux objets , l Ame , la Vie , ses nuances de couleurs , ses nuances subtiles , personne jamais va rejoindre Cezanne , Picasso et Paul Klee disaient ; Il est notre Pere
Great video, but Rembrandt's still lifes ?Rembrandt was never famous for his still lifes. You mean his painting of Slaughtered Ox or two dead peacocks ? they are more close to genre paintings cause both paintings involved with human figures. Or anyone else correct me and show me more still lifes by Rembrandt.
Very informative. Thank you.
멋찝니다~~
Cezanne was a genius and was the progenitor of cubism, Picasso admired his work
Cezanne was a 'progenitor of cubism' , only because Picasso and others projected that conceptually upon him. I would argue that Cezanne went much deeper in terms of the art form.
@@artroshiΙ ve read many books about Picasso and by Picasso, he definitely admired Cezanne and said many times that he owes a lot to him, he understood many things that nobody did at his time, so i don't get what conceptual projection means and i don't think it matters, Picasso's biggest influence was Cezanne
@@dimifisherNever said he didn't admire Cezanne, Braque was more influential tho! But in my opinion, Cezanne is a modern artist and Picasso while brilliant and even showing genius did not go as far or as deep as Cezanne. Cezanne's concerns were not conceptual. Remember his use of the phrase, 'petite sensation". Here's a link to my comparing and contrasting Cezanne and Da Vinci. Might make things clearer for you. ua-cam.com/video/8DFn7D2KzCA/v-deo.htmlsi=l60m8OE8_4XDe1wB Regards!
@@artroshiOh wow thanx, well Picasso and Cezanne are really favorites of mine and i think Cezanne even a little more, i still study his work when i have time, yes i agree Cezanne was far ahead even by Picasso
@@artroshi Braque was close friend of Picasso they invented cubism together, so in what way he was more influential to him?!
Giorgio Mirandi deserves a mention
Yes, Morandi was a follower of Cezanne's ideas.
Too superficial deeper next time
Chardin was before Cezanne was he not? He did it first.
This girl has the look I really go for. I'm liking Cezanne lately.
You seem like a real winner
@@RobberZhi
Wow, a while since I've been here. I met her last year. She's gorgeous. I'm a silversmith and restore silver art objects for Sotheby's before they go up for auction. Sotheby's must appreciate my work because they keep sending art for repair, repoussé candelabras, sculptures, Paul Revere pieces and such. The latest object I restored was a 1700's piece of hand hammered silver with cherubs climbing trees. I hand deliver a finished piece to Sotheby's and asked to see this woman and showed her my landscape paintings for her advice. I might call her soon as I need an assessment of the early academic figure drawing by Degas I recently inherited. Maybe over lunch at the Russian Tea Room, or a dark draft at McSorley's Ale House.
So, what do you think, Tea Room or McSorley's?
Have a nice day, loser.
LMAoOOoO 😂😂😂 anyone else bite the screeen cuase the fruits looks so good 🤬🤗🍆🍆
I’ll take two!
A lot of adverbs and adjectives but no explanation why it is a good painting. Even as a sales pitch, it is not exciting)
This would've been so interesting, were it not drenched in background music. Gave up after 40 seconds. It takes a lot of work to prepare and make a video, especially on this high level! Why do you turn al this into a music video? The content could stand for itself, the narration is pleasant to listen to, and the, I assume, intended effect, a viewing experience enhancing atmosphere, could be achieved with a few well placed musical accents of few seconds duration.
When on earth did young Americans start talking like this? Sing songy jerky upward inflections. Someone told me that the croaky petering out phrases is called 'vocal fry' . Whatever, it is difficult to listen to.
it's quite a recent thing as Americans never used to speak like this.
2:23-3:18 With all due respect, I really don't appreciate how you're explaining this particular piece of Cezanne's using so many adjectives such as simple, fresh, smart, radical. I'm still so very lost. This is far from helpful.
for me, Monet - beautiful, Cezanne - bland, Matisse - avant-garde, colorful, exciting
PS That was thr wring one sorry
Only God can make an apple or a pear....how much is that worth ?