I love videos like this. There's a lot to learn here. Yes, if it's cold it best be dry and cold and not wet and cold. Ice is good for soda and beer when one is cutting the lawn.
Same thing here, but it's an excellent vídeo and shows exactly the most propable cause of the crash , the question is why they entered a zone with severe Ice warning ?
Thanks for that. I like how every word of every sentence was important and useful - a welcomed change from “Hey what’s up UA-cam? So... I was watching the sky last week and I... I... I... and me. Me too. I mean... Amazing how it froze and I started thinking. I mean... thought I would reach out and make this video you know... me me me.” (It would just be the 60s version of pointless dribble and overused jargon, if there was any back then).
That’s great, but enough of you talking about people talking about themselves, I want to talk to about me talking about people talking about themselves...😉
Um yeah like I feel you bro. It’s like they think their audience is composed of people who talk back to the tv. And ,you know,add a lot of extraneous ,um , words and junk.👋
@MERC3NARYPRODUCTIONS I see that now that this is probably not Disney since the roman number is 20 years later and your correct the ruinning time don't match unless this was a later date re cut of Disney film as I would think as the name sound simlar to that on the Disney film and the only way to tell would be finding the 1941 Disney film and seems that it cannot be found anywere.
It is not "funny," it is just correct English. "He" is both a male and a gender-neutral singular personal pronoun, in English. When the gender of a person is known to be female, you use "she/her." When the gender of a person is known to be male you use "he/him/his." When the gender of a person is unknown you may use "he/him/his," or if you need to make it clear that the person's gender is unknown, you can use a construction like "he or she." My personal practice in such cases is usually to use "he or she" (or "his or her") for the first reference, and he/his for subsequent references to the same person. Of course, if you want to sound like an illiterate woke idiot, you can say "ze," or use "they" as a singular pronoun.
Interesting video from an entertainment point of view but the discussion of ice formation and the resulting flow over the wings and the associated graphics are factually incorrect. Do not use if you are actually flying an airplane.
At 12:20 the streamlines are all flowing back straight. That wing would never ever generate any lift. The turbulent flow is more or less accurate. There is a NASA video on youtube that shows actual flight test and wind tunnel shots.
@@bluegrayskies3831 They had to figure this out pretty quickly during World War I. The military would have noticed when their planes kept crashing due to ice. Pilots would have noticed the ice buildup. They did a lot of aviation meteorological work before and during WW2 to figure out all this.
@h k I am a pilot too. My issue is not so much with how the ice accumulation is discussed, but anytime I see streamlines that go straight in over the leading edge and then straight out the back I cringe. A wing that actually did that would produce no lift. The streamlines coming off the back should point downward which is the air accelerated downward which is the lift being generated (F=ma)
I love videos like this. There's a lot to learn here. Yes, if it's cold it best be dry and cold and not wet and cold. Ice is good for soda and beer when one is cutting the lawn.
Why was this suggested to me the day of ATR72 crash in Brazil? UA-cam algo is weird..
Same thing here, but it's an excellent vídeo and shows exactly the most propable cause of the crash , the question is why they entered a zone with severe Ice warning ?
They know what we need to know...😂
@@jackthorne7636 It's the algo I.A.
I love this old videos, they often have the best explainations
I wish today's documentaries would be a bit more like this again. Less screaming for sensational drama telling, more pure information
Wow this video is GREAT, even for the 1960s!
What do you think of the new super hydrophobic coatings/ surface etchings that stop ice formation?
Thanks for that. I like how every word of every sentence was important and useful - a welcomed change from “Hey what’s up UA-cam? So... I was watching the sky last week and I... I... I... and me. Me too. I mean... Amazing how it froze and I started thinking. I mean... thought I would reach out and make this video you know... me me me.” (It would just be the 60s version of pointless dribble and overused jargon, if there was any back then).
That’s great, but enough of you talking about people talking about themselves, I want to talk to about me talking about people talking about themselves...😉
@@georgemorley1029 🤣
Um yeah like I feel you bro. It’s like they think their audience is composed of people who talk back to the tv. And ,you know,add a lot of extraneous ,um , words and junk.👋
Wait... You mean a video is about the transfer of information?
Still up to date!
This video contains accurate information about icing, it really helped me during my studies for CMET. thanks for the up load.
I am watching this in August 2024, days after the ATR-72 crash in Brazil.
This video was awesome!
Wow! thats the last time i fly my plane when its cold. Thanks
You gotta love this
Thanks for the lesson
Just for the record; it's 1961, not 1960. MCMLXI=1961
Nice catch 👌
Back then everything was original, today everything is fucked
Loved it
Tnx for the upload
Who animated on this Walt Disney?
It's been 13 years since this comment, but if anyone's curious, it actually was produced by Disney. It was called the Aerology Series.
awesome !!!
I feel like this video was put out before planes were even invented the hell is this from 1954
nothing new under the sun this was before 50 years and still the same
Thnx for upload! :)
4:46 Excuse me but what ? Since when did the US use centigrade ? What's gone wrong between the 60' and today ?
Aviation uses a mix. They prefer imperial forces altitude airspeed and others
@Nathan-tc7gj metric is often used in more scientific and industrial settings.
@MERC3NARYPRODUCTIONS I see that now that this is probably not Disney since the roman number is 20 years later and your correct the ruinning time don't match unless this was a later date re cut of Disney film as I would think as the name sound simlar to that on the Disney film and the only way to tell would be finding the 1941 Disney film and seems that it cannot be found anywere.
good good thanks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is ridiculous why dont they justput heating elements in fhe leading edge of the aircraft wings
it probably would require so much heat that it would weaken the integrity of the airframe
how come that aircraft only have one jet engine?
Finalshot92 no it has two engine but they explain one. if one engine fail u can use another one to complete the journey it's like #magnedous
I also noticed the lack of one engine
It's just there so they don't have to use two airplanes. Lol
Same s**t different century
First comment WOOT
hahaha seems like it :)
back then they had ideas!!
my girlfriend also has icey raydomes
haha who clicked on this video and then didn't like it?
It's all He, He, He. Which I think is kind of funny as a 22 year old.
It is not "funny," it is just correct English. "He" is both a male and a gender-neutral singular personal pronoun, in English.
When the gender of a person is known to be female, you use "she/her." When the gender of a person is known to be male you use "he/him/his." When the gender of a person is unknown you may use "he/him/his," or if you need to make it clear that the person's gender is unknown, you can use a construction like "he or she."
My personal practice in such cases is usually to use "he or she" (or "his or her") for the first reference, and he/his for subsequent references to the same person.
Of course, if you want to sound like an illiterate woke idiot, you can say "ze," or use "they" as a singular pronoun.
Interesting video from an entertainment point of view but the discussion of ice formation and the resulting flow over the wings and the associated graphics are factually incorrect. Do not use if you are actually flying an airplane.
Can you explain what is wrong with it?
At 12:20 the streamlines are all flowing back straight. That wing would never ever generate any lift. The turbulent flow is more or less accurate. There is a NASA video on youtube that shows actual flight test and wind tunnel shots.
I’m a pilot, this video contains highly accurate information. I’m surprised they knew this stuff already.
@@bluegrayskies3831 They had to figure this out pretty quickly during World War I. The military would have noticed when their planes kept crashing due to ice. Pilots would have noticed the ice buildup. They did a lot of aviation meteorological work before and during WW2 to figure out all this.
@h k I am a pilot too. My issue is not so much with how the ice accumulation is discussed, but anytime I see streamlines that go straight in over the leading edge and then straight out the back I cringe. A wing that actually did that would produce no lift. The streamlines coming off the back should point downward which is the air accelerated downward which is the lift being generated (F=ma)